用户名: 密码: 验证码:
榅桲的组织培养快繁及耐盐性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究以新疆苹果型榅桲为试材,研究了榅桲的茎段及子叶组织培养快繁途径,分别采用榅桲组培苗和种子对其耐盐性作了初步探讨。组培快繁试验中分别研究了不同灭菌剂、灭菌时间、培养基、激素组合等对榅桲外植体灭菌、初代培养、继代培养和生根培养的影响。耐盐性研究中,探讨了不同盐种类、不同盐浓度及不同盐胁迫时间对榅桲组培苗生长性状、生理指标的影响。同时也研究了上述盐胁迫因素对榅桲种子萌发情况、酶活性和离子分布的影响。分析结果表明:
     1)用榅桲茎段进行组培快繁研究中,0.1%升汞溶液消毒5min,灭菌效果最好;初代培养基以MS+6-BA 0.6mg/L效果较好,萌芽率和增殖倍数均较高,分别为93.3%和4.7;继代培养基以MS+6-BA0.6 mg/L+IBA0.2mg/L和MS+6-BA0.6mg/L+IBA0.4mg/L组合交替使用更有利于组培苗的增殖和壮苗;生根培养基以1/2MS(I)+NAA1.0mg/L生根率最高,达50%,平均根数为7-10根。短时间(7d)暗培养对诱导榅桲苗生根有利,随着暗培养天数的增加叶焦边现象逐渐加重,甚至出现顶端枯死现象;6-BA对诱导榅桲组培苗生根无益且易出现畸形叶。
     2)在榅桲成熟胚子叶不定植株再生研究中,1/4MS(I)+6-BA5mg/L+NAA0.5mg/L组合诱导成熟胚子叶芽分化效果最好,芽分化率可达77.5%;继代培养基以MS+6-BA 0.6mg/L+IBA0.2mg/L效果较好,增殖倍数约达4倍;生根培养基以速蘸IBA50mg/L 3S后接入活性炭培养基中生根率最高为75%,根数较多,但根生长缓慢,30d平均根长还不到1cm。移栽炼苗采用培养室培养钵炼苗法,以锯末为介质,15d左右长出新根,30d后成活率为78%。
     3)组培苗耐盐性研究中,萌芽率、增殖倍数、平均株高均随着盐浓度的增大而降低,膜透性和盐害率随着盐浓度的增大而升高。三种保护酶SOD、CAT、POD活性除POD活性随着Na2SO4浓度的增加降低外,其它均随着盐浓度的增大呈先上升后下降趋势。NaCl胁迫下叶绿素a、b和总叶绿素含量的变化趋势相同,均呈下降-升高-下降趋势,但始终在空白处理时最高,最大盐浓度时最低。Na2SO4胁迫下叶绿素a和总叶绿素含量的变化趋势相同,呈下降趋势,叶绿素b与之不同,呈先升高后下降趋势。类胡萝卜素的含量变化没有规律性。认为,萌芽率、增殖倍数、平均株高、膜透性、盐害率、SOD、CAT、POD活性均可作为鉴定榅桲耐盐性评价指标,叶绿素可作为抗盐评价的参考指标。两种盐胁迫下,榅桲组培苗更能耐受NaCl胁迫,NaCl和Na2SO4分别在浓度为0.6%和0.8%时开始对榅桲组培苗造成严重伤害,在0.8%和1.0%时至死率超过50%。
     4)榅桲种子耐盐性研究中,随着盐浓度的增大,发芽率和成苗率均呈下降趋势。NaCl胁迫时,SOD、CAT活性均随着盐浓度的增大呈先上升后下降趋势,POD活性呈上升趋势。Na2SO4胁迫时,随着盐浓度的增大POD、CAT活性呈先上升后下降趋势,SOD活性呈降低趋势。所以认为,不同种类盐胁迫下,榅桲种子的耐盐机制不同。随着盐浓度的增大,芽苗和培养基中的Na+均呈上升趋势,种皮中的Na+呈先下降后上升趋势。K+在各组织中的变化没有规律性。NaCl胁迫下,随着盐浓度的增加,芽苗和种皮中Na+/K+呈升高-降低趋势,但始终高于空白处理中Na+/K+的值,培养基中Na+/K+呈升高-降低-升高趋势。Na2SO4胁迫时芽苗和种皮中Na+/K+呈升高-降低-升高趋势,培养基中Na+/K+呈升高趋势。综合分析,发芽率、成苗率、SOD、CAT、POD、榅桲芽苗中Na+含量可作为榅桲种子耐盐性评价指标。K+、Na+/K+变化较复杂,能否作为榅桲种子耐盐性鉴定的指标还有待于研究。Na2SO4胁迫对榅桲种子发芽的影响比NaCl胁迫大。以盐胁迫浓度对榅桲种子发芽率和成苗率为标准来看,Na2SO4和NaCl浓度分别为100mmol和150mmol时严重影响榅桲种子发芽。
In this research , Cydonia oblonga Mill of apple model in XinJiang was used to study the reproduction approaches of tender-stem and cotyledon .Then used the tissue culture plants and seeds to have a primary discuss on the salt-tolerance of quince .In the experiment of reproduction , studed the effect on setting axenic explants,primary culture ,succeed culture and rooting culture of different disinfectant、sterilization time、culture medium、hormone combinations,etc.The study on salt-tolerance ,we discussed the effect on regeneration plant’s growth character, Physiological index of different salt , concentration and time .we also had studied on the effect on seed buding,enzyme and ion of salt-stress.The results showed that:
     1)Using the tender-stem of Cydonia oblonga Mill to regeneration, HgCl2 0.1% for 5 min is the best for sterilization; The better Primary medium is MS+6-BA 0.6mg/L,its germination rate and multiplication multiple are all higher, they are 93.3% and 4.7; Using MS+6-BA0.6 mg/L +IBA0.2 mg/L and MS+6-BA0.6mg/L+IBA0.4 mg/L by turns is better for multiplication and strong seedlings; Rooting medium chose 1/2MS(I)+NAA1. 0 mg/L can achieve the highest 50% rootage rate and 7-10 average root number; Short dark treatment(7d) is benefit for rooting but as the time longer the leaf-burnt became more serious and even lead to dead of stem tip;(6)6-BA is not benefit for rooting and even lead to abnormal leaves.
     2)Using the cotyledon of Cydonia oblonga Mill to regeneration, 1/4MS(I)+6-BA5mg/L+NAA0.5mg/L is best for planted regeneration ; regeneration rate is 77.5%;MS+6-BA 0.6mg/L+IBA0.2mg/L is better for multiplication , it can be about 4 times more ; active carbon and dipped IBA50mg/L 3S is benefit for rooting ,rootage rate is 75% and the number is more ,but the growing of roots is slowly ,shorter then 1cm after 30d .In the culture room and used earthen bowls to transplant young plants ,sawdust is medium ,new roots would come out in 15d and 78% could be alive after 30d .
     3)In the research of regeneration plant salt-tolerance, the burgeon ratio ,multiplication multiple ,average tallness were all reduced along with the increasing degree salt-stress , MP and impair rate is increased . SOD、CAT、POD were all showed up-down except POD was showed down when Na2SO4 added .Under NaCl stress Chla ,Chlb and ChlT had the same movement ,showed down-up-down ,and highest at blankness lowest at most harvest salt concentration . Under Na2SO4 stress, Chla and chlT were all falled , Chlb was rised then falled . Chlx.c had no regular changed. We considered, burgeon ratio ratio, multiplication multiple,MP,impair rate SOD,CAT,POD can be the index of salt-tolerance estimation Cydonia oblonga Mill salt-tolerance estimation and Chl can be the reference index . Under the two salt stress, Cydonia oblonga Mill regeneration plants could be even more able to bear NaCl,and was injured hardly at 0.6% and 0.8% of NaCl and Na2SO4, 50% more died at 0.8% and 1.0% .
     4) In the research of Cydonia oblonga Mill seed salt-tolerance, the bud ratio and the seeding rate were all decreased . Under NaCl stress, SOD、CAT were showed down along with the increasing degree salt-stress when POD was showed up . Under Na2SO4stress, POD、CAT were showed up-down when SOD showed down .So we think , Cydonia oblonga Mill seed had different mechanism for different kinds of salt . Na+ in young plant and medium are increased along with the increasing degree salt-stress when Na+ in seed capsule was showed down-up . K+ in all organises had no ruled change . Na+/K+ in young plant and seed capsule were showed up-down and higher than the Na+/K+ of blank . Na+/K+ in medium showed up-down-up . Under Na2SO4 stress, Na+/K+ in young plant and seed capsule were showed up-down-up,when Na+/K+ in medium showed up . For all , bud ratio , seeding rate, SOD, CAT, POD, Na+ in young plant can be the index of Cydonia oblonga Mill seed salt-tolerance estimation . The change of K+ and Na+/K+ is complex ,whether can be the index of Cydonia oblonga Mill seed salt-tolerance estimation need futhermore research . Na2SO4 is more disadvantaged to Cydonia oblonga Mill buding, and 100mmol /L and150mmol/L of Na2SO4 and NaCl can have serious effect on Cydonia oblonga Mill buding .
引文
[1] 邓秀新,胡春根主编.园艺植物生物技术,北京[M]高等教育出版社 2005.
    [2] http://www.zupei.com/
    [3] 马文会,王献革等.黄金梨的组织培养和快速繁殖技术初报[J] 华北农学报, 2003,18(3):117
    [4] 王震星,张磊,刘贵仁.西洋梨茎段离体培养与快速繁殖的探讨[J].天津农业科学,1998,4 (2):16-19
    [5] Chang Wei-chin. Fruit-like structure proliferation and flowering in ginseng fruit culture in vitro In: Advances in developmental biology and biotechnology of higherplant[J]. Plant Tissue Culture, KoreanSoc.,1993(l):1-4
    [6] 陆文木,梁斌.离体条件下诱导番茄果实状结构的再生[J].植物学报,1996,36(6):405-410
    [7] 陈振光,园艺植物离体培养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996.
    [8] 张 健,吕柳新.柑桔幼胚培养的直接体细胞胚发生与植株再生[J].河南科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(6):82-85
    [9] 孙清荣,石荫坪等. 梨成熟胚子叶不定梢诱导[J].河北农业大学学报,1999,2(22):50-52
    [10] 杨振英,苏佳明,薛光荣.6 个草莓品种花药培养试验[J].中国果树 2001(5):22-24
    [11] 许红梅.植物组织培养中的污染及防止措施[J].北方园艺,2006(6):148-149
    [12] 孙清荣,孙洪雁,刘庆忠.丰水梨的组培快繁研究[J].落叶果树,2001(4):4-5
    [13] 祁东文,蒋琴,刘淑玉.新梨 7 号组织培养快繁技术研究[J].落叶果树[J],2002(4):4-5
    [14] 汤绍虎,孙敏等.采用正交设计快速获得梨无菌外植体的研究[J].西南师范大学学报,2004,29(2):282-284
    [15] Al-Kai H, Salesses G, Mouras A. Multiplication in vitro du noisetier ( Corylus avellana L.)[J].Ahronomie,1984,4(4):399-402
    [16] 何松林,朱道厅,孙利华.苹果茎尖培养与培养材料采取时期关系的研究[J].华北农学报1997,11(增刊)
    [17] 何水涛,刘沛镇,韩礼星苹果茎顶培养脱毒技术的研究[J].河南农业科学,1997,(11):25-28
    [18] 赵政阳,曹晓玲,黄英.叶片成热度对苹果试管苗叶片再生植株的影响[J].陕酉农业科学1997,(9):20-21.
    [19] 李 艳 红 , 马 宝 棍 . 苹 果 砧 木 M26 离 体 叶 片 愈 防 组 织 发 生 及 分 类 研 究 [J]. 果 树 科学,1999,16(4):259-262.
    [20] 张桂芳,贺红.广佛手组织培养中污染及防治研究[J].中医药学,2005,2( 2):259.
    [21] 孙清荣,刘庆忠,赵瑞华.西洋梨叶片直接再生体细胞胚[J].园艺学报,2003,30(1):85-86
    [22] 张志勤.澳洲青苹组培苗生根及移栽技术研究[J].西北农业学报,2003,12(2):126-129
    [23] 徐世彦,白海侠,郭韩玲等.高酸苹果的组织培养快繁技术研究[J].山西果树,2006(1):6-8
    [24] 李 昌 珠 ,Sedlak Jiri,Jan Blazek. 不 同 基 因 型 欧 洲 梨 离 体 繁 殖 研 究 [J]. 果 树 学报,2002,19(4):227-230
    [25] 姜淑荣,王际轩,刘志等.几种果树砧木和品种茎尖组培的培养基筛选试验[J].北方果联璧合树,1994(2):9-11
    [26] Wang Q.The effect of light,darkness and temperature on micropropagation of the pear rootstock BP 10030[J].J Hort Sci,1992,67:869-876
    [27] 蔡明,李树贵.水晶梨茎段再生植株的培养[J].河北果树,2001(3):43-44
    [28] Lane W D.Regeneration of pear plant from shoot meristem-tips[J]. Plant Science Letter,1979,16:337-342
    [29] 韩文璞,袁明莲.黄金梨的组织培养和快繁研究[J].落叶果树,2001(2):7-8
    [30] 侯修胜.黄金梨试管快繁技术研究[J].河北果树,2002(4):11,14
    [31] 侯修胜.红安久梨试管快繁技术研究[J].山东林业科技,2001(2):22-23
    [32] 孙清荣,刘庆忠,赵红军,刘鹏.培养基及培养条件对西洋梨试管苗生根的影响[J].落叶果树,2004(1):1-2
    [33] Amiri M Z.Mass propagation of a unique variety of pear (Pyrifolia(Burm)Nak.cv.Sebri) by shoot tip culture invitro[J]. ActaHort,2002,587:555-561
    [34] Kadota M, Imizu K, Hirano T. Double-phase invitro culture using sorbitol increases shoot prolifer-ation and reduces hyperhydricity in Japanese pear[J]. SciHort, 2001, 89: 207-215
    [35] Viseur J. Micropropagation of pear PyruscommunisL. in a double-phase culture medium[J]. Acta Hort,1987,212:117-124
    [36] Rodriguez R, Diaz-sala C, Cuozzo L,etal. Pear in vitro propagation using a double-phase culture system[J]. Hort Sci,1991,26:62-64
    [37] 董淑英,孙静,李梅等.苹果脱毒试管苗生根技术研究[J].河北农业科学,2001,5(4):6-9
    [38] Reed B M.Screening Pyrus germplasm for in vitro rooting response[J].Hort Sci , 1995, 30: 1292-129
    [39] 马文会,王献革,王利民等.黄金梨的组织培养和快速繁殖技术初报[J].华北农学报,2003,18(3):117
    [40] 赵秀梅,王发林,贾克礼等.梨树的组织培养快繁研究[J].甘肃农业科技,1995(12):13-14
    [41] Dolcet-Sanjuan R, Mok D W S, MokM C. Micro-propagation of Pyrus and Cydonia and their responses to Fe-limiting conditions[J]. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult,1990,21:191-199
    [42] Stimart D P,Harbage J F.Invitro shoot proliferation of Pyrus calleryana from vegetative buds[J].Hort Sci,1989,24:298-299
    [43] Masanori K, Yoshiji N. Effects of cytokinin types and their concentrations on shoot proliferation and hyperhydricity in invitro pear cultivar shoots[J]. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult,2003,72(3):261-265
    [44] 曾云英.金花梨组织培养研究[J].北方园艺,2007(1):145-146
    [45] KorbanSS, Oconnor PA, Elobeidy A,et al[J]. Hort Sci,1992,67(3):341-349
    [46] Gonzalez A, Rodriguez R, Sanchez-Tames R. Ethylene and in vitro rooting of hazelnut ( Corylus avellana L.) cotyledons[J]. Physiologia-Plantarum,1991,81(2):227-233
    [47] Chevreau E,Skirvin R M, Abu –Qaoud H, et al. Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf tissue of three pear (Pyrussp.) cultivars in vitro[J].Plant Cell Rep, 1989, 7: 688-691
    [48] Bertazza G, Baraldi R, PredieriS. Light effects on in Vitro rooting of pear cultivars of different rhizogenic ablity[J]. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult,1995,41:139-143
    [49] Singha S,Townsend E C, Oberly G H. Mineral nutrient status of crab apple and pear shoots cultured in vitro on varying concent rations of three commer cial agars[J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci,1985,110:407-411
    [50] Fuchs R L,Macintosh S C,Dean D A,et a1.ACS symposium series.NO.432.Analytical chemistry of Bacillus thuringiensis[J]. Elsevier Science Publisher BV,1990,105-113.
    [51] 徐凌飞,马锋旺,王颉之等.梨叶片离体培养和植株再生[J].园艺学报,2002,29(4):367-368.
    [52] 孙清荣,孙洪雁.西洋梨丰产叶片不定梢再生[J].落叶果树,1999,(4):9-10.
    [53] 刘翠琼,汤浩茹.梨叶片培养与转基因研究进展[J].果树学报,2003,20(5):374-378.
    [54] 孙 清 荣 , 孙 洪 雁 , 赵 红 军 . 中 国 樱 桃 抗 病 毒 选 系 试 管 苗 生 根 的 研 究 [J]. 园 艺 学报,2000,27(1):57-58.
    [55] 刘庆忠,赵红军,李志强.甜樱桃矮化砧木吉塞拉(Gisela)的离体叶片再生植株研究[J].果树学报,2001,18(5):255-257.
    [56] Tukey H B. Artificial culture of sweet cherry embryos[J].J hered,1933,24:7-12
    [57] 姚强,王德春,吴任良,等.桃、油桃和赐桃幼胚愈伤组织诱导和植株再生[J].上海农业学报,1990,6(3):23
    [58] 李宏潮.冬小麦原生质体培养及其植株再生[J].植物学报,1991,33(9):706-711
    [59] 李宝平.芫荽原生质体再生植株[J].植物学报,1991,33(12):932-937
    [60] 达 克 东 , 张 松 等 . 创 伤 诱 导 苹 果 离 体 叶 片 高 效 直 接 体 细 胞 胚 胎 发 生 [J]. 核 农 学报,2001,15(5):290-293
    [61] 王 海 英 , 孙 建 设 , 马 宝 琨 等 . 苹 果 砧 木 组 培 苗 耐 盐 筛 选 技 术 研 究 [J]. 果 树 学报,2000,17(3):164-169
    [62] 王遵亲.中国盐渍土[M].北京:科学出版社,1993
    [63] 赵科夫,范海.盐生植物及其对盐渍生境的适应生理[M].北京:科学出版社,2005
    [64] 李谦.浅谈灌区盐碱地治理[J].中国科技信息,2007(18):26-29
    [65] 张立新,周和平,朱焕丽.新疆土壤次生盐化主要成因及对策[J].中国土壤与肥料,2007(5): 11-14
    [66] 江苏农学院.植物生理学[M].北京:农业出版社,1984.
    [67] 毕述援.碱化土对苹果树生长结果的影响及改良效果[J].中国果树,1997(1):16-18.
    [68] 陈瑞珊.果树植物的耐盐力[J].河北农学报,1981(2):73-76.
    [69] 张福锁.环境胁迫与植物育种[M].北京:农业出版社,1993.
    [70] 查霞娟,孙岚,肖崇彬,等.苹果砧木耐盐性比较试验[J].中国果树,1986(2):5-9.
    [71] 杨 静 慧 , 刘 玉 冬 . 介 质 盐 碱 铁 对 八 楞 海 棠 根 际 PH 值 的 影 响 [J]. 西南农 业大 学学报,1995,17(2):115-117.
    [72] 朱世江,李道高,周学伍,等.不同基因型的柑桔试管苗对Fe2+及HCO-3的生理反应[J].西南农业大学学报,1993,15(6):506-509.
    [73] 谈健康,安树青,王铮锋,等.NaCl、Na2SO4和Na2CO3胁迫对小麦叶片自由基含量及质膜透性的比较研究[J].植物学通报,1998(15):82-86.
    [74] Partrick Boursier,Andre Luchli.Crop physiology metabolism[J].Crop Science, 1990, 30:1226-1233.
    [75] 朱兴运等.碱茅属植物抗盐性与抗盐机制的研究进展[J].草业学报,1994,3(3):9-15
    [76] 艾瓦努尔.新疆水资源开发与生态环境保护建设初探[J].干旱环境监测,2001,3
    [77] 李加宏,俞仁培.水-土壤-植物系统中盐分的迁移和植物耐盐性研究进展[J].土壤学报1995,23(6):9-17
    [78] 翟凤林.植物耐盐性及其改良[M].北京农业出版社,1989
    [79] 翁森红,王承斌.植物的耐盐性[J].中国草地,1995(4):70-72
    [80] 赵可夫.植物抗盐生理[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1993.22-24,309.
    [81] 邓占鳌,章文才,万蜀渊.柑橘耐盐系的离体诱发与原生质体植株再生[J].园艺学报,1993,20(2):127-132.
    [82] 陈立松,刘星辉编著.果树逆境生理[M].中国农业出版社 2002
    [83] 王海英,孙建设等 果树耐盐性研究进展[J].河北农业大学学报,2000,23(2):54-58
    [84] 王业遴,马凯,姜卫兵,等.五种果树耐盐力初报[J].中国果树,1990,(3):8-12.
    [85] 陈竹生,聂华堂,计玉,等.柑橘种质的耐盐性鉴定[J].园艺学报, 1992, 19(4): 289-295.
    [86] 查霞娟,孙岚,肖崇彬,等.苹果砧木耐盐性比较试验[J].中国果树,1986,(2):5-9.
    [87] 马继龙,崔连明,刘桂荣,等.珠美海棠耐滨海盐碱及嫁接苹果试验初报[J].落叶果树,1996,(1):13-14.
    [88] 赵可夫,HARRISPJC.盐胁迫对沙枣生理特性的影响[J].山东师范大学学报,1992,7(4):94-101.
    [89] BERNSTEINL. Effect of salinity and solinity on plant growth [J] .Ann Rev Plant Physiol,1975,26:295-312.
    [90] 翁迈东.海涂柑橘适用砧木探讨[J].中国柑橘,1980,(11):12-16.
    [91] 李瑞云,鲁纯养,凌礼章.植物耐盐性研究现状与展望[J].盐碱地利用,1989,(1):38-41.
    [92] 秦立钢.海涂橘园用本地早作温州蜜柑砧木获成功[J].中国柑橘,1981,(2):24.
    [93] 江苏农学院.植物生理学[M].北京:农业出版社,1984.
    [94] 张海燕,赵可夫.盐分和水分胁迫对盐地碱蓬幼苗渗透调节效应的研究[J].植物学报 , 1998, 40(1):56-61
    [95] Jarunee Jungklang,Yukari Sunohara, Hiroshi Matsumoto. Antioxidative enzymes response to NaCl stress in salt-tolerant Sesbania rostrata [J]. Weed Biology and Management, 2004, 4: 81-85
    [96] 汪良驹,马凯,姜卫兵,等.NaCl 胁迫下石榴和桃植株 NaCl 含量与耐盐性研究[J].园艺学报,1995,22(4):336-340.
    [97] 王慧英,孙建设,张建光.NaCl胁迫对苹果砧木K+和Na+吸收的影响及其与耐盐性的关系[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,25(增刊 1):104-107.
    [98] WALKER RR. Sodium exlusion and potassium-sodium selectivity in salt treated trifoliate orange (Poncirus triliata)and cleopatra manadrin (citrusre ticulata) plants [J].Aust J Plant Physiol, 1986,13:293-303.
    [99] DOWNTON W J S. Influenc e of root stocks on the accumulation of chloride. Sodium and potassium in grapevines [J].Aust J Agri Res,1997,7(28):897.
    [100] MOTOS U I H ,SUGIU RAA ,TOMANAT. Salt tolerance of various apple root stock cultivars [J]. J Jap Hort Sci,1987,56(2):135-141.
    [101] SEPSKHAH A R, MAFTOIN M. Relative salt tolerance of pistachio cultivars [J].Hort Sci,1988,63(1):157-162.
    [102] 陈竹生,聂华堂,计玉,等.柑橘种质的耐盐性鉴定[J].园艺学报,1992,19(4):289-295.
    [103] 林栖凤,李冠一.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].生物工程进展,2000,20(2):20-25.
    [104] 翟衡,杜中军,罗新书.苹果砧木耐盐性鉴定[J].山东农业大学学报,1999,30(3):296-297.
    [105] 姜卫兵,马凯,朱建华.多效唑提高草莓耐盐性的效应[J].江苏农业学报,1992,8(4):13-17
    [106] 王连君,皇甫淳,王铭,等.盐碱胁迫下山葡萄的叶绿素含量与耐盐性关系的研究[J].葡萄栽培与酿酒,1995(4):1-3.
    [107] 廖祥儒,贺普超,朱新立.盐渍对葡萄色素含量的影响[J].园艺学报,1996,23(3):300-302.
    [108] 陆承志.新疆的榅桲[J].林业实用技术 2005(8):44-45
    [109] 克热木.伊力,袁琳. 可在北方干旱地区开发利用的稀有果树[J].北方果树 2003(1):38
    [110] 马木提·库尔班,长马力别克·吾买尔.榅桲中总黄酮的测定[J].新疆师范大学学报2004,23(4):67-68
    [111] 夏扎日·夏克尔,买合布白等.新疆榅桲中鞣质类化合物及其生物活性[J].生物技术通讯,2006,17(5):840-842
    [112] Silva BM,Casal S, Andrade PB, et al. Free amino acid composition of quince(Cydonia oblanga Mliller) fruit(Pulp and Peel) and jam [J]. Anal Scinese, 2003,19:1285
    [113] Silva BM, Andrade PB,Ferreres F,et al.composition of quince(Cydonia oblanga Mliller) seeds: phenolics, organic acids and free amino [J] Nat Product Res, 2005,19(3):275
    [114] 马木提·库尔班,榅桲酒的研制[J].化学世界,2001(10): 554-555
    [115] 维吾尔医学常用材料[M] 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社,1990
    [116] 王放银,赵良忠,余有贵,等.老鹳草鞣质德的提取及其抑菌效果研究[J].邵阳学院学报(自然科学版)2004,1(3):103
    [117] 沙里,沙布尔.水果的药用[M].乌鲁木齐: 新疆科技出版社,1991
    [118] 如克亚·沙得克等编.维吾尔常用药材学(上册)[M].乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,1990
    [119] 曾斌,克热木·伊力等 新疆榅桲及其栽培[J].特种经济动植物,2005(8):29-30
    [120] 王洪庆,戴强,姜长阳.榅桲的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯 1987(9):52
    [121] 曾云英.金花梨组织培养研究[J].北方园艺,2007(1):145-146
    [122] 曾斌,罗淑萍,李疆.新疆野生巴旦杏的组织培养和植株再生[J].新疆农业大学学报,2006,29(4):27-31
    [123] Barghchi M,P G Alderson.In vitro propanation of Pistacia veral species[J]..Acta Hortic,1983,131:49-60
    [124] Zimmerman R H,Fordham I. Simplified method for rooting apple cultivars in vitro[J].J.Am.Soc.Hortic. Sci,1985,110:34- 38.
    [125] 王 震 星 , 张 磊 , 刘 贵 仁 . 西 洋 梨 茎 段 离 体 培 养 与 快 速 繁 殖 的 探 [J]. 天 津 农 业 科学,1998(4):16-19
    [126] Rey M, Diaz-Sala C, Rodriguez R. Exogenous polyamines improve rooting of hazel microshoots[J]. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult,1994,36:303-308
    [127] 朱登云,田慧琴等.杜仲成熟干胚乳愈伤组织的诱导和植株再生[J].农业生物技术学报,1998,6(4):307-312
    [128] Diaz-Sala C, Rey M, Rodriguez R. In vitro establishment of cycloclonal chain from nodal segments and apical buds of adult hazel ( Corylus avellana L.)[J]. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.,1990,23(3): 151-157
    [129] 邹琦 主编. 植物生理学实验指导[M].北京: 中国农业出版社,2000.7
    [130] 李合生 主编. 植物生理生化试验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000
    [131] Janero D R.Malonaldehyde an thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and perroxidative tissue injury [J]. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1990,9,515- 540.
    [132] Lin S,Lin Y,Zhang Z.Response of antioxidant defense system in populus tomentosa cuttings subjected to salt stress [J] . 2002,4(2):16-20.
    [133] Smironoff N.The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation [J].New Phyto1.1993,125:27-58.
    [134] 刘宛,胡文玉,谢甫绨.NaCI胁迫及外源自由基对离体小麦叶片O2-和膜脂过氧化的影响[J].植物生物学通讯,1995,31(1):26-29.
    [135] 买合木提·卡热 扁桃砧木抗盐性研究 硕士学位论文,2005 年
    [136] 陈立松,刘星辉.果树逆境生理[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2003,16-256
    [137] 克热木·伊力,袁琳等.盐胁迫对阿月浑子 SOD、CAT、POD 活性的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2004(3):129-134
    [138] 陈泌,刘友良.谷胱甘肽对盐胁迫大麦叶片活性氧清除系统的保护作用[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26 (3):365-371
    [139] 董 发 才 , 苗 琛 . 小 麦 根 系 过 氧 化 氢 酶 积 累 与 耐 盐 性 的 关 系 [J]. 武 汉 植 物 学 研究,2002,20(4):289-295
    [140] Abed S.Moshe T.The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in theleaf of thecultivated tomato and its wild salt-tlerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii[J]. Physiologia plantarum.1998.104:169-174
    [141] 袁 琳,克热木·伊力.NaCl 胁迫对阿月浑子实生苗活性氧代谢与细胞膜稳定性的影响[J].植物生态学报 2005,29(6)985-991
    [142] 郑兴莲NaCI及Ca(N03)2胁迫对茄子种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响.硕士学位论文 2006 年
    [143] 肖 雯,贾恢先,蒲陆梅.几种盐生植物抗盐生理指标的研究[J].西北植物学报.2000, 20(50):818-825,
    [144] 李合生,陈翠莲等.植物生理生化试验原理和技术[M].武汉:华中农业大学规划教材.1998,136-137
    [145] 孙振宙,叶柏军.绿显种子萌发及幼苗抗盐性的研究[J].内蒙古民族人学学报:自然科学版,2001,16(1):31-38
    [146] Ghonlam, K Fares,谢国禄,等.盐浓度对甜菜种子发芽和早期幼苗生长的影响[J].国外作物育种,2002,21(2): 61-62
    [147] 郑伟,王彬等 NaCl 胁迫对火龙果种子萌发的影响[J].种子, 2008,27(1):82-84
    [148] WangZ.Plant Physiology[M].China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 2000 422-439
    [149] Gueta_Dahan Y, Yaniv Z, Zilinskas BA, Ben_Hayyim G .Salt and oxidative stress: similar and specific responses and their relation to salt tolerance incitrus[J].Planta,1997,203,460-469
    [150] ChenQ, LiuYL. Effect of glutathione on active oxygen scavenging system in leaves of barley seedling under saltstress[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2000,26, 365-371
    [151] Hernandez JA,Jimenez A, Mullineaux P,Sevilla F. Tolerance of pea (PisumsativumL.) to long term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defenses[J]. Plant Cell Biology, 2000,(23): 853-862.
    [152] Battacharjee S, Mukherjee AK. Ethylene evolution and membrane lipid peroxidation as indicators of salt injury in leaf tissues of amaranths seedlings[J].Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 1996,34,279-281.
    [153] Dionisio Sese ML, TobitaS.Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress[J].Plant Science, 1998,135,1-9.
    [154] Flowers TJ. Improving crop salt tolerance[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55(396): 307-319

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700