用户名: 密码: 验证码:
烯效唑对玉米的壮苗机理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文以川单13为材料,探讨不同浓度(0、10、20、40和80mg/kg)烯效唑浸种对玉米苗期(3叶期到7叶期)地上部和地下部的形态特征变化以及干物质积累和分配的影响,对幼苗不同器官内4种内源激素和激素间动态平衡的调节,对苗期根系活性、光合特性及碳水化合物积累与分配的影响,以及对苗期的抗逆效应,结果表明:
     1 烯效唑浸种处理对叶片和叶鞘的伸长生长有明显的抑制作用,第7叶时抑制效应明显减弱,且抑制效应随浓度的增大而增强。但烯效唑处理的植株粗壮,比叶重、叶宽和茎基宽增加,根数增多,根长显著高于对照,根干重增加,根冠比和苗粗壮度提高,表现出壮苗的长相。对根系的促进作用10-40mg/kg范围内随浓度增大而增强,当浓度达到80mg/kg时,促进作用显著减弱。
     2 烯效唑处理后玉米体内的内源激素水平发生改变,IAA和GA_3水平较对照显著下降,叶鞘中尤为明显;ZT水平则是地上部提高,地下部下降;ABA含量提高,80mg/kg处理提高最多;植株各器官(1AA+GA_3)/ABA比值均降低,IAA/GA_3比值均升高,IAA/ZT和GA_3/ZT比值则是地上部降低,根系内提高。其中GA_3、IAA含量下降是抑制地上部伸长生长的主要原因,地上部ZT增加和IAA/ZT、GA_3/ZT比值下降是促进地上部横向生长的主要原因,根系IAA/ZT和IAA/GA_3比值升高是促进根系生长的主要原因。
     3 烯效唑处理后,苗期叶片的PEP羧化酶活性增强,叶绿素含量和叶绿素a/b比值增加,净光合速率提高,,不同器官(叶、叶鞘和根系)内碳水化合物含量均高于对照,且根系内增加最多。烯效唑处理后根系活力提高,浓度间以40mg/kg处理效果最好。
     4 烯效唑处理提高了玉米苗期的抗旱性,在干旱条件下植株根冠比增加,叶片SOD活性提高,质膜相对透性和MDA含量相对减少,同时减缓了光合速率和叶绿素含量的下降过程。
     5 烯效唑处理使得秃尖长降低,行粒数和穗粒数增加,千粒重提高,增产效果显著,增产幅度为7.4%~29.4%,40mg/kg处理的增产效果最佳,每公顷较对照
    
    增加 1301kg,增产29.7%。
     研究认为,烯效哩浸种是通过改变内源激素水平,改善光合同化能力、增强
    根系吸收能力以及提高SOD活性而促进了壮苗的形成,并最终促进穗粒数、千粒
    重等穗部性状的改善及产量的提高。
The effects of soaked seeds with different concentrations(0、10、20、40、80mg/kg)on plant of maize c.v. (chuandan13) were stuided. The results were showed as follows:
    l.The elongation of leaf blades and leaf sheaths of the treated plants was inhibited at 3~7-leaf stage, the inhibiting effect of S-3307 diminished at seventh leaf stage, and the higher of the concentration, the stronger of the effect. At the same time, as compared to the control, the plant in S-3307-treatment showed an appearance of high quality plant with increased specific leaf weight, leaf width and stem thickness as well as root number and root length, the root dry weight.
    2. S-3307 treatment decreased the levels of endogeneous IAA and GA3 in whole plant, the reduction of GA3 and IAA in leaf sheath were stronger than in leaf blade and shoot, and the reduction of GA3 was more than that of IAA. The reduction of GA3 and IAA was the major reason for the lower plant. The level of endogeneous ZT was increased in top and decreased in root markedly, which was benifit to plant growth. The level of endogeneous ABA had no significant difference in the treated plant, but the content of ABA for 80mg/kg treatment was significantly higher than that of control. While the blances of endogenous hormone was changed.
    3. S-3307 treatment increased PEP carboxylase activity, enhanced chlorophyll content and chlorophyll a/b ratio, and improved net photosynthetic rate in the leaves at 3~7-leaf stage. Meanwhile the contents of soluble carbohydrate and starch were increased in different organs of maize plant, the increasing in root was more than in shoot. S-3307 increased root activity.
    4. S-3307 treatments increased root-top ratio and the superoxide dismutase activity, prevented electrolyte leakage and the enhancing of MDA content, reduced the injuries caused by the soil drought in chlorophyll, and inhibited the reducing of photosynthetic rate during water stress.
    5. S-3307 treatments decreased bald tip length, increased obviously grain number per ear 1000-grain weight. So, S-3307 treatments increased yield significantly. Moreover 40mg/kg treatment was the best, the yield increased by 1301kg per hm2.
    41
    
    
    
    Therefore, it was suggested that the action of S-3307 on promoting strong plant was correlated with the changes of endogenous hormone, improvement of photosynthetic capacity, increasing of root activity and superoxide dismutase activity, which is the biological base for increasing grain yield.
引文
1.张宪政主编.作物生理研究法.北京:农业出版社,1992
    2.张礼军,廖联安,郭奇珍.S-3307的生理活性、构效关系及合成.农药译从,1998,10(3):26-31
    3.廖联安,郭奇珍.新型植物生长调节剂和杀菌剂-优康唑简介.植物生理学通讯,1989(1):74-75
    4.汤日圣,张大栋,郭士伟,等.烯效唑和三唑酮调节水稻秧苗生长的增效作用及机理.中国水稻科学,2000,14(1):51—54
    5.山东省农业科学院玉米研究所编著.玉米生理.农业出版社.1987
    6.孙群,梁宗锁,王渭玲,等.氮对水分亏缺条件下玉米幼苗膜脂过氧化及光合速率的影响.西北农业学报,2001,10(1):7-10
    7.刘贞琦,刘振业,马达鹏,等.水稻叶绿素含量及其与光合速率关系的研究.作物学报,1984,10(1):57-64
    8.王熹,俞美玉,陶龙兴,等.烯效唑对水稻幼苗内源激素IAA含量的影响.植物学报 1997,39(7):629-633
    9.李宗霆,周燮著.植物激素及其免疫检测技术.江苏科学技术出版社.1987,279-290
    10.朱根海,张荣铣.叶片含氮量与光合作用植物生理学通讯,1985,2:9—12
    11.施天生,陆定志.S-3307、PP333对水稻幼苗根系和地上部生长影响的比较(简报).植物生理学通讯,1993,29(4):272-274
    12.廖利民,韩碧文,何仲佩,等.S-3307和PP333对小麦某些生理特性的影响.植物生理学通讯,1990,3:28-31
    13.江玲,王章荣,周燮.镧对马尾松的根系生长和IAA含量的影响.植物学报,1998,40(3):251-255
    14.鄂玉江,戴俊英,顾慰连,等.玉米根系的生长规律及其与产量关系的研究Ⅰ.玉米根系生长和吸收能力与地上部分的关系.作物学报,1988,14(2):149-154
    15.戴俊英,鄂玉江,顾慰连等.玉米根系的生长规律及其与产量关系的研究Ⅱ.玉米根与叶的相互作用及其与产量的关系.作物学报,1988,14(4):310-314
    16.盛亚红,沈岳清,盛敏智,等.烯效唑(S-3307)对冬小麦生长发育的影响.上海农业学报,1993,9(4):69-74
    17.黄宜祥.对四川农业结构调整中发挥玉米优势的几点意见.西南农业学报,1999,12(4):106-110
    18.潘瑞炽.植物生长延缓剂的生化效应.植物生理学通讯,1996,32(3):161-168
    19.郑淑华,孙淑珍,徐刚,等.烯效唑浸种对玉米生长及产量的影响.种子科技,1999,4:32
    
    
    20.王熹,俞美玉,陶龙兴.烯效唑对稻苗的生物学效应.中国水稻科学1993,7(4):199-204
    21.刘华山,彭文博,孟凡庭,等.S3307对小麦幼苗形态及某些生理特性的影响.植物生理学通讯,1993,29(5):354-355
    22.蔡永萍,陶汉之,程备久.对生玉米叶片蒸腾、光合若干特性的研究.安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(4):474-477
    23.黄宜祥,李远春,石永刚.四川玉米生产的减灾对策。西南西南农业学报,1995,8(1):99-103
    24.杨大旗,杨建新,胡义文.优康唑(S3307)对油菜幼苗某些生理特性的影响(简报).植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):182—185
    25.王熹,俞美玉,陶龙兴.烯效唑小麦苗期生长的调控作用.华北农学报,1995,10(2):50-56
    26.董树亭,胡昌浩,周关印.玉米叶片气孔导度、蒸腾和光合特性研究.玉米科学,1993,1(2):41-44
    27.董学会,何钟佩,关彩虹.根系导入生长素和玉米素对玉米光合产物输出及分配的影响.中国农业大学学报,2001,6(3):21-25
    28.叶庆富,周伟军,奚海福,等.S-3307对油菜幼苗内源激素IAA、ABA及ZT含量水平的影响.浙江农业学报,1995,7(6):451-456
    29.张远海,汤日圣,高宁,等.多效唑调节水稻植株生长的作用机理.植物生理学报,1988,14(4):338-343
    30.白宝璋,汤学军.植物生理学测试技术.北京:中国科学技术出版社.1993:73~77
    31.吴光南编著.作物发育生理.中国农业科技出版社2000
    32.王群瑛,胡昌浩.玉米不同叶位叶片的初步研究.作物学报,1986,12(4):273-277
    33.周伟军,楼健,宋荣军。烯效唑对油菜的壮秧效应及增产作用探讨.浙江农业大学学报,1996,22(6):609-613
    34.王建华,刘鸿先,徐同.超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理中的作用.植物生理学通讯,1989,(1):1—7
    35.张红心,王伟中,夏凯,等.IPT对稻苗根系生长和三种内源激素水平的影响.作物学报,2000,26(5):599-604
    36.王仁杯,徐绍英.烯效唑对大麦降矮抗倒效应及其机理研究.浙江农业大学学报,1996,22(6):579—584
    37.施教耐,吴敏贤,查静娟.植物磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化酶的研究Ⅰ.羧化酶同工酶的分离和变构特性的比较.植物生理学报,1979,5:225-236
    38.沈岳清,盛敏智,盛亚红,等.多效唑培育水稻壮秧及提高产量的效果.上海农业学报,1990,6(1):23—32
    
    
    39.葛晓光 果菜壮苗指标研究的概况.中国蔬菜,1987(1):32—34,44
    40.李柏林,梅慧生.燕麦叶片衰老与活性氧代谢的关系.植物生理学报,1989,15(1):6-12
    41.李月莹,陈贵,陈凤玉.S3307调节剂对冬小麦某些生理特性的影响.麦类作物,1999(1):52-54
    42.陈少袷.膜脂过氧化对植物的伤害.植物生理学通讯,1991,27(2):84
    43.汪惠芳.S3307对玉米种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响.植物生理学通讯,2000,36(5) 491
    44.中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会编.现代植物生理学实验指南.科学出版社 120-121,314-315
    45.王爱国.大豆种子超氧化物歧化酶的研究.植物生理学报,1983,9(1):76—83
    46.刘晓冰.作物同化产物分配的激素调节.作物杂志,1993,3:33-34
    47.崔素霞,黄惠英,王蒂.烯效唑诱导小麦植株形态变化及其与内源激素的关系.西北植物学报,1997,17(6):5~11
    48.张敬贤,李俊明,崔四平,等.玉米细胞保护酶活性对苗期干旱的反应.华北农学报,1990,增刊:19—23
    49.梁雪莲,杨文钰.烯效唑拌种对小麦形态及营养的调节效应.四川农业大学学报,1998,16(4):403-406
    50.许长成,赵世杰,等.小麦叶片在干旱条件下的膜损伤与脂质过氧化.山东农业大学学报,1996,27(4):503-508
    51.孟军,陈温福,徐正进.水稻剑叶净光合速率与叶绿素含量的研究初报.沈阳农业大学学报,2001,32(4):247-249
    52.王熹,姚福德,高成伟,等.多效唑对水稻秧苗吲哚乙酸氧化酶及内源吲哚乙酸的影响.浙江农业大学学报,1991,17(1):60—64
    53.徐世昌,戴俊英,沈秀瑛,等.水分胁迫对玉米光合性能及产量的影响.作物学报,1995,21(3):356-363
    54.关义新,戴俊英,徐世昌,等.玉米花期干旱及复水对植物补偿生长及产量的影响.作物学报,1997,23(6):741—745
    55.李广敏,唐连顺,商振清,等.渗透胁迫对玉米保护酶系统的影响及其与抗旱性的关系.河北农业大学学报,1994,17(2):1—5
    56.王向阳,崔金梅,等.小麦不同生育期超氧化物歧化酶活性与脂质过氧化作用的初步研究.河南农业大学学报,1991,25(1):1-5
    57.西南农学院等主编.作物栽培学(中册).西南农学院出版.1984,185
    58.吴颂如,陈婉芬,周燮.酶联免疫法(ELISA)测定内源植物激素.植物生理学通讯,1988,5:53-57
    59.江龙,王庆斌,王有荣,等.高海拔山区不同株型玉米光合生理特征与产量的关
    
    系.山地农业生物学报,2001,20(2):81-85
    60.王志芬,陈学留,余美炎,等.冬小麦根系~(32)P吸收活力的变化规律及其与器官建成关系的研究.作物学报,1995,21(4):458-462
    61.王熹,陶龙兴,高成伟,等.连作晚稻秧苗徒长的化学调控:多效唑控长效应的生理分析.作物学报,1990,16(1):91-96
    62.邹华文,陈凤玉,尹敬芳.S3307浸种对玉米幼苗生长及幼苗体内内源激素水平的影响.杂粮作物,2001,21(6) 27-28
    63.刘殿英,等.栽培措施对冬小麦根系活力和植株性状的影响.中国农业科学,1993,26(5):51—56
    64.林植芳,李双顺等.水稻叶片的衰老与超氧化物歧化酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的关系.植物学报,1984,26(6):605—615
    65.郑寨生,张尚法,王祥根,等.烯效唑浸种对玉米的生物学效应初探.
    66.沈岳清,盛亚红,盛敏智,等.烯效唑(S—3307)对冬小麦种子的若干生理效应.上海农业学报 1993,9(4) 75—78
    67.陶龙兴.环境条件对烯效唑及多效唑在土壤中降解的影响.浙江农业学报,1997,9(5):246-250
    68.杨建新,胡义文,杨大旗.烯效唑(S-3307)对油菜幼苗抗旱性的生理效应.西南农业学报,1994,16(3):256—258
    69.Buttery BR等.1979.大豆光合作用速率和叶绿素含量之间的关系.科学出版社.72-75
    70.Uprety DC,王三根译,国外农学—麦类作物,1986,2:35—37
    71. Kramer PJ. 1983. Water Relations of Plant. Academic Press. 404-492
    72. Li-L., Staden-j-van., et al. Effects of plant growth regulation on the antionxidant system in seedings of two maize cultivars subjected to water stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 1998, 25(2): 81-87
    73. Zhou WJ., Leul M. Uniconazole-induced alleviation of freezing injury in relation to changes in hormonal balance, enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in winter rape. Plant Growth Regulation, 1998, 26(1): 41-47
    74. Forlani M., Coppola V. Use of two growth regulators on grape(cv. Fiano): paclobutrazol and S3307. Vignevini, 1992, 19(4): 39-42
    75. Kim-HY., Choi-BJ., Sang-CK. Effects of uniconazole on drought resistance of pilea cadierei. I. Morphological changes and drought resistance. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science, 1994, 35(4): 387-391
    76. Milborrow BV. The chemistry and physiology of abscisic Acid. Ann. Rew. Plant Physiology, 1974, 25: 259-307
    77. Kraus-TE., Murr-DP., Fletcher-RA. Uniconazole inhibits stress-induced ethylene in wheat and soybean seedling Plant-Growth-Regulation, 1991(10): 229-234
    
    
    78. Tafazoli-E., Beyl-C. Changes in endogenous abscisic acid and cold hardiness in Actinidia treated with trizole growth retardants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1993,12(2) : 79-83
    79. Hemberg J. Stuides on balance free and bound auxin germinating maize. Plant Physiol,1986,27:367-371
    80. Flecher RA., Arnoid V. Stimulation of cytokinins and chlorophyll synthesis in cucumber cotyledons by triadimefon. Physiol Plant, 1986,66:197-201
    81. Lzumi K., Nakagawa S., et al. Levels of IAA, cytokinins, ABA and ethylene in rice plants as affected by a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, Uniconazole-P. Plant Cell Physiol, 1988, 29: 97-104
    82. Shibaoka H. Plant hormore-induced changes in the orientation of cortical microtubules: Alterations in the crosslinking between microtubules and the plasma membrane. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1994,45: 527-544
    83. Upadhyaya A., Davis TV., Larsen MH., et al. Uniconazole-induced thermotolerance in soybean seedling root tissue. Physiol Plant, 1990, 79: 608-612
    84. Buttery BR., Buzzel RI. Relationships among photosynthetic rate, bean yield and other characters in field-grown cultivars of soybean. Can J Plant Sci, 1981,61:191-198
    85. Muller K., Leopold AC. The mechanism of kinetin induced transport in com leaves. Planta, 1966,68:186-250
    86. Kriedemann PE. An effect of kinetinon translocation of 14C-labeled photosynthate on Ciorus. Austr J Biol Sci, 1968,21: 569-571
    87. Masashi Hirai., Isamu Ueno. Development of citrus fruits: Fruits development and enzymatic changes in juice vesicle tissue. Plant & Cell Physiol, 1977,18: 791-799
    88. Wiesman Z., Riov J. Interaction of paclobutrazol and indole-3-butyric acid in relation to rooting of mung bean (Vigna radiata) cutting. Physiol Plant,1994,92:608-612
    89. Lzumi K., Kamiya Y., Sakurai A, et al. Studies of sites of action of a new plant growth retardant(E)-1-(4-chlorphenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-(l,2,4-triazol-l-yl)-l-penten-3-ol(S330 7) and comparative effects of its stereoisomers in a cell-free system from Cucurbita maxima. Plant Cell Physiol. 1985,26: 821-827
    90. Giannopolitis CN.,SK Ries.l977:Superoxide dismutase II.Purification and quantitative relationship with water-soluble protein in seedings. Plant Physiol, 59: 315-318
    91. Foster JG.,Hess JL. Oxygen effect on maize leaf superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase. Phytochemistry, 1982, 21: 1527-1532
    92. Blakesley D., Weston GD.,Hall JF. The role of endogenous auxin in root initiation. Plant. Growth Reg, 1991,10: 341-353
    93. Larson RA. Defenses against oxidative stress. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol, 1995, 29: 175-186
    94. Malan C, Greyling MM., Gressel J. Correlation between Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase
    
    and glutathione reductase, and xenobiotic stress tolerance in maize inbreds. Plant Sci, 1990, 69:157-166
    95. Foster JG., Edawads GE. Localization of superoxide dismutase in leaves of 3-carbon and 4-carbon pathway plant. Plant Cell Physiol, 1980, 21: 896-906
    96. Fosket DE. Hormonal control of morphogenesis in culture tisuue: In Skoog F (ed), Plant Growth Substances. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1979,362-369
    97. Elstner EF. Oxygen activition and oxygen toxicity, Ann. Rew. Plant Physiol, 1982, 33: 73-96
    98. Heath RL., Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplastsl. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation, Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 1968,125:189-198
    99. Kalir A., Poljakoff-Mayber A. Changes in activity of malate dehydorgenase catalyse peroxidase and superoxide dismutase in leaves of Halimione protulacoides L. Allen exposed to high sodium chloride concentrations,Ann. Bot. 1981,47: 75-85
    100. Rabinowitch HD., Sklam D. Superoxide dismutase: a possible protective agent against sunscald in tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Hill), Planta,1980,14:164
    101. Oski M., Shinano T., Tadano T. Redistribution of carbon and nitrogen compounds from the shoot to the harvesting organs during maturation in field crops. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1991,37: 445-454
    102. Oski M., Shinano T., Tadano T. Effect of nitrogen application on the accumulation of ribulose-l,5-bisphophate carboxyase/oxygenase and chlorophyll in several field crops. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1993, 39(3) : 427-436
    103. Swank JC, Below FE., Lambert RJ., Hageman RH. Interaction of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the productivity of maize. Plant Physiol. 1982,70:1185-1190
    104. Flecher RA., Kallidumbil V., Steele P. An improved bioassay for cytokinins using cucumber cotyledons. Plant Physiol, 1982,69: 675-677
    105. Green JF., Muir RM. The effect of potassium on cotyledon espansion induced by cytokinins. Plant Physiol, 1978,43: 213-218
    106. Arnon DI. Copper "enzymes in isolated chloroplast, polyphenoloxidase in Beta velguars. Plant Physiol, 1949, 24:10-15
    107. Giannoplitis CN., SK Ries. Superoxide dismutase II.Purification and quantitative relationship with water-soluble protein in seedings. Plant Physiol, 1977,59: 315-318
    108. Jackson WA. 1971. In photosynthesis and photorespiration eds.by Hatch MD. 89
    109. Shigesaburo Jsunoda. 1972. Photosynthetic efficincy in rice and wheat. Rice. Breeding(IRRI). 471-479
    110. Wareing PF, Phillips IDJ. Growth and differention in plants 3rd. Ed. Perga mon press, Oxford, 1981,113-120

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700