制度变迁动力理论研究
摘要
论文试图在理论上,构建一个制度变迁动力研究基本框架,进而推动制度变迁动力理论发展;在实践上,运用该制度变迁动力基本框架,完善中国金融制度变迁动力机制,进一步推动中国金融业快速健康发展。论文概述和评价了马克思主义制度变迁动力思想和制度学派制度变迁动力思想;界定了制度变迁动力的概念、主体、根源,分析了制度变迁动力的来源、层次和影响因素,揭示了制度变迁动力的本质,归纳了制度变迁动力的特征和表现形式;论述了制度变迁动力结构的概念、特征、成因、演进、种类和效率,论述了制度变迁动力机制;分析了中国金融制度尝试变迁阶段、全面变迁阶段和本质变迁阶段的特点、动力和动力结构,提出了完善中国金融制度变迁动力机制的建议。
This dissertation is aiming to build up a basic analysis framework of the driving force of institution change, which involves the study of its source, essence, characteristics, structure and mechanism, to develop the theory of driving force of institutional change. At the mean time, in the practical aspect, this academic outcoming could be used to deepen Chinese financial institutional changes and promote the development of Chinese financial sector in a healthy and prompt way.
The theoretical significance of this study is presented as follow:
Firstly, this research is favorable to the development of the theory on driving force of institutional change. In this thesis, I have defined what the driving force of institutional change is on the basis of the analysis on the concept and essence of institution and institutional change; summarized its characteristics; studied the system, structure, mechanism and presentative forms of the driving force of institutional change; and built a basic framework of the theory on the theory of the driving force of institutional change.
Secondly, this research is favorable to the development of institutional change theory. The theory of the driving force of institutional change is the core content of the institutional change theory, whose advance is also a part of the development of the institutional change theory. None but a systemic, comprehensive and in-depth study would help with the profoundly understanding of the nature of institutional change. View institutional change from the perspective of its driving force, a lot of issues related will be noticed. Because of the insufficiency of the studies on the driving force, the institutional change theory is also far from perfect. Therefore, the research on the driving force of institutional change is favorable to the development of institutional change theory.
The practical significance of this study is presented as:
The vitality of Economics, as well as any social science, lies in guiding the practice, at the mean time practical experience promotes the development of academic theories. At present, China is facing the challenge of furthering the Opening and Reform, building up a well-off society in an all round way, constructing a harmonious socialist society and speeding up socialist modernization drive. Therefore, the study of driving force of institutional change is of great practical significance.
Firstly, this research is favorable to the rationalization of institutional change policies. Studying the problem of driving force of institutional change systemically helps no only with the decision of the institutional change policies in China, but also with implementing the scientific concept of development to achieve sound and fast economic development. "Scientific development concept, of which the first prerequisite is to develop; the core is a people-oriented; the basic requirement is that the development should be comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable; the fundamental approach is overall consideration.”The analysis of driving force of institutional change is the demand of practicing scientific development concept and fulfilling the needs of people. Only if we put people first, view from the reasonable needs of people, basis on the situation of China's, sum up the practical experience of the development of our country, could we further the rationalization of our institutional change decisions, realize the aim of serving people, serving our society, thus contribute to the sustainable social development.
Secondly, this research is favorable to promote the efficiency of institutional change. The Study of driving force of institutional change allows us to understand correctly its methods and mechanism, which would give us a more profound understanding of institutional change and their internal order, in order to eliminate or suppress the negative factors, to promote the positive dynamic factors thus provide theoretical guidance for the practical action which aiming at improving the efficiency of institutional change.
Thirdly, this research is favorable to realize the expectation of institutional change. The Study of driving force of institutional change helps us to understand the relationship between driving force of institutional change and the outcome of institutional change, and follow the correct direction to achieve the expected results. Although the driving force of institutional change comes from the needs of people and its presentative forms, these driving force change and interact that cause unforeseeable results. Therefore, the study on the internal order and mechanism of driving force of institutional change would provide reference for the Government to protect and promote the efficiency of institutions. This theory is of great practical significance in making policy, forecasting the effect of policies and the achievement of the expected results of institutional change, and could provide theoretical support for the further development of our country.
Fourthly, this research is favorable to deepening institutional changes. The Study focuses on the analysis of the coming, the presentative forms, the structure and mechanism of driving force of institutional change, with which studies the process of the financial reform of our country and try to provide theoretical support to the further reform.
The dissertation contains seven chapters. Chapter 1 is Introduction. First, described the theoretical background, the reality background, theoretical research significance and practical research significance; Second, analyzed the domestic and abroad research status quo, discussed some problem to be noticed. Third, the thesis discussed the research methods used and introduced the structure. Finally, the paper outlines the main innovations and shortcoming. Chapter 2 is about the analysis of Marxist Thoughts on driving force of Institutional change. On the basis of describing the main opinion of Marxism thoughts, I have reviewed them from different aspects. Chapter 3 is about the study of the thoughts of western institutional economists on the driving force of institutional change, and author’s review on their views. Chapter 4 is the compotation of Marxist thoughts and western institutional economists’ thought on the driving force of institutional change. Chapter 5 is a basic research on the driving force of institutional change. First of all, argued about the definition of institution, institutional change and driving force and made some useful complements. Defined the concept of driving force of institutional change and their characteristics. Secondly, dissertated the essence of driving force of institutional change and their presentative forms; finally, analyzed the factors that affect driving force of institutional change. Chapter 6 is the analysis on the structure and mechanism of driving force of institutional change, including the research on the connotation, the characteristics of driving force of institutional change and how they formed and innovated. Analyzing on the catalog and efficiency of driving force of institutional change and the research on its mechanism is also included. Chapter 7 is the theory test: using the facts from the financial reform in China to proof-test the theory built. On the basis of empirical analysis, bring up suggestions toward China's financial institutional change in the next step.
The topics, research perspectives and research content of this dissertation are all quite different from previous studies and contain some of my own innovation to the previous theories. Of course, the thesis has some deficiencies and shortcomings to be revised in the future research.
This dissertation may have following innovations in it:
First, on the basis of previous studies, defines the concept of driving force of institutional change, summed up its characteristics and the four kinds of presentative forms.
Second, revealed the nature of driving force of institutional change. In this thesis the nature of institution has been re-defined, on which basis with reasoning and deducing the nature of institutional change was found out, and thus, the nature of driving force of institutional change was revealed.
Third, this dissertation analyzed the structure and mechanism of driving force of institutional change. On the basis of reviewing Marxist thought, come up with the analysis on the coming of driving force of institutional change. In this thesis the concept of the structure of driving force of institutional change was firstly brought out. The paper also analyzed from a unique perspective on the mechanism of driving force of institutional change.
Fourth, perfected the mechanism of driving force of institutional change in Chinese financial reform. On the basis of the analysis of the driving force of institutional change in different periods, brought up practical suggestions on how to perfect the mechanism of the driving force of our finance reform.
Though this dissertation has quite a lot innovation in it, it has some shortcomings mainly in two aspects:
The first one is that the framework built up in this thesis is still not perfect. Given limited reference on driving force of institutional change, it is not easy to do this research. Therefore, the framework built up is just a preliminary exploration that I will continue with in the future.
Second, because the focus of this research is on the theory of driving force of institutional change, the analysis on the financial reform appeared in this thesis is most in a macro way. However there are quite a lot micro content to be studied in the financial reform, which I will pick up in the future researches.
This dissertation is aiming to build up a basic analysis framework of the driving force of institution change, which involves the study of its source, essence, characteristics, structure and mechanism, to develop the theory of driving force of institutional change. At the mean time, in the practical aspect, this academic outcoming could be used to deepen Chinese financial institutional changes and promote the development of Chinese financial sector in a healthy and prompt way.
The theoretical significance of this study is presented as follow:
Firstly, this research is favorable to the development of the theory on driving force of institutional change. In this thesis, I have defined what the driving force of institutional change is on the basis of the analysis on the concept and essence of institution and institutional change; summarized its characteristics; studied the system, structure, mechanism and presentative forms of the driving force of institutional change; and built a basic framework of the theory on the theory of the driving force of institutional change.
Secondly, this research is favorable to the development of institutional change theory. The theory of the driving force of institutional change is the core content of the institutional change theory, whose advance is also a part of the development of the institutional change theory. None but a systemic, comprehensive and in-depth study would help with the profoundly understanding of the nature of institutional change. View institutional change from the perspective of its driving force, a lot of issues related will be noticed. Because of the insufficiency of the studies on the driving force, the institutional change theory is also far from perfect. Therefore, the research on the driving force of institutional change is favorable to the development of institutional change theory.
The practical significance of this study is presented as:
The vitality of Economics, as well as any social science, lies in guiding the practice, at the mean time practical experience promotes the development of academic theories. At present, China is facing the challenge of furthering the Opening and Reform, building up a well-off society in an all round way, constructing a harmonious socialist society and speeding up socialist modernization drive. Therefore, the study of driving force of institutional change is of great practical significance.
Firstly, this research is favorable to the rationalization of institutional change policies. Studying the problem of driving force of institutional change systemically helps no only with the decision of the institutional change policies in China, but also with implementing the scientific concept of development to achieve sound and fast economic development. "Scientific development concept, of which the first prerequisite is to develop; the core is a people-oriented; the basic requirement is that the development should be comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable; the fundamental approach is overall consideration.”The analysis of driving force of institutional change is the demand of practicing scientific development concept and fulfilling the needs of people. Only if we put people first, view from the reasonable needs of people, basis on the situation of China's, sum up the practical experience of the development of our country, could we further the rationalization of our institutional change decisions, realize the aim of serving people, serving our society, thus contribute to the sustainable social development.
Secondly, this research is favorable to promote the efficiency of institutional change. The Study of driving force of institutional change allows us to understand correctly its methods and mechanism, which would give us a more profound understanding of institutional change and their internal order, in order to eliminate or suppress the negative factors, to promote the positive dynamic factors thus provide theoretical guidance for the practical action which aiming at improving the efficiency of institutional change.
Thirdly, this research is favorable to realize the expectation of institutional change. The Study of driving force of institutional change helps us to understand the relationship between driving force of institutional change and the outcome of institutional change, and follow the correct direction to achieve the expected results. Although the driving force of institutional change comes from the needs of people and its presentative forms, these driving force change and interact that cause unforeseeable results. Therefore, the study on the internal order and mechanism of driving force of institutional change would provide reference for the Government to protect and promote the efficiency of institutions. This theory is of great practical significance in making policy, forecasting the effect of policies and the achievement of the expected results of institutional change, and could provide theoretical support for the further development of our country.
Fourthly, this research is favorable to deepening institutional changes. The Study focuses on the analysis of the coming, the presentative forms, the structure and mechanism of driving force of institutional change, with which studies the process of the financial reform of our country and try to provide theoretical support to the further reform.
The dissertation contains seven chapters. Chapter 1 is Introduction. First, described the theoretical background, the reality background, theoretical research significance and practical research significance; Second, analyzed the domestic and abroad research status quo, discussed some problem to be noticed. Third, the thesis discussed the research methods used and introduced the structure. Finally, the paper outlines the main innovations and shortcoming. Chapter 2 is about the analysis of Marxist Thoughts on driving force of Institutional change. On the basis of describing the main opinion of Marxism thoughts, I have reviewed them from different aspects. Chapter 3 is about the study of the thoughts of western institutional economists on the driving force of institutional change, and author’s review on their views. Chapter 4 is the compotation of Marxist thoughts and western institutional economists’ thought on the driving force of institutional change. Chapter 5 is a basic research on the driving force of institutional change. First of all, argued about the definition of institution, institutional change and driving force and made some useful complements. Defined the concept of driving force of institutional change and their characteristics. Secondly, dissertated the essence of driving force of institutional change and their presentative forms; finally, analyzed the factors that affect driving force of institutional change. Chapter 6 is the analysis on the structure and mechanism of driving force of institutional change, including the research on the connotation, the characteristics of driving force of institutional change and how they formed and innovated. Analyzing on the catalog and efficiency of driving force of institutional change and the research on its mechanism is also included. Chapter 7 is the theory test: using the facts from the financial reform in China to proof-test the theory built. On the basis of empirical analysis, bring up suggestions toward China's financial institutional change in the next step.
The topics, research perspectives and research content of this dissertation are all quite different from previous studies and contain some of my own innovation to the previous theories. Of course, the thesis has some deficiencies and shortcomings to be revised in the future research.
This dissertation may have following innovations in it:
First, on the basis of previous studies, defines the concept of driving force of institutional change, summed up its characteristics and the four kinds of presentative forms.
Second, revealed the nature of driving force of institutional change. In this thesis the nature of institution has been re-defined, on which basis with reasoning and deducing the nature of institutional change was found out, and thus, the nature of driving force of institutional change was revealed.
Third, this dissertation analyzed the structure and mechanism of driving force of institutional change. On the basis of reviewing Marxist thought, come up with the analysis on the coming of driving force of institutional change. In this thesis the concept of the structure of driving force of institutional change was firstly brought out. The paper also analyzed from a unique perspective on the mechanism of driving force of institutional change.
Fourth, perfected the mechanism of driving force of institutional change in Chinese financial reform. On the basis of the analysis of the driving force of institutional change in different periods, brought up practical suggestions on how to perfect the mechanism of the driving force of our finance reform.
Though this dissertation has quite a lot innovation in it, it has some shortcomings mainly in two aspects:
The first one is that the framework built up in this thesis is still not perfect. Given limited reference on driving force of institutional change, it is not easy to do this research. Therefore, the framework built up is just a preliminary exploration that I will continue with in the future.
Second, because the focus of this research is on the theory of driving force of institutional change, the analysis on the financial reform appeared in this thesis is most in a macro way. However there are quite a lot micro content to be studied in the financial reform, which I will pick up in the future researches.
引文
①舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:256.
②诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999:7.
①1978年统计公报[EB/OL].中国统计局网. http://www. Stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qgndtjgb/t20020331_15372.htm
②2008年统计公报[EB/OL].中国统计局网. http://www. Stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qgndtjgb/t20090226_402540710.htm
①胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗[M].北京:人民出版社,2007,15.
①林岗.诺斯与马克思:关于制度变迁道路理论的比较.高级政治经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:86.
②徐传谌,孟繁颖.制度变迁内部动力机制分析[J].税务与经济,2006(6):18.
③林岗.诺斯与马克思:关于制度变迁道路理论的比较.高级政治经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:108.
①林岗,张宇.诺斯与马克思:关于社会发展和制度变迁动力的比较.中国人民大学学报[J].2000(3):26.
②汪宗,田华,王元璋.马克思主义制度变迁的动力思想及其当代价值.社会科学研究[J].2007(5):19.
③宋小敏.论马克思主义关于制度变迁原因和条件的理论.江汉论坛[J].2002(5):32.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:139~140.
②舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:253.
③齐超.制度含义及其本质之我见.税务与经济[J].2009(3):9.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
①马克思.资本论(第三卷下) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:993.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1972:88.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1972:90.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1972:90.
①吴易风.论政治经济学或经济学的研究对象.高级政治经济学(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:68.
②林岗,张宇.马克思主义经济学的五个方法论命题.高级政治经济学(第二版) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:47.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:31.
①马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1958:144.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:344.
①林岗,张宇.马克思主义经济学的本质、精髓与创新.高级政治经济学(第二版) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:4.
②Rosenberg, N., Inside the Black Box, Cambridge University Press, 1982, PP. 35~36,38
①缪尔达尔.反潮流:经济学批判论文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992:248.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:34.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:83.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:108.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1958:165.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:238.
①张维达.政治经济学(第二版) [M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:7.
①拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度经济学译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991年:329～330.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:177.
③诺斯.经济史上的结构和变革[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992:62.
①马克思.资本论第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:689.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:344.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:585.
①Rosenberg, N., Inside the Black Box, Cambridge University Press, 1982, PP. 35~36,38
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:701.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②Lewis, W. Arthur.The Theory of Economic Growth[M]. London:George Allen& Urwin,1955.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:79.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
⑤马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
⑥马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:67.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:697.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:585.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:71.
①列宁选集(第1卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:286.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:68.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:39.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:83.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:37.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:68.
⑤马克思恩格斯全集(第三十卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:109.
⑥马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:632.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
③马克思恩格斯全集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
④马克思恩格斯全集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1960:103.
⑤马克思恩格斯全集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:389.
⑥马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:253.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:253.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:253.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:685.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:611.
⑤列宁全集(第39卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1986:24.
⑥邓小平文选(第2卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1994:170.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:739.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:739.
③林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②Schultz, Theodore W. Distortions of Agricultural Incentives[M].Bloomington:Indiana University Press, 1978:PP. 10.
③Lewis, W. Arthur.The Theory of Economic Growth[M].London:George Allen& Urwin, 1955.
④North, Douglass C.. Structure and Change in Economic History[M].New York:Norton, 1981.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:79.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:139~140.
①埃尔文·K·青格勒.凡勃伦和康芒斯:一个比较评价[M].1974,转引自拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论[M].1978,转引自科斯等.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,2004:330.
②C·E·Ayres, The Theory of Economic Progress, University of North Carolina Press, 1944, Page 176.
③C·E·Ayres, The Theory of Economic Progress, University of North Carolina Press, 1944, Page 176.
④Hodgson,G.M..Dichotomizing the dichotomy; Veblen versus Ayres.Institutionalist method and value:essays in honor of Paul dale Bush[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998: PP. 50.
⑤Hodgson,G.M..Dichotomizing the dichotomy; Veblen versus Ayres.Institutionalist method and value:essays in honor of Paul dale Bush[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998: PP. 50.
①卢瑟福.经济学中的制度:老制度经济学和新制度经济学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:115~116.
①舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:256~258.
②舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:255.
③舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:256.
①舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:251.
②拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996:333.
③自叶朝付,任荣明.制度变迁理论中的认识论问题[J].生产力研究,2005(11):34.
④拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996:336.
①程虹.制度变迁的周期——一个一般理论及其对中国改革的研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2000:14.
②诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990:1.
①诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990:150.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995:111.
③诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995:112~113.
④刘守英.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:257.
①诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991:129~130.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:8
①诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991:3.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:3.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:8.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:103.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论:关于制度的经济研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:1.
①诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994: 68.
①邵彥敏.经济制度动态发展的理论分析——马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的比较[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):42~45.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:408~423.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:139~140.
①康芒斯.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983:87.
②舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:253.
③舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:252.
④舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:255.
①诺斯.制度、制度变迁的经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995:111.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:103.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:67.
②王仲田.政治学导论[M].北京:中共中央学校出版社,1997:87.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:71.
①Simon H A. Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982:pp.88.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:34.
③迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999:34.
④Edgar H.Schein. Organizational Psychology [M].Prentice Hall,1965:pp.72.
①Jay W. Lorsch , John J. Morse. Organization and their members: a contingency approach [M]. New York: Harper and Row,1974.177pp.
②孟子.孟子.公孙丑章句[J/OL].大方广.四书集注. http://www.dfg.cn/gb/chtwh/ssjz/21-mengzi-gsch.htm.③荀子.荀子.性恶[J/OL].历史知识. http://cn.netor.com/know/hist/book18.htm.
④恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1981:159.
⑤马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:35.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:87.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:18.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
①诺斯.新制度经济学极其发展.转轨、制度与制度选择[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:7~8.
①卢现祥.新制度经济学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004:111~112.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1995:344.
①盛洪.现代制度经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版,2003:8.
②盛洪.现代制度经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版,2003:8.
①汤晓辉.加强内部控制提高制度效用的几点思考.现代商业银行导刊[J],2002(9):56-58.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:265.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②马克思恩格斯全集(第三十卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:109.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:423.
②林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:263.
③Lewis, W. Arthur.The Theory of Economic Growth[M].London:George Allen& Urwin,1955.
①夏征农.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1999:3317.
②皮亚杰.结构主义[M].倪连胜译.北京:商务印书馆,1986:2.
①李贵赏.社会财富沉积论[J].华东经济管理,2004(6):51.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:585.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:320~321.
①卢瑟福.经济学中的制度[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:100.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:68.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:83.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:632.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:263.
②Lewis, W. Arthur. The Theory of Economic Growth[M].London:George Allen& Urwin,1955.
①马克思恩格斯全集(第二十一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998:345.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:697.
①蒋永青.中共十一届三中全会召开的历史背景.上海党史与党建[J].1997(5):6.
①赵紫阳.沿着有中国特色的社会主义道路前进——在中国共产党第十三次全国代表大会上的报告(一九八七年十月二十五日)新华资料[J/OL].新华网.
①中华人民共和国宪法修正案(1988年4月12日第七届全国人民代表大会第一次会议通过) [N].人民日报,1988~4~13(1).
①林毅夫:人民币未被严重低估快升恐致金融危机[J/OL].新浪财经. http://finance.sina.com.cn/economist/jingjixueren/20070308/10553388385.shtml
①林毅夫:人民币升值可能阻滞全球经济复苏[J/OL].新浪财经. http://club.finance.sina.com.cn/thread-693741-1-1.html
②此图表为作者自己制作。
③统计数据来源于中国统计年鉴2008[M/OL]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/indexch.htm.
④此图表为作者自己制作。
①国彥兵.温州民营企业融资的七种方式[J].经济论坛,2004(24):33.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[5]马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[6]马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[7]马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[8]马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[9]马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1958.
[10]马克思恩格斯全集(第三十卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[11]马克思恩格斯全集(第二十一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
[12]马克思.资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
[13]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1981.
[14]列宁全集(第39卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.
[15]列宁选集(第1卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[16]邓小平文选(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.
[17]胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗[M].北京:人民出版社,2007.
[18]温家宝.提高认识,统一思想,牢固树立和认真落实科学发展观[N].人民日报,2004-3-1.
[19]盛洪.现代制度经济学[上卷].[M].北京:大学出版社, 2005.
[20]盛洪.现代制度经济学[下卷].[M].北京:大学出版社, 2005.
[21]卢现祥.新制度经济学[M].北京:武汉大学出版社,2004.
[22]袁庆明.新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社, 2005.
[23]彭德琳.新制度经济学[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2002.
[24]张维达.政治经济学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
[25]余永定.西方经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[26]宋承先.现代西方经济学(微观经济学)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.
[27]范家骧,王志伟.西方经济学名著提要[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2007.
[28]王松奇.金融学[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2000.余永定.西方经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[29]王仲田.政治学导论[M].北京:中共中央学校出版社,1997.
[30]夏征农.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1999.
[31]潘石.通货控制论[M].吉林:吉林大学出版社,2001.
[32]程虹.制度变迁的周期——一个一般理论及其对中国改革的研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2000.
[33]刘守英.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度经济学派译文[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
[34]杨春学.经济人与社会秩序分析[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1998.
[35]张荔.金融自由化效应分析[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2003.
[36]江曙霞等.中国金融制度供给[M].北京:中国金融出版社, 2007.
[37]王曙光.经济转型中的金融制度演进[M].北京:大学出版社, 2007.
[38]何新.思考——新国家主义的经济观[M].北京:时事出版社,2001.
[39]战明华.转轨过程中金融深化的绩效与经济环境研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[40]宋玉华.美国新经济研究——经济范式转型与制度演化[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[41]李稻葵.大国发展战略[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[42]曹啸.金融体系的内生演进与制度分析[M].北京:中国金融出版社, 2006.
[43]彭小泉.中国利率市场化[M].北京:中国审计出版社,1999.
[44]张魁峰.资本论浅说[M].北京:中国展望出版社,1982.
[45]陈勇勤.中西方经济思想的演化及比较研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[46]田学斌.家庭消费结构演变的制度分析[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2007.
[47]保罗·萨缪尔森,威廉·诺德豪斯.经济学[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
[48]戴维·罗默.高级宏观经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[49]康芒斯.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.
[50]埃里克?弗鲁博顿,(德)鲁道夫?芮切特.新制度经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[51]罗伊·哈罗德.动态经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.
[52]青木昌彦.比较制度分析[M].上海:上海远东出版社, 2001.
[53]缪尔达尔.反潮流:经济学批判论文集[M].商务印书馆,1992.
[54]约翰?伊特韦尔,默里?米尔盖特.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典第2卷[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1975.
[55]凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964.
[56]科斯等.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度经济学译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991.
[57]诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联出版社,1992.
[58]诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990.
[59]诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].北京:三联出版社,1994.
[60]诺斯.新制度经济学极其发展:转轨、制度与制度选择[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[61]薛恩.组织心理学[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1987.
[62]莫尔斯,洛希.组织及其成员:权变方式[M].北京:1974.
[63]卢瑟福.经济学中的制度:老制度经济学和新制度经济学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[64]皮亚杰.结构主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986.
[65]麦迪森.中国经济的长期表现[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
[66]迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[67]聂峰.浅析胡锦涛科学发展观与金融改革思想[J].商业时代,2008,(12):7.
[68]徐传谌,孟繁颖.制度变迁内部动力机制分析[J].税务与经济,2006(6):15-20.
[69]陈真兵.凯恩斯与康芒斯经济思想比较[J].湖南财经高等专科学校学报,2000(5):17-18.
[70]黄立君.康芒斯的法经济学思想及其贡献[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(5):92-96.
[71]胡平杰,王国顺.康芒斯与制度经济学的基础[J].经济社会体制比较,2005(5):117-124.
[72]邹东涛.从发展模式看制度变迁[J].宏观经济研究, 2002(12):9-10,41.
[73]李厚延.政府强力的制度变革动力效应[J].华东经济管理,2005(10):66-70.
[74]汪宗,田华,王元璋.马克思主义制度变迁的动力思想及其当代价值[J].社会科学研究,2007(5):18-22.
[75]林岗.诺斯与马克思:关于制度变迁道路理论的阐述[J].中国社会科学,2001(1):55-60.
[76]潘慧峰,杨立岩.制度变迁与内生经济增长[J].南开经济研究,2006(2):74-83.
[77]李玲娥.关于制度变迁观点的理论综述[J].生产力研究, 2000(1-2):141-143.
[78]李贵赏.社会财富沉积论[J].华东经济管理,2004(6):51.
[79]彭美玉,王成璋.强制性制度变迁的边界条件[J].改革与战略,007(2):7-9.
[80]崔希福.社会制度变迁规律新论[J].江西社会科学,2006(2):108-112.
[81]王世伟,赵保国.中国利率市场化改革前景分析:理论依据与经验借鉴[J].金融论坛,2005(5):56-63.
[82]胡海峰李雯.对制度变迁理论两种分析思路的互补性思考[J].人文杂志,2003(4):62-68.
[83]陈建青等.创新、经济增长与制度变迁的互依性[J].南开经济研究,2004(4):28-31.
[84]邓大才.同一轨迹制度供给累计升级假说——需求诱导性制度变迁条件下制度供给模式分析[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004(3):31-36.
[85]许志成.制度变迁与国际竞争[J].商场现代化,2006(10):13-14.
[86]王雪琴.诺思的制度变迁理论述评[J].北京教育学院学报, 2007(3):18-21.
[87]张旭昆.制度变迁的成本——收益分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002(5):11-15.
[88]林岗,刘元春,张宇.诺思与马克思:关于社会发展和制度变迁动力的比较[J].中国人民大学学报,2000(3):25-33.
[89]杜俊,李玉刚.非正式制度对农村强制性制度变迁的影响——以农村撤制村、队为研究个案[J].经济学与经济管理,2007(2):53-57.
[90]国彥兵.温州民营企业融资的七种方式[J].经济论坛,2004(24):33-34.
[91]胡川.马克思的竞争理论:产权制度变迁规律及其现实政策思考[J].马克思主义与现实,2007(4):156-158.
[92]张晓晶,孙涛.中国经济周期与金融稳定[ J ] .经济研究,2006(1):21-24.
[93]周小亮.论外在制度创新的差异性与多样性——兼评西方制度变迁理论关于制度创新差异性与多样性的不同解说[J].经济评论, 2002(3):19-24.
[94]徐晓黎.论制度变迁的成本约束[J].经济问题,2003(5):1-3.
[95]邓大才.强制性制度变迁方式转换的时机选择[J].财经问题研究,2006(4):11-18.
[96]刘和旺.诺思制度变迁的路径依赖理论的新发展[J].经济评论2006(2):64-68.
[97]左金隆.诺斯制度变迁理论方法论探析:修正的新古典经济学范式[J].经济经纬,2005(6):7-9.
[98]安立仁.经济增长与经济制度变迁动力分析[J].延安大学学报(社会科学版),2006(4):51-56.
[99]曲迎波.经济转型与融资制度变迁动力分析[J].金融改革, 2005(12):14-16.
[100]卢秀容,陈伟.论农业可持续发展的动力结构[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2002(1):32-35.
[101]冯曲.从资金筹集机制看乡镇企业改革:制度变迁动力学的一个案例[J].改革,2000(5):58-64.
[102]李萍,李世文.技术进步动力机制的制度绩效分析[J].经济学家,2002(4):86-92.
[103]沈建芳,姚华锋.关于产权理论的研究综述[J].沿海企业与科技,2005(5):1-2.
[104]张国栋.马克思与诺思制度变迁动力思想的比较[J].中华女子学院山东分院学刊,2005(4):89-92.
[105]梁謇.马克思与诺思制度变迁理论的比较研究[J].北方论丛,2007(4):141-144.
[106]林红玲.西方制度变迁理论述评[J].社会科学辑刊, 2001(1):76-80.
[107]谈建勤.制度安排多样性与制度变迁[J].理论导刊, 2005(5):38-39.
[108]邵彦敏.经济制度动态发展的理论分析——马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的比较[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):8-11.
[109]蒋永青.中共十一届三中全会召开的历史背景[J].上海党史与党建,1997(5):4-10.
[110]王广谦,郭田勇.中国金融改革历程:1978-2007[J].改革,2007(3):5-21.
[111]王松梅.马克思与诺斯:制度变迁理论的相互补充规定[J].求实,2003(3):12-14.
[112]郭田勇.利率市场化应优先于汇率市场化[N].上海证券报,2008-8-6.
[113]刘昌用.劳动价值论争论与马克思的研究方法[J].湖北经济学院学报,2006(5):30-34.
[114]姜楠男,王磊.新制度学派与新制度主义经济学的比较与评析[J].经济师,2008(1):25,76.
[115]易华.我国家庭消费结构演变的制度分析[J].经济论坛,2006(3):16-17.
[116]赵杰.新制度主义经济学分析框架下的人力资本产权问题研究综述[J].湖南商学院学报,2002(6):12-15.
[117]李成,赵天荣.利率市场化选择的理论逻辑与中国的实证[J].金融理论与实践,2008(8):3-7.
[118]纪玉山等.中等收入者比重的扩大及“橄榄型”财富结构的达致[J].社会科学研究,2005(2):35-40.
[119]林岗.论“生产力决定生产关系”的原理——兼析生产资料全民所有制的结构和和内在矛盾[J].哲学研究,1987(4):30.
[120]王军,戴群中,仲崇云.市场过程与制度变迁:现代奥地利经济学派的视角[J].当代经济研究,2004(3):56-59.
[121]朱意秋,郑敬高.制度形成、变迁的动力与机制[J].社会科学研究,2004(1):19-23.
[122]罗能生,谢里,洪联英.制度变迁中的权力博弈分析[J].中南财经大学学报,2007(5):31-38.
[123]李建标,曹利群.“诺思第二悖论”及其破解——制度变迁中交易费用范式的反思,[J].财经研究2003(10):31-35.
[124]宋小敏.论马克思主义关于制度变迁原因和条件的理论[J].江汉论坛,2002(5):32-36.
[125]陆明祥.制度变迁与制度创新的总括性分析[J].南方经济, 2002(4):36-39.
[126]黄卫华,商晨.新制度经济学制度变迁理论对制度均衡思想的疏漏[J].经济纵横,2005(7):44-46.
[127]勒涛.制度变迁的科学范式和动力分析[J].生产力研究, 2003(1):68-70.
[128]张林.凡勃伦的制度变迁理论解读[J].经济学家,2003(3):104-110.
[129]赵志峰.对制度变迁理论的新发展及假设前提的评述[J].财经理论与实践,2006(11):2-5.
[130]李伟群.对诺思的制度变迁理论的经济学分析[J].特区经济,2005(4):163-164.
[131]左金隆.关于奥地利学派制度变迁理论方法论的初步分析[J].经济经纬,2005(2):15-17.
[132]鲁玉祥,方云梅.基于技术进步的企业制度变迁[J].财经科学,2007(10):76-82.
[133]汪莹,董韶华,李林.基于新制度经济学的制度变迁与经济增长关系分析[J].经济师,2005(11):43-44.
[134]李波.诱致性制度变迁理论探析[J].兰州商学院学报, 2005(6):9-12.
[135]王芳,赖茂生.论信息经济的制度变迁[J].情报学报, 2002(10):608-612.
[136]蒋雅文.论制度变迁理论的变迁[J].经济评论,2003(4):73-79.
[137]史晋川,沈国兵.论制度变迁理论与制度变迁方式划分标准[J].经济学家,2002(2):41-46.
[138]洪名勇,施国庆.文化变迁与习俗元制度的演化[J].贵州社会科学,2007(7):35-39.
[139]刘文超,李辉.诺斯是否超越了马克思——比较两种不同的社会制度变迁理论[J].探索,2006(2):155-158.
[140]张兴茂,彭金柱.马克思主义经济学与新制度经济学关于制度变迁动力论的融通[J].山西财经大学学报,2001(6):1-5.
[141]王波.农村城市化演进的一般规律与动力机制[J].中共青岛市委学校,青岛行政学院学报,2003(3):84-87.
[142]冯继康,李岳云.农村土地制度创新的主体设计与动力分析[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004(6):26-28.
[143]汪洪涛.论制度变迁中发生的成本性质[J].学术月刊, 2003(7):51-58.
[144]杨光斌.诺斯制度变迁理念的贡献与问题[J].华中师范大学学(人文社会科学版),2007(7):30-37.
[145]邓宏图,李亚.社会转型、意识形态、政治正义与制度变迁[J].天津社会科学,2007(7):72-77.
[146]尹小剑.生产力发展与企业产权制度的历史变迁探析[J].企业经济,2005(8):16-17.
[1] North.D.C., R.P.Thomas·The Rise of West World: A New Economic History [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1973: 5.
[2] North, D. C.. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[3] Pierson. History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Politics in Time [M] Princeton University Press, 2004.
[4] Hayek, F. A.. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics [M] London: Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1967.
[5] Menger, C.. Problems of Economics and Sociology [M]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.
[6] Schultz, Theodore W. Distortions of Agricultural Incentives [M]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.
[7] Rosenberg, N.. Inside the Black Box [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
[8] Lewis, W. Arthur. The Theory of Economic Growth [M]. George Allen& Urwin, 1955.
[9] C·E·Ayres. The Theory of Economic Progress [M]. University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
[10] Hodgson, G.M..Dichotomizing the dichotomy; Veblen versus Ayres.Institutionalist method and value: essays in honor of Paul dale Bush[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998.
[11] Simon H A. Models of bounded rationality [M]. MIT Press, 1982.
[12] Walter Nicholson. Microeconomic theory [M]. Dryden Press, 1998.
[13] Earl A. Thompson, Charles R. Hickson.Ideology and the Evolution of Vital Institutions: Guilds, the Gold Standard and International Cooperation [M].Forward by A. Alchian, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
[14] Earl Thompson."The Anatomy of a Growth Miracle," in Foreign Investment in Rapidly Growing Countries: The Chinese and Indian Experiences.H.S. Kehal, Ed. [M]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, Chapter 1.
[15] Coase, R.H. The Lighthouse in Economics [J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1974: V.17, N.2(October).
[16] Brubaker Farl. Free Ride, Free Revelation, or Golden Rule [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1975: 18 (April).
[17] Coase, R.H. The lighthouse in economics[J].Journal of law and Economy, 1974:17 (2).
[18] North.D.C.and R.P.Thomas. An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World [J] .The Economic History Review,1970: VolumeⅩⅩⅢ,No.1.
[19] North. Institutions, Transaction Costs and Economic growth, Economic [J]. Inquiry, 1987: July.
[20] North. Economic Performance Through Time [J].American Economic Review, 1994: 84 (3).
[21] Fritz Machlup.Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: Misplaced Concreteness and Disguised Politics [J]. Economic Journal, March 1958:32.
[22] Earl Thompson.Ideology and the Evolution of Vital Institutions: A Synopsis[J]. Global Business and Economic Review, 2002: Volume 4, Number 1, June:24-52.
[23] P.N. Ireland. Economic Growth,Financial Evolution,and the Long-run Behavior of Velocity [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1994:18.
[24] R.G. King, R.Levine. Capital Fundamentalism,Economic Development, and Economic Growth [J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1994:15.
①胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗[M].北京人民出版社,2007,15.
②诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999:7.
①1978年统计公报[EB/OL].中国统计局网. http://www. Stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qgndtjgb/t20020331_15372.htm
②2008年统计公报[EB/OL].中国统计局网. http://www. Stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qgndtjgb/t20090226_402540710.htm
①胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗[M].北京:人民出版社,2007,15.
①林岗.诺斯与马克思:关于制度变迁道路理论的比较.高级政治经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:86.
②徐传谌,孟繁颖.制度变迁内部动力机制分析[J].税务与经济,2006(6):18.
③林岗.诺斯与马克思:关于制度变迁道路理论的比较.高级政治经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:108.
①林岗,张宇.诺斯与马克思:关于社会发展和制度变迁动力的比较.中国人民大学学报[J].2000(3):26.
②汪宗,田华,王元璋.马克思主义制度变迁的动力思想及其当代价值.社会科学研究[J].2007(5):19.
③宋小敏.论马克思主义关于制度变迁原因和条件的理论.江汉论坛[J].2002(5):32.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:139~140.
②舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:253.
③齐超.制度含义及其本质之我见.税务与经济[J].2009(3):9.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
①马克思.资本论(第三卷下) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:993.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1972:88.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1972:90.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1972:90.
①吴易风.论政治经济学或经济学的研究对象.高级政治经济学(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:68.
②林岗,张宇.马克思主义经济学的五个方法论命题.高级政治经济学(第二版) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:47.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:31.
①马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1958:144.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:344.
①林岗,张宇.马克思主义经济学的本质、精髓与创新.高级政治经济学(第二版) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:4.
②Rosenberg, N., Inside the Black Box, Cambridge University Press, 1982, PP. 35~36,38
①缪尔达尔.反潮流:经济学批判论文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992:248.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:34.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:83.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:108.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1958:165.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:238.
①张维达.政治经济学(第二版) [M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:7.
①拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度经济学译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991年:329～330.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:177.
③诺斯.经济史上的结构和变革[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992:62.
①马克思.资本论第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:689.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:344.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:585.
①Rosenberg, N., Inside the Black Box, Cambridge University Press, 1982, PP. 35~36,38
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:701.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②Lewis, W. Arthur.The Theory of Economic Growth[M]. London:George Allen& Urwin,1955.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:79.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
⑤马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
⑥马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:67.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:697.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:585.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:71.
①列宁选集(第1卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:286.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:68.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:39.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:83.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:37.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:68.
⑤马克思恩格斯全集(第三十卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:109.
⑥马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:632.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
③马克思恩格斯全集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:82.
④马克思恩格斯全集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1960:103.
⑤马克思恩格斯全集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:389.
⑥马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:253.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:253.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:253.
③马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:685.
④马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:611.
⑤列宁全集(第39卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1986:24.
⑥邓小平文选(第2卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1994:170.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:739.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:739.
③林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②Schultz, Theodore W. Distortions of Agricultural Incentives[M].Bloomington:Indiana University Press, 1978:PP. 10.
③Lewis, W. Arthur.The Theory of Economic Growth[M].London:George Allen& Urwin, 1955.
④North, Douglass C.. Structure and Change in Economic History[M].New York:Norton, 1981.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:79.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:250.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:139~140.
①埃尔文·K·青格勒.凡勃伦和康芒斯:一个比较评价[M].1974,转引自拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论[M].1978,转引自科斯等.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,2004:330.
②C·E·Ayres, The Theory of Economic Progress, University of North Carolina Press, 1944, Page 176.
③C·E·Ayres, The Theory of Economic Progress, University of North Carolina Press, 1944, Page 176.
④Hodgson,G.M..Dichotomizing the dichotomy; Veblen versus Ayres.Institutionalist method and value:essays in honor of Paul dale Bush[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998: PP. 50.
⑤Hodgson,G.M..Dichotomizing the dichotomy; Veblen versus Ayres.Institutionalist method and value:essays in honor of Paul dale Bush[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998: PP. 50.
①卢瑟福.经济学中的制度:老制度经济学和新制度经济学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:115~116.
①舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:256~258.
②舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:255.
③舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:256.
①舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:251.
②拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996:333.
③自叶朝付,任荣明.制度变迁理论中的认识论问题[J].生产力研究,2005(11):34.
④拉坦.诱致性制度变迁理论.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996:336.
①程虹.制度变迁的周期——一个一般理论及其对中国改革的研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2000:14.
②诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990:1.
①诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990:150.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995:111.
③诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995:112~113.
④刘守英.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:257.
①诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991:129~130.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:8
①诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991:3.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:3.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:8.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:103.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论:关于制度的经济研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:1.
①诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994: 68.
①邵彥敏.经济制度动态发展的理论分析——马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的比较[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):42~45.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:408~423.
①凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964:139~140.
①康芒斯.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983:87.
②舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:253.
③舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:252.
④舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:255.
①诺斯.制度、制度变迁的经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995:111.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:103.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:67.
②王仲田.政治学导论[M].北京:中共中央学校出版社,1997:87.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:71.
①Simon H A. Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982:pp.88.
②诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994:34.
③迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999:34.
④Edgar H.Schein. Organizational Psychology [M].Prentice Hall,1965:pp.72.
①Jay W. Lorsch , John J. Morse. Organization and their members: a contingency approach [M]. New York: Harper and Row,1974.177pp.
②孟子.孟子.公孙丑章句[J/OL].大方广.四书集注. http://www.dfg.cn/gb/chtwh/ssjz/21-mengzi-gsch.htm.③荀子.荀子.性恶[J/OL].历史知识. http://cn.netor.com/know/hist/book18.htm.
④恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1981:159.
⑤马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:35.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:87.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:18.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1972:94.
①诺斯.新制度经济学极其发展.转轨、制度与制度选择[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:7~8.
①卢现祥.新制度经济学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004:111~112.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版,1995:344.
①盛洪.现代制度经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版,2003:8.
②盛洪.现代制度经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版,2003:8.
①汤晓辉.加强内部控制提高制度效用的几点思考.现代商业银行导刊[J],2002(9):56-58.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:265.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:270.
②马克思恩格斯全集(第三十卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:109.
①马克思.资本论(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1975:423.
②林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷) [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:263.
③Lewis, W. Arthur.The Theory of Economic Growth[M].London:George Allen& Urwin,1955.
①夏征农.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1999:3317.
②皮亚杰.结构主义[M].倪连胜译.北京:商务印书馆,1986:2.
①李贵赏.社会财富沉积论[J].华东经济管理,2004(6):51.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:585.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:320~321.
①卢瑟福.经济学中的制度[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:100.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:78.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:68.
①马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:83.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995:632.
①林毅夫.诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁.现代制度经济学(下卷)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003:263.
②Lewis, W. Arthur. The Theory of Economic Growth[M].London:George Allen& Urwin,1955.
①马克思恩格斯全集(第二十一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998:345.
②马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:697.
①蒋永青.中共十一届三中全会召开的历史背景.上海党史与党建[J].1997(5):6.
①赵紫阳.沿着有中国特色的社会主义道路前进——在中国共产党第十三次全国代表大会上的报告(一九八七年十月二十五日)新华资料[J/OL].新华网.
①中华人民共和国宪法修正案(1988年4月12日第七届全国人民代表大会第一次会议通过) [N].人民日报,1988~4~13(1).
①林毅夫:人民币未被严重低估快升恐致金融危机[J/OL].新浪财经. http://finance.sina.com.cn/economist/jingjixueren/20070308/10553388385.shtml
①林毅夫:人民币升值可能阻滞全球经济复苏[J/OL].新浪财经. http://club.finance.sina.com.cn/thread-693741-1-1.html
②此图表为作者自己制作。
③统计数据来源于中国统计年鉴2008[M/OL]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/indexch.htm.
④此图表为作者自己制作。
①国彥兵.温州民营企业融资的七种方式[J].经济论坛,2004(24):33.
[1]马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[3]马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[5]马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[6]马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[7]马克思恩格斯选集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[8]马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[9]马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1958.
[10]马克思恩格斯全集(第三十卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[11]马克思恩格斯全集(第二十一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
[12]马克思.资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
[13]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:人民出版社,1981.
[14]列宁全集(第39卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.
[15]列宁选集(第1卷) [M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[16]邓小平文选(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.
[17]胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗[M].北京:人民出版社,2007.
[18]温家宝.提高认识,统一思想,牢固树立和认真落实科学发展观[N].人民日报,2004-3-1.
[19]盛洪.现代制度经济学[上卷].[M].北京:大学出版社, 2005.
[20]盛洪.现代制度经济学[下卷].[M].北京:大学出版社, 2005.
[21]卢现祥.新制度经济学[M].北京:武汉大学出版社,2004.
[22]袁庆明.新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社, 2005.
[23]彭德琳.新制度经济学[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2002.
[24]张维达.政治经济学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
[25]余永定.西方经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[26]宋承先.现代西方经济学(微观经济学)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.
[27]范家骧,王志伟.西方经济学名著提要[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2007.
[28]王松奇.金融学[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2000.余永定.西方经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[29]王仲田.政治学导论[M].北京:中共中央学校出版社,1997.
[30]夏征农.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1999.
[31]潘石.通货控制论[M].吉林:吉林大学出版社,2001.
[32]程虹.制度变迁的周期——一个一般理论及其对中国改革的研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2000.
[33]刘守英.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度经济学派译文[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
[34]杨春学.经济人与社会秩序分析[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1998.
[35]张荔.金融自由化效应分析[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2003.
[36]江曙霞等.中国金融制度供给[M].北京:中国金融出版社, 2007.
[37]王曙光.经济转型中的金融制度演进[M].北京:大学出版社, 2007.
[38]何新.思考——新国家主义的经济观[M].北京:时事出版社,2001.
[39]战明华.转轨过程中金融深化的绩效与经济环境研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[40]宋玉华.美国新经济研究——经济范式转型与制度演化[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[41]李稻葵.大国发展战略[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[42]曹啸.金融体系的内生演进与制度分析[M].北京:中国金融出版社, 2006.
[43]彭小泉.中国利率市场化[M].北京:中国审计出版社,1999.
[44]张魁峰.资本论浅说[M].北京:中国展望出版社,1982.
[45]陈勇勤.中西方经济思想的演化及比较研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[46]田学斌.家庭消费结构演变的制度分析[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2007.
[47]保罗·萨缪尔森,威廉·诺德豪斯.经济学[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
[48]戴维·罗默.高级宏观经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[49]康芒斯.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.
[50]埃里克?弗鲁博顿,(德)鲁道夫?芮切特.新制度经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[51]罗伊·哈罗德.动态经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.
[52]青木昌彦.比较制度分析[M].上海:上海远东出版社, 2001.
[53]缪尔达尔.反潮流:经济学批判论文集[M].商务印书馆,1992.
[54]约翰?伊特韦尔,默里?米尔盖特.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典第2卷[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1975.
[55]凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964.
[56]科斯等.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度经济学译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991.
[57]诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联出版社,1992.
[58]诺斯,托马斯.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1990.
[59]诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].北京:三联出版社,1994.
[60]诺斯.新制度经济学极其发展:转轨、制度与制度选择[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[61]薛恩.组织心理学[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1987.
[62]莫尔斯,洛希.组织及其成员:权变方式[M].北京:1974.
[63]卢瑟福.经济学中的制度:老制度经济学和新制度经济学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[64]皮亚杰.结构主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986.
[65]麦迪森.中国经济的长期表现[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
[66]迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
[67]聂峰.浅析胡锦涛科学发展观与金融改革思想[J].商业时代,2008,(12):7.
[68]徐传谌,孟繁颖.制度变迁内部动力机制分析[J].税务与经济,2006(6):15-20.
[69]陈真兵.凯恩斯与康芒斯经济思想比较[J].湖南财经高等专科学校学报,2000(5):17-18.
[70]黄立君.康芒斯的法经济学思想及其贡献[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2006(5):92-96.
[71]胡平杰,王国顺.康芒斯与制度经济学的基础[J].经济社会体制比较,2005(5):117-124.
[72]邹东涛.从发展模式看制度变迁[J].宏观经济研究, 2002(12):9-10,41.
[73]李厚延.政府强力的制度变革动力效应[J].华东经济管理,2005(10):66-70.
[74]汪宗,田华,王元璋.马克思主义制度变迁的动力思想及其当代价值[J].社会科学研究,2007(5):18-22.
[75]林岗.诺斯与马克思:关于制度变迁道路理论的阐述[J].中国社会科学,2001(1):55-60.
[76]潘慧峰,杨立岩.制度变迁与内生经济增长[J].南开经济研究,2006(2):74-83.
[77]李玲娥.关于制度变迁观点的理论综述[J].生产力研究, 2000(1-2):141-143.
[78]李贵赏.社会财富沉积论[J].华东经济管理,2004(6):51.
[79]彭美玉,王成璋.强制性制度变迁的边界条件[J].改革与战略,007(2):7-9.
[80]崔希福.社会制度变迁规律新论[J].江西社会科学,2006(2):108-112.
[81]王世伟,赵保国.中国利率市场化改革前景分析:理论依据与经验借鉴[J].金融论坛,2005(5):56-63.
[82]胡海峰李雯.对制度变迁理论两种分析思路的互补性思考[J].人文杂志,2003(4):62-68.
[83]陈建青等.创新、经济增长与制度变迁的互依性[J].南开经济研究,2004(4):28-31.
[84]邓大才.同一轨迹制度供给累计升级假说——需求诱导性制度变迁条件下制度供给模式分析[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004(3):31-36.
[85]许志成.制度变迁与国际竞争[J].商场现代化,2006(10):13-14.
[86]王雪琴.诺思的制度变迁理论述评[J].北京教育学院学报, 2007(3):18-21.
[87]张旭昆.制度变迁的成本——收益分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002(5):11-15.
[88]林岗,刘元春,张宇.诺思与马克思:关于社会发展和制度变迁动力的比较[J].中国人民大学学报,2000(3):25-33.
[89]杜俊,李玉刚.非正式制度对农村强制性制度变迁的影响——以农村撤制村、队为研究个案[J].经济学与经济管理,2007(2):53-57.
[90]国彥兵.温州民营企业融资的七种方式[J].经济论坛,2004(24):33-34.
[91]胡川.马克思的竞争理论:产权制度变迁规律及其现实政策思考[J].马克思主义与现实,2007(4):156-158.
[92]张晓晶,孙涛.中国经济周期与金融稳定[ J ] .经济研究,2006(1):21-24.
[93]周小亮.论外在制度创新的差异性与多样性——兼评西方制度变迁理论关于制度创新差异性与多样性的不同解说[J].经济评论, 2002(3):19-24.
[94]徐晓黎.论制度变迁的成本约束[J].经济问题,2003(5):1-3.
[95]邓大才.强制性制度变迁方式转换的时机选择[J].财经问题研究,2006(4):11-18.
[96]刘和旺.诺思制度变迁的路径依赖理论的新发展[J].经济评论2006(2):64-68.
[97]左金隆.诺斯制度变迁理论方法论探析:修正的新古典经济学范式[J].经济经纬,2005(6):7-9.
[98]安立仁.经济增长与经济制度变迁动力分析[J].延安大学学报(社会科学版),2006(4):51-56.
[99]曲迎波.经济转型与融资制度变迁动力分析[J].金融改革, 2005(12):14-16.
[100]卢秀容,陈伟.论农业可持续发展的动力结构[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2002(1):32-35.
[101]冯曲.从资金筹集机制看乡镇企业改革:制度变迁动力学的一个案例[J].改革,2000(5):58-64.
[102]李萍,李世文.技术进步动力机制的制度绩效分析[J].经济学家,2002(4):86-92.
[103]沈建芳,姚华锋.关于产权理论的研究综述[J].沿海企业与科技,2005(5):1-2.
[104]张国栋.马克思与诺思制度变迁动力思想的比较[J].中华女子学院山东分院学刊,2005(4):89-92.
[105]梁謇.马克思与诺思制度变迁理论的比较研究[J].北方论丛,2007(4):141-144.
[106]林红玲.西方制度变迁理论述评[J].社会科学辑刊, 2001(1):76-80.
[107]谈建勤.制度安排多样性与制度变迁[J].理论导刊, 2005(5):38-39.
[108]邵彦敏.经济制度动态发展的理论分析——马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的比较[J].当代经济研究,2004(9):8-11.
[109]蒋永青.中共十一届三中全会召开的历史背景[J].上海党史与党建,1997(5):4-10.
[110]王广谦,郭田勇.中国金融改革历程:1978-2007[J].改革,2007(3):5-21.
[111]王松梅.马克思与诺斯:制度变迁理论的相互补充规定[J].求实,2003(3):12-14.
[112]郭田勇.利率市场化应优先于汇率市场化[N].上海证券报,2008-8-6.
[113]刘昌用.劳动价值论争论与马克思的研究方法[J].湖北经济学院学报,2006(5):30-34.
[114]姜楠男,王磊.新制度学派与新制度主义经济学的比较与评析[J].经济师,2008(1):25,76.
[115]易华.我国家庭消费结构演变的制度分析[J].经济论坛,2006(3):16-17.
[116]赵杰.新制度主义经济学分析框架下的人力资本产权问题研究综述[J].湖南商学院学报,2002(6):12-15.
[117]李成,赵天荣.利率市场化选择的理论逻辑与中国的实证[J].金融理论与实践,2008(8):3-7.
[118]纪玉山等.中等收入者比重的扩大及“橄榄型”财富结构的达致[J].社会科学研究,2005(2):35-40.
[119]林岗.论“生产力决定生产关系”的原理——兼析生产资料全民所有制的结构和和内在矛盾[J].哲学研究,1987(4):30.
[120]王军,戴群中,仲崇云.市场过程与制度变迁:现代奥地利经济学派的视角[J].当代经济研究,2004(3):56-59.
[121]朱意秋,郑敬高.制度形成、变迁的动力与机制[J].社会科学研究,2004(1):19-23.
[122]罗能生,谢里,洪联英.制度变迁中的权力博弈分析[J].中南财经大学学报,2007(5):31-38.
[123]李建标,曹利群.“诺思第二悖论”及其破解——制度变迁中交易费用范式的反思,[J].财经研究2003(10):31-35.
[124]宋小敏.论马克思主义关于制度变迁原因和条件的理论[J].江汉论坛,2002(5):32-36.
[125]陆明祥.制度变迁与制度创新的总括性分析[J].南方经济, 2002(4):36-39.
[126]黄卫华,商晨.新制度经济学制度变迁理论对制度均衡思想的疏漏[J].经济纵横,2005(7):44-46.
[127]勒涛.制度变迁的科学范式和动力分析[J].生产力研究, 2003(1):68-70.
[128]张林.凡勃伦的制度变迁理论解读[J].经济学家,2003(3):104-110.
[129]赵志峰.对制度变迁理论的新发展及假设前提的评述[J].财经理论与实践,2006(11):2-5.
[130]李伟群.对诺思的制度变迁理论的经济学分析[J].特区经济,2005(4):163-164.
[131]左金隆.关于奥地利学派制度变迁理论方法论的初步分析[J].经济经纬,2005(2):15-17.
[132]鲁玉祥,方云梅.基于技术进步的企业制度变迁[J].财经科学,2007(10):76-82.
[133]汪莹,董韶华,李林.基于新制度经济学的制度变迁与经济增长关系分析[J].经济师,2005(11):43-44.
[134]李波.诱致性制度变迁理论探析[J].兰州商学院学报, 2005(6):9-12.
[135]王芳,赖茂生.论信息经济的制度变迁[J].情报学报, 2002(10):608-612.
[136]蒋雅文.论制度变迁理论的变迁[J].经济评论,2003(4):73-79.
[137]史晋川,沈国兵.论制度变迁理论与制度变迁方式划分标准[J].经济学家,2002(2):41-46.
[138]洪名勇,施国庆.文化变迁与习俗元制度的演化[J].贵州社会科学,2007(7):35-39.
[139]刘文超,李辉.诺斯是否超越了马克思——比较两种不同的社会制度变迁理论[J].探索,2006(2):155-158.
[140]张兴茂,彭金柱.马克思主义经济学与新制度经济学关于制度变迁动力论的融通[J].山西财经大学学报,2001(6):1-5.
[141]王波.农村城市化演进的一般规律与动力机制[J].中共青岛市委学校,青岛行政学院学报,2003(3):84-87.
[142]冯继康,李岳云.农村土地制度创新的主体设计与动力分析[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004(6):26-28.
[143]汪洪涛.论制度变迁中发生的成本性质[J].学术月刊, 2003(7):51-58.
[144]杨光斌.诺斯制度变迁理念的贡献与问题[J].华中师范大学学(人文社会科学版),2007(7):30-37.
[145]邓宏图,李亚.社会转型、意识形态、政治正义与制度变迁[J].天津社会科学,2007(7):72-77.
[146]尹小剑.生产力发展与企业产权制度的历史变迁探析[J].企业经济,2005(8):16-17.
[1] North.D.C., R.P.Thomas·The Rise of West World: A New Economic History [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1973: 5.
[2] North, D. C.. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[3] Pierson. History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Politics in Time [M] Princeton University Press, 2004.
[4] Hayek, F. A.. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics [M] London: Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1967.
[5] Menger, C.. Problems of Economics and Sociology [M]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.
[6] Schultz, Theodore W. Distortions of Agricultural Incentives [M]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.
[7] Rosenberg, N.. Inside the Black Box [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
[8] Lewis, W. Arthur. The Theory of Economic Growth [M]. George Allen& Urwin, 1955.
[9] C·E·Ayres. The Theory of Economic Progress [M]. University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
[10] Hodgson, G.M..Dichotomizing the dichotomy; Veblen versus Ayres.Institutionalist method and value: essays in honor of Paul dale Bush[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1998.
[11] Simon H A. Models of bounded rationality [M]. MIT Press, 1982.
[12] Walter Nicholson. Microeconomic theory [M]. Dryden Press, 1998.
[13] Earl A. Thompson, Charles R. Hickson.Ideology and the Evolution of Vital Institutions: Guilds, the Gold Standard and International Cooperation [M].Forward by A. Alchian, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
[14] Earl Thompson."The Anatomy of a Growth Miracle," in Foreign Investment in Rapidly Growing Countries: The Chinese and Indian Experiences.H.S. Kehal, Ed. [M]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, Chapter 1.
[15] Coase, R.H. The Lighthouse in Economics [J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1974: V.17, N.2(October).
[16] Brubaker Farl. Free Ride, Free Revelation, or Golden Rule [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1975: 18 (April).
[17] Coase, R.H. The lighthouse in economics[J].Journal of law and Economy, 1974:17 (2).
[18] North.D.C.and R.P.Thomas. An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World [J] .The Economic History Review,1970: VolumeⅩⅩⅢ,No.1.
[19] North. Institutions, Transaction Costs and Economic growth, Economic [J]. Inquiry, 1987: July.
[20] North. Economic Performance Through Time [J].American Economic Review, 1994: 84 (3).
[21] Fritz Machlup.Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: Misplaced Concreteness and Disguised Politics [J]. Economic Journal, March 1958:32.
[22] Earl Thompson.Ideology and the Evolution of Vital Institutions: A Synopsis[J]. Global Business and Economic Review, 2002: Volume 4, Number 1, June:24-52.
[23] P.N. Ireland. Economic Growth,Financial Evolution,and the Long-run Behavior of Velocity [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1994:18.
[24] R.G. King, R.Levine. Capital Fundamentalism,Economic Development, and Economic Growth [J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1994:15.
①胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗[M].北京人民出版社,2007,15.