用户名: 密码: 验证码:
某区医疗纠纷案例调查与对策研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
国际公认“医疗风险无处不在”,它贯穿于门诊、住院、出院等环节和诊断、治疗、康复等诊疗行为的全过程中。近年来,伴随着我国卫生事业的迅速发展,医疗纠纷的发生数量呈逐年上升的趋势。作为卫生事业管理者,应当正视医疗纠纷,深入了解医疗纠纷的特点,进而采取针对性的措施控制医疗纠纷,维护医患双方的共同利益。
     本课题以医疗纠纷作为主要研究对象,通过对某区已发生医疗纠纷投诉案例的调查和分析,明确医疗纠纷的分布和特点,提炼引发医疗纠纷的主要原因,并给予相应的政策性建议。研究共分为四个部分进行。
     第一部分为某区医疗纠纷情况调查。在了解该区医疗资源整体状况的基础上,对该区2007至2009年的医疗纠纷投诉案例进行调查。使用饼图和直方图的方式,描述医疗纠纷在时间、空间和人群间的分布情况。
     第二部分为医疗纠纷数据的统计分析。将样本的196例医疗纠纷案例分类统计后,录入SAS软件,对不同情况下医疗纠纷的发生率进行卡方检验,以明确医疗纠纷的发生特点,并分别进行讨论。本部分得出以下一些结论:二三级医疗机构的纠纷发生率高于其他医疗机构;病房较门急诊更易发生医疗纠纷;外科医疗纠纷发生率最高,其次是妇产科和儿科;二级医疗机构的急诊和手术病人较三级医疗机构更易发生医疗纠纷。
     第三部分从医疗纠纷的个案着手,针对纠纷患者的投诉内容,逐一分析出引起医疗纠纷投诉的原因;汇总后,提炼出社会因素、医方因素和患方因素三方面导致医疗纠纷发生的主要因素,共九条,分别是:医疗资源的整体投入不足;社会舆论的负面影响;医务人员业务水平不足;医务人员的责任心缺乏;医务人员的服务意识淡薄;医院的管理体制疏漏;患者的维权意识增强;患者医疗知识的缺乏;患者自身素质原因。最后对这九条纠纷的主要因素分别予以讨论。
     第四部分是政策性建议部分,在前文总结医疗纠纷的特点和产生原因的基础上,采取文献研读和专家咨询的方式,对医疗纠纷的防范和处理给出了相应的对策。其中医疗纠纷防范策略有五条,涵盖了政策的制定、医务人员的培训、医院管理的完善和和谐医患关系的构建等方面;医疗纠纷的处理策略四条,主要集中于医事法律的完善、风险分担机制的建立、纠纷应急方案的制定实施和非诉讼纠纷解决方式的推广。
     本课题从已发生的医疗纠纷案例着手,研究当前医院管理的棘手问题,调查资料丰富详实、研究方法科学有效、结果真实有针对性。研究成果对医疗政策的制定者和医院的管理者都有一定的借鉴意义。
'Medical Risks exist anywhere'has been accepted all over the world. They exist in outpatient, inpatient, hospital and other sectors, and hide in the process of diagnosis treatment and rehabilitation. In recent years, with the rapid development of China's health service, the number of medical disputes increases year by year. As a health manager, we should face the medical dispute status, understand the characteristics of medical dispute, take appropriate measures to control it and protect the common benefits of both doctors and patients.
     This subject take medical disputes as the main study object., and aim to figure out the distribution and characteristics of medical disputes, extract the main reason cited for the medical disputes, then give some appropriate policy recommendations through investigation and analysis one district's medical dispute cases. This study is divided into four parts.
     The first part is a survey of a district's medical disputes. Medical dispute cases of the area from 2007 to 2009 is investigated on the foundation of knowing the information of health care resources. There are pie charts and histograms to describe the distribution of medical dispute in time, space and groups.
     In the second part, we analyzed the data of medical disputes. Count the sample of medical disrupts after assort them, and input results into the software of SAS. We use the x2 test to clarify the specific features of medical disputes in different circumstances, then discussed them. This part has draw conclusions as follows:Incidence of medical disputes in high-level hospital is higher than others. Inpatients are more likely to have medical disputes than outpatient and emergency. Surgical department is the most vulnerable area to exist medical dispute in clinical departments. In emergency and surgery, Grade-II hospital is more likely to have medical disputes than Grade-Ⅲhospital.
     In the third part, we focused on the complaints of medical disputes, analyze the reasons of each case and composed them. After these steps, we extract nine main factors from society, hospital and patients. I. The overall shortage of health care resources, negative impact on public media, lack of medical skills, accountability. weak awareness of medical services among the stuffs, oversight of hospital management system, patients have more awareness of safeguard legal rights but less medical knowledge and the patient's own reasons.
     The fourth part is suggestion on policy recommendations. Based on the above study, we study files and ask exporters for advice and give corresponded countermeasures to prevent and handle medical disputes. Five strategies to prevent medical disputes:policy development, training of medical staffs, hospital management, improvement and construction of physician-patient relationship and so on. Four strategies to handle medical disrupts:mainly in improve medical law, build risk-sharing mechanism, formulate the contingency plans disputes and alternative dispute resolution
     This subject targets on occurred medical disrupts, study the knotty problems of hospital management. Survey data is extensive and detailed; research methods are scientific and effective; conclusions are real and targeted. The research has certain benefits to health policy makers and hospital managers.
引文
[1].连斌,孙亚林.医院医疗风险管理初探.解放军医院管理杂志,2002,9(6)587-588
    [2].杨友竹.医疗事故和纠纷的防止. 《国外医学》医院管理分册,2000,1(4)13-15
    [3].刘炜,徐宇杰.医疗纠纷的成因及防范.中国医院管理杂志,2005,11:47-48.
    [4].刘新立.风险管理.北京:北京大学出版社;2006:185-210
    [5].樊震林王旭许苹连斌.我国医疗风险管理概况[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2007,14(8):600-601.
    [6].樊震林 杨兴辰 吴宏 黎爱军 许苹 连斌.医疗风险调查结果的分组分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2009,16(4):8-10.
    [7].程齐坡,王军,王亚平.试论医疗纠纷对医疗机构的影响.解放军医院管理杂志,2004,11:4-5.
    [8].王亚平,金玉,王俊峰等.医疗纠纷形成原因的调查分析.解放军医院管理杂志,2002,12(9)582
    [9].尹健,姜希连.医患关系现状分析与应对策略.医药论坛,2006,13(3):92-93
    [10].王亚平,金玉,王俊峰等.论医疗纠纷的形成与阻断.解放军医院管理杂志,2001,2(8)76
    [11].杜筱蓓,杨苏华,施小红.协商解决医疗纠纷的难点及对策.中国医院管理,2007,1(27):30-31
    [12].赵衡文.医疗纠纷的理论与实践.湖南:中南大学出版社,2005
    [13].张专才,樊德.医疗纠纷处理的难点和对策.解放军医院管理杂志,2001,8(1)74-75
    [14].陈绍辉,周宇燕.建立多元化医疗纠纷调解机制的探讨.医院管理论坛,2006,9(119):54-56
    [15].张亮,王明旭,管理学基础,[M],北京,人民卫生出版社,2006:315-330
    [16].陆伟 高树琴 崔乔礼 周琳 黎爱军.医院信息化建设在医疗风险管理中应用的研究[J].成都医学院学报,2009(4):290-292.
    [17].王凯戎.医疗纠纷处理的新情况和新问题[J].中华医院管理杂志,2007,23(12):826-829.
    [18].李磊.基于危机管理理论的科主任防控医疗纠纷模型研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2009,16(3):8-10.
    [19].姚艳.论医疗纠纷预防性解决机制的构建[J].医学与哲学:人文社会医学版,2008,29(6):21-21,23.
    [20].王海威, 王宏, 李文斌.等医患双方医疗纠纷认知情况调查.人民军医,2005,48:368-370.
    [21].高新强,邹明,王亚平.医务人员对医疗纠纷认知分析.解放军医院管理杂志,2004,11:575-576.
    [22].朱华,宋兰堂,黄涛等.对医患关系现状的多位思考.中华医院管理杂志,2003,9-19.
    [23].吴宏杨兴辰连斌樊震林黎爱军许苹.医疗风险现状调查与分析研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2009,16(4):2-4.
    [24].金玉,王亚平,高新强.对医疗纠纷各期表现的分析.护理管理杂志,2005,,5:45-46
    [25].夏风,掀起医疗纠纷频发深层原因的盖头来.中国卫生经济,2002,19:37
    [26].陈观发,任顾群.临床医疗纠纷的分析与危机管理.实用医技杂志,2006,13:2278-2279.
    [27].杨永松,蔡丽丹,漆柏友.用优质服务应对医疗纠纷的挑战.中华医学丛刊,2004,4:109-110.
    [28].张颖,徐汉明.浅析医患关系在医疗纠纷中的作用.医学与社会,2005,18:46-47.
    [29].邱福建,许恒,李福林.当前医疗纠纷产生的原因及防范.海军医学杂志,2003,24,(1):78-80
    [30].孙楠黎爱军连斌樊震林吴宏杨兴辰许苹.医疗风险影响因素调查分析和对策研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2009,16(4):5-7.
    [31]. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaklson MS, "To Err is Human:Building a Safer Health System", Institute of Medicine, Washington DC:National Academy Press,1999.
    [32]. Grenvik. A, Schaefer JJ. New aspects on critical care medicine training. Current opinion in Critical Care,2004;10(4):233-237.
    [33]. Zhan. C. E. Kelley, et al. Assessing patient safety in the United States:Challenges and opportunities. Medical Care,2005;43(3 SUPPL).
    [34]. Health Care in Canada:The Canadian Institute for health Information.9 June 2004.
    [35]. Waring JJ Beyond blame:cultural barriers to medical incident reporting. Social science& medicine 2005 Vol60 No91927-35
    [36]. Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Mattera JA, et al. Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals. Quality& Safety in Health Care,2004,13:26-31.
    [37]. Vukmir RB Medical malpractice:managing the risk. Medicine and law.2004 Vol.23 o:3 495-531N
    [38]. Dark The "new" medical malpractice crisis-part 1 Hospital topics.2004 Vol.82 No.333-5
    [39]. Yang K H,Ma B, Tian J H, et, al."Evidence-Based Evaluation of American Medical Risk Monitoring and Precaution System". Chin J Ecid-based Med,2006,6(6):439-450.
    [40].邹东涛,发展与改革蓝皮书,[M],北京,社会科学文献出版社,2008.
    [41].刘岩岳冬丽程艳敏崔晓林静.重大医疗过失行为和医疗事故上报的现状、问题与对策[J].卫生软科学,2009,23(6):670-672.
    [42].张春实.门诊药房开展络化管理与标准化服务的体会[J].现代医药卫生,2008,24(24):3783-3783.
    [43].刘金妹杨艳陆洁 李传频.护士、患者对患者权利的认知度及维权意识的调查[J].解放军护理杂志,2007,24(11A):23-24,67.
    [44].过伟华龚晓红李光琴惠月红.实施动态手术分级管理的实践与体会[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(11):744-745.
    [45].周莉李从东.医疗服务标准化及其分类问题研究[J].工业工程,2005,8(6):26-29.
    [46].种衍军朱玉久.第三方调解解决医患纠纷的实践与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2009,16(4):65-68.
    [47].程传苗连斌方国恩李静.把医疗投诉作为改进医院工作的动力[J].中华医院管理杂志,2004,20(1):51-52.
    [1]Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual of Hospitals:The official Handbook.2002.
    [2]曹荣桂.以医院管理年为契机,提高医院服务水平[J]中国医院,2005,9(7):1—5.
    [3]张鸣明李幼平.病人安全——全球医疗服务的挑战[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008,8(7):509-512.
    [4]刘雅莉 景涛 田金徽等.新西兰医疗风险范及监管机制现状的循证评价——完善诉讼体系,规范医疗行为,防范医疗风险[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(9):673-681.
    [5]Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Newhouse JP, et al. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado.Health,1999;(36):255-264.
    [6]Yang K H,Ma B, Tian J H, et, al."Evidence-Based Evaluation of American Medical Risk Monitoring and Precaution System". Chin J Ecid-based Med,2006,6(6):439-450.
    [7]Towse A. Danzon P. Medical negligence and the NHS:An economic analysis. Health Economics,1999;8(2):93-101.
    [8]Health Care in Canada:The Canadian Institute for health Information.9 June 2004.
    [9]An organization with a Memory. Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the NHS Chaired by Chief Medical Officer. Department of Health.2000.Available from URL:http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/06/50/86/04065086.pdf.
    [10]Building a Safer NHS for Patients:Implementing an organization with a memory. Department of Health.2001.Available from URL:http://www.dh.gov.ud/assetRoot/04/05/80/94/04058094.pdf.
    [11]Smith G. Assesses the Patient Safety Challenge in the year ahead:NPSA annual review 2004-2005.The National Patient Safety Agency.
    [12]李颖(编译)杨一帆(编译).意大利的医疗卫生体系[J].医院院长论坛,2007,4(4):60-63.
    [13]Alessandro Ghirardini, Giuseppe Murolo, Filippo Palumbo, The Italian strategy for patient safety, Clinica Chimica Acta,6 June 2009:12-15.
    [14]Etchells E. Improving Patient Safety:Sharing Experiences to Develop and Implement Solutions. Canadian Journal of Diabetes,2004; 28(1):79-86.
    [15]Health Canada& Patient Safety Fact Sheet. Available from URL: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ach-acs/media/nr-cp/2004/2004_patient_e.html

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700