用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于融资视角的财务重述动因及后果研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
上市公司财务报告作为上市公司对外披露信息的重要媒介,是投资者了解企业财务状况、经营成果的重要途径。高质量的会计信息是现代资本市场健康运转以及投资者获取利益的保障。近年来,我国上市公司频繁的以发布临时公告的形式对前已发布的财务公告进行补充更正,即进行财务重述。财务重述表明企业历史财务报告不真实或者不全面,是低质量的财务报告,通常会造成企业市场价值损失、资本成本上升、所在行业声誉下降等负面影响。当前我国虽然已经基本上建立了财务重述制度,但是与西方完善的制度体系相比仍有一定的差距,由此提出以下问题,中国企业的财务重述究竟是什么原因引发的?我国资本市场上投资者进行投资决策时会使用到财务重述信息吗?会根据财务重述信息调整其投资决策吗?财务重述公告发布对企业融资会产生影响吗?对于这些问题的回答可以使我们进一步深入理解财务重述产生的原因及带来的后果,但目前国内外相关研究并不多见,因此本文在中国制度背景下围绕上述问题进行研究。
     文章在对相关文献进行梳理总结、对制度背景和发展现状进行分析的基础上,以2008-2010年发布财务重述临时公告的沪深主板A股公司为研究对象,将其与同交易所上市、同行业、类似规模的上市公司配对来进行实证研究。
     实证研究第一部分研究了中国上市公司是否有基于融资需求动机的财务重述行为,间接选取股利支付率、股利支付率变动、经营活动现金净流量、生产性融资需求、外部融资需求、再融资指标作为企业具有融资需求的代理变量,将重述企业上述指标与配对企业进行配对样本的T检验,发现除生产性融资需求外,其他指标都有显著差异。再以是否发生财务重述为应变量,进行逻辑回归,发现股利支付率、股利支付率变动、经营活动现金净流量净额与财务重述显著负相关,而外部融资需求和再融资意向与财务重述显著正相关,从而得出结论,融资需求越大的上市企业越有可能发生财务重述。
     实证第二部分基于融资变动视角研究了财务重述给企业带来的经济后果,首先对财务重述企业选取重述前及重述后取得借款发生的现金流入额,并对配对企业选取同期数据,配对比较发现,重述前重述企业与配对企业取得借款发生的现金流入额不存在显著差别,而重述后则有显著差别,这一配对比较初步说明了财务重述会给企业负债融资带来影响,其次本文首先以重述样本和配对样本进行了线性回归,结果表明财务重述与取得借款获得的现金流入量负相关。进一步以重述企业为样本,研究了重述延期、重述项目数、相对损益调整和绝对损益调整四项表明财务重述报告对历史财务报告修正程度的指标与取得借款发生的现金流入量的关系,得出重述项目数、重述相对金额与取得借款发生现金流量显著负相关的结论,该结论说明了企业发生财务重述后,债权人会根据财务重述信息调整对企业授信,导致企业债务筹资规模显著下降。
     本文在实证研究之后进行了研究结果的讨论,指出了除了基于特定目的进行财务舞弊而产生财务重述之外,还有一部分企业是对客观原因造成的会计差错进行更正。因此,有必要对财务重述企业进行进一步区分。对于国家监管部门来说,针对不同类型的财务重述企业制定出不同的监管制度,投资者来说,针对不同类别的财务重述企业做出不同的响应。
     最后本文提出研究的不足及后续的研究方向,希望在后续研究能进一步区分恶意财务重述与一般财务重述,并且区分财务重述对债务融资规模、债务融资来源结构、债务融资期限结构的影响进行进一步研究。图15幅,表26个,参考文献166篇
Accounting information is an important basis for the capital market investors to invest decision-making, and high quality of accounting information not only is the guarantee of the modern capital market operation healthy and security, but also is the security of the interests of investors.As an important way of disclosure information, the financial report of listed companies is an important way for investors to understand an enterprise's financial position and operating results. In recent years, there are more and more financial restatements, in a way of supplement or amendment, emerged in Chinese security market. The restatement of financial report showed the low quality and incredibility of former financial report, and caused serious economic result such as enterprise market value loss, cost of capital increase and the industry reputation negative decline. Although there has already set up financial restatements system in China, there are still large gaps when compared with Western countries; and China's capital market is being in transition and development stage. This paper puts forward some of the following questions:What is driving Chinese listed companies restate their financial report? Will Chinese investors use the financial restatement information when they make decisions? Will financial restatement announcement impact enterprises' financing?These answers can lead us to deeper understanding of causes and results of financial restatement,But nowadays domestic and international relevant research are seldom, so this paper research this themes under the background of China system.
     This paper is made on the basis of generalizing relevant literature, analysis of development of system background and the current situation. The reseach work takes the2008-2010financial restatements reports of a share companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen Securities Exchange as study samples. And Give her matching samples.
     The first part of the empirical research is about the relationship of financing demand and financial restatements.Selecting dividend payments ratio, dividend payment rate change, business activities net cash flow, generated productive financing demand and external financing demand, refinancing as proxy variable of enterprise financing needs.All data were analyzed by paired-sample T test. There's a marked difference between two groups variables in addition to the productive financing needs. Financial restatements as the explained variable and other variables as the explanatory variable, we set up the Logistic regression model and test three year's data of samples. The authors found that dividend payment rate, dividend payments rate reduced, business activities net cash flow and financial restatement generated significant negative correlation. And External financing demand, refinancing meaning and financial restatement are significant positive correlation. So come to the conclusion that the more financing is needed, the more probability of financial restatement.
     The second part of the empirical research is based on the financing change perspective to research the financial restatement brings to the enterprise's economic consequences. In the period of before and after the restatement report announced, borrowing cash inflow amount of the financial restatement enterprise is selected, and the matching enterprise select the same period and the same data, Paired analysis was used to compare between groups.Founds contain that before restatement report announced, restatement enterprise and matching enterprise borrowing cash inflow amount have not significant difference. And after restatement report announcement, they have significant difference.The pairing comparison showed that the financial restatement will give enterprise debt financing effects.Secondly this paper has conducted the linear regression. The results show that the financial restatements have negative correlation with borrowing cash inflow amount.Further research use the sample of restatement enterprise, the relationship between The restatement delay, relative income adjustment, absolute income and borrowing cash inflow amount。Come to the conclusion that restatement relative adjustment and borrowing cash inflow amount are significantly negative related.The conclusion shows that the financial restatement will lead to the creditor to adjust enterprise credit, enterprise debt decline significantly.
     The research results based on the empirical study are discussed. The paper point out that some of listed companies based on the specific purpose to financial fraud, Lead to later release financial restatement announcement. And some of the enterprises based on the objective reasons correct their financial report. Therefore, it is necessary to further distinguish between financial restatement enterprises。For countries, in view of the different types of financial restatement enterprise work out different supervision system, Investors, in view of the different types of financial restatement enterprise make different response.
     Finally this paper also puts forward the insufficiency and the follow-up research direction, For instance distinguish malicious financial restatement and general financial restatement. Research the relationship between the scale of debt financing, debt financing source structure, debt financing term structure and the financial restatement for.
引文
[1]葛家澍,裘宗舜.会计信息丛书:会计热点问题[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社.2001.
    [2]Scott, William Robert. Financial accounting theory[M]. City:Prentice Hall.1997.
    [3]Scholz, Susan. The changing nature and consequences of public company financial restatements[J]. The US Department of the Treasury,2008.
    [4]GAO, October. Financial statement restatements:Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges [J]. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, US Senate,2002.
    [5]Hirschey, Mark, Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna, Scholz, Susan. Long-term market underreaction to accounting restatements [J]. Working Pa-per, University of Kansas,2005.
    [6]Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna, Scholz, Susan. The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non-GAAP Reporting:Evidence from Restatements*[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2010,21(1):139-180.
    [7]李常青等.上市公司会计信息披露研究——基于年报重述的视角,上证联合研究计划第19期课题.2004.
    [8]Agrawal, Anup, Chadha, Sahiba. Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals [J]. Journal of Law and Economics,2005,48(2):371-406.
    [9]Abbott, Lawrence J, Parker, Susan, Peters, Gary F. Audit committee characteristics and restatements [J]. Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2004,23(1):69-87.
    [10]杨忠莲,杨振慧.独立董事与审计委员会执行效果研究——来自报表重述的证据[J].审计研究,2006,(2):81-85.
    [11]Owers, James E, Lin, Chen-Miao, Rogers, Ronald C. The informational content and valuation ramifications of earnings restatements [J]. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER),2011,1(5).
    [12]陈凌云.年报补充及更正公告的信息含量研究[J].湘潭大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2009,(5):93-99.
    [13]Desai, Hemang, Hogan, Chris E, Wilkins, Michael S. The reputational penalty for aggressive accounting:Earnings restatements and management turnover[J]. The Accounting Review,2006,81(1):83-112.
    [14]王泽霞,李明明,谢冰.财务报表重述公告与公司治理有效性研究[J].财会月刊:理论版,2009,(8):15-18.
    [15]陈毓圭.会计目标,财政部会计准则委员会课题研究报告.2005,大连出版社.
    [16]周小川.完善法律制度,改进金融生态[J].金融时报,2004,7.
    [17]Dechow, Patricia M, Skinner, Douglas J. Earnings management:Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators[J]. Accounting Horizons,2000,14(2):235-250.
    [18]潘克勤.政治关联,财务年报恶意补丁与债务融资契约——基于民营上市公司实际控制人政治身份的实证研究[J].经济经纬,2012,(2):75-80.
    [19]陈晓敏.财务重述公司盈余质量特征及经济后果研究[M].City.2010.
    [20]., US Government Accountability Office. Financial Restatements:Update of Public Company Trends, Market Impacts, and Regulatory Enforcement Activities. GAO-06-678.2006, GAO Washington, DC.
    [21]张为国,王霞.中国上市公司会计差错的动因分析[J].会计研究,2004(4):24-29.
    [22]郭超贤.会计差错更正与我国上市公司利润操纵实证研究[J].事业财会,2003,(4):40-42.
    [23]马贤明,郑朝晖.重大会计差错,虚假陈述与会计信息失真——TCL通讯财务风波透视[J].财会通讯:综合版,2005(9):33-35.
    [24]陈凌云,李弢.中国证券市场年报补丁公司特征研究[J].证券市场导报,2006,(2):35-42.
    [25]王啸,杨正洪.论财务报告的重新表述[J].证券市场导报,2003,,(2):4-10.
    [26]王霞,张为国.财务重述与独立审计质量[J].审计研究,2005,(3):56-61.
    [27]魏志华,李常青,王毅辉.中国上市公司年报重述公告效应研究[J].会计研究,2009,(8):31-39.
    [28]魏志华,李常青,王毅辉.中国上市公司年报重述分析:1999-2007[J].证券市场导报,2009,,(6):31-38.
    [29]张俊瑞,马晨.股权结构与财务重述研究[J].审计与经济研究,2011,(2):63-72.
    [30]周洋,李若山.二市公司年报“补丁”的特征和市场反应[J].审计研究,2007,(4):67-73.
    [31]Myers, Stewart C. Capital structure puzzle.1984, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
    [32]Myers, Stewart C, Majluf, Nicholas S. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have[J]. Journal of financial economics,1984,13(2):187-221.
    [33]Fama, Eugene F, French, Kenneth R. Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt[J]. Review of financial studies,2002,15(1): 1-33.
    [34]高晓红.产权效率与市场效率:我国上市公司股权融资偏好分析[J].投资研究,2000,(8):23-26.
    [35]黄少安,张岗.中国上市公司股权融资偏好分析[J].经济研究,2001,11(1):77-83.
    [36]屈耀辉,傅元略.优序融资理论的中国上市公司数据验证[J][J].财经研究,2007,(2):108-118.
    [37]Richardson, Scott, Tuna, Ayse, Wu, Min. Predicting earnings management:The case of earnings restatements [J]. Min, Predicting Earnings Management:The Case of Earnings Restatements (October 2002),2003.
    [38]王立彦,伍利娜.公司年报披露预约日变更及披露后更改行为——基于2002年中国上市公司年度报告的分析[J].经济科学,2004,(6):102-112.
    [39]姜英兵,崔刚,汪要文.上市公司财务报表重述的趋势与特征:2004-2008[J].上海立信会计学院学报,2010,24(2):17-27.
    [40]Ahmed, Kamran, Goodwin, John. An empirical investigation of earnings restatements by Australian firms[J]. Accounting & Finance,2007,47(1):1-22.
    [41]Kinney, William R, McDaniel, Linda S. Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1989,11(1):71-93.
    [42]Moriarty, George B, Livingston, Philip B. Quantitative measures of the quality of financial reporting[J]. Financial Executive,2001,17(5):53-57.
    [43]Wu, Min. Earnings restatements:A capital market perspective[J]. Available at SSRN 1844265,2002.
    [44]DeFond, Mark L, Jiambalvo, James. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals[J]. Journal of accounting and economics,1994,17(1):145-176.
    [45]Povel, Paul, Raith, Michael. Financial constraints and product market competition:ex ante vs. ex post incentives [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2004,22(7):917-949.
    [46]Burns, Natasha, Kedia, Simi. The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,79(1):35-67.
    [47]李斌,陈凌云.我国上市公司审计委员会有效性研究——基于上市公司年报补丁的实证分析[J].财贸研究,2006,(3):121-127.
    [48]魏志华,李常青,陈泰颖.中国上市公司年报重述影响因素的实证研究[J].商业经济与管理,2010,(4):75-82.
    [49]于鹏.股权结构与财务重述:来自上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2007,9:134-143.
    [50]Beasley, Mark S. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud[J]. Accounting Review,1996: 443-465.
    [51]Dechow, Patricia M, Sloan, Richard G, Sweeney, Amy P. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation:An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the sec*[J]. Contemporary accounting research,2010, 13(1):1-36.
    [52]Heninger, William G, Kim, Yongtae, Nabar, Sandeep. Earnings Misstatements, Restatements, and Corporate Governance [J]. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting,2009,1(2):1-35.
    [53]周春生,马光.中国上市公司的股权结构与财务报表更正[J].金融研究,2006,(11):82-92.
    [54]陈丽英.非审计服务与财务重述——来自上市公司的证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2009,(3):112-117.
    [55]姚瑶,黄曼行.机构投资者持股与财务重述——基于中国资本市场的经验证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,(5):85-92.
    [56]Cheng, Qiang, Warfield, Terry D. Equity incentives and earnings management[J]. The Accounting Review,2005,80(2):441-476.
    [57]Jensen, Michael C. Agency costs of overvalued equity[J]. Financial Management, 2008,34(1):5-19.
    [58]Bergstresser, Daniel, Philippon, Thomas. CEO incentives and earnings management[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,80(3):511-529.
    [59]Harris, Jared, Bromiley, Philip. Incentives to cheat:The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation[J]. Organization Science,2007,18(3):350-367.
    [60]胡国强,彭家生.股权激励与财务重述——基于中国A股市场上市公司的经验证据[J].财经科学,2009,(11):39-46.
    [61]Almer, Elizabeth Dreike, Gramling, Audrey A, Kaplan, Steven E. Impact of post-restatement actions taken by a firm on non-professional investors' credibility perceptions[J]. Journal of business ethics,2008,80(1):61-76.
    [62]Young, Chaur-Shiuh, Tsai, Liu-Ching, Hsu, Hui-Wen. The effect of controlling shareholders' excess board seats control on financial restatements:evidence from Taiwan[J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,2008,30(3): 297-314.
    [63]Kinney Jr, William R, Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna, Scholz, Susan. Auditor Independence, Non-Audit Services, and Restatements:Was the US Government Right?* [J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2004,42(3):561-588.
    [64]曹强,葛晓舰.事务所任期,行业专门化与财务重述[J].审计研究,2009,(6):59-68.
    [65]曹强.财务重述与会计师事务所风险管理战略[D].厦门:厦门大学.2009.
    [66]周晓苏,周琦.基于盈余管理动机的财务重述研究[J].当代财经,2011,(2):109-117.
    [67]陈丽英,李婉丽,吕怀立.盈余重述归因分析——资产负债表膨胀的角度[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(6).
    [68]Kasznik, Ron. On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management[J]. Available at SSRN 15062,1996.
    [69]Burgstahler, David, Eames, Michael. Management of earnings and analysts' forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,2006,33(5-6):633-652.
    [70]Anderson, Kirsten, Yohn, Teri. The effect of 10K restatements on firm value, information asymmetries, and investors' reliance on earnings[J]. Information Asymmetries, and Investors' Reliance on Earnings (September 2002),2002.
    [71]Callen, Jeffrey, Livnat, Joshua, Segal, Dan. Accounting restatements:Are they always bad news for investors?[J]. Journal of Investing, Forthcoming,2005.
    [72]Holmstrom, Bengt. Moral hazard in teams[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1982:324-340.
    [73]Beneish, Messod D. Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP[J]. The Accounting Review,1999,74(4):425-457.
    [74]Beneish, Messod D. Earnings management:A perspective [J]. Managerial Finance, 2001,27(12):3-17.
    [75]Agarwal, Ritu, Prasad, Jayesh. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?[J]. Decision sciences,1999,30(2): 361-391.
    [76]Srinivasan, Suraj. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors:Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2005,43(2):291-334.
    [77]谢羽婷.财务重述报告公布的及时性与时机选择研究[D].广州:暨南大学.2010.
    [78]Xu, Tan, Najand, Mohammad, Ziegenfuss, Douglas. Intra-industry effects of earnings restatements due to accounting irregularities[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,2006,33(5-6):696-714.
    [79]Akhigbe, Aigbe, Madura, Jeff. Industry signals relayed by corporate earnings restatements[J]. Financial Review,2008,43(4):569-589.
    [80]Gleason, Cristi A, Jenkins, Nicole Thorne, Johnson, W Bruce. The contagion effects of accounting restatements[J]. The Accounting Review,2008,83(1): 83-110.
    [81]李世新,刘兴翠.上市公司财务重述公告的市场反应与行业传递效应研究[J].管理评论,2012,24(5):137-143.
    [82]Li, Oliver, Zhang, Yuan. Financial restatement announcements and insider trading[J]. Available at SSRN 929539,2006.
    [83]Fama, Eugene F, Jensen, Michael C. Separation of ownership and control[J]. JL & Econ.,1983,26:301.
    [84]叶康涛,陆正飞,张志华.独立董事能否抑制大股东的“掏空”?[J].经济研究,2007,42(4):101-111.
    [85]潘克勤.独立董事比例,产权性质与长期债务融资契约[J].经济经纬,2010,(1):68-71.
    [86]丁庭选.董事会独立性与银行债务融资契约研究——基于2007~2009年上市公司数据实证分析[J].经济与管理研究,2011,(5):56-62.
    [87]Karjalainen, Jukka. Audit quality and cost of debt capital for private firms: evidence from Finland[J]. International journal of auditing,2011,15(1):88-108.
    [88]江伟,雷光勇.制度环境,审计质量与债务融资[J]当代经济科学,2008,(2):017.
    [89]丁庭选,潘克勤.所有权性质,审计信息与债务契约[J].经济学动态,2008,(1):61-63.
    [90]胡奕明,唐松莲.审计,信息透明度与银行贷款利率[J].审计研究,2007,(6): 74-84.
    [91]魏志华,王贞洁,吴育辉,et al.金融生态环境,审计意见与债务融资成本[J].审计研究,2012,(3):018.
    [92]Leftwich, Richard. Accounting information in private markets:Evidence from private lending agreements[J]. Accounting Review,1983:23-42.
    [93]Watts, Ross, Zimmerman, Jerold. Positive accounting theory[J].1986.
    [94]Roychowdhury, Sugata. Earnings management through real activities manipulation[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2006,42(3):335-370.
    [95]陆正飞,祝继高,孙便霞.盈余管理,会计信息与银行债务契约[J].管理世界,2008,(3):152-158.
    [96]于静霞.盈余管理与银行债务融资成本的实证研究——来自A股市场的经验证据[J].财政研究,2011,(11):68-72.
    [97]胡奕明,林文雄,李思琦,et al.大贷款人角色:我国银行具有监督作用吗?[J].经济研究,2008,(10):52-64.
    [98]Ahmed, Anwer S, Billings, Bruce K, Morton, Richard M, et al. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs[J]. The Accounting Review,2002, 77(4):867-890.
    [99]李志军,王善平.货币政策,信息披露质量与公司债务融资[J].会计研究,2011,(10):56-62.
    [100]于富生,张敏.信息披露质量与债务成本——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].审计与经济研究,2007,22(5):93-96.
    [101]Francis, Jennifer, LaFond, Ryan, Olsson, Per, et al. The market pricing of accruals quality[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2005,39(2):295-327.
    [102]孙铮,李增泉,王景斌.所有权性质,会计信息与债务契约——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].管理世界,2006,(10):100-107.
    [103]Titman, Sheridan, Wessels, Roberto. The determinants of capital structure choice[J]. The Journal of Finance,2012,43(1):1-19.
    [104]周勤,徐捷,程书礼.中国上市公司规模与债务融资关系的实证研究[J].金融研究,2006,(8):41-55.
    [105]宁宇新,柯大钢.转轨背景,公司成长性与债务融资——来自于上市公司的经验证据[J].中大管理研究,2008,3(2):107-124.
    [106]Beatty, Anne, Ramesh, Krishnamoorthy, Weber, Joseph. The importance of accounting changes in debt contracts:the cost of flexibility in covenant calculations[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2002,33(2):205-227.
    [107]雷宇,杜兴强.“关系”,会计信息与银行信贷——信任视角的理论分析与初步证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2011(8):115-124.
    [108]廖秀梅.会计信息的信贷决策有用性:基于所有权制度制约的研究[J].会计研究,2007,5:31-38.
    [109]江伟,李斌.制度环境,国有产权与银行差别贷款[J].金融研究,2006,(11):116-126.
    [110]李广子,刘力.债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视[J].金融研究,2009,(12):137-150.
    [111]Berger, Allen N, Udell, Gregory F. Small business credit availability and relationship lending:The importance of bank organisational structure[J]. The Economic Journal,2002,112(477):F32-F53.
    [112]Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, Mian, Atif. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2005,120(4):1371-1411.
    [113]余明桂,潘红波.政治关系,制度环境与民营企业银行贷款[J].管理世界,2009,(8):9-21.
    [114]苏宁.优化金融环境改善金融生态[J].金融信息参考,2005,(10):5-6.
    [115]Hackbarth, Dirk, Miao, Jianjun, Morellec, Erwan. Capital structure, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006, 82(3):519-550.
    [116]Korajczyk, Robert A, Levy, Amnon. Capital structure choice: macroeconomic conditions and financial constraints[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2003,68(1):75-109.
    [117]苏冬蔚,曾海舰.宏观经济因素,企业家信心与公司融资选择[J].金融研究,2011,(4):012.
    [118]Porta, Rafael La, Lopez-de-Silane, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, et al. Law and finance[R]. City:National Bureau of Economic Research,1996.
    [119]Qian, Jun, Strahan, Philip. How Laws & Institutions Shape Financial Contracts:The Case of Bank Loans," Journal of Finance (forthcoming)[J].2007.
    [120]江伟.法制环境,金融发展与企业长期债务融资[J].证券市场导报,2010,(3):50-57.
    [121]余明桂,潘红波.政府干预,法治,金融发展与国有企业银行贷款[J].金融研究,2009,(9):1-22.
    [122]Putnam, Robert D. The prosperous community[J]. The american prospect, 1993,4(13):35-42.
    [123]戴亦一,张俊生,曾亚敏,et al.社会资本与企业债务融资[J].中国工业经济,2009,(8):99-108.
    [124]邓建平,曾勇.金融生态环境,银行关联与债务融资——基于我国民营企业的实证研究[J].会计研究,2012,(12):33-40.
    [125]李扬,王国刚,刘煜辉.中国城市金融生态环境评价:2005[M].北京:人民出版社.2005.
    [126]江伟,李斌.金融发展与企业债务融资[J].中国会计评论,2006,2.
    [127]杜莹,刘立国.中国上市公司债权治理效率的实证分析[J].证券市场导报,2002,(12):66-69.
    [128]于东智.资本结构,债权治理与公司绩效[J].中国工业经济,2003,1:87-94.
    [129]汪辉.上市公司债务融资,公司治理与市场价值[J].经济研究,2003,8:28-35.
    [130]张锦铭.债务融资的治理效应[J].山西财经大学学报,2006,8.
    [131]李双飞,陈收,李小晓.上市公司债务融资与公司价值的实证研究[J].证券市场导报,2007,(8):73-77.
    [132]褚玉春,刘建平.债务融资对制造业经营绩效的影响效应研究——基于广义矩法估计的动态面板数据分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,(9):79-91.
    [133]万红波,阮铭华,王蓓蓓.负债融资,债务契约与盈余信息质量关系研究——基于中国上市公司面板数据的实证分析[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2010,(5):53-60.
    [134]吴祖光,万迪防.产权性质,债务融资与盈余质量——来自我国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].经济管理,2011,(5):129-136.
    [135]Watts, Ross. A proposal for research on conservatism[J]. Simon School of Business Working Paper FR,2001:93-13.
    [136]刘运国,吴小蒙,蒋涛.产权性质,债务融资与会计稳健性——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].会计研究,2010(001):43-50.
    [137]Jensen, Michael C, Meckling, William H. Theory of the firm:Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of financial economics, 1976,3(4):305-360.
    [138]Williamson, Oliver E. Corporate finance and corporate governance[J]. The journal of finance,1988,43(3):567-591.
    [139]张跃龙,谭跃,夏芳.投资效率是被“债务融资”束缚了手脚吗?[J].经济与管理研究,2011,(2):46-55.
    [140]李枫,杨兴全.债务融资,债务结构与公司过度投资行为[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,29(4):46-52.
    [141]董黎明.债务融资期限结构与融资效率的实证研究[J].财经理论与实践,2009,29(6):41-45.
    [142]张兆国,曾牧,刘永丽.政治关系,债务融资与企业投资行为——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2011,(5):106-121.
    [143]Ball, Ray, Brown, Philip. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers[J]. Journal of accounting research,1968:159-178.
    [144]Scott, Jeffrey G, Wen, Zhimou. Toxicity of fipronil to susceptible and resistant strains of German cockroaches (Dictyoptera:Blattellidae) and house flies (Diptera:Muscidae)[J]. Journal of economic entomology,1997,90(5): 1152-1156.
    [145]赵宇龙.会计盈余披露的信息含量:来自上海股市的经验证据[J].经济研究,1998(007):41-49.
    [146]蒋义宏.上市公司会计信息质量实证研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社.2008.
    [147]娄尔行,财务会计准则委员会.论财务会计概念[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社.1992.
    [148]财政部.国际会计准则.2000,北京:中国财政经济出版社.
    [149]葛家澍,刘峰.会计理论:关于财务会计概念结构的研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社.2003.
    [150]王建新.财务会计概念框架[M].沈阳:东北财经大学出版社.2007.
    [151]叶林.证券法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2000.
    [152]黄世忠,叶丰滢.上市公司报表粉饰新动向:手段,案例与启示(下)[J].财会通讯:综合版,2006,(2):6-10.
    [153]叶志锋.企业业绩操纵与银行债权保护研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社.2009.
    [154]李湛.中国企业债务结构和债务工具选择的理论和实证研究[D].广州:暨南大学.2011.
    [155]杨胜刚,何靖.上市公司债务融资结构特征的实证检验[J].证券市场导报,2007,(4):43-50.
    [156]马可,斯达德勒,Macho-Stadler, Ines, et al.信息经济学引论:激励与合约[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社.2004.
    [157]李心丹.行为金融学:理论及中国的证据[M].上海:上海三联书店.2004.
    [158]Slovic, Paul, Lichtenstein, Sarah, Edwards, Ward. Boredom-induced changes in preferences among bets[J]. The American journal of psychology,1965: 208-217.
    [159]Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, Tversky, Amos. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases[M]. City:Cambridge University Press.1982.
    [160]比弗,威廉·H.财务呈报会计革命[M].沈阳:东北财经大学出版社:4.1999.
    [161]陆正飞,魏涛.配股后业绩下降:盈余管理后果与真实业绩滑坡[J].会计研究,2006,(8):52-59.
    [162]雷光勇,刘慧龙.市场化进程,最终控制人性质与现金股利行为——来自中国A股公司的经验证据[J].管理世界,2007,(7):120-128.
    [163]Cleary, Sean. International corporate investment and the relationships between financial constraint measures[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance,2006, 30(5):1559-1580.
    [164]Zimmer, EA, Martin, SL, Beverley, SM, et al. Rapid duplication and loss of genes coding for the alpha chains of hemoglobin[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,1980,77(4):2158-2162.
    [165]饶艳超,胡奕明.银行信贷中会计信息的使用情况调查与分析[J].会计研究,2005,(4):36-41.
    [166]姚立杰,夏冬林.我国银行能识别借款企业的盈余质量吗?[J].审计研究,2009,(3):91-96.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700