用户名: 密码: 验证码:
我国审计师运营效率研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
经济组织是人们所创立的一种实体,它通过实体内外的相互作用帮助个人和集体实现经济目的。因此,组织是以组织的基本目标成果为基础来加以评判的。对于审计师组织而言,它所提供的审计报告必须具有一定独立性和质量保证,否则审计将失去意义;而审计师组织的效率能为执业质量的提高和维系提供强有力的支持。为了维护注册会计师行业的形象和声誉,引导行业持续发展,更好地为经济发展服务,这就要求审计师组织必须在一定质量下提供高效率的供给。高效运营的经济组织,能为行业的整体发展及其在市场经济中作用的发挥提供强有力的保障和支持。
     为此,本文以新制度经济学中的产权理论和不完全契约理论、组织经济学、产业经济学、微观经济学和X效率理论为基础,构建审计师运营效率影响因素的系统分析框架,并在此基础上展开实证研究。在对“十一五”期间我国审计师运营效率及其变动的实际情况进行计量和评价的基础上,继而对影响审计师运营效率及其变动的因素进行实证检验。全文共分八章,具体内容如下:
     第一章是导论,主要介绍本文的研究动机、对象、方法、研究路径及结构安排。第二章是文献综述,对国内外注册会计师行业中影响运营效率的各个因素与特征进行了回顾与评述。第三章是制度背景与理论基础,在我国注册会计师行业“做大做强”的背景,以新制度经济学中的产权理论和不完全契约理论、产业经济学、微观经济学和X效率理论等为基础,对审计师运营效率的影响因素及其作用机理进行理论归纳和分析。在此基础上,构建审计师运营效率影响因素的系统分析框架。第四章是审计师运营效率的计量和评价,以数据包络分析(DEA)和Malmquist指数为计量方法,对“十一五”期间我国审计师运营效率及其变动情况进行全面系统的计量和评价。第五章是审计师特征、审计质量与审计师运营效率,从事务所供给角度,采用截面和面板回归分析方法,实证检验了审计师特征、审计质量对审计师运营效率的影响。并且指出必须通过提高定价等一系列措施和手段,引导注册会计师行业走出审计质量与审计师运营效率相背离的恶性循环状态,使注册会计师行业持续健康发展。第六章是客户特征、客户需求与审计师运营效率,从事务所的客户以及事务所与客户关系的角度,采用截面和面板回归分析方法,实证检验客户特征、客户需求对审计师运营效率的影响。第七章是审计模式改变、事务所合并与审计师运营效率变化,以Malmquist指数方法计量结果中全要素生产率作为审计师运营效率变化的衡量标准,使用面板回归分析方法,实证检验“十一五”期间,审计模式改变、事务所合并以及事务所组织形式变化等因素对审计师运营效率变化的影响。第八章是总结研究结果,提出对策及建议,同时指出本文的主要贡献和局限性,以及后续的研究方向。
     通过上述研究,本文得出如下结论:
     1.注册会计师行业是一个以人力资本为主要投入要素的产业。它的运营效率内涵是指事务所在以人力资本、专业知识和声誉作为主要投入品进行投入后,利用一系列相关技术、技能和经验等,向客户提供一定质量水平的鉴证服务或其他信息服务。在取得报酬的过程中,既定质量水平下的报酬产出与要素投入之间的关系。然而,由于人力资本的特征,广泛的有限理性、选择理性和机会主义行为将导致注册会计师行业的交易费用水平较高,进而降低了行业的运营效率。同时从产出角度来分析,审计产品有准公共品性质,公共品的收费困难,难以弥补生产成本,导致产出效率低下。而且,从审计市场供求关系来看,审计市场仍属于买方市场,我国的审计市场结构仍未能形成寡头垄断格局,事务所之间竞争激烈,也使行业整体运营效率水平较为低下。
     另外,以一定质量的产出而言,审计产品属经验品,不对称信息较为严重。事前的逆向选择,将使高质量审计师遭到市场驱逐,尽管信号机制会部分改变不对称信息的状况,但信号机制本身也有成本,并受信号选择范围的影响。尤其当审计需求以法定需求为主时,较高质量的审计师可能难以实现高质量高效率的良性循环。更可能的是,审计师在签约后,出于自利目的或在“审计悖论”和购买意见盛行的影响下,出具较低审计质量水平的报告,现实中将导致审计质量与效率相背离的情形出现。
     2.以数据包络分析和Malmquist指数为计量方法的实证结果表明:“十一五”期间,我国事务所运营效率以不变收益技术效率(CRS效率)来衡量,确实运营效率水平不高,但在此期间,运营效率水平持续上升,已由0.42上升至0.62。其中国际“四大”整体的效率优势远高于我国内资事务所的平均水平,但我国内资事务所正在逐年缩小与它们的差距。尤其是在2008-2009年间,内资事务所运营效率持续上升。另外,从事务所运营效率变动的角度来看,2006-2010年期间,我国注册会计师行业年均实现了24%的增长率,其中相对效率变动贡献了15%,技术进步贡献了10%,而且内资事务所的增长构成了运营效率增长的主要力量。
     3.审计师特征、审计质量与审计师运营效率的实证结果表明:事务所的组织特征、业务特征、技术特征和人力资源特征均是影响审计师运营效率的主要因素。因此,目前注册会计师行业实施做大做强战略的各项措施,如大力发展业务多元化、扩大事务所规模、向特殊普通合伙制转变、规范统一定价水平等,有利于事务所运营效率水平的提高。而行业领军人才作用的发挥需要与其相关的产权安排相结合,从而使人力资源的效率优势得到更好的发挥。行业专长对效率水平的提高也需要建立在总体产出回报与投入相对应的关系上,通过各种措施提高产出水平,使行业专长有利于效率水平的提高。审计质量与事务所运营效率显著负相关。这种恶性循环状态将严重影响行业的持续健康发展,必须通过提高定价等一系列举措,引导行业向高质量高效率的良性循环发展。
     4.客户特征、客户需求与审计师运营效率的实证结果表明:客户特征、客户需求因素对事务所运营效率有显著的影响,需要进一步提高事务所对客户风险程度的认知,通过引导客户高质量需求,使事务所运营效率向良性循环转变。
     5.审计模式改变、事务所合并与审计师运营效率变化的实证结果表明:在影响审计师运营效率变动的因素中,除事务所注册会计师与其他从业人员的比例和事务所规模外,审计模式转变和事务所组织形式的变化是导致事务所运营效率提高的主要因素,合并未使审计师运营效率的变动得到显著提高。因此,持续加强审计技术、技能和经验的培养,加强合并事务所的整合协调,有利于注册会计师行业效率更加快速的提高。
     本文第一次尝试构建了审计师运营效率影响因素的系统分析框架,并以新制度经济学等理论为基础,对审计行业低效率及审计质量与效率相背离的情形进行了理论归纳和分析。在实证阶段,在我国第一次尝试以DEA和Malmquist指数方法,对“十一五”期间我国注册会计师行业的整体运营效率及其变动情况进行了计量和评价。并且利用截面和面板回归分析方法,实证检验了审计师特征、客户特征和客户需求等因素对审计师运营效率及其变动的影响。
     本文在以下方面还存在着一定的局限性,即在审计质量、审计模式、审计师任期、客户特征和需求中的部分代理变量选择方面,还应继续深入从多角度来进行研究,以使研究结论更具稳定性。另外,回归分析中仅以拥有证券期货资格的事务所为对象,形成的结论对于非证券资格事务所可能缺乏一定的适用性。
Economic organization is an entity founded by individual and collectivity to help them achieve their economic goals by the internal and external interaction of the entities. Therefore, the organization should be judged by its basic goal. For Auditors organization, they must provide audit reports that possess certain independence and quality assurance, or audit would be meaningless; and the efficiency of the organization can strongly support the maintenance and improvement of practice quality. In order to maintain the image and reputation of the CPA industry better serve the economy and the society and lead to a sustainable development of industry, the auditor is required to provide an efficient supply. And only economic organizations with efficiency operation can strongly protect and support the overall development of the industry and its role in the market economy.
     On the basis of the property rights theory, incomplete contract theory, organizational economics, industrial economics, the microeconomics and X-efficiency theory, this dissertation constructs the analytical framework of the main factors which influence the operational efficiency of the auditor. After that, an empirical study is conducted based on the above. This dissertation measures and evaluates the actual situation of the operational efficiency and its changes during the period of "eleven-five", and then empirically tests the main factors which has effect on the operational efficiency and its changes. The dissertation is divided into eight chapters as follows:
     The first chapter is the introduction, mainly introduces the research motivation, object, methods, research approach and structure arrangement. The second chapter is the literature review, commenting the factors and the characteristics that have influence on the operational efficiency of the CPA industry at home and abroad. The third chapter is the system background and the theoretical basis. Under "the bigger and stronger strategy system" background of our current CPA industry and based on the new institutional economics of property rights theory, incomplete contract theory, industrial economics, microeconomics and X efficiency theory, this chapter analyzed the factors and mechanism of auditor operational efficiency. And then this dissertation constructed the framework of system analysis of the auditor's operational efficiency. The fourth chapter is the measurement and evaluation of auditor's operational efficiency, using data envelopment analysis (DEA) method and the Malmquist index method, measured and evaluated the operational efficiency and its changes during the"eleven-five"period. The fifth chapter focuses on the auditor's characteristic, audit quality and the operational efficiency of the auditor. From the perspective of supply, with cross section and panel data regression method, this chapter empirically tested the relationship among auditor's characteristic, audit quality and its operational efficiency.And this chapter also pointed out that in order to continue to develop the entire industry healthy, it is required to take a series of measures and means including raising the price of auditing to guide the CPA industry to get out of the vicious circle. The sixth chapter illustrates the characteristic of customer, the demand from customer and auditor's operational efficiency. From the perspective of customer characteristics and needs, using cross section and panel data regression method, this chapter empirically tested the relationship among characteristic of customer, demand from customer and the auditor's operational efficiency. The seventh chapter discusses the changes of audit mode, the merge of CPA firms and the auditor operational efficiency changes, with total factor productivity representing the auditor's operational efficiency changes as the explained variable, using panel data, empirically tested the influences of the audit mode change, organization change and the merge of CPA firm on the operational efficiency changes. The eighth chapter is a summary of the research results, put forward countermeasures and suggestions, and points out that the main contribution and limitations, and the direction of future research.
     Through the above research, the dissertation draws the following conclusions:
     First, the CPA industry is an industry which is featured by the lots of human capital investment. Operational efficiency refers to input and output ratio during the process of the putting in the main inputs such as human capital, professional knowledge and reputation etc. to produce assurance services or other information service with certain quality, and gaining returns. However, due to the feature of human capital, a wide range of limited rationality, rational choice and opportunistic behavior will lead to a high transaction cost resulted in the CPA industry, which reduces the industry operational efficiency. At the same time, from the output perspective, audit product has a property of quasi public goods. Public goods charges difficultly, so it's hard to make up for the cost of production, which lead to a low efficiency. Moreover, from the view of relationship between supply and demand in the audit market, audit market is still a buyer's market. The market structure of audit industry in our country still fails to form a monopoly, and the fierce competition exists between firms, which also results in a low operational efficiency in the whole industry.
     In addition, in terms of output with certain quality, audit product belongs to experience goods, so information is relatively asymmetric. Adverse selection will make auditor of high quality expelled. Although the signal mechanism will change the situation of asymmetric information, the signal mechanism itself has cost, which is also influenced by range of signals. Especially when legal demand dominates, auditor of higher quality may be difficult to achieve virtuous circle of high quality and high efficiency. More likely, the auditor will issue the report with low quality under the influence of egoism," audit paradox" or the prevalence of opinion shopping after contract was signed, thus lead to the deviation of quality and efficiency.
     Second, with data envelopment analysis and Malmquist index method, the empirical results show that when measured by the constant technical efficiency(CRS efficiency), during "eleven five" period, our country's firm operational efficiency level remains on a low level, but within five years it is continues to rise, which has risen from0.42to0.62. And the efficiency of the "big four" is much higher than the domestic firm's average level, but the domestic firm is gradually narrowing the gap. Especially in2008-2009years, domestic firms'operational efficiency continues to rise. In addition, in the view of the firms' operational efficiency changes, during2006-2010, the CPA industry has achieved a24%growth, in which the relative efficiency changes contributed15%, and technical progress contributed10%. And the domestic firm's growth is the main force of operational efficiency growth.
     Third, the empirical results of auditor characteristics, audit quality and audit operational efficiency showed that organization characteristics, business characteristics, technical characteristics and human resource characteristics of the firm are the main factors affecting the operational efficiency of the auditor. Therefore, currently CPA industry implements bigger and stronger strategic measures, such as developing diversified business, expanding the firm's scale, changing the organization form, lifting and unifying the pricing level, which is helpful to raise the level of the firm's operational efficiency. Only combined with relative property arrangement the industry leading talented CPA can actually play its role, so that the efficiency advantage of human resource can play better. Raising the level of efficiency by the industry expertise, it needs to consider the corresponding relationship between output and input. A variety of measures should be taken to improve the level of output; therefore the industry expertise can be beneficial to the improvement of the auditor's operational efficiency. Audit quality has significant negative correlation with the auditor's operational efficiency. This deviation will seriously affect the development of the industry; it needs to adopt a series of measures to lead the whole industry to the situation of benign cycle development.
     Forth, the empirical results of characteristics of customers, customer demand and the auditor's operational efficiency show that customer characteristics and demand significantly influence the auditor's operational efficiency. It is required to raise the recognition of the customer risk in order to improve the auditor's operational efficiency. Moreover, driving the demand for high audit quality can change the deviation of quality and efficiency.
     Fifth, the empirical results of the change of audit mode, the CPA firm merge and the auditor operational efficiency changes show that except for the organization scale and ratio of CPA to employee, which have significant positive correlation with the changes of the auditor's operational efficiency, the change of audit mode and organization form are the most important factors that lead to the changes of auditor's operational efficiency. However, the firm merge doesn't have statistical significant correlation with the auditor's operation efficiency changes. Therefore continuing to strengthen the technique, skill, experience of the auditor, and the coordination of the integration of the merged firm will lead the operational efficiency of CPA industry to a faster enhancement.
     This dissertation first tries to construct the systems analysis framework of factors that influence the auditor operational efficiency. And basing on the new institutional economics theory and other theories, this dissertation theoretically summarized the reasons of low efficiency in audit industry and the reason of the deviation of audit quality and efficiency. In the empirical parts, DEA and Malmquist index method are first used to measure and evaluate the CPA industry operational efficiency and its changes during " eleven-five" period. At the same time, using cross section and panel data regression analysis methods, the dissertation identified the factors of auditor and customer characteristics that can influence auditor's operational efficiency and its changes.
     This dissertation still has some certain limitations in the following aspects:The selection of proxy variables, such as the audit quality, the audit mode, audit tenure, customer characteristics is still required of advanced rigor research. Moreover, the research scope is limited to the securities qualified firms, so the conclusion drawn from the research may not applicable to non securities qualified firms.
引文
①林启云:《注册会计师非审计服务研究》,P8,东北财经大学出版社,2002。
    [1]阿尔钦、德姆塞茨.生产、信息费用与经济组织(载于财产权利与制度变迁)[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
    [2]巴泽尔.产权的经济分析[M].上海: 上海三联书店,1997.
    [3]保罗·米尔格罗姆、约翰·罗伯茨、费方域,等.经济学、组织与管理[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.
    [4]保罗萨缪尔森, 威廉诺德豪斯,微观经济学[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
    [5]蔡春、唐滔智.会计师事务所规模报酬和效率分析[J].会计之友,2008(5):99-100.
    [6]曹强、陈汉文、胡南薇.事务所特征、行为与审计生产效率[J].财务与会计2008(11):84-91.
    [7]陈建凯、陈汉文.公司特征、审计需求与区域性事务所选择影响因素的实证研究[J].财经理论与实践,2009(9):62-66
    [8]陈小林.制度环境与审计独立性——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2007.
    [9]道格拉斯·诺思.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1991.
    [10]蒂莫西·J·科埃利、D·S·普拉萨德·拉奥、克里斯托德·J·奥唐奈.效率与生产率分析引论(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
    [11]杜兴强、郭剑花.审计师变更与审计意见购买——一项经验研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2008(11):101-112
    [12]段永瑞.数据包络分析—理论和应用[M].上海:上海科学普及出版社,2007.
    [13]方红星、苏菲.注册会计师审计市场集中度的演变与度量——基于A股公司1992-2009年报审计的分析[J].财经问题研究,2011(8):78-87
    [14]菲吕博顿、配杰威齐.产权与经济理论(载于财产权利与制度变迁)[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
    [15]哈罗姆·德姆塞茨.所有权、控制与企业[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [16]何海、黄彤.从外部性上来看事务所组织形式的选择.财政监督,2004(6):38-39.
    [17]黄乾.人力资本、企业性质与企业所有权安排[J].经济学家,2001,(6).
    [18]贾宪威、刘文、 侯路,等.我国会计师事务所审计运营效率的实证研究[J].财务月刊,2010(7):66-69.
    [19]江小涓、裴长洪.中国服务业发展报告[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
    [20]杰弗里·M.伍德里奇.计量经济学导论:现代观点[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
    [21]科斯、哈特、斯蒂格利茨,等.契约经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [22]科斯、诺思、威廉姆森,等.制度、 契约与组织——一个新制度经济学角度的透视[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
    [23]科斯、威廉姆森、温特,等.企业的性质——企业的性质:起源、演变和发展[M],北京: 商务印书馆,2007.
    [24]科斯.企业的性质[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000.
    [25]李树华.审计独立性的提高与审计市场的背离[M].上海:上海三联书店,2000.
    [26]李双杰.效率与生产率度量方法及应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010.
    [27]李眺.审计市场:产业组织视角的分析[M].上海:上海三联书店,2000.
    [28]李眺.审计市场中的合并、产业专用化投资和价格竞争[J].中国工业经济,2003(3):49-55.
    [29]李增泉、杨春燕:企业绩效、控制权转移与经理人员变更——一项基于我国证券市场的实证研究[J].中国会计与财务研究,2003(4):51-77.
    [30]李增泉、余谦、王晓坤.掏空、 支持与并购重组[J].经济研究,2005(1):95-105.
    [31]林启云.中国注册会计师非审计服务研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2002.
    [32]林孝伦.会计师事务所经营效率分析:中国之实证.工作论文,2010.
    [33]刘峰、林斌.会计师事务所脱钩与政府选择:一种解释[J].会计研究,2000(2):9-15.
    [34]刘明辉、王恩山.我国审计需求的异化及制度成因.审计与经济研究,2011(7):3-12.
    [35]刘明辉、徐正刚.审计市场的有效结构:基于产业组织视角的分析[J].审计研究,2006(2):69-73.
    [36]刘明辉.独立审计准则研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,1997.
    [37]刘明辉.高级审计研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2009.
    [38]刘志新、刘琛.基于DEA的中国商业银行效率研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004(4):42-45.
    [39]柳木华.会计师事务所选择组织形式的风险分析框架[J].中国注册会计师,2007(8):79-83.
    [40]罗杰·弗朗茨.x效率:理论、论据和应用[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1993.
    [41]乔尔·赫尔曼、马克·施克曼、王新颖.转轨国家的政府干预、腐败与政府被控——转型国家中企业与政府交易关系研究[J].经济社会体制比较,2002(5):26-33.
    [42]舒尔茨.论人力资本投资[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1992:26.
    [43]舒尔茨.制度与人的经济价值的不断提高(载于财产权利与制度变迁)[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
    [44]孙海鸣、孙海刚.现代服务业产业组织研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007.
    [45]孙铮、曹宇.股权结构与审计需求[J].审计研究,2004(3):7-14.
    [46]孙铮、李增泉.股价反应、企业绩效与控制权转移:来自中国上市公司的经验证据.中国会计与财务研究,2003(1):1-31.
    [47]王聪、邹朋飞.中国商业银行效率结构与改革策略探讨[J].金融研究,2004(3):58-65.
    [48]王稳.经济效率因素分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002.
    [49]王跃堂、赵子夜.股权结构影响审计意见吗?来自沪深股市的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2003(4):1-23
    [50]威廉·G谢泼德、乔安娜·M谢泼德、张志奇,等.产业组织经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
    [51]威廉姆森.资本主义经济制度[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.
    [52]徐正刚.中国审计市场结构研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2007.
    [53]许汉友、汤谷良、汪先娣.中国会计师事务所运营效率之DEA分析[J],会计研究,2008(3):74-81.
    [54]杨永森.基于超效率模型的中国会计师事务所效率研究[J].中国注册会计师,2009(5):41-45.
    [55]杨永森.我国会计师事务所运营效率的实证分析[J].财会月刊,2009(4):71-73.
    [56]Y巴泽尔、费方域、段毅才.产权的经济分析[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
    [57]叶丰滢.审计市场结构——审计师行业专门化行为与审计价格竞争[D].厦门大学博士论文,2007.
    [58]余玉苗、李琳.审计师任期与审计质量之间关系的理论分析[J].经济评论,2003(5): 124-128.
    [59]余玉苗.行业知识、行业专门化与独立审计风险的控制[J].审计研究,2004(5):63-67.
    [60]袁庆明.新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2005:169.
    [61]袁晓玲、张宝山.中国商业银行全要素生产率的影响因素研究—基于DEA模型的Malmquist指数分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(4):93-104.
    [62]詹森、麦克林.专门知识、一般知识和组织结构(载于契约经济学)[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [63]张健华.我国商业银行的X效率分析[J].金融研究,2003(6):46-57.
    [64]张健华.我国商业银行效率研究的DEA方法及1997~2001年效率的实证分析[J],金融研究,2003(3):11-25.
    [65]张奇峰.政府管制、公司控制权安排与独立审计需求——来自审计师选择与审计费用的经验证据[M].上海:立信会计出版社,2007.
    [66]中国证券监督管理委员会首席会计师办公室.谁审计中国证券市场——审计市场分析[M],北京:中国财政经济出版社,2001.
    [67]周其仁.市场里的企业:一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J].经济研究,1996(6).
    [68]朱南、刘一.中国证券公司生产效率的数据包络分析[J].金融研究,2008(11):120-137.
    [69]朱南、卓贤、董屹.关于我国国有商业银行效率的实证分析与改革策略[J].管理世界,2004(2):18-26.
    [70]Akerlof, G.1970, "The market for lemons:quality uncertainty and the market mechanism". Quarterly Journal of Economics,84,PP 488-500.
    [71]Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz,1972,"Production, information costs, and economic organization", American Economic Review,12, PP 777-795.
    [72]Antle, R., J. S. Demski,1991,"Contracting Frictions, Regulation and the Structure of CPA Firms[J]",Journal of Accounting Research,29, PP1-24.
    [73]Arrunada Benito,2000,"Audit Quality:Attributes Private Safeguards and the Role of Regulation[J]",European Accounting Review,9,PP205-224
    [74]B Golany, Y Roll and Omega,1989, "An aPPlication procedure for DEA",17 (3),PP237-250.
    [75]Bain, J.S.,"Industrial Organization", Nonunion York:Harvard University Press,1959.
    [76]Bain,J.S., "Barriers to New Competition",Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1956.
    [77]Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW,1984, "Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiency in data envelopment analysi", Management Science;30, PP 1078-92.
    [78]Banker, R. D,1993, "Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: A statistical foundation", Management Science.39(10) 1265-1273.
    [79]Banker, R. D., Chang, H.,& Natarajan, R,2007, "Estimating DEA technical and allocative inefficiency using aggregate cost or revenue data",Journal of Productivity Analysis,27(2), PP 115-121.
    [80]Banker, R. D., H. Chang, and Y. C. Kao,2002,"Impact of information technology on public accounting firm productivity", Journal of Information Systems,16(2),PP209-222.
    [81]Banker, R. D., H. Chang, R. Cunningham,2003,"The public accounting industry production function", Accounting Econom.35, PP 255-281,
    [82]Banker, R. D., R. Natarajan,2004, "Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis", Working paper.
    [83]Banker, R. D., S. Das, S. Datar,1989,"Analysis of cost variances for management control in hospitals", Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting,5,PP269-291.
    [84]Barzel, Y.1977, "Some fallacies in the interpretation of information cost", Journal of Law and Economics,291-307.
    [85]Beasley, Mark S. and Petroni,2001, " Kathy R. Board Independence and Audit Firm Type"[J],Auditing,20(3),PP97-114.
    [86]Chang H, Choy H, Cooper WW, Lin M,2007,"How has the Sarbanes-Oxley act affected CPA Firm fee productivity? ", Working paper.
    [87]Chen, Y. S.,& Lee, C. C.,2006,"Performance of strategic alliances between business consulting and accounting firms:A resource-based perspective", Journal of Management and Systems,13(4), PP499-522.
    [88]Chen, Y. S., Chang, B. G,& Lee, C. C,2008, "The association between continuing professional education and financial performance of public accounting firms", International Journal of Human Resource Management,19(9), PP1720-1737.
    [89]Chen, Y. S., Chang, B. G, Lee, C. C,2008, "Organization type, professional training, manpower and performance of audit firms", International Journal of Management,25(2), PP336-347.
    [90]Chen, Y. S., Lin, C. L,2007,"Productivity growth, human capital and technical efficiency", Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge,11(2), PP266-273.
    [91]Chia-Chi Lee,2009, "Analysis of Overall Technical Efficiency Pure Technical Efficiency & Scale Efficiency in the Medium-Sized Audit Firms", Expert Systems with APPlications,36,PP11156-11171
    [92]Chien, S. H.,& Lee, C. C,2008, "Analysis on the productivity of CPA industry", Journal of Global Business Management,4(1), PP343-352
    [93]Chow, C. W.,1982 "the Demand of External Auditing:Size Debt and Ownership Influences" the Accounting Review,57 (2),PP 272-291.
    [94]Coelli, T. J., Perelman, S.,1996, " A Comparison of Parametric and Non-parametric Distance Function:with APPlication to European Railways", CrePPd Discussion Paper,University of Liege,Liege
    [95]Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K,2007, "Data envelopment analysis, a comprehensive text with models, aPPlications, references and DEA-Solver software",2nd ed. New York: Springer Science-Business Media, Inc.
    [96]Dan A. Simunic.1980. "The Pricing of Audit Services:Theory and Evidence", Journal of Accounting Research,18(1), PP161-190.
    [97]Danos, P., J. W. Eichenseher,1982, "Audit Industry Dynamics:Factors Affecting Changes in Clien-Industry Market Shares[J]",Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, PP604-616
    [98]DEAngelo, L. E.,1981, "Auditor size and audit quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics,3(3),PP183-199.
    [99]Dechow, P., Sloan, R., Sweeney,1995a, " Detecting Earnings Management[J]" The Accounting Review,70, PP193-225.
    [100]DeFond, M. L., Wong, T. J. Li, S. H.,2000, "The Impact of Improved Auditor Independence on Audit Market Concentration in China", Journal of Accounting and Economics,28(03), PP269-305.
    [101]Demsetz, H., Lehn, K.,1985, "The structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences" Journal of Political Economy,93 (6), PP1155-1177.
    [102]Dopuch, N. and Gupta, M,1997, "Estimation of benchmark performance standards:An aPPlication to public school expenditures", Journal of Accounting and Economics 23, PP 141-161.
    [103]Dopuch, N., Gupta, M., Simunic, D. A., Stein, M. T,2003, "Production efficiency and the pricing of audit services", Contemporary Accounting Research,20(1), PP47-77.
    [104]Dopuch, M. L., Simunic, D.,1980, "The Nature of Competition in the Auditing Profession:A Descriptive and Normative View", Regulation and the Accounting Profession, Lifetime Learning Publications, PP77-94.
    [105]Dopuch, M. L., Simunic, D.,1982, "The Competition in Auditing:An Assessment in Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research Urbana", University of Illinois.
    [106]Doogar,R., and R. F. Easley.,1998, " Concentration Without Differentiation: A New Look at the Determinants of Audit Market Concentration", Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.25, Issue3, pp217-234
    [107]Eegene F.Fama, Michael C.Jense,1985, "Organizational Forms and Investment Decisions", Journal of Financial Economics,14, pp 101-119
    [108]Fare, R., Lovel, C. A. K.,1978, "Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production", Journal of Economic Theory,19, PP 150-162
    [109]Farrell, M. J.,1957, "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, " Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ACXX, Part 3, PP252-290
    [110]Ferris, K. R., Larcker, D. F,2004,"Explanatory Variables of Auditor Performance in a Large Public Accounting Firm", Accounting, Organizations and Society,8(1), PP1-11
    [111]Francis, J.R,1984, "The effect of audit firm size on audit prices:A study of the Australian market", Journal of Accounting and Economics,6(2), PP 133-151.
    [112]Fried, H.O., Lovell, C. A. K. and Schmidt, S. S. (eds.),1993, "Production frontiers and productive efficiency'The Measurement of Productive Efficiency:Techniques and APPlications, Oxford University Press, New York, PP 3-67.
    [113]Fusco CR,2007, "Accounting for the accountants", The Conference Board Review, March/April,7.
    [114]Hackenbrack, K., and Knechel, W.R.,1997, "Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements", Contemporary Accounting Research,14(3), PP 481-499
    [115]Hann, D. P,1981, "Partnership versus corporation performance:An X-efficiency study", Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business 19, PP 9-18.
    [116]Hogan C E, Jeter D C.1999. "Industry specialization by auditors", Auditing, 18(1), PP1-17.
    [117]Hsihui Chang, Hiu Lam Choy, William W. Cooper, Barnett R. Parker, Timothy W. Ruefli,2009, "Measuring productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes of CPA firms prior to, and following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 43221-228.
    [118]Iyer Venkataraman M., Iyer Govind S.,1996, "Effect on Big 8 Mergers on Audit Fees:Evidence from the United Kingdom", Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory,15, PP123-132.
    [119]Jensen, M., W, Meckling,1976, "Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics,3, (4), PP305-360.
    [120]Jerris, S. I. and Pearson, T. A,1996, "Benchmarking CPA firms for productivity and efficiency", CPA Journal 66, PP 64-66.
    [121]Jones J.,1991, "Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations", Journal of Accounting Research,29, PP193-228.
    [122]Kenton B. Walker, Eric N. Johnson,1996, "A Review and Synthesis of Research on SuPPlier Concentration, Quality and fee Structure in non-U.S Markets for Auditor Services", The International Journal of Accounting,1, PP1-18
    [123]Klein, B., K. Leffler,1981, "The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance", Political Econom.89, PP 615-641.
    [124]Kooreman, P.,1994, "Nursing home care in the Netherlands:A nonparametric efficiency analysis", Journal of Health Economics 13, PP 301-316.
    [125]Krishnan, v.,2003, "Does Big6 Auditor Industry Expertise Constrain Earnings Management?, Accounting Horizons, SuPPlement(17), PP1-16.
    [126]Laurence Van Lent,1999, "The Economics of an Audit Firm:the Benefits of Partnership Governance", British Accounting Review,31, PP 225-254.
    [127]Leibenstein, Harvey and Maital, Shlomo,1992, " Empirical Estimation and Partitioning of X-Inefficiency:A Data-Envelopment APProach", American Economic Review,82, PP428-433
    [128]Leibenstein, Harvey,1966, "Allocative Efficiency vs'X-Efficiency'", American Economic Review,56, PP392-415
    [129]Leibenstein, Harvey,1982, "The Prisoners'Dilemma in the Invisible Hand:An Analysis of Intrafirm Productivity", American Economic Review,72(2), PP92-97
    [130]Lieberman, M. B., D. B. Montgomery,1988, "First-mover advantages".
    [131]Lovell, G.A.K., and Rouse, A.P.B,2003, "Equivalent standard DEA Models to provide super-efficiency scores", Journal of the Operational Research Society,54(1), PP 101-108.
    [132]Majumdar, S. K., Chang, H,1996, "Scale efficiencies in US telecommunications:An empirical investigation", Managerial and Decision Economics 17, PP 303-318.
    [133]Malmquist, S,1953, "Index numbers and indifference surfaces", Trabajos de Estadstica 4, PP209-242
    [134]Mayhew, B., M.S. Wilkins. Audit Firm Industry Specializations As a Differentiation Strategy:Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Publi", Working Paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison and Texas A & M University.
    [135]Michael C. Jensen, William H.Meckling, "Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure", Blackwell Oxford,1992, PP251-274
    [136]Neal T and Rildy R.R.2004," Auditor industy specialist research design".Auditing:Journal of Practice and Theory,23(2),pp169-177
    [137]O'Keefe, T.B., Simunic, D.A., and Stein, M.T,1994, "The production of audit services:Evidence from a major public accounting firm", Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), PP 241-261.
    [138]Otley, D. T,1980, "The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis", Accounting, Organizations and Society 5(4), PP 413-428
    [139]Palmrose, Z.,1986, "The Effect of Non Audit Services on the Pricing of Audit Services:Further Evidence", Journal of Accounting Research,24 (Autumn), PP405-411.
    [140]R. G. Dyson, R. Allen and A. S. Camanho et al.2001. "Pitfalls and protocols in DEA", European Journal of Operational Research,132 (2), PP245-259
    [141]Rajiv D. Banker, Hsihui Chang, Ram Natarajan,2005, "Productivity Change, Technical Progress, and Relative Efficiency Change in the Public Accounting Industry", Management Science,51(2), PP V291-304
    [142]Rogers, E,1985, "Diffusion of Innovations", Free Press, New York.
    [143]Romer, P,1987, "Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization", Amer. Econom. Rev.77(2), PP 56-62.
    [144]Ronald A. Dye,1993, "Auditing Standards, Legal and Auditor Wealth Liability", The Journal of Political Economy,101(5). PP887-914.
    [145]Schmalensee, Richard,1978, "Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry", Bell Journal o f Economics,9, PP305-327
    [146]Seale, Jr., J. L,1990, "Estimating stochastic frontier systems with unbalanced panel data:The case of floor tile manufactories in Egypt", Journal of APPlied Econometrics 5, PP 59-74.
    [147]Sen, J., MacPherson, A.,1998, "Regional patterns of business performance among small and medium sized public accounting firms in New York State", Regional Studies, Cambridge,32(9), PP827-838.
    [148]Shockley R A and R N Holt.1983. "A Behavioral Investigation of SuPPlier Differentiation in the Market for Audit Services", Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, PP 545-564.
    [149]Simunic, D. A,1984, "Auditing, Consulting and Auditor Independence[J]" Journal of Accounting Research,22, PP679-702
    [150]Simunic, D. A,1980, "The pricing of audit services:Theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research",18(1), PP 161-190.
    [151]Stein, M., D. Simunic, T. O'Keefe,1994, "Industry differences in the production of audit services", Auditing:A J. Practice Theory 15(SuPPlement), PP 119-134.
    [152]Steindel, C, K. Stiroh,2001, "Productivity:What is it and why do we care about it? Bus. Econom",36(4), PP 12-31.
    [153]Stigler, G.,1950," Monopoly and Oligopoly by Mergers"[J], American Economic Review,40, PP23-34
    [154]Teoh, S. H. and Wong, T. J.1993, "Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient", The Accounting Review,68(2), PP346-366.
    [155]Ting-Wong Cheng, Kuo-Liang Wang, Chih-Chiang Weng,2000, "A Study of Technical Efficiencies of CPA Firms in Taiwan", Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies,3(1),27-44.
    [156]W. Robert Knechel, Paul Rouse, Caren Schelleman,2004, "A modified audit production framework:Evaluating the relative efficiency of audit engagements", Working paper.
    [157]Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman,1981, "The markets for independence and independent auditors", Unpublished manuscript (University of Rochester, Rochester, NY).
    [158]Watts, R., J. Zimmerman, "Positive Accounting Theory", Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,1986.
    [159]Wu, Y,1996, "Technical efficiency and firm attributes in the Chinese iron and steel industry", International Review of APPlied Economics 10, PP 235-248.
    [160]Yardley, J., Kauffman, N., Cairney, T., Albrecht, W.,1992, "SuPPlier Behavior in the U. S. Audit Market", Journal of Accounting Literature,11, PP 151-172.
    [161]Zeff, S. A., R. L. Fossum,1967, "An Analysis of Large Audit Clients", The Accounting Review,42, PP298-320.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700