用户名: 密码: 验证码:
信息生态视角下上市公司信息环境研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
上市公司信息环境是围绕公司层面信息而展开的各种信息交流和信息活动的集合,信息环境的完善程度直接影响着股价对其内在价值的反应。随着金融全球化的日益推进,信息流动速度越来越快。由于中国证券市场总体上仍处于发展阶段,上市公司在飞速发展的同时存在不少问题,而这些问题与信息环境息息相关。在此背景下,公司信息问题受到学界和业界的高度关注,但对此目前仍缺乏系统深入的研究。因此,本文拟对上市公司信息环境进行系统化研究。
     信息生态理论为研究信息管理提供了新的视角。本文在信息生态视角下,沿着理论分析、实证研究、政策建议的路线,以沪深A股上市公司为研究对象,度量公司信息环境。并从信息生产、信息传递和信息消费的角度,分别对公司信息披露、传递与运用问题进行实证分析。
     首先,本文界定上市公司信息环境的基本内涵,强调上市公司信息环境是以上市公司为主要信息源,探讨市场参与主体的各种信息行为,不仅包括其自身的信息披露行为,还包括信息中介的信息解读和传递行为以及投资者基于公司信息而进行的投资行为等。同时,系统梳理上市公司信息环境及其相关影响的基本理论。
     其次,本文在归纳总结信息环境度量方法的基础上,以2002~2011年中国上市公司为样本,提出改进后的公司信息含量测度模型,对上市公司信息环境进行度量。并运用会计盈余指标,检验实证结果的有效性。
     再次,本文依据信息生态理论,分别从信息披露、信息传递以及信息运用三方面,系统探讨上市公司信息环境过程中的信息活动及其引起的股价反应。在上市公司信息披露方面,结合熵权系数法,首次编制沪深上市公司信息披露质量评价指数。并利用上市公司在样本期的综合评价结果,描述沪深两市信息披露质量的整体和行业状况。实证研究结果表明,本文所编制的上市公司信息披露质量评价指数具有较好的解释能力,与现实情况基本吻合;在信息传递方面,重点讨论证券分析师的信息传递行为。具体考察分析师信息传递行为与公司信息间的关系、明星分析师传递行为与公司信息间的关系以及市场涨跌行情的影响。考虑到分析师与公司信息的内生性,提出基于工具变量的实证回归模型。实证结果表明,中国证券分析师传递的信息以市场信息为主,但明星证券分析师能提高股价中的公司信息含量。市场涨跌行情的研究证明,市场行情越好时证券分析师挖掘的公司信息越多;在信息运用研究方面,通过对个人投资者和机构投资者的行为特征进行对比分析,发现机构投资者在信息处理方面具有明显的优势。在此基础上,本文对机构投资者的持股行为进行实证研究。实证结果表明,机构投资者持股比例和持股数量的增加能增加上市公司的公司信息含量,对改善上市公司的信息环境具有积极的作用。此外,通过对机构投资者持股比例与股价崩盘风险间关系的研究发现,机构投资者积极监督者假说在中国证券市场并不成立。
     最后,在上述实证研究基础上,本文系统阐述中国上市公司信息环境存在的问题,讨论成熟市场在上市公司信息环境建设实践过程中的成功经验与失败教训,并从提高上市公司信息披露质量、规范证券分析师行业发展、加强机构投资者队伍建设以及构建信息协同监管机制等多方面,为完善上市公司信息环境提出政策建议。
The information environment of listed company is a series of informationcommunication and activities based on firm-specific information. And companies’information environment has direct impact on the stock price reaction to its intrinsicvalue. Recently, with the deepening of financial globalization, the information flowsfaster and faster, and the listed company in the Chinese securities market experiencesrapid growth. However, there are still many problems, and these problems are closelyrelated with the information environment. Under this background, the academia andgovernment give more attention to firm-specific information, but there is still lack ofsystematic analysis. Therefore, it shows important theoretical innovation and realitysignificance that systematically analyzes the information environment of listedcompany.
     Information ecology theory provides a new perspective for informationmanagement. This study starts with theoretical analysis, followed by empirical researchand then political suggestion. Based on reviewing the relative studies, this dissertationquantitatively researches on the information environment by A-share listed company,and explores information disclosure, transmission and utilization of firm-specificinformation from information ecology perspective.
     (1) This dissertation defines the information environment of listed company, andespecially, emphasizes listed company is the main information sourse. The informationenvironment includes information disclosure of listed companies, informationtransmission of intermediaries and investment behavior of investors. Meanwhile, thisdissertation reviews the relative informational theory.
     (2) Based on summarizing the measurement method, this dissertation proposes animproved model by using Chinese listed company data from2002to2011. And theeffectiveness of the model is also examined.
     (3) This dissertation explores the information environment from three mainsections following information ecology theory. That is information disclosure,information transmission and information utilization. In the section of informationdisclosure, this dissertation calculates an information disclosure quality index withentropy weight coefficient method. And then the evaluation results are applied todescribe information disclosure quality of Chinese securities markets. The empirical result shows that the calculated index has better explanatory power. In the section ofinformation transmission, this dissertation focuses on analysts’ information behavior.And the relation between analyst coverage and the firm-specific information, staranalysts and the firm-specific information, and the impact of market trends are alsoexamined. Considering that the influences of analyst coverage on stock returnsynchronicity may be endogenous, this study also uses the instrumental variable toalleviate this concern. The empirical result indicates that analysts pay more attention onmarket-wide information, while star analysts coverage actually increase stock priceinformativeness. The findings from market trends, however, show that analysts increaseattention on firm-specific information in bull market. After previous procedure, theinformation utilization section is taken into consideration. In the section of informationutilization, this study finds that institutional investors have obvious advantages ininformation processing by comparative analysis with individual investors. And then thisdissertation investigates holdings of institutional investors. The empirical result showsthat institutional ownership and institutional number increase the firm-specificinformation, and have a positive effect on the information environment. However, therelation between institutional investors and crash risk also implicitly indicates the activemonitor hypothesis is not hold in the Chinese securities market.
     (4) This study reviews core issues in the information environment of Chinese listedcompany, and discusses international experience. Meanwhile, the last context proposesthe political suggestion to improve the information environment from the aspects ofimproving information disclosure quality, regulating securities analysts, strengtheninginstitutional investors and developing information synergistic supervision mechanism,and so on.
引文
1数据来源:中国证券监督管理委员会官方网站(http://www.csrc.gov.cn)。
    5数据来源:中国证券业协会官方网站(http://www.sac.net.cn/)。
    8数据来源:中证网(http://www.cs.com.cn/)。
    9http://www.finra.org/Industry/Compliance/Registration/QualificationsExams/Qualifications/P011051
    [1] Toffler A. The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books,1980
    [2] Davenport T H. Information ecology. New York: Oxford University Press,1997
    [3]英国联合信息系统委员会. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/themes/informationenvironment/overview.aspx,2013-05-30
    [4] Sami H, Zhou H. Do auditing standards improve the accounting disclosure andinformation environment of public companies? Evidence from the emergingmarkets in China. The International Journal of Accounting,2008,43(2):139-169
    [5] Lerman A. Individual investors' attention to accounting information: messageboard discussions. SSRN Working paper,2011,4
    [6] Bae K H, Bailey W, Mao C X. Stock market liberalization and the informationenvironment. Journal of International Money and Finance,2006,25(3):404-428
    [7] Aleksanyan M. Does the information environment affect the value relevance offinancial statement data? Applied Economics Letters,2009,16(8):835-839
    [8]罗义成.和谐信息生态探析.情报科学,2006,(7):1069-1072
    [9]蒋录全,邹志仁.信息生态学——企业信息管理的新范式.图书情报知识,2001,(9):2-6
    [10]吴涛.企业管理中的信息环境分析.管理科学,2003,16(6):18-21
    [11] Shan Y, Taylor S, Walter T. The role of non-accounting information inunderstanding stock return volatility. SSRN Working paper,2008,10
    [12] Kelly P J. Information efficiency and firm-specific return variation. SSRNWorking paper,2005,1:1-30
    [13] Roll R. R2. The Journal of Finance,1988,43:541-566
    [14] Campell J Y, Martin L, Malkiel B G, et al. Have individual stocks become morevolatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. The Journal of Finance,2001,56(1):1-43
    [15] Durnev A, Morck R, Yeung B. Value enhancing capital budgeting and firm-specific stock returns variation. The Journal of Finance,2004,59(1):65-105
    [16] Wurgler J. Financial markets and the allocation of capital. Journal of FinancialEconomies,2000,58(1):187-214
    [17] Vega C. Stock price reaction to public and private information. Journal ofFinancial Economics,2006,82(1):103-133
    [18] Morck R. Yeung B, Yu W. The information content of stock markets: why doemerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of FinancialEconomics,2000,58(1):215-260
    [19] Jin L, Myers S C. R2around the world: Flow theory and new tests. Journal ofFinancial Economics,2006,79(2):257-292
    [20] Li K, Morck R, Yang F, et al. Firm-specific variation and openness in emergingmarkets. The Review of Economics and Statistics,2004,86(3):658-669
    [21] Khandaker S. R square measure of stock synchronicity. International Review ofBusiness Research Papers,2011,7(1):165-175
    [22] Hsin C W, Tseng P W. Stock price synchronicities and speculative trading inemerging markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management,2012,22(3):82-109
    [23] Francis B, Hasan I, Song L, et al. What determines bank stock price synchronicity?Global evidence. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper,2012,4
    [24]孔东民,申睿.信息环境、R2与过度自信:基于资产定价效率的检验.南方经济,2007,(6):3-19
    [25]陈梦根,毛小元.中国证券市场价格联动效应的实证研究.财贸经济,2007,(5):93-99
    [26]袁知柱,鞠晓峰.基于面板数据模型的股价波动非同步性方法测度股价信息含量的有效性检验.中国软科学,2009,(3):174-185
    [27] Wang Y, Wu L, Yang Y. Does the stock market affect firm investment in China? Aprice informativeness perspective. Journal of Banking&Finance,2009,33(1):53-62
    [28] Brown L D, Richardson G D, Schwager S J. An information interpretation offinancial analyst superiority in forecasting earnings. Journal of AccountingResearch,1987,25(1):49-67
    [29] Valero M, Lee H W, Cai N. Cross-listing pursuit of unseasoned foreign firms aftergoing public in the U.S. Journal of Business Research,2009,62(8):797-804
    [30] Yu M. Analyst forecast properties, analyst following and governance disclosures:A global perspective. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,2010,19(1):1-15
    [31] Fernandes N, Ferreira M A. Does international cross-listing really improve theinformation environment? Journal of Financial Economics,2008,88(2):216-244
    [32]荣莉,袁盛奇,陈梅花.论公平披露规则与信息环境.会计之友,2010,(3):121-123
    [33]陈君兰,谢赤.上市公司信息披露质量测度与评价.证券市场导报,2013,(3):25-30,35
    [34] Stephen X H, Gul F A. Media coverage, stock price informativeness and investortrading behavior: evidence from China. SSRN Working paper,2009,12
    [35] Lang M, Lundholm R. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior.Accounting Review,1996,71(4):467-492
    [36] Healy P, Hutton A, Palepu K. Stock performance and intermediation changessurrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary AccountingResearch,1999,16(3):485-520
    [37] Karamanou I. Value relevance of analyst earnings forecasts in emerging markets.Advances in Accounting,2012,28(1):128-137
    [38] Loh R K, Mian M G. Do accurate earnings forecasts facilitate superior investmentrecommendations? Journal of Financial Economics,2006,80(2):455-483
    [39] Chen X, Cheng Q, Lo K. On the relationship between analyst reports andcorporate disclosures: Exploring the roles of information discovery andinterpretation. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010,49(3):206-226
    [40] Ramnath S, Rock S, Shane P. The financial analyst forecasting literature: Ataxonomy with suggestions for further research. International Journal ofForecasting,2008,24(1):34-75
    [41] Bryan M D, Tiras L S. The Influence of forecast dispersion on the incrementalexplanatory power of eamings, book value, and analyst forecasts on market prices.The Accounting Review,2007,82(3):651-675
    [42] Frankel R, Kothari S P, Weber J. Determinants of the informativeness of analystresearch. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2006,41(1):29-54
    [43]朱红军,何贤杰.中国的证券分析师能够提高资本市场的效率吗?——基于股价同步性和股价信息含量的经验证据.金融研究,2007,(2):110-121
    [44] Moshirian F, Ng D, Wu E. The value of stock analysts' recommendations:Evidence from emerging markets. International Review of Financial Analysis,2009,18(1):74-83
    [45] Barberis N, Shleifer A, Wurgler J. Comovement. Journal of Financial Economics,2005,75(2):283-317
    [46] Balsam S, Bartov E, Marquardt C. Accruals management, investor sophistication,and equity valuation: Evidence from10-Q filings. Journal of Accounting Research,2002,40(4):987-1012
    [47] Cohen R B, Gompers P A, Vuolteenaho T. Who underreacts to cash-flow news?Evidence from trading between individuals and institutions. Journal of FinancialEconomics,2002,66(2):409-462
    [48] Ting H I, Wang M C. Institutional Investors and Stock Return Synchronicity:Evidence from Market, Industry and Firm-Specific Information. Journal ofEconomics and Management,2011,7(2):285-308
    [49] Yan X S, Zhang Z. Institutional investors and equity returns: Are short-terminstitutions better informed? Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(2):893-924
    [50] Baik B, Kang J K, Kim J M. Local institutional investors, informationasymmetries, and equity returns. Journal of Financial Economics,2010,97(1):81-106
    [51]谢赤,张太原,禹湘.证券市场基金投资行为对中国股市波动性影响研究.中国社会科学,2008,(3):68-78
    [52]侯宇,叶冬艳.机构投资者,知情人交易和市场效率——来自中国资本市场的实证证据.金融研究,2008,(4):131-145
    [53]尹雷.机构投资者持股与股价同步性分析.证券市场导报,2010,(3):72-77
    [54] Xie C, Su D F. The Correlation between Accounting Information Quality andInformation Contentof Stock Price-and the influence of institutional investors’stock holdings to the correlation between them. In:20112nd InternationalConference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and ElectronicCommerce(AIMSEC), IEEE Press,2011:5870-5873
    [55] Foucault T, Gehrig T. Stock price informativeness, cross-listings, and investmentdecisions. Journal of Financial Economics,2008,88(1):146-168
    [56] Lang M H, Lins K V. Miller D P. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross-listing in the United States improve a firm's information environment and increasemarket value? Journal of Accounting Research,2003,41(2):317-341
    [57]沈红波,潘飞.证券分析师盈利预测与企业海外上市溢价——来自A股市场信息环境的经验证据.山西财经大学学报,2008,30(4):84-89
    [58]王亚星,叶玲,杨立.交叉上市、信息环境与经济后果——来自A股、H股市场的经验证据.证券市场导报,2012,(12):35-41,73
    [59] Wang J, Yu W. The information content of stock prices, reporting incentives andaccounting standards: International evidence. SSRN elibrary,2009,3
    [60] Gul F A, Kim J B, Qiu A A. Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, auditquality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of FinancialEconomics,2010,95(3):425-442
    [61] Hasan I, Song L, Wachtel P. Institutional Development and Stock PriceSynchronicity: Evidence from China. SSRN Working paper,2011,1
    [62]袁知柱,鞠晓峰.中国上市公司会计信息质量与股价信息含量关系实证检验.中国管理科学,2008,16(10):231-234
    [63]袁知柱,鞠晓峰.制度环境、公司治理与股价信息含量.管理科学,2009,22(1):17-29
    [64]唐松,胡威,孙铮.政治关系,制度环境与股票价格的信息含量——来自我国民营上市公司股价同步性的经验证据.金融研究,2011,(7):182-195
    [65] Dasgupta S, Gan J, Gao N. Transparency, price informativeness, stock returnsynchronicity: theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and QuantitativeAnalysis,2010,45(5):1189-1220
    [66] Xu N H, Chan K C, Jiang X Y, et al. Do star analysts know more firm-specificinformation? Evidence from China. Journal of Banking&Finance,2012,37(1):89-102
    [67] Lee H W, Valero M. Cross-listing effect on information environment of foreignfirms: ADR type and country characteristics. Journal of Multinational FinancialManagement,2010,20(4):178-196
    [68] Eng L L, Mak Y T. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal ofAccounting and Public Policy,2003,22(4):325-345
    [69] Cheng E, Courtenay M S. Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntarydisclosure. The International Journal of Accounting,2006,41(3):262-289
    [70]周开国,李涛,张燕.董事会秘书与信息披露质量.金融研究,2011,(7):167-181
    [71]巫升柱,王建玲,乔旭东.中国上市公司年度报告披露及时性实证研究.会计研究,2006,(2):19-22
    [72]王雄元,陈文娜,顾俊.年报及时性的信号效应——基于2004-2006A股上市公司年报的实证检验.会计研究,2008,(12):47-55
    [73] Langberg N, Sivaramakrishnan K. Voluntary disclosures and informationproduction by analysts. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2008,46(1):78-100
    [74]程新生,谭有超,许垒.公司价值、自愿披露与市场化进程——基于定性信息的披露.金融研究,2011,(8):111-127
    [75]陈梦根,毛小元.股价信息含量与市场交易活跃程度.金融研究,2007,(3):125-139
    [76] Marchand D A, Horton F W. Infotrends: Profiting from your informationresources. R&D Management,1988,18(3):290
    [77]粟湘,郑建明,吴沛.信息生命周期管理研究.情报科学,2006,24(5):691-696
    [78]柯平,高洁.信息管理概论.北京:科学出版社,2007
    [79] Fama E F. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. TheJournal of Finance,1970,25(5):383-417
    [80] Spence A M. Market signaling: informational transfer in hiring and relatedscreening processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1974
    [81] Sarod K T M. Empirical analysis of stock return synchronicity a comparison ofdeveloped and emerging markets:[dissertation]. Melbourne: RMIT University,2008,5
    [82] Durnev A, Morck R, Yeung B, et al. Does greater firm-specific return variationmean more or less informed stock pricing? Journal of Accounting Research,2003,41(5):797-836
    [83] Colins D, Kothari S, Shanken J, et al. Lack of timeliness and noise as explanationsfor the low contemporaneous return-earnings association. Journal of Accountingand Economics,1994,18(3):289-324
    [84] Pantzails C, Xu Z W. Is stock return synchronicity important in terms of stockprice informativeness? University of South Florida Working paper,2009
    [85] DennisR O, Zarowin P. Capitalization of R&D and the informativeness of stockprices. European Accounting Review,2007,16(4):703-726
    [86] Brockman P, Yan X S. Block ownership and firm-specific information. Journal ofBanking&Finance,2009,33(2):308-316
    [87] Teoh S H, Yang Y, Zhang Y L. R-square noise or firm-specific information. SSRNWorking paper,2009,7
    [88] Skaife A H, Gassen J, LaFond R. Does stock price synchronicity reflectinformation or noise? The international evidence. SSRN Working paper,2006,3
    [89] Alves P, Peasnell K, Taylor P. The r2puzzle. Lancaster University Working paper,2009,3
    [90] Xing X, Anderson R. Stock price synchronicity and public firm-specificinformation. Journal of Financial Markets,2011,14(2):259-276
    [91] Kothar P S, Li X, Short E J. The effect of disclosures by management, analysts,and business press on cost of capital, return volatility, and analyst forecasts: astudy using content analysis. The Accounting Review,2009,84(5):1639-1670
    [92] Botosan C A. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The AccountingReview,1997,72(3):323-349
    [93] Kim O, Verrecchia E R. The relation among disclosure, returns, and tradingvolume information. The Accounting Review,2001,76(4):633-654
    [94]曾颖,陆正飞.信息披露质量与股权融资成本.经济研究,2006,(2):69-79
    [95] Francis J, Nanda D, Olsson P. Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost ofcapital. Journal of Accounting Research,2008,46(1):53-99
    [96] Cheung Y L, Jiang P, Tan W Q. A transparency disclosure index measuringdisclosures: Chinese listed companie. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2010,29(3):259-280
    [97]张晓岚,沈豪杰,杨默.基于熵模型计量的内部控制信息披露质量指数研究.西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2012,32(1):17-22
    [98] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communications. Bell Systems TechnicalJournal,1948,27(3):79-423
    [99] Alvarez-Ramirez J, Rodriguez E, Alvarez J. A multiscale entropy approach formarket efficiency. International Review of Financial Analysis,2012,21(1):64-69
    [100] Risso W A. The informational efficiency and the financial crashes. Research inInternational Business and Finance,2008,22(3):396-408
    [101] Hermalin E B, Weisbach S M. Information disclosure and corporate governance.The Journal of Finance,2012,67(1):195-233
    [102]谢赤,王鹏.构建社会诚信机制刻不容缓.经济日报(理论版),2012-5-11
    [103] Fernadez F A. The role and responsibilities of securities analysts. SecuritiesIndustry Association Research Report,2001,2(7):3-10
    [104] Bushman R M, Piotroski J D, Smith A J. Insider trading restrictions and analysts'incentives to follow firms. The Journal of Finance,2005,60(1):35-66
    [105] Sun J. The effect of analyst coverage on the informativeness of income smoothing.The International Journal of Accounting,2011,46(3):333-349
    [106]刘昶,修世宇.分析师利益与投资建议的信息含量.统计研究,2008,25(10):103-108
    [107]张纯,吕伟.信息环境、融资约束与现金股利.金融研究,2009,(7):81-94
    [108] Chan K, Hameed A. Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emergingmarkets. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,80(1):115-147
    [109] Stickel S E. Reputation and performance among security analysts. The Journal ofFinance,1992,47(5):1811-1836
    [110] Fang L H, Yasuda A. Are stars opinions worth more? The relation between analystreputation and recommendation values. SSRN Working paper,2011,9
    [111] Ole-kristian H, Tony K. The association between macroeconomic uncertainty andanalysts' forecast accuracy. Journal of International Accounting Research,2005,4(1):23-38
    [112]陈君兰,谢赤,曾志坚.证券市场间信息传递效应实证研究——兼论金融危机的影响.管理科学学报,2010,13(11):112-120
    [113] Defond M L, Hung M Y. Investor protection and analysts’ cash flow forecastsaround the world. Review of Accounting Studies,2007,12(2-3):377-419
    [114]李翔,郑云娟.我国投资者结构与投资行为有新变化.上海证券报,2011-06-23
    [115] Cohen R B, Gompers P A, Vuolteenaho T. Who underreacts to cash-flow news?Evidence from trading between individuals and institutions. Journal of FinancialEconomics,2002,66(2-3):409-462
    [116] Chang C E, Dong S. Idiosyncratic volatility, fundamentals, and institutionalherding: evidence from the Japanese stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2005,14(2):135-154
    [117]王亚平,刘慧龙,吴联生.信息透明度、机构投资者与股价同步性.金融研究,2009,(12):162-174
    [118]李维安,李滨.机构投资者介入公司治理效果的实证研究.南开管理评论,2008,11(1):4-14
    [119] Black B S. Shareholder passivity reexamined. Michigan Law Review,1990,89(3):520-608
    [120] Ayres I, Cramton P. An agency perspective on relational investing. John M. OlinProgram in Law and Economics, Stanford Law School,1993
    [121] Gillan S L, Starks L T. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism:The role of institutional investors. Journal of financial Economics,2000,57(2):275-305
    [122] Chen X, Harford J, Li K. Monitoring: Which institutions matter? Journal ofFinancial Economics,2007,86(2):279-305
    [123] Hutton A P, Marcus A J, Tehranian H. Opaque financial reports, and crash risk.Journal of Financial Economics,2009,94(1):67-86
    [124] Chen J, Hong H, Stein J C. Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, andconditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics,2001,61(3):345-381
    [125] Kim J B, Li Y, Zhang L. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk:Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics,2011,100(3):639-662
    [126] Kim J B, Li Y, Zhang L. CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes.Journal of Financial Economics,2011,101(3):713-730
    [127] An H, Zhang T. Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors.Journal of Corporate Finance,2013,21(3):1-15
    [128]上海证券交易所,海通证券.推动长期资金入市培育长期投资者.上证联合计划课题报告,2013,3

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700