用户名: 密码: 验证码:
短生命周期产品供应链协调激励机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
根据短生命周期产品供应链协调的特殊性问题,针对系统中的信息不对称和成员间的目标不一致,论文从提高系统全局需求预测水平、建立激励约束机制、改变供应链成员行为三个角度,研究了短生命周期产品供应链协调的激励机制设计问题。
     本文基于支持向量机和模式匹配方法建立了组合需求预测模型,进行产品需求预测,为后续研究提供共享需求信息,减弱或消除牛鞭效应现象。采用契约激励方法进行激励协调,目标是实现供应链系统整体收益最大,减弱或消除逆向选择、道德风险和双重边际问题。契约激励方法由静态激励和动态激励组成。在静态激励中,建立了数量折扣契约和收益共享契约的组合应用方法,目的是实现信息不对称条件下单周期供应链系统总体收益最大;在静态激励基础上,建立了信息不对称条件下融入马尔可夫决策过程的动态委托-代理模型,目的是实现短生命周期产品供应链系统有限时段多周期总体收益最大。最后,在契约激励方法基础上,应用学习型组织理论建立了组织激励机制,构建学习型供应链,旨在改变供应链成员的行为,解决供应链系统的学习力问题,进一步解决契约激励方法不能实现的资源配置帕累托最优问题,甚至以整体社会效益最优为目标。
Supply chain management (SCM) is a business management theory gradually developed with ever-changing technology, intensified market competition and globalized economy. Supply chain management is a bran-new management philosophy and is widely valued by international management academe and business circles already. Supply chain is the typical, dynamic and needing to coordinate system, and supply chain coordination is the core question of the supply chain management. Two typical coordination problems, i.e. bullwhip effect and double marginalization, are caused by asymmetric information and the own aim of each member in the supply chain system.
     Nowadays, the character of short-life-cycle is already the remarkable characteristic of the product in the society. Therefore, the study on the incentive mechanism of the short-life-cycle product supply chain coordination possesses important academic significance and practical value. Firstly, the thesis adopts the combination forecast model of support vector machine and pattern matching to provide the shared forecast information for the system and weaken or eliminate the bullwhip effect phenomenon. Then the thesis applies incentive theory to design the mechanisms of static incentive and dynamic incentive of the short-life-cycle product to obtain the overall and maximum profit of the system. Lastly, the thesis exerts the learning organization theory to conduct organization incentive and construct the learning supply chain, so that we change the behavior of the member of the system. The thesis systematically solves the coordination problem of the short-life-cycle supply chain in the decentralized condition, i.e., asymmetric information of the system and the individual rationality of the member.
     The two coordination obstacle of the system, i.e. bullwhip effect and double marginalization, and their intrinsic reasons are deeply analyzed in the thesis. The thesis expatiates the character of the short-life-cycle product and its supply chain, analyzes the characteristic problem and the policy of the of the supply chain coordination. The pointcut of the study are built from the above-mentioned two aspects in the thesis.
     The coordination policy based on the combination demand forecast of the global system is studied in the thesis. The demand information forecast is to afford the sufficient information for the supply chain system and to enhance the information precision of the system. The information sharing can make the member of the supply chain observe more private information, thereby effectively alleviating the phenomenon of bullwhip effect induced by asymmetric information. Adopting different demand forecast methods and lacking the rational information sharing are the main reasons of forming the bullwhip effect of the supply chain system when each echelon member of the supply chain makes predictions.
     In response to the characteristic of the short-life-cycle product, the thesis adopts the combination forecast method of support vector machine and pattern matching to make the demand forecast and overcomes the existing deficiency of the previous demand forecast method. The support vector machine as a machine learning method improves the prediction precision. The pattern matching method solves the problem of the absence of the historical data or no data at all. The combination forecast method gain superior forecast precision. Cooperation and competition coexist in the members of the supply chain. Coordinated forecast of the members of the supply chain make them form the strategic fellowship, i.e., they adopt the same forecast method to reduce the prediction error of demand forecast born by independent work.
     Except enhancing forecast precision, execution policy is studied in the thesis. To solve the influence of the asymmetric information on the supply chain coordination, the more important work is to build the information platform, except for improving the technology of the information forecast. With the information platform, we can share the demand forecast result, offer the demand information for the decision of the member of each echelon, and institute the policy to make the system obtain the overall and maximum profit according to the result of the demand forecast. When decision based on the sharing of partial or all information, the pace of each echelon of the supply chain will be consistent and the correlation of them will be coordinated. The theoretic study and practical result both indicate that conducting information sharing and avoiding multi-echolon demand forecast will weaken the bullwhip effect greatly. In addition to the information platform, enhancing the information sharing and carrying out the synergy forecast must be based on incentive mechanism, design rational incentive contract and construct perfect incentive and constraint mechamism. Therefore, weakening or eliminating the effect of the information asymmetry on the coordination of the supply chain and building trusty information sharing between members of the supply chain.
     The coordination policy based on contract incentive is studied in the thesis. The contract incentive solves the problem of the overall and maximum profit of the supply chain system. The contract incentive is the main method of the supply chain coordination. The asymmetric information in the system and own aim between the members of the supply chain are the two basic factors causing the incentive problems. Appropriate contract design can improve the problem of adverse selection and moral hazard induced by asymmetric information and the problem of double marginalization induced by individual rationality. The contract incentive studied by the thesis contains static incentive and dynamic incentive.
     Static incentive, i.e. the single period incentive, centers on content incentive and solves the problem of behavior solicitation. The goal of the static incentive is to realize the overall and maximum profit of the supply chain system in the single period and the asymmetric information. The method of the static incentive is the combination application of quantity discount contract model and revenue sharing contract model. Quantity discount contract motivates the retailer to increase the order quantity and realize the overall and maximum profit of the supply chain system, and the contract induces the double marginalization the same time. And revenue sharing contract can realize another assignment of the increased profit of the system, make each member’s profit increase and eliminate the double marginalization. On the mechanism design of the static incentive, the combination application of the quantity discount contract model and revenue sharing contract model can lead the members of the supply chain to adopt the policy of the overall and maximum profit and realize the overall and maximum profit in the single period and asymmetric information. And the method can realize the bear of the risk and the sharing of the revenue between members of the supply chain. The method conquers the asymmetric information in the supply chain system and the individual rationality of the members of the supply chain by the mechanism design and weakens or eliminates restrains adverse selection, moral hazard and double marginalization.
     To deeply mine the profit potential of the supply chain system and solve the special problem of the supply chain coordination for the short-life-cycle products more, the dynamic incentive model of the short-life-cycle product is built in the condition of the asymmetric information based on the markov decision process and the multi-period overall and maximum profit of finite-interval supply chain system is realized. By the analysis of the numerical value, the optimal policy of the incentive coordination of the supply chain is obtained. On the base of the static incentive, i.e. the content incentive, the dynamic incentive coordination, i.e. the process incentive problem is solved. In the thesis, the final state of multi-period incentive coordination of the supply chain system, i.e. the repeated game of the members of the supply chain, is presented theoretically. The system coordination obtains the result of the Pareto Optimality and the supply chain system is in equilibrium in the end. Thereby, the organic combination of static incentive and dynamic incentive of the supply chain system is realized. Because dynamic incentive can make members of the supply chain consider the current benefit and the long benefit, we can realize the overall and maximum profit of finite-interval supply chain system, and obtain the optimal policy of the incentive coordination of the supply chain. The repeated game of the members of the supply chain makes the system coordination obtain the Pareto Optimality result, realizes the overall and maximum profit of the multi-period incentive coordination of the supply chain system. And the supply chain system is in equilibrium in the end. By the organic combination of static incentive and dynamic incentive, the intrinsic profit potential of the supply chain system is deeply mined and the perfect state of the system coordination is approached or attained.
     The coordination policy based on organization incentive is studied in the thesis. Organization incentive solves the learning capacity of the supply chain system in the end. The contract incentive only cannot solve all problems of the coordination of the supply chain and the contract incentive adopted in the coordination of the supply chain cannot realize the Pareto Optimum of the resource configuration. The supply chain is a complicated system participated by persons. To further solve the coordination problem of the supply chain, we should try to change the person’s behavior to solve the coordination problem of the supply chain further. Contract incentive is the execution basis of organization incentive and organization incentive enhances the coordination effect of contract incentive further. The supply chain based on incentive studies the coordination problem from the institution point of view, while the supply chain based on learning organization theory studies the coordination problem from the organization point of view. The combination application of contract incentive and organization incentive can effectively improve the core competence of the supply chain system.
     Constructing the learning supply chain on the basis of the five disciplines affords a new management measure for studying supply chain coordination. By constructing learning supply chain, organization incentive is executed in the supply chain system and the behavior of members of the supply chain is changed. In the learning supply chain, members of the supply chain reinforce the information sharing initiatively, build trust in members of the supply chain and endeavor to the holistic goal. The profit of members increases with the increase of the system profit. By constructing learning supply chain, the strategic fellowship and trust relationship built in members of the supply chain even help to the realization of the coordination. Learning organization is built in the supply chain system and the coordination problem is solved by organization learning. The organization incentive policy can solve the Pareto Optimality problem of the resource scheme that cannot be realized by contract incentive. The learning supply chain constructed on the basis of contract incentive can realize the Pareto Optimality of resource scheme further, and the optimality of the holistic benefit of the society.
     The major innovations are:
     (1) On the basis of deeply analyzing the characteristic problem of the supply chain coordination of the short-life-cycle product, by adopting combination forecast method and building the mechanism of the contract incentive and organization incentive, the thesis systematically solves the coordination problems of the short-life-cycle product supply chain in the asymmetric information. The method makes each member’s profit increase with the profit of the supply chain system, even aiming at the optimality of the holistic benefit of the society.
     (2) In response to the forecast characteristic of the short-life-cycle product, the thesis adopts the combination forecast method of support vector machine and pattern matching to make synergy prediction of the global supply chain demand information. Support vector machine as a machine learning method enhances the forecast precision; and the method of pattern matching conquers the problem of no history data or shortage. The combination forecast method based on the execution policy of the information platform and incentive mechanism design enhances the level of the information sharing of the short-life-cycle product supply chain.
     (3) By combining markov decision process with principal-agent model, the dynamic model of the short-life-cycle product supply chain coordination is built. By computing the model gets the Pareto Optimality policy of the multi-period incentive coordination of the supply chain system. Adopting markov decision process avoids the equilibrium solution problem of repeated game. The multi-period incentive coordination of the supply chain system, i.e. the final result of the repeated game of the supply chain members is presented theoretically. The supply chain system is in equilibrium in the end. Thereby, the organic combination of static incentive and dynamic incentive of the supply chain system is realized in the thesis.
     (4) By applying learning organization theory, organization incentive is conducted in the supply chain system and the learning supply chain is built. Organization learning can change the behavior of members of the supply chain, solve the coordination obstacle existing in the supply chain system, and realize the overall and maximum profit of the supply chain system, even the overall and most social profit.
引文
[1]朱毅华.农产品供应链物流整合实证研究[D].南京:南京农业大学经济管理学院,2004.
    [2] Kraljic Peter. Purchasing must become supply management[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1983(9-12): 110-117.
    [3] Roy D. Shapiro. Get leverage from logistics[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1984(5-6): 119-126.
    [4]马士华.供应链管理(第2版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2008.
    [5]朱九龙.基于供应链管理理论的南水北调水量控制与水资源分配模型研究[D].南京:河海大学商学院,2006.
    [6]钱东人,朱海波.论实施供应链管理的战略意义[J].商业研究,2004(15):116-118.
    [7]陈良华,李文.供应链管理的演进与研究框架的解析[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,6(1):26-29.
    [8]姜方桃.集成化供应链管理的绩效评价研究[D].南京:河海大学商学院,2006.
    [9] CK Prahalad, G Hamel. The Core Competence of the Corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990(68): 79-91.
    [10]赵泉午.基于报童模型的易逝品供应链合同研究[D].重庆:重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,2004.
    [11]董安邦,廖志英.供应链管理的研究综述[J].工业工程,2002,5(5):16-20.
    [12] Hau L. Lee. The Triple-A Supply Chain[J]. Harvard business review, 2004(12), Product 8096.
    [13]王小玫.与李效良对话——危机下的供应链战略[EB/OL]. [2009-08-07]. http://interscm.com/person/interview/200908/07-57444.html.
    [14] Supply Chain Council. SCOR Overview Version 9.0[EB/OL]. https://www.supply-chain.org/.
    [15] Chee Yew Wong, John Johansen, Hans-Henrik Hvobly. Supply Chain Coordination Problems: Literature Review [M]. Working Paper of Aalborg University, 2004.
    [16] Tsay, A. S., Nahmias, S., Agrawal, N. Modeling supply chain contracts: A review[M]. Quantitative models for supply chain management. Boston: Kluwer, 1999:299-336.
    [17] Gérard P Cachon. Supply chain coordination with contracts[M]. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science:Supply Chain Management. NorthHolland: North Holland Publish Company, 2002.
    [18] Forrester, J. W. Industrial dynamics[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1958, 8:37-66.
    [19]赵涛,高远洋,梁艳.供应链管理中的协调机制设计[J].价值工程,2003年增刊:34-40.
    [20] Richard Y.K. Fung, Tsiushuang Chen. A multiagent supply chain planning and coordination architecture[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 2005, 25: 811-819.
    [21] Soroor J, Tarokh, MJ, Shemshadi A. Initiating a state of the art system for real-time supply chain coordination[J]. European journal of operational research, 2009, 196(2): 635-650.
    [22] Zhimin Huang, Susan X Li, Vijay Mahajan. An analysis of manufacturer-retailer supply chain coordination in cooperative advertising[J]. Decision Sciences, 2002, 33(3); ABI/INFORM Global: 469-494.
    [23] Hennet JC, Arda, Y. Supply chain coordination: A game-theory approach[C]. Rabat : 6th Conference on Modelling and Simulation, 2006.
    [24]封云,马军海.供应链需求预测的非线性方法研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(5):82-86.
    [25] Lee N, Padmanabhan S, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(4): 546-558.
    [26] Frank Chen, Zvi Drezner, Jennifer K.Ryan, David Simchi-Levi. Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information[J]. Management Science, 2000a, 46(3): 436-443.
    [27] Ryan, S.M. Forecast frequency in rolling horizon hedging heuristics for capacity expansion[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 109 (3): 550–558.
    [28] Businger, M.P., Read, R.R. Identification of demand patterns for selective processing: A case study[J]. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 1999, 27 (2): 189–200.
    [29] Frank Chen, Jennifer K, Ryan, David Simchi-Levi. The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2000b, 47: 269-286.
    [30] Zhang Fenrong, Jin Junwen. The application of GM(1,1) in the prediction of logistics freight quantity[J]. Industry Technology economy, 2003, 6: 72-73.
    [31]钟昌宝,聂茂林,徐永其.基于灰色马尔柯夫改进模型预测供应链独立需求[J].情报杂志,2009,28(6):199-203.
    [32]李刚,赵丽维.基于多agent的多级供应链需求预测研究[J].技术与创新管理,2008,29(2):145-148.
    [33]周明慧.供应链牛鞭效应风险的神经网络预测模型研究[J].商业研究,2008,545,25-26.
    [34]彭志忠.供应链需求预测中的神经网络预测技术应用分析[J].中国流通经济,2007,12:15-17.
    [35] Yang Maosheng, Sun Ke. Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Logistics Demand Forecast[J]. Logistics Technology, 2005, 5: 39-41.
    [36]舒彤.供应链协同的供应商选择与销售预测[D].长沙:湖南大学工商管理学院,2008.
    [37]陈冬冬,杨春.支持向量回归机在农业供应链预测中的应用[J].四川农业大学学报,2008,26(3):290-292.
    [38]徐贤浩.短生命周期产品库存管理及运营策略[M].北京:中国物资出版社,2007.
    [39]徐贤浩,宋奇志.短生命周期产品的预测方法[J].统计与决策,2006,12:161-162.
    [40] Thierry Moyaux, Brahim Chaib-drag, Sophie D'Amours. Information sharing as a coordination mechanism for reducing the bullwhip effect in a supply chain[R]. Working paper, 2006, 2.
    [41] Karabati S, Sayin, S. Single-supplier/multiple-buyer supply chain coordination: Incorporating buyers' expectations under vertical information sharing[J]. European journal of operational research, 2008, 187(3): 746-764.
    [42]李善良.供应链委托代理问题分析[D].上海:复旦大学管理学院,2005.
    [43] Ilaria Giannoccaro, Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts[J], Int. J. Production Economics, 2004(89): 131–139.
    [44]邱若臻,黄小原.非对称信息条件下供应链收入共享契约协调[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(8):1205-1208.
    [45] Leng M M, Parlar M. Lead-time reduction in a two-level supply chain: Non-cooperative equilibria vs. coordination with a profit-sharing contract[J]. International journal of production economics, 2009, 118(2): 521-544.
    [46] Li SJ, Zhu ZB, Huang, LH. Supply chain coordination and decision making under consignment contract with revenue sharing[J]. International journal of production economics, 2009, 120(1): 88-99.
    [47] Li Jian-li, Liu Li-wen. Supply chain coordination with quantity discount policy[J].Int. J. Production Economics, 2006(101): 89–98.
    [48] Apostolos Burnetas, Stephen M. Gilbert, Craig Smith. Quantity discount in single period supply contracts with asymmetric demand information[R]. University of Athens and the University of Texas at Austin, Working Paper, 2005.
    [49] Zhao DY, Wang, FH, Qi, YH. Channel Coordination of a Dominant-retailer Supply Chain Model with Option Contract[C]. 1st International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, Mar 07-08, 2009. Wuhan, Peoples R China.
    [50] Chu CL, Leon, VJ. Scalable methodology for supply chain inventory coordination with private information[J]. European journal of operational research, 2009, 195(1): 262-279.
    [51] Mark R. Frascatore, Farzad Mahmoodi. Long-term and penalty contracts in a two-stage supply chain with stochastic demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 184: 147-156.
    [52] Wang Junyan, Zhao Ruiqing, Tang Wansheng. Supply Chain Coordination by Single-Period and Long-Term Contracts with Fuzzy Market Demand[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2009, 14(2): 218-224.
    [53] Ding Yuan-yao, Jia Rang-cheng, Tang Shao-xiang. Dynamic principal agent model based on CMDP[J], Mathematical Methods of Operations Research (2003) 58: 149-157.
    [54] Puneet Prakash Mathur, Janat Shah. Supply chain contracts with capacity investment decision: Two-way penalties for coordination[J]. Int. J. Production Economics, 2008, 114: 56-70.
    [55]刘斌,陈振,孙成金,白宏远,张荣.短生命周期产品供应链的契约研究[J].河南理工大学学报,2006,25(1):79-84.
    [56]刘斌.一类短生命周期产品供应链的协调机制与建模[D].南京:南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,2005.
    [57]周茵.关于短生命周期产品的供应链协调[D].长沙:湖南大学数学与计量经济学院,2006.
    [58]黄河,徐鸿雁,王旭.短生命周期产品动态定价下供应链协调问题分析[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2007,6:150-154.
    [59]赵泉午,熊中楷,杨秀苔,卜祥智.易逝品两级供应链中的数量折扣问题研究[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(3):318-322.
    [60] Liu B, Bai HY, Li Y, Wang WL. Supply Chain Coordination for a Short-Life-Cycle Product under Price-Dependent Demand[C]. 15th International Conference onIndustrial Engineering and Engineering Management, SEP 20-22, 2008, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China.
    [61] Liu B, Liu S, Qiu RG. Supply chain coordination with a combined contract with pending prices for a short-life-cycle product[C]. IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intellignet Services, Nov 18-20, 2007, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
    [62] Liu B, Chen, J, Liu, SF, Zhang R. Supply-chain coordination with combined contract for a short-life-cycle product[C]. IEEE Transactions on systems man and cybernetics part a-systems and humans, 2006, 36(1): 53-61.
    [63] Tim Coltman, Kathrine Bru b, Nidthida Perm-Ajchariyawong, etc. Supply chain contract evolution[J]. European Management Journal, 2009, 27: 388-401.
    [64]袁明达,屠新曙.学习型供应链—关于SCM的一些思考和探索[J].现代管理科学,2006(10):23-25.
    [65]胡本勇,郑循刚.学习型组织对供应链管理的作用分析[J].物流技术,2004(11):104-105.
    [66]屈改柳,刘新霞.学习型组织对现代物流管理的启示[J].物流科技,2005,28(119):48-50.
    [67] Davis Tom. Effective supply chain management[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1993, 34(4): 35-46.
    [68]单汩源,彭忆,高阳.一种协同生产管理实现模式[J].中国机械工程,2000,11(7):773-776.
    [69]周八益.基于采购契约组合模型的动态协作供应链研究[D].上海:上海海事大学,2003.
    [70] Sterman, J.D. Modeling Management Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamics Decision Making Experiment[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(3): 321-339.
    [71]卢守权,张智文.基于支持向量机的供应链组合数据挖掘研究[C].第七届世界华人交通运输学术大会.上海:人民交通出版社,200705,P:676-680.
    [72]李国正,王猛,曾华军.支持向量机导论.北京:电子工业出版社,2005.
    [73]邓乃扬,田英杰.数据挖掘中的新方法——支持向量机[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
    [74]曾绍华.支持向量回归机算法理论研究与应用[D].重庆:重庆大学自动化学院,2006.
    [75] Yu wen-bin. Agent-based demand forecasting for supply chain management[D]. Kentucky: University of Louisville, Department of Computer Engineering andComputer Science, 2003.
    [76] Lu Shouquan, Zhang Zhiwen. Multi-echelon supply chain demand forecast based on support vector machines[C]. International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2007(ICTE 2007). Chengdu: American Society of Civil Engineers, 200707, 2: 1316-1321.
    [77]李善良,朱道立,王斌.供应链企业间的委托代理分析:成因、特点及模型[J].物流技术,2004,11:106-109.
    [78]余永定、张宇燕、郑秉文.西方经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [79]刘刚.制造企业供应链管理的交易费用与决策优化研究[D].北京:中国社会科学院工业经济系,2003.
    [80]赵晗萍,冯允成,姚李刚.供应链博弈问题综述[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2005,18(4):1-8.
    [81]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2004.
    [82]让-雅克?拉丰,大卫?马赫蒂摩.激励理论(第一卷):委托-代理模型[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
    [83]刘峰.不完全信息、激励与机制设计理论[N].光明日报,2007-10-30(10).
    [84]梁捷.梁捷评2007年诺贝尔经济学奖:三位英雄,一位逝者[EB/OL][2007-10-15].http://www.china.com.cn/news/txt/2007-10/15/content_9060600.htm.
    [85]姜奇平.冷静看待机制设计:2007诺贝尔经济学奖引发的思考[J].中国计算机用户,2007,40,65-66.
    [86]科斯,哈特,斯蒂格利茨.契约经济学[M].李风圣主译.北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [87] Pasternack B A. Optimal Pricing and Returns Policies for Perishable Commodities[J]. Marketing Science, 1985, 4: 166-176.
    [88]庄品.供应链协调控制机制研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学机电工程学院,2004.
    [89] Hart, Oliver, and Bengt Holmstrom. The Theory of Contracts[M]. in Advanced in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987, 71-155.
    [90]蒋洪伟.供应链中的竞争与协调问题研究[D].天津:天津大学管理学院,2000.
    [91]董秀.供应链协调中的利润共享契约研究[D].北京:北京交通大学交通运输学院,2008.
    [92]何勇.具有随机市场需求的供应链契约模型研究[D].大连:大连理工大学管理学院,2004.
    [93] Joseph J. Spengler. Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1950, 58 (4): 347-392.
    [94] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations[R]. University of Pennsylvania working paper, 2002.
    [95] Plambeck, E.L, T.A.Taylor. Sell the Plant? The Impact of Contract Manufacturing on Innovation, Capacity and Profitability[R]. Stanford University and Columbia University, working paper, 2003(8).
    [96] Rao, R.C. Compensating heterogeneous sales force: some explicit solutions[J]. Marketing science, 1990, 4(9): 319-341.
    [97] Taylor, T.A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects[J]. Management science, 2002(48): 992-1007.
    [98] Monahan J P. A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(6): 720-726.
    [99] Albert Y. Ha. Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2001(48): 41-64.
    [100] Jeuland A P, Shugan S M. Managing channel profits[J]. Marketing Science, 1983, 2: 239-272.
    [101] Li yao. Supply chain modeling: pricing, contracts and coordination[D]. Division of SEEM, Chinese University of Hongkong, Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, 2002.
    [102]陈钊.信息与激励经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2005.
    [103]运筹学教材编写组.运筹学(第三版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
    [104] Moutaz Khouja. The single-period (news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research[J]. Omega, Int. J. Management Science, 1999, 27: 537-553.
    [105]李雪敏,缪立新,徐青青.报童模型的研究进展综述[J].统计与决策,2008,17:11-14.
    [106]金强.供应链管理中数量折扣契约设计[D].上海:上海海事大学经济管理学院,2006.
    [107]彭作和.供应链数量折扣契约研究[D].上海:上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,2005.
    [108]成建丰.我国公务员动态激励之理论研究[D].苏州:苏州大学政治与公共管理学院,2005.
    [109]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2007.
    [110] Radner, Roy. Monitoring Cooperative Agreements in a Repeated Principal-Agent Relationship[J]. Econometrica, 1981, 49(5): 1127-1148.
    [111] Rubinstein, Ariel. Equilibrium in Supergames with the Overtaking Criterion[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1979, 21(1): 1-9.
    [112] David M. Kreps, Robert Wilson. Reputation and Imperfect Information[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982, 27: 253-279.
    [113] Paul Milgrom, John Roberts. Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(2): 443-459.
    [114]李忠范,高文森.数理统计与随机过程[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2000.
    [115]刘克.实用马尔可夫决策过程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
    [116]胡奇英,刘建庸.马尔可夫决策过程引论[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2000.
    [117]贾让成.基于马尔可夫过程的有限动态委托-代理模型:折扣准则[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001,8:91-94.
    [118]唐绍祥.基于马尔可夫过程的有限平均动态委托代理模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001,10:47-50.
    [119]李华,胡奇英.预测与决策[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2005.
    [120]卢现祥,朱巧玲.新制度经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
    [121]厉以宁.人情道德与管理效率[N].新华日报,2009-5-20(B07).
    [122]彼得?圣吉.第五项修炼:学习型组织的艺术与实务[M].上海:上海三联书店,2006.
    [123]沃特金斯,马席克. 21世纪学习型组织:企业领导的管理艺术[M].上海:上海世界图书出版公司,2000.
    [124] Reg Revans. Action learning: New technique for management[J]. Long Range Planning, 1981, 14(2): 98.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700