用户名: 密码: 验证码:
大学生网络使用、成瘾状况与人格特质的关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
互联网的飞速发展给人类的社会生活带来巨大的变革,有积极的影响,也有很多消极的影响。在消极影响中,网络成瘾(Internet Addiction Disorder简称IAD)是近年来网络心理学研究的新热点。网络成瘾的诱因是什么?现有研究众说纷纭。目前国内外的各种假设和猜测大致可以归为以下几个方面:(1)计算机和网络的某些特性及其使用行为方式具有成瘾性。(2)网络交流本身的某些特点具有成瘾性。(3)网络成瘾是其它成瘾行为的一个中介媒体。(4)个体的某些人格特质容易导致网络成瘾。对于不同的人群,原因可能不一样。本研究选取大学生作为研究对象,着重研究成瘾得分较高者的人格因素,旨在从理论和实践方面寻找网络成瘾的人格特质的深层原因,指导大学生合理使用网络,积极有效地预防网络带来的消极影响。
     本研究采用卡特尔16PF、网络成瘾问卷、网络使用情况调查表对西安市1100名大学生进行了调查,有效问卷940份。其中男生401人,女生539人,城市学生610人,农村学生330人,一年级学生311人,二年级学生286人,三年级学生221人,四年级学生122人,理工科学生391人,文科学生350人,艺术体育类学生199人。经过对调查的结果分析,得出如下结论:
     1.高分组和低分组学生在人格特质上有广泛的差异:这些特质是:(1)乐群性(2)聪慧性(3)稳定性(4)有恒性(5)敢为性(6)自律性(7)恃强性(8)怀疑性(9)忧虑性(10)紧张性 高分组前六种人格特质得分低于低分组,后四种人格特质得分高于低分组。
     2.男生比女生容易网络成瘾,且容易游戏成瘾、浏览黄色网站成瘾,女生容易聊天成瘾。男生有成瘾倾向的人,在有恒性上比没有成瘾倾向的人得分低,缺少高超的目标和理想,做事不能坚持。而有成瘾倾向的女生比没有成瘾倾向的女生在乐群性上,趋向于缄默孤独,不合群,抽象思考能力弱,学习能力与理解能力不强,情绪不稳定易生烦恼,容易受挫,并且畏却退缩缺乏自信心,有强烈的自卑感,不愿意和陌生人交谈。同样具有成瘾倾向,男生的乐群性比女生低,而女生的忧虑性比男生高。
     3.有成瘾倾向的农村学生的聪慧性最低。低于其它组群(包括有成瘾倾向的城市大学生,没有成瘾倾向的城市大学生,没有成瘾倾向的农村大学生)
    
     4.高分组城市学生在恃强性上比低分组城市学生高,而在敢为性上比低分组
    城市学生低,农村学生则不明显。说明有成病倾向的城市学生具有矛盾的人格特质。
    有时好强固执,自以为是,有时又畏却退缩,缺乏自信心,有时由于过分的自我
    意识而忽视了社会环境中的重要实物与活动,这些人格特质较容易使他们迷恋网
    络,在网络中寻找寄托。
     5.高分组的心理健康因子明显低于低分组,且其个性明显不利于促进其
    成就,在新的环境中的成长能力差。
     6.高分组的上网时问和上网年限显著高于低分组。
     7.成病学生中理工类院校学生所占比例显著高于其它两类院校学生。
     8.网络成罐和不良的人格特质互为因果关系。
The quick development of the internet has brought forth the great change in people's life.This is positive,but also is negtive.In negtive aspect,the study of Internet Addiction Disorder is the popular focus of psychology in recent years.At present,there are various reasons for IAD both in China and in the world,which can be classified as the following:(l)the IAD in the characteristics of computer and internet.(2) the IAD in the exchange of internet.(3)the medium of IAD for other addictions.(4)one's characteristics.The reasons are not the same for different people.In this paper,the author makes a careful study of the college students in their personality which have high marks in IAD.The purpose of the study is to find out the deep reason for IAD both in theory and in practice, and instruct them to use internet properly to prevent the negative influence of internet.
    The author adopts Cateral 16PF, the questionnaire on IAD, and the using of internet to investigate 1,100 college students,which includes 940 valid questionnaires. Among them,there are 401 boy students , 539 girl students,610 city students,330 country students;and 311 first year students,286 second year students,221 third year students;!22 fourth year students;391 science and engineering students,350 liberal art students, and 199 art and sports students.By investigating and analysizing, the following are the results:
    First, There are great differents between the group who are of high marks for IAD and the group who are of low marks for IAD. The marks in happiness, cleverness, stability, persistence, boldness and self-discipline for high marks group are lo.wer than that of low marks group;the marks in strengh,doubtfulness,anxiety and nervousness are higher than that of low marks group,which are of notability.
    Second, The boys are easier to be IAD than girls ,games addiction disordered like to visit pornographic webs;while girls are easy to be addicted in chatting. The marks in persistence for the boys of higher marks group are lower than those of low markd group,who are short of aim and ideal and can't keep doing anything. The girl students of high marks group tend to be silent,lonely, and less capable in abstraction than those of
    
    
    
    low marks group.They are less able in study and understanding, not steady in mood, easy to be worried and frustrated,and short of self-confidence.Then feel inferior and would not like to with strangers.These are very obvious.In the high marks group,the boys feel less pleasant than girls, however the girls feel more worried than boys.Both are very obvious.
    Third, The cleveress of country students is the lowest in all students.
    Fourth, The marks in strength for the city students of high marks group are higher than those of low marks group,but lower in boldness than those of city student of low marks group,which is very clear,and not clear for the country students who tend to IAD.They are sometimes eager to do well in everything and stubborn, feel proud,but sometime afraid,and short of self-confidence.They are too self-satisfied to notice the important activity in the society.This will cause their IAD and search for sustenance in internet.
    Fifth, The marks of psychological health elements for the high marks group are obviously lower than that of low marks group,and their personality is less helpful to promote them to gain achievement.and they are less capable to grow up in a new environment.
    Sixth, The time on line and the number of years for the high marks group are higher than that of low marks group.
    Seventh, The proportion of science and engineening students are higher in IAD than that of art and sports students.
    Finally, The unsound personality is easy to cause IAD, and viceversa.
引文
[1]www.rider.edu/userslsuler/psycyber/psycyber.html, 1999
    [2]Young,KS,what is internet addiction? From the http://www. netaddiction.com/net-compulsion.htm, 1999
    [3]Cooper, 1998;Freeman-Longo&Blanchard, 1998
    [4]Greenfield,2000
    [5]Alvin Cooper&Sylvain C.Boies, 1999
    [6]Young, 2000
    [7]Brenner,V.The result of an on-line survey for the first thirty days. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,August 18,1997,Chicago,IL.
    [8]Egger O.Internet and addiction. http://www.ifap bepr.ethz,ch/-egger/ibq/iddres.htm, 1996
    [9]Thompson,S.Internet-Addiction-MCSurvey-resalts. http://caclpsu.edu/-sjtl 12/mcnair/journal.html,1996
    [10]John Suler. The Psychology of Cyberspace. http://www. rider, edu/users/psycyber/psycyber, html, 1999,1998
    [11]Young KS What makes on-line usage stimulating ?-Potential explanation for pathological Internet use. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,August 15,1997.Chicago,IL. 1997
    [12]John suler. The psychology of cyberspace. http://www. rider.edu/users/psycyber/psycyber. html, 1999,1998
    [13]Young KS.Levels of depression and addiction underlying pathological Internet use. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,Washington,DC. 1997
    [14]Young,KS.Internet addiction:symptoms,evaluation and treatment.in Clinical Practice:A Source Book, 1997,17:19-31
    [15]Young, KS Net compulsions:The Latest treads in the area of Internet addiction.http://www.netaddiction.com/net-compulsions.htm, 1999
    [16][19]林绚晖,阎巩固,大学生上网行为及网络成瘾探讨,中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15,4,283.
    [17]刘建银,互联网成瘾症研究的新进展,社会心理研究,2001.2
    [18]陈赟文,新的心理疾病:网络成瘾症,社会,2000.6
    
    
    [19]四川省发现首例“网络性心理障碍”,中国新闻社报道,2001年12月20日.一台湾男生网络成瘾跳楼自杀,申江服务导报,2001年10月3日.
    
    [20]Scherer,K.(1997).College life online: Healthy and unhealthy Internet,use.Journal of College Life and Development,(38),655-665
    [21][美]K.T斯托曼著,张燕云译,情绪心理学,1987.7
    [22]Young,K.S, August. 1996.Internet addiction:The emergence of a new clinical disorder.Paper presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,Toronto.
    [23]Storm. 1996,Young, 1998
    [24]Walther, J.B. (1999),Communication Addiction Disorder:Concern over Media,Behavior and Effects Boston:the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
    [25]Cooper A. Sexuality and the Internet:Surfing into the new millennium Cyber Psychology &Behavior, 1998,1, 181-187
    [26]Murphey B. Computer addictions entangle students .The APA Monitor, 1996
    [27]Robert Kraut et al. Internet Paradox. Anerican Psychologist, 1998
    [28]What is internet addiction ?From the http://www. netaddiction, com
    [29]Brenner,V.The result of an on-line survey for the first thirty days. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 18,1997, Chicago, IL.
    [30]Egger O, Internet and addiction. From the http://www. ifap bepr. ethz, ch/-egger/ibp/iddres, htm, 1996
    [31]Thompsom, S, Internet-Addiction-MCSurvey-resalts. From the http://caclpsu, edu/-sjtll 2/mcnair/journal. html, 1996
    [32]John Suler, The Psychology of Cyberspace. From the http://www. rider, edu/users/psycyber. html, 1999,1998
    [33]Young KS, What makes on-line usage stimulating?-Potential explanation for pathological Internet use. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Asscciation, August 15,1997. Chicago, IL. 1997
    [34]Computer and Cyberspace Addiction. From the http://www. rider, edu/users/suler/psycyber
    
    
    [35]Young KS, Levels of depression and addiction underlying pathological Internet use. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC. 1997
    [36]Young KS, Internet addiction:symptoms,evaluation and treatment, in Clinical Practice:A Source Book, 1997,17:l9-31
    [37]Dealing with Internet misuse in the workplace. From the http://www.netaddiction. com
    [38]How do you treat Internet Addiction?From the http://www. netaddiction. com
    [39]Turkle S. Life behind the screen:Identity in the age of the Internet, New York :Simon & Schuster, 1995
    [40]Mark Slouka著,黄培坚译.,《大冲突》,南昌江西教育出版社,1999年4月.
    [41]李工华,卢黎歌,《网络世界与精神家园》,西安交通大学出版社,2002年1月.
    [42]PAtricia Wallace著,谢影,苟建新译,《互联网心理学》,中国轻工业出版社2001年1月.
    [43]王逢振主编,《网络幽灵》,2000年10月
    [44]乐华编著,《网络心理行为公开报告》,2002年4月.
    [45]程乐华,曾瑜芬,网络交往中性别差异的调查研究,社会心理研究,2000,1.
    [46]董素兰,21世纪资讯社会相关问题初探及建议,“中国社会学”网站“因特网与社会学”专页.
    [47]吴齐殷,电脑架陶的社会网络:社会学研究的新领域,“中国社会学”网站“因特网与社会学”专页.
    [48]文杰、姜素兰,论网络交往行为的新特点,自然辩证法研究1998,10,14.
    [49]郑荣双,严全治,当代人际交往的网络方式和人格的多元化趋势,自然辩证法研究,1998,2,14.
    [50]夼马克.马丁(美),《网络革命P2P》,上海远东出版社,2000年2月
    [51]冯志鹏,《延伸的世界—网络化及其限制》,北京出版社,1999年4月。
    [52]白树林,《人类的天罗地网》,海南教育出版社,2000年5月
    [53]傅小兰,计算机群体与人的心理,心理学,中国人民大学书报资料中心,2000,4.石磊,上网心理分析,大众心理学,2000,6.
    [54]朱家聪,网上交友,大众心理学,2000年,4.
    [55]陈文,新的心理疾病:网络成瘾症,人大复印资料,2000,6.
    [56]蒋耕,陆俊著,《网络悖论》,国防科技大学出版社,1998年12月.
    [57]姜一平,网络术语的形成及其社会文化背景,国外社会科学,1998,5.
    [58]网络与信息,新闻日志,2000年9月.
    [59]张江燕,网络环境下高校学生用户的心理因素及其调控,中南民族学院学报,2000,1.
    
    
    [60]蒋平,《计算机犯罪问题研究》,商务印书馆,1998年2月
    [61]金鑫,《中国问题报告》,中国社会科学出版社2000年5月
    [62]阎峰,卜卫,《生活在网络中》,中国人民大学出版社,1997年4月
    [63]宋文英,何谓网络性心理障碍,北京,解放军健康,2000,10.
    [64]李少群,网络对青少年的负面影响,青少年健康研究,2000,2.
    [65]冯川、苏克.荣格文集,北京,改革出版社,1997年2月
    [66]中国互联网络发展状况统计报告(2000年7月),中国互联网络信息中心,From the http://www.cnnic.net.cn
    [67]郭良、卜为,2000中国五城市互联网状况及影响的调查报告,From the http://www.cnnic.net.cn
    [68]香子,北京晨报,网络综合症危害几何,2001.09.20,From the http://www.ccidnet.com
    [69]电脑是如何成“性玩具”的,From the http://www.xinhuanet.com 2001.12.16 09:52:18
    [70]互联网疾病面面观,From the http://www.shou.com 2001.02.08,14:40
    [71]张福清:上网成瘾症—新生精神病,北京青年报,2000.09.14,第4版
    [72]陈猛,网络成瘾的剖析,From the http://www.netpsy.at.china.com 2001.11.5更新
    [73]杨志平,网络心理学,心理学新的研究领域,From the http://www.PsychAPEO.com.htm, 2001.11.6更新.
    [74]李方,大学生上网情况调查报告(上)(下)摘自中国教育报 From the http://ChinaByte,2002.3.11
    [75]黄厚铭,《面具与人格的认同—网络的人际关系》,2000年1月
    [76]杨永明,王有智,王淑兰,《心理学》,陕西人民教育出版社,2002年4月
    [77]黄希庭,郑涌,《当代中国大学生心理特点与教育》,上海教育出版社,1999年6月

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700