饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡古近系层序地层学研究与岩性圈闭预测
|
摘要
以层序地层学和沉积学理论为指导,通过岩心、钻井、测井和地震等资料的综合分析,将蠡县斜坡古近系划分为3个二级层序、10个三级级层。在宏观层序地层格架的控制下,针对重点层段沙二段(SQVI)和沙一段(SQVII),开展了高分辨率层序地层学分析,以测井资料为基础,利用小波分析等方法,将其中低位域、湖侵域和高位域三种不同类型的6个体系域划分为11个准层序组。在关键取心井相分析的基础上,结合测井曲线特征、分析化验资料等,在SQVI～SQVII高分辨率层序地层格架内主要识别出辫状河三角洲和湖泊两种相类型,进一步细分为5种亚相、12种微相。综合砂层厚度等值线图和砂岩百分含量等值线图等单因素图件,分析认为:SQVI和SQVII低位域,在斜坡外带局部地区发育辫状河三角洲平原亚相,而辫状河三角洲前缘亚相作为沉积主体广布于斜坡中带及斜坡低部位;SQVII湖侵域基本为湖泊覆盖,滩坝相发育,只在大百尺一带发育小型辫状河三角洲前缘,并且该时期形成了全区最为重要的一套富氢烃源岩;高位域基本继承了湖侵域的沉积特点,只在南部地区有辫状河三角洲前缘沉积,北部地区为湖泊覆盖。斜坡中带和频临洼槽低部位的低孔中渗前缘席状砂储集体及中孔中高渗滩坝储集体尖灭于或被暗色泥岩包裹,具备良好的生储盖组合条件,是最有利于形成岩性上倾尖灭和透镜体等岩性油藏的区带。
With the theoretical basis of sequence stratigraphy and sedimentology, through the comprehensive analysis of the data related to cores, drilling, logging and seismic, the Paleogene in Lixian Slope of Raoyang Sag can be divided into three second-order sequences and ten third-order sequences. Under the control of macro-sequence stratigraphic framework, with the principle of high-resolution sequence stratigrphy, the Member 2 of Shahejie Formation(SQVI) and the Member 1 of Shahejie Formation(SQVII) can be divided into 6 system tracts with 3 types: lowstand system tract, extension system tract and highstand system tract, and on this basis, these 6 system tracts can be further divided into 11 parasequence sets, based on the logging data by the wavelet analysis. On the base of the sedimentary facies analysis of single well and combining with the characteristics of logging curves and the testing results, braided river delta and lacustrine are identified in the isochronal framework of sequence stratigraphy of SQVI～SQVII. They can be subdivided into 5 types of subfacies and 12 types of microfacies. Through the analysis of single factor maps, such as the sand thickness contour map and percentage of sandstone contour map, the braided river delta plain distributes on the outer belt of the slope,but along the middle belt of the slope the braided river delta-front is widely developed during SQVI and the lowstand system tract of SQVII, as the main part of the sedimentary. While the extension system tract of SQVII is covered by lacustrine , and beach bar and carbonate bank-dam distribute along the shoreline, only in the area of Da Baichi a small delta-front is developed. Meanwhile, during this period, the most important set of hydrogen-rich hydrocarbon source rocks were formed. The highstand system tract of SQVII basically inherited the characteristics of the previous phase, only in the southern region braided delta front develops and the northern region was covered by lakes. The braided river delta-front sandbodies which are low-porosity and medium-permeability and the beach bar and carbonate bank-dam which are medium-porosity and medium-permeability or high-permeability in the middle and inner belts are pinch-out in or wrapped by the dark mudstone. These areas have a good source-reservoir-cap combination, and are the favorable exploration areas of sandstone updip pinch-out reservoirs and lens reservoir.
With the theoretical basis of sequence stratigraphy and sedimentology, through the comprehensive analysis of the data related to cores, drilling, logging and seismic, the Paleogene in Lixian Slope of Raoyang Sag can be divided into three second-order sequences and ten third-order sequences. Under the control of macro-sequence stratigraphic framework, with the principle of high-resolution sequence stratigrphy, the Member 2 of Shahejie Formation(SQVI) and the Member 1 of Shahejie Formation(SQVII) can be divided into 6 system tracts with 3 types: lowstand system tract, extension system tract and highstand system tract, and on this basis, these 6 system tracts can be further divided into 11 parasequence sets, based on the logging data by the wavelet analysis. On the base of the sedimentary facies analysis of single well and combining with the characteristics of logging curves and the testing results, braided river delta and lacustrine are identified in the isochronal framework of sequence stratigraphy of SQVI～SQVII. They can be subdivided into 5 types of subfacies and 12 types of microfacies. Through the analysis of single factor maps, such as the sand thickness contour map and percentage of sandstone contour map, the braided river delta plain distributes on the outer belt of the slope,but along the middle belt of the slope the braided river delta-front is widely developed during SQVI and the lowstand system tract of SQVII, as the main part of the sedimentary. While the extension system tract of SQVII is covered by lacustrine , and beach bar and carbonate bank-dam distribute along the shoreline, only in the area of Da Baichi a small delta-front is developed. Meanwhile, during this period, the most important set of hydrogen-rich hydrocarbon source rocks were formed. The highstand system tract of SQVII basically inherited the characteristics of the previous phase, only in the southern region braided delta front develops and the northern region was covered by lakes. The braided river delta-front sandbodies which are low-porosity and medium-permeability and the beach bar and carbonate bank-dam which are medium-porosity and medium-permeability or high-permeability in the middle and inner belts are pinch-out in or wrapped by the dark mudstone. These areas have a good source-reservoir-cap combination, and are the favorable exploration areas of sandstone updip pinch-out reservoirs and lens reservoir.
引文
[1] Sloss L.L., Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1963,74:93~144.
[2] Sloss L.L., Forty years of sequence stratigraphy[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1988, 100: 1661～1665.
[3] Vail P.R., Mitchum R.M., and Thompson S. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level[J].AAPG Memoir, 1977, 26:10～11.
[4] Vail P.R., Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy.1998 AAPG annual convention short course: sequence stratigraphy interpretation of seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In: Bally, A W editor: AAPG Atlas of seismic stratigraphy,1988.
[5] Jervey M.T., Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequence and the seismic expression[J].SEPM Special Publication,1988:42:47-69.
[6] Haq B.U., et al, Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and eustatic cycles[J]. SEPM Special Pubication1988:42,71～108.
[7] Posamentier H.W., Vail P.R., Eustatic control of clsatic deposition, sequence and system tract models. In: Wilgus C etal eds. Sea Level Changes, an Integrated Approach[J]. SEPM Special Pubication,1988, 42:109~124.
[8] Van Wagoner J.C, et al., Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well Logs, Cores, and Outcrops: Concepts for High-Resolution Correlation of Time and Facies[J].AAPG Methods in Exploration Series 7, 1990,55.
[9]迟秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:9～40,123～145.
[10] Sangree J.B.,Vail P.R.,应用层序地层学[M].张宏逵等译,钱凯等校.东营:石油大学出版社,1991.
[11]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995, 22 (4) : 6～10.
[12]池英柳,张万选,张厚福,等.陆相断陷盆地层序成因初探[J] .石油学报,1996,17(3):19～26.
[13]纪友亮,张世奇,等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M] .北京:地质出版社,1998:31～53,144～164.
[14]朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:1～42,119～133.
[15]邹才能,池英柳,李明,等.陆相层序地层学分析技术[M] .北京:石油工业出版社,2004:1～61,105～192.
[16]蔡希源,宋国奇,等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学—隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践(基础理论篇)[M] .北京:地质出版社,2003:1～53,215～263.
[17]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派高分辨率层序地层学[J] .石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89～97.
[18]罗立民.河湖沉积体系三维高分辨率层序地层学—以准噶尔盆地东部北27井区侏罗系头屯河组为例[M].北京:地质出版社,1999:45～59.
[19]赵文智.石油地质理论与方法进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006:54～93,156～194.
[20]杨桂茹,崔俊峰,张文朝,等.冀中拗陷断陷盆地构造岩相带控制油藏和油气聚集带的形成[J].大庆石油学院学报,2009,33(2):10～15.
[21]崔周旗,李文厚,李莉,等.冀中饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡古近系沙河街组沙二段及沙一段下亚段沉积相与隐蔽油藏[J].古地理学报,2005,7(3):373～380.
[22]纪中云,谯晓容,陈秋生,等.蠡县斜坡中北部Es1上段三角洲砂体成藏条件分析[J].石油仪器,2006,20(4):64～65. .
[23]张振生,黎英,王冰.冀中凹陷陆相层序地层学的应用[J].石油学报,1997,18(2):26～34.
[24]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正,等.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及演化模式[J].古地理学报,2006,8(3):398～406.
[25]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正,等.饶阳凹陷下第三系层序类型及发育模式[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):1～9.
[26]倪超,纪友亮.饶阳凹陷古近系沙河街组层序地层分析及沉积体系研究[J].中国地质,2006,33(1):193～200.
[27]杜新江,赵捧,朱萍,等.华北油田斜坡带油气富集规律及评价方法研究[J].石油钻采工艺,2009,31(1):29～32.
[28]姜在兴,向树安,陈秀艳,等.淀南地区古近系沙河街组层序地层模式[J].沉积学报,2009,27(5):931～938.
[29]于培峰,王青春,贺萍,等.蠡县斜坡西柳10井区古近系沙一段油气成藏特征[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(5):29～32.
[30]张大智,纪友亮,韩春元,等.饶阳凹陷沙河街组辫状河三角洲沉积特征及储集性[J].中国地质,2009,36(2):344～354.
[31]周路,左虎,张峰,等.蠡县斜坡沙河街组构造及其演化特征[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(3):8～12.
[32]陈刚,刘林雨,雷鸣,等.博士庄地区下第三系石油成藏条件研究[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(1):46～54.
[33]张光明,陈恭洋,吴东胜.高30断块沙二段储层成因[J].大庆石油学院学报,2004,28(4):6～8.
[34]张光明,吴东胜.高30断块沙二段储层岩石及物性特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(4):83～86.
[35]王志宏,柳广弟,李建明,等.饶阳凹陷下第三系隐蔽油气藏的形成[J].石油天然气学报,2005,227(2):288～291.
[36]张以明,王余泉,刘井旺,等.冀中坳陷复杂断块油藏成藏模式研究[J].中国石油勘探,2006,2:15～18.
[37]李兵,张彦.华北油田加紧实施4966勘探部署[N].中国石油报,2006—3—14(02).
[38]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正,等.饶阳凹陷古近系层序发育的控制因素分析[J].沉积学报,2007,25(2):163～168.
[39]王权,金凤鸣,王素卿,等.饶阳凹陷岩性地层油藏控制因素与成藏模式[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(5):595～598.
[40]王林,倪超,于永兴.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层演化影响因素[J].断块油气田,2008,15(1):22～25.
[41]张大智,纪友亮,张瑞峰,等.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层研究[J] .地质调查与研究,2008,31(1):34～42.
[42]张文朝,杨德相,陈彦均,等.冀中坳陷古近系沉积构造特征与油气分布规律[J].地质学报,2008,82(8):1104～1112.
[43]梁宏斌,崔周旗,卢学军,等.冀中坳陷沉积演化与岩性油气藏勘探[J].石油钻采工艺,2009,31(增1):1～8.
[44]罗彩珍,田世澄,李瑞明,等.冀中饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡北段古近系沙河街组沉积相及成藏有利区带[J].古地理学报,2009,11(6):697～7001.
[45]崔周旗.渤海湾盆地冀中凹陷古近系沉积体系与隐蔽油气藏勘探[D].西安:西北大学,2005.
[46]蔡志国,郑国光,崔占堂,等.冀中油气区第三纪地层及微体古生物群[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:1～67,354～373.
[47]赵贤正,金凤鸣,等.陆相断陷洼槽聚油理论与勘探实践以冀中拗陷及二连盆地为例[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:22～103.
[48]宋万超,刘波,宋新民.层序地层学概念、原理、方法及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:2～46,186～214,222～232.
[49]张锐锋.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及隐蔽油气藏勘探研究[D].北京:中国地质科学院,2005.
[50]苗顺德,李秋芬,欧阳诚.黄骅坳陷古近系层序地层格架特征及模式研究[J].中国地质,2008,35(2):256～262.
[51]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(2):23～26.
[52]王卫红,姜在兴,操应长,等.测井曲线识别层序边界的方法探讨[J].西南石油学院学报,2003,25(3):1～4.
[53]王卫红,姜在兴,操应长.测井曲线在识别陈家庄凸起北部缓坡带层序边界中的应用[J].江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(1):62～64.
[54]王起琮.旋回层序地层的控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(5):648～656.
[55]赵伟,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等.小波分析在高精度层序单元划分中的应用[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(2):18～22.
[56]华北油田石油地质志编写组.石油地质志(卷五·华北油田)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988:46～57.
[57]李华南.冀中及其邻区白垩纪至早第三纪轮藻[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989,1～6.
[58]姚益民,梁鸿德,蔡治国,等.中国油气区第三系(IV)·渤海湾盆地油气区分册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:119～128.
[59]操应长,姜在兴,李春华,等.山东惠民凹陷中央隆起带古近系沙三段层序地层及沉积演化[J].古地理学报,2002,4(3):40～45.
[60]于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:211～272.
[61]李丕龙,等.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探(卷二·陆相断陷盆地沉积体系域油气分布)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:50～52,79～84.
[62]袁静,杜玉民,李云南.惠民凹陷古近系碎屑岩主要沉积环境粒度概率累积曲线特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):103～106.
[62]杨帆,张峰.蠡县斜坡隐蔽油藏类型及勘探思路[J].海洋石油,2009,29(4):33～37.
[63]秦建中.中国烃源岩[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:493～526.
[64]易士威,沈华.饶阳凹陷勘探潜力分析及下步勘探部署[A].中国石油勘探与生成分公司.渤海湾盆地油气勘探论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:130～148.
[65]王建,马顺平,罗强,等.渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力分析[J].石油学报,2009,30(1):51～55.
[66]王瑞明,王晓萍,丘平,等.饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡油源研究[A] .第十二届全国有机地球化学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C].2009:241.
[67]梁狄刚,曾宪章,王雪平,等.冀中坳陷油气的生成[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:167～181.
[68]赵力民,赵贤正,刘井旺,等.冀中坳陷古近系地层岩性油藏成藏特征及勘探方向[J].石油学报,2009,20(4):492～497.
[2] Sloss L.L., Forty years of sequence stratigraphy[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1988, 100: 1661～1665.
[3] Vail P.R., Mitchum R.M., and Thompson S. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level[J].AAPG Memoir, 1977, 26:10～11.
[4] Vail P.R., Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy.1998 AAPG annual convention short course: sequence stratigraphy interpretation of seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In: Bally, A W editor: AAPG Atlas of seismic stratigraphy,1988.
[5] Jervey M.T., Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequence and the seismic expression[J].SEPM Special Publication,1988:42:47-69.
[6] Haq B.U., et al, Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and eustatic cycles[J]. SEPM Special Pubication1988:42,71～108.
[7] Posamentier H.W., Vail P.R., Eustatic control of clsatic deposition, sequence and system tract models. In: Wilgus C etal eds. Sea Level Changes, an Integrated Approach[J]. SEPM Special Pubication,1988, 42:109~124.
[8] Van Wagoner J.C, et al., Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well Logs, Cores, and Outcrops: Concepts for High-Resolution Correlation of Time and Facies[J].AAPG Methods in Exploration Series 7, 1990,55.
[9]迟秋鄂,龚福华.层序地层学基础与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:9～40,123～145.
[10] Sangree J.B.,Vail P.R.,应用层序地层学[M].张宏逵等译,钱凯等校.东营:石油大学出版社,1991.
[11]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995, 22 (4) : 6～10.
[12]池英柳,张万选,张厚福,等.陆相断陷盆地层序成因初探[J] .石油学报,1996,17(3):19～26.
[13]纪友亮,张世奇,等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M] .北京:地质出版社,1998:31～53,144～164.
[14]朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006:1～42,119～133.
[15]邹才能,池英柳,李明,等.陆相层序地层学分析技术[M] .北京:石油工业出版社,2004:1～61,105～192.
[16]蔡希源,宋国奇,等.陆相盆地高精度层序地层学—隐蔽油气藏勘探基础、方法与实践(基础理论篇)[M] .北京:地质出版社,2003:1～53,215～263.
[17]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派高分辨率层序地层学[J] .石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89～97.
[18]罗立民.河湖沉积体系三维高分辨率层序地层学—以准噶尔盆地东部北27井区侏罗系头屯河组为例[M].北京:地质出版社,1999:45～59.
[19]赵文智.石油地质理论与方法进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006:54～93,156～194.
[20]杨桂茹,崔俊峰,张文朝,等.冀中拗陷断陷盆地构造岩相带控制油藏和油气聚集带的形成[J].大庆石油学院学报,2009,33(2):10～15.
[21]崔周旗,李文厚,李莉,等.冀中饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡古近系沙河街组沙二段及沙一段下亚段沉积相与隐蔽油藏[J].古地理学报,2005,7(3):373～380.
[22]纪中云,谯晓容,陈秋生,等.蠡县斜坡中北部Es1上段三角洲砂体成藏条件分析[J].石油仪器,2006,20(4):64～65. .
[23]张振生,黎英,王冰.冀中凹陷陆相层序地层学的应用[J].石油学报,1997,18(2):26～34.
[24]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正,等.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及演化模式[J].古地理学报,2006,8(3):398～406.
[25]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正,等.饶阳凹陷下第三系层序类型及发育模式[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):1～9.
[26]倪超,纪友亮.饶阳凹陷古近系沙河街组层序地层分析及沉积体系研究[J].中国地质,2006,33(1):193～200.
[27]杜新江,赵捧,朱萍,等.华北油田斜坡带油气富集规律及评价方法研究[J].石油钻采工艺,2009,31(1):29～32.
[28]姜在兴,向树安,陈秀艳,等.淀南地区古近系沙河街组层序地层模式[J].沉积学报,2009,27(5):931～938.
[29]于培峰,王青春,贺萍,等.蠡县斜坡西柳10井区古近系沙一段油气成藏特征[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(5):29～32.
[30]张大智,纪友亮,韩春元,等.饶阳凹陷沙河街组辫状河三角洲沉积特征及储集性[J].中国地质,2009,36(2):344～354.
[31]周路,左虎,张峰,等.蠡县斜坡沙河街组构造及其演化特征[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(3):8～12.
[32]陈刚,刘林雨,雷鸣,等.博士庄地区下第三系石油成藏条件研究[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(1):46～54.
[33]张光明,陈恭洋,吴东胜.高30断块沙二段储层成因[J].大庆石油学院学报,2004,28(4):6～8.
[34]张光明,吴东胜.高30断块沙二段储层岩石及物性特征研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(4):83～86.
[35]王志宏,柳广弟,李建明,等.饶阳凹陷下第三系隐蔽油气藏的形成[J].石油天然气学报,2005,227(2):288～291.
[36]张以明,王余泉,刘井旺,等.冀中坳陷复杂断块油藏成藏模式研究[J].中国石油勘探,2006,2:15～18.
[37]李兵,张彦.华北油田加紧实施4966勘探部署[N].中国石油报,2006—3—14(02).
[38]纪友亮,杜金虎,赵贤正,等.饶阳凹陷古近系层序发育的控制因素分析[J].沉积学报,2007,25(2):163～168.
[39]王权,金凤鸣,王素卿,等.饶阳凹陷岩性地层油藏控制因素与成藏模式[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(5):595～598.
[40]王林,倪超,于永兴.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层演化影响因素[J].断块油气田,2008,15(1):22～25.
[41]张大智,纪友亮,张瑞峰,等.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层研究[J] .地质调查与研究,2008,31(1):34～42.
[42]张文朝,杨德相,陈彦均,等.冀中坳陷古近系沉积构造特征与油气分布规律[J].地质学报,2008,82(8):1104～1112.
[43]梁宏斌,崔周旗,卢学军,等.冀中坳陷沉积演化与岩性油气藏勘探[J].石油钻采工艺,2009,31(增1):1～8.
[44]罗彩珍,田世澄,李瑞明,等.冀中饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡北段古近系沙河街组沉积相及成藏有利区带[J].古地理学报,2009,11(6):697～7001.
[45]崔周旗.渤海湾盆地冀中凹陷古近系沉积体系与隐蔽油气藏勘探[D].西安:西北大学,2005.
[46]蔡志国,郑国光,崔占堂,等.冀中油气区第三纪地层及微体古生物群[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:1～67,354～373.
[47]赵贤正,金凤鸣,等.陆相断陷洼槽聚油理论与勘探实践以冀中拗陷及二连盆地为例[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:22～103.
[48]宋万超,刘波,宋新民.层序地层学概念、原理、方法及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:2～46,186～214,222～232.
[49]张锐锋.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及隐蔽油气藏勘探研究[D].北京:中国地质科学院,2005.
[50]苗顺德,李秋芬,欧阳诚.黄骅坳陷古近系层序地层格架特征及模式研究[J].中国地质,2008,35(2):256～262.
[51]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(2):23～26.
[52]王卫红,姜在兴,操应长,等.测井曲线识别层序边界的方法探讨[J].西南石油学院学报,2003,25(3):1～4.
[53]王卫红,姜在兴,操应长.测井曲线在识别陈家庄凸起北部缓坡带层序边界中的应用[J].江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(1):62～64.
[54]王起琮.旋回层序地层的控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(5):648～656.
[55]赵伟,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等.小波分析在高精度层序单元划分中的应用[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(2):18～22.
[56]华北油田石油地质志编写组.石油地质志(卷五·华北油田)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988:46～57.
[57]李华南.冀中及其邻区白垩纪至早第三纪轮藻[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989,1～6.
[58]姚益民,梁鸿德,蔡治国,等.中国油气区第三系(IV)·渤海湾盆地油气区分册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:119～128.
[59]操应长,姜在兴,李春华,等.山东惠民凹陷中央隆起带古近系沙三段层序地层及沉积演化[J].古地理学报,2002,4(3):40～45.
[60]于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:211～272.
[61]李丕龙,等.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探(卷二·陆相断陷盆地沉积体系域油气分布)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:50～52,79～84.
[62]袁静,杜玉民,李云南.惠民凹陷古近系碎屑岩主要沉积环境粒度概率累积曲线特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):103～106.
[62]杨帆,张峰.蠡县斜坡隐蔽油藏类型及勘探思路[J].海洋石油,2009,29(4):33～37.
[63]秦建中.中国烃源岩[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:493～526.
[64]易士威,沈华.饶阳凹陷勘探潜力分析及下步勘探部署[A].中国石油勘探与生成分公司.渤海湾盆地油气勘探论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:130～148.
[65]王建,马顺平,罗强,等.渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力分析[J].石油学报,2009,30(1):51～55.
[66]王瑞明,王晓萍,丘平,等.饶阳凹陷蠡县斜坡油源研究[A] .第十二届全国有机地球化学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C].2009:241.
[67]梁狄刚,曾宪章,王雪平,等.冀中坳陷油气的生成[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:167～181.
[68]赵力民,赵贤正,刘井旺,等.冀中坳陷古近系地层岩性油藏成藏特征及勘探方向[J].石油学报,2009,20(4):492～497.