区域创新体系中产学研合作行为与微观机制研究
|
摘要
本文运用产业经济学、创新经济学等理论和方法分析了产学研合作创新的理论基础,从交易成本和知识耦合的角度给出了产学研合作的本质;结合区域创新体系的结构和功能,指出产学研合作创新是提升区域科技创新能力的必经之路和关键所在,通过演化博弈模型和行动博弈分析,详细深入的分析了产学研合作的各方行为模式以及强调合作才是创新的关键;分析了产学研合作创新的产权和利益机制、协同机制;结合本人在南阳的工作经验,实证剖析了南阳市的社会经济环境与产学研合作体系的构成,研究了产学研合作创新的微观运行,进而对其进行绩效评估,找出存在的问题,尝试分析原因,并提出相应的对策建议。
本研究的贡献在于:(1)在方法上本研究结合演化博弈和行动博弈,从博弈论的角度深入分析了产学研合作创新的选择行为以及合作模式,更重要的,本研究给出了一个产学研合作的一个广义的演化博弈模型,对前人的工作进行了拓展;(2)本研究深入分析了产学研合作的理论基础,从交易成本和知识耦合的视角进行了深入剖析,丰富了现阶段该研究的内容;(3)本研究论证了区域创新体系的结构和功能,并指出产学研合作是区域创新的关键所在,且给出了产学研合作的产权和利益机制以及协同机制,这就从一个更全面的角度给出了产学研合作创新的整体分析范式,并为产学研合作创新和区域创新体系的结合指出了分析路径。(4)本研究结合南阳的实地调查数据,实证剖析了南阳市的社会经济环境与产学研合作体系的构成,说明政府在创新体系中的地位与作用;相对于大多数的描述性的研究,本研究结合实际数据进行了产学研合作创新的实证研究。
In this study, we analyze the theoretical basis of the research of industry-university-reseaarch cooperation, and we point out that the transaction costs and knowledge- coupling are the key theroretical basis. In this paper, the regional innovation system structure and function is dicussed, and the industry-university-reseaarch cooperation is the key way to enhance regional innovation capacity of scientific and technological innovation. Further, this article through the evolutionary game model and game analysis, detailed and in-depth analyzed the the research cooperation parties and stressed the cooperation patterns of behavior is the key to innovation. Afterthat, this study analyzed the production of innovative cooperation mechanism for property rights and interests, as well as the coordination mechanisms to achieve effective research are the foundation of university-industry-government cooperation. Finally, based on the study above-mentioned, the combination of my experience in the work of Nanyang, we give the empirical analysis of socio-economic environment and the composition of research co-operation system, the Government in the innovation system and the role of the position. We also stuied its performance evaluation, identify the existing problems; and try to analyze the reasons and give the corresponding Countermeasures and suggestions.
Contributions of this study are: firstly, in the method of combining the study of evolutionary game and action game, from the perspective of game theory-depth analysis of the research university-industry-government cooperation, as well as the choice of modes of cooperation, but more importantly, this study gives a production science research cooperation a broad evolutionary game model, the work of our predecessors had to expand. Secondly, a depth analysis of this study was the theoretical basis for research cooperation, transaction costs and knowledge from the perspective of coupling an in-depth analysis at this stage of the study has enriched the content. thirdly, this study demonstrated that the regional innovation system structure and function, and pointed out that research cooperation is the key to regional innovation and research are given property rights and interests of co-operation mechanisms and coordination mechanisms, which from the perspective of a more comprehensive research co-operation given the overall analysis of innovation paradigm, as well as research industry-university-reseaarch cooperation and regional innovation system analysis pointed out the path of integration.lastly, this study combined with field survey data of Nanyang, and the Nanyang empirical analysis of socio-economic environment and the composition of research co-operation system show that the government play a important role in industry-university-reseaarch cooperation ; compared with the majority of the descriptive study, our empirical research enriched the research of university-industry- government cooperation.
本研究的贡献在于:(1)在方法上本研究结合演化博弈和行动博弈,从博弈论的角度深入分析了产学研合作创新的选择行为以及合作模式,更重要的,本研究给出了一个产学研合作的一个广义的演化博弈模型,对前人的工作进行了拓展;(2)本研究深入分析了产学研合作的理论基础,从交易成本和知识耦合的视角进行了深入剖析,丰富了现阶段该研究的内容;(3)本研究论证了区域创新体系的结构和功能,并指出产学研合作是区域创新的关键所在,且给出了产学研合作的产权和利益机制以及协同机制,这就从一个更全面的角度给出了产学研合作创新的整体分析范式,并为产学研合作创新和区域创新体系的结合指出了分析路径。(4)本研究结合南阳的实地调查数据,实证剖析了南阳市的社会经济环境与产学研合作体系的构成,说明政府在创新体系中的地位与作用;相对于大多数的描述性的研究,本研究结合实际数据进行了产学研合作创新的实证研究。
In this study, we analyze the theoretical basis of the research of industry-university-reseaarch cooperation, and we point out that the transaction costs and knowledge- coupling are the key theroretical basis. In this paper, the regional innovation system structure and function is dicussed, and the industry-university-reseaarch cooperation is the key way to enhance regional innovation capacity of scientific and technological innovation. Further, this article through the evolutionary game model and game analysis, detailed and in-depth analyzed the the research cooperation parties and stressed the cooperation patterns of behavior is the key to innovation. Afterthat, this study analyzed the production of innovative cooperation mechanism for property rights and interests, as well as the coordination mechanisms to achieve effective research are the foundation of university-industry-government cooperation. Finally, based on the study above-mentioned, the combination of my experience in the work of Nanyang, we give the empirical analysis of socio-economic environment and the composition of research co-operation system, the Government in the innovation system and the role of the position. We also stuied its performance evaluation, identify the existing problems; and try to analyze the reasons and give the corresponding Countermeasures and suggestions.
Contributions of this study are: firstly, in the method of combining the study of evolutionary game and action game, from the perspective of game theory-depth analysis of the research university-industry-government cooperation, as well as the choice of modes of cooperation, but more importantly, this study gives a production science research cooperation a broad evolutionary game model, the work of our predecessors had to expand. Secondly, a depth analysis of this study was the theoretical basis for research cooperation, transaction costs and knowledge from the perspective of coupling an in-depth analysis at this stage of the study has enriched the content. thirdly, this study demonstrated that the regional innovation system structure and function, and pointed out that research cooperation is the key to regional innovation and research are given property rights and interests of co-operation mechanisms and coordination mechanisms, which from the perspective of a more comprehensive research co-operation given the overall analysis of innovation paradigm, as well as research industry-university-reseaarch cooperation and regional innovation system analysis pointed out the path of integration.lastly, this study combined with field survey data of Nanyang, and the Nanyang empirical analysis of socio-economic environment and the composition of research co-operation system show that the government play a important role in industry-university-reseaarch cooperation ; compared with the majority of the descriptive study, our empirical research enriched the research of university-industry- government cooperation.
引文
毕克新,周欣荣.1997:可持续发展的产学研联合的机制.科学学研究.12:66-69.
蔡剑英,赵玉林.高技术产业化主体系统管理界面信息流通分析.武汉理工大学学报.2001(10):87-90.
蔡立彬,崔英德等.产学研合作是培养高素质人才的重要途径.教学研究.2000(1):45-47.
陈曦,曹伯祥,陆建飞.优化产学研合作模式及其对策.扬州大学学报(高教研究版).2003,(1):87-89.
陈翔峰.产学研的激励兼容机制分析.杭州科技.2003,(1):33-34.
陈啸.论产学研合作教育与大学生人格培养.合肥工业大学学报(社科版).2002,(4):22-23.
崔英德,郭建维,蔡立彬.论产学研联合及其新机制.广东工业大学学报(社科版).2001,(1):77-78.
邓国取,朱选功.河南省区域自主创新能力评价研究.河南省科技统计研讨会论文集.2008:18-19.
邓廿庆,卞修凡.新形势下发展高校产学研合作的若干思考.安徽农业大学学报(社科版).2000,(1):23-24.
杜鹃,李众众,叶冰,肖引,桑建平.中外产学研合作开发模式之比较.统计与决策.2005,(14):55-56.
杜玉波.深化产学研合作服务创新型国家建设.中国高等教育.2008,(17):28-30.
冯冠平,王德保.研究型大学在产学研合作中的作用和角色.清华大学教育研究.2003,(2):90-92.
盖羽中,隋广军.基于契约理论的产业网络形成模型:综合成木的观点.当代经济科学,2004,26(5):57-59.
顾海.我国产学研实践中制约因素分析及对策冲国科技产业.2001,(4):78-80.
郭文兵,魏建平,周英.国内外产学研合作教育的发展与启示.淮南工业学院学报(社会科学版).2002,(2):98-99.
郭文莉.从松散到紧密的校企合作之路冲国高等教育.2008,(19):47-49.
胡恩华,郭秀丽.我国产学研合作创新中存在的问题及对策研究.科学管理研究.2002,(2):76-79.
胡恩华.产学研合作创新中问题与对策研究.研究与发展管理.2002,(1):12-14.
黄兴维.大力实施科教兴宛战略 加快南阳经济社会快速协调发展.河南科技.2004,(9):4-5.
江海,马强.重构适合高校的产学研合作模式.科技管理研究.2004,(5)15-17.
焦锦淼.实施技术创新战略促进南阳经济发展.南都学坛(人文社会科学学报).2003,(1):111-114.
金鸽.我国产学研合作的薄弱因素分析及对策.中外企业,2002(4):33-35.
孔建益,陈奎生.创新产学研合作机制 提升学生实践能力.中国高等教育.2009,(3/4):45-46.
李廉水.论产学研合作创新的组织方式.科研管理.1998,(8):23-25.
李迎.产学研合作与工程硕士培养.南京理工大学学报(社科版).2003,(2):33-36.
李玉民.产学研合作的创新型模式.天津市教科院学报.2002,(3):76-79.
刘冰.经济变迁过程中的组织学习机制.中外科技信息.2002(8):49-50.
刘贵伟,吴立贤.产学研合作创新的模式及评价.辽宁教育学院学报.2001,(5):33-34.
刘建忠,张宸,刘怀举,王晓星.地方科研机构出路探析.河南科技.2007,(6):14-15.
刘军跃,崔骥,曾宪军,龙思红.基于产学研联盟的企业技术创新模式研究-对重庆摩托车企业技术创新的思考.企业经济.2003,(10):36-37.
刘力.政府在产学研合作中的作用透视(上)-发达国家成功的经验.教育发展研究.2002,(1):11-14.
刘力.政府在产学研合作中的作用透视(下)-发达国家成功的经验.教育发展研究.2002,(2):34-36.
刘力.走向“三重螺旋”:我国产学研合作的战略选择.北京大学教育评论.2004,(10):4448.
刘谋升.论地方政府在产学研合作创新中的主导作用.集团经济研究.2006,(7):7-8.
刘智远.浅论高校产学研合作的新发展.江苏高教.2001,(2):23-25.
陆文明,潘海天,孙毅.主动对接区域经济发展 深入推进校地产学研合作.中国高等教育.2008,(17):31-32.
罗利,鲁若愚.产学研合作对策模型研究.管理工程学报.2000,2:67-70.
马德秀.产学研联盟:实现高校超常规发展的有效途径.教育发展研究.2004,(9):15-17.
马唯星.麦肯锡的学习机制与知识管理.外国经济与管.2002(9):46-49.
南阳市统计局编.南阳统计年鉴2008.中国统计出版社.2008:323-324,452-474.
山红红.产学研结合的理念、模式与机制探索.中国高等教育.2008,(9):30-32.
申学武.高校产学研联合模式中存在的问题及最优化模式构想.科技进步与对策.2001,(12):43-46.
石火学.产学研合作的典型模式述评.高等教育研究.2000,(3):78-79.
苏敬勤.产学研合作创新的交易成本及内外部化条件.科研管理.1999,4:90-91.
唐恒,严新娟.全方位多形式的高校产学研工作.科学管理研究.2000,(2):112-113.
佟晶石.产学研合作创新体系与自主知识产权.中国软科学,2003,(1):67-69.
佟晶石.对产学研合作创新的认识.财经问题研究.2002,6:38-41.
汪佩伟,李帆.当代美国产学研合作的发展趋势及其启示.科技进步与对策.2000,(7):11-15.
王娟茹,潘杰义.产学研合作模式探讨.科学管理研究.2002,7:40-43.
王衍章.产学研合作的形式及其作用.山东土业大学学报(社会科学版).1999,75(5):75-77.
王毅,吴贵生.产学研合作中粘滞知识的成因与转移机制研究.科研管理,2001,5:22-25,33-35.
王玉慧.高等学校产学研合作再发展的环境问题与对策.科学管理.2003,(6):14-17.
韦钰.高校功能的扩展与产学研合作.求是杂志.2001,(2):23-24.
吴继文,王娟茹.中国产学研合作的产生、发展过程和趋势.科技与管理.2002,(4):24-27.
吴树山,孔繁河等.我国产学研合作模式与机制及其创新.科技进步与对策.2002,(7):21-23.
武贵龙.积极探索新型产学研合作机制.中国高等教育.2008,(20):28-30.
夏建国.产学研合作机制初探.教育发展研究.2002,(2):34-36.
肖久灵.产学研合作运行机制中存在的问题及对策.北方经贸.2002,(12):99-100.
谢开勇.高校产学研相互关系及其模式选择.四川工业学院学报.2003,(2):64-65.
辛爱芳.析产学研合作中的合作模式选择.企业经济.2004,(9):62-63.
徐恩波.促进中国产学研合作的目标、途径与对策.科技与管理.2001,(2):54-56.
徐风云,王行愚.拓宽办学思路形成产学研合作的鲜明特色.中国高等教育(半月刊).2001,(8):89-91.
薛志勇,荆武浩.洛阳市主要科技经济发展指标与十八个省辖城市的对比定位分析.河南省科技统计研讨会论文集.2008:60-70.
杨榕,张麟,武振业.探索产学研合作的新模式.经济体制改革.2001,(2):43-47.
杨燕.从高校科研成果转化难看解决产学研合作的重要性.西北工业大学学报(社科版).2000,(3):65-68.
杨越.努力打造国际一流的光电产品.国防科技工业.2007,(3):19-23.
杨志欣.加快科技进步与创新 为实现南阳崛起提供强大科技支撑.河南科技.2006,(7):6-7.
游文明,周胜,冷得彤,丛曙,张煜,杨跃峰.产学研合作动力机制优化研究.科学学与科学技术管理.2004,2:34-37.
张安富.创新实习基地建设探索产学研育人新机制.中国高等教育.2008,(20):33-34.
张国宝.推进产学研合作 加快高校科技成果产业化步伐.中国创业投资与高科技.2003,(9):23-26.
张俊,李忠云.产学研合作的运行机制探讨.中国高等教育(半月刊).2001,(22):33-35.
张俊,李忠云.论我国高校产学研合作运行机制的分类与评价.中国科技信息.2005,(19):5-6.
张起民.深化产学研合作 促进高校科技创新.科技进步与对策.2000,(8):55-57.
张声雄主编.《第五项修炼》导读.上海三联书店.2001.8:204-212,252-253.
张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学.上海人民出版社.1996:403-431.
张伟.高校产学研结合机制研究.郑州大学出版社.2005.1:97-135,161-184.
赵兰香.产学研合作与制度创新.科研管理.1996,(6):20-22.
赵乔干,罗英姿,吴厚平.中国产学研联合工程的重构.中南工业大学学报(社会科学版).2002,(3):33-36.
赵玉林,陈渭.科技成果向现实生产力转化的界面障碍和对策.武汉工业大学学报.1999(1):73-76.
赵玉林,单元嫒,谭弟庆.企业界面管理的组织结构.武汉工业大学学报.2000(4):100-103.
赵玉林.创新经济学.中国经济出版社.2006.3:409-460.
赵玉林.高技术产业经济学.中国经济出版社.2004.1:66-115.
郑坚,陈中文.浅谈新形势下产学研合作的对策.科技进步与对策.2000,(8):77-79.
中国科技产业编辑部.加强产学研合作推进高新技术成果产业化.中国科技产业.2004,(7):1.
周静珍,万玉刚,高静.我国产学研合作创新的模式研究.科技进步与对策.2005,(3):70-72.
朱桂龙,彭有福.产学研合作创新网络组织模式及其运作机制研究.软科学.2003,(4):67-69.
左健民.产学研合作的动力机制研究.学海.2002,(6):56-59.
Abhai Mansingh Role of Universities in IT Education in India AI & Society May 2002 Numbers 1-2 Pages:138-147.
Acworth,E.,Crawley,E.,Kelly,M.,2004.A strategic planning process for organizations at the university-industry interface,Paper no.1289.In:Proceedings of the 13th International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology Conference,April 4-7,2004,Washington,DC.
Alan Macpherson The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation:The case of New York State's medical devices sector Papers in Regional Science January 2002Number 1 Pages:121-129.
Beesley,L G.A.(2003)."Science policy in changing times:are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition?" Research Policy 32(8):1519-1531.
Chang,W.-S,Hsu Improving the Innovative Capabilities of Taiwan's Manufacturing Industries with University-Industry Research Partnerships The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology June 2002 Number 10 Pages:775-787.
Coleman,s.(1995)industry-university cooperation at Japan's protein Engineering Research Institute: a study based on Long-term fieldwerk. Human Organization, 54(1), 20-30.
Damjan Krajnc, Peter Glavic Indicators of sustainable production Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy October 2003 Numbers 3-4 Pages:279-288.
Etzkowitz, H., 1999. Bridging the gap: the evolution of industry-university links in the United States. In: Branscomb, L, . Kodama, F. Eds., Industrializing Knowledge: University-In-dustry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press,Cambridge, MA.
Etzkowitw, H.and Leydesdorff, L. (1995) the triple helix of university- industry- government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based on economic development EASST Review, 14(1),11-19.
Etzkowitw, H, and Leydesdorff, L. (1996) A triple helix of academic- industry- government relations: development models beyond captitalism and socialism. Current science, 70.690-3.
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (2000). "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations." Research Policy 29(2): 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H., forthcoming. The Second Academic Revolution:MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Gordon &Breach, London.
Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., Levitt, J., 2000. Public Venture Capital: Government Funding Sources for Technology Entrepreneurs. Harcourt-Brace, New York.
Etzkowitz, H., J. M. C. de Mello, et al. (2005). "Towards "meta-innovation" in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix." Research Policy 34(4): 411-424.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. Eds., 1997. Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
Feller, I., C. P. Ailes, et al. (2002). "Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers." Research Policy 31(3): 457-474.
Geisler, E.and Rubenstein, A.H.(1989). Vniversity-industry relations: a review of major issues.In A.N.Iink and G. Tassey (Eds). Cooperative Research and development: The industry-university-Government Relationship. Boston: Kluwer.
Hartkopf, V., V. Loftness, et al. (1997). "An integrated approach to design and engineering of intelligent buildings--The Intelligent Workplace at Carnegie Mellon University." Automation in Construction 6(5-6): 401-415.
Hayashi, T. (2003). "Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes."Research Policy 32(8): 1421-1442.
Hershberg, E., K. Nabeshima, et al. (2007). "Opening the Ivory Tower to Business:University-Industry Linkages and the Development of Knowledge-Intensive Clusters in Asian Cities." World Development 35(6): 931-940.
Inzelt, A. (2004). "The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition." Research Policy 33(6-7): 975-995.
J. Debenham Investigating e-Market Evolution Lecture Notes in Computer Science January 2002 Page:246.
Kobayashi, S.-i. (2000). "Applying audition systems from the performing arts to R&D funding mechanisms: quality control in collaboration among the academic, public, and private sectors in Japan." Research Policy 29(2): 181-192.
Lecuyer, C., 1998. Academic science and technology in the service of industry:MIT creates a 'permeable' engineering school. American Economic Review 88 (2), 28-33.
Lecuyer, C., 2005. What do universities really owe industry? The case of solid state electronics at Stanford. Minerva 43 (1), 51-71.
Lecuyer, C., 2006. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech. MIT Press,Cambridge, MA/London, pp. 1930-1970.
Leon A.G. Oerlemans, Marius T.H. Meeus, Frans W.M. Boekema Firm clustering and innovation:Determinants and effects Papers in Regional Science July 2001 Number 3 Pages:337-356.
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). "The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations." Research Policy 29(2): 243-255.
Leydesdorff, L. and M. Meyer (2006). "Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue." Research Policy 35(10): 1441-1449.
Lynn, L.H., Reddy, N.M., Aram, J.D., 1996. Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. Research Policy 25,91-106.
Manfred M. Fischer Al, Attila Varga Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research:Evidence from Austria the Annals of Regional Science May 2003 Number 2 Pages:303-322.
Marques, J. P. C., J. M. G. Caraca, et al.(2006). "How can university- industry- government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?--the case of the University of Coimbra."Technovation 26(4): 534-542.
Mowery. D.C. the Changing Structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international coflict in R—D policy. Research Policy 27 (1998): 639-654.
Mowery, D.C., Shane, S., 2002. Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. Management Science 48 (1), V-VX.
Inzelt, A. (2004). "The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition." Research Policy 33(6-7): 975-995.
Nieddu, M. (2002). "Modele de la triple helice et regulation du changement regional: une etude de casTriple helix model and regulation of regional change: a case study." Geographie Economie Societe 4(2): 205-224.
Norman. E. Bowie (1994), University-Business Partnerships. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers,Inc, 15-21.System: A comparative Study . Oxford University Peess.1993:158.
O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A., Roche, E, 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy 34 (7), 994-1009.
O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Morse, K.P., O'Gorman, C, Roche, E, 2007. Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management 37 (1), 1-16.
R. Harris. The Impact of the University of Portsmouth on the Economy. Urban Studies, 1997,(34): 605626.
Seaton, R.A.F., Cordey-Hayes, M., 1993. The development and application of interactive models of industrial technology transfer. Technovation 13,45-53.
Stokes, D., 1996. Pasteur'sQuadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings,Washington, DC.
Sutz, J. (2000). "The university-industry-government relations in Latin America." Research Policy 29(2): 279-290.
Tao Meng, Ning Ding Enterprise Alliance and Virtue Enterprise: A Systematic Analysis and Theoretical Explanation Lecture Notes in Computer Science January 2001 Page:220.
Tether, B. S. and A. Tajar (2008). "Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base."Research Policy 37(6-7): 1079-1095.
Veronique A.J.M. Schutjens, Egbert Wever Determinants of new firm success Papers in Regional Science May 2000 Number 2 Pages:135-153.
Walker .W .National innovation system: Britian In Nelson .R .R .ed .National Innovation Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., Binks, M., 2006. University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy 35, 481-501.
Zhang, C. F. Chan, V.T. Y. Ng, and K. M. Yu Enterprise Virtualisation: Concept, Methodology,and Implementation the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology August 2001 Number 3 Pages:217-234.
蔡剑英,赵玉林.高技术产业化主体系统管理界面信息流通分析.武汉理工大学学报.2001(10):87-90.
蔡立彬,崔英德等.产学研合作是培养高素质人才的重要途径.教学研究.2000(1):45-47.
陈曦,曹伯祥,陆建飞.优化产学研合作模式及其对策.扬州大学学报(高教研究版).2003,(1):87-89.
陈翔峰.产学研的激励兼容机制分析.杭州科技.2003,(1):33-34.
陈啸.论产学研合作教育与大学生人格培养.合肥工业大学学报(社科版).2002,(4):22-23.
崔英德,郭建维,蔡立彬.论产学研联合及其新机制.广东工业大学学报(社科版).2001,(1):77-78.
邓国取,朱选功.河南省区域自主创新能力评价研究.河南省科技统计研讨会论文集.2008:18-19.
邓廿庆,卞修凡.新形势下发展高校产学研合作的若干思考.安徽农业大学学报(社科版).2000,(1):23-24.
杜鹃,李众众,叶冰,肖引,桑建平.中外产学研合作开发模式之比较.统计与决策.2005,(14):55-56.
杜玉波.深化产学研合作服务创新型国家建设.中国高等教育.2008,(17):28-30.
冯冠平,王德保.研究型大学在产学研合作中的作用和角色.清华大学教育研究.2003,(2):90-92.
盖羽中,隋广军.基于契约理论的产业网络形成模型:综合成木的观点.当代经济科学,2004,26(5):57-59.
顾海.我国产学研实践中制约因素分析及对策冲国科技产业.2001,(4):78-80.
郭文兵,魏建平,周英.国内外产学研合作教育的发展与启示.淮南工业学院学报(社会科学版).2002,(2):98-99.
郭文莉.从松散到紧密的校企合作之路冲国高等教育.2008,(19):47-49.
胡恩华,郭秀丽.我国产学研合作创新中存在的问题及对策研究.科学管理研究.2002,(2):76-79.
胡恩华.产学研合作创新中问题与对策研究.研究与发展管理.2002,(1):12-14.
黄兴维.大力实施科教兴宛战略 加快南阳经济社会快速协调发展.河南科技.2004,(9):4-5.
江海,马强.重构适合高校的产学研合作模式.科技管理研究.2004,(5)15-17.
焦锦淼.实施技术创新战略促进南阳经济发展.南都学坛(人文社会科学学报).2003,(1):111-114.
金鸽.我国产学研合作的薄弱因素分析及对策.中外企业,2002(4):33-35.
孔建益,陈奎生.创新产学研合作机制 提升学生实践能力.中国高等教育.2009,(3/4):45-46.
李廉水.论产学研合作创新的组织方式.科研管理.1998,(8):23-25.
李迎.产学研合作与工程硕士培养.南京理工大学学报(社科版).2003,(2):33-36.
李玉民.产学研合作的创新型模式.天津市教科院学报.2002,(3):76-79.
刘冰.经济变迁过程中的组织学习机制.中外科技信息.2002(8):49-50.
刘贵伟,吴立贤.产学研合作创新的模式及评价.辽宁教育学院学报.2001,(5):33-34.
刘建忠,张宸,刘怀举,王晓星.地方科研机构出路探析.河南科技.2007,(6):14-15.
刘军跃,崔骥,曾宪军,龙思红.基于产学研联盟的企业技术创新模式研究-对重庆摩托车企业技术创新的思考.企业经济.2003,(10):36-37.
刘力.政府在产学研合作中的作用透视(上)-发达国家成功的经验.教育发展研究.2002,(1):11-14.
刘力.政府在产学研合作中的作用透视(下)-发达国家成功的经验.教育发展研究.2002,(2):34-36.
刘力.走向“三重螺旋”:我国产学研合作的战略选择.北京大学教育评论.2004,(10):4448.
刘谋升.论地方政府在产学研合作创新中的主导作用.集团经济研究.2006,(7):7-8.
刘智远.浅论高校产学研合作的新发展.江苏高教.2001,(2):23-25.
陆文明,潘海天,孙毅.主动对接区域经济发展 深入推进校地产学研合作.中国高等教育.2008,(17):31-32.
罗利,鲁若愚.产学研合作对策模型研究.管理工程学报.2000,2:67-70.
马德秀.产学研联盟:实现高校超常规发展的有效途径.教育发展研究.2004,(9):15-17.
马唯星.麦肯锡的学习机制与知识管理.外国经济与管.2002(9):46-49.
南阳市统计局编.南阳统计年鉴2008.中国统计出版社.2008:323-324,452-474.
山红红.产学研结合的理念、模式与机制探索.中国高等教育.2008,(9):30-32.
申学武.高校产学研联合模式中存在的问题及最优化模式构想.科技进步与对策.2001,(12):43-46.
石火学.产学研合作的典型模式述评.高等教育研究.2000,(3):78-79.
苏敬勤.产学研合作创新的交易成本及内外部化条件.科研管理.1999,4:90-91.
唐恒,严新娟.全方位多形式的高校产学研工作.科学管理研究.2000,(2):112-113.
佟晶石.产学研合作创新体系与自主知识产权.中国软科学,2003,(1):67-69.
佟晶石.对产学研合作创新的认识.财经问题研究.2002,6:38-41.
汪佩伟,李帆.当代美国产学研合作的发展趋势及其启示.科技进步与对策.2000,(7):11-15.
王娟茹,潘杰义.产学研合作模式探讨.科学管理研究.2002,7:40-43.
王衍章.产学研合作的形式及其作用.山东土业大学学报(社会科学版).1999,75(5):75-77.
王毅,吴贵生.产学研合作中粘滞知识的成因与转移机制研究.科研管理,2001,5:22-25,33-35.
王玉慧.高等学校产学研合作再发展的环境问题与对策.科学管理.2003,(6):14-17.
韦钰.高校功能的扩展与产学研合作.求是杂志.2001,(2):23-24.
吴继文,王娟茹.中国产学研合作的产生、发展过程和趋势.科技与管理.2002,(4):24-27.
吴树山,孔繁河等.我国产学研合作模式与机制及其创新.科技进步与对策.2002,(7):21-23.
武贵龙.积极探索新型产学研合作机制.中国高等教育.2008,(20):28-30.
夏建国.产学研合作机制初探.教育发展研究.2002,(2):34-36.
肖久灵.产学研合作运行机制中存在的问题及对策.北方经贸.2002,(12):99-100.
谢开勇.高校产学研相互关系及其模式选择.四川工业学院学报.2003,(2):64-65.
辛爱芳.析产学研合作中的合作模式选择.企业经济.2004,(9):62-63.
徐恩波.促进中国产学研合作的目标、途径与对策.科技与管理.2001,(2):54-56.
徐风云,王行愚.拓宽办学思路形成产学研合作的鲜明特色.中国高等教育(半月刊).2001,(8):89-91.
薛志勇,荆武浩.洛阳市主要科技经济发展指标与十八个省辖城市的对比定位分析.河南省科技统计研讨会论文集.2008:60-70.
杨榕,张麟,武振业.探索产学研合作的新模式.经济体制改革.2001,(2):43-47.
杨燕.从高校科研成果转化难看解决产学研合作的重要性.西北工业大学学报(社科版).2000,(3):65-68.
杨越.努力打造国际一流的光电产品.国防科技工业.2007,(3):19-23.
杨志欣.加快科技进步与创新 为实现南阳崛起提供强大科技支撑.河南科技.2006,(7):6-7.
游文明,周胜,冷得彤,丛曙,张煜,杨跃峰.产学研合作动力机制优化研究.科学学与科学技术管理.2004,2:34-37.
张安富.创新实习基地建设探索产学研育人新机制.中国高等教育.2008,(20):33-34.
张国宝.推进产学研合作 加快高校科技成果产业化步伐.中国创业投资与高科技.2003,(9):23-26.
张俊,李忠云.产学研合作的运行机制探讨.中国高等教育(半月刊).2001,(22):33-35.
张俊,李忠云.论我国高校产学研合作运行机制的分类与评价.中国科技信息.2005,(19):5-6.
张起民.深化产学研合作 促进高校科技创新.科技进步与对策.2000,(8):55-57.
张声雄主编.《第五项修炼》导读.上海三联书店.2001.8:204-212,252-253.
张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学.上海人民出版社.1996:403-431.
张伟.高校产学研结合机制研究.郑州大学出版社.2005.1:97-135,161-184.
赵兰香.产学研合作与制度创新.科研管理.1996,(6):20-22.
赵乔干,罗英姿,吴厚平.中国产学研联合工程的重构.中南工业大学学报(社会科学版).2002,(3):33-36.
赵玉林,陈渭.科技成果向现实生产力转化的界面障碍和对策.武汉工业大学学报.1999(1):73-76.
赵玉林,单元嫒,谭弟庆.企业界面管理的组织结构.武汉工业大学学报.2000(4):100-103.
赵玉林.创新经济学.中国经济出版社.2006.3:409-460.
赵玉林.高技术产业经济学.中国经济出版社.2004.1:66-115.
郑坚,陈中文.浅谈新形势下产学研合作的对策.科技进步与对策.2000,(8):77-79.
中国科技产业编辑部.加强产学研合作推进高新技术成果产业化.中国科技产业.2004,(7):1.
周静珍,万玉刚,高静.我国产学研合作创新的模式研究.科技进步与对策.2005,(3):70-72.
朱桂龙,彭有福.产学研合作创新网络组织模式及其运作机制研究.软科学.2003,(4):67-69.
左健民.产学研合作的动力机制研究.学海.2002,(6):56-59.
Abhai Mansingh Role of Universities in IT Education in India AI & Society May 2002 Numbers 1-2 Pages:138-147.
Acworth,E.,Crawley,E.,Kelly,M.,2004.A strategic planning process for organizations at the university-industry interface,Paper no.1289.In:Proceedings of the 13th International Conference for the International Association of Management of Technology Conference,April 4-7,2004,Washington,DC.
Alan Macpherson The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation:The case of New York State's medical devices sector Papers in Regional Science January 2002Number 1 Pages:121-129.
Beesley,L G.A.(2003)."Science policy in changing times:are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition?" Research Policy 32(8):1519-1531.
Chang,W.-S,Hsu Improving the Innovative Capabilities of Taiwan's Manufacturing Industries with University-Industry Research Partnerships The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology June 2002 Number 10 Pages:775-787.
Coleman,s.(1995)industry-university cooperation at Japan's protein Engineering Research Institute: a study based on Long-term fieldwerk. Human Organization, 54(1), 20-30.
Damjan Krajnc, Peter Glavic Indicators of sustainable production Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy October 2003 Numbers 3-4 Pages:279-288.
Etzkowitz, H., 1999. Bridging the gap: the evolution of industry-university links in the United States. In: Branscomb, L, . Kodama, F. Eds., Industrializing Knowledge: University-In-dustry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press,Cambridge, MA.
Etzkowitw, H.and Leydesdorff, L. (1995) the triple helix of university- industry- government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based on economic development EASST Review, 14(1),11-19.
Etzkowitw, H, and Leydesdorff, L. (1996) A triple helix of academic- industry- government relations: development models beyond captitalism and socialism. Current science, 70.690-3.
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (2000). "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations." Research Policy 29(2): 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H., forthcoming. The Second Academic Revolution:MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Gordon &Breach, London.
Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., Levitt, J., 2000. Public Venture Capital: Government Funding Sources for Technology Entrepreneurs. Harcourt-Brace, New York.
Etzkowitz, H., J. M. C. de Mello, et al. (2005). "Towards "meta-innovation" in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix." Research Policy 34(4): 411-424.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. Eds., 1997. Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
Feller, I., C. P. Ailes, et al. (2002). "Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers." Research Policy 31(3): 457-474.
Geisler, E.and Rubenstein, A.H.(1989). Vniversity-industry relations: a review of major issues.In A.N.Iink and G. Tassey (Eds). Cooperative Research and development: The industry-university-Government Relationship. Boston: Kluwer.
Hartkopf, V., V. Loftness, et al. (1997). "An integrated approach to design and engineering of intelligent buildings--The Intelligent Workplace at Carnegie Mellon University." Automation in Construction 6(5-6): 401-415.
Hayashi, T. (2003). "Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes."Research Policy 32(8): 1421-1442.
Hershberg, E., K. Nabeshima, et al. (2007). "Opening the Ivory Tower to Business:University-Industry Linkages and the Development of Knowledge-Intensive Clusters in Asian Cities." World Development 35(6): 931-940.
Inzelt, A. (2004). "The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition." Research Policy 33(6-7): 975-995.
J. Debenham Investigating e-Market Evolution Lecture Notes in Computer Science January 2002 Page:246.
Kobayashi, S.-i. (2000). "Applying audition systems from the performing arts to R&D funding mechanisms: quality control in collaboration among the academic, public, and private sectors in Japan." Research Policy 29(2): 181-192.
Lecuyer, C., 1998. Academic science and technology in the service of industry:MIT creates a 'permeable' engineering school. American Economic Review 88 (2), 28-33.
Lecuyer, C., 2005. What do universities really owe industry? The case of solid state electronics at Stanford. Minerva 43 (1), 51-71.
Lecuyer, C., 2006. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech. MIT Press,Cambridge, MA/London, pp. 1930-1970.
Leon A.G. Oerlemans, Marius T.H. Meeus, Frans W.M. Boekema Firm clustering and innovation:Determinants and effects Papers in Regional Science July 2001 Number 3 Pages:337-356.
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). "The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations." Research Policy 29(2): 243-255.
Leydesdorff, L. and M. Meyer (2006). "Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue." Research Policy 35(10): 1441-1449.
Lynn, L.H., Reddy, N.M., Aram, J.D., 1996. Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. Research Policy 25,91-106.
Manfred M. Fischer Al, Attila Varga Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research:Evidence from Austria the Annals of Regional Science May 2003 Number 2 Pages:303-322.
Marques, J. P. C., J. M. G. Caraca, et al.(2006). "How can university- industry- government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?--the case of the University of Coimbra."Technovation 26(4): 534-542.
Mowery. D.C. the Changing Structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international coflict in R—D policy. Research Policy 27 (1998): 639-654.
Mowery, D.C., Shane, S., 2002. Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. Management Science 48 (1), V-VX.
Inzelt, A. (2004). "The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition." Research Policy 33(6-7): 975-995.
Nieddu, M. (2002). "Modele de la triple helice et regulation du changement regional: une etude de casTriple helix model and regulation of regional change: a case study." Geographie Economie Societe 4(2): 205-224.
Norman. E. Bowie (1994), University-Business Partnerships. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers,Inc, 15-21.System: A comparative Study . Oxford University Peess.1993:158.
O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A., Roche, E, 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy 34 (7), 994-1009.
O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Morse, K.P., O'Gorman, C, Roche, E, 2007. Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management 37 (1), 1-16.
R. Harris. The Impact of the University of Portsmouth on the Economy. Urban Studies, 1997,(34): 605626.
Seaton, R.A.F., Cordey-Hayes, M., 1993. The development and application of interactive models of industrial technology transfer. Technovation 13,45-53.
Stokes, D., 1996. Pasteur'sQuadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings,Washington, DC.
Sutz, J. (2000). "The university-industry-government relations in Latin America." Research Policy 29(2): 279-290.
Tao Meng, Ning Ding Enterprise Alliance and Virtue Enterprise: A Systematic Analysis and Theoretical Explanation Lecture Notes in Computer Science January 2001 Page:220.
Tether, B. S. and A. Tajar (2008). "Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base."Research Policy 37(6-7): 1079-1095.
Veronique A.J.M. Schutjens, Egbert Wever Determinants of new firm success Papers in Regional Science May 2000 Number 2 Pages:135-153.
Walker .W .National innovation system: Britian In Nelson .R .R .ed .National Innovation Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., Binks, M., 2006. University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy 35, 481-501.
Zhang, C. F. Chan, V.T. Y. Ng, and K. M. Yu Enterprise Virtualisation: Concept, Methodology,and Implementation the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology August 2001 Number 3 Pages:217-234.