塔里木盆地巴楚—阿瓦提地区构造特征与构造演化
摘要
本论文以塔里木盆地巴楚断隆-阿瓦提凹陷的构造特征及构造演化为主要研究内容。在应用断层相关褶皱理论的基础上,详细论述了研究区的断裂构造和褶皱构造及成因关系,指出了相应构造形成时间和形成过程,得出四点结论:
1.巴楚断隆的雏形形成与早古生代-晚古生代早期的加里东运动-早海西运动阶段:
表现为一些产状较平缓的北西向断层转折褶皱,在现在的吐木休克断裂带附近形成的背斜构造幅度、规模较大,并被后期的吐木休克大型高角度逆冲右旋走滑断层所借助。
2.吐木休克断裂带形成于新生代:
吐木休克断裂是本区最新的一个构造带,形成于老第三纪之后,是沿着先期断层传播褶皱或断层转折褶皱的前翼或后翼向斜的轴面发育起来的;
3、区域性的右旋挤压应立场形成与存在是研究区构造定型原因:该应力场的形成与帕米尔高原向北楔入亚洲大陆内部及南天山向南逆冲具有相关性;
4.技术方法上,在研究区首次应用了制作断层断面图技术研究断层的封闭性问题。
Tarim basin is located in west-north area of china , surround by Tianshan mo-untain ,Kunlun mountain .It is the biggest inland oil-gas basin with 560000km2 and is oil-gas exploration prospect area in china. The genetic potential is 15000×108t.The explored reserves and control reserves is only 10×108t,occupying 5 percent in total ,the number is far from the expect aim .The reason is bad earth’s surface and geography factor ,the geology of petroleum is not deep ,especially in Bachu upheaval–Awati sag of the basin ,the gains is not exact .so it is necessary to study geology petroleum depend on new two dimensional seismic dates .
Tarim basin is large superposition compound croton basin ,reformed in different degree ,under went long time complex evolution (Z-Q),especially Indian plate collision since Cenozoic era ,Kunlun mountain and Tianshan mountain uplift speedily , two foreland basin in different direction formed in Tarim plate ,they are Kuche basin in north margin and south-west sag in south margin at the same site as Bachu upheaval and Awati sag ,The site is near by the Tumuxiuke fault zone. So, to make the structure evolution of the last three places clear is very important to study the Tarim basin further
Before the thesis ,people can’t recognize the place (Bachu upheaval–Awati sag and Tumuxiuke fault zone) .importance in study Tarim basin structure evolution ,no suitable theory ,no suitable thinking ,so the gain is not compound the practice well in Fengnan1 well and Badong4 well. The people can’t notice the special position of the place in Tarim basin structure evolution .The new theory and method——thin structure ,transmission fault ,thrusting nappe have been put forward by studying Kuche sag recently years. That offers us a kind of new theory and help us to recognize the structure feature and evolution again in work area .That has important sense to Tiram basin. Tumuxiuke fault zone is a boundary fault between Bachu upheaval and Awati sag ,with difference structure both side of it .The sedimentary layer of Awati sag in north side is 1200m ,and it is 7000m in another .There is a set ofanticline in Bachu upheaval and Tumuxiuke fault zone .That is potential beneficial oil exploration area.
The thesis relies on growth fault correlation fold ,and balance geological cross-section theory ,applying geology logging and seismic section to study Bachu upheaval, Awati sag and Tumuxiuke fault zone in aspect of geometry ,kinetics deeply ,to inquiry into the structure evolution ,to study the structure activity in different time ,to study the factors affecting structure open and close and to evaluate them .
Above all ,the thesis gets four conclusion :
1. Bachu upheaval began to form from early Paleozoic era to late Paleozoic era .That is Caledonian orogeny and early Variscan orogeny . That shows some flatter occurrence fault band fold in north–west direction near by Tumuxiuke fault zone are large and high ,and they break by the large high angular thrusting right fault later in Tumuxiuke fault zone.
2. Tumuxiuke fault zone formed in Cenozoic era Tumuxiuke fault zone is the newest structure zone ,and it is to form following the axial plane of fore-limb or lateral–limb of the syncline in fault band fold or fault propagation fold .
3.Regional dextral compression stress field appear and keep exist is the reason of the work area structure fixed form .The stress field is related to Plate an wedding north ,to Asia-plate and Tianshan mountain thrusting south.
4.The thesis applies new method of structure sectional drawing to study structure conclusion first.
1.巴楚断隆的雏形形成与早古生代-晚古生代早期的加里东运动-早海西运动阶段:
表现为一些产状较平缓的北西向断层转折褶皱,在现在的吐木休克断裂带附近形成的背斜构造幅度、规模较大,并被后期的吐木休克大型高角度逆冲右旋走滑断层所借助。
2.吐木休克断裂带形成于新生代:
吐木休克断裂是本区最新的一个构造带,形成于老第三纪之后,是沿着先期断层传播褶皱或断层转折褶皱的前翼或后翼向斜的轴面发育起来的;
3、区域性的右旋挤压应立场形成与存在是研究区构造定型原因:该应力场的形成与帕米尔高原向北楔入亚洲大陆内部及南天山向南逆冲具有相关性;
4.技术方法上,在研究区首次应用了制作断层断面图技术研究断层的封闭性问题。
Tarim basin is located in west-north area of china , surround by Tianshan mo-untain ,Kunlun mountain .It is the biggest inland oil-gas basin with 560000km2 and is oil-gas exploration prospect area in china. The genetic potential is 15000×108t.The explored reserves and control reserves is only 10×108t,occupying 5 percent in total ,the number is far from the expect aim .The reason is bad earth’s surface and geography factor ,the geology of petroleum is not deep ,especially in Bachu upheaval–Awati sag of the basin ,the gains is not exact .so it is necessary to study geology petroleum depend on new two dimensional seismic dates .
Tarim basin is large superposition compound croton basin ,reformed in different degree ,under went long time complex evolution (Z-Q),especially Indian plate collision since Cenozoic era ,Kunlun mountain and Tianshan mountain uplift speedily , two foreland basin in different direction formed in Tarim plate ,they are Kuche basin in north margin and south-west sag in south margin at the same site as Bachu upheaval and Awati sag ,The site is near by the Tumuxiuke fault zone. So, to make the structure evolution of the last three places clear is very important to study the Tarim basin further
Before the thesis ,people can’t recognize the place (Bachu upheaval–Awati sag and Tumuxiuke fault zone) .importance in study Tarim basin structure evolution ,no suitable theory ,no suitable thinking ,so the gain is not compound the practice well in Fengnan1 well and Badong4 well. The people can’t notice the special position of the place in Tarim basin structure evolution .The new theory and method——thin structure ,transmission fault ,thrusting nappe have been put forward by studying Kuche sag recently years. That offers us a kind of new theory and help us to recognize the structure feature and evolution again in work area .That has important sense to Tiram basin. Tumuxiuke fault zone is a boundary fault between Bachu upheaval and Awati sag ,with difference structure both side of it .The sedimentary layer of Awati sag in north side is 1200m ,and it is 7000m in another .There is a set ofanticline in Bachu upheaval and Tumuxiuke fault zone .That is potential beneficial oil exploration area.
The thesis relies on growth fault correlation fold ,and balance geological cross-section theory ,applying geology logging and seismic section to study Bachu upheaval, Awati sag and Tumuxiuke fault zone in aspect of geometry ,kinetics deeply ,to inquiry into the structure evolution ,to study the structure activity in different time ,to study the factors affecting structure open and close and to evaluate them .
Above all ,the thesis gets four conclusion :
1. Bachu upheaval began to form from early Paleozoic era to late Paleozoic era .That is Caledonian orogeny and early Variscan orogeny . That shows some flatter occurrence fault band fold in north–west direction near by Tumuxiuke fault zone are large and high ,and they break by the large high angular thrusting right fault later in Tumuxiuke fault zone.
2. Tumuxiuke fault zone formed in Cenozoic era Tumuxiuke fault zone is the newest structure zone ,and it is to form following the axial plane of fore-limb or lateral–limb of the syncline in fault band fold or fault propagation fold .
3.Regional dextral compression stress field appear and keep exist is the reason of the work area structure fixed form .The stress field is related to Plate an wedding north ,to Asia-plate and Tianshan mountain thrusting south.
4.The thesis applies new method of structure sectional drawing to study structure conclusion first.
引文
1.查明. 断陷盆地油气二次运移与聚集[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1997,1—125
2.陈发景,田世澄主编. 压实与油气运移[M]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989,36—89
3.陈杰,丁国瑜,Burbank D W, 等. 2001. 中国西南天山山前的晚新生代构造与地震活动[J]. 中国地震, 17 (2) :134—155.
4.陈汉军, 段铁军, 周凌方, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚凸起北部乔肖尔盖构造带含油气性[J ]. 新疆石油地质, 2001, 22 (3) : 206- 207.
5.曹守连,周海民. 冀东油田南堡断裂构造带主要断层封闭性研究[J]. 地球科学,1996,21(6):629—631
6.德华特 N B,博耶 S E,萨普 J. 平衡地质剖面[M]. 贾维民,杜秀霞译. 第 1 版. 中国地质大学出版社,1991,1-170
7.邓起东, 冯先岳, 尤惠川, 等. 新疆独山子- 安集海活动逆断裂- 褶皱带的变形特征及其形成机制[A ]. 见:国家地震局地质研究所编. 活动断裂研究(1). 1991. 37—55.
8.方世虎,郭召杰,张志诚,等. 天山北缘前陆冲断带形成时间的地层学证据[J ] . 新疆地质, 2004 , 22 (1): 24-29.
9.付广,陈章明,吕延防, 梁海龙. 断层封闭性综合评价方法探讨及其应用[J]. 河南地质,1996,10(2):7—12
10.付广,王朋岩, 付晓飞. 塔中地区石炭系主要断层的侧向封闭性[J]. 新疆石油地质,1998,9(5):362—365
11.郭令智,施央申,卢华复,等.印藏碰撞的两种远距离效应.见:李清波,戴金星,刘如琦,李继亮主编.现代地质学研究文集(上)[M].第 1 版.南京大学出版社,1992,1-7
12.管树巍, 汪新, 杨树锋, 赵卫东, 徐峰, 雷刚林. 南天山库车秋里塔格褶皱带三维构造分析. 地质论评, 2003b.49 (5):464～ 473.
13.管树巍, 陈宁华, 徐峰, 雷刚林. 库车地区秋里塔格褶皱带几何学和运动学特征与油气圈闭. 石油学报, 2003a.24 (6):30～ 34.
14.高志农. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起烃源岩特征及其油气源研究[J ]. 石油实验地质, 2000, 22 (4) : 319- 324.
15.葛双成.花状构造研究初探[J].石油地质与实验,1993,34(2):73—74
16.何登发,吕修祥,林永汉,董大忠. 前陆盆地分析[M]. 第 1 版. 石油工业出版社,1996,1-212
17.何登发, 杨庚, 管树巍, 石昕, 张朝军, 王桂宏, 王晓波. 2005. 前陆盆地构造建模的原理与基本方法. 石油勘探与开发, 2005. 32 (3): 7
18.何文渊,李江海,钱祥麟,张臣. 塔里木盆地巴楚断隆中新生代的构造演化[ J ]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版) ,2000,36(4):539-546
19.贾承造,魏国齐,姚慧君,等.盆地构造演化与区域构造地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1995,159—160
20.贾承造, 魏国齐, 姚慧君. 塔南志留泥盆纪古逆冲构造带地质构造特征[A ]. 塔里木盆地石油地质研究新进展[C ]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.110-120
21.贾承造, 杨树锋, 陈汉林, 等. 特提斯北缘盆地群构造地质与天然气[M ]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001. 110-120
22.贾承造,卢华复.库车、坷坪再生前陆盆地冲断带油气聚集和勘探[M] 北京:科学出版社 2004,1-68
23.李新民,王小平,丁勇,等. 巴楚—麦盖提地区油气田特征及勘探方向. 见:蒋炳南主编
24.塔里木盆地北部油气田勘探与开发论文集[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2000,78—83
25.卢华复, 贾东, 蔡东升. 塔里木和西天山古生代板块构造演化[A ]. 塔里木盆地石油地质研究新进展[C ]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996. 90-120
26.李传友,宋方敏,冉勇康. 龙门山断裂带北段晚第四纪活动性讨论[J ] . 地震地质, 2004 , 26 (2):248-257.
27.李江海,蔡振忠,罗春树,耿玉海.塔拉斯-费尔干纳断裂带南端构造转换及其新生代区域构造相应[ J ]. 地质学报 ,2007, 81(1):23-31
28.李亚辉, 刘泽容, 陈利. 断层封闭演化史研究方法及其应用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),1998,22(3):15—18
29.刘长伟, 王飞宇, 李术元. 塔西南坳陷北坡至巴楚凸起的生烃史[J ]. 新疆石油地质, 2002, 23 (2) : 121- 123.
30.刘高波,施泽进,佘晓宇.巴楚- 麦盖提的区域构造演化与油气分布规律[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(2):157-161
31.刘志宏,卢华复,贾承造,等. 库车前陆盆地克拉苏构造带的构造特征与油气[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(3):215—221
32.刘志宏,卢华复,贾承造,等. 库车再生前陆逆冲带造山运动时间、断层滑移速率的厘定及其意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2000,32(1):12—15
33.刘志宏,卢华复,李西建,等. 库车再生前陆盆地的构造演化[J]. 地质科学,2000,(4):482—492
34.刘志宏,林东成,王文革,等. 塔里木盆地吐木休克断裂带的研究[J]. 长春科技大学学报,2001,31(3):242—248
35.刘和甫. 前陆盆地类型及褶皱-冲断层样式[J]. 地学前缘,1995,2(3~4):59—68
36.刘和甫,夏义平,殷进垠. 走滑造山带与盆地耦合机制[J]. 地学前缘,1999,6(3):
37.吕延防,李国会,王跃文,宋广建. 断层封闭性的定量研究方法[J]. 石油学报,1996,17(3):39—45
38.吕延防,陈章明,陈发景. 非线性映射分析判断断层封闭性[J]. 石油学报,1995,16(2):36—41
39.鲁兵,陈章明,关德范,等. 断面活动特征及其对油气的封闭作用[J]. 石油学报,1996,17(3):33—37
40.鲁兵,刘忠,孔宪政,张博闻. 断层折射与断层封闭性的关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1999,26(3):28—30
41.赖鸿钧. 巨鹿凹陷奥陶系碳酸盐岩断层封闭性研究[J]. 古潜山,1993,(2):13—19
42.乃恭,任希飞. 造山与成盆作用形成于统一的动力学机制[J]. 地质论评,1996,42(4):300—303
43.曲国胜,李亦纲,陈杰,等. 2003. 柯坪塔格推覆构造几何学、运动学及其构造演化[ J ]. 地学前缘, 10 (特刊) :142—152.
44.饶春涛,李平鲁,钟宏平. 珠江口盆地断层特征及封闭性研究[J]. 中国海上油气(地质). 1993,7(4),7—15
45.宋岩. 准噶尔盆地天然气聚集区带地质特征[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
46.宋岩,王震亮,王毅,等. 准噶尔盆地天然气成藏条件[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
47.宋方敏,闵伟,韩竹军,徐锡伟. 柯坪塔格推覆体的新生代变形与扩展[ J ]. 地震地质,2006,28(2):224-233
48.汤良杰. 塔里木盆地演化和构造样式[M ]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996. 200-340
49.童亨茂. 断层开启与封闭的定量分析[J]. 石油天然气地质,1998,19(3):215-220
50.王鸿祯(主编).中国古地理图集[M]. 北京地图出版社,1985,
51.王鸿祯,刘本培,李思田. 中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段. 见王鸿祯,杨森楠,刘本培(主编). 中国及邻区构造古地理和生物古地理[M]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990,3-34
52.王同和等,中国油气区反转构造[M],北京:石油工业出版社,2001,300-340.
53.王世谦,罗启后,邓鸿斌,等. 四川盆地西部侏罗系天然气成藏特征[J ] . 天然气工业,2001 ,21 (2):128.
54.王川. 燕南断裂带封堵性分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1998,25(3):19—21
55.汪新文,陈发景,李光. 塔北库车坳陷的变形特征及其与油气关系[J]. 石油天然气地质,1994,15(1):40-50
56.伍致中, 刘东海. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷的形成演化[J ]. 新疆石油地质, 1996, 17 (3) : 211- 218.
57.吴奇之等,中国油气盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M],北京:石油工业出版社,1997,40-100.
58.许靖华,孙枢,王清晨,等. 中国大地构造相图[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1998,1—155
59.肖安成,杨树锋,李曰俊,王清华,陈汉林. 塔里木盆地巴楚- 柯坪地区新生代断裂系统[ J ]. 石油与天然气地质,2005,26(5):78-85
60.徐嘉炜. 论走滑作用的几个主要问题[J]. 地学前缘,1995,2(2):125—136
61.杨晓平,蒋溥,宋方敏,等. 龙门山断裂带南段错断晚更新世以来地层的证据[J ] . 地震地质, 1999 , 21 (4) : 341-345.
62.杨庚. 2003. 塔里木西北缘北西向古隆起的存在及油气勘探前景[ J ]. 新疆地质, 21 (2) : 157—162.
63.杨克明,龚铭,段铁军,伍泓. 塔里木盆地的输导和封闭性[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1996,17(2):123—127
64.周清杰,郑建京,刘子贵等. 塔里木构造分析[M]. 科学出版社,1990,1—144
65.赵俊猛.天山造山带岩石圈结构与动力学[M] 北京:地震出版社 2005,198-230
66.张培震, 王琪, 马宗晋. 中国内地现今构造运动的GPS 速度场与活动地块[J ] . 地学前缘, 2002 , 9 (2) : 430-438.
67.张传恒,王自强,贾维民.论造山运动的时间特征[J].地质学报,1997,18 (1):18-25
68.Allen P A and Allen J R. Basin and analysis: principles & applications. Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1990, 1-443
69.Bouvier J D 等,刘均译. 尼日利亚农河油田的三维地震解释和断层封闭研究. 国外油气勘探,1989,1(1):1-22
70.Classou S, larroque C, Malavieille J. Transfer zone of deformation in thrust wedge: an experimental study. Tectonophysics 1993, 221(3-4): 325-344
71.Hardy S, et al. Mathematical modelling of growth strata associated with fault related fold structures. In: Buchanan P G & Nieuwland D A ed. Modern Developments in Structural Interpretation, Validation and Modelling, Geological Society Special Publication. 1996, 99: 265-282
72.Hooper E C D. Fluid migrition along growth faults in compacting sediments. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1991, 14(2): 161-180
73.Jamison J W. Geometrical analysis of fold development in overthrust terranes. Journal of Structural Geology, 1987, 9(2): 207-219
74.Jones P B. Triangle zone geometry, terminology and kinematics. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 1996, 44(2): 139
75.Knott S D. Fault seal analysis in the North Sea. Bulletin of the American Associationof Petroleum Geologists, 1993, 77: 778-792
76.Knipe R J, 李玉伟译.有助于分析油气藏断层封堵的并置和封堵图[J]. 国外油气勘探,1997,9(6):695-706
77.Lu H, Jia D, Chen C et al. Evidence for growth fault-band folds in the Tarim basin and its implication for fault-slip rates in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. In: Zhang et al ed. Proc. 30th Int’l. geol. Congr. 1997, 14: 253-262
78.Lu H., Howell D G, Jia D et al. Rejuvenation of the Kuqa foreland basin, northern flank of the 79.Tarim basin, Northern China. International Geology Review, 1994, 36: 1151-1158
80.Mitra S. Fault-propagation folds: Geometry, kinematic evolution, and hydrocarbon traps. 81.Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1990, 74: 921-945
82.Monar P and Tapponnier P. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of continental collision[J]. Science, 1975, 189: 419—426
83.Marel S J. 加利福尼亚艾博特幅联合走滑断层带的形成作用[J]. 地质科学译从,1991,8(3):25—31
84.Sontreras J & Suter M. Kinematic modelling of cross-sectional desequences by computer simulation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1990, 95: 21913-21929
85.Shaw J W, Hook S C & Suppe J. Structural trend analysis by axial surface mapping. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1994, 78(5): 700-721
86.Show J H, Suppe J. Active faulting and growth folding in the eastern Santa Barbara Channel, California. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 1994, 106: 607-626
87.Show J H, Suppe J. Earthquake hazards of active blind-thrust faults under the centralLos Angeles basin, California. Journal of Geological Research, 1996, 101: 8623-8642
88.Smith D A. Theoretical considerations of sealing and non-sealing faults. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1966, 50 (2): 363-374
89.Smith D A. Sealing and nonsealing faults in Louisiana Gulf Coast salt basin. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1980, 64 (1): 145-172
90.Suppe J, Chou G T & Hook S C. Rates of folding and faulting determined from growth strata. In: McCLAY K R ed. Thrust Tectonics. Chapman & Hall, London, 1991, 105-121
91.Suppe J, Verges J. Bed-by-bed fold growth by kink-band migration: Sant Liorenc de Morunys, eastern pyrenees, Journal of Structural Geology, 1997, 19 (3-4): 443-461
92.Suppe J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-band folding. American Journal of Science, 1983a,283: 684-721
93.Suppe J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding. Eclogae Geological Helvetiae, 1983b, 83 (3): 409-454
94.Sylvester A G. Strike slip fault. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 1989, 100: 1666-1703
95.Richard G G, 黄太柱译.特立尼达滨岸哥伦布盆地硅质碎屑岩地层中断层带的封闭性[J]. 地质科学译丛,1995,12(3):66-71
96.Woodcock N H and Fischer M. Strike-slip duplex. Journal of structural Geology,1986,8:725-735
97.Woodcock N H and Schubert C. Continented strike slip tectonics. In: Hancock P L. Continental Deformation. London: Rergaman Press,1994. 251~263Hardy S. 刘子忠译.断弯褶皱作用运动学定量研究法. 地质科学译丛[J].1996,13(2):22—26
98.Yielding G. 路艳译.定量预测断层封堵[J]. 国外油气勘探,1998,10(3):263-279
2.陈发景,田世澄主编. 压实与油气运移[M]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989,36—89
3.陈杰,丁国瑜,Burbank D W, 等. 2001. 中国西南天山山前的晚新生代构造与地震活动[J]. 中国地震, 17 (2) :134—155.
4.陈汉军, 段铁军, 周凌方, 等. 塔里木盆地巴楚凸起北部乔肖尔盖构造带含油气性[J ]. 新疆石油地质, 2001, 22 (3) : 206- 207.
5.曹守连,周海民. 冀东油田南堡断裂构造带主要断层封闭性研究[J]. 地球科学,1996,21(6):629—631
6.德华特 N B,博耶 S E,萨普 J. 平衡地质剖面[M]. 贾维民,杜秀霞译. 第 1 版. 中国地质大学出版社,1991,1-170
7.邓起东, 冯先岳, 尤惠川, 等. 新疆独山子- 安集海活动逆断裂- 褶皱带的变形特征及其形成机制[A ]. 见:国家地震局地质研究所编. 活动断裂研究(1). 1991. 37—55.
8.方世虎,郭召杰,张志诚,等. 天山北缘前陆冲断带形成时间的地层学证据[J ] . 新疆地质, 2004 , 22 (1): 24-29.
9.付广,陈章明,吕延防, 梁海龙. 断层封闭性综合评价方法探讨及其应用[J]. 河南地质,1996,10(2):7—12
10.付广,王朋岩, 付晓飞. 塔中地区石炭系主要断层的侧向封闭性[J]. 新疆石油地质,1998,9(5):362—365
11.郭令智,施央申,卢华复,等.印藏碰撞的两种远距离效应.见:李清波,戴金星,刘如琦,李继亮主编.现代地质学研究文集(上)[M].第 1 版.南京大学出版社,1992,1-7
12.管树巍, 汪新, 杨树锋, 赵卫东, 徐峰, 雷刚林. 南天山库车秋里塔格褶皱带三维构造分析. 地质论评, 2003b.49 (5):464～ 473.
13.管树巍, 陈宁华, 徐峰, 雷刚林. 库车地区秋里塔格褶皱带几何学和运动学特征与油气圈闭. 石油学报, 2003a.24 (6):30～ 34.
14.高志农. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起烃源岩特征及其油气源研究[J ]. 石油实验地质, 2000, 22 (4) : 319- 324.
15.葛双成.花状构造研究初探[J].石油地质与实验,1993,34(2):73—74
16.何登发,吕修祥,林永汉,董大忠. 前陆盆地分析[M]. 第 1 版. 石油工业出版社,1996,1-212
17.何登发, 杨庚, 管树巍, 石昕, 张朝军, 王桂宏, 王晓波. 2005. 前陆盆地构造建模的原理与基本方法. 石油勘探与开发, 2005. 32 (3): 7
18.何文渊,李江海,钱祥麟,张臣. 塔里木盆地巴楚断隆中新生代的构造演化[ J ]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版) ,2000,36(4):539-546
19.贾承造,魏国齐,姚慧君,等.盆地构造演化与区域构造地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1995,159—160
20.贾承造, 魏国齐, 姚慧君. 塔南志留泥盆纪古逆冲构造带地质构造特征[A ]. 塔里木盆地石油地质研究新进展[C ]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.110-120
21.贾承造, 杨树锋, 陈汉林, 等. 特提斯北缘盆地群构造地质与天然气[M ]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001. 110-120
22.贾承造,卢华复.库车、坷坪再生前陆盆地冲断带油气聚集和勘探[M] 北京:科学出版社 2004,1-68
23.李新民,王小平,丁勇,等. 巴楚—麦盖提地区油气田特征及勘探方向. 见:蒋炳南主编
24.塔里木盆地北部油气田勘探与开发论文集[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2000,78—83
25.卢华复, 贾东, 蔡东升. 塔里木和西天山古生代板块构造演化[A ]. 塔里木盆地石油地质研究新进展[C ]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996. 90-120
26.李传友,宋方敏,冉勇康. 龙门山断裂带北段晚第四纪活动性讨论[J ] . 地震地质, 2004 , 26 (2):248-257.
27.李江海,蔡振忠,罗春树,耿玉海.塔拉斯-费尔干纳断裂带南端构造转换及其新生代区域构造相应[ J ]. 地质学报 ,2007, 81(1):23-31
28.李亚辉, 刘泽容, 陈利. 断层封闭演化史研究方法及其应用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),1998,22(3):15—18
29.刘长伟, 王飞宇, 李术元. 塔西南坳陷北坡至巴楚凸起的生烃史[J ]. 新疆石油地质, 2002, 23 (2) : 121- 123.
30.刘高波,施泽进,佘晓宇.巴楚- 麦盖提的区域构造演化与油气分布规律[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(2):157-161
31.刘志宏,卢华复,贾承造,等. 库车前陆盆地克拉苏构造带的构造特征与油气[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(3):215—221
32.刘志宏,卢华复,贾承造,等. 库车再生前陆逆冲带造山运动时间、断层滑移速率的厘定及其意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2000,32(1):12—15
33.刘志宏,卢华复,李西建,等. 库车再生前陆盆地的构造演化[J]. 地质科学,2000,(4):482—492
34.刘志宏,林东成,王文革,等. 塔里木盆地吐木休克断裂带的研究[J]. 长春科技大学学报,2001,31(3):242—248
35.刘和甫. 前陆盆地类型及褶皱-冲断层样式[J]. 地学前缘,1995,2(3~4):59—68
36.刘和甫,夏义平,殷进垠. 走滑造山带与盆地耦合机制[J]. 地学前缘,1999,6(3):
37.吕延防,李国会,王跃文,宋广建. 断层封闭性的定量研究方法[J]. 石油学报,1996,17(3):39—45
38.吕延防,陈章明,陈发景. 非线性映射分析判断断层封闭性[J]. 石油学报,1995,16(2):36—41
39.鲁兵,陈章明,关德范,等. 断面活动特征及其对油气的封闭作用[J]. 石油学报,1996,17(3):33—37
40.鲁兵,刘忠,孔宪政,张博闻. 断层折射与断层封闭性的关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1999,26(3):28—30
41.赖鸿钧. 巨鹿凹陷奥陶系碳酸盐岩断层封闭性研究[J]. 古潜山,1993,(2):13—19
42.乃恭,任希飞. 造山与成盆作用形成于统一的动力学机制[J]. 地质论评,1996,42(4):300—303
43.曲国胜,李亦纲,陈杰,等. 2003. 柯坪塔格推覆构造几何学、运动学及其构造演化[ J ]. 地学前缘, 10 (特刊) :142—152.
44.饶春涛,李平鲁,钟宏平. 珠江口盆地断层特征及封闭性研究[J]. 中国海上油气(地质). 1993,7(4),7—15
45.宋岩. 准噶尔盆地天然气聚集区带地质特征[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
46.宋岩,王震亮,王毅,等. 准噶尔盆地天然气成藏条件[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
47.宋方敏,闵伟,韩竹军,徐锡伟. 柯坪塔格推覆体的新生代变形与扩展[ J ]. 地震地质,2006,28(2):224-233
48.汤良杰. 塔里木盆地演化和构造样式[M ]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996. 200-340
49.童亨茂. 断层开启与封闭的定量分析[J]. 石油天然气地质,1998,19(3):215-220
50.王鸿祯(主编).中国古地理图集[M]. 北京地图出版社,1985,
51.王鸿祯,刘本培,李思田. 中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段. 见王鸿祯,杨森楠,刘本培(主编). 中国及邻区构造古地理和生物古地理[M]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990,3-34
52.王同和等,中国油气区反转构造[M],北京:石油工业出版社,2001,300-340.
53.王世谦,罗启后,邓鸿斌,等. 四川盆地西部侏罗系天然气成藏特征[J ] . 天然气工业,2001 ,21 (2):128.
54.王川. 燕南断裂带封堵性分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1998,25(3):19—21
55.汪新文,陈发景,李光. 塔北库车坳陷的变形特征及其与油气关系[J]. 石油天然气地质,1994,15(1):40-50
56.伍致中, 刘东海. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷的形成演化[J ]. 新疆石油地质, 1996, 17 (3) : 211- 218.
57.吴奇之等,中国油气盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M],北京:石油工业出版社,1997,40-100.
58.许靖华,孙枢,王清晨,等. 中国大地构造相图[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1998,1—155
59.肖安成,杨树锋,李曰俊,王清华,陈汉林. 塔里木盆地巴楚- 柯坪地区新生代断裂系统[ J ]. 石油与天然气地质,2005,26(5):78-85
60.徐嘉炜. 论走滑作用的几个主要问题[J]. 地学前缘,1995,2(2):125—136
61.杨晓平,蒋溥,宋方敏,等. 龙门山断裂带南段错断晚更新世以来地层的证据[J ] . 地震地质, 1999 , 21 (4) : 341-345.
62.杨庚. 2003. 塔里木西北缘北西向古隆起的存在及油气勘探前景[ J ]. 新疆地质, 21 (2) : 157—162.
63.杨克明,龚铭,段铁军,伍泓. 塔里木盆地的输导和封闭性[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1996,17(2):123—127
64.周清杰,郑建京,刘子贵等. 塔里木构造分析[M]. 科学出版社,1990,1—144
65.赵俊猛.天山造山带岩石圈结构与动力学[M] 北京:地震出版社 2005,198-230
66.张培震, 王琪, 马宗晋. 中国内地现今构造运动的GPS 速度场与活动地块[J ] . 地学前缘, 2002 , 9 (2) : 430-438.
67.张传恒,王自强,贾维民.论造山运动的时间特征[J].地质学报,1997,18 (1):18-25
68.Allen P A and Allen J R. Basin and analysis: principles & applications. Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1990, 1-443
69.Bouvier J D 等,刘均译. 尼日利亚农河油田的三维地震解释和断层封闭研究. 国外油气勘探,1989,1(1):1-22
70.Classou S, larroque C, Malavieille J. Transfer zone of deformation in thrust wedge: an experimental study. Tectonophysics 1993, 221(3-4): 325-344
71.Hardy S, et al. Mathematical modelling of growth strata associated with fault related fold structures. In: Buchanan P G & Nieuwland D A ed. Modern Developments in Structural Interpretation, Validation and Modelling, Geological Society Special Publication. 1996, 99: 265-282
72.Hooper E C D. Fluid migrition along growth faults in compacting sediments. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1991, 14(2): 161-180
73.Jamison J W. Geometrical analysis of fold development in overthrust terranes. Journal of Structural Geology, 1987, 9(2): 207-219
74.Jones P B. Triangle zone geometry, terminology and kinematics. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 1996, 44(2): 139
75.Knott S D. Fault seal analysis in the North Sea. Bulletin of the American Associationof Petroleum Geologists, 1993, 77: 778-792
76.Knipe R J, 李玉伟译.有助于分析油气藏断层封堵的并置和封堵图[J]. 国外油气勘探,1997,9(6):695-706
77.Lu H, Jia D, Chen C et al. Evidence for growth fault-band folds in the Tarim basin and its implication for fault-slip rates in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. In: Zhang et al ed. Proc. 30th Int’l. geol. Congr. 1997, 14: 253-262
78.Lu H., Howell D G, Jia D et al. Rejuvenation of the Kuqa foreland basin, northern flank of the 79.Tarim basin, Northern China. International Geology Review, 1994, 36: 1151-1158
80.Mitra S. Fault-propagation folds: Geometry, kinematic evolution, and hydrocarbon traps. 81.Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1990, 74: 921-945
82.Monar P and Tapponnier P. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of continental collision[J]. Science, 1975, 189: 419—426
83.Marel S J. 加利福尼亚艾博特幅联合走滑断层带的形成作用[J]. 地质科学译从,1991,8(3):25—31
84.Sontreras J & Suter M. Kinematic modelling of cross-sectional desequences by computer simulation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1990, 95: 21913-21929
85.Shaw J W, Hook S C & Suppe J. Structural trend analysis by axial surface mapping. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1994, 78(5): 700-721
86.Show J H, Suppe J. Active faulting and growth folding in the eastern Santa Barbara Channel, California. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 1994, 106: 607-626
87.Show J H, Suppe J. Earthquake hazards of active blind-thrust faults under the centralLos Angeles basin, California. Journal of Geological Research, 1996, 101: 8623-8642
88.Smith D A. Theoretical considerations of sealing and non-sealing faults. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1966, 50 (2): 363-374
89.Smith D A. Sealing and nonsealing faults in Louisiana Gulf Coast salt basin. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1980, 64 (1): 145-172
90.Suppe J, Chou G T & Hook S C. Rates of folding and faulting determined from growth strata. In: McCLAY K R ed. Thrust Tectonics. Chapman & Hall, London, 1991, 105-121
91.Suppe J, Verges J. Bed-by-bed fold growth by kink-band migration: Sant Liorenc de Morunys, eastern pyrenees, Journal of Structural Geology, 1997, 19 (3-4): 443-461
92.Suppe J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-band folding. American Journal of Science, 1983a,283: 684-721
93.Suppe J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding. Eclogae Geological Helvetiae, 1983b, 83 (3): 409-454
94.Sylvester A G. Strike slip fault. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 1989, 100: 1666-1703
95.Richard G G, 黄太柱译.特立尼达滨岸哥伦布盆地硅质碎屑岩地层中断层带的封闭性[J]. 地质科学译丛,1995,12(3):66-71
96.Woodcock N H and Fischer M. Strike-slip duplex. Journal of structural Geology,1986,8:725-735
97.Woodcock N H and Schubert C. Continented strike slip tectonics. In: Hancock P L. Continental Deformation. London: Rergaman Press,1994. 251~263Hardy S. 刘子忠译.断弯褶皱作用运动学定量研究法. 地质科学译丛[J].1996,13(2):22—26
98.Yielding G. 路艳译.定量预测断层封堵[J]. 国外油气勘探,1998,10(3):263-279