用户名: 密码: 验证码:
创业氛围:基于内生演化的视角
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
围绕企业家特质及其如何识别与利用机会,或者从外部环境差异的影响入手,现有文献已对创业现象进行过多维度的理论透视,并从不同的视角提出了一系列富有见底的观点和见解,但存在的问题同样也是不可忽视。主要局限在于:(1)强调外生性,而不是内生性。(2)考察问题立足于创业行为人个体,而不是行为人所在群体。(3)注重静态的对应关系,而忽视创业活动自身的动态演化过程。如此,结论的似是而非和自相矛盾难以避免,面对为什么不同地区的创业活动水平会存在巨大差异、如何提升一个地区的创业活动水平等基本的现实命题,也必然束手无策。从而,立足于地区范围的“族群”水平,把创业者、创业活动、创业环境置于统一的分析框架,从内生演化的视角,动态地考察地区创业活动水平差异的成因,其理论和现实意义是不言自明的。根据这一研究目的,本文在系统地回归和评述国内外现有的创业理论文献,并广泛吸收演化经济理论、组织行为理论和新经济社会学理论的前沿成果及其思想方法基础上,详细阐述了创业氛围的概念和内涵、内生过程、作用机理、以及演化规律,并从创业氛围和创业环境的辩证关系中论证了“一个地区的创业活动水平并非由其创业环境水平唯一决定的,而在很大程度上决定于该地区的创业氛围,中西部地区促进地区创业活动水平的关键在于着力培育创业氛围并实现其临界突破”的观点。
     本文主要内容包括七个部分:第一章介绍创业实践及其理论研究中的问题与困惑,并就此提出本文的研究主题,在对相关概念进行必要界定的同时,说明本研究的逻辑框架、技术路线、章节安排和主要创新点等。第二章回顾创业理论发展历程,梳理和跟踪其演进脉络和前沿动态,详细介绍理论界关于创业氛围问题研究的现状、观点与局限,在此基础上对现有的创业理论进行总体评述。第三章界定创业氛围的概念,详细说明其主要的外在表现、本质内涵、以及与创业文化等概念的区别与联系。进而从创业学习(知识积累)、心理体验(报酬激励)和社会互动(利益博弈)三个方面,阐明地区创业氛围的内生性。第四章说明创业活动是一种经济选择惯例,而地区的创业活动水平由其复制频率决定,进而分析创业氛围如何通过影响创业平均收益率高和行为人风险偏好来影响惯例复制频率和地区的创业活动水平。第五章说明创业活动与创业氛围之间正反馈自我演化的规律,并探究这一演化过程的内在动力及阶段性特征,全面分析创业环境条件对创业氛围,尤其是在创业氛围演化的不同阶段的影响,进而提出基于创业氛围视角下的创业分析框架。第六章以无为县高沟镇社会创业活动为案例,考察创业氛围主要表现及其细节性信息,分析并归纳其生成路径及其演化动力。第七章对本研究的主要结论进行归纳与总结,说明其理论意义、政策含义、及其存在局限,进而对未来的研究进行了展望。
     本研究结论与主要观点有:(1)创业氛围是一个地区所有族群成员关于创业的心智能力、价值观念和习俗惯例,集体、外在的表现,是创业活动衍生的创业学习、心理体验和社会互动相互作用的结果。(2)一个地区的创业活动水平也是由创业这一经济行为惯例的复制频率决定的,创业氛围通过提升创业平均收益率和改变族群成员创业风险偏好,来提高创业惯例复制频率、进而地区创业活动水平。(3)创业氛围与创业活动之间存在一个以偏好与能力、激励与学习为纽带的正反馈回路,使其不断地由“低水平稳态阶段”、“自增强阶段”向“高水平收敛阶段”演化。(4)创业环境条件通过影响创业氛围演化进程影响地区创业活动水平的,而创业氛围演化的不同阶段对创业环境条件需求的侧重点不同,不同地区促进地区创业活动水平的政策举措应有所区别。
     本文的创新之处体现在以下两个方面:(1)以创业理论的研究成果为基础,综合制度演化理论、生态种群理论、新经济社会学理论的观点与方法,摒弃当前创业理论中注重企业家个人特质和外在创业环境条件分析个体、外生、静态的研究视角,从内生、演化的视角构建以创业氛围为中心的创业分析框架,特别是把研究层面从个体水平提升到“种群”水平,一定程度上开阔了创业研究的视域,拓展了创业分析的维度,这种尝试本身不失为一种积极理论的探索。(2)立足于我国中西部地区创业活力长期不足,而各地旨在通过改善外在创业环境条件来提升创业活动水平的努力又收效甚微的事实,指出创业氛围不浓是中西部地区创业活动低水平徘徊的根源所在,并说明了外生的创业环境条件改善必须通过内生的创业氛围起作用,而创业氛围演化的不同阶段对创业环境条件需求的侧重点也不同。这不仅为各级政府提供了决策参考,同时也赋予本项目研究相应的实践意义。
Around the traits of enterprisers and the way of identifying and exploiting opportunities, or starting from the impacts of the external different environments, the existing literature has focused on the entrepreneurial phenomenon in the theoretical perspective of many dimensions, and put forward a series of sound ideas and insights from different viewpoints. A problem, however, cannot also be ignored. Main limitations are as follows:(1) emphasizing exogenous rather than endogenous; (2) studying the problem from the entrepreneurial individuals, rather than the group where the individual is. (3) stressing the static correspondence, while ignoring the process of dynamic evolution of entrepreneurial activities. Consequently, a paradoxical and contradictory conclusion is easy to arrive. Facing such basic questions of realities as why the levels of entrepreneurial activities in different regions differ so much and how to enhance the level of entrepreneurial activities in a region, we are bound to be quite helpless. So, based on the level of regional "ethnic group", we analyze the entrepreneur, the entrepreneurial activities, and the entrepreneurial environment under a unified framework, and study dynamically the reason for the difference in the levels of regional entrepreneurial activities from the perspective of endogenous evolution. The significance is self-evident both in theory and practice. By this research purpose, the paper reviews systematically and comments the current literature of entrepreneurial theory at home and abroad. It absorbs widely the newest achievements and the ways of thinking in the theory of evolving economy, of organizational behavior theory, and of the new socio-economy. on this basis, the paper states in detail the concept of entrepreneur climate and its connotation, the endogenous process, its mechanism, and law of evolution. By the dialectical relationship between the entrepreneurial climate and the entrepreneurial environment, the paper demonstrates that"the level of entrepreneurial activities in a region is determined not just by the level of its entrepreneurial environment,but greatly by the entrepreneurial climate of the region ",and that"the key to enhance the level of regional entrepreneur activities in mid-western China is to foster entrepreneurial climate and achieve its threshold breakthrough"
     The paper consists mainly of seven parts:Chapter 1 introduces entrepreneurial practice and some confusing problems in its theory study, and then brings about the topic of the paper. It offers necessary definitions for some relevant concepts. Also it shows the logical framework of this research, the technical line, the chapter arrangements, and some major innovations. Chapter 2 reviews the development process of entrepreneurial theories, cards and traces the evolution line and the newest trends. It introduces in detail the present study, the viewpoints and the limitations of entrepreneurial climate issues in the theoretical circle. Based on this, the chapter comments generally the current entrepreneur theories. ChapterⅢdefines the concept of entrepreneurial climate, explaining in detail its main external display and the nature, as well as the difference from and the relation with such concepts as entrepreneurial environment and entrepreneurial culture. Furthermore, it illustrates the endogenous of regional entrepreneurial climate from entrepreneurial learning (knowledge accumulation), psychological experience (rewards incentives), and social interaction (benefit game). ChapterⅣshows that entrepreneurial activities are an economic choice practice, and that the level of regional entrepreneurial activities is determined by the replication frequency. Furthermore, it analyzes how the entrepreneurial climate affects the replication frequency of practice and the level of regional entrepreneurial activities by changing the high average entrepreneur income and the venture preference of individuals. ChapterⅤstates the law of positive-feedback self-evolution between entrepreneurial activities and entrepreneurial climate. It explores the internal motivation of the evolution and the stage characteristics. It offers a comprehensive analysis of how entrepreneurial environmental conditions influence the entrepreneurial climate, especially the evolution of entrepreneurial climate at different stages. Then, starting from the perspective of entrepreneurial climate, it proposes an analysis framework of entrepreneur. ChapterⅥoffers a case of social entrepreneurial activities in Gaogou Town, Wuwei County. It studies the main display of entrepreneurial climate and details of information, analyzing and summarizing the path of its formation and its evolution drive. ChapterⅦsummarizes the main ideas of this study, and explains its theoretical significance, policy implications, and limits, thus giving the prospect for future research.
     Conclusions and main ideas are as follows:(1) entrepreneurial climate is the collective and external display of mental ability, values and social conventions of all the members within a region, and the consequence of the interactions among entrepreneurial learning, psychological experience and social interaction evolving from the entrepreneurial activities. (2) The level of entrepreneurial activities in a region is also determined by the replication frequency of entrepreneur, the economic behavior practice. Entrepreneurial climate improves the replication frequency of entrepreneur practices and further the level of regional entrepreneurial activities by enhancing the average entrepreneurial income and changing the entrepreneur venture preference of its members. (3) There is a positive feedback loop between entrepreneurial climate and entrepreneurial activities with a preference and ability, motivation and learning as links to maintain the continuous evolution from "low and steady stage," "self-reinforcing stage" to "high convergence stage ". (4) Entrepreneurial environment affects the level of regional entrepreneurial activities by influencing the evolving process of entrepreneurial climate, while different stages of the evolution of entrepreneurial climate have different focuses on the need of entrepreneurial environment, and different regions are expected to take distinct measures and policies to promote the level of their own entrepreneurial activities.
     Innovations of the paper are shown in the following two aspects:(1) Based on the achievements in the entrepreneur theory, the paper combines the system-evolutionary theory, population ecology theory, and some ideas and methods of the new socio-economic theory. It abandons the focus of current entrepreneur theories on the personal traits of individual enterpriser, and the individual, exogenous, static research perspective in the analysis of external entrepreneurial environment. From the perspective of endogenous evolution it builds an analysis framework of entrepreneur with the focus on the entrepreneurial climate. In particular it enhances the research level from the individual to the"ethnical group", widening in a sense the horizon of and the dimension of entrepreneur research, which is in itself a positive attempt at the theory. (2) Based on the fact that with the long shortage of entrepreneurial vitality in the entrepreneurial activities of the regions in Midwestern China, the efforts by different regions produce little effect to enhance the level of entrepreneurial activities by improving the external entrepreneurial environment, the paper states that the poor entrepreneurial climate is the root of the fluctuating low level of entrepreneurial activities in mid-western China. It shows that the improving of the external entrepreneurial environment has to be realized through the endogenous entrepreneurial climate, while different stages of the evolution of entrepreneurial climate have different focuses on the need of entrepreneurial environment This not only provides the reference of policy-making for the government at different levels, but also renders the project study the corresponding practical significance.
引文
①数据来源:黄孟复,《中国民营经济发展报告2006》,中国社会科学出版社,2007年9月。
    ①郑风田,奥氏获经济学诺奖挑战六大传统误区,中国政治经济学教育科研网,2009年10月20日。
    [1]萨缪·鲍尔斯.微观经济学:行为、制度和演化[M].江艇等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
    [2]黄孟复.中国民营经济发展报告2006.中国社会科学出版社,2007.
    [3]杨敏.无中生有:三个中部县域的创富传奇.决策,2007,7:17-19.
    [4]解读“无为人经济”.决策,2007,5:44-45.
    [5]李亦亮.安徽高沟电缆业集群发展的个案研究.技术经济,2006,11:54-57.
    [6]理查德·R纳尔逊,G.温特.经济变迁的演化理论.胡世凯译.商务印书馆,1997.
    [7]约瑟夫·熊彼特.经济发展理论.北京:商务印书馆,1990.
    [8]Frank Knight.风险、不确定性和利润.王宇等译.人民大学出版社,2005.
    [9]林强,姜彦福,张健.创业理论及其架构分析[J].经济研究,2001(9).
    [10]朱仁宏.创业研究前沿理论探讨:理论流派与发展趋势[J].科学学研究,2005,23(5):688-696.
    [11]荣兆梓.中部崛起全民创业与地区创业氛围.市场周刊,2006(11).
    [12]荣兆梓,宋宏.企业家是怎样炼成的.安徽人民出版社,2006.
    [13]刘春蓉.把企业家精神引入经济增长理论的思考.山东经济,2005,21(6):68-72.
    [14]邓学军,夏宏胜.创业机会理论研究的综述.管理现代化,2005(3)
    [15]李剑力.战略型创业研究评介.外国经济与管理,2007,29(9):17-23.
    [16]蔡莉,崔启国,史琳.创业环境研究框架.吉林大学学报(社科版),2007,47(1):50-56.
    [17]林嵩,姜彦福.公司创业战略模式及应用.中国工业经济,2008(9).
    [18]秦正云.基于奥地利学派市场过程理论的创业研究及其应用.中国科技大学学报,2007(6).
    [19]吴红梅.西方组织伦理氛围研究探析.外国经济与管理,2005,27(9):32-38.
    [20]申明.论大学文化氛围感应与营造.江苏高教,2008,4:92-95.
    [21]田虎伟.民族文化心理结构视角中的学科情结[M].江苏高教,2005,6:5-7.
    [22]罗小芳,卢现祥.制度演化的层次及其设计分析.江汉论坛,2007,9:43-48.
    [23]王廷惠.一般均衡理论批评:时间、知识和企业家的角度.社会科学,2004,11:5-14.
    [24]卢现祥,朱巧玲.新制度经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2007(2):98.
    [25]柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学:社会秩序与公共政策[M].商务印书馆,2000:64.
    [26]姜彦福.全球创业观察中国报告.中小企业管理与科技,2008,12:32-33
    [27]孙如轩,郑德岭,夏海生.乡村经济增长的社会机制研究.安徽农学通报,2007,13(19):9-10.
    [28]许德音,周长辉.中国战略管理学研究现状评估[J].北京:管理世界,2004,5:76-87.
    [29]Aldrich,H. E. Pfeffer.J. Environment of organizations[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1976,11:76-105.
    [30]Aldrich,H.Zimmer,C. Entrepreneurship through social networks[C].In:Sexton, D.L., Smilor, R.W. (Eds.), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship.1986:3-23.
    [31]Aldrich, H. E. Using an ecological perspective to study organizational founding rates[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1990,14(3):7-24.
    [32]Aldrich,H. Reese,P.R. Does networking pay off?. A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle[C]. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.,1993:325-339.
    [33]Aldrich, H.E., Fiol, C.M. Fools rush in?.The institutional context of industry creation[J]. Academy of Management Review,1994,19:645-670.
    [34]Allinson, C.W., Hayes J. The cognitive style index:A measure of intuition analysis for organizational research[J]. Journal of Management Studies,1996,33(1):119-135.
    [35]Audretsch, D.B., Lehmann, E.E., Plummer, L.A. Agency and governance in strategic entrepreneurship [J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2009,33(1):149-166.
    [36]Anderson, J.R. Acquisition of cognitive skill[J]. Psychological Review.1982, 89(4):369-406.
    [37]Bailey, J. Learning styles of successful entrepreneurs[C]. In R. Ronstadt, J. Hornaday,J.R. Peterson,& K. Vesper (Eds), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA:Babson College Press.1986:199-210.
    [38]Bandura. A. Social learning theory[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall,1977.
    [39]Baron, R.A. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship:Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 1998,13(4):275-294.
    [40]Baron, R.Ward. T. Expanding entrepreneurial cognition's toolbox:Contributions from the field of cognitive science[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract,2004, 28(6):553-573.
    [41]Baron, R.A., Ensley.M.D. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns:Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs[J]. Management Science,2006,52(9):1331-1344.
    [42]Bates, T.. Race, Self-Employment, and Upward Mobility[M]. Washington. DC:Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
    [43]Barth.F. The role of the entrepreneur of social changes in Northern Norway[M]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget,1963.
    [44]Batjargal.B. Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia:A longitudinal study[J]. Organization Studies,2003,24:535-556.
    [45]Baum, J. R., Olian, J. D., Erez, M., Schnell, E. R., Smith, K. G., Sims, H. P., Scully, J. S., Smith. K. A. Nationality and work role interactions:A cultural contrast of Israeli and U.S. entrepreneurs'versus managers'needs[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1993 (8):449-512.
    [46]Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T., Silverman, B.S.. Don't go it alone:alliance network composition and startups'performance in Canadian biotech-nology[J]. Strategic Manage. J, 2000(21):267-294.
    [47]Baumol.W.J. Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory[J]. American Economic Review,1968,58(2):64-71.
    [48]Belussi,F., Pilotti, L.. Knowledge creation, Learning and innovation by networking within the Italian industrial districts[J]. Geogr.Ann.2000,84(2):125-139.
    [49]Bettis, R.A.,Hitt, M.A. The new competitive landscape[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1995(16):7-19.
    [50]Birch, D., Haggerty, A., Parsons.W. Entrepreneurial hot spots:The best places in America to start and grow a company[M]. Cambridge, MA:Corporate Demographics, Cognetics, Inc.1999.
    [51]Birley, S.. The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1985,1 (1):107-117.
    [52]Block,J.H..Wagner.M. Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation By Necessity and Opportunity Entrepreneurs:Empirical Evidence from Earnings Equations. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=899968,2006.
    [53]Briley, D.A., Morris, M.W., Simonson, Itamar. Reasons as carriers of culture: Dynamic versus Dispositional models of cultural influence on decision making[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2000,27:157-178.
    [54]Brockhaus, R. H.. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1980,23:509-520.
    [55]Brockhaus R. H..Entrepreneurial Folklore.Small Business Management,1981, 25(3):1-6.
    [56]Brown, J.S.,Duguid.R.. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation[J]. Organization Science,1991,2(1):40-57.
    [57]Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer. P.Network support and the success of newly founded businesses[J]. Small Business Economics,1998,10:213-225.
    [58]Bruno, A. V., Tyebjee, T. T.. The environment for entrepreneurship[C]. In C.A.Kent, D.L.Sexton,K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.1982:288-307.
    [59]Busenitz, L.W..Cognitive biases in strategic decision-making:Heuristics as a differentiator between managers in large organizations and entrepreneurs [M], Ph.D. Dissertation.Texas A&M University,1992.
    [60]Busenitz, L.W., Lau,. Chung-Ming. A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation[J].Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,1996,20(4):25-39.
    [61]Busenitz, L.W.,Barney, J. B.. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations:Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12(1):9-30.
    [62]Burt, R.S..The network structure of social capital. In:Sutton, R.I., Staw, B.M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior[M]. Greenwich CT:JAI Press,2000.
    [63]Capello R., and Faggian A. Collective leaning and relational capital in local innovation Processes [J].Regional Studies,2005,39:75-87.
    [64]Carroll, G., Wade.J. Density dependence in the organizational evolution of the American brewing industry across different levels of analysis[J]. Social Science Research,1991,20:217-302.
    [65]Chandler, G. N., Hanks, S. H.. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies,and venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331-350.
    [66]Chatman, D., Altman, I., Johnson.T. Community Entrepreneurial Climate:An Analysis of Small Business Owners'Perspectives In 12 Small Towns in Missouri, USA[J]. Journal of Rural and Community Development,2008,3:60-77.
    [67]Choueke, R., Armstrong.R. The learning organization in small and medium-sized enterprises:A destination or a journey?[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research,1998,4(2):1355-2554.
    [68]Chris Gerry, Carla Susana Marques, Fernanda Nogueira. Tracking student entrepreneurial potential:personal attributes and the propensity for business start-ups after graduation in a Portuguese university[J]. Problems and Perspectives in Management,2008, 6(4):46-54.
    [69]Church,R..The family firm in industrial capitalism:International perspectives on hypotheses and history[J]. Business History,1993,35(4):17-43.
    [70]Cornelius, B., Landstrom, H., Persson, O. Entrepreneurial studies:The dynamic research front of a developing social science[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2006,30(3):375-397.
    [71]Cooper, A., Woo, C., Dunkelberg.W. Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms[J]. Journal of Business Venturing.1989,4:317-332.
    [72]Cope.J.. Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2005,29(4):373-397.
    [73]Corbett, A.C.Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2005,29(4):473-491.
    [74]Corbett, A.C.. Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneur-ial opportunities[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2007,22(1):97-118.
    [75]Covin, J.G, Slevin,D,P..Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1989,(10):75-87. [76]Dana, L. P..Saint Martin/Sint Maarten:A case study of the effects of culture on economic development[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,1990,28(4):91-98. [77]Davis, S., Botkin, J..The coming of knowledge-based business[J]. Harvard Business Review,1994, September-October:165-170. [78]Deakins, D.. Entrepreneurship and small firms (2nd ed.). London:McGraw-Hill, 1999. [79]Delmar, F.,Davidsson, P.. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs[J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,2000,12(1):1-23. [80]Denrell, J.. Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management[J]. Organization Science,2003,14(3):227-243. [81]Dierkes, M., Berthoin Anthal, A., Child, J.,Nonaka, L.Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge[J]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001. [82]Drucker P.. Innovations and Entrep reneurship [M]. New York:Harper & Row,1985. [83]Duchesneau, D.A.,Gartner, W.B..A Profile of New Venture Success and Failure in an Emerging Industry, in Kirchoff, B.A.,(ed.),Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA,1988:372-386. [84]Dutta, Dev K., Crossan, Mary M. The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: understanding the process using the 41 organizational learning framework[J]. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2005,29(4):425-449.
    [85]Easterby-Smith, M. Disciplines of organizational learning:Contributions and critiques[J]. Human Relations,1997,50:1085-1113.
    [86]Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M..The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management[M]. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2003.
    [87]Eckhardt, J.T.,Shane, S.A.. Opportunities and entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Management,2003,29(3):333-349.
    [88]E1-Namaki, M. S. S. Encouraging entrepreneurship in developing countries[J]. Long Range Planning,1988,21 (4):98-106.
    [89]Ellsworth R R.. Entrep reneurship in Big Business:The Impossible Dream? [A]. Kao J J, Stevenson H H. Entrep reneur ship:What it is and How to Teach it[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School,1985:282-308.
    [90]Flora, C.,Flora, J.. Developing entrepreneurial rural communities[J]. Sociological Practice,1990,8:197-207.
    [91]Gaglio, C. M.. Opportunity identification:Review, critique and suggested research directions[C]. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepr-eneurship, firm emergence and growth. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press,1997,3:139-202.
    [92]Galbraith, C.,Noble, A. F.. Location decisions by high technology firms:A comparison of firm size, industry type, and institutional form[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1988,13(2):31-47.
    [93]Gartner, W. B.. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation[J]. Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):696-706.
    [94]Garvin, D..Building a learning organization[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993,July-August:78-91.
    [95]George,G., Zahra,S.A.. Culture and its consequences for entrepreneur-ship[J]. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2002,26:76-93.
    [96]Gnyawali, D.R.,Fogel, D.S.. Environments for Entrepreneurship Develop-ment: Key Dimensions and Research Implications [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1994,18:43-62.
    [97]Goodman, J.P., Meany, J. W., Pate, L. E. The government as entrepreneur:Industrial development and the creation of new ventures. In D. L. Sexton, J. D. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art on entrepreneurship. Boston:PWS-Kent.1992.
    [98]Granovetter. M. The strength of weak ties [J]. Am. J. Sociol.1973,78,1360-1380.
    [99]Granovetter. M. Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness [J]. American Journal of sociology.1985,91(3):481-510.
    [100]Granovetter. M. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior [J]. American Journal of Sociology.1978,83,1420-1443.
    [101]Greeve. A. Networks and entrepreneurship-an analysis of social relations, occupational background, and use of contacts during the establishment process [J]. Scand. J. Manage.1995,11(1):1-24.
    [102]Gupta, V.Turban, D. Wasti, S. Sikdar. A. The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur [J]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.2009,33(2):397-417.
    [103]Hannan, M. T., Carroll, G. R. Dynamics of organizational populations:Density, legitimation and competition, Oxford University Press.1992
    [104]Hansen, E.L. Resource acquisition as a startup process:initial stocks of social capital and organizational founding. Paper presented at the Babson-Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference,2000.
    [105]Harrison, R.T., Leitch, C.M. Entrepreneurial learning:researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Entrepreneurship Theory:Practice,2005, 29(4):351-71.
    [106]Hatten, T.S. Ruhland, S.K. Student attitude toward entrepreneurship as affected by participation in an SBI program, Journal of Education for Business,1995,70(4):224-227.
    [107]Henderson, J. Building the rural economy with high-growth entrepre-neurs. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,2002,87(3):45-70.
    [108]Hitt, M.A. Reed, T.S. Entrepreneurship in the new competitive landscape. In G.D. Meyer & K.A. Heppard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.2000,23-47
    [109]Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M., Sexton, D.L. Strategic entrepr-eneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6): 479-492.
    [110]Hite, J.M. Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2005,(29):113-44.
    [111]Hoang H., Antoncic B. Network-based research in entrepreneurship:A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing,2003, 18 (2):165-187.
    [112]Holcomb, T. R., Ireland, R. D., Holmes, R. M., Hitt, M. A. Architecture of entrepreneurial learning:exploring the link among heuristics, knowledge, and action. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2009,33(1):173-198.
    [113]Hodgson, G. M. The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 1998,36(1):166-192.
    [114]Hoy, F., Wisnieski, J., Gatewood, E., Bryant, L., Patel, V. An incubator within an incubator:A case study of biotechnology venturing. In N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. G. Covin, D. L. Sexton, D. P. Slevin, K. H. Vesper, W. E. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA:Babson College,1991:391-405.
    [115]Huber, G.. Organizational learning:The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science,1991,(2):88-115.
    [116]Ihrig, M., Knyphausen-Aufsec, Z. D., and O'Gorman, C.. The knowledge based approach to entrepreneurship:linking the entrepreneurial process to the dynamic evolution of knowledge. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies,2006, (2):38-58.
    [117]Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A, Sirmon, D.G..A Model of Strategic Entren-eurship:The Construct and its Dimensions [J]. Journal of management,2003,29(6):963-989.
    [118]Jackson, J.,Rodkey, G.. The Attitudinal Climate for Entrepreneurial Activit y. Public Opinion Quarterly,1994,58(3):358-380.
    [119]James, L.R., Jones, A.P.. Organizational climate:a review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin,1974,81 (12):1096-112.
    [120]Johannisson, B.. The dynamics of entrepreneurial networks. In:Reynolds, P., et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp.1996:253-267.
    [121]Johannisson, B., Landstrom, H., and Rosenberg, J.. University training for> entrepreneurship:an action frame of reference. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1998,23(4):477-496.
    [122]Jr, Gerald P, O'Driscoll, Mario J. Rizzo. The economics of time and ignorance [M], Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1985.
    [123]Katila, R., Mang, P.Y.. Interorganizational development activities:the likelihood and timing of contracts. Academy of Management Proceedings,1999, B1-B6.
    [124]Kao, J. The worldwide web of Chinese business. Harvard Business Review, March-April,1993:24-36.
    [125]Katz, R.. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1982,27(1):81-104.
    [126]Keasey, K., Watson, R.. The state of the art of small firm failure prediction: Achievements and prognosis. International Small Business Journal,1991,9(4):11-29.
    [127]Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Moore, B., Wilkinson F., Collective learning Processes, networking and institutional thickness in the Cambridge region. Regional Studies,1999, 33(4):319-331.
    [128]Kirzner, I.M.. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1973.
    [129]Kirzner, I. M.. How Markets Work:Disequilibrium. Entrepreneurship and Discovery [M]. London:The Institute of Economic Affairs,1997.
    [130]Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D, Whitcanack,L.. Intuition versus analysis: Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepre-neurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2009,33 (2):355-570.
    [131]Kline, C.. The role of entrepreneurial climate in rural tourism development [D]. North carolina state university,2007.
    [132]Koehler, D.J., White, C.M., Grondin, R.. An evidential support accumulation model of subjective probability. Cognitive Psychology,2003,46(2):152-197.
    [133]Kolb, D.. Experiential learning:Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.1984.
    [134]Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby, J., Naffziger, D.. The adverse impact of public policy on microenterprises:An exploratory study of owner's perceptions. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship,1999,4:81-93.
    [135]Kuratko, D.F.. Entrepreneurship:Theory, process, practice. Mason, OH: Southwestern/Cengaga Publishers. (2009).
    [136]Kuratko, D.F., Audretsch, D,B., Strategic entrepreneurship:exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2009, 33(1):1-17.
    [137]Larson, A., Starr, J.A.. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Pract,1993,17(2):5-15.
    [138]Le, Ngoc T.B., Nguyen, Thang V.. The impact of networking on bank financing:the case of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Entrepreneurship; Theory and Practice.2009,33(4):867-887.
    [139]Lee, S.M., Peterson, S.J.. Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global Competitiveness [J]. Journal of world Business,2000,35(4),401-416.
    [140]Leibenstein, H.. Entrepreneurship and development. American Economic Review, 1968,58:72-83.
    [141]Low, M.B..The adolescence of entrepreneurship research:Specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2001,25(4):17-26.
    [142]Low, M.B., MacMillan, I. C. Entrepreneurship:Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management,1988,14(2):139-161.
    [143]Lomi, A. The Population Ecology of Organizational Founding:Location Dependence and Unobserved Heterogeneity. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40: 111-144. [144]Lorenzoni, G, Lipparini, A.. The leveraging of inter-firm relation-ships as a distinctive organizational capability:a longitudinal study. Strategic Manage [J].1999,20 (4): 317-338.
    [145]Luke, B.. Uncovering strategic entrepreneurship:An examination of theory and practice[D]. Thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of a Master of Business Degree,2005.
    [146]Lumpkin, G.T. Dess, G.G.. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review.1996,21(1):135-172.
    [147]Lundberg, C. Conceptual issues in organizational learning. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,1995,3(1):7-19.
    [148]Lussier, R.N.. Startup business advice from business owners to would-be entrepreneurs. SAM Advanced Management Journal,1995,60.
    [149]Management Systems International. Entrepreneurship training and strengthening entrepreneurial performance. Report submitted to the USAID,1990.
    [150]Mansfield, E.. Technology change and the rate of imitation [J]. Econometrics,1961, (29):741-765.
    [151]McClelland, D. C., Winter, D. G. Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press.1969.
    [152]McMullen, J.S. Shepherd, D.A.. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(1):132-152.
    [153]McEvily, B., Zaheer, A.. Bridging ties:a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Manage,1999,20:1133-1156.
    [154]McGrath, R. G. Falling forward:Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review,1999,24(1),13-30.
    [155]Meyer, G. D.. Commentary:on the integration of strategic management and entrepreneurship:views of a contrarian. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 33,(1):341-351.
    [156]Minniti, M., Bgyrave, W.. A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship:Theory and practice,2001,25(3):5-16.
    [157]Minniti, M.. Entrepreneurship and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2005,57:1-27.
    [158]Mitchell, R.K., Smith, B., Seawright, K.W., Morse, E.A.. Cross cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43:974-993.
    [159]Mitchell, R.K., Smith, J. Brock, Morse, Eric A., Seawright, Kristie W., Peredo, Maria, McKensie, Brian. Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? Assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2002,20(4):9-32.
    [160]Mitchell,R.K., Busenitz, L., Lant,T., McDougall, P.P., Morse, E.A., Smith, B.J.. Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition:rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research, Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2002,27(2):93-104.
    [161]Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L.W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C.M.,McMullen, J., Morse, E.A.,Smith, J.B.. The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,2007,31(1):1-27.
    [162]Moingeon, B., Edmundson, A.. Organizational learning and competitive advantage. London:Sage Publications,1996.
    [163]Mokry, B. W.. Entrepreneurship and public policy:Can government stimulate start ups? New York:Quorum Books.1988.
    [164]Moingeon, B. Edmundson. Organizational learning and competitive advantage [M]. London:Sage Publications,1996.
    [165]Mokry, B. W.. Entrepreneurship and public policy:Can government stimulate start ups? [M]. New York:Quorum Books,1996.
    [166]Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., Allen, Jeffrey W. Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism [J], Journal of International Business Studies,1994,25,1:65-89.
    [167]Morris, S..Cultural Effects On Entrepreneurial Decision-Making:Why Every Society Can'T Be Entrepreneurial [R]. Charleston:AIB-SE (USA) 2005 Annual Meeting, 2005.
    [168]Mueller, S. L., Thomas, A. S.. Culture and entrepreneurial potential:A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000,16:51-75.
    [169]Nadler, J., Thompson, L., Van Boven, L.. Learning negotiation skills:Four models of knowledge creation and transfer[J]. Management Science,2003,49(4):529-540.
    [170]North, D.. Institutions, institutional change and economic perfor-mance[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
    [171]Nonaka, L. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization Science,1994,5:14-37.
    [172]Ohe, T., Honjo, S., MacMillan,I.C..Japanese Entrepreneurs and Corpor-ate Managers:A Comparison[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1990,5,3:163-176.
    [173]Otani, K.. A human capital approach to entrepreneurial capacity[J]. Economica 1996,63:273-289.
    [174]Pearson,A. W., Carr, J.C.Shaw, J. C. Toward a theory of familiness:A social capital perspective[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2008,32(6):949-969.
    [175]Pennings, J. M.. Organizational birth frequencies:An empirical investigation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1982,27:120-144.
    [176]Peterson,R..Understanding And Encouraging Entrepreneurship Internationally[J], Journal of Small Business Management,1988,26(2):1-7.
    [177]Phillips, B. D.. The growth of small firm jobs by state,1984-1988[J]. Business Economics,1993,4:48-53.
    [178]Phillip H. Phan, Maw Der Foo..Technological entrepreneurship in emerging regions[J], Journal of Business Venturing,2004,19:1-5.
    [179]Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G R.. The external control of organizations:A resource dependence perspective[M]. New York:Harper & Row,1978.
    [180]Politis, D., The process of entrepreneurial learning:a conceptual framework[J]. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2005,29(4):399-424.
    [181]Porter, M.. Competitive advantage of nations[M]. New York:Free Press,1990.
    [182]Portes, A., Sensenbrenner, J.. Embeddedness and immigration:notes on the social determinants of economic action[J].Am.J.Sociol,1993,98:1320-1350.
    [183]Rae, D.. Understanding entrepreneurial learning:a question of how?[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Bradford,2000,6(3):145.
    [184]Rae, D.,Carswell, M.. Towards a conceptual understanding of entrepre-neurial learning[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,2001,8(2):150-158.
    [185]Ravasci, D.,Turati, C. Exploring entrepreneurial learning:A compare-ative study of technology development projects[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20:137-164.
    [186]Robinson, P.B.,Stimpson, D.V., Huefner, J.C., Hunt, H.K.. An Attitude Approach to the Prediction of Entrepreneurship [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1991,15 (4): 13-31.
    [187]Romanelli, E.B..Environments and strategies of organization start-up:Effects on early survival[J], Administrative Science Quarterly,1989,34(3):369-387.
    [188]Rondinelli, D. A.. Developing private enterprises in the Czech and Slovak Republic: The challenges of economic reform[J]. Columbia Journal of World Business, 1991,16(3):26-36.
    [189]Ronstadt, R.. The corridor principle[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1988,3(1):31-40.
    [190]Roxas, H.,Lindsay, V., Ashill, N., and Victorio, A..An Institutional View Of Local Entrepreneurial Climate[J], Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability,2007,7 (1):27-41.
    [191]Russo, J. E.,Schoemaker, P. J. H.. Managing Overconfidence[J], Sloan Management Review,1992,33 (2):7-18.
    [192]Romanelli, E. B.. Environments and strategies of organization start-up:Effects on early survival[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1989,34(3):369-387.
    [193]Samit, M.. Cultural Effects On Entrepreneurial Decision-Making:Why Every Society Can'T Be Entrepreneurial [R].Charleston:AIB-SE (USA) Annual Meeting,2005.
    [194]Sarason, Y., Dean, T., Dillard J.F.. Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity:A structuration view [J], Journal of Business Venturing,2006,21:286-305.
    [195]Schere J.. Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers [J]. New York:Academy of Management,1982:404-408.
    [196]Shane, S. A.. Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival:A study of new franchisors [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(1):216-234.
    [197]Shane S.. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship:The Individual Opportunity Nexus[M], UK:Edward Elgar Cheltenham,2003.
    [198]Shane, S.. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities [J]. Organization Science,2000,11(4):448-469.
    [199]Shane, S.,& Venkataraman, S.. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research [J]. Academy of Management Review,2000,25(1):217-226.
    [200]Shapero, A.. The role of entrepreneurship in economic development at the less than national level[M]. Washington.DC:US Department of Commerce,1977.
    [201]Singh, J. V.Review Essay:Density Dependence Theory-Current Issues, Future Promise [J].American Journal of Sociology,1993,99(2):464-473.
    [202]Singh,R..A Comment on Developing the Field of Entrepreneurship through the Study of Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation [J].Academy of Management Review,2001,26:202-212.
    [203]Specht, P. H.. Munificence and carrying capacity of the environment and organizational formation[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1993,17(2):77-86.
    [204]Starr, J.A.,Bygrave, W.D.. The second time around:The outcomes, assets, and liabilities of prior start-up experience[M]. In S. Birley & I.C. MacMillan (Eds).
    [205]International perspectives on entrepreneurship research 1991:Proceedings of the first annual global conference on entrepreneurship research[R]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland,1992:340-363.
    [206]Stewart, W.H., Jr., Watson, W.E., Carland, J.C.,Carland, J.W.. A proclivity for entrepreneurship:A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,11999,14(2),189-214.
    [207]Swanson, Webster. Characteristics of Successful Entrepreneurs[J]. Personnel Psychology,1971,24:141-153.
    [208]Swanson, D., Webster, L.. Private sector manufacturing in the Czech and Slovak Republic:A survey of firms [M]. Washington DC:The World Bank,1992.
    [209]Thompson, J.D.. Organizations in action[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill,1967.
    [210]Trevelyan, R..Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity [J], Management Decision,2008,46 (7):986-1001.
    [211]Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M..The focus of entrepreneurial research: contextual and process issues [J]. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice,25(4):57-80.
    [212]Van de Ven, A. H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,8(3):211-230.
    [213]Venkataraman,S.,Katz, J., Brockhaus, R..The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research:an editor's perspective [M]. Firm Emergence, and Growth, Elsevier.New York Advances in Entrepreneurship,1997,3:119-138.
    [214]Vesper,K.H.,C.A.Kent,D.L.,Sexton,.Research on education for entrepreneurship [M]. NJ:Prentice Hall,1982:321-343.
    [215]Vesper, K. H.. Entrepreneurship and national policy [M]. Chicago:Walter E. Heller International Corporation Institute for Small Business,1983.
    [216]Vesper. K. H.,McMullan.,W. E.. Entrepreneurship:Today courses, tomorrow degrees? [J]Fntrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1988,13(l):7-14.
    [217]Wagner, J..Nascent Necessity and Opportunity Entrepreneurs in Germany Evidence from the Regional Entrepreneurship Monitor (REM) [EB/OL]. http:// www.uni-lueneburg.de/vwl/papers.
    [218]Walsh, J.,Ungson, G. Organizational memory [J]. Academy of Management Review,1991,16:57-91.
    [219]Welter, F., Smallbone, D..Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity[J]. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2006,30(4):465-476.
    [220]Westhead, P.,& Wright, M.. Novice, portfolio, and serial founders:Are they different? [J].Journal of Business Venturing,1998,13(3):173-204.
    [221]Whittlesea, B. W. A..The representation of general and particular knowledge in K. Lamberts and D. Shanks, Knowledge, concepts, and categorization [M]. MA:MIT Press,1997:211-264..
    [222]Windschitl, P. D., Young, M. E., Jenson, M. E.. Likelihood judgment based on previously observed outcomes:The alternative-outcomes effect in a learning paradigm[J],Memory and Cognition,2002,30(3):469-477.
    [223]Woo, C. Y., Folta, T., Cooper, A. C. Entrepreneurial search:Alternative theories of behavior[R]. N. C. Churchill, S. Birley, W.D. Bygrave, D. F. Muzyka, C. Wahlbin,& W. E. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers in entrepreneurship research 1992,1992:31-41.
    [224]Wood,R., and Bandura,A..Social cognitive theory of organizational management[J]. Academy of Management Review,1989,14(3):361-384.
    [225]Wright, M.,Coyne, J.. Management buy-outs[M]. Beckenham:Croom Helm,1985.
    [226]Wright, M., Westhead, P., Sohl, J. Habitual entrepreneurs and angel investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1998,22(4):5-21.
    [227]Zahra, S. A, Nielsen, A. P., and Bogner, W. C.. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1999,23(3):169-189.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700