中国能源富集区低碳转型发展研究
|
摘要
“十二五”规划开始,我国进入了加快转变经济发展方式,实现科学发展的战略机遇期和深刻变革期。“十二五”规划指出把经济结构战略性调整作为经济发展方式转变的主攻方向,把科技进步和创新作为经济发展方式转变的重要支撑。然而,当前我国经济发展中不平衡、不协调、不可持续问题仍就突出,资源环境的约束日愈强化,制约发展的各种障碍较多,深化改革和转变经济发展方式任重道远。从我国区域经济发展的实际来看,各地区都面临着经济发展方式转变的艰巨任务,但转型发展的压力仍存在显著的差异。能源资源富集地区作为一类特殊的资源型区域,既面临着继续保障国民经济发展的能源供应安全,又要实现区域自身可持续发展的双重任务。能源富集地区经济发展方式转变、可持续发展、低碳转型刻不容缓,任务尤其艰巨。本文针对能源富集区晋、陕、蒙三省区低碳转型发展问题,做出如下几方面努力：
1.本文考虑了我国能源富集区形成的特殊历史过程,深入分析了这类区域转型发展面临的特殊问题,并论证了能源富集区率先低碳转型发展的客观必然性。本文以能源富集区存在的特殊问题为基础,提出能源富集区率先低碳转型发展的观点,拓展了现有低碳研究的立论视域。这一观点无疑会受到很多挑战,但本文尝试从能源富集区低碳转型的必要性、特殊性、可行性及节能减排的“倒逼机制”等方面给出更合理更科学的解释和理论支撑。
2.从“资源诅咒”、民生发展、低碳水平三个方面对能源富集区的经济增长质量进行了三重检验。资源诅咒主要考察资源开发与经济增长的关系；民生发展考察资源红利是否有效转化为民生成果,是否惠及广大民众的问题；而低碳水平则主要考察经济增长与碳排放的关系,旨在判断经济增长造成的生态和环境问题,通过这三个方面的检验就可以大致判断能源富集区经济发展的质量高低。这一研究思路简洁新颖,虽与国内一般研究经济发展质量的文献思路并不一致,但这三个方面具有较强的内在逻辑递进关系,针对能源富集区的经济发展质量进行评估和检验有很强的说服力。
3.基于能源和环境的超越对数生产函数,对能源富集区三省区工业分行业进行了增长核算分析。研究表明,如果不考虑或不正确处置环境污染变量,会对能源富集区工业发展方式转变形成相当乐观的结论,即工业发展总体上已经实现集约型转变,TFP已经成为驱动工业增长的第一动力。然而这种乐观结论与使用的研究分析方法密切相关,尽管从后续研究表明这种乐观判断存在偏误,但是增长核算仍揭示了其他一些重要结论：
(1)能源重化工业行业对能源富集区工业全行业TFP增长作出的贡献占到绝对的主导地位,这说明高投资、高能耗、高排放的能源重化工业行业也取得了实实在在的技术进步,并隐含了能源富集区传统产业进行升级改造已经具有相应的产业基础。
(2)高新技术行业对工业全行业增长的贡献仅次于传统的能源重化工业行业,这表明加快现有高新技术产业的发展,主要应在行业规模和效率方面着力提升,将有助于能源富集区产业结构多样化,有助于粗放型的增长方式向集约型的低碳可持续发展方式尽快转变。
4.基于方向性距离函数和低碳规制的行为分析模型对能源富集的区域经济低碳转型进行了测度。关于增长核算的分析,现有文献主要针对国别及一国宏观层面进行总量增长研究,而很少有针对特定区域或省区的研究。究其原因,可能是由于区域层面的投入产出数据的获取比较难,特别是资本存量的数据需要采用专门方法进行估算,同时又由于统计口径的不一致,都加大了数据获取的难度和精度。本文尝试构建了能源富集区三省区增长核算所需的工业37个分行业的1990-2011年间的投入产出面板数据库,通过绿色全要素生产率测度表明,能源富集区工业发展方式转变远未实现,低碳转型进程任重而道远。这说明不考察或不正确处置环境污染变量的传统模型会显著高估全要素生产率和技术进步率,会对经济发展方式转变的评估形成有偏的或错误的结论。通过工业分行业面板数据的增长分析,也得到了比总量生产函数更为细致而丰富的研究结果,这为能源富集区的工业低碳转型提供了更为精确的实证依据。
能源富集区的工业增长依靠资本和能源驱动的粗放型增长特征依然显著。但是,在20世纪90年代初期到21世纪初叶,这一区域能源排放密集型的重工业的全要素生产率、生产效率和技术进步率的增长出现了优于轻工业的结果,出现了工业发展的“绿色生产力革命”。进入21世纪以来,中国工业再次出现了重化工业化现象,本文认为这对能源富集区有着特殊的意义：
一方面,从经济的需求和供给角度看,中国再度重化工业化现象背后是对能源及重化工业产品的强劲需求,这为能源富集区的工业发展带来了巨大的市场,通过满足这些市场需求,能源富集区的经济总量将会快速提升,经济将会保持高速增长。
另一方面,从能源富集区经济发展质量和低碳转型的角度看,再度重化工业化现象无疑会加大低碳转型的难度。但是,在国际、国内低碳发展的刚性指标约束下,以及能源富集区区域经济可持续发展的紧迫要求下,会形成一个强有力的“倒逼机制”,迫使能源富集区在经济适度增长的前提下,尽快实现工业发展方式的根本性转变和低碳转型。
5.通过对能源富集区工业分行业的增长核算分析,对“资源诅咒”的解释获得了一些新的视角。本文对能源富集区工业37个分行业增长贡献的研究表明,传统的依赖资源的重工业对轻工业和高新技术产业有显著的“荷兰病”效应和“挤出效应”,表明在资源型省区的工业发展中,“资源诅咒”的风险的确存在。这种从分行业内部得到的解释依据,在现有“资源诅咒”的文献中很少见到,主要原因在于已有相关研究大多采用了总量生产函数构建模型,因此难以深入工业分行业的内部去考察更为细致和丰富的诅咒形成的具体表象和机制。
总之,能源富集区经济低碳转型发展根本途径在于提高全要素生产率,即只有当全要素生产率的产出贡献大于投入要素的纯数量贡献并且保持持续增加,经济发展方式才会发生根本转变,低碳转型才会实现。提高全要素生产率的基本路径主要包括调整经济结构和加快技术进步和自主创新等。当然,这些路径需要一系列相关的配套政策支撑,诸如投资体制改革、就业、保障和民生、土地流转改革,节能减排规制改革等,也包括各种经济结构调整的政策和产业政策等。其中,严格的节能减排规制可谓一剂苦口的良药,短期内会给能源富集区的经济增长带来阵痛,而长远看则会有助于经济发展的根本转型。节能减排已经成为能源富集区发展方式转变与低碳转型的一种有效的“倒逼机制”,它能够倒逼经济结构调整,能够催生新能源和低碳技术,也将促进能效和环境效率的提高。
From the beginning of the Twelfth Five-year Plan, China has been into a period of strategic opportunities and profound period of change to accelerate the transition of economic development model and achieve scientific development. The Twelfth Five-Year Program pointed out that the strategic adjustment of economic structure should be the main direction of the transformation of economic development model with the strong support of the scientific and technological and innovational progress. However, it is still outstanding that the current development is imbalanced, uncoordinated and unsustainable, such as the constraint resource and environment, many obstacles of development. Thus, there is still a long way to deepen reform and achieve transformation of the economic developmental model. From a practical point of view of regional economic development, various regions are faced with the difficult task of transformation of the economic developmental model. However, the pressures of restructure and development are still significantly different. As a special kind of resource-based regions, the energy-rich region is not only facing security of the continuing energy supply for the national economic development, but also achieving their own sustainable development. Therefore, it is especially an difficult task to make the transformation of the economic developmental model, implementing the sustainable development and low-carbon transformation. In this paper, efforts are made as the following aspects for the development of low-carbon transition in energy-rich regions of Shanxi, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia Provinces:
1. Based on the special historical process of the formation of China's energy rich regions, This paper analyzes the special problems of the regional transformation development and proves the inevitability of energy-rich regions pioneering development of low-carbon transformation. Based on the special problems of the energy-rich region, this point of view expands the arguments of existing low-carbon research. This view will undoubtedly face many challenges, but this article attempts giving more reasonable and scientific explanation and theoretical supports from inevitability, particularity, feasibility and the "reversed transmission mechanism" of energy conservation and emissions reduction.
2. This paper has the quality of economic growth a test for the energy-rich region from the three aspects:"resource curse", the people's livelihood achievement levels and the low-carbon economic growth. Resource Curse mainly discusses the relations between resource development and economic growth; livelihood achievements mainly talks about whether the resource bonus achievements have been transformed as the benefit of the general public; while the carbon level was mainly on the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions, designing to determine the economic growth ecological and environmental problems caused. By these three aspects of the test, we can roughly determine the level of quality of energy-rich region's economic development. Despite the simple idea of this study, and its inconsistence with the mainstream economic development research of the quality literature of ideas, these three areas have better internal logic progressive relationship, convincingly evaluating and testing the quality of economic development for the energy-rich region.
3. Based on energy and environment translog production function, this paper makes the growth accounting on the sub-industries in the energy-rich region. Studies have shown that the way of industrial development has achieved a productive intensive change. Industries have achieved remarkable advances in technology. TFP has become the first driver of industrial growth. Certainly. This optimistic conclusion is closely related to the analysis methods which are used. Although the follow-up studies show that optimism is more or less from the judgment the existence of bias, the growth accounting still reveals some other conclusions:
(1)The traditional energy and heavy chemical industry accounted for the absolute dominance to the whole industry TFP growth in energy-rich region, which fully shows that the heavy chemical industry with high investment, high energy consumption and high emission energy has also made tangible advances in technology, and implies that the upgrading of traditional industries already has the appropriate industrial base in energy-rich region.
(2) The high-technical industry is after the industry-wide growth in traditional energy heavy chemical industry, which indicates that the acceleration of the development of existing high-tech industries mainly depend on striving to enhance the scale and efficiency in energy-rich region, which will help to diversify the industrial structure, but also promote the transformation from extensive model of growth to sustainable model which is drove by technological progress.
4. Based on directional distance function and activity analysis model (AAM) of carbon regulation, this paper measures low-carbon economy transition in energy-rich region. From the perspective of the analysis of growth accounting, most of the existing literature for countries mainly focused on the overall growth of a country's domestic macro-level analysis and few studies have focused on specific regions or provinces, because of the difficulties of the data acquisition on the regional input-output, especially the data of capital stock which needs to be estimated by a special method, while due to the statistical inconsistencies which have increased the difficulty and precision of data acquisition. In this paper, I try to build37sub-industries input-output panel accurate database (1990-2011) of energy-rich region three Provinces for industrial growth accounting. The Green TFP measurement showed that the industrial development model transformation of energy-rich area has not been achieved and low-carbon transition process still has a long way to go. This indicates that we will significantly overestimate TFP and the rate of technological progress or draw a wrong conclusion on evaluating economic development model transition if we do not incorrectly consider about disposal of environmental pollution variables. The Growth of industrial sub-sectors based on panel data analysis has also more detailed and extensive research results than that based on total production, which will provide a more precise empirical basis for industrial low-carbon transition of the energy-rich region. The capital and energy-driven features of the industrial growth is still significant in energy-rich region. However, from the early1990s to the early21st century, in the region, TFP, Production efficiency and rate of technological progress of energy emissions-intensive heavy industries appeared better than light industries. This can be called the Industrial Green Productivity Revolution. In the21st century, China's industry appears the phenomenon of heavy industrialization again, which will have a special significance for energy-rich region:
On the one hand, from the perspective of economic demand and supply, China strongly demand for energy and heavy chemical products behind the rising phenomenon of the heavy industrialization again, which brought a huge market for the industrial development of energy-rich region. By meeting these market demands, the total energy-rich region's economy will rapidly increase; the economy will maintain a rapid growth.
On the other hand, from the perspective of the quality of economic development and low-carbon transition, the heavy reindustrialization phenomenon will undoubtedly increase the difficulty of low-carbon economy transition. However, under the constraints of rigid targets on international and domestic low-carbon development and under the urgent requirements of sustainable of energy-rich region economic development, it will form a strong "Forced mechanism ". It will force the energy-rich region to achieve a fundamental change in the way of industrial development and low carbon transition as soon as possible under maintaining moderate economic growth.
5. Through the growth accounting on the sub-industries in energy-rich region, this paper gained some new perspectives about the "resource curse" explanation. The studies of37industrial sub-sectors shows that the traditional resource-dependent heavy industries produces a significant "crowding out" to the light industries and high-tech industries and also shows that the "resource curse" risk does exist in resource-based provinces. This detailed explanation on "resource curse" is difficult to see in the existing literature which mostly used the models of total production function; it is difficult to get into further internal industrial sub-sectors to find more detailed and specific representations on "resource curse" formation.
In short, the fundamental way for economy low-carbon transition development in the energy-rich region is to improve TFP. Only when the contribution of TFP is greater than the number of pure inputs contribution and keeps increasing, the pattern of economic development will change radically and low-carbon transformation can be achieved. The basic path of improving TFP mainly includes adjustment of economic structure and speeding up technological progress and independent innovation, etc. of course, the paths needs a series of relevant supporting policies, such as the reform of investment system reform, employment, etc. Among them, the energy conservation and emissions reduction regulation will make short-term economic growth of the energy-rich region declined, but in the long term, it will contribute to a fundamental transformation of economic development. The energy conservation and emissions reduction regulation has been an effective "reversed transmission mechanism". It can reverse economic structural adjustment and create new energy and low-carbon technologies and will also promote energy efficiency and environment efficiency.
1.本文考虑了我国能源富集区形成的特殊历史过程,深入分析了这类区域转型发展面临的特殊问题,并论证了能源富集区率先低碳转型发展的客观必然性。本文以能源富集区存在的特殊问题为基础,提出能源富集区率先低碳转型发展的观点,拓展了现有低碳研究的立论视域。这一观点无疑会受到很多挑战,但本文尝试从能源富集区低碳转型的必要性、特殊性、可行性及节能减排的“倒逼机制”等方面给出更合理更科学的解释和理论支撑。
2.从“资源诅咒”、民生发展、低碳水平三个方面对能源富集区的经济增长质量进行了三重检验。资源诅咒主要考察资源开发与经济增长的关系；民生发展考察资源红利是否有效转化为民生成果,是否惠及广大民众的问题；而低碳水平则主要考察经济增长与碳排放的关系,旨在判断经济增长造成的生态和环境问题,通过这三个方面的检验就可以大致判断能源富集区经济发展的质量高低。这一研究思路简洁新颖,虽与国内一般研究经济发展质量的文献思路并不一致,但这三个方面具有较强的内在逻辑递进关系,针对能源富集区的经济发展质量进行评估和检验有很强的说服力。
3.基于能源和环境的超越对数生产函数,对能源富集区三省区工业分行业进行了增长核算分析。研究表明,如果不考虑或不正确处置环境污染变量,会对能源富集区工业发展方式转变形成相当乐观的结论,即工业发展总体上已经实现集约型转变,TFP已经成为驱动工业增长的第一动力。然而这种乐观结论与使用的研究分析方法密切相关,尽管从后续研究表明这种乐观判断存在偏误,但是增长核算仍揭示了其他一些重要结论：
(1)能源重化工业行业对能源富集区工业全行业TFP增长作出的贡献占到绝对的主导地位,这说明高投资、高能耗、高排放的能源重化工业行业也取得了实实在在的技术进步,并隐含了能源富集区传统产业进行升级改造已经具有相应的产业基础。
(2)高新技术行业对工业全行业增长的贡献仅次于传统的能源重化工业行业,这表明加快现有高新技术产业的发展,主要应在行业规模和效率方面着力提升,将有助于能源富集区产业结构多样化,有助于粗放型的增长方式向集约型的低碳可持续发展方式尽快转变。
4.基于方向性距离函数和低碳规制的行为分析模型对能源富集的区域经济低碳转型进行了测度。关于增长核算的分析,现有文献主要针对国别及一国宏观层面进行总量增长研究,而很少有针对特定区域或省区的研究。究其原因,可能是由于区域层面的投入产出数据的获取比较难,特别是资本存量的数据需要采用专门方法进行估算,同时又由于统计口径的不一致,都加大了数据获取的难度和精度。本文尝试构建了能源富集区三省区增长核算所需的工业37个分行业的1990-2011年间的投入产出面板数据库,通过绿色全要素生产率测度表明,能源富集区工业发展方式转变远未实现,低碳转型进程任重而道远。这说明不考察或不正确处置环境污染变量的传统模型会显著高估全要素生产率和技术进步率,会对经济发展方式转变的评估形成有偏的或错误的结论。通过工业分行业面板数据的增长分析,也得到了比总量生产函数更为细致而丰富的研究结果,这为能源富集区的工业低碳转型提供了更为精确的实证依据。
能源富集区的工业增长依靠资本和能源驱动的粗放型增长特征依然显著。但是,在20世纪90年代初期到21世纪初叶,这一区域能源排放密集型的重工业的全要素生产率、生产效率和技术进步率的增长出现了优于轻工业的结果,出现了工业发展的“绿色生产力革命”。进入21世纪以来,中国工业再次出现了重化工业化现象,本文认为这对能源富集区有着特殊的意义：
一方面,从经济的需求和供给角度看,中国再度重化工业化现象背后是对能源及重化工业产品的强劲需求,这为能源富集区的工业发展带来了巨大的市场,通过满足这些市场需求,能源富集区的经济总量将会快速提升,经济将会保持高速增长。
另一方面,从能源富集区经济发展质量和低碳转型的角度看,再度重化工业化现象无疑会加大低碳转型的难度。但是,在国际、国内低碳发展的刚性指标约束下,以及能源富集区区域经济可持续发展的紧迫要求下,会形成一个强有力的“倒逼机制”,迫使能源富集区在经济适度增长的前提下,尽快实现工业发展方式的根本性转变和低碳转型。
5.通过对能源富集区工业分行业的增长核算分析,对“资源诅咒”的解释获得了一些新的视角。本文对能源富集区工业37个分行业增长贡献的研究表明,传统的依赖资源的重工业对轻工业和高新技术产业有显著的“荷兰病”效应和“挤出效应”,表明在资源型省区的工业发展中,“资源诅咒”的风险的确存在。这种从分行业内部得到的解释依据,在现有“资源诅咒”的文献中很少见到,主要原因在于已有相关研究大多采用了总量生产函数构建模型,因此难以深入工业分行业的内部去考察更为细致和丰富的诅咒形成的具体表象和机制。
总之,能源富集区经济低碳转型发展根本途径在于提高全要素生产率,即只有当全要素生产率的产出贡献大于投入要素的纯数量贡献并且保持持续增加,经济发展方式才会发生根本转变,低碳转型才会实现。提高全要素生产率的基本路径主要包括调整经济结构和加快技术进步和自主创新等。当然,这些路径需要一系列相关的配套政策支撑,诸如投资体制改革、就业、保障和民生、土地流转改革,节能减排规制改革等,也包括各种经济结构调整的政策和产业政策等。其中,严格的节能减排规制可谓一剂苦口的良药,短期内会给能源富集区的经济增长带来阵痛,而长远看则会有助于经济发展的根本转型。节能减排已经成为能源富集区发展方式转变与低碳转型的一种有效的“倒逼机制”,它能够倒逼经济结构调整,能够催生新能源和低碳技术,也将促进能效和环境效率的提高。
From the beginning of the Twelfth Five-year Plan, China has been into a period of strategic opportunities and profound period of change to accelerate the transition of economic development model and achieve scientific development. The Twelfth Five-Year Program pointed out that the strategic adjustment of economic structure should be the main direction of the transformation of economic development model with the strong support of the scientific and technological and innovational progress. However, it is still outstanding that the current development is imbalanced, uncoordinated and unsustainable, such as the constraint resource and environment, many obstacles of development. Thus, there is still a long way to deepen reform and achieve transformation of the economic developmental model. From a practical point of view of regional economic development, various regions are faced with the difficult task of transformation of the economic developmental model. However, the pressures of restructure and development are still significantly different. As a special kind of resource-based regions, the energy-rich region is not only facing security of the continuing energy supply for the national economic development, but also achieving their own sustainable development. Therefore, it is especially an difficult task to make the transformation of the economic developmental model, implementing the sustainable development and low-carbon transformation. In this paper, efforts are made as the following aspects for the development of low-carbon transition in energy-rich regions of Shanxi, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia Provinces:
1. Based on the special historical process of the formation of China's energy rich regions, This paper analyzes the special problems of the regional transformation development and proves the inevitability of energy-rich regions pioneering development of low-carbon transformation. Based on the special problems of the energy-rich region, this point of view expands the arguments of existing low-carbon research. This view will undoubtedly face many challenges, but this article attempts giving more reasonable and scientific explanation and theoretical supports from inevitability, particularity, feasibility and the "reversed transmission mechanism" of energy conservation and emissions reduction.
2. This paper has the quality of economic growth a test for the energy-rich region from the three aspects:"resource curse", the people's livelihood achievement levels and the low-carbon economic growth. Resource Curse mainly discusses the relations between resource development and economic growth; livelihood achievements mainly talks about whether the resource bonus achievements have been transformed as the benefit of the general public; while the carbon level was mainly on the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions, designing to determine the economic growth ecological and environmental problems caused. By these three aspects of the test, we can roughly determine the level of quality of energy-rich region's economic development. Despite the simple idea of this study, and its inconsistence with the mainstream economic development research of the quality literature of ideas, these three areas have better internal logic progressive relationship, convincingly evaluating and testing the quality of economic development for the energy-rich region.
3. Based on energy and environment translog production function, this paper makes the growth accounting on the sub-industries in the energy-rich region. Studies have shown that the way of industrial development has achieved a productive intensive change. Industries have achieved remarkable advances in technology. TFP has become the first driver of industrial growth. Certainly. This optimistic conclusion is closely related to the analysis methods which are used. Although the follow-up studies show that optimism is more or less from the judgment the existence of bias, the growth accounting still reveals some other conclusions:
(1)The traditional energy and heavy chemical industry accounted for the absolute dominance to the whole industry TFP growth in energy-rich region, which fully shows that the heavy chemical industry with high investment, high energy consumption and high emission energy has also made tangible advances in technology, and implies that the upgrading of traditional industries already has the appropriate industrial base in energy-rich region.
(2) The high-technical industry is after the industry-wide growth in traditional energy heavy chemical industry, which indicates that the acceleration of the development of existing high-tech industries mainly depend on striving to enhance the scale and efficiency in energy-rich region, which will help to diversify the industrial structure, but also promote the transformation from extensive model of growth to sustainable model which is drove by technological progress.
4. Based on directional distance function and activity analysis model (AAM) of carbon regulation, this paper measures low-carbon economy transition in energy-rich region. From the perspective of the analysis of growth accounting, most of the existing literature for countries mainly focused on the overall growth of a country's domestic macro-level analysis and few studies have focused on specific regions or provinces, because of the difficulties of the data acquisition on the regional input-output, especially the data of capital stock which needs to be estimated by a special method, while due to the statistical inconsistencies which have increased the difficulty and precision of data acquisition. In this paper, I try to build37sub-industries input-output panel accurate database (1990-2011) of energy-rich region three Provinces for industrial growth accounting. The Green TFP measurement showed that the industrial development model transformation of energy-rich area has not been achieved and low-carbon transition process still has a long way to go. This indicates that we will significantly overestimate TFP and the rate of technological progress or draw a wrong conclusion on evaluating economic development model transition if we do not incorrectly consider about disposal of environmental pollution variables. The Growth of industrial sub-sectors based on panel data analysis has also more detailed and extensive research results than that based on total production, which will provide a more precise empirical basis for industrial low-carbon transition of the energy-rich region. The capital and energy-driven features of the industrial growth is still significant in energy-rich region. However, from the early1990s to the early21st century, in the region, TFP, Production efficiency and rate of technological progress of energy emissions-intensive heavy industries appeared better than light industries. This can be called the Industrial Green Productivity Revolution. In the21st century, China's industry appears the phenomenon of heavy industrialization again, which will have a special significance for energy-rich region:
On the one hand, from the perspective of economic demand and supply, China strongly demand for energy and heavy chemical products behind the rising phenomenon of the heavy industrialization again, which brought a huge market for the industrial development of energy-rich region. By meeting these market demands, the total energy-rich region's economy will rapidly increase; the economy will maintain a rapid growth.
On the other hand, from the perspective of the quality of economic development and low-carbon transition, the heavy reindustrialization phenomenon will undoubtedly increase the difficulty of low-carbon economy transition. However, under the constraints of rigid targets on international and domestic low-carbon development and under the urgent requirements of sustainable of energy-rich region economic development, it will form a strong "Forced mechanism ". It will force the energy-rich region to achieve a fundamental change in the way of industrial development and low carbon transition as soon as possible under maintaining moderate economic growth.
5. Through the growth accounting on the sub-industries in energy-rich region, this paper gained some new perspectives about the "resource curse" explanation. The studies of37industrial sub-sectors shows that the traditional resource-dependent heavy industries produces a significant "crowding out" to the light industries and high-tech industries and also shows that the "resource curse" risk does exist in resource-based provinces. This detailed explanation on "resource curse" is difficult to see in the existing literature which mostly used the models of total production function; it is difficult to get into further internal industrial sub-sectors to find more detailed and specific representations on "resource curse" formation.
In short, the fundamental way for economy low-carbon transition development in the energy-rich region is to improve TFP. Only when the contribution of TFP is greater than the number of pure inputs contribution and keeps increasing, the pattern of economic development will change radically and low-carbon transformation can be achieved. The basic path of improving TFP mainly includes adjustment of economic structure and speeding up technological progress and independent innovation, etc. of course, the paths needs a series of relevant supporting policies, such as the reform of investment system reform, employment, etc. Among them, the energy conservation and emissions reduction regulation will make short-term economic growth of the energy-rich region declined, but in the long term, it will contribute to a fundamental transformation of economic development. The energy conservation and emissions reduction regulation has been an effective "reversed transmission mechanism". It can reverse economic structural adjustment and create new energy and low-carbon technologies and will also promote energy efficiency and environment efficiency.
引文
[1]J. E. Randall, R. G. Ironside. Communities on the Edge:An Economic Geography of Resource-dependent Communities in Canada. The Canadian Geographer.1996, 40(1):17-35.
[2]Gill A M, Enhancing social interaction in new resource towns:planning perspectives, Journal of Economic and Social Geography(TESG),1990(81): 348-363.
[3]Warren R L, The Community in America, Chicago:Rand McNally College Publishing,1963,12-16.
[4]C.O'faircheallaigh, Economic base and employment structure in northern territory mining towns, Resource Communities:Settlement and Workforces Issues, East Melbourne, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, 1988,221-236
[5]Bradbury JH, Living with boom and cycles:new towns on the resource frontier in Canada, Resource Communities:Settlement and Workforce Issues, East Melbourne:Common wealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, 1988,180-183.
[6]Bradbury J H, The impact of industrial cycles in the mining sector, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1984(8):311-331
[7]吴奇修, 陈晓红.资源型城市的转型与发展：一个文献综述.江汉论坛.2005,(3)：39-41.
[8]Spooner D, Mining and Regional Development, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1981,8-9.
[9]Lucas.R.A, Minetown, Milltown, Railtown, Life in Canadian Communities of single Industry, Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1971,12.
[10]Bradbury J H, I St.Martin, Winding down in a Qubic town:a case study of Schefferville, The Canadian Geographer,1983(27):128-144.
[11]Millward H A, Model of coalfield development:six stages exemplified by the Sydney field, The Canadian Geographer,1985(29):234-248.
[12]Aschmann H, The natural history of a mine, Economic Geography,1970(46): 172-189.
[13]Bradbury J H, Towards an alternative theory of resource-based town development, Economic Geography,1979(55):147-166.
[14]G Norcliffe. Regional Labour Market Adjustments in a Period of Structural Transformation:An Assessment of the Canadian case. The Canadian Geographer. 1994,38(1):2-17.
[15]R. Hayter, T. J. Barnes. Labour Market Segmentation, Flexibility and Recession: A British Colombian Case Study. Environment and Planing.1992, (10):333-353.
[16]Randll JE, RG Ironside, Communities on the edge:an economic geography of resource-dependent communities in Canada, The Canadian Geographer, 1996(40):17-35.
[17]Grabher G, The Weakness of Strong Ties:The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area, In idem, The Embedded Firm On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London, New York:Routledge,1993,253-277.
[18]Keana JH, The Towns that Coal Built:The Evolution of Landscapes and Communities in Southern Colorado, APCG Yearbook, Hawaii:University of Press,2000,70-94.
[19]汤建影,周德群.1990-1999年中国矿业城市发展轨迹及其分析.中国矿业大学学报,2003,32(1)：79-91.
[20]焦华富, 韩世君, 路建涛.德国鲁尔区工矿城市经济结构的转变.经济地理.1997,12(2)： 104-107.
[21]王著,吴栋.对煤炭资源型城市产业转型的深层次思考[J].经济经纬,2007,(6)：27-30.
[22]张米尔.市场化进程中的资源型城市产业转型研究[M].机械工业出版社.2005：38-39,107-184.
[23]田明,樊杰,孙威.我国煤炭城市转型发展研究.矿冶.2004,13(1)：10-14.
[24]樊艳萍, 牛冲槐.山西煤炭资源型城市产业转型系统研究.系统科学学报.2006,14(2)： 95-98.
[25]张凤武.煤炭城市发展接续产业的模式研究.辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版).2004,6(1)：24-26.
[26]董亚宁,尤强,李庆明.煤炭资源型城市的危机及战略决策[J].宏观经济管理,2005,(4)：23-25.
[27]任菊香.山西省煤炭资源型城市的发展态势及对策——以朔州市为例[J].资源科学.2008,30(2)：169-176.
[28]李锦峰.资源富集区的城市竞争力探析—以榆林与周边城市为例.西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(3)：115-118.
[29]付桂军,齐义军.煤炭资源型区域可持续发展水平比较研究——基于模糊综合评价法的分析.干旱地区资源与环境,2013,(4)：106-110.
[30]陈荣平.资源型城市现代化转型的概念性分析框架—以克拉玛依市为例.城市规划汇刊,2003,(5)：59-62.
[31]李咏梅.资源型城市的规避转型问题研究—以新疆克拉玛依市为例.当代财经,2005,(7)：82-84.
[32]王亮,等.资源型城市产业转型战略研究—以克拉玛依为例.经济地理,2011,(8)：1277-1282.
[33]董锋,等.资源型城市可持续发展水平评价—以黑龙江省大庆市为例.资源科学,2010,(8)：1584-1591.
[34]罗洪群,等.油气资源型城市的可持续发展机制.软科学,2011,(10)：65-68.
[35]王海飞,孔维新,蔡定昆.国内外资源型城市发展以甘肃资源型城市的启示—兼论庆阳市发展战略.甘肃社会科学,2013,(3)：207-210.
[36]Rostow, W.W.1960a. The Process of Economic Growth(second edition).London: Oxford University Press.
[37]R. M. Auty. Resource-based Industrialization:Sowing the Oil in Eight Developing Countries. Oxford University Press.1990:3.
[38]R. M. Auty. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies:The Resource Curse Thesis. Routledge Press.1993:1-2.
[39]段利民.资源诅咒与区域经济增长研究.西北大学博士论文.2009：11-12.
[40]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper No.5398. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA,1995, www.nber.org/tmp/10141-w5398.pdf
[41]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Fundamental Sources of Long-run Growth. American Economic Review.1997,87(2):184-188.
[42]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. The Big Push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth. Journal of Development Economics.1999,59(1):43-76.
[43]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Natural Resource Intensity and Economic Growth. In J. Mayer, B. Chambers, F. Ayisha (eds.), Development Policies in Natural Resource Economics. Edward Elgar.1999:13-38.
[44]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Natural Resources and Economic Development:The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review.2001,45(4-6): 827-838.
[45]Papyrakis, Elisaio and Gerlagh, Reyer."The Resource Curse Hypothesis and Its Transmission Channels." Journal of Comparative Economies,2004.
[46]W. M. Corden, J. P. Neary. Booming Sector and De-industrialization in a Small Open Economy. Economic Journal.1982,92(368):825-848.
[47]N. Birdsall, T. Pinckney, R. Sabot. Natural Resource, Human Capital, and Growth. In R. M. Auty (ed.), Resource Abundance and Economic Development.Oxford University Press.2001:57-75.
[48]K. Hamilton. The Sustainability of Extractive Economies. In R. M. Auty (ed.), Resource Abundance and Economic Development. Oxford University Press.2001: 36-56
[49]邵帅.能源开发对我国能源型地区经济增长的影响机制研究.哈尔滨工业大学博士论文.2009：18-21.
[50]R. Prebisch. The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. Reprinted in:Economic Bulletin for Latin Amertca. Santiago: ECLA/UN,1962,7(1):1-22.
[51]赵奉军.关于“资源诅咒”的文献综述.重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛).2006,16(1)：8-12.
[52]T. Gylfason, G. Zoega. Natural Resources and Economic Growth:The Role of Investment. The World Economy.2006,29(8):1091-1115.
[53]E. Papyrakis, R. Gerlagh. Resource Windfalls, Investment, and Long-term Income. Resources Policy.2006,31(2):117-128.
[54]T. Gylfason. Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development. European Economic Review.2001,45 (4-6):847-859.
[55]B. Douangngeune, Y. Hayami, Y. Godo. Education and Natural Resources in Economic Development:Thailand Compared with Japan and Korea. Journal of Asian Economics.2005,16(2):179-204.
[56]P. K. Asea, A. Lahiri. The Precious Bane. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.1999,23(5-6):823-849.
[57]E. Papyrakis, R. Gerlagh. Natural Resources, Innovation, and Growth. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working Paper No.129.04.2004, http: //papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=609764.
[58]J. M. Baland, P. Francois. Rent-seeking and Resource Booms. Journal of Development Economics.2000,61(2):527-542.
[59]K. Bjorvatn, K. Selvik. Destructive Competition:Factionalism and Rent-seeking in Iran. World Development.2008,36(11):2314-2324.
[60]徐康宁,王剑.自然资源丰裕程度与经济发展水平关系的研究[J].经济研究,2006(1)：78-88.
[61]胡援成,肖德勇.2007.经济发展门槛与自然资源诅咒[J].管理世界(4)：15-23).
[62]张馨,牛叔文等.中国省域能源资源与经济增长关系的实证分析[J].自然资源学报,2010(12)：2040-2051.
[63]冯宗宪,姜听.中国省际层面“资源诅咒”问题的再检验[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2010(10)：129-136.
[64]邵帅,齐中英.西部地区的能源开发与经济增长—基于“资源诅咒”假说的实证分析[J].经济研究,2008(4)：147-160.
[65]胡健,焦兵.2008.油气资源开发对西部区域经济拉动效应的比较研究[J].管理学报,2008(5)：655-658.
[66]武芳梅.“资源的诅咒”与经济发展：基于山西省的典型分析[J].经济问题,2007(10)：24-27.
[67]景普秋,王清宪.煤炭资源开发与区域经济发展中的“福”与“祸”：基于山西的实证分析[J]中国工业经济,2008(7)：80-90.
[68]赵文,‘赵国浩等.山西省煤炭资源开发与经济发展关系的实证研究[J].资源科学,2011(9)：1775-1780).
[69]冯宗宪,姜听等.资源诅咒传导机制之“荷兰病”：理论模型与实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2010(4)：74-82.
[70]徐盈之,胡永舜.内蒙古经济增长与资源优势的关系：基于“资源诅咒”假说的实证分析[J].资源科学,2010(12)：2391-2399.
[71]于立宏.可耗竭资源与经济增长：理论进展[J].浙江社会科学,2009,(5)：179-184.
[72]J. M. Hartwick. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources. American Economic Review.1977,67(5):972-974.
[73]R. H. Rashe, J. Tatom. Energy Resources and Potential GNP. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review.1977,59(6):10-24.
[74]Y. Moon, Y. Sonn. Productive Energy Consumption and Economic Growth:An Endogenous Growth Model and its Empirical Application. Resource and Energy Economics.1996,18(2):189-200.
[75]A. Zon, I. H. Yetkiner. An Endogenous Growth Model with Embodied Energy-saving Technical Change. Resource and Energy Economics.2003,25(1): 81-103.
[76]陈诗一.节能减排、结构调整与工业发展方式转变研究[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2011：57-58.
[77]Nielsen Sqren Bo, Lars Haagen Pedersen and Peter Birch Sqrensen, "Environment Policy, Pollution, Unemployment, and Endogenous Growth", International Tax and Public Finance,1995,2,185-205.
[78]Palmer Karen, Wallace E. Oates and Paul R. Portney, "Tightening Environmental Standards" The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4),119-132.
[79]Brock W. and M.S. Taylor, "Economic Growth and the Environment", In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S.(Eds), Handbook of Economic Growth II. Chap.28, Elsevier,2005,1749-1821.
[80]Bovenberg A. Lans and Sjak Smulders, Environmental Quality and Pollution-augmenting Technological Change in a Two-sector Endogenous Growth Model", Journal of Public Economics,1995,57,369-391.
[81]Ramanathan Ramakrishman, "An Analysis of Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Countries of the Middle East and North Africa", Energy, 2005,30(15),2831-2842.
[82]Considine T.J. and D.F. Larson, "The Environment as a Factor of Production", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2006,52(3),645-662.
[83]Fare Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, C.A. Knox Lovell and S. Yaisawarng, "Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs", Reviews of Economics and Statistics,1993,75(2),374-380.
[84]Fare Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf and Jr. C.A. Pasurka, "Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth", Journal of Regional Science,2001,41(3),381-409.
[85]Chambers R., Y.H. Chung and R. Fare, "Benefit and Distance Function ", Journal of Economic Theory,1996,70,407-419.
[86]Coggins JAY S. and John R. Swinton, "The Price of Pollution:A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2 Allowances", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996,30,58-72.
[87]Chung, Yangho, Rolf Fare, Shawna Grosskopf, "Productivity and Undesirable Outputs:A Directional Distance Function Approach." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1997,51,229-240.
[88]Boyd, G.A., G Tolley and J. Pang, "Plant Level Productivity, Efficiency, and Environmental Performance of the Container Glass Industry ", Environmental and Resource Economics,2002,23,29-43.
[89]Jeon Byung M. and R. C. Sickles, "The Role of Environmental Factors in Growth Accounting ", Journal of Applied Econometrics,2004,19(5), 567-591.
[90]Brummer B., T. Glauben and W. Lu, "Policy Reform and Productivity Change in Chinese Agriculture:A Distance Function Approach", Journal of Development Economics,2006,81,61-79.
[91]Kumar Surender, "Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth:A Global Analysis Using M-L Index", Ecological Economics,2006,56(2),280-293.
[92]王海建.耗竭性资源、R&D与内生经济增长模型[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1999,8(3)：38-42.
[93]王海建.资源约束、环境污染与内生经济增长[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2000,(1)：76-80.
[94]王海建.耗竭性资源管理与人力资本积累内生经济增长[J].管理工程学报,2000,14(3)：11-13.
[95]张彬,左晖.能源持续利用、环境治理和内生经济增长[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(5)：27-32.
[96]王兵,吴延瑞,颜鹏飞.中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长[J].经济研究,2010,(5)：95-109.
[97]涂正革.环境、资源与工业增长的协调性[J].经济研究,2008(2)93-105.
[98]涂正革,肖耿.环境约束下中国工业增长模式研究[J].世界经济,2009,(11)：41-54.
[99]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009(4)：41-55.
[100]陈诗一.中国的绿色工业革命：基于环境全要素生产率视角的解释(1980-2008)[J].经济研究,2010,(11)：21-34.
[101]Sunikka, Minna. Energy efficiency and low carbon technologies in urban renewal[J]. Building Researeh & Information,2006(34):521-533.
[102]Abdeen Mustal Omer Focuson Low Carbon Technologies:The Positive Solution [J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2007(4):1-27.
[103]Parnsh, Bradley D, Foxon, Timothy J. Sustainability Entrepreneurship and Equitable Transitions to a Low-Carbon Economy [J].Greener Management Intemational,2009(55):47-62.
[104]HaraldWinkler, Energy Policies for sustainable development in South Africa[J].Energy Sustainable,2007(1):26-34.
[105]]Till Requate. Dynamic incentives by environmental Policy instruments a survey [J].Ecological Economics,2005,54(2-3):175-195.
[106]]Binu Partllan, Marianne Osterkom, Mattllew Kennedy, St. John Hoskyns, Morgan Bazilian, Pradeep Monga. Lessons for low-carbon energy transition: Experience from the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership(REEEP)[J]. Energy for sustainable Development,2010(14):83-93.
[107]G Ballard-Tremeer and C. Searcy. Methodologies for the assessment of energy, Climate and Development Impacts of (REEEP)Projects:Proposal for Integration of Outcome Mapping into the REEEP Project Cycle. Prepared for REEEP by Eco Ltd, London,2009
[108]Morrison, Geoff. Yoshida, Phyllis. China, United States, Korea Take Lead in Clean Energy and Low-Carbon Initiatives [J]. Research Technology Management,2009(52):2-4.
[119]李友俊,姚红.资源型城市向低碳城市的转型.科学对社会的影响[J].2010,(2)5-9.
[110]孔维新,王海飞,钱茜.资源枯竭城市低碳经济转型战略分析[J].开发研究,2011,(6)：136-140.
[111]张巍.新兴资源型城市低碳化转型的模式选择[J].城市发展研究,2012,(9)：8-14.
[112]段立全,金起文.河北资源型城市向低碳经济转型的路径[J].经济导刊,2011,(7)：28-29.
[113]韩雪梅,刘欢欢.我国生态消耗与经济发展的动态比较研究—关于西部地区发展低碳经济的考量[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(3)：118-125.
[114]贺俊果.建设山西低碳绿色能源基地[J].宏观经济管理,2010,(6)：62-63.
[115]张小兰.马克思主义经济理论中的低碳思想及启示[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011(6)：138-142.
[116]陈学明.论福斯特的生态马克思主义给予我们的启示[J].苏州大学学报,2011(6)：27-36.
[117]王万山.中外生态经济发展趋势[J].未来与发展,2006(03)：14-17.
[118]李永东,路杨.生态经济发展研究综述[J].宁夏社会科学,2007(04)：48-51.
[119]张连国.论绿色经济学的三种范式[J].生态经济,2013(03)：63-66.
[120]诸大建.绿色经济新理念及中国开展绿色经济研究的思考[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012(05)：40-47.
[121]方时姣.绿色经济视野下的低碳经济发展新论[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010(4)：8-11.
[122]张晶,王丽萍.低碳经济相关理论的综述分析[J].云南财经大学学报(社会科学版),2011(06)：36-39.
[123]杨志,张洪国.气候变化与低碳经济、绿色经济、循环经济之辨析[J].广东社会科学,2009(06)：34-42.
[124]隗斌贤.对经济增长源泉与动力的新解释——兼评内生增长理论与模型的演进[J].浙江社会科学,1999,(4)：40-46.
[125]张彬,左晖.能源持续利用、环境治理和内生经济增长[J].国人口·资源与环境,2007(5)：27-32.
[126]于渤,黎永亮,迟春洁.考虑能源耗竭、污染治理的经济持续增长内生模型[J].管理科学学报,2006(4)：12-17.
[127]杨万平,袁晓玲.能源持续利用、污染治理下的经济可持续增长模型[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011(5)：80-85.
[128]彭皓玥.自然资源约束下的我国资源型区域可持续发展研究[D].天津大学管理科学与工程专业博士学位论文,2008：42-43.
[129]袁纯清.走出资源型地区科学发展的新路子[N].光明日报,2011-09-27.
[130]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数/各地区市场化相对进程2011年报告[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2011.
[131]中国经济增长与宏观稳定课题组.增长失衡与政府责任——基于社会性支出角度的分析[J].经济研究,2006,(10)：4-17.
[132]金碚.论民生的经济学性质[J].中国工业经济,2011,(1)：5-14.
[133]徐康宁,韩剑.中国区域经济的“资源诅咒”效应：地区差距的另一种解释[J].经济学家,2005,(6)：96-102.
[134]Sen, Amartya,1999, Development as Freedom, New York:Alfred A. Knopf Inc..
[135]Bloom, David, and Jaypee Sevilla,2004, "The Effect of Health on Economic Growth:A Production Function Approach", World Development, Vol.32, No. 1, pp.1-13.
[136]Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena, and Mark Wilson,2004, "Health Human Capital and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan African and OECD Countries", Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.44, No.2, pp.296-320.
[137]Strauss, John, and Duncan Thomas,1998, "Health, Nutrition, and Economic Development", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.36, No.2, pp.766-817.
[138]刘竹,等.中国低碳试点省份经济增长与碳排放关系研究[J].资源科学,2011(4)：620-625.
[139]孙耀华,李忠民.中国各省区经济发展与碳排放脱钩关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011(5)：87-92.
[140]Jorgenson et al. productivity and U. S. ecnomicgrowth, Cambrige, MA:Harvard University Press,1987.
[141]黄勇峰,任若恩,刘晓生.中国制造业资本存量永续盘存法估计[J].经济学(季刊),2002(2)：377-396.
[142]张军,等.中国省际物质资本存量估算：1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10)：35-44.
[143]张军.资本形成、工业化与经济增长：中国的转轨特征[J].经济研究,2002(6)：3-13.
[144]李治国,唐国兴.资本形成路径与资本存量调整模型[J].经济研究,2003(2)：34-42.
[145]林毅夫.新结构经济学：反思经济发展与政策的理论框架[M].北京：北京大学出版,2012.
[146]Fare, Rolf, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries [J].America Economic Review,1994(84):66-83.
[147]李福柱,杨跃峰.全要素生产率增长率的测算方法应用述评[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2)：64-68.
[148]李小平,卢现祥,朱钟棣.国际贸易、技术进步和中国工业行业的生产率增长[J].经济学(季刊),2008(2)：549-564.
[149]刘小玄,吴延兵.企业生产率增长及来源[J].经济研究,2009(7)：45-54.
[150]张军,施少华,陈诗一.中国的工业改革与效率变化——方法、数据、文献和现有的结果[J].经济学(季刊),2003(1)：1-38.
[151]Bosworth Barry and Susan M. Collins. Accounting for Growth:Comparing China and India [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2008,22(1):45-66.
[152]李红玉,等.企业演化：中国工业生产率增长的重要途径[J].经济研究, 2008(6)：12-24.
[153]张军,陈诗一.结构改革与中国工业增长[J].经济研究,2009(7)：4-20.
[154]Kuznets, S. Modern Economic Growth [M].CT:Yale University Press,1966.
[155]Chenery H. B., S. Robinson and M. Syrquin. Industrialization and Growth:A Comparative Study [M].New York:Oxford University Press,1986.
[156]陈佳贵,黄群慧.工业发展、国情变化与经济现代化战略——中国成为工业大国的国情分析[J].中国社会科学,2005,04：4-16.
[157]陈佳贵,黄群慧,钟宏武.中国地区工业化进程的综合评价和特征分析[J].经济研究,2006,06：4-15.
[158]蔡昉,王德文,曲珥.中国产业升级的大国雁阵模型分析[J].经济研究,2009(9)：4-14.
[159]钱纳里,鲁宾逊,赛尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].吴奇等译,上海：上海人民出版社：1986.
[160]Harberger A. C. A Vision of the Growth Process[J]. American Economic Review, 1998,88(1):1-32.
[161]Timmer Marcel and A. Szirmai. Productivity Growth in Asian Manufacturing [J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2000,11(4):371-392.
[162]林毅夫,刘明兴.经济发展战略与中国的工业化[J].经济研究,2004(7)：48-58.
[163]李后强,廖祖君.改革红利来源于结构调整和优化[EB/OL].求是理论网[2013-06-19].http://www.qstheory.cn/lg/xszh/201306/t20130619_241277.htm.
[164]韩峥.循环经济背景下煤炭产业技术创新系统研究[D].太原理工大学管理科学与工程硕士学位论文,2011：22.
[165]郑立新.自主创新是实现产业升级的中心环节[J].求是杂志,2010(2)：22-24.
[166]李士,方虹,刘春平.中国低碳经济发展研究报告[R].北京：科学出版社,2011：3.
[2]Gill A M, Enhancing social interaction in new resource towns:planning perspectives, Journal of Economic and Social Geography(TESG),1990(81): 348-363.
[3]Warren R L, The Community in America, Chicago:Rand McNally College Publishing,1963,12-16.
[4]C.O'faircheallaigh, Economic base and employment structure in northern territory mining towns, Resource Communities:Settlement and Workforces Issues, East Melbourne, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, 1988,221-236
[5]Bradbury JH, Living with boom and cycles:new towns on the resource frontier in Canada, Resource Communities:Settlement and Workforce Issues, East Melbourne:Common wealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, 1988,180-183.
[6]Bradbury J H, The impact of industrial cycles in the mining sector, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1984(8):311-331
[7]吴奇修, 陈晓红.资源型城市的转型与发展：一个文献综述.江汉论坛.2005,(3)：39-41.
[8]Spooner D, Mining and Regional Development, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1981,8-9.
[9]Lucas.R.A, Minetown, Milltown, Railtown, Life in Canadian Communities of single Industry, Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1971,12.
[10]Bradbury J H, I St.Martin, Winding down in a Qubic town:a case study of Schefferville, The Canadian Geographer,1983(27):128-144.
[11]Millward H A, Model of coalfield development:six stages exemplified by the Sydney field, The Canadian Geographer,1985(29):234-248.
[12]Aschmann H, The natural history of a mine, Economic Geography,1970(46): 172-189.
[13]Bradbury J H, Towards an alternative theory of resource-based town development, Economic Geography,1979(55):147-166.
[14]G Norcliffe. Regional Labour Market Adjustments in a Period of Structural Transformation:An Assessment of the Canadian case. The Canadian Geographer. 1994,38(1):2-17.
[15]R. Hayter, T. J. Barnes. Labour Market Segmentation, Flexibility and Recession: A British Colombian Case Study. Environment and Planing.1992, (10):333-353.
[16]Randll JE, RG Ironside, Communities on the edge:an economic geography of resource-dependent communities in Canada, The Canadian Geographer, 1996(40):17-35.
[17]Grabher G, The Weakness of Strong Ties:The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area, In idem, The Embedded Firm On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London, New York:Routledge,1993,253-277.
[18]Keana JH, The Towns that Coal Built:The Evolution of Landscapes and Communities in Southern Colorado, APCG Yearbook, Hawaii:University of Press,2000,70-94.
[19]汤建影,周德群.1990-1999年中国矿业城市发展轨迹及其分析.中国矿业大学学报,2003,32(1)：79-91.
[20]焦华富, 韩世君, 路建涛.德国鲁尔区工矿城市经济结构的转变.经济地理.1997,12(2)： 104-107.
[21]王著,吴栋.对煤炭资源型城市产业转型的深层次思考[J].经济经纬,2007,(6)：27-30.
[22]张米尔.市场化进程中的资源型城市产业转型研究[M].机械工业出版社.2005：38-39,107-184.
[23]田明,樊杰,孙威.我国煤炭城市转型发展研究.矿冶.2004,13(1)：10-14.
[24]樊艳萍, 牛冲槐.山西煤炭资源型城市产业转型系统研究.系统科学学报.2006,14(2)： 95-98.
[25]张凤武.煤炭城市发展接续产业的模式研究.辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版).2004,6(1)：24-26.
[26]董亚宁,尤强,李庆明.煤炭资源型城市的危机及战略决策[J].宏观经济管理,2005,(4)：23-25.
[27]任菊香.山西省煤炭资源型城市的发展态势及对策——以朔州市为例[J].资源科学.2008,30(2)：169-176.
[28]李锦峰.资源富集区的城市竞争力探析—以榆林与周边城市为例.西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(3)：115-118.
[29]付桂军,齐义军.煤炭资源型区域可持续发展水平比较研究——基于模糊综合评价法的分析.干旱地区资源与环境,2013,(4)：106-110.
[30]陈荣平.资源型城市现代化转型的概念性分析框架—以克拉玛依市为例.城市规划汇刊,2003,(5)：59-62.
[31]李咏梅.资源型城市的规避转型问题研究—以新疆克拉玛依市为例.当代财经,2005,(7)：82-84.
[32]王亮,等.资源型城市产业转型战略研究—以克拉玛依为例.经济地理,2011,(8)：1277-1282.
[33]董锋,等.资源型城市可持续发展水平评价—以黑龙江省大庆市为例.资源科学,2010,(8)：1584-1591.
[34]罗洪群,等.油气资源型城市的可持续发展机制.软科学,2011,(10)：65-68.
[35]王海飞,孔维新,蔡定昆.国内外资源型城市发展以甘肃资源型城市的启示—兼论庆阳市发展战略.甘肃社会科学,2013,(3)：207-210.
[36]Rostow, W.W.1960a. The Process of Economic Growth(second edition).London: Oxford University Press.
[37]R. M. Auty. Resource-based Industrialization:Sowing the Oil in Eight Developing Countries. Oxford University Press.1990:3.
[38]R. M. Auty. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies:The Resource Curse Thesis. Routledge Press.1993:1-2.
[39]段利民.资源诅咒与区域经济增长研究.西北大学博士论文.2009：11-12.
[40]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper No.5398. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA,1995, www.nber.org/tmp/10141-w5398.pdf
[41]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Fundamental Sources of Long-run Growth. American Economic Review.1997,87(2):184-188.
[42]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. The Big Push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth. Journal of Development Economics.1999,59(1):43-76.
[43]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Natural Resource Intensity and Economic Growth. In J. Mayer, B. Chambers, F. Ayisha (eds.), Development Policies in Natural Resource Economics. Edward Elgar.1999:13-38.
[44]J. D. Sachs, A. M. Warner. Natural Resources and Economic Development:The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review.2001,45(4-6): 827-838.
[45]Papyrakis, Elisaio and Gerlagh, Reyer."The Resource Curse Hypothesis and Its Transmission Channels." Journal of Comparative Economies,2004.
[46]W. M. Corden, J. P. Neary. Booming Sector and De-industrialization in a Small Open Economy. Economic Journal.1982,92(368):825-848.
[47]N. Birdsall, T. Pinckney, R. Sabot. Natural Resource, Human Capital, and Growth. In R. M. Auty (ed.), Resource Abundance and Economic Development.Oxford University Press.2001:57-75.
[48]K. Hamilton. The Sustainability of Extractive Economies. In R. M. Auty (ed.), Resource Abundance and Economic Development. Oxford University Press.2001: 36-56
[49]邵帅.能源开发对我国能源型地区经济增长的影响机制研究.哈尔滨工业大学博士论文.2009：18-21.
[50]R. Prebisch. The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. Reprinted in:Economic Bulletin for Latin Amertca. Santiago: ECLA/UN,1962,7(1):1-22.
[51]赵奉军.关于“资源诅咒”的文献综述.重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛).2006,16(1)：8-12.
[52]T. Gylfason, G. Zoega. Natural Resources and Economic Growth:The Role of Investment. The World Economy.2006,29(8):1091-1115.
[53]E. Papyrakis, R. Gerlagh. Resource Windfalls, Investment, and Long-term Income. Resources Policy.2006,31(2):117-128.
[54]T. Gylfason. Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development. European Economic Review.2001,45 (4-6):847-859.
[55]B. Douangngeune, Y. Hayami, Y. Godo. Education and Natural Resources in Economic Development:Thailand Compared with Japan and Korea. Journal of Asian Economics.2005,16(2):179-204.
[56]P. K. Asea, A. Lahiri. The Precious Bane. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.1999,23(5-6):823-849.
[57]E. Papyrakis, R. Gerlagh. Natural Resources, Innovation, and Growth. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working Paper No.129.04.2004, http: //papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=609764.
[58]J. M. Baland, P. Francois. Rent-seeking and Resource Booms. Journal of Development Economics.2000,61(2):527-542.
[59]K. Bjorvatn, K. Selvik. Destructive Competition:Factionalism and Rent-seeking in Iran. World Development.2008,36(11):2314-2324.
[60]徐康宁,王剑.自然资源丰裕程度与经济发展水平关系的研究[J].经济研究,2006(1)：78-88.
[61]胡援成,肖德勇.2007.经济发展门槛与自然资源诅咒[J].管理世界(4)：15-23).
[62]张馨,牛叔文等.中国省域能源资源与经济增长关系的实证分析[J].自然资源学报,2010(12)：2040-2051.
[63]冯宗宪,姜听.中国省际层面“资源诅咒”问题的再检验[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2010(10)：129-136.
[64]邵帅,齐中英.西部地区的能源开发与经济增长—基于“资源诅咒”假说的实证分析[J].经济研究,2008(4)：147-160.
[65]胡健,焦兵.2008.油气资源开发对西部区域经济拉动效应的比较研究[J].管理学报,2008(5)：655-658.
[66]武芳梅.“资源的诅咒”与经济发展：基于山西省的典型分析[J].经济问题,2007(10)：24-27.
[67]景普秋,王清宪.煤炭资源开发与区域经济发展中的“福”与“祸”：基于山西的实证分析[J]中国工业经济,2008(7)：80-90.
[68]赵文,‘赵国浩等.山西省煤炭资源开发与经济发展关系的实证研究[J].资源科学,2011(9)：1775-1780).
[69]冯宗宪,姜听等.资源诅咒传导机制之“荷兰病”：理论模型与实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2010(4)：74-82.
[70]徐盈之,胡永舜.内蒙古经济增长与资源优势的关系：基于“资源诅咒”假说的实证分析[J].资源科学,2010(12)：2391-2399.
[71]于立宏.可耗竭资源与经济增长：理论进展[J].浙江社会科学,2009,(5)：179-184.
[72]J. M. Hartwick. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources. American Economic Review.1977,67(5):972-974.
[73]R. H. Rashe, J. Tatom. Energy Resources and Potential GNP. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review.1977,59(6):10-24.
[74]Y. Moon, Y. Sonn. Productive Energy Consumption and Economic Growth:An Endogenous Growth Model and its Empirical Application. Resource and Energy Economics.1996,18(2):189-200.
[75]A. Zon, I. H. Yetkiner. An Endogenous Growth Model with Embodied Energy-saving Technical Change. Resource and Energy Economics.2003,25(1): 81-103.
[76]陈诗一.节能减排、结构调整与工业发展方式转变研究[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2011：57-58.
[77]Nielsen Sqren Bo, Lars Haagen Pedersen and Peter Birch Sqrensen, "Environment Policy, Pollution, Unemployment, and Endogenous Growth", International Tax and Public Finance,1995,2,185-205.
[78]Palmer Karen, Wallace E. Oates and Paul R. Portney, "Tightening Environmental Standards" The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4),119-132.
[79]Brock W. and M.S. Taylor, "Economic Growth and the Environment", In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S.(Eds), Handbook of Economic Growth II. Chap.28, Elsevier,2005,1749-1821.
[80]Bovenberg A. Lans and Sjak Smulders, Environmental Quality and Pollution-augmenting Technological Change in a Two-sector Endogenous Growth Model", Journal of Public Economics,1995,57,369-391.
[81]Ramanathan Ramakrishman, "An Analysis of Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Countries of the Middle East and North Africa", Energy, 2005,30(15),2831-2842.
[82]Considine T.J. and D.F. Larson, "The Environment as a Factor of Production", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2006,52(3),645-662.
[83]Fare Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf, C.A. Knox Lovell and S. Yaisawarng, "Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs", Reviews of Economics and Statistics,1993,75(2),374-380.
[84]Fare Rolf, Shawna Grosskopf and Jr. C.A. Pasurka, "Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth", Journal of Regional Science,2001,41(3),381-409.
[85]Chambers R., Y.H. Chung and R. Fare, "Benefit and Distance Function ", Journal of Economic Theory,1996,70,407-419.
[86]Coggins JAY S. and John R. Swinton, "The Price of Pollution:A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2 Allowances", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996,30,58-72.
[87]Chung, Yangho, Rolf Fare, Shawna Grosskopf, "Productivity and Undesirable Outputs:A Directional Distance Function Approach." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1997,51,229-240.
[88]Boyd, G.A., G Tolley and J. Pang, "Plant Level Productivity, Efficiency, and Environmental Performance of the Container Glass Industry ", Environmental and Resource Economics,2002,23,29-43.
[89]Jeon Byung M. and R. C. Sickles, "The Role of Environmental Factors in Growth Accounting ", Journal of Applied Econometrics,2004,19(5), 567-591.
[90]Brummer B., T. Glauben and W. Lu, "Policy Reform and Productivity Change in Chinese Agriculture:A Distance Function Approach", Journal of Development Economics,2006,81,61-79.
[91]Kumar Surender, "Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth:A Global Analysis Using M-L Index", Ecological Economics,2006,56(2),280-293.
[92]王海建.耗竭性资源、R&D与内生经济增长模型[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1999,8(3)：38-42.
[93]王海建.资源约束、环境污染与内生经济增长[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2000,(1)：76-80.
[94]王海建.耗竭性资源管理与人力资本积累内生经济增长[J].管理工程学报,2000,14(3)：11-13.
[95]张彬,左晖.能源持续利用、环境治理和内生经济增长[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(5)：27-32.
[96]王兵,吴延瑞,颜鹏飞.中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长[J].经济研究,2010,(5)：95-109.
[97]涂正革.环境、资源与工业增长的协调性[J].经济研究,2008(2)93-105.
[98]涂正革,肖耿.环境约束下中国工业增长模式研究[J].世界经济,2009,(11)：41-54.
[99]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009(4)：41-55.
[100]陈诗一.中国的绿色工业革命：基于环境全要素生产率视角的解释(1980-2008)[J].经济研究,2010,(11)：21-34.
[101]Sunikka, Minna. Energy efficiency and low carbon technologies in urban renewal[J]. Building Researeh & Information,2006(34):521-533.
[102]Abdeen Mustal Omer Focuson Low Carbon Technologies:The Positive Solution [J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2007(4):1-27.
[103]Parnsh, Bradley D, Foxon, Timothy J. Sustainability Entrepreneurship and Equitable Transitions to a Low-Carbon Economy [J].Greener Management Intemational,2009(55):47-62.
[104]HaraldWinkler, Energy Policies for sustainable development in South Africa[J].Energy Sustainable,2007(1):26-34.
[105]]Till Requate. Dynamic incentives by environmental Policy instruments a survey [J].Ecological Economics,2005,54(2-3):175-195.
[106]]Binu Partllan, Marianne Osterkom, Mattllew Kennedy, St. John Hoskyns, Morgan Bazilian, Pradeep Monga. Lessons for low-carbon energy transition: Experience from the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership(REEEP)[J]. Energy for sustainable Development,2010(14):83-93.
[107]G Ballard-Tremeer and C. Searcy. Methodologies for the assessment of energy, Climate and Development Impacts of (REEEP)Projects:Proposal for Integration of Outcome Mapping into the REEEP Project Cycle. Prepared for REEEP by Eco Ltd, London,2009
[108]Morrison, Geoff. Yoshida, Phyllis. China, United States, Korea Take Lead in Clean Energy and Low-Carbon Initiatives [J]. Research Technology Management,2009(52):2-4.
[119]李友俊,姚红.资源型城市向低碳城市的转型.科学对社会的影响[J].2010,(2)5-9.
[110]孔维新,王海飞,钱茜.资源枯竭城市低碳经济转型战略分析[J].开发研究,2011,(6)：136-140.
[111]张巍.新兴资源型城市低碳化转型的模式选择[J].城市发展研究,2012,(9)：8-14.
[112]段立全,金起文.河北资源型城市向低碳经济转型的路径[J].经济导刊,2011,(7)：28-29.
[113]韩雪梅,刘欢欢.我国生态消耗与经济发展的动态比较研究—关于西部地区发展低碳经济的考量[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(3)：118-125.
[114]贺俊果.建设山西低碳绿色能源基地[J].宏观经济管理,2010,(6)：62-63.
[115]张小兰.马克思主义经济理论中的低碳思想及启示[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011(6)：138-142.
[116]陈学明.论福斯特的生态马克思主义给予我们的启示[J].苏州大学学报,2011(6)：27-36.
[117]王万山.中外生态经济发展趋势[J].未来与发展,2006(03)：14-17.
[118]李永东,路杨.生态经济发展研究综述[J].宁夏社会科学,2007(04)：48-51.
[119]张连国.论绿色经济学的三种范式[J].生态经济,2013(03)：63-66.
[120]诸大建.绿色经济新理念及中国开展绿色经济研究的思考[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012(05)：40-47.
[121]方时姣.绿色经济视野下的低碳经济发展新论[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010(4)：8-11.
[122]张晶,王丽萍.低碳经济相关理论的综述分析[J].云南财经大学学报(社会科学版),2011(06)：36-39.
[123]杨志,张洪国.气候变化与低碳经济、绿色经济、循环经济之辨析[J].广东社会科学,2009(06)：34-42.
[124]隗斌贤.对经济增长源泉与动力的新解释——兼评内生增长理论与模型的演进[J].浙江社会科学,1999,(4)：40-46.
[125]张彬,左晖.能源持续利用、环境治理和内生经济增长[J].国人口·资源与环境,2007(5)：27-32.
[126]于渤,黎永亮,迟春洁.考虑能源耗竭、污染治理的经济持续增长内生模型[J].管理科学学报,2006(4)：12-17.
[127]杨万平,袁晓玲.能源持续利用、污染治理下的经济可持续增长模型[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011(5)：80-85.
[128]彭皓玥.自然资源约束下的我国资源型区域可持续发展研究[D].天津大学管理科学与工程专业博士学位论文,2008：42-43.
[129]袁纯清.走出资源型地区科学发展的新路子[N].光明日报,2011-09-27.
[130]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数/各地区市场化相对进程2011年报告[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2011.
[131]中国经济增长与宏观稳定课题组.增长失衡与政府责任——基于社会性支出角度的分析[J].经济研究,2006,(10)：4-17.
[132]金碚.论民生的经济学性质[J].中国工业经济,2011,(1)：5-14.
[133]徐康宁,韩剑.中国区域经济的“资源诅咒”效应：地区差距的另一种解释[J].经济学家,2005,(6)：96-102.
[134]Sen, Amartya,1999, Development as Freedom, New York:Alfred A. Knopf Inc..
[135]Bloom, David, and Jaypee Sevilla,2004, "The Effect of Health on Economic Growth:A Production Function Approach", World Development, Vol.32, No. 1, pp.1-13.
[136]Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena, and Mark Wilson,2004, "Health Human Capital and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan African and OECD Countries", Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.44, No.2, pp.296-320.
[137]Strauss, John, and Duncan Thomas,1998, "Health, Nutrition, and Economic Development", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.36, No.2, pp.766-817.
[138]刘竹,等.中国低碳试点省份经济增长与碳排放关系研究[J].资源科学,2011(4)：620-625.
[139]孙耀华,李忠民.中国各省区经济发展与碳排放脱钩关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011(5)：87-92.
[140]Jorgenson et al. productivity and U. S. ecnomicgrowth, Cambrige, MA:Harvard University Press,1987.
[141]黄勇峰,任若恩,刘晓生.中国制造业资本存量永续盘存法估计[J].经济学(季刊),2002(2)：377-396.
[142]张军,等.中国省际物质资本存量估算：1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10)：35-44.
[143]张军.资本形成、工业化与经济增长：中国的转轨特征[J].经济研究,2002(6)：3-13.
[144]李治国,唐国兴.资本形成路径与资本存量调整模型[J].经济研究,2003(2)：34-42.
[145]林毅夫.新结构经济学：反思经济发展与政策的理论框架[M].北京：北京大学出版,2012.
[146]Fare, Rolf, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries [J].America Economic Review,1994(84):66-83.
[147]李福柱,杨跃峰.全要素生产率增长率的测算方法应用述评[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2)：64-68.
[148]李小平,卢现祥,朱钟棣.国际贸易、技术进步和中国工业行业的生产率增长[J].经济学(季刊),2008(2)：549-564.
[149]刘小玄,吴延兵.企业生产率增长及来源[J].经济研究,2009(7)：45-54.
[150]张军,施少华,陈诗一.中国的工业改革与效率变化——方法、数据、文献和现有的结果[J].经济学(季刊),2003(1)：1-38.
[151]Bosworth Barry and Susan M. Collins. Accounting for Growth:Comparing China and India [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2008,22(1):45-66.
[152]李红玉,等.企业演化：中国工业生产率增长的重要途径[J].经济研究, 2008(6)：12-24.
[153]张军,陈诗一.结构改革与中国工业增长[J].经济研究,2009(7)：4-20.
[154]Kuznets, S. Modern Economic Growth [M].CT:Yale University Press,1966.
[155]Chenery H. B., S. Robinson and M. Syrquin. Industrialization and Growth:A Comparative Study [M].New York:Oxford University Press,1986.
[156]陈佳贵,黄群慧.工业发展、国情变化与经济现代化战略——中国成为工业大国的国情分析[J].中国社会科学,2005,04：4-16.
[157]陈佳贵,黄群慧,钟宏武.中国地区工业化进程的综合评价和特征分析[J].经济研究,2006,06：4-15.
[158]蔡昉,王德文,曲珥.中国产业升级的大国雁阵模型分析[J].经济研究,2009(9)：4-14.
[159]钱纳里,鲁宾逊,赛尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].吴奇等译,上海：上海人民出版社：1986.
[160]Harberger A. C. A Vision of the Growth Process[J]. American Economic Review, 1998,88(1):1-32.
[161]Timmer Marcel and A. Szirmai. Productivity Growth in Asian Manufacturing [J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2000,11(4):371-392.
[162]林毅夫,刘明兴.经济发展战略与中国的工业化[J].经济研究,2004(7)：48-58.
[163]李后强,廖祖君.改革红利来源于结构调整和优化[EB/OL].求是理论网[2013-06-19].http://www.qstheory.cn/lg/xszh/201306/t20130619_241277.htm.
[164]韩峥.循环经济背景下煤炭产业技术创新系统研究[D].太原理工大学管理科学与工程硕士学位论文,2011：22.
[165]郑立新.自主创新是实现产业升级的中心环节[J].求是杂志,2010(2)：22-24.
[166]李士,方虹,刘春平.中国低碳经济发展研究报告[R].北京：科学出版社,2011：3.