用户名: 密码: 验证码:
开放式基金流动性风险的VaR方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
文章研究了开放式基金流动性风险,对VaR模型进行了改进,选取了30支开放式基金2008年第一季度到2009年第一季度的数据进行了实证分析。
     首先介绍了文章的选题背景和研究意义,然后对国内外开放式基金流动性风险理论进行了综述,总结分析了20世纪90年代以来国内外理论界在开放式基金流动性风险方面取得的研究成果。
     其次介绍了流动性风险的定义及其衡量指标,说明流动性风险的含义,并介绍了开放式基金的发展历程。在开放式基金流动性风险的研究方法中选取了几个有代表性的并且和本文研究密切相关的流动性风险衡量理论进行了介绍,其中包括传统VaR计算方法历史模拟法、方差-协方差法、Monte-Carlo法,另外介绍了极值理论模型并对以上模型进行评价。
     再次,对我国开放式基金流动性风险进行了实证研究。首先收集数据并进行预处理,计算30支样本基金的基于价格波动的换手率并对它们的分布特征进行分析,得到其分布均不服从正态分布并普遍存在正偏斜、尖峰现象的结论。因此基于正态假设的方差-协方差法失效。对此,文章采用针对极端数据的极值法替代经典的参数法方差-协方差法。同时,对历史模拟法进行加权得到改进后的历史模拟法。通过采用基于VaR改进的历史模拟法和对极值理论法进行计算,得出实证结果,在不同置信水平下,极值法与改进后的历史数据法有效性略有差别,并对上述计算方法进行有效性对比。
     最后是文章的结束语。指出了研究结论、不足及今后的研究问题。根据现阶段我国开放式基金流动性风险所存在的问题提出几项建议。
The paper discusses the liquidity risk of open-end funds, It improves VaR model. Then make empirical research on liquidity risk of open-end funds by using data of 30 open-end funds from January,2008 to March,2009.
     Firstly, the paper outlines the liquidity risk of open-end funds on background, goals, domestic and foreign related fundamental research.The paper analyzes these theories in detail of liquidity risk of open-end funds.
     Secondly, It introduces definition and index of liquidity risk of open-end funds and introduces the history of open-end funds. In the part of methods of open-end funds researching, it elects some theories of liquidity risk which is representational and correlative, including Historical Simulation, Variance-Covariance Method and Monte-Carlo Method.It also introduces EVT.Then it estimates all above them.
     Thirdly, It makes an emoirical research on liquidity risk of domestic open-end funds. It elects 30 mutual funds and computes the turnover ratio of them. All of their kurtosis index and skewness index differ with the normal distribution. Based on the distribution of data,It can not use the classic parametric method-the model of variance and coefficient variance.So it choses POT model based on the extreme theory.As the classic model of historical has some defaults,there add exponentially weight to revise it. Then it compares the results of Historical Simulation with the results extreme theory. It gets the conclusion that VaR model based on the extreme theory is valid in high confidence levels. And invalid in low confidence levels,the model of revised historical is on the contrary.
     In the end, it is the ending.Point out the conclusion,the shortages and the further research. Considering the situation of china liquidity risk of open-end funds, the paper makes some pieces of advice at last.
引文
1.Ippolito,R.A..Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry[J],Journal of Law and Economics,1992,35 (1): 45-70.
    2.Warther,V..Aggregate Mutual Fund Flows and Security Returns[J],Journal of Financial Economics.1995,39(2):209-235.
    3.Edelen.Investor Flows and The Assessed Perfomance of Open-end Mutual Funds[J], Journal of Financial Economics.1999,53(9):439-466.
    4.Barelay.M.J., William.G.C., Jeffrey.H.H., Eugene.K.&Paul.H.S. Effects of Market Reform on The Trading Costs and Depths of Nasdaq Stocks[J], Journal of Finance,1999,54(1):1-34.
    5.James Tobin.Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk[J],Review of Economic Studies,1958,25(7):65-86.
    6.Kyle S..Continuous Actions and Insider Trading[J], Econometrical,1985, 53(5):1310-1325.
    7.Warther,V..Aggregate Mutual Fund Flows and Security Returns[J],Journal of Financial Economics.1995,39(2):209-235.
    8.Froot S..The Portfolio Flows of International Investors[J], Typescript, 1998,16(4):32-37.
    9.Sunder C..Growth Prospects of Mutual Funds and Investor Perception with Special Reference to Kathari Pioneer Mutual Fund,Project Report[M], Andhra: Andhra University,1998:555-628.
    10.Almgren R.,N.Chriss,Value Under Liquidation[R], Working Paper,1999, 10(5):1-10.
    11.Bangia,A.,FX.Dibeold,. T.Shumerann,J.D.Stroughair.Modeling Liuqidity Risk [R], Financial institutions center,the warton school, working paper,1999, (6): 68-73.
    12.Vikram Nanda, Narayanan. Liquidity, Investment Ability and Mutual Fund Structure [J], Journal of Financial Economics.2000,57(1):417-443.
    13.Annaert B.,Vennet J.Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance:A Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Approach[J],Working Paper at Union Collide in Schenectady,2001,12(7):87-92.
    14.Philipe Jorion.Value at Risk-The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk[J], Financial Markets and Portfolio Management,2007,21(3):397-399.
    15.ICI (U.S. Investment ComPany Institute) [R], Understanding Shareholder Redemption Decision,1992,(15):13-21.
    16.Gruber M..Another Puzzle:The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds[J], Journal of Finance,1996,51(3):783-810.
    17.Chordia,T..The Structure of Mutual Fund Charges[J], Journal of Financial Economics,1996,41 (1):3-39.
    18.Bangia, Diebold, Schuermann. Modeling Liquidity Risk With Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management[R],Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper,1998,(11):1-16.
    19. Harris.L.E..Liquidity, Trading Rules, and Electronic trading systems[J], Monograph Series in Finance and Economics,1990,(4):162-183.
    20. Hasbrouck.J..Measuring The Information Content of Stock Trades[J], The Journal of Finance,1991,46(1):179-207.
    21. Hasbrouek.J.,Sehwartz.R.A..Liquidity and Execution Costs in Equity Markets[J], Journal of Portfolio Management,1988,(14):10-16.
    22.Engle Robert F.,Lange Joe. Predicting VNET: A Model of The Dynamics of Market Depth[J] Journal of Financial Markets,2001,4(2):113-142.
    23.Bollersev,T..Generalized Autoregressive Condional Heteroseedastieity[J], Journal of Econometrics,1986,31 (3):07-27.
    24.Longin.The Asymptotic Distribution of Extreme Stock Market Returns[J], Journal of Business,1996,69(3):383-408.
    25.Longin. From Value-at-Risk to Stress Testing:the Extreme Vaule Approach [J], Journal of Money Banking and Finance,2000,24(7):1097-1130.
    26.Artzner.P..Coherent Measures of Risk[J],Mathematical Finance,1999,9(3): 203-228.
    27.Taylor.A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Multiperiod Returns [J], Journal of Derivatives,1999,(7):64-78.
    28.Taylor.A Quantile Regression Neural Network approach to Estimating the Conditional Density of Mlultiperiod Returns[J], Journal of Forecasting,2000, 19(4):299-311.
    29.Chen,M-Y.and J-E.Chen.Application of Quantile Regression to Estimation of Value at Risk[D],manuscript, Department of Economics.National Chung Cheng University,Taiwan,2002
    30. Neftci.Value-at-Risk Calculations.Extreme Events and Tail Estimation[J], Journal of Derivatives,2000,7(23):23-38.
    31.方汉平,汪浩.论开放式基金的流动性风险及其控制[J],湖北财经高等专科学校学报,2001,(10):27-29.
    32.艾志群.开放式基金流动性风险初探[J],吉林财税高等专科学校学报,2001,(4):13-16.
    33.龙文标.开放式基金的流动性风险初探[J],山西财政税务专科学校学报,2002,(4):19-21.
    34.杜海涛.中国股市流动性风险测度研究[J],证券市场导报,2002,(11):38-43.
    35.郭来生.开放式基金流动性风险评估与管理研究[N],中国证券报,2003.3.28(5).
    36.赵旭,吴冲锋.开放式基金流动性赎回风险实证分析与评价[J],运筹与管理,2003,12(6):1-6.
    37.陈日华,吴磊.开放式基金流动性风险及其管理模型研究[J],华东经济管理,2005,19(9):141-144.
    38.张洪建.开放式基金流动性风险研究(D),大连东北财经大学,2007.
    39.彭志刚.开放式基金:对市场影响有多大[J],金融信息参考,2001,(8):27-28.
    40.一夫.我国开放式基金的市场环境及流动性管理[J],财经科学,2002,(4):32-34.
    41.屈文洲,吴世农.中国股票市场微观结构的特征分析-买卖报价价差模式及影响因素的实证研究[J],经济研究,2002,(1):6-63.
    42.许崇正.中国金融市场创新再论,北京:中国财政经济出版社[M],2006,35-47.
    43.刘海龙,仲黎明,吴冲锋.开放式基金流动性风险的最优控制[J],控制与决策,2003,(2):217-220.
    44.刘志远.我国开放式基金赎回行为的实证研究[J],经济科学,2004(5):48-57.
    45.束景虹.开放式基金赎回现象的实证研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2005,(4):117-126.
    46.丘晓坚,孟卫东,张家萃.我国开放式基金投资者赎回的影响因素[J],重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2006,(6):149-153.
    47.喻洪涛.开放式基金的流动性管理,中国证券报[N],2007-3-13(5).
    48.陈朝阳.我国开放式基金问题研究[M],北京:光明日报出社,2002,13-15.
    49.程巍,李强.浅析我国开放式基金的流动性风险[J],经济与管理,2005,(9):34-35.
    50.王春峰.金融市场风险管理[M],天津:天津大学出版社,2001,35-57.
    51.刘丹,杨德权.关于VaR若干度量方法的准确性的比较研究[J],预测,2004,(4):56-6.
    52.郑文通.金融风险管理的VaR方法及其应用[J],国际金融研究,1999,(9):58-62.
    53.严太华,邱阳.VaR模型对我国股市投资的启示[J],技术经济,2001,(1):43-45.
    54.王春峰,李刚.基于模拟退火算法的VaR-GARCH模型[J],系统工程学报,2003,18(1):1-7.
    55.刘宇飞.VaR模型及其在金融监管中的应用[J],经济科学,1999,(1):39-50.
    56.邹平座,陈学彬.金融监管的外部控制系统研究[J],财经研究,2002,(10):15-22.
    57.陈建国.VaR在我国金融风险管理中的应用问题[J],广东金融,1998,(2):32-37.
    58.戴科,彭智.商业银行市场风险管理中的VaR模型[J],价值工程,2005,(8):24-27.
    59.刘争春,易海燕.关于金融产品流动性及流动性指标的研究[J],电子 科技大学学报社科版,2005,(1):21-24.
    60.康斌.基于VaR的我国开放式基金流动性风险分析与管理[D],广州暨南大学,2007.
    61.(加)赫尔·约翰(John C. Hull),王勇,金燕敏译.风险管理与金融机构[M],北京:机械工业出版社,2008,123-135.
    62.郑忠国.高等统计学[M],北京:北京大学出版社,1998,115-119.
    63.卢文莹.金融风险管理[M],上海:复旦大学出版社,2006,165-187.
    64.周大庆等.风险管理前沿[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004,115-147.
    65.朱琳.基于VaR的中国开放式基金流动性风险评估与管理[D),北京对外经济贸易大学,2006.
    66.(美)飞利浦·乔瑞(Philippe Jorion),陈跃等译.风险价值VAR[M],北京:中信出版社,2005,187-208.
    67.李秀敏,刘经华,刘金宪,刘梅星.沪深股市投资风险的极值理论分析[J],内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(5):59-61.
    68.陈静.基于极值理论的商业银行操作风险度量及其实证研究[D],长沙湖南大学,2006.
    69.宋加山,李勇,彭诚,王彪,方兆本.极值理论中阈值选取的Hill估计方法改进[J],中国科学技术大学学报,2008,(3):1104-1108.
    70.梁四安,曲红,李善民.我国开放式基金流动性风险及管理研究[J],现代管理科学,2005,(7):13-14.
    71.段斌,夏新平.我国开放式基金流动性风险问题研究[J],财经论坛,2004,(1):105-106.
    72.刘文娟.开放式基金流动性风险及其管理[J],金融经济,2007,(3):46-47.
    73.涂序平.我国开放式基金流动性风险的实证研究[J],金融经济,2008,(24):86-87.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700