断陷湖盆控砂机制研究与有利勘探方向优选
|
摘要
冀中坳陷深县凹陷古近纪以来盆小水深,地层产状较陡,双同沉积断裂控制湖盆发育,断裂系统复杂,目的层段储集体具有规模小、相带窄、砂层侧向变化复杂等特点,勘探程度较低。研究该类型湖盆层序地层特征、沉积特征及其控砂机制,对深县凹陷及类似地区的构造—岩性地层油气藏勘探具有重要的理论与实践意义。
论文在岩心观察的基础上,根据录井、测井及地震等资料,采用高分辨率层序地层学及储层沉积学原理与方法,利用井震结合地层对比、地震属性分析、井震多元回归拟合含砂率计算、波形分类地震相分析、古地貌恢复、层拉平、平衡剖面、构造沉积耦合关系研究等多项技术,遵循由点(井)→线(剖面)→面(平面)→域(时间演化与空间展布)→点(目标)的研究思路,在高分辨率层序地层格架内分析研究区目的层段各时期沉积体系平面展布及垂向演化特征,进而研究断陷湖盆层序充填模式及控砂机制,结合油气成藏特征进行构造—岩性地层圈闭预测及确定有利勘探目标。通过以上研究,本文主要取得以下认识:
1、根据地层的旋回特征和叠加方式进行地层划分与对比,将深县凹陷古近系地层共划分3个II级层序,11III级层序,22个IV级层序,首次完成整个凹陷高分辨率层序划分与格架建立,并与冀中坳陷层序划分结合,实现了局部与整体的统一。
2、归纳出本区岩性上南粗北细、相带上南扇北辫并分析其成因、总结出深县凹陷总体控砂规律:构造控物源、地貌控沉积;缓坡调节带、陡坡下切谷;
3、共识别出五种沉积相,总体为湖相背景,具有断陷湖盆沉积充填的典型特征。Ek-SQ～Es4-SQ为湖盆初始裂陷期沉积,地势起伏,水体独立,冲积扇、扇三角洲及大型辫状三角洲较发育,沉积大套粗粒的砂砾岩及砂岩,油气显示较弱;Es3-SQ1～Ed-SQ3沉积经历了断陷湖盆深陷扩张、构造抬升、构造回返、湖盆消亡的完整过程,早期湖盆发育各类近源扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲沉积体系,同时Es3-SQ2与Es1-SQ1上升半旋回与下降半旋回的转换位置发育的暗色泥岩为油气生成提供了良好的烃源岩;后期河流相中的河道、心滩和边滩砂体,为本区主要的油气储集砂体;
4、在层序地层格架内,分区带评价了油气成藏特征及油气控制因素,分析了两个有利目标区带(深西洼漕斜坡和衡水断裂下降盘)。分析认为本区油气勘探以构造油气藏和岩性油气藏并举为主要策略。
Since Paleogene,the basins were small and the water was deep in Shenxian sag Jizhong depression, thus,attitude of stratum was steep. Furthermore, double contemporaneous faults controlled the development of the lacustrine basins, rift system was complicated, the reservoir of intended interval was small, of which facies belt was narrow and lateral variation of sands was complicated, whose exploration degree was also lower. It has great theoretic and practical significance for structural stratigraphic hydrocarbon reservoir exploration of Shenxian sag and similar areas to study the sequence stratigraphic characteristics and sedimentary characteristics of the lacustrine basins and its mechanism about how to control the sands.
On the basis of core observation, according to the data of geo-logging, well logging and seismic, applying the principle and methodology of high resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentology, adopting many techniques such as strata correlation by combinating well with seismic, seismic attribute analysis, sand ratio calculation by multiple regression with well and seismic data, waveform classification and seismic facies analysis, palaeogeomorphology reversion, flattening seismic strata, balanced section, study of coupling relations of structure and sedimentation, etc, following the research path of point(well)-line(profile)-map(plane map)-tract(temporal evolution and spacial distribution)-point(trap), the depositional system’s planar distribution and vertical evolution of intended intervals of each period in the region of interest were studied in the HR isochronous stratigraphic framework and then the sequence packing model and mechanism about how to control the sands of the downfaulted lacustrine basins were also researched. Finally, structural stratigraphic hydrocarbon reservoirs were predicted and beneficial explortion targets were ascertained. Through the above studies, the following achievements were acquired.
1. According to the stratigraphic cyclicity and superimposed patterns, stratigraphic division and correlation were made using the base level as sequence boundary.The intended intervals were divided into three second-order sequences, eleven third-order sequences and twenty-two four-order sequences. It was the first time to complete the high resolution sequence divisions and establish framework in the whole sag;
2. The conclusion that grain size of southern area was large and that of northern area was small, fan delta was developed in southern area and braided delta was in northern area was generalized and analyse its origins.The regularity about how to control sands in Shenxian sag was summarized, which was that structure controls provenance, physiognomy controlled sedimentation, regulator belt was in gentle slope and down cutting valley was in abrupt slope;
3. Five kinds of depositional facies were distinguished,which were alluvial fan,fan delta, braided delta, lacustrine facies and fluvial facies. On the whole, they were lacustrine sedimentations,which present the typical characteristics of sediment fill in downfaulted basins. Ek-SQ～Es4-SQ were the depositions of initial chasmic stage of lake basin.At that time, relief was high; water was separate;alluvial fan, fan delta and large braided delta were relatively developed well; a big set of coarse glutinites and sands were deposited and hydrocarbon show was less. Es3-SQ1～Ed-SQ3 were the depositions that suffered the complete process of downfaulted lake basin expansion, tectonic uplift, tectonic reversion and lake basin consumption.At early stage, kinds of proximal fan delta and braided delta were developed in the lake basins. Meanwhile, dark mudstones at the dislocation of rising half cycle and falling half cycle in Es3-SQ2 sequence and Es1-SQ1 sequence offered good mother rocks for hydrocarbon generation.The late sands of fluvial channel, channel bar and point bar in fluvial facies were the dominate reservoir rocks;
4.The characteristics and control factors of play in each divided area were evaluated in the sequence stratigraphic frame.Two beneficial targets were analysed(slope of Shenxi sag and downthrow block of Hengshui fault). Through the above analysises, the combination of structural hydrocarbon reservoir and lithologic hydrocarbon reservoir should be taken as the chief strategy.
论文在岩心观察的基础上,根据录井、测井及地震等资料,采用高分辨率层序地层学及储层沉积学原理与方法,利用井震结合地层对比、地震属性分析、井震多元回归拟合含砂率计算、波形分类地震相分析、古地貌恢复、层拉平、平衡剖面、构造沉积耦合关系研究等多项技术,遵循由点(井)→线(剖面)→面(平面)→域(时间演化与空间展布)→点(目标)的研究思路,在高分辨率层序地层格架内分析研究区目的层段各时期沉积体系平面展布及垂向演化特征,进而研究断陷湖盆层序充填模式及控砂机制,结合油气成藏特征进行构造—岩性地层圈闭预测及确定有利勘探目标。通过以上研究,本文主要取得以下认识:
1、根据地层的旋回特征和叠加方式进行地层划分与对比,将深县凹陷古近系地层共划分3个II级层序,11III级层序,22个IV级层序,首次完成整个凹陷高分辨率层序划分与格架建立,并与冀中坳陷层序划分结合,实现了局部与整体的统一。
2、归纳出本区岩性上南粗北细、相带上南扇北辫并分析其成因、总结出深县凹陷总体控砂规律:构造控物源、地貌控沉积;缓坡调节带、陡坡下切谷;
3、共识别出五种沉积相,总体为湖相背景,具有断陷湖盆沉积充填的典型特征。Ek-SQ～Es4-SQ为湖盆初始裂陷期沉积,地势起伏,水体独立,冲积扇、扇三角洲及大型辫状三角洲较发育,沉积大套粗粒的砂砾岩及砂岩,油气显示较弱;Es3-SQ1～Ed-SQ3沉积经历了断陷湖盆深陷扩张、构造抬升、构造回返、湖盆消亡的完整过程,早期湖盆发育各类近源扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲沉积体系,同时Es3-SQ2与Es1-SQ1上升半旋回与下降半旋回的转换位置发育的暗色泥岩为油气生成提供了良好的烃源岩;后期河流相中的河道、心滩和边滩砂体,为本区主要的油气储集砂体;
4、在层序地层格架内,分区带评价了油气成藏特征及油气控制因素,分析了两个有利目标区带(深西洼漕斜坡和衡水断裂下降盘)。分析认为本区油气勘探以构造油气藏和岩性油气藏并举为主要策略。
Since Paleogene,the basins were small and the water was deep in Shenxian sag Jizhong depression, thus,attitude of stratum was steep. Furthermore, double contemporaneous faults controlled the development of the lacustrine basins, rift system was complicated, the reservoir of intended interval was small, of which facies belt was narrow and lateral variation of sands was complicated, whose exploration degree was also lower. It has great theoretic and practical significance for structural stratigraphic hydrocarbon reservoir exploration of Shenxian sag and similar areas to study the sequence stratigraphic characteristics and sedimentary characteristics of the lacustrine basins and its mechanism about how to control the sands.
On the basis of core observation, according to the data of geo-logging, well logging and seismic, applying the principle and methodology of high resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentology, adopting many techniques such as strata correlation by combinating well with seismic, seismic attribute analysis, sand ratio calculation by multiple regression with well and seismic data, waveform classification and seismic facies analysis, palaeogeomorphology reversion, flattening seismic strata, balanced section, study of coupling relations of structure and sedimentation, etc, following the research path of point(well)-line(profile)-map(plane map)-tract(temporal evolution and spacial distribution)-point(trap), the depositional system’s planar distribution and vertical evolution of intended intervals of each period in the region of interest were studied in the HR isochronous stratigraphic framework and then the sequence packing model and mechanism about how to control the sands of the downfaulted lacustrine basins were also researched. Finally, structural stratigraphic hydrocarbon reservoirs were predicted and beneficial explortion targets were ascertained. Through the above studies, the following achievements were acquired.
1. According to the stratigraphic cyclicity and superimposed patterns, stratigraphic division and correlation were made using the base level as sequence boundary.The intended intervals were divided into three second-order sequences, eleven third-order sequences and twenty-two four-order sequences. It was the first time to complete the high resolution sequence divisions and establish framework in the whole sag;
2. The conclusion that grain size of southern area was large and that of northern area was small, fan delta was developed in southern area and braided delta was in northern area was generalized and analyse its origins.The regularity about how to control sands in Shenxian sag was summarized, which was that structure controls provenance, physiognomy controlled sedimentation, regulator belt was in gentle slope and down cutting valley was in abrupt slope;
3. Five kinds of depositional facies were distinguished,which were alluvial fan,fan delta, braided delta, lacustrine facies and fluvial facies. On the whole, they were lacustrine sedimentations,which present the typical characteristics of sediment fill in downfaulted basins. Ek-SQ～Es4-SQ were the depositions of initial chasmic stage of lake basin.At that time, relief was high; water was separate;alluvial fan, fan delta and large braided delta were relatively developed well; a big set of coarse glutinites and sands were deposited and hydrocarbon show was less. Es3-SQ1～Ed-SQ3 were the depositions that suffered the complete process of downfaulted lake basin expansion, tectonic uplift, tectonic reversion and lake basin consumption.At early stage, kinds of proximal fan delta and braided delta were developed in the lake basins. Meanwhile, dark mudstones at the dislocation of rising half cycle and falling half cycle in Es3-SQ2 sequence and Es1-SQ1 sequence offered good mother rocks for hydrocarbon generation.The late sands of fluvial channel, channel bar and point bar in fluvial facies were the dominate reservoir rocks;
4.The characteristics and control factors of play in each divided area were evaluated in the sequence stratigraphic frame.Two beneficial targets were analysed(slope of Shenxi sag and downthrow block of Hengshui fault). Through the above analysises, the combination of structural hydrocarbon reservoir and lithologic hydrocarbon reservoir should be taken as the chief strategy.
引文
[1]于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学,石油工业出版社,2008
[2] Vail P.R. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. Part 1: seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In A. W. Bally, ed, Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy, volume AAPG Studies in Geology 27, 1987,1-10
[3] Van Wagoner J C An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition.In: Wilgus C K,ed. Sea-level changes: An Integrated Approuch.SEPM Spec Publ 1988,42:39-45
[4] Van Wagoner J C,et al Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs,cores,and outcrops AAPG methods in exploration series 7 1990
[5] Galloway.W.E ,D. K.Hobday,Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Systems 1996,219-225 (Springer-Verlag Berlin)
[6] Van Wagoner J C,Mitichum.R.M.Posamentier.H.W. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition In:Sea-Level Changes:An Integrated Approach (Ed.By Wilgus.C.K. Hastings.B.S. Kendall.C.G. Posamentier. H.W. , Ross.C.A. and Van.Wagoner.J.C.) SEPM Special Publication, 1988,42:39-46
[7]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):110-118
[8] E.Godoy,G.Yanez,《Inversion of an Oligocene volcano-tectonic basin and uplifting of its superimposed Miocene magmatic arc in the Chilean Central Andes;first seismic and gravity evidences》Tectonophysics (June 1999), 306(2):217-236
[9] Andrew D.Mial,Mahamud Arush.The castlegate of the book cliffs,Uta: sequence stratigraphy,and tectonic controls.Sediment Research,2001,71(4): 573-548
[10] level,part 3,relative changes of sea level from coastal onlap. In C.E.Payton,ed.,Seismic stratigraphy application to hydrocarbon exploration [C]:AAPG Memoir,1977,26:63-82
[11] G.C.Nadon,J.A.Simo,R.H.Dott,et al.High-resolution sequence stratigraphic analysis of the St.Peter sandstone and Glenwood Formation (Middle Ordovician),Michigan Basin.AAPG,2000,975～996
[12]李思田,林畅松,解习农,等.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究──以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例.地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):133-137
[13]纪友亮,张世奇.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.石油工业出版社1996.1
[14]纪友亮,张世奇.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式.北京:地质出版社,1998:1-195
[15]魏魁生,叶淑芬,郭占谦,等.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式.沉积学报,1996,14(4):50-60
[16]邓宏文,王红亮,宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理—高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京). 2000,7(4):305-313
[17]于兴河,姜辉,李胜利,等.中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例.岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):39-45
[18] Daniel J Miller Kenneth A. Eriksson.Sequence stragraphy of Upper Mississippian strata in the central Appalachians: a record of glacioeustary and tectonoeustasy in a foreland basin setting.AAPG bulletin,2000,84(2): 210～233
[19]冯友良,李思田,解习农.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式.地学前缘,2000,7(3):119-131
[20]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义.沉积学报,2000,19(2):249-255
[21] Vail P R,Audemard F,Bowman S A,et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics,eustasy and sedimentology an overview [A ].In:Einsele G,Ricken W,Seilacher A,eds.Cycles and events stratigraphy [C].Springer-Verlag Beel in Heidelberg,1991,617-659
[22] Mark E. Gettings《Factors controlling the geometry of southern Arizona extensional basins (in Geological Society of America,2005 annual meeting,Anonymous,)》Abstracts with Programs-Geological Society of America (October 2005),37(7):496
[23] J.Rodon,N.Clauer, M.Banas,A.Wqjtowicz《K-Ar evidence for a Mesozoic thermal event superimposed on burial diagenesis of the Upper Silesia Coal Basin》Clay Minerals,Jun 2006;41: 669-690
[24] S.Leleu,J.F.Ghienne G Manatschal《Upper Cretaceous-Palaeocene basin-margin alluvial fans documenting interaction between tectonic and environmental process (Provence,SE France)》Geological Society Special Publications (2005),251 217-239
[25]徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题.石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):83-89
[26]丘东洲.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题.新疆石油地质,1998,19(1):35-43
[27]赵玉光,王剑,唐锦玉,等.层序界面及其附近的地质特征与地质过程的表现.地质学报,1997,71(4):374-380
[28]袁选俊,薛良清,池英柳,等.坳陷型湖盆层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏勘探——以松辽盆地为例.石油学报,2003,24(3):11-16
[29]顾家裕,范土芝.层序地层学回顾与展望.海上油气地质,2001,6(4):15-25
[30]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(2):23-26
[31] Brown L.F. W.L.Fisher.Seismic stratigraphic interpretation of drpositional systems: example from Brazil rift and pull-apart basins,in C.E.Paayton,ed.Sesismic stratigaphy applications to hydrocarbon exploration.AAPG Memoir 26,1977,P.213-248
[32] Daniel J.Miller and Kenneth A.Eriksson.Sequence stragraphy of Upper Mississippian strata in the central Appalachians: a record of glacioeustary and tectonoeustasy in a foreland basin setting.AAPG bulletin,2000,84(2):210～233
[33]胡受权,郭文平,杨凤根,等.试论控制断陷湖盆陆相层序发育的影响因素[J].沉积学报,2002,19(2):256-262
[34]王纪祥,陈发景,李趁义.山东惠民凹陷伸展构造及调节带特征.现代地质,2003,17(2):203-209
[35]陈发景,贾庆素,张洪年.传递带及其在砂体发育中的作用.石油天然气地质,2004,25(2):144-148
[36]樊太亮,吕延仓,丁明华.层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律.地学前缘,2000,7(4):315-321
[37]邓宏文,王红亮,王敦则.古地貌对陆相裂谷盆地层序充填特征的控制——以渤中凹陷西斜坡区下第三系为例.石油天然气地质,2001,22(4):293-297
[38]林畅松,潘元林,肖建新,等.“构造坡折带”——断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2000,25(3):260-264
[39]胡受权,郭文平,杨凤根,等.断陷湖盆陡坡带陆相层序地层的“沉积滨线坡折”问题探讨.古地理学报,2000,2(4):20-29
[40] Sloss L L Forty years of sequence stratigraphy[J].Geol Soc Am Bull, 1988,100:1661-1665
[41] Cross T A,Lessenger M A.Sediment Volume Partitioning : Rationale for Stratigraphic Model Evaluation and High–Resolution Stratigraphic Correlation[R].Accepred for publication in Norwegian Petroleums–Forening Conference Volume,July.1996.1-24
[42] Cross T.A Baker M.R.Chapin MA.et al.Applications of high resolution sequence stratigraphy to reservoir analysis,in R.Eschard and B.Doligez, (eds),Subsurface reservoir characterization from outcrop observation, proceedings of the 7th Explo ration and production research conference.1993,P.11-33
[43]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆.层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用.石油天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-183
[44]于兴河,郑秀娟,沉积学的发展历程与未来展望,《地球科学进展》,2004年,第19卷,第2期,P173～182
[45]于兴河,陈永峤.碎屑岩系的八大沉积作用与其油气储层表征〔J〕.石油实验地质,2004,26(6):517～519
[46]邹德江,于兴河,梁宏斌,等.饶阳凹陷马西地区沙三中、上亚段层序地层与沉积体系分析.天然气地球科学,2008,19(4)
[47]邹德江,于兴河,李胜利,等.古地貌对储层沉积体系控制作用分析——以冀中油田马西地区为例.石油天然气学报,2008,30(2)
[48] Martin Sonderholm,Henrik Trisgaard.Proterozoic fluvial styles: response to changes in accommodation space (Rivieradal sandstones,eastern North Greenland) Sedimentary Geology,1998,120:257～274
[49]陈中红,查明.铀曲线在沉积盆地古环境反演中的应用[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(6):11-15
[50] Cande S.C.Kent D.V. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic.In Kent,D.V.and Berggren (eds),Geochronlogy,Time Scales,and Globle Stratigraphic Correlation.SEPM Special Publication,1995 no.54,129-212
[51]郝琦,刘震.中国东部陆相断陷盆地双断凹陷类型及特征.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,21(4):37-42
[52]杨明慧,刘池阳.陆相伸展盆地的层序类型、结构和序列与充填模式-以冀中坳陷古近系为例.沉积学报,2002,20(2):222-227
[53]张文朝,崔周旗,韩春元,等.冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气[J].古地理学报,2001,3(1):45-49
[54]李丕龙,张善文,宋国奇,等.断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成机制——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(1):3-10
[55]易士威,王权.岩性地层油气藏勘探思路与勘探方法[J].中国石油勘探,2005,10(2):9-15
[56]牛树银.太行山阜平、赞皇隆起是中新生代变质核杂岩.地质科技情报,1994,13(2):15-17
[57]徐杰,高战武,宋长青,等.太行山山前断裂带的构造特征.地震地质,2000,22(2):111-122
[58]杨旭升,刘池阳,杨斌谊,等.冀中坳陷衡水转换断裂带特征及演化.煤田地质与勘探,2004,32(3):5-8
[59]中国石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志卷五-华北油田.石油工业出版社,1988,45-77
[60]池秋鄂,龚福华编.层序地层学基础与应用.石油工业出版社,2001:12-25
[61]中国石油天然气集团公司,油气储层重点实验室编.陆相层序地层学应用指南,北京:石油工业出版社,2002:1-82
[62]王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水,等.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析[J].长春科技大学学报. 2000,30(2):139-144
[63]张占松.测井资料识别层序的方法及问题讨论[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(5):117-121
[64]张文华.层序地层学中的若干问题.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2):18-21
[65] Harland W.B,Cox A.V. Llewellyn P.G et al, A Geological Time Scale. Cambridge 1982,University Press
[66] Schager W.Depositional basin and environmental change- important factors in sequence stratigraphy.Sedimentary Geology,1991,70:109-130
[67]王鸿祯,翟裕生,游振东,等.中国地质科学50年的简要回顾.地质论评,2000:46(1):1-7
[68]郑荣才,彭军,彭光明,等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例.沉积学报,2003,21(4):654-662
[69]邓宏文,王红亮.高分辨率层序地层学—原理及应用.中国地质出版社,2002:15-35
[70]张明学,蒋波,文瑞霞.层序地层学在齐家北地区的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(5):24-26
[71]李雪,祝传林,操应长.深水沉积的层序地层单元划分方法探讨——以东营凹陷牛38井为例[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(2):15-17
[72]张世奇,肖焕钦.陆相断陷湖盆中层序边界的形成机理及其识别特征研究.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(1):4-8
[73] Fisher W.L. J.H.McGowen.Depositonal systems in the Willcox Grpoup of Texas and their relayionship to occurrence of oil and gas. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies.1967.17,P.105-125
[74]李道燧,张宗林,徐晓蓉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中部古地貌与构造对气藏的控制作用[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(3):9-14
[75]徐海鹏,莫多闻,岳升阳,等.北京王府井东方广场文化遗址的古地貌研究.北京大学学报(自然科学版),1999,35(2):824～833.
[76]赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强,等.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例.成都理工学院学报,2001,28 (3):260～266
[77]黄绪宝,张旭光,刘其,等. VoxelGeo在塔河油田碳酸盐岩储层预测中的应用.石油物探,2001,40 (4):100～105.
[78]谢又予.沉积地貌分析.北京:海洋出版社,2000:50～57
[79]陈发景.调节带(或传递带)的基本概念和分类.现代地质,2003,186(2):206-207
[80]刘德来,王伟,马莉.伸展盆地转换带分析──以松辽盆地北部为例.地质科技情报,1994,13(2):5-9
[81]邬光辉,漆家福.黄骅盆地一级构造变换带的特征与成因.石油与天然气地质,1999,22(2):125-128
[82]王定一,梁苏娟.任丘大油田形成与变换带演化.石油与天然气地质,2001,22(1):9-13
[83]周建生,杨池银,陈发景,等.黄骅坳陷横向变换带的构造特征及成因.现代地质,1997,11(4):425-432
[84]陶晓风,刘登忠,朱利东.陆相盆地沉积作用与构造作用的关系.沉积学报,2001,19(3):410-414
[85]宋国奇,纪友亮,赵俊青.不同级别层序界面及体系域的含油气性.石油勘探与开发. 2003,30(3):32-35
[86]王焕弟,牛滨华,任敦占,等.隐蔽油气藏勘探现状与对策分析.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(6):739-744
[87]牛嘉玉,李秋芬,鲁卫华,等.关于“隐蔽油气藏”概念的若干思考.石油学报,2005,26(2):122-126 [88 ]沈守文,彭大钧,颜其彬,等.试论隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路.石油学报,2000,21(1):16-22
[89]张运东,薛红兵,朱如凯,等.国内外隐蔽油气藏勘探现状.中国石油勘探,2005,10(3):64-68
[90]李祥权,陈少平,杜学斌,等.隐蔽油气藏勘探方法与发展趋势.断块油气田,2005,12(2):1-3
[91]曾联波,田崇鲁.构造应力场在隐蔽性油气藏勘探中的应用.现代地质,1998,12(3):401-405
[92]费宝生,汪建红.坡折带与隐蔽油气藏——以二连盆地为例.油气地质与采收率, 2004,11(6):22-23
[92]冯有良,周海民,李思田,等.陆相断陷盆地层序类型与构造特征.地质论评,2004,50(1):43-49
[93]冯有良.断陷湖盆沟谷及构造坡折对砂体的控制作用.石油学报,2006, 27(1):13-16
[94]郝琦,刘震.中国东部陆相断陷盆地双断凹陷类型及特征.西安石油大学学报,2006,21(4):37-41
[95]胡受权,郭文平,杨凤根,等.试论控制断陷湖盆陆相层序发育的影响因素.沉积学报,2001,19(2):256-262
[96]康仁华,刘魁元,赵翠霞,等.济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组沉积相.古地理学报,2002,4(4):19-29
[97]李丕龙,金之钧,张善文,等.济阳坳陷油气勘探现状及主要研究进展.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):1-4
[98]李丕龙,张善文,宋国奇,等.断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成机制——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例.石油实验地质,2004,26(1):3-10
[99]李守军,郑德顺,蔡进功,等.鲁北和鲁西南地区古近纪盆地沉积特征与控制因素探讨.地质论评,2003,49(3):225-232
[100]李思田,潘元林,陆永潮,等.断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及勘探的关键技术——高精度地震探测基础上的层序地层学研究.地球科学,2002,27(5):592-598
[101]林畅松,潘元林,肖建新,等.构造坡折带——断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念.地球科学,2000,25(3):260-266
[102]林畅松,郑和荣,任建业,等.渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制.中国科学, 2003,33(11):1025-1036
[103]刘玉亮,陈红汉,刘金,等.临南地区沙三段砂岩体及其成藏特征.特种油气藏,2003,10(4):10-15
[104]刘震,赵阳,杜金虎,等.陆相断陷盆地岩性油气藏形成与分布的"多元控油-主元成藏"特征.地质科学,2006,41(4):612-635
[105]潘元林,宗国洪,郭玉新,等.济阳断陷湖盆层序地层学及砾岩油气藏群.石油学报,2003,24(3):16-23
[106]潘元林,李思田.大型陆相断陷盆地层序地层与隐蔽油气藏研究——以济阳坳陷为例.北京:石油工业出版社,2004,116-141
[107]谯汉生,王明明.渤海湾盆地隐蔽油气藏.地学前缘,2000,7(4):497-506
[108]孙龙德.东营凹陷中央隆起带沉积体系及隐蔽油气藏.新疆石油地质,2000,21(2):123-128
[109]田景春,曾允孚,张长俊.东营凹陷沙河街组层序地层及地层格架研究.矿物岩石,1994,14(2):37-46
[110]王居峰,蔡希源,邓宏文,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷中央洼陷带沙三段基准面旋回变化与岩性圈闭.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):357-361
[111]王英民,刘豪,李立诚,等.准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征.地球科学,2002,27(6):683-688
[112]王英民,金武弟,刘书会,等.断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义.石油与天然气地质,2003,24(3):199-203
[113]吴因业,邹才能,季汉成.中国层序地层学导论.北京:石油工业出版社, 2005,23-36
[114]肖焕钦,王宝言,陈宝宁,等.济阳坳陷陡坡带断裂控砂模式.油气地质与采收率,2002,9(5):20-23
[115]张宇.济阳坳陷缓坡带构造特征及分类.断块油气田,2005,12(3):22-25
[116]赵文智,邹才能,汪泽成,等.富油气凹陷“满凹含油”论——内涵与意义.石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):5-13
[117]邹才能,陶士振,谷志东.中国低丰度大型岩性油气田形成条件和分布规律.地质学报,2006,80(11):1739-1751
[118]周廷全.济阳坳陷缓坡带沉积模式及有利储集体分布研究.油气地质与采收率,2005,12(3):18-22
[2] Vail P.R. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. Part 1: seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In A. W. Bally, ed, Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy, volume AAPG Studies in Geology 27, 1987,1-10
[3] Van Wagoner J C An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition.In: Wilgus C K,ed. Sea-level changes: An Integrated Approuch.SEPM Spec Publ 1988,42:39-45
[4] Van Wagoner J C,et al Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs,cores,and outcrops AAPG methods in exploration series 7 1990
[5] Galloway.W.E ,D. K.Hobday,Terrigenous Clastic Depositional Systems 1996,219-225 (Springer-Verlag Berlin)
[6] Van Wagoner J C,Mitichum.R.M.Posamentier.H.W. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition In:Sea-Level Changes:An Integrated Approach (Ed.By Wilgus.C.K. Hastings.B.S. Kendall.C.G. Posamentier. H.W. , Ross.C.A. and Van.Wagoner.J.C.) SEPM Special Publication, 1988,42:39-46
[7]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):110-118
[8] E.Godoy,G.Yanez,《Inversion of an Oligocene volcano-tectonic basin and uplifting of its superimposed Miocene magmatic arc in the Chilean Central Andes;first seismic and gravity evidences》Tectonophysics (June 1999), 306(2):217-236
[9] Andrew D.Mial,Mahamud Arush.The castlegate of the book cliffs,Uta: sequence stratigraphy,and tectonic controls.Sediment Research,2001,71(4): 573-548
[10] level,part 3,relative changes of sea level from coastal onlap. In C.E.Payton,ed.,Seismic stratigraphy application to hydrocarbon exploration [C]:AAPG Memoir,1977,26:63-82
[11] G.C.Nadon,J.A.Simo,R.H.Dott,et al.High-resolution sequence stratigraphic analysis of the St.Peter sandstone and Glenwood Formation (Middle Ordovician),Michigan Basin.AAPG,2000,975～996
[12]李思田,林畅松,解习农,等.大型陆相盆地层序地层学研究──以鄂尔多斯中生代盆地为例.地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):133-137
[13]纪友亮,张世奇.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.石油工业出版社1996.1
[14]纪友亮,张世奇.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式.北京:地质出版社,1998:1-195
[15]魏魁生,叶淑芬,郭占谦,等.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式.沉积学报,1996,14(4):50-60
[16]邓宏文,王红亮,宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理—高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京). 2000,7(4):305-313
[17]于兴河,姜辉,李胜利,等.中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例.岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):39-45
[18] Daniel J Miller Kenneth A. Eriksson.Sequence stragraphy of Upper Mississippian strata in the central Appalachians: a record of glacioeustary and tectonoeustasy in a foreland basin setting.AAPG bulletin,2000,84(2): 210～233
[19]冯友良,李思田,解习农.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式.地学前缘,2000,7(3):119-131
[20]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义.沉积学报,2000,19(2):249-255
[21] Vail P R,Audemard F,Bowman S A,et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics,eustasy and sedimentology an overview [A ].In:Einsele G,Ricken W,Seilacher A,eds.Cycles and events stratigraphy [C].Springer-Verlag Beel in Heidelberg,1991,617-659
[22] Mark E. Gettings《Factors controlling the geometry of southern Arizona extensional basins (in Geological Society of America,2005 annual meeting,Anonymous,)》Abstracts with Programs-Geological Society of America (October 2005),37(7):496
[23] J.Rodon,N.Clauer, M.Banas,A.Wqjtowicz《K-Ar evidence for a Mesozoic thermal event superimposed on burial diagenesis of the Upper Silesia Coal Basin》Clay Minerals,Jun 2006;41: 669-690
[24] S.Leleu,J.F.Ghienne G Manatschal《Upper Cretaceous-Palaeocene basin-margin alluvial fans documenting interaction between tectonic and environmental process (Provence,SE France)》Geological Society Special Publications (2005),251 217-239
[25]徐怀大.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题.石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):83-89
[26]丘东洲.陆相层序地层学研究中的某些问题.新疆石油地质,1998,19(1):35-43
[27]赵玉光,王剑,唐锦玉,等.层序界面及其附近的地质特征与地质过程的表现.地质学报,1997,71(4):374-380
[28]袁选俊,薛良清,池英柳,等.坳陷型湖盆层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏勘探——以松辽盆地为例.石油学报,2003,24(3):11-16
[29]顾家裕,范土芝.层序地层学回顾与展望.海上油气地质,2001,6(4):15-25
[30]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌,等.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(2):23-26
[31] Brown L.F. W.L.Fisher.Seismic stratigraphic interpretation of drpositional systems: example from Brazil rift and pull-apart basins,in C.E.Paayton,ed.Sesismic stratigaphy applications to hydrocarbon exploration.AAPG Memoir 26,1977,P.213-248
[32] Daniel J.Miller and Kenneth A.Eriksson.Sequence stragraphy of Upper Mississippian strata in the central Appalachians: a record of glacioeustary and tectonoeustasy in a foreland basin setting.AAPG bulletin,2000,84(2):210～233
[33]胡受权,郭文平,杨凤根,等.试论控制断陷湖盆陆相层序发育的影响因素[J].沉积学报,2002,19(2):256-262
[34]王纪祥,陈发景,李趁义.山东惠民凹陷伸展构造及调节带特征.现代地质,2003,17(2):203-209
[35]陈发景,贾庆素,张洪年.传递带及其在砂体发育中的作用.石油天然气地质,2004,25(2):144-148
[36]樊太亮,吕延仓,丁明华.层序地层体制中的陆相储层发育规律.地学前缘,2000,7(4):315-321
[37]邓宏文,王红亮,王敦则.古地貌对陆相裂谷盆地层序充填特征的控制——以渤中凹陷西斜坡区下第三系为例.石油天然气地质,2001,22(4):293-297
[38]林畅松,潘元林,肖建新,等.“构造坡折带”——断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2000,25(3):260-264
[39]胡受权,郭文平,杨凤根,等.断陷湖盆陡坡带陆相层序地层的“沉积滨线坡折”问题探讨.古地理学报,2000,2(4):20-29
[40] Sloss L L Forty years of sequence stratigraphy[J].Geol Soc Am Bull, 1988,100:1661-1665
[41] Cross T A,Lessenger M A.Sediment Volume Partitioning : Rationale for Stratigraphic Model Evaluation and High–Resolution Stratigraphic Correlation[R].Accepred for publication in Norwegian Petroleums–Forening Conference Volume,July.1996.1-24
[42] Cross T.A Baker M.R.Chapin MA.et al.Applications of high resolution sequence stratigraphy to reservoir analysis,in R.Eschard and B.Doligez, (eds),Subsurface reservoir characterization from outcrop observation, proceedings of the 7th Explo ration and production research conference.1993,P.11-33
[43]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆.层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用.石油天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-183
[44]于兴河,郑秀娟,沉积学的发展历程与未来展望,《地球科学进展》,2004年,第19卷,第2期,P173～182
[45]于兴河,陈永峤.碎屑岩系的八大沉积作用与其油气储层表征〔J〕.石油实验地质,2004,26(6):517～519
[46]邹德江,于兴河,梁宏斌,等.饶阳凹陷马西地区沙三中、上亚段层序地层与沉积体系分析.天然气地球科学,2008,19(4)
[47]邹德江,于兴河,李胜利,等.古地貌对储层沉积体系控制作用分析——以冀中油田马西地区为例.石油天然气学报,2008,30(2)
[48] Martin Sonderholm,Henrik Trisgaard.Proterozoic fluvial styles: response to changes in accommodation space (Rivieradal sandstones,eastern North Greenland) Sedimentary Geology,1998,120:257～274
[49]陈中红,查明.铀曲线在沉积盆地古环境反演中的应用[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(6):11-15
[50] Cande S.C.Kent D.V. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic.In Kent,D.V.and Berggren (eds),Geochronlogy,Time Scales,and Globle Stratigraphic Correlation.SEPM Special Publication,1995 no.54,129-212
[51]郝琦,刘震.中国东部陆相断陷盆地双断凹陷类型及特征.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,21(4):37-42
[52]杨明慧,刘池阳.陆相伸展盆地的层序类型、结构和序列与充填模式-以冀中坳陷古近系为例.沉积学报,2002,20(2):222-227
[53]张文朝,崔周旗,韩春元,等.冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气[J].古地理学报,2001,3(1):45-49
[54]李丕龙,张善文,宋国奇,等.断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成机制——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(1):3-10
[55]易士威,王权.岩性地层油气藏勘探思路与勘探方法[J].中国石油勘探,2005,10(2):9-15
[56]牛树银.太行山阜平、赞皇隆起是中新生代变质核杂岩.地质科技情报,1994,13(2):15-17
[57]徐杰,高战武,宋长青,等.太行山山前断裂带的构造特征.地震地质,2000,22(2):111-122
[58]杨旭升,刘池阳,杨斌谊,等.冀中坳陷衡水转换断裂带特征及演化.煤田地质与勘探,2004,32(3):5-8
[59]中国石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志卷五-华北油田.石油工业出版社,1988,45-77
[60]池秋鄂,龚福华编.层序地层学基础与应用.石油工业出版社,2001:12-25
[61]中国石油天然气集团公司,油气储层重点实验室编.陆相层序地层学应用指南,北京:石油工业出版社,2002:1-82
[62]王嗣敏,刘招君,董清水,等.陆相盆地层序地层形成机制分析[J].长春科技大学学报. 2000,30(2):139-144
[63]张占松.测井资料识别层序的方法及问题讨论[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(5):117-121
[64]张文华.层序地层学中的若干问题.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2):18-21
[65] Harland W.B,Cox A.V. Llewellyn P.G et al, A Geological Time Scale. Cambridge 1982,University Press
[66] Schager W.Depositional basin and environmental change- important factors in sequence stratigraphy.Sedimentary Geology,1991,70:109-130
[67]王鸿祯,翟裕生,游振东,等.中国地质科学50年的简要回顾.地质论评,2000:46(1):1-7
[68]郑荣才,彭军,彭光明,等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用——以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例.沉积学报,2003,21(4):654-662
[69]邓宏文,王红亮.高分辨率层序地层学—原理及应用.中国地质出版社,2002:15-35
[70]张明学,蒋波,文瑞霞.层序地层学在齐家北地区的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(5):24-26
[71]李雪,祝传林,操应长.深水沉积的层序地层单元划分方法探讨——以东营凹陷牛38井为例[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(2):15-17
[72]张世奇,肖焕钦.陆相断陷湖盆中层序边界的形成机理及其识别特征研究.江汉石油学院学报,2003,25(1):4-8
[73] Fisher W.L. J.H.McGowen.Depositonal systems in the Willcox Grpoup of Texas and their relayionship to occurrence of oil and gas. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies.1967.17,P.105-125
[74]李道燧,张宗林,徐晓蓉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中部古地貌与构造对气藏的控制作用[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(3):9-14
[75]徐海鹏,莫多闻,岳升阳,等.北京王府井东方广场文化遗址的古地貌研究.北京大学学报(自然科学版),1999,35(2):824～833.
[76]赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强,等.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例.成都理工学院学报,2001,28 (3):260～266
[77]黄绪宝,张旭光,刘其,等. VoxelGeo在塔河油田碳酸盐岩储层预测中的应用.石油物探,2001,40 (4):100～105.
[78]谢又予.沉积地貌分析.北京:海洋出版社,2000:50～57
[79]陈发景.调节带(或传递带)的基本概念和分类.现代地质,2003,186(2):206-207
[80]刘德来,王伟,马莉.伸展盆地转换带分析──以松辽盆地北部为例.地质科技情报,1994,13(2):5-9
[81]邬光辉,漆家福.黄骅盆地一级构造变换带的特征与成因.石油与天然气地质,1999,22(2):125-128
[82]王定一,梁苏娟.任丘大油田形成与变换带演化.石油与天然气地质,2001,22(1):9-13
[83]周建生,杨池银,陈发景,等.黄骅坳陷横向变换带的构造特征及成因.现代地质,1997,11(4):425-432
[84]陶晓风,刘登忠,朱利东.陆相盆地沉积作用与构造作用的关系.沉积学报,2001,19(3):410-414
[85]宋国奇,纪友亮,赵俊青.不同级别层序界面及体系域的含油气性.石油勘探与开发. 2003,30(3):32-35
[86]王焕弟,牛滨华,任敦占,等.隐蔽油气藏勘探现状与对策分析.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(6):739-744
[87]牛嘉玉,李秋芬,鲁卫华,等.关于“隐蔽油气藏”概念的若干思考.石油学报,2005,26(2):122-126 [88 ]沈守文,彭大钧,颜其彬,等.试论隐蔽油气藏的分类及勘探思路.石油学报,2000,21(1):16-22
[89]张运东,薛红兵,朱如凯,等.国内外隐蔽油气藏勘探现状.中国石油勘探,2005,10(3):64-68
[90]李祥权,陈少平,杜学斌,等.隐蔽油气藏勘探方法与发展趋势.断块油气田,2005,12(2):1-3
[91]曾联波,田崇鲁.构造应力场在隐蔽性油气藏勘探中的应用.现代地质,1998,12(3):401-405
[92]费宝生,汪建红.坡折带与隐蔽油气藏——以二连盆地为例.油气地质与采收率, 2004,11(6):22-23
[92]冯有良,周海民,李思田,等.陆相断陷盆地层序类型与构造特征.地质论评,2004,50(1):43-49
[93]冯有良.断陷湖盆沟谷及构造坡折对砂体的控制作用.石油学报,2006, 27(1):13-16
[94]郝琦,刘震.中国东部陆相断陷盆地双断凹陷类型及特征.西安石油大学学报,2006,21(4):37-41
[95]胡受权,郭文平,杨凤根,等.试论控制断陷湖盆陆相层序发育的影响因素.沉积学报,2001,19(2):256-262
[96]康仁华,刘魁元,赵翠霞,等.济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组沉积相.古地理学报,2002,4(4):19-29
[97]李丕龙,金之钧,张善文,等.济阳坳陷油气勘探现状及主要研究进展.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):1-4
[98]李丕龙,张善文,宋国奇,等.断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成机制——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例.石油实验地质,2004,26(1):3-10
[99]李守军,郑德顺,蔡进功,等.鲁北和鲁西南地区古近纪盆地沉积特征与控制因素探讨.地质论评,2003,49(3):225-232
[100]李思田,潘元林,陆永潮,等.断陷湖盆隐蔽油藏预测及勘探的关键技术——高精度地震探测基础上的层序地层学研究.地球科学,2002,27(5):592-598
[101]林畅松,潘元林,肖建新,等.构造坡折带——断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念.地球科学,2000,25(3):260-266
[102]林畅松,郑和荣,任建业,等.渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制.中国科学, 2003,33(11):1025-1036
[103]刘玉亮,陈红汉,刘金,等.临南地区沙三段砂岩体及其成藏特征.特种油气藏,2003,10(4):10-15
[104]刘震,赵阳,杜金虎,等.陆相断陷盆地岩性油气藏形成与分布的"多元控油-主元成藏"特征.地质科学,2006,41(4):612-635
[105]潘元林,宗国洪,郭玉新,等.济阳断陷湖盆层序地层学及砾岩油气藏群.石油学报,2003,24(3):16-23
[106]潘元林,李思田.大型陆相断陷盆地层序地层与隐蔽油气藏研究——以济阳坳陷为例.北京:石油工业出版社,2004,116-141
[107]谯汉生,王明明.渤海湾盆地隐蔽油气藏.地学前缘,2000,7(4):497-506
[108]孙龙德.东营凹陷中央隆起带沉积体系及隐蔽油气藏.新疆石油地质,2000,21(2):123-128
[109]田景春,曾允孚,张长俊.东营凹陷沙河街组层序地层及地层格架研究.矿物岩石,1994,14(2):37-46
[110]王居峰,蔡希源,邓宏文,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷中央洼陷带沙三段基准面旋回变化与岩性圈闭.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):357-361
[111]王英民,刘豪,李立诚,等.准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征.地球科学,2002,27(6):683-688
[112]王英民,金武弟,刘书会,等.断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义.石油与天然气地质,2003,24(3):199-203
[113]吴因业,邹才能,季汉成.中国层序地层学导论.北京:石油工业出版社, 2005,23-36
[114]肖焕钦,王宝言,陈宝宁,等.济阳坳陷陡坡带断裂控砂模式.油气地质与采收率,2002,9(5):20-23
[115]张宇.济阳坳陷缓坡带构造特征及分类.断块油气田,2005,12(3):22-25
[116]赵文智,邹才能,汪泽成,等.富油气凹陷“满凹含油”论——内涵与意义.石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):5-13
[117]邹才能,陶士振,谷志东.中国低丰度大型岩性油气田形成条件和分布规律.地质学报,2006,80(11):1739-1751
[118]周廷全.济阳坳陷缓坡带沉积模式及有利储集体分布研究.油气地质与采收率,2005,12(3):18-22