企业社会责任研究
|
摘要
企业社会责任是本世纪以来诸多学科共同研究的热点问题。随着建设可持续发展社会和以人为本社会价值观念的强化,全球社会对企业的社会责任要求已经从呼吁转变成一种具体行动,企业承担社会责任己经成为一股强而有力的国际潮流,并引起了社会各界的广泛关注。但是在我国的实践中,企业在承担社会责任方面仍有诸多不足,严重地影响到我国的社会经济发展,也不利于科学发展观的贯彻以及和谐社会的建设,因此,开展对企业社会责任的研究,具有相当迫切的现实意义和理论意义。
利益相关者因素是企业履行社会责任的外部压力和动力,因此,本文从利益相关者角度出发,紧紧围绕着三个核心问题开展较为深入和系统的研究,它们包括:利益相关者和企业社会责任的理论关系;利益相关者的监管或监督作用对企业履行社会责任的影响机制:利益相关者因素和企业自身属性是如何影响到企业在各类利益相关者所关注的社会责任领域上的表现水平。通过采取理论分析、实证研究、博弈分析等定性和定量相结合的研究方法展开论述,并从利益相关者角度,提出我国企业履行社会责任的机制和影响因素。
全文主要内容可分为六部分:
第一部分(第一章):本部分介绍论文研究的背景和意义、思路架构和研究方法,论述了研究的主要内容、主要创新点。
第二部分(第二章):本部分对国内外企业社会责任研究的文献进行了综述,在此基础上进行了简要的评论。
第三部分(第三章):本部分主要阐述利益相关者和企业社会责任的理论关系,从利益相关者理论出发,阐述了利益相关者理论中对企业履行社会责任的理论依据,各类利益相关者所关注的企业社会责任内容,利益相关者在社会责任领域上对企业施加影响的模式。
第四部分(第四章和第五章):基于博弈论的理论方法,从顾客、员工和政府等利益相关者角度出发,分析了利益相关者的监管或监督作用对企业履行社会责任的影响机制。文中采用的分析方法包括两方静态博弈分析、动态博弈分析和进化博弈分析等方法,从数量模型的角度上论述利益相关者对企业社会责任实施有效监管要满足的条件,并据此提出相应的建议。
第五部分(第六章):从利益相关者角度出发,利用问卷调查形式来采集数据,运用统计和计量分析方法进行研究,基于社会责任的多维性,在各类利益相关者所关注的社会责任细分领域上,检验了企业自身属性因素和利益相关者因素对企业履行社会责任的影响。
第六部分(第七章):最后部分为本文的主要结论和需要进一步研究的问题。
论文的主要创新之处如下:
首先,从利益相关者的角度对企业社会责任进行分析,利用博弈理论,采用两方博弈方法、动态博弈方法和进化博弈方法,分析了包括顾客、员工和政府等利益相关者的监管和监督作用对企业履行社会责任的影响机制和结果,并分析利益相关者对企业履行社会责任进行有效监管所要满足的均衡条件。
其次,因为企业社会责任是多维的,因此本文以细分领域的社会责任表现取代“总社会责任”表现,通过实证研究,研究包括垄断程度、危险性、利润率、高科技术属性、产品技术的更新换代速度等企业自身因素对企业在各类不同利益相关者所关注的社会责任细分领域的表现水平的影响。从而避免了研究的笼统性和模糊性。
最后,利益相关者是企业履行社会责任的外部压力,因此在实证研究中,率先将包括员工和社区的组织建设程度和教育程度以及客户对企业的社会责任要求等利益相关者因素纳入到实证研究中,更科学地分析企业社会责任的影响因素。
Corporate social responsibility has been a hot research problem in a number of disciplines in this century. With the construction of sustainable development-oriented society and the strengthening of people-oriented social values, the corporate social responsibility requirements of the global community has become from the appeals into specific actions, corporate social responsibility has become a powerful international trend. However, the practices of corporate social responsibility in our country is still no good and poses a serious threat to socio-economic development of China, and is not in concord with the constructions of a harmonious society. Therefore, studies of corporate social responsibility have considerable practical significance and urgency of theoretical significance.
The pressure from stakeholders is one of the reasons for corporate to fulfill their social responsibilities. On this basis, our thesis begins with the theory of stakeholders, and is focus on three core issues in this systematic study, including: theoretical relationship between stakeholders and corporate social responsibilities; stakeholders' role in the regulation or supervision over corporate in fulfilling their social responsibilities; the impact of stakeholders' characteristics on the performance level of corporate social responsibility. This thesis was accomplished by combining qualitative and quantitative research methods on the stakeholders' basis, including theoretical analysis, empirical research and the game theory analysis.
This thesis can be divided into six parts:
Part I (Chapter I): This part describs the research background and research purposes, the structure of this thesis, research methods used by this thesis and the main innovations are also included in this part.
Part II (chapter II): The research literatures of corporate social responsibility both in domestic and foreign countries are reviewed, and a brief comment will be proposed in the final.
Part III (Chapter III): The relationship of stakeholders and corporate social responsibility is conducted in this part by comparison analysis on a theoretical basis.
Part IV (Chapter IV and V): In this part, how the stakeholders' supervisions on enterprise influence performance of corporate social responsibility is analyzed with the method of game theory, consisting of static game analysis, dynamic analysis and evolutionary game analysis. The stakeholders in this part include of customers, employees and government.
Part V (Chapter VI): From the stakeholder theory, this part conducted an empirical research by using the form of a questionnaire survey to collect data, and analyzed the data by using of statistics and research methods of quantitative analysis. The empirical research was conducted on a basis considering both the multi-dimensional nature of social responsibility and influence of stakeholder. Part VI (Chapter VII): The last part concluded the main points of this paper and some problems needed further research. The main innovations of the thesis are as follows:
This thesis analyzes the stakeholders' supervision on enterprise and its influence on the performance of corporate social responsibility, by using the game theory including static game, dynamic game and evolutionary game approach.
Because of its multi-dimensional nature, corporate social responsibility should be studied on its each parts concerning with different types of stakeholders. So this thesis used a category performance of social responsibility instead of "total social responsibility" in empirical studies. We test the relationship between social responsibility performance and the characteristics of enterprises including the degree of monopoly, industry risk, profitability, and technology on a category basis so as to avoid the risk of vague study.
Stakeholders' pressures are the external causes for enterprise to fulfill social responsibilities. Therefore, the empirical study will give consideration to the stakeholders' factors including their organizations performance and average education level of their members.
利益相关者因素是企业履行社会责任的外部压力和动力,因此,本文从利益相关者角度出发,紧紧围绕着三个核心问题开展较为深入和系统的研究,它们包括:利益相关者和企业社会责任的理论关系;利益相关者的监管或监督作用对企业履行社会责任的影响机制:利益相关者因素和企业自身属性是如何影响到企业在各类利益相关者所关注的社会责任领域上的表现水平。通过采取理论分析、实证研究、博弈分析等定性和定量相结合的研究方法展开论述,并从利益相关者角度,提出我国企业履行社会责任的机制和影响因素。
全文主要内容可分为六部分:
第一部分(第一章):本部分介绍论文研究的背景和意义、思路架构和研究方法,论述了研究的主要内容、主要创新点。
第二部分(第二章):本部分对国内外企业社会责任研究的文献进行了综述,在此基础上进行了简要的评论。
第三部分(第三章):本部分主要阐述利益相关者和企业社会责任的理论关系,从利益相关者理论出发,阐述了利益相关者理论中对企业履行社会责任的理论依据,各类利益相关者所关注的企业社会责任内容,利益相关者在社会责任领域上对企业施加影响的模式。
第四部分(第四章和第五章):基于博弈论的理论方法,从顾客、员工和政府等利益相关者角度出发,分析了利益相关者的监管或监督作用对企业履行社会责任的影响机制。文中采用的分析方法包括两方静态博弈分析、动态博弈分析和进化博弈分析等方法,从数量模型的角度上论述利益相关者对企业社会责任实施有效监管要满足的条件,并据此提出相应的建议。
第五部分(第六章):从利益相关者角度出发,利用问卷调查形式来采集数据,运用统计和计量分析方法进行研究,基于社会责任的多维性,在各类利益相关者所关注的社会责任细分领域上,检验了企业自身属性因素和利益相关者因素对企业履行社会责任的影响。
第六部分(第七章):最后部分为本文的主要结论和需要进一步研究的问题。
论文的主要创新之处如下:
首先,从利益相关者的角度对企业社会责任进行分析,利用博弈理论,采用两方博弈方法、动态博弈方法和进化博弈方法,分析了包括顾客、员工和政府等利益相关者的监管和监督作用对企业履行社会责任的影响机制和结果,并分析利益相关者对企业履行社会责任进行有效监管所要满足的均衡条件。
其次,因为企业社会责任是多维的,因此本文以细分领域的社会责任表现取代“总社会责任”表现,通过实证研究,研究包括垄断程度、危险性、利润率、高科技术属性、产品技术的更新换代速度等企业自身因素对企业在各类不同利益相关者所关注的社会责任细分领域的表现水平的影响。从而避免了研究的笼统性和模糊性。
最后,利益相关者是企业履行社会责任的外部压力,因此在实证研究中,率先将包括员工和社区的组织建设程度和教育程度以及客户对企业的社会责任要求等利益相关者因素纳入到实证研究中,更科学地分析企业社会责任的影响因素。
Corporate social responsibility has been a hot research problem in a number of disciplines in this century. With the construction of sustainable development-oriented society and the strengthening of people-oriented social values, the corporate social responsibility requirements of the global community has become from the appeals into specific actions, corporate social responsibility has become a powerful international trend. However, the practices of corporate social responsibility in our country is still no good and poses a serious threat to socio-economic development of China, and is not in concord with the constructions of a harmonious society. Therefore, studies of corporate social responsibility have considerable practical significance and urgency of theoretical significance.
The pressure from stakeholders is one of the reasons for corporate to fulfill their social responsibilities. On this basis, our thesis begins with the theory of stakeholders, and is focus on three core issues in this systematic study, including: theoretical relationship between stakeholders and corporate social responsibilities; stakeholders' role in the regulation or supervision over corporate in fulfilling their social responsibilities; the impact of stakeholders' characteristics on the performance level of corporate social responsibility. This thesis was accomplished by combining qualitative and quantitative research methods on the stakeholders' basis, including theoretical analysis, empirical research and the game theory analysis.
This thesis can be divided into six parts:
Part I (Chapter I): This part describs the research background and research purposes, the structure of this thesis, research methods used by this thesis and the main innovations are also included in this part.
Part II (chapter II): The research literatures of corporate social responsibility both in domestic and foreign countries are reviewed, and a brief comment will be proposed in the final.
Part III (Chapter III): The relationship of stakeholders and corporate social responsibility is conducted in this part by comparison analysis on a theoretical basis.
Part IV (Chapter IV and V): In this part, how the stakeholders' supervisions on enterprise influence performance of corporate social responsibility is analyzed with the method of game theory, consisting of static game analysis, dynamic analysis and evolutionary game analysis. The stakeholders in this part include of customers, employees and government.
Part V (Chapter VI): From the stakeholder theory, this part conducted an empirical research by using the form of a questionnaire survey to collect data, and analyzed the data by using of statistics and research methods of quantitative analysis. The empirical research was conducted on a basis considering both the multi-dimensional nature of social responsibility and influence of stakeholder. Part VI (Chapter VII): The last part concluded the main points of this paper and some problems needed further research. The main innovations of the thesis are as follows:
This thesis analyzes the stakeholders' supervision on enterprise and its influence on the performance of corporate social responsibility, by using the game theory including static game, dynamic game and evolutionary game approach.
Because of its multi-dimensional nature, corporate social responsibility should be studied on its each parts concerning with different types of stakeholders. So this thesis used a category performance of social responsibility instead of "total social responsibility" in empirical studies. We test the relationship between social responsibility performance and the characteristics of enterprises including the degree of monopoly, industry risk, profitability, and technology on a category basis so as to avoid the risk of vague study.
Stakeholders' pressures are the external causes for enterprise to fulfill social responsibilities. Therefore, the empirical study will give consideration to the stakeholders' factors including their organizations performance and average education level of their members.
引文
[1]马伊里,杨团.公司与社会公益[M].华夏出版社,2002
[1]谭深,刘开明.跨国公司的社会责任与中国社会[M].社会科学文献出版社
[2]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究-社会责任的观点[D].台湾国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士论文.1987
[3]刘吉、张国华 主编.王晓冬译.贝克著。社会资本制胜如何挖掘个人与企业网络中的隐性资源[M].上海交通大学出版社.2002
[1]仲大军.企业社会责任在中国进展的情况[J].国际经济评论,2006年7月
[2]徐滇庆.对西班牙“烧鞋”事件的再思考[EB/OL]搜狐财经:http://busineds.sohu.com.2004年11月24
[1]企业社会责任及SA8000[EB/OL].中国企业社会责任网:http://www.csr-china.org.2007年6月5日
[2]郭伟.在台山市提高自主创新能力工作会议上的讲话[EB/OL].中国台山政府公众网:http://www.tsinfo.com.cn/Disp.Asax?ID=9158&ClassID=403.2005年10月27日
[1]北京中经纵横经济研究院.2004年中国环境保护行业研究咨询报告[R].2004年
[1]本刊记者.深期市上半年劳动争议仲裁案件同比增长243%[N].深圳特区报.2008年8月17
[1]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J],软科学,2008年1月
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文.2006
[2]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[3]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[1]Oliver Sheldon,The philosophy of Management[M].Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd.1924,p.74
[2]Keith Davis and Robert L.Blomstrom,Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility[M].New York:McGraw-Hill.1975:p39
[3]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].法律出版社,1999年3月版,第2页.
[4]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究——社会责任的观点[D]。国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士学位论文.1987
[1]王天习.公司治理与独立董事研究[M].中国法制出版社.2005:P78.
[2]王天习.公司治理与独立董事研究[M].中国法制出版社.2005:P336
[3]陈为华.企业社会责任的本质[D].台湾国立中兴大学企业管理研究所硕士论文.1995
[1]Friedman Hilton.The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits[J].New York Times Magazine,Sept,1970:P13
[1]海因茨·韦里克,哈罗德·孔茨著,马春光 译.管理学—全球化视角[M].经济科学出版社.2007年
[1]Posner,RichardA.ATheory of Negligence[J].Journal of Legal Studies,1972,1(1):P29-96.
[2]Tavis,Lee A.Power and Responsibility:Multinational Managers And Developing Country Concerns [M].Notre Dame,Indiana:University of NotreDame Press,1996.
[3]Lin,N.Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action.UK:Cambridge University Press.2000
Archie B.Carroll.Ethical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium[J].Business Ethics Quarterly.Issue 10 January 2000
[5]Lin,N.Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action.UK:Cambridge University Press.2000
[1]Preston,L.E.,O'Bannon,D.P.The corporate social-financial performance relationship[J].Business and Society,.1997,Vol.36:P419-429
[2]企业公众形象媒体沙龙:反倾销与企业社会责任[EB/OL].搜狐财经:http://business.sohu.com/20070117/n247672400.shtml.2007年1月17日
[3]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文.2006
[4]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.2003
[5]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[1]Joseph W.McGuire.Business and Society.New York:McGraw-Hill.1963:144-145
[2]万建华等.利益相关者管者[M].海天出版社.1998:41
[1]Archie B.Carroll.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J].Academy of Management Review,1979,10
[2]Steiner,G A.Business,government & society[J].New York:Random House.1980
[3]Brummer,J.J.Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy:An Interdisciplinary Analysis[M].New York,Greenwood Press.1991
[4]CED.Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations.New York:Committee for Economic Development.1971
[1]Sethi,P.Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance:An Analytic Framework.California Management Review,Volume 17,1975,p58-64
[2]The Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College and The U.S.Chamber of Commerce Center for Corporate Citizenship.The state of corporate citizenship in the U.S.:A view from inside 2003-2004.Chestnut Hill MA,2004.
[3]浦东新区经委和劳动局等.浦东新区企业社会责任指导原则[J].投资浦东 2007年9月:P32-33
[1]Modic,Stanley J,Movers and Shakers,Industry Week,January 18,1988,p.47
[1]Sethi,P.Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance:An Analytic Framework.California Management Review,Volume 17,1975,p58-64
[2]erman,S.L.,Wicks,A.C.,Kotha,S.,Jones,T M.Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance[J].The Academy of Management Journal,Vol.42,No.5,1999,10,p488-506.
[3]Logsdon,Reiner and Burke.Corporate philanthropy:strategic responses to firm's stakeholder's[J].Nonprofit and Voluntary Secto,Quarterly,1991,19,p93-110
[4]Warrick,S.L.Cochran.The evolution of the corporate social performance model[J].Academy of Management review,1995,10,p758-769.
[5]Wood,D.J.Jones,R.E.Stakeholder Mismatching:A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance[J].International Journal of Organizational Analysis,1995,3,p.229-267.
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文.未出版.2006
[2]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究,[D].西北大学博士论文,未出版.2007
[1]付俊义,赵红.利益相关者理论综述[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2006年2月
[2]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].法律出版社,1999年3月版
[1]Archie B.Carroll.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J].Academy of Management Review,1979
[2]R.Grimble and K.Wellard,Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management:a review of principles,contexts,experiences and opportunities[J].Agric.Syst.55,1997,(2),P 173-193.
[3]Freeman,R.Edward.Strategic Management:A stakeholder approach[M].Boston:Pitman.1984
[4]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[1]Freeman,R.Edward.Strategic Management:A stakeholder approach[M].Boston:Pitman.1984
[2]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社.2000
[1]Freeman,R.Edward.Strategic Management:A stakeholder approach[M].Boston:Pitman.1984
[2]Charkham,J.Corporate Governance:Lessons from Abroad[J].European Business Journal,1992,4(2):8-16
[3]Frederick J.Boehmke.The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation:How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems.Columbus:The Ohio State University Press.2005
[1]Clarkson,M.Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance [J].,Academy of Management Review,1995,20(1):92-117.
[2]Wheeler,D & Sillanpaa,M.The Stakeholder Corporation:A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder Value[M].London:Pitman Publishing,1997.
[3]Mitchell,R.K.,Agle,B.R.,Wood,D.J.Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts.Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4):853-886
[1]Mitchell,R.K.,Agle,B.R.,Wood,D.J.Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts.Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4):853-886
[2]2陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D]浙大大学博士论文.未出版.2004年:P76-77
[1]Walton,C.The Ethics of Corporate Conduct[M].Engle Wood Cliffs.N.J Prentice-Hall,1997
[2]李维安等.公司治理教程[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002
[3]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社.2000
[4]崔浩.企业利益相关者共同治理研究[D],中国科学技术大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[1]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[2]方竹兰.人力资本所有者拥有企业所有权是一个趋势[J].经济研究,1997年6期
[1]Clarkson M.A risk-based model of stakeholder theory.Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory.Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics.University of Toronto,Canada.1994.
[1]BlairMargaret M,Stout L A.Response to Peter C.Kostant's Exit,Voice and loyalty in the Course of Corporate Governance and Counsel's Changing Role.Journal of Socio-Economics,1999,28(3):251-253.
[2]杨瑞龙,杨其静.专用性、专有性与企业制度[J].经济研究,2001(3)
[3]杨瑞龙,周业安.交易费用与企业所有权分配合约的选择[J].经济研究,1998(9):27-36
[4]杨瑞龙,杨其静.对“资本雇佣劳动”命题的反思[J].经济科学,2000(6):91-100
[5]Dill,W.R.Public participation in corporate planning[J].Long Range Planning 1975.8:57-6
[1]Ansoff,I.Corporate Strategy[M].McGraw Hill,New York.1965.
[1]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[2]江若尘 企业利益相关者问题的实证研究 中国工业经济 2006年10月
[3]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.2003
[1]万建华等.利益相关者管理[M].海天出版社,深圳:1998
[1]R.P.Rumelt.Strategy and Economic Performance[M].Cambridge,MA.Havard University Press.1974:130
[1]新浪北美财经.高管培训可不是去休假[OL].[2007-7-22]http://financenews.sina.com/ftchinese/000-000-107-104/805/2007-07-22/1523197691.shtml
[2]Drucker Peter.Technology,Management and Society.1970.
[1]辛晴.綦建红 企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件 华东经济管理 2008年11月
[2]姜启军.企业社会责任和企业经济绩效的关系分析[J].生产力研究 2007年22期
[1]Charkham,J.Corporate Governance:Lessons from Abroad[J].European Business Journal,1992,4(2):8-16
[1]朱锦程 政府、企业与社会三者关系中的中国企业社会责任监管机制[J].社会科学战线,2007年1期
[1]辛晴,綦建红 企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J]华东经济管理 2008年11月
[2]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业社会责任观的演进与发展:基于综合性社会契约的理解[J].中国工业经济,2003年12期
[1]邓肀文.企业履行社会责任须有严格监管[N].学习时报2008年09月26日
[1]陈宏辉,陈利荣,王江艳.在华投资跨国公司弱化企业社会责任的原因分析[J].现代管理科学,2007年6期
[1]企业社会责任及SA8000[EB/OL].中国企业社会责任网:http://www.csr-china.org.2007年6月5日
[1]陈留彬(2006),黎友焕(2007),张明(2007),何新明(2006),陈宏辉(2007)
[1]Webb D.J.,Mohr L.A.,Harris K.E.A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement[J].Journal of Business Research,2007,(5):91-98.
[2]Mohr Lois.A.,Deborah J.Webb..The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses[J].Journal of Consumer Affairs,2005,(1).
[3]辛晴,綦建红 企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件 华东经济管理 2008年11月
[1]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002
[1]Robert W R,Don E K.Steering Complex Innovation[J].Research Technology Management,2000.
[2]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J].软科学.2008年1月
[1]Macleod,S.WhyW orry About CSR?[J].Strategic Communication Management.August/September,2001,201:8-9.
[2]Jiang Qijun.The Impact of the Corporate Social Responsibility on China Textile & Apparel's Compctitiveness[J].Chinese Business Review,2005:56-63.
[1]敬嵩,雷良海.利益相关者参与公司管理的进化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报.2006年12月
[2]Smith M.The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflict[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1974,47:209-22
[3]Smith M,Price B R.The logic of animal conflict[J].Nature,1973,246:15-18
[4]Williamson O E.Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications[M].New York:Free Press,1975.12-21
[1]敬嵩,雷良海.利益相关者参与公司管理的进化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报.2006年12月
[1]陈迅,韩亚琴.企业社会责任分级模型及其应用[J].中国工业经济.2005年9期
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]袁晓勐.加强自组织的城市社区建设[J/OL]中国社会科学院院报,[2003-05-27]http://www.cass.net.cn/file./200305276671.html
[1]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[1]浦东新区经委和劳动局等.浦东新区企业社会责任指导原则[J].投资浦东2007年9月:P32-33
[1]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[1]罗应婷,杨钰娟.SPSS统计分析从基础到实践[M]电子工业出版社,2007:p221
[1]薛有志.垄断行业的伦理缺失[OL][2007.11]http://manage.org.cn/observe/200711/53584.html
[2]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文2006
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p78
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p80
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Busincss and Sociecy:Environment and Responsibilty,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p77
[1]佚名 高新技术产业概念[OL].[2007-10-19]http://business.baoan.gov.cn/fwpt/tzfz/yscy/gxkjcy/20072007101949668.shtml
[2]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]陈留彬(2006),黎友焕(2007),何新明(2006),贺小刚(2008),李文川(2007),温素彬(2008),辛杰(2008)等
[1]辛晴,綦建红.企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J].华东经济管理,2008年11月
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p77-84
[2]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]辛晴,綦建红.企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J].华东经济管理,2008年11月
[1]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J],软科学,2008年1月
[1] Ackerman, Robert. How Companies Respond to Social Demand[J]. Harvard Bussiness Review, July-August, 1973.
[2] Aoki M. Cooperative Game Theory of the Firm. Oxford University Press&Clarendon Press, 1984.
[3] Bovee, L. Courland, John V. Thil, Burk Marian Wood and P. George Dovel.Management[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1993
[4] Abbott & Monsen. On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility:Self-reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, Vol 22, No 3, pp 501-515.
[5] Ackerman, R. W. The Social Challenge to Business[M]. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University press,2000.
[6] Ackoff R.A Concept of Corporate Planning.NewYork:Wiley, 1970.
[7] Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations[M].New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1776.
[8] Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K. (1998). A theory and test of relationships between stakeholder salience and corporate social performance. International Association for Business and Society 1998 Proceedings: Hilo, Hawaii, June, 1998.
[9] Aguirre Jr., Adalberto & Ellen Reese. Introduction: The Challenges of Globalization for Workers: Transnational and Transborder Issues[J]. Social Justice. 2004,31,(3).
[10] Anderson, G.. Fundamentals of educational research. (2nd)[M]. London: Faler Press. 1998
[11] Anderson, Jerry W. Jr.,Social Responsibility and the Corporate[J]. Business Horizon, July-August, 1986 PP. 22-7..
[12] Ansoff, I. Corporate Strategy, McGraw Hill, New York. 1965.
[13] Ansoff, I. Corporate Strategy[M]. McGraw Hill, New York. 1965.
[14] Aoki M. A Model of the Firm as a Stockholder Employee Cooperative. The American Economic Review, 1970(4).
[15] Archie B. Carroll . Ethical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium[J].Business Ethics Quarterly. Issue 10 January 2000
[16] Archie B.Carroll. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance [J].Academy of Management Review, 1979
[17] Axelrod, R. An Evolutionary Approach to Norras[J]. American Political Science Review, 1986,80, (4), p1106.
[18] Baker, James C. The International Infant Formula Controversy: A Dilemma in Corporate Social Responsibility[J] Journal of Business Ethics, 1985,4, pp181 -190.
[19] Baker, W. E. Market networks and corporate behavior.[J] American Journal of Sociology. 1990,96,589-625.
[20] Barbara, Piazza-Georgi The role of human and social capital in growth :extending our understanding[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002,26,461-479
[21] Bauer, Raymond A. and Dan H. Fenn, Jr., What is a Corporate Social Audit? [J].Harvard Business Review, January-February. 1973.
[22] Becker B, Gerhart B. The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and prospects [J]. Academy of Management journal,1996(9): 22-28.
[23] Bellant, Russ. The Coors Connection: How Coors Family Philanthropy Undermines Democratic Pluralism[M]. Boston: South End Press, 1991.
[24] Berman, S. L, Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., Jones, T M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance [J] .The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, 1999, 10,pp488-506.
[25] Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., Jones, T M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance[J].The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5,1999, 10,pp488-506.
[26] Blair. Margaret M, Ownership and Control : Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century. Washington D.C. The Brookings Institution. 1995.
[27] Blair, Margaret M, Wealth CreationandWealthSharing : A Colloquiumon Corporate Gover nance and Investments in Human Capital. Washington. D.C: The Brookings Institution. 1996.
[28] Brummer, J.J. Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis[M]. New York, Greenwood Press. 1991
[29] Burt, R. S. The contingent value of social capital[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42(2), 339-365.
[30] Burt, R. S. Structural Holes: The social structure of competition[M].Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1992
[31] Burton, B. K. & Dunn, C. P. Stakeholder interests and community groups: A new view. International Association for Business and Society Annual Meetings. 1996.
[32] C.M. Solomon. Put Your Ethics to a Global Test[J]. Personnel Journal 1996.1,pp66-74.
[33] Carroll, Archie B., A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, NO. 4,1979.
[34] Carroll, T. Douglas, Paul E. Green, and Waynens Desarbo, Optimiaing the Allocation of a Fixed Resoruce: A Simple Model and Its Experimental Test [J]. Working Paper, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ. 1978.
[35] Carroll,A.B. Ethics and stakeholder management (3 ed.).Cincinnati:South-Weatern. 1996.
[36] Carroll. Ethics and stakeholder management (2nd ed.). Cincinnati:South-Westem.1993.
[37] Catherine Barnard. EC. Employment Law[M].John Wiley & Sons,England,1995.
[38] CED. Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations. New York: Committee for Economic Development. 1971
[39] Charkham, J. Corporate governance: lessons from abroad. European Business Journal. 1992,4(2).
[40] Charkham, J. Corporate Governance: Lessons from Abroad[J]. European Business Journal, 1992,4(2): 8 -16
[41] Clarkson M. A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics.University of Toronto, Canada. 1994.
[42] Clarkson, M. Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance [J]. .Academy of Management Review, 199520(1): 92-117.
[43] Clarkson, M. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1)
[44] Clarkson. M. A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics. University of Toronto, Canada. 1994.
[45] Clarkson, M. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, 1995,20.
[46] Coleman, James, S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1998. vol.94, s95-121.
[47] Dan Galai, Zvi Wiener. Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors[J].Journal of Corporate Finance.Jan,2008
[48] Davis, K. Robe, L. Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility,NewYork: McGraw Hill 1975
[49] Davis, K., & W. C. Frederick. Bussiness and Society: Management, the Public Policy, Ethics[M], 5 ed., New Youk: McGraw-Hill. 1984.
[50] Davis, Keith, The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, June. 1973.
[51 ] Dill,W.R.Public participation in corporate planning. Long Range Planning 1975.8
[52] Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation:Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review. 1995,20(1)
[53] Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1999.
[54] Eikins, Arthur and Dennis W. Callaghan. A management Odyssey: Problems in Business and Its Environment[J]. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 1981.
[55] Frederick J. Boehmke. The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation: How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.2005
[56] Frederick, W. C. Business and society, corporate strategy, public policy, ethics(6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1988.
[57] Frederick, W. C. Values, nature and culture in the American corporation. New York: Oxford University Press. 1995.
[58] Frederick, WC. From CSR1 to CSR2: the maturing of business and society thought[J]. Business & Society, 1994,33, pp150-164.
[59] Freeman, R. E. & Evan, W. M. Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation.Journal of Behavioral Economic. 1990,19
[60] Freeman, R. Edward. Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach[M]. Boston:Pitman. 1984
[61] Freeman, R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston, MA:Pitman. 1984.
[62] Friedman Hilton. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits[J].New York Times Magazine,Sept,1970:P13
[63] Friedman, M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits[J].New York Times Magazine, 1970 (9): 13.
[64] Frienman, Hillton. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits[J]. New Youk Times Magazine, Sep. 1970.
[65] Fritzsche, J. David, Y.Paul Huo, Sakae Sugai, Dun-Hou Stephen Tasi and seok Cheong Kim. A Comparative Study of the Ethical Decisions of Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Managers[J]. Reitaku University Journal(Dec). Vol.55. 1992.
[66] Goodpaster, Kenneth, E. Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Beauchamp &Bowie. 1997.
[67] Gruning, James E. A New Measure of Public Opinion on Corporate Social Responsibility[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 22: 1979.
[68] Huselid, M. A. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices,Turnover,Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. [J] The Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 38, No. 3,1995, pp635-672.
[69] Huss, H. Fenwick and M. Denise Patterson. Ethics in Accountion:Values Education Without Indoctrination[J]. Journal of Business Ethics 12:236-243. 1993.
[70] Jeff, Allen and Davis Duane. Assessing Some Determinant Effects of Ethical Consulting Behavior: The Case of Personal and Professional Values[J]. Journal of Business Ethicsl2: 1993.
[71] Jones, Thomas M. Corporate Social Resposibility Revisited, Redefined[J].California Management Review. 1980.
[72] Jones J,. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics,Academy of Management Review. 1995,20.
[73] Joseph W. McGuire. Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1963:144-145
[74] Keith Davis and Robert L. Blomstrom, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility[M]. New York: MeGraw-Hill. 1975 :p39
[75] Kirrane, E and E. Diane. Managing Values: A Systematic Approach to Business Ethics[J]. Training & Developemnt Joumal,Nov. 1990.
[76] Kzai firoz Alam. ethics in New Zealand Organizations[J]. Joural of Business Ethics 12:443-440. 1993.
[77] Levitt, Theodore. Business Should Stay Out Politics[J]. Business Policy and Its Environment, 1965,10.
[78] Levitt, Theodore. The Dangers of Social Responsibility[J]. Harvard Business Review September-October, 1958.
[79] Levitte. The Dangers of Social Responsibility[J]. Harvard Business Review.September-October. 1958.
[80] Lin,N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. UK: Cambridge University Press.2000
[81] Logsdon, Reiner and Burke. Corporate philanthropy: strategic responses to firm's stakeholder's[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Secto, Quarterly, 1991,19, pp93-l 10
[82] Mitchell, A. & Wood, D. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997.22(4)
[83] Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts.Academy of Management Review, 1997,22(4): 853-886
[84] Modic,Stanley J, Movers and Shakers, Industry Week, January 18, 1988, pp.47
[85] Oliver Sheldon, The philosophy of Management[M]. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd.1924,p.74
[86] Pfeffer, J. Managing with powers[M]. Harvard Business School Press, 1994.
[87] Phillips, R. Stakeholder Theory and a Prin - ciple ofFairness, Business Ethics Quarterly, 1997(7)
[88] Posner, Richard A. A Theory of Negligence[J]. Journal of Legal Studies,1972,1(1): P29-96.
[89] Posner, Z. Barry and H. Warren Schmidt. Values Congruence and Difference Between the Interplay of Personal and Organizational Value Systems[J]. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 341-347.1993.
[90] Preston, L. E., O'Bannon, D. P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship[J]. Business and Society,. 1997, Vol.36:P419-429
[91] R. Grimble and K. Wellard, Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities[J]. Agric.Syst.55 ,1997, (2), P173-193.
[92] Saleem Sheikh. Corporate Social Responsibility: Law and Practice[M]. Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1996.
[93] Savage, G. T., W., Whitehead, C. J.& Bair, J, D. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive.l991,5(2):61-75.
[94] Sethi, P. Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytic Framework.California Management Review, Volume 17,1975, p58-64
[95] Sethi, S. Prakash. Dimension of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework[J]. Calfomia Management Revier. 1975.
[96] Shawn L Berman, Andrew C Wicks, Suresh Kotha, Thomas M Jones. Does stakeholder orientation matter? [J] .Academy of Managemen Journal, 1999 (10). 33-37.
[97] Sklair & Leslie. The Transnational Capitalist Class[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
[98] Snell, R., Developing skills for Ethical Management[M]. Chapman and Hall,1993.
[99] Steiner, G A. Business, government & society[J]. New York: Random House.1980
[100] Sturtevant & Vemon, Worst Business and Society[M]. Richard D. Irwin, INC,1990.
[101] Tavis, Lee A. Power and Responsibility: Multinational Managers And Developing Country Concerns [M].Notre Dame, Indiana: University of NotreDame Press, 1996.
[102] The Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College and The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Corporate Citizenship. The state of corporate citizenship in the U.S.:A view from inside 2003-2004. Chestnut Hill MA, 2004.
[103] Thomas, Anisya. S., and Simerly, R. L., The Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Social performance: An Interdisciplinary Examination[J] Journal of Business Ethics, VOL13, 1994,
[104] Trevino, L. K., Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model[J]. Academy of Management Review, VOL 11, NO.3,1986
[105] Ullman, A., Data in Search of A Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, VOL 10,1985.
[106] Vitell, S. T. & T. A. Festervand, Conflicts, Practices and Belief of Industrial Executives[J]. Journal of Business Ethics. 1987.
[107] Votaw, D. & S. P. Sethi. Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctorine of Social Responsibility[J]. California Management Review. 1972.
[108] Waddock, S.A, Graves, S. B. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link[J]. Strategic Management Journal.Vol. 18, No. 4 1997: pp303-19.
[109] Walton, C. The Ethics of Corporate Conduct[M]. Engle Wood Cliffs.N.J Prentice-Hall,1997,pp6.
[110] Warrick, S. L. Cochran. The evolution of the corporate social performance model [J]. Academy of Management review, 1995,10, pp758-769.
[111] Warrick, S. L.& Cochran. The evolution of the corporate social performance model[J]. Academy of Management review, 1995,10, pp758-769.
[112] Wartick, Steven L., and Rude, R. E., Issues Management: Corporate Fad of Corporate Function[J]. California Management Review, Fall 1986
[113] Wheeler D. & Maria S. 1998. Including the stakeholders: the business case. Long Range Planning. 1995,31(2)
[114] Wheeler, D & Sillanpaa, M. The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder ValuefM]. London: Pitman Publishing, 1997.
[115] Williamson, O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press. 1984.
[116] Wimbush, J. C., and Shepard, J. M., Toward An Understanding of Ethical Climate: Its Relationship to Ethical Behavior and Supervisor Influence[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, VOL 13,1994
[117] Wood, D.J. Business and society[M] .Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1990.
[118] Wood, D.J. Jones, R.E. Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance[J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1995, 3, pp.229-267.
[119] Wood, DJ. Corporate Social Performance Revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, October 1991, pp703-708.
[120] World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility. [J] 。 The WBCSD Journey, 2002, 2.
[121] World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Meeting Changing Expectations: Corporate Social Responsibility. WBCSD. Geneva Switzerland, 1998.
[122] 北京中经纵横经济研究院.2004年中国环境保护行业研究咨询报告[R].2004年
[123]本刊记者.深圳市上半年劳动争议仲裁案件同比增长243%[N].深圳特区报.2008年8月17
[124]陈宏辉,陈利荣,王江艳.在华投资跨国公司弱化企业社会责任的原因分析[J].现代管理科学,2007年6期
[125]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D]浙大大学博士论文.未出版.2004年:P76-77
[126]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.2003
[127]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[128]陈为华.企业社会责任的本质[D].台湾国立中兴大学企业管理研究所硕士论文.1995
[129]陈迅,韩亚琴.企业社会责任分级模型及其应用企业社会责任分级模型及其应用[J]中国工业经济2005年9月
[130]陈志昂、陆伟.企业社会责任三角模型[J].经济与管理,2003,11
[131]崔浩.企业利益相关者共同治理研究[D],中国科学技术大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[132]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[133]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文.2005
[134]邓肀文.企业履行社会责任须有严格监管[N].学习时报2008年09月26日
[135]董秀良,薛丰慧.股权结构、股东行为与核心代理问题研究,经济评论2003(4)
[136]多纳德逊.邓非.赵月瑟译.有约束力的关系——对企业伦理学的一种社会契约论的研究.上海.社会科学院出版社.1999/2001
[137]方竹兰.人力资本所有者拥有企业所有权是一个趋势[J].经济研究,1997年6期
[138]高尚全.企业社会责任和法人治理结构[J].学习时报,2004,10.
[139]郭伟.在台山市提高自主创新能力工作会议上的讲话[EB/OL].中国台山政府公众网:http://www.tsinfo.com.cn/Disp.Aspx?ID=9158&ClassID=403.2005年10月27日
[140]海因茨·韦里克,哈罗德·孔茨著,马春光译.管理学——全球化视角[M].经济科学出版社.2007年
[141]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[142]贺小刚,陆一婷.公司社会责任与价值创造:基于社会调查的数据分析[J].科学经济社会,2008年3期
[143]胡汝银.中国上市公司治理机制与独立董事制度建设.中国金融.2003(9)
[144]胡汝银.,中国上市公司成败实证研究,上海:复旦大学出版社,2003
[145]贾生华,陈宏辉.利益相关者的界定方法述评.外国经济与管理.2002(5)
[146]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J],软科学,2008(1)
[147]姜启军.企业社会责任和企业经济绩效的关系分析[J].生产力研究,2007年22期
[148]黎友焕.SA8000认证与中国社会责任建设[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2004
[149]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年:P6
[150]李双龙.浅析企业社会责任的影响因素[J].经济体制改革,2005,10.
[151]李维安等.公司治理教程[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[152]李伟.企业的社会契约:一个新的企业行为规范研究框架[J].财经研究,2003,10
[153]李文川,罗宣政.基于SA8000的民营企业社会责任现状调查分析——以浙江省为例[J]商业经济与管理2007/3
[154]李心合.面向可持续发展的利益相关者管理[J].当代财经.2001年1月
[155]李心合.面向可持续发展的利益相关者管理.当代经济.2001,1
[156]林军.公司控制权的经济学与社会学分析[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2005
[157]刘吉、张国华主编.王晓冬译.贝克著。社会资本制胜如何挖掘个人与企业网络中的隐性资源[M].上海交通大学出版社.2002
[158]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].法律出版社,1999年3月版,第2页.
[159]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].北京:法律出版社.1999.
[160]刘连煜.公司治理与公司社会责任[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001
[161]卢代富.企业社会责任的经济学与法学分析[M].北京:法律出版社,2002.
[162]吕荣杰 李无非 周力 基于SWARM 昀利益相关者共同治理机制模型昀设计经济论坛 2006 20
[163]罗国杰.伦理学[M].北京:人民出版社,1999.
[164]罗国杰.我国伦理学百科全书[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1993.
[165]罗应婷,杨钰娟.SPSS统计分析从基础到实践[M]电子工业出版社
[166]马伊里,杨团.公司与社会公益[M].华夏出版社,2002
[167]浦东新区经委和劳动局等.浦东新区企业社会责任指导原则[J].投资浦东2007年9月:P32.33
[168]企业公众形象媒体沙龙:反倾销与企业社会责任[EB/OL].搜狐财经:http://business.sohu.com/20070117/n247672400.shtml.2007年1月17日
[169]企业社会责任及SA8000[EB/OL].中国企业社会责任网:http://www.csr-china.org.2007年6月5日
[170]沈艺峰、林志扬.利益相关者理论评析.经济管理.2001.8
[171]孙永祥.公司治理结构:理论与实证研究,上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2002
[172]谭深,刘开明.跨国公司的社会责任与中国社会[M].社会科学文献出版社
[173]万建华等.利益相关者管者[M].海天出版社.1998:33
[174]万建华等.利益相关者管者[M].海天出版社.1998:41
[175]万建华等.利益相关者管理.深圳:海天出版社,1998
[176]王辉.从“企业依存”到“动态演化”_一个利益相关者理论文献的回顾与评述(上)(下).经济管理,2003.2
[177]王茂林.构建和谐社会必须强化企业的社会责任[[J].求是2005,23.
[178]王天习.公司治理与独立董事研究[M].中国法制出版社.2005:P78.
[179]王学义.企业伦理学[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004
[180]王跃生.打破垄断已到了不可拖延的时刻[OL][2009-3-15]http://www.competitionlaw.cn/show.aspx?id=4684&cid=35
[181]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析[J]中国工业经济,2008年10月
[182]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究—社会责任的观点[D].台湾国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士论文.1987
[183]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究——社会责任的观点[D]。国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士学位论文.1987
[184]吴淑琨、席酉民.公司治理与中国企业改革.机械工业出版社.2001
[185]肖海林.基于生产要素权重的企业所有制安排.东北财经大学学报,2003(5)
[186]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002
[187]辛杰.企业社会责任价值观研究——以山东省2200家企业调查为例[J].华东经济管理,2008年11月
[188]辛晴,綦建红.企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J].华东经济管,2008年11月
[189]徐滇庆.对西班牙“烧鞋”事件的再思考[EB/OL]搜狐财经:httv://business.sohu.com.2004年11月24日
[190]徐晓东、陈小悦,第一大股东对公司治理、企业业绩的影响分析,经济研究,2003(2)
[191]薛有志.垄断行业的伦理缺失[OL][2007-11]http://manage.org.cn/observe/200711/53584.html
[192]杨瑞龙,周业安.交易费用与企业所有权分配合约的选择[J].经济研究,1998(9):27-36
[193]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社.2000:p132
[194]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业利益相关者理论及其应用.北京.经济出版社.2000.
[195]杨瑞龙,杨其静.对“资本雇佣劳动”命题的反思[J].经济科学,2000(6):91-100
[196]杨瑞龙,杨其静.专用性、专有性与企业制度[J].经济研究,2001(3)
[197]佚名高新技术产业概念[OL].[2007-10-19]http://business.baoan.gov.cn/fwpt/tzfz/yscy/gxkjcy/2007101949668.shtml
[198]余颖.大股东控制型公司治理的效率评价.财经科学.2001(3)
[199]袁家方.企业社会责任[M].北京:海洋出版社,1990
[200]袁晓勐.加强自组织的城市社区建设[J/OL]中国社会科学院院报,[2003-05-27]http://www.cass.net.cn/file/200305276671.html
[201]张明入世后中国企业社会责任研究——基于和谐的观点[D]复旦大学博士论文,2007
[202]张明.入世后中国企业社会责任研究——基于和谐的观点[D].复旦大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[203]张维迎.企业的企业家——契约理论.上海.上海三联书店.1995.
[204]周祖城.企业伦理学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[1]谭深,刘开明.跨国公司的社会责任与中国社会[M].社会科学文献出版社
[2]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究-社会责任的观点[D].台湾国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士论文.1987
[3]刘吉、张国华 主编.王晓冬译.贝克著。社会资本制胜如何挖掘个人与企业网络中的隐性资源[M].上海交通大学出版社.2002
[1]仲大军.企业社会责任在中国进展的情况[J].国际经济评论,2006年7月
[2]徐滇庆.对西班牙“烧鞋”事件的再思考[EB/OL]搜狐财经:http://busineds.sohu.com.2004年11月24
[1]企业社会责任及SA8000[EB/OL].中国企业社会责任网:http://www.csr-china.org.2007年6月5日
[2]郭伟.在台山市提高自主创新能力工作会议上的讲话[EB/OL].中国台山政府公众网:http://www.tsinfo.com.cn/Disp.Asax?ID=9158&ClassID=403.2005年10月27日
[1]北京中经纵横经济研究院.2004年中国环境保护行业研究咨询报告[R].2004年
[1]本刊记者.深期市上半年劳动争议仲裁案件同比增长243%[N].深圳特区报.2008年8月17
[1]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J],软科学,2008年1月
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文.2006
[2]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[3]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[1]Oliver Sheldon,The philosophy of Management[M].Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd.1924,p.74
[2]Keith Davis and Robert L.Blomstrom,Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility[M].New York:McGraw-Hill.1975:p39
[3]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].法律出版社,1999年3月版,第2页.
[4]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究——社会责任的观点[D]。国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士学位论文.1987
[1]王天习.公司治理与独立董事研究[M].中国法制出版社.2005:P78.
[2]王天习.公司治理与独立董事研究[M].中国法制出版社.2005:P336
[3]陈为华.企业社会责任的本质[D].台湾国立中兴大学企业管理研究所硕士论文.1995
[1]Friedman Hilton.The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits[J].New York Times Magazine,Sept,1970:P13
[1]海因茨·韦里克,哈罗德·孔茨著,马春光 译.管理学—全球化视角[M].经济科学出版社.2007年
[1]Posner,RichardA.ATheory of Negligence[J].Journal of Legal Studies,1972,1(1):P29-96.
[2]Tavis,Lee A.Power and Responsibility:Multinational Managers And Developing Country Concerns [M].Notre Dame,Indiana:University of NotreDame Press,1996.
[3]Lin,N.Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action.UK:Cambridge University Press.2000
Archie B.Carroll.Ethical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium[J].Business Ethics Quarterly.Issue 10 January 2000
[5]Lin,N.Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action.UK:Cambridge University Press.2000
[1]Preston,L.E.,O'Bannon,D.P.The corporate social-financial performance relationship[J].Business and Society,.1997,Vol.36:P419-429
[2]企业公众形象媒体沙龙:反倾销与企业社会责任[EB/OL].搜狐财经:http://business.sohu.com/20070117/n247672400.shtml.2007年1月17日
[3]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文.2006
[4]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.2003
[5]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[1]Joseph W.McGuire.Business and Society.New York:McGraw-Hill.1963:144-145
[2]万建华等.利益相关者管者[M].海天出版社.1998:41
[1]Archie B.Carroll.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J].Academy of Management Review,1979,10
[2]Steiner,G A.Business,government & society[J].New York:Random House.1980
[3]Brummer,J.J.Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy:An Interdisciplinary Analysis[M].New York,Greenwood Press.1991
[4]CED.Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations.New York:Committee for Economic Development.1971
[1]Sethi,P.Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance:An Analytic Framework.California Management Review,Volume 17,1975,p58-64
[2]The Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College and The U.S.Chamber of Commerce Center for Corporate Citizenship.The state of corporate citizenship in the U.S.:A view from inside 2003-2004.Chestnut Hill MA,2004.
[3]浦东新区经委和劳动局等.浦东新区企业社会责任指导原则[J].投资浦东 2007年9月:P32-33
[1]Modic,Stanley J,Movers and Shakers,Industry Week,January 18,1988,p.47
[1]Sethi,P.Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance:An Analytic Framework.California Management Review,Volume 17,1975,p58-64
[2]erman,S.L.,Wicks,A.C.,Kotha,S.,Jones,T M.Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance[J].The Academy of Management Journal,Vol.42,No.5,1999,10,p488-506.
[3]Logsdon,Reiner and Burke.Corporate philanthropy:strategic responses to firm's stakeholder's[J].Nonprofit and Voluntary Secto,Quarterly,1991,19,p93-110
[4]Warrick,S.L.Cochran.The evolution of the corporate social performance model[J].Academy of Management review,1995,10,p758-769.
[5]Wood,D.J.Jones,R.E.Stakeholder Mismatching:A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance[J].International Journal of Organizational Analysis,1995,3,p.229-267.
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文.未出版.2006
[2]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究,[D].西北大学博士论文,未出版.2007
[1]付俊义,赵红.利益相关者理论综述[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2006年2月
[2]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].法律出版社,1999年3月版
[1]Archie B.Carroll.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J].Academy of Management Review,1979
[2]R.Grimble and K.Wellard,Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management:a review of principles,contexts,experiences and opportunities[J].Agric.Syst.55,1997,(2),P 173-193.
[3]Freeman,R.Edward.Strategic Management:A stakeholder approach[M].Boston:Pitman.1984
[4]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[1]Freeman,R.Edward.Strategic Management:A stakeholder approach[M].Boston:Pitman.1984
[2]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社.2000
[1]Freeman,R.Edward.Strategic Management:A stakeholder approach[M].Boston:Pitman.1984
[2]Charkham,J.Corporate Governance:Lessons from Abroad[J].European Business Journal,1992,4(2):8-16
[3]Frederick J.Boehmke.The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation:How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems.Columbus:The Ohio State University Press.2005
[1]Clarkson,M.Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance [J].,Academy of Management Review,1995,20(1):92-117.
[2]Wheeler,D & Sillanpaa,M.The Stakeholder Corporation:A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder Value[M].London:Pitman Publishing,1997.
[3]Mitchell,R.K.,Agle,B.R.,Wood,D.J.Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts.Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4):853-886
[1]Mitchell,R.K.,Agle,B.R.,Wood,D.J.Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts.Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4):853-886
[2]2陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D]浙大大学博士论文.未出版.2004年:P76-77
[1]Walton,C.The Ethics of Corporate Conduct[M].Engle Wood Cliffs.N.J Prentice-Hall,1997
[2]李维安等.公司治理教程[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002
[3]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社.2000
[4]崔浩.企业利益相关者共同治理研究[D],中国科学技术大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[1]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[2]方竹兰.人力资本所有者拥有企业所有权是一个趋势[J].经济研究,1997年6期
[1]Clarkson M.A risk-based model of stakeholder theory.Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory.Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics.University of Toronto,Canada.1994.
[1]BlairMargaret M,Stout L A.Response to Peter C.Kostant's Exit,Voice and loyalty in the Course of Corporate Governance and Counsel's Changing Role.Journal of Socio-Economics,1999,28(3):251-253.
[2]杨瑞龙,杨其静.专用性、专有性与企业制度[J].经济研究,2001(3)
[3]杨瑞龙,周业安.交易费用与企业所有权分配合约的选择[J].经济研究,1998(9):27-36
[4]杨瑞龙,杨其静.对“资本雇佣劳动”命题的反思[J].经济科学,2000(6):91-100
[5]Dill,W.R.Public participation in corporate planning[J].Long Range Planning 1975.8:57-6
[1]Ansoff,I.Corporate Strategy[M].McGraw Hill,New York.1965.
[1]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[2]江若尘 企业利益相关者问题的实证研究 中国工业经济 2006年10月
[3]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.2003
[1]万建华等.利益相关者管理[M].海天出版社,深圳:1998
[1]R.P.Rumelt.Strategy and Economic Performance[M].Cambridge,MA.Havard University Press.1974:130
[1]新浪北美财经.高管培训可不是去休假[OL].[2007-7-22]http://financenews.sina.com/ftchinese/000-000-107-104/805/2007-07-22/1523197691.shtml
[2]Drucker Peter.Technology,Management and Society.1970.
[1]辛晴.綦建红 企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件 华东经济管理 2008年11月
[2]姜启军.企业社会责任和企业经济绩效的关系分析[J].生产力研究 2007年22期
[1]Charkham,J.Corporate Governance:Lessons from Abroad[J].European Business Journal,1992,4(2):8-16
[1]朱锦程 政府、企业与社会三者关系中的中国企业社会责任监管机制[J].社会科学战线,2007年1期
[1]辛晴,綦建红 企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J]华东经济管理 2008年11月
[2]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业社会责任观的演进与发展:基于综合性社会契约的理解[J].中国工业经济,2003年12期
[1]邓肀文.企业履行社会责任须有严格监管[N].学习时报2008年09月26日
[1]陈宏辉,陈利荣,王江艳.在华投资跨国公司弱化企业社会责任的原因分析[J].现代管理科学,2007年6期
[1]企业社会责任及SA8000[EB/OL].中国企业社会责任网:http://www.csr-china.org.2007年6月5日
[1]陈留彬(2006),黎友焕(2007),张明(2007),何新明(2006),陈宏辉(2007)
[1]Webb D.J.,Mohr L.A.,Harris K.E.A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement[J].Journal of Business Research,2007,(5):91-98.
[2]Mohr Lois.A.,Deborah J.Webb..The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses[J].Journal of Consumer Affairs,2005,(1).
[3]辛晴,綦建红 企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件 华东经济管理 2008年11月
[1]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002
[1]Robert W R,Don E K.Steering Complex Innovation[J].Research Technology Management,2000.
[2]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J].软科学.2008年1月
[1]Macleod,S.WhyW orry About CSR?[J].Strategic Communication Management.August/September,2001,201:8-9.
[2]Jiang Qijun.The Impact of the Corporate Social Responsibility on China Textile & Apparel's Compctitiveness[J].Chinese Business Review,2005:56-63.
[1]敬嵩,雷良海.利益相关者参与公司管理的进化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报.2006年12月
[2]Smith M.The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflict[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1974,47:209-22
[3]Smith M,Price B R.The logic of animal conflict[J].Nature,1973,246:15-18
[4]Williamson O E.Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications[M].New York:Free Press,1975.12-21
[1]敬嵩,雷良海.利益相关者参与公司管理的进化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报.2006年12月
[1]陈迅,韩亚琴.企业社会责任分级模型及其应用[J].中国工业经济.2005年9期
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]袁晓勐.加强自组织的城市社区建设[J/OL]中国社会科学院院报,[2003-05-27]http://www.cass.net.cn/file./200305276671.html
[1]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[1]浦东新区经委和劳动局等.浦东新区企业社会责任指导原则[J].投资浦东2007年9月:P32-33
[1]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[1]罗应婷,杨钰娟.SPSS统计分析从基础到实践[M]电子工业出版社,2007:p221
[1]薛有志.垄断行业的伦理缺失[OL][2007.11]http://manage.org.cn/observe/200711/53584.html
[2]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文2006
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p78
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p80
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Busincss and Sociecy:Environment and Responsibilty,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p77
[1]佚名 高新技术产业概念[OL].[2007-10-19]http://business.baoan.gov.cn/fwpt/tzfz/yscy/gxkjcy/20072007101949668.shtml
[2]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]陈留彬(2006),黎友焕(2007),何新明(2006),贺小刚(2008),李文川(2007),温素彬(2008),辛杰(2008)等
[1]辛晴,綦建红.企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J].华东经济管理,2008年11月
[1]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]Davis,K.Robe,L.Business and Society:Environment and Responsibility,NewYork:McGraw Hill 1975:p77-84
[2]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[1]辛晴,綦建红.企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J].华东经济管理,2008年11月
[1]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J],软科学,2008年1月
[1] Ackerman, Robert. How Companies Respond to Social Demand[J]. Harvard Bussiness Review, July-August, 1973.
[2] Aoki M. Cooperative Game Theory of the Firm. Oxford University Press&Clarendon Press, 1984.
[3] Bovee, L. Courland, John V. Thil, Burk Marian Wood and P. George Dovel.Management[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1993
[4] Abbott & Monsen. On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility:Self-reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, Vol 22, No 3, pp 501-515.
[5] Ackerman, R. W. The Social Challenge to Business[M]. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University press,2000.
[6] Ackoff R.A Concept of Corporate Planning.NewYork:Wiley, 1970.
[7] Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations[M].New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1776.
[8] Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K. (1998). A theory and test of relationships between stakeholder salience and corporate social performance. International Association for Business and Society 1998 Proceedings: Hilo, Hawaii, June, 1998.
[9] Aguirre Jr., Adalberto & Ellen Reese. Introduction: The Challenges of Globalization for Workers: Transnational and Transborder Issues[J]. Social Justice. 2004,31,(3).
[10] Anderson, G.. Fundamentals of educational research. (2nd)[M]. London: Faler Press. 1998
[11] Anderson, Jerry W. Jr.,Social Responsibility and the Corporate[J]. Business Horizon, July-August, 1986 PP. 22-7..
[12] Ansoff, I. Corporate Strategy, McGraw Hill, New York. 1965.
[13] Ansoff, I. Corporate Strategy[M]. McGraw Hill, New York. 1965.
[14] Aoki M. A Model of the Firm as a Stockholder Employee Cooperative. The American Economic Review, 1970(4).
[15] Archie B. Carroll . Ethical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium[J].Business Ethics Quarterly. Issue 10 January 2000
[16] Archie B.Carroll. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance [J].Academy of Management Review, 1979
[17] Axelrod, R. An Evolutionary Approach to Norras[J]. American Political Science Review, 1986,80, (4), p1106.
[18] Baker, James C. The International Infant Formula Controversy: A Dilemma in Corporate Social Responsibility[J] Journal of Business Ethics, 1985,4, pp181 -190.
[19] Baker, W. E. Market networks and corporate behavior.[J] American Journal of Sociology. 1990,96,589-625.
[20] Barbara, Piazza-Georgi The role of human and social capital in growth :extending our understanding[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002,26,461-479
[21] Bauer, Raymond A. and Dan H. Fenn, Jr., What is a Corporate Social Audit? [J].Harvard Business Review, January-February. 1973.
[22] Becker B, Gerhart B. The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and prospects [J]. Academy of Management journal,1996(9): 22-28.
[23] Bellant, Russ. The Coors Connection: How Coors Family Philanthropy Undermines Democratic Pluralism[M]. Boston: South End Press, 1991.
[24] Berman, S. L, Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., Jones, T M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance [J] .The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, 1999, 10,pp488-506.
[25] Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., Jones, T M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance[J].The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5,1999, 10,pp488-506.
[26] Blair. Margaret M, Ownership and Control : Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century. Washington D.C. The Brookings Institution. 1995.
[27] Blair, Margaret M, Wealth CreationandWealthSharing : A Colloquiumon Corporate Gover nance and Investments in Human Capital. Washington. D.C: The Brookings Institution. 1996.
[28] Brummer, J.J. Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis[M]. New York, Greenwood Press. 1991
[29] Burt, R. S. The contingent value of social capital[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42(2), 339-365.
[30] Burt, R. S. Structural Holes: The social structure of competition[M].Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 1992
[31] Burton, B. K. & Dunn, C. P. Stakeholder interests and community groups: A new view. International Association for Business and Society Annual Meetings. 1996.
[32] C.M. Solomon. Put Your Ethics to a Global Test[J]. Personnel Journal 1996.1,pp66-74.
[33] Carroll, Archie B., A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, NO. 4,1979.
[34] Carroll, T. Douglas, Paul E. Green, and Waynens Desarbo, Optimiaing the Allocation of a Fixed Resoruce: A Simple Model and Its Experimental Test [J]. Working Paper, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ. 1978.
[35] Carroll,A.B. Ethics and stakeholder management (3 ed.).Cincinnati:South-Weatern. 1996.
[36] Carroll. Ethics and stakeholder management (2nd ed.). Cincinnati:South-Westem.1993.
[37] Catherine Barnard. EC. Employment Law[M].John Wiley & Sons,England,1995.
[38] CED. Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations. New York: Committee for Economic Development. 1971
[39] Charkham, J. Corporate governance: lessons from abroad. European Business Journal. 1992,4(2).
[40] Charkham, J. Corporate Governance: Lessons from Abroad[J]. European Business Journal, 1992,4(2): 8 -16
[41] Clarkson M. A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics.University of Toronto, Canada. 1994.
[42] Clarkson, M. Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance [J]. .Academy of Management Review, 199520(1): 92-117.
[43] Clarkson, M. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1)
[44] Clarkson. M. A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Center for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics. University of Toronto, Canada. 1994.
[45] Clarkson, M. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, 1995,20.
[46] Coleman, James, S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1998. vol.94, s95-121.
[47] Dan Galai, Zvi Wiener. Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors[J].Journal of Corporate Finance.Jan,2008
[48] Davis, K. Robe, L. Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility,NewYork: McGraw Hill 1975
[49] Davis, K., & W. C. Frederick. Bussiness and Society: Management, the Public Policy, Ethics[M], 5 ed., New Youk: McGraw-Hill. 1984.
[50] Davis, Keith, The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, June. 1973.
[51 ] Dill,W.R.Public participation in corporate planning. Long Range Planning 1975.8
[52] Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation:Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review. 1995,20(1)
[53] Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1999.
[54] Eikins, Arthur and Dennis W. Callaghan. A management Odyssey: Problems in Business and Its Environment[J]. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 1981.
[55] Frederick J. Boehmke. The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation: How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.2005
[56] Frederick, W. C. Business and society, corporate strategy, public policy, ethics(6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1988.
[57] Frederick, W. C. Values, nature and culture in the American corporation. New York: Oxford University Press. 1995.
[58] Frederick, WC. From CSR1 to CSR2: the maturing of business and society thought[J]. Business & Society, 1994,33, pp150-164.
[59] Freeman, R. E. & Evan, W. M. Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation.Journal of Behavioral Economic. 1990,19
[60] Freeman, R. Edward. Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach[M]. Boston:Pitman. 1984
[61] Freeman, R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston, MA:Pitman. 1984.
[62] Friedman Hilton. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits[J].New York Times Magazine,Sept,1970:P13
[63] Friedman, M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits[J].New York Times Magazine, 1970 (9): 13.
[64] Frienman, Hillton. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits[J]. New Youk Times Magazine, Sep. 1970.
[65] Fritzsche, J. David, Y.Paul Huo, Sakae Sugai, Dun-Hou Stephen Tasi and seok Cheong Kim. A Comparative Study of the Ethical Decisions of Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Managers[J]. Reitaku University Journal(Dec). Vol.55. 1992.
[66] Goodpaster, Kenneth, E. Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Beauchamp &Bowie. 1997.
[67] Gruning, James E. A New Measure of Public Opinion on Corporate Social Responsibility[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 22: 1979.
[68] Huselid, M. A. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices,Turnover,Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. [J] The Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 38, No. 3,1995, pp635-672.
[69] Huss, H. Fenwick and M. Denise Patterson. Ethics in Accountion:Values Education Without Indoctrination[J]. Journal of Business Ethics 12:236-243. 1993.
[70] Jeff, Allen and Davis Duane. Assessing Some Determinant Effects of Ethical Consulting Behavior: The Case of Personal and Professional Values[J]. Journal of Business Ethicsl2: 1993.
[71] Jones, Thomas M. Corporate Social Resposibility Revisited, Redefined[J].California Management Review. 1980.
[72] Jones J,. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics,Academy of Management Review. 1995,20.
[73] Joseph W. McGuire. Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1963:144-145
[74] Keith Davis and Robert L. Blomstrom, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility[M]. New York: MeGraw-Hill. 1975 :p39
[75] Kirrane, E and E. Diane. Managing Values: A Systematic Approach to Business Ethics[J]. Training & Developemnt Joumal,Nov. 1990.
[76] Kzai firoz Alam. ethics in New Zealand Organizations[J]. Joural of Business Ethics 12:443-440. 1993.
[77] Levitt, Theodore. Business Should Stay Out Politics[J]. Business Policy and Its Environment, 1965,10.
[78] Levitt, Theodore. The Dangers of Social Responsibility[J]. Harvard Business Review September-October, 1958.
[79] Levitte. The Dangers of Social Responsibility[J]. Harvard Business Review.September-October. 1958.
[80] Lin,N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. UK: Cambridge University Press.2000
[81] Logsdon, Reiner and Burke. Corporate philanthropy: strategic responses to firm's stakeholder's[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Secto, Quarterly, 1991,19, pp93-l 10
[82] Mitchell, A. & Wood, D. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997.22(4)
[83] Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts.Academy of Management Review, 1997,22(4): 853-886
[84] Modic,Stanley J, Movers and Shakers, Industry Week, January 18, 1988, pp.47
[85] Oliver Sheldon, The philosophy of Management[M]. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd.1924,p.74
[86] Pfeffer, J. Managing with powers[M]. Harvard Business School Press, 1994.
[87] Phillips, R. Stakeholder Theory and a Prin - ciple ofFairness, Business Ethics Quarterly, 1997(7)
[88] Posner, Richard A. A Theory of Negligence[J]. Journal of Legal Studies,1972,1(1): P29-96.
[89] Posner, Z. Barry and H. Warren Schmidt. Values Congruence and Difference Between the Interplay of Personal and Organizational Value Systems[J]. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 341-347.1993.
[90] Preston, L. E., O'Bannon, D. P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship[J]. Business and Society,. 1997, Vol.36:P419-429
[91] R. Grimble and K. Wellard, Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities[J]. Agric.Syst.55 ,1997, (2), P173-193.
[92] Saleem Sheikh. Corporate Social Responsibility: Law and Practice[M]. Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1996.
[93] Savage, G. T., W., Whitehead, C. J.& Bair, J, D. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive.l991,5(2):61-75.
[94] Sethi, P. Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytic Framework.California Management Review, Volume 17,1975, p58-64
[95] Sethi, S. Prakash. Dimension of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework[J]. Calfomia Management Revier. 1975.
[96] Shawn L Berman, Andrew C Wicks, Suresh Kotha, Thomas M Jones. Does stakeholder orientation matter? [J] .Academy of Managemen Journal, 1999 (10). 33-37.
[97] Sklair & Leslie. The Transnational Capitalist Class[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
[98] Snell, R., Developing skills for Ethical Management[M]. Chapman and Hall,1993.
[99] Steiner, G A. Business, government & society[J]. New York: Random House.1980
[100] Sturtevant & Vemon, Worst Business and Society[M]. Richard D. Irwin, INC,1990.
[101] Tavis, Lee A. Power and Responsibility: Multinational Managers And Developing Country Concerns [M].Notre Dame, Indiana: University of NotreDame Press, 1996.
[102] The Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College and The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Corporate Citizenship. The state of corporate citizenship in the U.S.:A view from inside 2003-2004. Chestnut Hill MA, 2004.
[103] Thomas, Anisya. S., and Simerly, R. L., The Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Social performance: An Interdisciplinary Examination[J] Journal of Business Ethics, VOL13, 1994,
[104] Trevino, L. K., Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model[J]. Academy of Management Review, VOL 11, NO.3,1986
[105] Ullman, A., Data in Search of A Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, VOL 10,1985.
[106] Vitell, S. T. & T. A. Festervand, Conflicts, Practices and Belief of Industrial Executives[J]. Journal of Business Ethics. 1987.
[107] Votaw, D. & S. P. Sethi. Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctorine of Social Responsibility[J]. California Management Review. 1972.
[108] Waddock, S.A, Graves, S. B. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link[J]. Strategic Management Journal.Vol. 18, No. 4 1997: pp303-19.
[109] Walton, C. The Ethics of Corporate Conduct[M]. Engle Wood Cliffs.N.J Prentice-Hall,1997,pp6.
[110] Warrick, S. L. Cochran. The evolution of the corporate social performance model [J]. Academy of Management review, 1995,10, pp758-769.
[111] Warrick, S. L.& Cochran. The evolution of the corporate social performance model[J]. Academy of Management review, 1995,10, pp758-769.
[112] Wartick, Steven L., and Rude, R. E., Issues Management: Corporate Fad of Corporate Function[J]. California Management Review, Fall 1986
[113] Wheeler D. & Maria S. 1998. Including the stakeholders: the business case. Long Range Planning. 1995,31(2)
[114] Wheeler, D & Sillanpaa, M. The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder ValuefM]. London: Pitman Publishing, 1997.
[115] Williamson, O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press. 1984.
[116] Wimbush, J. C., and Shepard, J. M., Toward An Understanding of Ethical Climate: Its Relationship to Ethical Behavior and Supervisor Influence[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, VOL 13,1994
[117] Wood, D.J. Business and society[M] .Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1990.
[118] Wood, D.J. Jones, R.E. Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance[J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1995, 3, pp.229-267.
[119] Wood, DJ. Corporate Social Performance Revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, October 1991, pp703-708.
[120] World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility. [J] 。 The WBCSD Journey, 2002, 2.
[121] World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Meeting Changing Expectations: Corporate Social Responsibility. WBCSD. Geneva Switzerland, 1998.
[122] 北京中经纵横经济研究院.2004年中国环境保护行业研究咨询报告[R].2004年
[123]本刊记者.深圳市上半年劳动争议仲裁案件同比增长243%[N].深圳特区报.2008年8月17
[124]陈宏辉,陈利荣,王江艳.在华投资跨国公司弱化企业社会责任的原因分析[J].现代管理科学,2007年6期
[125]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D]浙大大学博士论文.未出版.2004年:P76-77
[126]陈宏辉.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.2003
[127]陈留彬.中国企业社会责任理论与实证研究——以山东省企业为例[D].山东大学博士论文 2006
[128]陈为华.企业社会责任的本质[D].台湾国立中兴大学企业管理研究所硕士论文.1995
[129]陈迅,韩亚琴.企业社会责任分级模型及其应用企业社会责任分级模型及其应用[J]中国工业经济2005年9月
[130]陈志昂、陆伟.企业社会责任三角模型[J].经济与管理,2003,11
[131]崔浩.企业利益相关者共同治理研究[D],中国科学技术大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[132]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文,未出版,2005年
[133]邓汉慧.企业核心利益相关者利益要求与利益取向研究[D].华中科技大学博士学位论文.2005
[134]邓肀文.企业履行社会责任须有严格监管[N].学习时报2008年09月26日
[135]董秀良,薛丰慧.股权结构、股东行为与核心代理问题研究,经济评论2003(4)
[136]多纳德逊.邓非.赵月瑟译.有约束力的关系——对企业伦理学的一种社会契约论的研究.上海.社会科学院出版社.1999/2001
[137]方竹兰.人力资本所有者拥有企业所有权是一个趋势[J].经济研究,1997年6期
[138]高尚全.企业社会责任和法人治理结构[J].学习时报,2004,10.
[139]郭伟.在台山市提高自主创新能力工作会议上的讲话[EB/OL].中国台山政府公众网:http://www.tsinfo.com.cn/Disp.Aspx?ID=9158&ClassID=403.2005年10月27日
[140]海因茨·韦里克,哈罗德·孔茨著,马春光译.管理学——全球化视角[M].经济科学出版社.2007年
[141]何新明.从市场导向到利益相关者导向:营销价值观的演进[D].厦门大学博士论文.2006
[142]贺小刚,陆一婷.公司社会责任与价值创造:基于社会调查的数据分析[J].科学经济社会,2008年3期
[143]胡汝银.中国上市公司治理机制与独立董事制度建设.中国金融.2003(9)
[144]胡汝银.,中国上市公司成败实证研究,上海:复旦大学出版社,2003
[145]贾生华,陈宏辉.利益相关者的界定方法述评.外国经济与管理.2002(5)
[146]姜启军.企业长期利益最大化和履行社会责任最优水平分析[J],软科学,2008(1)
[147]姜启军.企业社会责任和企业经济绩效的关系分析[J].生产力研究,2007年22期
[148]黎友焕.SA8000认证与中国社会责任建设[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2004
[149]黎友焕.企业社会责任研究[D]西北大学博士论文.未出版.2007年:P6
[150]李双龙.浅析企业社会责任的影响因素[J].经济体制改革,2005,10.
[151]李维安等.公司治理教程[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[152]李伟.企业的社会契约:一个新的企业行为规范研究框架[J].财经研究,2003,10
[153]李文川,罗宣政.基于SA8000的民营企业社会责任现状调查分析——以浙江省为例[J]商业经济与管理2007/3
[154]李心合.面向可持续发展的利益相关者管理[J].当代财经.2001年1月
[155]李心合.面向可持续发展的利益相关者管理.当代经济.2001,1
[156]林军.公司控制权的经济学与社会学分析[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2005
[157]刘吉、张国华主编.王晓冬译.贝克著。社会资本制胜如何挖掘个人与企业网络中的隐性资源[M].上海交通大学出版社.2002
[158]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].法律出版社,1999年3月版,第2页.
[159]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].北京:法律出版社.1999.
[160]刘连煜.公司治理与公司社会责任[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001
[161]卢代富.企业社会责任的经济学与法学分析[M].北京:法律出版社,2002.
[162]吕荣杰 李无非 周力 基于SWARM 昀利益相关者共同治理机制模型昀设计经济论坛 2006 20
[163]罗国杰.伦理学[M].北京:人民出版社,1999.
[164]罗国杰.我国伦理学百科全书[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1993.
[165]罗应婷,杨钰娟.SPSS统计分析从基础到实践[M]电子工业出版社
[166]马伊里,杨团.公司与社会公益[M].华夏出版社,2002
[167]浦东新区经委和劳动局等.浦东新区企业社会责任指导原则[J].投资浦东2007年9月:P32.33
[168]企业公众形象媒体沙龙:反倾销与企业社会责任[EB/OL].搜狐财经:http://business.sohu.com/20070117/n247672400.shtml.2007年1月17日
[169]企业社会责任及SA8000[EB/OL].中国企业社会责任网:http://www.csr-china.org.2007年6月5日
[170]沈艺峰、林志扬.利益相关者理论评析.经济管理.2001.8
[171]孙永祥.公司治理结构:理论与实证研究,上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2002
[172]谭深,刘开明.跨国公司的社会责任与中国社会[M].社会科学文献出版社
[173]万建华等.利益相关者管者[M].海天出版社.1998:33
[174]万建华等.利益相关者管者[M].海天出版社.1998:41
[175]万建华等.利益相关者管理.深圳:海天出版社,1998
[176]王辉.从“企业依存”到“动态演化”_一个利益相关者理论文献的回顾与评述(上)(下).经济管理,2003.2
[177]王茂林.构建和谐社会必须强化企业的社会责任[[J].求是2005,23.
[178]王天习.公司治理与独立董事研究[M].中国法制出版社.2005:P78.
[179]王学义.企业伦理学[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004
[180]王跃生.打破垄断已到了不可拖延的时刻[OL][2009-3-15]http://www.competitionlaw.cn/show.aspx?id=4684&cid=35
[181]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析[J]中国工业经济,2008年10月
[182]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究—社会责任的观点[D].台湾国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士论文.1987
[183]翁望回.企业正当性之实证研究——社会责任的观点[D]。国立政治大学企业管理研究所博士学位论文.1987
[184]吴淑琨、席酉民.公司治理与中国企业改革.机械工业出版社.2001
[185]肖海林.基于生产要素权重的企业所有制安排.东北财经大学学报,2003(5)
[186]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002
[187]辛杰.企业社会责任价值观研究——以山东省2200家企业调查为例[J].华东经济管理,2008年11月
[188]辛晴,綦建红.企业承担社会责任的动因及实现条件[J].华东经济管,2008年11月
[189]徐滇庆.对西班牙“烧鞋”事件的再思考[EB/OL]搜狐财经:httv://business.sohu.com.2004年11月24日
[190]徐晓东、陈小悦,第一大股东对公司治理、企业业绩的影响分析,经济研究,2003(2)
[191]薛有志.垄断行业的伦理缺失[OL][2007-11]http://manage.org.cn/observe/200711/53584.html
[192]杨瑞龙,周业安.交易费用与企业所有权分配合约的选择[J].经济研究,1998(9):27-36
[193]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社.2000:p132
[194]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业利益相关者理论及其应用.北京.经济出版社.2000.
[195]杨瑞龙,杨其静.对“资本雇佣劳动”命题的反思[J].经济科学,2000(6):91-100
[196]杨瑞龙,杨其静.专用性、专有性与企业制度[J].经济研究,2001(3)
[197]佚名高新技术产业概念[OL].[2007-10-19]http://business.baoan.gov.cn/fwpt/tzfz/yscy/gxkjcy/2007101949668.shtml
[198]余颖.大股东控制型公司治理的效率评价.财经科学.2001(3)
[199]袁家方.企业社会责任[M].北京:海洋出版社,1990
[200]袁晓勐.加强自组织的城市社区建设[J/OL]中国社会科学院院报,[2003-05-27]http://www.cass.net.cn/file/200305276671.html
[201]张明入世后中国企业社会责任研究——基于和谐的观点[D]复旦大学博士论文,2007
[202]张明.入世后中国企业社会责任研究——基于和谐的观点[D].复旦大学博士论文.未出版.2007年
[203]张维迎.企业的企业家——契约理论.上海.上海三联书店.1995.
[204]周祖城.企业伦理学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.