用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于TPL的VMI供应链决策博弈与收益共享机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着生产外包过程中多级供应链库存成本的上升,越来越多的企业开始实施供应商管理库存(VMI);同时,第三方物流(TPL)的兴起使得许多供应商将VMI业务外包给第三方物流服务商(TPLP)。在分散决策VMI供应链中,参与者之间存在与利益相关的决策博弈;特别是当参与者人数增多时,博弈将会变得更为复杂。基于此,本论文系统研究TPLP独立或非独立决策时VMI供应链的决策博弈与收益共享机制设计问题,主要创新性研究工作总结如下:
     构建单供应商VMI供应链序贯决策博弈与纳什讨价还价博弈模型,指出每种博弈都具有唯一的均衡。通过分析纳什讨价还价博弈框架发现,供应商的收益却可能随着其讨价还价能力的增强而减少;存在使供应商利润最大化的供应商最优讨价还价能力。同时,供应商最优讨价还价能力受供应商物流引入非独立决策TPLP的影响。
     将TPLP作为独立决策主体,研究包括TPLP、单供应商和制造商在内的三级VMI&TPL供应链决策博弈,提出基于分散决策和基于参与者供应链贡献度两种收益共享合作机制。前者分为两方收益共享机制和三方收益共享机制;研究发现供应链效率在三方收益共享较两方收益共享时更高,TPLP和制造商则更偏好其他参与者之间合作而非自己参与两方合作。此外,前一种机制可能出现分配不公平,而后一种机制则可有效避免这一不足。
     以装配生产为背景,构建两供应商装配式VMI供应链决策博弈模型。研究表明分散决策下装配式VMI供应链效率较单供应商VMI供应链中更低。然后,引入基于分散决策和基于参与者供应链贡献度的收益共享机制。研究发现:若参与者利润不变,在一定条件下,他们的讨价还价能力空间在不同机制中具有相似特征;在前一种机制中,应限制供应商的增量利润分配比例,尤其是当他对备选供应源的成本优势变小时。
     基于TPLP、N个供应商和单制造商构成的装配式VMI&TPL供应链,构建决策博弈模型与收益共享机制。在分散决策下,TPLP对每类零部件库存服务分别定价或对所有零部件提供总服务价格。通过比较发现,两种定价模式下参与者利润无差异,且供应链的效率损失率均与供应商数量正相关。在基于参与者供应链贡献度的收益共享机制中,参与者愿意参与该机制的最低讨价还价能力值与供应商数量正相关。在基于分散决策的收益共享机制中,TPLP的服务价格低于其成本,供应商的总价格等于其总成本。此外,两种机制在一定讨价还价能力条件下可以相互转化。
With the increased holding cost of multi-echelon supply chains in process ofproduction outsourcing, more and more companies start to implement vendor-managedinventory (VMI); meanwhile, the growth of third-party logistics (TPL) induces manysuppliers to outsource the operation of VMI to third-party logistics provider (TPLP). In adecentralized VMI supply chain, the decision game on benefit exists among the playersand, with the increased number of the players, becomes more complicated. Departing fromthis, this dissertation concentrates on the decision game and revenue-sharing mechanismdesign in VMI supply chains with the TPLP who makes decision independently or not.More specifically, the innovative research works are summarized as follows:
     The sequential decision game and Nash bargaining game in a VMI supply chain withsingle supplier are modeled, and the unique equilibrium of each game is concluded. Byanalyzing the Nash bargaining game framework, the dissertation uncovers that thesupplier’s revenue may decrease with her bargaining power; there exists optimalbargaining power for the supplier to maximize her profit. Meanwhile, the optimalbargaining power for the supplier is impacted by her decision on whether to incorporatethe TPLP who does not make decision independently.
     By incorporating the TPLP who makes decision independently, the dissertationstudies the decision game and revenue-sharing mechanisms among the TPLP, singlesupplier and manufacturer in a3-echelon VMI&TPL supply chain, and proposes tworevenue-sharing mechanisms respectively based on decentralized decision-making and theplayers’ contributions on supply chain. The first mechanism is divided into twomechanisms with two players and with three players separately; the research discoversthat the supply chain efficiency is higher in the mechanism with three players than in theone with two players, and either the TPLP or the manufacturer prefers the cooperationbetween the others than that between herself and another player. Moreover, the unequaldistribution of revenue may arise in the first mechanism, but can be avoided in the second.
     The model of a decision game in an assembly VMI supply chain is proposed in thecontext of assembling production. The research results show that the supply chain efficiency is higher in the assembly supply chain than in the supply chain with singlesupplier if the players’ decisions are decentralized. Then, the revenue-sharing mechanismsrespectively based on decentralized decision-making and the players’ contributions onsupply chain are proposed. It is shown that given the equal profits under differentmechanisms for all players, the bargaining power space for them exhibits similarcharacteristics; the supplier’s shared proportion of the added profit needs to be bounded inthe former mechanism, especially when her cost advantage on the alternative supplysource is reduced.
     The dissertation studies the decision game and revenue-sharing mechanisms in anassembly VMI&TPL supply chain with TPLP, N suppliers and single manufacturer. Inthe decentralized supply chain, the TPLP either chooses the service price for each kind ofthe components or a total price for all kinds of components. It is uncovered by comparisonthat the players’ profits make no difference for these two pricing modes, and the loss rateof supply chain efficiency increases with the number of the suppliers. Under therevenue-sharing mechanism based on the players’ contributions on supply chain, theminimal bargaining power value for a player to participate in such mechanism decreaseswith the number of the suppliers. In the revenue-sharing mechanism based ondecentralized decision-making, the TPLP chooses service price that is lower than her cost,and the sum of suppliers’ prices equals the sum of their costs. Moreover, the twomechanisms can be mutually converted under certain conditions on the players’ bargainingpowers.
引文
[1] Aichlmayr M. DC mart: who manages inventory in a value chain?[J].Transportation and Distribution,2000,41(10):60-68
    [2] Anupindi R, Akella R. Diversification under supply uncertainty[J]. ManagementScience,1993,39(8):944-963
    [3] Aviv Y A, Federguen A. The operational benefits of information sharing and vendormanaged inventory programs[R]. Columbia University, New York,1998
    [4] Bagchi P K, Virum H. European logistics alliances: a management model[J]. TheInternational Journal of Logistics Management,1996,7(1):93-108
    [5] Banerjee A. A joint economic lot size model for purchaser and vendor[J]. DecisionSciences,1986,17(3):292-311
    [6] Bask A H. Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains-astrategic perspective[J]. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing,2001,16(6):470-486
    [7] Berglund M, Van Laarhoven P, Sharan G, et al. Third-party logistics: is there afuture[J]. The International Journal of Logistics Management,1999,10(1):59-70
    [8] Bernstein F, Chen F, Federgruen A. Coordinating supply chains with simple pricingschemes: The role of vendor-managed inventories[J]. Management Science,2006,52(10):1483-1492
    [9] Bernstein F, Chen F, Federgruen A. Vendor managed inventories and supply chaincoordination: The case with one supplier and competing retailers. Working Paper,Duke University, New York,2002
    [10] Bernstein F, Decroix G A. Decentralized pricing and capacity decisions in amultitier system with modular assembly[J]. Management Science,2004,50(9):1293-1308
    [11] Bernstein F, Decroix G A. Incentives and commonality in a decentralizedmultiproduct assembly system[J]. Operations Research,2007,55(4):630-646
    [12] Bernstein F, Decroix G A. Inventory policies in a decentralized assembly system[J].Operations Research,2006,54(2):324-336
    [13] Birendra K, Mishra Srinivasan Raghunathan. Retailer-vs. vendor-managedinventory and brand competition[J]. Management Science,2004,50(4):445-457
    [14] Bolen W H. Contemporary retailing[M]. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,1978
    [15] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demandforecasts in a supply chain[J]. Management Science,2001,47(5):629-646
    [16] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Supply chain coordination with revenue sharingcontracts: strengths and limitations[J]. Management Science,2005,51(1):30-44
    [17] Cachon G P, Zipkin P H. Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in atwo-stage supply chain[J]. Management Science,1999,45(7):936-953
    [18] Cachon G P. Stock war: inventory competition in a two-echelon supply chain withmultiple retailers[J]. Operations Research,2001,49(5):658-674
    [19] Cachon G, Fisher M. Campbell Soup’s continuous product replenishment program:Evaluation and enhanced decision rules[J]. Production and Operations Management,1997,6(3):266-276
    [20] Cetinkaya S, Lee C. Stock replenishment and shipment scheduling for vendor–managed inventory systems[J]. Management Science,2000,46(2):217-232
    [21] Cetinkaya S, üster H, Easwaran G, et al. An integrated outbound logistics model forfrito-lay: Coordinating aggregate-level production and distribution decisions[J].Interfaces,2009,39(5):460-475
    [22] Clark T H, Hammond J H. Reengineering channel reordering processes to improvetotal supply-chain performance[J]. Production Operations Management,1997,6(3):248-265
    [23] Copacino W C. Logistics strategy: how to get with the program[J]. TrafficManagement,1993,32(8):23-24
    [24] Coyle J J, Bardi E J, Langley C J. The management of business logistics[M]. Mason:South-Western Publishing,2003
    [25] De Toni A F, Zamolo E. From a traditional replenishment system tovendor-managed inventory: A case study from the household electrical[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2005,96(1):63-79
    [26] Dong Y, Xu K. A supply chain model of vendor managed inventory[J].Transportation Research Part E,2002,38(2):75-95
    [27] Dukes A, Gal-Or E, Srinivasan K. Channel bargaining with retailer asymmetry[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2006,43(1):84-97
    [28] Emerson R M. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review,1962,27(1):31-40
    [29] Fagel A J. Selling on consignment: another tool in the credit arsenal[J]. BusinessCredit,1996,98(9):6-8
    [30] Feng Q, Lu L X. The strategic perils of low cost outsourcing[J].2012,58(6):1196-1210
    [31] Gerchak Y, Wang Y. Revenue-sharing vs wholesale-price contracts in assemblysystems with random demand[J]. Production and Operations Management,2004,13(1):23-33
    [32] Giannoccaro I, Pontrandolfo P. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharingcontracts[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2004,89(2):131-139
    [33] Gilley M K. Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effectson firm performance[J]. Journal of Management,2000,26(4):763-790
    [34] Granot D, Yin S. Competition and cooperation in decentralized push and pullassembly Systems[J]. Management Science,2008,54(4):733-747
    [35] Gronalt M, Rauch P. Vendor managed inventory in wood processing industries-acase study[J]. Silva Fennica,2008,42(1):101-114
    [36] Güler M G, Bilgi T. On coordinating an assembly system under random yield andrandom demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009,196(1):342-350
    [37] Gurnani H, Akella R, Lehoczky J. Supply management in assembly systems withrandom yield and random demand [J]. IIE Transactions,2000,32(8):701-714
    [38] Gurnani H, Gerchak Y. Coordination in decentralized assembly systems withuncertain component yields[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,176(3):1559-1576
    [39] Holmstrom J. Implementing vendor-managed inventory the efficient way: A casestudy of partnership in supply chain[J]. Production and Inventory ManagementJournal,1998,39(3):1-5
    [40] Inderst R. Single sourcing versus multiple sourcing[J]. The Rand Journal ofEconomics,2008,39(1):199-213
    [41] Jaruphongsa W, Cetinkaya S, Lee C Y. A dynamic lot-sizing model withmulti-mode replenishments: polynomial algorithms for special cases with dual andmultiple modes[J]. IIE Transactions,2005,37(5):453-467
    [42] Jaruphongsa W, etinkaya S, Lee C Y. A Two-Echelon Inventory OptimizationModel with Demand Time Window Considerations[J]. Journal of GlobalOptimization,2004,30(4):347-366
    [43] Jaruphongsa W, Cetinkaya S, Lee C Y. Warehouse space capacity and delivery timewindow considerations in dynamic lot-sizing for a simple supply chain[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2004,92(2):169-180
    [44] Jaruphongsa W, Cetinkaya S, Lee C. Outbound shipment mode considerations forintegrated inventory and delivery lot-sizing decisions[J]. Operations ResearchLetters,2007,35(6):813-822
    [45] Jaruphongsa W, Cetinkaya S, Lee C. Warehouse space capacity and delivery timewindow considerations in dynamic lot sizing for a simple supply chain[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2004,92(2):169-180
    [46] Ji Y G, Park C, Kim M. A Study on the application of BPM systems forimplementation of RosettaNet based e-Logistics[C]. The International Conferenceon Computational Science and Its Applications,2006, May
    [47] Jiang L, Wang Y. Supplier competition in decentralized assembly systems withprice-sensitive and uncertain demand[J]. Manufacturing and Service OperationsManagement,2010,12(1):93-101
    [48] Kohli R, Park H. Coordinating buyer-seller transactions across multiple products[J].Management Science,1994,40(9):45-50
    [49] Kuk G. Effectiveness of vendor-managed inventory in the electronics industry:determinants and outcomes[J]. Information and Management,2004,41(5):645-654
    [50] Kumar P, Kumar M. Vendor managed inventory in retail industry[J]. TataConsultancy Services,2003, February
    [51] Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: Thebullwhip effect[J]. Management Science,1997,43(4):546-558
    [52] Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chains[J]. SloanManagement Review,1997,38(3):93-102
    [53] Lee H L, So K C, Tang C S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supplychain[J]. Management Science,2000,46(5):626-643
    [54] Lee H, Rosenblatt M J. A generalized quantity discount pricing model to increasesupplier profits[J]. Management Science,1986,32(9):1177-1185
    [55] Li S, Hua Z. A note on channel performance under consignment contract withrevenue sharing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,184(2):793-796
    [56] Li S, Zhu Z, Huang L. Supply chain coordination and decision making underconsignment contract with revenue sharing[J]. International Journal of ProductionEconomics,2009,120(1):88-99
    [57] Lieb R C, Van Millen, Wassenhove L N. Third party logistics service: a comparisonof experienced American and European manufacturers[J]. International Journal ofPhysical Distribution and Logistics Management,1993,23(6):35-44
    [58] Lovejoy W S. Bargaining chains. Management Science,2010,56(12):2282-2301
    [59] Magee J F. Production planning and inventory control[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company,1958:80-83
    [60] Marasco A. Third-party logistics: A literature review[J]. International Journal ofProduction Economics,2008,113(1):127-147
    [61] Micheau V A. How Boeing and Alcoa implemented a successful vendor managedinventory program[J]. The Journal of Business Forecasting,2005,24(1):17-19
    [62] Milliou C, Petrakis E. Upstream horizontal mergers, vertical contracts, andbargaining[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2007,25(5):963-987
    [63] Mishra B K, Raghunathan S. Retailer-vs. vendor-managed inventory and BrandCompetition[J]. Management Science,2004,50(4):445-457
    [64] Nachiappan S, Jawahar N. A genetic algorithm for optimal operating parameters ofVMI system in a two-echelon supply chain[J]. European Journal of OperationalResearch,2007,182(3):1433-1452
    [65] Nagarajan M, Bassok Y. A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assemblyproblem[J]. Management Science,2008,54(8):1482-1496
    [66] Nagarajan M. Coalition stability in assembly models[J]. Operations Research,2009,57(1):131-145
    [67] Nash J F. The Bargaining problem[J]. Econometrica,1950,18(2):155-162
    [68] Netessine S, Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demandsubstitution[J]. Operations Research,2003,51(2):329-335
    [69] O'Brien D P, Shaffer G. Bargaining, bundling, and clout: The portfolio effects ofhorizontal mergers[J]. Rand Journal of Economics,2005,36(3):573-595
    [70] Schelling T C. An essay on bargaining[J]. The American Economic Review,1956,46(3):281-306
    [71] Shaffer G, Zettelmeyer F. Advertising in a distribution channel[J]. MarketingScience,2004,23(4):619-628
    [72] Shaffer G, Zettelmeyer F. When good news about your rival is good for you: Theeffect of third-party information on the division of channel profits[J]. MarketingScience,2002,21(3):273-293
    [73] Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi Levi E. Designing and Managing the SupplyChain[M].2nd ed, McGraw. Hill, Homewood, IL,2003
    [74] Symeonidis G. Downstream competition, bargaining, and welfare[J]. Journal ofEconomics and Management Strategy,2008,17(1):247-270
    [75] Tomlin B. Capacity investments in supply chains: Sharing the gain rather thansharing the pain[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2003,5(4):317-333
    [76] Tyan J, We H. Vendor managed inventory: a survey of the Taiwanese groceryindustry[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,2003,9(1):11-18
    [77] Virum H. Third party logistics development in Europe[J]. Logistics andTransportation Review,1993,29(4):355-361
    [78] Wang Y, Gerchak Y. Capacity games in assembly systems with uncertaindemand[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2003,5(3):252-267
    [79] Weng Z K. Channel coordination and quantity discount[J]. Management Science,1995,41(9):1509-1522
    [80] Wu C C, Chen Y J, Wang C J. Is persuasive advertising always combative in adistribution channel[J]. Marketing Science,2009,28(6):1157-1163
    [81] Xu K, Dong Y, Evers P T. Towards better coordination of the supply chain[J].Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,2001,37(1):35-54
    [82] Yang D, Choi T-M, Xiao T, et al. Coordinating a two-supplier and one-retailersupply chain with forecast updating[J]. Automatica,2011,47(7):1317-1329
    [83] Yu Y, Chu F, Chen H. A stackelberg game and its improvement in a VMI systemwith a manufacturing vendor. European Journal of Operational Research,2009,192(3):929-948
    [84] Yu Y, Huang G Q, Liang L. Stackelberg game-theoretic model for optimizingadvertising, pricing and inventory policies in vendor managed inventory (VMI)production supply chains[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering,2009,57(1):368-382
    [85] Yu Y, Liang L, Huang G Q. Leader–follower game in vendor-managed inventorysystem with limited production capacity considering wholesale and retail prices[J].International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications,2006,9(4):335-350
    [86] Zhang F. Competition, cooperation, and information sharing in a Two-EchelonAssembly System[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2006,8(3):273-291
    [87] Zhang X, Ou J, Gilbert S M. Coordination of stocking decisions in anassemble-to-order environment[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,189(2):540-558
    [88] Zou X, Pokharel S, Piplani R. A two-period supply contract model for adecentralized assembly system[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,187(1):257-274
    [89]蔡建湖,黄卫来,周根贵.基于收益分享契约的VMI模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(4):108-113
    [90]韩超群,刘志学. VMI&TPL供应链集成化模型与策略空间[J].工业工程与管理,2011,16(2):97-102
    [91]兰振东,周耀烈. VMI技术的优化—引入TPL的VMI优化模型[J].技术经济与管理研究,2005(5):53-54
    [92]马士华,林勇.供应链管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2005
    [93]汤中明,刘志学.易逝品VMI与TPL集成供应链研究[J].管理评论,2010,22(1):115-120
    [94]唐宏祥,易荣华,朱卫平.博弈结构对VMI模式下供应链性能的影响分析[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(5):71-78
    [95]唐宏祥. VMI对供应链性能的影响分析[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(2):60-65
    [96]汪小京,刘志学,刘丹.时间窗需求下供应商管理库存补货及发货动态批量研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2010,16(7):1505-1514
    [97]王静,赵阿群,姜放.基于VMI的第三方物流企业仓储管理系统研究[J].铁路运输与经济,2006,28(2):28-30
    [98]杨阳,刘志学.供应商管理库存与第三方物流的系统动力学模型[J].系统工程,2007,25(7):38-44
    [99]余玉刚,梁樑,余雁.考虑定价、生产能力和原料采购的VMI系统Pareto最优及其实现[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(4):20-25
    [100]张梅艳,高远洋.引入第三方物流的VMI模型优化研究[J].管理学报,2007,4(1):53-56
    [101]张相斌,杨德礼.供应链系统重构模式研究[J].工业工程与管理.2002,7(1):25-28
    [102]钟磊钢,胡勇,张翠华.一类供应商管理库存供应链协调策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(6):92-97

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700