鄂尔多斯盆地自然电场及石油地质意义
|
摘要
本文重点研究了鄂尔多斯盆地利用自然电场法探测石油的方法和效果。综述了自然电场探测油气藏的机理及目前国内外自然电场法探测油气藏的现状。长期以来,由于自然电位形成的原因多,干扰因素多,测量精度等问题,一直影响着自然电位在油气勘探中的应用。测量精度主要是由仪器设备的稳定性、抗干扰能力及测量方法决定的。所以选择合理的测量方法及提高仪器设备的稳定性和抗干扰能力是自然电位测量方法的关键。
本文分析了传统的自然电位观测及处理方法在油气勘探中的不适应性。提出了多测道叠加自然电位观测方式,并依据新的观测方案,研制了仪器(GDZD—16),该仪器实现了多道同时连续观测及低频范围内时序曲线的观测,并实现了循环基点观测方式,且兼容传统的自然电位观测方法。实际观测结果表明,该设备在抗干扰、数据采集精度等方面优于常规的自然电场法仪器。对鄂尔多斯盆地的时变电场的研究表明,大面积、长时间的自然电位油气勘探需要对自然电场进行日变、季变改正。依据实测资料及理论分析,提出了鄂尔多斯盆地自然电场的构成,并指出山地过滤电场是鄂尔多斯盆地自然电场油气勘探的最主要干扰。
在资料处理方面:采用多种统计方法在电位时序曲线上提取与油气藏有关的电位,较好的压制了时变电场的干扰,提高了观测精度;用分时、线及块相关分析法对宁县-合水地区、姬塬-麻黄山地区山地过滤电场进行了校正,结果表明较好的解决了鄂尔多斯盆地山地过滤电场问题;利用不同尺度窗口滤波技术及趋势面分析法消除了区域自然电场,突出了局部油气自然电场;采用基于虚电流源理论的边界积分法进行自然电场地形影响校正(俗称‘曲化平’);提出了利用电流线的流动方向解释油气自然电场方法;利用变异系数较好的确定自然电位异常的边界;提出了油气自然电位形态识别技术;建立了适用于鄂尔多斯盆地油气藏勘探的自然电位处理流程。
通过对鄂尔多斯盆地宁县-合水地区,姬塬-麻黄山地区等近2000平方千米叠加自然电位观测资料的处理及分析,说明了用自然电位法探测油藏是可行的。对已知油井与叠加自然电位异常的统计分析表明,其总有效率为60%-70%。提高油井成功率约20%,干井比例降低20%。
The validation of oil exploration using spontaneous potential(SP) methods in the Ordos Basin is studied in this paper. Mechanism of survey and research progress at home and abroad for exploring oil and gas reservoirs using spontaneous potential (SP) are reviewed. For a long time, different causes of forming SP, large disturbances and measurement accuracy issues, have affected the natural potential in oil and gas exploration. Measurement accuracy is mainly decided by the stability, anti-interference ability of instruments and equipment and measurement method. So, Choosing the right methods and improving the stability and anti-jamming capability is the key to the natural potential measurement method.
Inadaptability of traditional SP measurement and processing in oil and gas exploration is analyzed in the paper. A multi-channel superposition measurement mode of SP method is proposed and the instrument (GDZD-16) is developed based on the new observation method. The multi-channel continuous observation in one time and timing curve observations of low-frequency range are performed, and the cycle basis points observation method compatible with the traditional SP measurement method are implemented. The actual observation results show that this Instrument is superior to conventional instruments in aspect of the interference device, data acquisition precision. Time-varying electric field studies in Ordos Basin indicate that a large area, long natural gas exploration using SP method need diurnal correction and quarter correction. According to the measured data and theoretical analysis, composition of natural electric field in the Ordos Basin is proposed, and that Mountain filtering natural electric field is the mainly interference in oil and gas exploration in the Ordos Basin is pointed.
In the data processing: potential relative to oil and gas reservoirs is extracted in the potential timing curve using a variety of statistical methods, which better suppressed the interference of time-varying electric field and improved the accuracy of observation; Mountain filter the electric field In Ning and Heshui County, Jiyuan - Ma Huang area is corrected with correlation analysis method, and the results show that preferable solving the problem of Mountain filtering electric field in the Ordos Basin; the regional natural electric field was eliminated using window filtering technique using different scales and total trend analysis method, and the SP of local oil and gas is highlighted; topographic correction is performed based on the theory of virtual current source with boundary integral method to the natural electric field(commonly known as ' reduction of curved surface into a horizontal plane'); method of interpretation for oil and gas exploration using the current flow direction and determination of the boundaries of SP anomalies making using of coefficient of variation is proposed; pattern recognition technology oil and gas SP is presented and the SP processes of oil and gas exploration in the Ordos Basin is established.
Through SP processing and analysis of observational data for stack of nearly 2,000 square kilometers of natural potential in In Ning and Heshui County, Jiyuan - Ma Huang area in the Ordos Basin, it shows that exploration of oil and gas reservoirs using SP method is feasible. The statistics and analysis of superposition of the known oil and gas reservoirs SP anomaly showed that the total effective rate was 60% -70%, the success rate of oil well was about 20%, proportion of dry wells was reduced 20%..
本文分析了传统的自然电位观测及处理方法在油气勘探中的不适应性。提出了多测道叠加自然电位观测方式,并依据新的观测方案,研制了仪器(GDZD—16),该仪器实现了多道同时连续观测及低频范围内时序曲线的观测,并实现了循环基点观测方式,且兼容传统的自然电位观测方法。实际观测结果表明,该设备在抗干扰、数据采集精度等方面优于常规的自然电场法仪器。对鄂尔多斯盆地的时变电场的研究表明,大面积、长时间的自然电位油气勘探需要对自然电场进行日变、季变改正。依据实测资料及理论分析,提出了鄂尔多斯盆地自然电场的构成,并指出山地过滤电场是鄂尔多斯盆地自然电场油气勘探的最主要干扰。
在资料处理方面:采用多种统计方法在电位时序曲线上提取与油气藏有关的电位,较好的压制了时变电场的干扰,提高了观测精度;用分时、线及块相关分析法对宁县-合水地区、姬塬-麻黄山地区山地过滤电场进行了校正,结果表明较好的解决了鄂尔多斯盆地山地过滤电场问题;利用不同尺度窗口滤波技术及趋势面分析法消除了区域自然电场,突出了局部油气自然电场;采用基于虚电流源理论的边界积分法进行自然电场地形影响校正(俗称‘曲化平’);提出了利用电流线的流动方向解释油气自然电场方法;利用变异系数较好的确定自然电位异常的边界;提出了油气自然电位形态识别技术;建立了适用于鄂尔多斯盆地油气藏勘探的自然电位处理流程。
通过对鄂尔多斯盆地宁县-合水地区,姬塬-麻黄山地区等近2000平方千米叠加自然电位观测资料的处理及分析,说明了用自然电位法探测油藏是可行的。对已知油井与叠加自然电位异常的统计分析表明,其总有效率为60%-70%。提高油井成功率约20%,干井比例降低20%。
The validation of oil exploration using spontaneous potential(SP) methods in the Ordos Basin is studied in this paper. Mechanism of survey and research progress at home and abroad for exploring oil and gas reservoirs using spontaneous potential (SP) are reviewed. For a long time, different causes of forming SP, large disturbances and measurement accuracy issues, have affected the natural potential in oil and gas exploration. Measurement accuracy is mainly decided by the stability, anti-interference ability of instruments and equipment and measurement method. So, Choosing the right methods and improving the stability and anti-jamming capability is the key to the natural potential measurement method.
Inadaptability of traditional SP measurement and processing in oil and gas exploration is analyzed in the paper. A multi-channel superposition measurement mode of SP method is proposed and the instrument (GDZD-16) is developed based on the new observation method. The multi-channel continuous observation in one time and timing curve observations of low-frequency range are performed, and the cycle basis points observation method compatible with the traditional SP measurement method are implemented. The actual observation results show that this Instrument is superior to conventional instruments in aspect of the interference device, data acquisition precision. Time-varying electric field studies in Ordos Basin indicate that a large area, long natural gas exploration using SP method need diurnal correction and quarter correction. According to the measured data and theoretical analysis, composition of natural electric field in the Ordos Basin is proposed, and that Mountain filtering natural electric field is the mainly interference in oil and gas exploration in the Ordos Basin is pointed.
In the data processing: potential relative to oil and gas reservoirs is extracted in the potential timing curve using a variety of statistical methods, which better suppressed the interference of time-varying electric field and improved the accuracy of observation; Mountain filter the electric field In Ning and Heshui County, Jiyuan - Ma Huang area is corrected with correlation analysis method, and the results show that preferable solving the problem of Mountain filtering electric field in the Ordos Basin; the regional natural electric field was eliminated using window filtering technique using different scales and total trend analysis method, and the SP of local oil and gas is highlighted; topographic correction is performed based on the theory of virtual current source with boundary integral method to the natural electric field(commonly known as ' reduction of curved surface into a horizontal plane'); method of interpretation for oil and gas exploration using the current flow direction and determination of the boundaries of SP anomalies making using of coefficient of variation is proposed; pattern recognition technology oil and gas SP is presented and the SP processes of oil and gas exploration in the Ordos Basin is established.
Through SP processing and analysis of observational data for stack of nearly 2,000 square kilometers of natural potential in In Ning and Heshui County, Jiyuan - Ma Huang area in the Ordos Basin, it shows that exploration of oil and gas reservoirs using SP method is feasible. The statistics and analysis of superposition of the known oil and gas reservoirs SP anomaly showed that the total effective rate was 60% -70%, the success rate of oil well was about 20%, proportion of dry wells was reduced 20%..
引文
[1]中国石油地质志(十二卷,长庆油田).北京:石油工业出版社,1992.
[2]傅良魁编.电法勘探教程.北京:地质出版社,1983.
[3]叶兴茂等编.非地震物探方法直接寻找油气藏.北京:中国地质矿产信息研究院,1995. 1～75。
[4]仇勇海等译.自然电场法文集.长沙:中南工业大学出版社,1988. 81～91,97～116,198～206。
[5]任俞,尚慧芸,曾国寿编.非地震物化探方法油气勘探百例集.北京:中国石油天然气总公司情报研究所,1990. 73～79,216～236。
[6]王君恒,邓明胜,潘竹平,管志宁等.油气藏自然电位勘探原理及在开发中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(3):96～99.
[7]王君恒,潘竹平,邓明胜等.油气藏自然电位与油层视有效厚度的关系研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):65～67.
[8]叶青.地电场变化的基本要素研究及物理解释[D].中国地震局兰州地震研究所硕士学位论文,2006.
[9]张洪魁.地电的幕式变化及其与地震的关系[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(增刊):90～95.
[9]杨荣丰.地下径流通道的形成、特征及其探测技术研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2006.
[10]王家映.我国石油电法勘探评述[J].勘探地球物理进展,2006,29(2):77～81.
[11]袁宁、卢涛、聂在平.地层因素对自然电位测井响应影响的定量研究[J].电子科技大学学报,1998,27(6):592～595.
[12]王俊业.应用自然电场法研究地下水流场[J].物探与化探,2002,26(2):140～142.
[13]厉玉乐,王均恒,潘竹平,侯遵泽.油气藏自然电位小波多尺度分解及其地球物理意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):80～83.
[14]郭新顺,潘作枢.油气藏上方磁异常及自电异常成因模型[J].西安地质学院学报,1997,19(1):76～84.
[15]王君恒,潘竹平,孙树文,郭雷.自然电位视有效厚度预测及在油田开发中的应用[J].中国地质大学学报,2007,32(4):461～468.
[16]郭友钊,罗壮伟,孟小红,余钦范等著.石油天然气的磁性勘查.北京:地质出版社,1999. 3～34。
[17]刘庆生、曲赞、辽乔奇等.非常规综合物化探方法寻找油气藏基础理论研究中的几个问题[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1999,24(6):613～616.
[18]刘庆生,程同锦,刘树根.综合磁学、地球化学与矿物学原理评价“烟筒效应”的机理[J].科学通报,1997,42(15):1569～1574
[19]徐忠祥,侯卫国,苏江玉等.塔里木盆地雅克拉地区油气地球物理地球化学异常系统研究.北京:中国地质大学出版社,1999.25～63,189～206。
[20]姜洪训等著.综合地质物探化探多参数直接探测油气理论方法与效果.陕西:陕西科学技术出版社,1994. 1～37,127～139,152～160。
[21]侯连华.自然电位基线偏移影响因素的实验研究[J].石油大学学报,2001,25(1):93～99
[22]陈书让.电测深和自电在陕北石油勘查中的应用[J].陕西地质,1999,17(2):79～85.
[23]肖承文、朱卫宏、任好、章成广.东河塘油田开发中后期自然电位异常机理分析和应用[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2008,30(1):95～97.
[24]高怀雄.鄂尔多斯盆地西北缘找油的物化探异常模式[J].陕西地质,1999,17(1):74～79.
[25]甄胜利,郝世彦,李旦.物化探综合找油方法在志丹探区的推广应用[J].西北地质,2005,38(1):108～112.
[26]陈书让.自然电位在油气勘探中的应用及其新生异常分析[J].陕西地质,1997,15(1):84～91
[27]许敬彦,李庆峰,丁明海.自然电位曲线异常原因分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(5):63～65
[28]张钊,邱彦章.自然电位法寻找油气藏效果及影响因素[J].西安工程学院学报,1998,20(增刊):26～28
[29]刘天佑,朱铉.综合地球物理数据处理新方法在西部油气勘探中的应用[J].勘探地球物理进展,2006,29(2):104～108
[30]王喜双,文百红,王晓帆,易启维.中国石油近年来非地震勘探技术应用实例及展望[J].中国石油勘探,2005,5:34～41
[31]文百红,杨辉,张研.中国石油非地震勘探技术应用现状及发展趋势[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(2):68～71
[32]赵邦六、何展翔、文百红.非地震直接油气检测技术及其勘探实践[J].勘探技术,2005,第6期:29～36.
[33]徐翔军、刘玉梅、郭少斌.非常规综合物化探油气预测研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2002,32(4):349～351.
[34]贾进斗、何展翔、孔繁恕.非地震综合物化探技术应用及效果[J].石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(5):625～631.
[35]郭少斌、刘庆海.非震物化探综合信息油气预测研究[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(1):71～74.
[36]王志刚、何展翔、魏文博、邓明.井地电法三维物理模拟试验[J].石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(5):594～597.
[37]Keisuke Ushijima等著.利用4D电测技术的油藏监测[J].石油勘探译丛,2000,第3期:85～88.
[38]衡伟,耿丽霞,黄杰,李凤君.强工频干扰下自然电位测量仪的设计[J].工程地球物理学报,2008,5(1):104～107.
[39]自然电场法技术规程(DZ/T 0081-1993),中国地质调查局,2006
[40]郑洪,王新蕾,王春媛等.深井电极与地表电极的自然电场对比研究[J].地震,2000,20(1):85～90.
[41] Ernstson K. Self-Potential variations with time and their relation to hydro-geologic and meteorological parameters. Geophysics , V.51 , No.10 ,1986.p1967-1977
[42] A.C.谢苗洛夫著.自然电场法电法勘探.北京:地质出版社1958年. 79～115,167～200。
[43]赵和云,扬荣,梁子斌等.天祝大地电场异常与1995年永登5.8、1996年天祝5.4级地震[J].西北地震学报,2002,24(1):56～62.
[44]刘加文,王治军,杜志伟.自然电场法在场地地下水勘查中的应用[J].工程地球物理学报,2009,6(5):612～615
[45]张贵宾,Maurice Aubert,齐剑玲.自然电场法勘探火山岩地区地下水的研究[J].地球物理学报,1999,42(增刊):250～256
[46]张荣.自然电场法勘测地下水流向的极差校正[J].物探与化探,2003,27(1):46～48
[47]莫承彬,陈忠献,陆怀成.自然电场法剧变场的起因初探及其应用[J].物探与化探,1993,19(4):315～318
[48]杜庆丰,白建平,乔德新.油气自电法(OGSP)及其应用[J].地质与勘探,2004,40(增刊):11～13.
[49]文百红,林蓓,刘吉敏.油气微渗透的垂向结构与地面地电化学油气检测[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(5):33～35.
[50]何展翔,王绪本.油气藏电性异常模式与电磁法油气检测[J].石油地球物理勘探,2007,42(1):102～106.
[51]郑秀芬,李金铭.油气电法勘探综述[J].地球物理学进展,1997,12(2):89～94.
[52]吴国平,徐忠翔,徐红燕.氧化还原电位油气性信息灰色ART聚类评价法[J].物探化探计算技术,2000,22(3):207～210.
[53]阮帅,王绪本,高永才,毛利峰.位场正则化下延在自然电位概率成像中的应用[J].物探化探计算技术,2006,28(4):332～336.
[54]汪忠德.中国大陆自然电场的前兆机理与特征[J].西北地震学报,2008,30(4):360～365
[41]贾国相,陈远荣,姚锦旗著.我国特殊景观区油气综合化探技术.北京:石油工业出版社,2003. 1～15,22～26,126～148。
[56]王锡福,陈安福主编.鄂尔多斯盆地非地震油气勘探.北京:地质出版社,1993. 1～50,193～203,216～225。
[57]吴传壁等编著.油气化探发展脉络与思考.北京:地质出版社,1996. 9～17,78～95。
[58]孙正江,王华俊编.地电概论.北京:地震出版社,1984. 19～95。
[59]刘庆生著.微磁方法寻找油气藏的基本原理与应用.北京:地质出版社,1996. 1～
[60]程同锦、王者顺等,烃类运移的近地表显示与地球化学勘探1999.12
[61]Pirson,S.J.,1982.Progress in magneto-electric exploration. Oil & Gas Journal,(10): 216-226.
[62]Thompson,C. K., Saunders, D. F.,Buyson,K.R.,1994. Model advanced for hydrocarbon microseepage,relatedalterations. Oil & Gas Journal,14:95-99.
[63]Tompkins,R.,1990. Direct location technologies: A unified theory. Oil & Gas Journal,(24):126-134.
[64]Tompkins,R.,1993.Redox identification technology:A direct location technique.Oil & Gas Journal,(6):95-98.
[65]Asfahani,J.,and Tlas,M.,(2002). A nonlinear programming technique for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies. Pure and Applied Geophysics.Vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1333-1343.
[66]Abdelrahman, E.M., Saber, H.S., Essa, K.S. and Fouda, M.A., (2004). A least-squares approach to depth determination from numerical horizontal self-potential gradients. Pure and Applied Geophysics.Vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 399-411.
[67]Perrier, F. and Pant, S.R., (2005). Noise reduction in long-term self-potential monitoring with travelling electrode referencing. Pure and Applied Geophysics. Vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 165-179.
[68]安海静,赵和云,刘宝勤,赵家骝.松山台地电场的自然电位异常[J].地震,2004,24(3):115～120.
[2]傅良魁编.电法勘探教程.北京:地质出版社,1983.
[3]叶兴茂等编.非地震物探方法直接寻找油气藏.北京:中国地质矿产信息研究院,1995. 1～75。
[4]仇勇海等译.自然电场法文集.长沙:中南工业大学出版社,1988. 81～91,97～116,198～206。
[5]任俞,尚慧芸,曾国寿编.非地震物化探方法油气勘探百例集.北京:中国石油天然气总公司情报研究所,1990. 73～79,216～236。
[6]王君恒,邓明胜,潘竹平,管志宁等.油气藏自然电位勘探原理及在开发中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(3):96～99.
[7]王君恒,潘竹平,邓明胜等.油气藏自然电位与油层视有效厚度的关系研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):65～67.
[8]叶青.地电场变化的基本要素研究及物理解释[D].中国地震局兰州地震研究所硕士学位论文,2006.
[9]张洪魁.地电的幕式变化及其与地震的关系[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(增刊):90～95.
[9]杨荣丰.地下径流通道的形成、特征及其探测技术研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2006.
[10]王家映.我国石油电法勘探评述[J].勘探地球物理进展,2006,29(2):77～81.
[11]袁宁、卢涛、聂在平.地层因素对自然电位测井响应影响的定量研究[J].电子科技大学学报,1998,27(6):592～595.
[12]王俊业.应用自然电场法研究地下水流场[J].物探与化探,2002,26(2):140～142.
[13]厉玉乐,王均恒,潘竹平,侯遵泽.油气藏自然电位小波多尺度分解及其地球物理意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):80～83.
[14]郭新顺,潘作枢.油气藏上方磁异常及自电异常成因模型[J].西安地质学院学报,1997,19(1):76～84.
[15]王君恒,潘竹平,孙树文,郭雷.自然电位视有效厚度预测及在油田开发中的应用[J].中国地质大学学报,2007,32(4):461～468.
[16]郭友钊,罗壮伟,孟小红,余钦范等著.石油天然气的磁性勘查.北京:地质出版社,1999. 3～34。
[17]刘庆生、曲赞、辽乔奇等.非常规综合物化探方法寻找油气藏基础理论研究中的几个问题[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1999,24(6):613～616.
[18]刘庆生,程同锦,刘树根.综合磁学、地球化学与矿物学原理评价“烟筒效应”的机理[J].科学通报,1997,42(15):1569～1574
[19]徐忠祥,侯卫国,苏江玉等.塔里木盆地雅克拉地区油气地球物理地球化学异常系统研究.北京:中国地质大学出版社,1999.25～63,189～206。
[20]姜洪训等著.综合地质物探化探多参数直接探测油气理论方法与效果.陕西:陕西科学技术出版社,1994. 1～37,127～139,152～160。
[21]侯连华.自然电位基线偏移影响因素的实验研究[J].石油大学学报,2001,25(1):93～99
[22]陈书让.电测深和自电在陕北石油勘查中的应用[J].陕西地质,1999,17(2):79～85.
[23]肖承文、朱卫宏、任好、章成广.东河塘油田开发中后期自然电位异常机理分析和应用[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2008,30(1):95～97.
[24]高怀雄.鄂尔多斯盆地西北缘找油的物化探异常模式[J].陕西地质,1999,17(1):74～79.
[25]甄胜利,郝世彦,李旦.物化探综合找油方法在志丹探区的推广应用[J].西北地质,2005,38(1):108～112.
[26]陈书让.自然电位在油气勘探中的应用及其新生异常分析[J].陕西地质,1997,15(1):84～91
[27]许敬彦,李庆峰,丁明海.自然电位曲线异常原因分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(5):63～65
[28]张钊,邱彦章.自然电位法寻找油气藏效果及影响因素[J].西安工程学院学报,1998,20(增刊):26～28
[29]刘天佑,朱铉.综合地球物理数据处理新方法在西部油气勘探中的应用[J].勘探地球物理进展,2006,29(2):104～108
[30]王喜双,文百红,王晓帆,易启维.中国石油近年来非地震勘探技术应用实例及展望[J].中国石油勘探,2005,5:34～41
[31]文百红,杨辉,张研.中国石油非地震勘探技术应用现状及发展趋势[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(2):68～71
[32]赵邦六、何展翔、文百红.非地震直接油气检测技术及其勘探实践[J].勘探技术,2005,第6期:29～36.
[33]徐翔军、刘玉梅、郭少斌.非常规综合物化探油气预测研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2002,32(4):349～351.
[34]贾进斗、何展翔、孔繁恕.非地震综合物化探技术应用及效果[J].石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(5):625～631.
[35]郭少斌、刘庆海.非震物化探综合信息油气预测研究[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(1):71～74.
[36]王志刚、何展翔、魏文博、邓明.井地电法三维物理模拟试验[J].石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(5):594～597.
[37]Keisuke Ushijima等著.利用4D电测技术的油藏监测[J].石油勘探译丛,2000,第3期:85～88.
[38]衡伟,耿丽霞,黄杰,李凤君.强工频干扰下自然电位测量仪的设计[J].工程地球物理学报,2008,5(1):104～107.
[39]自然电场法技术规程(DZ/T 0081-1993),中国地质调查局,2006
[40]郑洪,王新蕾,王春媛等.深井电极与地表电极的自然电场对比研究[J].地震,2000,20(1):85～90.
[41] Ernstson K. Self-Potential variations with time and their relation to hydro-geologic and meteorological parameters. Geophysics , V.51 , No.10 ,1986.p1967-1977
[42] A.C.谢苗洛夫著.自然电场法电法勘探.北京:地质出版社1958年. 79～115,167～200。
[43]赵和云,扬荣,梁子斌等.天祝大地电场异常与1995年永登5.8、1996年天祝5.4级地震[J].西北地震学报,2002,24(1):56～62.
[44]刘加文,王治军,杜志伟.自然电场法在场地地下水勘查中的应用[J].工程地球物理学报,2009,6(5):612～615
[45]张贵宾,Maurice Aubert,齐剑玲.自然电场法勘探火山岩地区地下水的研究[J].地球物理学报,1999,42(增刊):250～256
[46]张荣.自然电场法勘测地下水流向的极差校正[J].物探与化探,2003,27(1):46～48
[47]莫承彬,陈忠献,陆怀成.自然电场法剧变场的起因初探及其应用[J].物探与化探,1993,19(4):315～318
[48]杜庆丰,白建平,乔德新.油气自电法(OGSP)及其应用[J].地质与勘探,2004,40(增刊):11～13.
[49]文百红,林蓓,刘吉敏.油气微渗透的垂向结构与地面地电化学油气检测[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(5):33～35.
[50]何展翔,王绪本.油气藏电性异常模式与电磁法油气检测[J].石油地球物理勘探,2007,42(1):102～106.
[51]郑秀芬,李金铭.油气电法勘探综述[J].地球物理学进展,1997,12(2):89～94.
[52]吴国平,徐忠翔,徐红燕.氧化还原电位油气性信息灰色ART聚类评价法[J].物探化探计算技术,2000,22(3):207～210.
[53]阮帅,王绪本,高永才,毛利峰.位场正则化下延在自然电位概率成像中的应用[J].物探化探计算技术,2006,28(4):332～336.
[54]汪忠德.中国大陆自然电场的前兆机理与特征[J].西北地震学报,2008,30(4):360～365
[41]贾国相,陈远荣,姚锦旗著.我国特殊景观区油气综合化探技术.北京:石油工业出版社,2003. 1～15,22～26,126～148。
[56]王锡福,陈安福主编.鄂尔多斯盆地非地震油气勘探.北京:地质出版社,1993. 1～50,193～203,216～225。
[57]吴传壁等编著.油气化探发展脉络与思考.北京:地质出版社,1996. 9～17,78～95。
[58]孙正江,王华俊编.地电概论.北京:地震出版社,1984. 19～95。
[59]刘庆生著.微磁方法寻找油气藏的基本原理与应用.北京:地质出版社,1996. 1～
[60]程同锦、王者顺等,烃类运移的近地表显示与地球化学勘探1999.12
[61]Pirson,S.J.,1982.Progress in magneto-electric exploration. Oil & Gas Journal,(10): 216-226.
[62]Thompson,C. K., Saunders, D. F.,Buyson,K.R.,1994. Model advanced for hydrocarbon microseepage,relatedalterations. Oil & Gas Journal,14:95-99.
[63]Tompkins,R.,1990. Direct location technologies: A unified theory. Oil & Gas Journal,(24):126-134.
[64]Tompkins,R.,1993.Redox identification technology:A direct location technique.Oil & Gas Journal,(6):95-98.
[65]Asfahani,J.,and Tlas,M.,(2002). A nonlinear programming technique for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies. Pure and Applied Geophysics.Vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1333-1343.
[66]Abdelrahman, E.M., Saber, H.S., Essa, K.S. and Fouda, M.A., (2004). A least-squares approach to depth determination from numerical horizontal self-potential gradients. Pure and Applied Geophysics.Vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 399-411.
[67]Perrier, F. and Pant, S.R., (2005). Noise reduction in long-term self-potential monitoring with travelling electrode referencing. Pure and Applied Geophysics. Vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 165-179.
[68]安海静,赵和云,刘宝勤,赵家骝.松山台地电场的自然电位异常[J].地震,2004,24(3):115～120.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |