基于特高含水期油水两相渗流的水驱开发特征研究
|
摘要
目前,我国大多数陆上油田开发都已经进入高含水甚至特高含水期。基于特高含水期油水两相渗流的水驱开发特征研究对保持油田高产、稳产具有重大意义。本文通过对特高含水期油田的油水两相渗流特征、油藏工程方法、开发动态指标特征和提高水驱采收率方法研究,揭示了特高含水期油田不同于中高含水期油田的开发规律；分析了不同动力条件对驱油效率及相对渗透率的影响；改进了油水两相渗透率数据处理方法；研究了特高含水期油田的相渗比值表征新方法；发展了适合特高含水期的油藏工程方法；提出了特高含水期提高采收率的主攻技术方向与建议。这些成果丰富了油田开发理论,对指导油田经济有效地可持续开发具有重要意义。本文主要研究内容如下：
1.开展了特高含水期油水两相渗流特征研究分析了已有的室内油水两相实验方法,并对两种方法进行了改进。从相渗曲线变化特征及相渗曲线影响因素两个方面,分析了特高含水期油水两相渗流特征。
2.改进了特高含水期油藏工程方法提出了特高含水期油田的相渗数学表征新方法,并以此为基础改进了分流量曲线、水驱特征曲线、井网密度等油藏工程方法。
3.开展了特高含水期油田开发动态指标特征研究分析了产量递减、含水上升、产液量变化、单井控制可采储量等特征及其影响因素。
4.研究了特高含水期提高水驱采收率的主要技术方向分析了水驱油效率特征及影响因素,再认识了极限水驱油效率,并开展了提高采收率方法、技术及发展方向研究。
Currently, most onshore fields in China have been got into high water cut stage even ultra-high water cut stage. It is significant to study oil-water two-phase water flooding characteristics in ultra-high water cut stage to maintain high and stable oil production. In this paper, we studied the oil-water two-phase flow characteristics, methods of reservoir engineering, the development of dynamic characteristics of indicators and methods to enhance water flooding recovery in the ultra-high water cut stage of oil field. This study reveals the law of oil field development in the extra-high water cut stage which is different from the high water cut stage, analyzes the impact of the dynamic conditions of oil displacement efficiency and relative permeability, improves the data processing method of oil-water two-phase permeability and proposes a new method related to permeability ratio in ultra-high water cut stage. What's more, this study updates the reservoir engineering methods which probably be used to guide the oil field development in ultra-high water cut stage, and proposes some recommendations in main technical directions of EOR in the ultra-high water cut stage. The results obtained in the paper lay a base for the effective and sustained development of oil field, and enrich the theory of oil field development
The main contents are as follows:
1. Carry out the study of oil-water two-phase flow characteristics in the ultra-high water cut stage Contrast advantages and disadvantages of existing indoor oil-water two-phase test methods and improve these two methods, analyze the oil-water two-phase flow characteristics of ultra-high water cut stage from two aspects--relative permeability curve characteristics and relative permeability curves influencing factors.
2. Improve reservoir engineering methods of ultra-high water cut stage Present the relative permeability mathematical characterization of ultra-high water cut stage, and improve reservoir engineering methods, such as the sub-flow curve, water drive characteristic curve, well spacing density and so on.
3. Carry out the study of dynamic index features in the ultra-high water cut stage Analyze the characteristics and influencing factors of production decline, water cut, liquid-producing capacity, and single well controlled recoverable reserves.
4. Start the EOR study in the ultra-high water cut stage Analysis the characteristics and influencing factors of water displacement efficiency, understand the limited water oil displacement efficiency and carry out studies on methods, techniques and the development direction to improve oil recovery.
1.开展了特高含水期油水两相渗流特征研究分析了已有的室内油水两相实验方法,并对两种方法进行了改进。从相渗曲线变化特征及相渗曲线影响因素两个方面,分析了特高含水期油水两相渗流特征。
2.改进了特高含水期油藏工程方法提出了特高含水期油田的相渗数学表征新方法,并以此为基础改进了分流量曲线、水驱特征曲线、井网密度等油藏工程方法。
3.开展了特高含水期油田开发动态指标特征研究分析了产量递减、含水上升、产液量变化、单井控制可采储量等特征及其影响因素。
4.研究了特高含水期提高水驱采收率的主要技术方向分析了水驱油效率特征及影响因素,再认识了极限水驱油效率,并开展了提高采收率方法、技术及发展方向研究。
Currently, most onshore fields in China have been got into high water cut stage even ultra-high water cut stage. It is significant to study oil-water two-phase water flooding characteristics in ultra-high water cut stage to maintain high and stable oil production. In this paper, we studied the oil-water two-phase flow characteristics, methods of reservoir engineering, the development of dynamic characteristics of indicators and methods to enhance water flooding recovery in the ultra-high water cut stage of oil field. This study reveals the law of oil field development in the extra-high water cut stage which is different from the high water cut stage, analyzes the impact of the dynamic conditions of oil displacement efficiency and relative permeability, improves the data processing method of oil-water two-phase permeability and proposes a new method related to permeability ratio in ultra-high water cut stage. What's more, this study updates the reservoir engineering methods which probably be used to guide the oil field development in ultra-high water cut stage, and proposes some recommendations in main technical directions of EOR in the ultra-high water cut stage. The results obtained in the paper lay a base for the effective and sustained development of oil field, and enrich the theory of oil field development
The main contents are as follows:
1. Carry out the study of oil-water two-phase flow characteristics in the ultra-high water cut stage Contrast advantages and disadvantages of existing indoor oil-water two-phase test methods and improve these two methods, analyze the oil-water two-phase flow characteristics of ultra-high water cut stage from two aspects--relative permeability curve characteristics and relative permeability curves influencing factors.
2. Improve reservoir engineering methods of ultra-high water cut stage Present the relative permeability mathematical characterization of ultra-high water cut stage, and improve reservoir engineering methods, such as the sub-flow curve, water drive characteristic curve, well spacing density and so on.
3. Carry out the study of dynamic index features in the ultra-high water cut stage Analyze the characteristics and influencing factors of production decline, water cut, liquid-producing capacity, and single well controlled recoverable reserves.
4. Start the EOR study in the ultra-high water cut stage Analysis the characteristics and influencing factors of water displacement efficiency, understand the limited water oil displacement efficiency and carry out studies on methods, techniques and the development direction to improve oil recovery.
引文
[1]肖尧.某区块特高含水期剩余油分布特点与挖潜技术研究[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2012,1：091.
[2]姚军等.孤岛油田中二中强注强采水驱规律研究[J].油气采收率技术.1996,3(1)：65-71.
[3]李丽丽等.特高含水期油田水驱规律特征研究[J].石油钻探技术.2009,37(3)：91-94.
[4]毛建文等.耿271长8油藏水驱开发特征分析及稳产技术研究[J].石油化工应用.2012：31(6)：22-24.
[5]陈如鹤等.裂缝性火山岩油藏注水开发特征[J].新疆石油学院学报.2001,13(4)：23-26.
[6]王德等.孤岛油田中一区馆3聚合物驱试验区转后续水驱开采特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发.2004,23(4)：61-62.
[7]孙建平等.大港油田枣35区块裂缝性火山岩稠油油藏注水开发特征及效果评价[J].油气地质与采收率.2005,12(1)：50-52.
[8]柳家奎等.王场背斜构造裂缝性油藏注水开发特征研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报).2005,27(4)：480-482.
[9]Buckley S E. The Pressure-Production Relationship in the East Texas Field[J]. Drilling and Production Practice,1938.
[10]Peterson, J. A., Clarke, J. W. Geology of the Volga-Ural Petroleum Province and detailed description of the Romashkino and Arlan Oil Fields[R]. US Geological Survey open-file report,1983,11:90.
[11]Fitzgerald, M. J., and Mousset, E. Triton France - the evolution of a successful exploration venture in theParis Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Journal,1987,86(12): 69-72.
[12]Bildstein K L. Long-term counts of migrating raptors:a role for volunteers in wildlife research[J]. The Journal of wildlife management,1998:435-445.
[13]McGuire, P. L., and Holt, B. M. Unconventional miscible EOR experience at Prudhoe Bay:a project summary[C]. SPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur,2001,1-19.
[14]Panda, M. N., Zaucha, D. E., Perez, G. and Chopra, A. K. Application of neural networks to modeling fluid contacts in Prudhoe Bay[C]. Proceedings SPE 70th Annual Technical Conference, Dallas,1996,755-770.
[15]Sagers, M. J. West Siberia oil production in the mid-1990s[J]. International Geology Review,1994,36:997-1018.
[16]Loppinet A, Iakovlev S, Glenat P. Five years of injection of hydroxyethylcellulose:An ecological pure product for enhanced oil recovery in the field of Romashkino[J]. Offshore Europe,1997,39-43.
[17]王金勋,杨普华,刘庆杰,等.应用恒速压汞实验数据计算相对渗透率曲线[J].石油大学学报：自然科学版,2003,27(4)：66-69.
[18]王尤富等.油层岩石的孔隙结构与驱油效率的关系[J].河南石油,1999,13(1)：23-25.
[19]刘柏林.苏北盆地陈堡油田微观水驱油机理及水驱油效率影响因素研究[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(2)：179-181.
[20]张绍东.孤岛油田储层微观结构特征及其对驱油效率的影响[J].石油大学学报(自然科学报),2002,26(3)：47-54.
[21]熊敏.盘河断块区孔隙结构与驱油效率[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1)：42-44.
[22]何秋轩,高永利.沈阳油田储层微观驱油效率研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(2)：20-24.
[23]黄延章.低渗透油层渗流机理[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1998：58-79.
[24]李道品.低渗透砂岩油田开发[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1997：66-87.
[25]田乃林,张丽华高凝油驱油效率的室内实验研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1997,16(3)：53-55.
[26]俞启泰,赵明,林志芳.水驱砂岩驱油效率和波及系数研究(一)[J].石油勘探开发,1989,16(2)：48-52.
[27]张人雄.驱替条件对砂砾岩油藏水驱油效率的影响[J].河南石油,1995,9(4)：32-37.
[28]高永利.辽河油田冷43砾岩稠油油藏微观驱油效率研究[J].西安石油学院学报,1996,11(4)：35-36.
[29]邵创国,高永利,林光荣,等.特低渗透储层提高水驱油效率实验研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(3)：23-25.
[30]孙卫,付晓燕.姬塬延安组储层水驱油效率及影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1)：26-29.
[31]任晓娟,曲志浩,史承恩,等.西峰油田特低渗弱亲油储层微观水驱油特征[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,35(6)：766-769.
[32]朱玉双,曲志浩,孔令荣,等.靖安油田长6、长2油层驱油效率影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(4)：333-335.
[33]Demin W, Muchang G, Gang W. The Influence of Multi-Pore Volume Water Flooding on Pore Structure and Recovery of Lacustrine Deposit Mixed Wettability Cores[C]. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.2002.
[34]黄学斌,鲁国甫,张人雄.预测水驱砂岩油田驱油效率的方法[J].河南石油,1997,11(4)：15-16.
[35]吴汉东等.用孔隙结构参数预测水驱油效率的一个模糊数学模型[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1986,20(1)：20-25.
[36]何贤科,陈程.用动态资料预测注水开发油田驱油效率[J]XINJIANG PETROLEUM GEOLOGY,2005,26(3).
[37]Donaldson, et al. Wettability Determination and Its Effect on Recovery Efficiency[J]. SPE Journal.1969,13-20
[38]Norman R. Morrow, et al. Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology.1990,1476-1484
[39]MunGan, et al. Role of Wettability and Interfacial Tension in Water Flooding[J]. SPE Journal.1964,115-123
[40]Wagner. Effeet of interfacial tension on displacement efficiency [J]. SPE,1966,6(4):335-344.
[41]Farouq-Ali, S. M., Stahl, C.D. Increased oil recovery by improved waterflooding[J]. Earth Miner,1970,39(4):25-28.
[42]W. R.Foster. ALow-Tens ion Water Flooding Process [R]. JPT,1973,205-210.
[43]J. C. Melrose and C. F. Brandner. Role of Capillary Forces In Detennining Microscopic Displacement Efficiency For Oil Recovery By Waterflooding[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1974,13(4):74-75.
[44]Wardlaw, Norman C. THE EFFECTS OF PORE STRUCTURE ON DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY IN RESERVOIR ROCKS AND IN GLASS MICROMODELS[A]. SPE,1980
[45]N. C. WARDLAW et al. The Effects of Geometry, Wettability, Viscosity And Interfacial Tension On Trapping In Single Pore-throat Pairs [J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1982
[46]McDougall, et al. The Combined Effect of Capillary and Viscous Forces on Waterflood Displacement Efficiency in Finely Laminated Porous Media[A]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas.1993
[47]Norman R. Morrow, et al. Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology,1990,1476-1484
[48]P. P. Jadhunandan, et al. Effect of Wettability on Waterflood Recovery for Crude-Oil/Brine/Rock Systems[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1995,40-46
[49]S. R. McDougall, et all. The Impact of Wettability on Waterflooding:Pore-Scale Simulation[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1995,208-213
[50]D. Wang, et al. The Influence of Viscoelasticity on Displacement Efficiency--From Micro to Macro Scale [A]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,2007
[51]Gao Ming, et al. The Research of Waterflooding Strategy for High Pour Point Oil Reservoir[A]. Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2012,27-29.
[52]王金勋等人,应用Bethe网络研究孔隙结构对两相相对渗透率的影响[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2000,23(2)：130-132.
[53]谢然红等,利用神经网络和相渗曲线预测储层的润湿性[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4)：326-328.
[54]高慧梅等,储层孔隙结构对油水两相相对渗透率影响微观模拟研究[C].第九届全国渗流力学学术讨论会论文集,2007.
[55]刘红卫等,萨中开发区考虑油藏润湿性影响数值模拟[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,20(9)：221-223.
[56]阳晓燕等,稠油相对渗透率曲线影响因素分析[J].断块油气田,2011,18(6)：758-760.
[57]张金庆,孙福街,相渗曲线和水驱曲线与水驱储量的关系[J].新疆石油地质,2010,31(6)：50-58.
[58]邴绍献.特高含水期相渗关系表征研究[J].石油天然气学报,2012,32(10)：118-120.
[59]侯晓春,一种新的非稳态油水相对渗透率曲线计算方法[J].大庆石油地质2008,27(4)：54-56.
[60]徐传德等,一种油水两相“过渡”相对渗透率曲线计算方法[J].石油勘探与开发,1984,10(4)：21-26.
[61]王金勋等,应用逾渗理论计算非稳态法油水相渗曲线[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2)：79-81.
[62]张继成,宋考平,相对渗透率特征曲线及其应用[J].石油学报,2007,28(4)：104-107.
[63]R. A. Fulcher Jr., ARCO Oil and Gas Co.; Turgay Ertekin, C.D. Stahl, Pennsylvania State U., Effect of Capillary Number and Its Constituents on Two-Phase Relative Permeability Curves[J]. JPT,1985,37(2):249-260
[64]Anderson W G. Wettability Liter ature Survey) Par t 5:The Effects of Wettability on Relative Permeability [J]. JPT,1987,39(11):1453-1468.
[65]Silpngarmlers N, Guler B, Ertekin T, et al. Development and testing of two-phase relative permeability predictors using artificial neural networks[J]. SPE Journal,2002,7(3):299-308.
[66]Goda H M, Behrenbruch P. Using a modified Brooks-Corey model to study oil-water relative permeability for diverse pore structures[C]. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.2004.
[67]Asar H, Handy L. Influence of interfacial tension on gas/oil relative permeability in a gas-condensate system[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1988, 3(1):257-264.
[68]韩大匡,贾文瑞.中国油气田开发特征与技术发展[J].断块油气田.1996,3(3)：1-7.
[69]张博全,王岫云编.油(气)层物理学[M].中国地质大学出版社,1988：121.
[70]箭晓卫,赵伟.喇嘛甸油田特高含水期厚油层内剩余油描述及挖潜技术[J][J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(5)：31-33.
[71]韩伟东等.喇嘛甸油田剩余油挖潜方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发2002,21(3)：41-44.
[72]王飞等.强化精细油藏挖潜提高原油产量[J].油气田地面工程.2004,23(11)：29-30.
[73]柳家奎等.王场背斜构造裂缝性油藏注水开发特征研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报).2005,27(4)：480-482.
[74]侯建华等.濮城油田特高含水期高压分层注水工艺技术[J].钻采工艺.2005：112-114
[75]陈顺等.英台油田特高含水期提高开发水平研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发.2005,24(3)：45-47
[76]于兰.浅调剖应用于水驱开发调整[J].油气田地面工程.2008,27(8)：27-28.
[77]束青林等.孤岛油田特高含水期提高采收率技术措施及效果[J].油气地质与采收率.2009,16(5)：52-55.
[78]王友启.胜利油田高含水期油藏水驱精细调整技术方向[J].石油钻探技术.2011,39(1)：101-104.
[79]郭勇军等.濮城油田高含水油藏开发后期稳产增产措施[J].工程管理.2011,30(4)：82-84.
[80]王冬艳.CK注水示范区水驱开发效果评价分析[J].内蒙古石油化工 2012,12(8)：57-59
[81]刘晓彦等.靖安油田ZJ2井区侏罗系油藏水驱状况研究与调整对策[J].岩性油气藏.2007,19(1)：124-129.
[82]于兰.浅调剖应用于水驱开发调整[J].油气田地面工程.2008,27(8)：27-28
[83]侯建华等.濮城油田特高含水期高压分层注水工艺技术[J].钻采工艺.2005：112-114
[84]周家驹等.河31断块特高含水期剩余油挖潜措施[J].油气地质与采收率.2002,9(4)：75-77
[85]马功联,断块油藏特高含水期水驱开发因素敏感性分析[J].海洋石油,2005,25(1)：46-49.
[86]李春英,吴晓东,李淑霞.特高含水深度开发阶段调整挖潜技术政策界限[J].油气地质与采收率.2010,17(6)：97-100.
[87]谢俊等.胜坨油田聚合物驱转后续水驱技术对策研究[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版).2007,26(2)：12-17.
[88]岳登台,综述老油田改善开发效果及提高采收率技术[J].石油学报,1998,19(3)：46-50.
[89]梁文福,喇嘛甸油田特高含水期水驱综合调整技术研究[D].大庆石油学院硕士论文,2003.
[90]胡永乐等,注水油田高含水后期开发技术方针的调整[J].石油学报,2004,25(5)：65-69.
[91]宿春梁等,高含水油田后期提高采收率技术研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2004,(30)：90-91
[92]王友启,胜利油田高含水期油藏水驱精细调整技术方向[J].石油钻探技术,2011,39(1)：101-104.
[93]薛东安,利用油藏精细描述技术调整水驱开发方案[J].中外能源,2012,17(7)：43-47.
[94]王晶宇,改善水驱开发效果提高注水效率[J].石油石化节能,2013,(1)：51-52.
[95]Marco R. Thiele, Rod P. Batycky. Using Streamline-Derived Injection Efficiencies for Improved Waterflood Management[Z]. SPE84080,2006
[96]Joseph S. Tsng. Extended Brigham Model for Resodual Oil Saturation Measurement by Partitioning Teacer Tests[Z]. SPE Journal,2005
[97]计秉玉,李莉,李群.不同类型储层驱替速度对提高原油采收率的影响[J].石油学报,2004,25(3)：58-61
[98]张宏方,王德民,岳湘安等.不同类型聚合物溶液对采油残余油的作用机理研究[J]. 高分子学报,2003,(3)：321-325
[99]姜维东,任艳滨,张运来等.稠油油田油水相对渗透率和水驱油效率研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(4)：50-53
[100]魏斌,张友生,杨贵凯等.储集层流动单元水驱油实验研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(6)：72-74
[101]高慧梅,姜汉桥,陈民锋等.储集层微观参数对油水相对渗透率影响的微观模拟研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(6)：735-737
[102]王曙光,赵国忠,余碧君.大庆油田油水相对渗透率统计规律及其应用[J].石油学报,2005,26(3)：78-81
[103]康志宏.缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏水驱油机理模拟试验研究[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(1)：87-90
[104]何建华,张树林.高含水期微观剩余油分布研究[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(4)：35-344
[105]曹峰.混幼己油藏的润湿性和相对渗透率研究[J].国外油田工程,1999,5-9
[106]马建国,刘小娟,杜福祥等.机械振动对岩心相渗曲线的影响[J].西安石油学院学报,1999,14(1)：13-15
[107]陈民锋,姜汉桥.基于孔隙网络模型的微观水驱油驱替特征变化规律研究[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(5)：91-95
[108]周惠忠,王利群.两维油藏物理模拟装置[J].清华大学学报,1994,34(3)：75-82
[109]KhosrowBiglarbigi, G. W. Paul, R. M. Ray. A Methodology for Prediction of Oil Recovery by Infill Drilling[Z]. SPE27761,1994
[110]T. L. Gould, A.M. Sam Sarem. Infill Drilling for Incremental Recovery[Z]. SPE18941,1989
[111]Yujun Feng,Rene Tabary, Michel Renard. Characteristics of Microgels Designed for Water Shutoff and Profile Control[Z]. SPE 80203,2003
[112]Per H. Valvatne, Martin J. Blunt. Predictive Pore-Scale Network Model ing [Z]. SPE84550,2003
[113]I. Osako, M.Kumar, V. Hoang. Evaluation of Streamline Simulation Application to Heavy Oil Waterflood[Z]. SPE122922,2009
[114]秦积舜,李久娣,孟红霞.平面物理模型的拟相渗规律研究[J].重庆大学学报,2000,23增刊：111-113
[115]窦让林,邓君,计曙东.濮城油田深层低渗透储层驱替特征实验[J].断块油气田,2009,16(3)：64-67
[116]刘月田,郭分乔,涂彬.全岩心非均匀径向渗流各向异性渗透率测定方法[J].石油学报,2005,26(6)：66-68
[117]沈平平,王家禄,田玉玲等.三维油藏物理模拟的饱和度测量技术研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31增刊：71-72
[118]金佩强.水驱后留下的残余油流动机理[J].国外油田工程,2005,21(3)：1-6
[119]贾忠伟,杨清彦,兰玉波.水驱油微观物理模拟实验研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(1)：46-49
[120]张继红,岳湘安,侯吉瑞等.外加电场作用下水驱油藏的油水相对渗透率[J].高电压技术,2005,31(4)：75-76
[121]李中锋,何顺利,杨文新等.微观物理模拟水驱油实验及残余油分布分形特征研究[J].中国石油大学学报,2006,30(3)：67-71
[122]王玉斗,王世虎,姜泽菊.温度、界面张力对油水相对渗透率的影响[J].油气田地面工程,2004,23(4)：11
[123]李克文,戴志坚,江义容.稳定流方法与非稳定流方法的对比研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(1)：47-50
[124]彦欣,张立红,赵丽.相似理论在微观物理模拟实验中的应用可行性分析[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(4)：410-412
[125]王金勋,刘庆杰,杨普华.应用Bethe网络研究孔隙结构对两相相对渗透率的影响[J].重庆大学学报,2000,23增刊：130-132
[126]高建,韩冬,王家禄.应用CT成像技术研究岩心水驱含油饱和度分布特征[J].新疆石油地质,2009,30(2)：269-271
[127]王金勋,刘庆杰,杨普华.应用逾渗理论计算非稳态法油水相渗曲线[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2)：79-82
[128]张立娟,岳湘安.油藏中分散非连续残余油膜的驱替机理分析[J].油田化学,2006,23(3)：243-247
[129]张继红,岳湘安,杨晶.直流电场对水驱油藏油水相对渗透率的影响研究[J].电化学,2005,11(2)：214-218
[2]姚军等.孤岛油田中二中强注强采水驱规律研究[J].油气采收率技术.1996,3(1)：65-71.
[3]李丽丽等.特高含水期油田水驱规律特征研究[J].石油钻探技术.2009,37(3)：91-94.
[4]毛建文等.耿271长8油藏水驱开发特征分析及稳产技术研究[J].石油化工应用.2012：31(6)：22-24.
[5]陈如鹤等.裂缝性火山岩油藏注水开发特征[J].新疆石油学院学报.2001,13(4)：23-26.
[6]王德等.孤岛油田中一区馆3聚合物驱试验区转后续水驱开采特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发.2004,23(4)：61-62.
[7]孙建平等.大港油田枣35区块裂缝性火山岩稠油油藏注水开发特征及效果评价[J].油气地质与采收率.2005,12(1)：50-52.
[8]柳家奎等.王场背斜构造裂缝性油藏注水开发特征研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报).2005,27(4)：480-482.
[9]Buckley S E. The Pressure-Production Relationship in the East Texas Field[J]. Drilling and Production Practice,1938.
[10]Peterson, J. A., Clarke, J. W. Geology of the Volga-Ural Petroleum Province and detailed description of the Romashkino and Arlan Oil Fields[R]. US Geological Survey open-file report,1983,11:90.
[11]Fitzgerald, M. J., and Mousset, E. Triton France - the evolution of a successful exploration venture in theParis Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Journal,1987,86(12): 69-72.
[12]Bildstein K L. Long-term counts of migrating raptors:a role for volunteers in wildlife research[J]. The Journal of wildlife management,1998:435-445.
[13]McGuire, P. L., and Holt, B. M. Unconventional miscible EOR experience at Prudhoe Bay:a project summary[C]. SPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur,2001,1-19.
[14]Panda, M. N., Zaucha, D. E., Perez, G. and Chopra, A. K. Application of neural networks to modeling fluid contacts in Prudhoe Bay[C]. Proceedings SPE 70th Annual Technical Conference, Dallas,1996,755-770.
[15]Sagers, M. J. West Siberia oil production in the mid-1990s[J]. International Geology Review,1994,36:997-1018.
[16]Loppinet A, Iakovlev S, Glenat P. Five years of injection of hydroxyethylcellulose:An ecological pure product for enhanced oil recovery in the field of Romashkino[J]. Offshore Europe,1997,39-43.
[17]王金勋,杨普华,刘庆杰,等.应用恒速压汞实验数据计算相对渗透率曲线[J].石油大学学报：自然科学版,2003,27(4)：66-69.
[18]王尤富等.油层岩石的孔隙结构与驱油效率的关系[J].河南石油,1999,13(1)：23-25.
[19]刘柏林.苏北盆地陈堡油田微观水驱油机理及水驱油效率影响因素研究[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(2)：179-181.
[20]张绍东.孤岛油田储层微观结构特征及其对驱油效率的影响[J].石油大学学报(自然科学报),2002,26(3)：47-54.
[21]熊敏.盘河断块区孔隙结构与驱油效率[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1)：42-44.
[22]何秋轩,高永利.沈阳油田储层微观驱油效率研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(2)：20-24.
[23]黄延章.低渗透油层渗流机理[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1998：58-79.
[24]李道品.低渗透砂岩油田开发[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1997：66-87.
[25]田乃林,张丽华高凝油驱油效率的室内实验研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1997,16(3)：53-55.
[26]俞启泰,赵明,林志芳.水驱砂岩驱油效率和波及系数研究(一)[J].石油勘探开发,1989,16(2)：48-52.
[27]张人雄.驱替条件对砂砾岩油藏水驱油效率的影响[J].河南石油,1995,9(4)：32-37.
[28]高永利.辽河油田冷43砾岩稠油油藏微观驱油效率研究[J].西安石油学院学报,1996,11(4)：35-36.
[29]邵创国,高永利,林光荣,等.特低渗透储层提高水驱油效率实验研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(3)：23-25.
[30]孙卫,付晓燕.姬塬延安组储层水驱油效率及影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1)：26-29.
[31]任晓娟,曲志浩,史承恩,等.西峰油田特低渗弱亲油储层微观水驱油特征[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,35(6)：766-769.
[32]朱玉双,曲志浩,孔令荣,等.靖安油田长6、长2油层驱油效率影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(4)：333-335.
[33]Demin W, Muchang G, Gang W. The Influence of Multi-Pore Volume Water Flooding on Pore Structure and Recovery of Lacustrine Deposit Mixed Wettability Cores[C]. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.2002.
[34]黄学斌,鲁国甫,张人雄.预测水驱砂岩油田驱油效率的方法[J].河南石油,1997,11(4)：15-16.
[35]吴汉东等.用孔隙结构参数预测水驱油效率的一个模糊数学模型[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1986,20(1)：20-25.
[36]何贤科,陈程.用动态资料预测注水开发油田驱油效率[J]XINJIANG PETROLEUM GEOLOGY,2005,26(3).
[37]Donaldson, et al. Wettability Determination and Its Effect on Recovery Efficiency[J]. SPE Journal.1969,13-20
[38]Norman R. Morrow, et al. Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology.1990,1476-1484
[39]MunGan, et al. Role of Wettability and Interfacial Tension in Water Flooding[J]. SPE Journal.1964,115-123
[40]Wagner. Effeet of interfacial tension on displacement efficiency [J]. SPE,1966,6(4):335-344.
[41]Farouq-Ali, S. M., Stahl, C.D. Increased oil recovery by improved waterflooding[J]. Earth Miner,1970,39(4):25-28.
[42]W. R.Foster. ALow-Tens ion Water Flooding Process [R]. JPT,1973,205-210.
[43]J. C. Melrose and C. F. Brandner. Role of Capillary Forces In Detennining Microscopic Displacement Efficiency For Oil Recovery By Waterflooding[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1974,13(4):74-75.
[44]Wardlaw, Norman C. THE EFFECTS OF PORE STRUCTURE ON DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY IN RESERVOIR ROCKS AND IN GLASS MICROMODELS[A]. SPE,1980
[45]N. C. WARDLAW et al. The Effects of Geometry, Wettability, Viscosity And Interfacial Tension On Trapping In Single Pore-throat Pairs [J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1982
[46]McDougall, et al. The Combined Effect of Capillary and Viscous Forces on Waterflood Displacement Efficiency in Finely Laminated Porous Media[A]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas.1993
[47]Norman R. Morrow, et al. Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology,1990,1476-1484
[48]P. P. Jadhunandan, et al. Effect of Wettability on Waterflood Recovery for Crude-Oil/Brine/Rock Systems[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1995,40-46
[49]S. R. McDougall, et all. The Impact of Wettability on Waterflooding:Pore-Scale Simulation[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1995,208-213
[50]D. Wang, et al. The Influence of Viscoelasticity on Displacement Efficiency--From Micro to Macro Scale [A]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,2007
[51]Gao Ming, et al. The Research of Waterflooding Strategy for High Pour Point Oil Reservoir[A]. Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2012,27-29.
[52]王金勋等人,应用Bethe网络研究孔隙结构对两相相对渗透率的影响[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2000,23(2)：130-132.
[53]谢然红等,利用神经网络和相渗曲线预测储层的润湿性[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4)：326-328.
[54]高慧梅等,储层孔隙结构对油水两相相对渗透率影响微观模拟研究[C].第九届全国渗流力学学术讨论会论文集,2007.
[55]刘红卫等,萨中开发区考虑油藏润湿性影响数值模拟[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,20(9)：221-223.
[56]阳晓燕等,稠油相对渗透率曲线影响因素分析[J].断块油气田,2011,18(6)：758-760.
[57]张金庆,孙福街,相渗曲线和水驱曲线与水驱储量的关系[J].新疆石油地质,2010,31(6)：50-58.
[58]邴绍献.特高含水期相渗关系表征研究[J].石油天然气学报,2012,32(10)：118-120.
[59]侯晓春,一种新的非稳态油水相对渗透率曲线计算方法[J].大庆石油地质2008,27(4)：54-56.
[60]徐传德等,一种油水两相“过渡”相对渗透率曲线计算方法[J].石油勘探与开发,1984,10(4)：21-26.
[61]王金勋等,应用逾渗理论计算非稳态法油水相渗曲线[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2)：79-81.
[62]张继成,宋考平,相对渗透率特征曲线及其应用[J].石油学报,2007,28(4)：104-107.
[63]R. A. Fulcher Jr., ARCO Oil and Gas Co.; Turgay Ertekin, C.D. Stahl, Pennsylvania State U., Effect of Capillary Number and Its Constituents on Two-Phase Relative Permeability Curves[J]. JPT,1985,37(2):249-260
[64]Anderson W G. Wettability Liter ature Survey) Par t 5:The Effects of Wettability on Relative Permeability [J]. JPT,1987,39(11):1453-1468.
[65]Silpngarmlers N, Guler B, Ertekin T, et al. Development and testing of two-phase relative permeability predictors using artificial neural networks[J]. SPE Journal,2002,7(3):299-308.
[66]Goda H M, Behrenbruch P. Using a modified Brooks-Corey model to study oil-water relative permeability for diverse pore structures[C]. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.2004.
[67]Asar H, Handy L. Influence of interfacial tension on gas/oil relative permeability in a gas-condensate system[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1988, 3(1):257-264.
[68]韩大匡,贾文瑞.中国油气田开发特征与技术发展[J].断块油气田.1996,3(3)：1-7.
[69]张博全,王岫云编.油(气)层物理学[M].中国地质大学出版社,1988：121.
[70]箭晓卫,赵伟.喇嘛甸油田特高含水期厚油层内剩余油描述及挖潜技术[J][J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(5)：31-33.
[71]韩伟东等.喇嘛甸油田剩余油挖潜方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发2002,21(3)：41-44.
[72]王飞等.强化精细油藏挖潜提高原油产量[J].油气田地面工程.2004,23(11)：29-30.
[73]柳家奎等.王场背斜构造裂缝性油藏注水开发特征研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报).2005,27(4)：480-482.
[74]侯建华等.濮城油田特高含水期高压分层注水工艺技术[J].钻采工艺.2005：112-114
[75]陈顺等.英台油田特高含水期提高开发水平研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发.2005,24(3)：45-47
[76]于兰.浅调剖应用于水驱开发调整[J].油气田地面工程.2008,27(8)：27-28.
[77]束青林等.孤岛油田特高含水期提高采收率技术措施及效果[J].油气地质与采收率.2009,16(5)：52-55.
[78]王友启.胜利油田高含水期油藏水驱精细调整技术方向[J].石油钻探技术.2011,39(1)：101-104.
[79]郭勇军等.濮城油田高含水油藏开发后期稳产增产措施[J].工程管理.2011,30(4)：82-84.
[80]王冬艳.CK注水示范区水驱开发效果评价分析[J].内蒙古石油化工 2012,12(8)：57-59
[81]刘晓彦等.靖安油田ZJ2井区侏罗系油藏水驱状况研究与调整对策[J].岩性油气藏.2007,19(1)：124-129.
[82]于兰.浅调剖应用于水驱开发调整[J].油气田地面工程.2008,27(8)：27-28
[83]侯建华等.濮城油田特高含水期高压分层注水工艺技术[J].钻采工艺.2005：112-114
[84]周家驹等.河31断块特高含水期剩余油挖潜措施[J].油气地质与采收率.2002,9(4)：75-77
[85]马功联,断块油藏特高含水期水驱开发因素敏感性分析[J].海洋石油,2005,25(1)：46-49.
[86]李春英,吴晓东,李淑霞.特高含水深度开发阶段调整挖潜技术政策界限[J].油气地质与采收率.2010,17(6)：97-100.
[87]谢俊等.胜坨油田聚合物驱转后续水驱技术对策研究[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版).2007,26(2)：12-17.
[88]岳登台,综述老油田改善开发效果及提高采收率技术[J].石油学报,1998,19(3)：46-50.
[89]梁文福,喇嘛甸油田特高含水期水驱综合调整技术研究[D].大庆石油学院硕士论文,2003.
[90]胡永乐等,注水油田高含水后期开发技术方针的调整[J].石油学报,2004,25(5)：65-69.
[91]宿春梁等,高含水油田后期提高采收率技术研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2004,(30)：90-91
[92]王友启,胜利油田高含水期油藏水驱精细调整技术方向[J].石油钻探技术,2011,39(1)：101-104.
[93]薛东安,利用油藏精细描述技术调整水驱开发方案[J].中外能源,2012,17(7)：43-47.
[94]王晶宇,改善水驱开发效果提高注水效率[J].石油石化节能,2013,(1)：51-52.
[95]Marco R. Thiele, Rod P. Batycky. Using Streamline-Derived Injection Efficiencies for Improved Waterflood Management[Z]. SPE84080,2006
[96]Joseph S. Tsng. Extended Brigham Model for Resodual Oil Saturation Measurement by Partitioning Teacer Tests[Z]. SPE Journal,2005
[97]计秉玉,李莉,李群.不同类型储层驱替速度对提高原油采收率的影响[J].石油学报,2004,25(3)：58-61
[98]张宏方,王德民,岳湘安等.不同类型聚合物溶液对采油残余油的作用机理研究[J]. 高分子学报,2003,(3)：321-325
[99]姜维东,任艳滨,张运来等.稠油油田油水相对渗透率和水驱油效率研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(4)：50-53
[100]魏斌,张友生,杨贵凯等.储集层流动单元水驱油实验研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(6)：72-74
[101]高慧梅,姜汉桥,陈民锋等.储集层微观参数对油水相对渗透率影响的微观模拟研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(6)：735-737
[102]王曙光,赵国忠,余碧君.大庆油田油水相对渗透率统计规律及其应用[J].石油学报,2005,26(3)：78-81
[103]康志宏.缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏水驱油机理模拟试验研究[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(1)：87-90
[104]何建华,张树林.高含水期微观剩余油分布研究[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(4)：35-344
[105]曹峰.混幼己油藏的润湿性和相对渗透率研究[J].国外油田工程,1999,5-9
[106]马建国,刘小娟,杜福祥等.机械振动对岩心相渗曲线的影响[J].西安石油学院学报,1999,14(1)：13-15
[107]陈民锋,姜汉桥.基于孔隙网络模型的微观水驱油驱替特征变化规律研究[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(5)：91-95
[108]周惠忠,王利群.两维油藏物理模拟装置[J].清华大学学报,1994,34(3)：75-82
[109]KhosrowBiglarbigi, G. W. Paul, R. M. Ray. A Methodology for Prediction of Oil Recovery by Infill Drilling[Z]. SPE27761,1994
[110]T. L. Gould, A.M. Sam Sarem. Infill Drilling for Incremental Recovery[Z]. SPE18941,1989
[111]Yujun Feng,Rene Tabary, Michel Renard. Characteristics of Microgels Designed for Water Shutoff and Profile Control[Z]. SPE 80203,2003
[112]Per H. Valvatne, Martin J. Blunt. Predictive Pore-Scale Network Model ing [Z]. SPE84550,2003
[113]I. Osako, M.Kumar, V. Hoang. Evaluation of Streamline Simulation Application to Heavy Oil Waterflood[Z]. SPE122922,2009
[114]秦积舜,李久娣,孟红霞.平面物理模型的拟相渗规律研究[J].重庆大学学报,2000,23增刊：111-113
[115]窦让林,邓君,计曙东.濮城油田深层低渗透储层驱替特征实验[J].断块油气田,2009,16(3)：64-67
[116]刘月田,郭分乔,涂彬.全岩心非均匀径向渗流各向异性渗透率测定方法[J].石油学报,2005,26(6)：66-68
[117]沈平平,王家禄,田玉玲等.三维油藏物理模拟的饱和度测量技术研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31增刊：71-72
[118]金佩强.水驱后留下的残余油流动机理[J].国外油田工程,2005,21(3)：1-6
[119]贾忠伟,杨清彦,兰玉波.水驱油微观物理模拟实验研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(1)：46-49
[120]张继红,岳湘安,侯吉瑞等.外加电场作用下水驱油藏的油水相对渗透率[J].高电压技术,2005,31(4)：75-76
[121]李中锋,何顺利,杨文新等.微观物理模拟水驱油实验及残余油分布分形特征研究[J].中国石油大学学报,2006,30(3)：67-71
[122]王玉斗,王世虎,姜泽菊.温度、界面张力对油水相对渗透率的影响[J].油气田地面工程,2004,23(4)：11
[123]李克文,戴志坚,江义容.稳定流方法与非稳定流方法的对比研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(1)：47-50
[124]彦欣,张立红,赵丽.相似理论在微观物理模拟实验中的应用可行性分析[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(4)：410-412
[125]王金勋,刘庆杰,杨普华.应用Bethe网络研究孔隙结构对两相相对渗透率的影响[J].重庆大学学报,2000,23增刊：130-132
[126]高建,韩冬,王家禄.应用CT成像技术研究岩心水驱含油饱和度分布特征[J].新疆石油地质,2009,30(2)：269-271
[127]王金勋,刘庆杰,杨普华.应用逾渗理论计算非稳态法油水相渗曲线[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2)：79-82
[128]张立娟,岳湘安.油藏中分散非连续残余油膜的驱替机理分析[J].油田化学,2006,23(3)：243-247
[129]张继红,岳湘安,杨晶.直流电场对水驱油藏油水相对渗透率的影响研究[J].电化学,2005,11(2)：214-218