用户名: 密码: 验证码:
北细辛种子特性及光合生理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
北细辛(Asarum heterotropoides Fr. Schmidt Var. mandshuricum(Maxim) kitag.)(2n=14)为马兜铃科细辛族细辛属杜衡亚属华细辛组植物的1变种,以根入药,味辛,性温,归心、肺、肾经,具有祛风散寒、通窍止痛、温肺化饮之功效,用于风寒感冒、头痛、牙痛、风湿痹痛、痰饮喘咳等疾病的治疗。北细辛是吉林省大宗常用道地中药材,我国在20世纪80年代开始了北细辛野生变家植的驯化过程,并取得了重大成功。现在,人工种植北细辛已经在北细辛的应用中占主导地位。然而在人工种植过程中有许多问题亟待解决。本文对北细辛种子发育特性及萌发特性、贮藏方法及北细辛光合生理特性及光照强度对北细辛生长发育、品质的影响进行了研究。
     1.北细辛种子后熟研究。通过对北细辛种子种胚萌发能力的验证及种胚形态石蜡切片观察,发现北细辛种子采收后种胚不具有萌发能力,种胚发育过程为经过球形胚、心形胚、鱼雷型胚、具有完整子叶胚等阶段,胚根伸长直至发芽,种胚发育成熟需要约5~7周的时间。采用酶联免疫吸附法对种胚发育过程中4中内源激素ABA、GA3、IAA和ZR动态变化进行测定,结果表明,在胚发育阶段,从新鲜种子到沙藏2周的约14天时间内,ABA含量呈逐渐增加趋势,从第3周始,种子中ABA含量呈逐渐下降趋势;GA3的含量变化呈“抛物线型”变化趋势,从新鲜种子到沙藏5周,含量呈逐渐增加的趋势,从沙藏5周开始,含量逐渐降低,甚至降低到(0.01)ng/g的水平;IAA含量变化曲线呈“波浪型”,亦即含量呈高—低—高—低的变化趋势,直到10周后,含量降到最小值。ZR含量变化基本也呈“抛物线型”变化趋势,与GA3变化趋势线相似,均是在沙藏5周后,激素含量升高到定点,而后含量下降,直到10周后达到最小值。
     2.北细辛种子萌发特性及贮藏方法研究。北细辛是需光种子,萌发过程中需要光照。种子在15℃、18℃、20℃、25℃恒温下均可萌发,但15℃为北细辛种子萌发的最佳温度,在10℃和28℃下不能萌发。北细辛鲜种子置于4℃恒温条件下24个月,萌发率能达到94%左右,其萌发率与新鲜种子相当,是一种可行的种子贮藏方法。
     3.光照对叶片影响的解剖研究。出苗后分别给予4种光照条件后,进入果期后全光照条件下(Ⅰ)北细辛叶片开始发生光灼伤现象, 50%自然光照条件(Ⅱ)、28%自然光照条件(Ⅲ)、和12%自然光照条件下(Ⅳ)的细辛叶片生长发育良好。在全光照条件下,未发生灼伤的叶片叶肉细胞发生严重的质壁分离现象、细胞器外泄到细胞间隙,细细胞中出现过氧化物酶体、酚类、质体小球等,细胞核核膜破裂、有的叶绿体基粒片层模糊不清、有的片层清晰、叶绿体双层膜结构模糊、线粒体脊消失、双层膜消失等。发生灼伤的叶片叶肉细胞中的细胞器丧失、细胞内容物凝聚粘连、细胞严重变形、细胞器消失凝聚。其他3个光照条件下,叶肉细胞的细胞器生长发育良好,结构清晰完整。叶绿体中基粒片层结构清晰,细胞中其他细胞器形态清晰完整。在4种光照条件下,叶肉细胞横切解剖结构和叶表皮扫描结构也有差异,具体表现为栅栏组织、海绵组织和气孔、非腺毛等的分布。
     4.光照对北细辛光合生理特性的影响研究。叶片中叶绿素b含量类胡萝卜素含量均随遮荫程度的增加而增加,比叶重随遮荫程度的增加而减小。在7个生育期内,日均净光合速率随遮荫程度的加强而逐渐减小。在全光照条件下的3个生育期,净光合日变化呈双峰曲线变化, 50%自然光照条件下,展叶期、花期和果初期净光合日变化呈双峰曲线变化,其他4个生育期呈单峰曲线变化。其他2个光照条件下,花期净光合日变化呈双峰曲线变化,其他6个生育期呈单峰曲线变化。4种光照条件下,所有生态因子均呈单峰曲线变化。对不同光照条件下,北细辛展叶期和果中期2个生育期的环境因子间相关关系表明,大气温度(T)与叶片与大气间的水蒸汽压亏缺(VPD)成极显著正相关系(p<0.01),与大气相对湿度(%RH)呈极显著负相关(p<0.01)。叶片与大气间的水蒸汽压亏缺(VPD)与大气相对湿度(%RH)呈极显著负相关(p<0.01)。
     5.光照对北细辛质量的影响。对给予100%(Ⅰ、6月10日前给予50%)、50%(Ⅱ)、28%(Ⅲ)、12%(Ⅳ)自然光照条件的第5年生北细辛根折干率、根年增产率、挥发油含量及组分、灰分、浸出物、细辛脂素进行调查、分析和测试。结果表明,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ4种光照条件下根折干率分别为25.14%、28.27%、30.23%和31.57%,挥发油含量分别为1.81mL·100g-1、1.76mL·100g-1、1.63mL·100g-1和1.53mL·100g-1,4个光照条件下的挥发油总离子流图存在差异;挥发油的组分类别及含量均存在差异,各组分的含量并未出现随光照强度的减弱呈现逐渐减少/增加的趋势。Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ4种光照条件下,北细辛干燥根总灰分含量分别是9.76%、5.64%、6.50%和6.65%,酸不溶性灰分的含量分别是3.87%、1.04%、1.87%和1.71%,醇溶性浸出物含量分别是23.45%、22.45%、22.18%和21.12%,细辛脂素含量分别是0.285%、0.291%、0.279%和0.252%。
Asarum heterotropoides Fr. Schmidt Var. mandshuricum(Maxim) kitag.(2n=14)which was a variety of Asarum sieboldii Miq.was named as liaoxiixn,xishen,and yandaiguohua et al. Because its nature was warm and having pungnent and it had the function of relieving rheumatism and chills, alleviating pain,expelling wind and promoting the restoration consciousness, So, the dried radix was selected as Chinese medicine to treat the cold,headache,toothache and rheumatism arthralgia et al. Asarum heterotropoides Fr.Var. mandshuricum(Maxim) kitag.was the traditional material medica of Jilin province.The wild plant resources had been exhausted because they were damaged and over-collected.In china northeast, the cultural technique of artificial domestication and cultivation had been studied from 1980s.And,some technique had been put into practice. At present, the main source of medicine came from the cultivating plants. But, there were many problem should be cried out for solutions which had arisen in course of the cultivating of Asarum heterotropoides Fr.Var. mandshuricum(Maxim) kitag. In this paper, the seed developmental and germination characteristics, storage and photosynthetic ecophysiology of Asarum heterotropoides Fr.Var. mandshuricum(Maxim) kitag. were studied.
     The germination ability,vigor and embryo of Asarum heterotropoides Fr.Var. mandshuricum(Max- im) kitag. seeds were studied in this paper. The results showed that the embryo couldn’t germinate at any condition which was 25℃and 3500lx~4000 lx or 25℃and darkness. The seed could germinate at 25℃and 3500lx~4000 lx after 5 weeks but not germinating at 25℃and darkness. The ratio of vigor could remain constant during the seed preservation in wet sand which was 88.3%~93.7.7%. The appearance of embryo changed with the preservation time progressively through microscopic observation. The development process of embryo could be described as globular shape to heart-shaped stage, torpedo-shaped stage to mature cotyledons stage. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assary was used to detected the content of four kinds of endogenous phytohormone named as ABA,GA3,IAA and ZR respectively. The result showed that the content of endogenous phytohormone changed continuously during the embryo development. The ABA content was128.55ng/g~327.35ng/g during the embryo deve-
     lopment and rised in the first two weeks then reduced. The GA3 content was 0.01ng/g~5.56ng/g during the embryo development whose variation curve was similar to parabola. And, at the fifth week, the content rised highest level.In addition, the variation curve of ZR content was similar to parabola and the content rised high level at the fifth week too. The IAA content variation curve was similar to wave. The germination characteristic of seed was studied in the experiment. The result showed the seed need light stimulation during germinating and could germinate at 15℃,18℃,20℃,25℃but couldn’t germinate at 10℃or 28℃.Especially, we concluded that the optimum temperature for seed germination was 15℃.The seed was stored at 4℃in refrigerator twenty four mouth had the germination ability and the percentage of germination was about 95% which was same as fresh seed. So, we believed that this method could be used to store seed.
     The content of chlorophyll b and caroteniod in the leaves increased with the shading intensity. But, LMA reduced with the shading intensity .The net photosynthetic rate of plant leaves was“double peak”diurnal curve when they had been in the unwrapping stage,blooming stage and initial fruit stage. And other ecological factors was“single peak”diurnal curve.The plant leaves net photosynthetic rate was“double peak”diurnal curve grew under the 50% nature sunlight intensity condition when they had been in unwrapping stage, blooming stage and initial stage. And in other four stages, the net photosynthetic rate of plant leaves was“single peak”.The ecological factors was“single peak”diurnal curve too. Under the 28% and 12% nature sunlight intensity condition,the plant leaves net photosynthetic rate was“double peak”diurnal curve in their blooming stage and“single peak”diurnal curve in their other six phenological phase.
     In all the seven phenological phase,the net photosynthetic rate reduced with the shading intensity increase. This suggested that shading intensity had effected the leaves net photosynthetic rate.The correlation between net photosynthetic rate (Pn)and other ecological factors were analysed by spss 13.0 software, the statistics showed that there were no evident single correlation between Pn and other ecological factors. But, the correlation between ecological factors had been analysed that was the temperature of air and vapor pressure deficit(VPD) have correlated positive effect. But there had been correlated negatively effect between temperature of air and relative humidity(%RH ).The other,VPD and %RH had correlated negatively effect.
     In unwrapping stage of plant, the four different sunlight intensity condition mentioned above were offerd. About one mouth later, the leaf were sunburned grew under the nature sunlight condition.The ultrastructure of mesophyll cell had been destructed. Before the leaf were sunburned,there had been a number substance for example peroxisome, phenols and plastid in the cell.All together, plasmolysis had apperenced and the organell had leaked into cell interval.In addition, the grana lamella were blurred and membrane of organell dissolving. when leaf were sunburned,the ultrastructure of mesophyll cell had be- en destructed quite seriously leading to all organell and cytoplasm adhesion together. Meanwhile, the cholraplast membranes had dissolved and stroma of the chloroplast had disappeared. But, In another three sunlight intensity condition, the leaf grew very well and all the organell were clear and well- structured. The anatomical structure of leaf grew under the four different sunlight intensity condition apperenced difference. For example, The palisade tissue and spongy tissue distribution and stoma num- ber et al.
     The unwrapping stage, blooming stage, the initial fruit stage, fructescence and wither stage was investigated during the growth period under the different sunlight intensity which was 100%(50%nature sunlight before 10/6,Ⅰ)、50%(Ⅱ)、28%(Ⅲ)、12%(Ⅳ)natural sunlight. The result showed that there was difference in the date of the phenological phase. Among these phenological phase, the unwrapping stage, blooming stage and the early fruit stage postponed about 2 days with the sunlight intensity reduced. In addition, the infection rate of leaf spot, the drying rate and volatile oil of radix grown under the different sunlight intensity stated as above were detected. The result showed that the infection rate of leaf spot which was 88.46%,70.00%,0.23%and0.07% respectively was lessened with the sunlight intensity reduced and the volatile oil content which was 1.81 ( ml/100g ) ,1.76(ml/100g),1.63(ml/100g)and1.53(ml/100g)decreased with the sunlight intensity reduced. The components of volatile oil extracted from the dried radix grown under the four different sunlight intensity condition was scanned by GS-MS respectively. The result indicated there was the distinct difference between the total ion current spectrums and the component. But, the difference of every kind of component didn’t show the linear trend such as volatile oil of dried radix. Comparing the component of four kinds of volatile oil, the methyl eugenol was 46.75% and safrol was 11.42% in the volatile oil of dried radix growth under the sunlight intensity being 28%. Likewise in this sunlight intensity,the there was the highest methyl eugenol and the lowest safrol content. The total content of dried radix which under the different sunlight conditionⅠ,Ⅱ,ⅢandⅣwas 9.76%,5.64%,6.5%and6.65% respectively. And, the acid-insoluble ash content of radix mentioned above was 3.87%,1.04%,1.87% and 1.71% respectively. In addition, the extracts content was 23.45%,22.45%,22.18% and 21.12% and the Asarinin content was 0.285%、0.291%、0.279% and 0.252% respectively. Beside volatile oils, all index of quality of Asarum heterotropoides Fr.Var. mandshuricum(Maxim) kitag. could meet the standard of Chinese pharmacopoeia 2010.
引文
1.李国泰.东北细辛染色体核型分析[J].通化师范学院学报,2002,(23):2,70~71
    2.中国科学院中国植物志编委委员会.中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1980,112~113
    3.国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典[M]:一部.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2010. 214
    4.胡月娟,周弘,王家国,细辛挥发油的解痉抗炎作用[J].中国药理学通报,1986,2(11):415~418.
    5.曲淑岩,毋英杰.细辛油的抗炎作用[J].药学学报,1982,17(1):12~15
    6.曲淑岩,毋英杰,王一华,细辛对中枢神经系统的抑制作用[J].中医杂志,1982,17(6):72~76
    7.周勇,姚三桃,吴琦,细辛挥发油抗真菌作用及其有效成分黄樟醚的研究[J].中医杂志,1981,12,62
    8.田珍,董善年,王宝荣,国产细辛属植物中挥发油的成分鉴定Ⅰ.辽细辛的挥发油[J].北京大学学报(医学版),1981,13(3):179~182
    9.孙海英,陈海生.辽细辛挥发油的气相一质谱分析[J].第二军医大学学报,1993,1(2):193~197
    10.张峰,王龙星,罗茜,气相色谱-质谱分析北细辛根和根茎中的挥发性成分[J].色谱,2002,20(5): 467~471
    11.赵中振,肖培根当代药用植物典[M].世界图书出版社,2007,98~101
    12.王栋,都晓伟,刘玫,北细辛年发育与有效成分动态积累相关规律的研究[J].植物研究,1996,16(4):485~488
    13.蔡少青,陈世忠,谢丽华,不同生长年限及不同采集时间对北细辛根挥发油的影响[J].北京医科大学学报, 1997,29(4):336~371
    14.张红梅.规范化种植药材的品质评价(X)一北细辛的质量控制研究[硕士学位论文].哈尔滨:2007
    15.吴艳蓉,贾凌云,高福坤,不同产地和采收期辽细辛挥发油的含量测定[J].沈阳药科大学学报,2006,23(5): 285~288
    16.曾虹燕,金永钟,包罗涛,不同方法提取的辽细辛挥发油指纹图谱分析[J].测试技术学报,2004,18 (3):16~20
    17.曾虹燕,金永钟,曾美霞,超临界CO2和微波辅助萃取辽细辛挥发油[J].过程工程学报,2004, 4 (4):367~371
    18.杨厚玲,邱琴,陈婷婷,不同方法提取的北细辛挥发油的气质联用成分分析[J].中国药学杂志,2007,42(13):1031~1033
    19.王栋,王喜,夏晓晖,北细辛不同生长期甲基丁香酚和黄樟醚的气相色谱法定量分析[J].色谱,1997, 15(1):89~92
    20.蔡少青,陈世忠,谢丽华,不同生长年限及不同采集时间对北细辛根挥发油的影响[J].北京医科大学学报, 1997,29(4 ): 336~371
    21.张峰,王龙星,罗茜,气相色谱-质谱分析北细辛根和根茎中的挥发性成分[J].色谱,2002,2(5):467~470
    22.斋木保久,药学杂志,1967,(87): 1529~1532.
    23.田珍,董善年,王宝荣,国产细辛属植物中挥发油的成分鉴定Ⅰ[J].辽细辛的挥发油.北京医学院学报,1981,13(3): 179~182
    24徐植灵,杨春升,潘炯光,中国细辛属植物挥发油的气相色谱一质谱分析I[J].辽细辛华细辛紫背细辛深绿细辛和短尾细辛.中药通报,1984,9(l): 27~29
    25.杨广民,周天达.湖南细辛属(AsarumL.)植物资源及利用研究—湘细辛挥发油含量测定及成份分析[J].湖南中医杂志,1986,4:40~42
    26.回瑞华,魏倩,盖泽广,辽细辛挥发油化学成分的研究[J].辽宁大学学报,1993,29(2 ):53~55
    27.孙海英,陈海生,辽细辛挥发油的气相一质谱分析[J].第二军医大学学报,1993,14(2):193~195
    28.姚发业,崔兆杰,苏德民,细辛挥发油化学组成的研究[J].药物分析杂志,1998,18(增刊):133~136
    29.段鹤君,付朝晖,细辛挥发油化学成分研究[J]. 2010,33(4):562~565
    30.曾虹燕,金永钟,包罗涛,不同方法提取的辽细辛挥发油指纹图谱分析[J].测试技术学报,2004,18(3):232~236
    31.杨厚玲,邱琴,陈婷婷,不同方法提取的北细辛挥发油的气质联用成分分析[J].中国药学杂志, 2007,42(13):1031~1033
    32. Kosuge T,Yokota M, Nukaya H, et al. Studies on antitussive principles of Asiasarum Radix[J].Chem Pharm Bull. 1978:26(7):2284~2287
    33.蔡少青,王禾,陈世忠,北细辛非挥发性化学成分的研究[J].北京医科大学学报,1996,28(3):228~230
    34.王栋,夏晓晖,北细辛地上部分化学成分的研究[J].中草药,1998,29(2):83~84
    35.王桂芳,张守尧,朱素琴,HPLC法测定北细辛中芝麻脂素和细辛脂素的含量[J]药物分析杂志,1999,19(4):251~253
    36.郭增军,刘辉,王利, HPLC法测定不同品种商品细辛中细辛脂素和芝麻脂素的含量[J].中药材,2001,24(4): 273~274
    37.张磊,陈晓辉,刘玉磊,RP-HPLC法同时测定辽细辛中L-细辛脂素、L-芝麻脂素和卡枯醇[J].中草药2008,39(7):1098~1100
    38.李晶晶,倪秀珍,细辛多糖的分离纯化与免疫活性研究[J].长春师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2008, 27(1):54~58
    39.朱梅,细辛多糖的分离提取及性质研究[硕士论文].东北师范大学,长春,2007
    40.蔡传英,不同种细辛中微量生物元素的分布规律.昆明医学院学报,1992, 13(3): 17~24
    41.李素芬,张兢兢,辽产10种中草药微量元素含量的测定.广东微量元素科学,1995,2(3): 43~44
    42.周长征,李银,杨春澍,细辛道地药材与微量元素[J]中草药,2000,3(4):282~294
    43.谢昭明,李顺祥,廖汉成,HPLC法测定细辛药材中马兜铃酸A的含量.中南药学,2003,1(3):165~167
    44.李国信,于艳,田原,Rp-HPLC法测定细辛根中马兜铃酸A的含量.辽宁中医杂志,2005,32(1):1080~1081
    45.吴艳蓉,贾凌云,高福坤等.不同产地辽细辛中马兜铃酸的痕量检测,中药研究与信息,2005,7(1): 9~10
    46.徐玫,李景华等.细辛不同部位的马兜铃酸及挥发油含量研究.药物研究,2007,16(10):29~31
    47.谢昭明,李顺祥,刘杰等.细辛不同部位马兜铃酸A的含量测定.中成药,2007,29(12):1808~1810
    48.薛燕,童湘晖,王峰,UPLC-UV测定细辛地上和地下部位中的马兜铃酸A[J].药学学报,2008, 43(2): 221~223
    49.吴艳蓉,王宇杰,孙启时.辽细辛果实中马兜铃酸A的含量测定[J].沈阳药科大学学报,2007,24(5):288~291
    50.胡月娟,周弘,王家国.细辛挥发油的解痉抗炎作用[J]中国药理学通报,1986,2(11):41~44
    51.钱立群,钱大伟,谢伟,细辛挥发油对实验性炎症大鼠血清、肝脏中锌、铜含量的影响.中草药,1996, 27(5): 290~293
    52.王本祥主编.现代中药药理学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1999,6:49~53
    53.郑虎占等主编.中药现代研究与应用(第4卷)[M].北京,学苑出版社,1998,1: 51~62。
    54.黄顺旺细辛的药理毒理和临床应用[J],安徽医药,2003,7(6):477~479
    55.石原琢郎:细辛の解热作用に就て(予报)[J].日本药理学杂志,1957,53(2):60~63
    56.近藤东一郎.朝鲜医学会杂志,1928;88:44~46,
    57.近藤东一郎.KeijoJ Med, 1930,l:223
    58.李义奎细辛挥发油解痉作用研究[J].中国药理通,1954(3-4):321~324
    59.胡月娟,周弘,王家国,细辛挥发油的解痉抗炎作用[J].中国药理学通报,1986,2(11): 41~44
    60.周勇,姚三桃,吴琦,细辛挥发油抗真菌作用及其有效成分黄樟醚的研究[J].中医杂志,1981,12,62~65
    61.王桂清细辛精油对7种玉米病害的离体抑菌效果[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007,12,38(6):807~810
    62. Zhang G Z, Fan Y, Ding W L,et al. A study on antifungal activity of essential oils from Ephedra sinicaand Asarum heterotropoides var. mandshuricum [J].Acta Phytophyl Sin, 1995, 22(4): 373~374
    63. Wang S T, Hu T L, Wang X Y. Screening of plant extracts for the fungitoxicity againstBotrytis cinerea[J].J Agric Univ Hebei, 2003, 26(1): 61~64
    64.刘树民,罗明媚,杜心懿.细辛挥发油对栖北散白蚁毒效作用[J].中药材,2006,29(6):539~541
    65.蒋蓥,刘国卿,马俊儒,甲基丁香酚的药理研究[J].药学学报,1982,17(2):87~92
    66.周慧秋,于滨,乔婉红,甲基丁香酚药理作用研究[J].中医药学报,2000,2,79~80
    67. Machemer L. and Hess R. Additive and Synergistic Inhibition of Mammalian Microsomal Enzyme Functions by Piperonyl Butoxide, Safrole and Other Methylenedioxyphenyl Derivatives[J],Specialia, 1971,15 (9):1052~1056
    68. Neal J.J., Berenbaum M. Decreased Sensitivity of Mixed-function Oxidases from Papilio polyxenes to Inhibitors in Host Plants[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1989,15(1):439~442
    69. Johnson J D,RyanM J,Toft J D I I, etal.Two-year toxicity and carcinogenicity study of methyleugenol in F344/N ratsand B6C3F(1) mice. Agric Food Chem, 2000, 48 (8):3620~3625
    70. National Toxicology Program·NTP Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of methyleuge- nol (CAS NO·93-15-2) inF344/N Rats and B6C3F1 mice (Gavage Studies) Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser, 2000,491~495
    71. Chan V S, Caldwell J. Comparative induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in cultured rat hepatocytes by allylbenzenesand their 1’-hydroxy metabolites.Food Chem Toxicol,1992, 30 (10):831~837
    72. Gardner I, Bergin P, Stening P, et al. Immunochemical detection of covalently modified protein adducts in livers of ratstreated with methyleugenol.Chem Res Toxicol, 1996, 9(4):7131~7135
    73.杨秀伟.基于体内过程的中药毒性成分和毒性效应物质的发现策略.中华中医药杂志,2007,22 (2): 67~70
    74.方明,余应年,陈星若.DNA损伤剂与ADPRT介导的细胞NAD含量下降.中国药理学与毒理学志,1990,4(2):216~221
    75.周晓园.李苗.药用葛蒲研究近况.山东中医学院学报,1994,18(4):270~272
    76.贾天柱,姜涛,关洪全,肉豆蔻不同炮制品抗炎镇痛及抑菌作用比较,辽宁中医学院学报,1996,23,(10):474~476
    77.国家医药管理局中草药情报中心编·植物药有效成分手册·北京:人民卫生出社, 1986, 954
    78.张丽丽,于波,杨宝峰.细辛脂素+供鼠脾/骨髓细胞诱导的免疫耐受对大鼠心脏移植存活的影响.心脏杂志, 2010,22( 1):16~19
    79.张丽丽,关振中,张竞逵等.细辛脂素对心脏移植急性排斥反应的作用研究.中华器官移植杂志,2004,25(4):251~254
    80.尹红,杜心笼,刘树民等.细辛醇提物对栖北散白蚁的毒效及含量测定研究,中华卫生杀虫药械2007,13(4):263~266
    81.吴皓.芝麻脂素的抗高血压作用(4):抑制血管过氧化物的产生.国外医学中医中药分册,2004,6(1):37
    82.吴皓.芝麻木脂素的抗高血压作用(5):芝麻脂素的清除活性氧作用国外医学中医中药分册2003,25(3):172
    83.黄顺旺.细辛的药理毒理和临床应用.安徽医药2003,7(6):477~479
    84.张家俊,陈文为,去甲乌药碱对关节液的保护作用.药学学报,1985, 20(6): 423~426
    85. Hashimoto K.细辛根中抗过敏成分的研究〔英).国外医学中医中药分册,1994, 16(6): 43
    86.熊玉兰,荆宇,尚明英,细辛非挥发性提取物抗炎镇痛作用研究.2009,3(17):中国中药杂志,2252~2257
    87.郑虎占,董泽宏,佘靖,中药现代化研究与应用(第四卷).北京:学苑出版社,1998: 3057
    88.陈振中,刘莉,周铁军,细辛对狗左室功能及其与去甲乌药碱、异丙肾上腺素的比较.药学学报,1981, 16 (10):721~724
    89.何秀芬,施子棣,蒋时红,细辛对体外培养乳鼠心肌细胞的影响.河南中医药学刊,1994, 9(5): 26~29
    90.马晓红,宫汝淳,潘晓鹏,细辛提取物对家兔血压的影响.人参研究,2003 (3 ): 42~44
    91. But PP, Ma SCChinese-herb nephropathy. Lancet 1999,354:1731~1732
    92. Lord G.M., Tagore. R., Cook T, Nephropathy caused by Chinese herbs in the UK. Lancet 1999,354:481~482
    93. Tanaka A., Nishida R., Yoshida T.,..Outbreak of Chinese herb nephropathy in Japan: are there any differences from Belgium. Intern Med 2001,40:296~300
    94.Kim S J, Zhang C G, Lim J T. Mechanism of anti-nociceptive effects ofAsarum sieboldiiMiq. Radix: Potential role ofbradykinin, histamine and opioid Receptor-Mediated Pathways[ J]. J.Ethnopharmaco,l 2003, 88: 5~11
    95. JongK. H. ,Chun J. H.Wei-C. C. Independent [Ca2+]i increases and cell proliferation induced by the carcinogen safrole in human oral cancer cells Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s[J]. Arch Pharmacol (2005) 372: 88~94
    96.刘兴权,平贝母细辛无公害高效栽培与加工[M].金盾出版社,2003,第一版
    97.车长吉,中药材科技,1982,6:5~8
    98.陈瑛,李先恩,张军,细辛种子贮藏试验.特产研究,1993,1:40~43
    99.南桂仙,金光德.细辛组织培养研究.河北农业科学,2009,13(7): 39, 117~120
    100.闫恩维,郑世财,郝家发,东北细辛林下栽培技术.中国林副特产,2001,2(57):25~26
    101.华劲松,戴红燕,夏明忠.不同光照强度对芸豆光合特性及产量性状的影响[J].西北农业报,2009,18 (2) :136~140
    102.彭春华,不同鱼腥草的质量与遮阴调控效果评价研究[硕士学位论文],福建农林大学,福州,2008
    103.阎秀峰,王洋,尚辛亥,光强和光质对野外栽培高山红景天生物量和红景天甙含量的影响.应用生态学报,2004,24(4):674~679
    104.冷平生,苏淑银,王天华,光强与光质对银杏光合作用及黄酮苷与萜类内酯含量的影响.植物资源与环境学报2002,11(1):1~4
    105.于国华,苘辉民,罗文熹,不同光照强度对西洋参光合特性、营养成分和产量的影响.应用生态学报,1994,5卷(1):57~61
    106.徐克章,修立军,唐树延.不同透光率遮阴棚对人参生长和生理特性的影响.吉林农业科学,1986,2:84~85
    107.张永霞,李国旗,张琦,不同遮荫条件下罗布麻光合特性的初步研究.西北植物学报2007,27(12):2555~2558
    108.周忆堂,马红群,梁丽娇,不同光照条件下长春花的光合作用和叶绿素荧光动力学特征.中国农业科学,2008,41(11):3589~3595
    109.蔡永萍,李玲,李合生等,霍山县3种石斛叶片光合特性及其对光强的响应[J].中草药,2005,36(4):586~590
    110.孙佳音,杨逢建,庞海河,遮荫对南方红豆杉光合特性及生活史型影响[J].植物研究,2007, 27(4):439~444
    111.徐克章,曹正菊,张为群,人参叶片光合作用特性的研究[J].中国农业科学,1990, 23 ( 6 ): 69~74
    112.徐克章,曹正菊,陈星,人参光生理研究Ⅰ.光强对人参叶片生长、叶绿素含量和光合作用特性的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,1988,10(3):11~14
    113.刘世彪,胡正海.遮荫处理对绞股蓝叶形态结构及光合特性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究2004,22(4):339~344
    114.董丽华,张春雨,李亚东,遮荫对半高丛越橘光合特性的影响[J].东北农业大学学报2009,40(3): 27~30
    115.李强,任茜,张永良,生境、采收期、贮藏时间等因素对秦岭金银花绿原酸含量的影响[J].中国中药杂志,1994,19(10):594~595
    116.刘珊,贾云峰,邵东清,光照对麻黄生长发育及生物碱产量的影响[J].中药材,1999,22(5):221~222
    117.阎秀峰,王洋,尚辛亥,光强和光质对野外栽培高山红景天生物量和红景天甙含量的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):674~679
    118.肖艳辉,何金明,王羽梅,光照强度对茵香植株生长以及精油的含量和成分的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2007, 43(3):551~555
    119.袁开来,王文杰,光强对伊贝母鳞茎生物碱生产的影响[J].中草药,1993,24(7):369~370
    120.王万贤,戴为苹,杨毅,生态因子对绞股蓝皂甙含量影响的研究[J].中草药,1996,27(9):559~561
    121.官秀庆,老鹳属植物Geranium thunbergii的栽培和育种第1报[J].生药学杂志,1991,45(1):5~9
    122.朱旭祥,刘光明,傅美珍.红豆杉中紫杉醇含量与生态环境的关系[J].中草药,1998,28(增刊):17~20.
    123.张治安,徐克章,任跃英等.光照条件对参株碳水化合物和人参皂苷含量的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,1994,16(3): 15~17
    124.陈超君,李莉蓉,尹小红等.不同透光率对石韦活性成分含量的影响[J].时珍国医国药,2010,21(12):3191~3192
    125尚旭岚,青钱柳种子休眠机理及其解除休眠方法的研究.博士论文,南京林业大学,南京2007,14~15
    126.张鹏,沈海龙,纪玉山,东北刺人参种胚形态后熟过程中的解剖观察[J].种子,2007,26(12):45~47
    127. Khan,A.A.,Tao,K.L.Plant hormonesand related eompounds.Elsevier North一Holland Biomedieal PressB.V.,Amsterdam,
    128.宋松泉,段咏新,傅家瑞,ABA对种子发育的调节.种子,1997,5:36~42,;
    129. OGAWA M,HANADA A, YAMAUCHIY,Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arab- idopsisseed germination[J].PlantCel,l 2003, 15: 1591~1604
    130. Bewley J. E.Blaed M.,Physiology of development and germination . NewYork: PlenumPr- ess,1994,35~110
    131.黄上志,傅家瑞,脱落酸对发育中花生胚萌发和贮藏蛋白质合成的影响[J].植物生理学报,1993,19(l):31~37
    132.赵永华,杨世林,刘惠卿,西洋参种胚形态后熟过程中种子内源激素变化动态及其对种胚发育的调节[J].中草药,2001,32(2):159~162
    133. WHITE C. N.,PROEBSTING W. M.,HEDDEN P.,Gibberllins and seed development in maizeⅠ.Evidence that gibberellin/abscisicacid balance govern germination versus maturation pathways[J].Plant Physiol.,2000,122:1081~1088.;
    134. ALDRIDGE C. D.,PROBERTP R. J. Seed development,the accumulation of abscisic and desiccation tolerance in the aquatic grasses Porteresia coarctata(Roxb.) Tateoka andOryza sativaL.[J].Seed Sci.Res.,1993,3:97~103.
    135.王如玲,黄荟,宋松泉,玉米胚发育过程中内源ABA和GA3的含量变化及其与脱水耐性形成的关系[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(9):1772~1777
    136. Berge S.K.,Bartholomew D.W.,QuatranoR.S.,Moleeular basis of Plant development. NewYork:AlanR.Liss,1989,193~201
    137. YAMAGUCHI S., KAMIYA Y.,Gibberellins and light-stimulated seed germination[J]. J PlantGrowth Regul 2002, 20: 369~376.
    138.尹华军,刘庆,种子休眠与萌发的分子生物学的研究进展[J].植物学通报,2004,21(2):156~163
    139. OGAWA M.,HANADA A., YAMAUCHIY,Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arabidopsisseed germination[J].PlantCell, 2003, 15: 1591~1604.
    140.江玲,万建民,植物激素ABA和GA调控种子休眠和萌发的研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2007, 23(4):360~365
    141. Khan AA主编,种子休眠和萌发的生理变化(王沙生,洪铁宝,高荣孚等译)[M]北京:农业出版社,1989
    142.李秉真,乌云,田瑞华,山楂种子休眠与后熟期间内源激素的变化(简报)[J].植物生理学通讯,1998,34(24):254~256
    143.赵永华,杨世林,刘惠卿,西洋参种胚形态后熟过程中种子内源激素变化动态及其对种胚发育的调节[J].中草药,2001,32(2):159~162
    144. Khan A A.Primary,preventive and permissive role of hormones in plant systems[J]. BotRev.1995,41:341~410.
    145. Chachalis D.,ReddyK. N., Factors affectingCampsis radicans seed germination and seedling emergerce[J], Weed Sc,i 2000, 48: 212~216
    146. Taylorson R B. Environmental and chemicalmanipulation ofweed dormancy[J].RevWeed Sci 1987, 3: 135~154
    147.薛焱,王迎春,光照、温度和盐分对长叶红沙种子萌发的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2007,43(4):708~710
    148.黄振英,张新时,郑光华,光照、温度和盐分对梭梭种子萌发的影响.植物生理学报2001, 27(3):275~280
    149.张庆霞,杜彦斌,纪瑛,温度和光照对苦参种子萌发的影响[J].种子,2009,28(12):52~54,
    150.张风娟,李继泉,徐兴友,环境因子对黄顶菊种子萌发的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(4): 1947~1953
    151.黄涛,张君芝,张友德,温度、光照和几种药剂处理对黄姜种子萌发的影响[J].华中农业大学学报1999,18(2):114~116
    152.马艳华,宋瑜,郑健,白腊种子萌发最适条件的研究[J].种子2008,27(12):94~97
    153. Mayer, A. M. ,Poljakoff-Mayber, A. The Germination of Seeds(3rd edn.)[M]. Pergamon Press, Oxford.1983
    154. McKeon G. M.Seed dynamics of some pasture species in a dry monsoonal climate PhD Thesis,Griffith[M] University,Brisbane,Qld,1998.
    155. McKeonG.M.,Brook K. Establishment of Stylosanthes species: Changes in hard seeded- ness and potential speed of germination at Katherine,NT[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,2003,34:491-504. ), (6): 44~45
    156.肖关丽,郭华春.马铃薯温光反应及其与内源激素关系的研究[J].中国农业科学2010,43(7):1500~1507
    157.陈远平,杨文钰,任万军等.不同温度下卵叶韭更新芽内源激素的动态变化[J].园艺学报,2006, 33 (6): 1219~1224
    158.李秉真,刘梦云,刘奎彬,不同贮藏温度下马铃薯的萌芽和内源激素含量变化(简报)[J].植物生理学通讯,1999, 35(2):105~107
    159.张鹏,孙红阳,沈海龙,温度对水曲柳种子萌发过程中物质转化和内源激素含量的影响[J].东北林业大学学报2009,37(7):,5~7
    160. Sherry R. A., Zhou X., Gu S.,Divergence ofreproductive phenology under climatewarming[J].PNAS, 2007, 104: 198~202
    161.吴新颖.万寿菊链格孢叶斑病研究[硕士学位论文].吉林农业大学,长春,2002
    162.尚右文,尹建昌.影响月季花芽发生的环境因子研究初报[J].园艺学报,1984,4:215
    163.谢莹莹.中国东部季风主要木本植物萌动及展叶对温度变化的响应[硕士论文].北京林业大学,北京,2010
    164. Stuppner H., Ganzera M,Chromatographia, 1998, 47(11/12): 685;
    165. Machemer L. and Hess R. Additive and Synergistic Inhibition of Mammalian Microsomal Enzyme Functions by Piperonyl Butoxide, Safrole and Other Methylenedioxyphenyl Derivatives[J],Specialia,1997,39(9):1132~1153
    166.田广宇,中药细辛的现代临床应用研究[硕士学位论]湖北中医学院,武汉,2009
    167.中华人民共和国卫生部药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典[M],北京:人民卫生出版社、化学工业出版社,1990
    168.李芳兰,包维楷,植物叶片形态解剖结构对环境变化的响应与适应[J].植物学通报,2005,22(增刊):118~127,
    169. NilnenletsI.I.,Acclimation to low irradiance in Picea abies:influeces of past and present light climate on foliage structure and function[J]. Tree Physiol,1997,17:723~732;
    170. Weston E.,Thorogood K.,Vinti G.,Light quantity controis leaf-cell and chlomplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type and blue—light perception mutants[J]. Planta,2000,11:807~815
    171.刘世彪,胡正海,遮荫处理对绞股蓝叶形态结构及光合特性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究,2004,22(4):339~344,
    172. Mendes M.M.,Gazarini L.C.,Rodrigues M.L.,Acclimation ofMyrtus communis to contrasting Mediterranean light environments effects on structure and chemical composition of foliage and plant water relations[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany, (2001)45:165~178。
    173. Roscas G.,Scarano F.R. Leaf anatomical variationin Alchornea triplinervia(Spreng) Mull. Arg.(Euphorbiaceae)under distinct light and soil water regimes[J]. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2001,136:231~238
    174. Ivanova L.A. , Pankov V.I. , Structural Adaplatinn of the Leaf Mesophyll to Shading[J].Russ J.Plant Physiol,2002,49 (3):419~431
    175. Furukawa A. Stomatal frequency of Quercus myrinaefolia grown under different irradiant- ces[J].Photosynthetica. 1997,34:195~199
    176.贺金生,陈伟烈,王勋陵高山栎叶的形态结构及其与生态环境的关系[J].植物生态学报, 1994,18:219~227
    177.蔡志全,齐欣,曹坤芳,七种热带雨林树苗叶片气孔特征及其可塑性对不同光照强度的响应[J].应用生态学报,2004,15:201~204
    178.高金城,雷波,王勋陵,海拔高度对淡黄香青叶片超微结构的影响[J].电子显微学报1993,1:105~106
    179. ZhangZ.X.,Zuo X.Y.,Chen L.P.,Characters of pho tosyn thesis and transparatoion of main vegetables[J].Acta Hort sic,1995,(2):155~160(in Chinese);
    180. ZhangZ.X,Guo K.,gou Q.,Effects of shade on leaf microstraenae and ultrastracn of ginger[J].Acta Hort sic, 1999, (2):96~100(in Chinese)
    181. Demming-Adams B. Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature:uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species[J],Planta,1996,198:460~470.
    182. Kobata T., Sugawara S., Takatu S. Shading during the early grain filling period does not affect potentialgrain drymatter increase in rice[J]. Agron, 2000, 92: 411~415
    183. WANG B. Y.,FENG Y. L,Effects of growth light intensities on photosynthesis in seedlings of two tropical rain forest species[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(1):23~30
    184. Feng Y.L.,Cao K.F.,Feng Z.L. Acclimation of lamina mass per unit area,photosynthetic characteristics and dark respiration to growth light regimes in four tropical rainforest species[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2002,22:901~910.
    185. Rosati A.,Badeck F.W.,Dejong T.M,Estimating canopy light interception and absorption using leaf mass per unit leaf area in Solanum melongena[J].Annual of Botany, 2001,88:101~109
    186. Vincent G. Leaf photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen content adjustment to canopy openness in tropical forest tree seedlings[J].Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2001,17:495~509
    187. Green D,Skkpuger ELLight mediated constraints on leaf function correlate with leaf structure among deciduous and evergreen tree species[J].Tree Physiology, 2001, 21, 1341~1346.
    188. Li W,Cao K..F..Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in seedlings of Terminthia paniculata grown under different light level[J].Acta Botanica Boreali–Occidentalia Sinica. 2006, 26:266~275
    189. Kitao M.,Lei T.T.,Koike T.,Susceptibility to photo inhibition of three deciduous broad leaf tree species with different successional traits raisedunder various light regimes[J].Plant,Cell and Enviornment, 2000,23:81~89
    190. Kramer P.J. and Kozlowski T.T.,Physiology of Woody Plants,Academic Press,New York, San Francisco and London,1999,163~222。
    191. Troeng E. and Linder S..Gas exchange in a 20-year-old stand of Scots Pine.II.Variation in net photosynthesis within and between trees[J].Physiol.Plant.1992,54:15~23
    192.赵福庚,何龙飞.植物逆境生理生态学[M].北京,化学工业出版社,2004
    193.刘奇峰.4种药用植物的光合生理生态特性研究,西北农林大学硕士论文,2007
    194. SHAO X.W., HAN M., HAN Z. M. Relation ship between diurna l changes of photosynthesis of Scutellaria baicalens is and environmental factors in different habitats[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29,1470~1477
    195.陈德祥,李意德,骆土寿,海南岛尖峰岭热带山地雨林下层乔木中华厚壳桂光合生理生态特性的研究[J].林业科学研究,2003,16(5):540~547
    196. Mira S. Estrelles E. Elena M.et al Biochemical changes induced in seeds of Brassicaceae wild speciesduring ageing[J]. Acta Physiol Plant,2011,2
    197. RoqueiroG. , Graciela B. ,Facorro Mo′nica G., et alEffects of photooxidation on membrane integrity in Salix nigra seeds[J]. Annals of Botany 2010,105: 1027~1034,
    198. Varghese B. and Naithani S. C. Desiccation-induced changes in lipid peroxidation, superoxide level and antioxidant enzymes activity in neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seeds[J]. acta physiologlae plantarum,2002,24,79~87
    199. Sara M, Elena G., Ana M.,et al.Dormancy release and seed ageing in the endangered species Silene diclinis[J]. Biodivers Conserv,2011,20:345~358
    200. Narayana Murthy U.,Prakash P., Kumar,Sun Q. Mechanisms of seed ageing under different storage conditions for Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek: lipid peroxidation, sugar hydrolysis, Maillard reactions andtheir relationship to glass state transition[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2003,54,1057~1067
    210.陈叔平.种质资源低温保存原理和技术[M],中国农业科技出版社, 1995, 177~118
    211.覃初贤.作物种质低温干燥库种子贮藏生活力监测[J],1998,4:23~27;
    212. Ellis R.,Hong.T.,Roberts E et al. Logarithmic relationship between moisture contents and longevity[J]. Annals of Botnay1986,57:499~503
    213. EllisR.,HongT. ,Roberts E et al A low moisture content limit to logarithmie relations between seed moisture contents and longevity[J].Annals of Botany.1988,61,405~408
    214. Ellis R.,Hong.T,Roberts E.et al. Moisutre content and the longevity of seeds of Phaseolus vulgarism[J].AnnalsofBotany,1990b,66:341~348
    215.周长征,杨春澍,马长华等.气相色谱法测定细辛挥发油中甲基丁香酚和黄樟醚的含量[J].中国药学杂志1999,34(12):836~840

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700