城市人行地道浅埋暗挖施工技术及其环境效应研究
|
摘要
修建人行地下通道是缓解城市交通拥挤、保障行人交通安全、提高城市运行效率的一项有效措施。人行地道施工不可避免对周边环境造成不利的影响,严重者可能影响地面建构筑物和地下管线的正常使用。因此,选择合适的施工方法减小其环境效应具有非常重要的工程意义。本文在前人研究成果的基础上结合实际情况对城市人行地下通道施工技术及其环境效应进行了较系统的研究,主要工作和研究成果如下:
1.基于Pasternak双参数模型建立了接近工程实际的管棚工作机理力学模型和微分控制方程并求解。
2.基于普氏平衡拱理论和Terzaghi松散介质理论提出均质土层中城市人行地道采用全断面开挖时开挖进尺的计算方法,将该法推广应用到常用开挖方法(台阶法、CRD法)和成层土中,通过工程实例验证表明这两种计算方法可以应用到设计施工中。
3.对砂质粉土和淤泥软土中人行地下通道埋深4m时的施工技术进行了详细的数值模拟和分析,对埋深变化时(埋深2～7m)砂质粉土中开挖参数(开挖进尺和分部开挖长度)进行数值模拟分析。在保证结构和周边环境安全的前提下,对砂质粉土和淤泥软土中修建人行地下通道施工工艺(包括开挖方法、开挖进尺、分部开挖长度、格栅钢架间距、支护滞后长度等)给出合理的建议。
4.对均质土中单井和多井降水引起的孔隙压力和地表沉降变化应用数值模拟进行详细研究,在研究结果基础上建立了砂质粉土中人行地道的降水模型,研究不同降水方法引起的孔隙压力及地表沉降变化,指出边开挖边降水是适合人行地道的降水方法。
5.对不同土层、不同施工工艺、不同埋深等因素对地表沉降的影响进行了数值模拟和分析,在研究结果基础上总结了人行地道开挖引起地表沉降的影响因素和控制措施。
6.对不同条件下(不同材质、不同埋深、不同间距)人行地道施工对地下管线的影响进行数值模拟和分析。
7.通过对一个实际工程的数值模拟结果与实测值的对比,验证了本文提出的施工工艺可以应用到实际工程中。
Construction of the underpass is an effective measure to ease city traffic congestion, enhance pedestrian safety and improve the efficiency of the city. The influence of the underpass construction to the surrounding environment is inevitable, even may affect the ground buildings and the normal use of the underground pipeline. Therefore, it is significant to select an appropriate construction method to reduce the environmental effects. This paper, on the basis of the results of previous studies, has done a systematic study on the actual situation of the city underpass construction technique and its environmental effects. It runs as follows.
1. Based on two-parameter Pasternak model, a calculation model and differential governing equation which reflects the work of pipe roof mechanism has been set up and solved.
2. Based on M. M. Protodyakonov Equilibrium Arch Theory and Terzaghi Loose medium Theory, a calculating method of digging length has been given when full-face tunnel excavation is adopted in shallow tunnel construction in homogenized soil. Then, the methods have been applied to usual excavation method (e.g. step method, CRD method) and the construction in layered soil. At last, the methods have been proved to be practical in design and construction according to application in an example.
3. A detailed analysis of the numerical simulation of the underpass, 4m depth in silty sand soil and soft soil, construction technology has been conducted. Then, numerical analysis of digging length and division excavation length has been carried out according to different digging length (2～7m). On the premise of the safety of underpass and surrounding environments, reasonable proposals have been given to underpass construction technology when it is done at different depths of silty sand soil and soft soil (including excavation methods, digging length, division excavation length, steel grating spacing, the length of support etc.).
4. Through numerical simulation, detailed study has been done to the pore pressure changes and changes in surface subsidence caused by single-well and multi-well precipitation in homogeneous soil. On the basis of the results, a precipitation model of the underpass construction in gouache-rich sand soil has been made. Pore pressure changes and changes in surface subsidence caused by different precipitation construction technology have been studied to point out that dynamical precipitation is an appropriate precipitation method.
5. Numerical simulation and analysis on the impact of the different soil, construction technique and depth to surface subsidence have been done. On the basis of research results influencing factors and control measures have been summarized.
6. Numerical simulation and analysis on the impact of the underpass construction to underground pipeline under different conditions (including different material, depth and space) has been done.
7. Through the study of an actual subject and the comparison between the numerical simulation results and actual data, the construction methods proposed by this paper have been proved and can be applied to practical engineering.
1.基于Pasternak双参数模型建立了接近工程实际的管棚工作机理力学模型和微分控制方程并求解。
2.基于普氏平衡拱理论和Terzaghi松散介质理论提出均质土层中城市人行地道采用全断面开挖时开挖进尺的计算方法,将该法推广应用到常用开挖方法(台阶法、CRD法)和成层土中,通过工程实例验证表明这两种计算方法可以应用到设计施工中。
3.对砂质粉土和淤泥软土中人行地下通道埋深4m时的施工技术进行了详细的数值模拟和分析,对埋深变化时(埋深2～7m)砂质粉土中开挖参数(开挖进尺和分部开挖长度)进行数值模拟分析。在保证结构和周边环境安全的前提下,对砂质粉土和淤泥软土中修建人行地下通道施工工艺(包括开挖方法、开挖进尺、分部开挖长度、格栅钢架间距、支护滞后长度等)给出合理的建议。
4.对均质土中单井和多井降水引起的孔隙压力和地表沉降变化应用数值模拟进行详细研究,在研究结果基础上建立了砂质粉土中人行地道的降水模型,研究不同降水方法引起的孔隙压力及地表沉降变化,指出边开挖边降水是适合人行地道的降水方法。
5.对不同土层、不同施工工艺、不同埋深等因素对地表沉降的影响进行了数值模拟和分析,在研究结果基础上总结了人行地道开挖引起地表沉降的影响因素和控制措施。
6.对不同条件下(不同材质、不同埋深、不同间距)人行地道施工对地下管线的影响进行数值模拟和分析。
7.通过对一个实际工程的数值模拟结果与实测值的对比,验证了本文提出的施工工艺可以应用到实际工程中。
Construction of the underpass is an effective measure to ease city traffic congestion, enhance pedestrian safety and improve the efficiency of the city. The influence of the underpass construction to the surrounding environment is inevitable, even may affect the ground buildings and the normal use of the underground pipeline. Therefore, it is significant to select an appropriate construction method to reduce the environmental effects. This paper, on the basis of the results of previous studies, has done a systematic study on the actual situation of the city underpass construction technique and its environmental effects. It runs as follows.
1. Based on two-parameter Pasternak model, a calculation model and differential governing equation which reflects the work of pipe roof mechanism has been set up and solved.
2. Based on M. M. Protodyakonov Equilibrium Arch Theory and Terzaghi Loose medium Theory, a calculating method of digging length has been given when full-face tunnel excavation is adopted in shallow tunnel construction in homogenized soil. Then, the methods have been applied to usual excavation method (e.g. step method, CRD method) and the construction in layered soil. At last, the methods have been proved to be practical in design and construction according to application in an example.
3. A detailed analysis of the numerical simulation of the underpass, 4m depth in silty sand soil and soft soil, construction technology has been conducted. Then, numerical analysis of digging length and division excavation length has been carried out according to different digging length (2～7m). On the premise of the safety of underpass and surrounding environments, reasonable proposals have been given to underpass construction technology when it is done at different depths of silty sand soil and soft soil (including excavation methods, digging length, division excavation length, steel grating spacing, the length of support etc.).
4. Through numerical simulation, detailed study has been done to the pore pressure changes and changes in surface subsidence caused by single-well and multi-well precipitation in homogeneous soil. On the basis of the results, a precipitation model of the underpass construction in gouache-rich sand soil has been made. Pore pressure changes and changes in surface subsidence caused by different precipitation construction technology have been studied to point out that dynamical precipitation is an appropriate precipitation method.
5. Numerical simulation and analysis on the impact of the different soil, construction technique and depth to surface subsidence have been done. On the basis of research results influencing factors and control measures have been summarized.
6. Numerical simulation and analysis on the impact of the underpass construction to underground pipeline under different conditions (including different material, depth and space) has been done.
7. Through the study of an actual subject and the comparison between the numerical simulation results and actual data, the construction methods proposed by this paper have been proved and can be applied to practical engineering.
引文
[1]钱七虎.迎接我国城市地下空间开发高潮[J],岩土工程学报,1998(1):112-113.
[2]全国绿化委办公室,2006年中国国土绿化状况公报,2007.
[3]S.Kuwahara.Tunnelling and development of tunneling technologies in Japan.Tunnels and Underground Structures,Zhao,Shirlaw & Krishnan(eds),Balkema:133-140.
[4]陈晓婷.富水砂卵石条件下浅埋暗挖法隧道设计与施工对策[D].西南交通大学硕士论文,2006.
[5]Shinji Fukushima,Yoshitoshi Mochizuki,et al.(1989).Model study of pre-reinforcement method by bolts for shallow tunnel in sandy.Proc.Progress and Innovation in Tunnelling.(Toronto.Canada).(1):61-67.
[6]Kuwano,J.,Taylor.R.N.,et al.(1998).Modeling of deformations around tunnels in clay reinforced by soil nails.Centrifuge 98.Balkema.pp.745-750.
[7]AI Hallak,R.,Gamier,J.(2000),Experimental study of the stability of a tunnel face reinforced by bolts.Proc.Geoteehnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Kusakabe,Fujita &Miyazaki).Balkema.pp.65-68.
[8]Calvello,M.Taylor,R.N.(2000).Centrifuge modeling of a spile-reinforced tunnel heading.Proc.Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Kusakabe,Fujita & Miyazaki).Balkema.pp.345-350.
[9]Yoo,C.,Yang,K.H.(2001).Laboratory investigation of behavior of tunnel face reinforced with longitudinal pipes.Progress in tunneling after 2000.(eds Teuscher,P.&Colombo,A).Bologna,(1)pp.757-764.
[10]Aydan,et al.(1988).Three-dimensional simulation of an advancing tunnel supported with forepoles,shotcrete,steel ribs and rockbolts.Proc.Numerical Methods in Geomeehanics.(Innsbruck),pp.1481-1486.
[11]韩瑞庚.地下工程新奥法[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[12]Peila,D.Oreste,P.P.,et al.(1996).Study on the influence of sub-horizontal fiber-glass pipes on the stability of a tunnel face.Proc.North American Tunneling'96(ed Levent Ozdemir).Balkema,pp.425-432.
[13]Yoo,C.S.,Shin,H.K.(2000).Behavior of tunnel face pre-reinforced with sub-horizontal pipes.Proc.Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Kusakabe,Fujita & Miyazaki).Balkema.pp.463-468.
[14]王梦恕,张建华.浅埋双线铁路隧道不稳定地层新奥法施工[J].铁道工程学报,1987,(2):176-191.
[15]Lunardi,P,Foearacci,A.,et al.(1992).Tunnel face reinforcement in soft ground design and controls during excavation.Proc.Int.congr.Towards New Worlds in Tunnelling.(Acapulco).2:pp.567-580.
[16]Grasso,P.,Mahtab,A,et al.(1993).Consideration for design of shallow tunnels.Proc.Int.Conf.Underground Transportation Infrastructures.(Toulon).pp.38-49.
[17]Pelizza,S.,Peila,D,et al.(1993).Soil and rock reinforcements in tunneling.Tunnelling Underground Space Technology.1993,8(3):357-372.
[18]Peila,D.(1994).A theoretical study of reinforcement influence on the stability of a tunnel face Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.12:pp.145-168.
[19]Poma,A.,Grassi,F.,et al.(1995).Finite difference analysis of displacement measurements for optimizing tunnel construction in swelling soils.Field Measurements in Geomechanics 4th International Symposium.(Bergamo).pp.225-236.
[20]Poma,A.,Grassi,F.,et al.(1995).Finite difference analysis of displacement measurements for optimizing tunnel construction in swelling soils.Field Measurements in Geomechanics 4th International Symposium.(Bergamo).pp.225-236.
[21]Jassionnesse,C.,Dubois,P.,et al.(1996).Tunnel face reinforcement by bolting:soil bolts homogenization,strain approach.Proc.Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Mair,R.J.& Taylor,R.N).Balkema,pp.373-378.
[22]Barley,A.D.,Graham,M.(1997).Trail soil nails for tunnel face support in London clay and the detected influence of tendon stiffness and bond length on load transfer.Ground improvement geosystems.Thomas Telford,London.pp.549-566.
[23]Dias,D.,Kastner,.R.,et al.(1998).Behavior of a tunnel face reinforced by bolts:Comparison between analytical-numerical models.Proc.The Geotechnics of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks.(eds Evangelists &Picarelli).Balkema.pp.961-972
[24]Dias,D.,Kastner,.R.,et al,(1998).Effects of pre-lining on the tunnel design.Proc.Int.Conf.On Underground Structures in Modern Infrastructure.Baikema.pp.7-9.
[25]Wong,H.,Larue,E.(1998).Modeling of bolting support in tunnels taking account of non-simultaneous yielding of bolts and ground.Proc.The Geotechnics of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks.(eds Evangelists&Picarelli).Balkema.pp.1027-1038.
[26]Wong,H.,Trompille,V.,et al.(1999).A tunnel face reinforced by longitudinal bolts:analytical model and in situ data.Proc.Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.Tokyo.pp.435-440.
[27]Henry Wong,Didier subrin,et al.(2000).Extrusion movements of a tunnel head reinforced by finite length bolts-a closed-form solution using homogenization approach.Int.J.Numer.Anal.Meth.Geomech.,2000,24:533-565.
[28]Lunardi,P.,Bindi,R.(2001).The evolution of reinforcement of the advance core using fiber glass elements for short and long term stability of tunnels under difficult stress-strain conditions:design,technologies and operating methods.Progress in tunneling after 2000.(eds Teuscher,P.&Colombo,A).Bologna,(2) pp.309-322.
[29]常艄东.管棚法超前预支护作用机理的研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文.1999.
[30]李力.粉细砂地层注浆管棚作用机理及在暗挖隧道施工中的应用[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[31]苟德明.既有公路下连拱隧道管棚变形测试与作用机理研究[D].长沙理工大学硕士学位论文.2007.
[32]马同骧译.管棚支护与土壤的相互作用[[J].隧道译丛.1986.(3):34-38(俄文).
[33]马同骧译.巷道围岩的应力状态[[J].隧道译丛.1990,(6):60-62(俄文).
[34]Kotake,N.,Yamamoto,Y,et al.(1992).A study on applicability of horizontal jet-grouting in very large tunnel.Proc.Annual Conf.JSCE:pp.692-693.
[35]Koizumi,M.,Imamura,O,et al.(1990).Construction of 3-lane tunnel with thin earth covering-shoryou No.1 Tunnel on Tokyo-Nagoya Expressway-(part2):Tunnels and Underground.Vol.21.(6).pp.463-471.
[36]SIG 1992.Soil and rock improvement in underground works.Proc.Int.Cong.Towards New worlds in Tunneling.(Acapulco).Vol.2.pp.865-872.
[37]姚海波.大断面浅理暗挖法下穿既有地铁构筑物施工技术研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文.2005.
[38]王伟峰.软岩偏压双连拱隧道管棚预支护参数研究[D],北京交通大学硕士学位论文.2006.
[39]程小彬.地下工程管棚支护有限元分析[D].西北工业大学硕士学位论文.2007.
[40]王明年,张建华.工程措施对控制隧道围岩变形的力学效果研究[J].岩土工程学报.1998,Vol.20(5):27-30.
[41]孔恒.城市地铁隧道浅埋暗挖法地层预加固机理及其应用研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文2003.
[42]景诗庭,王海珍,孙星亮.水平钻孔喷射注浆技术的应用与研究展望[J].石家庄铁道学院学报.1999,12(2):9-12
[43]孙星亮,景诗庭.水平钻孔旋喷注浆加固地层效果研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(5):589-593.
[44]孙星亮,刘勇,王朝建.国内外水平旋喷注浆加固技术的应用发展[J].探矿工程,2001,(1):8-11.
[45]李远宁,段玉刚等.浅埋软弱地层隧道旋喷预衬砌支护技术的研究[J].探矿工程,2001;(5):58-61.
[46]吴波,复杂条件下城市地铁隧道施工地表沉降研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文.2003.
[47]王梦怒等.北京地铁浅埋暗挖法施工[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1989,8(1):52-61
[48]王梦恕.我国地下铁道施工方法综述与展望[J].地下空间.1998,18(2):98-103.
[49]王梦想.21世纪我国隧道及地下空间发展的探讨[J].铁道科学与工程学报.2004,1(1):7-9.
[50]王梦恕主编.地下工程浅埋暗挖技术通论[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2004.
[51]施仲衡,浅埋暗挖法设计理论论述[J],现代隧道技术,2005,42(2):37-39.
[52]周丰峻,浅埋暗挖法施工工艺研究[J],岩土工程界,2005,8(3):16-18.
[53]刘辉,浅埋暗挖法修建地下工程应用分析[J],铁道工程学报,2005,4(No.2 ser.86):38-40.
[54]刘辉,浅埋暗挖法和盾构法在城市地铁中的应用[J],铁道工程学报.2002,6(No.2 ser.74):55-57.
[55]傅鹤林,韩汝才,朱汉华,破碎围岩中单拱隧道荷载计算的理论解[J],中南大学学报,2004,35(3):478-483.
[56]李亮,郭乃正,傅鹤林等,破碎围岩中连拱隧道荷载计算理论解[J],中国铁道科学,2004,25(4):50-54.
[57]吕建兵,傅鹤林,破碎围岩中深埋隧道荷载计算值的对比[J],西部探矿工程,2004(2):96-99.
[58]毕继红,从蓉,各种形状洞室的围岩压力分析[J],地下空间,2004,24(1):23-26.
[59]莫勋涛,张清,用隧道围岩站立时间确定复合式衬砌的荷载分配[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(3):370-373.
[60]邓刚,半荷载结构法验算浅埋隧道结构之探讨[J],现代隧道技术,2002,39(3)29-34:.
[61]胡夏嵩,赵法锁,低地应力区地下洞室围岩压力计算方法及应用[J],水文地质与工程地质,2005(2):87-91.
[62]姜德义,大跨度隧道围岩竖直压力计算值的对比分析[J],中国矿业,2005,14(11):63-66.
[63]惠丽萍,王良,浅埋暗挖土质隧道开挖进尺的理论探讨[J].铁道标准设计,1995(11):25-27.
[64]王毅才主编,隧道工程[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[65]吉小明,张选兵,白世伟,浅埋暗挖地铁隧道开挖过程的模拟研究,岩土力学,2002,23(6):828-830.
[66]杜庆丽,焦仓,矩形浅埋软岩隧道开挖非线性过程数值模拟[J],施工技术,2005,34(6):4-6.
[67]王福柱,马锁柱,张振刚,浅埋暗挖双连拱隧道施工力学分析[J],铁道建筑,2003(8):23-25.
[68]高成雷,罗书学,朱永全,浅埋暗挖洞桩法的三维有限元模拟分析,石家庄铁道学院学报.2002,15(3):44-47.
[69]杨世武,范鹏,焦苍,城市超浅埋平顶大跨断面软岩洞室施工数值分析[J],隧道建设,2004,24(4):13-16.
[70]丁锐,不同开挖步骤引起浅埋隧道地表沉降的数值分析[J],铁道工程学报,2005(5):62-65.
[71]王暖堂,城市地铁复杂洞群浅埋暗挖法的有限元模拟[J],岩土力学,2001,22(4):504-508.
[72]赵喜海,北京地铁复杂洞群的有限元模拟分析[J],广西交通科技,2003,28(106):52-55.
[73]肖启扬,福州市超浅埋暗挖过街地下通道主要开挖过程模拟分析探讨[J],福建建设科技,2002(2):39-40.
[74]章立峰,刘建国,地铁区间隧道施工过程动态模拟分析[J],隧道建设,2003,23(6):3-5.
[75]宋玉香,刘尧军,北京地铁王府井站西南风道施工效应三维有限元分析[J],国防交通工程与技术,2003(1):49-51.
[76]李文江,刘志春,贾晓云,淤泥质地层浅埋暗挖通道管幕预支护施工效应分析[J],石家庄铁道学院学报,2005,18(3):1-4.
[77]曲学兵,苏红卫,超浅埋隧道暗挖施工模拟[J],四川建筑科学研究,2002,28(4):51-53.
[78]吴波,刘维宁,高波,索晓明,城市浅埋隧道施工性态的时空效应分析[J],岩土工程学报,2004,26(3):340-343.
[79]李进军,黄茂松,浅埋暗挖隧道穿越楼房基础的三维数值模拟[J],地下空间与工程学报,2005,1(2):78-82.
[80]黄俊,张顶立,地铁重叠隧道上覆地层变形的数值模拟[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(12):2176-2182.
[81]顾问天,顾问宇,覃应华,浅埋暗挖施工中临时仰拱控制地表沉降有效性分析[J],铁道建筑,2005(11):34-36.
[82]皇甫明,孔恒,王梦恕等,核心土留设对隧道工作面稳定性的影响[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(3):521-525.
[83]雷震宇,郭庆海,周顺华,大跨度浅埋暗挖隧道拆撑的数值模拟[J],地下空间与工程学报,2005,1(2):237-241
[84]郭晓魁,李强,周雁,浅埋近接隧道施工地表沉降有限元分析[J],内蒙古公路与运输,2005(3):25-28.
[85]毕继红,常斌,层状土地层中浅埋隧道施工时态的模拟与分析[J],现代隧道与技术,2004,41(6):1-4.
[86]张银屏,雷震宇,周顺华,浅埋暗挖隧道对地表变形影响的三维数值分析[J],华东交通大学学报,2005,22(5):52-55.
[87]许燕峰,苏钧,浅埋暗挖法隧道施工引起地面沉降的原因规律及控制措施[J],世界隧道,1998(2):49-52.
[88]丁春林,朱世友,周顺华,地应力释放对盾构隧道围岩稳定性和地表沉降变形的影响[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(11):1633-1638.
[89]吴应明,王学斌,地铁浅埋暗挖隧道地层沉降因素及控制对策[J],城市轨道交通研究,2003(4):64-67.
[90]李红军,深圳地铁某区间隧道地层异常变位原因分析与对策[J],隧道建设,2003,23(2):10-13.
[91]项彦勇,贺少辉,导洞隔离桩墙结构对浅埋暗挖隧道周边地层移动的限制作用[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(19):3317-3323.
[92]张顶立,黄俊,深圳地铁浅埋暗挖隧道地层变形分析[J],中国矿大学报,2004,33(5):578-583.
[93]张晓丽,王梦想,张顶立,减小浅埋暗挖法施工对建构筑物影响的措施[J],中国安全科学学报,2005,15(11):69-72.
[94]刘牧宇,浅埋暗挖法施工中的沉降控制[J],铁道建筑,2003(9):24-26.
[95]董新平,周顺华,浅埋地下通道地表沉降原因分析[J],现代隧道技术,2005,42(1):68-70.
[96]董新平,周顺华,地下通道开挖宽度对地表沉降的影响[J],地下空间,2005,25(3):419-422.
[97]刘招伟,杨世武,杭州某市政隧道过既有铁路暗挖施工技术[J],岩土工程学报,2006,28(3):353-357.
[98]丁锐,富水砂层城市地下过街通道浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],世界隧道,2000,第5期42-48.
[99]董天乐,陈金友,解放路隧道工程浅埋暗挖法施工技术[J],浙江建筑,2005,22(4):43-45.
[100]黄德华,粉砂地层小间距浅埋暗挖隧道穿越铁路施工技术[J],隧道建设,2004,24(1):40-43.
[101]史文杰,饱和粉质砂土内浅埋暗挖法施工降水技术[J],隧道建设,2005,25(2):34-35.
[102]李代军,彭振华,浅埋暗挖法在饱和粉砂地层中的应用技术[J],铁道建筑技术,2004(5):34-37.
[103]刘招伟,王梦想,周世祥,浅埋暗挖法修建广州地铁杨——体区间隧道工程[J],西部探矿工程,1999,11(6):10-12.
[104]韩莉,水平旋喷桩在含水砂层超浅埋地铁隧道中的应用[J],广东土木与建筑,2004(8):6-7.
[105]冯海,杨哲峰,浅埋暗挖技术在卵砾石地层隧洞施工中的应用[J],北京水利,2005(4):36-38.
[106]张梅,李迎春,彭东祥,软流塑地层地铁隧道暗挖施工技术[J],石家庄铁道学院学报,2004,17(2):103-106.
[107]谢晋水,王寿强,软流塑地层中地铁竖井施工技术[J],铁道标准设计,2004(6):74-76.
[108]周顺华,南京地铁软流塑地层浅埋暗挖法施工技术的探讨[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(3):526-531.
[109]蔡鹏程,俞希强,蔡福富,高水位淤泥质土层超浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],福建建筑,2000(4):49-52.
[110]杨世武,淤泥质地层浅埋暗挖施工技术措施[J],铁道工程学报,2003,6(No.2 ser.78):64-69.
[111]罗富荣,国斌,北京地铁天安门西站”暗挖逆筑法”施工技术[J],岩土工程学报,2001,23(1):75-78.
[112]李继宏,张梅,北京长安街地下人行通道大跨度超浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],:7-15.
[113]黄俊,杨小丽,武汉市常青路地下人行通道超浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],铁道标准设计,2005(2):76-77.
[114]申志军,武汉洪山广场地下人行通道施工技术[J],隧道建设,2001,21(1):55-59.
[115]李付湘,深圳市向西路地下人行通道工程施工技术[J],岩土工程界,2001,4(4):33-35.
[116]苏学清,齐之龙,郝玉生等,青岛某地下工程超浅埋暗挖施工效应分析[J],岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4):465-468.
[117]李端书,福州大跨浅埋暗挖地下通道的修建[J],地下空间,2001,21(1):61-66.
[118]贾顺礼,高碑店车站地下通道出入口的施工难点及其对策[J],铁道建筑,2003(11):40-42.
[119]贺善宁,李勇,采用暗挖法施工矩形断面地下通道的经验[J],铁道建筑,2003(11):45-47.
[120]杨刚,张爱峰,于海营,城市地下过街通道工程实例及分析[J],探矿工程,1998(1):57-58.
[121]高怀志,李养平,浅埋暗挖法在天津地铁1号线工程中的应用[J],隧道建设,2005,25(4):10-14.
[122]王永旗,王建新,用浅埋暗挖法修建城市人行地道[J],铁道建筑,1999(11):19-21.
[123]新型的地下暗挖法——管幕工法的设计与施工[J],中国市政工程,1997(6):45-46.
[124]英旭,浅覆地层过街通道小管棚法施工技术[J],施工技术,2005,34(6):24-26.
[125]杨春明,地铁站过街通道管棚拉管法施工[J],铁道建筑技术,2005(2):30-33.
[126]高岗荣,王圣公,杨春满,软土地层浅埋地下通道管棚—冻结法施工[J],地质与勘探,2003(8):210-211.
[127]贾小辉,注浆工艺在浅埋暗挖工程中的应用[J],探矿工程,2006(1):38-39.
[128]王连池,高军,周东勇等,过铁路超浅埋软土通道暗挖施工技术[J],隧道建设,2003,23(3):43-45.
[129]O'Rourke T.D.Buried pipeline response to tunneling ground movements[A].Europe'82 conference[C].Switzerland:Basel 1982:9-15.
[130]Attewell P.B.,et al.Soil movements induced by tunneling and the effects on pipelines and structures,Blackie,London,1986.
[131]Nath P..Movements and Strains Induced in Buried Pipes Due to Parallel Trench Excavations:Finite Element Predictions[J].Journal of Pipelines,1986,5(4):233-249.
[132]Kristin M.Molnar,Richard J.Finno,Edwin C.Rossow.Analysis of effects of deep braced excavations on adjacent buffed utilities.Department of Civil Engineering Northwestern University,2004.
[133]蒋洪胜,候学渊.盾构掘进对隧道周围土体扰动的理论与实测分析.岩石力学与工程学报,2003(9):1514-1520.
[134]高田至郎等.受地基沉降影响的地下管线的设计公式及应用,地下管线抗震[M].北京:学术书刊出版社,1990.
[135]廖少明,刘建航.基坑工程手册[M],北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
[136]李大勇,张土乔.深基坑开挖引起临近地下管线的位移分析[J].工业建筑,1999,29(11):36-41,27.
[137]高文华.基坑变形预测与邻近建筑及设施的保护研究[博士后出站报告],长沙:湖南大学,2001.
[138]段光杰.地铁隧道施工扰动对地表沉降和管线变形影响的理论和方法研究[D],北中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文,2002.
[139]A.Klar,T.E.B.Vorster,K.Soga,et al.Soil-pipe-tunnel interaction:Comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions[R].Technical Report of the University of Cambrige,2004.
[140]T.E.B.Vorster,A.Klar,K.Soga,et al.Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviroumental Engineering,2005,131(11):1399-1410.
[141]O' Rourke T.D.,Ahmed I..Effect of Shallow Trench Construction on Cast Iron Pipelines[A].Advances in Underground Pipeline Engineering[C].USA:WI,1985:1-31.
[142]李大勇,龚晓南.深基坑工程中地下管线位移影响因素分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(A01):1083-1087.
[143]李大勇,龚晓南,张土乔.软土地基深基坑周围地下管线保护措施的数值模拟[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(6):659-663.
[144]李大勇,龚晓南.软土地基深基坑工程邻近柔性接口地下管线的性状分析[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(2):77-80.
[145]李大勇,吕爱钟,曾庆军.内撑式基坑工程周围地下管线的性状分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(4):682-687.
[146]李大勇,龚晓南.深基坑开挖对周围地下管线影响因素分析[J].建筑技术,2003,34(2):94-96.
[147]吴为义.垂直荷载作用下软粘土地基中管道的纵向力学性状研究[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文,2000.
[148]吴为义,张土乔,郑旭晨等.竖向荷载下柔性接口管道的纵向力学计算[J].中国给水排水,2002,18(9):58-60.
[149]吴为义,孙宇坤,张土乔.承插口给水排水管线的竖向位移计算[J].特种结构,2003,20(3):22-24.
[150]吴波,高波.地铁区间隧道施工对邻近管线影响的三维数值模拟[JJ].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(增2):2451-2456.
[151]吴波,高波,索晓明等.城市地铁隧道施工对管线的影响[J].岩土力学,2004,25(4):657-662.
[152]吴为义,张土乔,孙宇坤.平面土基刚性圆管基底压力分布的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2004,25(1):137-140.
[153]彭基敏,张孟喜.盾构法施工引起邻近地下管线位移分析[J].工业建筑,2005(9):50-53.
[154]马涛.隧道施工引起的地层位移及其对邻近地下管线的影响分析[D].长沙理硕士学位论文,2005.
[155]毕继红,刘伟,江志峰.隧道开挖对地下管线的影响分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(8):1317-1321.
[156]Klar A.,Vorster T.E.B.Soga K.,et al.Elastoplastic Solution for Soil-Pipe-Tunnel interaction[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2007,133(7):782-792.
[157]姚宁,隧道施工对周边环境影响的研究[D],浙江大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[158]陈敏,隧道施工扰动下邻近管线的位移及其周围土体变形的研究[D],北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[159]吴为义,盾构隧道周围地下管线的性状研究[D],浙江大学博士学位论文,2008.
[160]A.P.S.SELVADURAI,土与基础的相互作用分析[M].北京:中国铁道出版社.1984.
[161]于学馥,郑颖人.地下工程围岩稳定分析[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1983
[162]朱维申,张玉军,任伟中.系统锚杆对三峡船闸高边坡岩体加固作用的块体相似模型试验研究[J].岩土力学,1996,17(2):1-6
[163]Zhu Weishen,ZhangYujun.Effect of supporting surrounding rocks by bolts and its application to high slope of three gorges flight lock.In:Proceedings of the international symposium on anchoring and grouting techniques.Hong Kong:Econarc Communication(Group) Ltd,1994.188-197
[164]王明年,张建华.工程措施对控制隧道围岩变形的力学效果研究[J].岩土工程学报,1998,20(5):27-30.
[165]王毅才,隧道工程(第二版)[M],北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[166]Eisenstein,Z.,Heinz,H.and Negro,A.,On Three-Dimensional Ground Response to Tunneling.ASCE.Geotech Ⅲ,Tunneling in Soils and Rocks,Atlanta,1984 pp.107-127.
[167]陈仲颐,周景星.土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994.
[168]秦建设.盾构施工开挖面变形与破坏机理研究[D].南京:河海大学.2005
[169]Itasca Consulting Group,Inc.FLAC3D(Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continuain 3 Dimensions) User Manuals,Version2.1,Minneapolis,Minnesota
[170]刘波,韩彦辉.FLAC原理、实例与应用指南[M],北京:人民交通出版社,2005.
[171]富海鹰.地铁隧道非降水法施工引起的地表沉降的研究[D].成都:西南交通大学.2006.
[2]全国绿化委办公室,2006年中国国土绿化状况公报,2007.
[3]S.Kuwahara.Tunnelling and development of tunneling technologies in Japan.Tunnels and Underground Structures,Zhao,Shirlaw & Krishnan(eds),Balkema:133-140.
[4]陈晓婷.富水砂卵石条件下浅埋暗挖法隧道设计与施工对策[D].西南交通大学硕士论文,2006.
[5]Shinji Fukushima,Yoshitoshi Mochizuki,et al.(1989).Model study of pre-reinforcement method by bolts for shallow tunnel in sandy.Proc.Progress and Innovation in Tunnelling.(Toronto.Canada).(1):61-67.
[6]Kuwano,J.,Taylor.R.N.,et al.(1998).Modeling of deformations around tunnels in clay reinforced by soil nails.Centrifuge 98.Balkema.pp.745-750.
[7]AI Hallak,R.,Gamier,J.(2000),Experimental study of the stability of a tunnel face reinforced by bolts.Proc.Geoteehnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Kusakabe,Fujita &Miyazaki).Balkema.pp.65-68.
[8]Calvello,M.Taylor,R.N.(2000).Centrifuge modeling of a spile-reinforced tunnel heading.Proc.Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Kusakabe,Fujita & Miyazaki).Balkema.pp.345-350.
[9]Yoo,C.,Yang,K.H.(2001).Laboratory investigation of behavior of tunnel face reinforced with longitudinal pipes.Progress in tunneling after 2000.(eds Teuscher,P.&Colombo,A).Bologna,(1)pp.757-764.
[10]Aydan,et al.(1988).Three-dimensional simulation of an advancing tunnel supported with forepoles,shotcrete,steel ribs and rockbolts.Proc.Numerical Methods in Geomeehanics.(Innsbruck),pp.1481-1486.
[11]韩瑞庚.地下工程新奥法[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[12]Peila,D.Oreste,P.P.,et al.(1996).Study on the influence of sub-horizontal fiber-glass pipes on the stability of a tunnel face.Proc.North American Tunneling'96(ed Levent Ozdemir).Balkema,pp.425-432.
[13]Yoo,C.S.,Shin,H.K.(2000).Behavior of tunnel face pre-reinforced with sub-horizontal pipes.Proc.Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Kusakabe,Fujita & Miyazaki).Balkema.pp.463-468.
[14]王梦恕,张建华.浅埋双线铁路隧道不稳定地层新奥法施工[J].铁道工程学报,1987,(2):176-191.
[15]Lunardi,P,Foearacci,A.,et al.(1992).Tunnel face reinforcement in soft ground design and controls during excavation.Proc.Int.congr.Towards New Worlds in Tunnelling.(Acapulco).2:pp.567-580.
[16]Grasso,P.,Mahtab,A,et al.(1993).Consideration for design of shallow tunnels.Proc.Int.Conf.Underground Transportation Infrastructures.(Toulon).pp.38-49.
[17]Pelizza,S.,Peila,D,et al.(1993).Soil and rock reinforcements in tunneling.Tunnelling Underground Space Technology.1993,8(3):357-372.
[18]Peila,D.(1994).A theoretical study of reinforcement influence on the stability of a tunnel face Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.12:pp.145-168.
[19]Poma,A.,Grassi,F.,et al.(1995).Finite difference analysis of displacement measurements for optimizing tunnel construction in swelling soils.Field Measurements in Geomechanics 4th International Symposium.(Bergamo).pp.225-236.
[20]Poma,A.,Grassi,F.,et al.(1995).Finite difference analysis of displacement measurements for optimizing tunnel construction in swelling soils.Field Measurements in Geomechanics 4th International Symposium.(Bergamo).pp.225-236.
[21]Jassionnesse,C.,Dubois,P.,et al.(1996).Tunnel face reinforcement by bolting:soil bolts homogenization,strain approach.Proc.Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.(eds Mair,R.J.& Taylor,R.N).Balkema,pp.373-378.
[22]Barley,A.D.,Graham,M.(1997).Trail soil nails for tunnel face support in London clay and the detected influence of tendon stiffness and bond length on load transfer.Ground improvement geosystems.Thomas Telford,London.pp.549-566.
[23]Dias,D.,Kastner,.R.,et al.(1998).Behavior of a tunnel face reinforced by bolts:Comparison between analytical-numerical models.Proc.The Geotechnics of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks.(eds Evangelists &Picarelli).Balkema.pp.961-972
[24]Dias,D.,Kastner,.R.,et al,(1998).Effects of pre-lining on the tunnel design.Proc.Int.Conf.On Underground Structures in Modern Infrastructure.Baikema.pp.7-9.
[25]Wong,H.,Larue,E.(1998).Modeling of bolting support in tunnels taking account of non-simultaneous yielding of bolts and ground.Proc.The Geotechnics of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks.(eds Evangelists&Picarelli).Balkema.pp.1027-1038.
[26]Wong,H.,Trompille,V.,et al.(1999).A tunnel face reinforced by longitudinal bolts:analytical model and in situ data.Proc.Geotechnical Aspect of Underground Construction in Soft Ground.Tokyo.pp.435-440.
[27]Henry Wong,Didier subrin,et al.(2000).Extrusion movements of a tunnel head reinforced by finite length bolts-a closed-form solution using homogenization approach.Int.J.Numer.Anal.Meth.Geomech.,2000,24:533-565.
[28]Lunardi,P.,Bindi,R.(2001).The evolution of reinforcement of the advance core using fiber glass elements for short and long term stability of tunnels under difficult stress-strain conditions:design,technologies and operating methods.Progress in tunneling after 2000.(eds Teuscher,P.&Colombo,A).Bologna,(2) pp.309-322.
[29]常艄东.管棚法超前预支护作用机理的研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文.1999.
[30]李力.粉细砂地层注浆管棚作用机理及在暗挖隧道施工中的应用[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[31]苟德明.既有公路下连拱隧道管棚变形测试与作用机理研究[D].长沙理工大学硕士学位论文.2007.
[32]马同骧译.管棚支护与土壤的相互作用[[J].隧道译丛.1986.(3):34-38(俄文).
[33]马同骧译.巷道围岩的应力状态[[J].隧道译丛.1990,(6):60-62(俄文).
[34]Kotake,N.,Yamamoto,Y,et al.(1992).A study on applicability of horizontal jet-grouting in very large tunnel.Proc.Annual Conf.JSCE:pp.692-693.
[35]Koizumi,M.,Imamura,O,et al.(1990).Construction of 3-lane tunnel with thin earth covering-shoryou No.1 Tunnel on Tokyo-Nagoya Expressway-(part2):Tunnels and Underground.Vol.21.(6).pp.463-471.
[36]SIG 1992.Soil and rock improvement in underground works.Proc.Int.Cong.Towards New worlds in Tunneling.(Acapulco).Vol.2.pp.865-872.
[37]姚海波.大断面浅理暗挖法下穿既有地铁构筑物施工技术研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文.2005.
[38]王伟峰.软岩偏压双连拱隧道管棚预支护参数研究[D],北京交通大学硕士学位论文.2006.
[39]程小彬.地下工程管棚支护有限元分析[D].西北工业大学硕士学位论文.2007.
[40]王明年,张建华.工程措施对控制隧道围岩变形的力学效果研究[J].岩土工程学报.1998,Vol.20(5):27-30.
[41]孔恒.城市地铁隧道浅埋暗挖法地层预加固机理及其应用研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文2003.
[42]景诗庭,王海珍,孙星亮.水平钻孔喷射注浆技术的应用与研究展望[J].石家庄铁道学院学报.1999,12(2):9-12
[43]孙星亮,景诗庭.水平钻孔旋喷注浆加固地层效果研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(5):589-593.
[44]孙星亮,刘勇,王朝建.国内外水平旋喷注浆加固技术的应用发展[J].探矿工程,2001,(1):8-11.
[45]李远宁,段玉刚等.浅埋软弱地层隧道旋喷预衬砌支护技术的研究[J].探矿工程,2001;(5):58-61.
[46]吴波,复杂条件下城市地铁隧道施工地表沉降研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文.2003.
[47]王梦怒等.北京地铁浅埋暗挖法施工[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1989,8(1):52-61
[48]王梦恕.我国地下铁道施工方法综述与展望[J].地下空间.1998,18(2):98-103.
[49]王梦想.21世纪我国隧道及地下空间发展的探讨[J].铁道科学与工程学报.2004,1(1):7-9.
[50]王梦恕主编.地下工程浅埋暗挖技术通论[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2004.
[51]施仲衡,浅埋暗挖法设计理论论述[J],现代隧道技术,2005,42(2):37-39.
[52]周丰峻,浅埋暗挖法施工工艺研究[J],岩土工程界,2005,8(3):16-18.
[53]刘辉,浅埋暗挖法修建地下工程应用分析[J],铁道工程学报,2005,4(No.2 ser.86):38-40.
[54]刘辉,浅埋暗挖法和盾构法在城市地铁中的应用[J],铁道工程学报.2002,6(No.2 ser.74):55-57.
[55]傅鹤林,韩汝才,朱汉华,破碎围岩中单拱隧道荷载计算的理论解[J],中南大学学报,2004,35(3):478-483.
[56]李亮,郭乃正,傅鹤林等,破碎围岩中连拱隧道荷载计算理论解[J],中国铁道科学,2004,25(4):50-54.
[57]吕建兵,傅鹤林,破碎围岩中深埋隧道荷载计算值的对比[J],西部探矿工程,2004(2):96-99.
[58]毕继红,从蓉,各种形状洞室的围岩压力分析[J],地下空间,2004,24(1):23-26.
[59]莫勋涛,张清,用隧道围岩站立时间确定复合式衬砌的荷载分配[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(3):370-373.
[60]邓刚,半荷载结构法验算浅埋隧道结构之探讨[J],现代隧道技术,2002,39(3)29-34:.
[61]胡夏嵩,赵法锁,低地应力区地下洞室围岩压力计算方法及应用[J],水文地质与工程地质,2005(2):87-91.
[62]姜德义,大跨度隧道围岩竖直压力计算值的对比分析[J],中国矿业,2005,14(11):63-66.
[63]惠丽萍,王良,浅埋暗挖土质隧道开挖进尺的理论探讨[J].铁道标准设计,1995(11):25-27.
[64]王毅才主编,隧道工程[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[65]吉小明,张选兵,白世伟,浅埋暗挖地铁隧道开挖过程的模拟研究,岩土力学,2002,23(6):828-830.
[66]杜庆丽,焦仓,矩形浅埋软岩隧道开挖非线性过程数值模拟[J],施工技术,2005,34(6):4-6.
[67]王福柱,马锁柱,张振刚,浅埋暗挖双连拱隧道施工力学分析[J],铁道建筑,2003(8):23-25.
[68]高成雷,罗书学,朱永全,浅埋暗挖洞桩法的三维有限元模拟分析,石家庄铁道学院学报.2002,15(3):44-47.
[69]杨世武,范鹏,焦苍,城市超浅埋平顶大跨断面软岩洞室施工数值分析[J],隧道建设,2004,24(4):13-16.
[70]丁锐,不同开挖步骤引起浅埋隧道地表沉降的数值分析[J],铁道工程学报,2005(5):62-65.
[71]王暖堂,城市地铁复杂洞群浅埋暗挖法的有限元模拟[J],岩土力学,2001,22(4):504-508.
[72]赵喜海,北京地铁复杂洞群的有限元模拟分析[J],广西交通科技,2003,28(106):52-55.
[73]肖启扬,福州市超浅埋暗挖过街地下通道主要开挖过程模拟分析探讨[J],福建建设科技,2002(2):39-40.
[74]章立峰,刘建国,地铁区间隧道施工过程动态模拟分析[J],隧道建设,2003,23(6):3-5.
[75]宋玉香,刘尧军,北京地铁王府井站西南风道施工效应三维有限元分析[J],国防交通工程与技术,2003(1):49-51.
[76]李文江,刘志春,贾晓云,淤泥质地层浅埋暗挖通道管幕预支护施工效应分析[J],石家庄铁道学院学报,2005,18(3):1-4.
[77]曲学兵,苏红卫,超浅埋隧道暗挖施工模拟[J],四川建筑科学研究,2002,28(4):51-53.
[78]吴波,刘维宁,高波,索晓明,城市浅埋隧道施工性态的时空效应分析[J],岩土工程学报,2004,26(3):340-343.
[79]李进军,黄茂松,浅埋暗挖隧道穿越楼房基础的三维数值模拟[J],地下空间与工程学报,2005,1(2):78-82.
[80]黄俊,张顶立,地铁重叠隧道上覆地层变形的数值模拟[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(12):2176-2182.
[81]顾问天,顾问宇,覃应华,浅埋暗挖施工中临时仰拱控制地表沉降有效性分析[J],铁道建筑,2005(11):34-36.
[82]皇甫明,孔恒,王梦恕等,核心土留设对隧道工作面稳定性的影响[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(3):521-525.
[83]雷震宇,郭庆海,周顺华,大跨度浅埋暗挖隧道拆撑的数值模拟[J],地下空间与工程学报,2005,1(2):237-241
[84]郭晓魁,李强,周雁,浅埋近接隧道施工地表沉降有限元分析[J],内蒙古公路与运输,2005(3):25-28.
[85]毕继红,常斌,层状土地层中浅埋隧道施工时态的模拟与分析[J],现代隧道与技术,2004,41(6):1-4.
[86]张银屏,雷震宇,周顺华,浅埋暗挖隧道对地表变形影响的三维数值分析[J],华东交通大学学报,2005,22(5):52-55.
[87]许燕峰,苏钧,浅埋暗挖法隧道施工引起地面沉降的原因规律及控制措施[J],世界隧道,1998(2):49-52.
[88]丁春林,朱世友,周顺华,地应力释放对盾构隧道围岩稳定性和地表沉降变形的影响[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(11):1633-1638.
[89]吴应明,王学斌,地铁浅埋暗挖隧道地层沉降因素及控制对策[J],城市轨道交通研究,2003(4):64-67.
[90]李红军,深圳地铁某区间隧道地层异常变位原因分析与对策[J],隧道建设,2003,23(2):10-13.
[91]项彦勇,贺少辉,导洞隔离桩墙结构对浅埋暗挖隧道周边地层移动的限制作用[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(19):3317-3323.
[92]张顶立,黄俊,深圳地铁浅埋暗挖隧道地层变形分析[J],中国矿大学报,2004,33(5):578-583.
[93]张晓丽,王梦想,张顶立,减小浅埋暗挖法施工对建构筑物影响的措施[J],中国安全科学学报,2005,15(11):69-72.
[94]刘牧宇,浅埋暗挖法施工中的沉降控制[J],铁道建筑,2003(9):24-26.
[95]董新平,周顺华,浅埋地下通道地表沉降原因分析[J],现代隧道技术,2005,42(1):68-70.
[96]董新平,周顺华,地下通道开挖宽度对地表沉降的影响[J],地下空间,2005,25(3):419-422.
[97]刘招伟,杨世武,杭州某市政隧道过既有铁路暗挖施工技术[J],岩土工程学报,2006,28(3):353-357.
[98]丁锐,富水砂层城市地下过街通道浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],世界隧道,2000,第5期42-48.
[99]董天乐,陈金友,解放路隧道工程浅埋暗挖法施工技术[J],浙江建筑,2005,22(4):43-45.
[100]黄德华,粉砂地层小间距浅埋暗挖隧道穿越铁路施工技术[J],隧道建设,2004,24(1):40-43.
[101]史文杰,饱和粉质砂土内浅埋暗挖法施工降水技术[J],隧道建设,2005,25(2):34-35.
[102]李代军,彭振华,浅埋暗挖法在饱和粉砂地层中的应用技术[J],铁道建筑技术,2004(5):34-37.
[103]刘招伟,王梦想,周世祥,浅埋暗挖法修建广州地铁杨——体区间隧道工程[J],西部探矿工程,1999,11(6):10-12.
[104]韩莉,水平旋喷桩在含水砂层超浅埋地铁隧道中的应用[J],广东土木与建筑,2004(8):6-7.
[105]冯海,杨哲峰,浅埋暗挖技术在卵砾石地层隧洞施工中的应用[J],北京水利,2005(4):36-38.
[106]张梅,李迎春,彭东祥,软流塑地层地铁隧道暗挖施工技术[J],石家庄铁道学院学报,2004,17(2):103-106.
[107]谢晋水,王寿强,软流塑地层中地铁竖井施工技术[J],铁道标准设计,2004(6):74-76.
[108]周顺华,南京地铁软流塑地层浅埋暗挖法施工技术的探讨[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(3):526-531.
[109]蔡鹏程,俞希强,蔡福富,高水位淤泥质土层超浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],福建建筑,2000(4):49-52.
[110]杨世武,淤泥质地层浅埋暗挖施工技术措施[J],铁道工程学报,2003,6(No.2 ser.78):64-69.
[111]罗富荣,国斌,北京地铁天安门西站”暗挖逆筑法”施工技术[J],岩土工程学报,2001,23(1):75-78.
[112]李继宏,张梅,北京长安街地下人行通道大跨度超浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],:7-15.
[113]黄俊,杨小丽,武汉市常青路地下人行通道超浅埋暗挖施工技术[J],铁道标准设计,2005(2):76-77.
[114]申志军,武汉洪山广场地下人行通道施工技术[J],隧道建设,2001,21(1):55-59.
[115]李付湘,深圳市向西路地下人行通道工程施工技术[J],岩土工程界,2001,4(4):33-35.
[116]苏学清,齐之龙,郝玉生等,青岛某地下工程超浅埋暗挖施工效应分析[J],岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4):465-468.
[117]李端书,福州大跨浅埋暗挖地下通道的修建[J],地下空间,2001,21(1):61-66.
[118]贾顺礼,高碑店车站地下通道出入口的施工难点及其对策[J],铁道建筑,2003(11):40-42.
[119]贺善宁,李勇,采用暗挖法施工矩形断面地下通道的经验[J],铁道建筑,2003(11):45-47.
[120]杨刚,张爱峰,于海营,城市地下过街通道工程实例及分析[J],探矿工程,1998(1):57-58.
[121]高怀志,李养平,浅埋暗挖法在天津地铁1号线工程中的应用[J],隧道建设,2005,25(4):10-14.
[122]王永旗,王建新,用浅埋暗挖法修建城市人行地道[J],铁道建筑,1999(11):19-21.
[123]新型的地下暗挖法——管幕工法的设计与施工[J],中国市政工程,1997(6):45-46.
[124]英旭,浅覆地层过街通道小管棚法施工技术[J],施工技术,2005,34(6):24-26.
[125]杨春明,地铁站过街通道管棚拉管法施工[J],铁道建筑技术,2005(2):30-33.
[126]高岗荣,王圣公,杨春满,软土地层浅埋地下通道管棚—冻结法施工[J],地质与勘探,2003(8):210-211.
[127]贾小辉,注浆工艺在浅埋暗挖工程中的应用[J],探矿工程,2006(1):38-39.
[128]王连池,高军,周东勇等,过铁路超浅埋软土通道暗挖施工技术[J],隧道建设,2003,23(3):43-45.
[129]O'Rourke T.D.Buried pipeline response to tunneling ground movements[A].Europe'82 conference[C].Switzerland:Basel 1982:9-15.
[130]Attewell P.B.,et al.Soil movements induced by tunneling and the effects on pipelines and structures,Blackie,London,1986.
[131]Nath P..Movements and Strains Induced in Buried Pipes Due to Parallel Trench Excavations:Finite Element Predictions[J].Journal of Pipelines,1986,5(4):233-249.
[132]Kristin M.Molnar,Richard J.Finno,Edwin C.Rossow.Analysis of effects of deep braced excavations on adjacent buffed utilities.Department of Civil Engineering Northwestern University,2004.
[133]蒋洪胜,候学渊.盾构掘进对隧道周围土体扰动的理论与实测分析.岩石力学与工程学报,2003(9):1514-1520.
[134]高田至郎等.受地基沉降影响的地下管线的设计公式及应用,地下管线抗震[M].北京:学术书刊出版社,1990.
[135]廖少明,刘建航.基坑工程手册[M],北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
[136]李大勇,张土乔.深基坑开挖引起临近地下管线的位移分析[J].工业建筑,1999,29(11):36-41,27.
[137]高文华.基坑变形预测与邻近建筑及设施的保护研究[博士后出站报告],长沙:湖南大学,2001.
[138]段光杰.地铁隧道施工扰动对地表沉降和管线变形影响的理论和方法研究[D],北中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文,2002.
[139]A.Klar,T.E.B.Vorster,K.Soga,et al.Soil-pipe-tunnel interaction:Comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions[R].Technical Report of the University of Cambrige,2004.
[140]T.E.B.Vorster,A.Klar,K.Soga,et al.Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviroumental Engineering,2005,131(11):1399-1410.
[141]O' Rourke T.D.,Ahmed I..Effect of Shallow Trench Construction on Cast Iron Pipelines[A].Advances in Underground Pipeline Engineering[C].USA:WI,1985:1-31.
[142]李大勇,龚晓南.深基坑工程中地下管线位移影响因素分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(A01):1083-1087.
[143]李大勇,龚晓南,张土乔.软土地基深基坑周围地下管线保护措施的数值模拟[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(6):659-663.
[144]李大勇,龚晓南.软土地基深基坑工程邻近柔性接口地下管线的性状分析[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(2):77-80.
[145]李大勇,吕爱钟,曾庆军.内撑式基坑工程周围地下管线的性状分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(4):682-687.
[146]李大勇,龚晓南.深基坑开挖对周围地下管线影响因素分析[J].建筑技术,2003,34(2):94-96.
[147]吴为义.垂直荷载作用下软粘土地基中管道的纵向力学性状研究[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文,2000.
[148]吴为义,张土乔,郑旭晨等.竖向荷载下柔性接口管道的纵向力学计算[J].中国给水排水,2002,18(9):58-60.
[149]吴为义,孙宇坤,张土乔.承插口给水排水管线的竖向位移计算[J].特种结构,2003,20(3):22-24.
[150]吴波,高波.地铁区间隧道施工对邻近管线影响的三维数值模拟[JJ].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(增2):2451-2456.
[151]吴波,高波,索晓明等.城市地铁隧道施工对管线的影响[J].岩土力学,2004,25(4):657-662.
[152]吴为义,张土乔,孙宇坤.平面土基刚性圆管基底压力分布的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2004,25(1):137-140.
[153]彭基敏,张孟喜.盾构法施工引起邻近地下管线位移分析[J].工业建筑,2005(9):50-53.
[154]马涛.隧道施工引起的地层位移及其对邻近地下管线的影响分析[D].长沙理硕士学位论文,2005.
[155]毕继红,刘伟,江志峰.隧道开挖对地下管线的影响分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(8):1317-1321.
[156]Klar A.,Vorster T.E.B.Soga K.,et al.Elastoplastic Solution for Soil-Pipe-Tunnel interaction[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2007,133(7):782-792.
[157]姚宁,隧道施工对周边环境影响的研究[D],浙江大学硕士学位论文,2007.
[158]陈敏,隧道施工扰动下邻近管线的位移及其周围土体变形的研究[D],北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[159]吴为义,盾构隧道周围地下管线的性状研究[D],浙江大学博士学位论文,2008.
[160]A.P.S.SELVADURAI,土与基础的相互作用分析[M].北京:中国铁道出版社.1984.
[161]于学馥,郑颖人.地下工程围岩稳定分析[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1983
[162]朱维申,张玉军,任伟中.系统锚杆对三峡船闸高边坡岩体加固作用的块体相似模型试验研究[J].岩土力学,1996,17(2):1-6
[163]Zhu Weishen,ZhangYujun.Effect of supporting surrounding rocks by bolts and its application to high slope of three gorges flight lock.In:Proceedings of the international symposium on anchoring and grouting techniques.Hong Kong:Econarc Communication(Group) Ltd,1994.188-197
[164]王明年,张建华.工程措施对控制隧道围岩变形的力学效果研究[J].岩土工程学报,1998,20(5):27-30.
[165]王毅才,隧道工程(第二版)[M],北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[166]Eisenstein,Z.,Heinz,H.and Negro,A.,On Three-Dimensional Ground Response to Tunneling.ASCE.Geotech Ⅲ,Tunneling in Soils and Rocks,Atlanta,1984 pp.107-127.
[167]陈仲颐,周景星.土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994.
[168]秦建设.盾构施工开挖面变形与破坏机理研究[D].南京:河海大学.2005
[169]Itasca Consulting Group,Inc.FLAC3D(Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continuain 3 Dimensions) User Manuals,Version2.1,Minneapolis,Minnesota
[170]刘波,韩彦辉.FLAC原理、实例与应用指南[M],北京:人民交通出版社,2005.
[171]富海鹰.地铁隧道非降水法施工引起的地表沉降的研究[D].成都:西南交通大学.2006.