用户名: 密码: 验证码:
高技术产业专利态势与绩效及专利风险研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着知识经济的到来,信息技术的发展,知识、信息、技术在经济中的作用日益突出。高技术产业在一国经济中的比重不断增大,成为一国经济可持续发展的动力与核心,其主导性作用持续增强。但伴随着高技术产业专利迅猛发展的态势,高技术产业的技术创新风险越来越大,专利重要地位进一步凸显,专利风险问题逐步引起广泛的关注。
     高技术的专利态势可以从申请总体趋势、核心技术体现、专利年度发展趋势、专利年度增长率、专利类型、发明专利、增长率等七个方面进行研究,通过在上述几个方面对信息技术领域相关IPC类别的专利数据进行检索分析,再结合其他重点领域分析基础上,本文研究发现,目前我国高技术产业呈现核心企业及院所领跑、关键技术专利集聚、跨国公司专利围剿的态势。在此基础上,本文又对高技术产业专利绩予以效研究并发现:高技术产业的专利绩效虽然整体上有所提高,但与发达国家相比仍有差距,R&D投入比重偏低;高技术产业中各行业专利绩效水平不均衡,只有电子和通信设备、电子计算机和办公设备专利绩效水平较高。针对这个局面,本文提出:我国政府既要保护知识产权,更要积极防范本地产业掉入知识产权陷阱;高技术产业充分利用与政府关系密切的有利条件,大力推动产业专利技术战略联盟体的构建与发展;高技术企业要坚持技术开发的自主地位,构筑自己的知识产权纵深防御体系等提升绩效策略。
     与通常把知识产权当作外生风险影响因素的研究不同,本文发现在高科技行业,专利权内部诸因素的不确定性,会引发更为深刻的不确定性影响。这种专利风险主要来源于专利获得的不确定性、专利有效性的不确定性、专利保护范围的不确定性、专利价值的不确定性。它存在于高科技发展的各个阶段,带来损失与受益的可能并存,内生于专利制度,无法完全避免。
     专利地图包括可进行专利管理分析、专利技术分析与专利权利分析的三类地图,运用这三类地图,可以分析高科技产业的技术生命周期,判断相关领域技术创新主体的多极化地位和关系,评价相关技术领域潜在竞争对手所拥有的创新人员的研究能力,以预测高技术行业的技术创新风险。
     高技术产业的专利态势和专利风险对高技术产业的技术创新、创新成果的专利价值评估和专利战略都将产生广泛影响。对此我国应当大力建立技术服务支撑体系;正视专利风险和专利态势,增强创新能力,优化法律环境、促进高新区的建设;充分发挥产业集群效应这三大对策来促进高技术产业的健康发展。
With the growth of knowledge economy and development of information technology, knowledge, information and technology have made great impact on economy. Hi-tech industry is taking bigger share in the economy of a country and becoming drive and core for the sustainable development of a country's economy at leading position. Accordingly the fast development of patent in hi-tech industry leads to bigger and bigger risk on technological innovation of hi-tech industry, which gives patents very important role and causes patent risk problems.
     The trend of hi-tech patent can be studied in seven aspects: the general application trend, core technology presentation, annual patent development trend, annual patent development rate, patent type, patent for invention, rate of increase. Through the index analysis on the above aspects for the relevant IPC patent data of information technology field, and the analysis on other key fields, this paper finds the trend that key enterprises and colleges are leading, key technology patents are concentrated and multinational companies own more patents in the hi-tech industries in our country. On the base of the above, this paper makes research on the patent performance of hi-tech industry and finds that although it has been improved generally, there is a gap between the patent performance in our country with it in developed countries. The gap comes from lower investment in R&D and unbalanced patent performance level in different business in hi-tech industry indicating only electric and telecom equipment, computer and office equipment have higher patent performance level. In front of this situation, this paper gives several ideas to promote the patent performance. Our government shall not only protect intellectual property, but also provent actively our local industries from intellectual property trap. The hi-tech industries shall make full use of the close relationship with local government and exert great efforts to drive the establishment and development of industrial patent technology strategic alliance. And also the hi-tech enterprises shall insist on the independent position of technology development and build their own intellectual property depth protection system.
     Different from the study regarding knowledge property as exogenous risk factor, this paper finds in hi-tech industry uncertainty of interior factors of patent right causes deeper impact of uncertainty. This kind of patent risk is mainly made by uncertainty of patent acquiry, uncertainty of patent validity, uncertainty of patent protection range and uncertainty of patent value. Existing in every phase of hi-tech development, and giving possibly both loss and benefit, it is caused from the patent system and can not be avoided completely.
     Patent map has three kinds which can be used for patent management analysis, patent technology analysis and patent right analysis. These three kinds of maps can be utilized to analyze the technology life cycle of hi-tech industry, find out the multi-terminal position and relationship of technology innovation subject in relevant industries, evaluate the research ability of innovation staff from potential competitors in relevant technology industries and forecast the technology innovation risk in hi-tech industry.
     The patent trend in hi-tech industries and patent risk will make wide influence on technology innovation, patent value assessment of innovation result and patent strategy in hi-tech industries. Therefore, our country should implement three solutions to increase the healthy development of hi-tech industries by first making efforts to set up technology service and support system; second facing the patent risk and trend, improving innovation ability, optimizing legal situation, pushing the construction of hi-tech zone and third exerting fully the effect of industry concentration.
引文
[1] Allison, J. R , Lemley, M. A., Empirical Analysis of the Validity of Litigated Patents[J]. American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 1998(3):185-275.
    [2] Allison, John R, M. A. Lemley. Who's patenting what? An Empirical Exploration of Patent Prosecution [J]. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2000(6): 2099-174
    [3] Anton, J. J.; Dennis A. Y., (2004). Little patents, big secrets, Managing Intellectual Property [J], Rand Journal of Economics, 2004, spring.
    [4] Antoniou, P. H. & Ansoff, H. I. (2004), Strategic Management of Technology [J].Technology Analysis &Strategic Management, 2004, (2). [5] Barney, J. B. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy [J].Management Science, 1998(32): 1231-1241.
    [6] BAY Y. Development and applications of patent map in Korean high-tech industry [C].The first Asia-Pacific conference on patent maps, Taipei, 2003: 3 -23.
    [7] Berkowitz, Leonard, Getting the Most from Your Patents [J], Research-Technology Management, 1993(2): 26-31. .
    [8] Berkowitz, L., (1995), Getting the most from your patents [J], London Maxwell, 1995.
    [9] Bessen J., Meurer, M. J., Patent litigation with endogenous disputes [J]. American Economics Review. 2006 (2): 77-81.
    [10] Bou-Wen Lin, Chung-Jen Chen, and Hsueh-LiangWu, Patent Portfolio Diversity,Technology Strategy, and Firm Value [J], IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2006(1).
    [11] Blind K., Edler J., Friesch T, et al.. Motives to patent: empirical evidence from Germany [J]. Research Policy. 2006(5): 655-672.
    [12] Bousquet, A. H. Cremer, M. I. and M. Wolkowicz. Risk sharing in licensing [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1998 (16): 535?54.
    [13] C. Freeman. The Economics of Industrial Innovation [M]. Harmondsworth: Penguin,1974:27-29.
    [14] Choi J. P., Patent Pools and Cross-Licensing in the Shadow of Patent Litigation [M],Michigan State University, October, 2002, (Revised March 2004).
    [15] Christopher J. Kelly Kaye Scholar LLP. Patent Pools and Antitrust Enforcement:1997-2001 [R], 2002.
    [16] Cohen, Nelson and Walsh J., Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not) [R], NBER, Working Paper 7552.
    [17] Corbin. RM. Managing risk and protecting intellectual property [J]. Ivey Business Journal 2002(3): 11-13.
    [18] Chesbrough, H, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Review [M],2003:35-41.
    [19] Cieri RM, Morgan MM. Licensing intellectual property and technology from the financially-troubled or startup company [J]. The business Lawyer, 2000, (4): 16-49.
    [20] Faith, Barry. Managing Risk [J]. Engineering Technology, 2003, (7): 25?6.
    [21] DenicoloV., Franzoni L. A., Patents, Secrets, and the First-Inventor Defense [J],Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2004(3): 517-538.
    [22] Donoghue, T. and Scotchmer, S., Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress [J], Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,2006(1): 1-33.
    [23] Fitz(?)erald M. At risk offshore: U.S companies outsourcing their software development offshore can get stung by industrial espionage and poor intellectual property safeguards[J]. CIO, 2003(4): 1.
    [24] Giuri, P, M. Mariani, S. Brusoni. et al, Inventors and invention processes in Europe,Results from the Pat Val-EU survey [J]. Res. Policy, 2007(36): 1107-1127
    [25] Henrik Sattler, Appropriability of product innovations: An empirical Analysis for Germany, Research papers on marketing and retailing [M], University of Hamburg.
    [26] Kamien, M. I., Tauman, Y, Patent Licensing: The Inside Story [J]. The Manchester School, 2002(1): 7-15.
    [27] Kaminski M. D., Effective management of US patent litigation [J]. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 2006(1): 13-25.
    [28] Kimberly K. Cauthorn. Managing Intellectual Property Risk: Because Knowledge Is A Company's Greatest Asset [J], Intellectual Asset Management Practice, 2004(6): 1 -20.
    [29] Knight, H. J, Patent Strategy: For Researchers and Research Managers [M], John Wiley&Sons, New York, 2002.
    [30] Koichi et. al, Classification of the Patent Strategy of the Japanese Firms by Market Environment and the Characteristics of Technology [C], IEEE, Engineering Management Society, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, July, 2001
    [31] Lemley, M. A., Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office [J]. Northwestern University Law Review, 2005(4): 1497-532.
    [32] Lemley, M. A, C. Shapiro, Probabilistic Patents [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2005(19):75-98.
    [33] Levin, R. C, Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., winter, S. G, Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development [R]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1987(3):242-279.
    [34] Llobet, G., Patent Litigation when innovation is cumulative [J], International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003(21): 1135-1157.
    [35] Lechers J., Risk-minimization strategies in licensing intellectual property from entities that are, or might become, financially troubled [J]. Intellectual property & technology law journal, 2002(6): 7-11.
    [36] Maehlup, F. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. [M],Prince University Press, 1962.
    [37] Marco A. C., The Option Value of Patent Litigation: Theory and Evidence [J], Review of Financial Economics. 2005(3): 323-351.
    [38] Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M. and Wagner, S., Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study [J]. Economic Journal, 1981(9): 907-918.
    [39] Moldovanu, B., Sela, A., Patent licensingto Bertrand Competitors [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003(1): 1-13.
    [40] OECD, OECD Science: Technology and Industry Outlook [R]. OECD: Pairs.
    [41] Osterberg E C. A primer on IP risk management and insurance [J]. The Licensing Journal 2003(11): 1-10.
    [42] Poddar, S., Sinha, U.B., On patent licensing and spatial competition [J]. Econ. Rev., 2004(8):208-218.
    [43] Poddar, S., Sinha, U.B., Patent licensing from high-cost firm to low-cost firm [EB/OL], http://nt2.fas.nus.sg/ecs/pub/wp/wp0503.pdf, 008-09-26.
    [44] Japan Patent Office, Asia-Pacific industrial property center, JⅢ. Guide book for practical use of 'patent map for each technology field [EB/OL], http://www.okpatents.com/phosita/images/patent_map_JPO.pdf, 2008-07-02
    [45] J.M. Utterback, W. J. Abernatky. A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation [C], IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1988 (2):63-70P
    [46] Joshua S. Gans, David H. Hsu, Scott Stern, The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Marker for Ideas [J], Management Science, 2008(5):982-997.
    [47] Reitzig M, Comprehensive View on Corporations'Intellectual Property: Towards a Specific Strategy-Structure Contingency Framework [R], CBS working paper, 2005.
    [48] Reitzig, M., Strategic management of intellectual property [J], Mit Sloan Management Review 2003(3):35-40.
    [49] Reitzig, M., What determines patent value? Insights from the semiconductor industry [J]. Research Policy, 2003(32): 13-26
    [50] Saracho, A.I., The Relationship between Patent Licensing and Competitive Behavior [J], The Manchester School, 2005(5):563-581.
    [51] Sarkar, S., Patent licensing by a standard auction in the presence of network externality [J], The Manchester School, 2005(2): 228-245.
    [52] Schankerman, Mark, How Valuable Is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field [J], RAND Journal of Economics, 1998(1):77-107.
    [53] Somaya D., Patent Strategy Viewed Through the Lens of Patent Litigation[D]. PhD Dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 2002.
    [54] Taylor, C. T. and Silberston, Z.A., The Economic Impact Of The Patent System: A Study Of The British Experience [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
    [55] Teece, D.J., Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic and Policy Dimensions [M], Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [56] Waterson, M., The Economics of Product Patents [J]. American Economic Review. 1990(4): 860-869.
    [57] Z. -L. He, K. lim, P. -K. Wong, Snakes and Ladders: A Patent Analysis of Ericsson [EB/OL], Motorola and Nokia in the Wireless Communications Industry, 1980-2000, http://www.nus.edu.sg/nec/publications/full_text2004.htm, 2008-06-21.
    [58] Ziedonis Rosemarie Ham, (2000). Patent protection and firm strategy in the semiconductor industry [D]. PhD Dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 2000.
    [59] 阿尔温·托夫勒.力量转移[M].北京:新华出版社,1997。
    [60] 阿瑟·威廉姆斯,理查德·汉斯.风险管理与保险[M].北京:中国商业出版社,1990。
    [61] 毕克新、朱娟、冯英浚.中小企业产品创新研究现状和发展趋势分析[J].科研管理,2005(3):7-160
    [62] 陈大雄、贺正楚.产业集群与我国高新技术产业开发区的发展[J].技术经济2004(3):29-30。
    [63] 蔡洪秋.关于我国医药企业的技术创新与专利管理工作的思考[J].知识产权,1997(6):22-25。
    [64] 陈俊.高新技术产业的发展:高新区、产业集群、制度安排[D],博士论文,收藏地点:西北农林科技大学,2004。
    [65] 陈克文.高技术风险投资理论[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003。
    [66] 陈立文.风险投资决策分析方法研究[J].技术经济,1995(8):8-12。
    [67] 蔡茂剑.高新技术产业发展应走自主创新为主的道路[J].上海工程技术大学学报,2002(4):277-280。
    [68] 陈美章.大学的知识产权管理与技术创新[J].知识产权,2002(2):20-23。
    [69] 陈玉和,白俊红,尚芳,张玉娟.技术创新风险分析的三维模型[J].中国软科学,2007(5):130-132。
    [70] 程永顺、罗李华.专利侵权判定[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2002:11。
    [71] 曹兴.高技术企业创新行为与创业发展机制研究[D],博士论文,收藏地点:中南大学,2004。
    [72] 陈晓红、王宗润.中小民营企业与风险投资[J].湖南社会科学,2002(1):70-72。
    [73] 杜端甫.重大工程项目风险管理中的综合集成方法[J].中国管理科学,1996(4):24-28。
    [74] 董惠石.铁路技术创新与专利保护[J].中国铁路,2000(10):33-34。
    [75] 饭沼光夫.企业研究开发管理[M],成都:四川人民出版社,1993。
    [76] 傅家骥.技术创新[M].北京:企业管理出版社,1992:16-18。
    [77] 傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998。
    [78] 符颖.上海高校专利工作态势分析及发展研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006(10):119-125。
    [79] 冯晓青.试论企业技术创新中专利战略的应用[J].科学管理研究,2001(4):13-15。
    [80] G·多西.技术进步与经济理论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1992:274。
    [81] 郭励弘等.高新技术产业:发展规律与风险投资[M].北京:中国发展出版,2000。
    [82] 郭庆存.企业技术创新与专利战略[J].知识产权,1999(4):30-31。
    [83] 古利平、张宗益、康继军.专利与R&D资源:中国创新的投入产出分析[J],管理工程学报,2006(1):147-151。
    [84] 工业和信息化部科技司.2008年信息技术领域专利态势分析报告[J].电子知识产权,2008(12):14-18。
    [85] 和育东、方慧聪.专利创造性客观化问题研究[J].知识产权,2007(2):76-81。
    [86] 蒋瑛.高技术产业空间聚集研究[D].博士论文,收藏地点: 四川大学,2003。
    [87] 金泳锋、余翔.专利风险的特征及其影响研究[J].知识产权,2008(6):84-88。
    [88] 金泳锋、唐春.专利地图对技术创新风险的认知及预测初探[J].电子知识产权,2008(7):34-37。
    [89] 金泳锋、程遥.中国信息技术领域专利发展态势研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009(2):
    [90] 科学技术部发展计划司.2006年我国高技术产业发展情况分析[EB/OL],http://www.most.gov.cn/kjtj/tjbg/200801/t20080116_58514.htm,访问时间:2008年12月25日。
    [91] 罗玉中、易继明.论我国高技术产业中的知识产权问题[J].中国法学,2000(5):74-85。
    [92] 刘大椿.科学技术哲学导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006。
    [93] 吕炜.风险投资的经济学考察-制度、原理及中国化应用的研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001。
    [94] 李洪彦.高科技创业企业风险管理研究[D],博士论文,收藏地点:武汉理工大学,2007。
    [95] 李坚.不确定性问题初探[D],博士论文,中国社会科学院研究生院,2006。
    [96] 梁建军.从专利分析看国内发光二极管的发展趋势[J].激光与光电子学进展2005(1):43-47。
    [97] 李晓峰.企业技术创新风险测度与决策及其控制研究[D],博士论文,收藏地点:四川大学,2005。
    [98] 孟庆伟.关于企业技术创新中的风险问题[C].中国科学技术协会第二届青年学术年会论文集,中国科学技术出版社,1995。
    [99] 马晓光等,高技术领域急需专利保驾护航[J],科研管理,2002(9):20-25。
    [100] 麦耶斯.知识管理与组织设计[M].珠海:珠海出版社:1998。
    [101] 纳尔森 经济增长的源泉[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2001。
    [102] 欧庭高.技术创新复杂性初探[J].系统辩证学报,2003(4):45-48。
    [103]邱洪华、金泳锋、余翔.基于专利地图理论的中国银行业商业方法专利研究[J].管理学报,2008(3):418-422。
    [104]苏爱华.企业专利工作存在的问题及对策[J].知识产权,2001(3):34-36。
    [105]沈建明.项目风险管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004。
    [106]唐春.专利制度国际化趋势及其对策研究[D],博士论文,收藏地点:华中科技大学,2008。
    [107]陶用之、曾艳、袁界平.提高我国高新技术产业专利产出水平的对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006(4):101-104。
    [108]特瑞期,普雷切特等.风险管理与保险[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:10-43。
    [109]阎华红.中国企业风险与防范[M].北京:中国工商出版社,2000。
    [110]周朝琦、侯龙文.企业创新经营战略[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2001。
    [111]袁明、彭友华等.利用专利制度促进技术创新发展高新技术产业[J].科技进步与对策,2000(2):41-42。
    [112]余平,黄瑞华.基于合作创新虚拟企业的知识产权风险及对策研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(10):112-114。
    [113]袁泽沛、王琼.技术创新与创新风险的研究综述[J].经济学动态,2002(3):79-82。
    [114]闰笑非.技术经济与管理[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005。
    [115]尹新天.关于发明和实用新型专利的保护范围[J].知识产权,2001(5):3-7。
    [116]吴国平.技术创新与专利制度的法经济学分析[J].研究与发展管理,1999(10):6-10。
    [117]王立新、高长春.企业技术创新的过程及创新风险研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(6):75-79。
    [118]汪善文.提高企业专利管理水平的探讨[J].河南石油,2001(4):51-52。
    [119]汪忠,黄瑞华.合作创新的知识产权风险与防范研究[J].科学学研究,2005(3):419-424。
    [120]汪忠、黄瑞华、张克英.知识型动态联盟知识产权风险防范体系构建[J].研究与发展管理,2006(1):90-96。
    [121]武芳.我国2007年高新技术产品进出口分析[N].中国高新技术产业导报2008年5月12日,第B08版。
    [122]吴季松.21世纪社会的新趋势:知识经济[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,1998。
    [123]吴涛.技术创新风险的分类研究及矩阵分析方法[J].科研管理,1999(2):40-45。
    [124]吴涛.考虑决策维和风险维德技术创新风险二维分析模型及案例分析[J].科学管理研究:2002.4(2):1-3。
    [125]王晓浒、陈小霞、刘晓斌.生物技术发明专利态势分析[J].科学观察,2008(2):19-25。
    [126]吴永忠.论技术创新的不确定性[J].自然辩证法研究,2002(6):37-39。
    [127]万小丽、朱雪忠.专利价值的评估指标体系及模糊综合评价[J].科研管理,2008(3):185-191。
    [128]吴新银、刘平.专利地图研究初探[J].研究与发展管理,2003(5):88-92。
    [129]吴新银.专利地图在企业专利战略中的运用研究[D].硕士论文,收藏地点:华中科技大学,2004。
    [130]夏保华.企业持续技术创新的结构[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,2001。
    [131]熊彼特.资本主义、社会主义与民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999。
    [132]肖国华.专利地图研究与应用[D].硕士论文,收藏地点:四川大学,2006。
    [133]许合先.技术标准专利化趋势对我国技术创新的影响及对策[J].湖北教育学院学报,2006(11):70-72。
    [134]谢科范.技术创新风险管理[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,1999。
    [135]信息产业部科学技术司.2007年信息技术领域专利态势分析报告[J].电子知识产权,2007(9):15-19。
    [136]周朝琦、侯龙文.企业创新经营战略[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2001。
    [137]周鸿德.知识产权制度的形成与技术创新[J].社会科学研究,2002(3):95-98。
    [138]张克英,黄瑞华.伙伴机会主义行为引发的知识产权风险分析[J].科学学研究, 2007(4):740-744。
    [139]张涛、李刚.企业知识产权价值及其评价研究[J].改革与战略,2006(8):23-26。
    [140]赵曙明、杨忠.国际企业:风险管理[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1998。
    [141]张晓伟.论成果管理与专利管理对知识产权保护的历史作用[J].知识产权2001(3):22-23。
    [142]张伟君、单晓光.滥用专利权与滥用专利制度之辨析--从日本“专利滥用”的理论与实践谈起[J].知识产权,2006(6):67-70。
    [143]张子睿、朱涛.机器人领域专利态势分析[J].中国专利与发明,2008(4):40-42。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700