湖北省高技术产业技术创新实证研究
|
摘要
高技术产业发展代表一个国家或地区的科技发展水平及综合实力,技术创新则是高技术产业发展的核心和竞争力提高的源泉。近十年湖北省高技术产业虽然发展迅猛,规模不断壮大,但是与发达国家和地区相比仍存在较大差距。本文从产业创新经济学的视角,运用多元统计分析方法、比较分析方法实证评价和分析湖北省高技术产业技术创新能力、创新绩效和创新体系,这对于高技术产业经济学科建设,提升湖北省高技术产业技术创新能力和产业竞争优势,加快经济发展方式转变和“两型社会”建设,具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。
全文共七章,第一章为绪论；第二章为理论基础,对产业创新经济学、高技术产业经济学、创新系统理论等相关理论成果进行梳理,为本文的后续研究奠定理论基础；第三、四、五章为本文的研究重点,运用Delphi和AHP方法构建了省级区域高技术产业创新能力和创新绩效评价指标体系,运用主成分分析法、数据包络分析法、多元线性回归等分析法和相应的系统软件,分别从八五、九五、十五、十一五期间四个时段,对同产业全国省际间及湖北省内产业间进行动态评价和比较分析,对湖北省高技术产业创新能力影响因素进行实证分析；第六章对湖北省高技术产业产学研合作现状及存在的问题进行分析,构建了湖北省高技术产业创新体系模型,提出了完善湖北省高技术产业创新体系的对策建议；第七章是全文总结与研究展望。
本文的主要创新表现为四个方面：(1)构建了多元多层次省级区域高技术产业创新能力和创新绩效评价指标体系,并按时段进行动态评价。为了避免某一年度数据的随机性,研究选取时段数据,取五年数据的平均数,按八五、九五、十五、十一五期间四个时段进行动态评价和比较分析,发现了各省级区域间创新能力和创新绩效的差异性以及不同时段的变动情况,湖北省高技术产业创新能力和创新绩效在全国的地位变动以及各产业的差异性。评价结果具有综合性、动态性和科学性。(2)揭示了高技术产业技术创新能力、创新绩效与创新体系的内在联系。研究发现,创新能力高的省份创新绩效并不一定高,创新绩效高的省份创新能力也不一定强,但创新能力强、创新绩效也高的省份,创新体系一定是相对发展好的；而创新能力弱、创新绩效也弱的省份,一定是创新体系不完善的。湖北省的高技术产业技术创新能力在全国排第12位,但创新绩效在全国排第22位,说明创新能力较强,且处于上升态势,但创新绩效较低,这正是湖北省的科教优势未转化为经济优势的主要原因之一,这也说明湖北省高技术产业技术创新体系尚不健全,亟待完善。(3)运用多元统计分析方法建立了湖北省高技术产业创新能力影响因素的计量模型,并以湖北省医药制造业为例进行实证。实证分析表明,企业规模、技术改造经费支出、研发人员投入对技术创新能力提升影响显著,政府支持影响不大。(4)构建了湖北省高技术产业创新体系模型,揭示了湖北省高技术产业产学研合作创新机制。湖北省高技术产业创新体系以企业作为创新主体的技术创新系统为核心,知识创新系统、环境支持系统、科技服务系统、科技投融资系统为支撑,提升湖北省高技术产业技术创新能力和创新绩效的关键是要加强企业、高校及科研机构、政府、中介服务机构和金融机构各主体要素的协同作用。
The development of high-tech industry represents technological development level and comprehensive strength of a country or region, while technological innovation is the core of the high-tech industry development and improvement of competitiveness. In a decade, high-tech industry in Hubei Province is developing rapidly and growing stronger, but there is still a large gap between Hubei Province and developed countries or regions. Using multivariate statistical analysis method and the comparative analysis method, this dissertation analyzes and evaluates the technological innovation capability, innovation performance and innovation system of high-tech industry in Hubei Province from the angle of industrial innovation economics. This research has important theoretical value and practical significance for the development of high-tech industry, the improvement of technical innovation, the enhancement of competitive strength, and acceleration of optimizing economical development ways.
This dissertation is divided into7chapters. The first chapter is an introduction. The second chapter presents the theoretical basis. The theories on industrial innovation economics, economics of high-tech industry and innovation system are discussed and summarized to lay the theoretical foundation for the following study. The third, fourth and fifth chapters are the focus of this dissertation. These chapters explain the use of Delphi and AHP methods to build evaluation index system of innovation capability and innovation performance for high-tech industries in Hubei Province. The chapters also describe the applications of principal component analysis, data envelopment analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and corresponding system software to make dynamic evaluation and comparative analysis for the same industry in different provinces as well as different industries in Hubei Province. These evaluation and analysis are made according to four stages dating from the8th Five-Year Plan to the11th Five-Year Plan. In addition, the analyses empirically address the factors that could affect innovation capability of high-tech industries. The sixth chapter analyzes status quo and existing problems of the Industry-Academy-Research cooperation, and builds innovation system model of high-tech industry in Hubei Province, and gives proposals on how to improve and perfect the innovation system of high-tech in Hubei Province. The seventh chapter summarizes the whole dissertation and puts forward research prospect.
The main innovation of this dissertation is shown in four aspects:(1) Multi-level evaluation index system of innovation capability and innovation performance is built to make dynamic evaluation by stages. In order to avoid the randomness of annual data, the average of five years' data, is employed to makes dynamic evaluation and comparative analysis by dividing evaluation years into four stages:The8th5-year period, the9th5-year period, the10th5-year period and the11th5-year period. The results show the change of country's statue of innovation performance and innovation capability of high-tech industry in Hubei Province as well as the differences in various industries. The proposed dynamic evaluation indicates the differences and variations of innovation capabilities and performances among different provincial regions and in different stages. The evaluation result is all-around, dynamic and science-oriented.(2) The inherent relationship of innovation capability, innovation performance and innovation system is illustrated. The research shows that not all provinces which have great innovation capabilities have good innovation performances and vice versa. However the province which have both strong innovative capabilities and good innovative performances do possess well-developed innovation systems, and on the other side, the provinces with imperfect innovation system certainly have week innovation capability and poor innovation performance. Hubei province ranked12in the country with the innovation capability of high-tech industry, but it ranked22with innovation performance. This suggests that the innovation systems without very good innovation performance in Hubei province must be improved to transform the science and education advantages into economic ones, even though it has greater innovation capability and is still making progress.(3) Multivariate statistical analysis method is applied to construct an econometric model of influential factor on Hubei province's innovation capability of high-tech industry. Taking pharmaceutical industry in Hubei province as an example to perform empirical study, the study indicates that evident influences on the promotion of technical innovation capabilities are mainly produce by scale of enterprises, budget of technical innovation and manpower for R&D, other than government support.(4) A model of high-tech industrial innovation system in Hubei Province is formed to reveal the Industry-Academy-Research cooperation mechanism. The Hubei high-tech industrial innovation system consists of the main innovation body of enterprises as the core of technology innovation system, which is supported by knowledge innovation system, environment support system, technological service system, technology investment and financing system. The key factor to improve the technological innovation capability and innovation performance of high-tech industry in Hubei Province is to cooperatively perform the actions of main parties of enterprises, universities and institutes, government, Intermediary service organizations and financial institutions.
全文共七章,第一章为绪论；第二章为理论基础,对产业创新经济学、高技术产业经济学、创新系统理论等相关理论成果进行梳理,为本文的后续研究奠定理论基础；第三、四、五章为本文的研究重点,运用Delphi和AHP方法构建了省级区域高技术产业创新能力和创新绩效评价指标体系,运用主成分分析法、数据包络分析法、多元线性回归等分析法和相应的系统软件,分别从八五、九五、十五、十一五期间四个时段,对同产业全国省际间及湖北省内产业间进行动态评价和比较分析,对湖北省高技术产业创新能力影响因素进行实证分析；第六章对湖北省高技术产业产学研合作现状及存在的问题进行分析,构建了湖北省高技术产业创新体系模型,提出了完善湖北省高技术产业创新体系的对策建议；第七章是全文总结与研究展望。
本文的主要创新表现为四个方面：(1)构建了多元多层次省级区域高技术产业创新能力和创新绩效评价指标体系,并按时段进行动态评价。为了避免某一年度数据的随机性,研究选取时段数据,取五年数据的平均数,按八五、九五、十五、十一五期间四个时段进行动态评价和比较分析,发现了各省级区域间创新能力和创新绩效的差异性以及不同时段的变动情况,湖北省高技术产业创新能力和创新绩效在全国的地位变动以及各产业的差异性。评价结果具有综合性、动态性和科学性。(2)揭示了高技术产业技术创新能力、创新绩效与创新体系的内在联系。研究发现,创新能力高的省份创新绩效并不一定高,创新绩效高的省份创新能力也不一定强,但创新能力强、创新绩效也高的省份,创新体系一定是相对发展好的；而创新能力弱、创新绩效也弱的省份,一定是创新体系不完善的。湖北省的高技术产业技术创新能力在全国排第12位,但创新绩效在全国排第22位,说明创新能力较强,且处于上升态势,但创新绩效较低,这正是湖北省的科教优势未转化为经济优势的主要原因之一,这也说明湖北省高技术产业技术创新体系尚不健全,亟待完善。(3)运用多元统计分析方法建立了湖北省高技术产业创新能力影响因素的计量模型,并以湖北省医药制造业为例进行实证。实证分析表明,企业规模、技术改造经费支出、研发人员投入对技术创新能力提升影响显著,政府支持影响不大。(4)构建了湖北省高技术产业创新体系模型,揭示了湖北省高技术产业产学研合作创新机制。湖北省高技术产业创新体系以企业作为创新主体的技术创新系统为核心,知识创新系统、环境支持系统、科技服务系统、科技投融资系统为支撑,提升湖北省高技术产业技术创新能力和创新绩效的关键是要加强企业、高校及科研机构、政府、中介服务机构和金融机构各主体要素的协同作用。
The development of high-tech industry represents technological development level and comprehensive strength of a country or region, while technological innovation is the core of the high-tech industry development and improvement of competitiveness. In a decade, high-tech industry in Hubei Province is developing rapidly and growing stronger, but there is still a large gap between Hubei Province and developed countries or regions. Using multivariate statistical analysis method and the comparative analysis method, this dissertation analyzes and evaluates the technological innovation capability, innovation performance and innovation system of high-tech industry in Hubei Province from the angle of industrial innovation economics. This research has important theoretical value and practical significance for the development of high-tech industry, the improvement of technical innovation, the enhancement of competitive strength, and acceleration of optimizing economical development ways.
This dissertation is divided into7chapters. The first chapter is an introduction. The second chapter presents the theoretical basis. The theories on industrial innovation economics, economics of high-tech industry and innovation system are discussed and summarized to lay the theoretical foundation for the following study. The third, fourth and fifth chapters are the focus of this dissertation. These chapters explain the use of Delphi and AHP methods to build evaluation index system of innovation capability and innovation performance for high-tech industries in Hubei Province. The chapters also describe the applications of principal component analysis, data envelopment analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and corresponding system software to make dynamic evaluation and comparative analysis for the same industry in different provinces as well as different industries in Hubei Province. These evaluation and analysis are made according to four stages dating from the8th Five-Year Plan to the11th Five-Year Plan. In addition, the analyses empirically address the factors that could affect innovation capability of high-tech industries. The sixth chapter analyzes status quo and existing problems of the Industry-Academy-Research cooperation, and builds innovation system model of high-tech industry in Hubei Province, and gives proposals on how to improve and perfect the innovation system of high-tech in Hubei Province. The seventh chapter summarizes the whole dissertation and puts forward research prospect.
The main innovation of this dissertation is shown in four aspects:(1) Multi-level evaluation index system of innovation capability and innovation performance is built to make dynamic evaluation by stages. In order to avoid the randomness of annual data, the average of five years' data, is employed to makes dynamic evaluation and comparative analysis by dividing evaluation years into four stages:The8th5-year period, the9th5-year period, the10th5-year period and the11th5-year period. The results show the change of country's statue of innovation performance and innovation capability of high-tech industry in Hubei Province as well as the differences in various industries. The proposed dynamic evaluation indicates the differences and variations of innovation capabilities and performances among different provincial regions and in different stages. The evaluation result is all-around, dynamic and science-oriented.(2) The inherent relationship of innovation capability, innovation performance and innovation system is illustrated. The research shows that not all provinces which have great innovation capabilities have good innovation performances and vice versa. However the province which have both strong innovative capabilities and good innovative performances do possess well-developed innovation systems, and on the other side, the provinces with imperfect innovation system certainly have week innovation capability and poor innovation performance. Hubei province ranked12in the country with the innovation capability of high-tech industry, but it ranked22with innovation performance. This suggests that the innovation systems without very good innovation performance in Hubei province must be improved to transform the science and education advantages into economic ones, even though it has greater innovation capability and is still making progress.(3) Multivariate statistical analysis method is applied to construct an econometric model of influential factor on Hubei province's innovation capability of high-tech industry. Taking pharmaceutical industry in Hubei province as an example to perform empirical study, the study indicates that evident influences on the promotion of technical innovation capabilities are mainly produce by scale of enterprises, budget of technical innovation and manpower for R&D, other than government support.(4) A model of high-tech industrial innovation system in Hubei Province is formed to reveal the Industry-Academy-Research cooperation mechanism. The Hubei high-tech industrial innovation system consists of the main innovation body of enterprises as the core of technology innovation system, which is supported by knowledge innovation system, environment support system, technological service system, technology investment and financing system. The key factor to improve the technological innovation capability and innovation performance of high-tech industry in Hubei Province is to cooperatively perform the actions of main parties of enterprises, universities and institutes, government, Intermediary service organizations and financial institutions.
引文
[1]Acs Z J, Anselin Luc, and Varga Attila. Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge [J]. Research Policy,2002(31):1069-1085.
[2]Acs Z J, Audretsch D. Innovation in Large and Small Firms:An Empirical Analysis [J]. American Economic Review,1988,78(4):678-690.
[3]Adler P S, Shenbar A. Adapting Your Technological Base:The Organizational Challenge [J]. Sloan Management Review,1990(25):25-37.
[4]Asheim B T, Lawton Smith Helen and Oughton C. Regional Innovation Systems:Theory, Empirics and Policy [J]. Regional Studies 2011,45 (7):875-891
[5]Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis [J]. Management Science,1984(30): 1078-1092.
[6]Burgelman R A, Maidique M A and Wheelwright S C. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill,2001.
[7]Bellandi M, Caloffi A. An Analysis of Regional Policies Promoting Networks for Innovation [J]. European Planning Studies,2010,18(1):67-82.
[8]Lundvall B-A. National Systems of Innovation:Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning [M]. London:Pinter Publishers,1992.
[9]Benneworth P, Coenen L, Moodysson J and Asheim B. Exploring the Multiple Roles of Lund University in Strengthening Scania's Regional Innovation System:Towards Institutional Learning [J]. European Planning Studies,2009,17(11),1645-1664.
[10]Eom B-Y, Lee K. Determinants of Industry-Academy Linkages and, Their Impact on Firm Performance:The Case of Korea as a Latecomer in Knowledge Industrialization [J]. Research Policy,2010(39):625-639.
[11]Bosco M G. Innovation, R & D and Technology Transfer:Policies Towards a Regional Innovation System:The Case of Lombardy [J]. European Planning Studies,2007,15(8): 1085-1111.
[12]Breschi S, Malerba F. Sectoral Innovation Systems:Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries [C]. Systems of Innovation:Technologies, Organizations, and Institutions, London:Pinter,1997.
[13]Burgelman R. A. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation [R]. China Machine Press,1998.
[14]Chaminade C, Vang J. Globalisation of Knowledge Production and Regional Innovation Policy:Supporting Specialized Hubs in the Bangalore Software Industry [J]. Research Policy,2008,37(10):1684-1696.
[15]Charnes A, Cooper W W, and Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1978(2):429-444.
[16]Christensen Clayton M. The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail [M]. Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1997.
[17]Cooke P, Uranga M G, and Etxebarria G. Regional Systems of Innovation:An Evolutionary Perspective [J]. Environment & Planning,1998,30(9):1563-1584.
[18]Cooke P, Morgan K. The Network Paradigm:New Departures in Corporate and Regional Development [J]. Environment & Planning D:Society and Space,1993,11(5):543-564.
[19]Cooke P. From Technopoles to Regional Innovation Systems:The Evolution of Localised Technology Development Policy [J]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science,2001,24(1): 21-42.
[20]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems:Development Opportunities from the'Green Turn' [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2010,22(7):831-844.
[21]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001,10(4):945-974.
[22]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems:Competitive Regulation in New Europe [J]. Geoforum,1992(23):365-382.
[23]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems:General Findings and Some New Evidence From Biotechnology Clusters [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):133-145.
[24]Cooke P. Transition Regions:Green Innovation and Economic Development [R]. Frederiksberg, Denmark:DRUID Conference,2009.
[25]Cooke P, Morgan K. The Creative Milieu:A Regional Perspective on Innovation [M]. The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Aldershot:Elgar,1994.
[26]Cristina B, Teresa G-M, and Emilio H. Firms' Motivations for Cooperative R&D:An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms [J]. Research Policy, Elsevier,2001,30(8):1289-1307.
[27]Csizmadia Z. Co-Operation and Ability for Innovation:Relationship Network Foundations of the Regional Innovation System [J]. Szociologiai Szemle,2008,39(2):22-56.
[28]Barton D L, Core Capability & Core Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development [J]. Strategic Management,1992:52-78.
[29]Doloreux D, Edquist C, Hommen L. The Institutional and Functional Underpinnings of the Regional Innovation System of East-Gothia in Sweden [R]. Conference on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge:The Role of Geography, Institutions and Organizations. Copenhagen,2003:1-41.
[30]Doloreux D, Dionne S. Is Regional Innovation System Development Possible in Peripheral Regions? Some Evidence from the Case of La Pocatiere, Canada [J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,2008,20(3):259-283.
[31]Dosi G. Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1988,26(3):1120-1171.
[32]Mansfield E. Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation [J]. Econometrics,1961,29(4): 741-766.
[33]Rothaermel F T. Complementary Assets, Strategic Alliances and the Incumbent's Advantage: An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry [J]. Research Policy,2001, (30):1235-1251.
[34]Freeman C, Soete L. New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change [M]. Pinter Publishers, London,1990.
[35]Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance:Lessons from Japan [M]. Pinter, London,1987.
[36]Griliches Z. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators A Survey [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1990,28 (4):1661-1707.
[37]Guan J, Ma N. Innovative Capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms [J]. Technovation,2003,23(9):131-141.
[38]Yasuda H. Formation of Strategic Alliances in High-technology Industries:Comparative Study of the Resource-based Theory and the Transaction-cost Theory [J]. Technovation, 2005,25(7):763-770.
[39]Isaksen A, Kalsaas B T. Suppliers and Strategies for Upgrading in Global Production Networks:The Case of a Supplier to the Global Automotive Industry in a High-cost Location [J]. European Planning Studies,2009,17(4):569-585.
[40]Jaffe A B. The U. S. Patent System in Transition:Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(4-5):531-557.
[41]Janet E L Bercovitz, Maryann P Feldman. Fishing Upstream:Firm Innovation Strategy and University Research Alliances [J]. Research Policy.2007,36(7):930-948.
[42]Wei J. Diffusion of Technical Innovation Based on Industry-university-institute Cooperation in Industrial Clusters [J]. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 2010,17,45-50.
[43]Kubeczko K, Rametsteiner E, Weiss G. The Role of Sectoral and Regional Innovation Systems in Supporting Innovations in Forestry [J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(7): 704-715.
[44]Lambooy J G. The Transmission of Knowledge, Emerging Networks and the Role of Universities:An Evolutionary Approach [J]. European Planning Studies,2004,12(5): 643-657.
[45]Lee D H. The Impact of Research Sponsorship upon Research Effectiveness [J]. Technovation.1991,11(1):39-57.
[46]Lee J D, Park C. Research and Development Linkages in a National Innovation System: Factors Affecting Success and Failure in Korea [J]. Technovation,2006,26(9):1045-1054.
[47]Malerba F. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production [J]. Research Policy,2002,31(2): 247-264.
[48]Mansfield E. The Allocation, Characteristics, and Outcome of the Firm's Research and Development Portfolio:A Case Study [J]. The Journey of Business,1966,39(4):447-464.
[49]Buesa M, Heijs J, Baumert T. The Determinants of Regional Innovation in Europe:A Combined Factorial and Regression Knowledge Production Function Approach [J]. Research Policy,2010,39(6):722-735.
[50]Morgan K. The Learning Region:Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renew [J]. Regional Studies,1997,31(5):410-503.
[51]Mowery D, Rosenberg N. The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation:a Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy [J],1979,8(2):102-153.
[52]Mueller D. Patents, Research and Development, and the Measurement of Inventive Activity [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1966,15(1):26-37.
[53]Nastase C, Kajanus M. The Role of the Universities in a Regional Innovation System:A Comparative A' WOT-Analysis [J]. Amfiteatru Economic,2008,10(23):219-224.
[54]OECD. National Innovation Systems. OECD Publications,1997.
[55]Nelson R R. National Systems of Innovation:A Comparative Analysis [M]. Oxford:Oxford University,1993.
[56]Fan P. Catching up Through Developing Innovation Capability:Evidence from China's Telecom-equipment Industry [J]. Technovation,2006,26(3):359-368.
[57]Pekkarinen S, Harmaakorpi V. Building Regional Innovation Networks:The Definition of an Age Business Core Process in a Regional Innovation System [J]. Regional Studies,2006,40 (4):401-413.
[58]Mazzoleni R, Nelson R R. The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection:A Contribution to the Current Debate [J]. Research Policy,1998,27(3):273-284.
[59]Ramos-Vielba I, Fernandez-Esquinas M, Espinosa-de-los-Monteros E. Measuring University-Industry Collaboration in a Regional Innovation System [J]. Scientometrics,2010, 84(3):649-667.
[60]Johnson R A, Wichern D W.实用多元统计分析[M].清华大学出版社,2001.
[61]Rosenberg N. Science, Invention and Economic Growth [J]. Economic Journal.1974,84 (333):90-108.
[62]Harbi S, Amamou M, Anderson A R. Establishing High-tech Industry:The Tunisian ICT Experience [J]. Technovation,2009,29(6-7):465-480.
[63]Schmookler J. Invention and economic Growth [M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1966.
[64]Schumpeter, J. Theory of Economic Development [M]. Harvard University Press,1994.
[65]Arvanitis S, Kubli U, Woerter M. University-industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland:What University Scientists Think about Co-operation with Private Enterprises [J]. Research Policy,2008,37(10):1865-1883.
[66]Hayashi T. Effect of R&D Programmes on the Formation of University-industry-government Networks:Comparative Analysis of Japanese R&D Programmes. Research Policy,2003, 32(8):1421-1442.
[67]Liu X, Buck T. Innovation Performance and Channels for International Technology Spillovers:Evidence from Chinese High-tech Industries [J]. Research Policy,2007,36(3): 355-366.
[68]McCutchen W W, Swamidass P M. Motivations for Strategic Alliances in the Pharmaceutical/Biotech Industry:Some New Findings [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2004,15(2):197-214.
[69]白枚.技术创新与管理创新[M].北京：中国经济出版社.2002.
[70]薜娜,赵曙东.基于DEA的高技术产业创新效率评价[J].南京社会科学,2007,(5)：135-141.
[71]陈宝权,聂锐.基于GPCA的高技术产业技术创新能力深化分析[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005(1)：117-122.
[72]陈丹宇.基于效率的长三角区域创新网络形成机理[J].经济地理,2007(5)：370-374.
[73]陈伟,赵富洋,林艳.基于两阶段DEA的高技术产业R&D绩效评价研究[J].软科学,2010(4)：6-10.
[74]陈小洪.我国企业的技术创新现状、机制和政策[J].中国软科学,2007(5)：22-33.
[75]程正中,吴永林,谢朝阳.技术创新能力与企业规模的关系研究[J].技术经济,2008(6)： 27-31.
[76]楚尔铭,李勇辉.高新技术产业经济学[M].北京：中国经济出版社.2005.
[77]代瑞红,田敏.跨国研发对中关村区域创新系统的影响分析[J].河北大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2009(6)：99-102.
[78]杜义飞,陈新有,刘兴贵,邵云飞.产业创新的价值结构研究——我国发电设备制造业产业创新分析[J].科学学研究,2007(5)：1014-1018.
[79]冯根福,刘军虎,徐志霖.中国工业部门研发效率及其影响因素市政分析[J].中国工业经济,2006,(11).
[80]冯缨,滕家佳.江苏省高技术产业技术创新效率评价[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(8)：107-112.
[81]弗里曼.工业创新经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2004.
[82]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[83]盖文启,王缉慈.论区域的技术创新型模式及其创新网络：以北京中关村地区为例[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1 999(5)：29-36.
[84]盖文启.论区域经济发展与区域创新环境[J].学术研究,2002(1)：60-63.
[85]谷兴荣等.高新技术产业与发展中地区[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2005.
[86]官建成,陈凯华.我国高技术产业技术创新效率的测度[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(10)：19-33.
[87]管丰顺,徐广文,祁华清.产业创新理论研究与实证分析[M].武汉：湖北人民出版社,2005.
[88]管顺丰,胡树华,石永军.产业创新原理及管理原则[J].企业改革与管理,2004(6)：16-19.
[89]郭晓川.企业网络合作化技术创新及其模式比较[J].科学管理研究,1998(10)：13-18.
[90]国家统计局,国家发展和改革委员会,科学技术部.中国高技术产业统计年鉴(2002-2011各年卷).北京：中国统计出版社,2002-2011.
[91]韩晶.中国高技术产业创新效率研究[J].科学学研究,2010(3)：467-472.
[92]胡明铭,徐姝.产业创新系统研究综述[J].科技管理研究,2009(7)：31-33.
[93]胡志坚,苏靖.区域创新系统理论的提出与发展[J].中国科技论坛,1999(6)：21-23.
[94]黄鲁成.关于区域创新系统研究内容的探讨[J].科研管理,2000(2)：43-48.
[95]姜红,陆晓芳：基于产业技术创新视角的产业分类与选择模型研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(9)：47-56.
[96]蒋殿春,夏良科.外商直接投资对中国高技术产业技术创新作用的经验分析[J].世界经济,2005(8)：3-10.
[97]李春艳,刘力臻.产业创新系统生成机理与结构模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(1)：50-55.
[98]李凯,任晓艳,向涛.产业集群效应对技术创新能力的贡献——基于国家高新区的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2007(3)：448-542.
[99]李荣平,李剑玲.产业技术创新能力评价方法研究[J].河北科技大学学报,2003(1)：13-17.
[100]李荣平.技术创新能力与活力评价理论和实证研究[M].天津大学出版社,2005.
[101]李锐,鞠晓峰.产业创新系统的自组织进化机制及动力模型[J].中国软科学,2009(1)：159-162.
[102]李翔.我国产业创新的瓶颈分析与制度安排[J].四川行政学院学报,2006(1)：71-75.
[103]李晓娣,赵毓婷.区域创新系统中地方政府行为分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(8)：16-19.
[104]李新男.创新“产学研结合”组织模式,构建产业技术创新战略联盟[J].中国软科学,2007(5)：9-12.
[105]李雪,李菁华.产学研联合的深化：产业技术创新战略联盟研究[J].科学管理研究,2008(1)：45-48.
[106]李宇、安玉兴.多元互构下技术创新与企业规模的互动演化研究[J].科学学研究,2008(6)：1333-1340.
[107]林金堵.关于“产业技术创新战略联盟”—我的认识和理解[J].印制电路信息,2010(5)：4-6.
[108]刘穷志.激励自主创新：公共支出效应与最优规模[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007(3)：81-90
[109]刘卫民,陈继样.企业间R&D合作与技术创新效率[J].中国科技论坛,2008(11)：37-39.
[110]刘贻新,张光宇,张玉磊,廖丽平.高技术产业技术创新能力的突变评价模型[J].工业工程,2011(3)：14-19.
[111]刘志高,尹贻梅.演化经济学的理论知识体系分析[J].外国经济与管理,2007(6)：1-6.
[112]柳卸林.国家创新体系的引入及其对中国的意义[J].中国科技论坛,1998(2)：26-28.
[113]柳卸林.技术创新经济学.北京：中国经济出版社,1993.
[114]卢林,孙辉.中国高技术产业技术创新策略及其效果的实证研究[J].科学学与科学术管理,2008(1)：170-177.
[115]陆国庆.产业创新：超越传统创新理论的新范式[J].产业经济研究,2002(1)：46-51.
[116]陆国庆.产业创新的动力源和风险分析[J].广西经济管理干部学院学报,2003(2)：38-40.
[117]罗积争,吴解生.产业创新：从企业创新到国家创新之间的桥梁[J].经济问题探索,2005(4)：111-114.
[118]罗亚非,焦玉灿.我国制药业技术创新效率分析[J].科研管理,2007(3)：3-4.
[119]吕振通,张凌云.SPSS统计分析与应用[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2009.
[120]梅强,赵万武.区域技术创新创业政策与工具的经验借鉴[J].科技与经济,2004,17(3)：19-22.
[121]孟庆敏,梅强.科技服务业在区域创新系统中的功能定位与运行机理研究[J].科技管理研究,2010,30(8)：74-77.
[122]孟庆伟,安会茹.企业技术创新能力的系统结构[J].科技管理研究.2000(2)：27-28
[123]彭宣新,邹珊刚.国家创新能力与中国高技术产业发展[J].华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(2)：62-66.
[124]容美平,王斌会.我国各地区高技术产业投入产出效率综合评价[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(14)：25-28.
[125]沈庆义,李东.增长理论对区域发展的适用性分析[J].统计与决策,2006(4)：49-52.
[126]石奇.产业创新全球问题理论与区域整合[J].产业经济研究,2006(1)：36-43.
[127]史清琪,尚勇.中国产业技术创新能力研究[M].北京：中国轻工出版社,2000.
[128]孙晓华,李传杰.有效需求规模、双重需求结构与产业创新能力——来自中国装备制造业的证据[J].科研管理,2010(1)：93-103.
[129]汪秀婷.国外产业创新模式对我国产业创新的借鉴[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007(8)：29-32.
[130]王海文.我国技术创新机制与自主创新[J].中国高新技术企业,2007,(3)：206-207.
[131]王海瑶.论科技服务对推动产业技术创新战略联盟构建和发展的作用[J].科技与创新,2009(6)：30-31.
[132]王健.我国高新技术产业技术创新能力研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学,2007.
[133]王露,王铮,杨妍,马翠芳,龚轶.知识网络动态与政策控制：中国国家创新体系调控模拟[J].科研管理,2002(1)：17-26.
[134]王明明,党志刚,钱坤.产业创新系统模型的构建研究——以中国石化产业创新系统模型为例[J].科学学研究,2009(2)：295-301.
[135]王伟.基于改进DEA的中国高技术产业技术创新效率研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(19)：119-124.
[136]王伟强.组合创新研究[D].浙江大学,1994.
[137]谢伟,胡玮,夏绍模.中国高新技术产业研发效率及其影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(3)：144-148.
[138]许玉民.中国高技术产业的科技进步贡献率分析[J].中国西部科技,2005(7)：7-8
[139]杨屹,薛惠娟.产业技术自主创新能力的区域差异性研究[J],中国工业经济,2010(11)：68-76.
[140]余泳泽.我国高技术产业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究——基于价值链视角下的两阶段分析[J].经济科学,2009(4)：62-74.
[141]张建同,孙昌言.以Excel和SPSS为工具的管理统计[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2005.
[142]张倩男,赵玉林.高技术产业技术创新能力的实证分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(4)：21-26.
[143]张倩男,赵玉林.区域高技术产业创新能力的比较分析[J].经济问题探索,2007(12)：60-65.
[144]张荣耀.中国国家创新系统理论与实证研究综述[J].商业现代化,2008(4)：398-399.
[145]张耀辉.产业创新：新经济下的产业升级模式[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002(1)：14-17.
[146]张耀辉.产业创新的理论探索[M].北京：中国计划出版社.2002年.
[147]张治河,丁华,孙丽杰,周国华.创新型城市与产业创新系统[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(12)：150-155.
[148]张治河,胡树华,金鑫,谢忠泉.产业创新系统模型的构建与分析[J].科研管理,2006(2)：36-39.
[149]张治河.面向“中国光谷”的产业创新系统研究[D].武汉理工大学,2003.
[150]赵琳,范德成.我国高技术产业技术创新效率的测度及动态演化分析[J].科技进步与对策,2011(11)：111-115.
[151]赵希男,褚德海,贾建锋.我国副省级城市科技创新能力的竞优分析[J].中国软科学,2010(11)：88-97.
[152]赵玉林.高技术产业经济学(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2012.
[153]郑坚,丁云龙.高技术产业技术创新效率评价指标体系的构建[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6)：105-108.
[154]中国科学院“高技术开发区研究”课题组.课题分报告之五.1988.
[155]周静.产业技术创新战略联盟组织形式的法律解读[J].研究生法学,2009(4)：121-126.
[156]周明,李宗植.基于产业集聚的高技术产业创新能力研究[J].科研管理,2011(1)：15-28.
[157]周勇,王国顺,周湘.科技人力资本与高技术产业发展关系的实证研究[J].人口与经济,2006(3)：50-54
[158]朱华晟,王缉慈.论柔性生产与产业集聚[J].世界地理研究,2001(4)：39-47.
[159]邹婧玮,陈晶.区域创新系统中科技中介作用机制及实证研究：以安徽省与上海市为例[J].科学研究,2006(1)：163-168.
[2]Acs Z J, Audretsch D. Innovation in Large and Small Firms:An Empirical Analysis [J]. American Economic Review,1988,78(4):678-690.
[3]Adler P S, Shenbar A. Adapting Your Technological Base:The Organizational Challenge [J]. Sloan Management Review,1990(25):25-37.
[4]Asheim B T, Lawton Smith Helen and Oughton C. Regional Innovation Systems:Theory, Empirics and Policy [J]. Regional Studies 2011,45 (7):875-891
[5]Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis [J]. Management Science,1984(30): 1078-1092.
[6]Burgelman R A, Maidique M A and Wheelwright S C. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill,2001.
[7]Bellandi M, Caloffi A. An Analysis of Regional Policies Promoting Networks for Innovation [J]. European Planning Studies,2010,18(1):67-82.
[8]Lundvall B-A. National Systems of Innovation:Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning [M]. London:Pinter Publishers,1992.
[9]Benneworth P, Coenen L, Moodysson J and Asheim B. Exploring the Multiple Roles of Lund University in Strengthening Scania's Regional Innovation System:Towards Institutional Learning [J]. European Planning Studies,2009,17(11),1645-1664.
[10]Eom B-Y, Lee K. Determinants of Industry-Academy Linkages and, Their Impact on Firm Performance:The Case of Korea as a Latecomer in Knowledge Industrialization [J]. Research Policy,2010(39):625-639.
[11]Bosco M G. Innovation, R & D and Technology Transfer:Policies Towards a Regional Innovation System:The Case of Lombardy [J]. European Planning Studies,2007,15(8): 1085-1111.
[12]Breschi S, Malerba F. Sectoral Innovation Systems:Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries [C]. Systems of Innovation:Technologies, Organizations, and Institutions, London:Pinter,1997.
[13]Burgelman R. A. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation [R]. China Machine Press,1998.
[14]Chaminade C, Vang J. Globalisation of Knowledge Production and Regional Innovation Policy:Supporting Specialized Hubs in the Bangalore Software Industry [J]. Research Policy,2008,37(10):1684-1696.
[15]Charnes A, Cooper W W, and Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1978(2):429-444.
[16]Christensen Clayton M. The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail [M]. Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1997.
[17]Cooke P, Uranga M G, and Etxebarria G. Regional Systems of Innovation:An Evolutionary Perspective [J]. Environment & Planning,1998,30(9):1563-1584.
[18]Cooke P, Morgan K. The Network Paradigm:New Departures in Corporate and Regional Development [J]. Environment & Planning D:Society and Space,1993,11(5):543-564.
[19]Cooke P. From Technopoles to Regional Innovation Systems:The Evolution of Localised Technology Development Policy [J]. Canadian Journal of Regional Science,2001,24(1): 21-42.
[20]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems:Development Opportunities from the'Green Turn' [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2010,22(7):831-844.
[21]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001,10(4):945-974.
[22]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems:Competitive Regulation in New Europe [J]. Geoforum,1992(23):365-382.
[23]Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems:General Findings and Some New Evidence From Biotechnology Clusters [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27(1):133-145.
[24]Cooke P. Transition Regions:Green Innovation and Economic Development [R]. Frederiksberg, Denmark:DRUID Conference,2009.
[25]Cooke P, Morgan K. The Creative Milieu:A Regional Perspective on Innovation [M]. The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Aldershot:Elgar,1994.
[26]Cristina B, Teresa G-M, and Emilio H. Firms' Motivations for Cooperative R&D:An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms [J]. Research Policy, Elsevier,2001,30(8):1289-1307.
[27]Csizmadia Z. Co-Operation and Ability for Innovation:Relationship Network Foundations of the Regional Innovation System [J]. Szociologiai Szemle,2008,39(2):22-56.
[28]Barton D L, Core Capability & Core Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development [J]. Strategic Management,1992:52-78.
[29]Doloreux D, Edquist C, Hommen L. The Institutional and Functional Underpinnings of the Regional Innovation System of East-Gothia in Sweden [R]. Conference on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge:The Role of Geography, Institutions and Organizations. Copenhagen,2003:1-41.
[30]Doloreux D, Dionne S. Is Regional Innovation System Development Possible in Peripheral Regions? Some Evidence from the Case of La Pocatiere, Canada [J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,2008,20(3):259-283.
[31]Dosi G. Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1988,26(3):1120-1171.
[32]Mansfield E. Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation [J]. Econometrics,1961,29(4): 741-766.
[33]Rothaermel F T. Complementary Assets, Strategic Alliances and the Incumbent's Advantage: An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry [J]. Research Policy,2001, (30):1235-1251.
[34]Freeman C, Soete L. New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change [M]. Pinter Publishers, London,1990.
[35]Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance:Lessons from Japan [M]. Pinter, London,1987.
[36]Griliches Z. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators A Survey [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1990,28 (4):1661-1707.
[37]Guan J, Ma N. Innovative Capability and Export Performance of Chinese Firms [J]. Technovation,2003,23(9):131-141.
[38]Yasuda H. Formation of Strategic Alliances in High-technology Industries:Comparative Study of the Resource-based Theory and the Transaction-cost Theory [J]. Technovation, 2005,25(7):763-770.
[39]Isaksen A, Kalsaas B T. Suppliers and Strategies for Upgrading in Global Production Networks:The Case of a Supplier to the Global Automotive Industry in a High-cost Location [J]. European Planning Studies,2009,17(4):569-585.
[40]Jaffe A B. The U. S. Patent System in Transition:Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(4-5):531-557.
[41]Janet E L Bercovitz, Maryann P Feldman. Fishing Upstream:Firm Innovation Strategy and University Research Alliances [J]. Research Policy.2007,36(7):930-948.
[42]Wei J. Diffusion of Technical Innovation Based on Industry-university-institute Cooperation in Industrial Clusters [J]. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 2010,17,45-50.
[43]Kubeczko K, Rametsteiner E, Weiss G. The Role of Sectoral and Regional Innovation Systems in Supporting Innovations in Forestry [J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(7): 704-715.
[44]Lambooy J G. The Transmission of Knowledge, Emerging Networks and the Role of Universities:An Evolutionary Approach [J]. European Planning Studies,2004,12(5): 643-657.
[45]Lee D H. The Impact of Research Sponsorship upon Research Effectiveness [J]. Technovation.1991,11(1):39-57.
[46]Lee J D, Park C. Research and Development Linkages in a National Innovation System: Factors Affecting Success and Failure in Korea [J]. Technovation,2006,26(9):1045-1054.
[47]Malerba F. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production [J]. Research Policy,2002,31(2): 247-264.
[48]Mansfield E. The Allocation, Characteristics, and Outcome of the Firm's Research and Development Portfolio:A Case Study [J]. The Journey of Business,1966,39(4):447-464.
[49]Buesa M, Heijs J, Baumert T. The Determinants of Regional Innovation in Europe:A Combined Factorial and Regression Knowledge Production Function Approach [J]. Research Policy,2010,39(6):722-735.
[50]Morgan K. The Learning Region:Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renew [J]. Regional Studies,1997,31(5):410-503.
[51]Mowery D, Rosenberg N. The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation:a Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy [J],1979,8(2):102-153.
[52]Mueller D. Patents, Research and Development, and the Measurement of Inventive Activity [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1966,15(1):26-37.
[53]Nastase C, Kajanus M. The Role of the Universities in a Regional Innovation System:A Comparative A' WOT-Analysis [J]. Amfiteatru Economic,2008,10(23):219-224.
[54]OECD. National Innovation Systems. OECD Publications,1997.
[55]Nelson R R. National Systems of Innovation:A Comparative Analysis [M]. Oxford:Oxford University,1993.
[56]Fan P. Catching up Through Developing Innovation Capability:Evidence from China's Telecom-equipment Industry [J]. Technovation,2006,26(3):359-368.
[57]Pekkarinen S, Harmaakorpi V. Building Regional Innovation Networks:The Definition of an Age Business Core Process in a Regional Innovation System [J]. Regional Studies,2006,40 (4):401-413.
[58]Mazzoleni R, Nelson R R. The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection:A Contribution to the Current Debate [J]. Research Policy,1998,27(3):273-284.
[59]Ramos-Vielba I, Fernandez-Esquinas M, Espinosa-de-los-Monteros E. Measuring University-Industry Collaboration in a Regional Innovation System [J]. Scientometrics,2010, 84(3):649-667.
[60]Johnson R A, Wichern D W.实用多元统计分析[M].清华大学出版社,2001.
[61]Rosenberg N. Science, Invention and Economic Growth [J]. Economic Journal.1974,84 (333):90-108.
[62]Harbi S, Amamou M, Anderson A R. Establishing High-tech Industry:The Tunisian ICT Experience [J]. Technovation,2009,29(6-7):465-480.
[63]Schmookler J. Invention and economic Growth [M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1966.
[64]Schumpeter, J. Theory of Economic Development [M]. Harvard University Press,1994.
[65]Arvanitis S, Kubli U, Woerter M. University-industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland:What University Scientists Think about Co-operation with Private Enterprises [J]. Research Policy,2008,37(10):1865-1883.
[66]Hayashi T. Effect of R&D Programmes on the Formation of University-industry-government Networks:Comparative Analysis of Japanese R&D Programmes. Research Policy,2003, 32(8):1421-1442.
[67]Liu X, Buck T. Innovation Performance and Channels for International Technology Spillovers:Evidence from Chinese High-tech Industries [J]. Research Policy,2007,36(3): 355-366.
[68]McCutchen W W, Swamidass P M. Motivations for Strategic Alliances in the Pharmaceutical/Biotech Industry:Some New Findings [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2004,15(2):197-214.
[69]白枚.技术创新与管理创新[M].北京：中国经济出版社.2002.
[70]薜娜,赵曙东.基于DEA的高技术产业创新效率评价[J].南京社会科学,2007,(5)：135-141.
[71]陈宝权,聂锐.基于GPCA的高技术产业技术创新能力深化分析[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005(1)：117-122.
[72]陈丹宇.基于效率的长三角区域创新网络形成机理[J].经济地理,2007(5)：370-374.
[73]陈伟,赵富洋,林艳.基于两阶段DEA的高技术产业R&D绩效评价研究[J].软科学,2010(4)：6-10.
[74]陈小洪.我国企业的技术创新现状、机制和政策[J].中国软科学,2007(5)：22-33.
[75]程正中,吴永林,谢朝阳.技术创新能力与企业规模的关系研究[J].技术经济,2008(6)： 27-31.
[76]楚尔铭,李勇辉.高新技术产业经济学[M].北京：中国经济出版社.2005.
[77]代瑞红,田敏.跨国研发对中关村区域创新系统的影响分析[J].河北大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2009(6)：99-102.
[78]杜义飞,陈新有,刘兴贵,邵云飞.产业创新的价值结构研究——我国发电设备制造业产业创新分析[J].科学学研究,2007(5)：1014-1018.
[79]冯根福,刘军虎,徐志霖.中国工业部门研发效率及其影响因素市政分析[J].中国工业经济,2006,(11).
[80]冯缨,滕家佳.江苏省高技术产业技术创新效率评价[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(8)：107-112.
[81]弗里曼.工业创新经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2004.
[82]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[83]盖文启,王缉慈.论区域的技术创新型模式及其创新网络：以北京中关村地区为例[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1 999(5)：29-36.
[84]盖文启.论区域经济发展与区域创新环境[J].学术研究,2002(1)：60-63.
[85]谷兴荣等.高新技术产业与发展中地区[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2005.
[86]官建成,陈凯华.我国高技术产业技术创新效率的测度[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(10)：19-33.
[87]管丰顺,徐广文,祁华清.产业创新理论研究与实证分析[M].武汉：湖北人民出版社,2005.
[88]管顺丰,胡树华,石永军.产业创新原理及管理原则[J].企业改革与管理,2004(6)：16-19.
[89]郭晓川.企业网络合作化技术创新及其模式比较[J].科学管理研究,1998(10)：13-18.
[90]国家统计局,国家发展和改革委员会,科学技术部.中国高技术产业统计年鉴(2002-2011各年卷).北京：中国统计出版社,2002-2011.
[91]韩晶.中国高技术产业创新效率研究[J].科学学研究,2010(3)：467-472.
[92]胡明铭,徐姝.产业创新系统研究综述[J].科技管理研究,2009(7)：31-33.
[93]胡志坚,苏靖.区域创新系统理论的提出与发展[J].中国科技论坛,1999(6)：21-23.
[94]黄鲁成.关于区域创新系统研究内容的探讨[J].科研管理,2000(2)：43-48.
[95]姜红,陆晓芳：基于产业技术创新视角的产业分类与选择模型研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(9)：47-56.
[96]蒋殿春,夏良科.外商直接投资对中国高技术产业技术创新作用的经验分析[J].世界经济,2005(8)：3-10.
[97]李春艳,刘力臻.产业创新系统生成机理与结构模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(1)：50-55.
[98]李凯,任晓艳,向涛.产业集群效应对技术创新能力的贡献——基于国家高新区的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2007(3)：448-542.
[99]李荣平,李剑玲.产业技术创新能力评价方法研究[J].河北科技大学学报,2003(1)：13-17.
[100]李荣平.技术创新能力与活力评价理论和实证研究[M].天津大学出版社,2005.
[101]李锐,鞠晓峰.产业创新系统的自组织进化机制及动力模型[J].中国软科学,2009(1)：159-162.
[102]李翔.我国产业创新的瓶颈分析与制度安排[J].四川行政学院学报,2006(1)：71-75.
[103]李晓娣,赵毓婷.区域创新系统中地方政府行为分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(8)：16-19.
[104]李新男.创新“产学研结合”组织模式,构建产业技术创新战略联盟[J].中国软科学,2007(5)：9-12.
[105]李雪,李菁华.产学研联合的深化：产业技术创新战略联盟研究[J].科学管理研究,2008(1)：45-48.
[106]李宇、安玉兴.多元互构下技术创新与企业规模的互动演化研究[J].科学学研究,2008(6)：1333-1340.
[107]林金堵.关于“产业技术创新战略联盟”—我的认识和理解[J].印制电路信息,2010(5)：4-6.
[108]刘穷志.激励自主创新：公共支出效应与最优规模[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007(3)：81-90
[109]刘卫民,陈继样.企业间R&D合作与技术创新效率[J].中国科技论坛,2008(11)：37-39.
[110]刘贻新,张光宇,张玉磊,廖丽平.高技术产业技术创新能力的突变评价模型[J].工业工程,2011(3)：14-19.
[111]刘志高,尹贻梅.演化经济学的理论知识体系分析[J].外国经济与管理,2007(6)：1-6.
[112]柳卸林.国家创新体系的引入及其对中国的意义[J].中国科技论坛,1998(2)：26-28.
[113]柳卸林.技术创新经济学.北京：中国经济出版社,1993.
[114]卢林,孙辉.中国高技术产业技术创新策略及其效果的实证研究[J].科学学与科学术管理,2008(1)：170-177.
[115]陆国庆.产业创新：超越传统创新理论的新范式[J].产业经济研究,2002(1)：46-51.
[116]陆国庆.产业创新的动力源和风险分析[J].广西经济管理干部学院学报,2003(2)：38-40.
[117]罗积争,吴解生.产业创新：从企业创新到国家创新之间的桥梁[J].经济问题探索,2005(4)：111-114.
[118]罗亚非,焦玉灿.我国制药业技术创新效率分析[J].科研管理,2007(3)：3-4.
[119]吕振通,张凌云.SPSS统计分析与应用[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2009.
[120]梅强,赵万武.区域技术创新创业政策与工具的经验借鉴[J].科技与经济,2004,17(3)：19-22.
[121]孟庆敏,梅强.科技服务业在区域创新系统中的功能定位与运行机理研究[J].科技管理研究,2010,30(8)：74-77.
[122]孟庆伟,安会茹.企业技术创新能力的系统结构[J].科技管理研究.2000(2)：27-28
[123]彭宣新,邹珊刚.国家创新能力与中国高技术产业发展[J].华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002(2)：62-66.
[124]容美平,王斌会.我国各地区高技术产业投入产出效率综合评价[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(14)：25-28.
[125]沈庆义,李东.增长理论对区域发展的适用性分析[J].统计与决策,2006(4)：49-52.
[126]石奇.产业创新全球问题理论与区域整合[J].产业经济研究,2006(1)：36-43.
[127]史清琪,尚勇.中国产业技术创新能力研究[M].北京：中国轻工出版社,2000.
[128]孙晓华,李传杰.有效需求规模、双重需求结构与产业创新能力——来自中国装备制造业的证据[J].科研管理,2010(1)：93-103.
[129]汪秀婷.国外产业创新模式对我国产业创新的借鉴[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007(8)：29-32.
[130]王海文.我国技术创新机制与自主创新[J].中国高新技术企业,2007,(3)：206-207.
[131]王海瑶.论科技服务对推动产业技术创新战略联盟构建和发展的作用[J].科技与创新,2009(6)：30-31.
[132]王健.我国高新技术产业技术创新能力研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学,2007.
[133]王露,王铮,杨妍,马翠芳,龚轶.知识网络动态与政策控制：中国国家创新体系调控模拟[J].科研管理,2002(1)：17-26.
[134]王明明,党志刚,钱坤.产业创新系统模型的构建研究——以中国石化产业创新系统模型为例[J].科学学研究,2009(2)：295-301.
[135]王伟.基于改进DEA的中国高技术产业技术创新效率研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(19)：119-124.
[136]王伟强.组合创新研究[D].浙江大学,1994.
[137]谢伟,胡玮,夏绍模.中国高新技术产业研发效率及其影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(3)：144-148.
[138]许玉民.中国高技术产业的科技进步贡献率分析[J].中国西部科技,2005(7)：7-8
[139]杨屹,薛惠娟.产业技术自主创新能力的区域差异性研究[J],中国工业经济,2010(11)：68-76.
[140]余泳泽.我国高技术产业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究——基于价值链视角下的两阶段分析[J].经济科学,2009(4)：62-74.
[141]张建同,孙昌言.以Excel和SPSS为工具的管理统计[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2005.
[142]张倩男,赵玉林.高技术产业技术创新能力的实证分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(4)：21-26.
[143]张倩男,赵玉林.区域高技术产业创新能力的比较分析[J].经济问题探索,2007(12)：60-65.
[144]张荣耀.中国国家创新系统理论与实证研究综述[J].商业现代化,2008(4)：398-399.
[145]张耀辉.产业创新：新经济下的产业升级模式[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002(1)：14-17.
[146]张耀辉.产业创新的理论探索[M].北京：中国计划出版社.2002年.
[147]张治河,丁华,孙丽杰,周国华.创新型城市与产业创新系统[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(12)：150-155.
[148]张治河,胡树华,金鑫,谢忠泉.产业创新系统模型的构建与分析[J].科研管理,2006(2)：36-39.
[149]张治河.面向“中国光谷”的产业创新系统研究[D].武汉理工大学,2003.
[150]赵琳,范德成.我国高技术产业技术创新效率的测度及动态演化分析[J].科技进步与对策,2011(11)：111-115.
[151]赵希男,褚德海,贾建锋.我国副省级城市科技创新能力的竞优分析[J].中国软科学,2010(11)：88-97.
[152]赵玉林.高技术产业经济学(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2012.
[153]郑坚,丁云龙.高技术产业技术创新效率评价指标体系的构建[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6)：105-108.
[154]中国科学院“高技术开发区研究”课题组.课题分报告之五.1988.
[155]周静.产业技术创新战略联盟组织形式的法律解读[J].研究生法学,2009(4)：121-126.
[156]周明,李宗植.基于产业集聚的高技术产业创新能力研究[J].科研管理,2011(1)：15-28.
[157]周勇,王国顺,周湘.科技人力资本与高技术产业发展关系的实证研究[J].人口与经济,2006(3)：50-54
[158]朱华晟,王缉慈.论柔性生产与产业集聚[J].世界地理研究,2001(4)：39-47.
[159]邹婧玮,陈晶.区域创新系统中科技中介作用机制及实证研究：以安徽省与上海市为例[J].科学研究,2006(1)：163-168.