用户名: 密码: 验证码:
防范化解资源环境风险财政对策研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
资源是人类社会生存和发展的物质基础。工业化的进程是建立在大量消耗资源的基础上的,这一过程产生的污染和大量废弃物严重破坏了人类的生存环境,污染程度和速度超出了地球的生态系统的补偿和修复能力。
     改革开放30年,惯性赶超战略引领下的高位增长中,我们付出了昂贵的资源与环境代价,对资源的的巨大需求和过度开采消耗浪费,导致我国资源基础的退化和枯竭,造成重要资源稀缺度加大,资源环境问题日益凸显;与资源匮乏局面形成长列反差的是,中国的资源利用效率低下,浪费严重,大量废弃污染物破坏生态环境,直接损害民众的生存与健康。如果政府不果断采取正确决策,势必会加剧资源与环境的风险,丧失发展机遇,全面建成小康社会的理想目标就难以实现。
     由于长期采取的粗放型经济发展方式,资源环境风险已经成为中国经济社会发展过程中面临的最严峻问题。虽早在20世纪90年代,我国就公布了《中国21世纪议程》,明确要求“制定和推行有利于可持续发展那的经济政策、技术政策和税收政策》,包括考虑将资源环境因素纳入经济核算体系”,但因“唯GDP至上”的惯性经济发展模式占据主流地位,如今,日益脆弱的资源环境承载力已经成为制约我国经济社会发展的最主要因素,资源环境风险仍不断加剧。
     由党的十七大报告提到的“经济增长的资源环境代价过大”,到十八大报告的深度揭示“资源环境约束加剧”,昭示:解决我国资源环境约束已经刻不容缓,为实现全面建成小康社会的的重要目标,党的十八大报告中首次将生态文明建设提升至与经济、政治、文化、社会四大建设并列的高度,生态文明被列为建设中国特色社会主义的“五位一体”的总布局之一,标志着中国正式跨入了新的阶段。
     生态文明发展是人与自然和谐共处、社会健康发展的基石,是衡量资源产业有序良性运转与否的重要标志,是最终实现建设生态文明,给子孙后代留一个天蓝、地绿、水净的美好家园的前提条件。是迄今为止人类社会经历的最为深刻、全面的生产和生活方式的转变。任何国家和地区,无一例外地把生态文明发展作为立法最重要的理念。自然资源政府监管制度体系、地质灾害应急制度与新能源战略,无不体现着各个国家政府重视生态文明发展的执政理念,经历着社会经济发展生态化转型的制度变迁。
     迄今为止绝大部分战争都是为了争夺资源,国家利益争夺最尖锐地表现在对世界资源的控制,因此,资源是各国战略安全保障的重要组成部分。尽管世界各国发展极不均衡,但发展进步是人类追求的共同目标,是人类社会的永恒主题’,伴随着世界经济进入新一轮发展周期,全球资源发展目标协同一致,就是在保障资源环境安全和社会经济可持续发展的前提下实现社会经济的可持续发展。
     防范化解资源环境风险问题必须从改革创新政策和制度设计入手,本文所研究的财政政策是必不可少的关键部分。
     本文的“防范化解资源环境风险的财政对策”的研究正是在此背景下开始的。
     论文的研究路径是:“中国经济社会发展面临资源环境风险——资源环境现状分析——资源环境问风险题的根源与成因——借鉴国外防范化解资源环境问题的经验做法和财政政策——提出防范化解我国资源环境风险的财政对策与建议”的思路展开。
     本文首先对资源、环境、财政政策等与论题相关的基本概念进行了界定和论述,对发展经济学、制度经济学、风险理论、资源与环境经济学等相关理论进行了研究、梳理与比较,在此基础上对国内外防范化解资源环境风险问题进行了论述,为整个论文铺垫了理论基础。而后,本文对中国资源环境问题从土地、水资源、矿产资源能源方面的问题和状况进行了详细分析,重点量化分析了我国资源环境付出的代价和面临的风险。同时,阐释了我国资源环境风险产生的根源与成因。
     在研究我国资源环境问题的定性分析基础上,构建我国资源环境综合评价指标体系及模型,并利用评价体系和方法进行分析,选取稀土开发利用对环境的破坏案例,为探索防范化解我国资源环境风险问题,提供了具体的量化分析依据。
     世界欧美等发达国家都经历过资源环境风险的问题,他们探索和实施了大量的治理措施和创新政策制度举措,比如依靠技术创新和政府主导的财政政策等方式,较好地化解了经济发展中的资源环境与可持续发展的融合,为开拓研究视野,本文选定了世界上较有代表性的国家防范化解资源环境问题的经验做法和财政政策,具体包括梳理国外政府资源环境治理政策制度、矿山生态环境保证金制度、国外政府应急管理制度进行研究分析,以使研究成果更多地具有参考价值。
     防范化解资源环境风险的财政对策措施,是本文研究的重点。基于讨论中国资源环境现状问题,从需求、利用、配置、管理方面分析根源与成因,依据党的十八大报告和十八届三中全会的精神,强调财政改革要考虑生态文明假设的要求,也就是防范化解资源环境风险。在健全完善财政政策体系宏观思路设计、财政政策与制度性创新方面提出来具体举措与建议。
Resources are the substantial basis for human existence and development. The process of industrial modernization is based upon the consumption of a huge amount of energy, during which the large quantities of pollutants and wastes have caused serious damage to the living environment of human beings. What's worse, the degree and speed of contamination has gone beyond the compensation and repair ability of the planet's ecosystem.
     The rapid economic growth in the past thirty years of reform and opening-up was obtained at the high cost of resources and environment. Huge demand for resources, excessive exploitation, consumption and waste not only caused degeneration and exhaustion of national resources, and also caused the increase of rarity of significant resources, all of which contributed to the fact that problem of resource constraint has become increasingly obvious; low resource use efficiency in China, serious waste and environment destroyed by numerous contaminants, which have caused direct damage to the survival and health of people, give a sharp contrast to the situation of resources shortage. If the government is not determined to make right decisions, it is bound to aggravate the risk of resource and environment and miss the development opportunity and the ideal goal to build a comprehensive well-off society will be difficult to achieve.
     Due to the extensive economic development mode adopted during a long period of time, resource constraints and environmental pollution has become a serious problem in the process of China's modernization. Although early in the1990s, China had released the China's Agenda21, which made clear requirements of making and implementing economic, technology and tax policies those are conducive to sustainable development, including considering resource and environment factors into the economic accounting system. However, as the traditional economic development mode of "GDP first" occupied a predominant position, the increasingly fragile environmental capacity has become the major factor that restricts China's economical and social development, and resources and environment risks are increasing.
     Both the report of the17th National Congress of CPC "resources and environment cost of economic growth is too expensive" and the upgraded caution of the report of the18th National Congress of CPC "resources and environment constraints deteriorate" demonstrate that to solve resources and environment constraints of our country in the modernization process is of great urgency. The construction of ecological civilization for the first time was brought to the paratactic position with the construction of economy, politics, culture and society in the report of18th National Congress of CPC, which has been regarded as a significant constituent part of the "Five-in-one" layout for building socialism with Chinese characteristics, which means the construction of China from economical, political, cultural, social and ecological aspects. It indicates that the transformation of modernization process of China is formally stepping into a new stage.
     The development of ecological civilization is a footstone of harmony between human beings and nature and healthy development of society, a significant symbol to measure whether the resource industry is operated in good order or not, as well as a precondition to construct a beautiful homeland with blue sky, green earth and limpid water for descendants. This is the most profound and comprehensive transformation of production mode and living styles ever in the human history. All countries and regions have regarded the development of ecological civilization as the most important concept of legislation without exception. Governmental supervision systems of natural sources, emergency response system of geological disasters and government regulatory system of natural resources in the world reflect the governing concept that governments of all nations attach great importance to the development of ecological civilization, and that they are all going through structural reform transition of ecologicalization of social economic development.
     So far, most of wars were caused by the fight for resources, and the control of the world's resources can best manifest the keen interest fight between countries. Therefore, resources are an important constituent part of strategic security of all countries. In spite of the unequal development among nations in the world, development is the mutual goal of human beings and the eternal theme of the society2. With the world economy stepping into a new round of development circle, consistency of the goal of global resource development is to realize the ecological development of social economy on the premise of resource and environment safety and sustainable development of social economy.
     The prevention and resolution of resources and environment risks should start with innovation of policies and systems, of which the financial policies in this paper is an essential constituent part.
     The study on the financial countermeasure to prevent and resolve resources and environment risks is started with this background.
     The paper is structures as follows:the resources and environment risks in China's economical and social development—analysis of the current situation of China's resources and environment—the root causes and factors of resources and environment problems—practices and financial measures from foreign countries to prevent and resolve resources and environment risks—financial countermeasures and suggestions to prevent and resolve resources and environment risks in China.
     This paper firstly defined and discussed some basic concepts related to the subject such as resources, environment and financial policies, etc, followed by a summary and comparison of theories such as development economics, institutional economics, and resources and environment economics, etc. Then, a description of the prevention and resolution of resources and environment risks abroad is given, which lays theoretical foundation for the whole paper. Next, detailed research and analysis on China's resource constraints from aspects land, water resource, mineral resource and energy etc is conducted, which will provide a quantitative analysis of the resource and environment costs and risks of China. Meanwhile, the paper will give an elaborate explanation of the root causes and factors of China's resources and environment risks.
     Building comprehensive assessment index system and model, conducting analysis by means of straight angel system and methods and selecting destruction to the environment by exploitation and use of rare earth on the basis of qualitative analysis of studying problems of resource constraint of China provide detailed basis of quantitative analysis for exploring and solving bottleneck problem of resource constraint in modernization process of China.
     Developed countries in Europe and America once also experienced problems of resources and environment risks, and they explored and implemented a lot of control and innovative measures, such as realizing the coordination between resource constraints and sustainable development in the process of economic development with technical innovation and government's financial measures. In order to open up the study field, the paper will conduct research and analysis about practices and financial measures to prevent and resolve resources and environment problems in some representative foreign countries, including a summary of policies and systems of foreign government to manage resources and environment, the deposit system to protect ecological environment in mineral area, and the study and analysis of management systems in foreign countries, so that the results will be valuable.
     Financial measures to resolve the resources and environment risks is the focus of this paper, which will discuss the current situation of China's resources and environment, analyze the root causes and factors from aspects of demand, utilization, distribution and management, and finally put forwards specific countermeasures and suggestions about the improvement of the macroscopic design of fiscal policy system, financial policies and systematic innovations based on main spirits of the report of the18th National Congress of CPC as well as the Third Plenary Session of the18th CPC Central Committee.
引文
1 王保安著,科学发展理论研究指标构件与体制保障,人民出版社。2011年版,P1
    2 Wang Bao'an, Index Constituent and Institutional Security of Study on Scientific Development Theories, People's Publishing House,2011, P1
    2 恩格斯。自然辨证法[A]。马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M]。北京:人民出版社1995.383
    4 [美]弗.卡特、汤姆·戴尔:《表土与人类》,庄峻等译,中国环境科学出版社,1987年版
    5 [英]汤因比、池田大作:《展望二十一世纪》,国际文化出版公司985年出版,p51
    6 [日]岩佐茂《环境的思想》中央编译出版社,1997年版,
    7 James Salzman,"Valuing Ecosystems",24 Ecology L Q.887,PP 898-903
    8 白景明,《中国税务报》;2012.09.19
    9 沈儒山搜狐博客2013.09.29
    10 网络《http://lunwen.cnkiz.com/lunwen/76/169/lunwen.102985.html》-2011.11.25
    11 陈劭锋、苏利阳、刘扬等:《科技促进发展》2013.07.20
    12 网络《http://lunwen.cnkiz.corn/lunwen/76/169/lunwen.102985.html》-2011.11.26
    13 李翠芬;《商业文化(学术版)》;2008.12.25
    14 ¨韩文博;《试论绿色财富》;《财政研究》;2006.01.05
    15 韩文博;《试论绿色财富》;《财政研究》;2006.01.05
    16 网络;(htpp://www.gov234.cn/article/al15/jinji/181478.html);2012.03.25
    17 ¨从更加宽泛的意义上说,可更新资源应该也是内生于经济决策的。
    18 汪祥春,当代西方微观经济学,代练:东北财经出版社,1993:3
    19 鲁传一,资源与环境经济学,北京:清华大学出版社,2004:3
    20 本文的资源定义并不考虑马克思等人所说的资源的社会属性,而是集中于狭义的自然资源。
    21 刘思华,《绿色经济论》,北京:中国财政经济出版社,2000:222
    22 鲁传一,资源与环境经济学,北京:清华大学出版社,2004:4
    23 李克国,魏国印,张宝安。环境经济学,北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003:3
    24 徐春,《建设生态文明与维护环境正义》,《党政干部学刊》,2008年第7期
    2 Roy Morrision(2005):"Ecocivlization 2140",参见http://ecocivilization.Info/index.html.
    26 “世界八大公害事件”指比利时马斯河谷污染事件、美国多诺拉污染事件、英国伦敦的烟雾事件、美国洛杉矶光化学烟雾事件、日本的水俣病事件以及富山、四日事件和米糠油事件这8个有害气体与毒物公害事件。
    27 春雨:《跨入生态文明新时代-关于生态文明建设若干问题的探讨》,http://www.eedu.org.cn,2008-7-17.
    28 潘岳:《社会主义与生态文明》,参见人民网http://www.people.com.cn,2007-10-19.
    29 网络(htpp://www.chineseiv.com/article/430/437/2006/200609151186602html);2012.04.07
    0 KANNAPAN S.,"The economics of development:the procustean bed of mainstream economics", Economic Development and Cultural Change,1995,pp.864-888
    31 制度经济学分为旧制度经济学与新制度经济学,新制度经济学由威廉姆森名命.他在20世纪60年代、70年代提出了新制度学派,以和凡勃伦(Thorstein Veblen)、康芒斯(John R. Commons)和米契尔(WesleyC. Mitchell)为首的旧制度学派相区分。本书中的制度经济学指的是新制度经济学。
    32 T-W·舒尔茨:《制度与人的经济价值的不断提高》,科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁—产权学派与新制度学派译文集》,上海三联书店991年版,第253页
    33 [日]青木昌彦:《比较制度分析》,上海远东出版社,2001年版,第97页
    34 钮曼,新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典(第三卷)。许明月译。北京:经济科学出版社,1992:1001
    35 巴泽尔Y.产权的经济分析。费方域等译。上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1997.03
    36 罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦·法和经济学(上),章俊等译。上海:上海人民出版社,1994:180
    37 郭建春,自然资源与环境经济学,北京:中国林业出社,2007,P7
    38 王克强,赵凯,刘红梅。资源与环境经济学,上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007.,P7
    39 BAUMOL W.J.&OATES W, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ.Pree,1988. BONNIEUXF.&DESAIGUES B.
    39 保罗·萨缪尔森、威廉·诺德豪斯.经济学[M]北京:华夏出版社,中文版16版,1999:5 互联网文档资源(htpp://wenku.baidu.com/view/3110c242336cleb91a375d66.html);2012.11.08
    42 孙兆学《从国际矿业发展趋势谈中国矿业发展对策》,《黄金》,2008.01
    43 陈玉民等《山东黄金集团建设生态矿业的实践与思考》2012中国矿山技术专备与管理大会,2012.11
    44 刘金平等《生态矿业发展评价体系研究:以江苏为例》,《中国矿业》,2013.06
    45 汤吉军、陈俊龙,《教育成本下煤矿安全治理的制度分析》,《经济体制个挨个》,2011,05
    46 肖兴志、李红娟:《煤炭安全规制的横向和纵向比较:国际比较与启示》,载于《财经论丛》,2006.07
    47 宁杉:《必须对战略资源加强管制》,载于《中国石化报》,2007.03
    48 张燕萍:《国民政府战时西部煤矿管制论述》,载于《档案与建设》,2007.01
    49 郭海强、云杉:《国家管制战略矿产资源》,载于《瞭望新闻周刊),2007.06
    50 王岳萌《煤矿安全的制度经济学思考》,载于《运营指南》2011.08
    51 盛昌明等《产资源储量管理改革成效,载于(国土资源情报),2013.06
    52 赵淑芹《我国矿业权交易有形市场及连东建设思考》载于《中国矿业》,2013.02
    53 王印《矿区环境治理与资源产权问关系的研究》载于《科学观察》,2013.02
    54 陈从喜等(关于我国矿业权市场建设制度的总体框架设计),载于《国土资源情报》2013.05
    55 李强、司雪峰,《我国矿业权及矿业管理机构改革纵览,载于《甘肃冶》,2013.06
    56 董振华,《自然生态环境资源的产权市场确实与价值补偿》,载于《当代经济,2013.06
    57 万伦来、胡志华、李勤,《矿产资源开发利用的环境效应研究进展》,载于《资源与环境》,2009.11
    58 刘航等《我国矿产资源开发与环境保护协调发展研究》,载于《中国国土资源经济》,2013.03
    59 温桂芳《深化资源性产品价格的基本思路于总体构想》,2013.07
    60 转引自张宇燕、管清友:《世界能源格局与中国的能源安全》,《世界经济》2007年第9期,第26页。
    61 汪晓文,潘剑虹,杨光宇,《资源枯竭型城市转型的路径选择——基于经济、社会、资源环境承载力视角的研究》,载于《河北学刊》,2012.09
    62 郭际、吴先华,《资源枯竭型城市创新体系的模式及选择研究》,第二届生态补偿机制建设与政策设计高级研讨会.
    63 杜国林、李超(2012),《资源枯竭型城市经济转型过程中财政困境研究——以阜新市为例》,载于辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2012.05
    64 Keeler E, Spence M, Zeckhauser R. The optimal control of ollution[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1971,4(1):19-34
    65 Stiglitz J. Growth with exhaustible natural resources:efficient and ptimal growth paths [J]. Review of Economic Studies Symposium),1974(41):123-137
    66 Nordhaus W D.Lethal Model 2:The limits to growth revisited [J]. Brookings Papers on conomic Activity,1992,23(2):1-43
    67 Lee C C. The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries evisited [J]. Energy Policy,2006,34 (9):1086-1093
    68 Bovenberg A L, Smulder S A. Transitional impacts of environmental32 policy in an ndogenous growth model [J]. International EconomicReview,1996,37(4),861-893
    69 Grimaud A, Rouge L. Non-renewable resources and growth with vertical innovations:optimum, equilibrium and economic policies [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2003, 45(2s):433-453
    70 Grimaud A, Rouge L. Polluting non-renewable resources, innovation and growth:welfare and environmental policy [J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2005,27(2):109-129
    71 Grimaud A, Rouge L. Environment, directed technical change and economic policy [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008,41(4):439-463
    72 Carla, Carlos H A. A multiple objective model to deal with economy-energy-environment interactions. [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,153(2):370-385
    73 ones S B. Mining and Tourist Towns in the Canadian Rockies [J]. Economic Geography,1933, 9(4):368-378.
    74 Gordon W B. Economic Growth in Canadian Industry,1870-1915:The Staple Model and the Take-Off Hypothesis [J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,1963,29(2): 159-184.
    75 Watkins M H. A Staple Theory of Economic Growth [J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,1963,29(2):141-158.
    76 Lucas R A. Minetown, Milltown, Railtown:Life in Canadian Communities of Single Industry [M]. Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1971:410-423.
    77 Bradbury J H, St-Martin I. Winding Down in a Quebec Mining Town:A Case Study of chefferville [J]. The Canadian Geographer,1983,27(2):128-144.
    78 Marsh B. Continuity and Decline in the Anthracite Towns of Pennsylvania. Annals of the Association of American Geographers [J],1987,77(3):337-352.
    79 Sorensen T, Epps R. The Role of Tourism in the Economic Transformation of the Central West Queensland Economy [J]. Australian Geographer,2003,34(1):73 - 89.
    80 Tanya B, Hayter R, Barnes T J. Resource Town Restructuring, Youth and Changing Labour Market Expectations:The Case of Grade 12 Students in Powell River, BC [J]. BC Studies,2003,103:75 103. Lockie S, Franettovich M, Petkova-Timmer V, et al. Coal Mining and the Resource Community Cycle: A Longitudinal Assessment ofthe Social Impacts of the Coppabella Coal Mine [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2009,29(5):330 - 339.
    Markey S, Halseth G, Manson D. The Struggle to Compete:From Comparative to Competitive Advantage in Northern British Columbia. International Planning Studies,2006,11(1):19 - 39.
    82 Rutherford T D. Requiem or Rebirth? Internal Labour Markets and Labour Market Restructuring in the Kitchener and Sault Ste. Marie Regions [J]. The Canadian Geographer,2006,50(2):197 216.
    83 Storey K. Fly-in/Fly-out and Fly-over:Mining and Regional Development in Western Australia [J]. Australian Geographer,2001,32(2):133 - 148.
    84 马中,王耀先,吴健.建立环境财政体系,增加环保投入是落实国务院决定的关键[N].中国环境报,2006-9-7.
    85 唐英.与生态环境建设相适应的我国财政体制改革[J].生态经济,2007,(7):142-145.
    86 李里.促进环境保护的财政政策选择[J].特区经济,2007,(3):174-175.
    87 陶勇.论环境保护的财政政策选择[J].经济问题探索,2006,(6):116-119.
    88 梁劲.保护生态环境的财税政策缺陷f J].经济研究参考,2003,(79):18-19.
    89 计金标.生态税收论[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2000.
    90 汤天滋.环境财政:构建公共财政体制的突破口f J].财经问题研究,2007,(9):78-83.
    91 马中,王耀先,吴健.建立环境财政体系,增加环保投入是落实国务院决定的关键[N].中国环境报,2006-9-7.
    92 王哲林.环境税的国际比较与借鉴[J].税务研究,2007,(7):78-82.
    93 武亚军.绿化中国税制若干理论与实证问题探讨[J].经济科学,2005,(1):77-90.
    94 付伯颖,齐海鹏.关于环境税收几个问题的探讨[J].税务研究,2002,(1):23-26.
    95 Mitcbam C. The concept of sustainable development:its origins and ambivalence [J]. Technology in Society,1995,17(3):331-326
    96 Mikesell R F. View point:Sustainable development and mineral resources [J]. Resources Policy, 1994,20(2):83-86
    97 Hilson G M. Introduction to this special issue, improving environmental:economic and ethical performance in the mining industry. Part 1:Environmental management and sustainable development [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2006,14 (3-4):225-226
    98 网络(htpp://npc.people.com.cn/GB/15097/13154691.html);2013.05.30
    99 网络(htpp://www.chinalaw.gov.cn/article/ztziz/201103/20103000334362.shtml;2012.09.10
    1 宋伟、陈百明、刘琳:《水土保持研究》;2013.04.15
    101 网络《我国水土流失问题及防治政策》-中国人大新闻;人民网;2013.05.20
    2 网络,方金;《我国生态安全和饮用水安全构成严重威胁》,2013,05.22
    中国科学院水资源领域战略研究组,2009
    1 王保安,中国经济现行版已难以为继,《求是》杂志,2014.01.01
    109 王保安,中国经济现行版已难以为继,《求是》杂志,2014.01.01
    1 陈甲斌,《加强“变废为宝”政策支撑》;《中国国土资源报》;2012.01.16
    111 张向达、吕阳《中国自然资源价格扭曲现象研究》;《财政研究》;2006.09.05
    112 郭永刚;《资源价格改革滞后制约经济发展》;《中国石化报》;2006.02.22
    113 张锐《谁在制造中国“能源危机”》;《中国外资》;2011.06.05
    114 Stephen Howes and Leo Dobes:"Climate Change and Fiscal Policy:A Report for APEC",2010。
    115 Mao, Y, Sheng H, and Yang F 2008:"The true cost of coal", Greenpeace, the Energy Foundation and WWF。 www.eu-china.net/web/cms/upload/pdf/materialien/TCOC-Final-EN-08_10-28.pdf。
    16 朱志刚:《迈向资源节约和环境友好型社会-论环境资源有偿使用制度改革,中国财政经济出版社2006版
    1 参见杰弗里·法兰克尔等编:《90年代美国的经济政策》,中信出版社2004年7月版,第403页。
    118 国外地质灾害防治经验扫描》;《中国国土资源报》;2010.08.16
    119 于义华;《发达国家的矿产资源战略》;《黄金科学技术》;2004.12.30
    121 黄振中;《感受德国生态康复》;《中国环境报》;2002.05.04
    122 王泠一,《韩国经济的可持续发展战略》;《上海经济研究》;2001.07.20
    123 金庆花等,韩国海外矿业资源开发战略的启示,《第六届世界华人地质科学研讨会和中国地质学
    127 21世纪日本对外战略-军事科学-全球访务-《网络》(http://www.defence.org:cn/article-13-96787.html))
    128 白益民,21世纪日本对外能源战略-军事科学-全球防务;《网络(http://blog.sina.com.cn/blog_5efda0100f4o6.html)
    129 [日]经济产业省.新国家能源战略.http://www.meti.go.jp/press/20060531 004/senryaku-hukokushset.pdf
    130 国外地质灾害防治经验扫描》;《中国国土资源报》;2010.08.16
    131 见“美国媒体再次指责中国控制稀土出口威胁美安全”一文,2009年9月29日,http://www.sina.com.cn环球时报。
    [1]巴泽尔Y。产权的经济分析。费方域等译。[M]上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1997:3
    [2]保罗·萨缪尔森、威廉·诺德豪斯.经济学[M]北京:华夏出版社,中文版16版,1999:5
    [3]蔡元沛、李绥远编著论中国矿业可持续发展,[M]广西师范大学出版社,2013.05出版,P056
    [4]恩格斯。自然辨证法[A]。马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M]。北京:人民出版社1995.383
    [5]甘肃省地矿局,地球科学词典
    [6]罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦·法和经济学(上),章俊等译。[M]上海:上海人民出版社,1994:180
    [[7][日]青木昌彦:《比较制度分析》,上海远东出版社,2001年版,第97页
    [8]钮曼。新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典(第三卷)。许明月译。北京:经济科学出版社,1992:1001
    [9]T·W·舒尔茨:《制度与人的经济价值的不断提高》,科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁
    [10][英]汤因比、池田大作:《展望二十一世纪》,[M]国际文化出版公司1985年出版,p51
    [11][日]岩佐茂《环境的思想》中央编译出版社,[M]1997年版.
    [12]朱志刚:《迈向资源节约和环境友好型社会-论环境资源有偿使用制度改革[M],中国财政经济出版社2006版
    [13]杨树旺易明编著,矿业经济理论、政策与实践,[M]科学出版社2012.12,P10
    [14]杨树旺易明编著,矿业经济理论、政策与实践,[M]科学出版社2012.12,P10
    [15]吴文盛著,中国矿业管制体制研究,经济科学出版社,[M]2011年7月出版,P4
    [16]王保安著,科学发展理论研究指标构件与体制保障,[M]人民出版社。2011年版,P1.
    [17]王俊豪:《管制经济学原理》高等教育出版社,[M]2007版
    [18]吴文盛著,中国矿业管制体制研究,经济科学出版社,[M12011年7月出版,P7
    [19][美]弗·卡特、汤姆·戴尔:《表土与人类》,庄峻等译,[M]中国环境科学出版社,
    1987年出版.[21]黄耀杰陈哗徐远:政府管制的集团利益理论与激励理论评述,《技术经济与管理研究》,2006年第2期
    [20]制度经济学分为旧制度经济学与新制度经济学,新制度经济学由威廉姆森名命.他在20世纪60年代、70年代提出了新制度学派,以和凡勃伦(Thorstein Veblen)、康芒斯(John R. Commons)和米契尔(WesleyC. Mitchell)为首的旧制度学派相区分。本书中的制度经济学指的是新制度经济学。一产权学派与新制度学派译文集》,[M]上海三联书店991年版,第253页
    [21]陈玉民等《山东黄金集团建设生态矿业的实践与思考》2012中国矿山技术专备与管理大会,2012.11
    [22]陈从喜等<关于我国矿业权市场建设制度的总体框架设计),载于《国土资源情报》2013.05
    [23]曹献珍,《国外绿色矿山建设对我国的借鉴意义》,载于《矿产保护与利用》2011.12
    [24]杜国林、李超(2012),《资源枯竭型城市经济转型过程中财政困境研究——以阜新市为例》,载于辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2012.05
    [25]董振华,《自然生态环境资源的产权市场确实与价值补偿》,载于《当代经济,2013.06
    [26]郭际、吴先华,《资源枯竭型城市创新体系的模式及选择研究》,第二届生态补偿机制建设与政策设计高级研讨会.
    [27]郭海强、云杉:《国家管制战略矿产资源》,载于《瞭望新闻周刊),2007.06
    [28]淮南子,和谐发展生态论,济南大学学报,社会科学版,2004年,第4、5期
    [29]淮南子,“生态平衡说”辨析-自然辩证法研究,社会科学版,1989年第一期
    [30]康纪田:《论建立产业管制型的现代矿业制度》,载于《企业活力》,2007年第六期
    [31]李强、司雪峰,《我国矿业权及矿业管理机构改革纵览,载于《甘肃冶》,2013.06
    [32]刘航等《我国矿产资源开发与环境保护协调发展研究》,载于《中国国土资源经济》,2013.03
    [33]刘金平等《生态矿业发展评价体系研究:以江苏为例》,《中国矿业》,2013.06
    [34]宁杉:《必须对战略资源加强管制》,载于《中国石化报》,2007.03
    [35]盛昌明等《款产资源储量管理改革成效,载于(国土资源情报),2013.06
    [36]孙兆学《从国际矿业发展趋势谈中国矿业发展对策》,《黄金》,2008.01
    [37]王印《矿区环境治理与资源产权间关系的研究》,载于《科学观察》,2013.02
    [38]张文驹《中国矿业的发展战略选择和体制改革》,2002.07
    [39]汤吉军、陈俊龙,《教育成本下煤矿安全治理的制度分析》,《经济体制改革》,2011,
    [40]肖兴志、李红娟:《煤炭安全规制的横向和纵向比较:国际比较与启示》,载于《财经论丛》,2006.7
    [41]万伦来、胡志华、李勤,《矿产资源开发利用的环境效应研究进展》,载于《资源与环境》,2009.11
    [42]汪晓文,潘剑虹,杨光宇,《资源枯竭型城市转型的路径选择——基于经济、社会、资源环境承载力视角的研究》,载于《河北学刊》,2012.09
    [43]温桂芳《深化资源性产品价格的基本思路于总体构想》,2013.07
    [44]王岳萌《煤矿安全的制度经济学思考》,载于《运营指南》2011.08
    [45]张燕萍:《国民政府战时西部煤矿管制论述》,载于《档案与建设》,2007.01
    [46]赵淑芹《我国矿业权交易有形市场及连东建设思考》载于《中国矿业》,2013.02
    [47]朱青山等,《生态矿区建设的系统分析及时间研究》,载于《金属矿山》2010.12
    [48]Acemoglu, Daron., Simon Johnson, James the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth.462004, No.10481.Robinson. Institutions as NBER Working Paper,
    [49]Adelman, M. A., G.C. Watkins. U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Prices,1982-2003. Energy Economics,2005, V01.27 (4):213-247.
    [50]Adelman, M. A., GC. Watkins. U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Prices,1982-2003. Energy Economics,2005, V01. 27 (4):553-571.
    [51]Adelman, M. A., Watkins, G C. Reserve Asset Value and the Hotelling Valuation Principle:Further Evidence. Southern Economics JournaL,1995,61 (3):664-673.
    [52]Andre Francisco J, Emilio Cerda. On Natural Resource Substitution.Resources Policy, 2006, V01. 30:233-246.
    [53]Amberg SOren and Thomas Bue BjOrner. Substitution between energy, capital and labour within industrial companies:A micro panel data analysis. Resource and Energy Economics,2007, Vol.29, Issue 2:122-136.
    [54]Auty Richard M_ Sustaining DeveLopment in MineraL Ecorzomies:The Resource Curse Thesis. Routledge, London,1993.
    [55]Auty Richard M_ Why Resource Endowments Can Undermine Economic Development: Concepts and Case Studies. Paper Prepared for the BP-Amoco Seminar, Lincoln College Oxford University,2011),November 28-29.
    [56]Auty Richard M_ Natural Resources, Development Models and Sustainable Development. International Institute for Environment and Development, Discussion Paper,2003, 03-01.
    [57]BAUMOL W.J.&OATES W, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ.Pree,1988._BONNIEUXF.&DESAIGUES B. Bovenberg A L, Smulder S A. Transitional impacts of environmenta123 policy in an ndogenous growth model [J]. International EconomicReview,1996,37(4),861-893
    [58]Bradbury J H, St-Martin I. Winding Down in a Quebec Mining Town:A Case Study of chefferville [J]. The Canadian Geographer,1983,27(2):128-144.
    [59]Carla, Carlos H A. A multiple objective model to deal with economy-energy-environment interactions. [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,153(2):370-385
    [60]Central West Queensland Economy [J]. Australian Geographer,2003,34(1):73 89.
    [61]Cabezas H, Pawlowski C W, Mayer A, et al.2003. Sustainability:Ecological, social, economic, techno-logical, and systems perspectives. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,5 (3):167-180.
    [62]Ding Ning, Barry C. Field. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. Department of Resource Economics Working Paper No.2004-7, University of Massachusetts Amherst,2004.
    [63]Franke Reiner., Peter Kalmbach. Structural Change in the Manufacturing Sector and Its Impact on Business-related Services:An Input-output Study for Germany. Structure Change and EconomicDynamics,2005, Vol.16, Issue 4:467-488
    [64]George J. Stigler, The Theory of Economic Regulation, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol.2, No.1. (Spring,1971), pp.3-21
    [65]Daly H.1990. Commentary:Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics,2:1-6.
    [66]Gleick P H.2001. Making every drop count. Scientific American,284 (2):41-45.
    [67]G.C. Watkins_ Oil Scarcity:What Have the Past Three Decades Revealed?. Energy Policy, 2006, Vol.34, Issue.5:508-514.
    [68]Gerlagh Reyer., Michiel A. Keyzer. Limits-to-Growth Theory.Chaper 13:219-232, in CoordinaLion and Growth, Essays in Honou.r of Simon Kuipers, edited by G. H. Kuper, E. Sterken and E. Wester,Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht,2001.
    [69]Economics,2003, Vol.25, Issue.2:137-154.
    [70]Grubler A.2003. Technology and Global Change. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
    [71]George J. Stigler, The Economics of Information, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 69, No.3 (Jun.,1961), pp.213-225
    [72]Gordon W B. Economic Growth in Canadian Industry,1870 - 1915:The Staple Model and the Take-Off Hypothesis [J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,1963,29(2):159-184.
    [73]Grimaud A, Rouge L. Non-renewable resources and growth with vertical innovations: optimum, equilibrium and economic policies [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2003,45(2s):433-453
    [74]Grimaud A, Rouge L. Polluting non-renewable resources, innovation and growth: welfare and environmental policy [J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2005,27(2): 109-129
    [75]Grimaud A, Rouge L. Environment, directed technical change and economic policy [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008,41(4):439-463
    [76]Feng Z,Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al.2005. Grain-for-green policy and its impacts on grain supply in West China. Land Use Policy,22:301-312.
    [77]James Sahman," Valuing Ecosystems",24 Ecology L Q.887,PP 898-903
    [78]Hu C,Fu B, Chen L,et al.2006. Farmers'attitudes towards the Grain-for-Green programme in the loess hilly area. China. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol, 34.HSBC.2011. The world in 2050:Quantifying the shift in the global economy.
    [79]Hilson G M. Introduction to this special issue, improving environmental:economic and ethical performance in the mining industry. Part 1:Environmental management and sustainable development [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2006,14 (3-4) 225-226
    [80]Kumar Surender. Measuring Energy Price Induced Technological Change:A Global Analysis Using Directional Function. Unpublished script,2006.
    Neumayer, Eric.,2000. Scarce or Abundant? the Economics of Natural Resource Availability. Journal of Economic Surveys,2000, Vol.14, No.3:307-335.
    [81]Kuijs 1.2009. China through 2020:A macroeconomic scenario. World Bank China Office Research Work-ing Paper, No.9.
    [82]Krausmann F.2009. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th centu-ry. Ecological Economics, (68):2696-2705.13:211-220.
    [83]Keeler E, Spence M, Zeckhauser R. The optimal control of ollution [J]. Journal of Economic Theory,1971,4(1):19-34
    [84]Lee C C. The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries evisited [J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(9):1086-1093
    [85]Lockie S, Franettovich M, Petkova-Timmer V, et al. Coal Mining and the Resource Community Cycle:A Longitudinal Assessment ofthe Social Impacts of the Coppabella Coal Mine [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2009,29(5):330 339.
    [86]Lucas R A. Minetown, Milltown, Railtown:Life in Canadian Communities of Stiglitz J. Growth with exhaustible natural resources:efficient and ptimal growth paths [J]. Review of Economic Studies Symposium),1974(41):123-137
    [87]Marsh B. Continuity and Decline in the Anthracite Towns of Pennsylvania. Annals of the Association of American Geographers [J],1987,77(3):337 - 352.
    [88]Markey S, Halseth G, Manson D. The Struggle to Compete:From Comparative to Competitive Advantage in Northern British Columbia. International Planning Studies, 2006,11(1):19-39.
    [89]Mitcbam C. The concept of sustainable development:its origins and ambivalence [J]. Technology in Society,1995,17(3):331-326
    [90]Mikesell R F. View point:Sustainable development and mineral resources [J]. Resources Policy,1994,20(2):83-86
    [91]Norgaard R B.2010. A coevolutionary interpretation of ecological civilization. pdfs/Chinese—BP_ StatsReview2012. pdf [2013-01-23].
    [92]Nordhaus W D. Lethal Model 2:The limits to growth revisited [J]. Brookings Papers on conomic Activity,1992,23(2):1-43
    [93]Rutherford T D. Requiem or Rebirth? Internal Labour Markets and Labour Market Restructuring in the Kitchener and Sault Ste. Marie Regions [J]. The Canadian Geographer,2006,50(2):197-216.
    [94]Storey K. Fly-in/Fly-out and Fly-over:Mining and Regional Development in Western Australia [J]. Australian Geographer,2001,32(2):133 - 148.
    [95]Single Industry [M]. Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1971:410 - 423.
    [96]Smulders, Sjak_ Endogenous Technical Change, Natural Resource and Growth. Chaper in Scarcity and Growth in the New Millennium. Edited by R. Ayres, D. Simpson and M. Toman. Resource for the Future,2003.
    [97]Solow, R. M_ Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources.The Review of Economic Studies,1974, Vol.41, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources:29-45.
    [98]Stevens P_ Resource Impact:Curse or Blessing?. JournaL of Energy LitercUure,2003, Vol.9, No.1:3-42.
    [99]Stijns, J. C. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth Revisited. Unpublished Second Draft. University of California at Berkeley,2001.
    [100]Stijns, J. C. Three Essays on Natural Resource Abundance,Economic Growth and Development. Ph. D Dissertation. University of Califo:mia, Berkeley,2003.
    [101]Svedberg Peter., John E. Tilton. The Real Price of Nonrenewable Resources:Copper 1870-2000. Seminar Papers No.723. Institute for International Economics Studies,2003.
    [102]Sorensen T, Epps R. The Role of Tourism in the Economic Transformation of the Tanya B, HayterR, Barnes TJ. Resource Town Restructuring, Youth and Changing Labour Market Expectations:The Case of Grade 12 Students in Powell River, BC [J]. BC Studies,2003,103:75-103.
    [103]Tones S B. Mining and Tourist Towns in the Canadian Rockies [J]. Economic Geography,1933,9(4):368-378.
    [104]Vina A, Scott S, Chen X D, et al.2007. Temporal changes in giant panda habitat connectivity across boundaries of Wolong Nature Reserve, China Ecol Appl,17: 1019-1030.
    [105]Watkins M H. A Staple Theory of Economic Growth [J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,1963,29(2):141 - 158.
    [106]Xu J,Yin R, Li Z,et al.2006. China's ecological rehabilitation. Ecol Econ,57:595-607.
    [107]Yuhn, K. H_ Growth and Distribution:A Test of Induced Innovation Hypothesis for Korean Economy. Applied Economics,1991.V01.23 (3):543-552.
    [108]中国黄金报,2006年5月12日,第004版
    [109]沈儒山,搜狐博客2013.09.29
    [110]http://www.hsbc.com/-/media/HSBC-com/about-hsbc/in-the-future/pdfs/120508-the-world-in-2050.ashx[2012-12-08]
    [111]http://neweconomicsinsti-tute.org/webfm_ send/23 [2012-12-06].Pearce D W, Warford J J.1993. World without End. New York:Oxford University Press.
    [112]World Bank.2013. World development indicators, http://databank. worldbank. org/ddp/home. do [2013-01-08].
    [113]WWF.2000. Living planet report 2000. http://w-wf.panda.org/about.ourearth/all_publications/living_planet_report [2013-01-05].
    [114]BP.2012.BP世界能源统计年鉴2012. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_intemet/china/bpchina_chi-nese/STACING/local_assets/downloads_
    [115]Magdoff F.2011.Ecological civilization. http://monthlyreview. org/2011/01/01/ecological-civilization[2012-12-06]
    [116]Krausmann F.2013. Clobal materials extraction 1900 tO 2009. http://www. uni-klu. ac. at/socec/inhajt/3133. htm [2013-01-23].
    [117]Maddison A.2010. Maddison historical statistics, http://www.ggdc. net/MADDISON/oriindex.htm[2013-01-23].
    [118]SERL 2010. Resource use. http://www.materialflows.net/data[2010-10-05].
    [119]SERI.2012. Global resource extraction,2005-2030. http://www.materialflows. net[2012-12-09].
    [120]Cobb J B.2010. Necessities for an ecological civilization, http://www. religion-online.org/showarti-cle.asp7title=3605[2012-12-06].
    [121]Hu C,Fu B, Chen L,et al.2006. Farmers'attitudes towards the Grain-for-Green programme in the loess hilly area. China. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol, 33.HSBC.2010. Sizing the climate economy, http://www.ens.dk/da-DK/Politik/groenvaekst/Documents/sizing_the_climate_economy,pdf[2012-12-08].

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700