稻鸭（萍）共作系统的主要生态环境效应及其作用机制研究
|
摘要
稻田是最大的人工湿地生态系统,具有多重生态功能,净化污水,美化环境,还是一座巨大的物种基因库。然而现代稻作生产为了片面追求其生产经济效益,对稻田生态系统过度干扰,加大稻田的利用开发程度,导致稻田生产力下降,污染加剧,不能满足当今人们对安全食品的需求。稻鸭共作生态农业模式正是适应农业发展现状而产生的,是以稻作水田为条件,以种稻为中心,家鸭田间网养的自然与人工相配合的生态工程系统,是有效控制常规稻作生态污染的重要技术途径.
1、通过田间小区对比试验研究分析了不同稻作模式对水稻植株形态的刺激效应.结果表明,由于鸭子在稻田的活动使水稻植株形态发生了明显的变化,植株碳水化合物含量、植株碳氮比、茎秆干物质输出率都明显增加,而且茎秆基部节间长度明显比对照缩短2.88%,茎粗增加64.90%,茎秆强度和抗倒伏指数也分别提高了11.78%和10.95%,并且稻鸭共作后提高了深层根比例和根系活力,黑根比例降低了16.63%.
2、分析了稻田放养鸭子后,不同土壤层次的理化性状、水体性质以及水稻产量构成和品质性状,可知,稻鸭共作处理有效改善了稻田土壤、水体的理化性状,与对照处理相比,土壤表层容重降低5.30%,总孔隙度提高2.52%,非毛管孔隙度提高19.03%,土壤表层的有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾比未放鸭的对照处理也分别提高了6.41%、9.74%、5.24%和5.17%,水体中的总氮、总磷和总钾比对照区分别增加9.31%、16.46%和16.42%,说明鸭子在田间的活动不仅有效刺激土壤养分释放,也明显改善了土壤结构,以及鸭子的排泄物等优质有机肥的还田,从而显著提高了稻田土壤、水体养分含量,也明显改善了水稻产量组成及品质指标,稻鸭共作处理的穗长比对照处理增加了1.41%,经济系数升高5.48%。通过稻米品质指标分析表明,与对照处理相比,出糙率、精米率和整精米率分别提高了3.21%、4.82%、3.49%,垩白粒率降低了26.17%,垩白度降低了32.56%,稻米直链淀粉含量降低4.03%,胶稠度提高了9.06%,稻米清蛋白和谷蛋白含量分别增加了12.12%和13.35%。
3、通过鸭子在稻田生态位的添加,系统研究了稻鸭共作对稻田病虫草的生态控制效应.结果表明:稻鸭共作对杂草的防除效应达到96.1%,降低了稻田杂草的发生种类,但Pielou均匀度指数显著提高;稻鸭共作对稻飞虱具有明显的生物控制效应,防治效果达到65.49%;稻鸭共作因鸭子对蜘蛛的捕食,降低了稻田蜘蛛的数量,而因稻田稻飞虱数量的明显减少,从而显著提高了稻田蜘蛛与稻飞虱的比例;鸭子对稻纵卷叶螟和二化螟有一定的控制效应,但控制能力随着水稻株高的增加而逐渐下降;鸭子的践踏、采食等活动特性并未控制住纹枯病的发生,只能减轻纹枯病的发病程度;稻鸭共作对稻瘟病也有明显的抑制作用,防治效果达到57.02%.由灰飞虱传毒危害的水稻条纹叶枯病是近年来在我国部分稻作区严重发生的病毒病害,稻鸭共作以及秧田期覆盖防虫网、栽后大田稻鸭共作处理对灰飞虱有显著的控制效应,因此也显著降低了两处理在水稻整个生长期间条纹叶枯病的发病率;稻鸭共作处理对条纹叶枯病的防效为79.44%,略高于常规稻作78.82%的防效,而秧田期覆盖防虫网、栽后大田稻鸭共作处理对稻田灰飞虱和条纹叶枯病的防治效果最好,防效超过94.01%.
4、轻型机械栽培具有省工、节本、增效等多重功能,但与之伴随的是杂草丛生,防治困难,为此本试验通过在水稻不同种植方式下进行稻鸭共作以探讨稻田杂草的群落特征.由此可知,人工移栽稻鸭共作稻田杂草种类明显低于直播稻鸭共作和机插稻鸭共作,以直播稻鸭共作田杂草的香农指数最高.由于田间环境的不同,各处理稻田的杂草组成也各异,直播稻鸭共作田杂草群落组成为丁香蓼+水苋菜+异型莎草,而稗草、千金子等稻田恶性杂草在直播稻鸭共作田下降为非优势杂草.直播稻鸭共作和机插秧稻鸭共作杂草群落的相似性指数较高,而且两者杂草物种数、杂草物种多样性指数均高于人工移栽稻鸭共作,以及表征杂草群落组成的Wittaker指数以人工移栽稻鸭共作最高.
5、绿萍具有固氮富钾、节水、培肥等多重生态功能,通过把稻田养萍与稻鸭共作的有机结合,构成了生态环保型稻鸭萍共作体系.稻鸭萍共作有利于提高土壤肥力,收获后的土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾分别比对照增加了7.95%、7.05%、6.47%、4.46%;稻鸭萍共作对杂草的控制效果达到98.94%,明显削弱了稻田优势杂草的发生危害,稻田残存杂草为数甚少,Pielou均匀度指数显著提高;稻鸭萍共作对稻田飞虱有显著的控制效应,因此,也明显抑制了主要由灰飞虱传毒危害的水稻条纹叶枯病发病率;稻鸭萍共作虽然对水稻纹枯病也有明显的防治效果,但不能控制住纹枯病的发生.
6、通过~(15)N标记技术分析萍体氮素动态可知,由于鸭子在田间的活动,从而有效地改善了田间的小气候环境,使得水体、土壤、稻株中的~(15)N回收率均以稻鸭萍共作处理最高,萍体氮素的损失率仅为11.20%,远低于单纯稻田养萍处理的62.45%.以及鸭子、绿萍对稻田生态系统有机肥的补充,显著促进了水稻的旺盛生长,使得稻鸭萍共作处理水稻的产量性状以及各项品质指标都得到了有效改善.
7、通过对不同稻作系统能流、养分循环特征分析表明,稻鸭共作系统、稻鸭萍共作系统、常规稻作系统的直接生理能分别占人工辅助能的比例为34.39%、30.83%和32.34%,其中有机能占人工辅助能输入的百分比分别为9.6%、2.8%和0.7%;稻鸭萍共作系统的氮磷钾养分含量都有一定程度的盈余,而常规稻作系统和稻鸭共作系统氮都有亏缺;稻鸭萍共作生态系统和稻鸭共作生态系统的氮磷钾养分循环通量均高于常规稻作系统,表明稻田养分再利用程度均较高,对肥料的依赖程度较低.
Rice field of gleyization and swampiness is a largest manual wetland ecological system,it is called "a gene pool of living things" because of its multi-ecological functions, for instance,cleansing sewage and beautifying environment.But its ecological function and productivity declined because that human being excess disturbing it and increasing its utilization and exploitation for economy benefit.Rice-duck integrated farming is an ecology agricultural pattern to adapt to agricultural development status,it is ecological engine system and can control ecological pollution in conventional rice production region.
1、Effects of rice-duck integrated farming on rice plant were studied.We examined the stimulation effects of different rice-growing systems on rice plant by the field experiment in Dongtai experimental station of Nanjing Agricultural University,Jiangsu Province. Results showed that rice plant shape apparently changed because of ducks' activity in rice paddy.Carbohydrate content,C/N ratio and dry matter transfer ratio in stem were higher than control system.Basal internodes length,stem thick,stem mechanical strength and stem lodging resistant index were 2.88%,64.90%,11.78%and 10.95%higher than control system,respectively.Rice-duck integrated farming increased deep layer root ratio and root activity,but decreased black root ratio 16.63%than control system.
2、Rice-duck integrated farming availability improved physichemical characters of soil and water,compared to CK treatment,soil surface layer's bulk density decreased 5.30%, total porosity increased 2.52%and non-capillary porosity increased 19.03%.Organic matter,available N,P,K increased 6.41%、9.74%、5.24%and 5.17%,respectively compared to CK treatment.Total N,P,K of water also increased 9.31%、16.46%and 16.42%.So these results showed that duck dejection can significantly increase water nutrition content,and significantly improve yield characters and quality items.Panicle length of rice-duck integrated farming was 1.41%longer than CK treatment and harvest index hoist 5.48%.Through rice quality items analyzing,brown rice,milled rice,and head rice ratio increased 3.21%、4.82%、3.49%in RD treatment compared to CK treatment,but chalkness decreased 26.17%,amylose content increased 4.03%,gel consistency increased 9.06%,and albumin,glutelin content increased 12.12%and 13.35%respectively.
3、This article makes research on the ecological effects of rice-duck integrated farming on developing regularity of flee diseases,insects and weeds.The research finds that rice-duck integrated farming can prevent 96.1%of the weeds from growing,thus reducing the varieties of the weeds,although the Pielou evenness index rises.Rice-duck integrated farming has visible ecological effect on control over brown planthoppers,and the total prevention rate reaches 65.49%.By adopting rice-duck integrated farming,the ducks prey on spiders,which reduces the numbers of spiders,as a result,the ratio between spiders and brown planthoppers is increased.Although ducks have some control effect on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee and Chilo suppressalis Walker,their control ability over such insects will be weakened with the growth of rice plants.Thanks to the ducks, rice-duck integrated farming can cut down the occurrence rate of rice stripe disease event if this method cannot fully prevent the disease from arising.Besides,rice-duck integrated farming can also effectively control rice blast,and the prevention rate reaches 57.02%.Rice stripe disease transmitted by brown planthopper is one of the most serious viral disease in some rice-growing areas of China in recent years.As an ecological practice of rice growing, rice-duck integrated farming has shown great effects on the controls of rice insects, diseases and weeds.However,there is no direct field evidence of the integrated farming effects on brown planthopper and rice stripe disease.Here we examined the effects of different rice-growing systems on controlling brown planthopper population and rice stripe disease in field experiments in Dongtai experimental station of Nanjing Agricultural University,Jiangsu Province,China.The treatments included Conventional rice production system,Rice-duck integrated system,Rice-duck integrated system with insect proof net during seedling stage and Control system.Results showed that the RD and NRD treatments significantly reduced brown planthopper population,resulting in great decline in the incidence of rice stripe disease during all stages of rice growth.The highest reduction in brown planthopper population was found in the NRD treatment with over 94.01% reduction of rice stripe disease.The RD treatment decreased rice stripe disease incidence by 79.44%,higher than that in CR treatment(78.82%).The findings suggest that rice-duck integrated farming,especially plant covered with insect proof net cover during the seedling stage,is a safe and high efficiently ecological approach for controlling rice stripe disease in China.
4、Light machinery cultivation has many ecological function of decreasing labor and cost,but increasing economical effect.While these dee paddies had many weeds,and difficulties to control them.Weeds varieties in Manpower transplanted rice-duck integrated farming region(TRD) were lower than that in Direct seeding rice-duck integrated farming region(DSRD) and Machine-transplanted rice-duck integrated farming region(MTRD),but Shannon-wiener index is the highest in DSRD treatment.Weeds community constitution was Ludwigia prostrata+Ammannia baccifera L+Cyperus difformis in DSRD treatment, however,Echinochloa crusgalli and Leptochloa chinensis declined non-dominant weeds. Similarity index of weed communities was higher between in DSRD treatment and MTRD treatment,their weed varieties and Shannon-wiener index all higher than TRD treatment. But Wittaker index was the highest in TRD treatment.
5、The article studied main eco-funetions of rice-duck-azolla mutualism compound system.Rice-duck-azolla integrated farming could improve soil fertility and the organic matter,available N、P、K increased 7.95%、7.05%、6.47%、4.46%than the CK treatment, respectively.The controlling effect of rice-duck-azolla integrated farming on weeds reached 98.94%,reduced the infestation of former dominant weed species and weed quantity,but evenness index rose.Rice-duck-azolla integrate farming had apparent controlling effects on planthopper,so decreased happening chances of rice stripe disease. Rice-duck-azolla integrate farming had significantly controlling effect on rice sheath blight, but it couldn't control the occurrence of rice sheath blight.
6、Through ~(15)N labeling technology analyzed azolla's N distribution dynamic, rice-duck-azolla integrated farming available improved rice field environment because of ducks's activity,~(15)N recovery ratio of water,soil and rice plant in this treatment was all the highest,and azolla N losing ratio was only 11.20%,but rice-azolla treatment's azolla losing ratio reached 62.45%.So rice-duck-azolla integrated farming availability improved yield characters and quality items with the condition of azolla and duck dejecta supplied nutrition to rice yield.
7、The ratio between direct physiological energy and manual supplementary energy were 34.39%、30.83%and 32.34%,in rice-duck-azolla integrated farming,rice-duck integrated farming and conventional rice production region,respectively.The ratio between organic energy and manual supplementary energy were 9.6%,2.8%和0.7%in the three treatments,respectively.The contents of N,P_2O_5,K_2O in rice-duck-azolla integrated farming had profit to some extent,but N content lost in dee-duck integrated farming and conventional rice production region,P_2O_5 and K_2O had profit.Flux of N,P_2O_5,K_2O in rice-duck-azolla integrated farming and rice-duck integrated farming were higher than that in conventional rice production region,this showed that the nutrient cycle degree were higher and low dependence on fertilization in the two treatments.
1、通过田间小区对比试验研究分析了不同稻作模式对水稻植株形态的刺激效应.结果表明,由于鸭子在稻田的活动使水稻植株形态发生了明显的变化,植株碳水化合物含量、植株碳氮比、茎秆干物质输出率都明显增加,而且茎秆基部节间长度明显比对照缩短2.88%,茎粗增加64.90%,茎秆强度和抗倒伏指数也分别提高了11.78%和10.95%,并且稻鸭共作后提高了深层根比例和根系活力,黑根比例降低了16.63%.
2、分析了稻田放养鸭子后,不同土壤层次的理化性状、水体性质以及水稻产量构成和品质性状,可知,稻鸭共作处理有效改善了稻田土壤、水体的理化性状,与对照处理相比,土壤表层容重降低5.30%,总孔隙度提高2.52%,非毛管孔隙度提高19.03%,土壤表层的有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾比未放鸭的对照处理也分别提高了6.41%、9.74%、5.24%和5.17%,水体中的总氮、总磷和总钾比对照区分别增加9.31%、16.46%和16.42%,说明鸭子在田间的活动不仅有效刺激土壤养分释放,也明显改善了土壤结构,以及鸭子的排泄物等优质有机肥的还田,从而显著提高了稻田土壤、水体养分含量,也明显改善了水稻产量组成及品质指标,稻鸭共作处理的穗长比对照处理增加了1.41%,经济系数升高5.48%。通过稻米品质指标分析表明,与对照处理相比,出糙率、精米率和整精米率分别提高了3.21%、4.82%、3.49%,垩白粒率降低了26.17%,垩白度降低了32.56%,稻米直链淀粉含量降低4.03%,胶稠度提高了9.06%,稻米清蛋白和谷蛋白含量分别增加了12.12%和13.35%。
3、通过鸭子在稻田生态位的添加,系统研究了稻鸭共作对稻田病虫草的生态控制效应.结果表明:稻鸭共作对杂草的防除效应达到96.1%,降低了稻田杂草的发生种类,但Pielou均匀度指数显著提高;稻鸭共作对稻飞虱具有明显的生物控制效应,防治效果达到65.49%;稻鸭共作因鸭子对蜘蛛的捕食,降低了稻田蜘蛛的数量,而因稻田稻飞虱数量的明显减少,从而显著提高了稻田蜘蛛与稻飞虱的比例;鸭子对稻纵卷叶螟和二化螟有一定的控制效应,但控制能力随着水稻株高的增加而逐渐下降;鸭子的践踏、采食等活动特性并未控制住纹枯病的发生,只能减轻纹枯病的发病程度;稻鸭共作对稻瘟病也有明显的抑制作用,防治效果达到57.02%.由灰飞虱传毒危害的水稻条纹叶枯病是近年来在我国部分稻作区严重发生的病毒病害,稻鸭共作以及秧田期覆盖防虫网、栽后大田稻鸭共作处理对灰飞虱有显著的控制效应,因此也显著降低了两处理在水稻整个生长期间条纹叶枯病的发病率;稻鸭共作处理对条纹叶枯病的防效为79.44%,略高于常规稻作78.82%的防效,而秧田期覆盖防虫网、栽后大田稻鸭共作处理对稻田灰飞虱和条纹叶枯病的防治效果最好,防效超过94.01%.
4、轻型机械栽培具有省工、节本、增效等多重功能,但与之伴随的是杂草丛生,防治困难,为此本试验通过在水稻不同种植方式下进行稻鸭共作以探讨稻田杂草的群落特征.由此可知,人工移栽稻鸭共作稻田杂草种类明显低于直播稻鸭共作和机插稻鸭共作,以直播稻鸭共作田杂草的香农指数最高.由于田间环境的不同,各处理稻田的杂草组成也各异,直播稻鸭共作田杂草群落组成为丁香蓼+水苋菜+异型莎草,而稗草、千金子等稻田恶性杂草在直播稻鸭共作田下降为非优势杂草.直播稻鸭共作和机插秧稻鸭共作杂草群落的相似性指数较高,而且两者杂草物种数、杂草物种多样性指数均高于人工移栽稻鸭共作,以及表征杂草群落组成的Wittaker指数以人工移栽稻鸭共作最高.
5、绿萍具有固氮富钾、节水、培肥等多重生态功能,通过把稻田养萍与稻鸭共作的有机结合,构成了生态环保型稻鸭萍共作体系.稻鸭萍共作有利于提高土壤肥力,收获后的土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾分别比对照增加了7.95%、7.05%、6.47%、4.46%;稻鸭萍共作对杂草的控制效果达到98.94%,明显削弱了稻田优势杂草的发生危害,稻田残存杂草为数甚少,Pielou均匀度指数显著提高;稻鸭萍共作对稻田飞虱有显著的控制效应,因此,也明显抑制了主要由灰飞虱传毒危害的水稻条纹叶枯病发病率;稻鸭萍共作虽然对水稻纹枯病也有明显的防治效果,但不能控制住纹枯病的发生.
6、通过~(15)N标记技术分析萍体氮素动态可知,由于鸭子在田间的活动,从而有效地改善了田间的小气候环境,使得水体、土壤、稻株中的~(15)N回收率均以稻鸭萍共作处理最高,萍体氮素的损失率仅为11.20%,远低于单纯稻田养萍处理的62.45%.以及鸭子、绿萍对稻田生态系统有机肥的补充,显著促进了水稻的旺盛生长,使得稻鸭萍共作处理水稻的产量性状以及各项品质指标都得到了有效改善.
7、通过对不同稻作系统能流、养分循环特征分析表明,稻鸭共作系统、稻鸭萍共作系统、常规稻作系统的直接生理能分别占人工辅助能的比例为34.39%、30.83%和32.34%,其中有机能占人工辅助能输入的百分比分别为9.6%、2.8%和0.7%;稻鸭萍共作系统的氮磷钾养分含量都有一定程度的盈余,而常规稻作系统和稻鸭共作系统氮都有亏缺;稻鸭萍共作生态系统和稻鸭共作生态系统的氮磷钾养分循环通量均高于常规稻作系统,表明稻田养分再利用程度均较高,对肥料的依赖程度较低.
Rice field of gleyization and swampiness is a largest manual wetland ecological system,it is called "a gene pool of living things" because of its multi-ecological functions, for instance,cleansing sewage and beautifying environment.But its ecological function and productivity declined because that human being excess disturbing it and increasing its utilization and exploitation for economy benefit.Rice-duck integrated farming is an ecology agricultural pattern to adapt to agricultural development status,it is ecological engine system and can control ecological pollution in conventional rice production region.
1、Effects of rice-duck integrated farming on rice plant were studied.We examined the stimulation effects of different rice-growing systems on rice plant by the field experiment in Dongtai experimental station of Nanjing Agricultural University,Jiangsu Province. Results showed that rice plant shape apparently changed because of ducks' activity in rice paddy.Carbohydrate content,C/N ratio and dry matter transfer ratio in stem were higher than control system.Basal internodes length,stem thick,stem mechanical strength and stem lodging resistant index were 2.88%,64.90%,11.78%and 10.95%higher than control system,respectively.Rice-duck integrated farming increased deep layer root ratio and root activity,but decreased black root ratio 16.63%than control system.
2、Rice-duck integrated farming availability improved physichemical characters of soil and water,compared to CK treatment,soil surface layer's bulk density decreased 5.30%, total porosity increased 2.52%and non-capillary porosity increased 19.03%.Organic matter,available N,P,K increased 6.41%、9.74%、5.24%and 5.17%,respectively compared to CK treatment.Total N,P,K of water also increased 9.31%、16.46%and 16.42%.So these results showed that duck dejection can significantly increase water nutrition content,and significantly improve yield characters and quality items.Panicle length of rice-duck integrated farming was 1.41%longer than CK treatment and harvest index hoist 5.48%.Through rice quality items analyzing,brown rice,milled rice,and head rice ratio increased 3.21%、4.82%、3.49%in RD treatment compared to CK treatment,but chalkness decreased 26.17%,amylose content increased 4.03%,gel consistency increased 9.06%,and albumin,glutelin content increased 12.12%and 13.35%respectively.
3、This article makes research on the ecological effects of rice-duck integrated farming on developing regularity of flee diseases,insects and weeds.The research finds that rice-duck integrated farming can prevent 96.1%of the weeds from growing,thus reducing the varieties of the weeds,although the Pielou evenness index rises.Rice-duck integrated farming has visible ecological effect on control over brown planthoppers,and the total prevention rate reaches 65.49%.By adopting rice-duck integrated farming,the ducks prey on spiders,which reduces the numbers of spiders,as a result,the ratio between spiders and brown planthoppers is increased.Although ducks have some control effect on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee and Chilo suppressalis Walker,their control ability over such insects will be weakened with the growth of rice plants.Thanks to the ducks, rice-duck integrated farming can cut down the occurrence rate of rice stripe disease event if this method cannot fully prevent the disease from arising.Besides,rice-duck integrated farming can also effectively control rice blast,and the prevention rate reaches 57.02%.Rice stripe disease transmitted by brown planthopper is one of the most serious viral disease in some rice-growing areas of China in recent years.As an ecological practice of rice growing, rice-duck integrated farming has shown great effects on the controls of rice insects, diseases and weeds.However,there is no direct field evidence of the integrated farming effects on brown planthopper and rice stripe disease.Here we examined the effects of different rice-growing systems on controlling brown planthopper population and rice stripe disease in field experiments in Dongtai experimental station of Nanjing Agricultural University,Jiangsu Province,China.The treatments included Conventional rice production system,Rice-duck integrated system,Rice-duck integrated system with insect proof net during seedling stage and Control system.Results showed that the RD and NRD treatments significantly reduced brown planthopper population,resulting in great decline in the incidence of rice stripe disease during all stages of rice growth.The highest reduction in brown planthopper population was found in the NRD treatment with over 94.01% reduction of rice stripe disease.The RD treatment decreased rice stripe disease incidence by 79.44%,higher than that in CR treatment(78.82%).The findings suggest that rice-duck integrated farming,especially plant covered with insect proof net cover during the seedling stage,is a safe and high efficiently ecological approach for controlling rice stripe disease in China.
4、Light machinery cultivation has many ecological function of decreasing labor and cost,but increasing economical effect.While these dee paddies had many weeds,and difficulties to control them.Weeds varieties in Manpower transplanted rice-duck integrated farming region(TRD) were lower than that in Direct seeding rice-duck integrated farming region(DSRD) and Machine-transplanted rice-duck integrated farming region(MTRD),but Shannon-wiener index is the highest in DSRD treatment.Weeds community constitution was Ludwigia prostrata+Ammannia baccifera L+Cyperus difformis in DSRD treatment, however,Echinochloa crusgalli and Leptochloa chinensis declined non-dominant weeds. Similarity index of weed communities was higher between in DSRD treatment and MTRD treatment,their weed varieties and Shannon-wiener index all higher than TRD treatment. But Wittaker index was the highest in TRD treatment.
5、The article studied main eco-funetions of rice-duck-azolla mutualism compound system.Rice-duck-azolla integrated farming could improve soil fertility and the organic matter,available N、P、K increased 7.95%、7.05%、6.47%、4.46%than the CK treatment, respectively.The controlling effect of rice-duck-azolla integrated farming on weeds reached 98.94%,reduced the infestation of former dominant weed species and weed quantity,but evenness index rose.Rice-duck-azolla integrate farming had apparent controlling effects on planthopper,so decreased happening chances of rice stripe disease. Rice-duck-azolla integrate farming had significantly controlling effect on rice sheath blight, but it couldn't control the occurrence of rice sheath blight.
6、Through ~(15)N labeling technology analyzed azolla's N distribution dynamic, rice-duck-azolla integrated farming available improved rice field environment because of ducks's activity,~(15)N recovery ratio of water,soil and rice plant in this treatment was all the highest,and azolla N losing ratio was only 11.20%,but rice-azolla treatment's azolla losing ratio reached 62.45%.So rice-duck-azolla integrated farming availability improved yield characters and quality items with the condition of azolla and duck dejecta supplied nutrition to rice yield.
7、The ratio between direct physiological energy and manual supplementary energy were 34.39%、30.83%and 32.34%,in rice-duck-azolla integrated farming,rice-duck integrated farming and conventional rice production region,respectively.The ratio between organic energy and manual supplementary energy were 9.6%,2.8%和0.7%in the three treatments,respectively.The contents of N,P_2O_5,K_2O in rice-duck-azolla integrated farming had profit to some extent,but N content lost in dee-duck integrated farming and conventional rice production region,P_2O_5 and K_2O had profit.Flux of N,P_2O_5,K_2O in rice-duck-azolla integrated farming and rice-duck integrated farming were higher than that in conventional rice production region,this showed that the nutrient cycle degree were higher and low dependence on fertilization in the two treatments.
引文
[1]郭晓楠.湿地生态及其在水污染控制中的应用研究[D].西安建筑科技大学,硕士学位论文,2004,1-7
[2]湿地国际-中国项目,中国林业部自然保护司,世界自然基金会湿地效益,北京:中国林业部野生动物和森林植物保护司,1997
[3]陆健健.中国湿地[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1989
[4]Giller P S,Hildrew A G,Raffaelli D O et al.Aquatic ecology:Scale,Pattern and Process[M].Landon:Blackwell Science Press,1992
[5]郎慧卿,林鹏,陆健健.中国湿地研究与保护[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1998
[6]安树青.湿地生态工程[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003
[7]付为国.镇江内江湿地植物群落演替规律及植被修复策略[D].南京农业大学,博士学位论文,2006
[8]中国水稻生态农业报告.绿色和平[M].2006
[9]化工农业走到穷途.中国稻米,农业资讯,2007
[10]陈丹,罗朝晖.稻田生态系统服务及其经济价值评估方法探讨[J].环境科学与技术,2005,28(6):61-63
[11]王向阳,邹运鼎,孟庆雷,等.两种除草剂对棉田节肢动物群落多样性指数的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):514-518
[12]王敬国.农用化学物质的利用与污染控制[M].北京:北京出版社,2001,177-195
[13]Haynes K Y.Sublethal effects of neurotoxic insecticides on insect behavior[J].Ann Rev Ent,1988,33:149-155
[14]农田生物多样性与害虫综合治理,丽水农技论坛,百度网站,2006
[15]国家农村小康环保行动计划.国家环境保护总局,2006
[16]欧晓明,余淑英,林雪梅,等.几种杀虫剂混用对粘虫增效作用的研究[J].华中农业大学学报,1999,18(1):50-57
[17]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):639-645
[18]沈晓昆.稻鸭共作无公害有机稻米生产新技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2003:26-124
[19]冉茂林,陈铮,谷义成.我国稻田养鸭的发展及研究现状[J].中国畜牧杂志,1993,29(5):58-60
[20]滕建军.稻鸭共栖的矛盾与对策[J].家畜生态,1994,15(1):2-26
[21]许德海,禹盛苗.无公害高效益稻鸭共育新技术[J].中国稻米,2002(3):36-38
[22]徐亲阳,金千瑜,章蓉蓉.稻鸭共育一项安全 绿色 高效 实用的新技术[J].中国稻米,2003(3):42
[23]熊国远,朱秀柏.稻鸭共生绿色农业生产技术初探[J].饲业,2003,24(4):28-30
[24]马国强,庄雅津,周铭成.稻鸭共作无公害水稻生产技术[J].农业装备技术,2002,28(2):20-21
[25]Su Sin Teo.Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail(Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice[J].Crop protection,2001,20(7):599-604
[26]魏守辉,强胜,马波,等.稻鸭共作及其它控草措施对稻田杂草群落的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1067-1071
[27]彭凤梅,戴志明,万田正治,等.云南稻鸭共生模式效益的与综合评价(一)[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(3):34-36
[28]杨华松,戴志明,万田正治,等.云南稻鸭共生模式效益的与综合评价(二)[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(5):23-24
[29]李克勤,黄璜,任泽明.湖南稻鸭生态种养与频振式诱蛾灯示范成效与技术[J].中国稻米,2003(5):35-37
[30]朱克明,沈晓昆,谢桐洲,等.稻鸭共作技术试验初报[J].农业科学,2001,29(2):262-264
[31]王缨,雷慰慈.稻田种养模式生态效益研究[J].生态学报,20(2):311-316
[32]王成豹,马成武,陈海星.稻鸭共作生产有机稻的效果[J].农业科学,2003(4):194-196
[33]朱凤姑,丰庆生,诸葛梓.稻鸭生态结构对稻田有害生物种群控制作用[J].浙江农业学报,2004,16(1):37-41
[34]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-102
[35]黄璜,杨志辉,王华,等.湿地稻鸭复合系统的CH4捧放[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):929-934
[36]王华,黄璜,杨志辉,等.湿地稻鸭复合生态系统综合效益[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(4):23-26
[37]熊国远,朱秀柏.稻鸭共生技术的实施程序及技术要点[J].家禽养殖,2003(11):12-13
[38]章家恩,陆敬雄,张光辉,等.鸭稻共作生态农业模式的功能效益分析[J].生态科学,2002,21(1):6-10
[39]唐建阳,翁伯奇,黄毅斌,等.稻田甲烷捧放机理和调控技术[J].中国农业大学学报,1998,3(3):101-105
[40]Lindau C W and Bollich P K.Methane emissions from Louisiana first and Ratoon crop rice[J].Soil Sci,1993,156:42-48
[41]唐龙飞,黄毅斌,翁伯奇,等.稻田高效、低耗、低污染的持续农业模式研究[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(3):60-66
[42]黄毅斌,翁伯奇,唐建阳,等.稻-萍-鱼体系对稻田土壤环境的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(1):74-76
[43]Huang Y,Wang H,Huang H,etc.Characteristics of methane emission from wetland rice-duck complex ecosystem[j].Agriculture Ecosystem s& Environment,2005,105:181-193
[44]Schimel J P,Gulledge J.Microbial community structure and global trace gases[J].Global Change Biology,1998,4:745-758
[45]Sebacher D I,Harriss R C,Bartlett K B,etc Atmospheric methane sources:Alaskan tundra bogs,an alpine fen,and a subarctic boreal marsh[J].Tellus,38B:1-10
[46]李晶,王明星,陈德章.水稻田甲烷的减排方法研究及评价[J].大气科学,1998,22(3):354-362
[47]Lindau C W,Bollich P K,Delaune R D,etc.Effect of urea fertilizer and environmental factors on methane emissions from a Louisiana,USA rice field[J].Plant and Soil,1991,136:195-203
[48]章家恩,赵美玉,陈进,等.鸭稻共作方式对水稻生长的影响[J].生态科学,2005,24(2):117-19.
[49]禹盛苗,欧阳由男,张秋英,等.稻鸭共育复合系统对水稻生长与产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1252-1256.
[50]施关林,秦忠耀,汪美良.适宜稻鸭共育的家鸭与疫病预防[J].中国家禽,2003,25(12):19-20
[51]朱克明,张利民,张建国.水稻有机栽培密度试验[J].农业技术,2003,29(1):26-27
[52]鲁建国,徐正国,余晋洋,等.稻鸭共育配套技术初探[J].农业科技,2003(4):60-61
[53]朱克明,张利民,张建国,等.水稻有机栽培肥料运筹试验益分析[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(1):141-143
[54]陈金星,景建华,储金根,等.稻鸭共作促花肥的使用对水量的效应探讨[J].农业装备技术,2003,29(3):28
[55]翁伯奇,唐建阳,应朝阳,等.闽北山垄田稻萍鱼共生体系与萍体氮素循环利用效率研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(2):138-144
[56]沈晓昆,王志强,戴网成,等.应用稻鸭共作技术实现水稻可持续生产[J].中国稻米,2005,(2):21-22
[57]甄若宏,王强盛,邓建平,等.稻鸭萍共作复合系统的主要生态效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):11-14
[58]刘浩官,李平,祝卫华,等.稻萍鱼生态体系控制稻飞虱和纹枯病试验[J].福建农业科技,1985,14-14
[59]Watanabe Ⅰ.,Utilization of the Azolla-Anabaena complex as nitrogen fertilizer for rice[J].IRRI Res.Pap.Ser.1981,11
[60]沈晓昆,王志强,戴网成,等.两种日本稻鸭共作的最新模式[J].农业装备技术,2006,32(5):25-26
[61]Liut.C.C.,Use of azoIla in rice production in China[J].IRRI Los Banos Philippine,1979,375-394
[62]吕书樱.中国绿肥(焦彬主编)[M].北京:农业出版社,1986。560-591
[63]束兆林,储国良,缪康,等.稻-鸭-萍共作对水稻田病虫草的控制效果及增产效应[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(6):72-75
[64]何代福.稻鸭萍共作生态种养技术[J].安徽农学通报。2006,12(8):105
[65]董益坤,董益禄,兰月相,等.稻鸭萍共育增产增效机理及关键技术[J].作物杂志,2004,(4):39-40
[66]董益坤.稻鸭萍共育的关键技术[J].畜禽养殖,2004,27
[67]蓝月相,孙蔚丽,董益坤,等.单季杂交稻田稻鸭萍共育技术初步总结[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(4):44
[68]甄若宏,王强盛,张卫建,等.稻鸭共作对稻田主要病、虫、草的生态控制效应[J].南京农业大学学报.2007,30(2):107-110
[1]甄若宏,王强盛,沈晓昆,等.我国稻鸭共作生态农业的发展现状与技术展望[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):1-5
[2]席运官,钦佩,宗良纲.有机水稻病虫草防治技术与经济效益分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(3):46-49
[3]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004.15(4):639-645
[4]Su Sin Teo.Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail(Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice[J].Crop protection,2001,20(7):599-604
[5]杨治平,刘小燕,黄璜,等.稻田养鸭对稻鸭复合系统中病、虫、草害及蜘蛛的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2756-2760
[6]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-10
[7]章家恩,陆敬雄,张光辉,等.鸭稻共作生态农业模式的功效益分析[J].生态科学,2002,21(1):6-10
[8]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-102
[9]黄璜,杨志辉,王华,等.湿地稻鸭复合系统的CH_4排放[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):929-934
[10]XiangLiu.The effects of integrated Azolla Duck Rice Farming system on weeding,pest control and the behavior of duck[J].Jpn.J.Livest.Management,1996,34(1):13-22
[11]Ekurem EDAR,Ryohei YABUKI.Comparative studies on behavior,weeding and pest control of duck free ranged in paddy fields[J].Jpn.Poult.Sci.,1996,33:261-267
[12]Masahara MANDA."Aigamo"(Crossbred Duck) rice farming in Asia[J].Farming Japan,1996,30:1-4
[13]Ekurem EDAR,Ryohei YABUKI,Koji TAKAYAMA.Comparative studies on growth and meat production of ducks(Malland,ChengValley and Their Crossbred) free ranged in paddy fields[J].Jpn.Poult.Sci.,1996,33:198-204
[14]禹盛苗,欧阳由男,张秋英,等.稻鸭共育复合系统对水稻生长与产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1252-1256
[15]章家恩,赵美玉,陈进,等.鸭稻共作方式对水稻生长的影响[J].生态科学,2005,24(2):117-19
[16]刘小燕,刘大志,陈艳芬,等.稻-鸭-鱼共栖生态系统中水稻根系特性及经济效益[J].湖南农 业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,31(3):314-316
[17]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005
[18]王强盛,丁艳锋,严定春,等.不同施氮量对水稻旱育秧苗形态特征和生理特性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(3):11-14
[19]赵全志,高尔明,黄丕生,等.水稻穗颈节与基部节间伤流的比较及其氮素调控研究[J].作物学报,2001,27(1):103-109
[20]中华人民共和国国家标准-优质稻谷(GB/T17891-1999)[M].中国标准出版社,1999,7-9
[21]蔡武城,袁厚积.生物物质常用化学分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,15-16
[22]何照范.粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社.1985,72-75
[23]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会编.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].科学出版社,1999
[24]Brabender M.The new MICRO-VISCO-AMYLO-GRAPH:oomparison of some results with those of the Viscograph.Poster presentation at 1995 American Association of Cereal Chemists Annual Meeting,Minneapoils.1998
[25]Tomio I,Masahiko T,Eiko A,et al.Distribution of amylase,nitrogen,and minerals in rice kernels with various characters[J].J.Agric.Food Chem.2003,54,526-532
[26]朱新开,王祥菊,郭凯泉,等.小麦倒伏的茎秆特征及对产量和品质的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2006,26(1):87-92
[27]王勇,李朝恒,李安飞,等.小麦品种茎秆质量的初步研究[J].麦类作物,1997,17(3):28-31
[28]Lin Hal,Huijun Guo,Shihe Xian,Guoliang Jiang,Xiuying Zhang,Changsheng Yan,Zhiyong Xin,Jizeng Jia.Quantitative trait loci(QTL) of stem strength and related traits in a doubled-haploid population of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.).Euphytica,2005,141:1-9
[29]Takayuki Kashiwagi,Ken Ishimaru.Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice.Plant Physiology,2004,134:676-683
[30]Changming Yang,Linzhang Yang,Yongxing Yang,Zhu Ouyang.Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils.Agricultural water management,2004,70(1):67-81
[31]Ghosh AK and PK Bhattacharya.Influence of nitrogen and growing season on the genetic variability of protein content in semidwarf high-yielding rice varieties[J].Indian J.Agric.Sci.,1980,59(5):398-401
[32]钟旭华.稻米垩白形成与籽粒灌浆动态的关系[J].江西农业学报,1995,7(1):55-60
[33]程方民,钟连进,舒庆尧,等.早籼水稻垩白部位淀粉的蒸煮食味品质特征[J].作物学报,2002,28(3):363-368
[34]蔺万煌,萧浪涛,彭克勤,等.稻米垩白的形成及其调控[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,27(3):235-239
[35]谭震波,况浩池.稻米垩白的研究综述[J].种子,1993,64(2):36-37
[36]赵式英.稻米的垩白[J].国外农学(水稻),1982,(6):43-46
[37]周瑞庆.施肥对稻米品质和产量影响的研究[J].湖南农学院学报,1989,15(3):1-57
[38]封晋.影响优质水稻米质的环境条件及高产条件及高产栽培技术[J].湖南农业科学,1991,(3):4-6
[39]金正勋,秋太权,孙艳丽,等.氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(1):31-35
[40]田代一亨.稻米腹白形成机制的研究Ⅳ抽穗期施氮对腹白形成的影响[J].日作记,1972,(48):99-106
[41]周拾禄.稻作科学技术[M].北京;农业出版社,1981:263-266
[42]吉志军.稻米品质形成对氮素穗肥的响应及生理机制[D].2004,南京农业大学硕士论文,38-46
[43]Bason M L,Blakcncy A B,Booth R I.Assessing rice quality using the RVA results of an international collaborative trial[J].RVA World,1994,(6):2-5
[44]Reddy K R,Suhramanian R,Zakiuddin S A.Viscoelastic properties of rice flour pastes and the rice relationship to amylase content and rice quality[J].Cereal Chem,1994,71:548-552
[45]黄发松,孙宗修,胡培松.食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望[J].中国水稻科学,1998,12(3):172-176
[46]Lim S.Varietal variation of amylogram properties and its relationship with other eating quality characteristics in rice[J].Korean J Breeding,1995,27(3):268-275
[47]Kim K H.Varietal variation of cooking quality and interrelationship between cooking and pysicochemical properties of rice grain[J].Korean J Crop Sci,1994,39(1):45-54
[48]Kim K H.Varietal and environmental variation of gel consistency of rice flour[J].Korean J Crop Sci.1993,38(1):38-45
[49]Cheong.J I.Effects of slow release fertilizer application on rice grain quality at different culture methods[J].Korean J Crop Sci,1996,41(3):286-294
[50]金正勋,秋太权,孙艳丽,等.黑龙江省稻米蒸煮食味品质特性的品种间变异研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2000,(1):1-4
[51]刘艳阳,张洪程,戴其根,等.不同地力水平下施氮量对水稻淀粉RVA谱特征的影响[J].中 国水稻利学,2006,20(5):529-534
[52]Duan Chuanren,Wang Bochu,Wang Pingqing,Wang Daohong,Cai Shaoxi.Relationship between the minute structure and the lodging resistance of rice stems[l].Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces,2004,35(3-4):155-158
[53]Takayuki Kashiwagi,Ken Ishimaru.Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice[i].Plant Physiology,2004,134:676-683
[54]李金才,尹钧,魏凤珍.播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响[J].作物学报,2005,31(5):662-666
[55]张玉屏,朱德峰,林贤青,等.田间条件下水稻根系分布及其与土壤容重的关系[J].中国水稻科学,2003,17(2):141-144
[56]北京农业大学,西北农业大学,山东农业大学主编.植物生物化学(研究生教材)[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1985
[57]程方民,钟连进.不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析[J].中国水稻科学,2001,15(3):187-191
[58]李晓鸣.矿质镁对水稻产量及品质影响的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2002,8(1):125-126
[59]陈能,罗玉坤,朱智伟,等.食用稻米米饭质地及适口性的研究[J].中国水稻科学,1999,13(3):152-156
[60]Lyon B G,Champagne E T,Vinyard B T,Wiindham W R.Sensory and instrumental relationships of texture of cooked rice from selected cultivars and postharvest handling practices[J].Cereal Chemistry,2000,77(1):64-69
[61]熊善柏,赵思明,李建林,等.米饭理化指标与感官品质的相关性研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(1):83-87
[1]安全食品呼唤洁净土壤.中国绿野,2005
[2]江俊起.不同类型和防治措施稻田害虫和天敌群落结构的研究[D].安徽农业大学硕士论文,2004,5-8
[3]中国水稻生态农业报告[M].绿色和平,2006
[4]苏少泉.杂草学(第1版)[M].北京:农业出版社,1993
[5]王晓红.辽宁省水稻田杂草群落研究[D].沈阳农业大学硕士论文,2005,14-15
[6]唐洪元.上海郊区稻田杂草种群变化及其防除对策[J].杂草学报,1993,7(1):11-16
[7]吉野隆雄.稻田养鸭的实用技术[M].东京:农业渔村文化协会,1992,10-16:121-124
[8]郑永华,等.稻鱼鸭复合生态经济效益的初步研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(4):431-434
[9]甄若宏,王强盛,沈晓昆,等.我国稻鸭共作生态农业的发展现状与技术展望[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):1-5
[10]席运官,钦佩,宗良纲.有机水稻病虫草防治技术与经济效益分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(3):46-49
[11]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):639-645
[12]Su Sin Teo.Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail(Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice[J].Crop protection,2001,20(7):599-604
[13]杨治平,刘小燕,黄璜,等.稻田养鸭对稻鸭复合系统中病、虫、草害及蜘蛛的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2756-2760
[14]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-102
[15]朱凤姑,丰庆生,诸葛梓.稻鸭生态结构对稻田有害生物群落的控制作用[J].浙江农业学报,2004,16(1):37-41
[16]魏守辉,强胜,马波,等.稻鸭共作及其它控草措施对稻田杂草群落的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1067-1071
[17]戴志明,杨华松,张曦,等.云南稻-鸭共生模式效益的研究及综合评价(三)[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(4):265-267
[18]熊国远,朱秀柏,陈周前,等.稻鸭共生技术示范推广报告[J].当代畜牧,2003,(10):4-6
[19]童泽霞.稻田养鸭与稻田生物种群的关系初探[J].中国稻米,2002,(1):33-34.
[20]刘小燕,杨治平,黄璜,等.湿地稻-鸭复合系统中水稻纹枯病的变化规律[J].生态学报,2004, 24(11):2579-258
[21]中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室编.土壤物理性质测定[M].北京:科学出版社,1978
[22]鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005
[23]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004.15(4):639-645
[24]Cardina J,Herms CP,Doohan DJ.Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks[J].Weed science,2002,50:448-460
[25]Shrestha A,Knezeric SZ,Roy RC,et al.Effect of tillage,cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil[J].Weed research,2002,42:76-87
[26]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239
[27]马克平,刘灿然,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅱβ多样性的测度方法[J].生物多样性,1995,3(1):38-43
[28]张左生.粮油作物病虫鼠害预测预报[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1994:8-268
[29]浙江省农业科学院植物保护研究所-病毒病研究组编.水稻病毒病[M].北京:农业出版社,1975,102-108
[30]JUO A S R,LAL R.Nutrient profile in a tropical alfisol under onventional and no-till systems[J].Soil Science,1979,127:168-173
[31]高亚军,朱培立,黄东迈,等.稻麦轮作条件下长期不同土壤管理对有机质和全氮的影响[J].土壤与环境,2000,9(1):27-30
[32]舒廷飞,温琰茂,汤叶涛.养殖水环境中氮的循环与平衡[J].水产科学,2002,21(2):30-34
[33]徐琪,杨林章,董元华,等.中国稻田生态系统[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998,140-146
[34]Christian R.The effect of submerged aquatic vegetation on phytoplankton and water quality in the trial freshwater Potomac river[J].J Freshw Ecol,1990,5(3):279-288
[35]秦玉金,焦骏森,鞠国钢,等,旱直播水稻田出草规律及防除技术初探[J].杂草科学,2006,(2):20-23
[36]姚永加,朱文龙,郭如文,等.机插稻大田化学除草技术初探[J].农业装备技术,2004,30(1):27-28
[37]张宗炳.农药对农田生态系统的影响[J].生态学杂志,1988,7(3):25-29
[38]吴春华,陈欣.农药对农区生物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(2):341-344
[39]李永丰,李宜慰,刘正道,等.抗药性杂草种群的发展及其防治对策[J].江西农业大学学报,1999.21(1):42-46
[40]刘小燕,杨治平,黄磺,等.湿地稻-鸭复合系统中田间杂草的变化规律[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,30(3):292-294
[41]强胜,沈俊明,张成群,等.种植制度对江苏省棉田杂草群落影响的研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(2):278-282
[42]邓玲玲,许木启,戴家银,等.农药对农田蜘蛛生态效应的研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2005,11(4),509-513
[43]谭荫初.稻飞虱、纹枯病共生的特点与防治[J].植保技术与推广,1997,17(6):15
[44]沈晓昆.稻鸭共作-无公害有机稻米生产新技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2003,26-35
[45]王宏康.水体污染与防治概论[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1991,85-119
[46]朱金明,施其俊,胡南河,等.稻鸭共育对稻田土壤理化性状的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(12):2803
[47]杨志辉,黄璜,王华.稻-鸭复合生态系统稻田土壤质量研究[J].土壤通报,2004,35(2):117-121
[48]Belyea LR,Lancaster J.Assembly rules within a contingent ecology[J].Oikos,1999,86:402-416
[49]Legere A,Samson DN.Relative influence of crop rotation,tillage,and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping system[J].Weed science,1999,47:112-122
[50]程兆榜,杨荣明,周益军,等.江苏稻区水稻条纹叶枯病发生新规律[J].江苏农业科学,2002,(1):39-41
[51]邰德良,李瑛,梅爱中,等.2004年稻田灰飞虱重发原因分析与控制对策[J].中国植保导刊,2005,25(3):33-35
[52]蔡祝南,吴蔚文,高君川.水稻病虫害防治[M].北京:金盾出版社,1992
[53]《中国农作物病虫图谱》编绘组.中国农作物病虫图谱,第一分册,水稻病虫[M].北京:农业出版社,1994
[54]蒋明星,程家安.不同施肥水平对水稻上白背飞虱种群的影响[J].中国农业科学,2003,17(3):270-274
[1]樊小林,史俊通.土壤肥料科学[M].西安:世界书籍出版公司,1995,1-20
[2]Sommerfeldt TG.Chang G,Entz T.Long-term annual application in crease soil organic matter and nitrogen and decrease carbon to nitrogen ratio[J].Soil Sci Soc Amer J,1988,52(6):1668-1673
[3]谢建昌.世界的粮食与肥料问题[J].土壤学进展,1994,22(3):1-19
[4]郝学宁,田种存,刘雪莲,等.化肥污染与环境保护[J].资源保护与利用,2000(3):39-40
[5]Lal,R.& Stewart,B.A.(Eds.).Soil Degradation[J].Advance in Soil Science,1990,11:1-12
[6]陈世正,杨邦俊,宋光煜.稻草还田对土壤肥力与作物产量的影响仁[J].土壤肥料,1995(4):13-17
[7]周卫军,王凯荣,张光远,等.施肥进步在红镶稻作区水稻增产中的贡献及其对土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤通报,2002,33(3):197-201
[8]王英.不同状态有机物料对土壤腐殖质及作物产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2002,33(2):156-157
[9]廖海秋,施卫明,严蔚东,等.有机无机肥配施对潜育性水稻土肥力水平的影响[J].土壤通报,1998,29(6):248-249
[10]张本元.有机无机肥配施对小麦、水稻产量的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2001,7(6):53-54
[11]高菊生.秦道珠,刘更另,等.长期施用有机肥对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J].耕作与栽培,2002,(2):31-33
[12]李国学,张福锁.固体废物堆肥化与有机复混肥生产[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2000
[13]刘杰.有机一无机复混肥料对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2002,(2):25-27
[14]温荣夫.化肥合理使用与农业可持续发展[J].当代生态农业,1998,(1):52-54
[15]方珊清,孙时银,汪雪薇.发展绿肥生产是生态农业建设的有效措施[J].安徽农学通报,2004,10(2):68
[16]甄若宏,王强盛,沈晓昆,等.我国稻鸭共作生态农业的发展现状与技术展望[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):1-5
[17]朱清海,李毓鹏,徐春河,等.稻-萍-蟹立体农业的效益[J].生态学杂志,1994,13(5):1-4
[18]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:农业出版社,2000,14-113.
[19]沈宏,曹志洪.不同农田土壤养分可持续性指数的研究[J].农村生态环境,1998,14(3):35-39
[20]中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室编.土壤物理性质测定[M].北京:科学出版社,1978
[21]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ α多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性, 1994,Z(4):Z31-239
[22]张左生.粮油作物病虫鼠害预测预报[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1994,8-268
[23]浙江省农业科学院植物保护研究所-病毒病研究组编.水稻病毒病[M].北京:农业出版社,1975,102-108
[24]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):639-645
[25]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999,169-259
[26]翁伯奇,唐建阳,陈炳焕,等.稻萍鱼体系中红萍供氮的特点[J].核农学报,1992,6(1):51-56
[27]黄毅斌.红萍在稻萍鱼体系中的部分作用研究[J].福建农业科技,1991,(4):8-10
[28]张钟先,刘中柱,宋永康,等.红萍钾在稻萍鱼共生系中循环利用研究[J].应用生态学报,1991,2(3):226-231
[29]高恩广.稻田放养翻压细绿萍的培肥与增产作用分析[J].垦殖与农作,2003,(2):36-37
[30]苏凤岩,闻大中,徐卿德,等.北方稻田生态系统研究Ⅰ稻萍结合系统的结构研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(2):179-184
[31]Liut.C.C.Use of Azolla in rice reduction in China[J].Nitrogen and Rice Los Banos Philiphiues,1979,375-394
[32]Mian M.H.A 15N tracer study to compare nitrogen supply by Azolla and ammonium sulphate to IR8 rice plants grown under flooded condition[J].Plant and Soil,1985,83(3):371-379
[33]lto O.and I.Watadabe.Availability to rice plants of nitrogen fixed by Azolla[j].Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,1985,31(1):91-105
[34]Li shi-ye.Azolla in the paddy fields of Eastern China[J].Organic Matter and Rice,1984,169-178
[35]董益坤,董益禄,兰月相,等.稻鸭萍共育增产增效机理及关键技术[J].作物杂志,2004,(4):39-40
[36]束兆林,储国良,缪康,等.稻-鸭-萍共作对水稻田病虫草的控制效果及增产效应[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(6):72-75
[37]何代福.稻鸭萍共作生态种养技术[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(8):105
[38]蓝月相,孙蔚丽,董益坤,等.单季杂交稻田稻鸭萍共育技术初步总结[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(4):44
[39]李学恒,王启发,徐凤琳,等.稻草还田对土壤钾磷锌的吸附-解吸及其有效性的硬性[J].华 中农业大学学报,2000,19:227-232
[40]王凯荣,刘鑫,周卫军,等.稻田系统养分循环利用对土壤肥力和可持续生产力的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2004,23(6):1041-1045
[41]甄若宏,王强盛,邓建平,等.稻鸭萍共作复合系统的主要生态效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):11-14
[42]唐建阳,翁伯奇,何萍,等.提高稻田尿素氮利用率若干方法与机理探讨[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(3):242-248
[43]翁伯奇,唐建阳,陈炳焕,等.稻-萍-鱼系统中红萍氮素吸收利用及有效性研究[J].生态学报,1991,11(1):25-31
[44]翁伯奇,陈炳焕,唐建阳,等.~(15)N示踪法研究稻萍鱼体系中红萍氮素的利用及对水稻生长的影响[J].福建省农科院学报,1987,2(1):16-24
[45]沈晓昆,王志强,戴网成,等.两种日本稻鸭共作的最新模式[J].农业装备技术,2006,32(5):25-26
[1]蔡晓明.生态系统生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2000
[2]骆世明.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001
[3]汪金平.南方双季稻田秸秆厢沟腐熟还田新型免耕耕作技术研究[D].南京农业大学博士论文,2003
[4]甄若宏,王强盛,邓建平,等.稻鸭萍共作复合系统的主要生态效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):11-14
[5]董益坤,董益禄,兰月相,等.稻鸭萍共育增产增效机理及关键技术[J].作物杂志,2004,(4):39-40
[6]束兆林,储国良,缪康,等.稻-鸭-萍共作对水稻田病虫草的控制效果及增产效应[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(6):72-75
[7]何代福.稻鸭萍共作生态种养技术[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(8):105
[8]蓝月相,孙蔚丽,董益坤,等.单季杂交稻田稻鸭萍共育技术初步总结[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(4):44
[9]席运管,钦佩.稻鸭共作有机农业模式的能值评估[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(2):237-242
[10]陈阜.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2001
[11]闻大中.农业生态系统研究方法(一)[J].农村生态环境,1985,(4):47-52
[12]闻大中.农业生态系统研究方法(二)[J].农村生态环境,1986,(1):52-56
[13]刘巽浩.我国不同地区生态系统能量转化效率的初步研究[J].北京农业大学学报,1982,8(1):47-53
[14]江苏太湖地区农田生态协作组.江苏太湖地区几种种植制度的能量转换状况[J].生态学杂志,1984,(6):19-22
[15]鲁如坤,刘鸿翔,闻大中,等.我国典型地区农业生态系统养分循环和平衡研究Ⅰ农田养分支出参数[J].土壤通报,1996,27(4):145-151
[16]鲁如坤,刘鸿翔,闻大中,等.我国典型地区农业生态系统养分循环和平衡研究Ⅱ农田养分收入参数[J].土壤通报,1996,27(4):151-154
[17]青先国,李建国.双季稻田吨粮种植模式经济生态技术效益研究[M].湖南师范大学出版社,1997,78-91
[18]刘巽浩.我国不同地区生态系统能量转化效率的初步研究[J].北京农业大学学报,1982,8(1):47-53
[19]Panesat B S,Fluck R C.Energy productivity of a production system:Analysis and measurement[J].Agric Sys.1993,43(4):415-437
[20]Bastianoni S,Marchettini N,Panzieri M,etal.Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area(Italy)[J].J Cleaner Prod,2001,9:364-373
[21]陆宏芳,彭少麟,蓝盛芳,等.基塘农业生态工程模式的能值评估[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1622-1626
[2]湿地国际-中国项目,中国林业部自然保护司,世界自然基金会湿地效益,北京:中国林业部野生动物和森林植物保护司,1997
[3]陆健健.中国湿地[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1989
[4]Giller P S,Hildrew A G,Raffaelli D O et al.Aquatic ecology:Scale,Pattern and Process[M].Landon:Blackwell Science Press,1992
[5]郎慧卿,林鹏,陆健健.中国湿地研究与保护[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1998
[6]安树青.湿地生态工程[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003
[7]付为国.镇江内江湿地植物群落演替规律及植被修复策略[D].南京农业大学,博士学位论文,2006
[8]中国水稻生态农业报告.绿色和平[M].2006
[9]化工农业走到穷途.中国稻米,农业资讯,2007
[10]陈丹,罗朝晖.稻田生态系统服务及其经济价值评估方法探讨[J].环境科学与技术,2005,28(6):61-63
[11]王向阳,邹运鼎,孟庆雷,等.两种除草剂对棉田节肢动物群落多样性指数的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):514-518
[12]王敬国.农用化学物质的利用与污染控制[M].北京:北京出版社,2001,177-195
[13]Haynes K Y.Sublethal effects of neurotoxic insecticides on insect behavior[J].Ann Rev Ent,1988,33:149-155
[14]农田生物多样性与害虫综合治理,丽水农技论坛,百度网站,2006
[15]国家农村小康环保行动计划.国家环境保护总局,2006
[16]欧晓明,余淑英,林雪梅,等.几种杀虫剂混用对粘虫增效作用的研究[J].华中农业大学学报,1999,18(1):50-57
[17]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):639-645
[18]沈晓昆.稻鸭共作无公害有机稻米生产新技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2003:26-124
[19]冉茂林,陈铮,谷义成.我国稻田养鸭的发展及研究现状[J].中国畜牧杂志,1993,29(5):58-60
[20]滕建军.稻鸭共栖的矛盾与对策[J].家畜生态,1994,15(1):2-26
[21]许德海,禹盛苗.无公害高效益稻鸭共育新技术[J].中国稻米,2002(3):36-38
[22]徐亲阳,金千瑜,章蓉蓉.稻鸭共育一项安全 绿色 高效 实用的新技术[J].中国稻米,2003(3):42
[23]熊国远,朱秀柏.稻鸭共生绿色农业生产技术初探[J].饲业,2003,24(4):28-30
[24]马国强,庄雅津,周铭成.稻鸭共作无公害水稻生产技术[J].农业装备技术,2002,28(2):20-21
[25]Su Sin Teo.Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail(Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice[J].Crop protection,2001,20(7):599-604
[26]魏守辉,强胜,马波,等.稻鸭共作及其它控草措施对稻田杂草群落的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1067-1071
[27]彭凤梅,戴志明,万田正治,等.云南稻鸭共生模式效益的与综合评价(一)[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(3):34-36
[28]杨华松,戴志明,万田正治,等.云南稻鸭共生模式效益的与综合评价(二)[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(5):23-24
[29]李克勤,黄璜,任泽明.湖南稻鸭生态种养与频振式诱蛾灯示范成效与技术[J].中国稻米,2003(5):35-37
[30]朱克明,沈晓昆,谢桐洲,等.稻鸭共作技术试验初报[J].农业科学,2001,29(2):262-264
[31]王缨,雷慰慈.稻田种养模式生态效益研究[J].生态学报,20(2):311-316
[32]王成豹,马成武,陈海星.稻鸭共作生产有机稻的效果[J].农业科学,2003(4):194-196
[33]朱凤姑,丰庆生,诸葛梓.稻鸭生态结构对稻田有害生物种群控制作用[J].浙江农业学报,2004,16(1):37-41
[34]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-102
[35]黄璜,杨志辉,王华,等.湿地稻鸭复合系统的CH4捧放[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):929-934
[36]王华,黄璜,杨志辉,等.湿地稻鸭复合生态系统综合效益[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(4):23-26
[37]熊国远,朱秀柏.稻鸭共生技术的实施程序及技术要点[J].家禽养殖,2003(11):12-13
[38]章家恩,陆敬雄,张光辉,等.鸭稻共作生态农业模式的功能效益分析[J].生态科学,2002,21(1):6-10
[39]唐建阳,翁伯奇,黄毅斌,等.稻田甲烷捧放机理和调控技术[J].中国农业大学学报,1998,3(3):101-105
[40]Lindau C W and Bollich P K.Methane emissions from Louisiana first and Ratoon crop rice[J].Soil Sci,1993,156:42-48
[41]唐龙飞,黄毅斌,翁伯奇,等.稻田高效、低耗、低污染的持续农业模式研究[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(3):60-66
[42]黄毅斌,翁伯奇,唐建阳,等.稻-萍-鱼体系对稻田土壤环境的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(1):74-76
[43]Huang Y,Wang H,Huang H,etc.Characteristics of methane emission from wetland rice-duck complex ecosystem[j].Agriculture Ecosystem s& Environment,2005,105:181-193
[44]Schimel J P,Gulledge J.Microbial community structure and global trace gases[J].Global Change Biology,1998,4:745-758
[45]Sebacher D I,Harriss R C,Bartlett K B,etc Atmospheric methane sources:Alaskan tundra bogs,an alpine fen,and a subarctic boreal marsh[J].Tellus,38B:1-10
[46]李晶,王明星,陈德章.水稻田甲烷的减排方法研究及评价[J].大气科学,1998,22(3):354-362
[47]Lindau C W,Bollich P K,Delaune R D,etc.Effect of urea fertilizer and environmental factors on methane emissions from a Louisiana,USA rice field[J].Plant and Soil,1991,136:195-203
[48]章家恩,赵美玉,陈进,等.鸭稻共作方式对水稻生长的影响[J].生态科学,2005,24(2):117-19.
[49]禹盛苗,欧阳由男,张秋英,等.稻鸭共育复合系统对水稻生长与产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1252-1256.
[50]施关林,秦忠耀,汪美良.适宜稻鸭共育的家鸭与疫病预防[J].中国家禽,2003,25(12):19-20
[51]朱克明,张利民,张建国.水稻有机栽培密度试验[J].农业技术,2003,29(1):26-27
[52]鲁建国,徐正国,余晋洋,等.稻鸭共育配套技术初探[J].农业科技,2003(4):60-61
[53]朱克明,张利民,张建国,等.水稻有机栽培肥料运筹试验益分析[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(1):141-143
[54]陈金星,景建华,储金根,等.稻鸭共作促花肥的使用对水量的效应探讨[J].农业装备技术,2003,29(3):28
[55]翁伯奇,唐建阳,应朝阳,等.闽北山垄田稻萍鱼共生体系与萍体氮素循环利用效率研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(2):138-144
[56]沈晓昆,王志强,戴网成,等.应用稻鸭共作技术实现水稻可持续生产[J].中国稻米,2005,(2):21-22
[57]甄若宏,王强盛,邓建平,等.稻鸭萍共作复合系统的主要生态效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):11-14
[58]刘浩官,李平,祝卫华,等.稻萍鱼生态体系控制稻飞虱和纹枯病试验[J].福建农业科技,1985,14-14
[59]Watanabe Ⅰ.,Utilization of the Azolla-Anabaena complex as nitrogen fertilizer for rice[J].IRRI Res.Pap.Ser.1981,11
[60]沈晓昆,王志强,戴网成,等.两种日本稻鸭共作的最新模式[J].农业装备技术,2006,32(5):25-26
[61]Liut.C.C.,Use of azoIla in rice production in China[J].IRRI Los Banos Philippine,1979,375-394
[62]吕书樱.中国绿肥(焦彬主编)[M].北京:农业出版社,1986。560-591
[63]束兆林,储国良,缪康,等.稻-鸭-萍共作对水稻田病虫草的控制效果及增产效应[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(6):72-75
[64]何代福.稻鸭萍共作生态种养技术[J].安徽农学通报。2006,12(8):105
[65]董益坤,董益禄,兰月相,等.稻鸭萍共育增产增效机理及关键技术[J].作物杂志,2004,(4):39-40
[66]董益坤.稻鸭萍共育的关键技术[J].畜禽养殖,2004,27
[67]蓝月相,孙蔚丽,董益坤,等.单季杂交稻田稻鸭萍共育技术初步总结[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(4):44
[68]甄若宏,王强盛,张卫建,等.稻鸭共作对稻田主要病、虫、草的生态控制效应[J].南京农业大学学报.2007,30(2):107-110
[1]甄若宏,王强盛,沈晓昆,等.我国稻鸭共作生态农业的发展现状与技术展望[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):1-5
[2]席运官,钦佩,宗良纲.有机水稻病虫草防治技术与经济效益分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(3):46-49
[3]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004.15(4):639-645
[4]Su Sin Teo.Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail(Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice[J].Crop protection,2001,20(7):599-604
[5]杨治平,刘小燕,黄璜,等.稻田养鸭对稻鸭复合系统中病、虫、草害及蜘蛛的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2756-2760
[6]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-10
[7]章家恩,陆敬雄,张光辉,等.鸭稻共作生态农业模式的功效益分析[J].生态科学,2002,21(1):6-10
[8]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-102
[9]黄璜,杨志辉,王华,等.湿地稻鸭复合系统的CH_4排放[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):929-934
[10]XiangLiu.The effects of integrated Azolla Duck Rice Farming system on weeding,pest control and the behavior of duck[J].Jpn.J.Livest.Management,1996,34(1):13-22
[11]Ekurem EDAR,Ryohei YABUKI.Comparative studies on behavior,weeding and pest control of duck free ranged in paddy fields[J].Jpn.Poult.Sci.,1996,33:261-267
[12]Masahara MANDA."Aigamo"(Crossbred Duck) rice farming in Asia[J].Farming Japan,1996,30:1-4
[13]Ekurem EDAR,Ryohei YABUKI,Koji TAKAYAMA.Comparative studies on growth and meat production of ducks(Malland,ChengValley and Their Crossbred) free ranged in paddy fields[J].Jpn.Poult.Sci.,1996,33:198-204
[14]禹盛苗,欧阳由男,张秋英,等.稻鸭共育复合系统对水稻生长与产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1252-1256
[15]章家恩,赵美玉,陈进,等.鸭稻共作方式对水稻生长的影响[J].生态科学,2005,24(2):117-19
[16]刘小燕,刘大志,陈艳芬,等.稻-鸭-鱼共栖生态系统中水稻根系特性及经济效益[J].湖南农 业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,31(3):314-316
[17]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005
[18]王强盛,丁艳锋,严定春,等.不同施氮量对水稻旱育秧苗形态特征和生理特性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(3):11-14
[19]赵全志,高尔明,黄丕生,等.水稻穗颈节与基部节间伤流的比较及其氮素调控研究[J].作物学报,2001,27(1):103-109
[20]中华人民共和国国家标准-优质稻谷(GB/T17891-1999)[M].中国标准出版社,1999,7-9
[21]蔡武城,袁厚积.生物物质常用化学分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,15-16
[22]何照范.粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社.1985,72-75
[23]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会编.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].科学出版社,1999
[24]Brabender M.The new MICRO-VISCO-AMYLO-GRAPH:oomparison of some results with those of the Viscograph.Poster presentation at 1995 American Association of Cereal Chemists Annual Meeting,Minneapoils.1998
[25]Tomio I,Masahiko T,Eiko A,et al.Distribution of amylase,nitrogen,and minerals in rice kernels with various characters[J].J.Agric.Food Chem.2003,54,526-532
[26]朱新开,王祥菊,郭凯泉,等.小麦倒伏的茎秆特征及对产量和品质的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2006,26(1):87-92
[27]王勇,李朝恒,李安飞,等.小麦品种茎秆质量的初步研究[J].麦类作物,1997,17(3):28-31
[28]Lin Hal,Huijun Guo,Shihe Xian,Guoliang Jiang,Xiuying Zhang,Changsheng Yan,Zhiyong Xin,Jizeng Jia.Quantitative trait loci(QTL) of stem strength and related traits in a doubled-haploid population of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.).Euphytica,2005,141:1-9
[29]Takayuki Kashiwagi,Ken Ishimaru.Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice.Plant Physiology,2004,134:676-683
[30]Changming Yang,Linzhang Yang,Yongxing Yang,Zhu Ouyang.Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils.Agricultural water management,2004,70(1):67-81
[31]Ghosh AK and PK Bhattacharya.Influence of nitrogen and growing season on the genetic variability of protein content in semidwarf high-yielding rice varieties[J].Indian J.Agric.Sci.,1980,59(5):398-401
[32]钟旭华.稻米垩白形成与籽粒灌浆动态的关系[J].江西农业学报,1995,7(1):55-60
[33]程方民,钟连进,舒庆尧,等.早籼水稻垩白部位淀粉的蒸煮食味品质特征[J].作物学报,2002,28(3):363-368
[34]蔺万煌,萧浪涛,彭克勤,等.稻米垩白的形成及其调控[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,27(3):235-239
[35]谭震波,况浩池.稻米垩白的研究综述[J].种子,1993,64(2):36-37
[36]赵式英.稻米的垩白[J].国外农学(水稻),1982,(6):43-46
[37]周瑞庆.施肥对稻米品质和产量影响的研究[J].湖南农学院学报,1989,15(3):1-57
[38]封晋.影响优质水稻米质的环境条件及高产条件及高产栽培技术[J].湖南农业科学,1991,(3):4-6
[39]金正勋,秋太权,孙艳丽,等.氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(1):31-35
[40]田代一亨.稻米腹白形成机制的研究Ⅳ抽穗期施氮对腹白形成的影响[J].日作记,1972,(48):99-106
[41]周拾禄.稻作科学技术[M].北京;农业出版社,1981:263-266
[42]吉志军.稻米品质形成对氮素穗肥的响应及生理机制[D].2004,南京农业大学硕士论文,38-46
[43]Bason M L,Blakcncy A B,Booth R I.Assessing rice quality using the RVA results of an international collaborative trial[J].RVA World,1994,(6):2-5
[44]Reddy K R,Suhramanian R,Zakiuddin S A.Viscoelastic properties of rice flour pastes and the rice relationship to amylase content and rice quality[J].Cereal Chem,1994,71:548-552
[45]黄发松,孙宗修,胡培松.食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望[J].中国水稻科学,1998,12(3):172-176
[46]Lim S.Varietal variation of amylogram properties and its relationship with other eating quality characteristics in rice[J].Korean J Breeding,1995,27(3):268-275
[47]Kim K H.Varietal variation of cooking quality and interrelationship between cooking and pysicochemical properties of rice grain[J].Korean J Crop Sci,1994,39(1):45-54
[48]Kim K H.Varietal and environmental variation of gel consistency of rice flour[J].Korean J Crop Sci.1993,38(1):38-45
[49]Cheong.J I.Effects of slow release fertilizer application on rice grain quality at different culture methods[J].Korean J Crop Sci,1996,41(3):286-294
[50]金正勋,秋太权,孙艳丽,等.黑龙江省稻米蒸煮食味品质特性的品种间变异研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2000,(1):1-4
[51]刘艳阳,张洪程,戴其根,等.不同地力水平下施氮量对水稻淀粉RVA谱特征的影响[J].中 国水稻利学,2006,20(5):529-534
[52]Duan Chuanren,Wang Bochu,Wang Pingqing,Wang Daohong,Cai Shaoxi.Relationship between the minute structure and the lodging resistance of rice stems[l].Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces,2004,35(3-4):155-158
[53]Takayuki Kashiwagi,Ken Ishimaru.Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice[i].Plant Physiology,2004,134:676-683
[54]李金才,尹钧,魏凤珍.播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响[J].作物学报,2005,31(5):662-666
[55]张玉屏,朱德峰,林贤青,等.田间条件下水稻根系分布及其与土壤容重的关系[J].中国水稻科学,2003,17(2):141-144
[56]北京农业大学,西北农业大学,山东农业大学主编.植物生物化学(研究生教材)[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1985
[57]程方民,钟连进.不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析[J].中国水稻科学,2001,15(3):187-191
[58]李晓鸣.矿质镁对水稻产量及品质影响的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2002,8(1):125-126
[59]陈能,罗玉坤,朱智伟,等.食用稻米米饭质地及适口性的研究[J].中国水稻科学,1999,13(3):152-156
[60]Lyon B G,Champagne E T,Vinyard B T,Wiindham W R.Sensory and instrumental relationships of texture of cooked rice from selected cultivars and postharvest handling practices[J].Cereal Chemistry,2000,77(1):64-69
[61]熊善柏,赵思明,李建林,等.米饭理化指标与感官品质的相关性研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(1):83-87
[1]安全食品呼唤洁净土壤.中国绿野,2005
[2]江俊起.不同类型和防治措施稻田害虫和天敌群落结构的研究[D].安徽农业大学硕士论文,2004,5-8
[3]中国水稻生态农业报告[M].绿色和平,2006
[4]苏少泉.杂草学(第1版)[M].北京:农业出版社,1993
[5]王晓红.辽宁省水稻田杂草群落研究[D].沈阳农业大学硕士论文,2005,14-15
[6]唐洪元.上海郊区稻田杂草种群变化及其防除对策[J].杂草学报,1993,7(1):11-16
[7]吉野隆雄.稻田养鸭的实用技术[M].东京:农业渔村文化协会,1992,10-16:121-124
[8]郑永华,等.稻鱼鸭复合生态经济效益的初步研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(4):431-434
[9]甄若宏,王强盛,沈晓昆,等.我国稻鸭共作生态农业的发展现状与技术展望[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):1-5
[10]席运官,钦佩,宗良纲.有机水稻病虫草防治技术与经济效益分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2004,27(3):46-49
[11]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):639-645
[12]Su Sin Teo.Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control of the golden apple snail(Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted and direct seeded rice[J].Crop protection,2001,20(7):599-604
[13]杨治平,刘小燕,黄璜,等.稻田养鸭对稻鸭复合系统中病、虫、草害及蜘蛛的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2756-2760
[14]禹盛苗,金千瑜,欧阳由男,等.稻鸭共育对稻田杂草和病虫害的生物防治效应[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(2):99-102
[15]朱凤姑,丰庆生,诸葛梓.稻鸭生态结构对稻田有害生物群落的控制作用[J].浙江农业学报,2004,16(1):37-41
[16]魏守辉,强胜,马波,等.稻鸭共作及其它控草措施对稻田杂草群落的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1067-1071
[17]戴志明,杨华松,张曦,等.云南稻-鸭共生模式效益的研究及综合评价(三)[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(4):265-267
[18]熊国远,朱秀柏,陈周前,等.稻鸭共生技术示范推广报告[J].当代畜牧,2003,(10):4-6
[19]童泽霞.稻田养鸭与稻田生物种群的关系初探[J].中国稻米,2002,(1):33-34.
[20]刘小燕,杨治平,黄璜,等.湿地稻-鸭复合系统中水稻纹枯病的变化规律[J].生态学报,2004, 24(11):2579-258
[21]中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室编.土壤物理性质测定[M].北京:科学出版社,1978
[22]鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005
[23]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004.15(4):639-645
[24]Cardina J,Herms CP,Doohan DJ.Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks[J].Weed science,2002,50:448-460
[25]Shrestha A,Knezeric SZ,Roy RC,et al.Effect of tillage,cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil[J].Weed research,2002,42:76-87
[26]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239
[27]马克平,刘灿然,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅱβ多样性的测度方法[J].生物多样性,1995,3(1):38-43
[28]张左生.粮油作物病虫鼠害预测预报[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1994:8-268
[29]浙江省农业科学院植物保护研究所-病毒病研究组编.水稻病毒病[M].北京:农业出版社,1975,102-108
[30]JUO A S R,LAL R.Nutrient profile in a tropical alfisol under onventional and no-till systems[J].Soil Science,1979,127:168-173
[31]高亚军,朱培立,黄东迈,等.稻麦轮作条件下长期不同土壤管理对有机质和全氮的影响[J].土壤与环境,2000,9(1):27-30
[32]舒廷飞,温琰茂,汤叶涛.养殖水环境中氮的循环与平衡[J].水产科学,2002,21(2):30-34
[33]徐琪,杨林章,董元华,等.中国稻田生态系统[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998,140-146
[34]Christian R.The effect of submerged aquatic vegetation on phytoplankton and water quality in the trial freshwater Potomac river[J].J Freshw Ecol,1990,5(3):279-288
[35]秦玉金,焦骏森,鞠国钢,等,旱直播水稻田出草规律及防除技术初探[J].杂草科学,2006,(2):20-23
[36]姚永加,朱文龙,郭如文,等.机插稻大田化学除草技术初探[J].农业装备技术,2004,30(1):27-28
[37]张宗炳.农药对农田生态系统的影响[J].生态学杂志,1988,7(3):25-29
[38]吴春华,陈欣.农药对农区生物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(2):341-344
[39]李永丰,李宜慰,刘正道,等.抗药性杂草种群的发展及其防治对策[J].江西农业大学学报,1999.21(1):42-46
[40]刘小燕,杨治平,黄磺,等.湿地稻-鸭复合系统中田间杂草的变化规律[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,30(3):292-294
[41]强胜,沈俊明,张成群,等.种植制度对江苏省棉田杂草群落影响的研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(2):278-282
[42]邓玲玲,许木启,戴家银,等.农药对农田蜘蛛生态效应的研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2005,11(4),509-513
[43]谭荫初.稻飞虱、纹枯病共生的特点与防治[J].植保技术与推广,1997,17(6):15
[44]沈晓昆.稻鸭共作-无公害有机稻米生产新技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2003,26-35
[45]王宏康.水体污染与防治概论[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1991,85-119
[46]朱金明,施其俊,胡南河,等.稻鸭共育对稻田土壤理化性状的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(12):2803
[47]杨志辉,黄璜,王华.稻-鸭复合生态系统稻田土壤质量研究[J].土壤通报,2004,35(2):117-121
[48]Belyea LR,Lancaster J.Assembly rules within a contingent ecology[J].Oikos,1999,86:402-416
[49]Legere A,Samson DN.Relative influence of crop rotation,tillage,and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping system[J].Weed science,1999,47:112-122
[50]程兆榜,杨荣明,周益军,等.江苏稻区水稻条纹叶枯病发生新规律[J].江苏农业科学,2002,(1):39-41
[51]邰德良,李瑛,梅爱中,等.2004年稻田灰飞虱重发原因分析与控制对策[J].中国植保导刊,2005,25(3):33-35
[52]蔡祝南,吴蔚文,高君川.水稻病虫害防治[M].北京:金盾出版社,1992
[53]《中国农作物病虫图谱》编绘组.中国农作物病虫图谱,第一分册,水稻病虫[M].北京:农业出版社,1994
[54]蒋明星,程家安.不同施肥水平对水稻上白背飞虱种群的影响[J].中国农业科学,2003,17(3):270-274
[1]樊小林,史俊通.土壤肥料科学[M].西安:世界书籍出版公司,1995,1-20
[2]Sommerfeldt TG.Chang G,Entz T.Long-term annual application in crease soil organic matter and nitrogen and decrease carbon to nitrogen ratio[J].Soil Sci Soc Amer J,1988,52(6):1668-1673
[3]谢建昌.世界的粮食与肥料问题[J].土壤学进展,1994,22(3):1-19
[4]郝学宁,田种存,刘雪莲,等.化肥污染与环境保护[J].资源保护与利用,2000(3):39-40
[5]Lal,R.& Stewart,B.A.(Eds.).Soil Degradation[J].Advance in Soil Science,1990,11:1-12
[6]陈世正,杨邦俊,宋光煜.稻草还田对土壤肥力与作物产量的影响仁[J].土壤肥料,1995(4):13-17
[7]周卫军,王凯荣,张光远,等.施肥进步在红镶稻作区水稻增产中的贡献及其对土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤通报,2002,33(3):197-201
[8]王英.不同状态有机物料对土壤腐殖质及作物产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2002,33(2):156-157
[9]廖海秋,施卫明,严蔚东,等.有机无机肥配施对潜育性水稻土肥力水平的影响[J].土壤通报,1998,29(6):248-249
[10]张本元.有机无机肥配施对小麦、水稻产量的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2001,7(6):53-54
[11]高菊生.秦道珠,刘更另,等.长期施用有机肥对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J].耕作与栽培,2002,(2):31-33
[12]李国学,张福锁.固体废物堆肥化与有机复混肥生产[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2000
[13]刘杰.有机一无机复混肥料对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2002,(2):25-27
[14]温荣夫.化肥合理使用与农业可持续发展[J].当代生态农业,1998,(1):52-54
[15]方珊清,孙时银,汪雪薇.发展绿肥生产是生态农业建设的有效措施[J].安徽农学通报,2004,10(2):68
[16]甄若宏,王强盛,沈晓昆,等.我国稻鸭共作生态农业的发展现状与技术展望[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):1-5
[17]朱清海,李毓鹏,徐春河,等.稻-萍-蟹立体农业的效益[J].生态学杂志,1994,13(5):1-4
[18]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:农业出版社,2000,14-113.
[19]沈宏,曹志洪.不同农田土壤养分可持续性指数的研究[J].农村生态环境,1998,14(3):35-39
[20]中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室编.土壤物理性质测定[M].北京:科学出版社,1978
[21]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ α多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性, 1994,Z(4):Z31-239
[22]张左生.粮油作物病虫鼠害预测预报[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1994,8-268
[23]浙江省农业科学院植物保护研究所-病毒病研究组编.水稻病毒病[M].北京:农业出版社,1975,102-108
[24]王强盛,黄丕生,甄若宏,等.稻鸭共作对稻田营养生态及稻米品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):639-645
[25]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999,169-259
[26]翁伯奇,唐建阳,陈炳焕,等.稻萍鱼体系中红萍供氮的特点[J].核农学报,1992,6(1):51-56
[27]黄毅斌.红萍在稻萍鱼体系中的部分作用研究[J].福建农业科技,1991,(4):8-10
[28]张钟先,刘中柱,宋永康,等.红萍钾在稻萍鱼共生系中循环利用研究[J].应用生态学报,1991,2(3):226-231
[29]高恩广.稻田放养翻压细绿萍的培肥与增产作用分析[J].垦殖与农作,2003,(2):36-37
[30]苏凤岩,闻大中,徐卿德,等.北方稻田生态系统研究Ⅰ稻萍结合系统的结构研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(2):179-184
[31]Liut.C.C.Use of Azolla in rice reduction in China[J].Nitrogen and Rice Los Banos Philiphiues,1979,375-394
[32]Mian M.H.A 15N tracer study to compare nitrogen supply by Azolla and ammonium sulphate to IR8 rice plants grown under flooded condition[J].Plant and Soil,1985,83(3):371-379
[33]lto O.and I.Watadabe.Availability to rice plants of nitrogen fixed by Azolla[j].Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,1985,31(1):91-105
[34]Li shi-ye.Azolla in the paddy fields of Eastern China[J].Organic Matter and Rice,1984,169-178
[35]董益坤,董益禄,兰月相,等.稻鸭萍共育增产增效机理及关键技术[J].作物杂志,2004,(4):39-40
[36]束兆林,储国良,缪康,等.稻-鸭-萍共作对水稻田病虫草的控制效果及增产效应[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(6):72-75
[37]何代福.稻鸭萍共作生态种养技术[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(8):105
[38]蓝月相,孙蔚丽,董益坤,等.单季杂交稻田稻鸭萍共育技术初步总结[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(4):44
[39]李学恒,王启发,徐凤琳,等.稻草还田对土壤钾磷锌的吸附-解吸及其有效性的硬性[J].华 中农业大学学报,2000,19:227-232
[40]王凯荣,刘鑫,周卫军,等.稻田系统养分循环利用对土壤肥力和可持续生产力的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2004,23(6):1041-1045
[41]甄若宏,王强盛,邓建平,等.稻鸭萍共作复合系统的主要生态效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):11-14
[42]唐建阳,翁伯奇,何萍,等.提高稻田尿素氮利用率若干方法与机理探讨[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1998,4(3):242-248
[43]翁伯奇,唐建阳,陈炳焕,等.稻-萍-鱼系统中红萍氮素吸收利用及有效性研究[J].生态学报,1991,11(1):25-31
[44]翁伯奇,陈炳焕,唐建阳,等.~(15)N示踪法研究稻萍鱼体系中红萍氮素的利用及对水稻生长的影响[J].福建省农科院学报,1987,2(1):16-24
[45]沈晓昆,王志强,戴网成,等.两种日本稻鸭共作的最新模式[J].农业装备技术,2006,32(5):25-26
[1]蔡晓明.生态系统生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2000
[2]骆世明.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001
[3]汪金平.南方双季稻田秸秆厢沟腐熟还田新型免耕耕作技术研究[D].南京农业大学博士论文,2003
[4]甄若宏,王强盛,邓建平,等.稻鸭萍共作复合系统的主要生态效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006,22(3):11-14
[5]董益坤,董益禄,兰月相,等.稻鸭萍共育增产增效机理及关键技术[J].作物杂志,2004,(4):39-40
[6]束兆林,储国良,缪康,等.稻-鸭-萍共作对水稻田病虫草的控制效果及增产效应[J].江苏农业科学,2004,(6):72-75
[7]何代福.稻鸭萍共作生态种养技术[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(8):105
[8]蓝月相,孙蔚丽,董益坤,等.单季杂交稻田稻鸭萍共育技术初步总结[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(4):44
[9]席运管,钦佩.稻鸭共作有机农业模式的能值评估[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(2):237-242
[10]陈阜.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2001
[11]闻大中.农业生态系统研究方法(一)[J].农村生态环境,1985,(4):47-52
[12]闻大中.农业生态系统研究方法(二)[J].农村生态环境,1986,(1):52-56
[13]刘巽浩.我国不同地区生态系统能量转化效率的初步研究[J].北京农业大学学报,1982,8(1):47-53
[14]江苏太湖地区农田生态协作组.江苏太湖地区几种种植制度的能量转换状况[J].生态学杂志,1984,(6):19-22
[15]鲁如坤,刘鸿翔,闻大中,等.我国典型地区农业生态系统养分循环和平衡研究Ⅰ农田养分支出参数[J].土壤通报,1996,27(4):145-151
[16]鲁如坤,刘鸿翔,闻大中,等.我国典型地区农业生态系统养分循环和平衡研究Ⅱ农田养分收入参数[J].土壤通报,1996,27(4):151-154
[17]青先国,李建国.双季稻田吨粮种植模式经济生态技术效益研究[M].湖南师范大学出版社,1997,78-91
[18]刘巽浩.我国不同地区生态系统能量转化效率的初步研究[J].北京农业大学学报,1982,8(1):47-53
[19]Panesat B S,Fluck R C.Energy productivity of a production system:Analysis and measurement[J].Agric Sys.1993,43(4):415-437
[20]Bastianoni S,Marchettini N,Panzieri M,etal.Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area(Italy)[J].J Cleaner Prod,2001,9:364-373
[21]陆宏芳,彭少麟,蓝盛芳,等.基塘农业生态工程模式的能值评估[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1622-1626
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |