用户名: 密码: 验证码:
我国制造业劳动生产率地区差异的演变趋势与成因研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
现有对我国地区差异的研究文献虽已较为丰富,但仍然没有形成一致认识。已有研究在分析层次、研究方法和研究角度等方面还存在一些局限性,进一步研究仍有必要性。本文在制造业层次上分析了劳动生产率地区差异的演变趋势,并着眼于从增长绩效、结构因素、集聚效应等新视角来解释地区差异的演变成因,为认识地区差异问题提供了相对微观层面的经验证据,也获得了一些有意义的结论和政策启示。
     首先,本文分析了制造业劳动生产率的增长收敛性。利用动态经济空间权重矩阵,检验发现制造业劳动生产率存在显著的空间依赖性,为此,采用了空间计量收敛模型和基于空间过滤的动态面板收敛模型。结果发现,制造业劳动生产率在1988-1997年以年均大约3%的速度扩散,而在1998-2005年以年均大约4.5%的速度收敛,意味着地区差异在前期趋于扩大,而在后期趋于缩小。这不同于现有基于整体层面的结论,支持了在更微观层面上研究地区差异问题的必要性。采用收入分布法的分析验证了上述结论的稳健性。
     其次,在放宽规模报酬不变的假定和重新定义技术集空间后,本文利用改进的增长分解方法,对制造业劳动生产率的增长进行了分解,从增长绩效角度剖析了地区差异演变成因。本文发现,增长的主要来源在1988-1997年和1998-2005年两个时期相异,前期为资本深化,后期为技术进步;但是,增长的主导因素并非驱动地区差异演变的关键因素,表现为技术进步驱动了前期差异的扩大,而资本深化则主导了后期差异的缩小。
     再次,本文考察了结构因素在制造业劳动生产率地区差异演变过程中的作用。利用改造后的偏离份额分析法和方差的自然分解法,得到了结构差异在地区差异中贡献较为次要的结论。然后,从增长的结构效应出发,发现结构转变对西部地区缩小与东部地区的差异发挥了主要作用,但对中部地区缩小与东部地区的差异却没有起到主要作用。
     最后,本文分析了集聚效应对制造业劳动生产率地区差异的影响。对集聚效应的估计采用了面板模型,区分了静态和动态效应,消除了变量的空间依赖性。在采用空间俱乐部模型区别了集聚效应的地区差别后,结合集聚结构的实际变动,结果发现专业化效应在整个研究期间起到了缩小中西部与东部差异的作用,而规模效应只在1998-2005年对差异缩小起到了促进作用。
     综上,制造业劳动生产率地区差异的演变趋势在1988-1997年和1998-2005年分别表现为扩大和缩小。在前期差异扩大过程中,技术进步和行业增长效应起到了推动作用。在后期差异缩小过程中,发挥积极效应的是资本深化,而非技术追赶或技术进步,表明在收敛过程中产生作用的是新古典的资本收敛机制而非技术扩散理论的技术收敛机制;结构效应主要作用于西部与东部之间的差异缩小,意味着结构转变的收敛机制在西部发挥了作用;专业化效应和规模效应也对缩小差异起到了正面作用,这源自集聚效应的地区差别与各地区集聚结构变动差异的共同作用。以上结论验证了新古典和新增长等理论对解释我国地区增长差异和地区差异演变问题的有效性,提供了相应的经验证据。
     本文结论包含的政策启示是,提高中西部的创新能力、经济效率和技术吸收能力,加快结构转变,强化专业化发展,以及促进东部的产业转移等。
The research papers in existence on regional disparity in China have been quite abundant. However, there is no consistent recognition. Because the papers have some localization on hierarchy of research object,research methods and standpoints, farther work on the question is rather needed. This paper researchs on the evolution of labor productivity of China’s manufacturing and makes explainations with some new views to growth performance, structural factor and agglormertaional effect. An empirical evidence form relatively microcosmic hierarchy has been afforded to understanding the regional disparity. It gains some significative results and provides several revelations on policy making.
     Firstly, the growth convergence of labor productivtity has been estimated to find out the evolution of regional disparity. Based on constructing dynamic economic spatial weight matrix, the marked spatial dependence in manufacturing’s labor productivity has been finded. To control the effect of spatial dependence, several spatial econometric convergence models and dynamic panel convergence model using spatial fitering data have been used. The results show that the labor productivity has disconverged by 3% in 1988-1997, but converged by 4.5% in 1998-2005, which means that the disparity has been enlarged in the first period and reduced in the second period. The results are different from that on the macro-economy and so it is need to research the regional disparity on the more micro hiberarchy.To make sure the correctness of above conclution, the income distribution method has been used, and the conclution has been proved robust.
     Secondly, to relax the hypothesis of constant return to scale and redefine the space of technique sets, the decomposition method of the growth of labor productivity has been improved. Using the corrected decomposition method of the labor productivity’s growth, the paper analyzes the drivers of evolvements of regional disparity in labor productivity of manufacturing, perspective on the performance of growth. The results are as follows. The main forces of the growth of manufacturing’s labor productivity are variational in the two periods that are 1988 to 1997 and 1998 to 2005. Capital deepening is the whole source of growth in the first period and technology progress is dominant in the second period. However, the drivers of the evolvements of the regional disparity are not as same as the forces of growth. Technology progress is the driving factor enlarging the regional disparity in the first period and capital deepening is the dominant factor reducing the regional disparity in the second period.
     Thirdly, the effects of structural factors to the evolution of reginonal dispariatiy of manufacturing’s labor productivity have been discussed. Using the rebuilt shift-share and natural decomposition of variance, the result shows that the effect of structural differences to disparity is minor. Then, after analysising the structural effect of growth, some results have been uncoverd, which structural change is a key factor to the gap reducing between the West and the East, but not a key factor to that between the Middle and the East.
     Lastly, the impace of agglomerational effect on the evolution of regional disparity of manufacturing’s labor producitivty has been analyzed. The agglomerational effect has been estimated. It is different from the existent researchs that panel data model has been adopted, and static effect and dynamic effect distinguished, and spatial dependence of variable eliminated. Based on using spatial regime model to disginguish the agglomerational effects between the East and the Midwest and calculating the real changes of agglomeration structure, the agglomerational effect to disparity has been estimated. The result shows that the effect of specialization has a positive impact on the gap reducing between the Midwest and the East in the whole research period, and the effect of scale impacts positively on the gap reducing only in 1998 to 2005.
     In conclusion, in 1988-1997 and 1998-2005, the labor productivity of regional disparity in manufacturing evolved differently, which enlarged in the first period and reduced in the second period. In the first period, the effects of technology progress and industry-growth increased disparity. In the second period, capital deepening played actively to disparity reducing, but technique’s catch up and technology progress don’t do it. It shown that the mechanism of the neoclassical capital convergence, not that of technology convergence in technology diffusion theory, worked in the process of disparity reducing. Structural effect mainly acted on the disparity deflating between the West and the the East, implying that the convergence mechanism of structural change worked in the West. The effects of specialization and scale impacted positively on the disparity reducing, which root in the conjunct impacts of the agglomerational effect and the agglomeration structure’s change. The above conclutions validate the validity of some growth theories, including neoclassical and new growth theories, on explaining regional growth dispatity and the evolution of regional disparity in China, providing some empirical facts.
     Based on the above conclusion, some policies and measures could be apopted: enhancing innovational ability, economic efficency and technology absorbency in the Midwest, and speeding up structural change, intensifying specialization, and promoting the industries transferation from the East to the Midwest.
引文
[1]张吉鹏,吴桂英.中国地区差距研究:度量与成因[C].第四届中国经济学年会入选论文,2004.
    [2]沈坤荣,马俊.中国经济增长的“俱乐部收敛”特征及其成因研究[J].经济研究,2002, 01:33-39.
    [3]王梦奎.西部开发和中国的现代化[A].王梦奎、李善同.中国地区社会经济发展不平衡问题研究[C].商务印书馆,2000.
    [4]赵伟,马瑞永.中国经济增长收敛性的再认识[J].管理世界, 2005, 11:12-21.
    [5] Solow, Robert. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956,70, 65-94.
    [6] Mankiw, N.,Romer, D.,Weil, D. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107,407-38.
    [7] Carl-Johan Dalgaard, Jes Winther Hansen.Capital Utilization and the Foundations of Club Convergence[J].Economics Letters,2005(87):145-152.
    [8] Romer, P.M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy ,1986, 94 (October):1002-1037.
    [9] Lucas, R. On the Mechanics of Economic Development [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22(1) : 3-42.
    [10]邓翔.增长理论中趋同假说的理论与现实考察[J].经济学动态,2001,06:43-46.
    [11] Bernard, A.B., Jones,C.I.Technology and convergence[J]. The Economic Journal, 1996, 106 (July):1037-1044.
    [12] Barro, Robert J., Sala - i - Martin, Xavier. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth[J] . Journal of Economic Growth, 1997(2):1-26.
    [13] Fujita Masahisa. A monopolistic competition model of spatial Agglomeration:A diferentiated products approach [J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,1988,18:87-124.
    [14] Krugman, P. R. Increasing returns and economic geography [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99: 483-499.
    [15] Puga D.The rise and fall of regional inequalities[J].European Economic Review,1999, 43:303-334.
    [16] Walz, U. Transport Costs, Intermediate Goods and Localized Growth[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1996, 26(6):671-695.
    [17] Krugman, P. R., and A. J. Venables.Globalization and the inequality of nations[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995,110(4):857-880
    [18] Baumol.W.J. Productivity Growth,Convergence and Welfare: What the Long Run Data Show[J]. American Economic Review,1986, 76:1072-85.
    [19] De Long, J. B. Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Comment[J]. American Economic Review, 1988,78,1138-54.
    [20] Barro R.J.,Sala-I-Martin,X. Convergence across States and Regions[J].Brookings Papers on Economic Acfivity,1991,01:107-182.
    [21] Barro R.J.,Sala-I-Martin,X. Convergence[J] Journal of Political Economy, 1992, April,100(2): 223-251.
    [22] Coulombe S.New Evidence of Convergence Across Canadian Provinces: The Role of Urbanization[J]. Regional Studies,1999, 34(8):713-725.
    [23] Siriopoulos C&Asterious D.Testing for convergence across the Greek regions[J].Regional Studies, 1998,(32):537-546.
    [24] Tsionas,G.E. Regional growth and convergence:Evidence from the United States[J] .Regional Studies,.2000,(34):231-238.
    [25] Barro. Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. Economic Growth [M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1995.
    [26] Galor, Oded. Convergence? Inference from Theoretical Models[J]. The Economic Journal, 1996,106:1056-1069.
    [27] Eduardo Andrade, Marcio Laurini, Regina Madalozzo, Pedro L. Valls Pereira. Convergence Clubs Among Brazilian Municipalities[J]. Economics,2004(83):179-184.
    [28] Islam.N. Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110, 4:1127-70.
    [29] Caselli,F.,Esquivel,G., F.Lefort.Reopening the convergence debate:a new look at cross-country empirics [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 1996,03:363-389.
    [30] Blundell, R. and S. Bond. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions inDynamic Panel Data Models[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1998, 87: 115–143.
    [31] Bruno, G. S. F.Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models[J]. Economics Letters, 2005, 87(3):. 361-66
    [32] De la Fuente. On the Sources of Convergence:A Close Look at the Spanish Regions[w]. UFAE and IAE Working Papers, 1996,362-96.
    [33] Cuadrado-Roura, J., Garcia-Greciano, B., Raymond, J. Regional convergence in productivity and productive structure: The Spanish case[J]. International Regional Science Review; 1999,22(1): 35-53.
    [34] Bernard, A. and Durlauf, S. Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Econom etrics, 1996, 71 (1-2): 161-173.
    [35] Quah,D.T.Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics [J]. Economic Journal, July 1996, 706(437):1045-55.
    [36] Quah,D.T. Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs [J]. Journal of Economic Growth.March 1997. 2(1):27-59.
    [37] Márcio Laurini, Eduardo Andrade and Pedro L. Valls Pereira. Income convergence clubs for Brazilian Municipalities: a non-parametric analysis [J]. Applied Economics, 2005, 37, (18):2099-2118.
    [38] Sakamoto .H, Islam.N. Convergence across Chinese provinces: An analysis using Markov transition matrix[J].China Economic Review, 2008(01),66-79.
    [39] Rey S, Montouri B. US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective[J]. Regional Studies, 1999,33:143 -156.
    [40] Lall, S V. Yilmaz, S. Regional economic convergence: Do policy instruments make a difference?[J]. The Annal of Regional Science, 2001, 35: 153-166.
    [41] Baumont C., Ertur C., Le Gallo J. Spatial Convergence Clubs and the European Regional Growth Process, 1980-1995 [A], in Fingleton B. (ed.), European Regional Growth[C], 2003: 131-158, Springer, Berlin.
    [42] Badinger H., Müller WG and Tondl G. Regional Convergence in the European Union (1985-1999):A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis[J].Regional Studies,2004,(38):241-53.
    [43]刘夏明,魏英琪,李国平.收敛还是发散?——中国区域经济发展争论的文献综述[J].经济研究,07:70-81.
    [44] Jian, T, Sachs J D, and Warner. A M.trends in regional inequality in China [J].China Economic Review,1996, 7 (1):pp.1-21.
    [45]魏后凯.中国地区经济增长及其收敛性[J].中国工业经济,1997,03:31-37.
    [46] Raiser,M. Subsidising Inequality: Economic Reforms, Fiscal Transfers and Convergence Across Chinese Provinces [J]. The Journal of Developments Studies,1998,.24:.1-26.
    [47]张胜,郭军,陈金贤.中国省际长期经济增长绝对收敛的经验分析[J].世界经济,2001,06:67-70.
    [48] Weeks, M., Yao J. Y. D. Provincial Conditional Income Convergence in China,1953-1997: A Panel Data Approach[J]. Econometric Reviews,2003, 22(1):59-77.
    [49]蔡昉,都阳.中国地区经济增长的趋同与差异──对西部开发战略的启示[J].经济研究,2000,01:30-37.
    [50] Zhang, Zongyi, Aying Liu, and Shujie Yao.Convergence of China's Regional Incomes: 1952-97[J].China Economic Review,2001(12):243-58.
    [51]陈安平,李国平.中国地区经济增长收敛性:时间序列的经验研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004(11):31-35.
    [52]王小鲁,樊纲.中国地区差距的变动趋势和影响因素[J].经济研究,2004,01:33-44.
    [53]沈坤荣,耿强.外国直接投资、技术外溢与内生经济增长—中国数据的计量检验与实证分析[J].中国社会科学,2001,05:83-93.
    [54]林毅夫,刘明兴.中国的经济增长收敛与收入分配[J].世界经济,2003, 08:3-14.
    [55] Chen, B, Yi F. Determinants of Economic Growth in China: Private Enterprise, Education and Openness [J]. China Economic Review, 2000, 11 (1):1–15.
    [56] Démurger S,.Infrastructrure Development and Economic Growth: An Explanation for Regional Disparities in China? [J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2001,29 (1):95-117.
    [57]马栓友,于红霞.转移支付与地区经济收敛[J].经济研究,2003,03:26-33.
    [58]徐现祥,李郇.中国省区经济差距的内生制度根源[J].经济学季刊,2005,04:86-99.
    [59]王志刚.质疑中国经济增长的条件收敛性[J].管理世界,2004,03:25-30.
    [60] Démurger, S., Jeffrey D. Sachs, Wing T. Woo, Shuming Bao, Gene Chang and Andrew Mellinger. Geography, Economic Policy and Regional Development in China[W]. NBER Working Paper, 2002, No. 8897.
    [61] Ying L.G. Understanding China's recent growth experience:A Spatial Economic Perspective[J]. The Annals of Regional Science,2003,(37):613-628.
    [62]林光平,龙志和,吴梅.中国地区经济σ-收敛的空间计量实证分析[J],数量经济技术经济研究, 2006,04:14-21.
    [63] Aziz, Jahangir and Christoph Duenwald,.China’s Provincial Dynamics[Z]. IMF working paper, 2001, WP/01/3.
    [64]徐现祥,舒元.中国省区经济增长分布的演进(1978-1998)[J].经济学(季刊), 2004, 04:619-638
    [65] Barro,RobertJ.Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study[M]. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1997.
    [66] Chen, J., Fleisher, B. M. Regional income inequality and economic growth[J].Journal of Comparative Economics, 1996, 22(2): 141-164.
    [67] Fleisher.Belton M.and Jian Chen.The Coast-Noncoast Income Gap Productivity, and Regional Economic Policy in China [J].Journal of Comparative Economcs, 1997, 25(2):220-236.
    [68] Young, A.The razor's edge: distortion and incremental reform in the People's [J]. Republic of China', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115(4):1091-1136.
    [69]段平忠,刘传江.人口流动对经济增长地区差距的影响[J].中国软科学,2005,12,99- 110.
    [70]刘强.中国经济增长的收敛性分析[J].经济研究,2001,06:70-77.
    [71] Bao S, Chang G, Sachs J, Woo W.Geographic factors and China's regional development under market reforms, 1978-1998[J]. China Economic Review, 2002,13(1):89-111.
    [72]许召元,李善同.近年来中国地区差距的变化趋势[J].经济研究,2006,07:106-116.
    [73] Norman Sedgley.Technology gaps , economic growth and convergence across US states[J].Applied economics letters,1998,5,55-59.
    [74] Abramovitz,M. Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind[J]. Journal of Economic History, 1986, 46: 385-406.
    [75] Fagerberg J. Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, 32:1147-1175.
    [76] Dowrick, S.,D. Nguyen.OECD Comparative Economic Growth 1950-85: Catch-Up and Convergence.[J] American Economic Review, 1989,79:1010-1030.
    [77] Dollar, D,Wolff, E. N. Capital intensity and TFP convergence by industry in manufacturing, 1963–1985[A]. W. J. Baumol, R. Nelson & E. N. Wolff (Eds). Convergence of Productivity, Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence[C].(Oxford University Press,1994.
    [78] Detragiache,E.Technology diffusion and international income convergence[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1998,56:367–392.
    [79] Hultberg PT, Nadiri MI, Sickles RC. Cross-country catch-up in the manufacturing sector: Impacts of heterogeneity on convergence and technology adoption[J]. Empirical economics.2004 (29):753-768.
    [80]彭国华.中国地区收入差距、全要素生产率及其收敛分析[J].经济研究,2005,(9):19-29.
    [81] Grosskopf,S. Eficiency and Productivity[A]. H.O.Fried, C.A.K.Lovell and S.S.Schmidt .The Measurement of Productive efficiency[C].Oxford University Press,1993.
    [82] Kumar, S., and R. Russell, Technological change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence [J]. The American Economic Review, 2002, 92: 527-548.
    [83] William L. W, Bruce R. D. Capital Deepening and Manufacturing's Contribution to Regional Economic Convergence[J]. Regional Analysis and Policy, 2006,31-44.
    [84]杨文举.技术效率、技术进步、资本深化与经济增长:基于DEA的经验分析[J].世界经济,2006. 05:73-83.
    [85] Kim,S. Expansion of Market and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The trends in U.S. Regional Manufacturing Structure,1860-1987[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995,110: 881-908.
    [86] Gallup, J., Sachs, J., Mellinger, A. Geography and economic development[C]. Proceedings of Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. World Bank, Washington D.C.,1998:127-178.
    [87] Frankel, J.A., Romer, D. Does trade cause growth?[J].American Economic Review, 1999,89(3):379-399.
    [88] Sjoberg O,Sjoholm F.Trade liberalization and the geography of production: agglomeration,concentration and dispersal in Indonesia’s manufacturing industry[J].Economic Geography,2004,(80):287-310.
    [89] Redding S, Venables A.J. Economic geography and international inequality [J].Journal of International Economics, 2004, (62):53- 82.
    [90] Geppert K, Happich M, Stephan A. Regional disparities in the European Union: Convergence and Agglomeration [C]. ERSA conference papers, 2004, ersa04p219.
    [91] Rosenthal S, Strange C.The determinants of agglomeration [J].Journal of Urban Economics, 2001, (50):191-229.
    [92] Fujita, M. and D. Hu.Regional Disparity in China 1995-1994: The Effects of Globalization and Economic Liberalization [J].The Annals of Regional Science, 2001, 35, 3-37.
    [93]李国平,范红忠.生产集中、人口分布与地区经济差异[J].经济研究,2003(11):79-86.
    [94]范剑勇.产业集聚与地区差距:来自中国的证据[M].中国社会科学评论,2004,01.
    [95]金煜,陈钊,陆铭.中国的地区工业集聚:经济地理、新经济地理与经济政策[J].经济研究,2006,04,79-89.
    [96]林理升,王晔倩.运输成本、劳动力流动与制造业区域分布.经济研究,2006,03: 115-121.
    [97] Julie Le Gallo and Sandy Dall'erba. Spatial And Sectoral Productivity Convergence Between European Regions, 1975-2000 [C]. ERSA conference papers 2005.
    [98]范剑勇,朱国林.中国地区差距的演变及其结构分解[J].管理世界,2002,07:37-44.
    [99] Prescott.E. Needed:A Theory ofTotal Factor Productivity[J]. International Economic Review, 1998, 39:525-552.
    [100] Hall.R.E, Jones.C.I. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114:83-l16.
    [101] De la Fuente, Angel. Convergence Across Countries And Regions: Theory And Empirics[W]. CEPR Discussion Papers,2000,No. 2465.
    [102] Paci R, Pigliaru F. Structural Change and Convergence: An Italian Regional Perspective [J]. Structural Change and economic Dynamics, 1997, 08: 297-318.
    [103] Sassi M. Structural Change And Economic Convergence Across The Eu-15 Regions: Can The Agricultural Sector Play A Role? [W]. The Agricultural Economics Society’s 81st Annual Conference,University of Reading,UK,2007.
    [104]黎德福,黄玖立.结构冲击与结构转换对中国地区差距变化的影响[J].南开经济研究, 2006,01:114-126.
    [105]袁鹏.制造业生产率的地区差距变化及结构效应的影响[J].当代财经,2007,07:81-85.
    [106]范剑勇.产业集聚与地区间劳动生产率差异[J].经济研究,2006,11:72-81.
    [107]黄勇峰,任若恩,刘晓生.中国制造业资本存量永续盘存法估计[J].经济学(季刊),2002, 01:377-396.
    [108]吕铁.80年代以来我国加工工业增长效率的实证分析[J].中国工业经济, 1997,09: 35-39.
    [109]李小平,朱钟棣.中国工业行业的全要素生产率测算[J].管理世界,2005,04:56-64.
    [110]袁鹏,陈圻,胡荣.我国制造业的结构效率与生产率度量-基于技术异质的结构效率模型[J].系统工程,2007,06:64-69.
    [111]吴玉鸣.空间计量经济模型在省域研发与创新中的应用研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究.2006,5:74-85.
    [112] Anselin, L., Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models[M]. Kluwer, Dordrecht ,1988.
    [113] Goodchild,M.F.Geographical information science[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,1992,6(1):31-45.
    [114] Cliff A, Ord J. Spatial Processes, Models and Applications [M]. London: Pion, 1981.
    [115] Bernard F, López-Bazo E. Empirical growth models with spatial effects [J]. Regional Science, 2006, 85 (2), 177–198.
    [116] Arbia, G , Piras, G .Convergence in Per-Capita GDP Across European Regions Using Panel Data Models Extended to Spatial Autocorrelation Effects[C].European Regional Science Association (ERSA) conference,2004.
    [117]吴玉鸣.中国省域经济增长趋同的空间计量经济分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2006, 12:101-108.
    [118] Anselin L. Spatial econometrics [A]. In: BALTAGI B H(ed.). A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics [C]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.,2001: 310-330.
    [119] Ord J K. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1975 ,70, 120–126.
    [120] Razin Assaf ,Yuen Chi-Wa. Factor Mobility and Income Growth:Two Convergence Hypotheses[W].NBER Working Paper,1998, No.W5135.
    [121] Cliff A D,Ord J K.Spatial Autocorrelation[M].London:Pion,1973.
    [122] Tobler W R.A computer movie sim ulating urban growth in the Detroit region[J] Economic Geography,1970,46(2) :234-240.
    [123] Tiiu Paas , Friso Schlitte. Regional Income Inequality and Convergence Processes in theEU-25[C]. ERSA conference papers, 2006 ,ersa06p229.
    [124] Fingleton, B. Equilibrium and Economic Growth: Spatial Econometric Models and Simulations[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2001, 41, 117–147.
    [125]林光平,龙志和,吴梅.我国地区经济收敛的空间计量实证分析:1978-2002年[J].经济学(季刊), 2005,B10:67-82.
    [126]陈晓玲,李国平.我国地区经济收敛的空间面板数据模型分析[J].经济科学,2006,05:5-17.
    [127] M J de Smith, M F Goodchild, P A Longley.Geospatial Analysis: A comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software[M].London, Troubador, Leicester, ISBN: 978-1905886-60-9,2007.
    [128] Griffith, D. A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem [J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2000 2:141–156.
    [129] Getis, A., and D. Griffith. Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis[J]. Geographical Analysis, 2002.34:130–140.
    [130] Getis A, Ord J. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1992, 24:189–206.
    [131] Robert Ferstl.Spatial Filtering with EViews and MATLAB. AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS. 2007 , 36, Number 1: 17–26.
    [132] Madariaga.N; Montout.S; Ollivaud.P. Regional convergence and agglomeration in Argentina: a spatial panel data approach. RePEc:mse:wpsorb:Bla05006, 2005:1-25.
    [133] Miller,S., M.Upadhyay.Total Factor Productivity and the Convergence Hypothesis.Journal of Macroeconomics,2002,24(2):267-286.
    [134] De la Fuente, A. On the sources of convergence: A close look at the Spanish regions [J]. European Economic Review, 2002,46 (3) :569-599.
    [135] Miller, S. and F. Russek. Fiscal Structures and Economic Growth: at the State and Local Level[J]. Public Finance Review, 1997, 25, 213-237.
    [136] Cellini R. Growth empirics: evidence from a panel of annual data[J] . Applied Economics Letters, 1997, 4: 347-351.
    [137] Nickell, S. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 1981,49: 1417-1426.
    [138] Anderson, T. W. and C. Hsiao. Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1982,18: 570-606.
    [139] Arellano, M. and S. Bond. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations [J]. Review of Economic Studies.1991,58: 277–297.
    [140] Kiviet, J.F. On Bias, Inconsistency and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1995, 68: 53-78.
    [141] Judson, R. A. and A. L. Owen. Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists[J]. Economics Letters, 1999, 65: 9–15.
    [142] Kiviet, Jan F. Expectation of Expansions for Estimators in a Dynamic Panel. Data Model[C]: Hsiao, Lahiri andM. H. Pesaran. Some Results for Weakly Exogenous Regressors[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1999:199-225.
    [143] Silverman B W.Density estimation for statistics and data analysis[M].Chapman & Hall,London,1986.
    [144] Jones, Charles I.On the Evolution of the World Income Distribution [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, 77(3):19-36.
    [145] Francisco J, Goerlich Gisbert,Weighted samples,kernel density estimators and convergence[J].Empirical Economics 2003,28:335~351.
    [146] Priebe CE, Marchette DJ. Alternating kernel and mixture density estimates. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis[J]. 2000, 35(1):43–65.
    [147] Abramson, I.S. On bandwidth variation in kernel estimates– a square root law [J]. Annals of Statistics,1982,10: 1217-1223.
    [148] F?re, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang .Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries, American Economic Review, 1994,84 (1),66-83.
    [149] Los, B. Timmer,M. the‘appropriate technology’explanation of productivity growth differentials: an empirical approach [J]. Journal of development Economics, 2005,77:517-531.
    [150] Ray. S. and E. Desli. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment, American Economic Review, 1997, 87 (5), 1.033-1.039.
    [151] Jose L. Zofio. Malmquist Productivity Index Decompositions: A Unifying Framework [J]. Applied Economics, 2007,39 (18):2371-2387.
    [152] Cowgill,P.,A.A Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Post-reform China[D]. The Dissertation of University of Georgia,2001
    [153]张军.资本形成、工业化与经济增长:中国的转轨特征[J].经济研究, 2002,06:3-13.
    [154]郑京海,胡鞍钢.中国改革时期省级生产率增长变化的实证分析(1979-2001年)[J].经济学(季刊),2005,02:263-296.
    [155]张军.改革以来中国的资本形成与经济增长:一些发现及其解释.世界经济文汇,2002,1:18-31.
    [156] Abramovitz,M. Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind[J]. Journal of Economic History, 1986, 46: 385-406.
    [157] Basu, S, Weil, D.N. Appropriate Technology and Growth [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998 ,113: 1025-1054.
    [158] Acemoglu D., F. Zilibotti. Productivity Differences [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001,116:563-606.
    [159] Miller S. M., M. P. Upadhyay. The effects of openness, trade orientation, and human capital on total factor productivity [J]. Journal of Development Economics,, 2000,Vol.63:399-423.
    [160] Esteban J.Regional convergence in Europe and the industry mix: a shift-share analysis.[J] Regional Science and Urban Economics,2000,30 (3):353-364.
    [161] Shorrocks, A.F. The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family Incomes [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1983,`98 (2): 311-326.
    [162] Benito, J. M , Ezcurra, R..Spatial disparities in productivity and industry mix: The case of the European regions[C]. ERSA conference papers, 2004, NO.ersa04p102:1-39.
    [163]钱纳里.工业化和经济增长的比较研究(中文版) [M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
    [164]吕铁.制造业结构变化对生产率增长的影响研究[J].管理世界,2002.02:87-94.
    [165] Sater,W.E.C.Productivity and Technical Change[M].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1960.
    [166] Fagerberg, J. Technological Progress,Strutrural Change and Productivity Growth:a Comparative Study[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2000,11,393- 411.
    [167] Marshall, A. Principles of Economics [M]. Macmillan, London, 1920.
    [168] Weber A. Theory of the Location of Industries[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.
    [169] Hoover E. The Location of Economic Activity [M]. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1948.
    [170] Fujita, M. and P. Krugman.The New Economic Geography: Past,Present, and the Future[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2004,83: 139-164.
    [171]张卉.产业分布、产业集聚和地区经济增长[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2007:46.
    [172] Henderson V, Kuncoro A., Turner M. Industrial Development in Cities [J]. Journal of Political Economy,1995,103:1067-l090.
    [173] Glaeser E.L., H.D., Kallal, J.A, Scheinkman and A.,Schleifer.. Growth in cities [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992,100,12:1126-52.
    [174] Henderson J. Externalities and industrial development [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1997, 42(3): 449-470.
    [175] Arrow K. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1962, 29,155-173.
    [176] Romer P. Endogenous technological change [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98:71-102.
    [177] Jacobs, J. The Economy of Cities [M]. New York: Vintage, 1969.
    [178] Usai S, Paci R. Externalities and local economic growth in manufacturing industries, in Fingleton B. (ed.) European Regional Growth[M]. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
    [179] Combes Pierre-Philippe. Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984–1993[J]. Journal of Urban Economics ,2000,47, 329-355.
    [180] Uwe Blien and Jens Suedekum. Local Economic Structure and Industry Development in Germany:1993-2001[J]. Economics Bulletin,2005(15),17:1-8.
    [181] Dekle R. Industrial Concetration and Regional Growth: Evidence from the Prefectures [J].Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, 84: 310-315.
    [182] F. Cingano and F. Schivardi..Identifying the sources of local productivity growth [Z]. Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) from Bank of Italy, Economic Research Department,2004,No 474.
    [183] Crozet. M, Koenig. P.The Cohesion vs Growth Tradeoff: Evidence from EU Regions(1980-2000) [C]. ERSA conference papers,2005, No. ersa05p716.
    [184] Bode E.Agglomeration Externalities in Germany[C].ERSA conference papers,2004, NO. 04p120.
    [185] Ciccone, A. and Hall, R. Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity [J]. American Economic Review, 1996, Vol.86, No.1, pp.54-70
    [186] Ciccone, A. Agglomeration effects in Europe [J]. European Economic Review,2002, 46, 213-227.
    [187] Brülhart, Marius, Mathys, Nicole Andréa. Sectoral Agglomeration Economies in a Panel of European Regions[Z]. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London , Discussion Papers ,NO.6410.
    [188] Batisse C.专门化、多样化和中国地区工业产业增长的关系[J].世界经济文汇,2002,04:49-62.
    [189] Gao Ting. Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2004, (34), 101-24.
    [190]张艳,刘亮.经济集聚与经济增长—基于中国城市数据的实证分析[J].世界经济文汇,2007,01:48-56.
    [191]罗勇.产业集聚、经济增长与区域差距—基于中国的实证[M].中国社会科学出版社,2007.
    [192]梁琦.中国工业的区位基尼系数—兼论外商直接投资对制造业集聚的影响[J].统计研究,2003,09:21-25.
    [193]吴学花,杨蕙馨.中国制造业产业集聚的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2004,10:36-43.
    [194]罗勇,曹丽莉.中国制造业集聚程度变动趋势的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,08: 106-115.
    [195]路江涌,陶志刚.中国制造业区域聚集及国际比较[J].经济研究,2006,03:103-114.
    [196]范剑勇.市场一体化、地区专业化与产业集聚趋势——兼谈对地区差距的影响[J].中国社会科学,2004,06:39-51.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700