光肩星天牛纤维素酶与寄主选择关系的研究
|
摘要
光肩星天牛(Anoplophora glabripennis Motschulsky)属鞘翅目,天牛科,沟胫天牛亚科,星天牛属,是我国重要林木蛀干害虫。在我国广泛分布,主要危害杨属(Populus spp.)、柳属(Salix spp.)、榆属(Ulmus spp.)和槭属(Acer spp.)的树木,对我国林业造成巨大的损失。国内外众多学者对光肩星天牛寄主选择以及光肩星天牛纤维素酶均有大量的研究,但光肩星天牛体内纤维素酶与寄主选择的关系尚未明确。为了明确光肩星天牛体内纤维酶与寄主选择的关系,本文选取四种不同寄主来源(新疆杨、箭杆杨、合作杨和漳河柳)光肩星天牛幼虫和成虫、取食不同树种(臭椿、毛白杨、合作杨、旱柳和复叶槭)光肩星天牛成虫、取食原寄主树种与非原寄主树种光肩星天牛成虫、不同虫态光肩星天牛、不同龄期光肩星天牛幼虫等为研究对象,采用纤维素酶活性测定、纤维素酶同工酶检测、肠道组织结构观察比较等研究方法。研究结果如下：
(1)以新疆杨、箭杆杨、合作杨和漳河柳四种寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫和幼虫为研究对象,测定其肠道内三类纤维素酶活性,结果表明,不同寄主来源光肩星天牛雌与雄成虫之间的Cx酶、C1酶以及β-萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异,同种寄主来源光肩星天牛雄成虫的Cx酶活性显著高于雌成虫,同种寄主来源光肩星天牛雌雄成虫的C1酶和β-萄糖苷酶活性无显著性差异；不同寄主来源光肩星天牛幼虫Cx酶、C1酶以及β-萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异。
以聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法检测上述四种寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫和幼虫Cx酶同工酶,结果显示,不同寄主来源幼虫、雌成虫以及雄成虫的Cx酶同工酶带型和迁移距离无明显差异,同种寄主来源雌雄成虫之间亦无明显差异。
在本研究结果中,三类纤维素酶活性和同工酶谱具有高度的一致性,分别显示出不同寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫纤维素酶在酶活性和Cx酶同工酶方面是没有明显差异的,这表明,光肩星天牛纤维素酶与幼虫寄主树种之间无明显的关联性。
(2)取合作杨来源光肩星天牛成虫,分别饲以臭椿、毛白杨、合作杨、旱柳和复叶槭五种不同树种的新鲜枝条,3d后检测其纤维素酶活性,研究结果为,取食复叶槭雌成虫Cx酶活性显著高于雄成虫,取食其它树种雌雄成虫Cx酶活性无显著性差异,对照雄成虫(饥饿3d)Cx酶活性显著高于雌成虫；取食各树种雌雄成虫之间C1酶活性均无显著性差异；取食复叶槭雌成虫β-葡萄糖苷酶活性显著高于雄成虫,取食其它树种雌雄成虫β-葡萄糖苷酶活性无显著性差异。
取食复叶槭雌成虫Cx酶活性显著高于取食臭椿与对照雌成虫,与取食其它树种无显著性差异,取食旱柳、合作杨雌成虫Cx酶活性显著高于对照,与取食其它树种无显著性差异；取食各树种雄成虫Cx酶活性均显著低于对照,取食复叶槭、合作杨和臭椿雄成虫Cx酶活性无显著性差异,取食旱柳、毛白杨、合作杨和臭椿雄成虫Cx酶活性无显著性差异。取食各树种雌成虫以及雄成虫之间C1酶活性和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异。
纤维素酶作为一种诱导性酶,本研究发现,光肩星天牛成虫取食与否以及取食材料的不同都对其纤维素酶活性大小有很大影响,尤其是对于Cx酶。由此可见,光肩星天牛纤维素酶与成虫寄主树种选择之间有一定的关联性。
(3)取旱柳和合作杨两种寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫,分别饲以旱柳、合作杨和复叶槭三种寄主树种的新鲜枝条,3d后检测其纤维素酶活性,结果为,旱柳和合作杨来源光肩星天牛取食三种寄主树种光肩星天牛雌雄成虫之间Cx酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异,旱柳和合作杨来源光肩星天牛雌成虫以及雄成虫之间Cx酶活性和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异,除了合作杨来源光肩星天牛成虫取食旱柳雄成虫β-葡萄糖苷酶活性显著低于取食合作杨和复叶槭雄成虫。
两种寄主来源光肩星天牛,取食原寄主与其它寄主树种之后,雌成虫之间和雄成虫之间纤维素酶活性都无明显差异,除了合作杨来源雄成虫取食复叶槭和合作杨之后,表现出比取食旱柳高的β-葡萄糖苷酶活性。这是光肩星天牛成虫对原寄主树种的“记忆效应”,在纤维素酶活性方面的体现,还是由天牛本身取食状态所导致,有待于进一步研究。
(4)检测光肩星天牛蛹和未出树体成虫体内纤维素酶活性,结果显示,光肩星天牛蛹体内各纤维素酶活性均极其微弱,在0.06μmol(葡萄糖)·g-1(FW)·h-1以内,雌雄蛹之间Cx酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶和C1酶活性均无显著性差异；未出树体光肩星天牛雌雄成虫之间Cx酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶和C1酶活性均无显著性差异。树体内光肩星天牛成虫体内纤维素酶活性已较蛹体内有很多增加,但仍然没有达到从羽化孔出树体后光肩星天牛成虫体内纤维素酶活性的水平,研究中也发现树体内光肩星天牛成虫纤维素酶活性大小波动比较大,尤其是Cx酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶,这表明光肩星天牛羽化之后,体内纤维素酶的功能以及分布是一个不断完善的过程。
(5)取食寄主树种与取食人工饲料光肩星天牛幼龄幼虫纤维素酶活性均显著高于老熟幼虫,这有可能是由于老熟幼虫相对取食量降低而导致,也有可能是由于随着天牛幼虫的生长,其体内的纤维素酶活性到达一个稳定的水平,但体重却不断增加,从而使相对酶活性降低。
(6)解剖光肩星天牛幼虫以及雌雄成虫,取出肠道并区别前中后肠,分别测定其纤维素酶活性,结果显示,光肩星天牛幼虫90.4%的Cx酶活性和93.4%的β-萄糖苷酶活性分布在中肠；光肩星天牛雌成虫65.4%的Cx酶活性和94.2%的β-萄糖苷酶分布在中肠,31.5%的Cx酶活性分布在后肠；光肩星天牛雄成虫89.0%的Cx酶活性和92.0%的β-萄糖苷酶活性分布在中肠；在光肩星天牛雌成虫后肠组织结构中观察到有囊状结构。这使得作者对光肩星天牛体内纤维素酶的来源,有了一个新的推测,即光肩星天牛幼虫和雄成虫体内的纤维素酶均由自身分泌,而光肩星天牛雌成虫对天然纤维素的消化,有后肠共生微生物的参与。对于这一推测的验证则需要进一步的研究。
The Asian Longhorn Beetle (ALB), Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera:Cerambycid ae:Lamiinae:Lamiini) is one of the most important forest pests and widely distribute in China, and caused great losses to the forest. Poplars (Populus spp.), willows (Salix spp.), maples (Acer spp.) and elm (Ulmus spp) are the primary host tree species.Because of the serious threat posed by A. glabripennis, a large amount of research of cellulase and host selection has focused on this species in recent years, but the relationship of cellulase and host selection is unclear.
To investigate the relationship between cellulase activity and host selection, A. glabripennis larvae and adults from four different host tree species (Populus alba L. var. bolleana Bunge; P. nigra var. thevestina (Dode)Bean; P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., and Salix matsudana f. lobato-glandulosa Fang & Liu), adults fed on five different tree species (Ailanthus altissima Swingle, P. tomentosa Carriere, P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., S. matsudana Koidz, and Acer negundo L.), adults fed on original and non-original host tree species, insect in different state and larvae in different instars were selected.The enzyme activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase and (3-glucosidase in the intestines of the insects were measured, the endoglucanase isozymes were detected with a CMC-incorporated polyacrylamide gel, and the intestinal tissue paraffin section of A. glabripennis were also been observed. The results show that:
(1) Adults and larvae from four different host tree species (P. alba L. var. bolleana Bunge; P. nigra var. thevestina (Dode)Bean; P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., and S. matsudana f. lobato-glandulosa Fang & Liu) were chosen, and three kinds of cellulase activities in the intestines of the insects were measured.The results were:there were no significant differences in the activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase in males and females emerging from different host tree species. When adults emerged from the same host tree species, there were no significant differences in the activities of exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase between males and females, but the activity of endoglucanase in males was clearly higher than that in females. There were no significant differences in endoglucanase, exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase activities between larvae from different host tree species.
The endoglucanase isozymes were detected with a CMC-incorporated polyacrylamide gel, the patterns and migration of endoglucanase isozymes of males and females emerging from different host tree species are clearly not different, neither are they different when emerging from the same hosts. No difference in larvae from different host tree species.
From the results, it can be concluded that there exists strong consistency between the enzyme activities of cellulase and isozymes patterns. There were no significant differences between the cellulase activities in A. glabripennis from different host tree species, as well as the endoglucanase isozymes patterns.This show that, there is no obvious relevance between cellulase and the larvae host tree species in A. glabripennis.
(2) Adults were emerging from opera poplar, fed them with fresh branches of A. altissima Swingle, P. tomentosa Carriere, P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., S. matsudana Koidz, and A. negundo L. respectively for three days.Cellulase activities were measured. The results were:Significant differences were found in the activities of endoglucanase between male and female fed on A. negundo L. and control, low activity of endoglucanase was occurred in both males and females fed on A. altissima Swingle. There were no significant differences in exoglucanase activities between males and females. Significant differences were noted inβ-glucosidase activity between male and female fed on A. negundo L., but there were no significant differences between male and female fed on other trees.
As a kind of induced enzymes, this study found that, the kind of trees which the adults fed on has great effect on the activity of cellulase in adults, especially for endoglucanase. Thus, there is some relevance between cellulase and host tree selection in A. glabripennis adults.
(3) Adults were emerging from P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu. and S. matsudana Koidz, fed them with fresh branches of P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., S. matsudana Koidz and A. negundo L. respectively for three days.Cellulase activities were measured. The results were:In A. glabripennis adults from S. matsudana Koidz fed on different host tree species, there are no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase between male and female fed on three host trees, neither inβ-glucosidase. No significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase andβ-glucosidase was found between male or female fed on three host tree species. In A. glabripennis adults from P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu. fed on different host tree species, there are no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase between male and female fed on three host trees, neither in P-glucosidase. No significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase and P-glucosidase was found between male or female fed on three host tree species, except the endoglucanase activity in male fed on S. matsudana Koidz is lower than that fed on A. negundo L. and P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu..
(4) In the research, extremely weak cellulase activity was detected in A. glabripennis pupae, not more than 0.06μmol (glucose)·g-1 (FW)·h-1, no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase and P-glucosidase between male pupae and female pupae. In the inner adults, no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase between male and female.There was a great fluctuation in the cellulase activity, this may show that the cellulase system in A. glabripennis adults is gradually perfect after adult emergence till coming out of the emergence hole.
(5) Larvae fed on host tree species under natural growth situation had a significant reduction in both endoglucanase andβ-glucosidase activities. The activities of endoglucanase in the first and second instars are significantly higher than the followed three instars, and the activities ofβ-glucosidase in the former three instars are significantly higher than the followed two instars. This trend also occurred in the larvae fed on artificial diet. The low cellulase activity of matured larvae may caused by low relative comsumption rate or stable cellulase activity level with increasing weight.
(6) Intestine of A. glabripennis larvae, female and male were tookout, foregut, midgut and hindgut were distinguished and the cellulase activity was measured respectively, the results show that:90.4% endoglucanase activity and 93.4%β-glucosidase activity of larvae were distributed in midgut.65.4% endoglucanase activity and 94.2%β-glucosidase activity of female were distributed in midgut, and 31.5 %endoglucanase activity distributed in hindgut.89.0%endoglucanase activity and 92.0%β-glucosidase activity of male were distributed in midgut. Cystic structure was discovered in the intestinal tissue paraffin section of female A. glabripennis. This makes cellulase source in A. glabripennis, with a new assumption that cellulase in A. glabripennis larvae and male adult was secreted by itself, and A. glabripennis adult female digest natural cellulose with the participation of symbiotic microorganism in there hindgut. For verification of this speculation requires further study.
(1)以新疆杨、箭杆杨、合作杨和漳河柳四种寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫和幼虫为研究对象,测定其肠道内三类纤维素酶活性,结果表明,不同寄主来源光肩星天牛雌与雄成虫之间的Cx酶、C1酶以及β-萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异,同种寄主来源光肩星天牛雄成虫的Cx酶活性显著高于雌成虫,同种寄主来源光肩星天牛雌雄成虫的C1酶和β-萄糖苷酶活性无显著性差异；不同寄主来源光肩星天牛幼虫Cx酶、C1酶以及β-萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异。
以聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法检测上述四种寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫和幼虫Cx酶同工酶,结果显示,不同寄主来源幼虫、雌成虫以及雄成虫的Cx酶同工酶带型和迁移距离无明显差异,同种寄主来源雌雄成虫之间亦无明显差异。
在本研究结果中,三类纤维素酶活性和同工酶谱具有高度的一致性,分别显示出不同寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫纤维素酶在酶活性和Cx酶同工酶方面是没有明显差异的,这表明,光肩星天牛纤维素酶与幼虫寄主树种之间无明显的关联性。
(2)取合作杨来源光肩星天牛成虫,分别饲以臭椿、毛白杨、合作杨、旱柳和复叶槭五种不同树种的新鲜枝条,3d后检测其纤维素酶活性,研究结果为,取食复叶槭雌成虫Cx酶活性显著高于雄成虫,取食其它树种雌雄成虫Cx酶活性无显著性差异,对照雄成虫(饥饿3d)Cx酶活性显著高于雌成虫；取食各树种雌雄成虫之间C1酶活性均无显著性差异；取食复叶槭雌成虫β-葡萄糖苷酶活性显著高于雄成虫,取食其它树种雌雄成虫β-葡萄糖苷酶活性无显著性差异。
取食复叶槭雌成虫Cx酶活性显著高于取食臭椿与对照雌成虫,与取食其它树种无显著性差异,取食旱柳、合作杨雌成虫Cx酶活性显著高于对照,与取食其它树种无显著性差异；取食各树种雄成虫Cx酶活性均显著低于对照,取食复叶槭、合作杨和臭椿雄成虫Cx酶活性无显著性差异,取食旱柳、毛白杨、合作杨和臭椿雄成虫Cx酶活性无显著性差异。取食各树种雌成虫以及雄成虫之间C1酶活性和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异。
纤维素酶作为一种诱导性酶,本研究发现,光肩星天牛成虫取食与否以及取食材料的不同都对其纤维素酶活性大小有很大影响,尤其是对于Cx酶。由此可见,光肩星天牛纤维素酶与成虫寄主树种选择之间有一定的关联性。
(3)取旱柳和合作杨两种寄主来源光肩星天牛成虫,分别饲以旱柳、合作杨和复叶槭三种寄主树种的新鲜枝条,3d后检测其纤维素酶活性,结果为,旱柳和合作杨来源光肩星天牛取食三种寄主树种光肩星天牛雌雄成虫之间Cx酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异,旱柳和合作杨来源光肩星天牛雌成虫以及雄成虫之间Cx酶活性和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性均无显著性差异,除了合作杨来源光肩星天牛成虫取食旱柳雄成虫β-葡萄糖苷酶活性显著低于取食合作杨和复叶槭雄成虫。
两种寄主来源光肩星天牛,取食原寄主与其它寄主树种之后,雌成虫之间和雄成虫之间纤维素酶活性都无明显差异,除了合作杨来源雄成虫取食复叶槭和合作杨之后,表现出比取食旱柳高的β-葡萄糖苷酶活性。这是光肩星天牛成虫对原寄主树种的“记忆效应”,在纤维素酶活性方面的体现,还是由天牛本身取食状态所导致,有待于进一步研究。
(4)检测光肩星天牛蛹和未出树体成虫体内纤维素酶活性,结果显示,光肩星天牛蛹体内各纤维素酶活性均极其微弱,在0.06μmol(葡萄糖)·g-1(FW)·h-1以内,雌雄蛹之间Cx酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶和C1酶活性均无显著性差异；未出树体光肩星天牛雌雄成虫之间Cx酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶和C1酶活性均无显著性差异。树体内光肩星天牛成虫体内纤维素酶活性已较蛹体内有很多增加,但仍然没有达到从羽化孔出树体后光肩星天牛成虫体内纤维素酶活性的水平,研究中也发现树体内光肩星天牛成虫纤维素酶活性大小波动比较大,尤其是Cx酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶,这表明光肩星天牛羽化之后,体内纤维素酶的功能以及分布是一个不断完善的过程。
(5)取食寄主树种与取食人工饲料光肩星天牛幼龄幼虫纤维素酶活性均显著高于老熟幼虫,这有可能是由于老熟幼虫相对取食量降低而导致,也有可能是由于随着天牛幼虫的生长,其体内的纤维素酶活性到达一个稳定的水平,但体重却不断增加,从而使相对酶活性降低。
(6)解剖光肩星天牛幼虫以及雌雄成虫,取出肠道并区别前中后肠,分别测定其纤维素酶活性,结果显示,光肩星天牛幼虫90.4%的Cx酶活性和93.4%的β-萄糖苷酶活性分布在中肠；光肩星天牛雌成虫65.4%的Cx酶活性和94.2%的β-萄糖苷酶分布在中肠,31.5%的Cx酶活性分布在后肠；光肩星天牛雄成虫89.0%的Cx酶活性和92.0%的β-萄糖苷酶活性分布在中肠；在光肩星天牛雌成虫后肠组织结构中观察到有囊状结构。这使得作者对光肩星天牛体内纤维素酶的来源,有了一个新的推测,即光肩星天牛幼虫和雄成虫体内的纤维素酶均由自身分泌,而光肩星天牛雌成虫对天然纤维素的消化,有后肠共生微生物的参与。对于这一推测的验证则需要进一步的研究。
The Asian Longhorn Beetle (ALB), Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera:Cerambycid ae:Lamiinae:Lamiini) is one of the most important forest pests and widely distribute in China, and caused great losses to the forest. Poplars (Populus spp.), willows (Salix spp.), maples (Acer spp.) and elm (Ulmus spp) are the primary host tree species.Because of the serious threat posed by A. glabripennis, a large amount of research of cellulase and host selection has focused on this species in recent years, but the relationship of cellulase and host selection is unclear.
To investigate the relationship between cellulase activity and host selection, A. glabripennis larvae and adults from four different host tree species (Populus alba L. var. bolleana Bunge; P. nigra var. thevestina (Dode)Bean; P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., and Salix matsudana f. lobato-glandulosa Fang & Liu), adults fed on five different tree species (Ailanthus altissima Swingle, P. tomentosa Carriere, P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., S. matsudana Koidz, and Acer negundo L.), adults fed on original and non-original host tree species, insect in different state and larvae in different instars were selected.The enzyme activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase and (3-glucosidase in the intestines of the insects were measured, the endoglucanase isozymes were detected with a CMC-incorporated polyacrylamide gel, and the intestinal tissue paraffin section of A. glabripennis were also been observed. The results show that:
(1) Adults and larvae from four different host tree species (P. alba L. var. bolleana Bunge; P. nigra var. thevestina (Dode)Bean; P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., and S. matsudana f. lobato-glandulosa Fang & Liu) were chosen, and three kinds of cellulase activities in the intestines of the insects were measured.The results were:there were no significant differences in the activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase in males and females emerging from different host tree species. When adults emerged from the same host tree species, there were no significant differences in the activities of exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase between males and females, but the activity of endoglucanase in males was clearly higher than that in females. There were no significant differences in endoglucanase, exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase activities between larvae from different host tree species.
The endoglucanase isozymes were detected with a CMC-incorporated polyacrylamide gel, the patterns and migration of endoglucanase isozymes of males and females emerging from different host tree species are clearly not different, neither are they different when emerging from the same hosts. No difference in larvae from different host tree species.
From the results, it can be concluded that there exists strong consistency between the enzyme activities of cellulase and isozymes patterns. There were no significant differences between the cellulase activities in A. glabripennis from different host tree species, as well as the endoglucanase isozymes patterns.This show that, there is no obvious relevance between cellulase and the larvae host tree species in A. glabripennis.
(2) Adults were emerging from opera poplar, fed them with fresh branches of A. altissima Swingle, P. tomentosa Carriere, P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., S. matsudana Koidz, and A. negundo L. respectively for three days.Cellulase activities were measured. The results were:Significant differences were found in the activities of endoglucanase between male and female fed on A. negundo L. and control, low activity of endoglucanase was occurred in both males and females fed on A. altissima Swingle. There were no significant differences in exoglucanase activities between males and females. Significant differences were noted inβ-glucosidase activity between male and female fed on A. negundo L., but there were no significant differences between male and female fed on other trees.
As a kind of induced enzymes, this study found that, the kind of trees which the adults fed on has great effect on the activity of cellulase in adults, especially for endoglucanase. Thus, there is some relevance between cellulase and host tree selection in A. glabripennis adults.
(3) Adults were emerging from P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu. and S. matsudana Koidz, fed them with fresh branches of P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu., S. matsudana Koidz and A. negundo L. respectively for three days.Cellulase activities were measured. The results were:In A. glabripennis adults from S. matsudana Koidz fed on different host tree species, there are no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase between male and female fed on three host trees, neither inβ-glucosidase. No significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase andβ-glucosidase was found between male or female fed on three host tree species. In A. glabripennis adults from P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu. fed on different host tree species, there are no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase between male and female fed on three host trees, neither in P-glucosidase. No significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase and P-glucosidase was found between male or female fed on three host tree species, except the endoglucanase activity in male fed on S. matsudana Koidz is lower than that fed on A. negundo L. and P. simonii Carriere×P. alba var. pyramidlis cv. opera Hsu..
(4) In the research, extremely weak cellulase activity was detected in A. glabripennis pupae, not more than 0.06μmol (glucose)·g-1 (FW)·h-1, no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase and P-glucosidase between male pupae and female pupae. In the inner adults, no significant differences in the enzyme activities of endoglucanase, exoglucanase andβ-glucosidase between male and female.There was a great fluctuation in the cellulase activity, this may show that the cellulase system in A. glabripennis adults is gradually perfect after adult emergence till coming out of the emergence hole.
(5) Larvae fed on host tree species under natural growth situation had a significant reduction in both endoglucanase andβ-glucosidase activities. The activities of endoglucanase in the first and second instars are significantly higher than the followed three instars, and the activities ofβ-glucosidase in the former three instars are significantly higher than the followed two instars. This trend also occurred in the larvae fed on artificial diet. The low cellulase activity of matured larvae may caused by low relative comsumption rate or stable cellulase activity level with increasing weight.
(6) Intestine of A. glabripennis larvae, female and male were tookout, foregut, midgut and hindgut were distinguished and the cellulase activity was measured respectively, the results show that:90.4% endoglucanase activity and 93.4%β-glucosidase activity of larvae were distributed in midgut.65.4% endoglucanase activity and 94.2%β-glucosidase activity of female were distributed in midgut, and 31.5 %endoglucanase activity distributed in hindgut.89.0%endoglucanase activity and 92.0%β-glucosidase activity of male were distributed in midgut. Cystic structure was discovered in the intestinal tissue paraffin section of female A. glabripennis. This makes cellulase source in A. glabripennis, with a new assumption that cellulase in A. glabripennis larvae and male adult was secreted by itself, and A. glabripennis adult female digest natural cellulose with the participation of symbiotic microorganism in there hindgut. For verification of this speculation requires further study.
引文
1. 安榆林,黄晓明,杨晓军,等.光肩星天牛及其近缘种mtDNA序列和基因特点[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(4)：6-12.
2. 奥斯伯F M.精编分子生物学实验指南[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
3. 彩万志,庞雄飞,花保祯,等.普通昆虫学[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2001.
4. 曹兵,李治中,姬学龙,等.臭椿提取物对光肩星天牛的驱避作用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004b,28(1)：47-49.
5. 曹兵,刘亚辉,吕文,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅵ)[J].辽宁林业科技,2000,(6)：8-11.
6. 曹兵,吕文,李尚志,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅳ)[J].宁夏农林科技,1997,(1)：1-3.
7. 曹兵,宋丽华,徐锡增.臭椿内含物对光肩星天牛取食、产卵的抑制作用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004a,28(5)：15-18.
8. 曹兵,孙永胜,马红军,等.臭椿提取液对光肩星天牛的毒杀作用[J].宁夏农林科技,2003,(4)：8-9.
9. 曹兵,徐万仁,吕文,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅳ)[J].宁夏农林科技,1997,(6)：1-3.
10.曹月青,殷幼平,董亚敏,等.桑粒肩天牛肠道纤维素分解细菌的分离和鉴定[J].微生物学通报,2001,28(1)：9-11.
11.陈长琨.昆虫生理生化[M].北京：农业出版社,1993.
12.陈敏,卢孟柱,王敏杰,等.具有光肩星天牛内切聚葡糖酶结合活性短肽的筛选[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(3)：267-271.
13.邓彩萍,闫喜中,刘红霞,等.光肩星天牛刻槽中一种细菌及其对天牛幼虫的致病性[J].中国生物防治,2008,24(3)244-248.
14.董蔚,李忠恒,徐桂环.光肩星天牛发生现状、原因及治理对策[J].辽宁林业科技,1998,(3)：18-20.
15.杜永均,严顺福.植物挥发性次生物质在植食性昆虫、寄主植物和昆虫天敌关系中的作用机理[J].昆虫学报,1994,37(2)：233-250.
16.方升佐,杨文忠.杨树无性系木材基本密度和纤维素含量株内变异[J].植物资源与环境学报,2004,13(1)：19-23.
17.房建军,韩一凡.植物化学抗虫性的遗传学研究进展[J].林业科学,2000,36(5)：92-99.
18.高瑞桐,卢永农,龚益鸿.利用诱饵树监测两种天牛成虫发生期的研究[J].林业科技通讯,1995,(2)：19-20.
19.郭郛,忻介六.昆虫学实验技术[M].北京：科学出版社,1988.
20.郭尧君.蛋白质电泳实验技术(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2005.
21.何雪青,季荣,杨志江,等.西伯利亚蝗和意大利蝗肠道结构比较[J].新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,27(1)：100-102.
22.贺萍,黄竞芳.光肩星天牛成虫的行为[J].昆虫学报,1993,36(1)：51-54.
23.贺萍,黄竞芳.光肩星天牛的人工饲养[J].北京林业大学学报,1992,14(2)：81-87.
24.黄竞芳,骆有庆,周章义.中国光肩星天牛研究的新进展[J].陕西林业科技,1992,(2)：57-61.
25.黄竞芳,骆有庆.我国杨树蛀干害虫的现状问题与对策[J].森林病虫通讯,1991,(1)：29-33.
26.蒋书楠,殷幼平,王中康.几种天牛纤维素酶的来源[J].林业科学,1996,32(5)：441-446.
27.蒋书楠.中国天牛幼虫[M].重庆：重庆出版社,1989.
28.矫振彪,万涛,温俊宝,等.大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛幼虫捕食的功能反应和数值反应[J].动物学报,2008,54(6)：1106-1111.
29.金艳芳,李桂琴,陈洪军.28%绿色威雷和16%虫线清防治杨树天牛成虫试验[J].防护林科技,2003(3)：28-29.
30.金幼菊,李建光,骆有庆,等.光肩星天牛对干旱胁迫下复叶槭挥发物的嗅觉反应[J].林业科学,2004,40(1)：99-105.
31.李春喜,王志和,王文林.生物统计学(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
32.李德家,刘益宁,中岛忠一,等.光肩星天牛成虫在寄主选择过程中的判断机制研究[J].1999,21(4)：28-32.
33.李德家,刘益宁.光肩星天牛成虫性发育同日龄、补充营养以及交配之间的关系[J].西北林学院学报,1997,12(4)：19-23.
34.李丰,刘荣光,宝山,等.选择诱杀树种防治光肩星天牛、黄斑星天牛的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4)：85-89.
35.李刚,热希,张剑英.关于啄木鸟控制光肩星天牛的初步探讨研究[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2000,(4)：34-36.
36.李会平,黄大庄,王志刚,等.杨树形态特征、组织结构与光肩星天牛危害的关系[J].东北林业大学学报,2004,32(6)：111-112.
37.李会平,王志刚,杨敏生,等.杨树单宁与酚类物质种类及含量与光肩星天牛危害之间关系的研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2003,26(1)：36-39.
38.李继泉,樊慧,金幼菊.光肩星天牛对损伤后复叶槭植株的行为反应[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(5)：42-46.
39.李建光,金幼菊,骆有庆,等.光肩星天牛不同寄主树种挥发性物质的比较分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5／6)：165-169.
40.李建光,金幼菊,骆有庆.用吸附-热脱附研究复叶槭挥发性物质的化学组成[J].河北林果研究,1999b,14(4)：298-302.
41.李建光,骆有庆,金幼菊.复叶槭挥发性物质对光肩星天牛的触角电位反应[J].北京林业大学学报,1999a,21(4)：1-5.
42.李建光.光肩星天牛对寄主植物挥发性物质的行为反应及作用机理的研究[D].[博士学位论文].北京：北京林业大学,2001.
43.李孟楼,李有忠,雷琼,等.释放花绒寄甲卵对光肩星天牛幼虫的防治效果[J].林业科学,2009,45(4)：78-82.
44.李孟楼,王培新,马峰,等.花绒坚甲对光肩星天牛的寄生效果研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(6)：152-156,162.
45.李庆.天牛科纤维素酶同工酶研究[J].林业科学,1996,32(2)：140-143.
46.李庆.天牛消化纤维素的机制研究[J].林业科学,1991,27(4)：417-424.
47.李庆.纤维素酶同工酶在天牛科分类中的地位及作用[J].西南农业大学学报,1990,12(1)：22-25.
48.李文杰,邬承先,王翠莲.槭类树木对光肩星天牛引诱力的测定[J].安徽林业科技,1990,(1)：12-15.
49.刘海清,马润生,文丽华.光肩星天牛调查研究及防治策略[J].天津农林科技,1999,(5)：40-44.
50.刘红霞,常青,马峰.昆虫病原线虫防治光肩星天牛、杨十斑吉丁虫的田间试验[J].宁夏农林科技,1998,(5)：15-17.
51.刘辉芳,王志刚,黄大庄.中国林木天牛天敌应用现状[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,25(增刊)：224-226.
52.刘晶岚,温俊宝,马履一,等.9种树种木材解剖结构及对杨树天牛的抗性机制[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4)：18-26.
53.卢希平,朱传祥,刘玉.利用病原线虫防治几种天牛幼虫的室内寄生性测试[J].森林病虫通讯,1994,(4)：31-33.
54.路大光,康文,李咏军,等.利用昆虫辐射不育技术防治光肩星天牛的可行性[J].核农学报,2001,15(5)：302-307.
55.骆有庆,黄竞芳,李建光.我国杨树天牛研究的主要成就、问题及展望[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(2)：116-122.
56.骆有庆,李建光.多树种合理配置可控制杨树天牛灾害[J].生态保护圈,1999a,(5)：25.
57.骆有庆,李建光.光肩星天牛的生物学特性及发生现状[J].植物检疫,1999,13(1)：5-7.
58.骆有庆,李建光.控制杨树天牛灾害的有效措施一多树种合理配置[J].森林病虫通讯,999b,(3)：45-48.
59.骆有庆,李建光.杨树天牛灾害控制的应用技术和基础研究策略[J].北京林业大学学报,1999c,21(4)：6-12.
60.骆有庆,刘荣光,刘乃生.杨树天牛灾害可持续控制策略与技术[J].中国森林病虫,2002b,21(1)：32-36.
61.骆有庆,刘荣光,许志春,等.防护林杨树天牛灾害的生态调控理论与技术[J].北京林业大学学报,2002a,24(5／6)：160-164.
62.孟雷,陈冠军,王怡,等.纤维素酶的多型性.纤维素科学与技术,2002,10(2)：47-55.
63.南京农业大学.昆虫生理生化试验[M].北京：农业出版社,1991.
64.乔海莉,骆有庆,冯晓峰,等.新疆主要造林树种对光肩星天牛的抗性[J].昆虫知识,2007,44(5)：660-664.
65.钦俊德,王琛柱.论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系[J].昆虫学报,2001,44(3)：360-365.
66.钦俊德.昆虫与植物的关系[M].北京：科学出版社,1987.
67.秦伟,王维平.白蚁消化道及肠道微生物研究简述[J].江西植保,2007,30(2)：68-69.
68.秦锡祥,高瑞桐,李吉震,等.抗光肩星天牛杨树品种的筛选[J].林业科学研究,1993,6(专刊)：42-45.
69.秦锡祥,高瑞桐,李吉震,等.以杨树抗虫品种为主综合防治光肩星天牛技术的研究[J].林业科学研究,1996,9(2)：202-205.
70.邱雁临.纤维素酶的研究和应用前景[J].粮食与饲料工业,2001,(8)：30-31.
71.邵强华,杨兴正,张素华,等.打孔注药防治光肩星天牛幼虫技术改进试验[J].内蒙古林业科技,1999,(增刊)79-84.
72.孙新杰,王邦磊,丛海江,等.触破式微胶囊剂防治天牛成虫试验研究[J].河南林业科技,2003,23(2)：9-10.
73.索风梅,林长春,王浩杰,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅰ.纤维素酶性质研究[J].林业科学研究,2004,17(5)：583-589.
74.索风梅,王浩杰,陈洪宝,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅱ.离体条件下金属离子对松墨天牛纤维
素酶活性的影响.林业科学研究,2006,19(2)：205-210.
75.索风梅,王浩杰,丁中文,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅳ.取食条件对松墨天牛纤维素酶活性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(3)：381-384.
76.唐桦,姜文胜,陈梅红,等.光肩星天牛受辐雌成虫的不育性初步研究[J].中国森林病虫,2001,(2)：10-11.
77.万涛,矫振彪,温俊宝,等.冬季大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛的选择性捕食[J].动物学报,2008,54(3)：555-560.
78.汪世泽.昆虫研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1990.
79.汪天虹,王春卉,高培基.纤维素酶纤维素吸附区的结构与功能[J].生物工程进,2000,20(2)：37-40.
80.汪维云,朱金华,吴守一.纤维素科学及纤维素酶的研究进展[J].江苏理工大学学报,1998,19(3)：21-28.
81.王翠莲,郭志红,托娅,等.高干截头防治光肩星天牛技术的应用[J].内蒙古林业科技,2005(3)：47-48
82.王福贵,周嘉熹,杨雪彦.混交林中黄斑星天牛选择寄主的行为与寄主抗虫性关系的研究[J].林业科学,2000,136(11)：58-65.
83.王浩杰,索风梅,郭付新,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅲ.活体条件下金属离子对松墨天牛纤维素酶活性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(4)：472-476.
84.王建红.复叶槭挥发性物质对光肩星天牛引诱作用机理的初步研究[D].[硕士学位论文].北京：北京林业大学,1995.
85.王健敏,冯颖,等.两种蛀干昆虫消化酶组成和活性比较[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(2)：170-175.
86.王蕤,巨关升,秦锡祥.毛白杨树皮内含物对光肩星天牛抗性的探讨[J].林业科学,1995,31(2)：185-188.
87.王瑞勤,李凤兰,黄一平,等.Ⅰ-69杨和大官杨对光肩星天牛抗性的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,15(1)：85-92.
88.王素英,其其格,时亚琴,等.不同病原菌对光肩星天牛致病力测定及应用技术研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1999,(5)：22-24.
89.王素英,邵强华,时亚琴,等.光肩星天牛幼虫病原真菌—球孢白僵菌的分离和鉴定[J].内蒙古林业科技,1996,(1)：14-16.
90.王素英,时亚琴,赵蒙玲.光肩星天牛幼虫病原细菌的分离和鉴别[J].内蒙古林业科技,1995,(1)：33,37-39.
91.王素英,赵蒙玲,时亚琴.光肩星天牛幼虫病原真菌—粉拟青霉的分离与鉴定[J].森林病虫通讯,1997,(4)：26-27.
92.王西南,范迪,李宪臣,等.桑天牛对白杨派无性系危害程度的研究[J].林业科学研究,1998,11(6)：660-663.
93.王希蒙,马峰,任国栋.昆虫病原线虫对天牛致死效应的室内试验[J].宁夏农学院学报,1996,17(3)：5-8.
94.王希蒙,张真,李再峰.树木挥发性物质对天牛行为的影响[J].林业科技通讯,1987,(8)：24-25.
95.王荫长.昆虫生理生化[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1994.
96.王志刚,阎浚杰,刘玉军等.西藏南部光肩星天牛发生情况调查报告[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(4)：70-71.
97.温俊宝,叶刚,李镇宇,等.杨树受光肩星天牛危害程度与树皮厚度的关系[J].河北林果研究,1998,13(2)：136-140.
98.温俊宝.杨树天牛种群动态及杨树抗性机制研究[D].[博士学位论文].北京：北京林业大学,2003.
99.吴明,丁中文.纤维素酶抑制剂对松墨天牛消化生理的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2003,23(1)：1-4.
100.吴显荣,穆小民.纤维素酶分子生物学研究进展及趋向[J].生物工程进展,1994,14(4),25-27.
101.吴浙东,朱国良,朱朝华,等.虫孔注射农药防治黑杨光肩星天牛大龄幼虫试验[J].广西林业科学,1999,28(3)：143-144.
102.萧刚柔.中国森林昆虫第2版(增订版)[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1992.
103.许志春,陈学英,田海燕.康福多防治杨树天牛成虫试验初报[J].森林病虫通讯,1999,(4)：11-13.
104.许志春,田海燕,陈学英,等.涂干剂防治杨树天牛成虫试验[J].中国森林病虫,2004,22(4)：17-20.
105.闫晔辉,黄大庄,闫浚杰.树木氨基酸组成与光肩星天牛为害程度关系的初步研究[J].河北林学院学报,1996,11(3-4)：259-262.
106.阎伯旭,高培基.纤维素酶的底物专一性.生命科学,2000,12(2)：86-88.
107.阎伯旭,高培基.纤维素酶分子结构与功能研究进展[J].生命科学,1995,7(5)：22-25.
108.阎伯旭,齐飞,张颖舒,等.纤维素酶分子结构和功能研究进展.生物化学与生物物理进展[J].1999,26(3)：233-237.
109.阎伯旭,曲音波,高培基,等.真菌和细菌纤维素酶的差别及内、外切葡聚糖苷酶的底物专一性[J].生命科学,1999a,11(增刊)：61-64.
110.阎俊杰,于秀林,任朝佐等.光肩星天牛虫口密度和空间分布型与抽样方法的数量化分析[J].生物数学学报,1989,4(2)：102-106.
111.阎雄飞.光肩星天牛成虫寄主选择“记忆”效应研究[D].[博士学位论文].北京林业大学,2008.
112.杨奋勇,苏梅,郝永峰,等.斑啄木鸟生物学特性及控制光肩星天牛危害初探[J].中国森林病虫,2006,25(3)：31-32.
113.杨建霞,郝德君,戴华国.寄主植物对松墨天牛幼虫体内酶系活性的影响[J].昆虫知识,2008,45(6)：940-943.
114.杨芒生.武山县杨树黄斑星天牛综合防治技术推广[J].甘肃林业科技,2003,28(2)：63-67.
115.杨天赐,莫建初,程家安,等.黄胸散白蚁纤维素酶的研究[J].中国森林病虫,2003,22(6)：4-7.
116.杨天赐,莫建初,程家安.白蚁消化纤维素机理研究进展[J].林业科学,2006,42(1)：110-115.
117.杨雪彦,高汉中,周嘉熹.混交林中树木形态特征、食物特性与天牛选择行为的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1997a,12(增)：47-51.
118.杨雪彦,王福贵,周嘉熹.混交林中天牛成虫选择行为研究[J].1995a,10(2)：22-26.
119.杨雪彦,燕新华,周晓彬,不同杨树营养物对黄斑星天牛抗性的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1992a,7(3)：26-33.
120.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,白耀宇,等.两种星天牛成虫对树种的选择试验[J].陕西林业科技,1996a,(4)：6-11.
121.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,白耀宇.主要造林树种解剖特征与天牛成虫食性研究[J].西北林学院学报,1995b,10(2)：7-15.
122.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,胡彩霞.树木嫩枝角、栓质层量与抗两种星天牛的关系[J].陕西林业科技,1996b,(4)：19-21,27.
123.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,黄红梅,等.树皮形态特征和解剖结构与两种星天牛危害的关系分析[J].陕西林业科技,1996c,(4)12-14,18.
124.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,燕新华.杨树形态特征、组织结构与天牛危害的关系[J].西北林学院学报,1992b,7(3)：34-43.
125.姚万军,杨忠岐.利用管氏肿腿蜂防治光肩星天牛技术研究[J].环境昆虫学报,2008,30(2)：127-134.
126.殷幼平,曹月青,何正波,等.桑粒肩天牛3种纤维素消化酶的分布[J].林业科技,2000,36(6)：82-85.
127.殷幼平,程惊秋,蒋书楠.桑粒肩天牛纤维素酶的性质研究[J].林业科技,1996,32(5)：454-459.
128.殷幼平,王中康,曹月青,等.桑粒肩天牛幼虫内切-β-1,4-葡聚糖酶的纯化及性质[J].林业科学,2004,40(2)：103-106.
129.张波,白杨,岛津光明,等.无纺布法防治光肩星天牛成虫的初步研究[J].西北林学院学报,1999,14(1)：68-72.
130.张波,刘益宁,白杨.宁夏天牛病原真菌的种类和致病力研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999a,21(4)：67-72.
131.张风娟,金幼菊,孟宪东.光肩星天牛咬食复叶槭后植物体内诱导的信号传导[J].福建林学院学报,2006,26(1)：53-57.
132.张风娟,武晓颖,杨莉,等.超临界CO2萃取五角枫挥发物及其对光肩星天牛的嗅觉行为反应[J].林业科学,2007,143(16)：146-150.
133.张国财,程功,张淑梅,等.哈尔滨市区利用昆虫病原线虫防治光肩星天牛初探[J].中国林副特产,2007,(4)：34-36.
134.张兰芬.光肩星天牛生物学特征及其病原微生物利用初探[J].内蒙古电大学刊(自然科学版),1993,(3-4)：22-25.
135.张连成.光肩星天牛的几种有效防治措施[J].天津农林科技,1996,(2)：41
136.张彦广,黄大庄,王志刚,等.杨树次生代谢物质对光肩星天牛羧酸酯酶和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶的影响[J].林业科学,2001,37(6)：123-128.
137.张永安,王玉珠,张龙,等.光肩星天牛的新病原—天牛微粒子虫初步研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(2)：171-173.
138.张执中.森林昆虫学(第2版)[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1991.
139.赵博光,李周直,葛庆杰.光肩星天牛在杨树上产卵部位的选择[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(3)：28-32.
140.赵汗青,刘铭汤,谢寿安,等.高压电击法防治黄斑星天牛的研究[J].植物检疫,2004,18(1)：5-8.
141.赵建庄.交变应力对杨树光肩星天牛产卵量及孵化率的影响[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(3)：22-24.
142.赵军,小仓信夫,矾野昌弘.光肩星天牛的人工饲养(Ⅰ)[J].北京林业大学学报,1992a,21(4)：58-61.
143.赵军，小仓信夫,矾野昌弘.光肩星天牛的人工饲养(Ⅱ)[J].北京林业大学学报,1992b,21(4)：62-66.
144.赵一宇,王希蒙,李金宁,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅱ)[J].宁夏农学院学报,1993,14(1)：20-24.
145.赵一宇,王希蒙,李金宁,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅲ)[J].宁夏农学院学报,1994,15(2)：23-26.
146.郑丽颖,温俊宝,许志春,等.内蒙古乌拉特前旗大斑啄木鸟与光肩星天牛生态位分析[J].河北林果研究,21(12)：144-146.
147.周嘉熹,杨雪彦,宋占邦.树木单宁含量可作为对两种星天牛的抗性指标[J].陕西林业科 技,1996,(4)：15-18.
148.周章义.林业措施控制光肩星天牛灾害的研究[J].林业科学研究,1993,6(专刊)：109-113.
149.朱元龙.啄木鸟对黄斑星天牛自然控制作用的林间调查[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(3)：72-74.
150. Agrawal O P,Bahadur J.Control of midgut invertase activity in Periplaneta americana:The possible non-exocrine role of the salivary glands[J].Journal of Insect Physiology,1981,27(5): 293-295.
151. Bayer E A. Properties of cellulolytic enzyme systems[J]..Biochem Soc Trans,1985,13:407-410.
152. Berghem L E R, Petersson L G, Axio-Fredrikwwon U B.The mechanism of enzymatic cellulose degradation[J].European J Biochem,1973,27:21-30.
153. Chararas C,Eberhard R,Courtois J E,et al.Purification of three cellulases from the xylophagous larvae of Ergates faber(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae).Insect Biochem,1983,13:213-218.
154. Chararas C.Ecophysiologie des insects des forests [J].Paris:By the author,1979,297.
155. Chen Min, Lu Mengzhu, Zhang Zhiyi.Charateristics of cellulases from Anoplophora glabripennis Motsch (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J].Forestry Studies in China,2002,4(2):43-47.
156. Denis R A W,Martha L W,John E L.Cellulase in the cockroach, with special reference to Periplaneta americana (L.)[J].Journal of Insect Physiology,1965,11(7):947-959.
157. Divne C, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, et al.The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase Ⅰ from Trichoderma reesei[J].Science,1994,265:524-528.
158. Dubois T,Hajek A E,Smith S.Methods for rearing the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on artificial diet[J].Annals of the Entomological Society of America,2002, 95(2):223-230.
159. Fleming M R,Bhardwaj M C,Janowiak J J,et al.Noncontact ultrasound detection of exotic insects in wood packing materials[J].Forest Products Journal,2005,55(6):33-37.
160. Geib S,Jimenez-Gasco M,Carlson J,et al.Effect of host tree species on cellulase activity and bacterial community composition in the gut of larval Asian Longhorned Beetle[J].Environmental Entomology,2009,38(3):686-699.
161. Geib S,Jones D,Sellmer J,Morewood D,Hoover K.Cellulose digestion in the larvae of the Asian Longhorned Beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis)[J].16th U S Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on gypsy moth and other invasive species,2005.
162. Haack R A, Law K R,Mastro V C.Ossenbruggen H S., Raimo B J.New York's battle with the Asian longhorned beetle[J] Journal of Forestry,1997,95(12):11-15.
163. Haack R A. Exotic bark-and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States:Recent establishments and interceptions[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2006,36(2):269-288.
164. Haack R A.Research on Anoplophora glabripennis in the United States[J].Nachrichten-blatt des Deutuschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes,2003,55(4):68-70.
165. Hajek A E,Kalb D M.Suitability of Acer saccharum and Acer pensylvanicum (Aceraceae) for rearing Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J].Canadian Entomologist,2007, 139:751-755.
166. Hajek A E,Lund J,Smith M T,Reduction in fitness of female Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) infected with Metarhizium anisopliae[J] Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,2008,98:198-205.
167. Hajek A E.Asian longhorned beetle:ecology and control [J].Encyclopedia of Pest Management, 2007,2:21-24.
168. Hanks L M.Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles[J]. Annals of the Entomological Society of America,1999,44:483-505.
169. Henrissat B.A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities [J]. Biochem J,1991,280(Part2):309-316.
170. Henrissat B.Beta-glucosidase, beta-galactosidase, family A cellulases, family F xylanases and two barley glycanases form a superfamily of enzymes with 8-fold beta/alpha architecture and with two conserved glutamates near the carboxy-terminal ends of beta-strands four and seven[J].FEBS Lett,1995,362(2):281-285.
171. Holl W,Zverlov V V,Schwarz W H.Enzymes for digestion of cellulose and other polysaccharides in the gut of longhorn beetle larvae, Rhagium inquisitor L. (Col., Cerambycidae) [J].International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation,2003,51(3):175-179.
172. Ishaaya I,Plaut H N.Digestive enzymes in Eurytoma amygdali and their relation to food digestion and to the boring process of the emergence holes in almond fruits[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:Physiology,1974,48(1):37-44.
173. Juy M, Alzati M.Crystal structure of a thermostable bacterial cellulose degrading enzyme[J]. Nature,1992,357(6373):89-91.
174. Kamra D N,Agarwal N,Chaudhary L C.Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary compounds[J].International Congress Series,2006,1293:156-163.
175. Keena M AAnoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) fecundity and longevity under laboratory conditions:Comparison of populations from New York and Illinois on Acer saccharum[J].Environmental Entomology,2002,31(3):490-498.
176. Keena M A.Pourable artificial diet for rearing Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycid ae) and methods to optimize larval survival and synchronize development[J].Annals of the Entomological Society of America,2005,98:536-547.
177. Klyosov A A.Trends in biochemistry and enzymology of cellulose degradation[J].Biochem,1990, 29(47):10577-10585.
178. Kukor J J,Martin M M.Cellulose digestion in Mouchamus marorator Key.(coleoptera: cerambycidae):Role of acquired fungal enzymes[J].Journal of chemical ecology,1986a, 12(5):1057-1070.
179. Kukor J J,Martin M M.The role of ingested fungal enzymes in cellulose digestion in the larvae of cerambycid beetles[J].Physiol Zool,1988,61(4):364-371.
180. Kukor J J,Martin M M.The transformation of Saperda calcarata (Coleoptera:Cerambucidae)into cellulose digester through the inclusion of fungal enzymes in its diet[J].Oecologia,1986b, 71:138-141.
181. Linder M,Lindeberg QReinikainen T,etal.Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I [J].Protein Sci,1995, 4(6):1056-1064.
182. Lingfelter S W,Lazrarus LF,McCullough D G,et al.Methods to evaluate host tree suitability to the Asian longhorned beetle,Anoplophora glabripennis[J]. Environ Hort,2002,20(3):175-180.
183. Luo Y Q,Wen J B,Xu Z C.Current situation of research and control on poplar longhorned beetle, especially on Anoplophora glabripennis in China[J].Nachrichtenblatt des deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes(Stuttgart),2003,55:66-67.
184. Macarron R, Acebal C.Mode of action of endoglucanase Ⅲ from Trichoderma reesei[J]. Biochem J, 1993,289:867-873.
185. Maciej A P,John J B.Single experience learning of host fruit selection by lepidopteran larvae[J].Physiology & Behavior,2005,86(1-2):168-175.
186. Mansour K,Mausour-Bek J J.The digestion of wood by insects and the supposed role of microorganisms[J].Biol Rev,1934,363-382.
187. Martin M M,Jones C QBerneys E A.The evolution of cellulose digestion in insects[J].Phil Trans R Soc Lond B,1991,333:281-288.
188. Martin M M.Cellulose digestion in insects[J].Comp Biochem Physiol,1983,75A:313-324.
189. Masahiro S, Hirofumi W, Nathan L, et al.Purification, characterization, cDNA cloning and nucleotide sequencing of a cellulase from the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle,Psacothea hilaris[J]. Eur J Biochem,2003,270:3455-3460.
190. Meinke A,Tomme P,Tomme P.Enhancement of the endo-beta-1,4-glucanase activity of an exocellobiohydrolase by deletion of a surface loop [J]. Journal of Biochemisitry,1995,270(9): 4383-4386.
191. Mishra S C,Singh P.Polysaccharide digestive enzymes in the larva of Stromatium barvatum (Fabr),a dry wood borer (Coleoptera,Cerambycidae)Materialu[J].Organism,1978,13(13):115-122.
192. Morewood W D,Hoover K,Neiner P R,et al.Complete development of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) in northern red oak trees[J].The Canadian Entomologist,2005, 137(3):376-379.
193. Morewood W D,Hoover K,Neiner P R,et al.Host tree resistance against the polyphagous wood-boring beetle Anoplophora glabripennis[J].Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,2004,110: 79-86.
194. Morewood W D,Neiner P R,McNeil J R,et al.Oviposition preference and larval performance of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) in four eastern North American hardwood tree species[J].Environmental Entomology,2003,32(5):1028-1034.
195. Nowak D J.Pasek J E,Sequeira R A,et al.Potential effect of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on urban trees in the United States[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology,2001,94(1):116-122.
196. Parkin EA.The digestive enzymes of some wood-boring beetle larvae[J].J Exp Biol,1940, (17):364-377.
197. Pedro G F, Fernando S Z.The influence of host nutritive value on the performance and food selection in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae)[J] Journal of Insect Physiology,1993,39(10): 883-887.
198. Reese E,Siu T, Levinson H S.The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis.JB acteriol,1950,59:485-497.
199. Ripper W.Zur Fraedes celluloseabbaus bei der Holzerdauung Xylophager Insecktenlarven[J].Z Vergl Physiol,1930,13:314-333.
200. Rodionoba N A,Martinovich L I,Smirova N I.In:Proc 2nd Int Symp Bioconv Biochem Eng, IIT Delhi March,1980.
201. Rouvinen J,Bergfors T,Teeri T,et al.Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei[J].Science,1990,249:380-386.
202. Schlottke E.Uber die Verdauungsferments im Holz fressender Kaferlarven[J].Zool Jahrb,1945, (61):88-140.
203. Selby K K,Maitland C C.Separation of the components involved in the solubilization of cotton[J].Biochem J,1967,104(3):716-724.
204. Sinnott M L.Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer[J].Chem Rev,1990,90:1171-1202.
205. Smith M T,Bancroft J,Tropp J.Age-specific fecundity of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)on three tree species infested in the United States[J].Environmental Entomology,2002,31 (1):76-83.
206. Spezio M,Karplus P A,Karplus P A.Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of a thermophilic endocellulase[J].Biochemistry,1993,32:9906-9916.
207. Sprey B, Lambert C. Titration curbes of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei:demonstration of cellulase-xylanase-β-glucosidase containing complex[J].FEMS Microbiol,1983,18:217-222.
208. Susanne D.Evolutionary aspects of defense by recycled plant compounds in herbivorous insects[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2001,2(1):15-26.
209. Tilbeurgh H V,Tomme P,Claeyssens M,et al.Limited proteolysis of the cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei[J].Febs Letters.1986,204(2):223-227.
210. Tomme P,Gilkes R,Gilkes R.Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi[J].Advances in Microbiology and Physiology,1995,37(l):1-18.
211. Wang Ji,Ding Ming,Li Yanhong, et al.lsolation of a Multi-functional endogenous cellulase gene from mollusc, Ampullaria crossean[J]生物化学与生物物理学报,2003,35(10)：941-946.
212. Wood T M, Ccrae S I, Wilson C A. Aerobic and anaerobic fungal cellulases with special reference to their mode of attack on crystalline cellulose[J].Biochemistry and Genetics of Cellulose Degradation,1988,43:31-52.
213. Wood T M, Mccrae S I. Sinergism between enzymes involvement in the solubilization of native cellulose[J].Adv Chem Ser,1979,181:181-209.
214. Wood T M.Properties and mode of action of cellulases[J].Biotechnol Bioeng Symp,1975,(5): 111-137.
215. Ya D W,Kwang S L,Zhong Z G.Molecular cloning, expression, and enzymatic activity of a novel endogenous cellulase from the mulberry longicorn beetle, Apriona germari[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,2006,PartB(145):220-229.
216. Yang Tianci,Mo Jianchu,Cheng Jiaan.Purification and some properties of cellulase from Odontoter mes formosanus (Isoptera:Termitidae)[J].Entomologia Sinica,2004,11(1):1-10.
217. Zhang J,Sofivener A M,Slaytor M,et al.Diet and carbohydrase activities in three cockroach es,Calolampra elegans Roth and Princis,Geoscapheus dilatatus Sanssure and Panethia cribrata Saussre[J].Comp Biochem Physiol,1993,104A:155-161.
218. Zhou X G,Marsha M W,Faith M O,et al.Inhibition of termite cellulases by carbohydrate-based cellulase inhibitors:Evidence from in vitro biochemistry and in vivo feeding studies[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2008,(90):31-41.
219. Zhou X G,Marsha M W,Faith M O,Michael E S.Inhibition of termite cellulases by carbohydrate-based cellulase inhibitors:Evidence from in vitro biochemistry and in vivo feeding studies[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2008,90:31-41.
220. Zverlova V V,HOllb W H,Schwarzc M.Enzymes for digestion and other polysaccarides in the gut of longorned beetle larvae,Rhagium inquisitor L. (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J].Int Biodeteriora tion,2003,51:175-179.
2. 奥斯伯F M.精编分子生物学实验指南[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
3. 彩万志,庞雄飞,花保祯,等.普通昆虫学[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2001.
4. 曹兵,李治中,姬学龙,等.臭椿提取物对光肩星天牛的驱避作用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004b,28(1)：47-49.
5. 曹兵,刘亚辉,吕文,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅵ)[J].辽宁林业科技,2000,(6)：8-11.
6. 曹兵,吕文,李尚志,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅳ)[J].宁夏农林科技,1997,(1)：1-3.
7. 曹兵,宋丽华,徐锡增.臭椿内含物对光肩星天牛取食、产卵的抑制作用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004a,28(5)：15-18.
8. 曹兵,孙永胜,马红军,等.臭椿提取液对光肩星天牛的毒杀作用[J].宁夏农林科技,2003,(4)：8-9.
9. 曹兵,徐万仁,吕文,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅳ)[J].宁夏农林科技,1997,(6)：1-3.
10.曹月青,殷幼平,董亚敏,等.桑粒肩天牛肠道纤维素分解细菌的分离和鉴定[J].微生物学通报,2001,28(1)：9-11.
11.陈长琨.昆虫生理生化[M].北京：农业出版社,1993.
12.陈敏,卢孟柱,王敏杰,等.具有光肩星天牛内切聚葡糖酶结合活性短肽的筛选[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(3)：267-271.
13.邓彩萍,闫喜中,刘红霞,等.光肩星天牛刻槽中一种细菌及其对天牛幼虫的致病性[J].中国生物防治,2008,24(3)244-248.
14.董蔚,李忠恒,徐桂环.光肩星天牛发生现状、原因及治理对策[J].辽宁林业科技,1998,(3)：18-20.
15.杜永均,严顺福.植物挥发性次生物质在植食性昆虫、寄主植物和昆虫天敌关系中的作用机理[J].昆虫学报,1994,37(2)：233-250.
16.方升佐,杨文忠.杨树无性系木材基本密度和纤维素含量株内变异[J].植物资源与环境学报,2004,13(1)：19-23.
17.房建军,韩一凡.植物化学抗虫性的遗传学研究进展[J].林业科学,2000,36(5)：92-99.
18.高瑞桐,卢永农,龚益鸿.利用诱饵树监测两种天牛成虫发生期的研究[J].林业科技通讯,1995,(2)：19-20.
19.郭郛,忻介六.昆虫学实验技术[M].北京：科学出版社,1988.
20.郭尧君.蛋白质电泳实验技术(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2005.
21.何雪青,季荣,杨志江,等.西伯利亚蝗和意大利蝗肠道结构比较[J].新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,27(1)：100-102.
22.贺萍,黄竞芳.光肩星天牛成虫的行为[J].昆虫学报,1993,36(1)：51-54.
23.贺萍,黄竞芳.光肩星天牛的人工饲养[J].北京林业大学学报,1992,14(2)：81-87.
24.黄竞芳,骆有庆,周章义.中国光肩星天牛研究的新进展[J].陕西林业科技,1992,(2)：57-61.
25.黄竞芳,骆有庆.我国杨树蛀干害虫的现状问题与对策[J].森林病虫通讯,1991,(1)：29-33.
26.蒋书楠,殷幼平,王中康.几种天牛纤维素酶的来源[J].林业科学,1996,32(5)：441-446.
27.蒋书楠.中国天牛幼虫[M].重庆：重庆出版社,1989.
28.矫振彪,万涛,温俊宝,等.大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛幼虫捕食的功能反应和数值反应[J].动物学报,2008,54(6)：1106-1111.
29.金艳芳,李桂琴,陈洪军.28%绿色威雷和16%虫线清防治杨树天牛成虫试验[J].防护林科技,2003(3)：28-29.
30.金幼菊,李建光,骆有庆,等.光肩星天牛对干旱胁迫下复叶槭挥发物的嗅觉反应[J].林业科学,2004,40(1)：99-105.
31.李春喜,王志和,王文林.生物统计学(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
32.李德家,刘益宁,中岛忠一,等.光肩星天牛成虫在寄主选择过程中的判断机制研究[J].1999,21(4)：28-32.
33.李德家,刘益宁.光肩星天牛成虫性发育同日龄、补充营养以及交配之间的关系[J].西北林学院学报,1997,12(4)：19-23.
34.李丰,刘荣光,宝山,等.选择诱杀树种防治光肩星天牛、黄斑星天牛的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4)：85-89.
35.李刚,热希,张剑英.关于啄木鸟控制光肩星天牛的初步探讨研究[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2000,(4)：34-36.
36.李会平,黄大庄,王志刚,等.杨树形态特征、组织结构与光肩星天牛危害的关系[J].东北林业大学学报,2004,32(6)：111-112.
37.李会平,王志刚,杨敏生,等.杨树单宁与酚类物质种类及含量与光肩星天牛危害之间关系的研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2003,26(1)：36-39.
38.李继泉,樊慧,金幼菊.光肩星天牛对损伤后复叶槭植株的行为反应[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(5)：42-46.
39.李建光,金幼菊,骆有庆,等.光肩星天牛不同寄主树种挥发性物质的比较分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5／6)：165-169.
40.李建光,金幼菊,骆有庆.用吸附-热脱附研究复叶槭挥发性物质的化学组成[J].河北林果研究,1999b,14(4)：298-302.
41.李建光,骆有庆,金幼菊.复叶槭挥发性物质对光肩星天牛的触角电位反应[J].北京林业大学学报,1999a,21(4)：1-5.
42.李建光.光肩星天牛对寄主植物挥发性物质的行为反应及作用机理的研究[D].[博士学位论文].北京：北京林业大学,2001.
43.李孟楼,李有忠,雷琼,等.释放花绒寄甲卵对光肩星天牛幼虫的防治效果[J].林业科学,2009,45(4)：78-82.
44.李孟楼,王培新,马峰,等.花绒坚甲对光肩星天牛的寄生效果研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(6)：152-156,162.
45.李庆.天牛科纤维素酶同工酶研究[J].林业科学,1996,32(2)：140-143.
46.李庆.天牛消化纤维素的机制研究[J].林业科学,1991,27(4)：417-424.
47.李庆.纤维素酶同工酶在天牛科分类中的地位及作用[J].西南农业大学学报,1990,12(1)：22-25.
48.李文杰,邬承先,王翠莲.槭类树木对光肩星天牛引诱力的测定[J].安徽林业科技,1990,(1)：12-15.
49.刘海清,马润生,文丽华.光肩星天牛调查研究及防治策略[J].天津农林科技,1999,(5)：40-44.
50.刘红霞,常青,马峰.昆虫病原线虫防治光肩星天牛、杨十斑吉丁虫的田间试验[J].宁夏农林科技,1998,(5)：15-17.
51.刘辉芳,王志刚,黄大庄.中国林木天牛天敌应用现状[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,25(增刊)：224-226.
52.刘晶岚,温俊宝,马履一,等.9种树种木材解剖结构及对杨树天牛的抗性机制[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(4)：18-26.
53.卢希平,朱传祥,刘玉.利用病原线虫防治几种天牛幼虫的室内寄生性测试[J].森林病虫通讯,1994,(4)：31-33.
54.路大光,康文,李咏军,等.利用昆虫辐射不育技术防治光肩星天牛的可行性[J].核农学报,2001,15(5)：302-307.
55.骆有庆,黄竞芳,李建光.我国杨树天牛研究的主要成就、问题及展望[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(2)：116-122.
56.骆有庆,李建光.多树种合理配置可控制杨树天牛灾害[J].生态保护圈,1999a,(5)：25.
57.骆有庆,李建光.光肩星天牛的生物学特性及发生现状[J].植物检疫,1999,13(1)：5-7.
58.骆有庆,李建光.控制杨树天牛灾害的有效措施一多树种合理配置[J].森林病虫通讯,999b,(3)：45-48.
59.骆有庆,李建光.杨树天牛灾害控制的应用技术和基础研究策略[J].北京林业大学学报,1999c,21(4)：6-12.
60.骆有庆,刘荣光,刘乃生.杨树天牛灾害可持续控制策略与技术[J].中国森林病虫,2002b,21(1)：32-36.
61.骆有庆,刘荣光,许志春,等.防护林杨树天牛灾害的生态调控理论与技术[J].北京林业大学学报,2002a,24(5／6)：160-164.
62.孟雷,陈冠军,王怡,等.纤维素酶的多型性.纤维素科学与技术,2002,10(2)：47-55.
63.南京农业大学.昆虫生理生化试验[M].北京：农业出版社,1991.
64.乔海莉,骆有庆,冯晓峰,等.新疆主要造林树种对光肩星天牛的抗性[J].昆虫知识,2007,44(5)：660-664.
65.钦俊德,王琛柱.论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系[J].昆虫学报,2001,44(3)：360-365.
66.钦俊德.昆虫与植物的关系[M].北京：科学出版社,1987.
67.秦伟,王维平.白蚁消化道及肠道微生物研究简述[J].江西植保,2007,30(2)：68-69.
68.秦锡祥,高瑞桐,李吉震,等.抗光肩星天牛杨树品种的筛选[J].林业科学研究,1993,6(专刊)：42-45.
69.秦锡祥,高瑞桐,李吉震,等.以杨树抗虫品种为主综合防治光肩星天牛技术的研究[J].林业科学研究,1996,9(2)：202-205.
70.邱雁临.纤维素酶的研究和应用前景[J].粮食与饲料工业,2001,(8)：30-31.
71.邵强华,杨兴正,张素华,等.打孔注药防治光肩星天牛幼虫技术改进试验[J].内蒙古林业科技,1999,(增刊)79-84.
72.孙新杰,王邦磊,丛海江,等.触破式微胶囊剂防治天牛成虫试验研究[J].河南林业科技,2003,23(2)：9-10.
73.索风梅,林长春,王浩杰,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅰ.纤维素酶性质研究[J].林业科学研究,2004,17(5)：583-589.
74.索风梅,王浩杰,陈洪宝,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅱ.离体条件下金属离子对松墨天牛纤维
素酶活性的影响.林业科学研究,2006,19(2)：205-210.
75.索风梅,王浩杰,丁中文,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅳ.取食条件对松墨天牛纤维素酶活性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(3)：381-384.
76.唐桦,姜文胜,陈梅红,等.光肩星天牛受辐雌成虫的不育性初步研究[J].中国森林病虫,2001,(2)：10-11.
77.万涛,矫振彪,温俊宝,等.冬季大斑啄木鸟对光肩星天牛的选择性捕食[J].动物学报,2008,54(3)：555-560.
78.汪世泽.昆虫研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1990.
79.汪天虹,王春卉,高培基.纤维素酶纤维素吸附区的结构与功能[J].生物工程进,2000,20(2)：37-40.
80.汪维云,朱金华,吴守一.纤维素科学及纤维素酶的研究进展[J].江苏理工大学学报,1998,19(3)：21-28.
81.王翠莲,郭志红,托娅,等.高干截头防治光肩星天牛技术的应用[J].内蒙古林业科技,2005(3)：47-48
82.王福贵,周嘉熹,杨雪彦.混交林中黄斑星天牛选择寄主的行为与寄主抗虫性关系的研究[J].林业科学,2000,136(11)：58-65.
83.王浩杰,索风梅,郭付新,等.松墨天牛纤维素酶的研究Ⅲ.活体条件下金属离子对松墨天牛纤维素酶活性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(4)：472-476.
84.王建红.复叶槭挥发性物质对光肩星天牛引诱作用机理的初步研究[D].[硕士学位论文].北京：北京林业大学,1995.
85.王健敏,冯颖,等.两种蛀干昆虫消化酶组成和活性比较[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(2)：170-175.
86.王蕤,巨关升,秦锡祥.毛白杨树皮内含物对光肩星天牛抗性的探讨[J].林业科学,1995,31(2)：185-188.
87.王瑞勤,李凤兰,黄一平,等.Ⅰ-69杨和大官杨对光肩星天牛抗性的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,15(1)：85-92.
88.王素英,其其格,时亚琴,等.不同病原菌对光肩星天牛致病力测定及应用技术研究[J].森林病虫通讯,1999,(5)：22-24.
89.王素英,邵强华,时亚琴,等.光肩星天牛幼虫病原真菌—球孢白僵菌的分离和鉴定[J].内蒙古林业科技,1996,(1)：14-16.
90.王素英,时亚琴,赵蒙玲.光肩星天牛幼虫病原细菌的分离和鉴别[J].内蒙古林业科技,1995,(1)：33,37-39.
91.王素英,赵蒙玲,时亚琴.光肩星天牛幼虫病原真菌—粉拟青霉的分离与鉴定[J].森林病虫通讯,1997,(4)：26-27.
92.王西南,范迪,李宪臣,等.桑天牛对白杨派无性系危害程度的研究[J].林业科学研究,1998,11(6)：660-663.
93.王希蒙,马峰,任国栋.昆虫病原线虫对天牛致死效应的室内试验[J].宁夏农学院学报,1996,17(3)：5-8.
94.王希蒙,张真,李再峰.树木挥发性物质对天牛行为的影响[J].林业科技通讯,1987,(8)：24-25.
95.王荫长.昆虫生理生化[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1994.
96.王志刚,阎浚杰,刘玉军等.西藏南部光肩星天牛发生情况调查报告[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(4)：70-71.
97.温俊宝,叶刚,李镇宇,等.杨树受光肩星天牛危害程度与树皮厚度的关系[J].河北林果研究,1998,13(2)：136-140.
98.温俊宝.杨树天牛种群动态及杨树抗性机制研究[D].[博士学位论文].北京：北京林业大学,2003.
99.吴明,丁中文.纤维素酶抑制剂对松墨天牛消化生理的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2003,23(1)：1-4.
100.吴显荣,穆小民.纤维素酶分子生物学研究进展及趋向[J].生物工程进展,1994,14(4),25-27.
101.吴浙东,朱国良,朱朝华,等.虫孔注射农药防治黑杨光肩星天牛大龄幼虫试验[J].广西林业科学,1999,28(3)：143-144.
102.萧刚柔.中国森林昆虫第2版(增订版)[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1992.
103.许志春,陈学英,田海燕.康福多防治杨树天牛成虫试验初报[J].森林病虫通讯,1999,(4)：11-13.
104.许志春,田海燕,陈学英,等.涂干剂防治杨树天牛成虫试验[J].中国森林病虫,2004,22(4)：17-20.
105.闫晔辉,黄大庄,闫浚杰.树木氨基酸组成与光肩星天牛为害程度关系的初步研究[J].河北林学院学报,1996,11(3-4)：259-262.
106.阎伯旭,高培基.纤维素酶的底物专一性.生命科学,2000,12(2)：86-88.
107.阎伯旭,高培基.纤维素酶分子结构与功能研究进展[J].生命科学,1995,7(5)：22-25.
108.阎伯旭,齐飞,张颖舒,等.纤维素酶分子结构和功能研究进展.生物化学与生物物理进展[J].1999,26(3)：233-237.
109.阎伯旭,曲音波,高培基,等.真菌和细菌纤维素酶的差别及内、外切葡聚糖苷酶的底物专一性[J].生命科学,1999a,11(增刊)：61-64.
110.阎俊杰,于秀林,任朝佐等.光肩星天牛虫口密度和空间分布型与抽样方法的数量化分析[J].生物数学学报,1989,4(2)：102-106.
111.阎雄飞.光肩星天牛成虫寄主选择“记忆”效应研究[D].[博士学位论文].北京林业大学,2008.
112.杨奋勇,苏梅,郝永峰,等.斑啄木鸟生物学特性及控制光肩星天牛危害初探[J].中国森林病虫,2006,25(3)：31-32.
113.杨建霞,郝德君,戴华国.寄主植物对松墨天牛幼虫体内酶系活性的影响[J].昆虫知识,2008,45(6)：940-943.
114.杨芒生.武山县杨树黄斑星天牛综合防治技术推广[J].甘肃林业科技,2003,28(2)：63-67.
115.杨天赐,莫建初,程家安,等.黄胸散白蚁纤维素酶的研究[J].中国森林病虫,2003,22(6)：4-7.
116.杨天赐,莫建初,程家安.白蚁消化纤维素机理研究进展[J].林业科学,2006,42(1)：110-115.
117.杨雪彦,高汉中,周嘉熹.混交林中树木形态特征、食物特性与天牛选择行为的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1997a,12(增)：47-51.
118.杨雪彦,王福贵,周嘉熹.混交林中天牛成虫选择行为研究[J].1995a,10(2)：22-26.
119.杨雪彦,燕新华,周晓彬,不同杨树营养物对黄斑星天牛抗性的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1992a,7(3)：26-33.
120.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,白耀宇,等.两种星天牛成虫对树种的选择试验[J].陕西林业科技,1996a,(4)：6-11.
121.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,白耀宇.主要造林树种解剖特征与天牛成虫食性研究[J].西北林学院学报,1995b,10(2)：7-15.
122.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,胡彩霞.树木嫩枝角、栓质层量与抗两种星天牛的关系[J].陕西林业科技,1996b,(4)：19-21,27.
123.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,黄红梅,等.树皮形态特征和解剖结构与两种星天牛危害的关系分析[J].陕西林业科技,1996c,(4)12-14,18.
124.杨雪彦,周嘉熹,燕新华.杨树形态特征、组织结构与天牛危害的关系[J].西北林学院学报,1992b,7(3)：34-43.
125.姚万军,杨忠岐.利用管氏肿腿蜂防治光肩星天牛技术研究[J].环境昆虫学报,2008,30(2)：127-134.
126.殷幼平,曹月青,何正波,等.桑粒肩天牛3种纤维素消化酶的分布[J].林业科技,2000,36(6)：82-85.
127.殷幼平,程惊秋,蒋书楠.桑粒肩天牛纤维素酶的性质研究[J].林业科技,1996,32(5)：454-459.
128.殷幼平,王中康,曹月青,等.桑粒肩天牛幼虫内切-β-1,4-葡聚糖酶的纯化及性质[J].林业科学,2004,40(2)：103-106.
129.张波,白杨,岛津光明,等.无纺布法防治光肩星天牛成虫的初步研究[J].西北林学院学报,1999,14(1)：68-72.
130.张波,刘益宁,白杨.宁夏天牛病原真菌的种类和致病力研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999a,21(4)：67-72.
131.张风娟,金幼菊,孟宪东.光肩星天牛咬食复叶槭后植物体内诱导的信号传导[J].福建林学院学报,2006,26(1)：53-57.
132.张风娟,武晓颖,杨莉,等.超临界CO2萃取五角枫挥发物及其对光肩星天牛的嗅觉行为反应[J].林业科学,2007,143(16)：146-150.
133.张国财,程功,张淑梅,等.哈尔滨市区利用昆虫病原线虫防治光肩星天牛初探[J].中国林副特产,2007,(4)：34-36.
134.张兰芬.光肩星天牛生物学特征及其病原微生物利用初探[J].内蒙古电大学刊(自然科学版),1993,(3-4)：22-25.
135.张连成.光肩星天牛的几种有效防治措施[J].天津农林科技,1996,(2)：41
136.张彦广,黄大庄,王志刚,等.杨树次生代谢物质对光肩星天牛羧酸酯酶和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶的影响[J].林业科学,2001,37(6)：123-128.
137.张永安,王玉珠,张龙,等.光肩星天牛的新病原—天牛微粒子虫初步研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(2)：171-173.
138.张执中.森林昆虫学(第2版)[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1991.
139.赵博光,李周直,葛庆杰.光肩星天牛在杨树上产卵部位的选择[J].北京林业大学学报,1997,19(3)：28-32.
140.赵汗青,刘铭汤,谢寿安,等.高压电击法防治黄斑星天牛的研究[J].植物检疫,2004,18(1)：5-8.
141.赵建庄.交变应力对杨树光肩星天牛产卵量及孵化率的影响[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(3)：22-24.
142.赵军,小仓信夫,矾野昌弘.光肩星天牛的人工饲养(Ⅰ)[J].北京林业大学学报,1992a,21(4)：58-61.
143.赵军，小仓信夫,矾野昌弘.光肩星天牛的人工饲养(Ⅱ)[J].北京林业大学学报,1992b,21(4)：62-66.
144.赵一宇,王希蒙,李金宁,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅱ)[J].宁夏农学院学报,1993,14(1)：20-24.
145.赵一宇,王希蒙,李金宁,等.几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究(Ⅲ)[J].宁夏农学院学报,1994,15(2)：23-26.
146.郑丽颖,温俊宝,许志春,等.内蒙古乌拉特前旗大斑啄木鸟与光肩星天牛生态位分析[J].河北林果研究,21(12)：144-146.
147.周嘉熹,杨雪彦,宋占邦.树木单宁含量可作为对两种星天牛的抗性指标[J].陕西林业科 技,1996,(4)：15-18.
148.周章义.林业措施控制光肩星天牛灾害的研究[J].林业科学研究,1993,6(专刊)：109-113.
149.朱元龙.啄木鸟对黄斑星天牛自然控制作用的林间调查[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(3)：72-74.
150. Agrawal O P,Bahadur J.Control of midgut invertase activity in Periplaneta americana:The possible non-exocrine role of the salivary glands[J].Journal of Insect Physiology,1981,27(5): 293-295.
151. Bayer E A. Properties of cellulolytic enzyme systems[J]..Biochem Soc Trans,1985,13:407-410.
152. Berghem L E R, Petersson L G, Axio-Fredrikwwon U B.The mechanism of enzymatic cellulose degradation[J].European J Biochem,1973,27:21-30.
153. Chararas C,Eberhard R,Courtois J E,et al.Purification of three cellulases from the xylophagous larvae of Ergates faber(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae).Insect Biochem,1983,13:213-218.
154. Chararas C.Ecophysiologie des insects des forests [J].Paris:By the author,1979,297.
155. Chen Min, Lu Mengzhu, Zhang Zhiyi.Charateristics of cellulases from Anoplophora glabripennis Motsch (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J].Forestry Studies in China,2002,4(2):43-47.
156. Denis R A W,Martha L W,John E L.Cellulase in the cockroach, with special reference to Periplaneta americana (L.)[J].Journal of Insect Physiology,1965,11(7):947-959.
157. Divne C, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, et al.The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase Ⅰ from Trichoderma reesei[J].Science,1994,265:524-528.
158. Dubois T,Hajek A E,Smith S.Methods for rearing the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on artificial diet[J].Annals of the Entomological Society of America,2002, 95(2):223-230.
159. Fleming M R,Bhardwaj M C,Janowiak J J,et al.Noncontact ultrasound detection of exotic insects in wood packing materials[J].Forest Products Journal,2005,55(6):33-37.
160. Geib S,Jimenez-Gasco M,Carlson J,et al.Effect of host tree species on cellulase activity and bacterial community composition in the gut of larval Asian Longhorned Beetle[J].Environmental Entomology,2009,38(3):686-699.
161. Geib S,Jones D,Sellmer J,Morewood D,Hoover K.Cellulose digestion in the larvae of the Asian Longhorned Beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis)[J].16th U S Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on gypsy moth and other invasive species,2005.
162. Haack R A, Law K R,Mastro V C.Ossenbruggen H S., Raimo B J.New York's battle with the Asian longhorned beetle[J] Journal of Forestry,1997,95(12):11-15.
163. Haack R A. Exotic bark-and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States:Recent establishments and interceptions[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2006,36(2):269-288.
164. Haack R A.Research on Anoplophora glabripennis in the United States[J].Nachrichten-blatt des Deutuschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes,2003,55(4):68-70.
165. Hajek A E,Kalb D M.Suitability of Acer saccharum and Acer pensylvanicum (Aceraceae) for rearing Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J].Canadian Entomologist,2007, 139:751-755.
166. Hajek A E,Lund J,Smith M T,Reduction in fitness of female Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) infected with Metarhizium anisopliae[J] Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,2008,98:198-205.
167. Hajek A E.Asian longhorned beetle:ecology and control [J].Encyclopedia of Pest Management, 2007,2:21-24.
168. Hanks L M.Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles[J]. Annals of the Entomological Society of America,1999,44:483-505.
169. Henrissat B.A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities [J]. Biochem J,1991,280(Part2):309-316.
170. Henrissat B.Beta-glucosidase, beta-galactosidase, family A cellulases, family F xylanases and two barley glycanases form a superfamily of enzymes with 8-fold beta/alpha architecture and with two conserved glutamates near the carboxy-terminal ends of beta-strands four and seven[J].FEBS Lett,1995,362(2):281-285.
171. Holl W,Zverlov V V,Schwarz W H.Enzymes for digestion of cellulose and other polysaccharides in the gut of longhorn beetle larvae, Rhagium inquisitor L. (Col., Cerambycidae) [J].International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation,2003,51(3):175-179.
172. Ishaaya I,Plaut H N.Digestive enzymes in Eurytoma amygdali and their relation to food digestion and to the boring process of the emergence holes in almond fruits[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:Physiology,1974,48(1):37-44.
173. Juy M, Alzati M.Crystal structure of a thermostable bacterial cellulose degrading enzyme[J]. Nature,1992,357(6373):89-91.
174. Kamra D N,Agarwal N,Chaudhary L C.Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary compounds[J].International Congress Series,2006,1293:156-163.
175. Keena M AAnoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) fecundity and longevity under laboratory conditions:Comparison of populations from New York and Illinois on Acer saccharum[J].Environmental Entomology,2002,31(3):490-498.
176. Keena M A.Pourable artificial diet for rearing Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycid ae) and methods to optimize larval survival and synchronize development[J].Annals of the Entomological Society of America,2005,98:536-547.
177. Klyosov A A.Trends in biochemistry and enzymology of cellulose degradation[J].Biochem,1990, 29(47):10577-10585.
178. Kukor J J,Martin M M.Cellulose digestion in Mouchamus marorator Key.(coleoptera: cerambycidae):Role of acquired fungal enzymes[J].Journal of chemical ecology,1986a, 12(5):1057-1070.
179. Kukor J J,Martin M M.The role of ingested fungal enzymes in cellulose digestion in the larvae of cerambycid beetles[J].Physiol Zool,1988,61(4):364-371.
180. Kukor J J,Martin M M.The transformation of Saperda calcarata (Coleoptera:Cerambucidae)into cellulose digester through the inclusion of fungal enzymes in its diet[J].Oecologia,1986b, 71:138-141.
181. Linder M,Lindeberg QReinikainen T,etal.Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I [J].Protein Sci,1995, 4(6):1056-1064.
182. Lingfelter S W,Lazrarus LF,McCullough D G,et al.Methods to evaluate host tree suitability to the Asian longhorned beetle,Anoplophora glabripennis[J]. Environ Hort,2002,20(3):175-180.
183. Luo Y Q,Wen J B,Xu Z C.Current situation of research and control on poplar longhorned beetle, especially on Anoplophora glabripennis in China[J].Nachrichtenblatt des deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes(Stuttgart),2003,55:66-67.
184. Macarron R, Acebal C.Mode of action of endoglucanase Ⅲ from Trichoderma reesei[J]. Biochem J, 1993,289:867-873.
185. Maciej A P,John J B.Single experience learning of host fruit selection by lepidopteran larvae[J].Physiology & Behavior,2005,86(1-2):168-175.
186. Mansour K,Mausour-Bek J J.The digestion of wood by insects and the supposed role of microorganisms[J].Biol Rev,1934,363-382.
187. Martin M M,Jones C QBerneys E A.The evolution of cellulose digestion in insects[J].Phil Trans R Soc Lond B,1991,333:281-288.
188. Martin M M.Cellulose digestion in insects[J].Comp Biochem Physiol,1983,75A:313-324.
189. Masahiro S, Hirofumi W, Nathan L, et al.Purification, characterization, cDNA cloning and nucleotide sequencing of a cellulase from the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle,Psacothea hilaris[J]. Eur J Biochem,2003,270:3455-3460.
190. Meinke A,Tomme P,Tomme P.Enhancement of the endo-beta-1,4-glucanase activity of an exocellobiohydrolase by deletion of a surface loop [J]. Journal of Biochemisitry,1995,270(9): 4383-4386.
191. Mishra S C,Singh P.Polysaccharide digestive enzymes in the larva of Stromatium barvatum (Fabr),a dry wood borer (Coleoptera,Cerambycidae)Materialu[J].Organism,1978,13(13):115-122.
192. Morewood W D,Hoover K,Neiner P R,et al.Complete development of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) in northern red oak trees[J].The Canadian Entomologist,2005, 137(3):376-379.
193. Morewood W D,Hoover K,Neiner P R,et al.Host tree resistance against the polyphagous wood-boring beetle Anoplophora glabripennis[J].Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,2004,110: 79-86.
194. Morewood W D,Neiner P R,McNeil J R,et al.Oviposition preference and larval performance of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) in four eastern North American hardwood tree species[J].Environmental Entomology,2003,32(5):1028-1034.
195. Nowak D J.Pasek J E,Sequeira R A,et al.Potential effect of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on urban trees in the United States[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology,2001,94(1):116-122.
196. Parkin EA.The digestive enzymes of some wood-boring beetle larvae[J].J Exp Biol,1940, (17):364-377.
197. Pedro G F, Fernando S Z.The influence of host nutritive value on the performance and food selection in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae)[J] Journal of Insect Physiology,1993,39(10): 883-887.
198. Reese E,Siu T, Levinson H S.The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis.JB acteriol,1950,59:485-497.
199. Ripper W.Zur Fraedes celluloseabbaus bei der Holzerdauung Xylophager Insecktenlarven[J].Z Vergl Physiol,1930,13:314-333.
200. Rodionoba N A,Martinovich L I,Smirova N I.In:Proc 2nd Int Symp Bioconv Biochem Eng, IIT Delhi March,1980.
201. Rouvinen J,Bergfors T,Teeri T,et al.Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei[J].Science,1990,249:380-386.
202. Schlottke E.Uber die Verdauungsferments im Holz fressender Kaferlarven[J].Zool Jahrb,1945, (61):88-140.
203. Selby K K,Maitland C C.Separation of the components involved in the solubilization of cotton[J].Biochem J,1967,104(3):716-724.
204. Sinnott M L.Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer[J].Chem Rev,1990,90:1171-1202.
205. Smith M T,Bancroft J,Tropp J.Age-specific fecundity of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)on three tree species infested in the United States[J].Environmental Entomology,2002,31 (1):76-83.
206. Spezio M,Karplus P A,Karplus P A.Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of a thermophilic endocellulase[J].Biochemistry,1993,32:9906-9916.
207. Sprey B, Lambert C. Titration curbes of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei:demonstration of cellulase-xylanase-β-glucosidase containing complex[J].FEMS Microbiol,1983,18:217-222.
208. Susanne D.Evolutionary aspects of defense by recycled plant compounds in herbivorous insects[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2001,2(1):15-26.
209. Tilbeurgh H V,Tomme P,Claeyssens M,et al.Limited proteolysis of the cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei[J].Febs Letters.1986,204(2):223-227.
210. Tomme P,Gilkes R,Gilkes R.Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi[J].Advances in Microbiology and Physiology,1995,37(l):1-18.
211. Wang Ji,Ding Ming,Li Yanhong, et al.lsolation of a Multi-functional endogenous cellulase gene from mollusc, Ampullaria crossean[J]生物化学与生物物理学报,2003,35(10)：941-946.
212. Wood T M, Ccrae S I, Wilson C A. Aerobic and anaerobic fungal cellulases with special reference to their mode of attack on crystalline cellulose[J].Biochemistry and Genetics of Cellulose Degradation,1988,43:31-52.
213. Wood T M, Mccrae S I. Sinergism between enzymes involvement in the solubilization of native cellulose[J].Adv Chem Ser,1979,181:181-209.
214. Wood T M.Properties and mode of action of cellulases[J].Biotechnol Bioeng Symp,1975,(5): 111-137.
215. Ya D W,Kwang S L,Zhong Z G.Molecular cloning, expression, and enzymatic activity of a novel endogenous cellulase from the mulberry longicorn beetle, Apriona germari[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,2006,PartB(145):220-229.
216. Yang Tianci,Mo Jianchu,Cheng Jiaan.Purification and some properties of cellulase from Odontoter mes formosanus (Isoptera:Termitidae)[J].Entomologia Sinica,2004,11(1):1-10.
217. Zhang J,Sofivener A M,Slaytor M,et al.Diet and carbohydrase activities in three cockroach es,Calolampra elegans Roth and Princis,Geoscapheus dilatatus Sanssure and Panethia cribrata Saussre[J].Comp Biochem Physiol,1993,104A:155-161.
218. Zhou X G,Marsha M W,Faith M O,et al.Inhibition of termite cellulases by carbohydrate-based cellulase inhibitors:Evidence from in vitro biochemistry and in vivo feeding studies[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2008,(90):31-41.
219. Zhou X G,Marsha M W,Faith M O,Michael E S.Inhibition of termite cellulases by carbohydrate-based cellulase inhibitors:Evidence from in vitro biochemistry and in vivo feeding studies[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2008,90:31-41.
220. Zverlova V V,HOllb W H,Schwarzc M.Enzymes for digestion and other polysaccarides in the gut of longorned beetle larvae,Rhagium inquisitor L. (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J].Int Biodeteriora tion,2003,51:175-179.