用户名: 密码: 验证码:
我国第三方支付发展研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
我国第三方支付行业随电子商务而生,发展历程较短,但是发展速度较快,并迅速改变着人们的生活。基于对行业发展前景的乐观判断,很多企业纷纷进入第三方支付行业,包括电信运营商、银行以及其他非金融类机构等。由于存在众多企业的进入,第三方支付行业在发生深刻地变化:一方面行业的结构与利润发生改变;另一方面企业的市场定位、发展策略与运营模式也在发生改变;同时,政府加强了对行业的规范,使得行业在向着规范、有序的方向发展。行业格局的变化逐渐成为了理论界研究与关注的重点:企业如何取得准确的市场定位、正确的发展策略,如何选择分工与协作等成为各企业面临的重要课题。
     近几年来,我国第三方支付行业分工与融合的现象初步显现,但学术界对第三方支付分工与融合的趋势尚缺乏足够的研究,在产业链价值提升、产业内与产业间分工与融合发展、产业规制等方面,我们仍需要付出更多努力。因此,文章选择了从分工与融合的视角来研究我国第三方支付行业的发展,具有较强的理论价值和现实意义。
     本文先对第三方支付相关文献及理论研究进行综述,对国内外发展现状及经验进行了探讨,并对我国第三方支付行业存在问题进行分析,在前述基础上深入研究了第三方支付的产业价值链及其影响因素,进而深入研究第三方支付行业的产业演化方向,即从分工与融合的视角对行业演化加以探讨,最后,得出了产业整合是提升第三方支付产业链价值的有效途径。
     本论文的结构安排如下:
     第一章:导论。介绍了文章的选题背景、研究目的、研究内容和框架、研究方法、创新与不足。
     第二章:第三方支付的研究综述与理论基础。本章是整篇论文的基础,首先是概念界定,主要对第三方支付的概念、特征、种类进行梳理,对第三方支付与网上支付、移动支付、网上银行等概念进行类比分析。接着,对第三方支付的职能、平台竞争、影响因素、盈利模式、行业存在问题以及与传统行业的关系等进行研究综述。最后,对研究第三方支付分工与融合所需的基础理论,包括分工理论、网络外部性理论、产业链理论、产业融合理论、产业组织理论等进行了综合介绍。
     第三章:第三方支付发展现状。本章首先介绍了国内外第三方支付行业发展的基本情况,包括发展规模、速度、行业应用结构与市场竞争格局等。其次,对我国第三方支付产业的组织结构进行了重点分析,包括我国第三方支付产业的集中度及形成原因、市场行为与市场绩效等。接着,列举了我国第三方支付主要企业的经营状况。最后,总结了我国第三方支付行业发展存在的问题,包括行业定位、企业运营、同质化竞争、技术与信用风险等,提出了产业需提升价值的要求。
     第四章:第三方支付产业价值链分析。通过回顾价值链与产业价值链的相关理论,提炼出国内外关于产业价值链地位的影响因素。继而分析了我国第三方支付产业价值链的构成及特点。接着,运用五力竞争模型分析了我国第三方支付产业价值链的竞争格局与产业价值链现状,确认出我国第三方支付企业在产业价值链中的地位。最后,从市场规模、市场集中度、规模经济、产品差异化、技术等角度总结出我国第三方支付产业价值链的影响因素。本章提出第三方支付行业在追求价值提升的进程中促进了产业的演化。
     第五章:第三方支付产业演化方向分析。通过回顾产业演化的相关理论,指出第三方支付产业价值链的演化方向。接着,根据第三方支付产业链环节间的关系变化特征,详细分析了第三方支付产业短期深化分工与长期融合发展的趋势,包括:产业内部融合、与其他产业进行产业间融合的方向,运用博弈论分析了第三方支付产业链各方的竞争选择策略。最后,提出了产业整合将是第三方支付产业提升产业链价值的有效途径。
     第六章:第三方支付商业模式探讨:产业整合的视角。本章通过典型的商业模式,分析了第三方支付整合的原因与影响因素。提出了第三方支付产业的整合方式,包括横向并购的整合方式增强支付功能、提高市场份额;纵向兼并与合作的整合方式降低交易成本,提高服务质量。最后,通过典型实例分析了整合后的第三方支付企业的运营模式与运行效益,得出了产业整合提升价值的结论。
     第七章:研究结论与展望。对文章进行了要点总结,提出了对产业实践的启示与建议,包括行业发展方向、发展策略、政府监管等,同时指出研究的局限及未来研究方向。
     本文可能的创新点有:
     本文主要是从产业演化的视角研究第三方支付产业的演变趋势,更进一步地说是从产业链纵向关系变化的视角,深化对第三方支付产业分工还是融合路径的研究,明确第三方支付产业各链条环节之间的关系,进而提出第三方支付产业的提升发展对策。具体有如下几点:
     1.分析了第三方支付产业价值链现状,梳理出第三方支付产业价值链的影响因素。
     第三方支付产业价值链面临着同业低水平无序竞争激烈、安全问题依旧存在、银行等金融机构与第三方支付企业存在较强的竞合关系、第三方支付企业面临重新组革等现实问题。而影响第三方支付产业价值链的因素主要包括内部因素和外部因素。行业内部因素包括行业内部企业的创新能力(包括满足多样化需求的产品差异化以及技术创新)、规模经济性、市场规模和需求多样性、价值链关系等:而外部的影响因素主要是政策性壁垒。
     2.通过逻辑推演、博弈分析,提出第三方支付产业呈现出先分工后融合的趋势。
     短期来看,根据其依托机构进行划分的依托电子商务平台的第三方支付企业、依托银行的第三方支付企业、依托电信运营商的第三方支付企业以及独立的第三方支付企业等四种类型的产业企业,将充分发挥自身优势更加专注于第三方支付行业细分业务方向。具体来说,银行业务将更集中于交易双方信任的支付,电信运营商第三方支付企业将集中于小额支付与生活化支付,依附于电子商务的第三方支付业务将集中于电子商务支付,独立的第三方支付企业将继续深耕行业支付需要,不断改造传统行业,为企业资金链提供服务。
     而从长期来看,第三方支付更需要包括与银行、硬件制造商、电信运营商在内的企业密切合作,形成产业融合的趋势。融合动因主要有竞争合作的压力和对范围经济的追求、市场需求推动、行业内部技术的融合。具体融合内容上看,第三方支付行业内部的融合主要体现在支付手段与支付功能的融合,包括线上支付、线下支付的融合,互联网支付、移动支付、银行卡收单业务等支付功能的融合。第三方支付与传统行业的融合主要体现在提供符合行业需要的差异化支付服务,同时,进入企业资金链服务,改善企业资金链。第三方支付与物流产业的关系主要体现在资金运转信息平台和物品流动信息平台的融合,进而提高企业运行效率。
     3.论文比较分析了第三方支付产业的典型商业模式,指出行业整合是提升第三方支付行业效益的有效途径。
     当前,第三方支付产业的典型商业模式主要有支付网关模式、信用增强型支付模式、帐户型支付模式、移动支付模式等,通过对四种模式的比较分析发现,四种模式都存在一定的缺陷和不足。而通过整合,第三方支付企业可以更好地发挥规模经济性,充分运用各产业链环节上的技术优势,顺应政府对行业监管的需要。第三方支付的整合方式主要包括横向整合和纵向整合,横向整合主要体现:一是在拥有营业牌照获得运行资格的企业与不能取得运营资格企业之间的整合;二是业务领域的整合,即B2B、B2C和C2C之间的融合,进而提升平台效率;三是市场的合并,即中小型第三方支付通过合并进而扩大市场份额;四是技术的合并,主要是实现网上支付、移动支付、电话支付、电视支付、预付卡支付等多种支付方式的融合。纵向整合主要包括:一是整合与银行的关系;二是与终端设备制造商或运营商的合作,开发新型支付手段;三是走垂直型路线,深挖产业链服务。
     本文研究中还存在诸多的不足,主要是:
     一是对产业分工与融合理论探讨不够系统和深入。目前产业分工与融合仍处于不断发展阶段,学术界对产业分工与融合理论尤其是第三方支付业的分工与融合发展理论的研究尚不够成熟和完善。本文重在构建第三方支付产业分工与融合的完整概念框架,对当前产业分工与融合现象的描述缺乏经济学角度的深入阐释,对产业融合和第三方支付产业的分工与融合发展的内在机理研究尚不够透彻。
     二是缺乏对第三方支付产业分工与融合趋势的进一步预测和展望。随着第三方支付产业的市场化发展、前沿技术的不断升级以及法制法规的不断完善,使得第三方支付产业处于不断地发展变化之中。由于研究时间的限制,文章仅从当前第三方支付业分工与融合所展现的方面,以及基于价值提升,形成产业整合的趋势,阐述了该行业未来可能出现的发展方式,还需做更多的跟踪研究。
     三是缺少定量分析研究。由于我国第三方支付业发展时间不长、融合发展程度不够高,相关数据较少(文中对第三方支付的分工与融合趋势的分析,使用工具主要是博弈论模式的推导论证,而原研究计划中产业融合效应模型由于数据年份短、变量指标数据不全等原因未能顺利进行,使得准确定量分析部分不足,这是本文的一个遗憾和缺陷),因而本文的研究主要集中在定性的描述上,缺乏对第三方支付业分工与融合发展的量化分析和实证研究,未能从数据上深入解剖变化历程及影响因素。只有把定性分析与定量分析结合起来,才能进一步丰富产业融合理论。
     最后,由于第三方支付产业是技术性、应用性非常强的产业领域,且当前还处于摸索成长阶段,本人对其发展模式、运行机制的分析更多是结合个人工作实践与推想而展开,因而对于第三支付产业未来发展方向的相关论断,仍有待时间做跟踪检验。
Born with the e-commerce, the third-party payment industry experienced a short course of development. With a rapid pace of development, the third-party payment is changing people's lives rapidly. Having an optimistic judgement at the development of the third-party payment industry, many enterprises get into the third-party payment industry, such as operators, banks and other non-financial institutions. Also, the third-party payment industry itself has undergone profound changes that the structure and profits of the industry are experiencing, as well as the industrial chain strategy and operating modes. At the same time, the government is trying his best to strengthen industry norms. As a result, changes in the industry structure have become a focus. On the one hand, numerous organizations enter the industry. Meanwhile, facing the enterprises, the relationship within the industry between competition and cooperation and between the division of labor and collaboration has become an important problem.
     In recent years, the phenomenon of division and fusion about the third-party payment industry in our country become clear, but the academic research circles about division of labor of the third-party industry and the fusion trend is still lack of sufficient. In the aspect of the industry value chain upgrading, we still need to make more efforts about industrial division of labor and industrial development and integration, industry regulation. Therefore, this paper chose the development perspective based on the industry of the division and integration of third-party payment in our country, it has great theoretical value and realistic significance.
     In this paper, Ⅰ first reviewed the theoretical research and related literatures about the third party payment, and then analysed the existing problems of third party payment in our country. Based on the foregoing, Ⅰ analysed the industry value chain, the third party payment and its influencing factors in-depth. Proceed to the next step, Ⅰ analysed the evolution direction of the third party payment industry from the perspective of the division and integration of industry. Finally, I come to a dicision that integration is an effective way to promote value chain of the third party payment industry.
     This paper is organized as follows:
     The first chapter:introduction the innovation of this paper, the topic background, research purpose, research contents and framework, research methods.
     The second chapter:research review and theoretical foundation of the third party payment. This chapter is the foundation of the whole thesis. Firstly, defines the concept, main carding on the concepts, characteristics, types of third party payment, analogy analysis of third party payment and online payment, mobile payment, online bank concept. Then, research review about function problem, the relationship between with the traditional industry, the existence of the third party payment, the platform competition, the influence factors, the profit model of the third party payment. Finally, introduce the basis of the theory of the third party payment research, including the division of labor theory, theory of network externality, the theory of industrial chain, industrial convergence theory, industrial organization theory etc.
     The third chapter:the development present situation of third party payment. Firstly, this chapter introduces the basic situation of the third party payment industry, including development scale, speed, industry structure and market competition pattern. Secondly, selective analysis the organizational structure of the third party payment in our country, including the concentration and the cause of formation, the market behavior and market performance. And then introduces the management state of the enterprise of the third party payment in our country. Finally, summarizes the problems of the third party payment industry in our country, including the industry positioning, business operations, the homogenization of competition, technology and credit risk, further industry value chain of the third party payment industry need to upgrade.
     The fourth chapter:analysis the value chain of the third party payment industry. Through the review of the related theories of value chain and industry value chain, refine the industry value chain status factors. Then analyze the structure and characteristics of the value chain of the third party payment industry in our country. Then, use five competitive forces model of competition to analyze the industrial value chain of the third party payment industry in our country, and identify the status of the third party payment in the industry value chain in our country enterprise. Finally, summarize the factors affecting our country third party payment industry value chain from point of the market scale, market concentration, scale economy, product differentiation, technology. This chapter puts forward the evolution of third party payment industry in the pursuit of value in the process of promoting industry.
     The fifth chapter:analysis the evolution direction of third party payment industry. Through the review of the related theories of industry evolution, This chapter point out the evolution direction of the third party payment industry value chain. Then, analysis the deepening of division of labor and industrial short-term long-term convergence trend according to the characteristics of the third party payment industry chain internodes, including the industrial integration between the direction and other industry and the internal industry, and use game theory to analysis the competitive strategy of the third party payment industry chain parties. Finally, this chapter raise that the integration of the industry will be a effective way to enhance the value of the industrial chain of third party payment industry.
     The sixth chapter:discussion on the third party payment business model:from the industrial integration perspective. Through analysis of the typical business model, this chapter explains the reasons and affecting factors of integration about the third party payment. The integration of the third party payment industry, include the integration of horizontal mergers which enhance the payment function, improve market share; and integration of vertical merger and cooperation which reduce transaction costs, improve service quality. Finally, this chapter come to a dicision that the integration of the industry can enhance the value, through the analysis of typical examples.
     The seventh chapter:conclusion and prospect. This chapter make a summary of the article, and make some suggestions of industry practice, including the development of the industry, development strategy, government regulation, and furthermore it points out the study limitations and future research directions.
     Why this paper is innovative:
     This paper is mainly to research the evolution trend of the third-party payment industry from the perspectives of the development trend of industry, furthermore, the deep research is about the division of labor and the fusion path changes the third-party payment industry from vertical relationship of the industrial chain perspective. Analysis the relationship between chain link of the third-party payment industry, and make further efforts to propose promotion development countermeasures about the third party payment industry.
     There are several key points in the paper:
     1. It analyzes the present status of value chain of the third-party payment industry and teases out its influencing factors.
     At present the value chain of the third-party payment industry is facing with some actual problems that the horizontal competition is fierce and disorderly at a low level,that the security problem persists,that there is a very strong competition and cooperation relationship between banks and other financial institutions and the third-party payment enterprises and that the third-party payment enterprises is re-setting.The factors influencing the industrial value chain are mainly divided into two types:internal and external factors.Internal factors includes the innovation abilities inside the industry,which includes product differentiation and technological innovation satisfying the diverse demand,scale economy,the diversity of the scale and demand of the market,the value chain relation and so on.And external factor mainly includes policy-related barriers.
     2. It is proposed that the third-party payment industry presents the trend that is first division and then convergence by logical deduction and game analysis.
     In the short term,the four third-party payment enterprises,which are divided according to the organizations they depend on and includes the one depending on e-ecommerce platform,the one depending on banks,the one depending on operators and the one depending on nothing,will give full play to their own advantages and focus more on market segmentation.Specifically,the first one will focus more on e-ecommerce payment,bank businesses more on the payment of the trust of trading partners,the third one more on micropayments and payments of living and the last one will deepen the industrial payment,make constant efforts to transform traditional industries and provide service for their capital chain.
     And in the long term,the third-party payment requires enterprises including banks, equipment manufacturers and operators to cooperate closely to form the trend of industrial convergence.The motivation of convergence mainly contains the pressure of competition and cooperation,the pursuit of scope economy,the driving of market demands and the convergence of technology inside the industry.From the point of the specific convergence,the convergence inside the third-party payment industry is largely reflected in the convergence of the payment means which includes online and offline payment,and the convergence of payment function,such as internet payment,mobile payment and bank card acquiring business.However,the convergence of the third-party payment industry with the traditional industry is mainly reflected in the differential payment services meeting the industry needs,engaging in capital chain service and the improvement of the chain.And the relationships of the third-party payment industry with logistics industry is largely reflected in the convergence of information platform of fund operation and logistics so to improve the operation efficiency.
     3. The thesis compares and analyzes its typical business mode of the third-party payment industry and points out that industrial integration is an effective way to improve its profits.
     The existing typical business mode of the third-party payment industry mainly includes:payment gateway mode,enhanced credit payment mode,account payment mode,mobile payment mode.By a comparative analysis of the four modes,a certain deficiencies and shortcomings can be perceived.But by the means of integration,the third-party payment enterprises can give better play to scale economy and make full use of the technological advantages of the links on the industrial chain to comform the government on the need for industry regulation. The integration of the third-party payment consists of horizontal and vertical integration.Horizontal integration are reflected in four aspects:the integration between enterprises having business licenses and being awarded operation and enterprises out of the qualification for operation;the integration of business area, namely the integration among B2B.B2C and C2C,resulting in an increase in the platform efficiency;the consolidation of markets,by which small and medium-sized third-party payment enterprises expand market share;the integration of technologies,which is mostly the integration of many payment modes,such as online payment,mobile payment.telephone payment,TV payment and prepaid card payment.And vertical integration is as follows:integrating the relationship with banks;the cooperation with terminal equipment manufacturers or operators to develop a new payment means;taking vertical line and extending industrial chain.
     Howerver,there are still several deficiency in this paper:
     First,theory researches in industrial division and convergence are far from systematic and deep.Now industrial division and convergence is still in the development and the studies of development theory on industrial division and convergence,especially those of the third-party payment industry are hard to be mature enough and perfect.This article focuses on constructing a complete conceptual framework of division and convergence of the third-party payment but less on the deep explanation of description of the phenomenon of industrial division and convergence in terms of economics and all are not very intensive to the internal mechanisms of the development of the industrial convergence and division and convergence of the third-party payment industry.
     Second,the study lacks of the further forecasts and outlook of the trend of the division and convergence of the third-party payment industry.With the marketization of the third-party payment industry,the escalating advanced technology and the continuous improvements in laws and rules, the third-party payment industry is developing.But without enough time, this paper only presents the possible development modes of the industry in the future based on the division and convergence of the third-party payment industry and the value promotion,which results in the trend of industrial integration.Thus,more follow-up studies are needed.
     Third one is lacking quantitative analysis. Due to the thirdparty payment indu stry arrives in China is not long, the degree of its integration is low, the relevant da-ta is not sufficient.(The analysis of division of labor and integration in third party payment industry just use tools in subject of simple game theory. The short periods and incompletion of variable indicators'data, the original industrial integra tion effects model can not carried out smoothly. Lack of accurate quantitative anal-ysis is one of defects in the paper.), so the paper focus mainly on qualitative descri ption. As the lack of quantitative analysis and empirical research about the division of labor and integration of third party payment industry development, the paper can not deeply explain the process of industry changing and influencing factors. Only qualitative and quantit-ative analysis be combined can enrich the industrial in tegration theory further.
     Finally, as the third party payment industry is a very strong technical and practical industry, and it is currently still in the exploratory stages of growth. The n I can only combine my own work practice and imagination to analyze the industr y's development model and operating mechanism. The personal inference about fu tur-e of third-party payment industry remains to be tested in the future time.
引文
1 周鹏,付强.积极探寻经济理论与经济实践的契合点[J].经济研究,2005第11期
    1 黄凯南.演化经济学四个基础理论问题探析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版).2011第6期
    2 李耀尧,邱永华.从产业演化视角看产业集聚理论的最新进展[J].《云南财经大学学报》,2011年05期
    1 智研数据研究中心《2013-2017年中国第三方支付运行态势与投资战略研究报告》2013.01
    林新华,梁莉.浅析第三方支付模式[J].九江学院学报(社会科学版).2007,第2期
    张国卿.基于SOA架构的现代服务业共性服务集成研究[M].解放军信息工程大学.硕士论文,2010.03
    2 韩刚.硕士论文《移动支付产业链研究》,2007
    张述平,杨国明.第三方支付竞争策略创新[J].电脑知识与技术.2006年第17期
    2 Gastaldi, Massimo,Iacovelli, Irene,Levialdi Ghiron, Nathan.Innovation and Competition in Two-Sided Markets:The Case of Payment Systems[J]. International Journal of Management and Network Economics,2008
    1 Laura K Johnson, Ella Nevill.Structured Earns PCI Security Standards Council Certification to Offer Complete Payment Card Security Services to Merchants and Service Providers[J].Business Wire,2011
    1 Prinz, Aloys.Standardising Electronic Means of Payment[J].Netnomics,2011
    1 Marshall. Principle of Economic[M].London:Macmillan,1890
    1 乔治·斯蒂格勒.经济学的进程与发展[J].世界经济译丛,1983第9期
    2 杨小凯、黄有光.专业化与经济组织—一种新兴古典微观经济学框架[M].张玉纲译.北京:经济科学出版社,2006
    3 Xiaokai Yang, and Borland J. 《A Microeconomic Mechanism of Economic Growth) [J]. Journal of Political Economy,1991
    1 科斯,RH,程启智.社会成本问题注释[M].经济译文,1992第4期
    2 Willamson, OE(1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism [M].NewYork, The Free Press
    1 芮明杰,刘明宇.网络状产业链的知识整合研究[J].中国工业经济,2006第1期
    2 吴金明.邵昶.产业链形成机制研究:“4+4+4”模型[J].中国工业经济,2006第4期
    3 潘成云.解读产业价值链——兼析我国新兴产业价值链基本特征[J].当代财经.2001第9期
    4 李心芹,李仕明,兰永.产业链结构类型研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2004第4期
    1 都晓岩,卢宁.论提高我国渔业经济效益的途径—一种产业链视角下的分析[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2006第3期
    1 刘明宇,芮明杰.价值网络重构、分工演进与产业结构优化[J].中国工业经济,2012第5期
    2 田夏,赵红岩.基于价值链视角下的我国区域综合竞争力评价[J].价格月刊,2011第9期
    1 聂子龙,李浩.产业融合中的企业战略思考[J].软科学,2003第2期
    2 胡金星,企业多元化战略与产业融合[J].中国科技产业,2007第7期
    1 孟令彤.西方产业组织理论追踪[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011第2期
    1 参见潘瑞.中国第三方支付产业竞争问题研究[M].云南大学硕士学位论文,2012
    1 王青林,陆军,李响.国内外第三方支付市场发展实践研究[J].金融电子化,2012.07
    2 朱绩新,章力,章亮亮.第三方支付监管的国际经验及其启示[J].中国金融,2010.06
    1 刘佳.电子商务中第三方支付的法律风险问题研究[M].内蒙古大学硕士论文、2012.05
    2 数据来源易观国际《2011中国第三方支付行业发展报告》,2012
    1 艾瑞咨询.《2005-2013中国第三方支付行业市场研究报告》,2013
    1 上海朗程投资管理有限公司.《中国电子支付行业研究报告》,2011年4月
    1 上海朗程投资管理有限公司.《中国电子支付行业研究报告》,2011年4月
    1 易观智库.《2012年中国第三方支付市场季度监测》,2013年2月
    1 易观智库.《2011年中国第三方支付市场季度监测》,2012年2月
    1 夏大慰.产业组织学[M],复旦大学出版社,1994
    1 艾瑞咨询.《2012-2013年中国互联网支付用户调研报告》,2013年3月
    1 熊国红,戴俊敏.我国电子商务中电子支付安全性问题的思考[J].武汉金融,2012.08
    1 迈克尔·波特.竞争战略[M].北京:华夏出版社.1997年版
    1 罗海燕,吕萍.甘肃省特色农产品产业价值链协调性的实证分析[J].兰州交通大学学报,2012第5期
    1 张亚斌,易先忠.贸易结构圈层升级与不均质大国外贸增长方式转变[J].国际贸易,2007第2期
    1 李国学,张宇燕.资产专用性投资、全球生产网络与我国产业结构升级[J].世界经济研究2010第5期
    1 迈克尔·波特;陈小悦译.竞争优势[M].北京:《华夏出版社》,1997
    2 参见潘瑞.中国第三方支付产业竞争问题研究[M].云南大学硕士学位论文,2012
    1 王菲菲.第三方支付产业价值链探析[J].电子商务.2009年第1期
    1 李彪.我国电子支付产业经济学理论特征浅析[J].中国电子商务,2013第1期
    2 尹冬生.我国电子支付产业经济学理论特征浅析[J].市场周刊(理论研究),2010期号:第1期
    1 易棉阳,汤智勇,中国银行业市场结构集中度的演进与改革[J].石家庄经济学院学报,2012.08
    1 白瑞雪.多层面生物学视角下的演化经济学评述[J].经济学动态,2011第1期
    1 逯笑微,原毅军.基于企业组织变革的产业演化过程[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008第4期
    1 约瑟夫·A·熊彼特.企业家的职能和工人的利益[J].国外经济文献摘要,1988第4期
    1 陆国庆.论产业演进的系统动力机理——兼论产业衰退的原因[J].江汉论坛,2002第4期
    2 隋广军,万俊毅,苏启林.区域产业生成的动力因素[J].广东社会科学,2004第1期
    1 周振华.产业融合中的市场结构及其行为方式分析[J].中国工业经济,2004第2期
    2 聂子龙,李浩.产业融合中的企业战略思考[J].软科学,2003第2期
    1 高婉露.浅谈第三方支付与网络金融业的融合问题[J].致富时代(下半月),2012第3期
    1 《翼支付加油活动全省推广专题部署》.中国电信四川公司市场部,2012年6月制定发布(企业内部资料)
    1 姜红兵,仲健心.我国产业整合并购研究[J].当代财经,2003第8期
    2 曾民.产业整合风险浅析[J].科技管理研究,2005第5期
    1 宋平,夏哗,杨琦峰.网银支付网关在线支付模式的委托代理模型[J].武汉理工大学学报,2009第5期
    1 参见樊自甫,魏晶莹,万晓榆.演化博弈视角下移动支付的商业模式研究[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2012第4期
    [1]Krugman P(1991), Center and PeriPhery, GeograPhy and Trade[M]. Beigium:Leuven University Press
    [2]Krugman P(1991), The move toward free trade zones[J], Eeonomic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
    [3]Loasby, B(1998) the organization of capabilities[R], Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization
    [4]Willamson, OE(1975), Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications[M], NewYork:The Free Press
    [5]Willamson, OE(1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism [MI, New York, The Free Press
    [6]Alchain, A.Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1950,58, (June)
    [7]Alchian, A.&Demsetz, J.Production, information costs, and economic economic organization[J].American Economic Review,1972,62 (December)
    [8]Churchill, N.C.&lewis, V.L. The Five Stages of Small Business Growth[J]. Harvard Business Review,1983,61(3)
    [9]Krugman P, Venables AJ. Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. Quarteriy Journal of Eeonomies,1995(60)
    [10]Marshall. Principle of Economic[M].London:Macmillan,1890
    [11]Anna-Greta Nystrom. Industrial convergence and business networks in the telecommunications sector-a theoretical approach. In Proceedings from the 21st. IMP. Conference, Rotterdam, September 1-3rd 2005.
    [12]Bernd W. Wirtz. Reconfiguration of value chains in converging media and communications markets[J]. Long range planning.2001(34).
    [13]Greenstein Shane, Khanna Tarun. What does Industrial Convergence Mean? [A].in:Yoffie B. David, Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence [C].Harvard Business School Press:1997.
    [14]Haeklin F.,Niklas Adamsson,Christian Marxt,Margareta Norell. Design for convergence:managing technological partnerships and competencies across and within industries[R]. International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 05 Melbourne, August 15-18,2005.
    [15]Lei,D.T.. Industry Evolution and Competence Development:The Imperatives of Technological Convergence [J]. International Journal of Technology management.2000,19(7-8):726.
    [16]Mueller,Milton. Telecom Policy and Digital Convergence [M], Hong Kong:City University of Hong Kong Press,1997.
    [17]Yoffie D B.Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence[M]. New York: The President and Fellow of Harvard Press,1996.
    [18]C. Bore's a, C. Saurina a, R.Torres. Torres. Technological convergence:a strategic perspective [J], Technovation,2003(23)1-13.
    [19]Elmar Gerum, Insa Sjurts, Nils Stieglitz. Industrial convergence and the Transformation of the Mobile Telecommunications System of Innovation [R], Phillips University Marburg, Department of Business Administration and Economics,2004.
    [20]European Commission(1997), Green Paper on the Convergence of the Telecommunications, Media and Information Technology Sectors, and the implications for regulation towards information Society Approach, Brussels: European Commission.
    [21]Fumio Measuring Emerging Categories of Innovation:Modularity and Business Model [J], Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2004(71).
    [22]Hacklin Fredrik, Christian Marxt, M. Inganas. Technology acquisition through convergence:the role of dynamic capabilities [R].14th International Conference on Management of Technology, Vienna, May 22-26,2005.
    [23]Hacklin Fredrik.,Niklas Adamsson,Christian Marxt, Margareta Norell. Design for convergence:managing technological partnerships and competencies across and within industries[R]. International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 05 Melbourne, August 15-18,2005.
    [24]科斯,诺思,威廉姆森等.制度、契约与组织[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
    [25]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
    [26]胡永佳.产业融合的经济学分析[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2008.
    [27]马健.产业融合论[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2006.
    [28]张忠军.金融业务融合与监管制度创新[M].北京:北京大学出版社2007.
    [29]于刃刚,李玉红,麻卫华,于大海.产业融合论[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.
    [30]王勇.新经济形式下产融结合研究[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2005.
    [31]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1996.
    [32]黄明.现代产融结合新论[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2000.
    [33]罗军.中国现代产融耦合研究[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2005.
    [34]张庆亮,杨莲娜.产融型企业集团:国外的实践与中国的发展[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2005.
    [35]胡金星.产业融合的内在机制研究——基于自组织理论的视角[D].上海:复旦大学,2007.
    [36]韩国文.演化经济学视野下的金融创新[D].武汉:武汉大学,2004.
    [37]陈春光.基于非接触支付市场分析的电信与金融产业融合研究[D].北京:北京邮电大学,2010.
    [38]郑明高.产业融合发展研究[D]北京:北京交通大学,201 0.
    [39]马健.产业融合理论研究评述[J].经济学动态,2002,(5).
    [40]马健.产业融合识别的理论探讨[J].社会科学辑刊,2005,(3).
    [41]聂子龙,李浩.产业融合中的企业战略思考[J].软科学,2003,(2).
    [42]周振华.产业融合中的市场结构及其行为方式分析[J].中国工业经济,2004, [43]周振华.信息化进程中的产业融合研究[J].经济学动态,2002,(6).
    [44]周振华.论信息化中的产业融合类型[J].上海经济研究,2004,(2).
    [45]周振华.产业融合拓展化的过程及其基本含义[J].中国工业经济,2003,(8).
    [46]周振华.产业融合:新产业革命的历史性标志——兼析电信、广播电 视盒出版三大产业融合的案例[J].产业经济研究(双月刊),2003,(1).
    [47]周振华.信息化与产业融合中的公司结构分析[J].经济学家,2004,(3).
    [48]胡金星.产业融合产生过程的模型研究[J].改革与战略,2010,(12).
    [49]张章颖、陈莉平.产业融合背景下产业合作网络的嵌入性竞争优势[J].科技进步与对策,2009,(18).
    [50]尹莉,臧旭恒.产业融合:基于消费需求升级的视角分析[J].东岳论丛,2009,(9).
    [51]韩顺法,李向民.基于产业融合的产业类型演变及划分研究[J].中国工业经济,2009,(12).
    [52]汪桂霞.产业融合与产业组织创新关系研究[J].当代经济,2010,(10).
    [53]刘珂.产业融合推动产业集群升级的路径探析[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2009,(1).
    [54]刘纯彬,杨仁发.基于产业融合的我国生产性服务业发展研究[J].经济问题探索,2011,(9).
    [55]胡金星.浅析产业融合产生的前提条件[J].中国科技产业,2008,(4).
    [56]杨红,杨柏.产融结合制约因素分析及对策研究——基于国有产业资本与国有金融资本融合的视角[J].探索,2011,(1).
    [57]聂子龙,李浩.产业融合中的企业战略思考[J].软科学,2003,(2).
    [58]张建刚,王新华,段治平.产业融合理论研究述评[J].山东科技大学学报,2010,(2).
    [59]厉无畏,王慧敏.产业发展的趋势研判与理性思考[J].中国工业经济,2002,(4).
    [60]李美云.国外产业融合研究新进展[J].外国经济与管理,2005,(12)
    [61]何立胜,李世新.产业融合与产业变革[J].中州学刊,2004,(6).
    [62]何立胜,李世新.产业融合与产业竞争力研究[J].商丘师范学院学报,2005,(3).
    [63]韩小明.对产业融合问题的理论研究[J].教学与研究,2006,(6).
    [64]林民盾,杜曙光.产业融合:横向产业研究[J].中国工业经济,2006,(2).
    [65]吴颖,刘志迎.产业融合——突破传统范式的产业创新[J].科技管理研 究,2005,(2).
    [66]吴颖,刘志迎,丰志培.产业融合问题的理论研究动态[J].产业经济研究,2004,(4).
    [67]朱渝铖.产融结合模式综述[J].广西大学学报,2008,(9).
    [68]傅艳.产融结合简析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2004,(1).
    [69]许天信,沈小波.产融结合的原因、方式及效应[J].厦门大学学报,2003,(5).
    [70]郑文平,苟文均.中国产融结合机制研究[J].经济研究,2000,(3).
    [71]张庆亮,孙景同.我国产融结合有效性的企业绩效分析[J].中国工业经济,2007,(7).
    [72]王松华,胡敬新.我国产融结合的发展现状及实证分析[J].金融理论与实践,2007,(5).
    [73]芮明杰,刘明宇.产业链整合理论述评[J].产业经济理论,2006
    [74]芮明杰,刘明宇.网络状产业链的知识整合研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(1)
    [75]芮明杰,刘明宇,任江波.论产业链整合[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006
    [76]苗明杰.论产业链整合[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006
    [77]迈克尔·波特.竞争战略[M].北京:华夏出版社.1997年版
    [78]迈克尔·波特.国家竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社.2002年版
    [79]汤清,付阳.电子商务中的博弈论分析[J].特区经济,2006
    [80]陶洋.B2C电子商务商城信用博弈分析[J].电子商务,2007
    [81]王军·现代产业组织理论述评[J].国外社会科学,1997
    [82]王旭磊.银行与第三方支付平台的竞合关系分析[J].华南金融电脑,2007
    [83]王莹.加强第三方支付监管的思考—基于博弈论的视角[J].电子商务,2008
    [84]夏大慰,产业组织学[M],复旦大学出版社,1994
    [85]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海:上海复旦大学出版社,2002
    [86]杨小凯.新兴古典经济学与超边际分析[M].北京:社会科学文献出版 社,2000
    [87]杨小凯.经济学一新兴古典与新古典框架[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003
    [88]杨小凯、黄有光.专业化与经济组织—一种新兴古典微观经济学框架[M].张玉纲译.北京:经济科学出版社,2006
    [89]亚当·斯密.国民财富的性质和原因的研究(中译本)[M].北京:商务印书馆.1972年版
    [90]郁义鸿.产业链类型与产业链效率基准[J].中国工业经济,2005
    [91]杨公朴,夏大慰,产业经济学教程[MJ,上海财经大学出版社,1998
    [92]杨胜刚,吴立源.实验经济学的新视野[1].财经理论与实践,2004
    [93]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1997
    [94]张维迎.产权、政府与信誉[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001
    [95]张华伟,武刚尧.《产业竞争力理论研究框架》[J].太原科技.2007
    [96]周振华.产业融合中的市场结构及其行为方式分析[J].中国工业经济,2004年2月
    [97]朱瑞博.价值模块整合与产业融合[J].中国工业经济,2003年第8期
    [98]郑绮萍.电子商务安全支付策略分析[J].华南金融电脑,2007
    [99]周庆山,周城雄.我国B2C电子支付方式及信用风险分析[J].南方经济,2003
    [100]郑建友.第三方网上支付市场的现状、问题及监管建议[J].金融会计,2006
    [101]张宽海,张靖.第三方支付的分析研究[J].中国信用卡,2006
    [102]周庆山,周城雄.我国B2C电子支付方式及信用风险分析[J].南方经济,2003
    [103]周鹏,付强.积极探寻经济理论与经济实践的契合点[J].经济研究,2005第11期
    [104]黄凯南.演化经济学四个基础理论问题探析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2011第6期
    [105]李耀尧,邱永华.从产业演化视角看产业集聚理论的最新进展[J].《云南财经大学学报》,2011年05期
    [106]智研数据研究中心《2013-2017年中国第三方支付运行态势与投资战略研究报告》2013.01
    [107]第 一 电 商 . 网 上 在 线 支付 方 式 [OL].http://www.isl.com.cn/infoDetail-1590069.html
    [108]张国卿.基于SOA架构的现代服务业共性服务集成研究[M].解放军信息工程大学.硕士论文,2010.03
    [109]韩刚.硕士论文《移动支付产业链研究》,2007
    [110]百度百科.网上支付[OL].http://baike.baidu.com/view/58779.htm
    [111]乔治·斯蒂格勒.经济学的进程与发展[J].世界经济译丛,1983第9期
    [112]科斯,RH,程启智.社会成本问题注释[M].经济译文,1992第4期
    [113]芮明杰,刘明宇.网络状产业链的知识整合研究[J].中国工业经济,2006第1期
    [114]吴金明,邵昶.产业链形成机制研究: “4+4+4”模型[J].中国工业经济,2006第4期
    [115]潘成云.解读产业价值链——兼析我国新兴产业价值链基本特征[J].当代财经,2001第9期
    [116]李心芹,李仕明,兰永.产业链结构类型研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2004第4期
    [117]都晓岩,卢宁.论提高我国渔业经济效益的途径—一种产业链视角下的分析[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2006第3期
    [118]刘明宇,芮明杰.价值网络重构、分工演进与产业结构优化[J].中国工业经济,2012第5期
    [119]田夏,赵红岩.基于价值链视角下的我国区域综合竞争力评价[J].价格月刊,2011第9期
    [120]聂子龙,李浩.产业融合中的企业战略思考[J].软科学,2003第2期
    [121]胡金星.企业多元化战略与产业融合[J].中国科技产业,2007第7期
    [122]孟令彤.西方产业组织理论追踪[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011第2期
    [123]潘瑞.中国第三方支付产业竞争问题研究[M].云南大学硕士学位论 文,2012
    [124]王青林,陆军,李响.国内外第三方支付市场发展实践研究[J].金融电子化,2012.07
    [125]朱绩新,章力,章亮亮.第三方支付监管的国际经验及其启示[J].中国金融,2010.06
    [126]刘佳.电子商务中第三方支付的法律风险问题研究[M].内蒙古大学硕士论文,2012.05
    [127]艾瑞咨询.2008-2009年中国网上支付行业发展报告[0L].http://news.iresearch.cn/Zt/89407.shtml
    [128]艾瑞咨询.2012年Q4及年度第三方支付核心数据发布[OL].http://news.iresearch.cn/zt/192591.shtml
    [129]艾瑞咨询.2008-2009年中国网上支付行业发展报告[OL].http://news.iresearch.cn/Zt/89407.shtml
    [130]易观国际.2011中国第三方支付行业发展报告
    [131]上海朗程投资管理有限公司.《中国电子支付行业研究报告》.2011年4月
    [132]熊国红,戴俊敏.我国电子商务中电子支付安全性问题的思考[J].武汉金融,2012.08
    [133]罗海燕,吕萍.甘肃省特色农产品产业价值链协调性的实证分析[J].兰州交通大学学报,2012第5期
    [134]张亚斌,易先忠.贸易结构圈层升级与不均质大国外贸增长方式转变[J].国际贸易,2007第2期
    [135]李国学,张宇燕.资产专用性投资、全球生产网络与我国产业结构升级[J].世界经济研究2010第5期
    [136]迈克尔·波特;陈小悦译.竞争优势[M].北京:《华夏出版社》,1997
    [137]潘瑞.中国第三方支付产业竞争问题研究[M].云南大学硕士学位论文,2012
    [138]李彪.我国电子支付产业经济学理论特征浅析[J].中国电子商务,2013第1期
    [139]尹冬生.我国电子支付产业经济学理论特征浅析[J].市场周刊(理论 研究),2010期号:第1期
    [140]白瑞雪.多层面生物学视角下的演化经济学评述[J].经济学动态,2011第1期
    [141]逯笑微,原毅军.基于企业组织变革的产业演化过程[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008第4期
    [142]约瑟夫·A·熊彼特.企业家的职能和工人的利益[J].国外经济文献摘要,1988第4期
    [143]陆国庆.论产业演进的系统动力机理——兼论产业衰退的原因[J].江汉论坛,2002第4期
    [144]隋广军,万俊毅,苏启林.区域产业生成的动力因素[J].广东社会科学,2004第1期
    [145]周振华.产业融合中的市场结构及其行为方式分析[J].中国工业经济,2004第2期
    [146]聂子龙,李浩.产业融合中的企业战略思考[J].软科学,2003第2期
    [147]姜红兵,仲健心.我国产业整合并购研究[J].当代财经,2003第8期
    [148]曾民.产业整合风险浅析[J].科技管理研究,2005第5期
    [149]宋平,夏晔,杨琦峰.网银支付网关在线支付模式的委托代理模型[J].武汉理工大学学报,2009第5期
    [150]樊自甫,魏晶莹,万晓榆.演化博弈视角下移动支付的商业模式研究[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2012第4期

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700