动态环境下组织学习与战略柔性对企业技术创新的影响研究
|
摘要
20世纪90年代以来，企业所面临的外部商业环境发生了巨大的变化，环境的不可预测性体现的尤为突出。这些变化体现在以下两个方面，一个方面是环境难以预测；另一个方面是环境的动态性、变化性和复杂性。环境是企业进行决策时必须直接予以考虑的实体及社会因素的总和。研究动态环境可以从两方面进行，一是市场的更新速，即顾客偏好和顾客构成的变化速度；二是技术的更新速度，即新产品技术发展的变化速度。识别环境的动态性已经成为当今企业技术创新的关键因素。
战略柔性和创新能力的提升都是伴随着环境的变化而变化的，企业如果缺乏战略柔性就意味着企业缺乏技术创新能力。因此，在研究中应该关注企业高层管理者对战略柔性的运用。战略柔性是企业维持持续竞争优势的源泉，只有对企业外部环境不确定性的成因进行分析，确定企业不确定性的内容和程度，从而确定企业应该增强哪个方面的柔性，才能以此为导向。
技术创新能力是企业生存的基础和发展的动力，而环境的动态性对企业技术创新能力产生一定的影响，组织学习和战略柔性分别受到环境动态性的影响，从而影响企业的技术创新能力。因此，本文将环境的动态性、组织学习能力、战略柔性及技术创新能力作为基本的研究要素，探究几个要素之间的作用关系。
在环境动态性变化给我们带来危机的同时，也给我国企业带来了发展的机遇，把环境的动态性分为技术的更新速度和市场的更新速度，并分析二者之间的关系。
企业组织学习是企业在动态环境中实现持续市场竞争优势的关键作用因素。论文把企业组织学习分为知识的获取、信息的分发和信息的解释，并对三者之间的相互作用关系进行剖析。
企业战略柔性是指企业在环境中识别变化因素，迅速将资源投入到新环境的能力。本文从资源柔性与协调柔性两个维度，研究其对企业技术创新的直接和间接作用。其中资源柔性包括资源应用的范围；资源从一方到另一方获取的成本和难度；资源从一方到另一方获取的时间三个方面；协调柔性包括寻找现有资源的使用方式或新的组合方式；寻找外部资源的使用方式或新的组合方式；通过组织系统配置资源并用于目标产品；在变化的环境中有效解决问题并获利四个方面。
企业技术创新能力是一种新的生产函数，这些活动可能是生产或产品技术创新、管理创新、组织创新、工艺创新、服务创新、营销创新、市场创新等其中的某一种或几种的结合。企业技术创新评价是综合评价企业各方面与技术创新相关联的活动，需要运用相关的统计数据和经验数据来研究技术创新，并对整个企业的技术创新能力、技术创新效率、创新过程中会遇到的各种风险进行系统的数量分析，它是一个繁琐而复杂的过程。本文采用单一维度进行衡量。
技术创新能力是企业生存的基础和发展的动力，而环境的动态性对企业技术创新能力产生一定的影响，组织学习和战略柔性分别受到环境动态性的影响，从而影响企业的技术创新能力。因此，本文将环境的动态性、组织学习能力、战略柔性及技术创新能力作为基本的研究要素，探究这几个要素之间的作用关系。基于此，提出本文的研究框架，具体包括以下五个方面的内容：环境的动态性与组织学习之间的关系及影响机理；环境的动态性与战略柔性之间的关系及影响机理；组织学习过程与战略柔性的关系及影响机理；组织学习与企业技术创新能力之间的关系及影响机理；战略柔性与企业技术创新能力之间的关系及影响机理。
运用SPSS13.0软件和LISREL8.7软件对调研数据进行因子分析、回归分析等计量统计方法进行实证研究，对动态环境下组织学习与战略柔性对企业技术创新能力影响的概念模型进行实证研究。
研究的基本结论：在影响企业技术创新过程中，市场更新速度与知识的获取、信息的分发、信息的解释之间存在负相关关系，技术更新速度与知识的获取、信息的分发、信息的解释之间存在正相关关系。市场更新速度与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系，技术更新速度与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系。知识的获取与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系；信息的分发与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在显著的正相关关系；信息的解释与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系。知识的获取、信息的分发与企业技术创新能力之间存在显著的正相关关系，而信息的解释与企业技术创新能力之间存在负相关关系。资源柔性与企业技术创新能力之间存在负相关关系，而协调柔性与企业技术创新能力之间存在显著的正相关关系。
本文的主要创新点主要有以下几个方面：
（1）将环境的动态性、组织学习能力、战略柔性以及技术创新这四个关键要素放入统一的研究模型内，有助于探究这些要素之间的相互作用关系及内在机理，在前人研究的基础上，更加细致、科学地揭示影响企业技术创新的因素即组织学习与战略柔性之间的内在机理，丰富企业技术创新理论的内容。
（2）对组织学习与战略柔性之间的作用关系进行了分析。本文首先分析了组织学习的内涵及维度；将组织学习分为知识获取、信息分发、信息解释三个维度。接着分析了战略柔性的内涵及维度；将战略柔性分为资源柔性和协调柔性两个维度。最后分析了组织学习的三个维度分别与战略柔性两个维度之间的逻辑关系及内在机理，揭示了组织学习对战略柔性的作用机理。因此，本文对动态环境下组织学习对战略柔性的影响研究具有一定的意义。
（3）在对组织学习能力影响企业技术创新能力形成机理进行剖析时，分别从知识的获取、信息的分发、信息的解释三方面对技术创新的作用进行了分析，并探讨了动态环境下组织学习对企业技术创新能力的提升作用。为今后完善和丰富组织学习理论研究打下良好的基础。
（4）对战略柔性与企业技术创新能力之间的作用关系进行了分析。本文首先分析了战略柔性的内涵及维度；将战略柔性分为资源柔性和协调柔性两个维度。接着分析了战略柔性两个维度与企业技术创新能力之间的逻辑关系及内在机理，揭示了战略柔性对企业技术创新能力的作用机理。因此，本文对动态环境下战略柔性对企业技术创新能力的影响研究具有一定的意义。
We are currently in a dramatic and dynamic changes times, either the market demandor technology development is full of dynamic,since the1990s.On the one hand, theenvironment changes rapidly, on the other hand, the operations of the enterprise will createa lot of market opportunities.The study of dynamic environment can be done in twoways:first, the dynamic demand of market,second,the development of technology.Identification of environmental dynamics has become the key factor of enterprises'technological innovation.
The promotion of strategic flexibility and innovation capability are accompanied withthe changes of environment.If companies lack strategic flexibility means that companieslack the technological innovation capability.Therefore, we should pay more attention tobusiness executives on strategic flexibility in future research.Strategic flexibility is asource of sustainable competitive advantage springs of enterprise. So we have to analyzethe causes of uncertainty of the external environment for enterprises.Determine the contentand extent of the uncertainty of enterprises in order to determine which aspects should beenhanced, so as a direction to innovation.
Technological innovation capability is the basis of development of enterprises.Thedynamic nature of the environment has some impact on the technological innovationcapability of enterprises.Organizational learning and strategic flexibility will be affected bydynamic environment respectively.Thus affecting the ability of technological innovation ofenterprises.In this paper,we regarded the dynamic nature of the environment,organizational learning capability, strategic flexibility and technical innovation capabilityas the basic elements of this study.Explore the role of the relationship among theseelements.
When the environmental dynamic changes brought us the crisis,at the same time,it willbring development opportunities to Chinese enterprises.The dynamic nature of the environment can be divided into market update rate and technological update rate andanalysis of the relationship between them.
The enterprise organizational learning ability is the key factor to enterprises to continuecompetitive advantage in the dynamic market.In this paper, organizational learning can bedivided into the acquisition of knowledge, the dissemination of information andinterpretation of the information and analysis of the relationship among them.
Strategic flexibility refers to enterprises identify the changes in the dynamicenvironment and the ability of putting the resources quickly into new environments.Thisarticle from two dimensions that are the resource flexibility and coordination flexible,studyits direct and indirect effects on enterprise technological innovation.Resource flexibility,including the scope of the application of resources;the cost and difficulty of resources fromone party to the other party;resources acquired time from one party to the otherparty.Coordination flexibility including the search for used or new combinations ofexisting resources;looking for use of or the combination of external resources.Through theorganization of system resource allocation and use it to the target product.Make aneffective solution to the problem and profitable in a changing environment.
Enterprise technology innovation is a new product function.These activities may beproduction or product innovation,management innovation,organizational innovation,process innovation,service innovation,marketing innovation,market innovation and soon.Evaluating enterprise technological innovation is a comprehensive evaluation of allaspects of business and technological innovation associated activities.Requires the use ofrelevant statistical data and empirical data to study technological innovation.And analysisthe enterprise technological innovation capability,the efficiency of technologicalinnovation and various risks encountered in the process of innovation.It is a tedious andcomplex process.In this paper, we use a single dimension to measure.
Technological innovation capability is the basis of survival and development ofenterprises.The dynamic nature of the environment has some impact on the technologicalinnovation capability of enterprises.Organizational learning and strategic flexibility wouldrespectively affect by the environmental dynamism.It would have an impact oftechnological innovation ability.Thus,in this paper,we regarded the dynamic nature of theenvironment, organizational learning capability, strategic flexibility and technicalinnovation capability as the basic elements of the study.Explore the role of the relationshipbetween these elements.Including the following five aspects:the relationship and impactmechanism between the dynamic nature of the environment and organizationallearning;the relationship and impact mechanism between the dynamic environment with strategic flexibility;relationship and influence mechanism of the process of organizationallearning and strategic flexibility;the relationship and impact mechanism between theprocess of organizational learning and innovation ability;the relationship and impactmechanism between the strategic flexibility and the ability to innovate.
We use the software SPSS13.0and LISREL8.70of the data analysis to test and discussthe results.Make an empirical study of under the dynamic environment, the impact oforganizational learning and strategic flexibility on the enterprises' technologicalinnovation.
The basic conclusion of the study:the process of the enterprise technology innovation,there is a negative correlation between the market update rate and knowledge acquisition,information distribution, information interpretation;there is a positive correlation betweenthe technological update rate and knowledge acquisition, information distribution andinformation interpretation;there is a positive correlation between market update rate andresource flexibility and coordination flexibility;there is a positive correlation betweentechnological update rate and resource flexibility and coordination flexibility;there is apositive correlation between knowledge acquisition and resource flexibility andcoordination flexibility;there is a significant positive correlation between informationdistribution and resource flexibility and coordination flexibility;there is a positivecorrelation betweenthe interpretation of the information and resource flexibility andcoordination flexibility;there is a significant positive correlation between knowledgeacquisition,information distribution and innovation capability;there is a negativecorrelation exists between the interpretation of the information and technologicalinnovation capability;there is a negative correlation between resource flexibility andtechnological innovation capability;there is a significant positive correlation between thecoordination flexibility and technical innovation capability.
There are several innovation points in this paper:
(1)Integrate the dynamic nature of the environment, organizational learning capability,strategic flexibility and technological innovation these four key elements incorporated intoa unified framework. It would help us to explore the interaction between these elementsand the internal mechanism.On the basis of previous studies,we make a more detailed,scientifically reveal the factors that affect the enterprises' technological innovation,enrichenterprise technology innovation theory.
(2)Proposed and verify the role of relationships between organizational learning andstrategic flexibility.This article analyzes the meaning and dimensions of organizationallearning first.Organizational learning can be divided into knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation.Then analyzes the meaning anddimensions of strategic flexibility.Strategic flexibility can be divided into two dimensionsthat are resource flexibility and coordination flexibility.Finally,analysis the relationshipbetween three dimensions of organizational learning and two dimensions of the strategicflexibility and the internal mechanism.Reveal on the mechanism of organizational learningand strategic flexibility. Therefore, the study has a certain significance on the impact oforganizational learning and the strategic flexiblility under dynamic environment.
(3)When analyzing the affects of organizational learning capability on the formationmechanism of technological innovation,we from three respect that are knowledgeacquisition, information distribution and information description.We also discussed underthe dynamic environment,the organizational learning how to enhance the enterprisetechnology innovation capability. Lay a good foundation to improve and enrichorganizational learning theory research for the future.
(4)Proposed and demonstrated the role of relationship between strategic flexibility andenterprise technological innovation.This article first analyzes the meaning and dimensionof strategic flexiblility.Strategic flexibility can be divided into two dimensions, flexibilityof resource and flexibility of coordination.Then we analysed of the logical internalmechanism relationship between two dimensions of the strategy of flexible and enterprisetechnology innovation.Reveals the mechanism of strategic flexibility and the enterprisetechnological innovation.Therefore, this paper has a certain significance between thestrategic flexibility and the enterprises' technological innovation under the dynamicenvironment.
战略柔性和创新能力的提升都是伴随着环境的变化而变化的，企业如果缺乏战略柔性就意味着企业缺乏技术创新能力。因此，在研究中应该关注企业高层管理者对战略柔性的运用。战略柔性是企业维持持续竞争优势的源泉，只有对企业外部环境不确定性的成因进行分析，确定企业不确定性的内容和程度，从而确定企业应该增强哪个方面的柔性，才能以此为导向。
技术创新能力是企业生存的基础和发展的动力，而环境的动态性对企业技术创新能力产生一定的影响，组织学习和战略柔性分别受到环境动态性的影响，从而影响企业的技术创新能力。因此，本文将环境的动态性、组织学习能力、战略柔性及技术创新能力作为基本的研究要素，探究几个要素之间的作用关系。
在环境动态性变化给我们带来危机的同时，也给我国企业带来了发展的机遇，把环境的动态性分为技术的更新速度和市场的更新速度，并分析二者之间的关系。
企业组织学习是企业在动态环境中实现持续市场竞争优势的关键作用因素。论文把企业组织学习分为知识的获取、信息的分发和信息的解释，并对三者之间的相互作用关系进行剖析。
企业战略柔性是指企业在环境中识别变化因素，迅速将资源投入到新环境的能力。本文从资源柔性与协调柔性两个维度，研究其对企业技术创新的直接和间接作用。其中资源柔性包括资源应用的范围；资源从一方到另一方获取的成本和难度；资源从一方到另一方获取的时间三个方面；协调柔性包括寻找现有资源的使用方式或新的组合方式；寻找外部资源的使用方式或新的组合方式；通过组织系统配置资源并用于目标产品；在变化的环境中有效解决问题并获利四个方面。
企业技术创新能力是一种新的生产函数，这些活动可能是生产或产品技术创新、管理创新、组织创新、工艺创新、服务创新、营销创新、市场创新等其中的某一种或几种的结合。企业技术创新评价是综合评价企业各方面与技术创新相关联的活动，需要运用相关的统计数据和经验数据来研究技术创新，并对整个企业的技术创新能力、技术创新效率、创新过程中会遇到的各种风险进行系统的数量分析，它是一个繁琐而复杂的过程。本文采用单一维度进行衡量。
技术创新能力是企业生存的基础和发展的动力，而环境的动态性对企业技术创新能力产生一定的影响，组织学习和战略柔性分别受到环境动态性的影响，从而影响企业的技术创新能力。因此，本文将环境的动态性、组织学习能力、战略柔性及技术创新能力作为基本的研究要素，探究这几个要素之间的作用关系。基于此，提出本文的研究框架，具体包括以下五个方面的内容：环境的动态性与组织学习之间的关系及影响机理；环境的动态性与战略柔性之间的关系及影响机理；组织学习过程与战略柔性的关系及影响机理；组织学习与企业技术创新能力之间的关系及影响机理；战略柔性与企业技术创新能力之间的关系及影响机理。
运用SPSS13.0软件和LISREL8.7软件对调研数据进行因子分析、回归分析等计量统计方法进行实证研究，对动态环境下组织学习与战略柔性对企业技术创新能力影响的概念模型进行实证研究。
研究的基本结论：在影响企业技术创新过程中，市场更新速度与知识的获取、信息的分发、信息的解释之间存在负相关关系，技术更新速度与知识的获取、信息的分发、信息的解释之间存在正相关关系。市场更新速度与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系，技术更新速度与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系。知识的获取与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系；信息的分发与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在显著的正相关关系；信息的解释与资源柔性、协调柔性之间存在正相关关系。知识的获取、信息的分发与企业技术创新能力之间存在显著的正相关关系，而信息的解释与企业技术创新能力之间存在负相关关系。资源柔性与企业技术创新能力之间存在负相关关系，而协调柔性与企业技术创新能力之间存在显著的正相关关系。
本文的主要创新点主要有以下几个方面：
（1）将环境的动态性、组织学习能力、战略柔性以及技术创新这四个关键要素放入统一的研究模型内，有助于探究这些要素之间的相互作用关系及内在机理，在前人研究的基础上，更加细致、科学地揭示影响企业技术创新的因素即组织学习与战略柔性之间的内在机理，丰富企业技术创新理论的内容。
（2）对组织学习与战略柔性之间的作用关系进行了分析。本文首先分析了组织学习的内涵及维度；将组织学习分为知识获取、信息分发、信息解释三个维度。接着分析了战略柔性的内涵及维度；将战略柔性分为资源柔性和协调柔性两个维度。最后分析了组织学习的三个维度分别与战略柔性两个维度之间的逻辑关系及内在机理，揭示了组织学习对战略柔性的作用机理。因此，本文对动态环境下组织学习对战略柔性的影响研究具有一定的意义。
（3）在对组织学习能力影响企业技术创新能力形成机理进行剖析时，分别从知识的获取、信息的分发、信息的解释三方面对技术创新的作用进行了分析，并探讨了动态环境下组织学习对企业技术创新能力的提升作用。为今后完善和丰富组织学习理论研究打下良好的基础。
（4）对战略柔性与企业技术创新能力之间的作用关系进行了分析。本文首先分析了战略柔性的内涵及维度；将战略柔性分为资源柔性和协调柔性两个维度。接着分析了战略柔性两个维度与企业技术创新能力之间的逻辑关系及内在机理，揭示了战略柔性对企业技术创新能力的作用机理。因此，本文对动态环境下战略柔性对企业技术创新能力的影响研究具有一定的意义。
We are currently in a dramatic and dynamic changes times, either the market demandor technology development is full of dynamic,since the1990s.On the one hand, theenvironment changes rapidly, on the other hand, the operations of the enterprise will createa lot of market opportunities.The study of dynamic environment can be done in twoways:first, the dynamic demand of market,second,the development of technology.Identification of environmental dynamics has become the key factor of enterprises'technological innovation.
The promotion of strategic flexibility and innovation capability are accompanied withthe changes of environment.If companies lack strategic flexibility means that companieslack the technological innovation capability.Therefore, we should pay more attention tobusiness executives on strategic flexibility in future research.Strategic flexibility is asource of sustainable competitive advantage springs of enterprise. So we have to analyzethe causes of uncertainty of the external environment for enterprises.Determine the contentand extent of the uncertainty of enterprises in order to determine which aspects should beenhanced, so as a direction to innovation.
Technological innovation capability is the basis of development of enterprises.Thedynamic nature of the environment has some impact on the technological innovationcapability of enterprises.Organizational learning and strategic flexibility will be affected bydynamic environment respectively.Thus affecting the ability of technological innovation ofenterprises.In this paper,we regarded the dynamic nature of the environment,organizational learning capability, strategic flexibility and technical innovation capabilityas the basic elements of this study.Explore the role of the relationship among theseelements.
When the environmental dynamic changes brought us the crisis,at the same time,it willbring development opportunities to Chinese enterprises.The dynamic nature of the environment can be divided into market update rate and technological update rate andanalysis of the relationship between them.
The enterprise organizational learning ability is the key factor to enterprises to continuecompetitive advantage in the dynamic market.In this paper, organizational learning can bedivided into the acquisition of knowledge, the dissemination of information andinterpretation of the information and analysis of the relationship among them.
Strategic flexibility refers to enterprises identify the changes in the dynamicenvironment and the ability of putting the resources quickly into new environments.Thisarticle from two dimensions that are the resource flexibility and coordination flexible,studyits direct and indirect effects on enterprise technological innovation.Resource flexibility,including the scope of the application of resources;the cost and difficulty of resources fromone party to the other party;resources acquired time from one party to the otherparty.Coordination flexibility including the search for used or new combinations ofexisting resources;looking for use of or the combination of external resources.Through theorganization of system resource allocation and use it to the target product.Make aneffective solution to the problem and profitable in a changing environment.
Enterprise technology innovation is a new product function.These activities may beproduction or product innovation,management innovation,organizational innovation,process innovation,service innovation,marketing innovation,market innovation and soon.Evaluating enterprise technological innovation is a comprehensive evaluation of allaspects of business and technological innovation associated activities.Requires the use ofrelevant statistical data and empirical data to study technological innovation.And analysisthe enterprise technological innovation capability,the efficiency of technologicalinnovation and various risks encountered in the process of innovation.It is a tedious andcomplex process.In this paper, we use a single dimension to measure.
Technological innovation capability is the basis of survival and development ofenterprises.The dynamic nature of the environment has some impact on the technologicalinnovation capability of enterprises.Organizational learning and strategic flexibility wouldrespectively affect by the environmental dynamism.It would have an impact oftechnological innovation ability.Thus,in this paper,we regarded the dynamic nature of theenvironment, organizational learning capability, strategic flexibility and technicalinnovation capability as the basic elements of the study.Explore the role of the relationshipbetween these elements.Including the following five aspects:the relationship and impactmechanism between the dynamic nature of the environment and organizationallearning;the relationship and impact mechanism between the dynamic environment with strategic flexibility;relationship and influence mechanism of the process of organizationallearning and strategic flexibility;the relationship and impact mechanism between theprocess of organizational learning and innovation ability;the relationship and impactmechanism between the strategic flexibility and the ability to innovate.
We use the software SPSS13.0and LISREL8.70of the data analysis to test and discussthe results.Make an empirical study of under the dynamic environment, the impact oforganizational learning and strategic flexibility on the enterprises' technologicalinnovation.
The basic conclusion of the study:the process of the enterprise technology innovation,there is a negative correlation between the market update rate and knowledge acquisition,information distribution, information interpretation;there is a positive correlation betweenthe technological update rate and knowledge acquisition, information distribution andinformation interpretation;there is a positive correlation between market update rate andresource flexibility and coordination flexibility;there is a positive correlation betweentechnological update rate and resource flexibility and coordination flexibility;there is apositive correlation between knowledge acquisition and resource flexibility andcoordination flexibility;there is a significant positive correlation between informationdistribution and resource flexibility and coordination flexibility;there is a positivecorrelation betweenthe interpretation of the information and resource flexibility andcoordination flexibility;there is a significant positive correlation between knowledgeacquisition,information distribution and innovation capability;there is a negativecorrelation exists between the interpretation of the information and technologicalinnovation capability;there is a negative correlation between resource flexibility andtechnological innovation capability;there is a significant positive correlation between thecoordination flexibility and technical innovation capability.
There are several innovation points in this paper:
(1)Integrate the dynamic nature of the environment, organizational learning capability,strategic flexibility and technological innovation these four key elements incorporated intoa unified framework. It would help us to explore the interaction between these elementsand the internal mechanism.On the basis of previous studies,we make a more detailed,scientifically reveal the factors that affect the enterprises' technological innovation,enrichenterprise technology innovation theory.
(2)Proposed and verify the role of relationships between organizational learning andstrategic flexibility.This article analyzes the meaning and dimensions of organizationallearning first.Organizational learning can be divided into knowledge acquisition, information distribution, information interpretation.Then analyzes the meaning anddimensions of strategic flexibility.Strategic flexibility can be divided into two dimensionsthat are resource flexibility and coordination flexibility.Finally,analysis the relationshipbetween three dimensions of organizational learning and two dimensions of the strategicflexibility and the internal mechanism.Reveal on the mechanism of organizational learningand strategic flexibility. Therefore, the study has a certain significance on the impact oforganizational learning and the strategic flexiblility under dynamic environment.
(3)When analyzing the affects of organizational learning capability on the formationmechanism of technological innovation,we from three respect that are knowledgeacquisition, information distribution and information description.We also discussed underthe dynamic environment,the organizational learning how to enhance the enterprisetechnology innovation capability. Lay a good foundation to improve and enrichorganizational learning theory research for the future.
(4)Proposed and demonstrated the role of relationship between strategic flexibility andenterprise technological innovation.This article first analyzes the meaning and dimensionof strategic flexiblility.Strategic flexibility can be divided into two dimensions, flexibilityof resource and flexibility of coordination.Then we analysed of the logical internalmechanism relationship between two dimensions of the strategy of flexible and enterprisetechnology innovation.Reveals the mechanism of strategic flexibility and the enterprisetechnological innovation.Therefore, this paper has a certain significance between thestrategic flexibility and the enterprises' technological innovation under the dynamicenvironment.
引文
[1]Marquardt, L.S., West, S.G.Multiple Regression: Testing andInterpretingInteractions.[J].Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA.,2002,21.456—677.
[2]Koh, J., Chiva, R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on productinnovation performance: an empirical test[M]. Technovation,1998,28,315–326.
[3]Prahalad&Hannel J.C., Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review andrecommended two-step approach[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1994,103(3),411–423.
[4]Aveni, J.S., Overton, T.Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys[J]. Journal ofMarketing Research14,1994,396–402.
[5]Feurer, K., Li, H.The effects of formal controls on supervisee trust in the manager in newproduct selling: evidence from young and inexper-ienced salespeople in China[J]. Journal ofProduct Innovation Management1995,23,342–358.
[6]张庆.复杂动态环境下高技术企业战略应变能力研究.[D]硕士学位论文，2008.11-22.
[7]Ducan, N., Farley, J.U.Hoenig, S. Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis[J].Management Science1972,36,1143–1159.
[8]Khandwalla, D., Phaalb, R., Probert, D. Understanding technology manage-ment as adynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities[M]. Technovation,1990,29,237–246.
[9]Baburoglu. R.K., Tellis, G.J. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical productinnovation[J]. Journal of Marketing,1990,64,1–17.
[10]Volberda, H., Sego, D.J. The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover:conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1998,83,922–931.
[11]E.Cangelosi, W.Dill., Cohen, P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis forBehavioral Science[M]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ,1965.
[12]March. Robbinsl, T., Nault, B.R. Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputersoftware industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1958,25,1005–1025.
[13]Agtyris, C., Larcker, D.F.Birth of an Organization： The Economic CooperationAdministration[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1978,18,39–50.
[14]Schon, Dill, G.Organizational Learning：Observations Towards a Theory[M].Technovation,1978,27,313–328.
[15]Argyris, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G. rganizational Learning：A Theory of ActionPerspective[J]. Journal of Management,1978,29,963–989.
[16]Senge B.J., Kohli, A.K.Market orientation: antecedents and consequences[J]. Journal ofMarketing,1993,57,53–70.
[17]Edmondson, R.A., Wichern, D.W.Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, fourthedPrentice-Hall[M],.Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1998,51,45-56.
[18]Moingeon, M.S., Zajac, E.J.How organizational resources affect strategic change andperformance in turbulent environments: theory and evidence[M]. Organization Science,2001,12,632–657.
[19]林义屏.林义屏.市场导向、组织学习、组织创新与组织绩效间关系之研究———以科学园区信息电子产业为例[D]台湾：“国立”中山大学企业管理学系未出版博士学位论文,2001,5.
[20]Kapasuwan, Peng, G., MacLachlan, D.L.Effect of risk management strategy on NPDperformance[M]. Technovation,2004,29,170–180.
[21]杨智.国外组织学习研究综述.[J]外国经济与管理.2005（12）.12.
[22]夏青.团队创新网络运行机制与创新团队竞争优势提升研究.[D]天津大学博士学位论文.2010.23-34.
[23]Argyris Schon. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledgeinteractions?[M]. Technovation1978，29,59–71.
[24]Huber, Llorens-Montes, J., Garcia-Morales, V.Flexibility, fit and innovative capacity: anempirical examination[J]. International Journal of Technology Management,2005.30,1991，131–146.
[25]Levit.,&Mascarenhas, B.. The need for strategic flexibility[J]. Journal of BusinessStrategy,1984,5，7482.
[26]Archibugi, A.,&Banerji, K.. Strategic flexibility and firm performance: the case ofUSbased transnational corporations[M]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,1995，4(1/2),19.
[27]Thompsson, N. J.. A typology of management studies involving culture[J]. Journal ofInternational Business Studies,1996，14,2947.
[28]Quinn, M.,&Kulatilaka, N.. Uncertainty: The new rules for strategy[J]. The JournalofBusiness Strategy,1996，20(3),2530.
[29]Armistead, T. J. Real options analysis in strategic decision making: An appliedapproach in adual options framework[J]. Journal of Applied Management Studies,2002.9(2).
[30]Nonaka, J.,&Johnson, J. Business strategies in more and less-innovative firmsinCanada[M]. Research Policy,1991.25,785804.
[31]Collins, F.,&Scholes, M. he pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Journal ofPolitical Economy,1990. T81,637659.
[32]Hart, S. L.,&Eisenhardt, K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, andfuture directions[J]. Academy of Management Review,1995.20,343378.
[33]谢洪明.市场导向、组织学习与组织创新的关系——中国大陆与台湾的比较.[J]科学学与科学技术管理.2005(12).19.
[34]韩子天.学习、知识能量、核心能力如何提升绩效——华南地区企业的实证研究.[J]科学学与科学技术管理.2008(5).29.
[35]Winter. The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities[J]. Journal of Finance,1987,5,12351256.
[36]Hart. Real options.Apractitioner's guide[M]. New York: Texere.1995.5.
[37]Teece, T.,&Weston, J. F..A note on the evaluation of cancellable operating leases[J].Financial Management,2000.11,6067.
[38]刘建新,陈雪阳.知识管理、动态能力与竞争优势.[J]工业技术经济.2008(9)34.
[39]Peter M. Investment under uncertainty, irreversibility and the arrival of information overtime[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2003.58(194),333.
[40]Mintzberg et al.The options approach to capital investment[J]. Harvard Business Review,1998,73(3),105115.
[41]芮明杰.企业战略转型中组织学习的效用分析.[J]研究与发展管理.2005(2).20.
[42]施瑞龙,蒋华楠.论以人力资源为导向的企业核心竞争力培育.[J]江西农业大学学报(社会科学版).2004(1).34-36.
[43]Ansoff. Real options and its platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice[J].Information Systems Research,1965,15(2),132154.
[44]Ulrich&Wiersema. Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingencytheory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications[J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,1989,34(6),555565.
[45]Piore&Sabel. The theory and practice of corporate finance:Evidence from the field[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1984,60,187243.
[46]Aaker&Mascarenhas. Competence based competition[M]. New York: John Wiley&Sons.1984.
[47]Aaker&Mascarenhas. Competing for the future[M]. Boston: Harvard Business SchoolPress.1984.
[48]Das&Elango.Innovation and Small Firms[M].MITPress,Cambridge,MA.1995.
[49]Harrigan. Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market forknow-how[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology2001.4(1),41–59.
[50]Harrigan. Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy[J]. Industrialand Corporate Change,1985,10,419–450.
[51]Hitt et al. Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturingand services firms in Australia[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,1998,13,35–52.
[52]Abbott&Banerji. Opening Van Zaken: Beleid Voor Open Innovatie (Opening up: Policyfor Open Innovation)[M]. Advisory Council for Science and Technology, Den Haag, TheNetherlands.2003.
[53]Johnson, Lee, Saini,and Grohmann. Kleinschalig Ondernemen: Structuur en Ontwikkel-ing van het Nederlandse MKB (Small Firms in the Netherlands: Structure and Development ofthe Dutch Business Society)[M]. EIM, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.2003.
[54]Matthyssens,Pauwels,&Vandenbempt. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment[J].Regional Studies2005,39(1),61–74.
[55]Volberda. Making sense of corporate venture capital[J]. Harvard Business Review,1996,4–11March.
[56]Aaker&Mascarenhas. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profitingfrom Technology[M]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.1984.
[57]Harrigan. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in a New Innovation Landscape[M].Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.2001
[58]Miles&Snow, Open innovation, the new imperative forcreating and profiting fromtechnology [M]. Harvard business school press.1978.
[59]张春华.不确定性环境下企业战略柔性研究.[D]博士学位论文.2006.6
[60]陈荣秋.企业柔性的概念与度量.[J]华中理工大学学报.1998(12)18.
[61]简兆权，刘益，李怀祖.基于核心能力的战略管理——战略柔性化的探讨.[J]管理工程学学报.1999(1).23.
[62]王迎军,王永贵.动态环境下营造竞争优势的关键维度——基于资源的“战略柔性”透视(上).[J]外国经济与管理.2000(7).13.
[63]张灿,周翔,赵波.新竞争环境下对持续竞争优势的再界定.[J]科技与管理.2002(1):15.
[64]易磊,和炳全.基于资源与能力的民营企业动态竞争优势构建.[J]经济师.2003(5):24.
[65]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径.[J]山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2003(5):10.
[66]徐再仕.动态环境下战略柔性对企业绩效的作用机制研究.[D]硕士学位论文.2006.34--36.
[67]王铁男.组织学习能力对战略柔性影响作用的实证研究.[J]中国软科学.2009(4):164-166.
[68]李杰.知识型企业战略柔性及其与企业绩效关系研究.[D]博士学位论文.2009.6.
[69]贾榕霞.组织学习、战略柔性对企业绩效影响的实证研究.[D]哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文.2009.6.
[70]Matthyssens. Profiting from technological innovation: Imp lications for integration,collaboration, licensing and publicpolicy[J]. Research Policy,2005.15(6):285-305.
[71]孙凌宇.动态环境中的企业战略柔性.攀登[J].2009.4.5.
[72]Sanchez, The Sources of Innovation[M]. Oxford University Press, New York,1997.
[73]Martin, N. Why do firms do basic research (with their ownmoney)[J]. Research Policy,19(2):165-174.2000.
[74]Teece et al. Kastelli, I.&Tsakanikas, A. Internal capabilities and external knowledgesources: comp lements orsubstitutes for innovative performance [J]. Technovation,1997,24:29-39.
[75]Martin. Open Innovation, the New Imperative forCreating and Profiting from Technology
[M]. Harvardbusiness school press.2000.
[76]Irelandetalr, Levinthal D A. Absorp tive capacity: a newperspective on learning andinnovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,35:128-152.
[77]Sanchez. The Sources of Innovation [M]. NewYork: Oxford University Press,1995.
[78]Edith Penrose.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledgecreation[J].OrganizationScience,1959,5:14-37.
[79]Sanchez, Kastelli I, Tsakanikas A. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources:comp lements orsubstitutes for innovative performance [J]. Technovation,1993,24:29-39.
[80]Mahony, Oxley J E, Silverman B S. Strategic alli2ance and interfirm knowledge transfer [J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,17,77-91.
[81]Hamel.Westp-kal.Swee Goh and Richards.Benchmarking the Learnin Capability ofOrganizations[J].EuropeanManagement Journal1994,15(5):575-583.
[82]Utterback＆M.A.Maidigue.Huber GP.Organizational learning:the contributin processes andthe literatures[J].Organization Science,1975.2(1):88-115.
[83]贾蔚文.在深化改革中建立和完善企业的创新机制.[J]中国软科学.1995(5):35.
[84]曹崇延，王淮学．企业技术创新能力评价指标体系研究[J]．预测，1998，(2)：66-68．
[85]高建．中国企业技术创新分析[M]．北京：清华大学出版社，1999：47-50．
[86]魏江．提高企业技术创新能力的支持系统研究．科技进步与对策，2000（9）：49-50．
[87]傅家骥，雷家骕，程源．技术经济学前沿问题[M]．经济科学出版社，2003.4.
[88]Fransman.Argris·C·and Schon,D·A.Organization Learning:A Theory of Action erspectiveReading[M].MA:Addison Wesley,1984.
[89]Unescap.Dusya Vera and Mary Crossan.Strategic leadership and organizationallearning[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,29(2):222-2403.
[90]王晓明.中国高新技术企业技术创新研究.山东大学硕士论文[D].2009.9.
[91]陈劲．国家创新系统：对实施科技发展道路的新探索[J]．自然辩证法通讯．1994（6）：22-29．
[92]牛莲芳.兰州市企业技术创新能力评价研究.兰州理工大学硕士论文.[D]2007.4.
[93]魏江．提高企业技术创新能力的支持系统研究．科技进步与对策，2000（9）：49-50．
[94]张克让.甘肃工业企业技术创新能力的环境评价.[J]兰州铁道学院学报.2001(5):10.
[95]云飞.科技型企业创新型文化对技术创新能力的作用研究.北京交通大学硕士论文.[D].2008.6.
[96]王秀.辽宁省高新技术企业技术创新能力研究.辽宁师范大学硕士论文.[D]2007.5.
[97]吴运建，王晓松．企业技术能力与技术创新能力研究现状．科学管理研究[J]，1994，(4)：33-38．
[98]魏江．提高企业技术创新能力的支持系统研究．科技进步与对策，2000（9）：49-50．
[99]许志晋.企业技术创新能力的模糊综合评判.科学学研究[J].1997(1):10.
[100]曹崇延，王淮学．企业技术创新能力评价指标体系研究．预测[J]，1998，(2)：66-68．
[101]陆菊春，韩国文．企业技术创新能力评价的密切值法模型．科研管理[J]，2002，23(1)：54-57．
[102]王向阳.FDI技术溢出对高技术企业技术创新的影响研究.吉林大学博士学位论文.[D].2009.5.40-56.
[103]宋洁.企业自主创新能力的系统分析.天津大学硕士论文.[D]2007.5.
[104]Baburoglu．Mobilizing InvisibleAssets[M]．Harvard University Press，Boston，1987．
[105]Volberda，B.，U. ZANDER．Knowledge of the Firm，Combinative Capabilities，and theReplication of Technology[J]．Organization Science，1992，(3)：383-397．
[106]Volberda.，OXLEY J. E.．Inward technology transfer and competitiveness： the role ofnational innovation systems[J]．Cambridge Journal of Economics，1995，(19)：67-93．
[107]Dunean.Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge intensive bestpractices[J]．SAM Advanced Management Journal，1972，(1)：21-27．
[108]李大元.企业动态能力及其功效:环境不确定性的影响.第三届（2008）中国管理学年会论文集[C].2008.10-15.
[109]Simon. JANSEN，FRANSA.J. VAN DEN BOSCH，HENK W. VOLBERDA．Managingpotential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?[M].TheAcademy of Management Journal，1969.4．
[110]Daft．The Many Faces of Absorptive Capacity：Spillovers of Copper InterconnectTechnology for Semiconductor Chips[C]．Working paper，1984.4．
[111]Starbuck et al，Sakakibara M.Japanese Research Consortia:A Microeconometric Analysisof Industrial Poliey[J].Journal of Industrial Economics，1978，46(2):207-233
[112]Powell，Mothe C.How to learn in R&D partnerships?[J].R&Management,1997，28(4):249-261
[113]Hult&Ferrell. Organizational learning: observations toward a theory[J]. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1965(10):175-203
[114]李富斌.组织学习、市场创新与创业绩效之间的关系研究.[D]浙江大学硕士论文.2011.2.
[115]Huber, Transforming social practice: An action science perspective [J]. ManagementLearning,1991, Jun.30,2:177-187
[116]Helleloid&Simonin. Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition)[M]. Tsinghua UniversityPress.1994.9
[117]Sinkufa.,Abehavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.1994.
[118]Slater, Birth of an Organization: The Economic Cooperation Administration [J]. PublicAdministration Review,1995,227-236.
[119]Argyris&Schon. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight [J].Academy of Management Journal,1978,44:118-132.
[120]陈国权,郑红平.组织学习影响因素、学习能力与绩效关系的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,(1):48-61.
[121]Norman, J.M. and Baron, J.M. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobilityin the workplace [J]. American Sociological Review,2004,62:673-693.
[122]Liebeskind，zucke:&Brewer, K.L., Network forms of organization [J], Annual Review ofsociology,2000,24:57-76
[123]Daft., Ahuja,G. Something, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior andnew product introduction [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1984,45:1183-1195.
[124]Michael Eisner. Human Capital Investment and Urban Competitiveness [M]. AmericanEconomic Association.1960
[125]Ansoff. The economic approach to human behavior [M]. Chicago: The University ofChicago,1965.
[126]Ulrich&Wiersema. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life [J].American Prospect.1989,13:35-42
[127]Ansoff.Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital [J]. Journal of Democracy.1995,6(1):66-78
[128]Sanchez. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy,1993,20(5):499-514
[129]Harrigan. Firm innovation and region: The role of space in innovation process [J].Innovation Management,1985,24:383-408.
[130]Edith Penrose., Coles A.M., Dickson K. Building innovation networks: Issues of Strategyand Expertise [J]. Technology Analysis&Strategic Management,1959(2),29-41.
[131]Matthew, Schienshock. Structural competitiveness and learning regions [J]. Enterprise andInnovation Management Studies,2000,8,265-280.
[132]Eisenhardt., Autio E., Sapienza H.J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledgeexploitation in young technology-based firms [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,(6-7),587-613
[133]Teece et al.. Structural holes: The social structure of competition [M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.1997.
[134]Eisenhardt. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American Journal ofSociology.2000,94:95-120
[135]Irelandetal. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the EconomicPerformance of Organizations: The Network Effects [J]. American Sociological Review.2003,61:674-698
[136]Katsuhiko and Hitt. The strength of weak ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology.2004,78:1360-1380
[137]Penrose., Van Buren H.J. Organizational social capital and employment practices [J].Academy of Management Review.1959,24:538-555.
[138]Sanchez. Network Updating and Exploratory Learning Environment [J]. Journal ofManagement Studies.1995,138:933-949
[139]Sanchez., Singh H., Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategicalliances: Building relational capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal.1995,21:217-238
[140]Grewal and Tansuhaj, Van de Ven A. Structuring cooperative relationships betweenorganizations [J]. Strategic Management Journal.2001,13:483-498
[141]Sanchez., Morris S.S., Snell S.A. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and valuecreation: Extending the human resource architecture [J]. Academy of Management Review.1997,32:236-256.
[142]Sanchez., George J.M. The excperience and evolution of trust: Implications forcooperation and teamwork [J]. Academy of Management Review.1997,23:531-546.
[143]Matthew., Salanick G.R. The external control of organization: a resource dependenceperspective [M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Education.2000.
[144]吕玉兰.制造企业战略柔性对企业竞争力影响研究.哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文.[D]2008.6.
[145]Eisenhardt. Singh H. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources ofInterorganizational Competitive Advantage [J].The Academy of Management Review,2000,23(4):660-679
[146]唐文萍.制造企业战略柔性对经营绩效影响的研究.哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文
[D]2008.6.
[147]Eisenhardt. Knowledge Management: a strategic agenda [J]. Long Range Planning.2000,30(3):385-391
[148]Irelandetal, Udo. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication oftechnology [J]. Organization Science,2003,3(3):383-396
[149]Barnard., Singh K. Entrenched Success: The Reciprocal Relationship between InterfirmCollaboration and Business Sales Growth [J]. Academy of Management Proceedings,1938,(2):31-36
[150]Andrews., Schiel H. When do Industries clusters? A proposal on how to assess anindustry’s propensity to concentration at a single region or nation [J].Research Policy,1980,(31):849-858.
[151]Burns&Stalkers., Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning [J].Journalof Marketing.1961,58:35-45
[152]Zaltman et al.., Noordewier T., A Framework for market-based organizational learning:linking value, knowledge and behavior [J].Journal of the Academy of marketing science.1973,25:305-318
[153]Zaltman, Duncan., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learningand innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly.1973,35:128-152
[154]Hurley., Salaman G. Strategic human resource management [M]. Oxford: BlackwellBusiness.1998.
[155]Vandeven, Innovation: The New Core Competency [J]. strategy and Leadership.1986,29(1):11-14
[156]Day. Cavusgil S.T., Zhao Y. Learning Orientation, firm innovation capability, and firmperformance [J]. Industrial Marketing Management.1990,31(6):515-524
[157]Narver., Clark K.B. Architectual innovation: the reconfiguration of existing producttechnologies and the failure of establish frims [M]. Administrative Science Quarterly.1990.
[158]Shapiro.Nohria N.，ZaheerA. Strategic newwork [J].Strategic Management Journal.1988，（3）：203-215.
[159]Webster. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital [J]. Journal of Democracy.1992,6(1):66-78
[160]Jaworski.Ghoshal S., Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the OrganizationalAdvantage [J]. Academy of Management Review.1993,23(2):242-266
[161]Houston. Social Capital in the Creation of Financial Capital: The Case of NetworkMarketing [J].Illinois Stipes Publishers.1986,57-62
[162]Lusch. Inkpen, Eric W.K. Tsang. Social Capital, Networks and Knowledge Transfer [J].Academic of Management Review.1987.1:146-165
[163]Harrigan. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity [M]. New York: FreePress.1985.
[164]Slater., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks [J].Academy of Management Journal.1998,41:464-476
[165]Kohlit. Measuring social capital: an integrated questionnaire [M].New York: FreePress.1990.
[166]Slater., Amara N., Lamari M. Does social capital determine innovation to what extent.[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change.1995,69:681-701.
[167]陈国权,马萌.组织学习的过程模型研究[J].管理科学学报.2000(9):15-23.
[168]Houston.Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive bestpractices[J]，SAM Advanced Management Journal，2004，Spring，21-27.
[169]Moorman，Tsang.Social captial，networks，and knowledge transfer[J].Academy ofmanagement review，1998，30（1）：146-165.
[170]Aaker，Marta A.and Donald D.Hambrick.The External Ties of Top Executives：Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly，1984，42（4）：654-681.
[171]Allen，Tsang.Social captial，networks，and knowledge transfer[J].Academy of managementreview，1971，30（1）：146-165.
[172]Bowman， J.H.and Nobeoka， K..Creating and Managing a High-PerformanceKnowledge-Sharing Network：The Toyota Case[J]，Strategic Management Journal，1993，21：345-367
[173]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2003，48(5).
[174]施放.朱国锭.徐再仕.技术创新的群集效应及其实现对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007(10).
[175]Evans.Social capital and value creation：The role of intra-firm networks[J].Academy ofManagement Journal，1991，41：464-476.
[176]Huber，M.and Swedberg，R.，The sociology of economic life[M].Boulder：Westview，1991.
[177]何悦桐,卢艳秋.企业战略柔性理论及影响因素.光明日报(理论版).[N]2012.8.13.
[178]Damanpour.Performance measurement system design:a literaturereview and researchagenda[J]，International Journal of Operations Production Managemen,1991(6):11-15.
[179]Hurley,Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company[M]London:Oxford UniversityPress,1998.
[180]Damanpour.Crossman,andIrisBerdrow.OrganizationaLearningandstrategicRenewal[J].Strategic management Jour-na,1991,(24):1087-1105.
[181]Moorman.The impact of CEO and characteristics on strategic flexibility and firmperformance[M].Texas A&M University the requirement for the dregree of doctor ofphilosophy.1998.
[182]Madhavan,Yongsun The impact of Strategic Flexibility on Business Performance
[M].International Business Environment1998.
[183]Nonaka. Strategic flexibility and performance the requirement for the degree of doctor ofphilosophy[M].London:Oxford University Press,1995.
[184]Von Krogh.Flynn,Sadao Sakakibara,Roger G.Schroeder,Kimberly A.Bates,E.JamesFlynn[J].Empirical research methods in operations management.Journal of operationsmanagement.1998,9(2):79-80.
[185]Gold et al.Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis:the role ofmarket orientation and strategic flexibility[J].Journal of Marketing,2001,65:67-80.
[186] Ruggles.The need for strategic flexibility[J]. Journal of Business Strategy,1998,5,7482.
[187]Scarbrough.Strategic flexibility and firm performance: the case of USbased transnationalcorporations[J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,2003.4(1/2),19.
[188]Scarbrough.A typology of management studies involving culture[J]. Journal ofInternational Business Studies,2003.14,2947.
[189]Subramaniam.Uncertainty: The new rules for strategy[J]. The Journalof Business Strategy,2005.20(3),2530.
[190]Yli-Renko et al.Real options analysis in strategic decision making: An applied approach ina dual options framework[J]. Journal of Applied Management Studies,2001.9(2).
[191]Nonaka.Business strategies in more and less-innovative firms in Canada[J]. ResearchPolicy,1995,25,785804.
[192]Gold et al.The pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2001,81,637659.
[193]Grant.Product development: Past research, presentfindings, and future directions.[J]Academy of Management Review,1996,20,343378.
[194]Calantone.Best practices in estimatingthe cost of capital: Survey and synthesis[J].Financial Practice and Education,1998,8,1328.
[195]Sarin.The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities[J]. Journal of Finance,2003,5,12351256.
[196]Yli-Renko et al.A note on the evaluation of cancellable operating leases[J]. FinancialManagement,2001,11,6067.
[197]Collins.Investment under uncertainty, irreversibility and the arrival of information overtime[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1990,58(194),333.
[198]Hart.The options approach to capital investment. HarvardBusiness Review,1995,73(3),105115.
[199]Bonoma.Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. OrganizationScience,1985,3,179202.
[200]Itami&Roehl.Strategic flexibility for high technology manoeuvres: A conceptualframework[J]. Journal of Management Studies,1987,28,6989.
[201]Reed&DeFillippi.Real options and its platform adoption: Implications for theory andpractice[J]. Information Systems Research,1990,15(2),132154.
[202]Cohendet,Heraud.Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingencytheory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications[J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,1993,34(6),555565.
[203]李正卫.动态环境条件下的组织学习与企业绩效.浙江大学博士学位论文
[D].2003.89-104.
[204]许学国.组织学习力提升机制研究.同济大学博士论文[D].2005.12.
[205]Dick.Competing for the future[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1991.
[206]Irwin, Mascarenhas, B.,1984. The need for strategic flexibility[J]. Journal ofBusinessStrategy1994,5(2),74–82.
[207]Moorman. Organizations and Environments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,NJ.Amburgey, T.L., Kelly, W.P., Barnett, W.P.[J]. Resetting the clock: The dynamicsoforganization al change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly1998.38,51–73.
[208]Schumpeter., Gerbing, D.W.,. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review andrecommended two-stepapproach[J]. Psychological Bulletin1934,103(2),411–423.
[209]Kogut C., Scho¨ n, D.A.,. Organizational Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Arias,D.Service operations strategy, flexibility andperformance in engineering consultingfirms[J].InternationalJournal of Operations and Production Management1992,1/12,1401–1421.
[210]Tsai. Principles ofMarketing Research. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge.Bengtsson, J.Manufacturing flexibility and real options:A review[J]. International Journal ofProductionEconomics.1998.74,213–224.
[211]Galunic Olhager, J. Valuation ofproduct-mix flexibility using real options[J]. InternationalJournal of Production Economics1998.78,13–28.
[212]Nonaka., Kahraman, C., Irani, Z.. Quantification of flexibility in advanced manufacturingsystems using fuzzy concept[J]. International Journal ofProductio n Economics1995.89,45–56.
[213]Nonaka. Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration[J]. Academy ofManage mentReview1998,5,25–39.
[214]Von Krogh. Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty,and economic performance in volatileenvironments[J].Academy ofManageme nt Journal1998,28(3),548–573.
[215]Nonaka, Hurri, D. Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view ofresourceinvestments and the incremental-choice process[J]. Academy ofManage ment Review1998,18,760–782.
[216]Daft. Measuring strategic performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal7(5),1984,437–458.
[217]Grant.Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Belknap Press, Cambridge,MA.Chang, S., Yang, C., Cheng, H., Sheu, C.[J]. Manufacturingflexibility and business strategy:An empirical study ofsmall and medium sized firms. International Journal ofProductionEconomics1996,83,13–26.
[218]Spender. A paradigm for developing better measures ofmarketing constructs[J]. Journal ofMarketing Research,1996,16,64–73.
[219]Yli-Renko et al. Levinthal, D.A.. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning andinnovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,35,128–152.
[220]Weisberg. Towards a model of organizations as interpretation systems[J] AcademyofManage ment Review,2006,9(2),284–295.
[221]Sarin, Kelly, D., Barnett, W.P. Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational changeand failure[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.2003,38,51–73.
[222]Grant, Tushman, M.L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclicalmodel of technological change[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1996,35,604–633.
[223]Gold et al.The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. Personality Social Psychol.2001,51,1173–1182.
[224]Sarin. Environmental regulation for competitive advantage[J]. Business Strat. Rev.Spring.2003,1–15.
[225]Day. Predation through regulation: the wage and profit effects of the Occupational Safetyand Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency[J]. J. Law Econ.1994,30,239–259.
[226]Dess. Simple question, not so simple answer: interpreting interaction terms in moderatedmultiple regression[J]. Manage.1987,20,159–165.
[227]Hamel. The choice of strategic alternatives under increasing regulation in hightechnologycompanies. Acad. Manage[J].1994,27,489–510.
[228]Meyer et al., Falbe, C.M., McKinley, W., Tracy, P.K. Technology and organization inmanufacturing[J].Administrative Sci. Q.2005,21,20–40.
[229]Volberda. Organizational effects of decline and turbulence[J]. AdministrativeSci. Q.1998,32,222–240.
[230]Banerji. American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance. Prentice-Hall, EnglewoodCliffs, NJ.Chen, K.H., Metcalf, R.W.,1980. The relationship between pollution control recordand financial indicators revisited[J]. Accounting Rev.2007,55,168–177.
[231]Utterback. Toward an integration of organization research and practice: a contingencystudy of bureaucratic control and performance in scientific settings[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1975,28,85–100.
[232]Hayes. Investment in new technology and competitive advantage. In: Teece, D.J. Ed.., TheCompetitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal[J]. Ballinger,Cambridge, MA,1979,pp.59–82.
[233]Freemand. Managing technology in international competition: The case of productdevelopment in response to foreign entry. In: Spence, M.A., Hazard, H. Eds.., InternationalCompetitiveness[J]. Ballinger,Cambridge, MA,1982,pp.27–74.
[234]Miller and Roth. Regulation and deregulation[J]. Calif. Manage. Rev.1994,294,169–183.
[235]Baldwin Johnson. Applied Multiple RegressionrCorrelation Analysis for the BehavioralSciences.Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Collins, P.D., Hage, J., Hull, F.M.Organizational andtechnological predictors of change in automaticity.Acad[J]. Manage. J.1996,31,512–543.
[236]Sanchez,1988. Bureaucratic Politics and Regulatory Reform: The EPA and EmissionsTrading. Greenwood Press, New York.Daft, R.L.Management. The Dryden Press, Fort Worth,TX.Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants andmoderators.Acad[J]. Manage. J.1997,34,555–590.
[237]Matthew, Davies, B.S.The Politics of Pollution. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN.Dean, T.J.,Brown, R.L.Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: initial evidence and implicationsfor future research. Acad[J]. Manage. J.2000,38,288–303.
[238]Eisenhardt. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms.Organization Sci.1997,3,179–202.
[239]Eisenhardt. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through productinnovation. Strat[J].Manage. J.2000,13,77–92.
[240]Irelandetal. Organizing for innovation. In: Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C., Nord, W.R. Eds..,Handbook of Organization Studies[J]. Sage Publications, London,2003,pp.424–439.
[241]Buzacott. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1982,30,514–539.
[242]Gerwin. Over-regulating America: Tomorrow’s economic argument [M].Management.July1993,27, pp.19–21.
[243]Teece. A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Acad[J]. Manage. J.1986,18,155–160.
[244]Sanchez. Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and thenew institutionalism[J]. Acad. Manage. Rev.1997,21,1022–1054.
[245]Lieberman and Montgomery.Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies[J].Administrative Sci. Q.1998,34,431–452.
[246]Guttmann, J.S., Sierck, A.W., Friedland, D.M., The new Clean Air Act’s big squeeze onAmerica’s manufacturing base[J]. Business Horizons,1992,352,37–40.
[247]Grewal and Tansuhaj.Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes[M].Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,2006.
[248]Auh and Menguc.Structural inertia and organizational change[J]. Am. Sociol. Rev.2005,49,149–164.
[249]Sanchez.Organizational Ecology. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.Hayes, R.H.,Jaikumar, R., Manufacturing’s crisis: New technologies, obsolete organizations[J]. HarvardBusiness Rev. September–October.1997,77–85.
[250]Eisenhardt. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologiesand the failure of established firms[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.2000,35,9–30.
[251]Sirmon.Costs, revenue, and business level strategy[J]. Acad. Manage.Rev.2003,13,202–213.
[252]Irelandetal..Innovation and competitive advantage: what we know and what we need tolearn[J]. Manage,2003,18,399–429.
[253]范志刚.基于企业网络的战略柔性与企业创新绩效提升机制研究.[D]浙江大学博士论文.2010.4.
[254]Teece. Are Environmental Regulations Driving U.S. Industry Overseas? The ConservationFoundation, Washington, DC. Marcus, A.A.U.S. firms’ responses to regulation: stonewalling andopportunism.[J] Long Range Planning1986,203,98–104.
[255]Katsuhiko and Hitt.Responses to externally induced innovation: their effects onorganizational performance[J].Strat. Manage.J.2004,9,387–402.
[256]Katsuhiko and Hitt.Compliance and performance: toward a contingency theory. In:Post,J.E., Preston, L.E. Eds.., Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy[J]. JAI Press,Greenwich,CT,1986,8,193–221.
[257]Cetindamara etal.Externally induced innovation. In: Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L.,Poole,M.S. Eds.., Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies[J]. Harperand Row, New York,2009,pp.537–559.
[258]Lieber-man and Montgomery.Complexity and administrative intensity: the case ofDeclining organizations[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1988,32,87–105.
[259]Li etal.The strategic advantages of the factory of the future[J]. Calif. Manage. Rev.2008,293,27–41.
[260]Katsuhiko and Hitt. Adapting to environmental jolts[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.2004,27,515–537.
[261]Cetindamara et al.The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy[J]. Strat.Manage. J.2009,8,55–76.
[262]Katsuhiko.Organizations: A Quantum View. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Mone,M.A., McKinley, W., Barker III, V.L. Organizational decline and innovation: a contingencyframework[J]. Academic Management Review2004,23,115–132.
[263]Cetindamara etal.Flexible manufacturing organizations:implications for strategyformulation and organization design[J]. Acad. Manage. Rev.1986,13,627–638.
[264]何悦桐，卢艳秋.战略柔性和决策能力对企业技术创新的影响分析.[J]吉林大学社会科学学报.2012(6).
[265]Bock&Bargmann. Environmental regulatory impact and firm-level innovation: A study ofelectric utilities’responses to the Clean Air Act Amendments. The effect of product regulation onbusiness global competitiveness: acontingency approach.[J].Manage. Int. Rev,1990,35,293–305.
[266]Jreskoge. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. HoughtonMifflin,Boston.Schon, D.A. Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hiddenwithin the language of contingency ‘theory’[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1970,26,49–77.
[267]Jalworski. Speeding products to market: waiting time to first product introduction in newfirms[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1993,35,177–207.
[268]Kohli. Regulation, competition, and strategy: evidence from the auto industry[J]. BusinessSoc.1993,33,224–225.
[269]Huber. The productivity paradox[J]. Harvard Business Rev. July–August.1991,55–60.
[270]Challdler.Social structure and organizations. In: March, J.G. Ed., Handbook ofOrganizations[J]. Rand McNally, Chicago,1962,142–193.
[271]Huber.The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation andRenewal.Technological discontinuities and organizational environments[J]. Administrative Sci.Q.1991,439–465.
[272]Sanchez.Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation inorganizations[J]. Organization Sci.1997,98–118.
[273]Sanchez.What really makes factories flexible?[J].Harvard Business Rev.July–August,1995,74–84.
[274]Jansuhaj.The impact on small business concerns of government regulations that forcetechnological change. Charleswater Associates, Washington, DC. Utterback, J.M., Abernathy,W.J.[J].2001,639–656,.
[275]Sanchez. Central problems in the management of innovation. Manage[M]. Sci.1997,32,590–607.
[276]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径.山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)[J].2003(5).34-38.
[277]项国鹏.从战略系统观视角分析“浙商”战略转型.科技进步与对策[J].2009(1).67-69.
[278]Sanchez.Levinthal.D.A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes[J]. Management Science,1997,43(7),934–950.
[279]苏中锋.战略柔性对企业获取创新收益的影响研究.科学学研究[J].2008(2).87-89.
[280]赵更申.组织柔性对企业创新方式选择的影响研究.科技进步与对策.[J]2007(2).67-69.
[281]王永贵.动态环境下营造竞争优势的关键维度——基于资源的“战略柔性”透视(上).外国经济与管理[J].2000(7).45-49.
[282]Teeceetal.Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitiveenvironments[J].Organization Sci.1997,359–374.
[283]Eisenhardt.Quick, save the ozone[J]. Business Week, May17,2000,78–79.
[284]Irelandetal,Ecology.Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning. Wiley, NewYork.Wheelwright, S.C. Restoring the competitive edge in U.S. manufacturing. In: Teece, D.J.Ed[J].2003,83–100.
[285]周玉泉,李垣.组织学习、能力与创新方式选择关系研究.科学学研究[J].2005(4).34-45.
[286]李守芹.FDI技术溢出对我国企业技术创新能力的影响机理研究.苏州大学硕士论文[D].2011.3.
[287]孙冰,张敏.基于结构方程的我国制造业自主创新现状分析.科技进步与对策.[J]2009.8.25.
[288]陈葵晞,张一纯.基于结构方程建模(SEM)的企业能力评价.产业与科技论坛.[J]2008.5.25.
[289]叶迎春.企业中层管理者管理潜能结构特征与显化机理研究.中国矿业大学博士论文.[D].2009.12.
[290]陈晓翔.企业知识型员工的薪酬关系研究.天津大学硕士论文.[D].2008.5.
[291]Roberts.Models of Man. Wiley&Sons, New York.Simon, H.A.Theories of decisionmaking in economics and behavioral science[J].American Economic Review49(3),255–283,1999.
[292]Chandy.Rational decision making in business organizations[J]. AmericanEconomicReview,2000,69(4),493–513.
[293]张公一.基于跨国技术联盟的合作创新机理研究.吉林大学博士学位论文.[D].2010.6.29-33.
[294]张扬.社会资本和知识溢出对产业集群升级的影响研究.吉林大学博士论文.[D]2009.12.
[295]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径.山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)[J]2003.10.
[296]许冠男.我国影视拍摄保护环境法律问题研究.东北林业大学硕士学位论文.[D]2009.4
[297]王志乐.2012跨国公司中国报告[M].2012.1.
[2]Koh, J., Chiva, R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on productinnovation performance: an empirical test[M]. Technovation,1998,28,315–326.
[3]Prahalad&Hannel J.C., Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review andrecommended two-step approach[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1994,103(3),411–423.
[4]Aveni, J.S., Overton, T.Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys[J]. Journal ofMarketing Research14,1994,396–402.
[5]Feurer, K., Li, H.The effects of formal controls on supervisee trust in the manager in newproduct selling: evidence from young and inexper-ienced salespeople in China[J]. Journal ofProduct Innovation Management1995,23,342–358.
[6]张庆.复杂动态环境下高技术企业战略应变能力研究.[D]硕士学位论文，2008.11-22.
[7]Ducan, N., Farley, J.U.Hoenig, S. Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis[J].Management Science1972,36,1143–1159.
[8]Khandwalla, D., Phaalb, R., Probert, D. Understanding technology manage-ment as adynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities[M]. Technovation,1990,29,237–246.
[9]Baburoglu. R.K., Tellis, G.J. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical productinnovation[J]. Journal of Marketing,1990,64,1–17.
[10]Volberda, H., Sego, D.J. The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover:conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1998,83,922–931.
[11]E.Cangelosi, W.Dill., Cohen, P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis forBehavioral Science[M]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ,1965.
[12]March. Robbinsl, T., Nault, B.R. Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputersoftware industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1958,25,1005–1025.
[13]Agtyris, C., Larcker, D.F.Birth of an Organization： The Economic CooperationAdministration[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1978,18,39–50.
[14]Schon, Dill, G.Organizational Learning：Observations Towards a Theory[M].Technovation,1978,27,313–328.
[15]Argyris, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G. rganizational Learning：A Theory of ActionPerspective[J]. Journal of Management,1978,29,963–989.
[16]Senge B.J., Kohli, A.K.Market orientation: antecedents and consequences[J]. Journal ofMarketing,1993,57,53–70.
[17]Edmondson, R.A., Wichern, D.W.Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, fourthedPrentice-Hall[M],.Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1998,51,45-56.
[18]Moingeon, M.S., Zajac, E.J.How organizational resources affect strategic change andperformance in turbulent environments: theory and evidence[M]. Organization Science,2001,12,632–657.
[19]林义屏.林义屏.市场导向、组织学习、组织创新与组织绩效间关系之研究———以科学园区信息电子产业为例[D]台湾：“国立”中山大学企业管理学系未出版博士学位论文,2001,5.
[20]Kapasuwan, Peng, G., MacLachlan, D.L.Effect of risk management strategy on NPDperformance[M]. Technovation,2004,29,170–180.
[21]杨智.国外组织学习研究综述.[J]外国经济与管理.2005（12）.12.
[22]夏青.团队创新网络运行机制与创新团队竞争优势提升研究.[D]天津大学博士学位论文.2010.23-34.
[23]Argyris Schon. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledgeinteractions?[M]. Technovation1978，29,59–71.
[24]Huber, Llorens-Montes, J., Garcia-Morales, V.Flexibility, fit and innovative capacity: anempirical examination[J]. International Journal of Technology Management,2005.30,1991，131–146.
[25]Levit.,&Mascarenhas, B.. The need for strategic flexibility[J]. Journal of BusinessStrategy,1984,5，7482.
[26]Archibugi, A.,&Banerji, K.. Strategic flexibility and firm performance: the case ofUSbased transnational corporations[M]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,1995，4(1/2),19.
[27]Thompsson, N. J.. A typology of management studies involving culture[J]. Journal ofInternational Business Studies,1996，14,2947.
[28]Quinn, M.,&Kulatilaka, N.. Uncertainty: The new rules for strategy[J]. The JournalofBusiness Strategy,1996，20(3),2530.
[29]Armistead, T. J. Real options analysis in strategic decision making: An appliedapproach in adual options framework[J]. Journal of Applied Management Studies,2002.9(2).
[30]Nonaka, J.,&Johnson, J. Business strategies in more and less-innovative firmsinCanada[M]. Research Policy,1991.25,785804.
[31]Collins, F.,&Scholes, M. he pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Journal ofPolitical Economy,1990. T81,637659.
[32]Hart, S. L.,&Eisenhardt, K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, andfuture directions[J]. Academy of Management Review,1995.20,343378.
[33]谢洪明.市场导向、组织学习与组织创新的关系——中国大陆与台湾的比较.[J]科学学与科学技术管理.2005(12).19.
[34]韩子天.学习、知识能量、核心能力如何提升绩效——华南地区企业的实证研究.[J]科学学与科学技术管理.2008(5).29.
[35]Winter. The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities[J]. Journal of Finance,1987,5,12351256.
[36]Hart. Real options.Apractitioner's guide[M]. New York: Texere.1995.5.
[37]Teece, T.,&Weston, J. F..A note on the evaluation of cancellable operating leases[J].Financial Management,2000.11,6067.
[38]刘建新,陈雪阳.知识管理、动态能力与竞争优势.[J]工业技术经济.2008(9)34.
[39]Peter M. Investment under uncertainty, irreversibility and the arrival of information overtime[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2003.58(194),333.
[40]Mintzberg et al.The options approach to capital investment[J]. Harvard Business Review,1998,73(3),105115.
[41]芮明杰.企业战略转型中组织学习的效用分析.[J]研究与发展管理.2005(2).20.
[42]施瑞龙,蒋华楠.论以人力资源为导向的企业核心竞争力培育.[J]江西农业大学学报(社会科学版).2004(1).34-36.
[43]Ansoff. Real options and its platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice[J].Information Systems Research,1965,15(2),132154.
[44]Ulrich&Wiersema. Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingencytheory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications[J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,1989,34(6),555565.
[45]Piore&Sabel. The theory and practice of corporate finance:Evidence from the field[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1984,60,187243.
[46]Aaker&Mascarenhas. Competence based competition[M]. New York: John Wiley&Sons.1984.
[47]Aaker&Mascarenhas. Competing for the future[M]. Boston: Harvard Business SchoolPress.1984.
[48]Das&Elango.Innovation and Small Firms[M].MITPress,Cambridge,MA.1995.
[49]Harrigan. Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market forknow-how[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology2001.4(1),41–59.
[50]Harrigan. Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy[J]. Industrialand Corporate Change,1985,10,419–450.
[51]Hitt et al. Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturingand services firms in Australia[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,1998,13,35–52.
[52]Abbott&Banerji. Opening Van Zaken: Beleid Voor Open Innovatie (Opening up: Policyfor Open Innovation)[M]. Advisory Council for Science and Technology, Den Haag, TheNetherlands.2003.
[53]Johnson, Lee, Saini,and Grohmann. Kleinschalig Ondernemen: Structuur en Ontwikkel-ing van het Nederlandse MKB (Small Firms in the Netherlands: Structure and Development ofthe Dutch Business Society)[M]. EIM, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.2003.
[54]Matthyssens,Pauwels,&Vandenbempt. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment[J].Regional Studies2005,39(1),61–74.
[55]Volberda. Making sense of corporate venture capital[J]. Harvard Business Review,1996,4–11March.
[56]Aaker&Mascarenhas. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profitingfrom Technology[M]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.1984.
[57]Harrigan. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in a New Innovation Landscape[M].Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.2001
[58]Miles&Snow, Open innovation, the new imperative forcreating and profiting fromtechnology [M]. Harvard business school press.1978.
[59]张春华.不确定性环境下企业战略柔性研究.[D]博士学位论文.2006.6
[60]陈荣秋.企业柔性的概念与度量.[J]华中理工大学学报.1998(12)18.
[61]简兆权，刘益，李怀祖.基于核心能力的战略管理——战略柔性化的探讨.[J]管理工程学学报.1999(1).23.
[62]王迎军,王永贵.动态环境下营造竞争优势的关键维度——基于资源的“战略柔性”透视(上).[J]外国经济与管理.2000(7).13.
[63]张灿,周翔,赵波.新竞争环境下对持续竞争优势的再界定.[J]科技与管理.2002(1):15.
[64]易磊,和炳全.基于资源与能力的民营企业动态竞争优势构建.[J]经济师.2003(5):24.
[65]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径.[J]山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2003(5):10.
[66]徐再仕.动态环境下战略柔性对企业绩效的作用机制研究.[D]硕士学位论文.2006.34--36.
[67]王铁男.组织学习能力对战略柔性影响作用的实证研究.[J]中国软科学.2009(4):164-166.
[68]李杰.知识型企业战略柔性及其与企业绩效关系研究.[D]博士学位论文.2009.6.
[69]贾榕霞.组织学习、战略柔性对企业绩效影响的实证研究.[D]哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文.2009.6.
[70]Matthyssens. Profiting from technological innovation: Imp lications for integration,collaboration, licensing and publicpolicy[J]. Research Policy,2005.15(6):285-305.
[71]孙凌宇.动态环境中的企业战略柔性.攀登[J].2009.4.5.
[72]Sanchez, The Sources of Innovation[M]. Oxford University Press, New York,1997.
[73]Martin, N. Why do firms do basic research (with their ownmoney)[J]. Research Policy,19(2):165-174.2000.
[74]Teece et al. Kastelli, I.&Tsakanikas, A. Internal capabilities and external knowledgesources: comp lements orsubstitutes for innovative performance [J]. Technovation,1997,24:29-39.
[75]Martin. Open Innovation, the New Imperative forCreating and Profiting from Technology
[M]. Harvardbusiness school press.2000.
[76]Irelandetalr, Levinthal D A. Absorp tive capacity: a newperspective on learning andinnovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,35:128-152.
[77]Sanchez. The Sources of Innovation [M]. NewYork: Oxford University Press,1995.
[78]Edith Penrose.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledgecreation[J].OrganizationScience,1959,5:14-37.
[79]Sanchez, Kastelli I, Tsakanikas A. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources:comp lements orsubstitutes for innovative performance [J]. Technovation,1993,24:29-39.
[80]Mahony, Oxley J E, Silverman B S. Strategic alli2ance and interfirm knowledge transfer [J].Strategic Management Journal,1994,17,77-91.
[81]Hamel.Westp-kal.Swee Goh and Richards.Benchmarking the Learnin Capability ofOrganizations[J].EuropeanManagement Journal1994,15(5):575-583.
[82]Utterback＆M.A.Maidigue.Huber GP.Organizational learning:the contributin processes andthe literatures[J].Organization Science,1975.2(1):88-115.
[83]贾蔚文.在深化改革中建立和完善企业的创新机制.[J]中国软科学.1995(5):35.
[84]曹崇延，王淮学．企业技术创新能力评价指标体系研究[J]．预测，1998，(2)：66-68．
[85]高建．中国企业技术创新分析[M]．北京：清华大学出版社，1999：47-50．
[86]魏江．提高企业技术创新能力的支持系统研究．科技进步与对策，2000（9）：49-50．
[87]傅家骥，雷家骕，程源．技术经济学前沿问题[M]．经济科学出版社，2003.4.
[88]Fransman.Argris·C·and Schon,D·A.Organization Learning:A Theory of Action erspectiveReading[M].MA:Addison Wesley,1984.
[89]Unescap.Dusya Vera and Mary Crossan.Strategic leadership and organizationallearning[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,29(2):222-2403.
[90]王晓明.中国高新技术企业技术创新研究.山东大学硕士论文[D].2009.9.
[91]陈劲．国家创新系统：对实施科技发展道路的新探索[J]．自然辩证法通讯．1994（6）：22-29．
[92]牛莲芳.兰州市企业技术创新能力评价研究.兰州理工大学硕士论文.[D]2007.4.
[93]魏江．提高企业技术创新能力的支持系统研究．科技进步与对策，2000（9）：49-50．
[94]张克让.甘肃工业企业技术创新能力的环境评价.[J]兰州铁道学院学报.2001(5):10.
[95]云飞.科技型企业创新型文化对技术创新能力的作用研究.北京交通大学硕士论文.[D].2008.6.
[96]王秀.辽宁省高新技术企业技术创新能力研究.辽宁师范大学硕士论文.[D]2007.5.
[97]吴运建，王晓松．企业技术能力与技术创新能力研究现状．科学管理研究[J]，1994，(4)：33-38．
[98]魏江．提高企业技术创新能力的支持系统研究．科技进步与对策，2000（9）：49-50．
[99]许志晋.企业技术创新能力的模糊综合评判.科学学研究[J].1997(1):10.
[100]曹崇延，王淮学．企业技术创新能力评价指标体系研究．预测[J]，1998，(2)：66-68．
[101]陆菊春，韩国文．企业技术创新能力评价的密切值法模型．科研管理[J]，2002，23(1)：54-57．
[102]王向阳.FDI技术溢出对高技术企业技术创新的影响研究.吉林大学博士学位论文.[D].2009.5.40-56.
[103]宋洁.企业自主创新能力的系统分析.天津大学硕士论文.[D]2007.5.
[104]Baburoglu．Mobilizing InvisibleAssets[M]．Harvard University Press，Boston，1987．
[105]Volberda，B.，U. ZANDER．Knowledge of the Firm，Combinative Capabilities，and theReplication of Technology[J]．Organization Science，1992，(3)：383-397．
[106]Volberda.，OXLEY J. E.．Inward technology transfer and competitiveness： the role ofnational innovation systems[J]．Cambridge Journal of Economics，1995，(19)：67-93．
[107]Dunean.Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge intensive bestpractices[J]．SAM Advanced Management Journal，1972，(1)：21-27．
[108]李大元.企业动态能力及其功效:环境不确定性的影响.第三届（2008）中国管理学年会论文集[C].2008.10-15.
[109]Simon. JANSEN，FRANSA.J. VAN DEN BOSCH，HENK W. VOLBERDA．Managingpotential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?[M].TheAcademy of Management Journal，1969.4．
[110]Daft．The Many Faces of Absorptive Capacity：Spillovers of Copper InterconnectTechnology for Semiconductor Chips[C]．Working paper，1984.4．
[111]Starbuck et al，Sakakibara M.Japanese Research Consortia:A Microeconometric Analysisof Industrial Poliey[J].Journal of Industrial Economics，1978，46(2):207-233
[112]Powell，Mothe C.How to learn in R&D partnerships?[J].R&Management,1997，28(4):249-261
[113]Hult&Ferrell. Organizational learning: observations toward a theory[J]. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1965(10):175-203
[114]李富斌.组织学习、市场创新与创业绩效之间的关系研究.[D]浙江大学硕士论文.2011.2.
[115]Huber, Transforming social practice: An action science perspective [J]. ManagementLearning,1991, Jun.30,2:177-187
[116]Helleloid&Simonin. Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition)[M]. Tsinghua UniversityPress.1994.9
[117]Sinkufa.,Abehavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.1994.
[118]Slater, Birth of an Organization: The Economic Cooperation Administration [J]. PublicAdministration Review,1995,227-236.
[119]Argyris&Schon. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight [J].Academy of Management Journal,1978,44:118-132.
[120]陈国权,郑红平.组织学习影响因素、学习能力与绩效关系的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,(1):48-61.
[121]Norman, J.M. and Baron, J.M. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobilityin the workplace [J]. American Sociological Review,2004,62:673-693.
[122]Liebeskind，zucke:&Brewer, K.L., Network forms of organization [J], Annual Review ofsociology,2000,24:57-76
[123]Daft., Ahuja,G. Something, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior andnew product introduction [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1984,45:1183-1195.
[124]Michael Eisner. Human Capital Investment and Urban Competitiveness [M]. AmericanEconomic Association.1960
[125]Ansoff. The economic approach to human behavior [M]. Chicago: The University ofChicago,1965.
[126]Ulrich&Wiersema. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life [J].American Prospect.1989,13:35-42
[127]Ansoff.Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital [J]. Journal of Democracy.1995,6(1):66-78
[128]Sanchez. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy,1993,20(5):499-514
[129]Harrigan. Firm innovation and region: The role of space in innovation process [J].Innovation Management,1985,24:383-408.
[130]Edith Penrose., Coles A.M., Dickson K. Building innovation networks: Issues of Strategyand Expertise [J]. Technology Analysis&Strategic Management,1959(2),29-41.
[131]Matthew, Schienshock. Structural competitiveness and learning regions [J]. Enterprise andInnovation Management Studies,2000,8,265-280.
[132]Eisenhardt., Autio E., Sapienza H.J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledgeexploitation in young technology-based firms [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,(6-7),587-613
[133]Teece et al.. Structural holes: The social structure of competition [M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.1997.
[134]Eisenhardt. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American Journal ofSociology.2000,94:95-120
[135]Irelandetal. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the EconomicPerformance of Organizations: The Network Effects [J]. American Sociological Review.2003,61:674-698
[136]Katsuhiko and Hitt. The strength of weak ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology.2004,78:1360-1380
[137]Penrose., Van Buren H.J. Organizational social capital and employment practices [J].Academy of Management Review.1959,24:538-555.
[138]Sanchez. Network Updating and Exploratory Learning Environment [J]. Journal ofManagement Studies.1995,138:933-949
[139]Sanchez., Singh H., Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategicalliances: Building relational capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal.1995,21:217-238
[140]Grewal and Tansuhaj, Van de Ven A. Structuring cooperative relationships betweenorganizations [J]. Strategic Management Journal.2001,13:483-498
[141]Sanchez., Morris S.S., Snell S.A. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and valuecreation: Extending the human resource architecture [J]. Academy of Management Review.1997,32:236-256.
[142]Sanchez., George J.M. The excperience and evolution of trust: Implications forcooperation and teamwork [J]. Academy of Management Review.1997,23:531-546.
[143]Matthew., Salanick G.R. The external control of organization: a resource dependenceperspective [M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Education.2000.
[144]吕玉兰.制造企业战略柔性对企业竞争力影响研究.哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文.[D]2008.6.
[145]Eisenhardt. Singh H. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources ofInterorganizational Competitive Advantage [J].The Academy of Management Review,2000,23(4):660-679
[146]唐文萍.制造企业战略柔性对经营绩效影响的研究.哈尔滨工业大学硕士论文
[D]2008.6.
[147]Eisenhardt. Knowledge Management: a strategic agenda [J]. Long Range Planning.2000,30(3):385-391
[148]Irelandetal, Udo. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication oftechnology [J]. Organization Science,2003,3(3):383-396
[149]Barnard., Singh K. Entrenched Success: The Reciprocal Relationship between InterfirmCollaboration and Business Sales Growth [J]. Academy of Management Proceedings,1938,(2):31-36
[150]Andrews., Schiel H. When do Industries clusters? A proposal on how to assess anindustry’s propensity to concentration at a single region or nation [J].Research Policy,1980,(31):849-858.
[151]Burns&Stalkers., Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning [J].Journalof Marketing.1961,58:35-45
[152]Zaltman et al.., Noordewier T., A Framework for market-based organizational learning:linking value, knowledge and behavior [J].Journal of the Academy of marketing science.1973,25:305-318
[153]Zaltman, Duncan., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learningand innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly.1973,35:128-152
[154]Hurley., Salaman G. Strategic human resource management [M]. Oxford: BlackwellBusiness.1998.
[155]Vandeven, Innovation: The New Core Competency [J]. strategy and Leadership.1986,29(1):11-14
[156]Day. Cavusgil S.T., Zhao Y. Learning Orientation, firm innovation capability, and firmperformance [J]. Industrial Marketing Management.1990,31(6):515-524
[157]Narver., Clark K.B. Architectual innovation: the reconfiguration of existing producttechnologies and the failure of establish frims [M]. Administrative Science Quarterly.1990.
[158]Shapiro.Nohria N.，ZaheerA. Strategic newwork [J].Strategic Management Journal.1988，（3）：203-215.
[159]Webster. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital [J]. Journal of Democracy.1992,6(1):66-78
[160]Jaworski.Ghoshal S., Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the OrganizationalAdvantage [J]. Academy of Management Review.1993,23(2):242-266
[161]Houston. Social Capital in the Creation of Financial Capital: The Case of NetworkMarketing [J].Illinois Stipes Publishers.1986,57-62
[162]Lusch. Inkpen, Eric W.K. Tsang. Social Capital, Networks and Knowledge Transfer [J].Academic of Management Review.1987.1:146-165
[163]Harrigan. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity [M]. New York: FreePress.1985.
[164]Slater., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks [J].Academy of Management Journal.1998,41:464-476
[165]Kohlit. Measuring social capital: an integrated questionnaire [M].New York: FreePress.1990.
[166]Slater., Amara N., Lamari M. Does social capital determine innovation to what extent.[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change.1995,69:681-701.
[167]陈国权,马萌.组织学习的过程模型研究[J].管理科学学报.2000(9):15-23.
[168]Houston.Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive bestpractices[J]，SAM Advanced Management Journal，2004，Spring，21-27.
[169]Moorman，Tsang.Social captial，networks，and knowledge transfer[J].Academy ofmanagement review，1998，30（1）：146-165.
[170]Aaker，Marta A.and Donald D.Hambrick.The External Ties of Top Executives：Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly，1984，42（4）：654-681.
[171]Allen，Tsang.Social captial，networks，and knowledge transfer[J].Academy of managementreview，1971，30（1）：146-165.
[172]Bowman， J.H.and Nobeoka， K..Creating and Managing a High-PerformanceKnowledge-Sharing Network：The Toyota Case[J]，Strategic Management Journal，1993，21：345-367
[173]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2003，48(5).
[174]施放.朱国锭.徐再仕.技术创新的群集效应及其实现对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007(10).
[175]Evans.Social capital and value creation：The role of intra-firm networks[J].Academy ofManagement Journal，1991，41：464-476.
[176]Huber，M.and Swedberg，R.，The sociology of economic life[M].Boulder：Westview，1991.
[177]何悦桐,卢艳秋.企业战略柔性理论及影响因素.光明日报(理论版).[N]2012.8.13.
[178]Damanpour.Performance measurement system design:a literaturereview and researchagenda[J]，International Journal of Operations Production Managemen,1991(6):11-15.
[179]Hurley,Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company[M]London:Oxford UniversityPress,1998.
[180]Damanpour.Crossman,andIrisBerdrow.OrganizationaLearningandstrategicRenewal[J].Strategic management Jour-na,1991,(24):1087-1105.
[181]Moorman.The impact of CEO and characteristics on strategic flexibility and firmperformance[M].Texas A&M University the requirement for the dregree of doctor ofphilosophy.1998.
[182]Madhavan,Yongsun The impact of Strategic Flexibility on Business Performance
[M].International Business Environment1998.
[183]Nonaka. Strategic flexibility and performance the requirement for the degree of doctor ofphilosophy[M].London:Oxford University Press,1995.
[184]Von Krogh.Flynn,Sadao Sakakibara,Roger G.Schroeder,Kimberly A.Bates,E.JamesFlynn[J].Empirical research methods in operations management.Journal of operationsmanagement.1998,9(2):79-80.
[185]Gold et al.Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis:the role ofmarket orientation and strategic flexibility[J].Journal of Marketing,2001,65:67-80.
[186] Ruggles.The need for strategic flexibility[J]. Journal of Business Strategy,1998,5,7482.
[187]Scarbrough.Strategic flexibility and firm performance: the case of USbased transnationalcorporations[J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,2003.4(1/2),19.
[188]Scarbrough.A typology of management studies involving culture[J]. Journal ofInternational Business Studies,2003.14,2947.
[189]Subramaniam.Uncertainty: The new rules for strategy[J]. The Journalof Business Strategy,2005.20(3),2530.
[190]Yli-Renko et al.Real options analysis in strategic decision making: An applied approach ina dual options framework[J]. Journal of Applied Management Studies,2001.9(2).
[191]Nonaka.Business strategies in more and less-innovative firms in Canada[J]. ResearchPolicy,1995,25,785804.
[192]Gold et al.The pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2001,81,637659.
[193]Grant.Product development: Past research, presentfindings, and future directions.[J]Academy of Management Review,1996,20,343378.
[194]Calantone.Best practices in estimatingthe cost of capital: Survey and synthesis[J].Financial Practice and Education,1998,8,1328.
[195]Sarin.The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities[J]. Journal of Finance,2003,5,12351256.
[196]Yli-Renko et al.A note on the evaluation of cancellable operating leases[J]. FinancialManagement,2001,11,6067.
[197]Collins.Investment under uncertainty, irreversibility and the arrival of information overtime[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1990,58(194),333.
[198]Hart.The options approach to capital investment. HarvardBusiness Review,1995,73(3),105115.
[199]Bonoma.Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. OrganizationScience,1985,3,179202.
[200]Itami&Roehl.Strategic flexibility for high technology manoeuvres: A conceptualframework[J]. Journal of Management Studies,1987,28,6989.
[201]Reed&DeFillippi.Real options and its platform adoption: Implications for theory andpractice[J]. Information Systems Research,1990,15(2),132154.
[202]Cohendet,Heraud.Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingencytheory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications[J]. Industrial MarketingManagement,1993,34(6),555565.
[203]李正卫.动态环境条件下的组织学习与企业绩效.浙江大学博士学位论文
[D].2003.89-104.
[204]许学国.组织学习力提升机制研究.同济大学博士论文[D].2005.12.
[205]Dick.Competing for the future[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press,1991.
[206]Irwin, Mascarenhas, B.,1984. The need for strategic flexibility[J]. Journal ofBusinessStrategy1994,5(2),74–82.
[207]Moorman. Organizations and Environments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,NJ.Amburgey, T.L., Kelly, W.P., Barnett, W.P.[J]. Resetting the clock: The dynamicsoforganization al change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly1998.38,51–73.
[208]Schumpeter., Gerbing, D.W.,. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review andrecommended two-stepapproach[J]. Psychological Bulletin1934,103(2),411–423.
[209]Kogut C., Scho¨ n, D.A.,. Organizational Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Arias,D.Service operations strategy, flexibility andperformance in engineering consultingfirms[J].InternationalJournal of Operations and Production Management1992,1/12,1401–1421.
[210]Tsai. Principles ofMarketing Research. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge.Bengtsson, J.Manufacturing flexibility and real options:A review[J]. International Journal ofProductionEconomics.1998.74,213–224.
[211]Galunic Olhager, J. Valuation ofproduct-mix flexibility using real options[J]. InternationalJournal of Production Economics1998.78,13–28.
[212]Nonaka., Kahraman, C., Irani, Z.. Quantification of flexibility in advanced manufacturingsystems using fuzzy concept[J]. International Journal ofProductio n Economics1995.89,45–56.
[213]Nonaka. Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration[J]. Academy ofManage mentReview1998,5,25–39.
[214]Von Krogh. Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty,and economic performance in volatileenvironments[J].Academy ofManageme nt Journal1998,28(3),548–573.
[215]Nonaka, Hurri, D. Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view ofresourceinvestments and the incremental-choice process[J]. Academy ofManage ment Review1998,18,760–782.
[216]Daft. Measuring strategic performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal7(5),1984,437–458.
[217]Grant.Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Belknap Press, Cambridge,MA.Chang, S., Yang, C., Cheng, H., Sheu, C.[J]. Manufacturingflexibility and business strategy:An empirical study ofsmall and medium sized firms. International Journal ofProductionEconomics1996,83,13–26.
[218]Spender. A paradigm for developing better measures ofmarketing constructs[J]. Journal ofMarketing Research,1996,16,64–73.
[219]Yli-Renko et al. Levinthal, D.A.. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning andinnovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,35,128–152.
[220]Weisberg. Towards a model of organizations as interpretation systems[J] AcademyofManage ment Review,2006,9(2),284–295.
[221]Sarin, Kelly, D., Barnett, W.P. Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational changeand failure[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.2003,38,51–73.
[222]Grant, Tushman, M.L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclicalmodel of technological change[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1996,35,604–633.
[223]Gold et al.The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. Personality Social Psychol.2001,51,1173–1182.
[224]Sarin. Environmental regulation for competitive advantage[J]. Business Strat. Rev.Spring.2003,1–15.
[225]Day. Predation through regulation: the wage and profit effects of the Occupational Safetyand Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency[J]. J. Law Econ.1994,30,239–259.
[226]Dess. Simple question, not so simple answer: interpreting interaction terms in moderatedmultiple regression[J]. Manage.1987,20,159–165.
[227]Hamel. The choice of strategic alternatives under increasing regulation in hightechnologycompanies. Acad. Manage[J].1994,27,489–510.
[228]Meyer et al., Falbe, C.M., McKinley, W., Tracy, P.K. Technology and organization inmanufacturing[J].Administrative Sci. Q.2005,21,20–40.
[229]Volberda. Organizational effects of decline and turbulence[J]. AdministrativeSci. Q.1998,32,222–240.
[230]Banerji. American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance. Prentice-Hall, EnglewoodCliffs, NJ.Chen, K.H., Metcalf, R.W.,1980. The relationship between pollution control recordand financial indicators revisited[J]. Accounting Rev.2007,55,168–177.
[231]Utterback. Toward an integration of organization research and practice: a contingencystudy of bureaucratic control and performance in scientific settings[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1975,28,85–100.
[232]Hayes. Investment in new technology and competitive advantage. In: Teece, D.J. Ed.., TheCompetitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal[J]. Ballinger,Cambridge, MA,1979,pp.59–82.
[233]Freemand. Managing technology in international competition: The case of productdevelopment in response to foreign entry. In: Spence, M.A., Hazard, H. Eds.., InternationalCompetitiveness[J]. Ballinger,Cambridge, MA,1982,pp.27–74.
[234]Miller and Roth. Regulation and deregulation[J]. Calif. Manage. Rev.1994,294,169–183.
[235]Baldwin Johnson. Applied Multiple RegressionrCorrelation Analysis for the BehavioralSciences.Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Collins, P.D., Hage, J., Hull, F.M.Organizational andtechnological predictors of change in automaticity.Acad[J]. Manage. J.1996,31,512–543.
[236]Sanchez,1988. Bureaucratic Politics and Regulatory Reform: The EPA and EmissionsTrading. Greenwood Press, New York.Daft, R.L.Management. The Dryden Press, Fort Worth,TX.Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants andmoderators.Acad[J]. Manage. J.1997,34,555–590.
[237]Matthew, Davies, B.S.The Politics of Pollution. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN.Dean, T.J.,Brown, R.L.Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: initial evidence and implicationsfor future research. Acad[J]. Manage. J.2000,38,288–303.
[238]Eisenhardt. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms.Organization Sci.1997,3,179–202.
[239]Eisenhardt. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through productinnovation. Strat[J].Manage. J.2000,13,77–92.
[240]Irelandetal. Organizing for innovation. In: Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C., Nord, W.R. Eds..,Handbook of Organization Studies[J]. Sage Publications, London,2003,pp.424–439.
[241]Buzacott. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1982,30,514–539.
[242]Gerwin. Over-regulating America: Tomorrow’s economic argument [M].Management.July1993,27, pp.19–21.
[243]Teece. A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Acad[J]. Manage. J.1986,18,155–160.
[244]Sanchez. Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and thenew institutionalism[J]. Acad. Manage. Rev.1997,21,1022–1054.
[245]Lieberman and Montgomery.Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies[J].Administrative Sci. Q.1998,34,431–452.
[246]Guttmann, J.S., Sierck, A.W., Friedland, D.M., The new Clean Air Act’s big squeeze onAmerica’s manufacturing base[J]. Business Horizons,1992,352,37–40.
[247]Grewal and Tansuhaj.Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes[M].Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,2006.
[248]Auh and Menguc.Structural inertia and organizational change[J]. Am. Sociol. Rev.2005,49,149–164.
[249]Sanchez.Organizational Ecology. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.Hayes, R.H.,Jaikumar, R., Manufacturing’s crisis: New technologies, obsolete organizations[J]. HarvardBusiness Rev. September–October.1997,77–85.
[250]Eisenhardt. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologiesand the failure of established firms[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.2000,35,9–30.
[251]Sirmon.Costs, revenue, and business level strategy[J]. Acad. Manage.Rev.2003,13,202–213.
[252]Irelandetal..Innovation and competitive advantage: what we know and what we need tolearn[J]. Manage,2003,18,399–429.
[253]范志刚.基于企业网络的战略柔性与企业创新绩效提升机制研究.[D]浙江大学博士论文.2010.4.
[254]Teece. Are Environmental Regulations Driving U.S. Industry Overseas? The ConservationFoundation, Washington, DC. Marcus, A.A.U.S. firms’ responses to regulation: stonewalling andopportunism.[J] Long Range Planning1986,203,98–104.
[255]Katsuhiko and Hitt.Responses to externally induced innovation: their effects onorganizational performance[J].Strat. Manage.J.2004,9,387–402.
[256]Katsuhiko and Hitt.Compliance and performance: toward a contingency theory. In:Post,J.E., Preston, L.E. Eds.., Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy[J]. JAI Press,Greenwich,CT,1986,8,193–221.
[257]Cetindamara etal.Externally induced innovation. In: Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L.,Poole,M.S. Eds.., Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies[J]. Harperand Row, New York,2009,pp.537–559.
[258]Lieber-man and Montgomery.Complexity and administrative intensity: the case ofDeclining organizations[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1988,32,87–105.
[259]Li etal.The strategic advantages of the factory of the future[J]. Calif. Manage. Rev.2008,293,27–41.
[260]Katsuhiko and Hitt. Adapting to environmental jolts[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.2004,27,515–537.
[261]Cetindamara et al.The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy[J]. Strat.Manage. J.2009,8,55–76.
[262]Katsuhiko.Organizations: A Quantum View. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Mone,M.A., McKinley, W., Barker III, V.L. Organizational decline and innovation: a contingencyframework[J]. Academic Management Review2004,23,115–132.
[263]Cetindamara etal.Flexible manufacturing organizations:implications for strategyformulation and organization design[J]. Acad. Manage. Rev.1986,13,627–638.
[264]何悦桐，卢艳秋.战略柔性和决策能力对企业技术创新的影响分析.[J]吉林大学社会科学学报.2012(6).
[265]Bock&Bargmann. Environmental regulatory impact and firm-level innovation: A study ofelectric utilities’responses to the Clean Air Act Amendments. The effect of product regulation onbusiness global competitiveness: acontingency approach.[J].Manage. Int. Rev,1990,35,293–305.
[266]Jreskoge. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. HoughtonMifflin,Boston.Schon, D.A. Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hiddenwithin the language of contingency ‘theory’[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1970,26,49–77.
[267]Jalworski. Speeding products to market: waiting time to first product introduction in newfirms[J]. Administrative Sci. Q.1993,35,177–207.
[268]Kohli. Regulation, competition, and strategy: evidence from the auto industry[J]. BusinessSoc.1993,33,224–225.
[269]Huber. The productivity paradox[J]. Harvard Business Rev. July–August.1991,55–60.
[270]Challdler.Social structure and organizations. In: March, J.G. Ed., Handbook ofOrganizations[J]. Rand McNally, Chicago,1962,142–193.
[271]Huber.The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation andRenewal.Technological discontinuities and organizational environments[J]. Administrative Sci.Q.1991,439–465.
[272]Sanchez.Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation inorganizations[J]. Organization Sci.1997,98–118.
[273]Sanchez.What really makes factories flexible?[J].Harvard Business Rev.July–August,1995,74–84.
[274]Jansuhaj.The impact on small business concerns of government regulations that forcetechnological change. Charleswater Associates, Washington, DC. Utterback, J.M., Abernathy,W.J.[J].2001,639–656,.
[275]Sanchez. Central problems in the management of innovation. Manage[M]. Sci.1997,32,590–607.
[276]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径.山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)[J].2003(5).34-38.
[277]项国鹏.从战略系统观视角分析“浙商”战略转型.科技进步与对策[J].2009(1).67-69.
[278]Sanchez.Levinthal.D.A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes[J]. Management Science,1997,43(7),934–950.
[279]苏中锋.战略柔性对企业获取创新收益的影响研究.科学学研究[J].2008(2).87-89.
[280]赵更申.组织柔性对企业创新方式选择的影响研究.科技进步与对策.[J]2007(2).67-69.
[281]王永贵.动态环境下营造竞争优势的关键维度——基于资源的“战略柔性”透视(上).外国经济与管理[J].2000(7).45-49.
[282]Teeceetal.Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitiveenvironments[J].Organization Sci.1997,359–374.
[283]Eisenhardt.Quick, save the ozone[J]. Business Week, May17,2000,78–79.
[284]Irelandetal,Ecology.Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning. Wiley, NewYork.Wheelwright, S.C. Restoring the competitive edge in U.S. manufacturing. In: Teece, D.J.Ed[J].2003,83–100.
[285]周玉泉,李垣.组织学习、能力与创新方式选择关系研究.科学学研究[J].2005(4).34-45.
[286]李守芹.FDI技术溢出对我国企业技术创新能力的影响机理研究.苏州大学硕士论文[D].2011.3.
[287]孙冰,张敏.基于结构方程的我国制造业自主创新现状分析.科技进步与对策.[J]2009.8.25.
[288]陈葵晞,张一纯.基于结构方程建模(SEM)的企业能力评价.产业与科技论坛.[J]2008.5.25.
[289]叶迎春.企业中层管理者管理潜能结构特征与显化机理研究.中国矿业大学博士论文.[D].2009.12.
[290]陈晓翔.企业知识型员工的薪酬关系研究.天津大学硕士论文.[D].2008.5.
[291]Roberts.Models of Man. Wiley&Sons, New York.Simon, H.A.Theories of decisionmaking in economics and behavioral science[J].American Economic Review49(3),255–283,1999.
[292]Chandy.Rational decision making in business organizations[J]. AmericanEconomicReview,2000,69(4),493–513.
[293]张公一.基于跨国技术联盟的合作创新机理研究.吉林大学博士学位论文.[D].2010.6.29-33.
[294]张扬.社会资本和知识溢出对产业集群升级的影响研究.吉林大学博士论文.[D]2009.12.
[295]侯玉莲.战略柔性的增强途径.山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)[J]2003.10.
[296]许冠男.我国影视拍摄保护环境法律问题研究.东北林业大学硕士学位论文.[D]2009.4
[297]王志乐.2012跨国公司中国报告[M].2012.1.