用户名: 密码: 验证码:
制度制约下的上市公司高管变更的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
公司的高管是拥有独特的、具有竞争力的人力资本。高管变更是完善公司治理结构的重要力量源泉之一。公司的内外部治理机制都会影响到高管的变更。高管自身的经营管理能力的优劣会直接影响到企业未来的可持续经营。自从21世纪中国加入WTO以来,中国的经济形势和制度环境发生了翻天覆地的变化。上市公司高管作为公司治理的主要参与者,发挥着重要的作用,而高管变更会直接影响公司治理的效果,进而影响公司所处行业的发展。因此,高管在公司治理中具有举足轻重的地位,高管的变更就更加值得我们关注。中国的经济与制度环境发生了很大的变化,会对高管变更产生一定的影响。公司的外部制度环境的变化如何影响高管的变更?公司的业绩在受到外部制度环境的影响时,与高管变更存在什么样的关系?这些问题值得我们去仔细研究。
     本文从公司治理理论、委托代理理论和制度变迁理论出发,结合中国上市公司特有的经济和制度环境,以规范研究与实证研究相结合的方法,选取1999年12月31日以前上市的公司为样本,观测高管变更的区间是2003年——2007年,从制度环境因素即市场竞争度、要素市场发育程度、市场化程度、政府干预企业的程度、商品市场的地方保护程度等五个方面分析对于高管变更影响的研究,以发现不同的制度环境因素对公司业绩的影响,进而影响高管的变更。本文结合高管变更的研究特征,运用logit回归方法,对制度环境因素变量和高管变更的关系进行了实证检验。本文为了能够进一步剖析高管变更的深层原因,在实证分析时将样本分为三种情况展开研究:全样本分析;董事长变更、总经理变更和两者同时变更的对比分析;第一大股东为国有股股东和第一大股东为非国有股股东的对比分析。研究结果发现,第一大股东为国有股股东时市场化进程、政府对于企业的干预程度、商品市场的地方保护程度对于高管变更的影响不明显。除此之外本文还发现以下重要的研究结论:第一,本文发现市场竞争度越强的企业,企业竞争能力就越强,高管变更的可能性就越低,即市场竞争度与高管变更之间的关系是负相关。第二,在市场发育较好的地区,高管人员变更的难度会越小,从而增大高管人员变更的可能性,高管变更与公司业绩之间的关系是负相关。第三,市场化程度越高,公司的外部制度环境对股东权益保护就会越好,从而提高了公司治理的效率,公司业绩与高管变更之间的关系是负相关。第四,政府对于企业的干预力度越大,高管变更的可能性就越大,人才的流动更加频繁,高管变更与公司绩效之间的关系是负相关。第五,当地政府对于商品市场的保护力度越大,高管变更的可能性就越大,高管变更与公司绩效之间的关系是负相关。
Company executives are unique, competitive human capital. Executive change which is to improve the corporate governance structure is one important source of strength. The company's internal and external governance mechanisms will affect the executive changes. Executive management capacity of their own strengths and weaknesses will directly affect the future of sustainable business enterprises. Since the 21st century, China's accession to WTO, China's economic situation and institutional environment has undergone enormous changes. Listed Companies Corporate Governance as a key player, to play an important role, but executives of corporate governance changes will directly affect the results, thereby affecting the company in which development of the industry. Thus, executives in corporate governance plays a decisive role, executives of the change is even more worthy of our attention. China's economic and institutional environment has undergone great changes, executive changes will have some impact. Company changes in the external institutional environment changes how they affect executives? The company's performance in the external system by the impact of the environment, and executives there is any kind of relationship change? These issues deserve our careful study.
     From the corporate governance theory, principal agent theory and the theory of institutional change, combined with China's listed companies unique economic and institutional environment, to regulate the research and empirical research methods combined, selected on Dec.31,1999 the company marketed before the sample observed range of executive changes in 2003 and 2007, from a system that is market competition, environmental factors, degree, elements of market development, market level, the degree of government intervention in business, commodity market where the level of protection of the five areas The impact of the change of executives to find a different system of environmental factors on company performance, which in turn affect the executive changes. This paper studies characteristics of executive changes, using logit regression method, the system environmental variables and the relationship between the executive change an empirical test. This executive order to further analyze the underlying causes of changes in the empirical analysis to a study sample is divided into three cases:the full sample analysis; chairman of the board changes, general manager of change and comparative analysis of both changes; the first major shareholders state-owned shareholders and non-largest shareholder of comparative analysis of state-owned shareholders. The results showed that the largest shareholder is state-owned shareholders when the process of marketization, the government intervention in business, the degree of commodity market where the level of protection for the executive change was not obvious, In addition this study also found that the following important conclusions:First, we find that the stronger the degree of competition in the enterprise, the more powerful enterprise competitiveness, the lower the possibility of executive changes, that degree of market competition and executive change the relationship between a negative correlation. Second, good growth in the market area, executives will change the difficulty of the smaller, thereby increasing the possibility of changes to senior management, senior management changes and the relationship between company performance is negative. Third, the higher the level of the market, the company's external institutional environment will better protect the rights of shareholders, thereby increasing the efficiency of corporate governance, company performance and executives to change the relationship between the negative. Fourth, the government intervention in business, the greater the intensity, the greater the likelihood of executive changes, more frequent movement of personnel, executive changes and the relationship between corporate performance is negative. Fifth, the local government for greater efforts to protect the commodity market, the greater the likelihood of executive changes, executive changes and the relationship between corporate performance is negative.
引文
1潘新兴.上市公司股权结构问题研究综述[J].当代经济科学.2003,(2).
    2 Kaplan,S.N,1994,Top executives, turnover, and firm performance in Germany[J].Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, (10):142-159.
    1赵超,JulianLowe,皮莉莉.中国上司公司股权结构与总经理变更[J].改革,2005,(1):93-100.
    2陈漩,淳伟德.人股东对公司高层更换影响的实证分析[J].软科学.2006,(2):134-139.
    3 Weisbach,Michael S.,1998,Outside directors and CEO turnover[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,(20): 431-460.
    4 Allgood,S.,Farrell,K.A,2000,The effect of CEO tenure on the relation between firm performance and turnover[J].The Journal of Financial Research,(11):373-390.
    5 Dalton,D.R.Kesner,I,F.1983,Inside or Outside succession and organizationl size:the pragmatics of executive replacement[J]。 Academy of Managenment Journa,(26):736-742.
    6 Pouriau,Susan,1993,Earnings management and non-routine ececutive changes [J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,(16):317-336.
    7奚俊芳,于培友.我国上市公司控制权转移绩效研究一基于经营业绩的分析[J].南开管理评论,2006,(9):42—48.
    8朱琪,彭璧玉,黄祖辉.人股东变更和高层更换:市场绩效的实证研究[J].华南师范大学学报,2004,(2):15-20.
    9 Kini,O.,Kracaw,W.,Mian,S.1995,Corporate takeovers,firm performance, and board composition[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,(1):383-412.
    10张必武,石金涛.总经理更换与高管团队的稳定性研究[J].财经研究,2005,(32):121-132.
    ,Xi为企业i的主营业务收入;X为该行业内主营业务收入的总和;n——该行业内企业的数量。
    Gibson,M,2003,Is Corporate Governance Effective in Emerging Marketing Markets? [J], Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,(38):231-250.
    3于智东,谷立日.公司的领导权结构与经营绩效[J].中国工业经济,2002,(2):70-78.
    4结束代理是指高管层在因公出国学习或到中央党校培训等情况而暂时将职务交由公司其他人担任的情况。
    5完善法人治理结构是1998年12月29日颁布的《中华人民共和国证券法》对上市公司要求“完善法人治理结构”,要求经营权和所有权相分离,董事长和总经理的职位应该由两个人分别担任。
    6何浚.上市公司治理结构的实证分析[J].经济研究,1998,(5):50-57.
    7宋德舜.国有控股、最高决策者激励与公司绩效[J].中国工业经济,2004,(3):91-98.
    8孙永祥,黄祖辉.上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J].经济研究,1999,(12):23-30.
    9朱红军.大股东变更与高级管理人员更换:经营业绩的作用[J].会计研究,2002,(9):31-40.
    10朱琪,彭璧玉,黄祖辉.大股东变更和高层更换:市场绩效的实证研究[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(2):15-20.
    11王巍.中国并购报告[M].人民邮电出版社.2008.
    1在本文实证检验中如无特殊说明,在变量定义中高管就特指董事长或者总经理。
    2净资产收益率(扣除摊薄)是公司面向未来的一个公司业绩指标,而净资产收益率(摊薄)是公司考虑未上市的因素面向过去的一个公司业绩指标。2002年3月财政部、国家经贸委、中心企业工委、劳动保障部和国家计委重现颁布新的《企业业绩评价操作细则》,总共设置了8项基本指标、12项修正指标和8项评议指标。在此当中“净资产收益率”这项指标给予的权重最高。
    3 Parrion,R,1997,CEO Turnover and Outside Succession:a Cross-sectional Analysis[J],Journal of Finanacial Economics,(46):165-197.
    4赫佛因德指数是由赫佛因德在1950年的博士论文《钢铁业中的集中》中提出来的。
    5姜付秀,刘志彪.行业特征、资本结构与产品市场竞争[J].管理世界,2005,(10):74-81.
    6樊刚,王小鲁.中国市场化指数[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.
    7龚玉池.公司绩效与高层更换[J].经济研究,2001,(10):75-82.
    8 Cleary,S.,1999,The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status,Journal of Finance,(54): 673-692.
    [1]埃里克·弗鲁博顿,鲁道夫·苗切特著.新制度经济学:一个交易费用分析范式.姜建强,罗长远译[M].上海:上海人民出版社.2006.
    [2]白重恩,杜颖娟,陶志刚.地方保护主义及产业地区集中度的决定因素和变动趋势[J].经济研究,2004,(4):29-40.
    [3]白重恩,刘俏,陆洲.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,(2):81-91.
    [4]陈冬华.地方政府、公司治理与企业绩效[D].上海财经大学博士学位论文.2002.
    [5]陈健,席酉民,贾隽.并购后高管变更的绩效影响:基于中国上市公司的实证分析[J].南开管理评论,2006,(9):33-37.
    [6]陈小悦,徐晓东.第一大股东对公司治理、企业绩效的影响分析[J],经济研究,2003,(2):64-74.
    [7]陈寒玉.公司控制权转移、绩效变化及解释[D].上海财经大学博士学位论文.2003.
    [8]陈晓,王琨.关联交易、公司治理与国有股改革[J].经济研究,2005,(4):77-86.
    [9]陈璇,淳伟德.大股东对公司高层更换影响的实证分析[J].软科学,2006,(2):134-139.
    [10]陈璇,李仕明,祝小宁.公司业绩与经营者变更:上市公司政府控制权的差异[J].管理评论,2006,(3):3-13.
    [11]陈璇,刘卉.公司绩效对CEO更换的影响分析——基于我国高新技术企业与传统企业的实践[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2006,(3):164-167.
    [12]陈宗胜,吴浙,谢思全.中国经济体制市场化进程[M].上海:上海人民出版社.1999.
    [13]淳伟德.高新技术企业与传统企业CEO更换异同分析[J].社会科学研究,2005,(6):49-53.
    [14]丁烈云,刘荣英.制度环境、股权性质与高管变更研究[J].管理科学,2008,(6):47-56.
    [15]丁希炜,周中胜.公司高管人员更换的影响因素——基于上市公司的实证分析[J].山西财经大学学报,2008,(8):70-76.
    [16]杜兴强,王丽华.高层管理当局薪酬与上市公司业绩的相关性实证研究[J].会计研究,2007,(1):58-66.
    [17]杜兴强,周泽将.高管变更、继任来源与盈余管理[J].当代经济科学,2010,(1):23-33.
    [18]丁翔,陈东林.国有资产分级产权新体制下的国有投资公司研究[J].财贸研究,2003,(4):54-56.
    [19]杜晓宇.中国上市公司高管变更期间业绩预告披露行为研究[D].吉林大学博士论文,2009.
    [20]达摩达尔·N·古扎拉蒂.计量经济学基础[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2000.
    [21]方轶强,夏立军,李莫愁.控股权转移后公司绩效变化的影响因素分析——基于效率理论和管制理论的解释[J].财经研究,2006,(1):53-64.
    [22]樊刚,王小鲁.中国市场化指数[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.
    [23]范从来,袁静.成长性、成熟性和衰退性产业上市公司并购绩效的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2002,(8):65-72.
    [24]冯瑛.控股股东、董事会与盈余质量的实证研究[D].吉林大学博士论文,2007.
    [25]高鹤.基于财政分权和地方政府行为的转型分析框架[J].改革,2004,(4):38-43.
    [26]胡燕京,张洁.因子分析:上市公司综合业绩分析的一种新视角[J].管理评论,2004,(4):49-53.
    [27]黄建柏,钟美瑞.解雇威胁条件下经营者风险分担与激励设计[J].中国管理科学,2005,(8):87-94.
    [28]李春琦.国有企业经营者的声誉激励问题研究[J].财经研究,2002,(12):50-55.
    [29]李新春,苏晓华.总经理继任:西方的理论和我国的实践[J].管理世界,2001,(4):145-152.
    [30]李维安等.现代公司治理研究[M].中国人民大学出版社,2002.
    [31]李仕明.产权理论和国有产权制度改革[J].经济研究,1995,(2):41-45.
    [32]李自杰,陈晨.市场环境、控制能力与企业产权制度的变迁[J].管理世界,2005,(8):143-148.
    [33]李增泉,杨春燕.企业绩效、控制权转移与经理人员变更[J].中国会计与财务研究,2003,(4):51-108.
    [34]李增泉,国家控股与公司治理的有效性[D].上海财经大学博士学位论文,2003.
    [35]龚玉池.公司绩效与高层更换[J].经济研究,2001,(10):75-82.
    [36]郭鹏飞,孙培源.资本结构的行业特征:基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003,(5):66-73.
    [37]郝凤杰.市场集中度、资本结构与产品市场竞争力——基于制造业上市公司数据的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2008,(2):56-60.
    [38]韩晓明.公司治理的更迭机制研究[D].财政部财政科学研究所博士论文.2002.
    [39]何浚.上市公司治理结构的实证分析[J].经济研究,1998,(5):50-57.
    [40]贺家铁.上市公司高级管理层激励组合研究[D].山东大学博士论文.2006.
    [41]姜付秀,刘志彪.行业特征、资本结构与产品市场竞争[J].管理世界,2005,(10):74-81.
    [42]贾晓峰.对市场集中度的应用统计分析[J].财贸研究,1995,(3):61-65.
    [43]蒋荣.中国上市公司CEO变更的影响因素与经济后果研究:基于大股东视角[D].重庆大学博士论文.2008.
    [44]蒋荣,陈丽蓉.产品市场竞争治理效应的实证研究——基于CEO变更视角[J].经济科学,2007,(2):102-111.
    [45]蒋荣,刘星,刘斌.中国上市公司外部审计治理有效性的实证研究——基于CEO变更视角[J].财经研究,2007,(11):92-103.
    [46]姬美光,王克明.我国上市公司高管变更与业绩敏感性研究[J].嘉应学院学报,2008,(2):56-63.
    [47]柯江林,张必武,孙健敏.上市公司总经理更换、高管团队重组与企业绩效改进[J].南开管理评论,2007,(4):104-112.
    [48]林毅夫.关于制度变迁的经济学理论[M].上海:上海三联书店,1990.
    [49]林毅夫,蔡防,李周.中国经济转型时期的地区差距分析[J].经济研究,1998,(6):3-10.
    [50]林浚清,黄祖辉,孙永祥.高管团队内薪酬差距、公司绩效和治理结构[J].经济研究,2003,(4):31-40.
    [51]刘博,干胜道.基于高官变更视角的盈余管理研究综述[J].当代经济管理,2009,(10):16-19.
    [52]刘立国,杜荣.公司治理与会计信息质量关系的实证研究[J].会计研究,2003,(2): 28-37.
    [53]刘旻,芮萌,尹立东.转轨背景下中国上市公司高级管理者变更的影响因素研究[J].中国软科学,2005,(2):86-90.
    [54]刘荣英.制度环境、股权性质与高管变更[D].华东科技大学博士论文.2009.
    [55]刘志彪,姜付秀,卢二坡.资本结构与产品市场竞争强度[J].经济研究,2003,(7):60-67.
    [56]娄芳.国外独立董事制度的研究现状[J].外国经济与管理,2001,(12):24-29.
    [57]欧湛颖.中国上市公司高管变更与企业持续成长:1999-2005年经验数据分析[J].学术研究,2008,(9):59-64.
    [58]罗建华,张琦.区域性产业特征分析及其市场集中度的实证研究[J].工业技术经济.2006,(8):9-11.
    [59]庞金勇.国外团队理论视角下的高管变更研究综述[J].工业技术经济,2007,(12):52-53.
    [60]庞金勇.上市公司高挂变更与公司治理关系研究[D].山东大学博士论文.2008.
    [61]平新乔,周艺艺.产品市场竞争度对企业研发的影响[J].产业经济研究,2007,(5):1-10.
    [62]青木昌彦等.转轨经济中的公司治理结构[M].中国经济出版社,1995.
    [63]热若尔·罗兰.转型与经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
    [64]让·若儿.公司金融理论[M].人民大学出版社,1996.
    [65]施东晖.转轨经济中的所有权与竞争:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].经济研究,2003,(8):46-54.
    [66]石水平.控股权转移、控股股东与大股东利益侵占——来自上市公司高管变更的经验证据[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学),2009,(4):93-104.
    [67]宋德舜,宋逢明.国有控股、经营者变更和公司绩效[J].南开管理评论,2005,(1):10-15.
    [68]宋德舜.国有控股、最高决策者激励与公司绩效[J].中国工业经济,2004,(3):91-98.
    [69]孙永祥,黄祖辉.上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J].经济研究,1999,(12):23-30.
    [70]孙世敏.公司绩效评价与管理报酬[J].管理评论,2004,(3):16-18.
    [71]孙铮,刘凤委,李增泉.市场化程度、政府干预与企业债务期限结构—来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].经济研究,2005,(5):52-63.
    [72]孙海法,伍晓奕.企业高层管理团队研究的进展[J].管理科学学报,2003,(4):82-89.
    [73]盛洪.现代制度经济学[M].北京大学出版社.2007.
    [74]王国生.转型时期地方政府面临的制度环境及其市场地位分析[J].南京社会科学,1999,(11):9-14.
    [75]魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,(3):32-69.
    [76]魏立群,王智慧.我国上市公司高管特征与企业绩效的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2002,(4):16-22.
    [77]王丽娜.我国继任者来源影响因素的实证研究[J].生产力研究,2008,(19):78-80.
    [78]吴淑琨,柏杰,席西民.董事长与总经理两职的分离与合一—中国上市公司实证分析[J].经济研究,1998,(8):21-28.
    [79]徐莉萍,陈工孟,辛宇.控制权转移、产权改革及公司经营绩效之改进[J].管理世界,2005,(3):126-136.
    [80]徐向艺,庞金勇.上市公司主要高管变更后的团队稳定性[J].经济管理,2008,(13):42-47
    [81]肖作平.公司治理对资本选择的影响[J].管理科学学报,2008,(10):129-44.
    [82]肖作平.公司治理结构对资本结构类型的影响—一个Logit模型[J].管理世界,2005,(9):137-47.
    [83]夏立军,方轶强.政府控制、治理环境与公司价值一来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].经济研究,2005,(5):40-51.
    [84]奚俊芳,于培友.我国上市公司控制权转移绩效研究一基于经营业绩的分析[J].南开管理评论,2006,(9):42-48.
    [85]薛祖云,黄彤.董事会、监事会制度特征与会计信息质量—来自中国资本市场的经验分析[J].财经理论与实践,2004,(9):84-89.
    [86]杨华荣,陈军,陈金贤.产品市场竞争度对上市公司自愿性信息披露影响研究[J].预测,2008,(1):41-45.
    [87]杨瑞龙.国有企业股份制造的理论思考[J].经济研究,1995,(2):13-22.
    [88]阎薇.公司治理及独立董事的激励与约束[J].财经问题研究,2005,(5):83-86.
    [89]朱红军.我国上市公司高管人员更换的现状分析[J].管理世界,2002,(5):126-131.
    [90]朱红军.大股东变更与高级管理人员更换:经营业绩的作用[J].会计研究,2002,(9):31-40.
    [91]朱红军.高级管理人员更换的原因与经济后果[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003.
    [92]朱红军,林俞.高管人员更换的财富效应[J].经济科学,2003,(4):85-94.
    [93]朱琪,彭璧玉,黄祖辉.大股东变更和高层更换:市场绩效的实证研究[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(2):15-20.
    [94]郑红亮.中国公司治理结构改革研究:一个理论综述[J].管理世界,2000,(3):119-125.
    [95]郑红亮.公司治理理论与中国国有企业改革[J].经济研究,1998,(10):20-27.
    [96]周立群.中国国有企业改革理论的演进与发展[J].南开学报,1999,(2):1-8.
    [97]赵超,JulianLowe,皮莉莉:中国上市公司股权结构与总经理变更[J].改革,2005,(1):93-100.
    [98]赵山.中国上市公司高层更换实证研究[J].改革,2001,(6):29-34.
    [99]张俊生,曾亚敏.董事会特征与总经理变更[J].南开管理评论,2005,(8):16-20.
    [100]张俊瑞,赵进文,张建.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效相关性的实证分析[J].会计研究,2003,(9):29-34.
    [101]张慕濒,范从来.管理层变更与控制权市场智利效力的实证研究[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2005,(6):117-126.
    [102]张旭.当代公司治理结构演变的新趋势与我国的对策[J].经济纵横,1996,(3):68-69.
    [103]张维迎,栗树和.地区间竞争和国有企业的民营化[J].经济研究,1998,(12):13-22.
    [104]张维迎.产权安排与企业内的权力斗争[J].经济研究,2000,(6):41-50.
    [105]张维迎.企业理论与中国企业改革[M].北京:北京大学出版,1999.
    [106]张维迎.企业的企业家—契约理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
    [107]杨瑞龙.国有企业股份制造的理论思考[J].经济研究,1995,(2):13-22.
    [108]赵震宇,杨之曙,白重恩.影响中国上市公司高管层变更的因素分析与实证检验[J].金融研究,2007,(8):76-89.
    [1]Banks,J.and Sundaram,R,1998,Optimal Retention in Agency Problems[J],Journal of Economic Theory,(10):293-323.
    [2]Barro J,R Barro,1990,Pay,performance,and turnover of bank CEOs[J],Journal of Labor Economics,(8):448-481.
    [3]Boeker,W.& Goodstein,J,1993,Performance and Succession Choice:The Moderating Effects of Governance and Qwner ship [J], Academy of Management Journal,(36):172-186.
    [4]Boyacigiller N.A.& Adler N.J,1991,The parochical dinosaur:Organizational science in a global context[J],Academy of Management Review,(16):262-290.
    [5]Boycko M, A Shleifer, R Vishny.,1996,A Theory of Privatization[J], Economic Journal, (106):309-319.
    [6]Brickley,J.A.,J.L.Coles,and R.L.Terry,1994,Outside directorsand the adoption of poison pills[J],Journal of Financial Economics,(35):371-390.
    [7]BrickleyJ.A.,Coles J.L.,Jarrell G..,1997,Leadership structure:separating the CEO and chairman of the board[J] Journal of Corporate Finance,(3):189-220.
    [8]Brunello,G.,C.Graziano,B.M.Parigi,2003,CEO Turnover in Insider-Dominated Boards:The Italian Case[J],Journal of Banking&Finance,(27):1027-1051.
    [9]Bushman R, Chen Q, Engel E, Smith A,2004,Financial Accounting Information, Organizational Complexity and Corporate Governance Systems [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics,37(2):67-201.
    [10]Cannella, A-A-, Jr·,& Shen, W,2001,So close and yet so far:Promotion versus exit for CEO heirs apparent[J],Academy of Management Journal, (44):252-270.
    [11]Cannella,B.,Hambrick,D.,1993,Succession as a Sociopolitical Process:Internal Impediments to Outsider Selection[J],Academy of Management,36(4):733-762.
    [12]Carl P.Maertz Jr.,Rodger W.Griffeth,2004,Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research [J],Journal of Management,30(5):667-683.
    [13]Charles J Hadlock, Gerald B Lumer,1997,Compensation,Turnover, and Top Management Incentives:Historical Evidence[J], Journal of Business,70(2):153-187.
    [14]Choi,Y.,1993,The Choice of Organizational Form.The Case of Post-merger Managerial Incentive Structure [J],Financial Management, (22):69-81.
    [15]Conyon M., Florou A.,2002,Top Executive Dismissal,Ownership and Corporate Performance [J],Accounting and Business Research,32(4):209-225.
    [16]Coughlan A., Schmidt R.,1985,Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance:An Empirical Investigation[J], Journal of Accounting and Economics,7(1-3): 43-66.
    [17]Dahya J.,LonieA., Power D.,1988,Ownership Structure, Firm Performance and Top Executive Change:An Analysis of UK Firms [J],Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 25(9-10):1089-1118.
    [18]Dahya J.,McConnell J.,2002,Travlos N.G.The Cadbury committee,corporate performance ,and top management turnover[J],Journal of Finance,(57):461-484.
    [19]David,Hiller,Scott,C,Linn, and Patrik,McColgan,2005,Equity Issuance,CEO turnover and corporate governance[J],European Financial Management,11 (4):515-538.
    [20]David J Denis, Diane K Denis,1995,Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals[J],The Journal of Finance,1995,50(4):1029-1057.
    [21]Dechow P., Sloan R., Sweeney A.,1995,Detecting Earnings Management[J],he Accounting Review,70(2):193-225.
    [22]Defond, M. Park, C,2000,The effect of competition on CEO turnover [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics,(27):35-56.
    [23]Defond.M.,HungM.,2004,Investor Protection and Corporate Governance:Evidence from World wide CEO Turnover [J], Journal of Accounting Research,42(2):269-312.
    [24]Demsetz,H.,Lehn,K,1985,The Structure of Corporate Ownership:Cause and Consequence [J],Journal of Political Economics,(93):1155-1177.
    [25]Denis D J,Denis D K,Sarin A,1997,Ownership Structure and Top Management Turnover [J],Journal of Financial Economics,(45):193-221.
    [26]Denis,D J.,D.K.Denis,1995,Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals [J],Journal of Finance,(50):1029-1058.
    [27]Dennis,D.J.,Denis,D.and A.Sarin,1997,Agency problems,equity ownership and corporate diversification[J],Journal of Finance,(52):135-160.
    [28]Denis,Diane K,2001,Twenty-five years of corporate governancere search and counting[J], Review of Financial Economics,(10):191-212.
    [29]Donald C.Clarke,2003,Corporate govenance in China:An overview[J],China Economic Review,(14):494-507.
    [30]Edward,Fee,and Charless,J.,Hadlock,2000,Managenment Turnover and Product Market Competition:Empirical Evidence from the U.S. Newspaper Industry[J],The Journal of Business,73(2):205-243.
    [31]Elisabeth,Dedman,2003,Executive turnover in UK firms:the impact of Cadbury [J],Accoun-ting and Business Research,(33):33-50.
    [32]Engel, Ellen, Hayes, Rachel, M.,and Wang, Xue,2003,CEO turnover and properties of accounting information[J], Journal of Accounting & Economics,36(1-3):197-226.
    [33]Fama,Eugene F,1980,Agency problems and the theory of the firm[J],Journal of Political Economy,(88):283-307.
    [34]Fama E, Jensen M C,1983,Agency problem and residual claims[J],Journal of Law and Eeonomies,26(2):327-349.
    [35]Fama E.Agency problems and theory the firm [J].Journal of Political Economy,1980,88(2): 288-307.
    [36]Farrell,K.A.,Whidbee.D,2000,The Consequences of Forced CEO Succession for Outside Director[J],Journal of Bussiness,(73):597-627.
    [37]Firth M., Fung P., Rui O.,2006,Firm Performance, Governance Structure, and Top Management Turnover in a Transitional Economy[J]. Journal of Management Studies,43 (6): 1289-1330.
    [38]Franks J.,Mayer C.,2001,Ownership and Control of German Corporations [J],Review of Financial Studies,14(4):943-977.
    [39]Franks J.,MayerC.,1996,Hostile Takeovers and the Correction of Managerial Failure[J], Journal of Financial Economics,40(1):193-221.
    [40]Gibbons,Robert and Kevin J.Murphy,1992,Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns:Theory and Evidence[J],The Journal of Political Economy,(100):468-505.
    [41]Gibson,M.,2003,Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets?[J],Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,(38):231-250.
    [42]Gilson S.Bankruptcy,1990,Boards,Banks and Blockholders[J], Journal of Financial Economi-cs,(27):355-387.
    [43]Gilson,S.C.,1989,Management Turnover and Financial Distress[J],Journal of Financial Economics,(25):241-262.
    [44]Giorgio,Brunello,Clara,Graziano,and Bruno,M.,Parigi,2003,CEO turnover in insider-dominated boards:The Italian case[J],Journal of Banking & Finance,(27):1027-1051.
    [45]Groves,T.,Y.Hong,McMillan et al,1995,China's Evolving Management Labor Market[J], Journal of Political Economy,(103):873-892.
    [46]Gongmeng, Chen, Michael, Firth, Daniel, N.,Gao, and Oliver,M., Rui,2005,Is China's securities Regulatory agency a toothless tiger?Evidence from enforcement actions[J].Journal of Accounting and Pulicy,(24):451-488.
    [47]Goyal,V.K,Park,C,2002,Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover[J]Journal of Corporate Finance,(8):49-66.
    [48]Hambrick D. C, Mason P.A,1984,Upper echelons:The organization as a reflection of its top managers [J],Academy of Management Review,(9):193-206.
    [49]Hambrick D. C.,& Rukutomi.GS,1991,The Reason of a CEO's Tenure[J],Academy of Management Review,(16):719-742.
    [50]Hambrick D. C.,Gelekanycz,M.A.,& Fredrickson,J.W,1993,Top Executive Commitment to Status quo:Some Tests of its Determinats[J], Strategic Management Journal,(14):401-418.
    [51]Hart Oliver,1995,Corporate Governance:Some Theory and Implication [J], The Economic Journal,105(430):678-689.
    [52]Healy,P.M,1985,The Effect of Bonus Schmes on Accounting Decisions[J],Journal of Accounting and Economics, (7):85-107.
    [53]Heaney,R.,Naughton,T.,Truong,T.et al,2006,The Link between Performance and Changes in the Size and Stability of a Firm's Officers and Directors [J],Journal of Multinational Financial Management,(271):1-14.
    [54]Holmstrom B,1999,Managerial Incentive Problems:A Dynamic Perspective [J],Review of Economic Studies, (66):169-182.
    [55]Holmstrom Bengt,1982,Managerial incentive problemsa dynamic perspective [J],Review of Economic Studies,(66):169-182.
    [56]Holmstrom,B.& P,1987,Milgrom Aggregation and linearity in the provision of inter-temporal incentives[J],Econometrica,(55):303-328.
    [57]Holthausen R W, Watts R L,2001,The Relevance of the Value-Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting[J], Journal of Accounting and Economics,31(1-3):3-75.
    [58]Huson,M.,Parrino,R.,and Starks,L.,2001,Internal moniting mechanisms and CEO turnover:a long-term perspective [J],Journal of Finance,56(6):2265-2297.
    [59]Huson MR,Malatesta PH,Parrino R,2004,Managerial,Succession and Firm Performance [J],Journal of Finanical Economics,(74):237-275.
    [60]Jackson S E,Brett J F,Sessa V I.Cooper D M,Julin,J A and Peyronnin K,1991,Some differences make a difference:Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitement,promotions,and turnover[J], Journal of Applied Psychology,(76):675-689.
    [61]Jame A Brickley,2003,Empirical research on CEO turnover and firm-performance:A discussion[J],Journal of Accounting and Economics,(36):227-233.
    [62]Jensen M C,1986,Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers [J],American Economic Review,76(3):323-339.
    [63]Jensen M,1993,The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems[J],Journal of Finance,(48):831-880.
    [64]Jensen,M.,M.Meckling,1976,Theory of Firm:Managerial Behavior,Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J], Journal of Financial Economics,3(4):305-360.
    [65]Jensen,Michael C., and Kevie J.Murphy,1990b,Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives [J],Journal of Political Economy,(2):225-264.
    [66]Johnson S.,La PortaR.,2000,Lopez-de-SilanesF., ShleiferA..Tunneling[J],American Economic Review,,90(2):22-27.
    [67]Jun-koo Kang, Anli Shivdasani,1995,Firm performance, corporate governance,and top executive turnover in Japan[J],Journal of Financial Economics,(38):29-58.
    [68]Kang J., ShivdasaniA.,1995,Firm Performance, Corporate Governance, and Top Executive Turnover in Japan[J],Journal of Financial Economics,38(1):19-58.
    [69]Kaplan S.,1994,Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance:A Comparison of Japan and the United States[J], Journal of Political Economy,102(3):510-546.
    [70]Kaplan S.,1994,Top Executives,Turnover, and Firm Performance in Germany [J],Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,10(1):142-159.
    [71]Kaplan S.,Minton B.,1994,Appointments of Outsiders of Japanese Boards:Determinants and Implications for Managers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,36(2):225-258.
    [72]Kathleen A.Farrella,David A.Whidbeeb,2003, Impact of firm performance expectatins on CEO turnover and replacement decisions [J],Journal of Accounting and Economics,(36): 165-196.
    [73]Keck, S.L.,& Tushman, M.L.,1995,Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure [J], Academy of management journal, (36):1314-1344.
    [74]Kesner, I.F., Sebora, T.C,1994,Executive succession:past, present and future [J],Journal of Management,(20):327-372.
    [75]La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R,1998,Law and Finance[J], Journal of Political Economy,106(6):1113-1155.
    [76]La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R,2000,Investor Protection and Corporate Governance[J], Journal of Financial Economics,58(1-2):4-27.
    [77]Lambert R A,2001,Contracting Theory and Accounting [J] Journal of Accounting and Economics,32(1-3):3-87.
    [78]Mark R.Huson,Robert Parrino,Laura T.Starks,2001,Internal Monitoring Mechanisms and CEO Turnover:A Long-term Perspective [J],The Journal of Finance,(6):2265-2297.
    [79]Martin K.J.,McConnell J.J,1991,Corporate performance,corporate takeovers,and management turnover[J] Journal of Finance,(46):671-687.
    [80]Michael C.Jensen & Kevin J.Murphy,1990,Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives [J] Journal of Political Economy,(98):225-164.
    [81]Mikkelson W.H.,Partch M.M.,1997,The decline of takeovers and disciplinary managerial turnover[J],Journal of Financial Economics,(44):205-227.
    [82]Morck R.,ShleiferA.,Vishny R.,1989, A lternative Mechanisms for Corporate Control [J], American Economic Review,79(4):842-852.
    [83]Murphy,K.and Zimmerman,J,1993,Financial Performance Surrounding CEO Turnover [J], Journal of Accounting and Economics,(16):273-316.
    [84]Nickell,S.J.,1996,Competition and Corporate Performance [J],Journal of Political Economy,(104):724-746.
    [85]Omesh K,William K,Shehzad M,1995,Corporate takeovers,firm performance,and board composition[J],Journal of Corparate Finance,(1):383-412.
    [86]O'Reily Ⅲ C A,Caldwell C and Barnett D,1989,Work group demography,social integration,and turnover[J],Administrative Science Quarterly,(34):21-37.
    [87]Parrion,R,1997,CEO Turnover and Outside Succession:a Cross-sectional Analysis [J],Journal of Finanacial Economics,(46):165-197.
    [88]Robert, Neumann, and Torben, Voetman,2005,Top Executive Turnovers:Separating Decision and Control Rights [J],Managerial & Decision Economics,26(1):25-37.
    [89]Sam, Allgood, and Kathleen,A.,Farrell,2000,The Effect of CEO Tenure on the Relation Between Firm Performance and Turnover[J],The Journal of Financial Research,XXIII(3): 373-390.
    [90]Sanson Ekanayake,2004, Agency theory,national culture and management control systems [J],The Journal of American Acadeny of Business,(3):49-54.
    [91]Sappington,D.,J.Stiglitz,1987,Privatization,Information and Incentives [J],Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,(6):567-582.
    [92]Schweiger,D.M,DeNisi,A.S.,1991,communication with Employees Following a Merger:A Longitudinal Field Experiment[J],Academy of Management Journal, (34):110-135.
    [93]Shapiro,C.and J.Stiglitz,1984,Equilibrium Unemployment as a Discipline Device[J],Ameri-can Economic Review,(74):433-444.
    [94]Shleifer,A., R.Vishny,1986,Large Shareholders and Corporate Control [J],Journal of Political Economics,94(3):461-488.
    [95]Shleifer A.,Vishny R.,1989,Management Entrenchment:The Case of Manager-Specific Investments [J], Journal of Financial Economics,25(1):123-139.
    [96]Shleifer,A, R.Vishny,1994,Politicians and Firms[J],Quarterly Journal of Economics, (109):995-1025.
    [97]Shleifer,A.,R.Vishny,1997,A survey of Corporate Governance [J] Journal of Finance,(52): 737-783.
    [98]Stiglitz,J.E.,and A.Weiss,1983,Incentive effects of termina-tions:applications to the credit and labor markets [J],American Economic Review,(73):912-927.
    [99]Tor,Eriksson,2005,Management pay and executive turnover in the Czech and Slovak Republics[J],13(4):659-677.
    [100]Warner,J.,J.,1988,Watts,K.Wruck.Stock Prices and Top Management Changes [J], Journal of Financial Economics,(20):461-492.
    [101]Wagner G W,Pfeffer J and O'Reilly III C A,1984,Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups [J],Administrative Science Quarterly,(29):74-92.
    [102]Weisbach MS,1988,Outside directors and CEO turnover [J],Journal of Financial Economics,(20):431-460.
    [103]Virany,B.,Tushman,M.,& Romanelli.E,1992,Executive Succession and Oraganization Outcomes in Turbulent Environmets:An Organizational Learning Approach [J],Oraganization Science,(3):72-90.
    [104]Volpin P.,2002,Govemance with Poor Investor Protection:Evidence from Top Executive Turnover in Italy[J],Journal of Financial Economics,64(1):61-90.
    [105]Warren Boeker,1992, Power and Managerial Dismissal:Scapegoating at the Top[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,37(3):400-421.
    [106]Warner,J.B.,Watts,R.L.,Wruck,K,1988,Stock Prices and Top Management Changes [J], Journal of Financial Economics,(20):461-492.
    [107]Weisbach,M.S,1995,CEO Turnover and the Firm's Investment Decisions [J],Journal of Financial Economics,(37):88-159.
    [108]Wiersema M F and Bird A,1993,Organizational demography in Japanese firms:Group heterogeneity,individual dissimilarity,and top manangement team turnover.Academy of Managenment[J],Academy of Managenment Journal,36(5):996-1025.
    [109]Willamson O,1988,Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance[J],Journal of Finance,(38):567-591.
    [110]Xu X, Ywang,1999,Ownership Structure and CorporateGovernment in Chinese Stock Companies[J],China Economic Review,(10):75-98.
    [111]YermackD,1996,Higher Market Valuation of Companieswith a Small Board of Directors [J],Journal of Financial Economics, (40):185-211.
    [112]Zenger T.R.,Lawrence B.S,1989,Organizational demography:The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication[J],Academy of Management Journal,(32): 353-376.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700