黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置评价及优化对策研究
|
摘要
继以土地为基础的农业经济和以原材料及能源为基础的工业经济之后,知识经济作为一种新的经济形态来势迅猛。知识经济的根本特征是知识创新与积累,而知识本质上是科技活动的成果,科技活动又是人的素质和技能的体现,因此,发展知识经济,科技进步是灵魂,人才培养是根本。以优化科技资源配置为重点,开展教育与科技的契合性研究日益受到理论学界的重视。另外,高校是科技资源重要产出地,高校科技资源是高等教育与科技资源的关键耦合域,既是科技资源在高等教育领域中的运行,又是高等教育中最具有活力与潜力的因素,具有双重属性和特殊价值。研究高等教育科技资源配置,充分调动与激活关键要素,发挥潜力,提高能力,对促进高等教育发展、提高科技可持续发展能力,进而促进经济与社会和谐快速发展具有重要意义。
论文在认真研究和总结国内外关于高等教育科技资源配置理论的基础上,针对黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置现状,运用DEA方法进行评价分析,旨在促进高等教育科技发展,提高办学经济效益和社会效益,减少资源浪费,提高教育和科技服务质量,形成与区域经济发展相适应的有特色的区域高等教育科技资源配置系统。
论文以认识高等教育科技资源及其系统作为逻辑起点,从理论上分析了高等教育科技资源配置系统的构成与运行机制,建立了比较完整的高等教育科技资源配置系统框架,并通过比较研究,明确界定了论文的研究对象一黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置系统。随后,紧紧围绕高等教育科技资源优化配置目标体系,建立了一套科学而又简洁的评价指标体系,并利用DEA有关理论和方法,从效率、质量、规模、结构四个方面建立了具体评价模型,并对现阶段黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置状况相应从效率、质量、规模、结构四个方面进行了评价。在高等教育资源配置综合效率方面,论文运用横向和纵向相结合的方法,以2000年至2007年为时间跨度,评价了黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置时序变化情况。以黑龙江省十三个地市为空间跨度,评价2007年黑龙江省高等教育科技资源区域配置情况。在高等教育资源配置质量效益方面,论文结合创新能力指标,利用仅有产出的DEA模型,评价分析了2007年黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置质量效益。在高等教育资源配置规模方面,论文利用传统DEA模型,结合评价过剩的DEA模型,从规模收益递增、不变、递减及拥挤四个状态评价了2007年黑龙江省各地市高等教育科技资源配置的规模收益情况。在高等教育资源配置结构方面,论文利用带有“偏好锥”的C2WH模型,对2007年黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置的结构效益进行了评价。论文通过对黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置在效率、质量、规模和结构方面的实证分析,总结了现阶段黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置过程中存在的问题。
最后,论文根据实证研究过程中发现的问题,从建设有利于高等教育科技资源优化配置的外部运行环境、完善有利于高等教育科技资源优化配置的内部运行机制和优化高等教育科技资源优化配置的目标体系三个方面提出了进一步优化黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置的对策及建议。
Followed by land-based agricultural economy and to raw materials, energy-based industrial economy, the knowledge-based economy as a new economic structure is the rapid fast. The fundamental characteristics of knowledge-based economy are innovation and the accumulation of knowledge, and knowledge is essentially the outcome of science and technology activities, science and technology activities is a manifestation of the quality and skills, so the development of knowledge-based economy, scientific and technological progress is the soul, and personnel training are fundamental. Science and technology to optimize the allocation of resources, focusing on education and technology research increasingly fit theoretical academic attention. And colleges and universities are an important output of scientific and technological resources, the colleges and universities of higher education and scientific and technological resources are the key scientific and technological resources coupled domain, is both a science and technology resources in higher education in the field of operation, but also in higher education are the most dynamic and potential factors that have a dual attributes and special values. Study of higher education science and technology resources, the full mobilization and activation of the key elements of potential, enhance capacity, to promote the development of higher education to improve the capacity for sustainable development, thereby promoting economic and social harmony in the rapid development of great significance.
Papers in the serious study of higher education science and technology at home and abroad about the allocation of resources theory, based on the Higher Education Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province for the allocation of resources the status quo, the use of DEA method to evaluate the analysis, aimed at promoting higher education in science and technology development, improve economic efficiency and social school efficiency, reduce waste of resources, improve education and technology, service quality, and the formation and regional economic development have characteristics suited to the regional higher education in science and technology resource allocation system.
Papers in the carding and analyzed with the papers related to basic theory and research findings on the basis of scientific and technological resources in order to understand higher education as a logical starting point, from the theoretical analysis of the higher education system in science and technology constitute the allocation of resources and operational mechanism, set up a relatively complete higher education in science and technology framework for resource allocation system, and through a comparative study, a clearly defined object of study in this paper-in Heilongjiang Province of the basic characteristics of higher education resources. Subsequently, another closely focusing on optimizing the allocation of higher education in scientific and technological resources of the target system, set up a simple scientific evaluation system on the use of DEA theory and methods of efficiency, quality, size, structure aspects of four set up a specific evaluation model, and at this stage of Heilongjiang Province the situation of higher education in science and technology resource allocation is evaluated. The efficiency of resource allocation in higher education side and thesis use a combination of horizontal and vertical approach to 2000 to 2007 time span for the evaluation of higher education in science and technology in Heilongjiang Province timing changes in the allocation of resources. Heilongjiang Province to 13 prefectures and cities in-span space, evaluation of higher education in 2007 in Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology regional changes in the allocation of resources. The allocation of resources in higher education quality, this paper innovation capability indicators, the use of only the output DEA model, evaluation and analysis of the 2007 Higher Education in Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province quality and efficiency of resource allocation. The size of the allocation of resources in higher education context, this paper combines the classic DEA model excess DEA evaluation model, increasing returns from scale, constant, decreasing and crowded four states, evaluated in 2007 in Heilongjiang Province of higher education science and technology around the city the size of the allocation of resources earnings. The allocation of resources in higher education structure, this paper with a "preference cone"of C2 WH model of higher education in 2007 in Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology of the structure of effective allocation of resources were evaluated. In this paper, Higher Education Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province in the efficiency of resource allocation, quality, size and structure of the empirical analysis, objective summary of higher education in science and technology in Heilongjiang Province at the present stage of resource allocation problems in the process.
Finally, empirical research papers in accordance with the process of problem found, from the building is conducive to optimizing the allocation of higher education in scientific and technological resources of the external operating environment, and improve scientific and technological resources of higher education is conducive to optimizing the allocation of the internal operating mechanism and optimization of scientific and technological resources of higher education the goal of optimizing the allocation of three aspects of the system proposed in Heilongjiang Province to further optimize the allocation of resourcesin higher education technology strategies and recommendations.
论文在认真研究和总结国内外关于高等教育科技资源配置理论的基础上,针对黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置现状,运用DEA方法进行评价分析,旨在促进高等教育科技发展,提高办学经济效益和社会效益,减少资源浪费,提高教育和科技服务质量,形成与区域经济发展相适应的有特色的区域高等教育科技资源配置系统。
论文以认识高等教育科技资源及其系统作为逻辑起点,从理论上分析了高等教育科技资源配置系统的构成与运行机制,建立了比较完整的高等教育科技资源配置系统框架,并通过比较研究,明确界定了论文的研究对象一黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置系统。随后,紧紧围绕高等教育科技资源优化配置目标体系,建立了一套科学而又简洁的评价指标体系,并利用DEA有关理论和方法,从效率、质量、规模、结构四个方面建立了具体评价模型,并对现阶段黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置状况相应从效率、质量、规模、结构四个方面进行了评价。在高等教育资源配置综合效率方面,论文运用横向和纵向相结合的方法,以2000年至2007年为时间跨度,评价了黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置时序变化情况。以黑龙江省十三个地市为空间跨度,评价2007年黑龙江省高等教育科技资源区域配置情况。在高等教育资源配置质量效益方面,论文结合创新能力指标,利用仅有产出的DEA模型,评价分析了2007年黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置质量效益。在高等教育资源配置规模方面,论文利用传统DEA模型,结合评价过剩的DEA模型,从规模收益递增、不变、递减及拥挤四个状态评价了2007年黑龙江省各地市高等教育科技资源配置的规模收益情况。在高等教育资源配置结构方面,论文利用带有“偏好锥”的C2WH模型,对2007年黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置的结构效益进行了评价。论文通过对黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置在效率、质量、规模和结构方面的实证分析,总结了现阶段黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置过程中存在的问题。
最后,论文根据实证研究过程中发现的问题,从建设有利于高等教育科技资源优化配置的外部运行环境、完善有利于高等教育科技资源优化配置的内部运行机制和优化高等教育科技资源优化配置的目标体系三个方面提出了进一步优化黑龙江省高等教育科技资源配置的对策及建议。
Followed by land-based agricultural economy and to raw materials, energy-based industrial economy, the knowledge-based economy as a new economic structure is the rapid fast. The fundamental characteristics of knowledge-based economy are innovation and the accumulation of knowledge, and knowledge is essentially the outcome of science and technology activities, science and technology activities is a manifestation of the quality and skills, so the development of knowledge-based economy, scientific and technological progress is the soul, and personnel training are fundamental. Science and technology to optimize the allocation of resources, focusing on education and technology research increasingly fit theoretical academic attention. And colleges and universities are an important output of scientific and technological resources, the colleges and universities of higher education and scientific and technological resources are the key scientific and technological resources coupled domain, is both a science and technology resources in higher education in the field of operation, but also in higher education are the most dynamic and potential factors that have a dual attributes and special values. Study of higher education science and technology resources, the full mobilization and activation of the key elements of potential, enhance capacity, to promote the development of higher education to improve the capacity for sustainable development, thereby promoting economic and social harmony in the rapid development of great significance.
Papers in the serious study of higher education science and technology at home and abroad about the allocation of resources theory, based on the Higher Education Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province for the allocation of resources the status quo, the use of DEA method to evaluate the analysis, aimed at promoting higher education in science and technology development, improve economic efficiency and social school efficiency, reduce waste of resources, improve education and technology, service quality, and the formation and regional economic development have characteristics suited to the regional higher education in science and technology resource allocation system.
Papers in the carding and analyzed with the papers related to basic theory and research findings on the basis of scientific and technological resources in order to understand higher education as a logical starting point, from the theoretical analysis of the higher education system in science and technology constitute the allocation of resources and operational mechanism, set up a relatively complete higher education in science and technology framework for resource allocation system, and through a comparative study, a clearly defined object of study in this paper-in Heilongjiang Province of the basic characteristics of higher education resources. Subsequently, another closely focusing on optimizing the allocation of higher education in scientific and technological resources of the target system, set up a simple scientific evaluation system on the use of DEA theory and methods of efficiency, quality, size, structure aspects of four set up a specific evaluation model, and at this stage of Heilongjiang Province the situation of higher education in science and technology resource allocation is evaluated. The efficiency of resource allocation in higher education side and thesis use a combination of horizontal and vertical approach to 2000 to 2007 time span for the evaluation of higher education in science and technology in Heilongjiang Province timing changes in the allocation of resources. Heilongjiang Province to 13 prefectures and cities in-span space, evaluation of higher education in 2007 in Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology regional changes in the allocation of resources. The allocation of resources in higher education quality, this paper innovation capability indicators, the use of only the output DEA model, evaluation and analysis of the 2007 Higher Education in Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province quality and efficiency of resource allocation. The size of the allocation of resources in higher education context, this paper combines the classic DEA model excess DEA evaluation model, increasing returns from scale, constant, decreasing and crowded four states, evaluated in 2007 in Heilongjiang Province of higher education science and technology around the city the size of the allocation of resources earnings. The allocation of resources in higher education structure, this paper with a "preference cone"of C2 WH model of higher education in 2007 in Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology of the structure of effective allocation of resources were evaluated. In this paper, Higher Education Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province in the efficiency of resource allocation, quality, size and structure of the empirical analysis, objective summary of higher education in science and technology in Heilongjiang Province at the present stage of resource allocation problems in the process.
Finally, empirical research papers in accordance with the process of problem found, from the building is conducive to optimizing the allocation of higher education in scientific and technological resources of the external operating environment, and improve scientific and technological resources of higher education is conducive to optimizing the allocation of the internal operating mechanism and optimization of scientific and technological resources of higher education the goal of optimizing the allocation of three aspects of the system proposed in Heilongjiang Province to further optimize the allocation of resourcesin higher education technology strategies and recommendations.
引文
[1]钟越.高校科研管理如何适应知识经济时代的发展[J].中国市场.2008(35)：13-25页
[2]李丽军.知识经济作用分析[J].辽宁行政学院学报．2008(9)：241-244页
[3]郭洁.经济全球化与区域经济一体化的关系[J].北京工业职业技术学院学报.2008(4)：120-123页
[4]林湘.高等教育与区域经济发展[J].甘肃中医学院学报.2008(5)：56页
[5]林根祥,袁虎.科技与经济一体化的过程模式研究[J].高科技与产业化.2007(4)：24-28页
[6]冯艳飞.中国高等教育产业研究[M].经济管理出版社,2004：230页
[7]John F. Ryan. The Relationship Between Institutional Expenditures and Degree Attainment. Research in Higher Education, March 2004,45 (2): 97-115P
[8]Card, D., and Krueger, A. School Resources and Student Outcomes:An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina. Journal of Economic Perspectives, June 2001,16(4):31-50P
[9]Pritchett, L., and Fulmer, D. What Education Production Functions Really Show:A Positive Theory of Education Expenditures. Economics of Education Review. March 2002,18(2):223-239P
[10]Hanushek, E. A. Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. October 1997,19: 141-164P
[11]Fortune, J. C. Why Production Function Analysis is Irrelevant in Policy Deliberations Concerning Educational funding Equity. Education Policy Analysis Archives. December 1999,11 (1)
[12]Hodas, S. Is Water an Input to a Fish?:Problems with the Production-function Model in Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives. January 1993,12(1)
[13]Levin, B. Students and Educational Productivity. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis. February 2003,5(1)
[14]Amy Colbert.Reuven R. Levary, Michael C. Shaner. Determining the Relative Efficiency of MBA Programs Using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research.125 (2000):656-669P
[15]Breu, T.M., Raab,R.L.. Efficiency and Perceived Quality of the Nations Top 25 National Universities and National Liberal Arts Colleges:An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Higher Education. Socio-Economic Planning Science.28(1994):33-45P
[16]Hooshang Izadi,Geraint Johnes,Reza Oskrochi, Robert Crouchley. Stochastic Frontier Estimation.of a CES Cost Function:Thecase of Higher Education in Britain. Economics of Education Review.21 (2002) 63-71P
[17]Training Susan R. A Review of Methodological Characteristics of Research Published in Key Journals in Higher Education:Implications for Graduate Research. Research in Higher Education. June 2004,45(4):383-401P
[18]D.Guellec,Van Pottelsberghe.The Impact ofPublic R&DExpenditure on Business R&D[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2007,(3): 225-243P
[19]Seung-Hoon Yoo.Public R&D Expenditure and Private R&D Expenditure:a Causality Analysis[J].Applied Economics Letters,2004,11 (11):711-714P
[20]Wu,Yonghong.TheEffects of State R&D Tax Creditsin Stimulating Private R&D Expenditure:A Cross-state Empirical Analysis[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management [H.W.Wilson-SSA],2005,24(4):785-802P
[21]Day-Yang Liu,Lon-FonShieh.The Effects of Government Subsidy Measures on Corporate R&D Expenditure:a Case Study of the Leading Product Development Programme [J].International Journal of Product Development, 2005,2(3)
[22]Matthew Rafferty,Mark Demand Shocks and Firm-financed R&D Expenditures [J]. Applied Economics,2004,36(14):1529-1536P
[23]Katharine Wakelin.Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Firms[J]. Res-earchPolicy,2005,30(7):1079-1090P
[24]LogC.Mahlich.The Determinants of Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures: Evidence from Japan[J].Review of Industrial Organization,2007,28(2): 145-164P
[25]Chun-Chu Liu,A Two-Dimensional Model for Allo-cating Resources to R&D Programs[J] Journal of American of Business,2004,5(1/2):459-473P
[26]Burton Clark. Higher Education System:International Research of Academy Organization. Higher Education Policy.2002(12):39-52P
[27]Dai Xiaoxia, Mo Jiahao,Xie Anbang. Higher Education Marketing.Peking University Publishers,2004:17-19P
[28]Sun Wei. Research of Malmquist Productivity Index Based on Input Frontier of Nonparameter.Management and Science of China.2000(3):22-28P
[29]Wei QL H. Congestion and Return to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,2005:145P
[30]李立,邓玉勇.科技资源市场化配置模式探析[J].青岛化工学院学报(社版).2007(4)：33-35页
[31]宋宇.教育资源配置中权力失范及规制[J].教育发展研究.2005(12)：14-17页
[32]叶儒霏.中国科技资源配置效率变化及其影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2008(7)：13-19页
[33]彭华涛.中国地区科技资源配置效率的动态演变分析[J].河北经贸大学学报.2008(4)：22-26,页
[34]丁厚德.科技资源配置的新问题和对策分析.科学学研究[J].2005(4)：474-480页
[35]李华.高校教育资源整合面临的问题及对策[J].科技情报开发与经济.2007(13)：237-238页
[36]梅静娟.科技资源配置阶段结构优化理论数学模型[J].北京机械工业学院学报.2002(3)：59-64页
[37]马勇.科技资源使用效率研究[J].东北师大学报哲社版.2002(2)：24-27页
[38]李石柱,李刚.我国地区科技资源配置现状分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社科版).2002(10)：107-109页
[39]吴和成．1999-2000年我国各地区科技投入产出相对有效性测度[J].统计与决策.2002(7)：30-36页
[40]雷睿勇等.对我国科技资源配置效率评价方法述评[J].山地农业生物学报.2004(5)：448-453页
[41]杨栩.我国科技创新成果转化的障碍及对策研究.经济师.2005(10)：42-45页
[42]高哲.马克思恩格斯要论精选[M].中央编译出版社,2007：28-30页
[43]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].经济管理出版社.2002：21-37页
[44]LAWSON C,E LORENZ. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies,1999,33(4):305-317P
[45]孙启贵.社会创新内涵、意义与过程[J].国外社会科学.2008(3)：90-97页
[46]傅家骥.技术创新是人类财富之源[J].企业技术进步.1997(1)：18-20页
[47]COOKE P. Knowledge economies:clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. London and New York:Routledge,2002
[48]Asheim B, Isaken A. Regional innovation systems:the integration of local sticky and global ubiquitous knowledge. Technol Transfer,2002(27):77-86P
[49]ASTELLSM,PHall. Techno poles of the world-the making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London and New York:Routledge,1994
[50]Asheim, B. Cooke,P.Local learning and interactive innovation networks in a globaleconomy. InMalecki, E.J.Oinas, P(Eds.),Making Connections:Learning and Regional Economic Change. Aldershot, Ashgate.1999:145-178P
[51]Storper M.The regionalized world territorial development in a global
[52]Michael E.Porter. Clusters and the New Economies of Competition. Harvard Business Review.1998 (Nov.-Dec.):78-92P
[53]Kaufmann A, Todtling F. How effective is innovation support for SME Analysis of the region of Upper Austria Technovation,2002(2):147-159P
[54]杨冬丽.论高等教育资源优化配置与产业化[J].经济经纬.2007(5)：28-30页
[55]夏丽萍,张志英.我国高等教育资源配置主体系统的思考[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版).2007(1)：238-240页
[56]杨雅清,高志军,李景春.论优化区域高等教育结构与资源配置的途径[J].河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版).2005(12)：8-11页
[57]Philip Cooke, Mikel Gomez Uranga, Goio Etxebarria.Regional innovation systems:Institutional organizational dimensions.Research Policy,1997(26): 475-491P
[58]曹振纲.中国公办高等教育资源配置中的市场与政府职能[D].西北大学硕士学位论文.2005：48-50页
[59]翟小会.治理机制：高等教育资源配置的补充机制[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版).2007(1)：28-30页
[60]李明.高等教育资源的配置与市场机制的关系[J].教育与经济.2002(1)：51-53页
[61]Wei QL,Yu G,J Lu S.A Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Return to Scale Properties in Generating Date Envelopment Analysis Models. Chinese Science,2002(45):23-29P
[62]Wei QL,Yan H.Congestion and Return to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research.2003:145P
[63]周寄中.科技资源论[M].陕西：陕西人民教育出版社,1999：108页
[64]周德群.资源概念拓展和面向可持续发展经济学[J].当代经济.1999(1)：29-32页
[65]宋华明.高校教育资源优化与办学经济效益[J].教育与经济.2005(12)：7-10页
[66]浒国志等.系统科学[M].上海：上海科技教育出版社,2000：29页
[67]李冬梅等.我国区域科技资源配置效率情况评价[J].北京机械工业学院学报.200318(1)：50-55页
[68]Sino,C.Analysis of Panel Data[M].Cambridge University Press
[69]吴瑛,杨宏进.科技资源配置效率DEA度量模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2007,(9)：28-32页.
[70]魏守华,吴贵生.区域科技资源配置效率研究[J].科学学研究.2005(4)：67-73页
[71]Barnes.Strategies for Hihger Education:TheAltenative White Paer. Abedreen: Aberdeen Univesriyt Perss,1998:25-46P
[72]Burton Clark. Hihger Education System:Intenatinoal Research of Aacdemy Ogannization.Hihger Education Policy.2002(12):39-52P
[73]王一兵.西方市场经济国家高等教育运行机制[J].科技导报.1993(1)：26-34页
[74]刘晓红.国外高等教育评估制度对我国高教评估的启迪[J].北京理工大学学报.2004(1)：25-27页
[75]阂维方.美国高教管理的特点[J].外国教育．988(3)：14-19页
[76]严全治.美国大学科技资源配置及效益[J].比较教育研究.2003(3)：14-17页
[77]别敦荣.中美大学学术管理[M].华中理工大学出版社,2000：113-139页
[78]周江.黑龙江省高教资源优化配置研究[J]科学学研究.2007(3)：40-42页
[79]董友.河北省高等学校科技资源配置与博弈分析[D].河北工业大学博士学位论文.2005：72-89页
[80]董泽芳,柯佑祥.高等教育区域化研究[J].江苏高教.2007(5)：31-34页
[81]朱雪文.中国高等教育区域分布研究[D].华东师大博士学位论文.2002：161页
[82]王苏斌,郑海涛等.SPSS统计分析[M],北京：机械工业出版社,2003：369-379页
[83]盛昭翰,朱乔.DEA理论、方法与应用[M].科学出版社，1996：31-33页
[84]魏权龄.数据包络分析[J]．科学出版社,2004(8)：259-266页’
[85]马占新.数据包络分析方法的研究进展[J].系统工程与电子技术.2002(3)：42-48页
[86]曾祥云等.随机DEA模型及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践.2000(6)：19-27页
[87]杨印生.带参数C2R模型灵敏度分析[J].系统工程电子技术.2007(12)59-62页
[88]李亮.关于DEA和逆DEA模型与算法研究[D].中国科学院系统工程研究
[89]段永瑞.数据包络分析理论与应用[J].上海科普出版社,2007(12)：18-26页
[90]许晓东.偏好强度可调DEA模型及应用[J].武汉理工大学学报.2005(5)：86-90页
[91]高等教育事业统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[92]中国教育经费统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[93]中国教育统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[94]中国科技统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[95]黑龙江统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[96]黑龙江省教育年鉴[M].黑龙江人民出版社,1999-2007
[97]黑龙江教育经费统计主要指标提要[M].黑龙江教育出版社,2000
[98]蔡克勇.高等教育体制改革及综合效益分析[M].人民教育出版社,1997：168页
[99]曾小彬,包叶群.区域创新能力评估指标体系探析[J].决策与信息：财经观察.2008(4)：19-27页
[100]中国科技发展战略研究小组.2007中国区域创新能力报告[M].经济管理出版社,2007：21-37页
[101]田宗远.论高校规模结构质量和效益[J].遵义师范学院学报.码2004(2)：107-109页
[102]李光金.评价相对效率投入产出型DEA[J].管理科学学报.2003(4)：59-64页
[103]傅毓维,邵争艳.基于偏好DEA模型区域高等教育资源配置结构效益评价[J].价值工程.2007(6)
[104]蔡小慎,潘加军.试论行政审批制度创新的成本与方式选择[J].前沿.2004(10)：129-132页
[105]赵振红.高等教育资源浪费与对策[J].辽宁教育研究.2007(2)：46-48页
[106]杜育红.我国地区间科技发展差异实证分析[J].高等教育研究.2004(3)： 44-48页
[107]刘志坚,戴年红,赵文武.高校设备资源配置社会化的探索[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报.2005(9)：82-84页
[108]江静.中国高校R&D强度差异比较[J].南京大学学报,2007(3)：13-25页
[109]张跃.高校优化资源配置提高办学效益研究[D].河海大学博士学位论文.2005：105页
[110]张振助.高等教育与区域互动发展研究[D].华东师大博士学位论文.2004：12页-15页
[111]张局同.山东省科技资源配置效率研究[D].曲埠师范大学博士学位论文.2006：38-47页
[112]徐同文.论高等教育科技的特殊战略地位[J].临沂师范学院学报.2003(2)：22-24页
[113]张奇等.高等教育与社会科技资源共享实现途径[J].台州学院学报.2003(8)：66-69页
[114]何榕.政府研究机构科技人力资源的流动分析[J].科技管理研究.2008(1)：161-163页
[115]王立英等.高校科技成果转化过程中的风险识别[J].科技管理研究.2008(6)：186-188页
[116]吴园,赵鞠.我国科技中介转轨现状及路径选择[J].社会研究.2004(8)：121-122页
[117]王成军著.官产学三重螺旋研究：知识与选择[M].北京：社科文献出版社,2005：12页
[118]王瑜.创新科研管理大力推进产学研合作[J].中国高校科技与产业化.2008(6)：70-71页
[119]李铭.促进我国技术市场发展与繁荣[J].工业技术经济.2008(9)：56-57页
[120]张振宇.试论高等教育中介组织产生的合理性—政府失灵的视角[J].长春工业大学学报(高教研究版),2005(3)：14-16页
[121]龙朝双.地方政府对三种权力关系的处理[J].探索.2004(9)：119-122页
[2]李丽军.知识经济作用分析[J].辽宁行政学院学报．2008(9)：241-244页
[3]郭洁.经济全球化与区域经济一体化的关系[J].北京工业职业技术学院学报.2008(4)：120-123页
[4]林湘.高等教育与区域经济发展[J].甘肃中医学院学报.2008(5)：56页
[5]林根祥,袁虎.科技与经济一体化的过程模式研究[J].高科技与产业化.2007(4)：24-28页
[6]冯艳飞.中国高等教育产业研究[M].经济管理出版社,2004：230页
[7]John F. Ryan. The Relationship Between Institutional Expenditures and Degree Attainment. Research in Higher Education, March 2004,45 (2): 97-115P
[8]Card, D., and Krueger, A. School Resources and Student Outcomes:An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina. Journal of Economic Perspectives, June 2001,16(4):31-50P
[9]Pritchett, L., and Fulmer, D. What Education Production Functions Really Show:A Positive Theory of Education Expenditures. Economics of Education Review. March 2002,18(2):223-239P
[10]Hanushek, E. A. Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. October 1997,19: 141-164P
[11]Fortune, J. C. Why Production Function Analysis is Irrelevant in Policy Deliberations Concerning Educational funding Equity. Education Policy Analysis Archives. December 1999,11 (1)
[12]Hodas, S. Is Water an Input to a Fish?:Problems with the Production-function Model in Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives. January 1993,12(1)
[13]Levin, B. Students and Educational Productivity. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis. February 2003,5(1)
[14]Amy Colbert.Reuven R. Levary, Michael C. Shaner. Determining the Relative Efficiency of MBA Programs Using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research.125 (2000):656-669P
[15]Breu, T.M., Raab,R.L.. Efficiency and Perceived Quality of the Nations Top 25 National Universities and National Liberal Arts Colleges:An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Higher Education. Socio-Economic Planning Science.28(1994):33-45P
[16]Hooshang Izadi,Geraint Johnes,Reza Oskrochi, Robert Crouchley. Stochastic Frontier Estimation.of a CES Cost Function:Thecase of Higher Education in Britain. Economics of Education Review.21 (2002) 63-71P
[17]Training Susan R. A Review of Methodological Characteristics of Research Published in Key Journals in Higher Education:Implications for Graduate Research. Research in Higher Education. June 2004,45(4):383-401P
[18]D.Guellec,Van Pottelsberghe.The Impact ofPublic R&DExpenditure on Business R&D[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2007,(3): 225-243P
[19]Seung-Hoon Yoo.Public R&D Expenditure and Private R&D Expenditure:a Causality Analysis[J].Applied Economics Letters,2004,11 (11):711-714P
[20]Wu,Yonghong.TheEffects of State R&D Tax Creditsin Stimulating Private R&D Expenditure:A Cross-state Empirical Analysis[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management [H.W.Wilson-SSA],2005,24(4):785-802P
[21]Day-Yang Liu,Lon-FonShieh.The Effects of Government Subsidy Measures on Corporate R&D Expenditure:a Case Study of the Leading Product Development Programme [J].International Journal of Product Development, 2005,2(3)
[22]Matthew Rafferty,Mark Demand Shocks and Firm-financed R&D Expenditures [J]. Applied Economics,2004,36(14):1529-1536P
[23]Katharine Wakelin.Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Firms[J]. Res-earchPolicy,2005,30(7):1079-1090P
[24]LogC.Mahlich.The Determinants of Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures: Evidence from Japan[J].Review of Industrial Organization,2007,28(2): 145-164P
[25]Chun-Chu Liu,A Two-Dimensional Model for Allo-cating Resources to R&D Programs[J] Journal of American of Business,2004,5(1/2):459-473P
[26]Burton Clark. Higher Education System:International Research of Academy Organization. Higher Education Policy.2002(12):39-52P
[27]Dai Xiaoxia, Mo Jiahao,Xie Anbang. Higher Education Marketing.Peking University Publishers,2004:17-19P
[28]Sun Wei. Research of Malmquist Productivity Index Based on Input Frontier of Nonparameter.Management and Science of China.2000(3):22-28P
[29]Wei QL H. Congestion and Return to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,2005:145P
[30]李立,邓玉勇.科技资源市场化配置模式探析[J].青岛化工学院学报(社版).2007(4)：33-35页
[31]宋宇.教育资源配置中权力失范及规制[J].教育发展研究.2005(12)：14-17页
[32]叶儒霏.中国科技资源配置效率变化及其影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2008(7)：13-19页
[33]彭华涛.中国地区科技资源配置效率的动态演变分析[J].河北经贸大学学报.2008(4)：22-26,页
[34]丁厚德.科技资源配置的新问题和对策分析.科学学研究[J].2005(4)：474-480页
[35]李华.高校教育资源整合面临的问题及对策[J].科技情报开发与经济.2007(13)：237-238页
[36]梅静娟.科技资源配置阶段结构优化理论数学模型[J].北京机械工业学院学报.2002(3)：59-64页
[37]马勇.科技资源使用效率研究[J].东北师大学报哲社版.2002(2)：24-27页
[38]李石柱,李刚.我国地区科技资源配置现状分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社科版).2002(10)：107-109页
[39]吴和成．1999-2000年我国各地区科技投入产出相对有效性测度[J].统计与决策.2002(7)：30-36页
[40]雷睿勇等.对我国科技资源配置效率评价方法述评[J].山地农业生物学报.2004(5)：448-453页
[41]杨栩.我国科技创新成果转化的障碍及对策研究.经济师.2005(10)：42-45页
[42]高哲.马克思恩格斯要论精选[M].中央编译出版社,2007：28-30页
[43]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].经济管理出版社.2002：21-37页
[44]LAWSON C,E LORENZ. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies,1999,33(4):305-317P
[45]孙启贵.社会创新内涵、意义与过程[J].国外社会科学.2008(3)：90-97页
[46]傅家骥.技术创新是人类财富之源[J].企业技术进步.1997(1)：18-20页
[47]COOKE P. Knowledge economies:clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. London and New York:Routledge,2002
[48]Asheim B, Isaken A. Regional innovation systems:the integration of local sticky and global ubiquitous knowledge. Technol Transfer,2002(27):77-86P
[49]ASTELLSM,PHall. Techno poles of the world-the making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London and New York:Routledge,1994
[50]Asheim, B. Cooke,P.Local learning and interactive innovation networks in a globaleconomy. InMalecki, E.J.Oinas, P(Eds.),Making Connections:Learning and Regional Economic Change. Aldershot, Ashgate.1999:145-178P
[51]Storper M.The regionalized world territorial development in a global
[52]Michael E.Porter. Clusters and the New Economies of Competition. Harvard Business Review.1998 (Nov.-Dec.):78-92P
[53]Kaufmann A, Todtling F. How effective is innovation support for SME Analysis of the region of Upper Austria Technovation,2002(2):147-159P
[54]杨冬丽.论高等教育资源优化配置与产业化[J].经济经纬.2007(5)：28-30页
[55]夏丽萍,张志英.我国高等教育资源配置主体系统的思考[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版).2007(1)：238-240页
[56]杨雅清,高志军,李景春.论优化区域高等教育结构与资源配置的途径[J].河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版).2005(12)：8-11页
[57]Philip Cooke, Mikel Gomez Uranga, Goio Etxebarria.Regional innovation systems:Institutional organizational dimensions.Research Policy,1997(26): 475-491P
[58]曹振纲.中国公办高等教育资源配置中的市场与政府职能[D].西北大学硕士学位论文.2005：48-50页
[59]翟小会.治理机制：高等教育资源配置的补充机制[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版).2007(1)：28-30页
[60]李明.高等教育资源的配置与市场机制的关系[J].教育与经济.2002(1)：51-53页
[61]Wei QL,Yu G,J Lu S.A Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Return to Scale Properties in Generating Date Envelopment Analysis Models. Chinese Science,2002(45):23-29P
[62]Wei QL,Yan H.Congestion and Return to Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research.2003:145P
[63]周寄中.科技资源论[M].陕西：陕西人民教育出版社,1999：108页
[64]周德群.资源概念拓展和面向可持续发展经济学[J].当代经济.1999(1)：29-32页
[65]宋华明.高校教育资源优化与办学经济效益[J].教育与经济.2005(12)：7-10页
[66]浒国志等.系统科学[M].上海：上海科技教育出版社,2000：29页
[67]李冬梅等.我国区域科技资源配置效率情况评价[J].北京机械工业学院学报.200318(1)：50-55页
[68]Sino,C.Analysis of Panel Data[M].Cambridge University Press
[69]吴瑛,杨宏进.科技资源配置效率DEA度量模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2007,(9)：28-32页.
[70]魏守华,吴贵生.区域科技资源配置效率研究[J].科学学研究.2005(4)：67-73页
[71]Barnes.Strategies for Hihger Education:TheAltenative White Paer. Abedreen: Aberdeen Univesriyt Perss,1998:25-46P
[72]Burton Clark. Hihger Education System:Intenatinoal Research of Aacdemy Ogannization.Hihger Education Policy.2002(12):39-52P
[73]王一兵.西方市场经济国家高等教育运行机制[J].科技导报.1993(1)：26-34页
[74]刘晓红.国外高等教育评估制度对我国高教评估的启迪[J].北京理工大学学报.2004(1)：25-27页
[75]阂维方.美国高教管理的特点[J].外国教育．988(3)：14-19页
[76]严全治.美国大学科技资源配置及效益[J].比较教育研究.2003(3)：14-17页
[77]别敦荣.中美大学学术管理[M].华中理工大学出版社,2000：113-139页
[78]周江.黑龙江省高教资源优化配置研究[J]科学学研究.2007(3)：40-42页
[79]董友.河北省高等学校科技资源配置与博弈分析[D].河北工业大学博士学位论文.2005：72-89页
[80]董泽芳,柯佑祥.高等教育区域化研究[J].江苏高教.2007(5)：31-34页
[81]朱雪文.中国高等教育区域分布研究[D].华东师大博士学位论文.2002：161页
[82]王苏斌,郑海涛等.SPSS统计分析[M],北京：机械工业出版社,2003：369-379页
[83]盛昭翰,朱乔.DEA理论、方法与应用[M].科学出版社，1996：31-33页
[84]魏权龄.数据包络分析[J]．科学出版社,2004(8)：259-266页’
[85]马占新.数据包络分析方法的研究进展[J].系统工程与电子技术.2002(3)：42-48页
[86]曾祥云等.随机DEA模型及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践.2000(6)：19-27页
[87]杨印生.带参数C2R模型灵敏度分析[J].系统工程电子技术.2007(12)59-62页
[88]李亮.关于DEA和逆DEA模型与算法研究[D].中国科学院系统工程研究
[89]段永瑞.数据包络分析理论与应用[J].上海科普出版社,2007(12)：18-26页
[90]许晓东.偏好强度可调DEA模型及应用[J].武汉理工大学学报.2005(5)：86-90页
[91]高等教育事业统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[92]中国教育经费统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[93]中国教育统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[94]中国科技统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[95]黑龙江统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,2000-2007
[96]黑龙江省教育年鉴[M].黑龙江人民出版社,1999-2007
[97]黑龙江教育经费统计主要指标提要[M].黑龙江教育出版社,2000
[98]蔡克勇.高等教育体制改革及综合效益分析[M].人民教育出版社,1997：168页
[99]曾小彬,包叶群.区域创新能力评估指标体系探析[J].决策与信息：财经观察.2008(4)：19-27页
[100]中国科技发展战略研究小组.2007中国区域创新能力报告[M].经济管理出版社,2007：21-37页
[101]田宗远.论高校规模结构质量和效益[J].遵义师范学院学报.码2004(2)：107-109页
[102]李光金.评价相对效率投入产出型DEA[J].管理科学学报.2003(4)：59-64页
[103]傅毓维,邵争艳.基于偏好DEA模型区域高等教育资源配置结构效益评价[J].价值工程.2007(6)
[104]蔡小慎,潘加军.试论行政审批制度创新的成本与方式选择[J].前沿.2004(10)：129-132页
[105]赵振红.高等教育资源浪费与对策[J].辽宁教育研究.2007(2)：46-48页
[106]杜育红.我国地区间科技发展差异实证分析[J].高等教育研究.2004(3)： 44-48页
[107]刘志坚,戴年红,赵文武.高校设备资源配置社会化的探索[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报.2005(9)：82-84页
[108]江静.中国高校R&D强度差异比较[J].南京大学学报,2007(3)：13-25页
[109]张跃.高校优化资源配置提高办学效益研究[D].河海大学博士学位论文.2005：105页
[110]张振助.高等教育与区域互动发展研究[D].华东师大博士学位论文.2004：12页-15页
[111]张局同.山东省科技资源配置效率研究[D].曲埠师范大学博士学位论文.2006：38-47页
[112]徐同文.论高等教育科技的特殊战略地位[J].临沂师范学院学报.2003(2)：22-24页
[113]张奇等.高等教育与社会科技资源共享实现途径[J].台州学院学报.2003(8)：66-69页
[114]何榕.政府研究机构科技人力资源的流动分析[J].科技管理研究.2008(1)：161-163页
[115]王立英等.高校科技成果转化过程中的风险识别[J].科技管理研究.2008(6)：186-188页
[116]吴园,赵鞠.我国科技中介转轨现状及路径选择[J].社会研究.2004(8)：121-122页
[117]王成军著.官产学三重螺旋研究：知识与选择[M].北京：社科文献出版社,2005：12页
[118]王瑜.创新科研管理大力推进产学研合作[J].中国高校科技与产业化.2008(6)：70-71页
[119]李铭.促进我国技术市场发展与繁荣[J].工业技术经济.2008(9)：56-57页
[120]张振宇.试论高等教育中介组织产生的合理性—政府失灵的视角[J].长春工业大学学报(高教研究版),2005(3)：14-16页
[121]龙朝双.地方政府对三种权力关系的处理[J].探索.2004(9)：119-122页