内蒙古京津风沙源治理工程可持续发展能力研究
|
摘要
京津风沙源治理工程建设是在生态环境问题已经严重制约经济社会发展的背景下实施的生态工程。论文以京津风沙源治理工程为例,阐述生态工程建设和经济发展的相互促进关系,并以这些关系为基础对生态治理工程建设的可持续发展能力问题进行了研究。
京津风沙源治理工程于2000年6月开始实施,经过多年的建设,以植树(灌木)、种草等林业生态工程为主体的生态环境建设已经取得了可喜的成果,公益效益开始显现。同时,在许多地区,建立在国家公共投资、政府管理基础上的公益事业还没有与参与工程建设的农牧民生产和生活发生直接的联系,如何改善管理方式和建设思路,调整生态工程建设与生态、经济和社会效益的和谐统一,已经成为京津风沙源治理工程持续发挥工程建设效益的重要课题。
本论文研究的目的是以京津风沙源治理工程为主要对象,探讨在保证持续发挥工程生态效益的前提下,在项目区建立以生态环境建设成果为基础的产业链,形成与当地的资源生产方式、社会经济发展状况相适应的生产和经济循环,提高项目区内生态工程可持续发展能力和管理效率。解决生态环境建设中的核心问题—提高生态环境工程建设的效率和综合效益长效发挥。
论文在以往调查研究基础上,收集试验点自然状况、社会经济、生产方式、资源状况等的基础数据,运用典型分析方法进行深入调查和研究,在定性分析的基础上,在各个试验点探讨新型生产和经济循环系统的基本内容和要点。
在内蒙古察哈尔右翼右后旗实施京津风沙源治理工程以后,通过科技支撑手段,提高单位土地面积生物量,通过改善社会经济运行方式成为提高项目区可持续发展能力的关键。本文对于内蒙古林业科学院开展的京津风沙源治理工程科技支撑项目实施5年以来产生的社会经济效益,用可持续发展能力的概念定性评价研究和生态足迹方法进行了定量评价,计算出科技支撑项目在82万元投入的情况下,在14.67万亩土地建设以林业生态建设工程为核心工程建设,在发挥显著生态效益的同时,有效地促使更多户农(牧)民实现生产、生活方式的转型,可以产生显著的经济和社会效益。
本论文针对京津风沙源治理工程的今后实施和管理提出如下建议:第一,调整管理模式,使工程区广大农牧民深层次地参与到工程建设中来;第二,将工程建设由公共事业性建设工程转变为经营性工程项目投资,实行具有经营性质的投资项目管理;第三,由大规模的面上投入转变为有目的的重点项目投入,集中资金进行产业基地建设;第四,随着工程建设的继续深入,通过经营性组织从事生态环境建设。
Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects were carried out in the context of the eco-environmental problems had seriously hampered economic and social development. The thesis took the Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects for an example to explain the mutually reinforcing relationships of the ecological construction and economic development, and with these relationships as a basis we studied the sustainable development ability of ecological management project construction.
Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects were launched in June 2000, after years of construction, to planting trees (shrubs), grass and other forest ecological projects as the main body of the ecological environment construction it has been achieved gratifying results, public benefits are becoming apparent. At the same time, in many areas, the establishment of the national public investment, the government management on the basis of public welfare undertakings have not yet in direct contact with the production and living of the peasants and herdsmen who have participate in, how to improve management methods and construction ideas, adjust ecological construction and ecological economic and social benefits to be harmony and unity has become an important subject of Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects to exert project construction benefits.
The purpose of this thesis is based on Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects as the main objects, exploring under the premise of continuing to play in ensuring that eco-efficiency projects, establishing the industrial chain based on the results of the ecological environment construction, forming the production cycle of local resources way, social and economic development and economic compatibility, improving sustainable development ability and effective' management efficiency of ecological project in project area. For addressing the core issue of ecological environment construction, we must improve the efficiency of the ecological environment construction and overall effectiveness to play a long-term effect.
Base on the past research, we collected natural conditions, socio-economic, production methods, the resource situation and other basic data, using the typical methods to investigat and research deeply, and based on qualitative analysis, we investigated the basic content and elements of new production and circulatory system of economy in each of the experimental points.
We can through the scientific and technological support means to improve the biomass of the unit land area after implementing Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control project in Inner Mongolia, Chaharyouyihouqi.But improving the socio-economic operation mode is the key to the raise sustainable development ability of the project area.
This thesis summarized social and economic benefits emerged from Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects that the Academy of Forestry Science of Inner Mongolia launched for 5 years, and used the concept of sustainable development ability and ecological footprint for a qualitative evaluation. So we calculate that under the scientific and technological support projects given 820,000 yuan, can save almost 14.67 million mu of land used to produce ecological benefits, and also encourage more farmer (herdsman) to realize production, lifestyle transformation, equally can produce significant economic and social benefits.
This thesis aims at the future implementation and management for Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects advancing suggestion as follows: First, adjusting the management model so that the project area farmers and herdsmen participate in the project construction deeply; second, to the construction of public utilities by construction of the project into a commercial investment, the implementation of investment projects with the nature of the business management; third, from the surface of a large-scale investment into purposeful focus on project inputs, focusing funds industry base construction; fourth, with the the engineering construction continued to deepen, through commercial organizations engaged in ecological environment construction.
京津风沙源治理工程于2000年6月开始实施,经过多年的建设,以植树(灌木)、种草等林业生态工程为主体的生态环境建设已经取得了可喜的成果,公益效益开始显现。同时,在许多地区,建立在国家公共投资、政府管理基础上的公益事业还没有与参与工程建设的农牧民生产和生活发生直接的联系,如何改善管理方式和建设思路,调整生态工程建设与生态、经济和社会效益的和谐统一,已经成为京津风沙源治理工程持续发挥工程建设效益的重要课题。
本论文研究的目的是以京津风沙源治理工程为主要对象,探讨在保证持续发挥工程生态效益的前提下,在项目区建立以生态环境建设成果为基础的产业链,形成与当地的资源生产方式、社会经济发展状况相适应的生产和经济循环,提高项目区内生态工程可持续发展能力和管理效率。解决生态环境建设中的核心问题—提高生态环境工程建设的效率和综合效益长效发挥。
论文在以往调查研究基础上,收集试验点自然状况、社会经济、生产方式、资源状况等的基础数据,运用典型分析方法进行深入调查和研究,在定性分析的基础上,在各个试验点探讨新型生产和经济循环系统的基本内容和要点。
在内蒙古察哈尔右翼右后旗实施京津风沙源治理工程以后,通过科技支撑手段,提高单位土地面积生物量,通过改善社会经济运行方式成为提高项目区可持续发展能力的关键。本文对于内蒙古林业科学院开展的京津风沙源治理工程科技支撑项目实施5年以来产生的社会经济效益,用可持续发展能力的概念定性评价研究和生态足迹方法进行了定量评价,计算出科技支撑项目在82万元投入的情况下,在14.67万亩土地建设以林业生态建设工程为核心工程建设,在发挥显著生态效益的同时,有效地促使更多户农(牧)民实现生产、生活方式的转型,可以产生显著的经济和社会效益。
本论文针对京津风沙源治理工程的今后实施和管理提出如下建议:第一,调整管理模式,使工程区广大农牧民深层次地参与到工程建设中来;第二,将工程建设由公共事业性建设工程转变为经营性工程项目投资,实行具有经营性质的投资项目管理;第三,由大规模的面上投入转变为有目的的重点项目投入,集中资金进行产业基地建设;第四,随着工程建设的继续深入,通过经营性组织从事生态环境建设。
Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects were carried out in the context of the eco-environmental problems had seriously hampered economic and social development. The thesis took the Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects for an example to explain the mutually reinforcing relationships of the ecological construction and economic development, and with these relationships as a basis we studied the sustainable development ability of ecological management project construction.
Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects were launched in June 2000, after years of construction, to planting trees (shrubs), grass and other forest ecological projects as the main body of the ecological environment construction it has been achieved gratifying results, public benefits are becoming apparent. At the same time, in many areas, the establishment of the national public investment, the government management on the basis of public welfare undertakings have not yet in direct contact with the production and living of the peasants and herdsmen who have participate in, how to improve management methods and construction ideas, adjust ecological construction and ecological economic and social benefits to be harmony and unity has become an important subject of Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects to exert project construction benefits.
The purpose of this thesis is based on Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects as the main objects, exploring under the premise of continuing to play in ensuring that eco-efficiency projects, establishing the industrial chain based on the results of the ecological environment construction, forming the production cycle of local resources way, social and economic development and economic compatibility, improving sustainable development ability and effective' management efficiency of ecological project in project area. For addressing the core issue of ecological environment construction, we must improve the efficiency of the ecological environment construction and overall effectiveness to play a long-term effect.
Base on the past research, we collected natural conditions, socio-economic, production methods, the resource situation and other basic data, using the typical methods to investigat and research deeply, and based on qualitative analysis, we investigated the basic content and elements of new production and circulatory system of economy in each of the experimental points.
We can through the scientific and technological support means to improve the biomass of the unit land area after implementing Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control project in Inner Mongolia, Chaharyouyihouqi.But improving the socio-economic operation mode is the key to the raise sustainable development ability of the project area.
This thesis summarized social and economic benefits emerged from Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects that the Academy of Forestry Science of Inner Mongolia launched for 5 years, and used the concept of sustainable development ability and ecological footprint for a qualitative evaluation. So we calculate that under the scientific and technological support projects given 820,000 yuan, can save almost 14.67 million mu of land used to produce ecological benefits, and also encourage more farmer (herdsman) to realize production, lifestyle transformation, equally can produce significant economic and social benefits.
This thesis aims at the future implementation and management for Beijing and Tianjin sandstorm source control projects advancing suggestion as follows: First, adjusting the management model so that the project area farmers and herdsmen participate in the project construction deeply; second, to the construction of public utilities by construction of the project into a commercial investment, the implementation of investment projects with the nature of the business management; third, from the surface of a large-scale investment into purposeful focus on project inputs, focusing funds industry base construction; fourth, with the the engineering construction continued to deepen, through commercial organizations engaged in ecological environment construction.
引文
[1]付娜,姚淑荣.浅析林业生态工程与区域生态环境[J].农林科技,2007,26(1).
[2]高军,贾志文,刘艳华,等.乌拉特中旗退耕还林工程试点阶段性社会经济效益评价[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2003,26(1):20-22.
[3]高瑞馨,王凤友.林业可持续发展指标体系和综合评价研究概述[J].防护林科技,2005(7):38-40.
[4]宫伟光,向开馥,王明忠,等.防护林系区域性生态效益的评价[J].东北林业大学学报,1997,28(1):1-7.
[5]谷春莲.京津风沙源治理工程干旱草原区沙产业发展战略思考.内蒙古林业科技,2004(2):30.
[6]国家林业局专家组.内蒙古京津风沙源治理工程中期检查报告[R],2005.
[7]侯军岐,张社梅.黄土高原地区退耕还林还草效果评价[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(6):29-31.
[8]韩维栋,高秀梅,卢昌义,等.中国红树林生态系统生态价值评估[J].生态科学,2000,19(1):40-46.
[9]侯宁.从青海大通县看退耕还林效益[J].林业经济,2003,(3):29-30.
[10]侯元兆.中国森林资源核算研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995.
[11]洪志声,张春霞,谢志中.生态生产力解析[J].林业经济问题,2006(1):57.
[12]胡新艳等.广东省的生态足迹与可持续发展研究[J].上海生态科学,2003(12):926-1047.
[13]胡培兴.防沙止漠建屏障,绿色护卫北京城[J].林业经济,2003(7):22-23.
[14]焦方义,孟令军.绿色生产力:可持续发展的必由之路[J].生产力研究,2002(6):13.
[15]李明志,张学培.实施京津风沙源治理工程的问题及对策[J].北京林业大学学报,2004(3):76-79.
[16]李卫忠,郑小贤,赵鹏祥.生态公益林建设效益评价指标体系初探[J].内蒙古大学学报,2001,22(2):12-15.
[17]刘璨,张巍.退耕还林政策选择对农户收入的影响-以我国京津风沙源治理工程为例[J].经济学(季刊),2006,6(1):274-290.
[18]刘拓.土地沙漠化防治综合效益评价[J].绿色中国(理论版),2005(11).
[19]刘江主编.中国可持续发展战略研究[M].中国农业出版社,2001.
[20]刘众.紫花苜蓿的栽培与利用[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005(4):42-44.
[21]刘晶.柠条饲料生产的开发[J].草业科学,2003(6):30-35.
[22]隆学文,马礼.河北坝上地区生态产业构想[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004(1):85.
[23]李金算.国内外绿色生产力的理论与实践[J].科技论坛,2005(5):109.
[24]梅再美,熊康宁.喀斯特地区水土流失动态特征及生态效益评价-以贵州清镇退耕还林示范区为例[J].中国岩溶,2003,22(2):136-143.
[25]孟庆琳.中国的选择:生产力发展的绿色道路[J].生产力研究,2002,(1).
[26]Paul Hawken等著.王乃粒等译.自然资本论(Nature Capitalism)[M].上海科学普及出版社,2000.
[27]彭珂珊,谢永生.退耕还林(草)工程发展模式的探讨[J].世界林业,2004(3).
[28]任宝俊.河北省京津风沙源治理区县级退耕还林工程年度实施方案编制中的几个关键因素[J].河北林业科技2004(3):13-22.
[29]孙立达,朱金兆.水土保持林体系综合效益研究与评价[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.
[30]谭成文.守住风沙之源[J].中国宏观经济管理,2003(10):43.
[31]王继军等.退耕还林(草)下生态农业发展模式[J].水土保持学报,2004(2).
[32]王明芹.延庆县环京津风沙源治理工程的经验与特点[J].中国水土保持SWCC,2004(6).
[33]王温等.柠条饲料化技术及其应用[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(3):143-147.
[34]王中锋.绿色生产力是自然生产力与社会生产力的统一[J].湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版),2005,(3):88.
[35]熊映梧.改善人与自然的关系--新千年经济学的头号课题[J].生产力研究,2002,(1).
[36]许涤新.实现四化与生态经济学[J].经济研究,1980(9):14-18.
[37]薛伟.可持续发展与环境经济综合核算[J].统计研究,1996,(6).
[38]向成华.川中浅丘区不同林分类型的综合效益评价[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(1):61-68.
[39]杨魁孚,田雪原.人口资源环境可持续发展[M].浙江人民出版社,2001.
[40]杨云彦.人口、资源与环境经济学[M].中国经济出版社,1999.
[41]杨振,常慧丽.区域生态经济系统协调发展的定量评估[J].资源开发与市场,2004,20(6):403-405.
[42]杨正礼.我国退耕还林研究进展与基本途径[J].林业科学研究,2004(4).
[43]叶廷琼,张信宝.水土保持效益分析与社会进步[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):71-73.
[44]叶文虎.联合国可持续发展指标述评[J].中国人口、资源与环境,1997,7(3).
[45]张世君,刘永忠.实施退耕还林,构筑立场色屏障[J].内蒙古林业,2004(5):9-10.
[46]张丽君.可持续发展指标体系建设的国际进展[J].国土资源情报,2004(4):11.
[47]张坤民.环境可持续性指数:尝试评价国家或地区环境可持续能力的指标[J].环境保护,2002(8):24-29.
[48]张红霞,苏勤,章锦河,王群.1990-1999年安徽省生态足迹的动态测度与分析[J].生态学学报,2006,25(1):39-44.
[49]张坤民.可持续发展论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
[50]张丽萍,刘则渊,姜照华.可持续发展能力评价的综合分析方法--以上海为例[J].软科学,2004,18(1):9-12.
[51]张锦高,李忠武.可持续发展定量研究方法综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社).
[52]张松,曹靖.县域可持续发展评价理论研究[J].中国经济问题,1999,(4).
[53]张凤嵋,尚润阳,孙玉兰.水利水保项目实施情况分析[J].内蒙古自治区京津风沙源治理工程,2008(2):29-33.
[54]张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(4):506-515.
[55]张晓东,朱德海.中国区域经济与环境协调度预测分析[J].资源科学,2003,25(2):1-6.
[56]赵景柱,欧阳志云,吴钢.社会-经济-自然复合生态系统可持续发展研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.
[57]中国科学院可持续战略研究组冲国可持续发展战略报告[R],科学出版社,2000.
[58]周海林,黄晶.持续发展能力建设的理论分析与重构[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1999(3):20.
[59]周学安.水源涵养林效益计量评价及工程建设技术对策研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
[60]朱永杰.可持续发展的管理与政策研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005.
[61] COGEOENVIRONMENT Work Group (1996).Tools for Assessing Rapid Environmental Changes, The 1995 Geoindicator Checklist. Enschede, The Netherlands.ITC Publication No.46Costanza,R.,d Arge,R.,deGroot,R.,1997:"The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Nature"[J], Nature 387:253-260,May 15.
[62] Anthony Fisher and MiehaelWard. Trends in Natural Resource Eeonomies in JEEM1974-1997:Break Pointand NonParametrieAnalysis[J],Journal of Environmental Eeonomies and Management. 1999,39(3).
[63] Brydson J.A. Rubber Chemistry[M].London, Cambridge Press, 1978:69-73.
[64] Baumol,William J,Dates and WhllaceE. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics[C].Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1988.
[65] BavanaJoan.FidueiaryobligationandthelInPortaneeofanenvironrnentalaeeounting standard[J]. Corporateenvironmentalstrategy, 1999,6(1)
[66] Belkna PPK,Furtad J G, and Blossom H B.Threeap Proaehes to Environmental Resource Analysis[J].Washington,D.C.The ConservationFoundation,1967.
[67] BettersDRete.Suitabilityanalysisandwildlandelassifieation:anapproaeh[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 1978,7(l):59-72.
[68] Canter, LanyWC. Environmentalim Paetassessment(Secondedition)Singapore[J].MeGRAWHillIne 1996:587-588.
[69] CarolAdaire Jones. Economy evaluation of resource in juriesin natural resource liabilitysuits[J].JoumalofwaterresoureePlanningandmanagement,200(3),126(6).
[70] CkaistoPherWood.EnvironmentalimPaetassessment-AeomParativereview[J].longnan Group Limited, 1995:72-95.
[71] Constanza R,Daly H.Nature capital and sustainable development[J].Conservation Biology,1992,6(1):37-38.
[72] Douglas Holtz-Eakin and ThomasM. Selden. Stoking the fires. CO2 emissions and economic growth[J].JournalofPublicEeonomies,1995,57(1):85-101.
[73] 《Ecloogical Indicator for the Nation》 [M]. NATIONAL ACADEMAY PRESS, Washington,D.C,2003.
[74] Edward Hobson. Value and control: perce Ptionsofeon serving the built environment in loeal Planning authority Praetiee[J] .Environment and Planning& Planning and design,2001,28(3).
[75] Flaherty,Mark,Kamjanakesor,Choomjet.Marneshrimp aquaculture and natural Resource degradation in Thailand[J].Environmental management, 1995,19(1).
[76] Fridol in Kraus man Mathis Wackernagel Helmut Haherl, Karl-Heinz Erb, Resource Flows and Land Use in Austria 1950 - 2000: Using the MEFA Framework to Monitor Society's nature Interaction for Sustairtability[J].Land Use Policy,21 (2604): 215-230.
[77] Frank Place,Keijiro Otsuka.Population,tenure,and natural resource management: the Case of customary land area in Malawi[J].Journal of environmental economies and management,2001,41 (1).
[78] G.C.Unruh and W.R.Moomaw.An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions[J].Ecological Eeonomies, 1998,25(2):221 -229.
[79] Grossman GM,Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment[J].Quarterly journal of Economics. 1995,110:53-77.
[80] Jon Matthews, Max Munday, Annette Roberts, Andrew Williams, An index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Wales: 1990 - 2000[R].Report for the Country side Council for Wales,2003 .
[81] Jason Venetoulis , Cliff Cobb, The Genaine Progress Indicator 1950 -2002 ( 2004 Update)[J].Sustainability Indicator Program,2004,3.
[82] Johnson FR,Dunford RW,Desvousges WH,Banzhaf MR.Role of knowledge in Assessing nonuse values for natural resource damages. Growth and ehange,20(1).
[83] John C.V.Pezzey.One-sided sustainability tests with amenities,and changes in Technology,trade and Population. Journal of Environmental Economies and Management,2004,(48):613-631.
[84] Lisa Segnestam, Indicators of Environment and Sustainable Development Theories and Practical Experience, Environmental Economics Series paper[R].The World Bank.2002,98.
[85] Loomis J, KentP. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey[J].Ecol-Econ,2000,33: 103-117.
[86] Macdonald D., Hanley N, Moffatt I. Applying the concept of nature criticality to regional resource management[J].Ecological economics, 1999,29:73-76.
[87] Louis Hotte. Conflicts over Property rights and natural:resource eexploitation at the frontier[J].Journal of development economies,2001,66(1).
[88] Mc Eiroy, MB,etal. Energizing China: Reconciling Environmental Protection and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, 1998.
[89] Minna,Maari karvonen.Envlronmental accounting as a tool for SME sin environmentally Induced economic risk analysis[J].Eco-Management and auditing,2000,7(1).
[90] Murlis J,Integrated environmental assessment :an urban perspective[J].Journal of environmental Sciences,1999,11(3):264-271.
[91] McDonough,M,and Braungart,M,1998: "The Next Industrial Revolution"[J]. Atlantic Monthly ,282(4).
[92] Nabhan G P, Buchmann S L. Pollination services: biodiversity's direct link to world food stability[A]. Daily G C Nature 's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[C].Washington D C: Island Press, 1997,133-150.
[93] OECD. Environmental Indicators for Methods and Results[R].2000.
[94] Pete Bettinger,Kevin Boston.A conceptual model for describing decision-making situations in integrated natural resource planning and modeling projects[J]. Environmental management,2001,28(1).
[95] Potsehin MB,Haines Young RH,Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital :a ease study from southern Germany[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,63(2):93-108.
[96] Rocchi .Toward a New Product-Services Mix: Corporations in the Perspective of Sustainability,MS thesis in Environment Management and Policy, Lund University,Sweden,1997,9.
[97] Reyer Gerlagh and Michiel A. Keyzer.Sustainability and the intergenerational distribution of natural resource entitlements[J]. Journal of Public economies,2001,79(2).
[98] Riki Theriveletal,strategic environmental assessment[J].London, Eeathscan Publieation Ltd,1992:371-389.
[99] Steiner F,Kenneth B.Ecological planning: a review[J].Environmental management,1981,5(6):495-505.
[100]Suresh Chandra Babu. Capacity strengthen in environmental actual resource Policy analysis:meeting the changing needsJournal of environmental management,2000,59(1).
[101]Sedjo, R,"The Forest sector: Important Innovation"[J]. Resources for the future,Washington,DC.1997(3),5.
[102] Wackernagel M, Rees W. E. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on earth.Gabriola Island, B.C[M]. Canada: New Society Publishers, 1996.
[103] Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our Ecological Foot print-Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[J].New Society Publishers. 1996:61-83.
[104] Vitousek P,Ehrlich P, Ehrlich A, Matson P. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis[J].Bio-science.1986,36:368-373.
[105] WoodwellGM. Forests: what in the world are they for? [A].in: RamakrishnaK, WoodwellG M.World Forests for the Future: Their use and Conservation[C].New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1993:1-20.
[2]高军,贾志文,刘艳华,等.乌拉特中旗退耕还林工程试点阶段性社会经济效益评价[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2003,26(1):20-22.
[3]高瑞馨,王凤友.林业可持续发展指标体系和综合评价研究概述[J].防护林科技,2005(7):38-40.
[4]宫伟光,向开馥,王明忠,等.防护林系区域性生态效益的评价[J].东北林业大学学报,1997,28(1):1-7.
[5]谷春莲.京津风沙源治理工程干旱草原区沙产业发展战略思考.内蒙古林业科技,2004(2):30.
[6]国家林业局专家组.内蒙古京津风沙源治理工程中期检查报告[R],2005.
[7]侯军岐,张社梅.黄土高原地区退耕还林还草效果评价[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(6):29-31.
[8]韩维栋,高秀梅,卢昌义,等.中国红树林生态系统生态价值评估[J].生态科学,2000,19(1):40-46.
[9]侯宁.从青海大通县看退耕还林效益[J].林业经济,2003,(3):29-30.
[10]侯元兆.中国森林资源核算研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995.
[11]洪志声,张春霞,谢志中.生态生产力解析[J].林业经济问题,2006(1):57.
[12]胡新艳等.广东省的生态足迹与可持续发展研究[J].上海生态科学,2003(12):926-1047.
[13]胡培兴.防沙止漠建屏障,绿色护卫北京城[J].林业经济,2003(7):22-23.
[14]焦方义,孟令军.绿色生产力:可持续发展的必由之路[J].生产力研究,2002(6):13.
[15]李明志,张学培.实施京津风沙源治理工程的问题及对策[J].北京林业大学学报,2004(3):76-79.
[16]李卫忠,郑小贤,赵鹏祥.生态公益林建设效益评价指标体系初探[J].内蒙古大学学报,2001,22(2):12-15.
[17]刘璨,张巍.退耕还林政策选择对农户收入的影响-以我国京津风沙源治理工程为例[J].经济学(季刊),2006,6(1):274-290.
[18]刘拓.土地沙漠化防治综合效益评价[J].绿色中国(理论版),2005(11).
[19]刘江主编.中国可持续发展战略研究[M].中国农业出版社,2001.
[20]刘众.紫花苜蓿的栽培与利用[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005(4):42-44.
[21]刘晶.柠条饲料生产的开发[J].草业科学,2003(6):30-35.
[22]隆学文,马礼.河北坝上地区生态产业构想[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004(1):85.
[23]李金算.国内外绿色生产力的理论与实践[J].科技论坛,2005(5):109.
[24]梅再美,熊康宁.喀斯特地区水土流失动态特征及生态效益评价-以贵州清镇退耕还林示范区为例[J].中国岩溶,2003,22(2):136-143.
[25]孟庆琳.中国的选择:生产力发展的绿色道路[J].生产力研究,2002,(1).
[26]Paul Hawken等著.王乃粒等译.自然资本论(Nature Capitalism)[M].上海科学普及出版社,2000.
[27]彭珂珊,谢永生.退耕还林(草)工程发展模式的探讨[J].世界林业,2004(3).
[28]任宝俊.河北省京津风沙源治理区县级退耕还林工程年度实施方案编制中的几个关键因素[J].河北林业科技2004(3):13-22.
[29]孙立达,朱金兆.水土保持林体系综合效益研究与评价[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.
[30]谭成文.守住风沙之源[J].中国宏观经济管理,2003(10):43.
[31]王继军等.退耕还林(草)下生态农业发展模式[J].水土保持学报,2004(2).
[32]王明芹.延庆县环京津风沙源治理工程的经验与特点[J].中国水土保持SWCC,2004(6).
[33]王温等.柠条饲料化技术及其应用[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(3):143-147.
[34]王中锋.绿色生产力是自然生产力与社会生产力的统一[J].湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版),2005,(3):88.
[35]熊映梧.改善人与自然的关系--新千年经济学的头号课题[J].生产力研究,2002,(1).
[36]许涤新.实现四化与生态经济学[J].经济研究,1980(9):14-18.
[37]薛伟.可持续发展与环境经济综合核算[J].统计研究,1996,(6).
[38]向成华.川中浅丘区不同林分类型的综合效益评价[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(1):61-68.
[39]杨魁孚,田雪原.人口资源环境可持续发展[M].浙江人民出版社,2001.
[40]杨云彦.人口、资源与环境经济学[M].中国经济出版社,1999.
[41]杨振,常慧丽.区域生态经济系统协调发展的定量评估[J].资源开发与市场,2004,20(6):403-405.
[42]杨正礼.我国退耕还林研究进展与基本途径[J].林业科学研究,2004(4).
[43]叶廷琼,张信宝.水土保持效益分析与社会进步[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):71-73.
[44]叶文虎.联合国可持续发展指标述评[J].中国人口、资源与环境,1997,7(3).
[45]张世君,刘永忠.实施退耕还林,构筑立场色屏障[J].内蒙古林业,2004(5):9-10.
[46]张丽君.可持续发展指标体系建设的国际进展[J].国土资源情报,2004(4):11.
[47]张坤民.环境可持续性指数:尝试评价国家或地区环境可持续能力的指标[J].环境保护,2002(8):24-29.
[48]张红霞,苏勤,章锦河,王群.1990-1999年安徽省生态足迹的动态测度与分析[J].生态学学报,2006,25(1):39-44.
[49]张坤民.可持续发展论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
[50]张丽萍,刘则渊,姜照华.可持续发展能力评价的综合分析方法--以上海为例[J].软科学,2004,18(1):9-12.
[51]张锦高,李忠武.可持续发展定量研究方法综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社).
[52]张松,曹靖.县域可持续发展评价理论研究[J].中国经济问题,1999,(4).
[53]张凤嵋,尚润阳,孙玉兰.水利水保项目实施情况分析[J].内蒙古自治区京津风沙源治理工程,2008(2):29-33.
[54]张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(4):506-515.
[55]张晓东,朱德海.中国区域经济与环境协调度预测分析[J].资源科学,2003,25(2):1-6.
[56]赵景柱,欧阳志云,吴钢.社会-经济-自然复合生态系统可持续发展研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.
[57]中国科学院可持续战略研究组冲国可持续发展战略报告[R],科学出版社,2000.
[58]周海林,黄晶.持续发展能力建设的理论分析与重构[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1999(3):20.
[59]周学安.水源涵养林效益计量评价及工程建设技术对策研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
[60]朱永杰.可持续发展的管理与政策研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005.
[61] COGEOENVIRONMENT Work Group (1996).Tools for Assessing Rapid Environmental Changes, The 1995 Geoindicator Checklist. Enschede, The Netherlands.ITC Publication No.46Costanza,R.,d Arge,R.,deGroot,R.,1997:"The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Nature"[J], Nature 387:253-260,May 15.
[62] Anthony Fisher and MiehaelWard. Trends in Natural Resource Eeonomies in JEEM1974-1997:Break Pointand NonParametrieAnalysis[J],Journal of Environmental Eeonomies and Management. 1999,39(3).
[63] Brydson J.A. Rubber Chemistry[M].London, Cambridge Press, 1978:69-73.
[64] Baumol,William J,Dates and WhllaceE. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics[C].Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1988.
[65] BavanaJoan.FidueiaryobligationandthelInPortaneeofanenvironrnentalaeeounting standard[J]. Corporateenvironmentalstrategy, 1999,6(1)
[66] Belkna PPK,Furtad J G, and Blossom H B.Threeap Proaehes to Environmental Resource Analysis[J].Washington,D.C.The ConservationFoundation,1967.
[67] BettersDRete.Suitabilityanalysisandwildlandelassifieation:anapproaeh[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 1978,7(l):59-72.
[68] Canter, LanyWC. Environmentalim Paetassessment(Secondedition)Singapore[J].MeGRAWHillIne 1996:587-588.
[69] CarolAdaire Jones. Economy evaluation of resource in juriesin natural resource liabilitysuits[J].JoumalofwaterresoureePlanningandmanagement,200(3),126(6).
[70] CkaistoPherWood.EnvironmentalimPaetassessment-AeomParativereview[J].longnan Group Limited, 1995:72-95.
[71] Constanza R,Daly H.Nature capital and sustainable development[J].Conservation Biology,1992,6(1):37-38.
[72] Douglas Holtz-Eakin and ThomasM. Selden. Stoking the fires. CO2 emissions and economic growth[J].JournalofPublicEeonomies,1995,57(1):85-101.
[73] 《Ecloogical Indicator for the Nation》 [M]. NATIONAL ACADEMAY PRESS, Washington,D.C,2003.
[74] Edward Hobson. Value and control: perce Ptionsofeon serving the built environment in loeal Planning authority Praetiee[J] .Environment and Planning& Planning and design,2001,28(3).
[75] Flaherty,Mark,Kamjanakesor,Choomjet.Marneshrimp aquaculture and natural Resource degradation in Thailand[J].Environmental management, 1995,19(1).
[76] Fridol in Kraus man Mathis Wackernagel Helmut Haherl, Karl-Heinz Erb, Resource Flows and Land Use in Austria 1950 - 2000: Using the MEFA Framework to Monitor Society's nature Interaction for Sustairtability[J].Land Use Policy,21 (2604): 215-230.
[77] Frank Place,Keijiro Otsuka.Population,tenure,and natural resource management: the Case of customary land area in Malawi[J].Journal of environmental economies and management,2001,41 (1).
[78] G.C.Unruh and W.R.Moomaw.An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions[J].Ecological Eeonomies, 1998,25(2):221 -229.
[79] Grossman GM,Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment[J].Quarterly journal of Economics. 1995,110:53-77.
[80] Jon Matthews, Max Munday, Annette Roberts, Andrew Williams, An index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Wales: 1990 - 2000[R].Report for the Country side Council for Wales,2003 .
[81] Jason Venetoulis , Cliff Cobb, The Genaine Progress Indicator 1950 -2002 ( 2004 Update)[J].Sustainability Indicator Program,2004,3.
[82] Johnson FR,Dunford RW,Desvousges WH,Banzhaf MR.Role of knowledge in Assessing nonuse values for natural resource damages. Growth and ehange,20(1).
[83] John C.V.Pezzey.One-sided sustainability tests with amenities,and changes in Technology,trade and Population. Journal of Environmental Economies and Management,2004,(48):613-631.
[84] Lisa Segnestam, Indicators of Environment and Sustainable Development Theories and Practical Experience, Environmental Economics Series paper[R].The World Bank.2002,98.
[85] Loomis J, KentP. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey[J].Ecol-Econ,2000,33: 103-117.
[86] Macdonald D., Hanley N, Moffatt I. Applying the concept of nature criticality to regional resource management[J].Ecological economics, 1999,29:73-76.
[87] Louis Hotte. Conflicts over Property rights and natural:resource eexploitation at the frontier[J].Journal of development economies,2001,66(1).
[88] Mc Eiroy, MB,etal. Energizing China: Reconciling Environmental Protection and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, 1998.
[89] Minna,Maari karvonen.Envlronmental accounting as a tool for SME sin environmentally Induced economic risk analysis[J].Eco-Management and auditing,2000,7(1).
[90] Murlis J,Integrated environmental assessment :an urban perspective[J].Journal of environmental Sciences,1999,11(3):264-271.
[91] McDonough,M,and Braungart,M,1998: "The Next Industrial Revolution"[J]. Atlantic Monthly ,282(4).
[92] Nabhan G P, Buchmann S L. Pollination services: biodiversity's direct link to world food stability[A]. Daily G C Nature 's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[C].Washington D C: Island Press, 1997,133-150.
[93] OECD. Environmental Indicators for Methods and Results[R].2000.
[94] Pete Bettinger,Kevin Boston.A conceptual model for describing decision-making situations in integrated natural resource planning and modeling projects[J]. Environmental management,2001,28(1).
[95] Potsehin MB,Haines Young RH,Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital :a ease study from southern Germany[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,63(2):93-108.
[96] Rocchi .Toward a New Product-Services Mix: Corporations in the Perspective of Sustainability,MS thesis in Environment Management and Policy, Lund University,Sweden,1997,9.
[97] Reyer Gerlagh and Michiel A. Keyzer.Sustainability and the intergenerational distribution of natural resource entitlements[J]. Journal of Public economies,2001,79(2).
[98] Riki Theriveletal,strategic environmental assessment[J].London, Eeathscan Publieation Ltd,1992:371-389.
[99] Steiner F,Kenneth B.Ecological planning: a review[J].Environmental management,1981,5(6):495-505.
[100]Suresh Chandra Babu. Capacity strengthen in environmental actual resource Policy analysis:meeting the changing needsJournal of environmental management,2000,59(1).
[101]Sedjo, R,"The Forest sector: Important Innovation"[J]. Resources for the future,Washington,DC.1997(3),5.
[102] Wackernagel M, Rees W. E. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on earth.Gabriola Island, B.C[M]. Canada: New Society Publishers, 1996.
[103] Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our Ecological Foot print-Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[J].New Society Publishers. 1996:61-83.
[104] Vitousek P,Ehrlich P, Ehrlich A, Matson P. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis[J].Bio-science.1986,36:368-373.
[105] WoodwellGM. Forests: what in the world are they for? [A].in: RamakrishnaK, WoodwellG M.World Forests for the Future: Their use and Conservation[C].New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1993:1-20.