用户名: 密码: 验证码:
营运驾驶员安全性评估方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文从当前我国营运车辆道路交通事故现状出发,借鉴分析国内外驾驶员安全性研究成果,重点从营运驾驶员人因因素出发,阐述了营运驾驶员安全性的定义,探索导致营运车辆交通事故的深层次原因,针对营运驾驶员安全性进行了深入研究。
     基于营运驾驶员人因因素对道路交通事故的影响机理,以事故致因理论、计划行为理论和海因里希因果连锁理论为基础,对营运驾驶员安全性的主要影响因素进行分析,得出营运驾驶员安全性的影响因素主要有安全意识、潜在危险预知能力、驾驶技能和应激反应能力等4项能力。
     分别对营运驾驶员安全意识、潜在危险预知能力、驾驶技能和应激反应能力等4方面安全性评估关键技术展开研究,分析以上4方面各自的特点和影响因素,提出和构建相应的表征指标体系及评估方法、模型,分别运用问卷法、实验法、计算机仿真、实车测验等方法,研究开发相应的评估系统,对营运驾驶员以上4方面能力进行客观、准确地评估,给出评估结果,分析出被评估营运驾驶员存在的不足及缺陷,提出针对性的对策和建议。
     在实现以上4项能力单项评估的基础上,集成开发营运驾驶员安全性综合评估系统,实现对其安全性的总体评估并给出相应提升对策和建议,运用该系统可对单个营运驾驶员进行评估,也可以对多个营运驾驶员进行评估,分析群体安全性。
     立足当前营运驾驶员安全管理的现状及存在问题,进行了总结和分析,结合营运驾驶员安全性综合评估系统的实际应用,提出了加强和改进营运驾驶员安全管理的对策建议。
Departing from the current status quo of the road traffic accidents of operating vehicles inChina, the present author has conducted an in-depth research about the security of operationdrivers. Based on research studies about the security of domestic drivers, the present articleexplores the deep-seated reasons for the road traffic accidents of operating vehicles, the focusof which is the human factor of operation drivers.
     Based on the affecting mechanism of human factors to road traffic accidents, the affectingfactors, as well as the definition, of the security of operation drivers have been elaborated bymaking use of the accident cause theory, theory of planned behavior, Heinrich causal chaintheory. It is concluded in the present article that chief affecting factors for the security ofoperation drivers are four abilities such as security consciousness, precognition of potentialdanger, driving skills, and stress response ability.
     The research has been developed into the Gordian technique of security assessment inrespect of the operation drivers’ security consciousness, precognition of potential danger,driving skills, and stress response ability. Based on the analysis of characteristics andaffecting factors of the four aspects mentioned above, the corresponding characterization ofthe index system and assessment methods of weightiness and quantification have been putforward; meanwhile, corresponding models have to be constructed. Then what is followed isto do research and to develop the corresponding assessment software by way of questionnaire,experimentation, computer simulation and real vehicle tests, aiming at realizing objective andaccurate assessment of the four abilities of operation drivers mentioned above, according towhich the existing defects of operation drivers could be figured out and correspondingsuggestions might be put forward.
     Then with the single assessment and Gordian technique of the four abilities combined, acomprehensive evaluation software of the security of operation drivers could be developed,which can achieve comprehensive assessment and supply relevant measures and advices. Inaddition, such a software helps to evaluate one or more operation drivers, which means that ithelps to analyze community security.
     Finally, the present author draws a conclusion and makes an analysis of the status quo and existing problems of safety management about operation drivers.Furthermore, on the groundsof practical application of the comprehensive evaluation system of the security of operationdrivers, a few countermeasures and proposals have been presented.
引文
[1] Global status report on road safety: time for action. Geneva, World Health Organization,2009
    [2]中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报[M].公安部交通管理局,2005-2011
    [3]交通部公路科学研究院编著.中国道路交通安全蓝皮书[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2007-2008
    [4] Xie C, Parker D.A social psychological approach to driving violations in twoChinesecities [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behavior,2002
    [5] Parker D. Intention to commit driving violations An application of the theory ofplannedbehavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1992,77(1)
    [6] James Reason: Human Error[M]. Cambridge University Press,1990
    [7] Verschuur W L, Hurts K. Modeling safe and unsafe driving behavior[J]. Accident AnalysisandPrevention,2008
    [8] U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, TrafficSafety Facts,2000.13-15
    [9] Nor den M.J. Orleans, H. Jacobs. Application of Statistical Quality-Control TechniquestoAnalysis of Highway-Accident Data. Bulletin117, H R B. National Research Council,Washington, D.C.1995.25-29
    [10]刘兆琪.道路交通安全应用心理学[M].北京:警官教育出版社,1998
    [11]Finn P, Bragg,B W E. Perception of the Risk of an Accident by Young and OlderDrivers[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1986,18(4):289-298
    [12]Jonah B. A[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1986,18(4):225-271
    [13]Peter, Ryan. An Investigation of Perceived Risk at the Brand Level[J]. Journal of MarketryResearch,1975,2:29-37
    [14]Deery H. Hazard and Risk Perception among Young Novice Drivers[J]. Journal of SafetyResearch,1999,30(4):225-236
    [15]Sagberg F, Bjornskau T. Hazard Perception and Driving Experience Among NoviceDrivers[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2006,38:407-414
    [16]Horswill M S, Marrington S A, Mccullough C M. etal. The Hazard Perception Ability of
    [17]Older Drivers[J]. The Gerontological Society of America,2008,4:212-218
    [18]Browm.I, D. Groger J.A, Risk Perception and Decision Taking During the TtransitionBetween Novice and Experienced Driver Status[J]. Ergonomics,1988,31(4):585-597
    [19]Adams L.D. Review of the Literature on Obstacle Avoidance Maneuvers: Braking VersusSteering[R].1994
    [20]Hiroaki Yoshida, Tatsuo Sugitani, Masashi Ohtaetal. Development of the Brake AssistSystem[J]. SAE Transactions,1998,107:1099-1106
    [21]Yasushi Amano,Masatoshi Hada.A Model of Driver’s Behavior in Ordinary and EmergentSituations[J]. Review of Toyota CRDL,1998,33(1):23-30
    [22]Lora Warshawsky-Livne, David Shinar. Effects of Uncertainty, Transmission Type, DriverAge and Gender on Brake Reaction and Movement Time[J]. Journal of Safety Research,2002(33):117-128
    [23]Hiroshi Uno, Kaneo Hiramatsu. Aged Driver’s Avoidance Capabilities in an EmergentTraffic Situation[C]. Transaction of Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan,2001,32(1):113-118
    [24]Justin M. Owens, Richard Lehman. The Effects of Age and Distraction on Reaction Timein a Driving Simulator[J]. Proceedings of the1st International Driving Symposium onHuman Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design,2001:147-152
    [25]Lei Zhang, Kevin Baldwin, etc. Visual and Cognitive Predictors of Performance on BrakeReaction Test: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study[J]. Ophthalmic Epidemiology,2007,14:216-222
    [26]林泽炎.人为事故预防学[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江教育出版社,1998
    [27]刘移民,艾玲保,招小林等.对乡镇企业职工的职业安全卫生知识、态度、行为的调查[J].中国安全科学学报,1998,8(4):72-76
    [28]李延红,郭常义,周顺福.上海市中小学生交通安全意识的现况调查[J].环境与职业医学,2002,19(3):155-159
    [29]李延红,郭常义,卢伟.上海市老年人交通安全意识的调杳研究.环境与职业医学,2003,20(1):34-37
    [30]陈鲁.强化安全意识、减少道路交通死亡事故[J].中国铁路.2004:42-45
    [31]李锋.山东省高速公路公司职工安全意识调查与分析[D].济南:山东大学,2004
    [32]张宇婧.出租车驾驶员安全意识的测量与评价[D].北京:北京交通大学,2007
    [33]张琼.驾驶人安全意识评估研究[D].西安:长安大学.2010
    [34]戎靖.交通安全意识与安全行为之间的关系研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2008
    [35]赵亮.汽车驾驶行为理论及基于3D的危险感受性计算机模拟系统研究[D].西安:长安大学.2005
    [36]张茜.驾驶经验与人格特征对驾驶人危险感受影响的研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2010
    [37]韩玉昌.汽车驾驶员的反应时间检测及其数学处理方法[J].心理科学,1997,20:436-440
    [38]田新民,田泉,田原.客车驾驶员驾驶适宜性的动态模拟驾驶测试[J].公路交通科技,2000,17(5):85-88
    [39]吴初娜.驾驶人应激反应能力评估研究[D].西安:长安大学.2011
    [40]陈永对,信占莹,申维新.对驾驶员应激训练的分析与实验[J].公路与汽运,2004,105:19-21
    [41]晏国强.驾驶人潜在危险预知能力评估研究[D].西安:长安大学.2010
    [42]于增亮.基于仿真环境驾驶员临界反应能力的研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2005
    [43]陈雪梅,魏中华,高利.紧急情况下驾驶员行为研究[J].北京工业大学学报,2007,33(5):449-454
    [44]张展宏.基于模拟器的驾驶员应急状态下刹车反应时间的研究[J].华北科技学院学报,2009,6(3):27-30
    [45]阎淑芳,呼庆媛,贾正锐,金凤阁.机动车驾驶员操作技能分析[J].人类工效学,1997,3(2):60-61
    [46]丁靖艳.基于计划行为理论的侵犯巧驶行为研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006(12)
    [47]刘卫增.基于单调关联系统的驾驶行为可靠度计算方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2008(4)
    [48]骆勇.道路交通中攻击性驾驶行为分析与研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2009
    [49]侯雪艳.个性特质、态度对驾驶行为的预测研究[D].沈阳师范大学硕士学位论文,2007
    [50]王荣本等.适用驾驶员疲劳状态监测的人眼定位方法研究.公路交通科技.2003,20(5)
    [51]王猛.营运驾驶员驾驶疲劳研究[D].交通部公路科学研究院硕士论文,2006
    [52]贾洪飞.基于认知心理学的驾驶员信息加工模式研究.中国安全科学学报.2006,16(1)
    [53]马骏.论驾驶员的感知特性及安全管理对策[J].公路交通科技.2000,17(5)
    [54]王武宏.汽车驾驶员行为模式及其心理因素对可靠性的影响[J].汽车技术,1994
    [55]张殿业.驾驶员身心条件安全可靠性综合评价[J].中国公路学报,2004.17(4)
    [56]金会庆.机动车驾驶员身体素质条件及测评指标的研究.人类工效学.2001,7(3)
    [57]刘西刚.影响驾驶员可靠性的因素分析与综合评价模型[J].学术论坛,2005
    [58]李江,卓睛,王文渊.一种与情绪有关的皮肤直流建模及其实验方法研究[J].行为医学科学,2000,9(4):22522
    [59]吴国春,李文石.皮肤电阻测量x一Y指示器[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2002,18(4):24~27
    [60]王正,姚云云,张红静等.大学生皮肤电阻实验设计与研究[J1.医学教育探索,2005,4(3):153~157
    [61]陈雪梅,魏中华,高利.紧急情况下驾驶员行为研究[J].北京工业大学学报,2007,33(5):449~454
    [62]杨治良.实验心理学[Ml.浙江:浙江教育出版社,1998
    [63]王海波.浅谈驾驶员可靠性评价模型的建立[J].工程与技术,2007
    [64]张春兴.教育心理学[M].浙江:浙江教育出版社,2005
    [65]Mesken, J, Lajunen, T., Summala, H. Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and theirrelation to accident involvement in Finland.Ergonomics,2002,7:469–483
    [66]Timo Lajunen, Dianne Parker, Heikki Summala. The Manchester Driver BehaviourQuestionnaire: a cross-cultural study.Accident Analysis and Prevention,2004,36:231-238
    [67]Elander J, West R, Freneh D.Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road traffiecrash risk: an examination of methods and findings.Psychol Bu11,1993,113:279-294
    [68]Beirness, D.J. Do we really drive as we live? The role of personality factors in road crashes[J].Alcohol, Drugs and Driving,1993,9:129-143
    [69]赵亮.汽车驾驶行为理论及基于3D的危险感受性计算机模拟系统研究[D].西安:长安大学,2005
    [70]David Shinar.Psychology on the Road: the Human Factors in Traffic Safety[J].JohnWiley&Sons Inc,1976:89-92
    [71]Mihal WL,Barrett GU.Individual Differences in Perceptual Information Processing andtheir Relation to Automobile Accident Involvement[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1976,6(2):229-233
    [72]韩玉昌.汽车交通心理学[M].大连:大连海运学院出版社,1991
    [73]金会庆.驾驶适宜性[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,1995
    [74]刘宁,郝学芹,葛燕等.驾驶经验和次要任务难度对模拟驾驶行为的影响[C].第十一届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集,2007
    [75]任有.交通环境下驾驶行为模拟与应急驾驶可靠性建模[D].吉林:吉林大学,2007
    [76]杨治良.实验心理学[M].浙江:浙江教育出版社,1998
    [77]李江,卓睛,王文渊.一种与情绪有关的皮肤直流建模及其实验方法研究[J].行为医学科学,2000,9(4):225-227
    [78]吴国春,李文石.皮肤电阻测量X-Y指示器[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2002,18(4):24-27
    [79]王正,姚云云,张红静.大学生皮肤电阻实验设计与研究[J].医学教育探索.2005.4(3):153-157
    [80]李百川.汽车驾驶员适宜性检测及评价[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003
    [81]张凤忠,杨夏峰,文中五.汽车安全驾驶[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2003
    [82]Frank P,Mckenna.What Role Should the Concept of Risk Play in Theories of AccidentInvolvement?[J].Erogmics,1988,31(4):469-484
    [83]Lennart S,Moen B,Rundmo T.Explaining Risk Perception.An Evaluation of CulturalTheory[M].Nor-way:C Rotunde Publikasjoner,2004
    [84]郭伟伟.交通冲突判别方法研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2008
    [85]Robert B. Isler, Nicola J. Starkey, Amy R.Williamson. Video-based Road CommentaryTraining Improves Hazard Perception of Young Drivers in a Dual Task[J]. AccidentAnalysis and Prevention,2009
    [86]Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elharar A et al. Risk Perception of Driving as a Function ofAdvanced Training Aimed at Cognizing and Handling Risks in Demanding DrivingSituations[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2008,40(2):697-703
    [87]Rundmo T, Iversen H.Risk Perception and Driving Behaviour Among Adolescents in twoNorwegian Counties Before and After a Traffic Safety Campaign[J].Safety Science,2004,42(1):1-21
    [88]黄端,张侃.驾驶人风险认知研究进展[J].人类工效学,2008,14(4):65-68
    [89]Mourant, R.R.and Rockwell,T.H.Strategies of Visual Search by Novice and ExperiencedDrivers[J]. Human Factors,1972,14:323-335
    [90]Horswill,M.S.,McKenna,F.P.Drivers’ Hazard Perception Ability:Situation Awarenesson the Road[J]. Banbury Tremblay, S.(Eds.), A Cognitive Approach to SituationAwareness Asgate, Aldershot, UK,2004:155-175
    [91]Underwood, G., Visual Attention and the Transition from Novice to Advanced Driver.[J].Ergonomics,2007,50(8):1235-1249
    [92]Wallis, T.S.A.,&Horswill,M.S.Using Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory to Determinewhy Experienced and Trained Drivers Respond Faster than Novices in a Hazard Perceptiontest[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2007,39:1137-1185
    [93]Geoffrey Underwood, Peter Chapman,Karen Bowden, David Crundall. Visual SearchWhile Driving: Skill and Awareness During Inspection of the Scene[J]. TransportationResearch,2002,5:87-97
    [94]Avinoam Borowsky,David Shinar,and Tal Oron-GiladBen Gurion.Age, Kill,and HazardPerception in Driving[J]. Proceedings of the Fourth International Driving Symposium onHuman Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design
    [95]Endsley, M.Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems[J]. Human Factor,1995,37:65-84

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700