假卫矛属（卫矛科）的分类修订
|
摘要
假卫矛属(Microtropis Wall.ex Meissner)为卫矛科(Celastraceae)植物,至今世界范围内记载的假卫矛属约60-70余种,分布于东亚、东南亚及中美洲温暖地区,为环太平洋间断分布。该属虽然不大,但自建立以来直到最近,一直不断有新类群发表,而该属植物形态变异复杂,花朵微小观察较难,标本材料缺乏,分类相当困难,属内植物同物异名、名实不符的问题相当常见,至今未有一个世界性的系统修订,因此对该属进行全面修订是很有必要的。
本文研究馆藏腊叶标本3000余份,并在野外观察了20多个假卫矛植物居群,重点研究假卫矛属植物关键形态性状变异规律及评价其分类学意义。确认假卫矛属植物有价值的分类性状集中在花部特征,其中花序分枝式样与分枝次数、花萼形状及质地、花瓣形状、花盘的发育情况及与花瓣雄蕊的合生情况、花药的形态、子房的形状等特征具有重要的分类价值。但研究中发现假卫矛的花发育非常缓慢,花从开始发育到成熟开放历时常长达6个月以上,而不同发育阶段的花部特征常存在显著差异,有些种类中还存在雌雄异株的分化现象,这使花部特征的应用存在局限。此外,叶片的形状和质地以及果实的形状和大小在分类中也具有重要的参考价值,但同样由于生长环境和发育阶段的不同而表现出较大的变异。研究中还发现,不同的地理分布和生境下的同一个种类从叶片到花序特征各方面均可表现出较大的变异。因此,在该属的分类中,必须综合运用各方面的尽可能多的性状,而不能仅依靠少数几个性状。
本文对该属的16个分类群的叶脉序特征进行了研究。发现该属的叶脉序特征整体上较为一致,均为分枝曲行羽状脉;二级脉的倾斜角度、高级脉的疏密程度在种内有较大的变异,不能作为分类依据;而二级脉的数目,直行或弧形,以及脉岛的发育情况在种间差异较大且较为稳定,可以作为分类的依据。
本文对该属及相关属共5属67个分类群的叶表皮微形态进行了电镜扫描观察。发现假卫矛属及相关属植物的叶表皮角质层很厚,表皮细胞结构大都不能分辨,所有种类的气孔器均出现于下表皮,为不规则形排列。角质层纹饰可分为三种类型,一为光滑无纹饰,二为具条纹状纹饰,三为具乳突状纹饰。后两种类型仅出现在少数的种类中,为较特化的性状。叶表皮形态特征在属间没有明显的差异。
本文对该属及相关属共4属39个分类群的花粉进行了电镜扫描观察。发现假卫矛属植物的花粉外观为卵圆形或长圆形,明显具三孔沟,表面具陷窝状或网眼状纹饰。多数种类的花粉仅在大小上有微小的区别,其它方面差异微小,但马来西亚地区产的一些种类的花粉相互排列紧密,形成类似花粉块的结构,单个花粉粒的外形很不规则,有较大的差异。此外,所观察的几个属植物的花粉仅在大小上有较显著的差异,其它方面差异微小。
通过文献查阅、标本研究、野外考察及实验证据,本文对该属进行了较为全面的分类修订。归并了Lundell(1970)从该属独立出来的包括中美洲种类的属名Quetzalia,确认世界假卫矛属植物47种,在世界各国的大概分布情况是,中国18种,马来西亚15种,印度尼西亚8种,越南8种,印度5种,菲律宾5种,缅甸4种,泰国4种,斯里兰卡2种,墨西哥2种,日本1种,孟加拉国1种,不丹1种,哥斯达黎加1种,危地马拉1种,柬埔寨1种,老挝1种,文莱1种。描述新种3个:大围山假卫矛M.daweishanensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang、长果假卫矛M.longicarpa Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang、西藏假卫矛M.xizangensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang,均产于中国。重新确认尖尾假卫矛M.caudata、簇果假卫矛M.fasciculata、大果假卫矛M.macrocarpa、菲律宾假卫矛M.philippinensis、红色假卫矛M.rubra、爪哇假卫矛M.javanica为独立的种,另将47个分类群名称新处理为异名。确认7个学名为非假卫矛属植物,做出新命名全缘叶沟瓣Glyptopetalum integrifolium Q.W.Lin,Z.X.Zhang et Q.R.Liu(基原异名M.poilanei Tardieu)及新组合Garcinia gagei(Merr.et Freeman)Q.W.Lin etZ.X.Zhang(基原异名M.gagei Merr.et Freeman)。确认中国记录的越南假卫矛M.fallax、大叶假卫矛M.macrophylla及淡色假卫矛M.pallens系鉴定错误,并确认大果假卫矛M.macrocarpa为中国特有的濒危物种,喙果假卫矛M.rhynchocarpa分布于广东,为中国新记录植物。此外,尚有3个名称由于缺乏材料,暂时存疑。
Microtropis Wall.ex Meisner,a medium genus of the family Celastraceae,currently contains about 60-70 species in the world,which are distributing in East and Southeast Asia,and Central American.Although this is no a large genus,but from the day when it is established,the names published under this genus are numerous,but have no yet been well treated for even one time in the worldwide scale.Due to the complex of variation in the morphological characters and the difficulties of observation of the small flowers,the classification of this genus is very difficult and there are many problems in the present species under this genus.Therefore,the work to conduct a comprehensive revision of this genus is very necessary.
By studying on more than 3000 sheets of specimens in herbaria and observing of more than 20 populations in fields,we tried to search and evaluate the variation patterns of morphological characters amang the Microtropis plants.The results show that the good characters for taxonomy concentrates on flowers.Inflorescence types and branching times,calyx shape and texture,petal shape, disk state and its condition with petals and stamens,anther shape,and pistil shape are the most important characters in the genus.But we also found that the development of flowers in this genus is very slow and the phase from the beginning of inflorescence primordium to mature or opening of the flowers is often more than 6 months,there are conspicuous differences of flower characters between the materials collected at different phases,and there are still pseudohermaphroditic and diecious phenomenons in some species,so the practical use of flower characters are somewhat limited.The leaf shape and texture,and the fruit shape and size are also very important characters for taxonomy, but variable due to different habitat and different developmental stages.It is noteworthy that the populations of the same species from different geographical locations often show conspicuous and gradual variation in various characters.Therefore,the taxonomy of such a genus must use as many characters as possible,can no rely on a few characters.
Leaf architecture features of 16 taxa in Microtropis were studied.The results show that thegeneral features of leaf architecture are quite uniform as camptodromous pinnate venation.Intraspecific the divergence angle of secondary veins,and the density of tertiary veins or higher veins are quite variable,thus are inappropriate for species discrimination.Whereas the number and shape(straight or arcuate) of secondary veins,and the state of vein areolas are quite different and stable between different species,so can be used as characters for taxonomy.
Foliar epidermis of 67 taxa in Microtropis and 4 related genera was observed with SEM.The results show that the comeous layer is very thick,the structure of epidermal cells can't be distinguished,the stomas are irregularly arranged on the lower surface of leaves.Sculpture can be devided as 3 types,smooth,striate,and papillate.Striate sculpture and papillate sculpture are specialized characters,and only occur in a few species.Generally,there are not significant differences of foliar epidermis between the genera observed.
Pollen of 39 taxa in Microtropis and 3 related genera was observed with SEM.The results show that most pollen grains observed are elliptoid,globose,or oblong at equatorial view,tricolporate, extine layer foveolate or reticulate.In most species the pollen grains are only slightly different in the size,but a few Malaysian species have specialized pollen grains which are irregular in shape and closely arranged to form structure like pollen mass.Generally,the pollen grains show not significant differences between the genera observed except the size.
Finally,a taxonomic revision of the genus Microtropis worldwide was conducted,based on extensive literature survey,both herbarium and field observations,and experimental evidences.The genus Quetzalia Lundell(1970) with central American species are included in Microtropis,and total 47 species in Microtropis worldwide have been accepted,the gross distribution in the countries as following: China 18,Malaysia 15,Indonesia 8,Vietnam 8,India 5,Philippines 5,Myanmar 4,Thailands 4,Sri Lanka 2,Mexico 2,Japan 1,Bangladesh 1,Bhutan 1,Costa Rica 1,Guatemala 1,Cambodia 1,Laos 1, Brunei 1.3 new species M.daweishanensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang,M.longicarpa Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang,and M.xizangensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang from China are described.M.caudata, M.fasciculata,M.macrocarpa,M.philippinensis,M.rubra,and M.javanica are recognized as independent species,other 47 names are reduced to synonyms.7 taxa are recognized as not Microtropis plants,in which new nomenclature Glyptopetalum integrifolium Q.W.Lin,Z.X.Zhang et Q.R.Liu(Basonym:M.poilanei Tardieu) and new combination Garcinia gagei(Merr.et Freeman) Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang(Basonym:M.gagei Merr.et Freeman) were proposed. M.fallax,M.macrophylla,and M.pallens recorded in Chinese literature are confirmed as misidentification,M.macrocarpa is confirmed as endangered species endemic to China,and M.rhynchocarpa is newly record in Guangdong,China.Finally,there are still 3 names which are lack of any materials and can only be left to be done later.
本文研究馆藏腊叶标本3000余份,并在野外观察了20多个假卫矛植物居群,重点研究假卫矛属植物关键形态性状变异规律及评价其分类学意义。确认假卫矛属植物有价值的分类性状集中在花部特征,其中花序分枝式样与分枝次数、花萼形状及质地、花瓣形状、花盘的发育情况及与花瓣雄蕊的合生情况、花药的形态、子房的形状等特征具有重要的分类价值。但研究中发现假卫矛的花发育非常缓慢,花从开始发育到成熟开放历时常长达6个月以上,而不同发育阶段的花部特征常存在显著差异,有些种类中还存在雌雄异株的分化现象,这使花部特征的应用存在局限。此外,叶片的形状和质地以及果实的形状和大小在分类中也具有重要的参考价值,但同样由于生长环境和发育阶段的不同而表现出较大的变异。研究中还发现,不同的地理分布和生境下的同一个种类从叶片到花序特征各方面均可表现出较大的变异。因此,在该属的分类中,必须综合运用各方面的尽可能多的性状,而不能仅依靠少数几个性状。
本文对该属的16个分类群的叶脉序特征进行了研究。发现该属的叶脉序特征整体上较为一致,均为分枝曲行羽状脉;二级脉的倾斜角度、高级脉的疏密程度在种内有较大的变异,不能作为分类依据;而二级脉的数目,直行或弧形,以及脉岛的发育情况在种间差异较大且较为稳定,可以作为分类的依据。
本文对该属及相关属共5属67个分类群的叶表皮微形态进行了电镜扫描观察。发现假卫矛属及相关属植物的叶表皮角质层很厚,表皮细胞结构大都不能分辨,所有种类的气孔器均出现于下表皮,为不规则形排列。角质层纹饰可分为三种类型,一为光滑无纹饰,二为具条纹状纹饰,三为具乳突状纹饰。后两种类型仅出现在少数的种类中,为较特化的性状。叶表皮形态特征在属间没有明显的差异。
本文对该属及相关属共4属39个分类群的花粉进行了电镜扫描观察。发现假卫矛属植物的花粉外观为卵圆形或长圆形,明显具三孔沟,表面具陷窝状或网眼状纹饰。多数种类的花粉仅在大小上有微小的区别,其它方面差异微小,但马来西亚地区产的一些种类的花粉相互排列紧密,形成类似花粉块的结构,单个花粉粒的外形很不规则,有较大的差异。此外,所观察的几个属植物的花粉仅在大小上有较显著的差异,其它方面差异微小。
通过文献查阅、标本研究、野外考察及实验证据,本文对该属进行了较为全面的分类修订。归并了Lundell(1970)从该属独立出来的包括中美洲种类的属名Quetzalia,确认世界假卫矛属植物47种,在世界各国的大概分布情况是,中国18种,马来西亚15种,印度尼西亚8种,越南8种,印度5种,菲律宾5种,缅甸4种,泰国4种,斯里兰卡2种,墨西哥2种,日本1种,孟加拉国1种,不丹1种,哥斯达黎加1种,危地马拉1种,柬埔寨1种,老挝1种,文莱1种。描述新种3个:大围山假卫矛M.daweishanensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang、长果假卫矛M.longicarpa Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang、西藏假卫矛M.xizangensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang,均产于中国。重新确认尖尾假卫矛M.caudata、簇果假卫矛M.fasciculata、大果假卫矛M.macrocarpa、菲律宾假卫矛M.philippinensis、红色假卫矛M.rubra、爪哇假卫矛M.javanica为独立的种,另将47个分类群名称新处理为异名。确认7个学名为非假卫矛属植物,做出新命名全缘叶沟瓣Glyptopetalum integrifolium Q.W.Lin,Z.X.Zhang et Q.R.Liu(基原异名M.poilanei Tardieu)及新组合Garcinia gagei(Merr.et Freeman)Q.W.Lin etZ.X.Zhang(基原异名M.gagei Merr.et Freeman)。确认中国记录的越南假卫矛M.fallax、大叶假卫矛M.macrophylla及淡色假卫矛M.pallens系鉴定错误,并确认大果假卫矛M.macrocarpa为中国特有的濒危物种,喙果假卫矛M.rhynchocarpa分布于广东,为中国新记录植物。此外,尚有3个名称由于缺乏材料,暂时存疑。
Microtropis Wall.ex Meisner,a medium genus of the family Celastraceae,currently contains about 60-70 species in the world,which are distributing in East and Southeast Asia,and Central American.Although this is no a large genus,but from the day when it is established,the names published under this genus are numerous,but have no yet been well treated for even one time in the worldwide scale.Due to the complex of variation in the morphological characters and the difficulties of observation of the small flowers,the classification of this genus is very difficult and there are many problems in the present species under this genus.Therefore,the work to conduct a comprehensive revision of this genus is very necessary.
By studying on more than 3000 sheets of specimens in herbaria and observing of more than 20 populations in fields,we tried to search and evaluate the variation patterns of morphological characters amang the Microtropis plants.The results show that the good characters for taxonomy concentrates on flowers.Inflorescence types and branching times,calyx shape and texture,petal shape, disk state and its condition with petals and stamens,anther shape,and pistil shape are the most important characters in the genus.But we also found that the development of flowers in this genus is very slow and the phase from the beginning of inflorescence primordium to mature or opening of the flowers is often more than 6 months,there are conspicuous differences of flower characters between the materials collected at different phases,and there are still pseudohermaphroditic and diecious phenomenons in some species,so the practical use of flower characters are somewhat limited.The leaf shape and texture,and the fruit shape and size are also very important characters for taxonomy, but variable due to different habitat and different developmental stages.It is noteworthy that the populations of the same species from different geographical locations often show conspicuous and gradual variation in various characters.Therefore,the taxonomy of such a genus must use as many characters as possible,can no rely on a few characters.
Leaf architecture features of 16 taxa in Microtropis were studied.The results show that thegeneral features of leaf architecture are quite uniform as camptodromous pinnate venation.Intraspecific the divergence angle of secondary veins,and the density of tertiary veins or higher veins are quite variable,thus are inappropriate for species discrimination.Whereas the number and shape(straight or arcuate) of secondary veins,and the state of vein areolas are quite different and stable between different species,so can be used as characters for taxonomy.
Foliar epidermis of 67 taxa in Microtropis and 4 related genera was observed with SEM.The results show that the comeous layer is very thick,the structure of epidermal cells can't be distinguished,the stomas are irregularly arranged on the lower surface of leaves.Sculpture can be devided as 3 types,smooth,striate,and papillate.Striate sculpture and papillate sculpture are specialized characters,and only occur in a few species.Generally,there are not significant differences of foliar epidermis between the genera observed.
Pollen of 39 taxa in Microtropis and 3 related genera was observed with SEM.The results show that most pollen grains observed are elliptoid,globose,or oblong at equatorial view,tricolporate, extine layer foveolate or reticulate.In most species the pollen grains are only slightly different in the size,but a few Malaysian species have specialized pollen grains which are irregular in shape and closely arranged to form structure like pollen mass.Generally,the pollen grains show not significant differences between the genera observed except the size.
Finally,a taxonomic revision of the genus Microtropis worldwide was conducted,based on extensive literature survey,both herbarium and field observations,and experimental evidences.The genus Quetzalia Lundell(1970) with central American species are included in Microtropis,and total 47 species in Microtropis worldwide have been accepted,the gross distribution in the countries as following: China 18,Malaysia 15,Indonesia 8,Vietnam 8,India 5,Philippines 5,Myanmar 4,Thailands 4,Sri Lanka 2,Mexico 2,Japan 1,Bangladesh 1,Bhutan 1,Costa Rica 1,Guatemala 1,Cambodia 1,Laos 1, Brunei 1.3 new species M.daweishanensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang,M.longicarpa Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang,and M.xizangensis Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang from China are described.M.caudata, M.fasciculata,M.macrocarpa,M.philippinensis,M.rubra,and M.javanica are recognized as independent species,other 47 names are reduced to synonyms.7 taxa are recognized as not Microtropis plants,in which new nomenclature Glyptopetalum integrifolium Q.W.Lin,Z.X.Zhang et Q.R.Liu(Basonym:M.poilanei Tardieu) and new combination Garcinia gagei(Merr.et Freeman) Q.W.Lin et Z.X.Zhang(Basonym:M.gagei Merr.et Freeman) were proposed. M.fallax,M.macrophylla,and M.pallens recorded in Chinese literature are confirmed as misidentification,M.macrocarpa is confirmed as endangered species endemic to China,and M.rhynchocarpa is newly record in Guangdong,China.Finally,there are still 3 names which are lack of any materials and can only be left to be done later.
引文
1.安徽木本植物编写组.安徽木本植物[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1983,182.
2.安徽植物志协助组.安徽植物志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1990,3:368.
3.蔡敏,朱华,王红.亚洲粗叶木属及相关属植物叶表皮微形态特征[J].云南植物研究2007,29(5):497-512.
4.曹明,张奠湘.中国花椒属(广义)叶表皮特征初步研究[J].植物分类学报2008,46(4):628-640.
5.常生辉,邓传良,高武军,卢龙斗.27种木犀属植物叶表皮微形态特征的研究[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(2):0278-0288
6.陈封怀.庐山及邻近卫矛科植物的研究[J].植物分类学报,1954,3(2):233-243.
7.陈焕镛.海南植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1965,2:437-439.
8.陈家辉,孙航,杨永平.柳属的叶表皮微形态特征及其分类学意义[J].云南植物研究2008,30(1):38-46.
9.陈健辉,李秉滔.中国番荔枝科囊瓣木族植物叶片脉序比较观察[J].广西植物,1993,13(1):26-31.
10.陈连造.台湾自然观察图鉴(野生观赏植物)[M].台湾:陈连造出版社,1992,21:121.
11.陈谦海.贵州卫矛科植物区系构成与地理分布[J].贵州科学,1992,10(4):32-37.
12.陈嵘.中国树木分类学[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1957,668.
13.陈泽濂,吴七根.双子叶植物叶的脉序特征在植物分类学上的运用[J].植物学通报.1993,10:35-42.
14.邓小燕,周颂东,何兴金.中国黄精属13种植物花粉形态及系统学研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2007,25(1):11-18.
15.福建省科学技术委员会及福建植物志编写组.福建植物志[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1987,3:286-287.
16.方玉霖,刘剑秋,姜业芳.福建薯蓣属植物叶脉序特征及其分类学意义[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)2002,18(2):65-69.
17.傅立国.中国高等植物[M].青岛:青岛出版社,2001,7:819-825.
18.傅书遐.湖北植物志[M].武汉:湖北科技出版社,2002,2:428.
19.郭庆海,王康才,唐晓清,汤兴利,李淑艳.不同栽培居群菘蓝花粉的扫描电镜观察[J].中国中药杂志,2008,33(11):1332-1334.
20.广西植物研究所.广西植物名录[M].1972,2:409-410.
21.贵州植物志编辑委员会.贵州植物志[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1985,2:416-421.
22.郝刚,胡启明.绣球亚科的脉序研究[J].广西植物1996,16(2):155-160.
23.横断山区维管植物编辑委员会.横断山区维管植物[M].北京:科学出版社,1993,1:1109-1110.
24.侯宽昭.中国种子植物科属词典[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,ed.2:310.
25.侯元同,曲畅游,鲁法军,李法曾.中国蓼科萹蓄属植物花粉形态及其分类意义[J].武汉植物学研究,2007,25(2):127-135.
26.黄彩萍,黄安.华南胡椒属植物的脉序结构及其在分类中的意义[J].广东林业科技2004,20(2):16-19.
27.黄芯婷,刘剑秋,方玉霖.福建柃属植物(山茶科)叶表皮特征的比较研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)2006,21(2):80-85.
28.黄志森,林彦云.福建假卫矛属(卫矛科)一新种-德化假卫矛[J].广西植物.2008,28(4):458-459.
29.胡金蓉,周守标,李金花,王影,罗琦,王贵军.安徽产两种山罗花属(Melampyrum)植物及其居群 叶的微形态比较[J].植物研究2007,27(2):159-164.
30.匡延凤,廖景平.中国钩藤属9种植物的花粉形态[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2008,16(4):350-356.
31.姜正旺,王圣梅,张忠慧,黄宏文.猕猴桃属花粉形态及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报,2004,42(3):245-260.
32.李浩敏,Leo J.Hickey.金缕梅科(广义)的叶结构及分类[J].植物分类学报 1988,26(2):96-100.
33.李恒,郭辉军,刀志灵.高黎贡山植物[M].北京:科学出版社,2000,748.
34.李燕立,张新英.卫矛科16种藤本与乔木次生木质部比较解剖学研究[J].植物学报.1990,32(4):252-261.
35.李烨,李秉滔,李镇魁.蜡梅科植物叶片脉序的比较观察[J].华南农业大学学报1999,20(4):103-106.
36.梁红平,任宪威,刘一樵.中国常绿栎类表皮毛被的研究[J].植物分类学报 1990,28(2):112-121.
37.林中清,蒙仁宪,周忠泽,许仁鑫,林红.扫描电镜下几种蓼属(Polygonum)植物叶表皮的微形态学特征[J].安徽大学学报(自然科学版)1997,21(1):104-105.
38.刘剑秋,李和阳.福建防己科植物叶脉序比较研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)2000,16(2):80-84.
39.刘建全,何亚平,孔宏智.大吴风草属、假橐吾属花粉表面纹饰及其分类学意义[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(1):33-36.
40.刘利霞,侯元同,李法曾.中国拳参属(蓼科)植物叶脉序式样的研究[J].西北植物学报2006,26(8):1554-1561.
41.刘棠瑞.台湾木本植物图志[M].台北:国立台湾大学农学院出版,1991,2:801-802.
42.刘业经,吕福原,欧辰雄.台湾树木志(增补修订版)[M].台中:国立中兴大学农学院出版,1994,512-513.
43.刘颖,孙稚颖,李法曾.十字花科芸薹族植物叶脉序的研究[J].西北植物学报2006,26(3):0544-0550.
44.陆露,王红.大风子科13个种的花粉形态[J].云南植物研究,2004,26(1):73-82.
45.祁承经.湖南植物名录[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1987,mis.
46.祁承经,林亲众.湖南树木志[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2000,437-438.
47.任勃,朱相云,温洁.关于紫荆属(豆科)叶型和脉序的研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)2004,32:119-122.
48.任毅,胡正海.独叶草叶二叉分枝脉序中网结脉和盲脉的形态学研究[J].植物分类学报1996,34(6):569-576.
49.任毅,胡正海,李智军.星叶草叶脉序的形态学及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报1997,35(3):219-224.
50.山宝琴,贺学礼,陈彦生.黄土高原蒿属植物花粉形态研究[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(7):1373-1379.
51.邵剑文,张小平.国产狗娃花属植物的花粉形态研究[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(6):759-764.
52.邵邻相,张凤娟.6种松科植物叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].植物研究2005,25(3):281-285.
53.邵邻相,张均平,刘艳.8种柏科植物叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版)2008,31(2):195-200.
54.石硕,贺学礼,祝东立.不同海拔高度上两种蒿属植物叶表皮结构比较研究[J].河北农业大学学 报 2008,31(1):42-47.
55.舒璞,佘孟兰.中国伞形科植物花粉图志[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001,1-331.
56.树木学(南方本)编写委员会.树木学(南方本)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1994,515.
57.税玉民,李启任,黄素华.云南秋海棠属叶表皮及毛被的扫描电镜观察[J].云南植物研究 1999,21(3):309-316.
58.税玉民,陈文红.滇东南红河地区种子植物[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2003,248-249.
59.税玉民,陈文红.中国喀斯特地区种子植物第一册[M].北京:科学出版社,2006,1:107.
60.四川植物志编辑委员会.四川植物志[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1988,4:320-322.
61.孙坤,陈家宽,张志耘.水鳖科9属15种植物花粉形态的研究[J].植物分类学报,2002,40(6):490-500.
62.孙同兴,陈新芳,杨秉耀,吴鸿,李乘滔.中国番荔枝科8属植物叶的扫描电镜观察[J].电子显微学报 2002,21(2):146-152.
63.唐桂英,孙稚颖,李法曾.中国独行菜属9种植物花粉形态扫描电镜观察[J].武汉植物学研究,2005,23(5):432-436.
64.唐桂英,孙稚颖,张学杰,李法曾.中国大蒜芥族植物花粉形态的研究[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(8):1540-1547.
65.唐自慧,逢云莉,何兴金,刘海艳.鹿药属植物叶表皮特征及其系统学意义[J].武汉植物学研究2007,25(6):550-557.
66.王伏雄,钱南芬,张玉龙,杨惠秋.中国植物花粉形态(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1997,1-461.
67.王开发,王宪曾.孢粉学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1983,1-205.
68.王奎武,潘远江.三种卫矛科药用植物的化学成分研究[M].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006.
69.王奎武,胡新玲,沈莲清,潘远江.三花假卫矛三萜类化学成分的研究[J].中国中药杂志.2007,32(15):1539-1541.
70.王雷宏,汤庚国,夏海武,蔡华.山荆子叶脉序的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)2008,32(2):39-42.
71.王利松.伞形科囊瓣芹属的系统学研究[M].中国科学院植物研究所博士学位论文2007,1-210.
72.王心燕,何惠玲,肖德兴.荔枝、龙眼叶片表皮结构的研究[J].园艺学报2006,33(4):825-828.
73.王宇飞,陶君容.植物角质层分析术语新体系[J].植物学通报1991,8(4):8-13.
74.王玉国,李光照,漆小雪,欧祖兰.杜鹃花属植物花粉形态及其分类学意义[J].广西植物,2006,26(2):113-119.
75.魏乐.牡丹种间花粉粒形态差异性比较[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,25(6):52-54.
76.韦仲新,丘华兴,周丽华.大戟科叶下珠属花粉形态的研究[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(2):253-259.
77.韦仲新,金巧军,王红,田欣,陈书坤.旌节花科及其相关类群花粉形态的研究(英文)[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(4):483-496.
78.韦仲新.种子植物花粉电镜图志[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2003.
79.文香英,林祁.国产五味子科五种植物叶片脉序研究[J].生命科学研究1999,3(1):69-74.
80.吴征镒,路安民,汤彦承,陈之端,李德铢编著.中国被子植物科属综论[M].北京:科学出版社,2003,772-777.
81.吴征镒.西藏植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1986,3:135.
82.梧桐山植物编委会.梧桐山植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003,75.
83.武季玲,牛俊义,严子柱,李胜,高玉红,姜寒玉.麻黄属6种植物茎叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].中国中药杂志2007,32(18):1854-1857.
84.西南林学院及云南省林业厅.云南树木图志[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1991,2:506-511.
85.向巧萍,傅立国.冷杉属植物叶角质层内表面的观察及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报1998,36(5):441-448.
86.邢福武.深圳野生植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000,153.
87.邢福武.中国的珍稀植物[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2005,173.
88.杨德奎,宋立波,宋艳梅.悬铃木科花粉形态的研究[J].山东科学,2007,20(5):21-23.
89.杨德奎,马成涛,宋艳梅.葫芦科8属11种植物花粉形态的扫描电镜观察[J].广西植物,2008,28(2):148-153.
90.杨恭毅,陈连造.杨氏园艺植物大名典图谱[M].台北:中国花卉杂志社,1984,538.
91.杨恭毅.杨氏园艺植物大名典[M].台北:中国花卉杂志社,1984,7:4945-4946.
92.杨庆锋,蔡雪珍,陈涛.长果安息香属和秤锤树属植物叶片脉序研究[J].广西植物1997,17(2):145-148.
93.游新,杨莉.栎属和青冈属角质层表面结构的扫描电镜观察[J].北京林业大举学报1994,16(3):61-65.
94.喻诚鸿,陈泽濂.华南双子叶木本植物叶的宏观结构资料,Ⅰ.术语与方法[J].中国科学院华南植物研究室集刊,1986,2:83-97.
95.曾宪锋,邱贺媛,唐光大,李清湖,刘乐,庄雪影.广东省3种新记录植物[J].华南农业大学学报2008,29(2):36-37.
96.张莫湘.紫荆族的脉序研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报1994,2(4):45-57.
97.张利,杨在君,黄霞,李进,万德光.丹参及四川鼠尾草属植物叶表皮微形态研究[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版)2008,45(3):674-680.
98.张美珍,赖明洲.华东五省一市植物名录[M].上海:上海科学普及出版社,1993,242.
99.张文澄,吕海亮,张遂申.四棱草属比较形态及其分类系统位置的研究Ⅱ.四棱草属及其近缘属叶片宏观结构[J].西北植物学报1995,15(2):110-115.
100.张小平,周忠泽.中国蓼科花粉的系统演化[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,1998,1-235.
101.浙江植物志编辑委员会.浙江植物志[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1993,4:44.
102.郑万钧.中国树木志[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998,3:3686-3699.
103.郑艳,巩劫.安徽景天属(Sedum)植物叶表皮研究[J].植物研究 1999,19(3):292-297.
104.中国科学院华南植物研究所鼎湖山树木园.鼎湖山植物手册[M].1976,275.
105.中国科学院昆明植物研究所.云南种子植物名录(上)[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1984,759-760.
106.中国科学院昆明植物研究所.云南植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,2006,16:254-267.
107.中国科学院植物研究所.中国高等植物图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1972,2:663-664.
108.中国科学院植物研究所.中国高等植物图鉴补编[M].北京:科学出版社,1983,2:243-252.
109.中国科学院植物研究所.中国高等植物科属检索表[M].北京:科学出版社,1983,260-262.
110.中国科学院植物研究所古植物室孢粉组及华南植物研究生形态研究室.中国热带亚热带被子植物花粉形态[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,91.
111.中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1999,45(3):150-174.
112.周桂玲,魏岩,安争夕.独行菜属植物叶片脉序的比较观察[J].云南植物研究1997,19(3):280-284.
113.周桂玲,魏岩,张丽萍.独行菜族叶片脉序及其分类学意义[J].新疆农业大学学报1997,20(3):5-11.
114.周兰英,王永清,张丽.26种杜鹃属植物花粉形态及分类学研究[J].林业科学,2008,44(2):55-63.
115.周丽华,韦仲新,吴征镒.国产蔷薇科苹果亚科的花粉形态[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(1):47-52.
116.周守标,王影,李金花,王春景,余本祺.安徽贝母属植物的叶表皮形态研究[J].中国中药杂志2007,32(2):105-109.
117.周守标,孟娜,蒋继宏.安徽产大戟属植物叶表皮微形态[J].云南植物研究2005,27(5):517-524.
118.朱光华.国际植物命名法规(中文版)[M].北京:科学出版社,美国:密苏里植物园出版社,2001.
119.朱立涛,鲁法军,侯元同,李法曾.中国蓼属头状蓼组植物叶表皮微形态及其分类学意义[J].武汉植物学研究2007,25(2):136-142.
120.Bentham G.,Hooker J D.Genera Plantarum ad Exemplaria Imprimis in Herbariis Kewensibus Servata Definita[M].Londini:Kew,Soho,Covent Garden,Mdccclxii.1862,1:361.
121.Biswas K.Systematic position of a little known flowering plant from south Burma[J].The Journal of the Indian Botanical Society.1940,19:141-146.
122.Boed.Mittel-Sumatra Expedition[J].Systematisches Verzeichnis.1911,2:33.
123.Bucker C A.Flora of Java[M].Leiden:Published under the auspices of the Kuksherbarium.1965,2:54.
124.Chen J J,Chou T H.Antitubercular Dihydroagarofuranoid Sesquiterpenes from the Roots of Microtropis fokienensis[J].Journal of Natural Products.2007,70:202-205.
125.Cheng C Y,Kao T C.New Taxa of the Chinese Celastraceae(1)[J].Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica.1988,26(4):310-314.
126.Chen J J,Chou T H.New Cytotoxie Dihydroagarofuranoid Sesquiterpenes from the Root of Microtropis fokienensis[J].Journal of Natural Products.2006,69:685-688.
127.Craib W G.Microtropis crassifolia[J].Kew Bulletin.1926,1926:349.
128.Craib W G.Florae Siamensis Enumeratio[M].Bangkok:Published under the auspices of the Siam Society.1926,1:281-282.
129.Deng Y F.Microtropis chaffanjonii(H.Lev.)Y.F.Deng,Comb.Nova(Celastraceae)[J].Annales of Botanici Fennici.2007,44:397-398.
130.Dilcher D L.Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains[J].The Botanical Review,1974,40:1-157.
131.Dunn S T.Expedition to Central Fokien[J].The Journal of the Linnean Society.Botany.1908,38:357.
132.Dunn S T.New Chinese Plants[J].Journal of Botany.1909,47:375.
133.Editorial Commiittee of the Flora of Taiwan.Flora of Taiwan(Second Edition)[M].Taipei:published by Editorial Commiittee of the Flora of Taiwan,1993,3:656-657.
134.Franchet A.,Savatier L.Enumeratio Plantarum in Japonia Sponte crescentium hucusque rite cognitarum adjectis descriptions[M].Paris:Apun F.Savy,Bibliopolam,77,Via Dicta boulevard Saint-Germain.1879,2:315.
135.Gamble.Plantarum Novarum in Herbario Hortii Regii Conservatarum[J].Kew Bulletin 1916,1916:132.
136.Hallier f.Short notes[J].Mededeelingen van's Rijks Herbarium,Leiden.1911,1910:33.
137.Handel-Mazzetti.Plantae Novae Chingianae[J].Sinensia.1932,2:128-129.
138.Handel-Mazzetti.Plantae Novae Chingianae[J].Sinensia.1933,3:189.
139.Hayata B.Icones Plantarum Formosanarum[M].Taiwan:Phblished by the Bureau of Productive Industry,Government of Formosa,Taihoku.1913,3:60-61.
140.Hayata B.Icones Plantarum Formosanarum[M].Taiwan:Phblished by the Bureau of Productive Industry,Government of Formosa,Taihoku.1919,9:17-18.
141.Hedtke S M.Townsend T,hillis D M.Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling[J].Systematic Bilology 2006,55:522-529.
142.Hickey L J.Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves American Journal of Botany,1973,60:17-33.
143.Hickey L J.A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves in Metcalfe,Anatomy of the dicotyledons[M].London:Oxford Press,1979,25-39.
144.Hickey L J.Wolfe J A.The bases of angiosperm phylogeny:Vegetative morphology[J].Missouri Botanical Garden Annual Report,1975,63:538-589.
145.Hills D M.Taxonomic sampling,phylogenetic accuracy,and investigator bias[J].Systematic Biology 1998,47:3-8.
146.Hills D M,Pollock D D,McGuire J A,Zwickl D J.Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? [J].Systematic Biology 2003,52:124-126.
147.Hooker J D.The Flora of British India[M].London:L.Reeve et Co.,5,Henrietta Street,Covent Garden.1875,l:613-614.
148.Hooker J D.The Flora of British India[M].London:L.Reeve et Co.,5,Henrietta Street,Covent Garden.1877,2:440.
149.Hou D.Celastraceae.In:Van Steenis,Flora Malesiana Series I[M].Leiden:National Herbarium of the Netherlands,1962,6(2):272-280.
150.Hou D.Note[J].Taxon.1962,11:226.
151.Hou D.Notes on some Asiatic species Microtropis (Celastraceae)[J].Blumea.1966,13(2):405-408.
152.Hou D.Sarawakodendron,ANew Genus of Celastraceae[J].Blumea.1967,15(1):139-143.
153.Hou D.Pollen of Sarawakodendron (Celastraceae)and some related genera,with notes on techniques[J].Blumea.1969,17(1):97-120.
154.Hu H.H.Notulae Systematicae Ad Florem Sinensium Ⅶ[J].Bulletin of the Fan Memorial Institute of Biology,Botanical Series.1936,7:214-215.
155.Iwatsuki K.,Boufford D E.,Ohba H.Flora of Japan[M].Tokyo:Kodansha LTD.,12-21 Otowa 2-chome,Bunkyo-ku.1999,2:99-100.
156.Jones J H.Evolution of the Fagaceae:the implications of foliar features[J].Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1986,73:228-275.
157.Johonson H B.Plant pubescence,An ecological perspective[J].Botanical Review 1975,41:233-258.
158.Kanehira R.Formosan trees[M].Taiwan:Department of Forestry,Government Research Institue et Tokyo:Yokendo,Limited,70 Morikawacho,Hongo-ku.1936,Revised.394-396.
159.King G Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula[J].The Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal.1874,65(2):340-343.
160.Kluching E P.Leaf venation patterns,Vol.1.Annonaceae[M].Berlin:Gebriider Borntraeger.1986.
161.Kluching E P.Leaf venation patterns,Vol.2.Lauraceae[M].Berlin:Gebriider Borntraeger.1987.
162.Kochummen K M.Taxonomic notes on the Celastraceae of Sabah and Sarawak.Sandakania.1994,5:51-66.
163.Koidz.Plantae Asiae Orientalis.Botanical Magazine.1926,40:334-335.
164.Koidz.Microtropis sakaguchiana[J].Plantae Novae Amami-Ohsimae.1928:16.
165.Kuntze O.Revisio Generum PlantarumVascularium Omnium Atque Cellularium Multarum Secundum Leges Nomenclaturae[M].Paris:Charles Klincksieck,11 Rue de Lille.1891,1:14.
166.Kurz S.Contributions Towards a Knowledge of the Burmese Flora[J].The Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal.1874,43(2):160-161.
167.Kurz S.Forest Flora of Brish Burma[M].Calcutta:Published by Oxbex of the Obobexnment of India,Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.1877,1:250-251.
168.Leveille H.Flore du Kouy-Tcheou[M].Franch:Le Mans.1914,287.
169.Li H L.Flora of Taiwan[M].Taiwan:Taibei,Epoch Publishing Company.1977,3:631-633.
170.Lobreau-Callen D.Les pollens des Celastrales (illustrations,commentaires)[J].Mem.Trav.Inst.Montpellier Ecole Prat.Hautes Etudes 1977,3:1-116.
171.Loesener.Undescribed plants from central America [J].Botanical Gazette.1897,24:393.
172.Loesener.In:Engler A.et Prantl K.Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien[M].Leipzig:Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.1897,3(5):202-203.
173.Loesener.In:Engler A.et Prantl K.Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien[M].Berlin:Duncker et Humblot.1942,ed.2.20b:126-130.
174.Loesener.Beitrage Zur Kenntnis der Flora von Central-Amerika (einsehl.Mexico)Ⅱ[J].Botanische Jahrbueher for Systematik,Pflanzengeschichte and Pflanzengeographie.1901,29:97-98.
175.Lu F Y.Contributions to the Dicotyledonous Plants of Taiwan (4)[J].Quarter Journal Chinese Forestry.1978,11(3):95-114.
176.Lundell C L.Studies in the American Celastraceae I.New species of Microtropis,Wimmeria and Zinowiewia[J].Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club.1938,65:463.
177.Lundell C L.Revision of the American Celastraceae I.Wimmeria,Microtropis and Zinowiewia[J].Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium.1939,3:28-35.
178.Lundell C L.Plants of Mexico[J].Wrightia.1946,1:156-160.
179.Lundell C L.Studies of American Plants-Ⅱ[J].Wrightia 1970,4:137-138.
180.Lundell C L.Studies of American Plants-VⅢ[J].Wrightia.1975,5(4):80-81.
181.Makino.Observation on the Flora of Japan[J].Botanical Magazine.1909,23:60-65.
182.Matsumura J.Notes on Liukiu and Formosan Plants[J].Botanical Magazine.1898,12:62.
183.Merr.E D.New or Noteworthy Philippine Plants,VI[J].The Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1908,3:238.
184.Merr.E D.Philippine Plants,Ⅻ[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1915,10:319-320.
185.Merr.E D.Noteworthy Philippine Plants[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1918,13:306-307.
186.Merr.E D.Microtropis rostrata[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1921,17:275.
187.Merr.E D.Microtropis sumatrana[J],Papers from Michigan Academician Science.1934,19:164.
188.Merr.E D.,Metcalf.New Kwangtung Plants[J].Lingnan Science Journal.1937,16:87-88.
189.Merr.E D.,Freemam F.L.The old world species of the Celastraceous genus Microtropis Wall.[J].Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.1940,73(10):271-310.
190.Merr.E D.Records of Indo-Chinese Plants,Ⅲ[J].Journal of the Arnold Arboretum.1942,23:174.
191.Meyer,Walker.Flora of Japan[M].Tokyo:Kodansha LTD.,1965,674.
192.Nair K K N.Southern Peninsular Indian Endemic Trees in the Proposed Pooyamkutty Hydroelectric Project Area[J].Journal Economic and Taxonomic Botany.1993,17(2):265-273.
193.Nakai.Notulce ad plantas Japonice et Koreoe.XXVⅡ[J].Botanical Magazine.1922,36:67-68.
194.Nakai.Microtropis[J].The Journal of Japanese Botany.1941,17(6):374-377.
195.Parker R N.Additamenta ad Floram Burmanicam.Ⅰ[J].Feddes Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis.1931,29:104-105.
196.Payne W W.A glossary of plant hair terminology[J].Britthonia 1978,30:230-255.
197.Pierre L.Flore Forestiere de la Cochinchine[M].Paris:Octave Doin.Editeur,S.Place De Lodeon.1894,20.pl.305(b).
198.Pitard.C J.Celastraceae In:Lecomte M.H.Flore Generale L'Indo-Chine[M].Paris:Masson et Cie,Editeurs 120,Boulevard Saint-Germain.1912,1:863-894.
199.Poe K E.Terminology of hairs in the genus Solanum[J].Taxon 1971,20:501-508.
200.Quisumb.Merr.E D.Microtropis fasciculata[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1928,37:162.
201.Rao AN.Foliar Sclereids in Microtropis valida[J].Current Science.1976,45(1):380-381.
202.Radford A E,et al.Vascular plant systematics New York:Harper and Row Publishers.1974.
203.Rehder.Ligneous Plants Described By Leveille[J].Journal of the Arnold Arboretum.1937,18:216.
204.Ridley.The Flora of Mount Ophir[J].The Journal Asiatic Society Straits.1901,35:10.
205.Ridley.New and Rare Malayan Plants[J].The Journal Asiatic Society Straits.1901,75:19.
206.Ridley.Microtropis peduncularis[i].Kew Bulletin.1924,1924:262.
207.Ridley.Microtropis rigida[J].Kew Bulletin.1931,1931:36-37.
208.Shui Y M.,Chen W H.Microtropis (Celastraceae)from the Daweishan Range,SE Yunnan,China[J].Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica.2002,43:305-312.
209.Shui Y M.,Chen W H.A New Species of the Genus Microtropis (Celastraceae)from SE Yunnan,China[J].Acta Botanica Yunnanica.2002,24(6):707-708.
210.Simmons M P,Hedin J P.Relationships and morphological character change amang genera of Celastraceae sensu lato (including Hippocrateaceae)[J].Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1999,86:723-757.
211.Simmons M P.Celastraceae In:Kubitzki K.,The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants[M].Berlin:Springer,2004,29-64.
212.SpragueTA.The American Species of Microtropis[J].Kew Bulletin.1909,1909:363.
213.Stace C A.The significance of the leaf epidermis in the taxomony of the Combretaceae.Ⅱ.The genus Combretum Subgenus Combretum in Africa[J].Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 1969,62:131-168.
214.Stace C A.The significance of the leaf epidermis in the classification of the Combretaceae.Ⅲ.the genus Combretum in America[J].Brittonia.1969,21:130-143.
215.Standley P C,Steyermark J.A.Studies of Central American Plants-Ⅲ[J].Field Museum of Natural History Botany.l 944,23:170-171.
216.Stuessy T F.Plant taxomony.The systematic evolution of comparative data[M].New York:Columbia University Press.1990,222-223.
217.Symington C F.Microtropis tenuis[J].Journal Malayan Branch,Royal Asiatic Society.1936,14:350.
218.Tardie-Blot.Celastraceae In:Humbert.Supplement A La Flore Generale de L Indo-Chine Tome Premier I[M].Paris:Masson et Cie,Editeurs 120,Boulevard Saint-Germain.1949,1:783-797.
219.Thwaites G H K.Enumeratio Plantarum Zeylaniae and Enumeration of Ceylon Plants[M].London:Dulau et Co.,37,Soho Square.1864.71-72.
220.Wall.N.In.William Roxburgh et al.Flora Indica or Descriptions of Indian Plants[M].Superintendent of the Botanic garden,Calcutta.Serampore:printed at the mission press.1824,2:376-416.
221.Wall.N.In:William Roxburgh et al.Flora Indica or Descriptions of Indian Plants[M].Serampore:Printed for W.thacher and Co.Calcutta,and Parbury,Allen and Co.London.1832,Vol.l.ed.2:628-629.
222.Wang C H.The Studies of Chinese Celastraceae Ⅱ[J].Contributions from the Biological Laboratory of the Science Society of China,Botanical Series.1939,1(1):1-84.
223.Wight R.Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis or figures of Indian Plants[M].Madras:Printed by the author,and sold by Messrs.Franck and Co.,Madras;And Messrs.Ostell,Lbface and Co.Calcutta.Athenrum Press.1843,3(1):761.
224.Wight R.Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis or figures of Indian Plants[M].Madras:Printed by the author,and sold by Messrs.Franck and Co.,Madras;And Messrs.Ostell,Lbface and Co.Calcutta.Athenrum Press.1845,3(3):975-1052.
225.Yu C H,Chen Z L.Leaf architecture of the woody dicotyledons from tropical and subtropical China[M].International Academic Publisher,1991,194-201.
226.Zhang Z X,Funston A M.Microtropis.In:Wu Z Y,Raven P H,Hong D Y.Flora of China[M].Beijing:Science Press;St.Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden Press.2008,11:479-484.
227.Zhou Z K,Hazel W,Wu Z Y.Taxonomical and evolutonary implications of the leaf anatomy and architecture of Quercus L.subgenus Quercus from China[J].Cathaya 1995,7:l-34.
2.安徽植物志协助组.安徽植物志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1990,3:368.
3.蔡敏,朱华,王红.亚洲粗叶木属及相关属植物叶表皮微形态特征[J].云南植物研究2007,29(5):497-512.
4.曹明,张奠湘.中国花椒属(广义)叶表皮特征初步研究[J].植物分类学报2008,46(4):628-640.
5.常生辉,邓传良,高武军,卢龙斗.27种木犀属植物叶表皮微形态特征的研究[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(2):0278-0288
6.陈封怀.庐山及邻近卫矛科植物的研究[J].植物分类学报,1954,3(2):233-243.
7.陈焕镛.海南植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1965,2:437-439.
8.陈家辉,孙航,杨永平.柳属的叶表皮微形态特征及其分类学意义[J].云南植物研究2008,30(1):38-46.
9.陈健辉,李秉滔.中国番荔枝科囊瓣木族植物叶片脉序比较观察[J].广西植物,1993,13(1):26-31.
10.陈连造.台湾自然观察图鉴(野生观赏植物)[M].台湾:陈连造出版社,1992,21:121.
11.陈谦海.贵州卫矛科植物区系构成与地理分布[J].贵州科学,1992,10(4):32-37.
12.陈嵘.中国树木分类学[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1957,668.
13.陈泽濂,吴七根.双子叶植物叶的脉序特征在植物分类学上的运用[J].植物学通报.1993,10:35-42.
14.邓小燕,周颂东,何兴金.中国黄精属13种植物花粉形态及系统学研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2007,25(1):11-18.
15.福建省科学技术委员会及福建植物志编写组.福建植物志[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1987,3:286-287.
16.方玉霖,刘剑秋,姜业芳.福建薯蓣属植物叶脉序特征及其分类学意义[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)2002,18(2):65-69.
17.傅立国.中国高等植物[M].青岛:青岛出版社,2001,7:819-825.
18.傅书遐.湖北植物志[M].武汉:湖北科技出版社,2002,2:428.
19.郭庆海,王康才,唐晓清,汤兴利,李淑艳.不同栽培居群菘蓝花粉的扫描电镜观察[J].中国中药杂志,2008,33(11):1332-1334.
20.广西植物研究所.广西植物名录[M].1972,2:409-410.
21.贵州植物志编辑委员会.贵州植物志[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1985,2:416-421.
22.郝刚,胡启明.绣球亚科的脉序研究[J].广西植物1996,16(2):155-160.
23.横断山区维管植物编辑委员会.横断山区维管植物[M].北京:科学出版社,1993,1:1109-1110.
24.侯宽昭.中国种子植物科属词典[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,ed.2:310.
25.侯元同,曲畅游,鲁法军,李法曾.中国蓼科萹蓄属植物花粉形态及其分类意义[J].武汉植物学研究,2007,25(2):127-135.
26.黄彩萍,黄安.华南胡椒属植物的脉序结构及其在分类中的意义[J].广东林业科技2004,20(2):16-19.
27.黄芯婷,刘剑秋,方玉霖.福建柃属植物(山茶科)叶表皮特征的比较研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)2006,21(2):80-85.
28.黄志森,林彦云.福建假卫矛属(卫矛科)一新种-德化假卫矛[J].广西植物.2008,28(4):458-459.
29.胡金蓉,周守标,李金花,王影,罗琦,王贵军.安徽产两种山罗花属(Melampyrum)植物及其居群 叶的微形态比较[J].植物研究2007,27(2):159-164.
30.匡延凤,廖景平.中国钩藤属9种植物的花粉形态[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2008,16(4):350-356.
31.姜正旺,王圣梅,张忠慧,黄宏文.猕猴桃属花粉形态及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报,2004,42(3):245-260.
32.李浩敏,Leo J.Hickey.金缕梅科(广义)的叶结构及分类[J].植物分类学报 1988,26(2):96-100.
33.李恒,郭辉军,刀志灵.高黎贡山植物[M].北京:科学出版社,2000,748.
34.李燕立,张新英.卫矛科16种藤本与乔木次生木质部比较解剖学研究[J].植物学报.1990,32(4):252-261.
35.李烨,李秉滔,李镇魁.蜡梅科植物叶片脉序的比较观察[J].华南农业大学学报1999,20(4):103-106.
36.梁红平,任宪威,刘一樵.中国常绿栎类表皮毛被的研究[J].植物分类学报 1990,28(2):112-121.
37.林中清,蒙仁宪,周忠泽,许仁鑫,林红.扫描电镜下几种蓼属(Polygonum)植物叶表皮的微形态学特征[J].安徽大学学报(自然科学版)1997,21(1):104-105.
38.刘剑秋,李和阳.福建防己科植物叶脉序比较研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版)2000,16(2):80-84.
39.刘建全,何亚平,孔宏智.大吴风草属、假橐吾属花粉表面纹饰及其分类学意义[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(1):33-36.
40.刘利霞,侯元同,李法曾.中国拳参属(蓼科)植物叶脉序式样的研究[J].西北植物学报2006,26(8):1554-1561.
41.刘棠瑞.台湾木本植物图志[M].台北:国立台湾大学农学院出版,1991,2:801-802.
42.刘业经,吕福原,欧辰雄.台湾树木志(增补修订版)[M].台中:国立中兴大学农学院出版,1994,512-513.
43.刘颖,孙稚颖,李法曾.十字花科芸薹族植物叶脉序的研究[J].西北植物学报2006,26(3):0544-0550.
44.陆露,王红.大风子科13个种的花粉形态[J].云南植物研究,2004,26(1):73-82.
45.祁承经.湖南植物名录[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1987,mis.
46.祁承经,林亲众.湖南树木志[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2000,437-438.
47.任勃,朱相云,温洁.关于紫荆属(豆科)叶型和脉序的研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)2004,32:119-122.
48.任毅,胡正海.独叶草叶二叉分枝脉序中网结脉和盲脉的形态学研究[J].植物分类学报1996,34(6):569-576.
49.任毅,胡正海,李智军.星叶草叶脉序的形态学及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报1997,35(3):219-224.
50.山宝琴,贺学礼,陈彦生.黄土高原蒿属植物花粉形态研究[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(7):1373-1379.
51.邵剑文,张小平.国产狗娃花属植物的花粉形态研究[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(6):759-764.
52.邵邻相,张凤娟.6种松科植物叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].植物研究2005,25(3):281-285.
53.邵邻相,张均平,刘艳.8种柏科植物叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版)2008,31(2):195-200.
54.石硕,贺学礼,祝东立.不同海拔高度上两种蒿属植物叶表皮结构比较研究[J].河北农业大学学 报 2008,31(1):42-47.
55.舒璞,佘孟兰.中国伞形科植物花粉图志[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001,1-331.
56.树木学(南方本)编写委员会.树木学(南方本)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1994,515.
57.税玉民,李启任,黄素华.云南秋海棠属叶表皮及毛被的扫描电镜观察[J].云南植物研究 1999,21(3):309-316.
58.税玉民,陈文红.滇东南红河地区种子植物[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2003,248-249.
59.税玉民,陈文红.中国喀斯特地区种子植物第一册[M].北京:科学出版社,2006,1:107.
60.四川植物志编辑委员会.四川植物志[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1988,4:320-322.
61.孙坤,陈家宽,张志耘.水鳖科9属15种植物花粉形态的研究[J].植物分类学报,2002,40(6):490-500.
62.孙同兴,陈新芳,杨秉耀,吴鸿,李乘滔.中国番荔枝科8属植物叶的扫描电镜观察[J].电子显微学报 2002,21(2):146-152.
63.唐桂英,孙稚颖,李法曾.中国独行菜属9种植物花粉形态扫描电镜观察[J].武汉植物学研究,2005,23(5):432-436.
64.唐桂英,孙稚颖,张学杰,李法曾.中国大蒜芥族植物花粉形态的研究[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(8):1540-1547.
65.唐自慧,逢云莉,何兴金,刘海艳.鹿药属植物叶表皮特征及其系统学意义[J].武汉植物学研究2007,25(6):550-557.
66.王伏雄,钱南芬,张玉龙,杨惠秋.中国植物花粉形态(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1997,1-461.
67.王开发,王宪曾.孢粉学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1983,1-205.
68.王奎武,潘远江.三种卫矛科药用植物的化学成分研究[M].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006.
69.王奎武,胡新玲,沈莲清,潘远江.三花假卫矛三萜类化学成分的研究[J].中国中药杂志.2007,32(15):1539-1541.
70.王雷宏,汤庚国,夏海武,蔡华.山荆子叶脉序的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)2008,32(2):39-42.
71.王利松.伞形科囊瓣芹属的系统学研究[M].中国科学院植物研究所博士学位论文2007,1-210.
72.王心燕,何惠玲,肖德兴.荔枝、龙眼叶片表皮结构的研究[J].园艺学报2006,33(4):825-828.
73.王宇飞,陶君容.植物角质层分析术语新体系[J].植物学通报1991,8(4):8-13.
74.王玉国,李光照,漆小雪,欧祖兰.杜鹃花属植物花粉形态及其分类学意义[J].广西植物,2006,26(2):113-119.
75.魏乐.牡丹种间花粉粒形态差异性比较[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,25(6):52-54.
76.韦仲新,丘华兴,周丽华.大戟科叶下珠属花粉形态的研究[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(2):253-259.
77.韦仲新,金巧军,王红,田欣,陈书坤.旌节花科及其相关类群花粉形态的研究(英文)[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(4):483-496.
78.韦仲新.种子植物花粉电镜图志[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2003.
79.文香英,林祁.国产五味子科五种植物叶片脉序研究[J].生命科学研究1999,3(1):69-74.
80.吴征镒,路安民,汤彦承,陈之端,李德铢编著.中国被子植物科属综论[M].北京:科学出版社,2003,772-777.
81.吴征镒.西藏植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1986,3:135.
82.梧桐山植物编委会.梧桐山植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003,75.
83.武季玲,牛俊义,严子柱,李胜,高玉红,姜寒玉.麻黄属6种植物茎叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J].中国中药杂志2007,32(18):1854-1857.
84.西南林学院及云南省林业厅.云南树木图志[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1991,2:506-511.
85.向巧萍,傅立国.冷杉属植物叶角质层内表面的观察及其系统学意义[J].植物分类学报1998,36(5):441-448.
86.邢福武.深圳野生植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000,153.
87.邢福武.中国的珍稀植物[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2005,173.
88.杨德奎,宋立波,宋艳梅.悬铃木科花粉形态的研究[J].山东科学,2007,20(5):21-23.
89.杨德奎,马成涛,宋艳梅.葫芦科8属11种植物花粉形态的扫描电镜观察[J].广西植物,2008,28(2):148-153.
90.杨恭毅,陈连造.杨氏园艺植物大名典图谱[M].台北:中国花卉杂志社,1984,538.
91.杨恭毅.杨氏园艺植物大名典[M].台北:中国花卉杂志社,1984,7:4945-4946.
92.杨庆锋,蔡雪珍,陈涛.长果安息香属和秤锤树属植物叶片脉序研究[J].广西植物1997,17(2):145-148.
93.游新,杨莉.栎属和青冈属角质层表面结构的扫描电镜观察[J].北京林业大举学报1994,16(3):61-65.
94.喻诚鸿,陈泽濂.华南双子叶木本植物叶的宏观结构资料,Ⅰ.术语与方法[J].中国科学院华南植物研究室集刊,1986,2:83-97.
95.曾宪锋,邱贺媛,唐光大,李清湖,刘乐,庄雪影.广东省3种新记录植物[J].华南农业大学学报2008,29(2):36-37.
96.张莫湘.紫荆族的脉序研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报1994,2(4):45-57.
97.张利,杨在君,黄霞,李进,万德光.丹参及四川鼠尾草属植物叶表皮微形态研究[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版)2008,45(3):674-680.
98.张美珍,赖明洲.华东五省一市植物名录[M].上海:上海科学普及出版社,1993,242.
99.张文澄,吕海亮,张遂申.四棱草属比较形态及其分类系统位置的研究Ⅱ.四棱草属及其近缘属叶片宏观结构[J].西北植物学报1995,15(2):110-115.
100.张小平,周忠泽.中国蓼科花粉的系统演化[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,1998,1-235.
101.浙江植物志编辑委员会.浙江植物志[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1993,4:44.
102.郑万钧.中国树木志[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998,3:3686-3699.
103.郑艳,巩劫.安徽景天属(Sedum)植物叶表皮研究[J].植物研究 1999,19(3):292-297.
104.中国科学院华南植物研究所鼎湖山树木园.鼎湖山植物手册[M].1976,275.
105.中国科学院昆明植物研究所.云南种子植物名录(上)[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1984,759-760.
106.中国科学院昆明植物研究所.云南植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,2006,16:254-267.
107.中国科学院植物研究所.中国高等植物图鉴[M].北京:科学出版社,1972,2:663-664.
108.中国科学院植物研究所.中国高等植物图鉴补编[M].北京:科学出版社,1983,2:243-252.
109.中国科学院植物研究所.中国高等植物科属检索表[M].北京:科学出版社,1983,260-262.
110.中国科学院植物研究所古植物室孢粉组及华南植物研究生形态研究室.中国热带亚热带被子植物花粉形态[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,91.
111.中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1999,45(3):150-174.
112.周桂玲,魏岩,安争夕.独行菜属植物叶片脉序的比较观察[J].云南植物研究1997,19(3):280-284.
113.周桂玲,魏岩,张丽萍.独行菜族叶片脉序及其分类学意义[J].新疆农业大学学报1997,20(3):5-11.
114.周兰英,王永清,张丽.26种杜鹃属植物花粉形态及分类学研究[J].林业科学,2008,44(2):55-63.
115.周丽华,韦仲新,吴征镒.国产蔷薇科苹果亚科的花粉形态[J].云南植物研究,2000,22(1):47-52.
116.周守标,王影,李金花,王春景,余本祺.安徽贝母属植物的叶表皮形态研究[J].中国中药杂志2007,32(2):105-109.
117.周守标,孟娜,蒋继宏.安徽产大戟属植物叶表皮微形态[J].云南植物研究2005,27(5):517-524.
118.朱光华.国际植物命名法规(中文版)[M].北京:科学出版社,美国:密苏里植物园出版社,2001.
119.朱立涛,鲁法军,侯元同,李法曾.中国蓼属头状蓼组植物叶表皮微形态及其分类学意义[J].武汉植物学研究2007,25(2):136-142.
120.Bentham G.,Hooker J D.Genera Plantarum ad Exemplaria Imprimis in Herbariis Kewensibus Servata Definita[M].Londini:Kew,Soho,Covent Garden,Mdccclxii.1862,1:361.
121.Biswas K.Systematic position of a little known flowering plant from south Burma[J].The Journal of the Indian Botanical Society.1940,19:141-146.
122.Boed.Mittel-Sumatra Expedition[J].Systematisches Verzeichnis.1911,2:33.
123.Bucker C A.Flora of Java[M].Leiden:Published under the auspices of the Kuksherbarium.1965,2:54.
124.Chen J J,Chou T H.Antitubercular Dihydroagarofuranoid Sesquiterpenes from the Roots of Microtropis fokienensis[J].Journal of Natural Products.2007,70:202-205.
125.Cheng C Y,Kao T C.New Taxa of the Chinese Celastraceae(1)[J].Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica.1988,26(4):310-314.
126.Chen J J,Chou T H.New Cytotoxie Dihydroagarofuranoid Sesquiterpenes from the Root of Microtropis fokienensis[J].Journal of Natural Products.2006,69:685-688.
127.Craib W G.Microtropis crassifolia[J].Kew Bulletin.1926,1926:349.
128.Craib W G.Florae Siamensis Enumeratio[M].Bangkok:Published under the auspices of the Siam Society.1926,1:281-282.
129.Deng Y F.Microtropis chaffanjonii(H.Lev.)Y.F.Deng,Comb.Nova(Celastraceae)[J].Annales of Botanici Fennici.2007,44:397-398.
130.Dilcher D L.Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains[J].The Botanical Review,1974,40:1-157.
131.Dunn S T.Expedition to Central Fokien[J].The Journal of the Linnean Society.Botany.1908,38:357.
132.Dunn S T.New Chinese Plants[J].Journal of Botany.1909,47:375.
133.Editorial Commiittee of the Flora of Taiwan.Flora of Taiwan(Second Edition)[M].Taipei:published by Editorial Commiittee of the Flora of Taiwan,1993,3:656-657.
134.Franchet A.,Savatier L.Enumeratio Plantarum in Japonia Sponte crescentium hucusque rite cognitarum adjectis descriptions[M].Paris:Apun F.Savy,Bibliopolam,77,Via Dicta boulevard Saint-Germain.1879,2:315.
135.Gamble.Plantarum Novarum in Herbario Hortii Regii Conservatarum[J].Kew Bulletin 1916,1916:132.
136.Hallier f.Short notes[J].Mededeelingen van's Rijks Herbarium,Leiden.1911,1910:33.
137.Handel-Mazzetti.Plantae Novae Chingianae[J].Sinensia.1932,2:128-129.
138.Handel-Mazzetti.Plantae Novae Chingianae[J].Sinensia.1933,3:189.
139.Hayata B.Icones Plantarum Formosanarum[M].Taiwan:Phblished by the Bureau of Productive Industry,Government of Formosa,Taihoku.1913,3:60-61.
140.Hayata B.Icones Plantarum Formosanarum[M].Taiwan:Phblished by the Bureau of Productive Industry,Government of Formosa,Taihoku.1919,9:17-18.
141.Hedtke S M.Townsend T,hillis D M.Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling[J].Systematic Bilology 2006,55:522-529.
142.Hickey L J.Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves American Journal of Botany,1973,60:17-33.
143.Hickey L J.A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves in Metcalfe,Anatomy of the dicotyledons[M].London:Oxford Press,1979,25-39.
144.Hickey L J.Wolfe J A.The bases of angiosperm phylogeny:Vegetative morphology[J].Missouri Botanical Garden Annual Report,1975,63:538-589.
145.Hills D M.Taxonomic sampling,phylogenetic accuracy,and investigator bias[J].Systematic Biology 1998,47:3-8.
146.Hills D M,Pollock D D,McGuire J A,Zwickl D J.Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? [J].Systematic Biology 2003,52:124-126.
147.Hooker J D.The Flora of British India[M].London:L.Reeve et Co.,5,Henrietta Street,Covent Garden.1875,l:613-614.
148.Hooker J D.The Flora of British India[M].London:L.Reeve et Co.,5,Henrietta Street,Covent Garden.1877,2:440.
149.Hou D.Celastraceae.In:Van Steenis,Flora Malesiana Series I[M].Leiden:National Herbarium of the Netherlands,1962,6(2):272-280.
150.Hou D.Note[J].Taxon.1962,11:226.
151.Hou D.Notes on some Asiatic species Microtropis (Celastraceae)[J].Blumea.1966,13(2):405-408.
152.Hou D.Sarawakodendron,ANew Genus of Celastraceae[J].Blumea.1967,15(1):139-143.
153.Hou D.Pollen of Sarawakodendron (Celastraceae)and some related genera,with notes on techniques[J].Blumea.1969,17(1):97-120.
154.Hu H.H.Notulae Systematicae Ad Florem Sinensium Ⅶ[J].Bulletin of the Fan Memorial Institute of Biology,Botanical Series.1936,7:214-215.
155.Iwatsuki K.,Boufford D E.,Ohba H.Flora of Japan[M].Tokyo:Kodansha LTD.,12-21 Otowa 2-chome,Bunkyo-ku.1999,2:99-100.
156.Jones J H.Evolution of the Fagaceae:the implications of foliar features[J].Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1986,73:228-275.
157.Johonson H B.Plant pubescence,An ecological perspective[J].Botanical Review 1975,41:233-258.
158.Kanehira R.Formosan trees[M].Taiwan:Department of Forestry,Government Research Institue et Tokyo:Yokendo,Limited,70 Morikawacho,Hongo-ku.1936,Revised.394-396.
159.King G Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula[J].The Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal.1874,65(2):340-343.
160.Kluching E P.Leaf venation patterns,Vol.1.Annonaceae[M].Berlin:Gebriider Borntraeger.1986.
161.Kluching E P.Leaf venation patterns,Vol.2.Lauraceae[M].Berlin:Gebriider Borntraeger.1987.
162.Kochummen K M.Taxonomic notes on the Celastraceae of Sabah and Sarawak.Sandakania.1994,5:51-66.
163.Koidz.Plantae Asiae Orientalis.Botanical Magazine.1926,40:334-335.
164.Koidz.Microtropis sakaguchiana[J].Plantae Novae Amami-Ohsimae.1928:16.
165.Kuntze O.Revisio Generum PlantarumVascularium Omnium Atque Cellularium Multarum Secundum Leges Nomenclaturae[M].Paris:Charles Klincksieck,11 Rue de Lille.1891,1:14.
166.Kurz S.Contributions Towards a Knowledge of the Burmese Flora[J].The Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal.1874,43(2):160-161.
167.Kurz S.Forest Flora of Brish Burma[M].Calcutta:Published by Oxbex of the Obobexnment of India,Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.1877,1:250-251.
168.Leveille H.Flore du Kouy-Tcheou[M].Franch:Le Mans.1914,287.
169.Li H L.Flora of Taiwan[M].Taiwan:Taibei,Epoch Publishing Company.1977,3:631-633.
170.Lobreau-Callen D.Les pollens des Celastrales (illustrations,commentaires)[J].Mem.Trav.Inst.Montpellier Ecole Prat.Hautes Etudes 1977,3:1-116.
171.Loesener.Undescribed plants from central America [J].Botanical Gazette.1897,24:393.
172.Loesener.In:Engler A.et Prantl K.Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien[M].Leipzig:Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.1897,3(5):202-203.
173.Loesener.In:Engler A.et Prantl K.Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien[M].Berlin:Duncker et Humblot.1942,ed.2.20b:126-130.
174.Loesener.Beitrage Zur Kenntnis der Flora von Central-Amerika (einsehl.Mexico)Ⅱ[J].Botanische Jahrbueher for Systematik,Pflanzengeschichte and Pflanzengeographie.1901,29:97-98.
175.Lu F Y.Contributions to the Dicotyledonous Plants of Taiwan (4)[J].Quarter Journal Chinese Forestry.1978,11(3):95-114.
176.Lundell C L.Studies in the American Celastraceae I.New species of Microtropis,Wimmeria and Zinowiewia[J].Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club.1938,65:463.
177.Lundell C L.Revision of the American Celastraceae I.Wimmeria,Microtropis and Zinowiewia[J].Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium.1939,3:28-35.
178.Lundell C L.Plants of Mexico[J].Wrightia.1946,1:156-160.
179.Lundell C L.Studies of American Plants-Ⅱ[J].Wrightia 1970,4:137-138.
180.Lundell C L.Studies of American Plants-VⅢ[J].Wrightia.1975,5(4):80-81.
181.Makino.Observation on the Flora of Japan[J].Botanical Magazine.1909,23:60-65.
182.Matsumura J.Notes on Liukiu and Formosan Plants[J].Botanical Magazine.1898,12:62.
183.Merr.E D.New or Noteworthy Philippine Plants,VI[J].The Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1908,3:238.
184.Merr.E D.Philippine Plants,Ⅻ[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1915,10:319-320.
185.Merr.E D.Noteworthy Philippine Plants[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1918,13:306-307.
186.Merr.E D.Microtropis rostrata[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1921,17:275.
187.Merr.E D.Microtropis sumatrana[J],Papers from Michigan Academician Science.1934,19:164.
188.Merr.E D.,Metcalf.New Kwangtung Plants[J].Lingnan Science Journal.1937,16:87-88.
189.Merr.E D.,Freemam F.L.The old world species of the Celastraceous genus Microtropis Wall.[J].Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.1940,73(10):271-310.
190.Merr.E D.Records of Indo-Chinese Plants,Ⅲ[J].Journal of the Arnold Arboretum.1942,23:174.
191.Meyer,Walker.Flora of Japan[M].Tokyo:Kodansha LTD.,1965,674.
192.Nair K K N.Southern Peninsular Indian Endemic Trees in the Proposed Pooyamkutty Hydroelectric Project Area[J].Journal Economic and Taxonomic Botany.1993,17(2):265-273.
193.Nakai.Notulce ad plantas Japonice et Koreoe.XXVⅡ[J].Botanical Magazine.1922,36:67-68.
194.Nakai.Microtropis[J].The Journal of Japanese Botany.1941,17(6):374-377.
195.Parker R N.Additamenta ad Floram Burmanicam.Ⅰ[J].Feddes Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis.1931,29:104-105.
196.Payne W W.A glossary of plant hair terminology[J].Britthonia 1978,30:230-255.
197.Pierre L.Flore Forestiere de la Cochinchine[M].Paris:Octave Doin.Editeur,S.Place De Lodeon.1894,20.pl.305(b).
198.Pitard.C J.Celastraceae In:Lecomte M.H.Flore Generale L'Indo-Chine[M].Paris:Masson et Cie,Editeurs 120,Boulevard Saint-Germain.1912,1:863-894.
199.Poe K E.Terminology of hairs in the genus Solanum[J].Taxon 1971,20:501-508.
200.Quisumb.Merr.E D.Microtropis fasciculata[J].Philippine Journal of Science,Botany.1928,37:162.
201.Rao AN.Foliar Sclereids in Microtropis valida[J].Current Science.1976,45(1):380-381.
202.Radford A E,et al.Vascular plant systematics New York:Harper and Row Publishers.1974.
203.Rehder.Ligneous Plants Described By Leveille[J].Journal of the Arnold Arboretum.1937,18:216.
204.Ridley.The Flora of Mount Ophir[J].The Journal Asiatic Society Straits.1901,35:10.
205.Ridley.New and Rare Malayan Plants[J].The Journal Asiatic Society Straits.1901,75:19.
206.Ridley.Microtropis peduncularis[i].Kew Bulletin.1924,1924:262.
207.Ridley.Microtropis rigida[J].Kew Bulletin.1931,1931:36-37.
208.Shui Y M.,Chen W H.Microtropis (Celastraceae)from the Daweishan Range,SE Yunnan,China[J].Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica.2002,43:305-312.
209.Shui Y M.,Chen W H.A New Species of the Genus Microtropis (Celastraceae)from SE Yunnan,China[J].Acta Botanica Yunnanica.2002,24(6):707-708.
210.Simmons M P,Hedin J P.Relationships and morphological character change amang genera of Celastraceae sensu lato (including Hippocrateaceae)[J].Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1999,86:723-757.
211.Simmons M P.Celastraceae In:Kubitzki K.,The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants[M].Berlin:Springer,2004,29-64.
212.SpragueTA.The American Species of Microtropis[J].Kew Bulletin.1909,1909:363.
213.Stace C A.The significance of the leaf epidermis in the taxomony of the Combretaceae.Ⅱ.The genus Combretum Subgenus Combretum in Africa[J].Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 1969,62:131-168.
214.Stace C A.The significance of the leaf epidermis in the classification of the Combretaceae.Ⅲ.the genus Combretum in America[J].Brittonia.1969,21:130-143.
215.Standley P C,Steyermark J.A.Studies of Central American Plants-Ⅲ[J].Field Museum of Natural History Botany.l 944,23:170-171.
216.Stuessy T F.Plant taxomony.The systematic evolution of comparative data[M].New York:Columbia University Press.1990,222-223.
217.Symington C F.Microtropis tenuis[J].Journal Malayan Branch,Royal Asiatic Society.1936,14:350.
218.Tardie-Blot.Celastraceae In:Humbert.Supplement A La Flore Generale de L Indo-Chine Tome Premier I[M].Paris:Masson et Cie,Editeurs 120,Boulevard Saint-Germain.1949,1:783-797.
219.Thwaites G H K.Enumeratio Plantarum Zeylaniae and Enumeration of Ceylon Plants[M].London:Dulau et Co.,37,Soho Square.1864.71-72.
220.Wall.N.In.William Roxburgh et al.Flora Indica or Descriptions of Indian Plants[M].Superintendent of the Botanic garden,Calcutta.Serampore:printed at the mission press.1824,2:376-416.
221.Wall.N.In:William Roxburgh et al.Flora Indica or Descriptions of Indian Plants[M].Serampore:Printed for W.thacher and Co.Calcutta,and Parbury,Allen and Co.London.1832,Vol.l.ed.2:628-629.
222.Wang C H.The Studies of Chinese Celastraceae Ⅱ[J].Contributions from the Biological Laboratory of the Science Society of China,Botanical Series.1939,1(1):1-84.
223.Wight R.Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis or figures of Indian Plants[M].Madras:Printed by the author,and sold by Messrs.Franck and Co.,Madras;And Messrs.Ostell,Lbface and Co.Calcutta.Athenrum Press.1843,3(1):761.
224.Wight R.Icones Plantarum Indiae Orientalis or figures of Indian Plants[M].Madras:Printed by the author,and sold by Messrs.Franck and Co.,Madras;And Messrs.Ostell,Lbface and Co.Calcutta.Athenrum Press.1845,3(3):975-1052.
225.Yu C H,Chen Z L.Leaf architecture of the woody dicotyledons from tropical and subtropical China[M].International Academic Publisher,1991,194-201.
226.Zhang Z X,Funston A M.Microtropis.In:Wu Z Y,Raven P H,Hong D Y.Flora of China[M].Beijing:Science Press;St.Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden Press.2008,11:479-484.
227.Zhou Z K,Hazel W,Wu Z Y.Taxonomical and evolutonary implications of the leaf anatomy and architecture of Quercus L.subgenus Quercus from China[J].Cathaya 1995,7:l-34.