用户名: 密码: 验证码:
问卷评估在心理干预效果研究中的应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
心理干预效果研究中,“恶化”指的是比较两次心理干预的问卷评估结果,存在超过划界分(cutoff)或可信变化指数(RCI)大于规定值的现象。国外已有研究表明,及时发现这种理论上的“恶化”有助于减少实际临床不良心理干预结果的发生。目前国内尚缺少心理干预效果评估的研究,本研究试图探讨在本土实践中,心理问卷评估在心理干预中的作用及其使用的影响因素。
     首先,研究一探讨了在个体心理干预过程中,利用问卷评估是否存在当事人心理状况“恶化”的不良结果。研究二探讨了在团体心理干预中,是否同样存在当事人心理状况“恶化”的不良结果。研究三分别探讨了不同专业背景下心理从业人员在使用问卷评估方面是否存在差异。最后,研究四则通过对两例个案的追踪研究,探讨了问卷评估对心理从业人员在实际心理干预中所产生的作用。
     本研究结果表明:
     (1)采用心理干预效果评估问卷(OQ-45)在当事人个体心理干预期间进行连续评估发现,约5.7%(2/34)的干预个案存在“恶化”状况。
     (2)采用心理干预效果评估问卷(OQ-45)在当事人团体心理干预期间进行连续评估发现,约7.7%(3/39)的干预个案存在“恶化”状况。
     (3)虚拟情境案例设计研究提示,问卷评估的结果信息对不同背景(年龄、工作经验和教育背景)心理从业人员的干预决策影响存在显著性差异(χ~2 = 19.033,P<0.001;χ~2=16.246,P<0.001;χ~2=7.791,P<0.01),结果提示问卷评估的结果信息对经验越浅、学历越高的新手型心理从业人员的影响较大。
     (4)通过对两例个案心理干预的跟踪研究发现,连续问卷OQ-45评估提示,在心理干预中当事人的心理状况变化并非呈线性变化,且当事人在情绪症状、人际关系和社会功能三个维度的改变存在差异。
     本研究结果提示,问卷评估有助于对心理干预中的“恶化”状况及时预警,但不同专业背景的心理从业人员对评估结果的使用存在差异,今后应进一步探讨问卷评估对心理干预结果的实际效用。
In psychological intervention effects study,―deteriorate‖referred to compare the results of two psychological intervention questionnaire evaluation, and found it that over the delimitation of points (cutoff) or reliable change index (RCI) than specified value. Foreign studies had shown that, timely found this theoretical "deteriorate" helped to reduce the happening of the result of the actual clinical adverse psychological intervention. At present domestic still lacked of psychological intervention effect evaluation of studies, this study tried to discuss in domestic practice, the effect and its influencing factors of using the psychological questionnaire evaluation in psychological intervention.
     First, a research was discussed in an individual's psychological intervention process, using the questionnaire to evaluate whether there were the existences of "psychological condition deteriorates" adverse outcomes. We also discussed whether there were the psychological condition "deteriorate" adverse outcomes in the group psychological intervention. In the research three, we discussed under the background of psychological practitioners in using questionnaire evaluate whether there were differences. Finally, the study of two cases of four through case follow-up study, we discussed the effect of the questionnaire assessment in actual psychological intervention for psychological practitioners.
     The research results indicated that:
     (1) Using psychological intervention outcome assessment questionnaire (OQ - 45) in the individual psychological intervention during continuous assessment showed that about 5.7% (2/34) intervention cases existing "deteriorate" status.
     (2) Using psychological intervention outcome assessment questionnaire (OQ - 45) in the group psychological intervention during continuous assessment showed that about 7.7% (3/39) intervention cases existing "deteriorate" status.
     (3) Virtual situation case design research suggested that questionnaire evaluation result of different background information (age, work experience and education background) psychological intervention from personnel of decision-making influence, there were existed significant differences(χ~2 = 19.033,P<0.001;χ~2=16.246,P<0.001;χ~2=7.791,P<0.01). The results indicated that the evaluation result of questionnaire information more shallow, experience the higher degree of novice type psychological practitioners influenced
     (4) Through the case study of two cases of psychological intervention study that followed continuous questionnaire assessment hint (OQ–45), psychological intervention in the clients in the psychological situation change was not a linear relation, and the clients in mood symptoms, interpersonal relationship and social function three dimensions changes in different ways.
     This research indicated that, questionnaire was helpful for the assessment psychological intervention "deteriorate" situations timely warning, but different professional background of psychological practitioners of evaluation results vary, the future of using questionnaire should be further discussed to assess their psychological intervention results of actual utility.
引文
[1] Lambert M.J. Emerging Methods for Providing Clinicians With Timely Feedback on Treatment Effectiveness: An Introduction [J]. JCLP/In Session, 2005, 61(2): 141–144.
    [2] Hannan C., Lambert M.J., Harmon C., et al. A Lab Test and Algorithms for Identifying Clients at Risk for Treatment Failure [J]. JCLP/In Session, 2005, 61(2): 155–163.
    [3] Lambert M.J., Ogles B.M. The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy [M]. 5thed. New York: Wiley, 2004: 139-193.
    [4] Slade K., Lambert M.J., Harmon S.C. et al. Improving psychotherapy outcome: the use of immediate electronic feedback and reviesed clinical support tools [J].Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2008, 15(5):287-303.
    [5] Ogles B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Fields, S. A. Essentials of outcome assessment [M]. New York: Wiley, 2002.
    [6] Bickman, L., Rosof-Williams, J., Salzer, M. S., et al. What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent client progress and outcomes? [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2000, 31: 70–74.
    [7] Hatfield D.R., Ogles B.M. The influence of outcome measures in assessing client change and treatment decisions [J]. Journal of clinical psychology, 2006, 62(3): 325-337.
    [8] Froyd J.E. A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement [J]. Journal of Mental Health, 1996, 5(1):11-16.
    [9] Lambert M.J., Whipple J.L., Hawkins E.J., et al. Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient progress: a meta-analysis [J]. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2003; 10(3): 288-301.
    [10] Beutler L. E. Comparisons among quality assurance systems: From outcome assessment to clinical utility [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001, 69: 197–204.
    [11] Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B., & Finch A.E. Patient-Focused Research: UsingPatient Outcome Data to Enhance Treatment Effects [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001, 69(2): 159-172.
    [12] Lueger, R. J., Howard, K. I., Martinovich, Z., et al. Assessing treatment progress of individual clients using expected treatment response models[J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001, 69: 150–158.
    [13] Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., et al. Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001, 69: 184–196.
    [14] Kordy, H., Hanno¨ver, W., & Richard, M. Computer-assisted feedback-driven quality management for psychotherapy: The Stuttgart-Heidelberg model [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001, 69: 173–183.
    [15] Lutz K., Martinovich Z., and Howard K.I. Patient Profiling: An Application of Random Coefficient Regression Models to Depicting the Response of a Patient to Outpatient Psychotherapy [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1999, 67(4): 571-577.
    [16] Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., et al. Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress [J]. American Psychologist, 1996, 51(10): 1059-1064.
    [17] Seligman, M. E. P. The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study [J]. American Psychologist, 1995, 50(12): 965–974.
    [18] McLellan A T , Durell J . Outcome evaluation in psychiatric and substance abuse treatments : Concepts , rationale , and methods [M]. In :Sederer L J ,Dickey B ( Eds. ) . Outcome assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore : Williams and Wilkins , 1996: 34– 44.
    [19] Docherty J P , Streeter M J . Measuring outcomes. In : Sederer L I ,Dickey B( Eds. ) . Outcome assessment in clinical practice [M]. Baltimore :Williams and Wilkins , 1996 : 8– 18.
    [20] Lambert M.J., Ogles B.M., & Masters K.S. Choosing ouotcome assessment devices: An organizational and conceptual scheme [J]. Journal of Counseling and Development , 1992 ,70(4) :527-532.
    [21] Ogles B.M., Lambert M.J., & Miller T.I. The benefits of psychotherapy [M]. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
    [22] Lambert M.J., Hawkins E.J. Measuring Outcome in Professional Practice: Considerations in Selecting and Using Brief Outcome Instruments [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2004, 35(5): 492–499.
    [23]洪芳,骆宏.国内心理干预效果评估现状分析[J].浙江理工大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 301-303.
    [24] Ogles B.M., Lunnen K. M., & Bonesteel K. Clinical Significance: History, Application, and Current Practice [J]. Clinical Psychology Review, 2001, 21(3):421-446.
    [25]杨宏飞.心理咨询效果评价模型初探[J].心理科学, 2005, 28 (3) :656– 659.
    [26] Anderson E.M., Lambert M.J. A Survival Analysis of Clinically Significant Change in Outpatient Psychotherapy [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2001, 57(7): 875-888.
    [27] McLellan A T , Durell J . Outcome evaluation in psychiatric and substance abuse treatments : Concepts , rationale , and methods. In :Sederer L J ,Dickey B ( Eds. ) . Outcome assessment in clinical practice [M]. Baltimore : Williams and Wilkins , 1996 : 34– 44.
    [28] Hansen N.B., Lambert M.J., & Forman E.V. The psychotherapy dose–response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services [J]. Clinical Psychology, 2002, 9(3): 162–169.
    [29] Lyons J.S., Howard K.I., Mahoney M.T., et al. The Measurement and Management of Clinical Outcomes in Mental Health [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
    [30] Sperry L., Brill P. L., Howard K. I., et al. Treatment outcomes in psychotherapy and psychiatric interventions [M]. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1996.
    [31] Breslin, F., Sobell, L.C., Buchan, G., et al. Toward a stepped-care approach to treating problem drinkers: The predictive validity of within-treatment variables and therapist prognostic ratings [J]. Addiction, 1997, 92(11): 1479–1489.
    [32] Lambert M.J., Hawkins E.J. Measuring Outcome in Professional Practice:?Considerations in Selecting and Using Brief Outcome Instruments [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2004, 35, (5): 492–499.
    [33] Ogles B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Fields, S. A. Essentials of outcome assessment [M]. New York: Wiley, 2002.
    [34] Phelps R., Eisman, E. J., & Kohout, J. Psychological practice and managed care: Results of the CAPP practitioner survey [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1998, 29, 31–36.
    [35] Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., et al. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: Manual for administration and scoring (rev. ed.) [M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.
    [36] Hatfield D.R., Ogles B.M. The Use of Outcome Measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2004, 35(5): 485–491.
    [37] Bickman, L., Rosof-Williams, J., Salzer, M. S., et al. What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent client progress and outcomes? [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2000, 31: 70–74.
    [38] Froyd, J. E., Lambert, M. J., & Froyd, J. D. A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement[J]. Journal of Mental Health, 1996, 5:11-15.
    [39] Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Masters, K. Assessing outcome in clinical practice[M]. New York: Allyn & Bacon, 1996.
    [40] Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., et al. Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2)[M]. Stevenson, MD: American Professional Credentialing Services, 1996.
    [41] Strupp, H. H., Horowitz, L. M., & Lambert, M. J. Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: Toward a core battery. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997.
    [42] Tingey, R., Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., & Hansen, N. Clinically significant change: Practical indicators for evaluating psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 1996, 6: 109-123.
    [43] Kazdin, A. E. Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1977, 1:427-452.
    [44] Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991, 59: 12-19.
    [45] Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., Revenstorf, D., Baucora, D. H., Hahlweg, K., & Margolin, G. Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: A reanalysis of outcome data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1984, 52: 497—504.
    [46] Claiborn C.D., Goodyear R.K. Feedback in Psychotherapy [J]. JCLP/In Session, 2005, 61(2): 209–217.
    [47] Lambert M.J., Whipple JL, Hawkins EJ. Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patient’s progress: clinical results and practice suggestions [J]. Clinical Psychology, 2005, 61(2): 165-174.
    [48]李钰静,骆宏.心理咨询效果评估量表中文版的信度和效度.中国学校卫生, 2009, 23(2): 105-107.
    [49] Howard K.I., Kopta S.M, Krause M.S., et al. The dose-response relationship in psychotherapy [J]. American Psychologist, 1986, 41: 159-164.
    [50] Kadera S.W., Lambert M. J., & Andrews A.A. How much therapy is really enough: A session-by-session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship [J]. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 1996, 5: 132-151.
    [51] Kopta S.M., Howard K. I., Lowry J. L., et al. Patterns of symptomatic recovery in time-unlimited psychotherapy [J]. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 1994, 62: 1009-1016.
    [52] Maling M. S., Gurtman M. B., & Howard K. I. The response of interpersonal problems to varying doses of psychotherapy [J]. Psychotherapy Research, 1995, 5(1): 63-75.
    [53] Kopta S.M. The dose—effect relationship in psychotherapy: A defining achievement for Dr. Kenneth Howard [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003,59(7): 727-733.
    [54] Tang, T.Z., & DeRubies, R.J. Reconsidering rapid early response in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression [J]. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1999, 6(3): 283–288.
    [55] Tang, T.Z., & DeRubies, R.J. Sudden gains and critical sessions in cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1999, 67(6): 894–904.
    [56] Haas, E., Hill, R., Lambert, M.J., & Morrell, B. Do early responders to psychotherapy maintain treatment gains? [J] Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2002, 58: 1157–1172.
    [57] Howard K.I., Lueger R.J., Kolden G.G. Measuring progress and outcome in the treatment of affective disorders. In L.M. Horowitz, M.J. Lambert, & H.H. Strupp (Eds.), Measuring patient change after treatment for mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: Toward a core battery [M]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997, 263-281.
    [58] Hansen N.B., Lambert M.J., Forman E.V. The psychotherapy dose-effect and its implications for treatment delivery services [J]. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2002, 9(3): 329–343.
    [59] George S. Brown, Edward R. Jones. Implementation of a feedback system in a managed care environment: What are patients teaching us? [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 61(2):187-198.
    [60]樊富珉.团体心理咨询[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2005, 4-5.
    [61]杨眉.大学生社交焦虑的集体心理干预[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 1997, 11(4): 247-248.
    [62]田万生,方平.大学生集体心理咨询的实验研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 1999, 11(1): 55-57.
    [63]孙时进,范新河,刘伟.团体心理咨询对提高大学生自信心的效果研究[J].心理科学, 2000, 23 (1): 77-797.
    [64]刘春燕,詹仁碧,乔梁.通过团体心理咨询提高初中生自我概念水平的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2002, 10(1): 56-58.
    [65]侯丽杰,陈永进,魏昌武等.论高职院校心理健康教育的不足与对策[J].职业教育研究, 2008,(1):32-33.
    [66] Percevic R, Lambert M.J., Kordy H. Computer-supported monitoring of patient treatment response [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2004, 60(3): 285-99.
    [67] Sapyta J., Riemer M., and Bickman L. Feedback to Clinicians: Theory, Research, and Practice [J]. JCLP/In Session, 2005, 61(2): 145–153.
    [68]钱铭怡.变态心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2006: 140-142.
    [69]袁丽娜.反馈信息对咨询师咨询决策的影响研究[J].浙江理工大学, 2009.
    [70] Ilgen D.R., Fisher C.D., & Taylor M.S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64(4): 349–371.
    [71] Phelps, R., Eisman, E. J., & Kohout, J. Psychological practice and managed care: Results of the CAPP practitioner survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1998, 29: 31–36.
    [72] Hatfield D.R., and Ogles B.M. The Use of Outcome Measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice [J]. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2004, 35(5): 485–491.
    [73] Garb H.N. Studying the clinician [M]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998.
    [74] Grove W.M., Zald D.H., Lebow B.S., et al. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychological Assessment, 2000, 12(1): 19–30.
    [75] Dew S., & Riemer M. Why inaccurate self-evaluation of performance justifies feedback interventions. In L. Bickman (Chair), Improving outcomes through feedback intervention. Symposium conducted at the 16th Annual Research Conference, A System of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base, Tampa, University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health, 2003.
    [76] Riemer M., Rosof-Williams J., & Bickman L. (in press). Theories related tochanging clinician practice. In B.J. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, evidence-based practice, part II.
    [77] Harmon C., Hawkins E.J., Lambert M.J, et al. Improving outcomes for poorly responding clients: The use of clinical support tools and feedback to clients [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 61(2): 175-185.
    [78] Haas E., Hill R., Lambert M.J., et al. Do early responders to psychotherapy maintain treatment gains? [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2002, 58(9): 1157–1172.
    [79] Canen E.L., Lambert M.J. The incidence of patterned deterioration before stable improvement in psychotherapy [M]. Poster presented at the Western Psychological Association. Irvine, California, 1999.
    [80]Mohr D.C. Negative outcome in psychotherapy: A critical review [J]. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1995, 2(1):1-27.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700