用户名: 密码: 验证码:
变革型领导、社会资本与协同创新组织学习的视角
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
知识经济时代,海量的知识外溢成果在大幅增加社会整体正外部性的同时,也大大提高了企业的创新机率,然而,企业的实际创新绩效取决于其对组织内外海量的人力资本、社会资本和知识资本再整合及再配置方式的理解。从经济学角度分析:协同创新是对人、网络和知识这三种决定企业发展的本质要素的网络化整合,一方面可以大幅降低要素获取成本,另一方面还能产生功能倍增的协同效应,因而可以被认为是企业创新的帕累托最优选择。
     虽然协同创新能够从根本上增强企业的竞争优势,但是这一创新模式尚未引起学术界和企业界足够的关注和认识。因此,如何准确地对协同创新的内涵及影响因素进行界定,并将其应用和推广于企业的创新实践,不仅是该理论研究的核心,也是企业实践的难点。目前,有关协同创新的研究还处于起步阶段,缺乏完整的系统分析,为数不多的研究也未能从协同学的基本内涵出发,对协同创新的本质及其核心影响因素给出系统的阐释,就此意义而言,本文填补了该领域的研究空白,有利于厘清人们对协同创新的认识并有助于指导企业的协同创新实践。
     本研究在汲取相关研究领域精华的基础上,结合江苏省高科技领军企业的创新实践,从认知的视角构建起协同创新的理论范式,提出并回答了两个核心问题:
     1、变革型领导和企业家社会资本是否是影响协同创新的本质因素?
     本文从系统角度出发,通过运用自组织理论对变革型领导和企业家社会资本的内涵、维度和自组织过程展开动态分析,探讨它们在协同创新过程中的影响、地位、作用,提出了协同创新的理论范式,并指出协同创新的本质是知识的创新。
     2、变革型领导和企业家社会资本影响协同创新的作用机理是什么?
     本文以组织学习为中介,构建起变革型领导和企业家社会资本对协同创新的作用机制模型,根据知识在企业内外的循环流动路径,探讨内生因素—变革型领导与外部影响因素—企业家社会资本之间的相互作用关系及协同度,以及它们经由组织学习的机制转换作用于企业创新的过程机理。
     围绕上述两个核心问题,本研究分六个章节展开,各章主要内容如下:
     第一章:绪论。本章建立在知识经济时代我国自主创新的宏观背景之上,通过分析企业家和社会资本在创新中的地位和作用,提出研究问题、阐明选题意义,并对研究方法、对象、结构及创新之处进行了介绍。本章是研究的基础与铺垫。
     第二章:文献综述。本章通过对构建理论模型将要涉及的变革型领导理论、社会资本理论、组织学习理论和协同创新理论的发展演进、理论内涵和代表性观点的回顾与评论,指出了理论间存在的内在逻辑联系及现有研究的空白点。本章是研究形成的理论依据。
     第三章:理论基础。本章从认知角度对变革型领导、企业家社会资本和组织学习各自维度及其自组织过程开展理论分析,指出了它们对协同创新的影响,并借鉴协同学理论,提出了企业协同创新的理论范式,指明了协同创新的知识创新本质。本章是研究形成的理论基础。
     第四章:理论模型构建与研究假设确立。本章结合前文的理论范式及现有的实证成果提出了相关理论假设,并构建起变革型领导、企业家社会资本分别以组织学习为中介对协同创新的作用机制模型。本章是研究形成的实证基础。
     第五章:研究设计与数据分析。本章通过研究设计、问卷调查、相关与回归分析以及结构方程模型对理论模型提出的关系路径进行了完整的实证分析和假设检验。本章是研究形成的实证依据。
     第六章:结论与展望。本章通过阐明本文的研究结论,剖析研究的理论贡献与实践意义,对其在实践中的应用给出了建设性意见,并指出了研究的局限和后续研究方向。本章是本研究的系统性总结。
     通过上述分析,本文证明了前文所提出的理论模型并得出如下结论:
     1、企业协同创新的实现完全建立在变革型领导、企业家社会资本和组织学习三个关键因素协同作用的基础上,企业及企业家的外在基础特征,如:企业性质、规模、盈利状况,企业家性别、年龄、学历、经验等对协同创新的影响可以忽略。
     2、变革型领导、企业家社会资本和组织学习都对协同创新有着积极、直接的正向影响:变革型领导心智模式和激励机制越开放,企业心智模式的协同创新度越高:企业家结构维和关系维社会资本越丰富,企业心智模式的协同创新度越高企业家认知维社会资本越丰富,企业网络结构协同创新度越高;组织学习层面越宽泛、方式越灵活,企业网络结构和心智模式的协同创新度越高。
     3、对于变革型领导、企业家社会资本和组织学习三者而言:变革型领导心智模式、激励机制和个人学习越开放,组织学习层面越宽泛,且变革型领导激励机制的开放性显著影响组织学习方式和企业家关系型和认知型社会资本;企业家社会资本能够直接影响组织学习,但影响效果显得较为有限。
     4、组织学习是变革型领导和协同创新的完全中介,但组织学习却未能在企业家社会资本和协同创新之间产生中介作用。
     本研究的主要创新点反映在:
     1、本研究从企业创新的实践出发,将变革型领导、企业家社会资本、组织学习和协同创新整合入一个理论框架,建立起中国情境下企业协同创新的理论范式,并率先提出协同创新的两个核心问题:变革型领导和企业家社会资本是否是影响协同创新的本质因素?如是,变革型领导和企业家社会资本影响协同创新的作用机理是什么?对该领域的研究作出了一定的贡献。
     2、本研究从认知的视角出发,把变革型领导分为心智模式、激励机制和个人学习三维度,把企业家社会资本分为结构维、关系维和认知维三维度,把协同创新分为组织结构的协同创新和共享心智模式的协同创新两维度,突破了其他研究只关注企业及企业家外部特质和行为的局限性,为从根本上理解和把握协同创新提供了可借鉴的分析思路。通过运用自组织理论对变革型领导、企业家社会资本、组织学习和协同创新在企业生命周期中的自组织过程的动态分析,揭示了企业家认知能力、网络能力以及组织学习能力在协同创新过程中的重要意义,指出变革型领导、企业家社会资本和组织学习是实现协同创新的三个关键影响因素。
     3、本文以组织学习为中介,构建起变革型领导和企业家社会资本对企业协同创新的作用机制模型,通过实地采集江苏省部分代表性高科技企业数据,综合运用描述性统计分析、相关与回归分析以及结构方程模型分析等多种方法对理论模型进行实证,验证了本文对四者间关系的理论推断。本研究结论有助于理论界及企业界深刻理解协同创新的本质、关键影响因素及四者间的相互关系,为企业从宏观和微观两个层面开展协同创新的实践提供了重要的理论依据、应对思路和解决方案,也为协同创新的理论范式在实践中的应用与推广打下了坚实基础。
In an era of knowledge-based economy, massive knowledge spillover not only enhances the overall positive externality of the society significantly but also increases enterprise'innovation probability. However, enterprise's actual innovation performance is decided by their understanding on reintegration and reallocation of enormous human resource, social resource and knowledge capital inside and outside the organization. From the perspective of economics, synergy innovation is network integration on three essential elements that determine enterprise development including human, network and knowledge, which greatly reduces elements acquisition cost on the one hand, and produces synergistic effect with multiple functions on the other hand. Therefore, it can be regarded as Pareto optimal choice for enterprise's innovation.
     Although synergy innovation can fundamentally enhance enterprise's competitive edge, but this innovation mode hasn't drawn enough attention and recognition from academic community and business circle. Hence, accurate definition on synergy innovation connotation, influencing factor and its constitution element together with application and promotion in enterprise's innovation practice is the core of this theoretical research and also difficult point in enterprise practice. At present, relevant research on synergy innovation is still in its infancy, lacking of complete systematic analysis. Few researchers are successful in starting from the basic connotation of synergetic, failing to give systematic and accurate interpretations on essence and core influencing elements of synergy innovation. In the light of the above-mentioned issue, this article fills the research gap in this field, improves people's understanding on synergy innovation and provides guidance for enterprise to carry out synergy innovation practice.
     On the basis of absorbing quintessence in relevant research, by combining innovative performance from leading high-tech enterprises in Jiangsu province, this research dedicated to establishing innovative theoretical paradigm from the perspective of perception theory, puts forward and answers two core problems.
     Will transformational leadership and entrepreneurs social capital represents the essence influencing the synergy innovation?
     From systematic perspective, this article makes dynamic analysis on transformational leadership, entrepreneur's social capital, connotation and dimension of organizational learning together with self-organized process. It also discusses their influence, position and role in synergy innovation and synergic relationship and synergy degree. Then the paper puts forward the theoretical paradigm of synergy innovation and then points out that the very essence of synergy innovation is the innovation of knowledge.
     What's the mechanism of action regarding the impact of transformational leadership and entrepreneurs' social capital on the synergy innovation?
     Taking organizational learning as the medium, this article builds mechanism of interaction on synergy innovation by transformational leadership and entrepreneur s' social capital. In accordance with knowledge circulation path inside and outside of the enterprise, it discusses interaction and interrelationship between end genetic factor, transformational leadership and external influencing factors and entrepreneur's social capital, as weil as process mechanism transformed from organizational learning mechanism to enterprise innovation.
     Centering on the above two core problems, this research is carried out in six chapters. Main contents of each chapter are as below:
     The First Chapter: Introduction. This chapter is set against the macro background of China's independent innovation in an era of knowledge-based economy. Through analysis on the role and position entrepreneur and social capita! play in innovation, these chapters proposes the research subject and explains significance of subject selection, and also make an introduction on research method, object and structure. As the basis, this chapter paves way for further research.
     The Second Chapter: Literature Review. Through reviewing and commenting on theoretical connotation, representative viewpoints and development and evolution of transformational leadership, involving in theory model building, organizational learning theory, social capital theory and synergy innovation theory, this chapter describes internal logical relationship between theories and gaps in current research. This chapter is the theoretical foundation for the research.
     The Third Chapter: Theoretical basis. From the perspective of cognitive research, this chapter performs analysis on transformational leadership, entrepreneur's social capital, connotation and dimension of organizational learning together with self-organized process, pointing out their role as order parameter in synergy innovation, meanwhile, it also specifies the essence of knowledge innovation of enterprise synergy innovation. This chapter is the theoretical basis for the research.
     The Fourth Chapter: Theoretical Mode Building and Research Assumption Making. This chapter makes relevant theoretical assumption by combining the above-mentioned theoretical paradigm and existing demonstration achievement. It also establishes mechanism of interaction on synergy innovation by transformational leadership and entrepreneur's social capital through respectively taking organizational learning as the medium. This chapter is the empirical basis for this research.
     The Fifth Chapter: Research Design and Data Analysis. Through research design, questionnaire survey, regression analysis and structural equation model, this chapter makes complete empirical analysis and assumption verification on relationship path put forward by theoretical mode. This chapter is the empirical foundation for this research.
     The Sixth Chapter: Conclusion and Prospect. Through analysis on assumption verification, this chapter concludes and elaborates on research conclusion of this article, analyzes contribution and practical significance of research theory, proposes constructive suggestions for practical application and also points out research limitations and further research direction. This chapter is the systematic conclusion of this research.
     Through the above-mentioned analysis, this article proves theoretical mode in the former parts and make the following conclusions:
     Realization of enterprise synergy innovation is completely based on synergic action of three crucial elements including transformational entrepreneurs, entrepreneur's social capital and organizational learning. The role playing by enterprise nature, size, profit status, as well as sex, age, educational background and experience of entrepreneur is very limited.
     Transformational leadership, entrepreneur's social capital and organizational learning exert direct and positive impact on synergy innovation:the more open are the mental model of transformational entrepreneurs and incentive mechanism, the higher will be the level of synergy innovation of enterprise mental model; the richer will be entrepreneur's cognitive social capital, and the higher level of synergy innovation of enterprise's network structure; the wider in learning horizon, the more flexible in method, the higher synergetical level of enterprise network structure and mental mode.
     Regarding transformational leadership, entrepreneur's social capital and organizational learning:the more open in mental mode, incentive mechanism and individual learning of transformational entrepreneurs, the broader the learning horizon will be; the extent of openness in transformational entrepreneurs incentive mechanism exerts direct impact on organizational learning methods and entrepreneur' s relation-based and knowledge-based capital; entrepreneur's social capital can exert direct impact on organizational learning, but too limited.
     In terms of mediated relations between order parameters:organizational learning is the complete medium for transformational entrepreneurs and synergy innovation. But organizational learning doesn't produce mediating effect between entrepreneur's social capital and synergy innovation.
     This research has the following innovation points:
     1. Starting from enterprise innovation practice, the research integrates the transformational leadership, entrepreneurs'social capital, organized learning and synergy innovation into a theoretical framework and establishes enterprise's synergy innovation theoretical paradigm in China's situation for the first time. It is pioneering in putting forward two core problems of synergy innovation:Will the transformational leadership and entrepreneur's social capital affect the essence of the synergy innovation? If so, what's the interaction mechanism of transformational leadership and entrepreneurs' social capital impact on synergy innovation elements? This research fills the systematic research gap in this field.
     2. From the perspective of cognition, the research divides the transformational leadership into three dimensions comprising of mental mode, incentive mode and individual learning mode. At the same time, the research also divides the entrepreneurs' social capital into three dimensions of structure, relation and cognitive. Dividing the synergy innovation into the two dimensions of composing of the structure-based innovation and shared mental model. By doing this, this research comes up with new concept of breaking the limitation of other researches that only pays attention to entrepreneurs' external characters and behaviors. The research provided the insightful suggestions on the fundamental understanding of synergy innovation. This research adopts thoughts and methods from self-organization theory in synergetic and makes dynamic analysis on self-organization process of transformational leadership, entrepreneur's social capital and organizational learning in enterprise's life cycle. Therefore, it reveals the significance of entrepreneur's recognition ability, network capability and organized learning ability in synergy innovation process and meanwhile points out 3 crucial influencing elements of transformational leadership, entrepreneur's social capital and organizational learning in terms of realizing synergy innovation.
     3. Taking organizational learning as the medium, this article builds mechanism of interaction on synergy innovation by transformational leadership and entrepreneur's social capital. Through first-hand on-site data collected from part of representative high-tech enterprises in Jiangsu province; this article makes assumption verification on theoretical model by comprehensively applying various methods like factor analysis, regression analysis and structural equation model. The research facilitates the better understanding of the essence and the relations between the crucial influencing factor and interactive relations of the synergy innovation for academia and business community. The article also provided the important theoretical basis and solutions for the enterprise in terms of synergy innovation at macro and micro level and laid solid foundation for theoretical paradigm application of synergy innovations.
引文
1 雷加骕:高度关注我国对外技术依赖基本动因的深刻变化[J],中国青年科技,2008.12
    李惠斌,杨雪冬:《社会资本与社会发展》[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
    3 陈放:企业病诊断[M].中国经济出版社,1999
    4 中华全国工商联合会:中国民营企业发展报告[M].社会科学文献出版社,2005
    (美)吉姆·科林斯&杰里·波勒斯.真如译,基业长青[M].北京:中信出版社,2006.9
    6 郑钢:全面协同创新:迈向创新型企业之路[M].北京:科学出版社,2006
    科技部:高新技术企业认定管理办法[J].科学技术部办公厅.2008.4
    8 Burns, J.M.:Leadership [M].New York: Harper & Row,1978
    9Bass.B.M.: Leadership and performance beyond expeclations[M]. New York: Free Press,1985
    0 Goleman.D.:What makes a leader?[J].Harvard Business Review, November-December,1998
    11 Yukl,G.: Leadership in Organizations[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall,2002
    12 Skogstad,A.& Einarsen.S.L.: The importance of a change-centered leadership style in four organizational culturcs[J]. Scand Journal of Management.1999,15:289-306
    3 Sharmir.B., House.R.J., & Arthur.M.B.: The Motivational effects of charismatic leadership: a self-concept based theory[J]. Organization Science.1993(4)
    14 Kernis,M.H.:Optimal self-esteem and authenticity:Separating fantasy from reality[J].Psycliological Inquiry, 2003,14(1):83-89
    15Gardner, W.L., Avolio.B.J., Luthans.F., et a!.:Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development[J].Leadership Quarterly,2005,16:343-372
    16 张鼎昆:改善与革命—企业变革的理论综述[J].中国软科学,2000.10
    17 (美)埃德加·沙因:企业文化生存指南[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004
    18 Schein.E.H.:Organizational Culture and Leadership[M], CA:San Francisco. Jossey -Bass,1992.1-2
    19 Kurt Lewin: A Study Using Three Steps Is Reported in Paul O'Neil:"Transforming Managers for Organizational Change" [J]. Training and Development Journal,1990 (7):87-90
    20 Bourdieu P.:The Forms of Capital[J].In: J G Richardson. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood,1985
    21 吴琼,施建军:企业家资源—社会资本理论综述[J].《学海》,2009.6
    2 Coleman J.S.:Foundations of Social Theory[J]. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press,1990.
    边燕杰,丘海雄:企业社会资本及其功效[J],《中国社会科学》,2000.2
    24 Belliveau. M.A., C.A.O'Reilly Ⅲ, & J.B.Wade:Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996.39:15
    5 Lin Nan: Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and.Action[M].New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001
    26 Putanam.R.: Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].NJ:Princeton University Press,1993
    Pories.A., & Sensenbrenner Julia: F.mbeddedness and Immigration:Notes on the Social Capital Determinants of Economic Action[J].Amewrican Journal of Sociology,1993, Vol.98:1320-1350
    28 Portes.A.:Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology[J].Annual Review of Sociology,1998.24
    29 Granovetter. M.:The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973, Vol.78,1360-1380
    30 Granovetter, M.:Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness[J].American Journal of Sociolgy,1985, Vol.91:481-510
    31 Burt R.S: tructural Holes: he Social Structural of Competition [M]. Cambridge, M.A.:Harvard University Press.1992
    32 Burt,R.S.:The contingent value of social capital[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997 a,42:339-365
    33 托马斯·布朗:社会资本理论综述[J].《社会资本与社会发展》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.P77-100
    34 Lin Nan & P.V.Marsden: Social Resources and Instrumental Action[J].Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage,1982:131-145
    35 Burt, R.S.: Anote on social capital and network content[J].Social Networks,1997 b,19:355-373
    36 Krackhardt, David: The Strength of Strong Ties: the Importance of Philos in Networks and Organizations [J].In Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles (Ed.), Networks and Organizations. Cambridge, Harvard Business School Press,1992
    7 Fukuyama, F.: Trust: The Social Virtucs and the Creation of Prosperity[M].New York: Free Press,1995
    8 Putanam,R.:Turning in. Turning out: The stage disappearance of social capital in American[J]. Political Science and Politics,1995.28(4)
    9 Fountain, J.:Social Capital: A key enable of innovation in science and teehnology[J].In. Branscomb L.M & Keller,J,(eds).Investing in innovation towards a consensus strategy for federal technology policy. Cambridge: the MIT press.1997
    40 Putnam, R.:Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community[M].New York: Simon and Schuster.2000
    41 Adler, Paul & Kwon, Seok-Woo: Social Capital:Prospects for a new concept [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002, Vo127, No.1:17-40
    42 Yli-Renko. H., Autio. E., et al.:Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,2001.22,587-613
    43 Yli-Renko. H.. Autio. E. & V.Tontti:Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms[J] International business review.2002.11:279-304
    44 Grootaert C. et al.: Measuring Social Capital[J].,The World Bank,2004
    45 Krishna, Anirudh & Elizabeth Shrader.: Cross-Cultural Measures of Social Capital: A Tool and Results from India and Panama[J]. In Social Capital Initiative Working Paper Series. Washington. DC:The World Bank.
    46Nahapiel J. & Goslia] S.:Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.2,1908:242-266
    47 Tsai,W. & S.Ghoshal.:Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm networks[J]. Academy of Management Journal.1998.41:464-476
    48 Crossan, M., Lane, H., White, R. and Djurfeldt, L.:Organizational learning: dimensions for a theory [J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,1995,3(4):337-60
    49 March,J.G.:Bounded Rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice[J].Bell Journal of Economy,1978.9: 587-608
    50 Argyris, C. & Schon, D.: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective[M]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley:1978, p15-42
    51 Levitt,B. & March,J.:Organizational Learning[J].Annual Review of Sociology,1988.14, p157-163
    52 Kim, D. H.:The link between individual and organizational learning [J]. Sloan Management Review, Fall,1993
    53 Szulanski,G. & R.J.Jensen: Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006.27(10):937-957
    54 朱伟民,万迪昉:基于组织学习的企业知识管理[D].西安交通大学学报(社科版),2001.4
    Simon. H.: Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,1991.2:p125-133
    Hedberg.R.: How Organizations Learn and Unlearn [M].in Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol.1.1, P.C. Nystrom and W.H.Starbuck(eds), Oxford.1981,p3-27
    7 March J, Simon,H.:Organizational Learning[M].New York:Wiley:1958:54-79
    58 Levinthal. D.A. and March, J.G.:The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1993.14:95-112
    59 Pedler.M.: The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development[M].London: McGraw-Hill,1991
    60Nevis.E.C DiBella.A.J. and Gould, J.M.: Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems[J].Sloan Management Review,1995.36(2):73-85
    61 邓学军:企业家社会网络对企业绩效的影响研究:基于知识的视角[D].暨南大学,2009
    1 Daft.R.L. & K.E.Weick: Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Syslems[J]. Academy of Management Review,1984.9(2):284-295
    3 Meyers.P.W.: Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms[J].Research Policy;1990. vol.19.97-115
    64 Gherardi,S. & Nicolini,D.:The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice[J].Journal of Management Inquiry,2000.9(1),7
    5 Huber.G.P.: Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures[J]. Organization Science. 1991.2:88-115
    许冠南:关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响研究—基于探索型学习的中介机制[D].浙江大学,2008
    67 Senge. P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Orgmization[M] New York: Currency Doubleday,1995
    68 Joseph Alois Schumpeter: The Theory of Economic Development[M].Harvard University Press,2004
    69 Rothwell.R: Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990's[J]. R & D Management,1992.22: 221-239
    70 Freeman. C. & Soete.L.: The economics of industrial innovation[M]. London. Printer,1997
    71 Chaminade.C. & Roberts, H.:Social Capital as a Mechanism:Connecting knowledge within and across tirms[J]. Third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge.Learing and Capabilities. Athens. Greece,2002
    72 赵延东,肖为群:论创新型国家的社会结构基础-为创新积累社会资本[J]科学学研究,2009.1
    73 丘海雄,徐建牛:产业集群技术创新中的地方政府行为[M].管理世界,2004.10
    74 Nelson. R.R. & Winter. S.G.: National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.1993
    5 Nelson Richard R. Understanding tedmical change as an evolutionary process[M].Nortb-Holland,1987
    6 Freeman Christopher: Economics of Hope[M].Printer: London,1992
    7 Bent-Lundvall: National System of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning [M]. London:Printer Publishers,1992
    8 Pari Patel & Keith Pavitt: The continuing,widespread(and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies[J].Research Policy.1991,23(5):533-515
    79 OECD: National Innovation System[R].Puris.1997.7-11
    80 Tecce.D.J., Pisano,G.& Shuen, A.:Dynamic capabilities and strategic Management[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533
    81 Prigogine, I. & Glansdorff, P.:Thermodynamics Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations[M]. London: Wiley-Interscience,1971
    82 曾国屏:竞争与协同:系统发展的动力和源泉[J].系统辨证学学报,1996.7:7-13
    83 Ehrlich,P.R.& P.H.Raven: Butterflies and plants: a study in co evolution [J]. Evolution,1964.8
    84 Eisenhardt, K..M. & Galunic, D.C.:Coevolving [J]. Harvard Business Review.2000.1/2, Vol.78, Issue.1, p91
    85 Joe Tidd, John Bessant & Keith Pavitt: Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological. Market and Organizational Change[M].New York: John Wiley,1997
    86 郑刚:基于TIM视角的技术创新过程中各创新要素全面协同机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004
    87 Chen, X.P., & Farh,L.J.: The effectiveness of transactional and transformational leader behaviors in Chinese organizations: Evidence from Taiwan[M].Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.1999
    88 Bass,B.M.& B.J. Avolio: Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire[M].CA: Consulting Psychologists Press,1993, p 3-186
    89 Podsakoff.P.M., MacKenzie.S.B.. Moorman,R.H.,& Fetter,R.: Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1990. 1:p107-142
    90 李超平,时勘:变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报.2005.7
    91 (德)奥伊肯著,万以译;生活的意义与价值[M].上海译文出版社,2005
    92 魏江,沈璞,樊培仁:基于企业家网络的企业家学习过程模式剖析[J].浙江大学学报(人文社科版)2005.3
    93 李慧才:把握变革之舞的领导艺术—基于自组织理论的思考[J].生产力研究 2006.1
    94 徐长江,时勘:领导者—组织文化匹配模式的研究构思[J],管理评论,2003,15(7):45-50
    95 陈俊杰,陈震:“差序格局”的再思考[J].社会科学战线,1998(1):197-204
    96 周小虎:企业家社会资本及其对企业绩效的作用[J],安徽师范大学学报(人文社科版),2002.1
    97 杨鹏鹏,万迪防,王延丽:企业家社会资本及其与企业绩效的关系[J]当代经济科学,2005.7
    98 樊懿德:社会资本与企业竞争优势[D].中国人民大学,2005
    张文江,陈传明:企业社会资本与企业家社会资本的贯通性研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009.2
    (?)邱昭良:组织学习研究领域的新进展—U理论[J].经济界,2009
    101 Dyer, J.H. and Nobeoka,K.:Creating and Managing a High-Perfonnance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000.21, p345-367
    102 March,J.G.: Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J].Organization Science,1990.2:71-87
    103 Crossman M.M, Lane H.W., White R.E.:An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution[J]. Academy of Management Review,1999.24(3):522-537
    104 朱朝晕:基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究[D].浙江大学,2007
    105 Tushman,M.I.& O'Reilly,C.A.: Ambidetrous organizations:managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review,1996,38(4):8-30
    106 Haken.H: Advanced Synergetics: An Introduction[M],Berlin:Sprinner,1987
    许庆瑞,朱凌,王方瑞:从研发-营销的整合到技术创新-市场创新的协同[J].科研管理,2006(2):22-30
    108 石秀印:中国企业家成功的社会网络基础[J].管理世界,1998(6):187-208
    109 董俊武,黄江圳,陈震红:动态能力演化的知识模型与一个企业的案例分析[J].管理世界,2004.4
    110 胡恩华,刘洪:基于协同创新的集群创新企业与群外环境关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2007.6
    111 樊治平,冯博,俞竹超:知识协周的发展及研究展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007.11
    112 D.M.Amidon: Innovation Strategy for the Knowledge Economy: The Ken Awakening [M].Boston: Butterworth--Heinemann.1997.7
    113 吴子稳,胡长深:企业家心智模式形成及其对企业发展的影响[J],华东经济管理,2007.1
    114 Shin,S.J.,Zhou,J.Transformational Leadership,Conservation and Creativity: Evidence from Korea[J].Academy of Management Journal.2003(46):703-711
    115 Koene,B.A.S..Vogelaar,A.L.W..& Socters,J.L,.:Leadership Effects on Organizational Climate and Financial Performance:Local Leadership Effect in China Organizations[J].Leadership Quarterly,2002.13 (3):192-315
    116 Rogers.E.M.:Diffusion of Innovations(4th ed)[M].New York: Free Press,1995
    117 那瑛:企业家社会网络资本的作用分析[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版),2006.1
    118 Anderson. A.R. & C.J. Miller: "Class matters": human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process [J]. Journal of Socio-Economics,2003.32(1):17-36
    119 Isaksen,S.G. & Lauer.K.J.:The climate for creativity and change in teams[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management,2002.11(1):74-86
    120 刘善球&王月平:“信任链”在科技型企业家社会网络中的作用机理诠释[J].科技进步与对策,2005(11):120-121
    121 Inkpen.A., Eric.W.. & Tsang.K.:Social capital,networks and knowledge transfe[J]. Academy of Management Revieiw.2005,30(1):116-165
    122 Gieskes.J.F.B.: Learning in product innovation processes[D].PhD Thesis. Twente University, Enschde,2001
    123 Hunter,S.T., Bedell,K.E..& Mumford,M.D.:Dimensions of creative climate: A general taxonomy[J].The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving,2005.15 (2):97-116
    124 朱兵、王文平、王为东、张廷龙:企业文化、组织学习对创新绩效的影响[J].软科学,2010.1
    125 Anand,B.N. & T. Khanna: Do films learn to create value? The case of alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal. 2000.21(3):295-315
    126 Laursen,K. & Salter,A.:Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation perlormance among U.K. Manufacturing firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006.27:131-150
    127 Adams.M.E.,Day.G.S. & Dougherty,D.:Enhancing new product development performance: an organizational learning perspectivc[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,1998.15(5):403-422
    128 约翰·蔡尔德,莎莉·赫文斯:组织的社会构成及其对组织学习的影响[R].转引自张新华主编:组织学习与知识创新[M].上海人民出版社,2001
    129 Vera.D. & Grossman,.M.:Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning[J]. Academy of Management Review. 2004,29 (2):222-240
    130 McGiIl,M.E.,Slocum,J.W., & Lei,D.:Management practices in learning organizations[J].Organizational Dynamics,1993.22:5-17
    131 Ahmed.P.K.: Cluture and climate for innovation[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management.1998.1:30-43
    132 于海波,郑晓明,方俐洛,凌文铨,刘春萍:如何领导组织学习:变革型领导与组织学习的关系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008.3
    133 Zi Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong:Exploration vs. Exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothsis[J]. Organization Science,2004.15(4):481-494
    134 Gupta,A.K. & Govindarajan.V.:Knowledge flows within multinational corporations[J].Strategic Mangement Journal,2000.21 (4):473-496
    135 Reagans,R. & McEvily,B.:Network structure and Knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range[J], Administrative Science Quarterly,2003.48:240-267
    136 Kale.P., Singh. H. & Perlmutter.H.:Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000.21:217-238
    137 Krackhardt. David & Robert. N. Stern.Informal Networks and Organizational Crisis: an Experimental Simulation[J].Social Psychology Quarterly,1988,51 (2):123-140
    138 Andrews.K.M., & Delahay.B.L.:Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning:The psychosocial filter[J].Journal of Management Studies,2000.37(4):797-810
    139 高祥宇,卫民堂,李伟:信任促进两人层次知识转移的机制研究[J].科学学研究,2005(3):394-400
    140 潘松挺.蔡宁:网络关系强度与组织学习:环境动态性的调节作用[J].科学决策,2010.4
    141 韩瑜:企业网络成长的企业家社会资本维度研究[J].中国管理信息化2008.3
    142 Pillai.R., Schriesheim.C.A.& Williams,E.S.:Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study[J].Journal of Management,1999.25 (6):897-933
    144 Gulati,R.,Nohria.N. & Zaheer,A.:Strategic networks[J].Strategic Management Journal.2000.21 (3):203-215
    145 Sinkula.W., E.Baker & T.Noordewier: A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values.Knowledge. and Behavior[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.1997.Vol.25, No.4,305-318
    146 Slater,Stanley,F.& Narver.J.C.: Market Orientation and the Learning Organization[J].Journal of Marketing Science.1995. Vol.59, Jnly:63-74
    147 黄俊英:非盈利组织市场导向之研究-组织学习观点[R].行政院国家科委专题研究计划成果报告,1999
    148 Ahuja, G.:Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly;2000a.15:425-455
    149 王莉:动态企业下企业网络、组织学习和企业绩效关系研究[D].山东大学,2008
    150 荣泰生:企业研究方法[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005
    151 Andrews, F. M:Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modeling approach[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly,1984.48:409-442
    152 谢家琳:实地研究中的问卷调查法[J].载于陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编:组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.6
    153 Churchill.G.:A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs[J].Journal of Marketing Reasearch,1979.16(1):64-73
    153 转引自李燚:管理创新中的组织学习方式研究[D].复旦大学,2004
    154 耿新:企业家社会资本对新创企业绩效影响研究[D].山东大学,2008
    156 Dunn,S.C. & Seakcr,R.F..et.al.:Latent variable in business logistics research: Scale development and validation[J]. Journal of Business Logistics.1994.15(2):145-172
    157 Flower.F.J.: Survey research methods[M].Newwbury Park. CA.Sage,1988
    158 Lee.C.,Lee.K..et.al.:Internal capabilities.external networks and performance: A study on technology-based ventures[J].Sirategic Managemcnt Journal.2001.22:615-640
    159 吕晓俊:组织中员工心智模式的理论与实证研究[D].华东师范大学,2002
    160 沈璞:基于网络分析的中小企业家学习过程模式研究[D].浙江大学,2004
    161 吕淑丽:企业家社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响[D].东华大学,2008
    162 蔡启通:组织因素、组织成员整体创造性与组织创新之关系[D].台湾大学,1997
    163 龙飞:基于组织共享心智模型的组织知识创新管理研究[D].东华大学,2008
    164 涂辉文:基于变革动力特征的组织学习与心理授权关系研究[D].浙江大学,2010
    165 于海波、方俐洛、凌文铨:企业组织的学习结构[J].心理学报,2006.38(4)
    166 Boomsma,A.:Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation[J]. Psychometrika,1982.50:229-242
    167 Nunnally,J.C.: Psychometric Theory[M].McGraw Hill, New York,1967
    168 张文彤,闫洁主编:SPSS统计分析基础教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.9
    169 Kline,R.B.:Principles and Practice of Structuctural Equation Modeling[M].New York.Guilford Press,1998
    171Hinkin.T.K.: A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires[J].Organizational Research Methods,1998.1:104-121
    172 刘怀伟:商务市场中顾客关系的持续机制研究[D].浙江大学,2003
    杨静:供应链内企业间信任的产生机制及其对合作的影响-基于制造业企业的研究[D].浙江大学,2006
    174 Sinionin,B.L.: Anibiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal.1999.20:595-623
    175 王立生:社会资本、吸收能力对知识获取和创新绩效的影响研究[D].浙江大学,2007
    176 吴明隆:SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
    吴治国:变革型领导、组织创新气氛与创新绩效关联模型研究[D].上海交通大学,2008
    178 黄芳铭:结构方程模型:理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005
    179 侯杰泰、温忠麟、成子娟:结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004
    [1]J.Adler, Paul & Kwon, Seok-Woo:Social Capital:Prospects for a new concept [J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,Vol.27, No.1:17-40
    [2].Adams,M.E.,Day,G.S. & Dougherty,D.:Enhancing new product development performance:an organizational learning perspective[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,1998.15(5):403-422
    [3].Ahmed,P.K.:Cluture and climate for innovation[J].European Journal of Innovation Management,1998.1:30-43
    [4].Ahuja, G.:Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation:a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000a,45:425-455
    [5].Amidon D.M.: Innovation Strategy for the Knowledge Economy: The Ken Awakening [M].Boston:Butterworth- Heinemann,1997.7
    [6].Anand,B.N. & T. Khanna:Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000.21 (3):295-315
    [7].Anderson, A.R. & C.J. Miller:"Class matters":human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process [J]. Journal of Socio-Economics,2003.32 (1):17-36
    [8].Andrews, F. M.:Construct validity and error components of survey measures:A structural modeling approach[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly,1984.48,409-442
    [9].Andrews,K.M. & Delahay,B.L.:Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning:The psychosocial filter[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2000.37(4):797-810
    [10].Argyris, C. & Schon, D.:Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective [M]. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley:1978, p15-42
    [11].Baron,R. & Kenny, D.:The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986. 51:1173-1182
    [12].Bass,B.M.:Leadership and performance beyond expectations[M]. New York:Free Press,1985
    [13].Bass,B.M.& B.J. Avolio: MultifactorLeadershipQuestionnaire[M].CA: Consulting Psychologists Press,1993, P3-186
    [14].Belliveau, M.A., C.A.O'Reilly Ⅲ, & J.B.Wade.:Social capital at the top:Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compenstion[J].Academy of Management Journals 996.39:15
    [15].Boomsma,A.:Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation[J].Psychometrika,1982.50:229-242
    [16].Bourdieu P.:The Forms of CapitaJ[R].ln:J G Richardson. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood,1985
    [17].Burns, J.M.:Leadership [M].New York: Harper & Row,1978
    [18].Burt R.S:Structural Holes: The Social Structural of Competition[M]. Cambridge, M.A.:Harvard University Press.1992
    [19].Burt,R.S.:The contingent value of social capital[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997a,42:339-365
    [20].Burt, R.S.:A note on social capital and network content[J].Social Networks,1997 b,19:355-373
    [21].Chaminade,C. & Roberts, H.:Social Capital as a Mechanism: Connecting knowledge within and across firms[R]. Third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge,Learning and Capabilities, Athens, Greece,2002
    [22].Chen, X.P.,& Farh,L.J.: The effectiveness of transactional and transformational leader behaviors in Chinese organizations: Evidence from Taiwan[R].Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago,1999
    [23].Churchill,G.:A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Reasearch,1979.16(1):64-73
    [24].Coleman J.S.:Foundations of Social Theory[M].Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1990.
    [25].Crossman M.M, Lane H.W.,&White R.E.:An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution [J]. Academy of Management Review.1999.24 (3):522-537
    [26].Crossan, M., Lane, H., White, R. and Djurfeldt, L.:Organizational learning: dimensions for a theory [J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1995.3:337-360
    [27].Daft,R.L.&K.E.Weick:Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems[J]. Academy of Management Review,1984.9(2):284-295
    [28].Dunn,S.C. & Seaker,R.F.,et.al.:Latent variable in business logistics research:Scale development and validation[J]. Journal of Business Logistics,1994.15(2):145 172
    [29].Dyer, J.H. & Nobeoka,K.:Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,2000. 21,p345-367
    [30].Ehrlich, P.R. & P.H.Raven:Butterflies and Plants:A Study in Co-evolution [J]. Evolution,1964.8
    [31].Eisenhardt, K.M. & Galunic, D.C.:Coevolving[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000.1/2, Vol.78, Issue.I,p91
    [32].Flower,F.J.: Survey research methods[M].Newbury Park, CA,Sage,1988
    [33].Fountain, J.:Social Capital: A key enable of innovation in science and technology[J].In:Branscomb L.M & Keller,J,(eds).Investing in innovation towards a consensus strategy for federal technology policy. Cambridge:the MIT press.1997
    [34].Freeman Christopher: Economics of Hope[M].Printer: London,1992
    [35].Freeman, C. & Soete, L.: The economics of industrialinnovation[M].London, Printer,1997
    [36].Fukuyama, F.:Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prospervity[M].New York: Free Press,1995
    [37].Gardner,W.L., Avolio,B.J., & Luthans,F., et al.:Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development[J]. Leadership Quarterly,2005.16:343-372
    [38].Gherardi,S. & Nicolini,D.:The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice [J].Journal of Management Inquiry,2000.9 (1),7
    [39].Gieskes,J.F.B.:learning in product innovation processes[D].PhD Thesis, Twente University, Enschde,2001
    [40].Goleman,D.:What makes a leader? [J]. Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec,1998
    [41].Granovetter, M.:The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, Vol.78,1360-1380
    [42].Granovetter, M.:Economic Action and Social Structure:the Problem of Embeddedness [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1985, Vol.91:481-510
    [43].Grootaert C. et al.:Measuring Social Capital [J].The World Bank,2004
    [44].Gulati,R.,Nohria,N. & Zaheer,A.:Strategic networks[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000.21 (3):203-215
    [45].Gupta,A.K. & Govindarajan,V.:Knowledge flows within multinational corporations [J]. Strategic Mangement.Journal,2000.21 (4):473-496
    [46].Haken.H: Advanced Synergetics: An Introduction[M],Berlin:Sprinner,1987
    [47].Hedberg,R.:How Organizations Learn and Unlearn[M].in Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol.1.1, P.C. Nystrom and W.H.Starbuck(eds), Oxford,1981,p3-27
    [48].Hinkin,T,K.:A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires[J].Organizational Research Methods,1998.1:104-121
    [49].Huber,G.P.:Organizational learning:the contributing processes and the literatures[J]. Organization Science,1991.2:88-115
    [50].Hunter,S.T., Bedell,K.E., & Mumford,M.D.:Dimensions of creative climate:A general taxonomy [J].Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 2005.15(2):97-116
    [51].Inkpen.A., Eric.W., & Tsang,K.:Social capital,networks and knowledge transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(1):146-165
    [52].Isaksen,S.G. & Lauer,K.J.:The climate for creativity and change in teams[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management,2002.11(1):74-86
    [53]Joe Tidd. John Bessant & Keith Pavitt: Managing Innovation: Integrating tech- -nological, Market and Organizational Change[M]. New York: John Wiley,1997
    [54].Joseph.A.Schumpeter:The Theory of Economic Development[M].Harvard University Press,2004
    [55].Kale,P., Singh, H. & Perlmutter,H.:Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances:Building Relational Capital [J].StrategicManagement Journal,2000.21:217-238
    [56].Kernis,M.H.:Optimal self-esteem and authenticity:Separating fantasy from reality [J].Psychological Inquiry,2003,14(1):83-89
    [57].Kim,D.H.:The link between individual and organizational learning[J].Sloan Manage- ment Review, Fall,1993
    [58].Kline,R.B.:Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling[M].New York,Guilford Press,1998
    [59].Koene,B.A.S..Vogelaar,A.L.W., & Soeters,J.L.:Leadership Effects on Organizational Climate and Financial Performance:Local Leadership Effect in China Organizations [J].Leadership Quarterly,2002.13(3):192-315
    [60]. Krackhardt, David & Robert, N. Stern.:Informal Networks and Organizational Crisis:an Experimental Simulation[J].Social Psychology Quarterly,1988,51 (2):123-140
    [61]. Krackhardt, David:The Strength of Strong Ties:the Importance of Philos in Networks and Organizations [J].In Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles (Ed.), Networks and Organizations. Cambridge, Harvard Business School Press,1992
    [62].Krishna, Anirudh & Elizabeth Shrader.:Cross-Cultural Measures of Social Capital:A Tool and Results from India and Panama[J].In Social Capital Initiative Working Paper Series. Washington, DC:The World Bank.
    [63].Kurt Lewin:A Study Using Three Steps Is Reported in Paul O'Neil: "Transforming Managers for Organizational Change" [J]. Training and Development Journal,1990 (7):87-90
    [64].Laursen,K. & Salter,A.:Open for innovation:the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. Manufacturing firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006.27:131-150
    [65].Lee.C.,Lee.K..et.al.:Internal capabilities,external networks and performance:A study on technology-based ventures[J].Strategic Management Journal,2001.22: 615-640
    [66].Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G.:The myopia of learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,1993.14:95-112
    [67].Levitt.B. & March,J.:Organizational Learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1988.14, p157-163
    [68].Lin Nan & P.V.Marsden:Social Resources and Instrumental Action[J].Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage,1982:131-145
    [69].Lin Nan:Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action[M].New York: Cambridge University Press,2001
    [70].Lundvall-Bent: National System of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning[M]. London:Printer Publishers,1992
    [71].March J, Simon,H.: Organizational Learning [M].New York:Wiley:1958:54-79
    [72].March,J.G.:Bounded Rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice[J].Bell Journal of Economy,1978.9:587-608
    [73].March,J.G.:Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J]. Organization Science,1991.2:71-87
    [74]McGill,M.E.,Slocum,J.W.,& Lei,D.:Management practices in learning organizations [J].Organizational Dynamics,1993.22:5-17
    [75]Meyers,P.W.:Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms[J].Research Policy, 1990. Vol.19.97-115
    [76].Nahapiet,J.&Goshal,S.:Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,1998, Vol.23, No.2:242-266
    [77].Nelson,R.R.:Understanding technical change as an evolutionary process[M]. North- Holland.1987
    [78].Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S.G.: National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1993
    [79].Nevis,E.C., DiBella,A.J. and Gould, J.M.:Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems[J].Sloan Management Review,1995.36(2):73-85
    [80].Nunnially,J.C.:Psychometric Theory[M].McGraw Hill, New York,1967
    [81].OECD:NationalInnovation System[R].OECD.Paris.1997.7-11
    [82].Pari Patel & Keith Pavitt: The continuing,widespread(and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies[J].Research Policy.1994,23(5); 533-545
    [83].Pedler,M.: The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development [M]. London:McGraw-Hill,1991
    [84].Pillai,R., Schriesheim,C.A.& Williams,E.S.:Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study[J].Journal of Management,1999.25(6):897-933
    [85].Podsakoff,P.M., MacKenzie.S.B., Moorman,R.H., & Fetter,R.:Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors[J]. Leadership Quarterly,1990.1, p107-142
    [86].Portes,A.,& Sensenbrenner Julia: Embeddedness and Immigration:Notes on the Social Capital Determinants of Economic Action[J] American Journal of Sociology,1993,Vol.98:1320-1350
    [87].Portes,A.:Social capital:Its origins and applications in modern sociology [J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1998.24
    [88].Prigogine,I. & Glansdorff,P.:Thermodynamics Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations[M]. London:Wiley-Interscience,1971
    [89].Putanam,R.: Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].NJ: Princeton University Press,1993
    [90].Putanam, R.:Turning in, Turning out: The stage disappearance of social capital in American[J]. Political Science and Politics,1995,28 (4)
    [91].Putnam, R.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community [M]. New York: Simon and Schuster.2000
    [92].Reagans,R. & McEvily,B.:Network structure and Knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2003.48:240-267
    [93].Rogers,E.M.:Diffusion of Innovations(4th ed)[M].New York: Free Press,1995
    [94].Rothwell,R:Successful Industrial Innovation:Critical Factors for the 1990's [J].R & D Management,1992.22:221-239
    [95].Schein.E.H.:Organizational Culture and Leadership [M].CA:San Francisco, Jossey-Bass,1992.1-2
    [96].Senge.P.M.:The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organization [M]. New York:Currency Doubleday.1995
    [97].Sharmir,B., House,R.J.,& Arthur,M.B.:The Motivational effects of charismatic leadership:a self-concept based theory[J]. Organization Science,1993 (4)
    [98].Shin,S.J.,Zhou,J.Transformational Leadership,Conservation and Creativity: Evidence from Korea[J].Academy of Management Journal,2003 (46):703-714
    [99].Simon. H.:Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,1991.2:p125-133
    [100].Simonin,B.L.:Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal,1999.20:595-623
    [101].Sinkula,W., E.Baker & T.Noordewier:A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning:Linking Values,Knowledge, and Behavior[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,1997. Vol.25,No.4,305-318
    [102].Slater,S.F. & J.C.Narver:Market Orientation and the Learning Organization [J]. Journal of Marketing,1995.59(3):63-74
    [103].Skogstad,A. & Einarsen,S.L.:The importance of a change-centered leadership style in four organizational cultures[J]. Scand. Journal of Management,1999, 15:289-306
    [104].Szulanski,G.& R.J.Jensen:Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006.27(10):937-957
    [105].Teece,D.J.,Pisano,G. & Shuen,A.:Dynamic capabilities and strategic Management [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533
    [106].Tsai,W. & S.Ghoshal.:Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Intrafirm networks[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1998.41:464-476
    [107].Tushman,M.I. & O'Reilly,C.A.: Ambidetrous organizations:managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review, 1996.38(4):8-30
    [108]. Vera.D. & Crossman,M.:Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning[J]. Academy of Management Review,2004.29 (2):222-240
    [109].Yli-Renko. H., Autio. E., et al.:Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,2001.22:587-613
    [110]. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. & V.Tontti:Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology -based new firms[J]. International Business Review,2002.11:279-304
    [111]. Yukl.G.:Leadership in Organizations.[M].Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice -Hall, 2002
    [112]. Zi Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong:Exploration vs. Exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothsis[J]. Organization Science,2004.15(4):481-494
    [1].(美)埃德加·沙因:企业文化生存指南[M],北京:机械工业出版社,2004
    [2].(德)奥伊肯著,万以译:生活的意义与价值[M].上海译文出版社,2005
    [3].边燕杰,丘海雄:企业社会资本及其功效[J],《中国社会科学》,2000.2
    [4].蔡启通:组织因素、组织成员整体创造性与组织创新关系[D].台湾大学,1997
    [5].陈放:企业病诊断[M].中国经济出版社,1999
    [6].陈俊杰,陈震:“差序格局”的再思考[J].社会科学战线,1998(1):197-204
    [7].邓学军:企业家社会网络对企业绩效的影响研究:基于知识的视角[D].暨南大学,2009
    [8].董俊武,黄江圳,陈震红:动态能力演化的知识模型与一个企业的案例分析[J].管理世界,2004.4
    [9].樊懿德:社会资本与企业竞争优势[D].中国人民大学,2005
    [10].樊治平,冯博,俞竹超:知识协同的发展及研究展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007.11
    [11].高祥宇,卫民堂,李伟:信任促进两人层次知识转移的机制研究[J].科学学研究,2005(3):394-400
    [12].耿新:企业家社会资本对新创企业绩效影响研究[D].山东大学,2008
    [13].韩瑜:企业网络成长的企业家社会资本维度研究[J].中国管理信息化2008.3
    [14].侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟:结构方程模型及其应用[M].教育科学出版社,2004
    [15].胡恩华,刘洪:基于协同创新的集群创新企业与群外环境关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2007.6
    [16].黄芳铭:结构方程模型:理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005
    [17].黄俊英:非盈利组织市场导向之研究-组织学习观点[R].行政院国家科委专题研究计划成果报告,1999
    [18].(美)吉姆·科林斯&杰里·波勒斯,真如译,基业长青[M].北京:中信出版社,2006.9
    [19].科技部:高新技术企业认定管理办法[J].科学技术部办公厅,2008.4
    [20].雷加骗:高度关注我国对外技术依赖基本动因的深刻变化[J],中国青年科技,2008.12
    [21].李超平,时勘:变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005.7
    [22].李惠斌,杨雪冬:《社会资本与社会发展》[M].北京:社科文献出版社,2000
    [23].李慧才:把握变革之舞的领导艺术[J].生产力研究2006.1
    [24].李燚:管理创新中的组织学习方式研究[D].复旦大学,2004
    [25].刘怀伟:商务市场中顾客关系的持续机制研究[D].浙江大学,2003
    [26].刘善球&王月平:“信任链”在科技型企业家社会网络中的作用机理诠释[J].科技进步与对策,2005(11):120-121
    [27].龙飞:基于组织共享心智模型的组织知识创新管理研究[D].东华大学,2008
    [28].吕晓俊:组织中员工心智模式的理论与实证研究[D].华东师范大学,2002
    [29].吕淑丽:企业家社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响[D].东华大学,2008
    [30].那瑛:企业家社会网络资本的作用分析[J].内蒙古民族大学学报,2006.1
    [31].潘松挺,蔡宁:网络关系强度与组织学习:环境动态性的调节作用[J].科学 决策,2010.4
    [32].丘海雄,徐建牛:产业集群技术创新中的地方政府行为[M].管理世界,2004.10
    [33].邱昭良:组织学习研究领域的新进展—U理论[J].经济界,2009
    [34].荣泰生:企业研究方法[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005
    [35].沈璞:基于网络分析的中小企业家学习过程模式研究[D].浙江大学,2004
    [36].石秀印:中国企业家成功的社会网络基础[J].管理世界,1998(6):187-208
    [37].涂辉文:基于变革动力特征的组织学习与心理授权关系研究[D].浙江大学,2010
    [38].托马斯·布朗:社会资本理论综述[J],《社会资本与社会发展》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.P77-100
    [39].王莉:动态企业网络、组织学习和企业绩效关系研究[D].山东大学,2008
    [40].王立生:社会资本、吸收能力对知识获取和创新绩效的影响研究[D].浙江大学,2007
    [41].魏江,沈璞,樊培仁:基于企业家网络的企业家学习过程模式剖析[J].浙江大学学报(人文社科版),2005.3
    [42].吴明隆:SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
    [43].吴琼,施建军:企业家资源—社会资本理论综述[J].《学海》,2009.6
    [44].吴治国:变革型领导、组织创新气氛与创新绩效关联模型研究[D].上海交通大学,2008
    [45].吴子稳,胡长深:企业家心智模式形成及其对企业发展的影响[J].华东经济管理,2007.1
    [46].徐长江,时勘:领导者—组织文化匹配模式的研究构思[J],管理评论,2003.15(7):45-50
    [47].谢家琳:实地研究中的问卷调查法[J].载于陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编:组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.6
    [48].许冠南:关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响研究—基于探索型学习的中介机制[[)].浙江大学,2008
    [49].许庆瑞,朱凌,王方瑞:从研发-营销的整合到技术创新-市场创新的协同[J]. 科研管理,2006(2):22-30
    [50].杨静:供应链内企业间信任的产生机制及其对合作的影响-基于制造业企业的研究[D].浙江大学,2006
    [51].杨鹏鹏,万迪昉,王延丽:企业家社会资本及其与企业绩效的关系[J]当代经济科学,2005.7
    [52].于海波、方俐洛、凌文铨:企业组织的学习结构[J].心理学报,2006.38(4)
    [53].于海波,郑晓明,方俐洛,凌文铨,刘春萍:如何领导组织学习:变革型领导与组织学习的关系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008.3
    [54].曾国屏:竞争与协同:系统发展的动力和源泉[J].系统辨证学学报,1996.7
    [55].张鼎昆:改善与革命—企业变革的理论综述[J].中国软科学,2000.10
    [56].张明,江旭,高山行:战略联盟中组织学习、知识创造与创新绩效的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008.8
    [57].张文江,陈传明:企业社会资本与企业家社会资本的贯通性研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009.2
    [58].张文彤,闫洁主编:SPSS统计分析基础[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.9
    [59].张新华主编:组织学习与知识创新[M].上海人民出版社,2001
    [60].赵延东,肖为群:论创新型国家的社会结构基础-为创新积累社会资本[J]科学学研究,2009.1
    [61].郑刚:基于TIM视角的技术创新过程中各创新要素全面协同机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004
    [62].郑钢:全面协同创新:迈向创新型企业之路[M].北京:科学出版社,2006
    [63].中华全国工商联:中国民营企业发展报告[M].社会科学文献出版社,2005
    [64].周小虎:企业家社会资本及其对企业绩效的作用[J],安徽师范大学学报(人文社科版),2002.1
    [65].朱兵、王文平、王为东、张廷龙:企业文化、组织学习对创新绩效的影响,[J].软科学,2010.1
    [66].朱伟民,万迪防:基于组织学习的企业知识管理[J].西安交通大学学报(社科版),2001.4
    [67].朱朝晖:基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究[D].浙江大学,2007

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700