覆膜玉米后茬免耕种植向日葵农田效应研究
|
摘要
地膜再利用是增温保水、稳产高产、节本增效、固土减残留的重要耕作技术之一针对地膜残留污染加重的实际问题,开展覆膜玉米后茬免耕种植向日葵农田效应研究,对进一步发挥地膜增产效应具有现实意义。本研究在内蒙古河套地区临河区双河镇通过田间试验和室内测定分析,并结合走访调查等方法,以新覆膜和露地栽培为对照研究地膜再利用对土壤温度、水分、土壤微生物量、土壤酶活性、向日葵出苗、生育进程和产量及相关性状的影响,分析其经济效益及生态效应。研究结果如下：
1.地膜再利用仍具有明显的增温和提高地积温的效果。地膜再利用仍能显著提高向日葵出苗期(前7天)的土壤温度,各土层(0-50cm)日均温均高于露地,增幅随着土层的加深略有减弱,其中旧膜的浅层(0-20cm)温度较露地高1.7～2.1℃,深层(30-50cm)高1.8～2.0℃。旧膜浅层土温较新膜低1.3-2.0℃,深层差异不明显。新旧膜对向日葵不同生育阶段的增温作用均表现为：出苗期>现蕾期>收获期>始花期>终花期。出苗期旧膜5cm和10cm土层有效地积温均高于露地约21.6℃,略低于新膜约12.4℃。全生育期旧膜5cm土层总积温高于露地229.5℃,低于新膜101℃。
2.地膜再利用仍具有保水保墒和提高水分利用效率的作用。在播前初始土壤含水量补齐到一致的前提下,旧膜1m土层的生育期土壤平均相对含水量较露地均提高约1.5个百分点,其中0-10cm土层相差最大,两年分别提高1.9和2.6个百分点,差异均显著。旧膜较露地两年分别为后茬向日葵田节水46.4mm和56.5mm,与新膜无显著差异。旧膜的土壤剖面水分稳定性较露地提高,水分变异系数两年分别比露地降低3.6%和4.8%；旧膜籽粒水分利用效率分别较露地显著提高15.7%和22.7%,与新膜相比差异不显著(P<0.05)。
3.地膜再利用能增加土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量。在0-40cm土层,土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量大小均表现为：旧膜>新膜>露地。旧膜的生物量碳含量较露地和新膜分别显著提高13.8%和12.1%(P<0.01)；旧膜的土壤微生物量氮含量较露地和新膜分别显著提高5.0%和4.0%(P<0.05)；旧膜的土壤微生物量磷含量较露地和新膜分别显著提高34.2%和18.3%(P<0.01)。土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量生育期变化有所不同。土壤微生物量碳含量生育期变化总体上受灌水影响呈波动下降；土壤微生物量氮含量全生育期降低趋势,土壤微生物量磷含量呈先增加后降低的变化趋势。土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量垂直变化均表现为随土层加深而减少。
4.地膜再利用可明显提高土壤酶活性。在0-40cm土层,旧膜全生育期土壤过氧化氢酶活性较露地和新膜分别显著增加4.2%和2.6%；旧膜的土壤脲酶活性较新膜显著增加7.4%,较露地增加1.1%,无显著差异；旧膜的土壤蔗糖酶活性较露地显著增加3.8%,较新膜增加3.0%,差异不显著。土壤酶活性生育期变化各不相同。土壤过氧化氢酶活性在播前到现蕾变化较为平稳,花期下降到最低,之后上升,到收获期达最高；土壤脲酶活性的生育期变化具有上升-下降-小幅上升的规律；土壤蔗糖酶活性的生育期变化呈下降一上升一下降的变化趋势。土壤氧化氢酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶活性的垂直变化均表现为随土层加深而减少的趋势。
5.地膜再利用仍具有促苗早发,加快生育进程和提高产量的作用。旧膜较露地提前1-2天出苗,新旧膜间无明显差异。旧膜生育期较露地缩短5-6天,较新膜延长2天。旧膜的株高、茎粗、盘径、叶干重和地上部总干重均显著高于露地；旧膜的茎粗略高于新膜,但差异不显著,旧膜的株高、盘径、叶干重和地上部总千重均略低于新膜,无显著差异。旧膜覆盖下向日葵的每盘粒重、百粒重及产量均显著高于露地。其中,旧膜与露地相比,两年的每盘粒重分别高3.3%和10.4%,百粒重分别高3.7%和5.8%,产量分别高11.4%和16.8%。旧膜的每盘粒重、百粒重均略低于新膜,两年的产量较新膜分别低3.3%和2.6%,差异均不显著(P<0.05)。
6.地膜再利用具有节本省工、增值增效的协同作用。地膜再利用的机械人工投入两年分别较露地耕作减少419.3元/hm2和371.6元/hm2,较新膜节省494.4元/hm2和518.0元/hm2,农资投入分别较新膜少1394元/hm2和817元/hm2,产值较露地两年分别显著提高4189元/hm2和5641元/hm2,稍低于新膜1420元/hm2和965元/hm2,差异不显著,纯收益两年分别比露地提高5059元/hm2和5863元/hm2,比新膜仅低26元/hm2和147元/hm2。地膜再利用的产投比最大,两年分别为3.0和2.68,比露地增大18.5%和19.9%,比新膜增大6.7%和3.2%。
7.地膜再利用对休闲期农田具有增温、保水、减蚀、降低膜残留的作用,改善了农田生态环境。在农田休闲期,地膜再利用的0-100cm土壤含水量较露地平均提高2.1个百分点,土壤贮水量较露地增加24.8mm-33.0mm,其中0-10cm和10-20cm土层土壤墒情得到显著改善；地膜再利用的0-50cm土层土壤温度两年分别提高3.1℃和2.8℃,其中5cm土层高4.6℃和1.7℃,10cm高4.1℃和2.8℃；地膜再利用的风蚀量比露地显著减少了68.77%。地膜再利用使地膜利用率提高约1倍,而农田残留量降为新膜的一半,有力缓解了农田污染,改善了农田生态环境。
Film mulching plays a very important role in soil warming, water preserving, soil conservation, reducing soil erosion and increasing yield, which is widely used in agricultural production. However, every year crop mulching with new film come into being of a large number of film residue, leading to the "white pollution", which make agricultural ecological environment degenerated. At the same time, in the Hetao region the farming practice such as plough and irrigation is after harvest in autumn that soil was completely exposed during fallow period of cropland from November to next early May (about7months), combined with climatic drought and windy, which result in excessive cropland evaporation, poor capacity of soil water, severe soil erosion, and finally the cropland deteriorated. Aiming at reducing agricultural pollution caused by plastic film, the effects of re-used plastic film mulching on soil temperatures, seed emergence and all seedlings period, sunflower's growth and development, sunflower's yield, soil moisture, water use efficiency and soil erosion during fallow period of cropland were studied, investigated the effects of re-used plastic film mulching on sunflower's economic benefit, the study also investigated plastic film residue and sunflower's yield, which compared with new plastic film mulching and bare field in Hetao region. The results were as follows:
1. Re-used film could increase the soil temperatures. Compared with bare field, the soil temperature of re-used film mulching increased1.3～4.0℃and0.7～1.8℃separately in the highest and lowest temperature stage. The soil average temperature increased significantly1.7～2.1℃in upper layer (0-20cm) and1.8～2.0℃in lower layer (30-50cm); compared with new film mulching lower1.3～2.0℃in upper layer, and similar as in lower layer. Compared with bare field, Daily maximum and minimum temperatures of re-used film mulching were postponed about1hour, similar as new film mulching. Re-used plastic film mulching can increase the soil temperatures in sunflower earlier and later stage, it's warming effect was:sowing stage> seedling stage> maturing stage>blooming stage> after flowering stage; During emergence stage (7days after sowing), effective accumulated temperature of re-used film mulching was21.6℃and23.8℃higher than that of bare field in depth of5cm and10cm. Compared with new film mulching, it was12.4℃and10.0℃lower in depth of5cm and10cm. During all stage, effective accumulated temperature of re-used film was229.5℃higher than that of open field,101℃slightly lower than new film in the depth of5cm.
2. Re-used tilm could improve the soil moisture, increasing water use efficiency. The soil moisture of re-used plastic film mulching was increased1.5percentage points in the soil depth of0-100cm and maximum of1.9or2.6higher in the soil depth of0-10cm than that of open field in sunflower's growth stage. Soil water of re-used film was more than open field's24.8mm or33.0mm before seeding and after soil water was replenished to same level,21.6mm or24.5mm was more than open field's at harvest. Re-used film's C.V of vertical soil moisture was dropped in3.6%or4.8%than that of open field. Meanwhile, water use efficiency of re-used film were higher significantly than that of open field15.7%or22.7%respectively in2010and2011, no significant with new film.
3. Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content of re-used film mulching increased at different degree. compared with bare field and new film mulching, soil microbial biomass carbon content in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly (p<0.01)13.8%and12.1%respectively, soil microbial biomass nitrogen content in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly (p<0.05)5.0%and4.0%respectively, soil microbial biomass phosphorus content in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly34.2%a nd18.3%respectively(p<0.01). Growth stage changes of Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content are different. The soil microbial biomass carbon content decline with fluctuation effecting by irrigation; microbial biomass nitrogen content decreased; microbial biomass phosphorus content was increased first and then decreased. Vertical changes of the soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus content are reduced with increasing soil depth.
4. Soil enzyme activity of re-used film mulching increased at different degree. compared with bare field and new film mulching, soil catalase activity in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly4.2%and2.6%respectively, soil urease activity in0-40cm of re-used film were higher no significantly1.1%and significantly7.4%respectively, invertase activity in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly3.8%and3.0%respectively(p<0.05). Growth stage changes of soil catalase activity, soil urease activity, soil invertase activity are different from each other. The soil catalase activity is relatively stable Beginning from sowing to squaring, decreased to a minimum in flowering, after rising up to the maximum in harvest: soil (?)rease activity beginning with a minimum in sowing rise up to the maximum in squaring: then decreased decreased to flowering; soil invertase activity was f(?)uctuating decline effecting by irrigation, and with a minimum in squaring. Vertical changes of the soil catalase activity, soil urease activity, soil invertase activity are reduced with soil deepening.
5. Re-used film could also decrease sunflower's growth and development time and increase the yield of sunflower. Mulching with re-used film could effectively shorten seed germination for1-2days. Meanwhile, growth period of re-used film was significant earlier than open field5-6days and not significant later than plastic film2days. In addition, plant height; stem diameter, disc diameter, leaf dry weight and total dry weight of re-used film mulching was significantly higher than that of bare field; Except stem diameter, plant height, disc diameter, leaf dry weight and total dry weight of re-used film mulching was slightly lower than that of new film mulching, but the difference was not significant. Compared with bare field, yield per plant of re-used film mulching was significantly increased3.3%(2010) and10.4%(2011),100-seed weight of re-used film mulching was significantly increased3.7%(2010) and5.8%(2011), and they were lower than that of new film mulching, but the difference was not significant. In addition, compared with bare field, sunflower yield of re-used film mulching was significantly increased11.4%(2010) and16.8%(2011), and compared to the new film treatment, the yield decreased3.3%(2010) and2.6%(2011)(p<0.05).
6. Re-used plastic film mulching had significantly increased the economic benefit. Compared with bare field, the sunflower's yield of re-used film mulching increased9.6to15%significantly, and lower than new film by2.6to4.9%(p<0.05). Compared with bare field, the input of re-used film mulching was reduced by5.6%to9.4%, which was1.6%to6.1%lower than that of new film mulching. The output of re-used film mulching was9.6%to18.1%significantly higher than that of bare field and2.5%to4.9%lower than that of new film mulching. The net income of re-used film mulching was22590RMB·hm-2to26914RMB·hm-2, obviously increased by19.6%to34.4%than that of open field and0.6%to2.4%less than that of new film mulching. The ratio of output to input of re-used film mulching was the highest (3.0and2.6), higher than that of open field (18.5%and19.9%) and new film (6.7%and3.2%).
7. Re-used plastic film mulching can improve the ecological environment of cropland in fallow period, reduce the film pollution. Compared with bare field, the average soil moisture in0-100cm of re-used film mulching increased2.1%, the water storage capacity in0-100cm and0-20cm increased24.8～33.0mm and14.9～15.5mm separately. The soil average temperature significantly increased3.1～2.8℃, especially soil temperature in5cm and10cm increased1.7～4.6℃and2.8～4.1℃separately (p<0.05). Re-used plastic film mulching can reduce the amount of soil erosion significantly by68.77%. Compared with new plastic film mulching, the residual plastic film of re-used film mulching cropland significantly reduced50%, and the film use efficiency increased one time.
1.地膜再利用仍具有明显的增温和提高地积温的效果。地膜再利用仍能显著提高向日葵出苗期(前7天)的土壤温度,各土层(0-50cm)日均温均高于露地,增幅随着土层的加深略有减弱,其中旧膜的浅层(0-20cm)温度较露地高1.7～2.1℃,深层(30-50cm)高1.8～2.0℃。旧膜浅层土温较新膜低1.3-2.0℃,深层差异不明显。新旧膜对向日葵不同生育阶段的增温作用均表现为：出苗期>现蕾期>收获期>始花期>终花期。出苗期旧膜5cm和10cm土层有效地积温均高于露地约21.6℃,略低于新膜约12.4℃。全生育期旧膜5cm土层总积温高于露地229.5℃,低于新膜101℃。
2.地膜再利用仍具有保水保墒和提高水分利用效率的作用。在播前初始土壤含水量补齐到一致的前提下,旧膜1m土层的生育期土壤平均相对含水量较露地均提高约1.5个百分点,其中0-10cm土层相差最大,两年分别提高1.9和2.6个百分点,差异均显著。旧膜较露地两年分别为后茬向日葵田节水46.4mm和56.5mm,与新膜无显著差异。旧膜的土壤剖面水分稳定性较露地提高,水分变异系数两年分别比露地降低3.6%和4.8%；旧膜籽粒水分利用效率分别较露地显著提高15.7%和22.7%,与新膜相比差异不显著(P<0.05)。
3.地膜再利用能增加土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量。在0-40cm土层,土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量大小均表现为：旧膜>新膜>露地。旧膜的生物量碳含量较露地和新膜分别显著提高13.8%和12.1%(P<0.01)；旧膜的土壤微生物量氮含量较露地和新膜分别显著提高5.0%和4.0%(P<0.05)；旧膜的土壤微生物量磷含量较露地和新膜分别显著提高34.2%和18.3%(P<0.01)。土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量生育期变化有所不同。土壤微生物量碳含量生育期变化总体上受灌水影响呈波动下降；土壤微生物量氮含量全生育期降低趋势,土壤微生物量磷含量呈先增加后降低的变化趋势。土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量垂直变化均表现为随土层加深而减少。
4.地膜再利用可明显提高土壤酶活性。在0-40cm土层,旧膜全生育期土壤过氧化氢酶活性较露地和新膜分别显著增加4.2%和2.6%；旧膜的土壤脲酶活性较新膜显著增加7.4%,较露地增加1.1%,无显著差异；旧膜的土壤蔗糖酶活性较露地显著增加3.8%,较新膜增加3.0%,差异不显著。土壤酶活性生育期变化各不相同。土壤过氧化氢酶活性在播前到现蕾变化较为平稳,花期下降到最低,之后上升,到收获期达最高；土壤脲酶活性的生育期变化具有上升-下降-小幅上升的规律；土壤蔗糖酶活性的生育期变化呈下降一上升一下降的变化趋势。土壤氧化氢酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶活性的垂直变化均表现为随土层加深而减少的趋势。
5.地膜再利用仍具有促苗早发,加快生育进程和提高产量的作用。旧膜较露地提前1-2天出苗,新旧膜间无明显差异。旧膜生育期较露地缩短5-6天,较新膜延长2天。旧膜的株高、茎粗、盘径、叶干重和地上部总干重均显著高于露地；旧膜的茎粗略高于新膜,但差异不显著,旧膜的株高、盘径、叶干重和地上部总千重均略低于新膜,无显著差异。旧膜覆盖下向日葵的每盘粒重、百粒重及产量均显著高于露地。其中,旧膜与露地相比,两年的每盘粒重分别高3.3%和10.4%,百粒重分别高3.7%和5.8%,产量分别高11.4%和16.8%。旧膜的每盘粒重、百粒重均略低于新膜,两年的产量较新膜分别低3.3%和2.6%,差异均不显著(P<0.05)。
6.地膜再利用具有节本省工、增值增效的协同作用。地膜再利用的机械人工投入两年分别较露地耕作减少419.3元/hm2和371.6元/hm2,较新膜节省494.4元/hm2和518.0元/hm2,农资投入分别较新膜少1394元/hm2和817元/hm2,产值较露地两年分别显著提高4189元/hm2和5641元/hm2,稍低于新膜1420元/hm2和965元/hm2,差异不显著,纯收益两年分别比露地提高5059元/hm2和5863元/hm2,比新膜仅低26元/hm2和147元/hm2。地膜再利用的产投比最大,两年分别为3.0和2.68,比露地增大18.5%和19.9%,比新膜增大6.7%和3.2%。
7.地膜再利用对休闲期农田具有增温、保水、减蚀、降低膜残留的作用,改善了农田生态环境。在农田休闲期,地膜再利用的0-100cm土壤含水量较露地平均提高2.1个百分点,土壤贮水量较露地增加24.8mm-33.0mm,其中0-10cm和10-20cm土层土壤墒情得到显著改善；地膜再利用的0-50cm土层土壤温度两年分别提高3.1℃和2.8℃,其中5cm土层高4.6℃和1.7℃,10cm高4.1℃和2.8℃；地膜再利用的风蚀量比露地显著减少了68.77%。地膜再利用使地膜利用率提高约1倍,而农田残留量降为新膜的一半,有力缓解了农田污染,改善了农田生态环境。
Film mulching plays a very important role in soil warming, water preserving, soil conservation, reducing soil erosion and increasing yield, which is widely used in agricultural production. However, every year crop mulching with new film come into being of a large number of film residue, leading to the "white pollution", which make agricultural ecological environment degenerated. At the same time, in the Hetao region the farming practice such as plough and irrigation is after harvest in autumn that soil was completely exposed during fallow period of cropland from November to next early May (about7months), combined with climatic drought and windy, which result in excessive cropland evaporation, poor capacity of soil water, severe soil erosion, and finally the cropland deteriorated. Aiming at reducing agricultural pollution caused by plastic film, the effects of re-used plastic film mulching on soil temperatures, seed emergence and all seedlings period, sunflower's growth and development, sunflower's yield, soil moisture, water use efficiency and soil erosion during fallow period of cropland were studied, investigated the effects of re-used plastic film mulching on sunflower's economic benefit, the study also investigated plastic film residue and sunflower's yield, which compared with new plastic film mulching and bare field in Hetao region. The results were as follows:
1. Re-used film could increase the soil temperatures. Compared with bare field, the soil temperature of re-used film mulching increased1.3～4.0℃and0.7～1.8℃separately in the highest and lowest temperature stage. The soil average temperature increased significantly1.7～2.1℃in upper layer (0-20cm) and1.8～2.0℃in lower layer (30-50cm); compared with new film mulching lower1.3～2.0℃in upper layer, and similar as in lower layer. Compared with bare field, Daily maximum and minimum temperatures of re-used film mulching were postponed about1hour, similar as new film mulching. Re-used plastic film mulching can increase the soil temperatures in sunflower earlier and later stage, it's warming effect was:sowing stage> seedling stage> maturing stage>blooming stage> after flowering stage; During emergence stage (7days after sowing), effective accumulated temperature of re-used film mulching was21.6℃and23.8℃higher than that of bare field in depth of5cm and10cm. Compared with new film mulching, it was12.4℃and10.0℃lower in depth of5cm and10cm. During all stage, effective accumulated temperature of re-used film was229.5℃higher than that of open field,101℃slightly lower than new film in the depth of5cm.
2. Re-used tilm could improve the soil moisture, increasing water use efficiency. The soil moisture of re-used plastic film mulching was increased1.5percentage points in the soil depth of0-100cm and maximum of1.9or2.6higher in the soil depth of0-10cm than that of open field in sunflower's growth stage. Soil water of re-used film was more than open field's24.8mm or33.0mm before seeding and after soil water was replenished to same level,21.6mm or24.5mm was more than open field's at harvest. Re-used film's C.V of vertical soil moisture was dropped in3.6%or4.8%than that of open field. Meanwhile, water use efficiency of re-used film were higher significantly than that of open field15.7%or22.7%respectively in2010and2011, no significant with new film.
3. Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content of re-used film mulching increased at different degree. compared with bare field and new film mulching, soil microbial biomass carbon content in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly (p<0.01)13.8%and12.1%respectively, soil microbial biomass nitrogen content in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly (p<0.05)5.0%and4.0%respectively, soil microbial biomass phosphorus content in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly34.2%a nd18.3%respectively(p<0.01). Growth stage changes of Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content are different. The soil microbial biomass carbon content decline with fluctuation effecting by irrigation; microbial biomass nitrogen content decreased; microbial biomass phosphorus content was increased first and then decreased. Vertical changes of the soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus content are reduced with increasing soil depth.
4. Soil enzyme activity of re-used film mulching increased at different degree. compared with bare field and new film mulching, soil catalase activity in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly4.2%and2.6%respectively, soil urease activity in0-40cm of re-used film were higher no significantly1.1%and significantly7.4%respectively, invertase activity in0-40cm of re-used film were higher significantly3.8%and3.0%respectively(p<0.05). Growth stage changes of soil catalase activity, soil urease activity, soil invertase activity are different from each other. The soil catalase activity is relatively stable Beginning from sowing to squaring, decreased to a minimum in flowering, after rising up to the maximum in harvest: soil (?)rease activity beginning with a minimum in sowing rise up to the maximum in squaring: then decreased decreased to flowering; soil invertase activity was f(?)uctuating decline effecting by irrigation, and with a minimum in squaring. Vertical changes of the soil catalase activity, soil urease activity, soil invertase activity are reduced with soil deepening.
5. Re-used film could also decrease sunflower's growth and development time and increase the yield of sunflower. Mulching with re-used film could effectively shorten seed germination for1-2days. Meanwhile, growth period of re-used film was significant earlier than open field5-6days and not significant later than plastic film2days. In addition, plant height; stem diameter, disc diameter, leaf dry weight and total dry weight of re-used film mulching was significantly higher than that of bare field; Except stem diameter, plant height, disc diameter, leaf dry weight and total dry weight of re-used film mulching was slightly lower than that of new film mulching, but the difference was not significant. Compared with bare field, yield per plant of re-used film mulching was significantly increased3.3%(2010) and10.4%(2011),100-seed weight of re-used film mulching was significantly increased3.7%(2010) and5.8%(2011), and they were lower than that of new film mulching, but the difference was not significant. In addition, compared with bare field, sunflower yield of re-used film mulching was significantly increased11.4%(2010) and16.8%(2011), and compared to the new film treatment, the yield decreased3.3%(2010) and2.6%(2011)(p<0.05).
6. Re-used plastic film mulching had significantly increased the economic benefit. Compared with bare field, the sunflower's yield of re-used film mulching increased9.6to15%significantly, and lower than new film by2.6to4.9%(p<0.05). Compared with bare field, the input of re-used film mulching was reduced by5.6%to9.4%, which was1.6%to6.1%lower than that of new film mulching. The output of re-used film mulching was9.6%to18.1%significantly higher than that of bare field and2.5%to4.9%lower than that of new film mulching. The net income of re-used film mulching was22590RMB·hm-2to26914RMB·hm-2, obviously increased by19.6%to34.4%than that of open field and0.6%to2.4%less than that of new film mulching. The ratio of output to input of re-used film mulching was the highest (3.0and2.6), higher than that of open field (18.5%and19.9%) and new film (6.7%and3.2%).
7. Re-used plastic film mulching can improve the ecological environment of cropland in fallow period, reduce the film pollution. Compared with bare field, the average soil moisture in0-100cm of re-used film mulching increased2.1%, the water storage capacity in0-100cm and0-20cm increased24.8～33.0mm and14.9～15.5mm separately. The soil average temperature significantly increased3.1～2.8℃, especially soil temperature in5cm and10cm increased1.7～4.6℃and2.8～4.1℃separately (p<0.05). Re-used plastic film mulching can reduce the amount of soil erosion significantly by68.77%. Compared with new plastic film mulching, the residual plastic film of re-used film mulching cropland significantly reduced50%, and the film use efficiency increased one time.
引文
1 温家宝.2011年3月5日在第十一届全国人民代表大会第四次会议政府工作报告[EB/0L].http://www.china.com.cn/policy/txt/2011-03/16/content_22150608.htm
2 2012年中央一号文件[EB/OL]. http://www.china.com.cn/policy/txt/2012-02/02/conte nt_24528271.htm
3 鲁奇.中国耕地资源开发、保护与粮食安全保障问题[J].资源科学,1999,21(6)：5-8
4 姜文来.建立农业用水红线制度确保国家粮食安全[EB/OL]. http://theory.people.com.c n/GB/40537/17462281.html
5 李毅,邵明安,王文焰,等.玉米田地温的时空变化特征及其预报[J].水利学报,2003,(1)：103-107
6 段喜明,吴普特,白秀梅,等.旱地玉米垄膜沟种微集水种植技术研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1)：143-146
7 徐方.农业水资源的可持续利用[J].世界农业,2007.8：15-18
8 康绍忠.新的农业技术革命与21世纪我国节水农业的发展[J].干旱地区农业研究,1998,(1)：11-17
9 Gale, W. J., Mc. Coll, R. W.. Sandy fields traditional farming for water conservation in China [J]. Soil Water Conserve,1993,48:474-477
10 Haywood, J.D., Youngquist, J.A.. Mulching effects of plant fiber-polyester mats combined with fertilizer on loblolly pine seedlings [J]. USDA Forest Serv., Tree Planters' Notes,1991,42(3):32-35
11 James D. Haywood. Durability of selected mulches, their ability to control weeds, and influence growth of loblolly pine seedlings [J]. New Forests,1999,18:263-276
12 Tomokazu Haraguchi, Atsushi Marui, Kozue Yuge. Effect of plastic-film mulching on leaching of ni trate nitrogen in an upland field converted from paddy [J]. Paddy Water Environ 2004,2:67-72.
13 Haraguchi T, Marui A, Mori K. Movement of water collected by vegetables in plastic-mulching field [J]. Kyushu Univ2003,48(1,2):237-245
4 李毅,王文焰,王全九.论膜下滴灌技术在干旱-半干旱地区节水抑盐灌溉中的应用[J].灌溉排水,2001,20(2)：42-46
5 焦艳平,康跃虎,万书勤,等.干旱区盐碱地滴灌土壤基质势对土壤盐分分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(6)：53-58
6 焦艳平,康跃虎,万书勤,等.干旱区盐碱地覆膜滴灌条件下土壤基质势对糯玉米生长和灌溉水利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(6)：144-151
7 Wan S, Kang Y, Wang D. Effect of drip irrigation with saline water on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) yield and water use in semi-humid area[J]. Agriculture Water Management,2007,90(1/2):63-74
18 袁海燕. “白色革命”与农业的可持续发展[J].宁夏农学院学报,2001,2：73-75
19 叶永成,白福臣.我国农膜技术的发展方向[J].塑料工业,2002,30(6)：1-3
2 0 王晓方,申茂向.塑料农膜-中国农业发展的希望和曙光[M].中华人民共和国科学技术部农村科技司,1998
21 高秀瑛.我国农膜生产应用的现状、存在问题及建议[J].现代塑料加工应用.1997,9(2)：55-59
22 国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.中国农村统计年鉴[M].北京：中国统计出版社,1981-2006
23 国家统计局农村社会调查总队.新中国五十年农业统计资料[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2000
24 赵素荣,张书荣,徐霞,等.农膜残留污染研究[J].农业环境与发展.1998,3(57)：7-10
25 严昌荣,梅旭荣,何文清,等.农用地膜残留污染的现状与防治[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(11)：269-272
26 王文兴,童莉,海热提.土壤污染物来源及前沿问题[J].生态环境,2005,14(1)：1-5
27 杜晓明,徐刚,许瑞平,等.中国北方典型地区农用地膜污染现状调查及其防治对策[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(增刊)：225-227
28 王献志,盛祝梅,叶国民,等.农田农地膜残留污染现状及对策[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(2)：330-331
29 李静.新疆地膜污染的经济分析[J].边疆经济与文化,2008(1)：16-17
30 尉海东,伦志磊,郭峰.残留农膜对土壤性状的影响[J].生态环境,2008,17(5)：1853-1856
31 朱政.治理“白色污染”实现农业可持续发展[J].新疆农机化,2004,(5)：22-23
32 肖军,赵景波.农田塑料地膜污染及防治[J].四川环境,2005：24(1)：102-105
33 薛少平,朱琳,姚万生,等.麦草覆盖与地膜覆盖对旱地可持续利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(6)：71-73
34 何文清,严昌荣,赵彩霞,等.我国地膜应用污染现状及其防治途径研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(3)：533-538
35 郭庆姿,谢风超,武胜先,等.怎样防止地膜棉早衰[J].河南农业科学,2001,(7)：52
36 徐香春.麻地膜覆盖的土壤生态及作物生长发育的影响[D].硕士研究论文,中国农业科学院,2006
37 付登强.麻地膜覆盖的保水保温特性及对作物的影响[D].硕士研究论文,中国农业科学院,2008
38 李荣,张睿,贾志宽.不同覆盖材料对耕层土壤温度及玉米出苗的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3)：13-16,16
39 赵爱琴,李子忠,龚元石.生物降解地膜对玉米生长的影响及其田间降解状况[J].中国农业大学学报,2005,10(2)：74-78
40 范变娥,翟耀锋,薛建勋,等.生物降解农膜与普通地膜覆盖小麦试验[J].陕西农业科学,2002, (5)：13-22
41 王星,吕家珑,孙木华.覆盖可降解地膜对玉米生长和土壤环境的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(4)：397-401
42 冯武焕,孙升学,范变娥,等.生物降解树脂农膜在玉米上的应用研究[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(2)：166-169
43 白丽婷,海江波,韩清芳,等.不同地膜覆盖对渭北旱塬冬小麦生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(4)：131-162
44 王喜庆,李生秀,高亚军.地膜覆盖对旱地春玉米生理生态和产量的影响[J].作物学报,1998, (3)：348-353
45 王树森,邓根云.地膜覆盖增温机制研究[J].中国农业科学,1991,24 (3)：74-78
46 张振华,蔡焕杰,柴红敏,等.膜上灌作物需水量和地膜覆盖效应试验研究[3].灌溉排水,2002,21(1)：11-14
47 吴序卉,蒲小朋.地膜覆盖对高寒地区燕麦+豌豆人工草地土壤温度和水分的影响[J].草业科学,1999,16(3)：13-16
48 李世清,李东方,李凤民,等.半干旱农田生态系统地膜覆盖的土壤生态效应[J].北农林科技大学学报,2003,31,(5)：21-29
49 杨智超,王晓燕,张齐凤,等.大垄垄上行间覆膜对土壤水分、温度及大豆产量形成的影响[J].大豆科技,2008,5：21-23
50 胡明芳,田长彦.新疆棉田地膜覆盖耕层土壤温度效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2003,11(3)：128-130
51 杨祁峰,岳云,熊春蓉,等.不同覆膜方式对陇东旱塬玉米田土壤温度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(6)：29-33
52 潘渝,郭谨,李毅,等.地膜覆盖条件下的土壤增温特性[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(2)：130-134
53 员学锋,汪有科.不同保墒条件下土壤温度日变化效应研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2008,27(3)：82-85
54 王有宁,王荣堂,董秀荣.地膜覆盖作物农田光温效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(3)：134-136
55 胡芬,陈尚模.寿阳试验区玉米地农田水分平衡及其覆盖调控试验[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(4)：146-148
56 纪晓玲,岳鹏鹏,张静,等.不同覆盖方式对绿豆水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3)：168-170
57 王星,吕家珑,孙本华.覆盖可降解地膜对玉米生长和土壤环境的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(4)：397-401
58 王顺霞,王占军,左忠,等.不同覆盖方式对旱地玉米田土壤环境及玉米产量的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(9)：134-137
59 Mohapatra B K, Lenka D, Naik D. Effect of plastic mulching on yield and water use efficiency in maize [J]. Annals of Agric Res.1998,19:210-211
60 Ramakrishna A, Tam H M, Wani S P, et al. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam [J]. Field Crops Research,2006,95:115-125
61 卜玉山,苗果园,周乃健,等.地膜和秸秆覆盖土壤肥力效应分析与比较[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(5)：1069-1075
62 张淑芳,柴守玺,蔺艳春,等.干旱年份地膜覆盖模式对春小麦土壤水分和产量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2011,32(3)：368-374
63 刘毓中.对地膜覆盖棉田增温、保墒、提墒和地面水入渗补给作用机理的探讨[J].灌溉排水,1989,8(3)：10-17
64 孙继颖,高聚林,王志刚,等.不同覆膜方式对旱作大豆生理特性及水分利用效率的影响[J].大豆科学,2008,(02)：251-254
65 王有庆.地膜覆盖和播种时期对玉米叶片生长的影响[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2003,21(1)：4-6
66 于贤昌,崔志峰,艾希珍,等.地膜覆盖对姜生长和产量的影响[J].中国蔬菜,1995,(6)：15-16
67 孙永玲,郭高,童存泉,等.地膜覆盖对油菜生长发育的影响及其产量效应[J].安徽农业科学,2000,28(6)：730-733
68 廖长见,林建新,纪荣昌,等.不同播期与覆膜处理对高山反季节鲜食玉米产量及生长状况影响研究[J].福建稻麦科技,2009,(4)：34-38
69 何春雨,周祥椿,张礼军,等.全膜免耕栽培技术对冬小麦产量效应的研究[J].小麦研究,2010,31(2)：1-10
70 张万文,王萍,王彦华,等.春玉米地膜覆盖增产因素研究[J].杂粮作物,2000,20(2)：28-30
71 袁孝莲,周桃华,姚大年.地膜覆盖移栽对棉田生态效应及棉花生长发育的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2000,27(2)：138-140
72 李华,陈英旭,梁新强,等.土壤脲酶活性对稻田田面水氮素转化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1)：55-58
73 李兆君,李万峰,解晓瑜,等.覆膜对不同施肥条件下玉米苗期生长和光合及生理参数的影响[J].核农学报,2010.24(2)：360-364
74 薛菁芳,汪景宽,李双异,等.长期地膜覆盖和施肥条件下玉米生物产量及其构成的变化研究[J].玉米科学,2006,14(5)：66-70
75 张修森.地膜覆盖对冬小麦几个主要农艺性状的影响[J].麦类作物学报,1998,18(5)：58-59
76 梁亚超,于桂霞,杨殿荣,等.玉米地膜覆盖蓄水保墒高产机理的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1990,(1)：27-32
77 金胜利,周丽敏,李凤民,等.黄土高原地区玉米双垄全膜覆盖沟播栽培技术土壤水温条件及其产量效应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(2)：28-33
78 员学锋：吴普特,汪有科.地膜覆盖保墒灌溉的土壤水、热以及作物效应研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2006,25(1)：25-29
79 马树庆,王琪,郭建平,等.玉米地膜覆盖土壤水分效应及抗旱涝试验研究[J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(3)：8-13
80 程俊珊.渭源地区旱地玉米覆膜种植增温效应及高产增效研究初报[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,21(1)：39-42
81 聂安全,赵海祯,齐宏立,等.覆盖补水施肥对旱地小麦产量的影响[J].华北农学报,2001,16(1)：92-98
82 张继宏,汪景宽,须湘成,等.覆膜栽培条件下有机肥对土壤氮和玉米生物量的影响[J].土壤通报,1990,8(29)：162-166
83 汪景宽,张继宏,须湘成,等.长期地膜覆盖对土壤氮素状况的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1996,2 (2)：125-130
84 汪景宽,须湘成,张旭东,等.长期地膜覆盖对土壤磷素状况的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1994,25(3)：311-315
85 汪景宽,等.地膜覆盖对土壤肥力影响的研究.沈阳农业大学学报[J].1992.(专刊)：32-37
86 谭军利,王林权,李生秀.地面覆盖的保水增产效应及其机理研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,(3)：50-54
87 王俊,李凤民,宋秋华,等.地膜覆盖对土壤水温和春小麦产量形成的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(2)：205-210
88 王海泉,王英,周宝库,等.行间覆膜栽培对大豆根际土壤微生物区系和土壤肥力的影响[J].大豆科学,2009,28(5)：875-878
89 陈锡时,郭树凡,汪景宽,等.地膜覆盖栽培对土壤微生物种群和生物活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(4)：435-439
90 张敬敏.调控措施对高产杨树的生长代谢及土壤条件的影响[D].博士学位论文,山东农业大学,2011
91 张成娥,梁银丽,贺秀斌.地膜覆盖玉米对土壤微生物量的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(4)：508-512
92 Hooker B A, Morris T F, Peters R. et al. Long-term effects of tillage and corn stalk return on soil carbon dynamics [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005,69(2):188-196
93 张电学, 韩志卿, 李东坡,等.不同促腐条件下秸秆还田对土壤微生物量碳氮磷动态变化的影响应[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(10)：1903-1908
94 强学彩, 袁红莉, 高旺盛.秸秆还田量对土壤CO2释放和土壤微生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3)：469-472
95 李升东,王法宏,司纪升,等.耕作方式对土壤微生物和土壤肥力的影响[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(5)：1961-1964
96 朱波,胡跃高,曾昭海,等.双季稻区冬种覆盖作物对土壤微生物量的影响[J].生态环境2008,17(5)： 2074-2077
97 王晶,解宏图,张旭东,等.施肥对黑土土壤微生物量碳的作用研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(2)：118-120
98 于树,汪景宽,高艳梅.地膜覆盖及不同施肥处理对土壤微生物量碳和氮的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2006,37(4)：602-606
99 蔡晓布.不同培肥方式对西藏中部退化土壤的影响[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(2)：12-15
100樊军,郝明德.长期轮作施肥对土壤微生物碳氮的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1)：85-87
101许月蓉.不同施肥条件下潮土中微生物量及其活性[J].土壤学报,1995,32(3)：349-352
102刘苗,孙建,刘景辉,等.农牧交错带不同施肥措施土壤剖面生物量动态变化[J].水土保持学报.2010,24(1)：159-166
103王光华,齐晓宁.施肥对黑土农田土壤全碳、微生物量碳及土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4)：661-665
104王岩,沈其荣,史瑞和,等.有机、无机肥料施用后土壤生物量C、N、P的变化及N素转化[J].土壤学报,1996,19(4)：45-51
105高云超,朱文珊,陈文新.秸秆覆盖免耕土壤微生物生物量与养分转化的研究[J].中国农业科学,1994,27(6)：41-49
106周建斌,陈竹君,李生秀.土壤微生物量氮含量、矿化特性及其供氮作用[J].生态学报,2001,21(10)：1718-1723
107 Alan L Wright, Frank M Hons, John E Matocha Jr. Tillage impacts on microbial biomass and soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics of corn and cotton rotations [J]. Appl ied Soil Ecology,2005,29:85-92
108 Wright A L, Hons F M, Matocha Jr JE. Tillage impacts on microbial biomass and soil carbon and ni trogen dynamics of corn and cotton rotat ions [J]. Appl ied Soil Ecology, 2005,29:85-92
109 Aslam T, Choudhary M A, Saggar S. Tillage impacts on soil microbial biomass C, N and P, earthworms and agronomy after two years of cropping following permanent pasture in New Zealand [J]. Soil & Tillage Research,1999.51:103-111
110赵建波.保护性耕作对农田土壤生态因子及温室气体排放的影响[D].山东农业大学,博士学位论文,2008
111姜勇,梁文举,闻大中.免耕对农田土壤生物学特性的影响[J].土壤通报,2004,35(3)：347-351
112樊丽琴,南志标,沈禹颖,等.保护性耕作对黄土高原小麦田土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].草原与草坪,2005,(4)：51-53
113张洁,姚宇卿,金轲,等.保护性耕作对坡耕地土壤微生物量碳、氮的影。的[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4)：126-129
114孙建,刘苗,李立军,等.不同耕作方式对内蒙古旱作农田土壤微生物量和作物指标的影响[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(11)：2279-2285
115徐春阳,沈其荣,冉炜,等.长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J].土壤通报,2002,39(1)：89-96
116王芸,韩宾,史忠强,等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006.20(4)：120-122
117王芸,李增嘉,韩宾,等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物量及活性的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(8)：3384-3390
118刘文娜,吴文良,王秀斌.不同土壤类型和农业用地方式对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(3)：406-411
119 Dick R P: Soil Enzyme Activities as Indicators of Soil Quality [M]. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, Society of Agriculture,1994, (35):107-124
120 Dick R P. Soil Enzyme Activities as Integrative Indicators of Soil Health [M]. Biological Indicators of Soil Health. Wallingford: CAB International,1996: 121-156
21万淑婉.双季稻高产田的土壤微生物及土壤酶生物学指标[J].江西农业大学学报,1993,]5(4)：351-355
22杨万勤,王开运.土壤酶研究动态与展望[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(5)：564-570
23薛东,姚槐应,黄昌勇.植茶年龄对茶园土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2)：84-87
24窦超银,康跃虎,万书勤,等.覆膜滴灌对地下水浅埋区重量度盐碱地土壤晦活性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(3)：44-51
25许自成,王小东,杨伊乐,等.覆盖对烟田土壤酶活性及烤烟叶片荧光特性的影响[J].旱地区农业研究,2011,29(1)：197-200
26苗琳,王立,黄高宝,等.保护性耕作对旱地麦田土壤酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(1)：6-11
27杨青华,韩锦峰,贺德先.液体地膜覆盖对棉田土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].生态学报, 2005,25(6)：1312-1317
128汪景宽,彭涛,张旭东,等.地膜覆盖对土壤主要酶活性的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1997,28 (3)：210-213
129汪邓民,龚文丰,吴福如,等.覆膜条件下氮磷肥对土壤理化性质、酶活性及烟草生长的影响[J].烟草科技,2004,(6)：33-36
130杨鹏,薛立,陈红跃,等.不同混交林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J].湖南林业科技,2004,31(4)：43-45
131金轲,汪德水,蔡典雄,等.水肥耦合研究Ⅱ—不同N、P水配合对旱地冬情产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1999,5(1)：8-13
132严昶升.土壤肥力研究方法[M].北京：农业出版社,1988
133周扎恺.土壤中的脲酶活性与尿素肥料在土壤中的转化[J].土壤学进展,1984,(1)：1-8
134高明,周保同,魏朝富,等.不同耕作方式对稻田土壤动物、微生物及酶活性的影响研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(7)：1775-1181
135张洁,姚宇卿,金轲,等.保护性耕作对坡耕地土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4)：126-129
136 Roldan A, Salinas-Garcia JR, Alguaci MM, et al. Soil enzyme activities suggest advantages of conservation tillage practices in sorghum cultivation under subtropical conditions [J]. Geoderma,2005,129:178-185
137扬招弟,蔡立群,张仁陟,等.不同耕作方式对旱地土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(3)：514-517
138陈蓓,张仁陟.免耕与覆盖对土壤微生物数量及组成的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2004,39(6)：634-638
139朱文珊.北方一年两熟地区秸秆覆盖免耕技术原理及应用效果研究.中国少耕免耕与覆盖技术研究[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社,1991,11-20
140逢焕成.渭北旱塬秸秆覆盖耕作法研究.中国少耕免耕与覆盖技术研究[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社,1991,113-117
141 Adem H H. Management of tillage and crop residues fordouble—cropping in fragile soils of south-eastern Australia. Soil and Fillage Research[J].1984,4:577-589
142李春勃,盂春香,唐玉霞.早地棉田秸秆覆盖少耕土壤酶活性[J].河北农业科学,1993,4：9-11.
143张永清.巴彦淖尔市推广地膜二次利用免耕栽培技术[J].中国农技推广.2008,10：11-12
144陈浩,贾利欣,融晓萍,等.地膜二次利用免耕种植小麦套晚播向日葵栽培技术[J].作物栽培,47-48
145苏化洲,韩成,张瑞琴.等.地膜玉米后茬免耕直播向日葵栽培技术[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005(7)：357
146周月君.地膜西瓜后茬免耕直播向日葵栽培技术[J].宁夏农林科技.2011.52(4)：71.85
147王洪军,武凤玲,马成琴,等.地膜再利用技术及其意义[J].北方园艺,1998.1,23-24
148李金田,张喜林,孔德胤,等.巴彦淖尔市农牧业气候资源与区划[J].北京：科学普及出版社,2006
149史建国,严昌荣,何文清,等.黄河流域水分亏缺时空格局变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(1)：113-119
150刘克礼主编.作物栽培学[M].北京：中国农业出版社.2007
151王小东,许自成,刘占卿,等.液膜覆盖对烟田土壤水热状况和烤烟生长发育的影响[J].节水灌溉,2008,(4)：8-10
152郑洪元,张德生.土壤动态生物化学研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1982
153李阜棣主编.土壤微生物学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1996,131
154张宪武主编.土壤微生物研究—理论、应用新方法[M].沈阳：沈阳出版社,1993,483-504
155俞慎,李勇,王俊华,等.土壤微生物生物量作为红壤质量生物指标的探讨[J].土壤学报,1999,36(3)： 413-421
156 Schnure J, Rosswall T. Mineralization of nitrogen from 15N labelled fungi, soil microbial biomass and roots and its uptake by barely plant [J]. Plant and Soil, 1987,102:71-78
157陈安磊,王凯荣,谢小立,等.不同施肥模式下稻田土壤微生物生物量磷对土壤有机碳和磷素变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2)：2733-2738
158 Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS. Phosphorus in soil microbial biomass [J]. Soil biology and Biochemistry,1984,17:169-175
159何振立.土壤微生物量及其在养分循环和环境质量评价中的意义[J].土壤,1997,29(2)：61-69
160翟瑞常,张之一.耕作对土壤生物碳动态变化的影响[J].土壤学报,1996,33(2)：201-210
161 Abdul K S, Katayama A, Kimura M. Activities of some soil enzymes in different land use system after deforestation in hilly areas of west Lampung, South Sumatra, Indonesia [J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,1998,44(1):91-97
162关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1986
163万忠梅,吴景贵.土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报：自然科学版,2005,33(6)：87-92
164吴凤芝,孟立君,王学征.设施蔬菜轮作和连作土壤酶活性的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(4)：554-558
165孙瑞莲,赵秉强,朱鲁生,等.长期定位施肥对土壤酶活性的影响及其调控土壤肥力的作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,(4)：406-410
166彭正萍,门明新,薛世川,等.腐植酸复合肥对土壤养分转化土壤酶活性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2005,28(4)：1-4
167严昶升.土壤肥力研究法[M].北京科学出版社,1999：242-245
168章铁,刘秀清,孙晓莉.栗茶间作模式对土壤酶活性和土壤养分的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(4)：265-268
169杨鹏,薛立,陈红跃,等.不同混交林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J].湖南林业科技,2004,31(4)：43-45
170李华,陈英旭,梁新强,等.土壤脲酶活性对稻田田面水氮素转化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1)：55-58
171 Cotrufo M F, Ineson P. Effects of Enhanced Atmospheric CO2 and Nutrient Supply on the Quality and Subsequent Decomposition of Fine Roots of Betula pendula Roth. and Picea sitchensis (Bong) Carr[J]. Plant and Soil,1995,170(2):267-277
172吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等.土壤微生物生物量的测定方法及应用[M].北京：气象出版社,2006
173关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1986.274-279
174赵沛义,妥德宝,郑大玮,等.野外土壤风蚀定量观测方法的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(29)：12810-12812
175 Drury C. F, et al. Red clover, tillage influence on soil temperature, water content, and corn emergence [J]. Agronomy Journal,1999,91:101-108
176闫根海,杨晓军,王斌,等.地膜覆盖对玉米产量及其土壤状况的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(12)：6405-6406,6413
177张德奇,廖允成,贾志宽,等.宁南旱区谷子地膜覆盖的土壤水温效应[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(10)：2069-2075
178廖允成,温晓霞,韩思明,等.黄土台原旱地小麦覆盖保水技术效果研究[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(5)：548-552
179于晓莹,韩雷,贾春天,等.向日葵田除草剂除草试验初报.杂粮作物,2006,26(1)：37-39
180薛光,马建霞.草坪杂草及化学防除彩色图谱[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001
181郭书普,时敏,方应,等.旱田杂草识别与防治原色图鉴[M].安徽科学技术出版社,2005
182王莉,王玉金.大豆田苗后除草技术试验[J].辽宁农业科学,2004,(6)：52
2 2012年中央一号文件[EB/OL]. http://www.china.com.cn/policy/txt/2012-02/02/conte nt_24528271.htm
3 鲁奇.中国耕地资源开发、保护与粮食安全保障问题[J].资源科学,1999,21(6)：5-8
4 姜文来.建立农业用水红线制度确保国家粮食安全[EB/OL]. http://theory.people.com.c n/GB/40537/17462281.html
5 李毅,邵明安,王文焰,等.玉米田地温的时空变化特征及其预报[J].水利学报,2003,(1)：103-107
6 段喜明,吴普特,白秀梅,等.旱地玉米垄膜沟种微集水种植技术研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1)：143-146
7 徐方.农业水资源的可持续利用[J].世界农业,2007.8：15-18
8 康绍忠.新的农业技术革命与21世纪我国节水农业的发展[J].干旱地区农业研究,1998,(1)：11-17
9 Gale, W. J., Mc. Coll, R. W.. Sandy fields traditional farming for water conservation in China [J]. Soil Water Conserve,1993,48:474-477
10 Haywood, J.D., Youngquist, J.A.. Mulching effects of plant fiber-polyester mats combined with fertilizer on loblolly pine seedlings [J]. USDA Forest Serv., Tree Planters' Notes,1991,42(3):32-35
11 James D. Haywood. Durability of selected mulches, their ability to control weeds, and influence growth of loblolly pine seedlings [J]. New Forests,1999,18:263-276
12 Tomokazu Haraguchi, Atsushi Marui, Kozue Yuge. Effect of plastic-film mulching on leaching of ni trate nitrogen in an upland field converted from paddy [J]. Paddy Water Environ 2004,2:67-72.
13 Haraguchi T, Marui A, Mori K. Movement of water collected by vegetables in plastic-mulching field [J]. Kyushu Univ2003,48(1,2):237-245
4 李毅,王文焰,王全九.论膜下滴灌技术在干旱-半干旱地区节水抑盐灌溉中的应用[J].灌溉排水,2001,20(2)：42-46
5 焦艳平,康跃虎,万书勤,等.干旱区盐碱地滴灌土壤基质势对土壤盐分分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(6)：53-58
6 焦艳平,康跃虎,万书勤,等.干旱区盐碱地覆膜滴灌条件下土壤基质势对糯玉米生长和灌溉水利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(6)：144-151
7 Wan S, Kang Y, Wang D. Effect of drip irrigation with saline water on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) yield and water use in semi-humid area[J]. Agriculture Water Management,2007,90(1/2):63-74
18 袁海燕. “白色革命”与农业的可持续发展[J].宁夏农学院学报,2001,2：73-75
19 叶永成,白福臣.我国农膜技术的发展方向[J].塑料工业,2002,30(6)：1-3
2 0 王晓方,申茂向.塑料农膜-中国农业发展的希望和曙光[M].中华人民共和国科学技术部农村科技司,1998
21 高秀瑛.我国农膜生产应用的现状、存在问题及建议[J].现代塑料加工应用.1997,9(2)：55-59
22 国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.中国农村统计年鉴[M].北京：中国统计出版社,1981-2006
23 国家统计局农村社会调查总队.新中国五十年农业统计资料[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2000
24 赵素荣,张书荣,徐霞,等.农膜残留污染研究[J].农业环境与发展.1998,3(57)：7-10
25 严昌荣,梅旭荣,何文清,等.农用地膜残留污染的现状与防治[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(11)：269-272
26 王文兴,童莉,海热提.土壤污染物来源及前沿问题[J].生态环境,2005,14(1)：1-5
27 杜晓明,徐刚,许瑞平,等.中国北方典型地区农用地膜污染现状调查及其防治对策[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(增刊)：225-227
28 王献志,盛祝梅,叶国民,等.农田农地膜残留污染现状及对策[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(2)：330-331
29 李静.新疆地膜污染的经济分析[J].边疆经济与文化,2008(1)：16-17
30 尉海东,伦志磊,郭峰.残留农膜对土壤性状的影响[J].生态环境,2008,17(5)：1853-1856
31 朱政.治理“白色污染”实现农业可持续发展[J].新疆农机化,2004,(5)：22-23
32 肖军,赵景波.农田塑料地膜污染及防治[J].四川环境,2005：24(1)：102-105
33 薛少平,朱琳,姚万生,等.麦草覆盖与地膜覆盖对旱地可持续利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(6)：71-73
34 何文清,严昌荣,赵彩霞,等.我国地膜应用污染现状及其防治途径研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(3)：533-538
35 郭庆姿,谢风超,武胜先,等.怎样防止地膜棉早衰[J].河南农业科学,2001,(7)：52
36 徐香春.麻地膜覆盖的土壤生态及作物生长发育的影响[D].硕士研究论文,中国农业科学院,2006
37 付登强.麻地膜覆盖的保水保温特性及对作物的影响[D].硕士研究论文,中国农业科学院,2008
38 李荣,张睿,贾志宽.不同覆盖材料对耕层土壤温度及玉米出苗的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3)：13-16,16
39 赵爱琴,李子忠,龚元石.生物降解地膜对玉米生长的影响及其田间降解状况[J].中国农业大学学报,2005,10(2)：74-78
40 范变娥,翟耀锋,薛建勋,等.生物降解农膜与普通地膜覆盖小麦试验[J].陕西农业科学,2002, (5)：13-22
41 王星,吕家珑,孙木华.覆盖可降解地膜对玉米生长和土壤环境的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(4)：397-401
42 冯武焕,孙升学,范变娥,等.生物降解树脂农膜在玉米上的应用研究[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(2)：166-169
43 白丽婷,海江波,韩清芳,等.不同地膜覆盖对渭北旱塬冬小麦生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(4)：131-162
44 王喜庆,李生秀,高亚军.地膜覆盖对旱地春玉米生理生态和产量的影响[J].作物学报,1998, (3)：348-353
45 王树森,邓根云.地膜覆盖增温机制研究[J].中国农业科学,1991,24 (3)：74-78
46 张振华,蔡焕杰,柴红敏,等.膜上灌作物需水量和地膜覆盖效应试验研究[3].灌溉排水,2002,21(1)：11-14
47 吴序卉,蒲小朋.地膜覆盖对高寒地区燕麦+豌豆人工草地土壤温度和水分的影响[J].草业科学,1999,16(3)：13-16
48 李世清,李东方,李凤民,等.半干旱农田生态系统地膜覆盖的土壤生态效应[J].北农林科技大学学报,2003,31,(5)：21-29
49 杨智超,王晓燕,张齐凤,等.大垄垄上行间覆膜对土壤水分、温度及大豆产量形成的影响[J].大豆科技,2008,5：21-23
50 胡明芳,田长彦.新疆棉田地膜覆盖耕层土壤温度效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2003,11(3)：128-130
51 杨祁峰,岳云,熊春蓉,等.不同覆膜方式对陇东旱塬玉米田土壤温度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(6)：29-33
52 潘渝,郭谨,李毅,等.地膜覆盖条件下的土壤增温特性[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(2)：130-134
53 员学锋,汪有科.不同保墒条件下土壤温度日变化效应研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2008,27(3)：82-85
54 王有宁,王荣堂,董秀荣.地膜覆盖作物农田光温效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(3)：134-136
55 胡芬,陈尚模.寿阳试验区玉米地农田水分平衡及其覆盖调控试验[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(4)：146-148
56 纪晓玲,岳鹏鹏,张静,等.不同覆盖方式对绿豆水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3)：168-170
57 王星,吕家珑,孙本华.覆盖可降解地膜对玉米生长和土壤环境的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(4)：397-401
58 王顺霞,王占军,左忠,等.不同覆盖方式对旱地玉米田土壤环境及玉米产量的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(9)：134-137
59 Mohapatra B K, Lenka D, Naik D. Effect of plastic mulching on yield and water use efficiency in maize [J]. Annals of Agric Res.1998,19:210-211
60 Ramakrishna A, Tam H M, Wani S P, et al. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam [J]. Field Crops Research,2006,95:115-125
61 卜玉山,苗果园,周乃健,等.地膜和秸秆覆盖土壤肥力效应分析与比较[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(5)：1069-1075
62 张淑芳,柴守玺,蔺艳春,等.干旱年份地膜覆盖模式对春小麦土壤水分和产量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2011,32(3)：368-374
63 刘毓中.对地膜覆盖棉田增温、保墒、提墒和地面水入渗补给作用机理的探讨[J].灌溉排水,1989,8(3)：10-17
64 孙继颖,高聚林,王志刚,等.不同覆膜方式对旱作大豆生理特性及水分利用效率的影响[J].大豆科学,2008,(02)：251-254
65 王有庆.地膜覆盖和播种时期对玉米叶片生长的影响[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2003,21(1)：4-6
66 于贤昌,崔志峰,艾希珍,等.地膜覆盖对姜生长和产量的影响[J].中国蔬菜,1995,(6)：15-16
67 孙永玲,郭高,童存泉,等.地膜覆盖对油菜生长发育的影响及其产量效应[J].安徽农业科学,2000,28(6)：730-733
68 廖长见,林建新,纪荣昌,等.不同播期与覆膜处理对高山反季节鲜食玉米产量及生长状况影响研究[J].福建稻麦科技,2009,(4)：34-38
69 何春雨,周祥椿,张礼军,等.全膜免耕栽培技术对冬小麦产量效应的研究[J].小麦研究,2010,31(2)：1-10
70 张万文,王萍,王彦华,等.春玉米地膜覆盖增产因素研究[J].杂粮作物,2000,20(2)：28-30
71 袁孝莲,周桃华,姚大年.地膜覆盖移栽对棉田生态效应及棉花生长发育的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2000,27(2)：138-140
72 李华,陈英旭,梁新强,等.土壤脲酶活性对稻田田面水氮素转化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1)：55-58
73 李兆君,李万峰,解晓瑜,等.覆膜对不同施肥条件下玉米苗期生长和光合及生理参数的影响[J].核农学报,2010.24(2)：360-364
74 薛菁芳,汪景宽,李双异,等.长期地膜覆盖和施肥条件下玉米生物产量及其构成的变化研究[J].玉米科学,2006,14(5)：66-70
75 张修森.地膜覆盖对冬小麦几个主要农艺性状的影响[J].麦类作物学报,1998,18(5)：58-59
76 梁亚超,于桂霞,杨殿荣,等.玉米地膜覆盖蓄水保墒高产机理的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1990,(1)：27-32
77 金胜利,周丽敏,李凤民,等.黄土高原地区玉米双垄全膜覆盖沟播栽培技术土壤水温条件及其产量效应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(2)：28-33
78 员学锋：吴普特,汪有科.地膜覆盖保墒灌溉的土壤水、热以及作物效应研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2006,25(1)：25-29
79 马树庆,王琪,郭建平,等.玉米地膜覆盖土壤水分效应及抗旱涝试验研究[J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(3)：8-13
80 程俊珊.渭源地区旱地玉米覆膜种植增温效应及高产增效研究初报[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,21(1)：39-42
81 聂安全,赵海祯,齐宏立,等.覆盖补水施肥对旱地小麦产量的影响[J].华北农学报,2001,16(1)：92-98
82 张继宏,汪景宽,须湘成,等.覆膜栽培条件下有机肥对土壤氮和玉米生物量的影响[J].土壤通报,1990,8(29)：162-166
83 汪景宽,张继宏,须湘成,等.长期地膜覆盖对土壤氮素状况的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1996,2 (2)：125-130
84 汪景宽,须湘成,张旭东,等.长期地膜覆盖对土壤磷素状况的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1994,25(3)：311-315
85 汪景宽,等.地膜覆盖对土壤肥力影响的研究.沈阳农业大学学报[J].1992.(专刊)：32-37
86 谭军利,王林权,李生秀.地面覆盖的保水增产效应及其机理研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,(3)：50-54
87 王俊,李凤民,宋秋华,等.地膜覆盖对土壤水温和春小麦产量形成的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(2)：205-210
88 王海泉,王英,周宝库,等.行间覆膜栽培对大豆根际土壤微生物区系和土壤肥力的影响[J].大豆科学,2009,28(5)：875-878
89 陈锡时,郭树凡,汪景宽,等.地膜覆盖栽培对土壤微生物种群和生物活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(4)：435-439
90 张敬敏.调控措施对高产杨树的生长代谢及土壤条件的影响[D].博士学位论文,山东农业大学,2011
91 张成娥,梁银丽,贺秀斌.地膜覆盖玉米对土壤微生物量的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(4)：508-512
92 Hooker B A, Morris T F, Peters R. et al. Long-term effects of tillage and corn stalk return on soil carbon dynamics [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005,69(2):188-196
93 张电学, 韩志卿, 李东坡,等.不同促腐条件下秸秆还田对土壤微生物量碳氮磷动态变化的影响应[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(10)：1903-1908
94 强学彩, 袁红莉, 高旺盛.秸秆还田量对土壤CO2释放和土壤微生物量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3)：469-472
95 李升东,王法宏,司纪升,等.耕作方式对土壤微生物和土壤肥力的影响[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(5)：1961-1964
96 朱波,胡跃高,曾昭海,等.双季稻区冬种覆盖作物对土壤微生物量的影响[J].生态环境2008,17(5)： 2074-2077
97 王晶,解宏图,张旭东,等.施肥对黑土土壤微生物量碳的作用研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(2)：118-120
98 于树,汪景宽,高艳梅.地膜覆盖及不同施肥处理对土壤微生物量碳和氮的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2006,37(4)：602-606
99 蔡晓布.不同培肥方式对西藏中部退化土壤的影响[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(2)：12-15
100樊军,郝明德.长期轮作施肥对土壤微生物碳氮的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1)：85-87
101许月蓉.不同施肥条件下潮土中微生物量及其活性[J].土壤学报,1995,32(3)：349-352
102刘苗,孙建,刘景辉,等.农牧交错带不同施肥措施土壤剖面生物量动态变化[J].水土保持学报.2010,24(1)：159-166
103王光华,齐晓宁.施肥对黑土农田土壤全碳、微生物量碳及土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4)：661-665
104王岩,沈其荣,史瑞和,等.有机、无机肥料施用后土壤生物量C、N、P的变化及N素转化[J].土壤学报,1996,19(4)：45-51
105高云超,朱文珊,陈文新.秸秆覆盖免耕土壤微生物生物量与养分转化的研究[J].中国农业科学,1994,27(6)：41-49
106周建斌,陈竹君,李生秀.土壤微生物量氮含量、矿化特性及其供氮作用[J].生态学报,2001,21(10)：1718-1723
107 Alan L Wright, Frank M Hons, John E Matocha Jr. Tillage impacts on microbial biomass and soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics of corn and cotton rotations [J]. Appl ied Soil Ecology,2005,29:85-92
108 Wright A L, Hons F M, Matocha Jr JE. Tillage impacts on microbial biomass and soil carbon and ni trogen dynamics of corn and cotton rotat ions [J]. Appl ied Soil Ecology, 2005,29:85-92
109 Aslam T, Choudhary M A, Saggar S. Tillage impacts on soil microbial biomass C, N and P, earthworms and agronomy after two years of cropping following permanent pasture in New Zealand [J]. Soil & Tillage Research,1999.51:103-111
110赵建波.保护性耕作对农田土壤生态因子及温室气体排放的影响[D].山东农业大学,博士学位论文,2008
111姜勇,梁文举,闻大中.免耕对农田土壤生物学特性的影响[J].土壤通报,2004,35(3)：347-351
112樊丽琴,南志标,沈禹颖,等.保护性耕作对黄土高原小麦田土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].草原与草坪,2005,(4)：51-53
113张洁,姚宇卿,金轲,等.保护性耕作对坡耕地土壤微生物量碳、氮的影。的[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4)：126-129
114孙建,刘苗,李立军,等.不同耕作方式对内蒙古旱作农田土壤微生物量和作物指标的影响[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(11)：2279-2285
115徐春阳,沈其荣,冉炜,等.长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J].土壤通报,2002,39(1)：89-96
116王芸,韩宾,史忠强,等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006.20(4)：120-122
117王芸,李增嘉,韩宾,等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物量及活性的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(8)：3384-3390
118刘文娜,吴文良,王秀斌.不同土壤类型和农业用地方式对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(3)：406-411
119 Dick R P: Soil Enzyme Activities as Indicators of Soil Quality [M]. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, Society of Agriculture,1994, (35):107-124
120 Dick R P. Soil Enzyme Activities as Integrative Indicators of Soil Health [M]. Biological Indicators of Soil Health. Wallingford: CAB International,1996: 121-156
21万淑婉.双季稻高产田的土壤微生物及土壤酶生物学指标[J].江西农业大学学报,1993,]5(4)：351-355
22杨万勤,王开运.土壤酶研究动态与展望[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(5)：564-570
23薛东,姚槐应,黄昌勇.植茶年龄对茶园土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2)：84-87
24窦超银,康跃虎,万书勤,等.覆膜滴灌对地下水浅埋区重量度盐碱地土壤晦活性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(3)：44-51
25许自成,王小东,杨伊乐,等.覆盖对烟田土壤酶活性及烤烟叶片荧光特性的影响[J].旱地区农业研究,2011,29(1)：197-200
26苗琳,王立,黄高宝,等.保护性耕作对旱地麦田土壤酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(1)：6-11
27杨青华,韩锦峰,贺德先.液体地膜覆盖对棉田土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].生态学报, 2005,25(6)：1312-1317
128汪景宽,彭涛,张旭东,等.地膜覆盖对土壤主要酶活性的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1997,28 (3)：210-213
129汪邓民,龚文丰,吴福如,等.覆膜条件下氮磷肥对土壤理化性质、酶活性及烟草生长的影响[J].烟草科技,2004,(6)：33-36
130杨鹏,薛立,陈红跃,等.不同混交林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J].湖南林业科技,2004,31(4)：43-45
131金轲,汪德水,蔡典雄,等.水肥耦合研究Ⅱ—不同N、P水配合对旱地冬情产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1999,5(1)：8-13
132严昶升.土壤肥力研究方法[M].北京：农业出版社,1988
133周扎恺.土壤中的脲酶活性与尿素肥料在土壤中的转化[J].土壤学进展,1984,(1)：1-8
134高明,周保同,魏朝富,等.不同耕作方式对稻田土壤动物、微生物及酶活性的影响研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(7)：1775-1181
135张洁,姚宇卿,金轲,等.保护性耕作对坡耕地土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4)：126-129
136 Roldan A, Salinas-Garcia JR, Alguaci MM, et al. Soil enzyme activities suggest advantages of conservation tillage practices in sorghum cultivation under subtropical conditions [J]. Geoderma,2005,129:178-185
137扬招弟,蔡立群,张仁陟,等.不同耕作方式对旱地土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(3)：514-517
138陈蓓,张仁陟.免耕与覆盖对土壤微生物数量及组成的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2004,39(6)：634-638
139朱文珊.北方一年两熟地区秸秆覆盖免耕技术原理及应用效果研究.中国少耕免耕与覆盖技术研究[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社,1991,11-20
140逢焕成.渭北旱塬秸秆覆盖耕作法研究.中国少耕免耕与覆盖技术研究[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社,1991,113-117
141 Adem H H. Management of tillage and crop residues fordouble—cropping in fragile soils of south-eastern Australia. Soil and Fillage Research[J].1984,4:577-589
142李春勃,盂春香,唐玉霞.早地棉田秸秆覆盖少耕土壤酶活性[J].河北农业科学,1993,4：9-11.
143张永清.巴彦淖尔市推广地膜二次利用免耕栽培技术[J].中国农技推广.2008,10：11-12
144陈浩,贾利欣,融晓萍,等.地膜二次利用免耕种植小麦套晚播向日葵栽培技术[J].作物栽培,47-48
145苏化洲,韩成,张瑞琴.等.地膜玉米后茬免耕直播向日葵栽培技术[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005(7)：357
146周月君.地膜西瓜后茬免耕直播向日葵栽培技术[J].宁夏农林科技.2011.52(4)：71.85
147王洪军,武凤玲,马成琴,等.地膜再利用技术及其意义[J].北方园艺,1998.1,23-24
148李金田,张喜林,孔德胤,等.巴彦淖尔市农牧业气候资源与区划[J].北京：科学普及出版社,2006
149史建国,严昌荣,何文清,等.黄河流域水分亏缺时空格局变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(1)：113-119
150刘克礼主编.作物栽培学[M].北京：中国农业出版社.2007
151王小东,许自成,刘占卿,等.液膜覆盖对烟田土壤水热状况和烤烟生长发育的影响[J].节水灌溉,2008,(4)：8-10
152郑洪元,张德生.土壤动态生物化学研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1982
153李阜棣主编.土壤微生物学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1996,131
154张宪武主编.土壤微生物研究—理论、应用新方法[M].沈阳：沈阳出版社,1993,483-504
155俞慎,李勇,王俊华,等.土壤微生物生物量作为红壤质量生物指标的探讨[J].土壤学报,1999,36(3)： 413-421
156 Schnure J, Rosswall T. Mineralization of nitrogen from 15N labelled fungi, soil microbial biomass and roots and its uptake by barely plant [J]. Plant and Soil, 1987,102:71-78
157陈安磊,王凯荣,谢小立,等.不同施肥模式下稻田土壤微生物生物量磷对土壤有机碳和磷素变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2)：2733-2738
158 Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS. Phosphorus in soil microbial biomass [J]. Soil biology and Biochemistry,1984,17:169-175
159何振立.土壤微生物量及其在养分循环和环境质量评价中的意义[J].土壤,1997,29(2)：61-69
160翟瑞常,张之一.耕作对土壤生物碳动态变化的影响[J].土壤学报,1996,33(2)：201-210
161 Abdul K S, Katayama A, Kimura M. Activities of some soil enzymes in different land use system after deforestation in hilly areas of west Lampung, South Sumatra, Indonesia [J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,1998,44(1):91-97
162关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1986
163万忠梅,吴景贵.土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报：自然科学版,2005,33(6)：87-92
164吴凤芝,孟立君,王学征.设施蔬菜轮作和连作土壤酶活性的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(4)：554-558
165孙瑞莲,赵秉强,朱鲁生,等.长期定位施肥对土壤酶活性的影响及其调控土壤肥力的作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,(4)：406-410
166彭正萍,门明新,薛世川,等.腐植酸复合肥对土壤养分转化土壤酶活性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2005,28(4)：1-4
167严昶升.土壤肥力研究法[M].北京科学出版社,1999：242-245
168章铁,刘秀清,孙晓莉.栗茶间作模式对土壤酶活性和土壤养分的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(4)：265-268
169杨鹏,薛立,陈红跃,等.不同混交林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J].湖南林业科技,2004,31(4)：43-45
170李华,陈英旭,梁新强,等.土壤脲酶活性对稻田田面水氮素转化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1)：55-58
171 Cotrufo M F, Ineson P. Effects of Enhanced Atmospheric CO2 and Nutrient Supply on the Quality and Subsequent Decomposition of Fine Roots of Betula pendula Roth. and Picea sitchensis (Bong) Carr[J]. Plant and Soil,1995,170(2):267-277
172吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等.土壤微生物生物量的测定方法及应用[M].北京：气象出版社,2006
173关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京：农业出版社,1986.274-279
174赵沛义,妥德宝,郑大玮,等.野外土壤风蚀定量观测方法的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(29)：12810-12812
175 Drury C. F, et al. Red clover, tillage influence on soil temperature, water content, and corn emergence [J]. Agronomy Journal,1999,91:101-108
176闫根海,杨晓军,王斌,等.地膜覆盖对玉米产量及其土壤状况的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(12)：6405-6406,6413
177张德奇,廖允成,贾志宽,等.宁南旱区谷子地膜覆盖的土壤水温效应[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(10)：2069-2075
178廖允成,温晓霞,韩思明,等.黄土台原旱地小麦覆盖保水技术效果研究[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(5)：548-552
179于晓莹,韩雷,贾春天,等.向日葵田除草剂除草试验初报.杂粮作物,2006,26(1)：37-39
180薛光,马建霞.草坪杂草及化学防除彩色图谱[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001
181郭书普,时敏,方应,等.旱田杂草识别与防治原色图鉴[M].安徽科学技术出版社,2005
182王莉,王玉金.大豆田苗后除草技术试验[J].辽宁农业科学,2004,(6)：52