基于可比价IO-SDA模型的我国二氧化碳强度研究
|
摘要
随着以二氧化碳为主的温室气体排放量的不断增长,由温室气体引发的气候变化问题引起了世界各国的广泛关注。联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第五次评估报告明确指出：对于观测到的20世纪中叶以来全球气候变暖的现象,人为影响极有可能是主要原因。我国是目前全球二氧化碳排放量最多的国家,在国际社会面临很大的减排压力。由于我国目前正处于工业化发展中期,城镇化建设和各项基础设施建设需要消耗大量化石能源,未来很长一段时期内随着化石能源需求的持续增长,化石能源燃烧产生的二氧化碳等温室气体排放量的持续增长不可避免,绝对数量的减排与经济增长之间必然存在冲突。针对我国国情,我国政府做出至2020年我国二氧化碳强度在2005年基础上减少40%至45%的承诺。在不影响我国经济稳定增长的前提之下,如何实现我国的减排承诺,制定符合我国国情的减排政策以降低我国二氧化碳强度成为值得关注和研究的问题。
本文在明确研究对象的基础上,通过对大量的文献总结与分析,尝试运用清单法对我国能源活动产生的二氧化碳排放量进行核算,并对我国二氧化碳排放历史特征、行业特征、区域特征进行分析,进而进行二氧化碳强度的国际比较,总结二氧化碳强度的变化特点和规律；在此基础上提出本文主要的理论基础和研究方法,通过引入经济——资源——环境投入产出表建立二氧化碳强度投入产出模型,运用结构分解法对二氧化碳强度的变动进行分析；进一步,对能源消费原始数据进行预处理,编制1997-2010年可比价投入产出序列表以满足实证分析需要；运用IO-SDA模型对我国二氧化碳强度进行实证分析,找出我国二氧化碳强度降低的有利因素与不利因素；最后,针对实证分析结果提出相应的减排对策。主要内容可以分为以下几个部分：
第1章为绪论。本章主要对研究的目的、背景和意义进行阐述,界定本文研究对象与范围,介绍本文研究的主要内容、研究思路、研究方法、技术路线、论文的创新点和不足之处。
第2章为国内外文献综述。本章对二氧化碳排放的几种核算方法进行了介绍,着重对本文采用的清单法进行了详细的阐述。对二氧化碳排放与二氧化碳强度研究中常用的两种因素分解法——指数分解法和结构分解法进行了回顾和分析,确定基于投入产出模型的结构分解法作为本文主要的实证分析方法。
第3章主要依据清单法对我国能源活动二氧化碳排放量进行核算,在此基础上对当前我国二氧化碳排放特征进行总结。从二氧化碳排放总量来看各省区二氧化碳排放呈现不平衡性；从二氧化碳强度变动趋势来看,除个别省份外大部分省区二氧化碳强度呈下降趋势；从二氧化碳排放的行业特征来看,能源生产和能源加工转换行业、工业制造业、交通运输业二氧化碳排放量明显高于其他行业；通过二氧化碳排放总量、人均二氧化碳排放量、二氧化碳强度的国际对比发现,虽然我国二氧化碳排放总量居世界首位,但人均二氧化碳排放量并不高；我国二氧化碳强度虽然近年来一直呈下降趋势,但和西方发达国家相比,总体水平依然较高,还存在很大的下降空间。
第4章主要阐述本文研究所依据的理论基础和方法模型,包括低碳经济理论、投入产出分析法、可比价投入产出表的编制原理、非竞争型投入产出模型和结构分解法。通过引入经济——资源——环境投入产出表,建立二氧化碳强度投入产出模型并运用结构分解法对我国二氧化碳强度的变动进行分解。
第5章主要对数据进行预处理以满足实证分析的需要。首先对能源消费数据进行相应的部门合并,以确保能源数据的部门分类与可比价投入产出序列表的部门分类保持一致,并将分品种能源由实物量单位转换为标准煤单位；其次对1997年、2002年、2007年、2010年当年价投入产出表制定统一的表式和部门分类标准,并根据部门分类标准对各年当年价投入产出表进行相应的部门合并；然后确定价格基年以及各部门的生产价格指数,最后依据价格指数运用第4章介绍的可比价投入产出表的编制原理依据当年价投入产出序列表编制以2002年为价格基年的1997—2010年可比价投入产出序列表。
第6章基于二氧化碳强度投入产出结构分解(IO-SDA)模型对我国二氧化碳强度变动进行实证研究。将经济总体二氧化碳强度与各部门经济二氧化碳强度的变动分解为能源结构效应、能源强度效应、投入结构效应、进口替代效应、最终需求产品结构效应和最终产品使用结构效应,并将影响因素归为生产模式与需求模式两类。实证分析结果表明：生产模式的变化是我国二氧化碳强度下降的主要原因,需求模式的变化是我国二氧化碳强度降低的主要阻碍因素。
第7章基于实证分析结果,分别从优化能源结构、降低能源强度、调整和优化产业结构、促进技术进步、培养低碳需求模式等方面对降低我国二氧化碳强度提出政策建议。结语部分对全文进行总结并对后继研究进行展望。
本文的创新点主要体现在以下三个方面：
1.运用清单法对我国能源活动二氧化碳排放进行核算的过程中采取了新的处理方法以降低误差。由于《2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南》中能源分类与各年份《中国统计年鉴》中能源分类并不完全一致,本文结合我国颁布的《综合能耗计算通则》及《省级温室气体清单编制指南》确定分品种能源的二氧化碳排放因子、单位热值含碳量及碳氧化率,比《2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南》中相应的缺省值更符合我国实际情况；由于受数据可获得性的限制,出现能源的非燃料用途及能源损失量等数据无法取得而使得能源消费数据大于实际值而导致二氧化碳总排放量计算结果偏大的问题,本文尝试将这种偏差通过二氧化碳排放因子取95%置信区间下限的方法进行修正。
2.引入经济——资源——环境投入产出表建立二氧化碳强度投入产出模型。经济——资源——环境投入产出表将投入产出分析的研究领域拓展到资源领域和环境领域,将经济流量表、资源投入表和污染物排放表中的数量关系进行有机的衔接,揭示经济、资源、环境之间的内在数量联系,在经济——资源——环境投入产出表基础上建立的二氧化碳强度投入产出模型能够更清晰的反映二氧化碳强度与能源投入结构、能源强度、中间投入结构、最终需求产品结构、最终产品使用结构之间的关系,以实现对二氧化碳强度的分析和研究。
3.利用不同的价格指数编制了1997-2010年中国可比价投入产出序列表。在编制可比价投入产出序列表过程中,对于工业各部门产品的可比价缩减,本文采用按行业分工业品出厂价格指数；由于无法获取第三产业各部门产品生产价格指数,第三产业各部门产品的可比价缩减采用第三产业价格平减指数近似地作为第三产业产品生产价格指数。同时,可比价投入产出序列表中的2007年、2010年可比价投入产出表是国内现有的可比价投入产出表编制领域内的最新成果。
With the gradual increment of greenhouse gas emissions mainly include carbon dioxide, the problem of climate change which caused by greenhouse gas is now attracting widespread attention in the world. The fifth appraisal report of IPCC shows clearly:Man-made influence is very likely to be the main reason for the global warming phenomenon observed since the middle of20th century. Our country is facing up to great pressure of reducing emissions in the global society because it is our country that has the largest global carbon dioxide emissions currently, and therefore our country is in the face of great pressure of reducing emissions. Urbanization and various infrastructure construction need to consume lots of fossil energy as our country is currently in the middle of industrialization, As the demand for fossil energy continues to grow for a long period in the future, the continuing growth of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions is inevitable, so there will be a conflict between absolute number of emission reduction and economic growth inevitably. In view of the situation of our country, in2009our government made a promise that reducing carbon dioxide intensity40%to45%by2020. Under the premise of steady economic growth in China, how to realize our emissions reduction promise and how to establish the appropriate emissions reduction policy so that decrease the carbon dioxide intensity of our country have become a problem which needs great attention.
Carbon dioxide intensity is chosen as the research object in this article. Through the review and analysis of a large number of relevant literatures in this paper, the main theoretical basis and research methods are put forward, with the introduction of economic resources and environment input-output tables, input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity is established. Based on input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity, structural decomposition analysis (IO-SDA) model is adopted to analyze the factors that influence the carbon dioxide intensity, determine the effect of various factors, summarize favorable factors and unfavorable factors for reducing the carbon dioxide intensity and the corresponding measures to reduce emissions is put forward according to the empirical analysis results. Main contents can be divided into the following several parts:
Chapter1is the introduction. This chapter mainly demonstrates the background and significance, defines the object and scope of this research and introduces the main contents, research ideas, methods, innovation points and also shortcomings of the article.
Chapter2mainly focus on the literature review at home and abroad, induces several methods of accounting carbon dioxide emissions, especially has an detailed introduction and summary of inventory method which is adopted in this article. And also compares and analyzes two factor decomposition methods:one is index decomposition method and the other is structural decompositional approach, both of which are widely used in research of carbon dioxide intensity, chooses structure decomposition method based on input-output model as the main method of empirical analysis in this paper.
Chapter3mainly carries out an accounting of the quantities of carbon dioxide emissions according to inventory method, and makes a summary of the features of carbon dioxide emissions on the basis of it. Look back the total quantity of carbon dioxide emissions, it takes on an imbalance in various provinces; from the variation trend of carbon dioxide intensity, carbon dioxide intensity is on the decline in most provinces except individual places. From the industry features of carbon dioxide emissions, the quantities of carbon dioxide emissions in energy production and processing and transformation industry, industrial manufacturing industry and transportation industry are obviously more over than other industries; By comparing the total quantities of carbon dioxide emissions, the quantity of carbon emissions per capita, carbon dioxide intensity in international world, the results show the quantity of carbon emissions per capita is not high although the total quantity of carbon dioxide emissions in China is the highest in the world. Even though the carbon dioxide intensity has been decreasing in recent years in our country, comparing to western developed countries, the overall level is still higher, and there is still a great deal of room for decreasing.
Chapter4introduces the theoretical and approach basis of the research in the article, mainly demonstrates the theoretical basis and method model includes the theory of low-carbon economy, input-output analysis, the compiling principle of comparable price of input-output table, the noncompetitive input-output model and structural decomposition analysis. Through bringing into the input-output table of economy-resourse-enrvironment, establishes input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity and apply structural decomposition analysis to disassemble the alteration of carbon dioxide intensity.
Chapter5pays close attention to the data preprocessing largely. Firstly, makes a corresponding combination with all data of energy consumption from all departments in order to make sure the industry classification of energy data and the comparable price input-output sequential tables keep the same; Secondly, sets up the form for input-output table and standard for department classification for the year of1997,2002,2007and2010, and makes a corresponding combination to the input-output table of current prices according to the department classification standard; Then set the price base year and producer price index, and finally compiles comparable price input-output sequential table from1997-2010taking2002as the price base year, which adopts the compiling principles of comparable price input-output table introduced in Chapter3according to the price index and the input-output sequential table at current price.
An empirical research on the variation factors of influencing carbon dioxide intensity is carried out on the basis of the input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity in Chapter6, and structural decomposition analysis (IO-SDA) is adopted in the research. Disassembling overall economy carbon dioxide intensity and the variation of carbon dioxide intensity in respective departments into energy structure effect, energy intensity effect, technology effect, import replacement effect, final demand product structure effect and final demand distribution structure effect and classifies influenced factors into production mode and demand mode. The result of the empirical research shows that it is the change of production mode that be responsible for the decrease of carbon dioxide intensity in our country. But the main obstructive factor of influencing carbon dioxide intensity is the change of demand mode.
Based on the result of the empirical research Chapter7puts forward some policies and suggestions to decrease carbon dioxide intensity from the following aspects:optimizing the energy structure, adjusting and optimizing industrial structure, promoting the advancement of technology, training low carbon demand mode etc. The ending is the summary and prospect, summarizes the whole dissertation and also includes the prospect of further research. Three innovative points mainly are as follows:
1. On the basis of looking back lots of literatures relevant to the accounting of greenhouse gas, refers to the method of accounting carbon dioxide emissions provided in The2006IPCC country listing guidelines of greenhouse gases(Hereinafter referred to as the guide) and accounts the carbon dioxide emissions which produced by energy activities. Because the classification of energy in The guide does not completely correspond with the classification of energy in China Statistical Yearbook, the dissertation combines The general principles of the comprehensive energy consumption calculation and Provincial greenhouse gas inventories preparation guidelines so that set carbon dioxide emissions factors due to various energies and the unit content of calorific value and oxygenation efficiency, which more suitable for the current situation of our country than the default value provided in the Guide; Because of the limitation of acceptable data, some data such as loss of energy processing and transformation, energy loss, non fuel purpose of energy and so on, could not be accepted, which results in the data of energy consumption is greater than practical value so that arouses a problem that the result of calculating the total quantity of carbon dioxide emissions trends to be greater. The dissertation attempts to modify the deviation by using the method that taking the lower limit of95%confidence interval in carbon dioxide emissions factors. This processing method has not been found in relevant researches.
2. The dissertation brings into input-output table of economy-resource-environment to set up input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity. The input-output table of economy-resource-environment links up the data relationship smoothly in economy flow table, resource input table, pollution emission table and reveals the inner relationship between economy, resource and environment in order to analyze the carbon dioxide intensity.
3. In the process of compiling comparable price input-output table, all products in various departments in current price input-output table need to be deflated correspondingly by adopting producer price index of the products in various departments. For the deflation of comparable price of the products in industrial departments, the dissertation makes use of producer price index according to industry. Because it is impossible to get the producer price index in the various departments in the tertiary industry, price index in the tertiary industry is adopted in the deflation of comparable price of the products in the tertiary industry, just as the producer price index approximately in the tertiary industry. These processing methods are very innovative based on the compiling method of current price input-output table. In addition, the dissertation compiles the comparable price input-output table, which according to the input-output table in2007, the input-output extended table in2010and taking.2002as the price base year, includes the comparable input-output table of28departments in2007and2010(in appendix), is the most fresh fruit in the field of compiling current comparable price input-output table in domestic.
本文在明确研究对象的基础上,通过对大量的文献总结与分析,尝试运用清单法对我国能源活动产生的二氧化碳排放量进行核算,并对我国二氧化碳排放历史特征、行业特征、区域特征进行分析,进而进行二氧化碳强度的国际比较,总结二氧化碳强度的变化特点和规律；在此基础上提出本文主要的理论基础和研究方法,通过引入经济——资源——环境投入产出表建立二氧化碳强度投入产出模型,运用结构分解法对二氧化碳强度的变动进行分析；进一步,对能源消费原始数据进行预处理,编制1997-2010年可比价投入产出序列表以满足实证分析需要；运用IO-SDA模型对我国二氧化碳强度进行实证分析,找出我国二氧化碳强度降低的有利因素与不利因素；最后,针对实证分析结果提出相应的减排对策。主要内容可以分为以下几个部分：
第1章为绪论。本章主要对研究的目的、背景和意义进行阐述,界定本文研究对象与范围,介绍本文研究的主要内容、研究思路、研究方法、技术路线、论文的创新点和不足之处。
第2章为国内外文献综述。本章对二氧化碳排放的几种核算方法进行了介绍,着重对本文采用的清单法进行了详细的阐述。对二氧化碳排放与二氧化碳强度研究中常用的两种因素分解法——指数分解法和结构分解法进行了回顾和分析,确定基于投入产出模型的结构分解法作为本文主要的实证分析方法。
第3章主要依据清单法对我国能源活动二氧化碳排放量进行核算,在此基础上对当前我国二氧化碳排放特征进行总结。从二氧化碳排放总量来看各省区二氧化碳排放呈现不平衡性；从二氧化碳强度变动趋势来看,除个别省份外大部分省区二氧化碳强度呈下降趋势；从二氧化碳排放的行业特征来看,能源生产和能源加工转换行业、工业制造业、交通运输业二氧化碳排放量明显高于其他行业；通过二氧化碳排放总量、人均二氧化碳排放量、二氧化碳强度的国际对比发现,虽然我国二氧化碳排放总量居世界首位,但人均二氧化碳排放量并不高；我国二氧化碳强度虽然近年来一直呈下降趋势,但和西方发达国家相比,总体水平依然较高,还存在很大的下降空间。
第4章主要阐述本文研究所依据的理论基础和方法模型,包括低碳经济理论、投入产出分析法、可比价投入产出表的编制原理、非竞争型投入产出模型和结构分解法。通过引入经济——资源——环境投入产出表,建立二氧化碳强度投入产出模型并运用结构分解法对我国二氧化碳强度的变动进行分解。
第5章主要对数据进行预处理以满足实证分析的需要。首先对能源消费数据进行相应的部门合并,以确保能源数据的部门分类与可比价投入产出序列表的部门分类保持一致,并将分品种能源由实物量单位转换为标准煤单位；其次对1997年、2002年、2007年、2010年当年价投入产出表制定统一的表式和部门分类标准,并根据部门分类标准对各年当年价投入产出表进行相应的部门合并；然后确定价格基年以及各部门的生产价格指数,最后依据价格指数运用第4章介绍的可比价投入产出表的编制原理依据当年价投入产出序列表编制以2002年为价格基年的1997—2010年可比价投入产出序列表。
第6章基于二氧化碳强度投入产出结构分解(IO-SDA)模型对我国二氧化碳强度变动进行实证研究。将经济总体二氧化碳强度与各部门经济二氧化碳强度的变动分解为能源结构效应、能源强度效应、投入结构效应、进口替代效应、最终需求产品结构效应和最终产品使用结构效应,并将影响因素归为生产模式与需求模式两类。实证分析结果表明：生产模式的变化是我国二氧化碳强度下降的主要原因,需求模式的变化是我国二氧化碳强度降低的主要阻碍因素。
第7章基于实证分析结果,分别从优化能源结构、降低能源强度、调整和优化产业结构、促进技术进步、培养低碳需求模式等方面对降低我国二氧化碳强度提出政策建议。结语部分对全文进行总结并对后继研究进行展望。
本文的创新点主要体现在以下三个方面：
1.运用清单法对我国能源活动二氧化碳排放进行核算的过程中采取了新的处理方法以降低误差。由于《2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南》中能源分类与各年份《中国统计年鉴》中能源分类并不完全一致,本文结合我国颁布的《综合能耗计算通则》及《省级温室气体清单编制指南》确定分品种能源的二氧化碳排放因子、单位热值含碳量及碳氧化率,比《2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南》中相应的缺省值更符合我国实际情况；由于受数据可获得性的限制,出现能源的非燃料用途及能源损失量等数据无法取得而使得能源消费数据大于实际值而导致二氧化碳总排放量计算结果偏大的问题,本文尝试将这种偏差通过二氧化碳排放因子取95%置信区间下限的方法进行修正。
2.引入经济——资源——环境投入产出表建立二氧化碳强度投入产出模型。经济——资源——环境投入产出表将投入产出分析的研究领域拓展到资源领域和环境领域,将经济流量表、资源投入表和污染物排放表中的数量关系进行有机的衔接,揭示经济、资源、环境之间的内在数量联系,在经济——资源——环境投入产出表基础上建立的二氧化碳强度投入产出模型能够更清晰的反映二氧化碳强度与能源投入结构、能源强度、中间投入结构、最终需求产品结构、最终产品使用结构之间的关系,以实现对二氧化碳强度的分析和研究。
3.利用不同的价格指数编制了1997-2010年中国可比价投入产出序列表。在编制可比价投入产出序列表过程中,对于工业各部门产品的可比价缩减,本文采用按行业分工业品出厂价格指数；由于无法获取第三产业各部门产品生产价格指数,第三产业各部门产品的可比价缩减采用第三产业价格平减指数近似地作为第三产业产品生产价格指数。同时,可比价投入产出序列表中的2007年、2010年可比价投入产出表是国内现有的可比价投入产出表编制领域内的最新成果。
With the gradual increment of greenhouse gas emissions mainly include carbon dioxide, the problem of climate change which caused by greenhouse gas is now attracting widespread attention in the world. The fifth appraisal report of IPCC shows clearly:Man-made influence is very likely to be the main reason for the global warming phenomenon observed since the middle of20th century. Our country is facing up to great pressure of reducing emissions in the global society because it is our country that has the largest global carbon dioxide emissions currently, and therefore our country is in the face of great pressure of reducing emissions. Urbanization and various infrastructure construction need to consume lots of fossil energy as our country is currently in the middle of industrialization, As the demand for fossil energy continues to grow for a long period in the future, the continuing growth of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions is inevitable, so there will be a conflict between absolute number of emission reduction and economic growth inevitably. In view of the situation of our country, in2009our government made a promise that reducing carbon dioxide intensity40%to45%by2020. Under the premise of steady economic growth in China, how to realize our emissions reduction promise and how to establish the appropriate emissions reduction policy so that decrease the carbon dioxide intensity of our country have become a problem which needs great attention.
Carbon dioxide intensity is chosen as the research object in this article. Through the review and analysis of a large number of relevant literatures in this paper, the main theoretical basis and research methods are put forward, with the introduction of economic resources and environment input-output tables, input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity is established. Based on input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity, structural decomposition analysis (IO-SDA) model is adopted to analyze the factors that influence the carbon dioxide intensity, determine the effect of various factors, summarize favorable factors and unfavorable factors for reducing the carbon dioxide intensity and the corresponding measures to reduce emissions is put forward according to the empirical analysis results. Main contents can be divided into the following several parts:
Chapter1is the introduction. This chapter mainly demonstrates the background and significance, defines the object and scope of this research and introduces the main contents, research ideas, methods, innovation points and also shortcomings of the article.
Chapter2mainly focus on the literature review at home and abroad, induces several methods of accounting carbon dioxide emissions, especially has an detailed introduction and summary of inventory method which is adopted in this article. And also compares and analyzes two factor decomposition methods:one is index decomposition method and the other is structural decompositional approach, both of which are widely used in research of carbon dioxide intensity, chooses structure decomposition method based on input-output model as the main method of empirical analysis in this paper.
Chapter3mainly carries out an accounting of the quantities of carbon dioxide emissions according to inventory method, and makes a summary of the features of carbon dioxide emissions on the basis of it. Look back the total quantity of carbon dioxide emissions, it takes on an imbalance in various provinces; from the variation trend of carbon dioxide intensity, carbon dioxide intensity is on the decline in most provinces except individual places. From the industry features of carbon dioxide emissions, the quantities of carbon dioxide emissions in energy production and processing and transformation industry, industrial manufacturing industry and transportation industry are obviously more over than other industries; By comparing the total quantities of carbon dioxide emissions, the quantity of carbon emissions per capita, carbon dioxide intensity in international world, the results show the quantity of carbon emissions per capita is not high although the total quantity of carbon dioxide emissions in China is the highest in the world. Even though the carbon dioxide intensity has been decreasing in recent years in our country, comparing to western developed countries, the overall level is still higher, and there is still a great deal of room for decreasing.
Chapter4introduces the theoretical and approach basis of the research in the article, mainly demonstrates the theoretical basis and method model includes the theory of low-carbon economy, input-output analysis, the compiling principle of comparable price of input-output table, the noncompetitive input-output model and structural decomposition analysis. Through bringing into the input-output table of economy-resourse-enrvironment, establishes input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity and apply structural decomposition analysis to disassemble the alteration of carbon dioxide intensity.
Chapter5pays close attention to the data preprocessing largely. Firstly, makes a corresponding combination with all data of energy consumption from all departments in order to make sure the industry classification of energy data and the comparable price input-output sequential tables keep the same; Secondly, sets up the form for input-output table and standard for department classification for the year of1997,2002,2007and2010, and makes a corresponding combination to the input-output table of current prices according to the department classification standard; Then set the price base year and producer price index, and finally compiles comparable price input-output sequential table from1997-2010taking2002as the price base year, which adopts the compiling principles of comparable price input-output table introduced in Chapter3according to the price index and the input-output sequential table at current price.
An empirical research on the variation factors of influencing carbon dioxide intensity is carried out on the basis of the input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity in Chapter6, and structural decomposition analysis (IO-SDA) is adopted in the research. Disassembling overall economy carbon dioxide intensity and the variation of carbon dioxide intensity in respective departments into energy structure effect, energy intensity effect, technology effect, import replacement effect, final demand product structure effect and final demand distribution structure effect and classifies influenced factors into production mode and demand mode. The result of the empirical research shows that it is the change of production mode that be responsible for the decrease of carbon dioxide intensity in our country. But the main obstructive factor of influencing carbon dioxide intensity is the change of demand mode.
Based on the result of the empirical research Chapter7puts forward some policies and suggestions to decrease carbon dioxide intensity from the following aspects:optimizing the energy structure, adjusting and optimizing industrial structure, promoting the advancement of technology, training low carbon demand mode etc. The ending is the summary and prospect, summarizes the whole dissertation and also includes the prospect of further research. Three innovative points mainly are as follows:
1. On the basis of looking back lots of literatures relevant to the accounting of greenhouse gas, refers to the method of accounting carbon dioxide emissions provided in The2006IPCC country listing guidelines of greenhouse gases(Hereinafter referred to as the guide) and accounts the carbon dioxide emissions which produced by energy activities. Because the classification of energy in The guide does not completely correspond with the classification of energy in China Statistical Yearbook, the dissertation combines The general principles of the comprehensive energy consumption calculation and Provincial greenhouse gas inventories preparation guidelines so that set carbon dioxide emissions factors due to various energies and the unit content of calorific value and oxygenation efficiency, which more suitable for the current situation of our country than the default value provided in the Guide; Because of the limitation of acceptable data, some data such as loss of energy processing and transformation, energy loss, non fuel purpose of energy and so on, could not be accepted, which results in the data of energy consumption is greater than practical value so that arouses a problem that the result of calculating the total quantity of carbon dioxide emissions trends to be greater. The dissertation attempts to modify the deviation by using the method that taking the lower limit of95%confidence interval in carbon dioxide emissions factors. This processing method has not been found in relevant researches.
2. The dissertation brings into input-output table of economy-resource-environment to set up input-output model of carbon dioxide intensity. The input-output table of economy-resource-environment links up the data relationship smoothly in economy flow table, resource input table, pollution emission table and reveals the inner relationship between economy, resource and environment in order to analyze the carbon dioxide intensity.
3. In the process of compiling comparable price input-output table, all products in various departments in current price input-output table need to be deflated correspondingly by adopting producer price index of the products in various departments. For the deflation of comparable price of the products in industrial departments, the dissertation makes use of producer price index according to industry. Because it is impossible to get the producer price index in the various departments in the tertiary industry, price index in the tertiary industry is adopted in the deflation of comparable price of the products in the tertiary industry, just as the producer price index approximately in the tertiary industry. These processing methods are very innovative based on the compiling method of current price input-output table. In addition, the dissertation compiles the comparable price input-output table, which according to the input-output table in2007, the input-output extended table in2010and taking.2002as the price base year, includes the comparable input-output table of28departments in2007and2010(in appendix), is the most fresh fruit in the field of compiling current comparable price input-output table in domestic.
引文
5 政府间气候变化专门委员会.《2006年PCC国家温室气体清单指南》第二卷1.6
6 摘自《中国统计年鉴2011》对能源消费量的定义。
7 Grossman,Krueger.(1991).Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Working paper http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914
8 向蓉美：《投入产出法》,西南财经大学出版社,2007.07第1-6页。
(?) 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.《中国的能源政策(2012)》,2012年10月24日
[1]Adam Rose, Stephen Casler. Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal[J], Economic Systems Research,2006(7):33-62
[2]B.Lim, P.Boileau, Y. Bonduki. Improving the quality of national greenhouse gas inventories[J], Environmental Science & Policy,1999(3):335-346
[3]B.W. Ang, Na Liu. Energy Decomposition Analysis:IEA model versus other methods[J], Energy Policy,2007(35):1426-1432
[4]B.W. Ang. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis:a practical guide[J], Energy Policy,2005(33):867-871
[5]B.W.Ang, Ki-Hong Choi. Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry:A Refined Divisia Index Method[J], The Energy Journal,1997(18):59-73
[6]Bo Huang, Lina Meng. Convergence of Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Urban China:A Spatio-temporal Perspective[J], Applied Geography, 2013(40):21-29
[7]Can Wang, Jining Chen, Ji Zou. Decomposition of Energy-related CO2 emission in China:1957-2000[J], Energy,2005(1):73-83
[8]Can Wang, Jining Chen. Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's iron and steel industry[J], Energy Policy,2007(35): 2320-2335
[9]CAsbj(?)rn Torvanger. Manufacturing sector carbon dioxide emissions in nine OECD countries,1973-87 A Divisia index decomposition to changes in fuel mix, emission coefficients, industry structure, energy intensities and international structure[J], Energy Economics,1991(13):168-186
[10]Casler S.D, Rose A. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy:A Structural Decomposition Analysis [J], Environmental and Resource Economics,1998(11):349-363
[11]Chen, Rose. Sources of change in energy use in the Uited States-economy,1972-1982 A strcutrual Decomposition Analysis[J], Resources and Energy,1991(13):1-21
[12]Common M S, Salma U. Accounting for changes in Australian carbon dioxide emissions[J], Energy Economics,1992(14):217-225.
[13]Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural decomposition techniques:sense and sensitivity[J], Economic Systems Research,1998(10):307-324
[14]Domingo Gonzalez, Manuel Martinez. Changes in CO2 emission intensities in the Mexican industry[J], Energy Ploicy,2012(51):149-163
[15]F.L. Liu, B.W. Ang. Eight methods for decomposing the aggregate energy-intensity of industry[J], Applied Energy,2003(76):15-23
[16]Fredrik N.G Andersson, Peter Karpestam. CO2 emissions and economic activity:Short-and long-run economic determinants of scale, energy intensity and carbon intensity[J], Energy Policy,2013(10)1285-1294
[17]Glen P. Peters, Christopher L. Weber.China's Growing CO2 EmissionsA Race between Increasing Consumption and Efficiency Gains [J], Environment Science Technology,2007(41):5939-5944
[18]Gould B. W., Kulshreshtha S N. An interindustry analysis of structural change and energy use linkages in the Saskatchewan economy [J], Energy Economics, 1986(8):186-196
[19]Gregg Marland, Thomas Buchholz, Tammy Kowalczyk. Accounting for Carbon·Dioxide Emissions[J], Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013(17):340-342
[20]Gurkan Kumbaroglu. A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO2 emissions over 1990-2007[J], Energy,2011(5):2419-2433
[21]Gurkan Kumbaroglu. Energy and Climate Policy Analysis with the Hybrid Bottom-Up Computable General Equilibrium Model SCREEN:The Case of the Swiss CO2Act[J], Annals of Operations Research,2011(121):181-203
[22]Hiroki Hondo, Shinsuke Sakai, Shiro Tanno. Sensitivity analysis of total CO2 emission intensities estimated using an input-output table[J], Applied Energy, 2002(7):689-704
[23]JaeHyun Park, TaeHoon Hong. Analysis of South Korea's economic growth, carbon dioxide emission, and energy consumption using the Markov switching model[J], Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2013(2):543-551
[24]Ju Liping, Chen Bin. An Input-output Model to Analyze Sector Linkages and CO2 Emissions[J], Procedia Environmental Sciences,2010 (2):1841-1845
[25]Keisuke Nansai, Yuichi Moriguchi, Susumu Tohno. Development of Database on Japanese Sectoral Energy Consumption, CO2 and Air Pollutant Emissions Intensities Based on the Input-Output Tables [J], Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies-6th International Conference,2002(10):1745-1748
[26]Ken Caldeira, Steven J. Davis. Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions:A matter of time[J], Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011(5):8533-8534
[27]Kuan-Min Wang. The relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth:quantile panel-type analysis[J], Quality & Quantity, 2013(4):1337-1366
[28]Kyonghwa Jeong, Suyi Kim.. LMDI decomposition analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the Korean manufacturing sector[J], Energy Policy, 2013(62):1245-1253
[29]Leontief W, Ford D. Air pollution and the economic structure:empirical results of input-output computations [J], Input-output techniques,1972:9-30
[30]Leya Wu, Weihua Zeng. Research on the Contribution of Structure Adjustment on Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction based on LMDI Method[J], Procedia Computer Science,2013(17):744-751
[31]Limin Du, Chu Wei, Shenghua Cai. Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China:Provincial panel data analysis [J], China Economic Review,2012(23):371-384
[32]Lorna A. GreeningU, William B. Davis, Lee Schipper. Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for the manufacturing sector:comparison of declining trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1991[J], Energy Economics,1998(20):43-65
[33]Margarita Robaina Alves, Victor Moutinho. Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996-2009 in Portugal[J], Energy,2013(57):775-787
[34]Miguel Angel Tarancon, Pablo Del Rio. Assessing energy-related CO2 emissions with sensitivity analysis and input-output techniques [J], Energy, 2012(1):161-170
[35]Nilgun Cil Yavuz, Veli Yilanci. Convergence in Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions Among G7 Countries:A TAR Panel Unit Root Approach[J], Environ Resource Econ,2013(54):283-291
[36]Peter Erickson, David Allaway, Michael Lazarus, Elizabeth A Stanton. A consumption-based GHG inventory for the U.S. state of Oregon[J], Environmental Science & Technology,2012(3):3679-3686
[37]Philip R. Israilevich, Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, Michael Sonis, Graham R. Schindler. Forecasting Structural Change With a Regional Econometric Input-Output Model[J], Journal of Regional Science,1997(4):565-590
[38]Philip W. Gay & John L. R. Proops. Carbon---dioxide production by the UK economy:An input-output assessment J], Applied Energy,1993 (44):113-130
[39]Philip W. Gay, John L. R. Proops. Carbon-dioxide production by the UK economy:An input-output assessment[J], Applied Energy,1993(2):113-130
[40]Ratnakar Pani, Ujjaini Mukhopadhyay. Identifying the major players behind increasing global carbon dioxide emissions:a decomposition analysis [J], The Environmentalist,2010(6):183-205
[41]Ross Mckitrick Mark C, Strazicich, Junsoo Lee. Long-Term Forecasting of Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions:Reducing Uncertainties Using a Per Capita Approach [J], Journal of Forecasting,2013(7):435-451
[42]Rutger Hoekstra, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh. Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy [J], Environmental and Resource Economics,2002(23):357-378
[43]Rutger Hoekstra, Jeroen J.C.J.M.van der Bergh. Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis[J], Energy Economics,2003(25):39-64
[44]Selim Adem Hatirlia, Burhan Ozkanb, Cemal Fert. An econometric analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture [J], Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2005(9):608-623
[45]Shan Guo, Ling Shao, H. Chen,Z. Li, J.B. Liu,F.X. Xu, J.S. Li, M.Y. Han, J. Meng,Zhan-Ming Chen, S.C. Li. Inventory and input-output analysis of CO2 emissions by fossil fuel consumption in Beijing 2007[J], Ecological Informatics,2012(11):93-100
[46]Shiyi Chen. The Abatement of Carbon Dioxide Intensity in China:Factors Decomposition and Policy Implications[J], The World Economy, 2011(7):1148-1167
[47]Shrestha, Timilsina. Factors affecting CO2 intensities of power sector in Asia: ADivisia decomposition analysis[J], Energy Economics,1996(18):293-293
[48]Simone Gingrichr Petra Kuskovd, Julia K Steinberger. Long-term changes in CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia-Identifying the drivers of environmental pressures[J], Energy Policy,2011(39):535-545
[49]Stephen D. Casler, Adam Rose. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy[J], Environmental and Resource Economics,1998(11):349-363
[50]Sun J.W. Accounting for energy use in China[J], Energy,1998(23):835-849
[51]Surugiu Camelia, Surugiu Marius Razvan, Zelia Breda, Dinca Ana-Irina. An Input-Output Approach of CO2 Emissions in Tourism Sector in Post-Communist Romania[J], Procedia Economics and Finance, 2012(3):987-992
[52]Travis Roach. A dynamic state-level analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States[J], Energy Policy,2013(59):931-937
[53]Wier. Sources of changes in emissions from energy:A structural decomposition analysis[J], Economic Systems Research,1998(10):99-108
[54]William E. Easterling, Colin Polsky, Doug Goodin, Michael W. Mayfield, William A. Muraco, Brent Yarnal. Changing Places, Changing Emissions:The cross-scale reliability of greenhouse gas emissions inventories in the US[J]. Local Environment,1998(3):247-62
[55]X.Y. Xu, B.W. Ang. Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies[J], Ecological Economics,2013(9):313-329
[56]Xavier Labandeira, Jose M. Labeaga. Estimation and control of Spanish energy-related CO2 emissions:an input-output approach[J], Energy Policy, 2002(6):597-611
[57]Xin Tian, Miao Chang, Hiroki Tanikawa, Feng Shi, Hidefumi Imura. Structural decomposition analysis:Carbon dioxide emissions [J], Energy Policy,2013(53):279-286
[58]Xin Tian, Miao Chang, Hiroki Tanikawa. Regional Disparity in Carbon Dioxide Emissions:Assessing Sectoral Impacts on the Carbon Dioxide Emissions Structure Among Regions of Mainland China[J], Journal of Industrial Ecology,2012(16):612-622
[59]Yafei Wang, Hongyan Zhao, Liying Li, Zhu Liu, Sai Liang. Carbon dioxide emission drivers for a typical metropolis using input-output structural decomposition analysis[J], Energy Policy,2013(7):312-318
[60]Yih F Chang, Sue J Lin. Comprehensive evaluation of industrial CO2 emission (1989-2004) in Taiwan by input-output structural decomposition[J], Energy Policy,2008(36):2471-2480
[61]向蓉美,孟彦菊.国外投入产出法研究述评[J],统计与信息论坛,2007(4)：97-98
[62]向蓉美,孟彦菊.投入产出与计量模型浅谈[J],统计与信息论坛,2011(3)：3-8
[63]向蓉美.地区投入产出模型扩展研究[M],成都：西南财经大学出版社,2011(9)
[64]向蓉美.国民经济核算及分析[M],成都：西南财经大学出版社,2005(3)
[65]向蓉美.投入产出分析[M],成都：西南财经大学出版社,2007(3)
[66]向蓉美.投入产出系数作用新探及实证分析[J],统计与信息论坛,2008(6)：5-9
[67]孟彦菊,向蓉美.产业结构与产业关联：基于投入产出表的面板数据分析[J],统计与决策,2009(1)：13-17
[68]孟彦菊,向蓉美.投入产出与计量经济联合模型研究[J],数理统计与管理,2011(3)：531-539
[69]GB/T2589-2008《综合能耗计算通则》.2008(2)
[70]鲍健强,苗阳,陈锋.低碳经济：人类经济发展方式的新变革[J],中国工业经济,2008(4)：153-160
[71]查冬兰,周德群.我国工业C02排放的影响因素差异性研究——基于高能耗行业中能耗行业[J],财贸研究,2008(1)：13-18
[72]常征.能源活动相关温室气体排放清单分析——以美国为例[J],世界经济情况,2012(8)：76-81.
[73]陈春华,路正南.我国碳排放强度的影响因素及路径分析[J],统计观察,2012(2)：96-98
[74]陈德湖,张津.中国碳排放的环境库兹涅茨曲线分析——基于空间面板模型的实证研究[J],统计与信息论坛,2012(5)：48-53
[75]陈红敏.中国出口贸易中隐含能变化的影响因素——基于结构分解分析的研究[J],财贸研究,2009(3)：66-72
[76]陈建华.重庆市碳排放特征分析与减排对策[D],西南交通大学,2010：1-64
[77]陈健鹏.温室气体减排——国际经验与政策选择[明,北京：中国发展出版社,2011(9)
[78]陈铭泽.基于Divisia分解法的碳排放因素分解研究——以广东省为例[J],安徽农业科学,2011(11)：6640-6642
[79]陈其颢,朱林,王圣.江苏省温室气体排放清单基础研究[J],环境科学与管理,2012(37)：1-4
[80]陈诗一.能源消耗,二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J],经济研究,2009(4)：41-55
[81]陈诗一.中国碳排放强度的波动下降模式及经济解释[J],世界经济,2011(4)：124-143
[82]陈莹.我国产业结构对碳排放影响的实证研究[D],湖南大学,2011：1-58
[83]程永伟.我国产业结构的低碳化转型——基于碳效益和产业协调性的投入产出分析[J],哈尔滨商业大学学报,2012(5)：19-25
[84]邓舒仁,低碳经济发展研究：理论分析和政策选择[D],中共中央党校,2012：1-184
[85]杜官印,蔡运龙,李双成.1997-2007年中国分省化石能源碳排放强度变化趋势分析[J],地理与地理信息科学,2010(9)：76-81
[86]杜立民.我国二氧化碳排放的影响因素[J],南方经济,2010(11)：20-33
[87]樊纲,苏铭,曹静.最终消费与碳减排责任的经济学分析[J],经济研究,2010(1)：4-14
[88]樊茂清,任若恩,陈高才.技术变化,要素替代和贸易对能源强度影响的实证研究[J],经济学,2009(10)：237-258
[89]付雪,王桂新.上海碳排放强度结构分解分析[J],资源科学,2011(11)：2124-2130
[90]高博.1991-2008年中国碳排放影响因素研究[J],生态经济,2013(7)：43-46
[91]高姗.经济结构转型对碳排放强度的影响----北京市碳排放变化的实证研究[D],中央财经大学经济学院,2011：1-38
[92]高振宇,王益.我国生产用能源消费变动的分解分析[J],统计研究,2007(3)：52-57
[93]郭朝先.中国二氧化碳排放增长因素分析[J],中国工业经济,2010(12)：47-56
[94]郭杰.中国碳减排政策分析与评估方法及应用研究[D],中国科学技术大学,2011：1-146
[95]国家发展改革委应对气候变化司组织国家发展改革委能源研究所,清华大学.《省级温室气体清单编制指南》,2011年5月
[96]国家温室气体清单特别工作组.《2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南》2006年
[97]何建坤,刘滨,张阿玲.我国未来减缓C02排放的潜力分析[J],清华大学学报,2002(6)：76-80
[98]何建坤,刘滨.作为温室气体排放衡量指标的碳排放强度分析[J],清华大学学报,2004(6)：740-743
[99]贺红兵.我国碳排放影响因素分析[D],华中科技大学,2012：1-117
[100]胡宗义,刘亦文,唐李伟.低碳经济背景下碳排放的库兹涅茨曲线研究[J],统计研究,2013(2)：73-79
[101]黄芳,江可申,卢愿清,吴优.中国碳强度的影响因素解析——基于LMD1分解方法[J],数学的实践与认识,2012(3)：40-46
[102]黄建.二氧化碳强度下降目标的动态分解研究[J],中南财经政法大学学报,2011(4)：60-67
[103]籍艳丽,郜元兴.二氧化碳强度的实证研究[J],统计研究,2011(7)：37-44
[104]蒋洪强,周颖.温室气体排放统计核算技术方法[M],北京：中国环境科学出版社,2009(10)
[105]蒋金荷.中国碳排放特征及发展低碳经济的对策分析[J],经济研究参考,2012(5)：6-14
[106]金乐琴.中国如何理智应对低碳经济的潮流[J].经济学家,2009(3)100-101
[107]冷雪.碳排放与我国经济发展关系研究[D],复旦大学,2012：1-133
[108]李家才.中国碳强度承诺的含义特点与履行[J],汕头大学学报,2012(4)：74-78
[109]李景华.SDA模型加权平均分解法及在中国第三产业经济发展分析中的 应用[J],系统工程,2004(9)：69-73
[110]李锴,齐绍洲.贸易开放,经济增长与中国二氧化碳排放[J],经济研究,2011(11)：60-72
[111]李力,王凤.中国制造业能源强度因素分解研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2008(10)：66-74
[112]李强,薛天栋.中国经济发展部门分析：兼新编可比价投入产出序列表[M].北京：中国统计出版社,1998
[113]李晴,唐立娜,石龙宇.城市温室气体排放清单编制研究进展[J],生态学报,2013(33)：367-373
[114]李涛,傅强.中国省际碳排放效率研究[J],统计研究,2011(28)：62-71
[115]李霞.我国二氧化碳排放区域差异研究——基于PCC碳排放核算方法[J],国土与自然资源研究,2013(2)：63-65
[116]廖明球.基于“节能减排”的投入产出模型研究[J],中国工业经济,2011(7)：26-34
[117]廖明球.经济、资源、环境投入产出模型研究[M],北京：首都经济贸易大学出版社,2005
[118]林伯强,刘希颖.中国城市化阶段的碳排放,影响因素和减排策略[J],经济研究,2010(8)：66-78
[119]林伯强,魏巍贤,李丕东.中国长期煤炭需求：影响与政策选择[J],经济研究,2007(2)：48-58
[120]刘广为.中国碳排放强度预测及其影响因素动态效应建模[D],天津大学管理与经济学部,2012：1-117
[121]刘华军,赵浩.中国二氧化碳强度的地区差异分析[J],统计研究,2012(6)：46-50
[122]刘兰翠.我国二氧化碳减排问题的政策建模与实证研究[D],中国科学技术大学,2006：1-168
[123]刘启运,王万洲.基于投入产出的环境问题结构分析[J],统计教育,2009(10)：44-49
[124]刘瑞翔,姜彩楼.从投入产出视角看中国能耗加速增长现象[J],经济学,2011(10)：777-796
[125]刘玉萍,郭郡郡,李维莉.技术进步对二氧化碳强度的影响——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J],西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(3)：83-89
[126]马萍.中国能源消耗强度影响因素分解分析[D],东北大学工商管理学院,2009：1-71
[127]马树才,李国柱.中国经济增长与环境污染关系的Kuznets曲线[J],统计研究,2006(8)：37-40
[128]毛毳.中国低碳经济影响因素和作用路径研究[D],天津大学,2010：1-64
[129]孟彦菊.投入产出模型扩展研究[D],西南财经大学,2009：1-189
[130]穆智睿,杨翠红.出口结构及其变动对国民经济影响的分析[J],《对外经济贸易大学学报》2009(2)：39-44
[131]齐绍洲,罗威.中国地区经济增长与能源消费强度差异分析[J],经济研究,2007(7)：74-81
[132]邱东,陈梦根.中国不应在资源消耗问题上过于自责——基于“资源消耗层级论”的思考[J],统计研究,2007(24)：14-26
[133]邱东,蒋萍国民经济统计前沿问题[M],北京：中国统计出版社,2008(4)
[134]申萌,李凯杰,曲如晓.技术进步,经济增长与二氧化碳排放,理论和经验研究[J],世界经济,2012(7)：83-100
[135]史代敏,向蓉美.产品结构变动投入产出模型的简化解法[J],天津商学院学报,1998(5)：42-45
[136]史亚东.各国二氧化碳排放责任的实证分析[J],统计研究,2012(7)：61-67
[137]孙敬水,中国碳排放强度驱动因素实证研究[J],贵州财经学院学报,2011(3)：1-6
[138]孙耀华,仲伟周,庆东瑞.基于Theil指数的中国省际间碳排放强度差异分析[J],财贸研究,2012(3)：1-7
[139]孙作人,周德群,周鹏.工业碳排放驱动因素研究：一种生产分解分析新方法[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2012(5)：63-74
[140]谭娟,陈晓春.基于产业结构视角的政府环境规制对低碳经济影响分析[J],经济学家,2011(10)：91-97
[141]佟新华.中国工业燃烧能源碳排放影响因素分解研究[J],吉林大学社会科 学学报,2012(7)：151-158
[142]王峰,吴丽华,杨超.中国经济发展中碳排放增长的驱动因素研究[J],经济研究,2010(2)：123-136
[143]王锋,冯根福.优化能源结构对实现中国碳强度目标的贡献潜力评估[J],中国工业经济,2011(4)：127-137
[144]王锋,冯根福,吴丽华.中国经济增长中碳强度下降的省区贡献分解[J],经济研究,2013(8)：143-155
[145]王金南,蔡博峰,严刚,曹东,周颖.排放强度承诺下的C02排放总量控制研究[J],中国环境科学,2010(11)：1568-1572
[146]王群伟,周鹏,周德群.我国二氧化碳排放绩效的动态变化,区域差异及影响因素[J],中国工业经济,2010(1)：45-54
[147]王韶华,于维洋.一次能源消费结构变动对碳强度影响的灵敏度分析[J],资源科学,2013(7)：1438-1446
[148]王文举,李峰.国际碳排放核算标准选择的公平性研究[J],中国工业经济,2013(3)：59-71
[149]王文举,向其凤.中国产业结构调整及其节能减排潜力评估[J],中国工业经济,2014(1)：44-56
[150]王霞,淳伟德.我国能源强度变化的影响因素分析及其实证研究[J],统计研究,2010(27)：71-74
[151]王勇.中国投入产出核算：回顾与展望[J],统计研究,2012(8)：66-75
[152]王友转.基于减排目标和经济增长双重约束的碳排放强度及影响因素分析[D],华南理工大学,2012：1-54
[153]魏巍贤,杨芳.技术进步对中国二氧化碳排放的影响[J],统计研究,2010(7)：36-44
[154]吴巧生,成金华,王华.中国工业化进程中的能源消费变动——基于计量模型的实证分析[J],中国工业经济,2005(4)：30-37
[155]徐大丰.碳生产率的差异与低碳经济结构调整——基于沪陕投入产出表的比较研究[J],上海经济研究,2012(11)：55-64
[156]徐国泉,刘则渊,姜照华.中国碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析：1995-2004[J],中国人口资源与环境,2006(6)：158-161
[157]徐杰,段万春,杨建龙.中国资本存量的重估[J],统计研究,2010(12)：72-77
[158]徐军委.基于LMDI的我国二氧化碳排放影响因素研究[D],中国矿业大学,2013：1-127
[159]徐盈之,徐康宁,胡永舜,中国制造业碳排放的驱动因素及脱钩效应[J],统计研究,2011,(7)：55-61
[160]徐盈之,邹芳.基于投入产出分析法的我国各产业部门碳减排责任研究[J],产业经济研究,2010(5)：27-35
[161]许广月,宋德勇.中国碳排放环境库兹涅茨曲线的实证研究[J],中国工业经济,2010(5)：38-47
[162]许广月.碳排放收敛性：理论假说和中国的经验研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2010(9)：31-42
[163]许广月.中国能源消费、碳排放与经济增长关系的研究[D],华中科技大学,2010：1-183
[164]薛俊宁.高技术产业与碳排放强度——中国省际面板数据分析[J],工业技术经济,2013(7)：117-123
[165]杨灿.国民核算与研究通论[M],北京：中国统计出版社,2005(6)
[166]杨骞,刘华军.中国二氧化碳排放的区域差异分解及影响因素-基于1995-2009年省际面板数据的研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2012(5)：36-48
[167]杨浏.江苏省发展低碳经济的影响因素及对策研究[D],江苏大学,2011：1-59
[168]杨志,赵彦云,王岩.中国低碳经济年度发展报告[M],北京：石油工业出版社,2012(6)
[169]杨子晖.经济增长,能源消费与二氧化碳排放的动态关系研究[J],世界经济,2011(6)：100-125
[170]姚西龙.技术进步、结构变动与制造业的二氧化碳强度,暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(3)：59-65
[171]袁鹏,程施,刘海洋.国际贸易对我国CO2排放增长的影响——基于SDA与LMDI结合的分解方法[J],经济评论,2012(1)：122-131
[172]袁鹏,程施.辽宁省碳排放增长的驱动因素分析——基于分解法的实证[J], 大连理工大学学报,2012(3)：35-40
[173]岳超,胡雪洋,贺灿飞.1995—-2007年我国省区碳排放及碳强度的分析——碳排放与社会发展[J],北京大学学报,2010(4)：510-516
[174]张成龙,李继峰,张阿玲,张亚雄.1997-2007年中国能源强度变化的因素分解[J],清华大学学报(自然科学版),2013(5)：688-693
[175]张红霞,刘起运.我国高能耗产业的地区间相对有效性及其影响[J],统计研究,2008(4)：50-55
[176]张纪录.消费视角下的我国二氧化碳排放研究[D],华中科技大学,2012：1-145
[177]张进铭,陶然.美国控制温室气体排放的市场化政策选择[J],经济社会体制比较,2010(1)：55-61
[178]张庆.基于二氧化碳排放下的中西部选择产业转移项目实证分析[J],经济研究导刊,2011(004)：169-172
[179]张伟,潘文卿.一个可比价投入产出表编制中价格指数求解的理论模型[J],甘肃社会科学,2003(4)：63-64
[180]张晓津.基于投入产出分析的各产业部门碳减排责任研究——以河北省为例[D],燕山大学,2011：1-46
[181]张炎治,聂锐.能源强度的指数分解分析研究综述[J],管理学报,2008(9)：647-650
[182]张友国.经济发展方式变化对中国碳排放强度的影响[J],经济研究,2010(4)：120-133
[183]赵奥,武春友.中国C02排放量变化的影响因素分解研究：基于改进的kaya等式与LMDI分解法[J],生态环境与保护,2011(4)：20-26
[184]赵进文,范继涛.经济增长与能源消费内在依从关系的实证研究[J],经济研究,2007(8)：31-42
[185]郑丽琳,朱启贵.技术冲击,二氧化碳排放与中国经济波动[J],财经研究,2012(7)：37-48
[186]中国投入产出学会课题组.我国能源部门产业关联分析-2002年投入产出表系列分析报告之六[J],统计研究,2007(5)：3-6
[187]中华人民共和国气候变化第二次国家信息通报
[188]仲云云,仲伟周.我国碳排放的区域差异及驱动因素分析[J],财经研究,2012(2)：123-133
[189]周五七,聂鸣.碳排放与碳减排的经济学研究文献综述[J],经济评论,2012(5)：144-151
[190]周五七,聂鸣.中国碳排放强度影响因素的动态计量检验[J],管理科学,2010(10)：99-107
[191]朱聆,张真.上海市碳排放强度的影响因素解析[J],环境科学研究,2011(1)：20-26
[192]朱琴,彭希哲等.中国能源消费碳排放变化的因素分解及实证分析[J],资源科学,2009(2)：2072-2079
[193]朱勤,彭希哲,吴开亚.基于结构分解的居民消费品载能碳排放变动分析[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2012(1)：65-77
[194]朱松丽.加拿大油气系统温室气体逃逸排放清单简述[J],油气田环境保护,2006(4)：4-6
6 摘自《中国统计年鉴2011》对能源消费量的定义。
7 Grossman,Krueger.(1991).Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Working paper http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914
8 向蓉美：《投入产出法》,西南财经大学出版社,2007.07第1-6页。
(?) 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.《中国的能源政策(2012)》,2012年10月24日
[1]Adam Rose, Stephen Casler. Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal[J], Economic Systems Research,2006(7):33-62
[2]B.Lim, P.Boileau, Y. Bonduki. Improving the quality of national greenhouse gas inventories[J], Environmental Science & Policy,1999(3):335-346
[3]B.W. Ang, Na Liu. Energy Decomposition Analysis:IEA model versus other methods[J], Energy Policy,2007(35):1426-1432
[4]B.W. Ang. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis:a practical guide[J], Energy Policy,2005(33):867-871
[5]B.W.Ang, Ki-Hong Choi. Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry:A Refined Divisia Index Method[J], The Energy Journal,1997(18):59-73
[6]Bo Huang, Lina Meng. Convergence of Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Urban China:A Spatio-temporal Perspective[J], Applied Geography, 2013(40):21-29
[7]Can Wang, Jining Chen, Ji Zou. Decomposition of Energy-related CO2 emission in China:1957-2000[J], Energy,2005(1):73-83
[8]Can Wang, Jining Chen. Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's iron and steel industry[J], Energy Policy,2007(35): 2320-2335
[9]CAsbj(?)rn Torvanger. Manufacturing sector carbon dioxide emissions in nine OECD countries,1973-87 A Divisia index decomposition to changes in fuel mix, emission coefficients, industry structure, energy intensities and international structure[J], Energy Economics,1991(13):168-186
[10]Casler S.D, Rose A. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy:A Structural Decomposition Analysis [J], Environmental and Resource Economics,1998(11):349-363
[11]Chen, Rose. Sources of change in energy use in the Uited States-economy,1972-1982 A strcutrual Decomposition Analysis[J], Resources and Energy,1991(13):1-21
[12]Common M S, Salma U. Accounting for changes in Australian carbon dioxide emissions[J], Energy Economics,1992(14):217-225.
[13]Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural decomposition techniques:sense and sensitivity[J], Economic Systems Research,1998(10):307-324
[14]Domingo Gonzalez, Manuel Martinez. Changes in CO2 emission intensities in the Mexican industry[J], Energy Ploicy,2012(51):149-163
[15]F.L. Liu, B.W. Ang. Eight methods for decomposing the aggregate energy-intensity of industry[J], Applied Energy,2003(76):15-23
[16]Fredrik N.G Andersson, Peter Karpestam. CO2 emissions and economic activity:Short-and long-run economic determinants of scale, energy intensity and carbon intensity[J], Energy Policy,2013(10)1285-1294
[17]Glen P. Peters, Christopher L. Weber.China's Growing CO2 EmissionsA Race between Increasing Consumption and Efficiency Gains [J], Environment Science Technology,2007(41):5939-5944
[18]Gould B. W., Kulshreshtha S N. An interindustry analysis of structural change and energy use linkages in the Saskatchewan economy [J], Energy Economics, 1986(8):186-196
[19]Gregg Marland, Thomas Buchholz, Tammy Kowalczyk. Accounting for Carbon·Dioxide Emissions[J], Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2013(17):340-342
[20]Gurkan Kumbaroglu. A sectoral decomposition analysis of Turkish CO2 emissions over 1990-2007[J], Energy,2011(5):2419-2433
[21]Gurkan Kumbaroglu. Energy and Climate Policy Analysis with the Hybrid Bottom-Up Computable General Equilibrium Model SCREEN:The Case of the Swiss CO2Act[J], Annals of Operations Research,2011(121):181-203
[22]Hiroki Hondo, Shinsuke Sakai, Shiro Tanno. Sensitivity analysis of total CO2 emission intensities estimated using an input-output table[J], Applied Energy, 2002(7):689-704
[23]JaeHyun Park, TaeHoon Hong. Analysis of South Korea's economic growth, carbon dioxide emission, and energy consumption using the Markov switching model[J], Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2013(2):543-551
[24]Ju Liping, Chen Bin. An Input-output Model to Analyze Sector Linkages and CO2 Emissions[J], Procedia Environmental Sciences,2010 (2):1841-1845
[25]Keisuke Nansai, Yuichi Moriguchi, Susumu Tohno. Development of Database on Japanese Sectoral Energy Consumption, CO2 and Air Pollutant Emissions Intensities Based on the Input-Output Tables [J], Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies-6th International Conference,2002(10):1745-1748
[26]Ken Caldeira, Steven J. Davis. Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions:A matter of time[J], Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011(5):8533-8534
[27]Kuan-Min Wang. The relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth:quantile panel-type analysis[J], Quality & Quantity, 2013(4):1337-1366
[28]Kyonghwa Jeong, Suyi Kim.. LMDI decomposition analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the Korean manufacturing sector[J], Energy Policy, 2013(62):1245-1253
[29]Leontief W, Ford D. Air pollution and the economic structure:empirical results of input-output computations [J], Input-output techniques,1972:9-30
[30]Leya Wu, Weihua Zeng. Research on the Contribution of Structure Adjustment on Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction based on LMDI Method[J], Procedia Computer Science,2013(17):744-751
[31]Limin Du, Chu Wei, Shenghua Cai. Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China:Provincial panel data analysis [J], China Economic Review,2012(23):371-384
[32]Lorna A. GreeningU, William B. Davis, Lee Schipper. Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for the manufacturing sector:comparison of declining trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1991[J], Energy Economics,1998(20):43-65
[33]Margarita Robaina Alves, Victor Moutinho. Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996-2009 in Portugal[J], Energy,2013(57):775-787
[34]Miguel Angel Tarancon, Pablo Del Rio. Assessing energy-related CO2 emissions with sensitivity analysis and input-output techniques [J], Energy, 2012(1):161-170
[35]Nilgun Cil Yavuz, Veli Yilanci. Convergence in Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions Among G7 Countries:A TAR Panel Unit Root Approach[J], Environ Resource Econ,2013(54):283-291
[36]Peter Erickson, David Allaway, Michael Lazarus, Elizabeth A Stanton. A consumption-based GHG inventory for the U.S. state of Oregon[J], Environmental Science & Technology,2012(3):3679-3686
[37]Philip R. Israilevich, Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, Michael Sonis, Graham R. Schindler. Forecasting Structural Change With a Regional Econometric Input-Output Model[J], Journal of Regional Science,1997(4):565-590
[38]Philip W. Gay & John L. R. Proops. Carbon---dioxide production by the UK economy:An input-output assessment J], Applied Energy,1993 (44):113-130
[39]Philip W. Gay, John L. R. Proops. Carbon-dioxide production by the UK economy:An input-output assessment[J], Applied Energy,1993(2):113-130
[40]Ratnakar Pani, Ujjaini Mukhopadhyay. Identifying the major players behind increasing global carbon dioxide emissions:a decomposition analysis [J], The Environmentalist,2010(6):183-205
[41]Ross Mckitrick Mark C, Strazicich, Junsoo Lee. Long-Term Forecasting of Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions:Reducing Uncertainties Using a Per Capita Approach [J], Journal of Forecasting,2013(7):435-451
[42]Rutger Hoekstra, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh. Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy [J], Environmental and Resource Economics,2002(23):357-378
[43]Rutger Hoekstra, Jeroen J.C.J.M.van der Bergh. Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis[J], Energy Economics,2003(25):39-64
[44]Selim Adem Hatirlia, Burhan Ozkanb, Cemal Fert. An econometric analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture [J], Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2005(9):608-623
[45]Shan Guo, Ling Shao, H. Chen,Z. Li, J.B. Liu,F.X. Xu, J.S. Li, M.Y. Han, J. Meng,Zhan-Ming Chen, S.C. Li. Inventory and input-output analysis of CO2 emissions by fossil fuel consumption in Beijing 2007[J], Ecological Informatics,2012(11):93-100
[46]Shiyi Chen. The Abatement of Carbon Dioxide Intensity in China:Factors Decomposition and Policy Implications[J], The World Economy, 2011(7):1148-1167
[47]Shrestha, Timilsina. Factors affecting CO2 intensities of power sector in Asia: ADivisia decomposition analysis[J], Energy Economics,1996(18):293-293
[48]Simone Gingrichr Petra Kuskovd, Julia K Steinberger. Long-term changes in CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia-Identifying the drivers of environmental pressures[J], Energy Policy,2011(39):535-545
[49]Stephen D. Casler, Adam Rose. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy[J], Environmental and Resource Economics,1998(11):349-363
[50]Sun J.W. Accounting for energy use in China[J], Energy,1998(23):835-849
[51]Surugiu Camelia, Surugiu Marius Razvan, Zelia Breda, Dinca Ana-Irina. An Input-Output Approach of CO2 Emissions in Tourism Sector in Post-Communist Romania[J], Procedia Economics and Finance, 2012(3):987-992
[52]Travis Roach. A dynamic state-level analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States[J], Energy Policy,2013(59):931-937
[53]Wier. Sources of changes in emissions from energy:A structural decomposition analysis[J], Economic Systems Research,1998(10):99-108
[54]William E. Easterling, Colin Polsky, Doug Goodin, Michael W. Mayfield, William A. Muraco, Brent Yarnal. Changing Places, Changing Emissions:The cross-scale reliability of greenhouse gas emissions inventories in the US[J]. Local Environment,1998(3):247-62
[55]X.Y. Xu, B.W. Ang. Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies[J], Ecological Economics,2013(9):313-329
[56]Xavier Labandeira, Jose M. Labeaga. Estimation and control of Spanish energy-related CO2 emissions:an input-output approach[J], Energy Policy, 2002(6):597-611
[57]Xin Tian, Miao Chang, Hiroki Tanikawa, Feng Shi, Hidefumi Imura. Structural decomposition analysis:Carbon dioxide emissions [J], Energy Policy,2013(53):279-286
[58]Xin Tian, Miao Chang, Hiroki Tanikawa. Regional Disparity in Carbon Dioxide Emissions:Assessing Sectoral Impacts on the Carbon Dioxide Emissions Structure Among Regions of Mainland China[J], Journal of Industrial Ecology,2012(16):612-622
[59]Yafei Wang, Hongyan Zhao, Liying Li, Zhu Liu, Sai Liang. Carbon dioxide emission drivers for a typical metropolis using input-output structural decomposition analysis[J], Energy Policy,2013(7):312-318
[60]Yih F Chang, Sue J Lin. Comprehensive evaluation of industrial CO2 emission (1989-2004) in Taiwan by input-output structural decomposition[J], Energy Policy,2008(36):2471-2480
[61]向蓉美,孟彦菊.国外投入产出法研究述评[J],统计与信息论坛,2007(4)：97-98
[62]向蓉美,孟彦菊.投入产出与计量模型浅谈[J],统计与信息论坛,2011(3)：3-8
[63]向蓉美.地区投入产出模型扩展研究[M],成都：西南财经大学出版社,2011(9)
[64]向蓉美.国民经济核算及分析[M],成都：西南财经大学出版社,2005(3)
[65]向蓉美.投入产出分析[M],成都：西南财经大学出版社,2007(3)
[66]向蓉美.投入产出系数作用新探及实证分析[J],统计与信息论坛,2008(6)：5-9
[67]孟彦菊,向蓉美.产业结构与产业关联：基于投入产出表的面板数据分析[J],统计与决策,2009(1)：13-17
[68]孟彦菊,向蓉美.投入产出与计量经济联合模型研究[J],数理统计与管理,2011(3)：531-539
[69]GB/T2589-2008《综合能耗计算通则》.2008(2)
[70]鲍健强,苗阳,陈锋.低碳经济：人类经济发展方式的新变革[J],中国工业经济,2008(4)：153-160
[71]查冬兰,周德群.我国工业C02排放的影响因素差异性研究——基于高能耗行业中能耗行业[J],财贸研究,2008(1)：13-18
[72]常征.能源活动相关温室气体排放清单分析——以美国为例[J],世界经济情况,2012(8)：76-81.
[73]陈春华,路正南.我国碳排放强度的影响因素及路径分析[J],统计观察,2012(2)：96-98
[74]陈德湖,张津.中国碳排放的环境库兹涅茨曲线分析——基于空间面板模型的实证研究[J],统计与信息论坛,2012(5)：48-53
[75]陈红敏.中国出口贸易中隐含能变化的影响因素——基于结构分解分析的研究[J],财贸研究,2009(3)：66-72
[76]陈建华.重庆市碳排放特征分析与减排对策[D],西南交通大学,2010：1-64
[77]陈健鹏.温室气体减排——国际经验与政策选择[明,北京：中国发展出版社,2011(9)
[78]陈铭泽.基于Divisia分解法的碳排放因素分解研究——以广东省为例[J],安徽农业科学,2011(11)：6640-6642
[79]陈其颢,朱林,王圣.江苏省温室气体排放清单基础研究[J],环境科学与管理,2012(37)：1-4
[80]陈诗一.能源消耗,二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J],经济研究,2009(4)：41-55
[81]陈诗一.中国碳排放强度的波动下降模式及经济解释[J],世界经济,2011(4)：124-143
[82]陈莹.我国产业结构对碳排放影响的实证研究[D],湖南大学,2011：1-58
[83]程永伟.我国产业结构的低碳化转型——基于碳效益和产业协调性的投入产出分析[J],哈尔滨商业大学学报,2012(5)：19-25
[84]邓舒仁,低碳经济发展研究：理论分析和政策选择[D],中共中央党校,2012：1-184
[85]杜官印,蔡运龙,李双成.1997-2007年中国分省化石能源碳排放强度变化趋势分析[J],地理与地理信息科学,2010(9)：76-81
[86]杜立民.我国二氧化碳排放的影响因素[J],南方经济,2010(11)：20-33
[87]樊纲,苏铭,曹静.最终消费与碳减排责任的经济学分析[J],经济研究,2010(1)：4-14
[88]樊茂清,任若恩,陈高才.技术变化,要素替代和贸易对能源强度影响的实证研究[J],经济学,2009(10)：237-258
[89]付雪,王桂新.上海碳排放强度结构分解分析[J],资源科学,2011(11)：2124-2130
[90]高博.1991-2008年中国碳排放影响因素研究[J],生态经济,2013(7)：43-46
[91]高姗.经济结构转型对碳排放强度的影响----北京市碳排放变化的实证研究[D],中央财经大学经济学院,2011：1-38
[92]高振宇,王益.我国生产用能源消费变动的分解分析[J],统计研究,2007(3)：52-57
[93]郭朝先.中国二氧化碳排放增长因素分析[J],中国工业经济,2010(12)：47-56
[94]郭杰.中国碳减排政策分析与评估方法及应用研究[D],中国科学技术大学,2011：1-146
[95]国家发展改革委应对气候变化司组织国家发展改革委能源研究所,清华大学.《省级温室气体清单编制指南》,2011年5月
[96]国家温室气体清单特别工作组.《2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南》2006年
[97]何建坤,刘滨,张阿玲.我国未来减缓C02排放的潜力分析[J],清华大学学报,2002(6)：76-80
[98]何建坤,刘滨.作为温室气体排放衡量指标的碳排放强度分析[J],清华大学学报,2004(6)：740-743
[99]贺红兵.我国碳排放影响因素分析[D],华中科技大学,2012：1-117
[100]胡宗义,刘亦文,唐李伟.低碳经济背景下碳排放的库兹涅茨曲线研究[J],统计研究,2013(2)：73-79
[101]黄芳,江可申,卢愿清,吴优.中国碳强度的影响因素解析——基于LMD1分解方法[J],数学的实践与认识,2012(3)：40-46
[102]黄建.二氧化碳强度下降目标的动态分解研究[J],中南财经政法大学学报,2011(4)：60-67
[103]籍艳丽,郜元兴.二氧化碳强度的实证研究[J],统计研究,2011(7)：37-44
[104]蒋洪强,周颖.温室气体排放统计核算技术方法[M],北京：中国环境科学出版社,2009(10)
[105]蒋金荷.中国碳排放特征及发展低碳经济的对策分析[J],经济研究参考,2012(5)：6-14
[106]金乐琴.中国如何理智应对低碳经济的潮流[J].经济学家,2009(3)100-101
[107]冷雪.碳排放与我国经济发展关系研究[D],复旦大学,2012：1-133
[108]李家才.中国碳强度承诺的含义特点与履行[J],汕头大学学报,2012(4)：74-78
[109]李景华.SDA模型加权平均分解法及在中国第三产业经济发展分析中的 应用[J],系统工程,2004(9)：69-73
[110]李锴,齐绍洲.贸易开放,经济增长与中国二氧化碳排放[J],经济研究,2011(11)：60-72
[111]李力,王凤.中国制造业能源强度因素分解研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2008(10)：66-74
[112]李强,薛天栋.中国经济发展部门分析：兼新编可比价投入产出序列表[M].北京：中国统计出版社,1998
[113]李晴,唐立娜,石龙宇.城市温室气体排放清单编制研究进展[J],生态学报,2013(33)：367-373
[114]李涛,傅强.中国省际碳排放效率研究[J],统计研究,2011(28)：62-71
[115]李霞.我国二氧化碳排放区域差异研究——基于PCC碳排放核算方法[J],国土与自然资源研究,2013(2)：63-65
[116]廖明球.基于“节能减排”的投入产出模型研究[J],中国工业经济,2011(7)：26-34
[117]廖明球.经济、资源、环境投入产出模型研究[M],北京：首都经济贸易大学出版社,2005
[118]林伯强,刘希颖.中国城市化阶段的碳排放,影响因素和减排策略[J],经济研究,2010(8)：66-78
[119]林伯强,魏巍贤,李丕东.中国长期煤炭需求：影响与政策选择[J],经济研究,2007(2)：48-58
[120]刘广为.中国碳排放强度预测及其影响因素动态效应建模[D],天津大学管理与经济学部,2012：1-117
[121]刘华军,赵浩.中国二氧化碳强度的地区差异分析[J],统计研究,2012(6)：46-50
[122]刘兰翠.我国二氧化碳减排问题的政策建模与实证研究[D],中国科学技术大学,2006：1-168
[123]刘启运,王万洲.基于投入产出的环境问题结构分析[J],统计教育,2009(10)：44-49
[124]刘瑞翔,姜彩楼.从投入产出视角看中国能耗加速增长现象[J],经济学,2011(10)：777-796
[125]刘玉萍,郭郡郡,李维莉.技术进步对二氧化碳强度的影响——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J],西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(3)：83-89
[126]马萍.中国能源消耗强度影响因素分解分析[D],东北大学工商管理学院,2009：1-71
[127]马树才,李国柱.中国经济增长与环境污染关系的Kuznets曲线[J],统计研究,2006(8)：37-40
[128]毛毳.中国低碳经济影响因素和作用路径研究[D],天津大学,2010：1-64
[129]孟彦菊.投入产出模型扩展研究[D],西南财经大学,2009：1-189
[130]穆智睿,杨翠红.出口结构及其变动对国民经济影响的分析[J],《对外经济贸易大学学报》2009(2)：39-44
[131]齐绍洲,罗威.中国地区经济增长与能源消费强度差异分析[J],经济研究,2007(7)：74-81
[132]邱东,陈梦根.中国不应在资源消耗问题上过于自责——基于“资源消耗层级论”的思考[J],统计研究,2007(24)：14-26
[133]邱东,蒋萍国民经济统计前沿问题[M],北京：中国统计出版社,2008(4)
[134]申萌,李凯杰,曲如晓.技术进步,经济增长与二氧化碳排放,理论和经验研究[J],世界经济,2012(7)：83-100
[135]史代敏,向蓉美.产品结构变动投入产出模型的简化解法[J],天津商学院学报,1998(5)：42-45
[136]史亚东.各国二氧化碳排放责任的实证分析[J],统计研究,2012(7)：61-67
[137]孙敬水,中国碳排放强度驱动因素实证研究[J],贵州财经学院学报,2011(3)：1-6
[138]孙耀华,仲伟周,庆东瑞.基于Theil指数的中国省际间碳排放强度差异分析[J],财贸研究,2012(3)：1-7
[139]孙作人,周德群,周鹏.工业碳排放驱动因素研究：一种生产分解分析新方法[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2012(5)：63-74
[140]谭娟,陈晓春.基于产业结构视角的政府环境规制对低碳经济影响分析[J],经济学家,2011(10)：91-97
[141]佟新华.中国工业燃烧能源碳排放影响因素分解研究[J],吉林大学社会科 学学报,2012(7)：151-158
[142]王峰,吴丽华,杨超.中国经济发展中碳排放增长的驱动因素研究[J],经济研究,2010(2)：123-136
[143]王锋,冯根福.优化能源结构对实现中国碳强度目标的贡献潜力评估[J],中国工业经济,2011(4)：127-137
[144]王锋,冯根福,吴丽华.中国经济增长中碳强度下降的省区贡献分解[J],经济研究,2013(8)：143-155
[145]王金南,蔡博峰,严刚,曹东,周颖.排放强度承诺下的C02排放总量控制研究[J],中国环境科学,2010(11)：1568-1572
[146]王群伟,周鹏,周德群.我国二氧化碳排放绩效的动态变化,区域差异及影响因素[J],中国工业经济,2010(1)：45-54
[147]王韶华,于维洋.一次能源消费结构变动对碳强度影响的灵敏度分析[J],资源科学,2013(7)：1438-1446
[148]王文举,李峰.国际碳排放核算标准选择的公平性研究[J],中国工业经济,2013(3)：59-71
[149]王文举,向其凤.中国产业结构调整及其节能减排潜力评估[J],中国工业经济,2014(1)：44-56
[150]王霞,淳伟德.我国能源强度变化的影响因素分析及其实证研究[J],统计研究,2010(27)：71-74
[151]王勇.中国投入产出核算：回顾与展望[J],统计研究,2012(8)：66-75
[152]王友转.基于减排目标和经济增长双重约束的碳排放强度及影响因素分析[D],华南理工大学,2012：1-54
[153]魏巍贤,杨芳.技术进步对中国二氧化碳排放的影响[J],统计研究,2010(7)：36-44
[154]吴巧生,成金华,王华.中国工业化进程中的能源消费变动——基于计量模型的实证分析[J],中国工业经济,2005(4)：30-37
[155]徐大丰.碳生产率的差异与低碳经济结构调整——基于沪陕投入产出表的比较研究[J],上海经济研究,2012(11)：55-64
[156]徐国泉,刘则渊,姜照华.中国碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析：1995-2004[J],中国人口资源与环境,2006(6)：158-161
[157]徐杰,段万春,杨建龙.中国资本存量的重估[J],统计研究,2010(12)：72-77
[158]徐军委.基于LMDI的我国二氧化碳排放影响因素研究[D],中国矿业大学,2013：1-127
[159]徐盈之,徐康宁,胡永舜,中国制造业碳排放的驱动因素及脱钩效应[J],统计研究,2011,(7)：55-61
[160]徐盈之,邹芳.基于投入产出分析法的我国各产业部门碳减排责任研究[J],产业经济研究,2010(5)：27-35
[161]许广月,宋德勇.中国碳排放环境库兹涅茨曲线的实证研究[J],中国工业经济,2010(5)：38-47
[162]许广月.碳排放收敛性：理论假说和中国的经验研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2010(9)：31-42
[163]许广月.中国能源消费、碳排放与经济增长关系的研究[D],华中科技大学,2010：1-183
[164]薛俊宁.高技术产业与碳排放强度——中国省际面板数据分析[J],工业技术经济,2013(7)：117-123
[165]杨灿.国民核算与研究通论[M],北京：中国统计出版社,2005(6)
[166]杨骞,刘华军.中国二氧化碳排放的区域差异分解及影响因素-基于1995-2009年省际面板数据的研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2012(5)：36-48
[167]杨浏.江苏省发展低碳经济的影响因素及对策研究[D],江苏大学,2011：1-59
[168]杨志,赵彦云,王岩.中国低碳经济年度发展报告[M],北京：石油工业出版社,2012(6)
[169]杨子晖.经济增长,能源消费与二氧化碳排放的动态关系研究[J],世界经济,2011(6)：100-125
[170]姚西龙.技术进步、结构变动与制造业的二氧化碳强度,暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(3)：59-65
[171]袁鹏,程施,刘海洋.国际贸易对我国CO2排放增长的影响——基于SDA与LMDI结合的分解方法[J],经济评论,2012(1)：122-131
[172]袁鹏,程施.辽宁省碳排放增长的驱动因素分析——基于分解法的实证[J], 大连理工大学学报,2012(3)：35-40
[173]岳超,胡雪洋,贺灿飞.1995—-2007年我国省区碳排放及碳强度的分析——碳排放与社会发展[J],北京大学学报,2010(4)：510-516
[174]张成龙,李继峰,张阿玲,张亚雄.1997-2007年中国能源强度变化的因素分解[J],清华大学学报(自然科学版),2013(5)：688-693
[175]张红霞,刘起运.我国高能耗产业的地区间相对有效性及其影响[J],统计研究,2008(4)：50-55
[176]张纪录.消费视角下的我国二氧化碳排放研究[D],华中科技大学,2012：1-145
[177]张进铭,陶然.美国控制温室气体排放的市场化政策选择[J],经济社会体制比较,2010(1)：55-61
[178]张庆.基于二氧化碳排放下的中西部选择产业转移项目实证分析[J],经济研究导刊,2011(004)：169-172
[179]张伟,潘文卿.一个可比价投入产出表编制中价格指数求解的理论模型[J],甘肃社会科学,2003(4)：63-64
[180]张晓津.基于投入产出分析的各产业部门碳减排责任研究——以河北省为例[D],燕山大学,2011：1-46
[181]张炎治,聂锐.能源强度的指数分解分析研究综述[J],管理学报,2008(9)：647-650
[182]张友国.经济发展方式变化对中国碳排放强度的影响[J],经济研究,2010(4)：120-133
[183]赵奥,武春友.中国C02排放量变化的影响因素分解研究：基于改进的kaya等式与LMDI分解法[J],生态环境与保护,2011(4)：20-26
[184]赵进文,范继涛.经济增长与能源消费内在依从关系的实证研究[J],经济研究,2007(8)：31-42
[185]郑丽琳,朱启贵.技术冲击,二氧化碳排放与中国经济波动[J],财经研究,2012(7)：37-48
[186]中国投入产出学会课题组.我国能源部门产业关联分析-2002年投入产出表系列分析报告之六[J],统计研究,2007(5)：3-6
[187]中华人民共和国气候变化第二次国家信息通报
[188]仲云云,仲伟周.我国碳排放的区域差异及驱动因素分析[J],财经研究,2012(2)：123-133
[189]周五七,聂鸣.碳排放与碳减排的经济学研究文献综述[J],经济评论,2012(5)：144-151
[190]周五七,聂鸣.中国碳排放强度影响因素的动态计量检验[J],管理科学,2010(10)：99-107
[191]朱聆,张真.上海市碳排放强度的影响因素解析[J],环境科学研究,2011(1)：20-26
[192]朱琴,彭希哲等.中国能源消费碳排放变化的因素分解及实证分析[J],资源科学,2009(2)：2072-2079
[193]朱勤,彭希哲,吴开亚.基于结构分解的居民消费品载能碳排放变动分析[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2012(1)：65-77
[194]朱松丽.加拿大油气系统温室气体逃逸排放清单简述[J],油气田环境保护,2006(4)：4-6
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |