用户名: 密码: 验证码:
腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管扭曲性不孕的临床分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
不孕症(infertility)是指婚后同居,有正常性生活,未避孕一年而未妊娠者。它是一种比较常见的病症,且病因复杂多样。多数学者认为输卵管功能异常是导致女性不孕的主要因素之一,而由输卵管扭曲引起的不孕症约占输卵管性不孕症患者的30%-40%。由慢性输卵管炎、输卵管周围炎或输卵管发育异常等因素造成的输卵管扭曲改变了输卵管的正常走行,降低了它的蠕动功能并影响了输卵管液的流动,从而影响拾卵及配子(卵子和精子)的运输,引起不孕。目前腹腔镜是诊断输卵管病变的金标准。在输卵管性不孕症的治疗方面,腹腔镜手术作为其常规治疗手段,效果确切,可以使一部分患者自然受孕,有伦理学顾虑和轻中度输卵管病变患者也更容易接受。
     目的
     通过对输卵管扭曲性不孕症患者行腹腔镜下输卵管整形术,分析术后妊娠结局及输卵管扭曲程度对其影响,探讨腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管扭曲性不孕症的临床价值以及输卵管扭曲程度与术后妊娠率的关系,为治疗输卵管扭曲引起的不孕症提供指导。
     方法
     选择2008年01月~2010年10月在郑州大学第三附属医院妇科二病区行腹腔镜下输卵管整形术的输卵管性不孕症患者,排除含有男性不育因素、免疫因素、子宫因素、排卵障碍等因素的病例,经筛选共268例。术中镜下对盆腔粘连及输卵管情况进行评估,以单纯性输卵管扭曲引起的不孕症患者为研究对象,即输卵管扭曲、管壁柔软、伞端正常、子宫直肠窝正常者,共77例。
     根据术中所见,行腹腔镜下输卵管整形术。对单纯性输卵管扭曲性不孕症患者,术中牵拉输卵管尽量恢复其正常形态后目测法测量输卵管扭曲处所成角度,记录其最小成角,并根据最小成角大小将患者分为最小成角<45°组、450-900组和90°-1450组。以单极电钩行粘连松解术分解扭曲处浆膜。宫腔镜检查了解宫腔情况及输卵管插管通液术了解双侧输卵管通畅情况。
     术后确诊妊娠标准为HCG阳性且超声检查见妊娠囊。统计研究对象的临床资料和术后6-24个月随访资料,采用SPSS17.0软件进行分析,统计方法采用χ2检验以及Logistic回归分析,以a=0.05作为检验水准,分析术后妊娠结局及输卵管扭曲程度对妊娠结局的影响。
     结果
     1.腹腔镜下输卵管整形术后,248例输卵管性不孕症患者术后总妊娠率48.9%,宫内妊娠率44.4%,宫外妊娠率4.5%。
     2.单纯性输卵管扭曲引起的不孕症患者共77人,占输卵管性不孕症患者的28.7%。输卵管扭曲最小成角<45°者22例,术后妊娠5例;最小成角45°-900者49例,妊娠24例;最小成角90°-145°者6例,妊娠3例。最小成角<45°组与45°-90°组术后妊娠情况比较,经χ2检验尸值为0.037,即两组患者术后妊娠率有明显差异。最小成角90°-145°组与45°-90°组术后妊娠情况经χ2检验尸值为0.962,两组患者术后妊娠率的差异无统计学意义。
     3.单纯性输卵管扭曲引起的不孕症患者,腹腔镜下输卵管整形术后妊娠32例,宫内妊娠为30例。其中25例为术后6个月内妊娠,占妊娠人数的80.6%;6例为术后7-12个月内妊娠,占妊娠人数的18.75%;1例为术后13-24个月内妊娠,占妊娠人数的3.125%。结论
     1.对输卵管扭曲最小成角大于450的单纯性输卵管扭曲性不孕症患者,腹腔镜下输卵管整形术是其有效治疗方法。
     2.腹腔镜下输卵管整形术后6个月内为妊娠的高峰期,受孕人数的构成比随时间推移而下降。
Infertility is to point to living together after marriage, having a normal sex life without contraceptiion a year, without pregnancy.It is a relatively common disease, and the etiology is complex and diverse.Most scholars believe that the fallopian tube abnormalities is one of the main factors leading to female infertility, and infertility caused by tubal distortion accounts for about30%to40%of patients with tubal infertility.The tubal distortions caused by chronic salpingitis,tubal phlogistic surrounding tissue,congenital tubal abnormalities change the normal walking of the fallopian tube,reducing its peristaltic fuction and affect the flow of tubal fluid,thus affecting the transport of ova and sperm and cause infertility.At present, laparoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of tubal disease. In terms of treatment, laparoscopic surgery as a routine treatment for tubal infertility,it can make part of patients conceive naturally.For ones who have ethical concerns and in patients with mild to moderate tubal disease,tubal plastic surgery is more acceptable.
     Objective
     By undergoing laparoscopic tubal plastic surgery to tubal infertility patients,intraoperative assessment of tubal morphology and its function,to analyze the outcome of pregnancy and degree of tubal distortion of its impact.To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopic treatment of tubal infertility caused by tubal distortion and the relationship between postoperative pregnancy rate and the degree of tubal distortion,providing guidance for the treatment of infertility caused by tubal distortion.
     Methods
     Chose268cases who have had laparoscopic tubal plastic surgery in Gynecological ward two of Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, intraoperative assessment of situation of pelvic adhesions and fallopian tubes.There are77cases who were caused by simple distorted tubal infertility of all.
     To operate tubal plastic surgery according to intraoperative findings.Try to sretch the fallopian tubes to restore its normal shape,and record the minimum angle of the distortion.Patients are divided into the minimum angle group<45°,group45°~90°and group90°~145°.Then eliminate the distortion by electrocantery.Conduct hysteroscopy for uterine and tubal cannulation for tubal patency.
     Patients who have HCG-positive and the gestational sac under ultrasound can be diagnosed pregnant. According to statistics of clinical data and postoperative follow-up6~24months data, analyze the outcome of pregnancy and degree of tubal distortion of its impact by SPSS17.0software,and α=0.05are used as test standard.
     Results
     1.The total pregnancy rate after laparoscopic tubal plastic surgery of these268cases are48.9%, with44.4%intrauterine pregnancy rate and4.5%ectopic pregnancy rate.
     2. There are77patients with simple twisted tube,which account for28.7%of patients with tubal infertility.There are22cases in the group the minimum angle <45°,and5cases got pregnancy after operation.In49cases the minimum angle between45°to90°,24cases of them got pregnancy.In6cases the angle between90° to145°,3cases got pregnancy.Comparing the pregnancy rate of the group the minimum angle <45°and group minimum angle45°~90°,the result of Pearson Chi-Square is0.037. Similarly,comparing the pregnancy rate of the group the minimum angle45°~90°and group minimum angle90°~145°,the result of Pearson Chi-Square is0.962.
     3.There are32cases got pregnant in the77patients with simple twisted tube after laparoscopic tubal plastic surgery,in which30cases had intrauterine pregnancy--25cases are pregnant in six months after surgery,6cases in the seventh month to the twelfth month,and1case in the thirteenth month to the twenty-forth month.
     Conclusions
     1.By laparoscopic tubal plastic surgery to restore the normal shape of fallopian tube is an effective method of treatment of infertility,especially for those cases the minimum angle>45°.
     2.The peak of pregnancy appears in the six months after surgery.And the composition of pregnancy declines with time.
引文
[1]Aflatoonian A, Baghianimoghadam B, Partovi P,A new classification for female infertility. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol.2011;38(4):379-81.
    [2]Quaas A, Dokras A. Diagnosis and treatment of unexplained infertility.Rev Obstet Gynecol.2008 Spring; 1(2):69-76.
    [3]乐杰.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.351
    [4]Terzic M, Kocijancic D. Pelvic inflammatory disease:contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Srp Arh Celok Lek.2010 Sep-Oct,138(9-10):658-63
    [5]Ray A, Shah A, Gudi A, etal.Unexplained infertility:an update and review of practice.Reprod Biomed Online.2012 Mar 7.
    [6]The American Fertility Society. Classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusicion,tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation,tubal pregnancies,multerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions[J].Fertil Steril,2006,(49):6
    [7]罗欣,漆洪波.盆腔炎性疾病与不孕不育的关系.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008,(4):256-257
    [8]Tulandi T,Al-Ghafri W,Zarei A.Tubal surgery.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2009-09;52(3):344-50.
    [9]朱惠清,陆桂玲,廖金兰.腹腔镜探查不孕症90例.实用医学杂志,2009(6):943-944
    [10]Naz T, Hassan L, Gulmeen, etal.Laparoscopic evaluation in infertility. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak.2009 Nov,19(11):704-7.
    [11]Bonneau C, Chanelles O, Sifer C, etal.Use of laparoscopy in unexplained infertility.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2012 Apr 17.
    [12]Nakagawa K, Ohgi S, Horikawa T,etal.Laparoscopy should be strongly considered for women with unexplained infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Res.2007 Oct;33(5):665-70.
    [13]Moayeri SE, Lee HC, Lathi RB, etal.Laparoscopy in women with unexplained infertility: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Fertil Steril.2009 Aug;92(2):471-80. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
    [14]夏良斌,李爱斌,谢青贞等.腹腔镜治疗237例不孕症临床分析.实用医学杂志,2005,(5):494-495
    [15]Kahyaoglu S, Kahyaoglu I, Yilmaz B,etal. Should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed initially or not, during infertilitymanagement of primary and secondary infertile women? A cross-sectional study.J Obstet Gynaecol Res.2009 Feb;35(1):139-44.
    [16]龙文,夏良斌,胡静等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗输卵管性不孕症的临床分析.实用医学杂志,2005,(20):83-84
    [17]阮正一,刘建华,东敏等.腹腔镜与开腹输卵管整形术治疗输卵管不孕症的疗效观察.临床和实验医学杂志,2010,(24),1851-1852
    [18]Ten Broek RP, Kok-Krant N,Verhoeve HR,etal.Efficacy of polyethylene glycol adhesion barrier after gynecological laparoscopicsurgery:Results of a randomized controlled pilot study.Gynecol Surg.2012 Feb;9(1):29-35. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
    [19]Pouly JL,Darai E,Yazbeck C,etal.Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery:Ⅱ. How can they be prevented?Gynecol Obstet Fertil.2011 Nov 30.
    [20]Hirschelmann A,Tchartchian G,Wallwiener M,etal.A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery.Arch Gynecol Obstet.2012 Apr;285(4):1089-97. Epub 2011 Oct30.
    [21]Trew G,Pistofidis G,Pados G,etal. Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution:a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.Hum Reprod.2011 Aug;26(8):2015-27. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
    [22]Watrelot A, Chauvin G Current practice in tubal surgery and adhesion management:a review.Reprod Biomed Online.2011 Jul;23(1):53-62. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
    [23]黄萍,王丽,廖吉勇等.用壁层腹膜替代输卵管浆膜治疗输卵管扭曲性梗阻不孕61例临床分析.生殖与避孕,1997,(3):186-187
    [24]魏庆云,封维娜.可吸收医用膜在腹腔镜治疗输卵管远端粘连阻塞术后放置的疗效评价.中国妇幼保健,2010,(17):2437-2438
    [25]乐杰.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.421
    [26]Zimmer M, Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk E, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, etal. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for diagnosis of tubal infertility.Neuro Endocrinol Lett.2011 Sep 3;32(5):722-726
    [27]Suneeta M, Lakhbir D,Sanjeev S, etal. Infertility.Obstet Gynecol Int.2012;2012:508276. Epub 2012 Mar 11.
    [28]Lopes VM, Leal IM. Personality and emotional adjustment in infertility.J Reprod Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(3-4):153-8.
    [29]Herman A. Advances and updates in obstetrics, gynecology and infertility.Harefuah. 2011 Nov;150(11):842-3.
    [30]熊芝桃,朱定方.242例不孕不育症病因分析.中外医疗,2008,(18):46+64
    [31]姜爱芳,任春娥,李琰珉等.1525例不孕症患者病因分析.实用妇产科杂志,2007,(11):705-706
    [32]贾兴平、刘文秀.不孕症子宫输卵管造影的X线诊断.延安大学学报(医学科学版),2009,(04):105+108
    [33]Farhi J,Ben-Haroush A.Distribution of causes of infertility in patients attending primary fertility clinics in Israel.Isr Med Assoc J.2011 Jan;13(1):51-4.
    [34]Dhont N,van de Wijgert J,Vyankandondera J.etal.Results of infertility investigations and follow-up among 312 infertile women and their partners in Kigali,Rwanda.Trop Doct. 2011 Apr;41(2):96-101.
    [35]Nackley AC, Muasher SJ.The significance of hydrosalpinx in in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril,1998,69(3):373-84
    [36]Muzii L, Sereni MI, Battista C,etal. Tubo-peritoneal factor of infertility:diagnosis and treatment. Clin Ter.2010;161(1):77-85.
    [37]Kodaman PH, Arici A, Seli E. Evidence-based diagnosis and management of tubal factor infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol.2004 Jun;16(3):221-9
    [38]刘宁.腹腔镜手术在治疗输卵管积水性不孕症的价值评估.硕士学位论文.沈阳:中国医科大学,201O
    [39]Vecchio R, MacFayden BV,Palazzo F.History of laparoscopic surgery.Panminerva Med. 2000 Mar;42(1):87-90
    [40]Haider G, Rani S, Talpur S, etal.Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad.2010 Jan-Mar;22(1):136-8.
    [41]Tsuji I, Ami K, Miyazaki A,etal.Benefit of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with unexplained infertility and normal hysterosalpingography findings.Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Sep;219(1):39-42.
    [42]黄安安,高丽,孙贵红.宫、腹腔镜联合用于诊治不孕症的临床价值.中国内镜杂志,2012,(01):66-68.
    [43]Merviel P, Lourdel E, Brzakowski M,etal.Should a laparoscopy be necessary in case of infertility with normal tubes at hysterosalpingography? Gynecol Obstet Fertil.2011 Sep;39(9):504-8. Epub 2011 Aug 5
    [44]Marana R, Ferrari S, Merola A,etal.Role of a mini-invasive approach in the diagnosis and treatment of tubo-peritoneal infertility as an altenative to IVF.Minerva Ginecol. 2011 Feb;63(1):1-10
    [45]Shimizu Y, Yamaguchi W, Takashima A,etal.Long-term cumulative pregnancy rate in women with unexplained infertility after laparoscopic surgery followed by in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization alone. J Obstet Gynaecol Res.2011 May;37(5):412-5. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01369.x. Epub 2011 Jan 27
    [I]The American Fertility Society.Classifications of adnexal adhesions,distal tubal occlusicion,tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation,tubal pregnancies,multerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions[J].Fertil Steril,2006,(49):6
    [2]Serafini P, Batzofin J. Diagnosis of female infertility. A comprehensive approach.J ReprodMed.1989 Jan;34(1):29-40.
    [3]Sweet RL.Pelvic Inflammatory Disease:Current Concepts of Diagnosis and Management. Current infectious disease reports 2012 Feb 2.
    [4]Muzii L, Sereni MI, Battista C,etal. Tubo-peritoneal factor of infertility:diagnosis and treatment. Clin Ter.2010;161(1):77-85.
    [5]Szabo I,Sobel G,Pajor A, etal. Clinical relevance of proximal tubal occlusion--diagnosis and therapy.Orv Hetil.2010 Jul 4; 151(27):1106-10.
    [6]Szabo I,Langmar Z,Fontanyi Z,etal. Selective chromopertubation via hysteroscopic tubal cannulation; Orvosi hetilap 2010 Mar 14; 151 (11):453-6
    [7]McComb PF, Rowe TC. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa:evidence it is a progressive disease.Fertil Steril.1989 Mar;51(3):542-5.
    [8]Creasy JL, Clark RL, Cuttino JT, etal. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa:radiologic and clinical correlates.Radiology.1985 Mar; 154(3):597-600.
    [9]LISA JR, GIOIA JD, RUBIN IC. Observations on the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube.Surg Gynecol Obstet.1954 Aug;92(2):159-69.
    [10]Fortier KJ, Haney AF.The pathologic spectrum of uterotubal junction obstruction.Obstet Gynecol.1985 Jan;65(1):93-8.
    [11]Rock JA, Katayama KP, Martin EJ, etal.Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction.Obstet Gynecol.1978 Nov;52(5):591-6.
    [12]Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, etal.The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology:a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril.1995 Sep;64(3):486-91.
    [13]Ikechebelu JI,Mbamara SU. Should laparoscopy and dye test be a first line evaluation for infertile women in southeast Nigeria? Nigerian journal of medicine:journal of the National Association of Resident Doctors of Nigeria 2011 Oct-Dec; 20 (4):462-5
    [14]Bukar M,Mustapha Z,Takai UI,etal. Hysterosalpingographic findings in infertile women: a seven year review. Nigerian journal of clinical practice 2011 Apr-Jun; 14 (2):168-70
    [15]Nugent D, Watson AJ, Killick SR, etal.A randomized controlled trial of tubal flushing with lipiodol for unexplained infertility.Fertil Steril.2002 Jan;77(1):173-5.
    [16]Watson A, Vandekerckhove P, Lilford R, etal.A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography:a surprising result?Fertil Steril. 1994 Mar;61(3):470-7.
    [17]Jenkins CS, Williams SR, Schmidt GE. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa:a review of the literature, discussion of clinical significance, and consideration of patient management.Fertil Steril.1993 Oct;60(4):599-607.
    [18]de Wit W, Gowrising CJ, Kuik DJ, etal.Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.Hum Reprod.1998 Jun;13(6):1696-701.
    [19]Young PE, Egan JE, Barlow JJ, etal.Reconstructive surgery for infertility at the Boston Hospital for Women.Am J Obstet Gynecol.1970 Dec 1;108(7):1092-7.
    [20]Vardhana PA,Silberzweig JE.Guarnaccia M,etal. Hysterosalpingography with selective salpingography. The Journal of reproductive medicine 2009 Mar; 54 (3):126-32
    [21]Novy MJ, Thurmond AS, Patton P,etal.Diagnosis of cornual obstruction by transcervical fallopian tubecannulation.Fertil Steril.1988 Sep;50(3):434-40.
    [22]Thurmond AS, Novy M, Rosch J. Terbutaline in diagnosis of interstitial fallopian tube obstruction.Invest Radiol.1988 Mar;23(3):209-10.
    [23]Honore GM, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage.Fertil Steril.1999 May;71(5):785-95.
    [24]Hurd WW,Wyckoff ET,Reynolds DB,etal.Patient rotation and resolution of unilateral cornual obstruction during hysterosalpingography.Obstet Gynecol.2003 Jun;101(6): 1275-8.
    [25]Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, etal.The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology:a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril.1995 Sep;64(3):486-91.
    [26]Swolin K, Rosencrantz M. Laparoscopy vs. hysterosalpingography in sterility investigations. A comparative study.Fertil Steril.1972 Apr;23(4):270-3.
    [27]Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Johns DA, etal. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubalblockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?Am J Obstet Gynecol.2011 Jan;204(1):79.e1-5
    [28]Schlief R, Deichert U.Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography of the uterus and fallopian tubes:results of a clinical trial of a new contrast medium in 120 patients.Radiology. 1991 Jan;178(1):213-5.
    [29]Holz K, Becker R, Schiirmann R.Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies of Echovist-200 including 1007 women.Zentralbl Gynakol.1997;119(8):366-73.
    [30]Saunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment.Fertil Steril.2011 Jun;95(7):2171-9. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
    [31]Jeanty P, Besnard S, Arnold A,etal.Air-contrast sonohysterography as a first step assessment of tubal patency. J Ultrasound Med.2000 Aug;19(8):519-27.
    [32]Marana R, Catalano GF, Muzii L, etal.The prognostic role of salpingoscopy in laparoscopic tubal surgery.Hum Reprod.1999 Dec;14(12):2991-5.
    [33]Marchino GL, Gigante V, Gennarelli G, etal. Salpingoscopic and laparoscopic investigations in relation to fertility outcome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc.2001 May;8(2):218-21.
    [34]Marana R, Catalano GF, Muzii L. Salpingoscopy.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol.2003 Aug;15(4):333-6.
    [35]Muzii L,Angioli R,Tambone V,etal. Salpingoscopy during laparoscopy using a small-caliber hysteroscope introduced through an accessory trocar. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2010 Sep; 20 (7):619-21
    [36]Tanaka Y,Tajima H.Falloposcopic tuboplasty as an option for tubal infertility:an alternative to in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril.2011 Jan;95(1):441-3. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
    [37]Budrys NM,Gong S,Rodgers AK,etal. Chlamydia trachomatis Antigens Recognized in Women With Tubal Factor Infertility, Normal Fertility, and Acute Infection. Obstetrics and gynecology 2012 May; 119 (5):1009-16
    [38]Rodgers AK,Wang J,Zhang Y,etal. Association of tubal factor infertility with elevated antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis caseinolytic protease P. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2010 Nov; 203 (5):494.e7-494.el4
    [39]Mol BW, Dijkman B, Wertheim P, etal.The accuracy of serum chlamydial antibodies in the diagnosis of tubal pathology:a meta-analysis.Fertil Steril.1997 Jun;67(6):1031-7.
    [40]Claman P, Honey L, Peeling RW, etal.The presence of serum antibody to the chlamydial heat shock protein (CHSP60) as a diagnostic test for tubal factor infertility.Fertil Steril. 1997 Mar;67(3):501-4.
    [41]Hjelholt A, Christiansen G, Johannesson TG,etal. Tubal factor infertility is associated with antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) but not human HSP60.Hum Reprod.2011 Aug;26(8):2069-76. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
    [42]Den Hartog J, Land J, Stassen F, etal. Predictive value of cHSP60 antibodies in screening for tubal subfertility[abstract].In:Abstracts of the 19th Annual Meeting of ESHRE;2003;Madrid.6/29/03-7/2/03; 18:Suppl 1,p.83.
    [43]Allahbadia GN,Merchant R.Fallopian tube recanalization:lessons learnt and future challenges. Women's health (London, England)2010 Jul; 6 (4):531-48, quiz 548-9
    [44]Winfield AC, Pittaway D, Maxson W, etal. Apparent cornual occlusion in hysterosalpingography:reversal by glucagon.AJR Am J Roentgenol.1982 Sep; 139 (3): 525-7.
    [45]Mekaru K,Yagi C,Asato K,etal. Hysteroscopic tubal catheterization under laparoscopy for proximal tubal obstruction. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2011 Dec; 284 (6): 1573-6
    [46]Anil G,Tay KH, Loh SF,etal.Fluoroscopy-guided,transcervical, selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalisation. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology:the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011 Nov; 31 (8):746-50
    [47]Kumpe DA, Zwerdlinger SC, Rothbarth LJ, etal.Proximal fallopian tube occlusion: diagnosis and treatment with transcervical fallopian tube catheterization.Radiology. 1990 Oct; 177(1):183-7.
    [48]Confino E, Tur-Kaspa I, DeCherney A,etal.Transcervical balloon tuboplasty. A multicenter study.JAMA.1990 Oct 24-31;264(16):2079-82.
    [49]Martensson O, Nilsson B, Ekelund L,etal.Selective salpingography and fluoroscopic transcervical salpingoplasty for diagnosis and treatment of proximal fallopian tube occlusions.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.1993 Aug;72(6):458-64.
    [50]Gomel V. Tubal reanastomosis by microsurgery.Fertil Steril.1977 Jan;28(1):59-65.
    [51]Tanaka Y, Tajima H, Sakuraba S, etal. Renaissance of surgical recanalization for proximal fallopian tubal occlusion:falloposcopic tuboplasty as a promising therapeutic option in tubal infertility.J Minim Invasive Gynecol.2011 Sep-Oct; 18(5):651-9.
    [52]Stenchever MA, Droegemueller W, Herbst AL, Mishell DR. Comprehensive Gynecology.4th ed. St. Louis:Mosby; 2001.
    [53]Schlaff WD, Hassiakos DK, Damewood MD, etal.Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction:prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique.Fertil Steril.1990 Dec;54(6):984-90.
    [54]Watson A,Vandekerckhove P,Lilford R.Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2000;(2):CD000221.
    [55]Lavy G, Diamond MP, DeCherney AH. Ectopic pregnancy:its relationship to tubal reconstructive surgery.Fertil Steril.1987 Apr;47(4):543-56.
    [56]Gomel V. Salpingo-ovariolysis by laparoscopy in infertility.Fertil Steril.1983 Nov;40(5):607-11
    [57]Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL.Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in vitrofertilization-embryo transfer.Fertil Steril.1998 Sep;70(3):492-9.
    [58]Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F,etal.Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx:a meta-analysis of published comparative studies.Hum Reprod.1999 May; 14(5):1243-9.
    [59]Chanelles O, Ducarme G, Sifer C, etal. Hydrosalpinx and infertility:what about conservative surgical management?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2011 Nov; 159(1):122-6. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
    [60]Andersen AN, Lindhard A, Loft A, etal.The infertile patient with hydrosalpinges--IVF with or without salpingectomy?Hum Reprod.1996 Oct;11(10):2081-4.
    [61]Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U, etal.Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome:a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF.
    [62]Johnson NP, Mak W, Sowter MC. Laparoscopic salpingectomy for women with hydrosalpinges enhances the success of IVF:a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod.2002 Mar;17(3):543-8.
    [63]Audibert F, Hedon B, Arnal F, etal.Therapeutic strategies in tubal infertility with distal pathology.Hum Reprod.1991 Nov;6(10):1439-42.
    [64]Benadiva CA, Kligman I, Davis O, etal.In vitro fertilization versus tubal surgery:is pelvic reconstructive surgery obsolete?Fertil Steril.1995 Dec;64(6):1051-61.
    [65]Karande VC, Korn A, Morris R,etal.Prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost ofin vitro fertilization with that of a traditional treatment algorithmas first-line therapy for couples with infertility.Fertil Steril.1999 Mar;71(3):468-75.
    [66]Patton PE, Williams TJ, Coulam CB. Results of microsurgical reconstruction in patients with combined proximal and distal tubal occlusion:double obstruction.Fertil Steril. 1987 Oct;48(4):670-4.
    [67]Zouves C, Erenus M, Gomel V. Tubal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer:a role for proximal occlusion or salpingectomy afterfailed distal tubal surgery?Fertil Steril.1991 Oct;56(4):691-5.
    [68]Mardesic T, Muller P, Huttelova R, etal.Effect of salpingectomy on the results of IVF in women with tubal sterility--prospective study.Ceska Gynekol.2001 Jul;66(4):259-64.
    [69]Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer:salpingectomy versus proximaltubal occlusion.Fertil Steril.2001 Mar;75(3):612-7.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700