软件企业知识管理能力与经营绩效的关系研究
|
摘要
我们正在进入一个以知识(智力)资源的占有、生产、分配、使用(消费)为最重要因素的经济时代——知识经济时代。知识是知识经济时代企业资源的陔心,只有知识才能解释核心竞争能力,也惟有知识和知识管理才是企业核心能力、核心竞争力的惟一源泉。
推动软件企业的知识管理除了可以大幅提升我国软件技术与相关产值外,同时也将进一步带动软件产业对其产品设计与创新的重视程度、降低生产成本、延长软件产业的产业链,并有助于提高软件产业的国际竞争能力,对于促进软件产业的升级和推动中国整体经济发展都有着积极的意义。
本文首先对和知识管理流程、知识管理能力测量、组织绩效等问题相关的国内外文献进行了探讨,并归纳如下;一、企业因管理知识而获得利润的潜力,称为企业的知识管理能力。Andrew(2001)将知识管理能力分为知识管理基础建设能力及知识管理流程能力两大部分的定义和分类得到了大多数学者的认可和运用。二、知识管理属于企业活动之一,其范围包括知识取得、知识转化、知识应用、知识保护等流程;该流程是一个动态循环,并包括反馈与控制机制。综合上述专家学者们对知识管理的看法,本文对知识管理的定义为;“在企业愿景与战略规划下,促使企业内成员通过创造、扩散、转移与积累知识来实现提升组织的竞争优势,并将知识妥善利用与成员分享,进而改进组织的绩效。”三、企业知识管理能力衡量问题一直是学术界研究的重要内容.企业知识管理能力衡量的研究方法主要涉及多级模糊综合评价方法、综合评价的数学模型、评价指标体系和评价模型等。四、组织对其拥有的知识资源,特别是关键知识资源的利用效率和效果对于组织竞争力具有重要影响。知识管理能力与组织绩效息息相关。企业要提高组织绩效,首要条件就是建立一个分享知识的企业文化与环境。
其次探讨了软件企业的知识特性,并分析了软件企业的知识管理的内涵;创新管理和领导的前瞻性、建设学习型组织、软件知识工作者的管理、软件知识的共享、不断地完善知识和更新技术、迈向新的知识产业。并且提出软件企业知识管理实施的重点是知识整合和创新。软件企业一般都有各种相对比较成熟的信息系统作为知识的载体,如何把各个系统中的知识甄选和整合起来是知识管理的重点。比如配置管理系统、办公管理系统、邮件系统、社区等整合起来。创新是另外一个重点。创新包括两个方面;一是技术的创新,二是管理的创新。技术创新是知识管理永远的主题,也是软件企业在知识管理过程中比较容易取得成果的一个环节。管理创新的意义在于可以不断改进业务流程,使得企业内部管理更为合理和高效。
提出软件企业知识管理的主要难点在于共享。并提出了解决知识管理实施难题的几条途径;认识问题是最大的问题,也是需要很长时间才能解决的问题,需要企业高层要有基本的,打持久战的思想准备,避免急功近利的思想;在共享方面,可以从两个方面着手,一是必须让员工尽快体会到共享的好处,二是共享的方式和工具必须统一和很方便;知识管理的全面规划是难点也是重点,一定要在实施的初始阶段就要做好全面的规划。知识的分类和标准化是一个难题,如何结合企业的具体情况,制订方便、实用的分类体系和标准化方法是每个企业需要解决的问题,应避免产生大量的知识垃圾;软件企业知识型员工很多,与其它类型的人才相比软件人才的特点也很突出,因此,建立尊重、信任的氛围和文化是一个值得关注的问题。并以金蝶和用友软件为例探讨了软件企业实施知识管理的具体做法及其经验。
第四章运用模糊理论构建了知识管理能力评估的指标体系。所构建的知识管理能力评估分为评估指标筛选与绩效评估两大阶段。依据知识管理循环结构构建以知识管理系统为核心的企业知识管理能力评估模式。并根据知识管理能力的信息技术、组织结构、组织文化、知识取得、应用、转化与保护七大层面与经筛选所得的评估指标构建了一个层级结构的企业知识管理能力评估体系。以语意变量来表达主观评估的模糊性,通过模糊德尔菲法来筛选评估层面中重要的评估指标,并结合模糊层级分析法计算各层面间的权重。并以三家软件企业进行知识管理能力评估为例,说明本文所构建的绩效评估模式的评估步骤与评估流程。根据案例分析中资深主管的自评结果,与本文所提出的模式与系统评估结果相当的一致。
第五章运用平衡计分卡的方法对软件企业知识管理能力与经营绩效的关系进行实证分析。以浙江省软件行业协会2006年5月30日所公布的231家年审合格的软件企业为研究对象。主要以寄发问卷方式进行。经过问卷统计分析实证研究结果表明,信息技术基础建设对顾客层面绩效有正面影响关系;组织结构基础建设对企业内部程序层面绩效有正面影响关系;组织结构基础建设对学习与成长层面绩效有正面影响关系;知识取得流程对财务层面绩效有正面影响关系;知识应用流程对财务层面绩效有正面影响关系。此外,还得到组织结构基础建设对财务层面的绩效有反面影响关系;知识转化流程对顾客层面的绩效有反面影响关系。且研究结果呈现显著,但影响为反面因子。
并针对分析结果对软件企业提出若干建议。一、必须注重加强信息技术基础建设。二、发挥组织结构基础建设对软件企业知识管理的积极作用。三、提高知识取得流程的效率。四、弱化知识转化流程对顾客层面绩效的负面影响。五、注重知识的应用和保护。
未来软件产业的发展趋势势必走向网络化的发展。知识管理对于软件产业来说更显重要。未来软件企业者如何运用知识研发软件,或者利用知识来发行软件,利用知识来进行软件用户的服务都将会是将来软件产业从业者的重大课题。软件企业需要利用各种方法或方式来达到经营的目标,如良好的组织知识系统,学习型组织的建立等等,这些都是可以改善绩效的方法。但是由于软件产业特性的影响,为了研发项目的进行及代理发行软件,可能使得市场占有率下降,顾客满意度不佳并付出的大量金钱造成财务上的损失。只有运用并取得知识技术提高研发能力,提高软件开发技术能力,减少不必要的财务支出,减少代理软件数量并提高具有自有知识产权的软件的比例,才能有效提升市场占有率,提升顾客满意度、品质及提升财务绩效。总的来说,软件企业的竞争力来自于维持知识核心价值,如果软件企业有较佳的知识管理能力加以支持,则企业竞争力与技术的积累会变得更有效率。本文发现,由于软件产业是新兴产业,产业竞争激烈,尤其很多国内软件企业可以依靠做国外软件的发行代理或是数据加工代理而获得短期利润(如网络软件、信息管理系统软件等),因此宁可代理软件也不愿加强研发能力,长期看来并不明智。在软件产业环境变化快速的情况下,造成企业决策偏向短期决策,缺乏长远的目标及竞争战略。事实上,培育和留住优秀人才、维持知识核心价值才是软件企业提升核心竞争力的关键因素。
We are entering an age of knowledge-based economy with which the most important characteristics are possessing,producing,distributing,and using (consummating)knowledge and intellectual resources.Knowledge is the core of enterprise resource in the age of knowledge-based economy.Only knowledge can interpret the core competitive ability,and only knowledge and knowledge management can be the source of enterprise's core ability and core competence.
Improving the knowledge management in software enterprise can not only increase the software technique and its related production value,but can also push software industry to pay more attention to the design and innovation of its products, to the decrease of producing cost and the extension of industry chain in software industry;at the same time it can increase the international competitive ability of software industry.This will be of positive significance in both pushing the upgrading of software industry and promoting china's economic development.
Firstly,this dissertation mainly discusses literatures such as the definition of knowledge,the management process of knowledge,the management ability of knowledge,the management performance of knowledge and organization performance.The discussions are as follows;1.Knowledge management ability refers to the potential of getting margin because of managing knowledge.Andrew's definition and classification to knowledge management ability,which contains basic construction ability of knowledge management and knowledge management process ability,is recognized and used by most scholars.2.Knowledge management belongs to enterprise activities.It includes knowledge acquisition,knowledge transformation, knowledge pervasion and knowledge accumulation.It is a dynamic loop,and contains feed back and controlling mechanism.To sum up the attitudes of the experts towards knowledge management,it can be defined as "under the foreground and strategic planning of the enterprise,promoting the staff to raise the competitive edge of the organization by creation,pervasion,transformation and accumulation of knowledge, making good use of the knowledge and sharing it with the members,then improving the performance of the organization.3.Measurement of the enterprise's knowledge management ability is always an important subject of academic research.The research methods to measurement of the enterprise's knowledge management ability mainly refer to multi-class misty synthetically evaluation method,mathematical model of synthetically evaluation,evaluation index system,evaluation model and so on.4.Knowledge resources owned by an organization,especially the utilization efficiency and effectiveness of the key knowledge resources,play an important role in the competitiveness of the organization.There is a close relationship between knowledge management ability and organization performance.If an enterprise wants to improve the organization performance,the parameter clause is to establish a culture and environment to share the knowledge.
Secondly,this dissertation discusses the characteristics of software industry and software enterprises.The knowledge management of software enterprises mainly contains;innovative management and forward looking of the leaders, construct-and-learn organization,and management of the software knowledge workers,sharing of software knowledge,continuous development of knowledge and technology and moving into new knowledge industry.This dissertation points out that the focus to implement knowledge is on knowledge integration and innovation. Software enterprises generally have various relatively mature information systems as a carrier of knowledge.One key of knowledge management is how to select and integrate knowledge from those systems,for example,how to configurate management systems,office management systems,e-mail systems,and integrate them with the community.Innovation is another key.It has two aspects,i.e. technology innovation and management innovation.Technology innovation is the permanent subject of knowledge management,and is an easy process of knowledge management for software enterprises to get results.The meaning of management rests on its capability to continuously improving business procedures so as to make internal management more reasonable and efficient.
This dissertation shows that the main difficulty in knowledge management for software enterprises is sharing the knowledge and proposes some respondent measures;the most urgent problem is how to recognize problem,and it is also a dreary problem,which requires the senior management to make a basic,fighting protracted war mental preparation and to avoid quick success ideas.To promote sharing the knowledge we can begin with;to make the staff realize the benefits of sharing knowledge as soon as possible;and to make the sharing approaches and tools unified and convenient.Comprehensive planning is a difficult and key issue of knowledge management and should be completed at the initial implementation stage. The classification and standardization of knowledge is a difficult problem.How to combine the specific situation of enterprises and develop a convenient and practical classification system and standardized approach is the problem that each enterprise needs to address.Software enterprises have a lot of knowledge workers,and the characteristics of software personnel is also prominent compared with other types of talent,and therefore the establishment of respect,trust and cultural atmosphere is a matter of concern.This dissertation takes UF and Jindie software as an example to discuss practices and specific experience of knowledge management implementation for software enterprises.
In the fourth chapter,the author constructs the index system of knowledge management ability evaluation and the evaluation pattern.The constructed knowledge management ability evaluation is divided into sifting of evaluation index and performance evaluation.According to the knowledge management cycle structure, the author establishes the enterprise knowledge management ability evaluation pattern whose key point is knowledge management system.On the basis of knowledge creation,pervasion,transformation and accumulation of knowledge management activities and the sifted evaluation index,the author constructs a layer-structured enterprise knowledge management ability evaluation system.In order to master the enterprise knowledge management ability,the author uses semanteme variability to express the faintness of subjective valuation,uses faintness Deft method to sift the important evaluation index of the evaluation aspect,and combines with the faintness layer analysis method to calculate the importance among each aspect. Taking the knowledge management ability evaluation of an intellective enterprise for example,the author tries to explain the evaluation process and approach of the performance evaluation pattern constructed in this paper.According to the self-judgment results of the three senior directors in this case,the pattern mentioned in this paper is quite in accordance with the evaluation results of the system.
The relationship between software enterprise knowledge management ability and management performance is analyzed by the method of balanced scoring card in chapter five.The research subjects are the 231 qualified software enterprises in the annual verification revealed by ZheJiang Software Industry Association on 30 May, 2006.The research is done mainly by mailing question papers.After analyzing the statistics of the question papers,research shows that basic construction of information technology has a good effect on the guests' performance,basic construction of organization structure has a good effect on performance of the enterprise' inner procedure,and basic construction of organization structure also has a good effect on performance of learning and development.Procedure of knowledge acquisition has a good effect on performance of finance,and procedure of knowledge appliance also has a good effect on finance.Besides that,basic construction of organization structure has a bad effect on performance of finance,and procedure of knowledge transformation has a bad effect on performance of guests.The research results are presented remarkably,but the effect is reversed.
Then based on the results of this analysis,we make some suggestions.Firstly,we should strengthen technological infrastructure construction.Secondly,we should let organizational infrastructure developments play an active role in knowledge management of soft ware enterprises.Thirdly,we should increase the efficiency of the flow of getting knowledge.Fourthly,we should weaken the negative effects to customers in the course of knowledge conversion.Fifthly;we should pay attention to the application and the protection of knowledge.
The trend for future software industry development must head to the internet. Knowledge management is more important to software industry.How software entrepreneurs use knowledge to research software,use knowledge to publish software, or use knowledge to provide service to software users will be a significant subject for the future software industry workers.The software enterprises need to use all kinds of methods or modes to get the business goal,such as a good organization knowledge system,the establishment of innovative organizations and so on,which are all approaches to improve the performance.But affected by the feature of software industry,to go on with research projects and publish software may reduce the share of the market,lower the satisfaction of customers,waste quite much money and cause financial losses.Only to get and use knowledge technology to improve research ability and the software development ability,reduce unnecessary financial payout and amount of the deputized software and increase the proportion of software with independent intellectual property,can the market share,satisfaction of customers, quality and financial performance be improved effectively.Generally speaking, competitiveness of software enterprises comes from maintaining the core value of knowledge.If supported by a better knowledge management ability of the organization,the competitiveness of enterprises and technical accumulation will be more efficient.The paper finds out that because software industry is a new developed one competitiveness in this industry is very strong,especially,that many domestic software enterprises prefer to get short term margin by being the publish agent or data processing agent of foreign software(e.g.Internet software,information management system software),rather than strengthening the research ability which is not advisable for the long run.In addition to the rapid changing of industry environment,the decisions of enterprises lean to the short term and are lack of long term strategies on training excellent persons and competitiveness.Consequently, training excellent talents and improving the technology abilities must be the key factors in upgrading the competitiveness of software industries.
推动软件企业的知识管理除了可以大幅提升我国软件技术与相关产值外,同时也将进一步带动软件产业对其产品设计与创新的重视程度、降低生产成本、延长软件产业的产业链,并有助于提高软件产业的国际竞争能力,对于促进软件产业的升级和推动中国整体经济发展都有着积极的意义。
本文首先对和知识管理流程、知识管理能力测量、组织绩效等问题相关的国内外文献进行了探讨,并归纳如下;一、企业因管理知识而获得利润的潜力,称为企业的知识管理能力。Andrew(2001)将知识管理能力分为知识管理基础建设能力及知识管理流程能力两大部分的定义和分类得到了大多数学者的认可和运用。二、知识管理属于企业活动之一,其范围包括知识取得、知识转化、知识应用、知识保护等流程;该流程是一个动态循环,并包括反馈与控制机制。综合上述专家学者们对知识管理的看法,本文对知识管理的定义为;“在企业愿景与战略规划下,促使企业内成员通过创造、扩散、转移与积累知识来实现提升组织的竞争优势,并将知识妥善利用与成员分享,进而改进组织的绩效。”三、企业知识管理能力衡量问题一直是学术界研究的重要内容.企业知识管理能力衡量的研究方法主要涉及多级模糊综合评价方法、综合评价的数学模型、评价指标体系和评价模型等。四、组织对其拥有的知识资源,特别是关键知识资源的利用效率和效果对于组织竞争力具有重要影响。知识管理能力与组织绩效息息相关。企业要提高组织绩效,首要条件就是建立一个分享知识的企业文化与环境。
其次探讨了软件企业的知识特性,并分析了软件企业的知识管理的内涵;创新管理和领导的前瞻性、建设学习型组织、软件知识工作者的管理、软件知识的共享、不断地完善知识和更新技术、迈向新的知识产业。并且提出软件企业知识管理实施的重点是知识整合和创新。软件企业一般都有各种相对比较成熟的信息系统作为知识的载体,如何把各个系统中的知识甄选和整合起来是知识管理的重点。比如配置管理系统、办公管理系统、邮件系统、社区等整合起来。创新是另外一个重点。创新包括两个方面;一是技术的创新,二是管理的创新。技术创新是知识管理永远的主题,也是软件企业在知识管理过程中比较容易取得成果的一个环节。管理创新的意义在于可以不断改进业务流程,使得企业内部管理更为合理和高效。
提出软件企业知识管理的主要难点在于共享。并提出了解决知识管理实施难题的几条途径;认识问题是最大的问题,也是需要很长时间才能解决的问题,需要企业高层要有基本的,打持久战的思想准备,避免急功近利的思想;在共享方面,可以从两个方面着手,一是必须让员工尽快体会到共享的好处,二是共享的方式和工具必须统一和很方便;知识管理的全面规划是难点也是重点,一定要在实施的初始阶段就要做好全面的规划。知识的分类和标准化是一个难题,如何结合企业的具体情况,制订方便、实用的分类体系和标准化方法是每个企业需要解决的问题,应避免产生大量的知识垃圾;软件企业知识型员工很多,与其它类型的人才相比软件人才的特点也很突出,因此,建立尊重、信任的氛围和文化是一个值得关注的问题。并以金蝶和用友软件为例探讨了软件企业实施知识管理的具体做法及其经验。
第四章运用模糊理论构建了知识管理能力评估的指标体系。所构建的知识管理能力评估分为评估指标筛选与绩效评估两大阶段。依据知识管理循环结构构建以知识管理系统为核心的企业知识管理能力评估模式。并根据知识管理能力的信息技术、组织结构、组织文化、知识取得、应用、转化与保护七大层面与经筛选所得的评估指标构建了一个层级结构的企业知识管理能力评估体系。以语意变量来表达主观评估的模糊性,通过模糊德尔菲法来筛选评估层面中重要的评估指标,并结合模糊层级分析法计算各层面间的权重。并以三家软件企业进行知识管理能力评估为例,说明本文所构建的绩效评估模式的评估步骤与评估流程。根据案例分析中资深主管的自评结果,与本文所提出的模式与系统评估结果相当的一致。
第五章运用平衡计分卡的方法对软件企业知识管理能力与经营绩效的关系进行实证分析。以浙江省软件行业协会2006年5月30日所公布的231家年审合格的软件企业为研究对象。主要以寄发问卷方式进行。经过问卷统计分析实证研究结果表明,信息技术基础建设对顾客层面绩效有正面影响关系;组织结构基础建设对企业内部程序层面绩效有正面影响关系;组织结构基础建设对学习与成长层面绩效有正面影响关系;知识取得流程对财务层面绩效有正面影响关系;知识应用流程对财务层面绩效有正面影响关系。此外,还得到组织结构基础建设对财务层面的绩效有反面影响关系;知识转化流程对顾客层面的绩效有反面影响关系。且研究结果呈现显著,但影响为反面因子。
并针对分析结果对软件企业提出若干建议。一、必须注重加强信息技术基础建设。二、发挥组织结构基础建设对软件企业知识管理的积极作用。三、提高知识取得流程的效率。四、弱化知识转化流程对顾客层面绩效的负面影响。五、注重知识的应用和保护。
未来软件产业的发展趋势势必走向网络化的发展。知识管理对于软件产业来说更显重要。未来软件企业者如何运用知识研发软件,或者利用知识来发行软件,利用知识来进行软件用户的服务都将会是将来软件产业从业者的重大课题。软件企业需要利用各种方法或方式来达到经营的目标,如良好的组织知识系统,学习型组织的建立等等,这些都是可以改善绩效的方法。但是由于软件产业特性的影响,为了研发项目的进行及代理发行软件,可能使得市场占有率下降,顾客满意度不佳并付出的大量金钱造成财务上的损失。只有运用并取得知识技术提高研发能力,提高软件开发技术能力,减少不必要的财务支出,减少代理软件数量并提高具有自有知识产权的软件的比例,才能有效提升市场占有率,提升顾客满意度、品质及提升财务绩效。总的来说,软件企业的竞争力来自于维持知识核心价值,如果软件企业有较佳的知识管理能力加以支持,则企业竞争力与技术的积累会变得更有效率。本文发现,由于软件产业是新兴产业,产业竞争激烈,尤其很多国内软件企业可以依靠做国外软件的发行代理或是数据加工代理而获得短期利润(如网络软件、信息管理系统软件等),因此宁可代理软件也不愿加强研发能力,长期看来并不明智。在软件产业环境变化快速的情况下,造成企业决策偏向短期决策,缺乏长远的目标及竞争战略。事实上,培育和留住优秀人才、维持知识核心价值才是软件企业提升核心竞争力的关键因素。
We are entering an age of knowledge-based economy with which the most important characteristics are possessing,producing,distributing,and using (consummating)knowledge and intellectual resources.Knowledge is the core of enterprise resource in the age of knowledge-based economy.Only knowledge can interpret the core competitive ability,and only knowledge and knowledge management can be the source of enterprise's core ability and core competence.
Improving the knowledge management in software enterprise can not only increase the software technique and its related production value,but can also push software industry to pay more attention to the design and innovation of its products, to the decrease of producing cost and the extension of industry chain in software industry;at the same time it can increase the international competitive ability of software industry.This will be of positive significance in both pushing the upgrading of software industry and promoting china's economic development.
Firstly,this dissertation mainly discusses literatures such as the definition of knowledge,the management process of knowledge,the management ability of knowledge,the management performance of knowledge and organization performance.The discussions are as follows;1.Knowledge management ability refers to the potential of getting margin because of managing knowledge.Andrew's definition and classification to knowledge management ability,which contains basic construction ability of knowledge management and knowledge management process ability,is recognized and used by most scholars.2.Knowledge management belongs to enterprise activities.It includes knowledge acquisition,knowledge transformation, knowledge pervasion and knowledge accumulation.It is a dynamic loop,and contains feed back and controlling mechanism.To sum up the attitudes of the experts towards knowledge management,it can be defined as "under the foreground and strategic planning of the enterprise,promoting the staff to raise the competitive edge of the organization by creation,pervasion,transformation and accumulation of knowledge, making good use of the knowledge and sharing it with the members,then improving the performance of the organization.3.Measurement of the enterprise's knowledge management ability is always an important subject of academic research.The research methods to measurement of the enterprise's knowledge management ability mainly refer to multi-class misty synthetically evaluation method,mathematical model of synthetically evaluation,evaluation index system,evaluation model and so on.4.Knowledge resources owned by an organization,especially the utilization efficiency and effectiveness of the key knowledge resources,play an important role in the competitiveness of the organization.There is a close relationship between knowledge management ability and organization performance.If an enterprise wants to improve the organization performance,the parameter clause is to establish a culture and environment to share the knowledge.
Secondly,this dissertation discusses the characteristics of software industry and software enterprises.The knowledge management of software enterprises mainly contains;innovative management and forward looking of the leaders, construct-and-learn organization,and management of the software knowledge workers,sharing of software knowledge,continuous development of knowledge and technology and moving into new knowledge industry.This dissertation points out that the focus to implement knowledge is on knowledge integration and innovation. Software enterprises generally have various relatively mature information systems as a carrier of knowledge.One key of knowledge management is how to select and integrate knowledge from those systems,for example,how to configurate management systems,office management systems,e-mail systems,and integrate them with the community.Innovation is another key.It has two aspects,i.e. technology innovation and management innovation.Technology innovation is the permanent subject of knowledge management,and is an easy process of knowledge management for software enterprises to get results.The meaning of management rests on its capability to continuously improving business procedures so as to make internal management more reasonable and efficient.
This dissertation shows that the main difficulty in knowledge management for software enterprises is sharing the knowledge and proposes some respondent measures;the most urgent problem is how to recognize problem,and it is also a dreary problem,which requires the senior management to make a basic,fighting protracted war mental preparation and to avoid quick success ideas.To promote sharing the knowledge we can begin with;to make the staff realize the benefits of sharing knowledge as soon as possible;and to make the sharing approaches and tools unified and convenient.Comprehensive planning is a difficult and key issue of knowledge management and should be completed at the initial implementation stage. The classification and standardization of knowledge is a difficult problem.How to combine the specific situation of enterprises and develop a convenient and practical classification system and standardized approach is the problem that each enterprise needs to address.Software enterprises have a lot of knowledge workers,and the characteristics of software personnel is also prominent compared with other types of talent,and therefore the establishment of respect,trust and cultural atmosphere is a matter of concern.This dissertation takes UF and Jindie software as an example to discuss practices and specific experience of knowledge management implementation for software enterprises.
In the fourth chapter,the author constructs the index system of knowledge management ability evaluation and the evaluation pattern.The constructed knowledge management ability evaluation is divided into sifting of evaluation index and performance evaluation.According to the knowledge management cycle structure, the author establishes the enterprise knowledge management ability evaluation pattern whose key point is knowledge management system.On the basis of knowledge creation,pervasion,transformation and accumulation of knowledge management activities and the sifted evaluation index,the author constructs a layer-structured enterprise knowledge management ability evaluation system.In order to master the enterprise knowledge management ability,the author uses semanteme variability to express the faintness of subjective valuation,uses faintness Deft method to sift the important evaluation index of the evaluation aspect,and combines with the faintness layer analysis method to calculate the importance among each aspect. Taking the knowledge management ability evaluation of an intellective enterprise for example,the author tries to explain the evaluation process and approach of the performance evaluation pattern constructed in this paper.According to the self-judgment results of the three senior directors in this case,the pattern mentioned in this paper is quite in accordance with the evaluation results of the system.
The relationship between software enterprise knowledge management ability and management performance is analyzed by the method of balanced scoring card in chapter five.The research subjects are the 231 qualified software enterprises in the annual verification revealed by ZheJiang Software Industry Association on 30 May, 2006.The research is done mainly by mailing question papers.After analyzing the statistics of the question papers,research shows that basic construction of information technology has a good effect on the guests' performance,basic construction of organization structure has a good effect on performance of the enterprise' inner procedure,and basic construction of organization structure also has a good effect on performance of learning and development.Procedure of knowledge acquisition has a good effect on performance of finance,and procedure of knowledge appliance also has a good effect on finance.Besides that,basic construction of organization structure has a bad effect on performance of finance,and procedure of knowledge transformation has a bad effect on performance of guests.The research results are presented remarkably,but the effect is reversed.
Then based on the results of this analysis,we make some suggestions.Firstly,we should strengthen technological infrastructure construction.Secondly,we should let organizational infrastructure developments play an active role in knowledge management of soft ware enterprises.Thirdly,we should increase the efficiency of the flow of getting knowledge.Fourthly,we should weaken the negative effects to customers in the course of knowledge conversion.Fifthly;we should pay attention to the application and the protection of knowledge.
The trend for future software industry development must head to the internet. Knowledge management is more important to software industry.How software entrepreneurs use knowledge to research software,use knowledge to publish software, or use knowledge to provide service to software users will be a significant subject for the future software industry workers.The software enterprises need to use all kinds of methods or modes to get the business goal,such as a good organization knowledge system,the establishment of innovative organizations and so on,which are all approaches to improve the performance.But affected by the feature of software industry,to go on with research projects and publish software may reduce the share of the market,lower the satisfaction of customers,waste quite much money and cause financial losses.Only to get and use knowledge technology to improve research ability and the software development ability,reduce unnecessary financial payout and amount of the deputized software and increase the proportion of software with independent intellectual property,can the market share,satisfaction of customers, quality and financial performance be improved effectively.Generally speaking, competitiveness of software enterprises comes from maintaining the core value of knowledge.If supported by a better knowledge management ability of the organization,the competitiveness of enterprises and technical accumulation will be more efficient.The paper finds out that because software industry is a new developed one competitiveness in this industry is very strong,especially,that many domestic software enterprises prefer to get short term margin by being the publish agent or data processing agent of foreign software(e.g.Internet software,information management system software),rather than strengthening the research ability which is not advisable for the long run.In addition to the rapid changing of industry environment,the decisions of enterprises lean to the short term and are lack of long term strategies on training excellent persons and competitiveness.Consequently, training excellent talents and improving the technology abilities must be the key factors in upgrading the competitiveness of software industries.
引文
[1]Mansfield、Edwin,Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States;A comparative study[J],America Economic Review,1988.78,P223-228
[2]Mowery,David C.,Joanne E.Oxley,Brain S.Silverman,Strategic alliances and inter firm knowledge transfer[J],Strategic Management,1996.17,P77-91
[3]Kogut,Bruce,Udo Zander,Knowledge of the firm combinative capabilities and the replication of technology[J],Organization Science,1992.3,P383-397
[4]Von Hippele,The source of innovation[M],New York;Oxford University Press,1988
[5]Reinganum J.F.,On the diffusion of new technology;A game theoretic approach[J],Review of Economic Studies XLVI-Ⅱ,1981,P395-405
[6]Rogers E.,Diffusion of innovations[M],New York;The Free Press,1995
[7]TannyS.M.and DerzkoN.A.,Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modeling[J],Journal of Forecasting,1988.7,P225-231
[8]Ziss,Steffen,Strategic R&Dwith spillovers,collusion and welfare[J],The Journal of Industrial Economics,Vol.XLII,No.4,December 1994,P45-52
[9]夏敬华、金昕,知识管理[M],北京;机械工业出版社,2003
[10]彼得·圣吉著,郭进隆译,第五项修炼-学习型组织的艺术与实务[M],上海三联书店,2002
[11]应力、钱省三,企业知识管理;战略与方法[J],中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(1),P55-60
[12]董俊武、黄江圳、陈震红,基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究[J],中国工业经济,2004,(2),P77-85
[13]杜伟、郭宪英,企业知识管理战略研究[J],现代情报,2002(10),P117-118
[14]季晓林,竞争情报与企业知识管理[J],中国信息导报,2004(9),P46-48
[15]陈华、胡振鹏,企业知识管理实施障碍及对策探讨[J],大连理工大学学报(社科版),2003(4),P19-23
[16]杨秀萍,我国国有企业知识管理实施路径探索[J],科学管理研究,2004(3),P80-84
[17]邱进冬、顾新建,制造企业知识管理实施方法的探讨[J],成组技术与生产现代化,2002(2),P18-21,25
[18]苏新宁等,企业知识管理研究与实践的进展[J],图书情报知识,2003(1),P2-6
[19]左美云,国内外企业知识管理研究综述[J],科学决策,2000(3),P31-37
[20]Andrew H.G.,Arvind M.and Albert H.Segars,Knowledge Management;An Organizaional Capabilities Perspective[J],Journal of Management Information System,Vol.18,2001,P185-214
[21]刘权莹,信息服务业知识管理的研究[D],国立政治大学企业管理研究所硕士论文,1999
[22]林淳一,建立知识管理数据库以提升企业竞争力的研究[D],大叶大学事业经营研究所硕士论文,1999
[23]胡哲生,构建组织知识系统的研究探索方法论雏议[J],商管科技,2000(1),P87-101
[24]Michael Polanyi,Tacit Knowledge[M],In Laurence Prusak.(ed).Knowledge in Organizations,Butterworth Heinemann,1997,P135-146
[25]Glueck,W.F.,Business Policy;Strategy Formulation and Management Action[M],New York McGraw-Hill,1976
[26]McNichols,T.J.,Executive Policy and Planning[M],McGraw-Hill,New York,1977
[27]Dorothy Leonard-Barton,Wellsprings of Knowledge;Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation[M],Harvard Business School Press,1995
[28]Hansen,M.T.,N.Nohria,and T.Tierney,What's your strategy for managing knowledge?[J],Harvard Business Review,March-April,1999,P106-116
[29]Helleloid D.& Simonin B.,Organizational Learning and a Firm's Core Competence[M],In Hamel Gary and Heene.A.(ed),Competence-Base Competition,New York;John Wiley & Sons,P214-239.1994
[30]Ikujiro Nonaka,Hirotaka Takeuchi,The Knowledge-Creating Company[M],Oxford University Press,1995
[31]曾凯瀚,知识管理应用于创业投资评估行为的研究[D],国立政治大学企业管理学系硕士论文,2000
[32]Gilbert,Myrna & Gordey-Hayes,Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation[J],Technovation,Jun 1996,P301-312
[33]Hedlund,A Model of Knowledge Management and The N-Form Corporation[J],Strategic Management Journal,vol.15,1994,P74-90
[34]陈玉玲,组织内人力资本的积蓄-知识资本管理的观点[D],国立中央大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,1998
[35]许意雯,知识密集产业核心资源的运用与维持[D],辅仁大学企业管理研究所硕士论文,1996
[36]陈运祚,企业内技术知识创造程序的设计研究-以加工丝成形技术创造为例[D],国立清华大学工业工程与工程管理学系硕士论文,2000
[37]Grant,R.M.,Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J],Strategic Management,winter special issue,Journal 1996,P109-122
[38]刘士豪,知识扩散与产业的创新及发展;以台湾扫描仪产业为例[D],国立清华大学工业工程与工程管理学系硕士论文,2000
[39]Alavi,M.,Leidner,DE,Review;Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems;Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues[J],Management Information Systems Quarterly,2001,25(1);P107-136
[40]林东清,影响企业引进信息技术成效组织因素[J],管理评论,1995,14(2),P59-84
[41]Davenport,T.H.,Process Innovation;Reengineering Work through information Technology[M],Boston,Harvard Business School Press,1993
[42]Donald Marchand,Hard IM choice for senior managers[N],FINANCIAL TIMES,April 5,1999
[43]Michael Earl,& Ian Scott,Chief knowledge officers-what is their role?[N]FINANCIAL TIMES,March 8,1999
[44]Deloitte Consulting,以知识创造智能型企业[J],企业经理人,2000年10月,P32-35
[45]洪毓泽,组织知识创造活动中人力资源发展专业人员角色研究[D],国立台湾师范大学工业科技教育研究所硕士论文,2000
[46]朱倍莹,知识整合机制与创新战略配合类型对知识转移绩效影响的研究--高科技与服务业的比较[D],中原大学企业管理学系硕士论文,2000
[47]Philip B.Crosby,Quality Without Tears;The Art of Hassle-Free Management[M],New York McGraw-Hill,1995
[48]Thomas H.Davenport & Laurence Prusak,Working Knowledge[M],Harvard Business School Press,1997
[49]苏永富,转换型领导、组织承诺与组织公民行为关系的研究-以派外人员为例[D],中山大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[50]Tushman,Michael,and C.O'Reilly.Winning through Innovation;A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal[M],Boston,Mass.;Harvard Business School Press,1997
[51]刘淑娟,台湾信息硬件产业知识管理的实证研究[D],云林科技大学企业管理技术研究所博士论文,2000
[52]黄文辉,技术知识特性、组织文化因素与内、外部技术网络的研究-以光电产业为例[D],辅仁大学管理学研究所硕士论文,2000
[53]许兴豪,技术知识特性、组织平台情境与组织动态能力的研究-以工研院光电所为例[D],辅仁大学管理学研究所硕士论文,2000
[54]廖盈升,企业文化对于知识管理应用的影响[D],国立中正大学信息管理学系硕士论文,2000
[55]王文尧,组织知识管理的实证研究-以台湾连锁体系为例[D],云林科技大学企业管理技术研究所硕士论文,民国89
[56]林佳慧,组织内部创新气氛与知识管理机制关系探讨[D],国立中央大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[57]吴惠君,半导体公司的组织学习机制对组织学习表现的影响[D],国立交通大学经营管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[58]周芸薇,学习型组织评鉴量表的建立[D],国立中央大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[59]Bass,B.M.,Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectation[M],New York;The Free Press,1985
[60]Tichy,N.& Devanna,M.,The Transformational Leader.[M],J.Wiley,New York,1986
[61]林士奇,转换型领导、组织承诺与组织公民行为相关研究-以中华电信南区分公司为例[D],国立中山大学硕士人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[62]侯堂柱,转换型领导、组织承诺与组织公民行为的关系-以台湾电子业为例[D],国立中山大学硕士人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[63]Organ,D.W.,A Reappraisal and Reinterpretation of the satisfaction causes performance hypothesis[J],Academy of Management Journal,vol.2,1977,P46-53
[64]Bateman,T.S.and Organ,D.W.,Job Satisfaction and The Good Soldier;The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship"[J],Academy of Management Journal,26(4),1983,P587-595
[65]Organ,D.W.,Organizational Citizenship Behavior;The Good Soldier Syndrome[M],Lexington,MA;Lexington Books,1988
[66]Smith,C.A.,D.W.Organ and J.P.Near,Organizational Citizenship Behavior;Its Nature and Antecedents[J],Journal of Applied Psychology,Nov 1983,P654-663
[67]颜光华、李建伟,知识管理绩效评价研究[J],南开管理评论,2001(6),P26-29
[68]谢洪明、刘常勇,技术创新类型与知识管理方法的关系研究[J],科学学研究,2003年10月,P539-545
[69]朱启红、张钢,基于人工神经网络的企业知识管理评价模型[J],科学学与科学技术管理,2003/08,P32-34
[70]李玉刚,IT企业知识管理的测度[J],社会科学辑刊,2005年第1期,P177-179
[71]Morita M.and Takanashi T.,Nyuumon Knowledge Management Kihon to Jistsurei[M],Japan;Kanki Publishing INC,1999
[72]甘永成、祝智庭,知识管理的绩效评估[J],科学学与科学技术管理,2002(9),P24-28
[73]Ahmed P.K.,Lim K.K.,Zairi M.,Measurement practice for knowledge management[J],Journal of Workplace Learning,Volume 11,Number 8,1999,P304-311
[74]Tobin J.,Kermit Gordon(1916-1976),Year Book,The American Philosophical Society,1978
[75]Stewart T.A.,Intellectual Capital;The New Wealth of Organizations[M],Fortune Magazine,1997
[76]Paul A.Strassmann,Calculating Knowledge Capital[M],Knowledge Management Magazine,October,1999
[77]Thomas Housel、Arthur H.Bell,Measuring and Managing Knowledge,1 st edition[M],McGraw-Hill Higher Education,2001
[78]Sveiby K.E.,The new organizational wealth;Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets[M],San Francisco,Calif Berrett-Koehler Publishers,1997
[79]Dilip Bhatt,EFQM Excellence Model and Knowledge Management Implications,1999.http;//www.eknowledgecenter.com/dissertations/1010/1010.htm
[80]Bornemann M.,Karin I.S.,etc,Holistic measurement of intellectual capital,Measuring reporting intellectual capital;Experiences,issues,and prospects[M],Austria,1999
[81]Edvinsson L.and Malone M.,Intellectual Capital[M],published by HarperCollins,New York,1997,P147-160
[82]Kaplan,R.S.&Norton,D.P.,战略核心组织[M],哈佛商学院出版社,2001
[83]张福学,企业知识管理的测度体系研究[J],情报理论与实践,2002,25(3),P187-189
[84]戴淑芬,当代企业知识管理的特点与模式探讨[J],管理世界,2002年第4期,P146-147
[85]周彩红、张玉娟,高新技术企业知识管理的绩效评估[J],现代管理科学,2004年第4期,P63-64
[86]Ikujiro Nonaka.,A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation[J],Organization Science,5(1),1994,P14-37
[87]Marquardt,M.J.,Building The Learning Organization;a System Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success[M],New York;McGraw-Hill,1996
[88]Brown,J.S.,& Duguid,P.,Organizing Knowledge[J],California Management Review,40(spring),1998,P90-112
[89]Teece.,D.J.,Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets;the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context[J],Long Range Planning,33 2000,P35-54
[90]Laurie,J.,Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Capital[J],Training and Development,51(12),1997,P25-30
[91]Papows J.,Enterprise.com;Market Leadership in the Information Age[M],William Morris Agency,1998
[92]Hatten,K.J.and M.L.Hatten,Strategic Groups,Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability[J],Strategic Management Journal,Vol.8,1987,P329-342
[93]Venkatraman,N.& V.Ramanujam,Management of management performance on strategy research;A comparison of approach[J],Academy of Management Review,Vol.11,No 4,1986,P801-814
[94]Dyer,L.& T.Reeves,Human resource strategies and firm Performance;What do we know and where do we need to go?[J],The International Journal of Human Resource Management,Vol.8,No.3,1995,P656-670.
[95]Becker,B.& Gerhart,B.,The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance;Progress and Prospects[J],Academy of Management Journal,39 1996,P779-801
[96]Edvinsson L,&Sullivan P.,Developing A Model For Managing Intellectual Capital,European Management Journal,1996,14(4);356-364
[97]Choi B.&Lee H.,Knowledge Management Strategy and Its Link To Knowledge Creation Process,Expert Systems With Applications,2002,23;173-187
[98]Kaplan & Norton,The Balanced Measures That Drive Performance[J],Harvard Business Review,Jan-Feb 1992,P77-79
[99]APQC & Arthur Andersen(1996),2006-06-02,http;//www.apqc.org/
[100]郑锡锴,社会资本与政府再造[C]//政府再造--政府角色功能的新定位,台湾人文教育基金会,2002
[101]宋远方,知识管理与企业核心竞争能力培养[J],管理世界,2002年第8期,P141-142,148
[102]谢洪明、刘常勇、李晓彤,知识管理战略、方法及其绩效研究[J],管理世界,2002(10),Pg5-92.101
[103]吴隽、汪烈鑫、王铁男,基于知识利用状况分析的知识管理战略选择[J],中国软科学,2003年第8期,P79-83
[104]石勇、杨海珍、张玲玲,知识管理和数据挖掘在提升中国国家竞争力中的应用初探[J],中国软科学,2005年第8期,P46-51,62
[105]梁哨辉,知识管理对核心能力的创造过程和数理证明--基于核心能力创新模型的研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2005年第11期,P86-98
[106]Shapiro,C.& Varian,H.R.,Information Rules;A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy[M],Harvard,1998
[107]陈宏益,我国信息服务业者竞争的关键成功因素研究[D],国立台湾大学商学研究所硕士论文,1993
[108]刘得欣,台湾信息服务业---经营成功关键要素探讨[D],元智大学管理研究所硕士论文,2001
[109]孙蔼彬,台湾信息软件产业发展生态演进分析[D],国立中央大学信息管理研究所博士论文,1998
[110]尚荣安,技术创新与组织成长的关联性--信息服务厂商的历史分析[D],国立台湾大学商学研究所博士论文,1997
[111]Yourdon,E.,Decline & Fall of the American Programmer[M],Prentice Hall,1993
[112]Sheard,S.A.,The Frameworks Quagmire[N],Software Productivity Consortium,2006.06.20,http;//www.software.org/quagmire/
[113](美)菲利普·克劳士比(1979)著,杨钢、林海译,质量免费;确定质量的艺术[M],中国人民大学出版社,2006
[114]吴筱茹,信息技术人员生涯发展战略究[D],元智大学信息管理研究所硕士论文,2001
[115]李晴雯,使用者部门人员和软件人员在系统建置过程中,冲突的来源与影响[D],国立中央大学信息管理研究所硕士论文,1998
[116]林志鸿,组织亲信角色、部属工作能力与主管领导型态的相关研究--以南部二医学中心临床护士为例[D],国防管理学院资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[117]王宜敏,影响软件人员知识分享行为的因素--以社会交换理论为基础来探讨[D],国立中山大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[118]张起华,信息技术人员的工作特性、创造力人格特征与工作满足的相关性研究[D],国立中央大学信息管理研究所硕士论文,2001
[119]陈建宏,资管人员情绪商数的研究[D],大叶工学院信息管理研究所硕士论文,1996
[120](印)Raieev T Shandilya著,王克仁等译,软件项目管理[M],科学出版社,2002
[121]刘永刚,基于公共服务的知识管理系统的研究[J],计算机工程,2006(09)
[122]杜世鹏,蓝永胜,软件工程中的知识管理[J],中国信息导报,2005(04)
[123]张新,知识管理在软件工程中的应用研究[J],图书情报知识,2005(01)
[124]孙建,知识管理系统开发的研究[D],大连海事大学硕士学位论文,2007
[125]张新,刘位龙,,王洪海,基于本体的软件企业知识管理[J],价值工程,2006(10)
[126]沈备军,居德华,杨根兴,软件企业的知识管理[J],计算机应用与软件,2005(05)
[127]邓君,新思维新视野--评《组织的知识管理》[J],情报科学,2005(03)
[128]彭明喜,“知识管理”在软件企业中应用的分析和研究[J],计算机工程,2004(S1)
[129]田志刚,2004知识管理市场热度判断[J],信息空间,2004(08)
[130]阮晓毅,知识管理扬帆起航[J],微电脑世界,2001(11)
[131]李艳萍,谷华龙,田志刚等,KM专家谈软件企业知识管理[EB/OL],知识管理中心网
[132]潘辰辉,数字神经系统[EB/OL].hnp;//www.chinakm.com/share/list.asp?id=1011,中国知识管理网
[133]Dubois D.,Prade H.,Fuzzy Sets and Systems;Theory and Applications[M],Academy Press,1980
[134]Kaufmann A.,and Gupta M.M.,Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic;Theory and application[M],Van Nostrand Reinhold,New York,1991
[135]Zadeh L.A.,The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ[J],Information Science,1975,Vol.8,P199-251,P301-357;Vol.9,P43-80
[136]Zimmerman H.J.,Fuzzy Set theory and its applications[M],Kluwer Academic Publishers,Boston,1991
[137]Klir G.J.,and Yuan B.,Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic-Theory and Application[M],Prentice-Hall Inc.,New Jersey,1995
[138]Chen C.T.,Extensions of TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J],Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol.114,2000,P1-9
[139]Dalkey Norman C.,An Experimental Study of Group Opinion[M],The Rand Corporation,California,1969
[140]Ishikawa A.,Amagasa M.etc.,The Max-Min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration[J],Fuzzy Set and Systems,May 1993,P241-253
[141]Saaty T.L.,The Analysis Hierarchy Process[M],New York;McGraw-Hill Inc.,1980
[142]Buckley J.J.,Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis[J],Fuzzy Sets and Systems,No.17,1985,P233-247
[143]Buckley J.J.,Feuring T.and Hayashi Y.,Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited[J],European Journal of Operational Research,No.129,2001,P48-64
[144]Csutora R.and Buckley J.J.,Fuzzy hierarchical analysis;the Lambda-Max method[J],Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol.120,2001,P181-195
[145]Spek R.van der and Spijkervet A.,Knowledge Management;Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge[M],in Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements,edited by Jay Liebowitz,New York;CRC Press,1997,P31-59
[146]Bourgeois,L.J.,Strategy and Environment;A Conceptual Integration[J],Academy of Manufacturing Review,Vol.5,No.1 1980,P25-39
[147]Powell & Dent-Micallef,Information technology as competitive advantage;the role of human business and technology resources[J],Strategic Management Journal,Vol.18;5,1997,P375-405
[148]Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment[M], Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2001
[149]Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system[J], Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1996, P75-85
[150] Powell & Dent-Micallef, Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human business and technology resources[J], Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18: 5,1997,P375-4-5
[151]Bourgeois, L.J., Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration[J], Academy of Manufacturing Review, Vol.5, No.1, 1980, P25-39
[152] Hower, D. C, Statistical Methods for Psychology (2nd ed.) [M], Boston: Duxbury Press,1987
[153] Belsley, D.A.,Huh, E. & Welsch, R. E., Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collineaity[M], New York: John Wiely, 1980
[2]Mowery,David C.,Joanne E.Oxley,Brain S.Silverman,Strategic alliances and inter firm knowledge transfer[J],Strategic Management,1996.17,P77-91
[3]Kogut,Bruce,Udo Zander,Knowledge of the firm combinative capabilities and the replication of technology[J],Organization Science,1992.3,P383-397
[4]Von Hippele,The source of innovation[M],New York;Oxford University Press,1988
[5]Reinganum J.F.,On the diffusion of new technology;A game theoretic approach[J],Review of Economic Studies XLVI-Ⅱ,1981,P395-405
[6]Rogers E.,Diffusion of innovations[M],New York;The Free Press,1995
[7]TannyS.M.and DerzkoN.A.,Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modeling[J],Journal of Forecasting,1988.7,P225-231
[8]Ziss,Steffen,Strategic R&Dwith spillovers,collusion and welfare[J],The Journal of Industrial Economics,Vol.XLII,No.4,December 1994,P45-52
[9]夏敬华、金昕,知识管理[M],北京;机械工业出版社,2003
[10]彼得·圣吉著,郭进隆译,第五项修炼-学习型组织的艺术与实务[M],上海三联书店,2002
[11]应力、钱省三,企业知识管理;战略与方法[J],中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2002,(1),P55-60
[12]董俊武、黄江圳、陈震红,基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究[J],中国工业经济,2004,(2),P77-85
[13]杜伟、郭宪英,企业知识管理战略研究[J],现代情报,2002(10),P117-118
[14]季晓林,竞争情报与企业知识管理[J],中国信息导报,2004(9),P46-48
[15]陈华、胡振鹏,企业知识管理实施障碍及对策探讨[J],大连理工大学学报(社科版),2003(4),P19-23
[16]杨秀萍,我国国有企业知识管理实施路径探索[J],科学管理研究,2004(3),P80-84
[17]邱进冬、顾新建,制造企业知识管理实施方法的探讨[J],成组技术与生产现代化,2002(2),P18-21,25
[18]苏新宁等,企业知识管理研究与实践的进展[J],图书情报知识,2003(1),P2-6
[19]左美云,国内外企业知识管理研究综述[J],科学决策,2000(3),P31-37
[20]Andrew H.G.,Arvind M.and Albert H.Segars,Knowledge Management;An Organizaional Capabilities Perspective[J],Journal of Management Information System,Vol.18,2001,P185-214
[21]刘权莹,信息服务业知识管理的研究[D],国立政治大学企业管理研究所硕士论文,1999
[22]林淳一,建立知识管理数据库以提升企业竞争力的研究[D],大叶大学事业经营研究所硕士论文,1999
[23]胡哲生,构建组织知识系统的研究探索方法论雏议[J],商管科技,2000(1),P87-101
[24]Michael Polanyi,Tacit Knowledge[M],In Laurence Prusak.(ed).Knowledge in Organizations,Butterworth Heinemann,1997,P135-146
[25]Glueck,W.F.,Business Policy;Strategy Formulation and Management Action[M],New York McGraw-Hill,1976
[26]McNichols,T.J.,Executive Policy and Planning[M],McGraw-Hill,New York,1977
[27]Dorothy Leonard-Barton,Wellsprings of Knowledge;Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation[M],Harvard Business School Press,1995
[28]Hansen,M.T.,N.Nohria,and T.Tierney,What's your strategy for managing knowledge?[J],Harvard Business Review,March-April,1999,P106-116
[29]Helleloid D.& Simonin B.,Organizational Learning and a Firm's Core Competence[M],In Hamel Gary and Heene.A.(ed),Competence-Base Competition,New York;John Wiley & Sons,P214-239.1994
[30]Ikujiro Nonaka,Hirotaka Takeuchi,The Knowledge-Creating Company[M],Oxford University Press,1995
[31]曾凯瀚,知识管理应用于创业投资评估行为的研究[D],国立政治大学企业管理学系硕士论文,2000
[32]Gilbert,Myrna & Gordey-Hayes,Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation[J],Technovation,Jun 1996,P301-312
[33]Hedlund,A Model of Knowledge Management and The N-Form Corporation[J],Strategic Management Journal,vol.15,1994,P74-90
[34]陈玉玲,组织内人力资本的积蓄-知识资本管理的观点[D],国立中央大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,1998
[35]许意雯,知识密集产业核心资源的运用与维持[D],辅仁大学企业管理研究所硕士论文,1996
[36]陈运祚,企业内技术知识创造程序的设计研究-以加工丝成形技术创造为例[D],国立清华大学工业工程与工程管理学系硕士论文,2000
[37]Grant,R.M.,Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J],Strategic Management,winter special issue,Journal 1996,P109-122
[38]刘士豪,知识扩散与产业的创新及发展;以台湾扫描仪产业为例[D],国立清华大学工业工程与工程管理学系硕士论文,2000
[39]Alavi,M.,Leidner,DE,Review;Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems;Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues[J],Management Information Systems Quarterly,2001,25(1);P107-136
[40]林东清,影响企业引进信息技术成效组织因素[J],管理评论,1995,14(2),P59-84
[41]Davenport,T.H.,Process Innovation;Reengineering Work through information Technology[M],Boston,Harvard Business School Press,1993
[42]Donald Marchand,Hard IM choice for senior managers[N],FINANCIAL TIMES,April 5,1999
[43]Michael Earl,& Ian Scott,Chief knowledge officers-what is their role?[N]FINANCIAL TIMES,March 8,1999
[44]Deloitte Consulting,以知识创造智能型企业[J],企业经理人,2000年10月,P32-35
[45]洪毓泽,组织知识创造活动中人力资源发展专业人员角色研究[D],国立台湾师范大学工业科技教育研究所硕士论文,2000
[46]朱倍莹,知识整合机制与创新战略配合类型对知识转移绩效影响的研究--高科技与服务业的比较[D],中原大学企业管理学系硕士论文,2000
[47]Philip B.Crosby,Quality Without Tears;The Art of Hassle-Free Management[M],New York McGraw-Hill,1995
[48]Thomas H.Davenport & Laurence Prusak,Working Knowledge[M],Harvard Business School Press,1997
[49]苏永富,转换型领导、组织承诺与组织公民行为关系的研究-以派外人员为例[D],中山大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[50]Tushman,Michael,and C.O'Reilly.Winning through Innovation;A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal[M],Boston,Mass.;Harvard Business School Press,1997
[51]刘淑娟,台湾信息硬件产业知识管理的实证研究[D],云林科技大学企业管理技术研究所博士论文,2000
[52]黄文辉,技术知识特性、组织文化因素与内、外部技术网络的研究-以光电产业为例[D],辅仁大学管理学研究所硕士论文,2000
[53]许兴豪,技术知识特性、组织平台情境与组织动态能力的研究-以工研院光电所为例[D],辅仁大学管理学研究所硕士论文,2000
[54]廖盈升,企业文化对于知识管理应用的影响[D],国立中正大学信息管理学系硕士论文,2000
[55]王文尧,组织知识管理的实证研究-以台湾连锁体系为例[D],云林科技大学企业管理技术研究所硕士论文,民国89
[56]林佳慧,组织内部创新气氛与知识管理机制关系探讨[D],国立中央大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[57]吴惠君,半导体公司的组织学习机制对组织学习表现的影响[D],国立交通大学经营管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[58]周芸薇,学习型组织评鉴量表的建立[D],国立中央大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[59]Bass,B.M.,Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectation[M],New York;The Free Press,1985
[60]Tichy,N.& Devanna,M.,The Transformational Leader.[M],J.Wiley,New York,1986
[61]林士奇,转换型领导、组织承诺与组织公民行为相关研究-以中华电信南区分公司为例[D],国立中山大学硕士人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[62]侯堂柱,转换型领导、组织承诺与组织公民行为的关系-以台湾电子业为例[D],国立中山大学硕士人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[63]Organ,D.W.,A Reappraisal and Reinterpretation of the satisfaction causes performance hypothesis[J],Academy of Management Journal,vol.2,1977,P46-53
[64]Bateman,T.S.and Organ,D.W.,Job Satisfaction and The Good Soldier;The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship"[J],Academy of Management Journal,26(4),1983,P587-595
[65]Organ,D.W.,Organizational Citizenship Behavior;The Good Soldier Syndrome[M],Lexington,MA;Lexington Books,1988
[66]Smith,C.A.,D.W.Organ and J.P.Near,Organizational Citizenship Behavior;Its Nature and Antecedents[J],Journal of Applied Psychology,Nov 1983,P654-663
[67]颜光华、李建伟,知识管理绩效评价研究[J],南开管理评论,2001(6),P26-29
[68]谢洪明、刘常勇,技术创新类型与知识管理方法的关系研究[J],科学学研究,2003年10月,P539-545
[69]朱启红、张钢,基于人工神经网络的企业知识管理评价模型[J],科学学与科学技术管理,2003/08,P32-34
[70]李玉刚,IT企业知识管理的测度[J],社会科学辑刊,2005年第1期,P177-179
[71]Morita M.and Takanashi T.,Nyuumon Knowledge Management Kihon to Jistsurei[M],Japan;Kanki Publishing INC,1999
[72]甘永成、祝智庭,知识管理的绩效评估[J],科学学与科学技术管理,2002(9),P24-28
[73]Ahmed P.K.,Lim K.K.,Zairi M.,Measurement practice for knowledge management[J],Journal of Workplace Learning,Volume 11,Number 8,1999,P304-311
[74]Tobin J.,Kermit Gordon(1916-1976),Year Book,The American Philosophical Society,1978
[75]Stewart T.A.,Intellectual Capital;The New Wealth of Organizations[M],Fortune Magazine,1997
[76]Paul A.Strassmann,Calculating Knowledge Capital[M],Knowledge Management Magazine,October,1999
[77]Thomas Housel、Arthur H.Bell,Measuring and Managing Knowledge,1 st edition[M],McGraw-Hill Higher Education,2001
[78]Sveiby K.E.,The new organizational wealth;Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets[M],San Francisco,Calif Berrett-Koehler Publishers,1997
[79]Dilip Bhatt,EFQM Excellence Model and Knowledge Management Implications,1999.http;//www.eknowledgecenter.com/dissertations/1010/1010.htm
[80]Bornemann M.,Karin I.S.,etc,Holistic measurement of intellectual capital,Measuring reporting intellectual capital;Experiences,issues,and prospects[M],Austria,1999
[81]Edvinsson L.and Malone M.,Intellectual Capital[M],published by HarperCollins,New York,1997,P147-160
[82]Kaplan,R.S.&Norton,D.P.,战略核心组织[M],哈佛商学院出版社,2001
[83]张福学,企业知识管理的测度体系研究[J],情报理论与实践,2002,25(3),P187-189
[84]戴淑芬,当代企业知识管理的特点与模式探讨[J],管理世界,2002年第4期,P146-147
[85]周彩红、张玉娟,高新技术企业知识管理的绩效评估[J],现代管理科学,2004年第4期,P63-64
[86]Ikujiro Nonaka.,A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation[J],Organization Science,5(1),1994,P14-37
[87]Marquardt,M.J.,Building The Learning Organization;a System Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success[M],New York;McGraw-Hill,1996
[88]Brown,J.S.,& Duguid,P.,Organizing Knowledge[J],California Management Review,40(spring),1998,P90-112
[89]Teece.,D.J.,Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets;the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context[J],Long Range Planning,33 2000,P35-54
[90]Laurie,J.,Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Capital[J],Training and Development,51(12),1997,P25-30
[91]Papows J.,Enterprise.com;Market Leadership in the Information Age[M],William Morris Agency,1998
[92]Hatten,K.J.and M.L.Hatten,Strategic Groups,Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability[J],Strategic Management Journal,Vol.8,1987,P329-342
[93]Venkatraman,N.& V.Ramanujam,Management of management performance on strategy research;A comparison of approach[J],Academy of Management Review,Vol.11,No 4,1986,P801-814
[94]Dyer,L.& T.Reeves,Human resource strategies and firm Performance;What do we know and where do we need to go?[J],The International Journal of Human Resource Management,Vol.8,No.3,1995,P656-670.
[95]Becker,B.& Gerhart,B.,The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance;Progress and Prospects[J],Academy of Management Journal,39 1996,P779-801
[96]Edvinsson L,&Sullivan P.,Developing A Model For Managing Intellectual Capital,European Management Journal,1996,14(4);356-364
[97]Choi B.&Lee H.,Knowledge Management Strategy and Its Link To Knowledge Creation Process,Expert Systems With Applications,2002,23;173-187
[98]Kaplan & Norton,The Balanced Measures That Drive Performance[J],Harvard Business Review,Jan-Feb 1992,P77-79
[99]APQC & Arthur Andersen(1996),2006-06-02,http;//www.apqc.org/
[100]郑锡锴,社会资本与政府再造[C]//政府再造--政府角色功能的新定位,台湾人文教育基金会,2002
[101]宋远方,知识管理与企业核心竞争能力培养[J],管理世界,2002年第8期,P141-142,148
[102]谢洪明、刘常勇、李晓彤,知识管理战略、方法及其绩效研究[J],管理世界,2002(10),Pg5-92.101
[103]吴隽、汪烈鑫、王铁男,基于知识利用状况分析的知识管理战略选择[J],中国软科学,2003年第8期,P79-83
[104]石勇、杨海珍、张玲玲,知识管理和数据挖掘在提升中国国家竞争力中的应用初探[J],中国软科学,2005年第8期,P46-51,62
[105]梁哨辉,知识管理对核心能力的创造过程和数理证明--基于核心能力创新模型的研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2005年第11期,P86-98
[106]Shapiro,C.& Varian,H.R.,Information Rules;A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy[M],Harvard,1998
[107]陈宏益,我国信息服务业者竞争的关键成功因素研究[D],国立台湾大学商学研究所硕士论文,1993
[108]刘得欣,台湾信息服务业---经营成功关键要素探讨[D],元智大学管理研究所硕士论文,2001
[109]孙蔼彬,台湾信息软件产业发展生态演进分析[D],国立中央大学信息管理研究所博士论文,1998
[110]尚荣安,技术创新与组织成长的关联性--信息服务厂商的历史分析[D],国立台湾大学商学研究所博士论文,1997
[111]Yourdon,E.,Decline & Fall of the American Programmer[M],Prentice Hall,1993
[112]Sheard,S.A.,The Frameworks Quagmire[N],Software Productivity Consortium,2006.06.20,http;//www.software.org/quagmire/
[113](美)菲利普·克劳士比(1979)著,杨钢、林海译,质量免费;确定质量的艺术[M],中国人民大学出版社,2006
[114]吴筱茹,信息技术人员生涯发展战略究[D],元智大学信息管理研究所硕士论文,2001
[115]李晴雯,使用者部门人员和软件人员在系统建置过程中,冲突的来源与影响[D],国立中央大学信息管理研究所硕士论文,1998
[116]林志鸿,组织亲信角色、部属工作能力与主管领导型态的相关研究--以南部二医学中心临床护士为例[D],国防管理学院资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[117]王宜敏,影响软件人员知识分享行为的因素--以社会交换理论为基础来探讨[D],国立中山大学人力资源管理研究所硕士论文,2000
[118]张起华,信息技术人员的工作特性、创造力人格特征与工作满足的相关性研究[D],国立中央大学信息管理研究所硕士论文,2001
[119]陈建宏,资管人员情绪商数的研究[D],大叶工学院信息管理研究所硕士论文,1996
[120](印)Raieev T Shandilya著,王克仁等译,软件项目管理[M],科学出版社,2002
[121]刘永刚,基于公共服务的知识管理系统的研究[J],计算机工程,2006(09)
[122]杜世鹏,蓝永胜,软件工程中的知识管理[J],中国信息导报,2005(04)
[123]张新,知识管理在软件工程中的应用研究[J],图书情报知识,2005(01)
[124]孙建,知识管理系统开发的研究[D],大连海事大学硕士学位论文,2007
[125]张新,刘位龙,,王洪海,基于本体的软件企业知识管理[J],价值工程,2006(10)
[126]沈备军,居德华,杨根兴,软件企业的知识管理[J],计算机应用与软件,2005(05)
[127]邓君,新思维新视野--评《组织的知识管理》[J],情报科学,2005(03)
[128]彭明喜,“知识管理”在软件企业中应用的分析和研究[J],计算机工程,2004(S1)
[129]田志刚,2004知识管理市场热度判断[J],信息空间,2004(08)
[130]阮晓毅,知识管理扬帆起航[J],微电脑世界,2001(11)
[131]李艳萍,谷华龙,田志刚等,KM专家谈软件企业知识管理[EB/OL],知识管理中心网
[132]潘辰辉,数字神经系统[EB/OL].hnp;//www.chinakm.com/share/list.asp?id=1011,中国知识管理网
[133]Dubois D.,Prade H.,Fuzzy Sets and Systems;Theory and Applications[M],Academy Press,1980
[134]Kaufmann A.,and Gupta M.M.,Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic;Theory and application[M],Van Nostrand Reinhold,New York,1991
[135]Zadeh L.A.,The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ[J],Information Science,1975,Vol.8,P199-251,P301-357;Vol.9,P43-80
[136]Zimmerman H.J.,Fuzzy Set theory and its applications[M],Kluwer Academic Publishers,Boston,1991
[137]Klir G.J.,and Yuan B.,Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic-Theory and Application[M],Prentice-Hall Inc.,New Jersey,1995
[138]Chen C.T.,Extensions of TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J],Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol.114,2000,P1-9
[139]Dalkey Norman C.,An Experimental Study of Group Opinion[M],The Rand Corporation,California,1969
[140]Ishikawa A.,Amagasa M.etc.,The Max-Min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration[J],Fuzzy Set and Systems,May 1993,P241-253
[141]Saaty T.L.,The Analysis Hierarchy Process[M],New York;McGraw-Hill Inc.,1980
[142]Buckley J.J.,Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis[J],Fuzzy Sets and Systems,No.17,1985,P233-247
[143]Buckley J.J.,Feuring T.and Hayashi Y.,Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited[J],European Journal of Operational Research,No.129,2001,P48-64
[144]Csutora R.and Buckley J.J.,Fuzzy hierarchical analysis;the Lambda-Max method[J],Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol.120,2001,P181-195
[145]Spek R.van der and Spijkervet A.,Knowledge Management;Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge[M],in Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements,edited by Jay Liebowitz,New York;CRC Press,1997,P31-59
[146]Bourgeois,L.J.,Strategy and Environment;A Conceptual Integration[J],Academy of Manufacturing Review,Vol.5,No.1 1980,P25-39
[147]Powell & Dent-Micallef,Information technology as competitive advantage;the role of human business and technology resources[J],Strategic Management Journal,Vol.18;5,1997,P375-405
[148]Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment[M], Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2001
[149]Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P., Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system[J], Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1996, P75-85
[150] Powell & Dent-Micallef, Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human business and technology resources[J], Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18: 5,1997,P375-4-5
[151]Bourgeois, L.J., Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration[J], Academy of Manufacturing Review, Vol.5, No.1, 1980, P25-39
[152] Hower, D. C, Statistical Methods for Psychology (2nd ed.) [M], Boston: Duxbury Press,1987
[153] Belsley, D.A.,Huh, E. & Welsch, R. E., Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collineaity[M], New York: John Wiely, 1980
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |