用户名: 密码: 验证码:
第二松花江水体环境地球化学特征及潜在生态风险
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
第二松花江是吉林省第一大河流,近年来其水环境问题日益突出。为了给该水体环境保护提供科学依据,本次研究通过对水体样品的采集和测试,探讨了第二松花江水体环境地球化学特征,并对该水体潜在生态危害进行评价。结果表明,第二松花江水中重金属平均含量较低,沉积物中重金属含量均远高于水中重金属含量,中游河段水和沉积物中的含量远高于其他河段水和沉积物中的含量。沉积物重金属的潜在生态风险危害比较低,以Hg生态风险为主。水和沉积物中有机污染物为酞酸酯、多环芳烃和苯系物。中下游河段底泥中多环芳烃可能对生物产生一定的负面影响,属较高生态风险河段;水中酞酸二异辛酯有62.5%样点对藻类而言是处在潜在低生态风险状态。
Presently a variety of scientific researches targeted on river basin due to its characteristics of huge drainage area, rich fresh water resources, fertile land, large population, dense towns, the more developed industrial and agricultural production and others, has gradually become the core of the earth's surface system investigation The Second Songhua River as the largest river in Jilin province whose total area of the basins is 7.3 million square kilometers, accounting for 38.2% of the total area of the province, is the major commodity grain production base and industrial concentration in the northeast of China. In recent years, with the rapid economic development in the Second Songhua River, water environment issues become prominent increasingly. The water environment characteristics and the potential ecological risks of the Second Songhua River were researched in this paper mainly from the perspective of environmental geochemistry.
     Totally 38 water samples and 117 sediment samples in the Second Songhua River and its major tributaries were collected for this research. The Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn contents in the samples were measured by X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (TW2440), and Cd content was available by atomic absorption spectrophotometer with a graphite furnace (M6). The As and Hg contents were determined by atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer (AFS-230E). The test equipment for phthalates, PAHs, and benzene class of organic pollutants in water and sediment is the Agilent 6890/5973N GC-MS. The chromatogram was DB-5MS and 30m×0.25mm×0.25μm with the temperature 250℃of vaporization chamber inlet and the column flow 1ml/min. The heating procedure was keeping 2 minutes in 50℃and then heating to 200℃which maintained 10 minutes by 5℃/ min rate, and rising up to 250℃maintaining 30min by 10℃/ min rate in the end with the splitless injector mode and 2 minutes solvent delay time. The electron multiplier voltage was 2282v; the quadrupole temperature was 150℃with the MS scan range of 15 ~ 400u and the EI ion source temperature of 230℃. National standard material was used to control the quality in the analysis and the results accorded to the quality control requirements.
     The statistical characteristics of heavy metals concentrations in water from the Second Songhua River suggest that whether it was wet or dry season period, the average levels of heavy metals in water were low and far less thanⅢ-class water quality standard in national surface water environmental quality standards, so generally it was consistent with the water quality requirements as drinking water source. The contents in water of As, Cd, Cr, and Hg in the dry season were all higher than in the wet period, while the Cu, Pb, and Zn were on the contrary, that mean the contents in water were lower in the dry season than in the wet period.
     The heavy metals contents in sediments were much higher than in water in the Second Songhua River but were still at a relatively low level compared to other major rivers in China. The highest concentrations values of the studied seven kinds of heavy metals were all in the Second Songhua River middle reaches in where the values were significantly higher than in other reaches; in the source area of this river, except Hg content in sediments was slightly higher in Erdaobaihe river than in Toudaobaihe river, the contents of remaining heavy metals were higher in Toudaobaihe river; in the two main tributaries named Huifa river and Jiaohe river in upper reaches, the contents of As, Pb, and Zn in sediments were higher in Jiaohe river, while the Cd, Cr, Cu, and Hg were opposite. The heavy metals contents in sediments and in water basically had the same change characteristics along the way in the middle and lower reaches, that the contents in sediments were much higher in urban river than in non-urban river.It showed that water body was clearly affected by the urban industrial activities.
     The two main kinds of phthalates in water from the Second Songhua River were DBP mean 717.24μg /l and DEHP mean 370.02μg/l, whose averages have exceeded China's standard limits for surface water (3μg/l for DBP, 8μg/l for DEHP). The averages of naphthalene, phenanthrene, benzo [b] fluoranthene, benzo [k] fluoranthene and benzo [a] pyrene in water were all at a comparative low level, and in particular benzo [b] fluoranthene, benzo [k] fluoranthene and Benzo [a] pyrene were not detected in water at all. Also the averages of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene and p-xylene in water were comparative low. The two main kinds of phthalate esters in sediments were DBP and DEHP that was consistent with the detection of PAEs in water; the contents both of total and various components of the phthalate esters had a certain degree of variation in distribution along the way, presenting increase firstly and then decrease, and the maximum points in contents all located in the middle reaches of urban river in Jilin City. The total amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different samples ranged from 106.91 to 20330.95μg/kg with an average of 3788.56μg/kg. The contents of a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and total PAHs in sediments were higher in urban river than in non-urban river. The total detection rate of benzenes in sediments was 88%. Including detection rates of benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were highest up to 100%, and the lowest of o-xylene was only 50%. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and benzene contents basically had the same variation as phthalate esters along the way.
     The potential ecological risk evaluation of heavy metals pollution in sediments from the Second Songhua River were finished in this paper by use of the potential ecological risk index method proposed by Swedish scholar Hakanson. The results showed that potential ecological risks of heavy metal elements in the Second Songhua River sediments were at a general low level relatively mainly Hg-based ecological risk. But the heavy metal elements in sediments from the Second Songhua River middle and lower reaches showed moderate to strong ecological risk, to which should be paid more vigilance. The ecological risk assessment for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments was done by use of a method proposed by Long and other U.S. scholars, which is used to evaluate the ecological risk effects of organic pollutants by low value(ERL, probability of biological harmful effects less than 10%) and median value(ERM, probability of biological harmful effects more than 50%) in the effect range of ecological risk. The results showed that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the middle and lower reaches of the Second Songhua River which belonged to higher ecological risks river, might have a certain negative effects on biology. And the results of ecological risk assessment using the quotient method for phthalic acid esters in water showed that the water phthalate DEHP in 62.5% of samples have a low potential ecological risk to algae.
引文
[1] Laane R W P M, Sonneveldt H L A, Vander Weyden A J, et al. Trends in the spatial and temporal distribution of metals (Cd, Cu, Zn and Pb) and organic compounds (PCBs and PAHs) in Dutch coastal zone sediments from 1981 to 1996: A model case study for Cd and PCBs [J] . Journal of Sea Research, 1999, 41 (122): 1-17.
    [2] Malm O. Gold mining as a source of mercury exposure in the Brazilian Amazon [J]. Environmental Research, 1998, 77 (2): 73-78.
    [3] Akagi H, Malm O, Kinjo Y, et al. Methylmercury pollution in t he Amazon, Brazil [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 1995, 175 (2): 85-95.
    [4] Robert H M, Herbert H S. Strategies and equipment for sampling suspended sediment and associated toxic chemical s in large rivers: With emphasis on the Mississippi River [J]. The Science of t he Total Environment, 1990 (97/ 98): 125-135.
    [5] Scotta L, Robert T P. Spatial and temporal variations in the grain-size characteristics of historical flood plain deposits, Blue River, Wisconsin, USA [J]. Geomorphology, 2004, 61 (324): 361-371.
    [6] Chowdhury U K, Biswas B K, Chowdhury T R ,et al. Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India [J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000, 108 (5): 393-397.
    [7] Tareq S M, Safiullah S, Anawar H M, et al. Arsenic pollution in groundwater: A self- organizing complex geochemical process in the deltaic sedimentary environment, Bangladesh [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2003, 313: 213-226.
    [8] Koval P V, Kalmychkov G V, GEL ETY V F, et al .Correlation of natural and technogenic mercury sources in the Baikal polygon, Russia [J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1999, 66 (1, 2): 277-289.
    [9] Tsydenova O, Minh T B, Kaj Iwara N, et al. Recent contamination by persistent organo- chlorines in Baikalseal (Phoca sibirica) from Lake Baikal, Russia [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2004, 48 (7, 8): 749-758.
    [10]朱圣清,臧小平.长江主要城市江段重金属污染状况及特征[J].人民长江,2001,32(7):23-25,50.
    [11]李春晖,杨志峰,郑小康,等.黄河干流主要重金属污染特征及其与流量关系[J].水资源与水工程学报,2007,18(6):1-3.
    [12]叶立群.珠江重金属入海通量探讨[J].环境与开发,2001,16(2):52-54.
    [13]游勇,鞠荣.重金属对食品的污染及其危害[J].环境,2007,(2):102-103.
    [14]孟多,周立岱,于常武.水体重金属污染现状及治理技术[J].辽宁化工,2006,35(9):534-549.
    [15] K. Chandra Sekha, N.S.Chary. Fractionation studies and bioaccumulation of sediment - bound heavy metals in Kolleru lake by edible fish[J]. Environmental International, 2003, 29: 1001-1008.
    [16] Aleya Begum, Md.Nurul Amin.Selected elemental compositon of the muscle tissue of three species of fish.Tilapia niltica.Cirrhina mrigala and Clarius batrachus from the fresh water Dhanmondi Lake in Bangladesh[J].Food Chemistry, 2005, (93):439-443.
    [17]杨正亮,冯贵颖,呼世斌,等.水体重金属污染研究现状及治理技术[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(1):219-222.
    [18] Walker K, Vallero D A , Lewis R G. Factors influencing thedistribution of lindane and other hexachlorocyclohexanes in the environment [J] . Environ. Sci. Technol., 1999, 33: 4373- 4378.
    [19] Doong R A, Sun Y C, Liao P L, et al. Distribution and fate oforganochlorine pesticide residues in sediments from the selected rivers in Taiwan [J] . Chemosphere, 2002, 48 : 237- 246.
    [20] Fernandez M A, Alonso C, Gonzalez M J, et al. Occurance of organochlorine insecticides, PCBs and PCB congeners in waters and sediments in the Ebro River (Spain) [J]. Chemosphere, 1998, 38: 33 - 43.
    [21] Staples C A, Peterson D R, Parkerton T F,et al. The environmental fate of phthalate esters: A literature review [J]. Chemosphere, 1997, 35(4):667-749.
    [22] Peakall, D.B.. Phthalate esters: occurrence and biological effects [J]. Residue Rev, 54: 1-41.
    [23]张天永,崔新安,费学宁.环境激素酞酸酯类化合物的净化技术进展[J].环境科学与技术. 2005,28(1):103-105.
    [24] Matteo Vitali, Maurizio Guidotti, Giannetto Macilenti. Phthalate esters in freshwaters as markers of contamination sources: a site study in Italy [J]. Environment International, 1997, 23(3): 337-347
    [25]胡晓宇,张克荣,孙俊红,等.中国环境中邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物污染的研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2003,13(1):9-14.
    [26] Charles A. Staples, Thomas F. Parkerton, Dennis R. Peterson. A risk assessment of selected phthalate esters in North American and Western European surface waters [J]. Chemosphere, 2000, 40: 885-891.
    [27]程爱华,王磊,王旭东,等.水中的环境内分泌干扰物[J].环境科学与技术,2006,29(11):106-108.
    [28] EPA-440/5-80-067, Ambient water quality criteria for phthalate esters[S].
    [29]金相灿主编.有机化合物污染化学——有毒有机污染化学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1990,266-275.
    [30]国家环境保护总局. GB3838-2002.地表水环境质量标准[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
    [31]周明耀.环境有机污染与致癌物质[M].成都:四川大学出版社,1990:62-103
    [32] Ronald Harkov, Arthur Greenberg, Faye Darack, et al. Summertime variations in polycyclic aromatic hydro- carbons at four sites in New Jersey [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol, 1984, 18: 287-291
    [33] Chen J, Chen S. Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by low density polyethylene from liquid model and roasted meat [J]. Food Chemistry, 2005, 90(3): 461-469
    [34]蹇兴超.多环芳烃(PAH)的污染[J].环境保护,1995,10:31-33
    [35]许士奋,蒋新,王连生,等.长江和辽河沉积物中的多环芳烃类污染物[J].中国环境科学,2000, 20(2): 128-131
    [36]刘现明,徐学仁,张笑天,等.大连湾沉积物中PAHs的初步研究[J].环境科学学报,2001,21(4):507-509
    [37]李斌,吴莹,张经.北黄海表层沉积物中多环芳烃的分布及其来源[J].中国环境科学,2002,22(5):429-432
    [38]袁旭音,李阿梅,王禹,等.太湖表层沉积物中的多环芳烃及其毒性评估[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(6):607-610
    [39]罗雪梅,刘昌明,何孟常.黄河沉积物中多环芳烃的分布特征及来源分析[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(2):48-50,65
    [40] Ludwing Kramer. Focus on European environmetal law[M]. London:Sweet&Maxwell, 1997.
    [41]李伟英,李富生,高乃云,等.日本最新饮用水水质标准及相关管理[J].中国给水排水,2004,20(5):104-106.
    [42]王曦.美国环境法概论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1992.
    [43]许学工,林辉平,付在毅.黄河三角洲湿地区域生态风险评价[J].北京大学学报,2001,37(1):111-120.
    [44]顾泳洁.上海市崇明县农田生态风险评价[D].上海:华东师范大学,2006.
    [45] Forstner U. Lecture notes in earth sciences (contaminated sediments) [M].Berlin Spinger Verlag, 1989.
    [46] Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach [J]. Water Research, 1980, 14: 975- 986.
    [47] Hilton J. A mathematical model for analysis of sediment core data: implications for enrichment factor calculations and trace metal transport mechanism [J]. Chemical Geology,1985, 48: 281- 29.
    [48]付川,潘杰,牟新利,等.长江(万州段)沉积物中重金属污染生态风险评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(2):236-239.
    [49]李莲芳,曾希柏,李国学,等.北京市温榆河沉积物的重金属污染风险评价[ J ].环境科学学报,2007,27(2):289 - 297
    [50]丁振华,贾洪武,刘彩娥,等.黄浦江沉积物重金属的污染及评价[J].环境可续与技术,2006,29(2):64-66
    [51]刘爱霞,郎印海,薛荔栋,等.沉积物中有机污染物生态风险分析方法研究[J].海洋湖沼通报,2009,(3):17-23
    [52]郝凌云,朱颜明,王稔华.松花江流域主要环境问题解析[M]. //中国科学院长春分院《松花江流域环境问题研究》编辑委员会主编.松花江流域环境问题研究.北京:科学出版社,1992:10-20.
    [53]林春野,周豫湘,呼丽娟,等.松花江水体沉积物汞污染的生态风险[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(3):466-473.
    [54] Lin C Y, He M C, Zhou Y X, et al. Distribution and contamination assessment of heavy metals in sediment of the Second Songhua River, China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2008, 137(1-3): 329-342.
    [55]陆继龙,郝立波,赵玉岩,等.第二松花江中下游水体重金属特征及潜在生态风险.环境科学与技术,2009,32(5):168-172.
    [56]陆继龙,蔡波,郝立波,等.第二松花江中下游河段底泥中多环芳烃的初步研究[J].岩矿测试,2007,26(4):325-327.
    [57]陆继龙,郝立波,王春珍,等.第二松花江中下游水体邻苯二甲酸酯分布特征[J].环境科学与技术,2007,30(12):35-37.
    [58]李巍,郝立波,陆继龙,等.第二松花江中下游水体苯系物的特征[J].环境保护科学,2008,34(2):18-20.
    [59] http://www.1921.org.cn/CN_2/library/books_print.jsp?bookchid=89d2e310356f4f5a9b2e317 4a56e899f.
    [60]吉林省地质矿产局.吉林省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
    [61]中华人民共和国地质矿产部. DZ/T0167-1995.区域地球化学勘查规范比例尺1:200000 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
    [62]牛红义,吴群河,陈新庚.珠江(广州河段)表层沉积物中的重金属污染调查与评价[J].环境监测管理与技术,2007,19(2):23-25.
    [63]丁振华,贾洪武,刘彩娥,等.黄浦江沉积物重金属的污染及评价[J].环境科学与技术,2006,29(2):64-66.
    [64]黄宏,郁亚娟,王晓栋,等.淮河沉积物中重金属污染及潜在生态危害评价[J].环境污染与防治,2004,26(3):207-208,231.
    [65]赵锁志,刘丽萍,王喜宽,等.黄河内蒙古段上覆水、悬浮物和底泥重金属特征及生态风险研究[J].现代地质,2008,22(2):304-312.
    [66]王胜强,孙津生,丁辉.海河沉积物重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境工程,2005,23(2):62-64.
    [67] Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: A sediment logical approach [J]. Water Research, 1980, 14: 975-1001.
    [68]陈静生,王忠,刘玉机.水体金属污染潜在危害应用沉积学方法评价[J].环境科技,1989,9(1):16-25.
    [69]贺心然,付永硕,柳然.连云港市河流表层沉积物中重金属污染及潜在生态危害[J].淮海工学院学报(自然科学版),2007,16(1):47-50
    [70]佘中盛,王晓君,刘玉青,等.松花江水系沉积物中重金属元素背景值[M]. //中国科学院长春分院《松花江流域环境问题研究》编辑委员会主编.松花江流域环境问题研究.北京:科学出版社,1992:67-74.
    [71] Zhu Y L, Zayed A M, Qian J H, et a1. Phytoaccumulation of Trace Elements by Wetland Plants: I Water Hyacinth[J]. Environmental Quality, 1999, (28) : 339~344
    [72] Edward R. Long, Donald D. Macdonald, Sherri L. Smith, et al. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments [J]. Environmental Management, 1995, 19(1): 81-97
    [73] Fernandes M B, Sicre M A,Boireau A, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) distributions in the Seine River and its estuary[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1997, 34(11): 857-867.
    [74]张永春,林玉锁等著.有害废物生态风险评价[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
    [75]朱琳,史淑洁.斑马鱼胚胎发育技术在毒性评价中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(2):252-254.
    [76]李潇.邻苯二甲酸酯类在养殖鱼类体内含量分析及其胚胎毒性研究[D].暨南大学硕士论文,2007.
    [77]张征,吴振斌.酞酸酯对水生生物的生物学效应[J].淡水渔业,2006,36(1):57-59.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700