滁河断裂特征研究及其意义
|
摘要
本文完成了滁河断裂(巢湖地区青苔山——草鞋岭)段的构造填图,发现滁河断裂在该区段有多条产状一致、性质相同的断层组成,它们在剖面上构成叠瓦状组合;该断裂以脆性破裂为主,构造岩发育,主要为构造角砾岩、碎裂岩和碎粉岩,其中发育了三条规模相对较大的构造岩带,这些角砾岩带分别代表了三条强变形带。在此基础上,查明了滁河断裂的特征(几何学、运动学),对滁河断裂构造岩特征进行了探讨,提出了这些构造岩经历了多期断裂叠加;在野外对多条断层的擦痕进行了统计、测量并利用法国巴黎南方大学研制的计算机程序反演了研究区内古应力场特征及演化过程,在综合前人对该区动力学背景研究的成果基础上,探讨了滁河断裂的演化过程及各阶段特征,即滁河断裂经历了造山期的逆冲挤压、晚侏罗世末—早白垩世初的左行平移、早白垩世—古近纪时期的伸展正断及新近纪以来的逆冲挤压活动。在对滁河断裂研究的基础上,认为该断裂属于下扬子区的一条边界断裂,它控制着北西侧滁-全坳陷的沉积、影响着南东侧巢-含隆起的构造变形。作为郯庐断裂系的重要组成部分,与郯庐断裂带的构造特征和演化方面有着良好的一致关系。
Based on the tectonic mapping of the Chuhe fault (from Qintaishan to Caoxielin in Chaohu area),this paper finds out the Chuhe fault is composed of several faults which have the same occurrences and characters, and to form the imbricate structure in sections; The brittle fracture gave priority to this fault, the tectonite are developed, mostly such as the tectonic breccia , the cataclasite and smithereens, and three large tectonite zones are developed in it, these breccia zones are separately represented the three strong deformation belts.
On this basis, the characteristics of the Chuhe fault (Geometry and kinematics) are found out, the characteristics of the tectonite are discussed, and these tectonites experienced several issues of the fault overlay on it; In the field, the scratchs of many faults are statisticed and measured, then , this paper utilized the programme to inversing the ancient stress field’s evolution of the study area by the computer program developed by Southern University in Paris, France.
On the foundation of the dynamics background by our predecessors , the evolution process and characteristics of each phases are discussed, that is to say , the Chuhe fault zone has experienced four periods, the thrust extrusion during the orogeny period , the sinistral strike-slip during Late Triassic to Early cretaceous; the extend down fault during Early Cretaceous and resulted in the sinistral strike-slip movement; the extend down fault during Early Cretaceous to the Paleocene ;the thrust extrusion during the Neogene.On the foundation of research on the Chuhe fault , it is considered that it is a boundary fault in the Lower Yangtze area, which controlled the deposition of Chu-Quan seg in the northwest and affected the tectonic deformation of the Chao-Han heave in the southeast. As an important part of the Tan-Lu fault zone ,it has good consistency with the Tan-Lu fault zone in the structural characteristics and evolution.
Based on the tectonic mapping of the Chuhe fault (from Qintaishan to Caoxielin in Chaohu area),this paper finds out the Chuhe fault is composed of several faults which have the same occurrences and characters, and to form the imbricate structure in sections; The brittle fracture gave priority to this fault, the tectonite are developed, mostly such as the tectonic breccia , the cataclasite and smithereens, and three large tectonite zones are developed in it, these breccia zones are separately represented the three strong deformation belts.
On this basis, the characteristics of the Chuhe fault (Geometry and kinematics) are found out, the characteristics of the tectonite are discussed, and these tectonites experienced several issues of the fault overlay on it; In the field, the scratchs of many faults are statisticed and measured, then , this paper utilized the programme to inversing the ancient stress field’s evolution of the study area by the computer program developed by Southern University in Paris, France.
On the foundation of the dynamics background by our predecessors , the evolution process and characteristics of each phases are discussed, that is to say , the Chuhe fault zone has experienced four periods, the thrust extrusion during the orogeny period , the sinistral strike-slip during Late Triassic to Early cretaceous; the extend down fault during Early Cretaceous and resulted in the sinistral strike-slip movement; the extend down fault during Early Cretaceous to the Paleocene ;the thrust extrusion during the Neogene.On the foundation of research on the Chuhe fault , it is considered that it is a boundary fault in the Lower Yangtze area, which controlled the deposition of Chu-Quan seg in the northwest and affected the tectonic deformation of the Chao-Han heave in the southeast. As an important part of the Tan-Lu fault zone ,it has good consistency with the Tan-Lu fault zone in the structural characteristics and evolution.
引文
[1] Angelier J. Tectonic analysis of fault-slip data sets. J. Geophys, 1984, Res, 89: 5834-5848.
[2] Chung S L. Trace element and isotope characterstics of Cenozoic basalts around the Tanlu fault with implications for the eastern plate boundary between north and south China. The Journal of Geology, 1999, 07: 301-312.
[3] Hsu K J, Li J, Chen I, et al. Tectonic evolution of Qinling Mountains, China. Eclogae. Geol. Helve, 1987, 80: 735-752.
[4] Jiang J P. Cenozoic Kinematics of the Yingkou-Weifang fault Zone in eastern China. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology, 2008, 28(4): 57-64.
[5] Le Pourhiet, Michael Gurnis and Jason Saleeby. Mantle instability beneath the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California and Death Valley extension. EPSL, 2006, 251: 104-119.
[6] Li Z X. Collision between the North and South China Blacks: A Crustal-detachment model for the suturing in the region east of the Tanlu fault. Geology, 1994, 22: 739-742.
[7] Liu J L, Davis G A, Lin Z Y, et al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, Southeastern Liaoning Province, North China: A likely contributor to Cretaceous rotation of Eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas. Tectonophysics, 2005, 407: 65-80.
[8] Liu M. Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the North American Cordillera: the role of gravitational collapse. Tectonophysics, 2001, 342: 407-433.
[9] Liu S F, Heller P L and Zhang G W. Mesozoic basin development and tectonic evolution of the Dabieshan orogenic belt, central China. Tectonics, 2003, 22(4): 1038.
[10] Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G, et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: plate tectonic synthesis from 750 Ma to the present. The Island Arc,1997, 6: 121-142.
[11] Meng Q R. What drove late Mesozoic extension of the northern China–Mongolia tract-Tectonophysics, 2003, 369: 155-174.
[12] Meng Q R, Li S Y and Li R W. Mesozoic evolution of the Hefei basinin eastern China: sedimentary response to deformations in the adjacent Dabieshan and along the Tanlu fault. GSA Bulletin, 2007, 119: 897-916.
[13] Menzies M, Xu Y G, Zhang H F and Fan W M. Integration of geology, geophysics and geochemistry: A key to understanding the North China Craton. Lithos, 2007, 96: 1-21.
[14] Mercier J L, Hou M J, Vergely P, et al. Structural and stratigraphical constraints on the kinematics history of the Southern Tan–Lu Fault Zone during the Mesozoic Anhui Province, China. Tectonophysics, 2007, 439: 33-66.
[15] Qi J F, Zhou X H, Deng R L, et al. Structural characteristics of the Tan-Lu fault zone in Cenozoic basins offshore the Bohai Sea. Science in China (Series D), 2008, 51(Supp.2): 20-31.
[16] Ren J Y, Tamaki K, Li S T, et al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics, 2002, 344: 175-205.
[17] Sager W W. Cretaceou paleomagnetic apparent polar wander path for the Pacific plate calculated from Deep Sea Drilling Project and Ocean Drilling Program basalt cores. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2006, 156: 329-349.
[18] Sokoutis D, Corti G, Bonini M, et al. Modeling the extension of heterogeneous hot lithosphere. Tectonophysics, 2007, 444: 63-79.
[19] Sun W D, Ding X, Hu Y H, et al. The golden transformation of the Cretaceous plate subduction in the west Pacific. EPSL, 2007, 262: 533-542.
[20] Tarduno J A. On the motion of Hawaii and other mantle plumes. Chemical Geology, 2007, 241: 234-247.
[21] Tong H M, Mi R S, Yu T C, et al. The Strike-Slip Tectonics in the Western Liaohe Depression , Bohai Bay Basin. Acta Geologica Sinca, 2008, 82(8): 1017-1026.
[22] Uyeda S,Miyashiro A.Plate tectonic and the Japanese Is-land: a synthesis [J]. Geol Soc Amer Bull, 1974, 85:1159-1170.
[23]汤家富,许卫.郯庐断裂带南段并无巨大平移—来自安徽境内的证据.地质论评,2002,48(5):449-456.
[24]王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等.郯庐走滑断裂系的形成演化及其地质意见.见:郑亚东等主编.第30届国际地质大会论文集.北京:地质出版社.1998,14:176-196.
[25]肖文交,杨振宇.大别-郯庐-苏鲁造山带复合旋转拼贴作用.地球科学进展,2000,15(2):147-153.
[26]杨文采,程振炎,张春贺.中国科学深钻选址地球科学物理调查与大别-苏鲁岩石圈.地球学报,2003,24(5):391-404.
[27]张宏福,英基丰,徐平,等.华北中生代玄武岩中地幔橄榄石捕虏晶:对岩石圈地幔置换过程的启示.科学通报,2004,49(8):784-789.
[28]张树林,费琪,叶加仁.渤海湾盆地边缘凹陷的构造意义.石油实验地质,2006,28(5):409-413.
[29]张岳桥,赵越,董树文,等.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘,2004,11(3):123-133.
[30]周建勋,周建生.渤海湾盆地新生代构造变形机制:物理模拟和讨论.中国地质科学, 2006, 41(2): 202-207.
[31]周新华.中国东部中、新生代岩石圈转型与减薄研究若干问题.地学前缘,2006,13(2):50~64.
[32]朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景.地质科学,2001,36(3):269~278.
[33]安徽省地质矿产局.安徽省地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1987:496.
[34]徐树桐.安徽省主要构造要素的变形和演化[M].北京:海洋出版社,1987:63-78.
[35]常印佛,刘湘培,吴言昌.长江中下游铁铜成矿带[M].北京:地质出版社, 1991:100-105.
[36]唐永成,吴言昌,储国正,等.安徽沿江地区铜金多金属矿床地质[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:22-31.
[37]王治顺,朱永余.论皖东经向构造体系及其意义[J].中国地质科学院地质力学研究所所刊,1985,(5):27-44.
[38]黄德志,邱瑞龙,刘德良,等.安徽省嘉山管店-全椒龙王尖断裂的厘定[J].地质论评,2000,46(1):58-63.
[39]常印佛,董树文,黄德志.论中-下扬子“一盖多底”格局与演化[J].火山地质与矿产,1996,17(1/2):1-15.
[40]储国正,曹奋扬.安徽沿江成矿带主要控制因素的探讨[J].安徽地质,2000,10(1):35-43.
[41]邢凤鸣.安徽沿江地区岩浆成矿带[J].安徽地质,1999,9(4):272-279.
[42]蔡东升,施央申,卢华复,等.苏州西南部的推覆和伸展构造[J].大地构造与成矿学,1993,17(2):163-178.
[43]张开均,施央申.台阶式逆冲推覆———安徽沿江煤田的基本构造形式[J].中国煤田地质,1996,8(1):1-4.
[44]张开均,施央申.安徽巢湖大型平卧褶皱研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,1993,17(2):179-189.
[45]张开均,黄钟瑾,施央申,等.安徽东南煤田逆冲推覆构造初步研究[J].煤,1997,6(4):29-30.
[46]张开均,朱君星.华北大陆楔入的华南板内效应:安徽沿江台阶式逆冲推覆构造及其控矿作用[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2003,39(6):745-753.
[47]张开均,黄钟瑾,施央申.平卧式褶皱推覆———巢湖煤田的基本构造形式[J].中国煤田地质,1994,6(4):1-6.
[48]朱光,徐嘉炜,刘国生,等.下扬子地区前陆变形构造格局及其动力学机制[J].中国区域地质,1999,18(1):73-79.
[49]宋传中,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带南段及邻区中、新生代盆地的反转机制[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,25(3):325-330.
[50]程捷,万天丰.郯庐断裂带在新生代的演化[J].地质科技情报,1996,15(3):35-42.
[51]郭念发,姚柏平,吴群.安徽无为盆地油气地质条件评价[J].安徽地质,1999,9(4):289-311.
[52]朱光,徐佑德,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律[J].地质科学,2006,41(2):226-241.
[53]王桂粱.姜波余志伟.逆冲断层前锋的构造样式[J].地质科技情报.1994,13(3):10～17
[54]董树文,言景爽,李勇.等下扬子中三叠一中侏罗世沉积相与印支运动[J].地质论评1994.40(}):111～11 9.
[55]朱光,徐嘉炜.刘国生,等.下扬子地区沿江前陆盆地形成的构造控制[J].地质论评。1998,44(2) 120-129.
[56]朱光,徐嘉炜。刘国生。等.下扬子地区前陆变形构造格局及其动力学机制[J].中国区域地质.1999.18(1):73-79
[57] Sootheaste-Australian Prescambrian Craton a reappraisal ol the structural evolution ol the southern Adelaide Fold—Thrust h[J].Tectonophysics。1994(234):g5—1I6.
[58] In Xu J W B~sin eharaeterlstics and tectonic evlution of the Tan—Lu fault zone[A].In: The Tan—lu Wrench fault system
[59]汤家富,荆延仁,侯明金,等.安徽大别山-张八岭地区新的构造格局与非板块碰撞造山过程[J].安徽地质,1995,5(3):1—12.
[60]许志琴.扬子板块北缘的大型深层滑脱构造和动力学分析[J].中国区域地质,1987,(4):289
[61]徐树桐.安徽省主要构造要素的变形和演化[M].北京;海洋出版社,1987.
[62]张永军,黄钟瑾.张八岭推覆体特征及其成因机制[J].高校地质学报.1998.4(4):444—451.
[63]侯明金,王永敏.断裂带的动力学分析——“利用断层面上擦痕的观察、测量计算主应力轴状态”方法简介.安徽地质. 2002, 86-91
[64]侯明金,朱光,Jacques Mercier,Pierre Vergley,王永敏.郯庐断裂带(安徽段)及邻区的动力学分析与区域构造演化,地质科学, 2007, 42(2): 362-381
[65]侯明金.郯庐断裂带(安徽段)及邻区的动力学分析与区域构造演化.地质科学, 2007,42(2): 362-381.
[66]侯明金.郯庐断裂带的两大发展阶段—广义的逆冲推覆断裂带和狭义的平移断裂带.中国地质, 2006, 33(6): 1267-1275.
[67]江在森,马宗晋,张希,等. GPS初步结果揭示的中国大陆水平应变场与构造变形.地球物理学报. 2003, 346(3): 352-358.
[68]刘茂强,杨丙中,邓俊国,等.伊通-舒兰地堑地质构造特征及其演化.北京:地质出版社, 1993.
[69]路凤香,郑建平,李伍平,陈美华,成中梅.中国东部显生宙地幔演化的主要样式:“蘑菇云”模型.地学前缘,2000,7 (1): 97-107.
[70]任凤楼,张岳桥,邱连贵等.胶莱盆地白垩纪构造应力场与转换机制.大地构造与成矿学. 2007,31卷第2期157-167
[71]任有保,于有兰.沂水北部沂沭断裂带构造透镜体特征.山东地质, 1996. 12(1):76-83.
[72]宋传中,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带南段及邻区中、新生代盆地的反转机制.合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版) 2002, 25(3): 325-330.
[73]吴福元,孙德有.中国东部中生代岩浆作用与岩石圈减薄.长春科技大学学报, 1999,313-318.
[74]吴福元,孙德有,张广良,任向文.论燕山运动的深部地球动力学本质.高校地质学报. 2000,379-388
[75]万京林,王庆隆.郯庐断裂活动年龄及热历史的裂变径迹研究.地球学报. 1997,74-76
[76]王琪,张培震,马宗晋.中国大陆现今构造变形GPS观测数据与速度场.地学前缘,2002,9(2): 415-429.
[77]吴堑虹.东大别地区磷灰石裂变径迹年龄的构造意义初析.地质科学. 2002,37(3):343-349
[78]万天丰,朱鸿.郯庐断裂带的最大左行走滑断距及其形成时期.高校地质学报, 1996.2(1): l4-27.
[79]万天丰等.郯庐断裂带的形成与演化:综述.现代地质, 1996. 10(2): 159-168.
[80]万天丰.山东省构造演化与应力场.山东地质,1992, 8(2): 70-101.
[81]万天丰.郯庐断裂带的演化与古应力场.地球科学—中国地质大学学报. 1995,20(5): 15-24.
[82]王小凤等著.郯庐断裂带,北京:地质出版社, 2000.
[83]郑亚东等主编.第30届国际地质大会论文集.北京:地质出版社.14: 176-l96.
[84]薛爱民,金维浚,袁学诚.大别山北缘合肥盆地中、新生代构造演化.高校地质学报,1999, 5(2): 157-163.
[85]郑建平,路凤香, Griffin, W. L. ,余淳梅,张瑞生,袁晓萍,吴秀玲.华北东部橄榄岩与岩石圈减薄中的地幔伸展和侵蚀置换作用.地学前缘. 2006, 76-85
[86]朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰.郯庐断裂带晚第三纪以来的浅部挤压活动与深部过程.地震地质. 2002, 24(2): 265-277.
[87]朱光.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景.地质科学, 2001.36(3):
[88]张青,朱光,刘国生,等.2008.郯庐断裂带张八岭隆起北段的左旋走滑挤压变形及其40Ar/39Ar定年[J].地学前缘,15(3):234-249.
[89]张勇等, 2003.也论郯庐断裂带的构造性质和演化[J].安徽地质, 13(4):257-260.
[90]张云银,2002.郯庐断裂带构造特征及油气分布规律[J].油气地质与采收率,9(6):22-25.
[91]张云银,2003.郯—庐断裂带含油气性研究[J],石油实验地质,(1),12-18.
[92]朱光等,2006.前陆沉积与变形对郯庐断裂带同造山运动的制约[J].地质科学,41(1):102-121.
[93]朱光等,2002.郯庐断裂带晚第三纪以来的浅部挤压活动与深部过程[J].地震地质,24(2):265-277.
[94]朱光等,2004.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应[J].地质科学, 39(1):36-49.
[95]朱光,王勇生,牛漫兰,等.2004.郯庐断裂带的同造山运动[J].地学前缘,11(3):169-182.
[96]朱光,徐佑德,刘国生,等.2006.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律[J].地质科学,41(2):226-241.
[97]朱光,谢成龙,王勇生,等.2005.郯庐高压走滑韧性剪切带特征及其40Ar/39Ar定年[J].岩石学报,21(6):1687-1702.
[98]朱光,刘国生,Dunlap WJ,et al.2004.郯庐断裂带同造山走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar年代学证据[J].科学通报,49(2):190-198.
[99]常印佛,刘湘培,吴言昌.长江中下游铜铁成矿带[M] .北京:地质出版社,1991. 1 - 137.
[100]宋传中等:苏皖境内滁河断裂的演化与大地构造背景[J] .中国区域地质,2000 ,19 (1) :1 - 8.第4期
[101]董树文,言景爽,李勇,等.下扬子中三叠世—中侏罗世沉积相与印支运动[J] .地质论评,1994 ,40 (2) :111 - 119.
[102]李培军,夏邦栋.走滑挤压盆地———以中晚三叠世下扬子沿江盆地为例[J] .地质科学,1995 ,30 (2) :130 - 137.
[103]王桂梁,姜波,余志伟.逆冲断层前锋的构造样式[J] .地质科技情报,1994 ,13 (3) :10 - 17.
[104]夏木林,周存亭.沉积岩区推覆构造鉴别特征和特征的构造形迹[J] .安徽区域地质,1988 ,26 (1) :34 - 41.
[105]任启江,王德滋,徐兆文,等.安徽庐枞火山—构造洼地的形成、演化及成矿[J] .地质学报,1993 ,67 (2) :131 - 145.
[106]叶德隆,等.下扬子地区火山作用深部过程与盆地形成[M] .武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992. 44 - 45.
[107]刘训.对中国东部中、新生代盆地沉积—构造发展的几点认识[J] .地质学报,1988 , (2) :111 - 122.
[108]刘少峰,庄培仁,徐成彦.下扬子坳陷带古生代盆地构造的叠加关系和区域应力场特征[A] .见:江南—雪峰科研专题组编.江南—雪峰地区的层滑作用及多期复合构造[C] .北京:地质出版社,1993. 211 - 246.
[109]宋传中,钱德玲.西北太平洋岛弧系列成因的探讨[J] .地质论评,1993 ,39 (1) :1 - 8.第4期
[2] Chung S L. Trace element and isotope characterstics of Cenozoic basalts around the Tanlu fault with implications for the eastern plate boundary between north and south China. The Journal of Geology, 1999, 07: 301-312.
[3] Hsu K J, Li J, Chen I, et al. Tectonic evolution of Qinling Mountains, China. Eclogae. Geol. Helve, 1987, 80: 735-752.
[4] Jiang J P. Cenozoic Kinematics of the Yingkou-Weifang fault Zone in eastern China. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology, 2008, 28(4): 57-64.
[5] Le Pourhiet, Michael Gurnis and Jason Saleeby. Mantle instability beneath the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California and Death Valley extension. EPSL, 2006, 251: 104-119.
[6] Li Z X. Collision between the North and South China Blacks: A Crustal-detachment model for the suturing in the region east of the Tanlu fault. Geology, 1994, 22: 739-742.
[7] Liu J L, Davis G A, Lin Z Y, et al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, Southeastern Liaoning Province, North China: A likely contributor to Cretaceous rotation of Eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas. Tectonophysics, 2005, 407: 65-80.
[8] Liu M. Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the North American Cordillera: the role of gravitational collapse. Tectonophysics, 2001, 342: 407-433.
[9] Liu S F, Heller P L and Zhang G W. Mesozoic basin development and tectonic evolution of the Dabieshan orogenic belt, central China. Tectonics, 2003, 22(4): 1038.
[10] Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G, et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: plate tectonic synthesis from 750 Ma to the present. The Island Arc,1997, 6: 121-142.
[11] Meng Q R. What drove late Mesozoic extension of the northern China–Mongolia tract-Tectonophysics, 2003, 369: 155-174.
[12] Meng Q R, Li S Y and Li R W. Mesozoic evolution of the Hefei basinin eastern China: sedimentary response to deformations in the adjacent Dabieshan and along the Tanlu fault. GSA Bulletin, 2007, 119: 897-916.
[13] Menzies M, Xu Y G, Zhang H F and Fan W M. Integration of geology, geophysics and geochemistry: A key to understanding the North China Craton. Lithos, 2007, 96: 1-21.
[14] Mercier J L, Hou M J, Vergely P, et al. Structural and stratigraphical constraints on the kinematics history of the Southern Tan–Lu Fault Zone during the Mesozoic Anhui Province, China. Tectonophysics, 2007, 439: 33-66.
[15] Qi J F, Zhou X H, Deng R L, et al. Structural characteristics of the Tan-Lu fault zone in Cenozoic basins offshore the Bohai Sea. Science in China (Series D), 2008, 51(Supp.2): 20-31.
[16] Ren J Y, Tamaki K, Li S T, et al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics, 2002, 344: 175-205.
[17] Sager W W. Cretaceou paleomagnetic apparent polar wander path for the Pacific plate calculated from Deep Sea Drilling Project and Ocean Drilling Program basalt cores. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2006, 156: 329-349.
[18] Sokoutis D, Corti G, Bonini M, et al. Modeling the extension of heterogeneous hot lithosphere. Tectonophysics, 2007, 444: 63-79.
[19] Sun W D, Ding X, Hu Y H, et al. The golden transformation of the Cretaceous plate subduction in the west Pacific. EPSL, 2007, 262: 533-542.
[20] Tarduno J A. On the motion of Hawaii and other mantle plumes. Chemical Geology, 2007, 241: 234-247.
[21] Tong H M, Mi R S, Yu T C, et al. The Strike-Slip Tectonics in the Western Liaohe Depression , Bohai Bay Basin. Acta Geologica Sinca, 2008, 82(8): 1017-1026.
[22] Uyeda S,Miyashiro A.Plate tectonic and the Japanese Is-land: a synthesis [J]. Geol Soc Amer Bull, 1974, 85:1159-1170.
[23]汤家富,许卫.郯庐断裂带南段并无巨大平移—来自安徽境内的证据.地质论评,2002,48(5):449-456.
[24]王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等.郯庐走滑断裂系的形成演化及其地质意见.见:郑亚东等主编.第30届国际地质大会论文集.北京:地质出版社.1998,14:176-196.
[25]肖文交,杨振宇.大别-郯庐-苏鲁造山带复合旋转拼贴作用.地球科学进展,2000,15(2):147-153.
[26]杨文采,程振炎,张春贺.中国科学深钻选址地球科学物理调查与大别-苏鲁岩石圈.地球学报,2003,24(5):391-404.
[27]张宏福,英基丰,徐平,等.华北中生代玄武岩中地幔橄榄石捕虏晶:对岩石圈地幔置换过程的启示.科学通报,2004,49(8):784-789.
[28]张树林,费琪,叶加仁.渤海湾盆地边缘凹陷的构造意义.石油实验地质,2006,28(5):409-413.
[29]张岳桥,赵越,董树文,等.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘,2004,11(3):123-133.
[30]周建勋,周建生.渤海湾盆地新生代构造变形机制:物理模拟和讨论.中国地质科学, 2006, 41(2): 202-207.
[31]周新华.中国东部中、新生代岩石圈转型与减薄研究若干问题.地学前缘,2006,13(2):50~64.
[32]朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景.地质科学,2001,36(3):269~278.
[33]安徽省地质矿产局.安徽省地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1987:496.
[34]徐树桐.安徽省主要构造要素的变形和演化[M].北京:海洋出版社,1987:63-78.
[35]常印佛,刘湘培,吴言昌.长江中下游铁铜成矿带[M].北京:地质出版社, 1991:100-105.
[36]唐永成,吴言昌,储国正,等.安徽沿江地区铜金多金属矿床地质[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:22-31.
[37]王治顺,朱永余.论皖东经向构造体系及其意义[J].中国地质科学院地质力学研究所所刊,1985,(5):27-44.
[38]黄德志,邱瑞龙,刘德良,等.安徽省嘉山管店-全椒龙王尖断裂的厘定[J].地质论评,2000,46(1):58-63.
[39]常印佛,董树文,黄德志.论中-下扬子“一盖多底”格局与演化[J].火山地质与矿产,1996,17(1/2):1-15.
[40]储国正,曹奋扬.安徽沿江成矿带主要控制因素的探讨[J].安徽地质,2000,10(1):35-43.
[41]邢凤鸣.安徽沿江地区岩浆成矿带[J].安徽地质,1999,9(4):272-279.
[42]蔡东升,施央申,卢华复,等.苏州西南部的推覆和伸展构造[J].大地构造与成矿学,1993,17(2):163-178.
[43]张开均,施央申.台阶式逆冲推覆———安徽沿江煤田的基本构造形式[J].中国煤田地质,1996,8(1):1-4.
[44]张开均,施央申.安徽巢湖大型平卧褶皱研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,1993,17(2):179-189.
[45]张开均,黄钟瑾,施央申,等.安徽东南煤田逆冲推覆构造初步研究[J].煤,1997,6(4):29-30.
[46]张开均,朱君星.华北大陆楔入的华南板内效应:安徽沿江台阶式逆冲推覆构造及其控矿作用[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2003,39(6):745-753.
[47]张开均,黄钟瑾,施央申.平卧式褶皱推覆———巢湖煤田的基本构造形式[J].中国煤田地质,1994,6(4):1-6.
[48]朱光,徐嘉炜,刘国生,等.下扬子地区前陆变形构造格局及其动力学机制[J].中国区域地质,1999,18(1):73-79.
[49]宋传中,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带南段及邻区中、新生代盆地的反转机制[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,25(3):325-330.
[50]程捷,万天丰.郯庐断裂带在新生代的演化[J].地质科技情报,1996,15(3):35-42.
[51]郭念发,姚柏平,吴群.安徽无为盆地油气地质条件评价[J].安徽地质,1999,9(4):289-311.
[52]朱光,徐佑德,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律[J].地质科学,2006,41(2):226-241.
[53]王桂粱.姜波余志伟.逆冲断层前锋的构造样式[J].地质科技情报.1994,13(3):10～17
[54]董树文,言景爽,李勇.等下扬子中三叠一中侏罗世沉积相与印支运动[J].地质论评1994.40(}):111～11 9.
[55]朱光,徐嘉炜.刘国生,等.下扬子地区沿江前陆盆地形成的构造控制[J].地质论评。1998,44(2) 120-129.
[56]朱光,徐嘉炜。刘国生。等.下扬子地区前陆变形构造格局及其动力学机制[J].中国区域地质.1999.18(1):73-79
[57] Sootheaste-Australian Prescambrian Craton a reappraisal ol the structural evolution ol the southern Adelaide Fold—Thrust h[J].Tectonophysics。1994(234):g5—1I6.
[58] In Xu J W B~sin eharaeterlstics and tectonic evlution of the Tan—Lu fault zone[A].In: The Tan—lu Wrench fault system
[59]汤家富,荆延仁,侯明金,等.安徽大别山-张八岭地区新的构造格局与非板块碰撞造山过程[J].安徽地质,1995,5(3):1—12.
[60]许志琴.扬子板块北缘的大型深层滑脱构造和动力学分析[J].中国区域地质,1987,(4):289
[61]徐树桐.安徽省主要构造要素的变形和演化[M].北京;海洋出版社,1987.
[62]张永军,黄钟瑾.张八岭推覆体特征及其成因机制[J].高校地质学报.1998.4(4):444—451.
[63]侯明金,王永敏.断裂带的动力学分析——“利用断层面上擦痕的观察、测量计算主应力轴状态”方法简介.安徽地质. 2002, 86-91
[64]侯明金,朱光,Jacques Mercier,Pierre Vergley,王永敏.郯庐断裂带(安徽段)及邻区的动力学分析与区域构造演化,地质科学, 2007, 42(2): 362-381
[65]侯明金.郯庐断裂带(安徽段)及邻区的动力学分析与区域构造演化.地质科学, 2007,42(2): 362-381.
[66]侯明金.郯庐断裂带的两大发展阶段—广义的逆冲推覆断裂带和狭义的平移断裂带.中国地质, 2006, 33(6): 1267-1275.
[67]江在森,马宗晋,张希,等. GPS初步结果揭示的中国大陆水平应变场与构造变形.地球物理学报. 2003, 346(3): 352-358.
[68]刘茂强,杨丙中,邓俊国,等.伊通-舒兰地堑地质构造特征及其演化.北京:地质出版社, 1993.
[69]路凤香,郑建平,李伍平,陈美华,成中梅.中国东部显生宙地幔演化的主要样式:“蘑菇云”模型.地学前缘,2000,7 (1): 97-107.
[70]任凤楼,张岳桥,邱连贵等.胶莱盆地白垩纪构造应力场与转换机制.大地构造与成矿学. 2007,31卷第2期157-167
[71]任有保,于有兰.沂水北部沂沭断裂带构造透镜体特征.山东地质, 1996. 12(1):76-83.
[72]宋传中,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带南段及邻区中、新生代盆地的反转机制.合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版) 2002, 25(3): 325-330.
[73]吴福元,孙德有.中国东部中生代岩浆作用与岩石圈减薄.长春科技大学学报, 1999,313-318.
[74]吴福元,孙德有,张广良,任向文.论燕山运动的深部地球动力学本质.高校地质学报. 2000,379-388
[75]万京林,王庆隆.郯庐断裂活动年龄及热历史的裂变径迹研究.地球学报. 1997,74-76
[76]王琪,张培震,马宗晋.中国大陆现今构造变形GPS观测数据与速度场.地学前缘,2002,9(2): 415-429.
[77]吴堑虹.东大别地区磷灰石裂变径迹年龄的构造意义初析.地质科学. 2002,37(3):343-349
[78]万天丰,朱鸿.郯庐断裂带的最大左行走滑断距及其形成时期.高校地质学报, 1996.2(1): l4-27.
[79]万天丰等.郯庐断裂带的形成与演化:综述.现代地质, 1996. 10(2): 159-168.
[80]万天丰.山东省构造演化与应力场.山东地质,1992, 8(2): 70-101.
[81]万天丰.郯庐断裂带的演化与古应力场.地球科学—中国地质大学学报. 1995,20(5): 15-24.
[82]王小凤等著.郯庐断裂带,北京:地质出版社, 2000.
[83]郑亚东等主编.第30届国际地质大会论文集.北京:地质出版社.14: 176-l96.
[84]薛爱民,金维浚,袁学诚.大别山北缘合肥盆地中、新生代构造演化.高校地质学报,1999, 5(2): 157-163.
[85]郑建平,路凤香, Griffin, W. L. ,余淳梅,张瑞生,袁晓萍,吴秀玲.华北东部橄榄岩与岩石圈减薄中的地幔伸展和侵蚀置换作用.地学前缘. 2006, 76-85
[86]朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰.郯庐断裂带晚第三纪以来的浅部挤压活动与深部过程.地震地质. 2002, 24(2): 265-277.
[87]朱光.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景.地质科学, 2001.36(3):
[88]张青,朱光,刘国生,等.2008.郯庐断裂带张八岭隆起北段的左旋走滑挤压变形及其40Ar/39Ar定年[J].地学前缘,15(3):234-249.
[89]张勇等, 2003.也论郯庐断裂带的构造性质和演化[J].安徽地质, 13(4):257-260.
[90]张云银,2002.郯庐断裂带构造特征及油气分布规律[J].油气地质与采收率,9(6):22-25.
[91]张云银,2003.郯—庐断裂带含油气性研究[J],石油实验地质,(1),12-18.
[92]朱光等,2006.前陆沉积与变形对郯庐断裂带同造山运动的制约[J].地质科学,41(1):102-121.
[93]朱光等,2002.郯庐断裂带晚第三纪以来的浅部挤压活动与深部过程[J].地震地质,24(2):265-277.
[94]朱光等,2004.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应[J].地质科学, 39(1):36-49.
[95]朱光,王勇生,牛漫兰,等.2004.郯庐断裂带的同造山运动[J].地学前缘,11(3):169-182.
[96]朱光,徐佑德,刘国生,等.2006.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律[J].地质科学,41(2):226-241.
[97]朱光,谢成龙,王勇生,等.2005.郯庐高压走滑韧性剪切带特征及其40Ar/39Ar定年[J].岩石学报,21(6):1687-1702.
[98]朱光,刘国生,Dunlap WJ,et al.2004.郯庐断裂带同造山走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar年代学证据[J].科学通报,49(2):190-198.
[99]常印佛,刘湘培,吴言昌.长江中下游铜铁成矿带[M] .北京:地质出版社,1991. 1 - 137.
[100]宋传中等:苏皖境内滁河断裂的演化与大地构造背景[J] .中国区域地质,2000 ,19 (1) :1 - 8.第4期
[101]董树文,言景爽,李勇,等.下扬子中三叠世—中侏罗世沉积相与印支运动[J] .地质论评,1994 ,40 (2) :111 - 119.
[102]李培军,夏邦栋.走滑挤压盆地———以中晚三叠世下扬子沿江盆地为例[J] .地质科学,1995 ,30 (2) :130 - 137.
[103]王桂梁,姜波,余志伟.逆冲断层前锋的构造样式[J] .地质科技情报,1994 ,13 (3) :10 - 17.
[104]夏木林,周存亭.沉积岩区推覆构造鉴别特征和特征的构造形迹[J] .安徽区域地质,1988 ,26 (1) :34 - 41.
[105]任启江,王德滋,徐兆文,等.安徽庐枞火山—构造洼地的形成、演化及成矿[J] .地质学报,1993 ,67 (2) :131 - 145.
[106]叶德隆,等.下扬子地区火山作用深部过程与盆地形成[M] .武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992. 44 - 45.
[107]刘训.对中国东部中、新生代盆地沉积—构造发展的几点认识[J] .地质学报,1988 , (2) :111 - 122.
[108]刘少峰,庄培仁,徐成彦.下扬子坳陷带古生代盆地构造的叠加关系和区域应力场特征[A] .见:江南—雪峰科研专题组编.江南—雪峰地区的层滑作用及多期复合构造[C] .北京:地质出版社,1993. 211 - 246.
[109]宋传中,钱德玲.西北太平洋岛弧系列成因的探讨[J] .地质论评,1993 ,39 (1) :1 - 8.第4期