用户名: 密码: 验证码:
MRI-PWI评价靶向EBV-LMP1 mRNA脱氧核酶辅助放疗鼻咽癌疗效的临床研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:采用MRI-PWI评价靶向EBV-LMPl mRNA脱氧核酶辅助放疗鼻咽癌的疗效。
     方法:本院自2007年3月至2008年5月临床及病理诊断为鼻咽癌患者31例,完全双盲分组,其中17例为综合治疗组,14例为单纯放疗组。综合治疗组采用靶向EBV-LMPl mRNA的脱氧核酶+根治性放疗;单纯放疗组采用安慰剂+根治性放疗。分别在放疗前、放疗50Gy、放疗70Gy和放疗结束后3个月进行MRI以及PWI检查。通过MRI观察肿块消退的情况,以及放疗前、中、后PWI参数的改变来分析靶向EBV-LMP1 mRNA的脱氧核酶的疗效。PWI采用Turbo FLASH成像序列,肘前静脉团注Gd—DTPA(0.4mmol/kg),注射速率4ml/s。获得时间一信号强度曲线进行后处理,得到灌注参数E_R、Catake、EP、TTP。常规增强MRI横断位上勾画肿瘤边界,得到肿块体积,计算肿块缩小比率。
     结果:①三个时期的综合治疗组缩小率(平均秩和:15.33,14.92,16.5)与单纯放疗组肿块缩小率(平均秩和:9.67,10.08,8.5)之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②综合治疗组放疗50Gy时E_R(4.01±2.29/min)、Catake(287.41±101.54 ml/100cm~3)下降比单纯放疗组的E_R(8.08±4.23 enhancement)、Catake(384.91±42.36ml/100cm~3)明显,两组患者之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);③在放疗70Gy时,综合治疗组的E_R(2.70±1.48/min)、Catake(209.35±63.81 ml/100cm~3)和EP(2.59±0.70%)下降比单纯放疗组的E_R(6.06±3.21/min)、Catake(338.99±108.75 ml/100cm~3)、EP(3.41±0.65%)明显,与单纯放疗组之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);④在放疗结束后3个月时,综合治疗组的Catake(176.43±118.05 ml/100cm~3)仍低于单纯放疗组的Catake(347.09±153.15ml/100cm~3),两者之间的差异有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
     结论:①运用PWI获得E_R、Catake、EP、TTP等参数评价肿瘤组织血管的渗漏性等,来判断放疗的疗效,转归及预后有重要的临床价值,可以有望成为临床判断肿块预后、疗效的备选指标。②MRI评价肿块的大小、形态、边界及淋巴结转移等用于明确病变范围、肿块分期及指导放疗定位等有重要的临床价值。③综合治疗较单纯放疗更有利于肿块的缩小、消退及降低病灶组织血管的渗漏性。
Obieetive:Using MR perfusion imaging to evaluate targeting EBV-LMP1 mRNA deoxy ribozyme radiotherapy effect of the NPC.
     Methods:All these sections,which including 31 patients were all originated from Xiangya Hospital,Central South University from March 2007 to May 2008,were pathological diagnosised Nasopharyngeal cancer.They were divided into groups by double-blind,which including 17 patients in the testing group,14 patients un the contrasting group.The comprehensive treatment group use the EBV-LMP1 mRNA deoxyribozymes targeted therapy and radical radiotherapy,the radiotherapy alone group use placebo radical radiotherapy.All these patients were checked by MRI and PWI before radiotherapy,radiotherapy 50Gy,radiotherapy 70Gy and after 3 months of radiotherapy ending.The curative effect of EBV-LMP1 mRNA deoxyribozymes targeted therapy was analysis by observing the regression of tumor and changing the dabbling parameter,which before radiotherapy,in the radiotherapy and after radiotherapy.PWI using Turbo FLASH imaging sequence.Mission elbow intravenous injection Gd-DTPA(0.4mmol/kg),and the injection rate is 4 ml/s.TIC will be carried out after processing,and getting perfusion parameters,such as ER,Catake,EP,TTP.In conventional transverse- enhanced MRI,Sketched tumor borders and getted the mass volume,calculation of mass ratio.
     Results:During the three times,between the comprehensive treatment group masses reduced rate(the average rank:15.33,14.92,16.5) and the radiotherapy alone group masses reduced rate(the average rank: 9.67,10.08,8.5)had significant differences in the mass reduced rate.(P<0.05).(?)In radiotherapy 50 Gy,the comprehensive treatment group's E_R (4.01±2.29/min)and Catake(287.41±101.54ml/100cm~3)was significantly lower than the radiotherapy alone group's E_R(8.08±4.23/min)、Catake(384.91±42.36 ml/100cm~3)(P<0.05).(?)In radiotherapy 70 Gy,the comprehensive treatment group's E_R(2.70±1.48/min)、Catake(209.35±63.81 ml/100cm~3)and EP(2.59±0.70%)was significantly lower than the radiotherapy alone group's E_R(6.06±3.21/min)、Catake(338.99±108.75 ml/100cm~3)and EP(3.41±0.65%)(P<0.05)(?)After 3 months of radiotherapy ending,the comprehensive treatment group's Catake(176.43±118.05 ml/100cm~3) was significantly lower than the radiotherapy alone group's Catake (347.09±153.15 ml/100cm~3)(P<0.05).
     Conclusion:①Use PWI to get ER,Catake,EP and TTP,will help evaluation of tumor's blood vessels leakage,judge radiation therapy,the outcome and prognosis has important clinical value,PWI is expected to become a mass prognosis of clinical judgement,by the effect of Election indicators.②Use MRI to evaluate the tumor size,shape,border and metastasis,will help to clear the masses border,staging mass and guiding radiotherapy has important clinical value.③The comprehensive treatment than the radiotherapy alone group may be more conducive to Reduce tumor size and vascular lesions of the leakage.
引文
[1]高元桂,蔡幼铨,蔡祖龙,等.MRI成像诊断学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002,262-267.
    [2]吴恩惠,兰宝森.中华影像医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002,208-209.
    [3]Kim JK,Petin VG and Zhurakovskaya GP.Exposure rate as a determinant of the synergistic interaction of heat combined with ionizing or ultraviolet radiation in cell killing.J Radiat Res(Tokyo).2001;42(4):361-9.
    [4]Mizumoto K,Qian LW,Zhang L,et al.A nitroimidazole derivative,PR-350,enhances the killing of pancreatic cancer cells exposed to high-dose irradiation under hypoxia.J Radiat Res(Tokyo).2002;43(1):43-51.
    [5]Xia JR,Xia K,Feng Y,et al.The combination of suicide gene therapy and radiation enhances the killing of nasopharyngeal carcinoma xenographs.J Radiat Res.2004;45(2):281-289.
    [6]Chong VFH,Mukherji SK,Ng SH,et al.Nasopharyngeal carcinoma:Review of how imaging affects staging[J].JCAT,1999,23(6):984-993.
    [7]David L.BuckY,PH D.Uncertainty in the Analysis of tracer kinetic using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2002;47:601-606
    [8]Ping H,Elise J B D,Larry A,et al.Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study of male pelvic perfusion at 3T:preliminary clinical report.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2007,25:160-169.
    [9]Tofes PS,Brix G,Buckley DL,et al.Estimating Kinetic preliminary from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer:standardized quantities and symbol.J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223-232.
    [10]Gupta RK,Cloughesy TF,Sinha U,et al.Relationship between choline magneticr esonances pectroscopy,apparentd diffusion coefficient and quantitative histopathology in human glioma.Neuron ocol,2000,50(3):215-226.
    [11]Stadnik TW,Chaskis C,Michotte,A,et al.Diffusion-weight MR imaging of introcerebral masses:cimparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings.AJNR,2001,22(5):9 69-976.
    [12]Bosari S,Delellis RA,Healtley GJ.Microvesse 1 quantition and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma.Hum Pathol,1992,23(4):755-761.
    [13]Folkman J.What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst,1990;82(1):4-6.
    [14]Koch AE Harlow LA Haines GK et al.Vascular endothelial growth factor,a cytokine modulating endothelia function in Rheunatioid arthritis.J Immunol,1994;152(8):4149-4156.
    [15]Maeda K,Chumg Y,Ogawa Yet al.Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in gastric carcinoma.Cancer,1996;77(5):858-863.
    [16]Connolly DT,Heuvelman DM,Nelson R et al.Tumor vascular permeability factor stimulates endothlial cell growth and angiogenesis.J Clin Invest,1989;84(5):1470-1478.
    [17]Wakisaka N,Wenq H,Yoshizaki T,et al Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with angiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Laryngoscope 1999,109(5):810
    [18]Huangguang WU,Mdp H D,Masano R I,et al.The relationshi pbetween microvessel density,the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor,and the extension if nasopharyngealcarcinorna[J].Laryngoscope,2000,110(12):2066
    [19]刘宜敏,薛卫平,白守民.NPC组织中VEGF表达及MVD的临床意义[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2004,25(3S):69-70.
    [20]Weidner N,Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in canner.Am J Pathol,1995;147:9-19.
    [21]Brem S,Cotran R Folkrnan J.Tumer angiogenesis:a quantitative method for histologic grading.J Natl Cancer Inst,1972;48:347-356.
    [22]Weidner N,Semple JP,Welch W R,et al.Tumer angiogenesis and metasttatic correlation in invasive breast carcinoma.N Engl J Med,1991;324:1-8.
    [23]Weidner N,Flokman J,P ozza F,et al.Tumer angiogenesis:a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in ear ly-stage breast carcinma.J Natl.Cancer Inst,1992;84:1875-1887.
    [24]Weidner N.Current pathologic method for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumers.Breast Cancer Res.Treat,1995;36:169-180.
    [25]Gong QY,Zhu HY,Zheng GL,et al.MRI-T2 values in the differentiation of recurrence and fibrosis after radiation of nasopharyngeal carcinma.Chin Med J (Engl),1992,105:135.
    [26][26]Wakisaka N,Wenq H,Yoshizaki T,et al Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with angiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Laryngoscope 1999,109(5):810。
    [27]NG SH,WAN Y L,KO SF,et al.MRI of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with emphasis on ralationship to radiotherapy[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1998,8(2):327-326.
    [28]OLMI P,FALLAI C,COLAGRANDE S,et al.Staging and follow-up of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:magnetic resongance imaging versus computerized tomography[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1995,32(3):795-800.
    [29]Geng L,Donnklly E,McMAhon G.et al.Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor repector signaling leads to reveral of tumer resistance to radiotherapy[J].Cancer Res,2001,61(6):2413-2419.
    [30]Gondhowiardjo S.Epstein-Barr virus laten membrane protein 1(EBV-LMP1)and tumer proliferation rate as predictive factors of nasopharyngeal cancer(NPC)radiation respone.Gan To Kagaku Ryoho.2000;(Suppl 2):323-31.
    [31]谭运年,陶永光,李力力,等.EB病毒潜伏膜蛋白1在NPC细胞中通过STAT3促进VEGF表达[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,2004,31(5):427.
    [32]姜武忠,赵素萍,廖遇平,等.鼻咽癌组织中LMP1和VEGF蛋白表达及其临床意义[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2007,13(3):173-177
    [1]Chong VFH,Mukherji SK,Ng SH,et al.Nasopharyngeal carcinoma:Review of how imaging affects staging[J].JCAT,1999,23(6):984-993.
    [2]高元桂,蔡幼铨,蔡祖龙,等.磁共振成像诊断学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002,262-267.
    [3]吴恩惠,兰宝森.中华影像医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002,208-209.
    [4]李恒国,谢敬霞,钟兴,等.鼻咽癌周围深层结构蔓延和预后与P53蛋白表达的相关性研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2001,17(5):32-323
    [5]Andrew van Hasslit Nasopharyngeal careinom a[M].Second edition,Hong Kong The Chinese University,1999.127-160
    [6]Kuhl CK,Mielcareck P,Klaschik S,et al.Dynamic breast MR imaging:are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions[J].Radiology,1999,211(1):101-110.
    [7]Toffs PS.Modeling tracer kinetics in dnamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1997,7(1):91-101.
    [8]Toffs PS,Brix G,Bucldey DL,et al.Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer:standardized quantities and symbols[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,10(3):223-232.
    [9]徐丽莹,孔祥泉,徐海波,等1早期乳腺癌动态增强MRI诊断[J]1肿瘤防治研究,2004,31:6171
    [10]Hayes C,Padhani AR,Leach.MO.Assessing changes in tumorvascular function using dynamic contrast-enchanced magnetic resonance imaging[J].NMR Biomed,2002,15(2):154-163.
    [11]Gupta RK,Cloughesy TF,Sinha U,et al.Relationship between choline magneticr esonances pectroscopy,apparentd diffusion coefficient and quantitative histopathology in human glioma.Neuron ocol,2000,50(3):215-226。
    [12]Stadnik TW,Chaskis C,Michotte,A,et al.Diffusion-weight MR imaging of introcerebral masses:cimparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings.AJNR,2001,22(5):969-976。
    [13]Lam WW,Poon WS,Metrewelic C.Diffusion MR imaging inglioma:does it have any role in the pre-operation determination of grading of glioma?Clin Radiol,2002,57(3):219-225。
    [14]Filippi C,Edgar M,U lug A,et al.Appearance of meningiomao on diffusion weightd imaging:correlating diffusion contrasts with histopathologic findings.AJNR,2001,22(1):65-72。
    [15]R.Luypaert,S.Boujraf,S.Sourbron,et al.Diffusion and perfusion MRI:basic physics.Eur.Radiol,2001,38:19-27。
    [16]Jensen JH,Chandra R.MR Imaging of Microvasculature.Magn reson Med 2000;44:224-230。
    [17]Law M,Cha S,Knopp EA,High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases:diferentiation By using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging.Radiology2002:222(3):715-21。
    [18]E.Y.K.Tsui,J.H.M.Chan,R.G.Ramsey,et al.Late temporal lobe necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma:evaluation with combined multi-section diffusion weighted and perfusion weighted MR imaging.European Journal of Radiology,2001,39:133-138.
    [19]Chong VF,Fan YF,Mukherji SK.Radiation-induced temporal lobe changes:CT and MR imaging characteristics[J].AJR,2000,175:431-436.
    [20]田野,郭志荣,祝梅芳.中国大陆地区鼻咽癌放疗后放射性脑病的系统评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2002,24(5):471-473.
    [21]Valk PE,Dillon WP.Radiation injury of brain[J].AJR Am J Neuroradiol,1991,12(1):45-62.
    [22]Tsui EY,Chan JH,Leung TW,et al.Rsdionecrosis of the temporal lobe:dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.Neuroradiology,2000,42:149-152.
    [23]赵继泉,梁碧玲,沈君,等.颞叶迟发性放射性脑病磁共振脑血流灌注表现.癌症,2005,24:1102-1105.
    [24]林曰增,张雪林,阎卫平.鼻咽癌放疗后放射性脑病的CT灌注研究.中华放射学杂志,2002,36:339-343.
    [25]New P.Radiationg injury to the nervous system[J].Curr Opin Neurol,2001,14(6):725-734.
    [26]Yu CS,Li KC,Xuan Y,et al.Diffusion tensor tractography in patients with cerebral tumors:a helpful technique for neurosurgical planning and postoperative assessment.Eur J Radiol 2005;56:197-204.
    [27]Le Bihan D,B retort E,La llemand D,e t al.MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions:application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.Radiology,1986,161(2):401-407。
    [28]Cercignbnani M,Horsfield MA.The physical basis of diffusion-weighted MRI.J Neurol Sci,2001,186[Suppl 1]:11-14。
    [29]Bammer R,Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2003,45:169-184.
    [30]Nakahara M,Ericson K,Bellander BM.Diffusion-weighted MR and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluationn of sever brain injury[J].Acat Radiol,2001,42:365-369.
    [31]Jellison BJ,Field AS,Medow J,et al.Diffusion tensor imaging of cerebral white matter:apictorial review of physics,fiber tract anatomy,and tumor imaging patterns.Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:356-369.
    [32]Masutani Y,Aoki S,Abe O,et al.MR diffusion tensor imaging:recent advanceand new techniques for diffusiont ensorvisualization.European Journal of Radiology 2003;46:53-66.
    [33]Bammer R,Acar B,Moseley ME.Invivo MR tractography using diffusion imaging.European Journal of Radiology 2003;45:223-234.
    [34]谭湘萍,赵继泉,梁碧玲,等.扩散张量成像对鼻咽癌放疗后早期放射性脑损伤的诊断价值.癌症2004,23:1334-1337.
    [35]刘雅洁,蔡伟明.鼻咽癌放疗的后放射性脑损伤的研究进展[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2001,21(1):67-68.
    [36]Rutkowski T,Tarnawski R,Sokol M,et al.1H-MRSpectroscopy of Normal Brain Tissue before and after Postoperative Radiotherapy because of Primary Brain Tumors[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,56(5):1381-1389.
    [37]Baker P,Breiter SN,Sober BJ,et al.Quantitative proton sepeetroscopy of canie brain:in vivo and in vitro correltations.Magn Reson Med,1994,32:157-163.
    [38]张雪林.蒋猛.邱士军.等.鼻咽癌放疗后放射性脑病的~1H-MRS波谱研究.中华放射学杂志2004,38:570-574.
    [39]Taylor JS,Langston JW,Reddick WE,et al.Clinical value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for differentiating recurrent or residual brain tumor from delayed cerebral necrosis.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1996,36:1251-1261.
    [40]Preul MC,Leblanc R,Caramanos Z.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy guided brain tumor resection:differentiation between recurrent glioma and radiation change in two diagnostically difficult cases.Can J Neurol Sci,1998,25:13-22.
    [41]Kinoshita K,Tada E,Matsumoto K.Proton MR spectroscopy of delayed cerebral radiation in monkeys and human after brachytherapy.AJNR,1997,18:1753-1761.
    [42]Usenius T,Usenius JP,Tenhunen M,et al.Radiation-induced change in human metabolites as studied by ~1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1995,33:719-724.
    [43]Urenjak J,Williams SR,Gadian GD,et al.Specific expression of Nacetyl aspartate in neurons,olegodendrocytes in vivo.J Neurochem,1992,59:55-61.
    [44]Rango M,Spagnoli D,Tomei G,et al.Central nervous system trans-synaptic effects of acute axonal injury:a ~1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.Magn Reson Med,1995,33:595-600.
    [45]Chong VFH,Rumpel H,Aw YS,et al.Temporal lobe necrosis following radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:~1H MR spectroscopic findings.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45:699-705.
    [46]范德生,孙宁.线粒体与电离辐射损伤的关系研究现状[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(6):843-846.
    [47]Kamiryo T,Kassell NF,Thai QA,et al.Histological changes in the normal rat brain irradiation[J].Acta Neurochir,1996,138(4):451-459.
    [48]Andreas B,Harald B,Vassilios V,et al.Inflammatory CNS demyelination:histopathologic correlation with in vivo quantitative proton MR spectroscopy[J].AJNR,1999,20(9):1619-1627.
    [49]Chikkathur N M,Peethambaran A,John R M,et al.Defective NAA catabolism reduces brain acetate levels and myelin lipid Synthesis in Canavan's disease[J].PNAS,2005,02(4):5221-5226.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700