西北地区4种优质饲草的肉牛体外瘤胃发酵性能研究
|
摘要
本试验选用黄土高丘陵沟壑区推广应用的玉米、燕麦、苜蓿裹包青贮及苜蓿干草为试验材料,旨在研究其在肉牛体外瘤胃发酵性能及组合效应,为其科学应用提供技术支持。将4种优质饲草按干物质基础组成7种不同比例组合,即C_1(50%玉米青贮+50%燕麦青贮)、C_2(50%玉米青贮+50%苜蓿青贮)、C_3(80%玉米青贮+20%苜蓿干草)、C_4(50%燕麦青贮+50%苜蓿干草)、C_5(70%玉米青贮+10%燕麦青贮+20%苜蓿青贮)、C_6(65%玉米青贮+15%燕麦青贮+25%苜蓿青贮)和C_7(50%玉米青贮+20%燕麦青贮+30%苜蓿青贮)共构成11种发酵底物。结果表明:4种单一饲料在各时间点的产气量(GP)玉米青贮最高,苜蓿青贮最低(P<0.05);7种组合不同时间点产气特点为,C_3的GP最高,C_4最低(P<0.05)。4种单一饲料的快速降解部分产气量(a)和产气速率常数(c)分别为玉米青贮和苜蓿干草最高,与其他单一饲料存在显著差异(P<0.05);7种组合中的a和c均以C_2最高;慢速降解部分产气量(b)和潜在产气量(a+b)均以C_3最高,亦均显著高于其他组合(P<0.05)。体外发酵48 h后,4种单一饲料中玉米青贮的干物质消失率(DMD)显著高于其他3种(P<0.05);培养液的pH介于6.27～6.72,且各组间差异显著(P<0.05);氨态氮(NH_3-N)浓度燕麦青贮最高(P<0.05)。7种组合的DMDC_2显著低于C_5和C_7(P<0.05);pH介于6.40～6.69,其中C_3显著低于其他6种(P<0.05);NH_3-N的浓度C_1与C_2显著高于其他5种(P<0.05)。4种单一粗饲料的总挥发性脂肪酸(TVFA)为玉米青贮显著高于苜蓿青贮和干草(P<0.05);7种组合培养48 h后,培养液的TVFA浓度C_2和C_4显著低于C_5和C_6(P<0.05)。综上,玉米青贮的体外发酵GP、DMD、TVFA及乙酸浓度均最高;苜蓿青贮的体外发酵GP较低,发酵速度慢;不同组合的综合组合效应值(MFAEI)均为正值,由高到低依次为C_4、C_2、C_5、C_1、C_3、C_6、C_7。
The aim of this study was to investigate the fermentation performance and combination effect of high-quality forages treated with beef cattle rumen fluid in vitro. The four forages studied were packaged silage of maize, oat and alfalfa, and alfalfa hay. The feeds were sourced from the Loess Plateau region. Seven mixtures of the four forages were also tested: C_1(50% maize silage+50% oat silage), C_2(50% maize silage+50% alfalfa silage), C_3(80% maize silage+20% alfalfa hay), C_4(50% oat silage+50% alfalfa hay), C_5(70% maize silage+10% oat silage+20% alfalfa silage), C_6(65% maize silage+15% oat silage+25% alfalfa silage) and C_7(50% maize silage +20% oat silage+30% alfalfa silage). It was found that: at each time point, the gas production(GP) was highest for maize silage and lowest for alfalfa silage, among the four forages tested singly(P<0.05). For the seven mixtures, the highest and lowest GP was from C_3 and C_4, respectively(P<0.05). Gas production was partitioned into a rapid degradation component(a), a slow degradation component(b), and a gas production rate constant(c). Among the four single feeds, maize silage had the highest value of a, while alfalfa hay had the highest value of c, and values differed significantly(P<0.05) between the four single feeds for both a and c. Among the seven feed mixtures, the highest values of a and c occurred in mixture C_2, while values of c, and potential gas production(a+b) were higher(P<0.05) in mixture C_3, than in the other mixtures. Among the four single feeds, the highest dry matter digestibility(DMD) after 48 h was for maize silage, and there were also significant differences among the other three forages(P<0.05); the pH values differed among the four feeds(P<0.05), and ranged from 6.27 to 6.72; while the NH_3-N concentration was the highest in oat silage(P<0.05). For the seven feed mixtures, the DMD of C_2 was lower than C_5 and C_7(P<0.05); the pH values ranged from 6.40 to 6.69, and the pH value of C_3 was significantly lower than that of the other six feed mixtures(P<0.05); The NH_3-N concentration of C_1 and C_2 was higher than that of the other five feed mixtures(P<0.05). Among the four single forages, the total volatile fatty acids(TVFA) alfalfa silage and hay were significantly lower than for maize and oat silage(P<0.05). Among the feed mixtures, the TVFA concentrations of C_2 and C_4 were significantly lower than those of C_5 and C_6(P<0.05). In conclusion, the GP, DMD, TVFA and acetic acid production from maize silage was the highest, while the lowest GP occurred in alfalfa silage. For the seven feed mixtures positive associative effects were detected, and according to the ‘MAFEI' index, these effects ranked C_4>C_2>C_5>C_1>C_3>C_6>C_7.
The aim of this study was to investigate the fermentation performance and combination effect of high-quality forages treated with beef cattle rumen fluid in vitro. The four forages studied were packaged silage of maize, oat and alfalfa, and alfalfa hay. The feeds were sourced from the Loess Plateau region. Seven mixtures of the four forages were also tested: C_1(50% maize silage+50% oat silage), C_2(50% maize silage+50% alfalfa silage), C_3(80% maize silage+20% alfalfa hay), C_4(50% oat silage+50% alfalfa hay), C_5(70% maize silage+10% oat silage+20% alfalfa silage), C_6(65% maize silage+15% oat silage+25% alfalfa silage) and C_7(50% maize silage +20% oat silage+30% alfalfa silage). It was found that: at each time point, the gas production(GP) was highest for maize silage and lowest for alfalfa silage, among the four forages tested singly(P<0.05). For the seven mixtures, the highest and lowest GP was from C_3 and C_4, respectively(P<0.05). Gas production was partitioned into a rapid degradation component(a), a slow degradation component(b), and a gas production rate constant(c). Among the four single feeds, maize silage had the highest value of a, while alfalfa hay had the highest value of c, and values differed significantly(P<0.05) between the four single feeds for both a and c. Among the seven feed mixtures, the highest values of a and c occurred in mixture C_2, while values of c, and potential gas production(a+b) were higher(P<0.05) in mixture C_3, than in the other mixtures. Among the four single feeds, the highest dry matter digestibility(DMD) after 48 h was for maize silage, and there were also significant differences among the other three forages(P<0.05); the pH values differed among the four feeds(P<0.05), and ranged from 6.27 to 6.72; while the NH_3-N concentration was the highest in oat silage(P<0.05). For the seven feed mixtures, the DMD of C_2 was lower than C_5 and C_7(P<0.05); the pH values ranged from 6.40 to 6.69, and the pH value of C_3 was significantly lower than that of the other six feed mixtures(P<0.05); The NH_3-N concentration of C_1 and C_2 was higher than that of the other five feed mixtures(P<0.05). Among the four single forages, the total volatile fatty acids(TVFA) alfalfa silage and hay were significantly lower than for maize and oat silage(P<0.05). Among the feed mixtures, the TVFA concentrations of C_2 and C_4 were significantly lower than those of C_5 and C_6(P<0.05). In conclusion, the GP, DMD, TVFA and acetic acid production from maize silage was the highest, while the lowest GP occurred in alfalfa silage. For the seven feed mixtures positive associative effects were detected, and according to the ‘MAFEI' index, these effects ranked C_4>C_2>C_5>C_1>C_3>C_6>C_7.
引文
[1] Mazzenga A,Gianesella M,Brscic M,et al.Feeding behaviour,diet digestibility,rumen fluid and metabolic parameters of beef cattle fed total mixed rations with a stepped substitution of wheat straw with maize silage.Livestock Science,2009,122(1):16-23.
[2] Yang D Y,Hao L Z,Liu S J,et al.Research progress on nutritional value of roughage commonly used in ruminants in Qinghai Province.Feed Industry,2018,39(1):20-23.杨得玉,郝力壮,刘书杰,等.青海省反刍动物常用粗饲料营养价值研究进展.饲料工业,2018,39(1):20-23.
[3] Jin E W,Zhou L Y,Bu D P,et al.Advances in the application of in vitro gas production in animal nutrition.Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Surgeons,2012,39(10):128-133.金恩望,周凌云,卜登攀,等.体外产气法在动物营养学中应用的研究进展.中国畜牧兽医,2012,39(10):128-133.
[4] Mauricio R M,Mould F L,Dhanoa M S,et al.A semiautomated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feed stuff evaluation.Animal Feed Science and Technology,1999,79(4):321-330.
[5] Guo Y J,Long R J,Zhang D G,et al.The dry matter degradation rate of alpine forage and shrub was determined by in vitro gas production method.Journal of Grass Industry,2003,12(2):54-60.郭彦军,龙瑞军,张德罡,等.利用体外产气法测定高山牧草和灌木的干物质降解率.草业学报,2003,12(2):54-60.
[6] Han X M,Cao Y F,Li Q F,et al.Evaluation of the combined effects of corn stover,straw,corn stover silage and concentrate by in vitro gas production.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2017,29(2):699-711.韩肖敏,曹玉凤,李秋凤,等.用体外产气法评价玉米秸秆、稻草、玉米秸秆青贮与精料的组合效应.动物营养学报,2017,29(2):699-711.
[7] Zhang J X,Liu J B,Xue B,et al.Effects of diet ratio on the rumen in vitro fermentation of Nanjiang Yellow Sheep.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2013,25(4):870-877.张建勋,刘江波,薛白,等.饲粮精粗比对南江黄羊瘤胃体外发酵的影响.动物营养学报,2013,25(4):870-877.
[8] Sun G Q,Lü Y Y,Zhang J J.Study on the combined effect of whole plant corn silage and peanut vine and Leymus chinensis by in vitro rumen fermentation.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2014,23(3):224-231.孙国强,吕永艳,张杰杰.利用体外瘤胃发酵法研究全株玉米青贮与花生蔓和羊草间的组合效应.草业学报,2014,23(3):224-231.
[9] Zhang J Z,Zou Q H,Wang J F,et al.Integrated study on the combined effects of straw and multi-level sputum mixed rumen in vitro fermentation.Feed Industry,2011,32(17):40-48.张吉鹍,邹庆华,王金芬,等.稻草与多水平苜蓿混合瘤胃体外发酵组合效应的整体研究.饲料工业,2011,32(17):40-48.
[10] Li Y,Han X M,Li J G,et al.Evaluation of the combined effects of corn stover,cereal grass and corn stover silage in vitro.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(5):213-223.李妍,韩肖敏,李建国,等.体外法评价玉米秸秆、谷草和玉米秸秆青贮饲料组合效应研究.草业学报,2017,26(5):213-223.
[11] Meng M J,Tu Y L,Bai Y F,et al.Study on the combined effect of wheat straw and rice rumen in vitro fermentation.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(9):161-172.孟梅娟,涂远璐,白云峰,等.小麦秸秆与米糠粕瘤胃体外发酵组合效应研究.草业学报,2016,25(9):161-172.
[12] He Y,Wang H R,Xu J H,et al.Evaluation of the feeding value of ramie by in vitro gas production method and nylon bag method.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2017,29(2):690-698.贺瑶,王洪荣,徐进昊,等.体外产气法和尼龙袋法评定苎麻的饲用价值.动物营养学报,2017,29(2):690-698.
[13] Jin E W,Wang J Q,Bu D P,et al.Effects of plant essential oils on rumen in vitro fermentation and methane production by in vitro gas production.Journal of China Agricultural University,2013,18(3):120-127.金恩望,王加启,卜登攀,等.利用体外产气法研究植物精油对瘤胃体外发酵和甲烷生成的影响.中国农业大学学报,2013,18(3):120-127.
[14] Huang Y L,Zou C X,Wei S J,et al.Effects of cysteamine on rumen fermentation parameters and methane production in buffalo by in vitro gas production.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2014,26(1):125-133.黄雅莉,邹彩霞,韦升菊,等.体外产气法研究半胱胺对水牛瘤胃发酵参数和甲烷产量的影响.动物营养学报,2014,26(1):125-133.
[15] Li M S,Xue S Y,Wang C,et al.In vitro gas production method to study the effects of mixed fertilizer of Salix psammophila on rumen environmental parameters in sheep.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2015,27(6):1943-1953.李满双,薛树媛,王超,等.体外产气法研究沙柳混合发酵饲料对绵羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响.动物营养学报,2015,27(6):1943-1953.
[16] Chen Z L,Wang Z S,Xue B,et al.Effect of nitrogen source and level on rumen fermentation characteristics of beef cattle in vitro.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2012,24(6):1150-1156.陈智亮,王之盛,薛白,等.氮源和水平对肉牛体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响.动物营养学报,2012,24(6):1150-1156.
[17] Menke K H,Steingawss H.Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid.Animal Research,1988,28:7-55.
[18] ?rskov E R,McDonald I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.
[19] Zhou J W.Adaptability of Tibetan sheep to nitrogen nutrition stress on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2015.周建伟.藏羊对青藏高原氮素营养胁迫的适应性研究.兰州:兰州大学,2015.
[20] Li X Y.Effects of feeding time of flaxseed diet on growth and fattening performance and meat quality of lambs.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2017.李晓亚.亚麻籽饲粮饲喂时间对羔羊生长育肥性能和肉品质的影响.兰州:兰州大学,2017.
[21] Wang X.Study on the scientific matching of roughage and the optimization technology of sheep diet formula system by using GI technology.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2003.王旭.利用GI技术对粗饲料进行科学搭配及绵羊日粮配方系统优化技术的研究.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2003.
[22] Lei D Z,Jin S G,Wu R T N.Evaluation of the combined effects of different roughages and the same concentrate by in vitro gas production.Feed Industry,2009,30(3):30-33.雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应.饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.
[23] Menke K H,Raab L,Salewskl A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ru-minant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro.Journal of Agriculture Science,1979,93(1):217-222.
[24] Bu T L.Evaluation of the combined effects of silage corn,Leymus chinensis and alfalfa by in vitro gas production method.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2006.布同良.体外产气法评定青贮玉米、羊草和苜蓿草之间的组合效应.杭州:浙江大学,2006.
[25] Rocha J L,Baker J F,Womack J E,et al.Statistical associations between restriction fragment length polymorphisms and quantitative traits in beef cattle.Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3360-3370.
[26] Yang Z L,Li Q F,Cao Y F,et al.Study on the combined effect of whole plant corn silage and cereal grass by in vitro gas production method.Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine,2017,44(3):698-707.杨志林,李秋凤,曹玉凤,等.体外产气法评定全株玉米青贮与谷草的组合效应研究.中国畜牧兽医,2017,44(3):698-707.
[27] Zhao X,Dong K H,Wang Y X,et al.Degradation dynamics of different fine-to-roughage mixed feeds in rumen of sheep.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2005,14(3):9-11.赵祥,董宽虎,王永新,等.不同精粗比全混合饲料在绵羊瘤胃内的降解动态.草业学报,2005,14(3):9-11.
[28] Xue H F,Meng Q X.Progress in research on neutral detergent fiber nutrition of dairy cows.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2007,19(1):454-458.薛红枫,孟庆翔.奶牛中性洗涤纤维营养研究进展.动物营养学报,2007,19(1):454-458.
[29] Li Y F,Hao J X,Ma Y Y,et al.Evaluation of nutritional value of different types of feed by rumen fermentation in vitro.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2013,25(10):2403-2413.李袁飞,郝建祥,马艳艳,等.体外瘤胃发酵法评定不同类型饲料的营养价值.动物营养学报,2013,25(10):2403-2413.
[30] Hoover W H.Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion.Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69:2755-2766.
[31] Hu M,Lu D X,Niu W Y,et al.Effects of different anions and cations on the rumen environmental parameters of sheep.Animal Husbandry and Feed Science,2002,23(5):7-8.胡明,卢德勋,牛文艺,等.不同阴阳离子水平日粮对绵羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响.畜牧与饲料科学,2002,23(5):7-8.
[32] Di B.In vitro gas production method to evaluate the combined effect of yak cold season supplement forage and natural grass in Yushu area.Xining:Qinghai University,2013.刁波.体外产气法评价牦牛冷季补饲草料与玉树地区天然牧草的组合效应.西宁:青海大学,2013.
[33] Chen W J,Sun P F,Zhang X D,et al.Effect of nitrogen-energy balance on the associative effects of feedstuffs in vitro.Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,2007,16(2):139-144.
[34] Feng Y L.Nutrition of ruminant animals.Beijing:Science Press,2004:136-138.冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学.北京:科学出版社,2004:136-138.
[35] Xiong B H,Pang Z H,Luo Q Y.China feed ingredients and nutritional value table (22 Edition).China Feed,2011,(21):37-43.熊本海,庞之洪,罗清尧.中国饲料成分及营养价值表(22版).中国饲料,2011,(21):37-43.
[36] Zhang J J.Modeling of roughage grading index parameters and combined effects of roughage scientific collocation.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2004.张吉鹃.粗饲料分级指数参数的模型化及粗饲料科学搭配的组合效应研究.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2004.
[37] Wang S,Shi L F,Zhang Z B,et al.Effects of the ratio of ramie and ramie on the rumen microbial fermentation parameters in vitro.Chinese Journal of Animal Ecology,2018,39(4):39-43.王珊,史良峰,张振斌,等.麻叶荨麻和羊草比例对体外培养瘤胃微生物发酵参数的影响.家畜生态学报,2018,39(4):39-43.
[38] Wang D L,Fang J,Xing F,et al.Alfalfa as a supplement of dried cornstalk diets:Associative effects on intake,digestibility,nitrogen metabolisation,rumen environment and hematological parameters in sheep.Livestock Science,2008,113(1):87-97.
[39] Spears J W,Schlegel P,Seal M C,et al.Bioavailability of zinc from zinc sulfate and different organic zinc sources and their effects on ruminal volatile fatty acid proportions.Livestock Production Science,2004,90(2):211-217.
[40] Hu W L.Study on the effect of saponin on rumen fermentation and methane production and animal performance.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.胡伟莲.皂甙对瘤胃发酵与甲烷产量及动物生产性能影响的研究.杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[41] Mo F.Nutritional needs of ruminants and evaluation and application of feed nutrient value.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2011.莫放.反刍动物营养需要及饲料营养价值评定与应用.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2011.
[42] Zhang S J,Chandhy A S,Osman A.Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value,fermentation and methane characteristics.Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,206:29-38.
[43] Li J G,An Y F.Standardized production technology of dairy cows.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2003:105.李建国,安永福.奶牛标准化生产技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:105.
[44] Shi H L,Wang L Q,Xi L Q,et al.Study on the rumen fermentation characteristics of the combination effect of alfalfa silage and corn silage by in vitro gas production.Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2013,50(7):1353-1359.史卉玲,王连群,席琳乔,等.利用体外产气法研究苜蓿青贮与玉米青贮组合效应的瘤胃发酵特征.新疆农业科学,2013,50(7):1353-1359.
[2] Yang D Y,Hao L Z,Liu S J,et al.Research progress on nutritional value of roughage commonly used in ruminants in Qinghai Province.Feed Industry,2018,39(1):20-23.杨得玉,郝力壮,刘书杰,等.青海省反刍动物常用粗饲料营养价值研究进展.饲料工业,2018,39(1):20-23.
[3] Jin E W,Zhou L Y,Bu D P,et al.Advances in the application of in vitro gas production in animal nutrition.Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Surgeons,2012,39(10):128-133.金恩望,周凌云,卜登攀,等.体外产气法在动物营养学中应用的研究进展.中国畜牧兽医,2012,39(10):128-133.
[4] Mauricio R M,Mould F L,Dhanoa M S,et al.A semiautomated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feed stuff evaluation.Animal Feed Science and Technology,1999,79(4):321-330.
[5] Guo Y J,Long R J,Zhang D G,et al.The dry matter degradation rate of alpine forage and shrub was determined by in vitro gas production method.Journal of Grass Industry,2003,12(2):54-60.郭彦军,龙瑞军,张德罡,等.利用体外产气法测定高山牧草和灌木的干物质降解率.草业学报,2003,12(2):54-60.
[6] Han X M,Cao Y F,Li Q F,et al.Evaluation of the combined effects of corn stover,straw,corn stover silage and concentrate by in vitro gas production.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2017,29(2):699-711.韩肖敏,曹玉凤,李秋凤,等.用体外产气法评价玉米秸秆、稻草、玉米秸秆青贮与精料的组合效应.动物营养学报,2017,29(2):699-711.
[7] Zhang J X,Liu J B,Xue B,et al.Effects of diet ratio on the rumen in vitro fermentation of Nanjiang Yellow Sheep.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2013,25(4):870-877.张建勋,刘江波,薛白,等.饲粮精粗比对南江黄羊瘤胃体外发酵的影响.动物营养学报,2013,25(4):870-877.
[8] Sun G Q,Lü Y Y,Zhang J J.Study on the combined effect of whole plant corn silage and peanut vine and Leymus chinensis by in vitro rumen fermentation.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2014,23(3):224-231.孙国强,吕永艳,张杰杰.利用体外瘤胃发酵法研究全株玉米青贮与花生蔓和羊草间的组合效应.草业学报,2014,23(3):224-231.
[9] Zhang J Z,Zou Q H,Wang J F,et al.Integrated study on the combined effects of straw and multi-level sputum mixed rumen in vitro fermentation.Feed Industry,2011,32(17):40-48.张吉鹍,邹庆华,王金芬,等.稻草与多水平苜蓿混合瘤胃体外发酵组合效应的整体研究.饲料工业,2011,32(17):40-48.
[10] Li Y,Han X M,Li J G,et al.Evaluation of the combined effects of corn stover,cereal grass and corn stover silage in vitro.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(5):213-223.李妍,韩肖敏,李建国,等.体外法评价玉米秸秆、谷草和玉米秸秆青贮饲料组合效应研究.草业学报,2017,26(5):213-223.
[11] Meng M J,Tu Y L,Bai Y F,et al.Study on the combined effect of wheat straw and rice rumen in vitro fermentation.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(9):161-172.孟梅娟,涂远璐,白云峰,等.小麦秸秆与米糠粕瘤胃体外发酵组合效应研究.草业学报,2016,25(9):161-172.
[12] He Y,Wang H R,Xu J H,et al.Evaluation of the feeding value of ramie by in vitro gas production method and nylon bag method.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2017,29(2):690-698.贺瑶,王洪荣,徐进昊,等.体外产气法和尼龙袋法评定苎麻的饲用价值.动物营养学报,2017,29(2):690-698.
[13] Jin E W,Wang J Q,Bu D P,et al.Effects of plant essential oils on rumen in vitro fermentation and methane production by in vitro gas production.Journal of China Agricultural University,2013,18(3):120-127.金恩望,王加启,卜登攀,等.利用体外产气法研究植物精油对瘤胃体外发酵和甲烷生成的影响.中国农业大学学报,2013,18(3):120-127.
[14] Huang Y L,Zou C X,Wei S J,et al.Effects of cysteamine on rumen fermentation parameters and methane production in buffalo by in vitro gas production.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2014,26(1):125-133.黄雅莉,邹彩霞,韦升菊,等.体外产气法研究半胱胺对水牛瘤胃发酵参数和甲烷产量的影响.动物营养学报,2014,26(1):125-133.
[15] Li M S,Xue S Y,Wang C,et al.In vitro gas production method to study the effects of mixed fertilizer of Salix psammophila on rumen environmental parameters in sheep.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2015,27(6):1943-1953.李满双,薛树媛,王超,等.体外产气法研究沙柳混合发酵饲料对绵羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响.动物营养学报,2015,27(6):1943-1953.
[16] Chen Z L,Wang Z S,Xue B,et al.Effect of nitrogen source and level on rumen fermentation characteristics of beef cattle in vitro.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2012,24(6):1150-1156.陈智亮,王之盛,薛白,等.氮源和水平对肉牛体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响.动物营养学报,2012,24(6):1150-1156.
[17] Menke K H,Steingawss H.Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid.Animal Research,1988,28:7-55.
[18] ?rskov E R,McDonald I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.
[19] Zhou J W.Adaptability of Tibetan sheep to nitrogen nutrition stress on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2015.周建伟.藏羊对青藏高原氮素营养胁迫的适应性研究.兰州:兰州大学,2015.
[20] Li X Y.Effects of feeding time of flaxseed diet on growth and fattening performance and meat quality of lambs.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2017.李晓亚.亚麻籽饲粮饲喂时间对羔羊生长育肥性能和肉品质的影响.兰州:兰州大学,2017.
[21] Wang X.Study on the scientific matching of roughage and the optimization technology of sheep diet formula system by using GI technology.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2003.王旭.利用GI技术对粗饲料进行科学搭配及绵羊日粮配方系统优化技术的研究.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2003.
[22] Lei D Z,Jin S G,Wu R T N.Evaluation of the combined effects of different roughages and the same concentrate by in vitro gas production.Feed Industry,2009,30(3):30-33.雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应.饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.
[23] Menke K H,Raab L,Salewskl A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ru-minant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro.Journal of Agriculture Science,1979,93(1):217-222.
[24] Bu T L.Evaluation of the combined effects of silage corn,Leymus chinensis and alfalfa by in vitro gas production method.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2006.布同良.体外产气法评定青贮玉米、羊草和苜蓿草之间的组合效应.杭州:浙江大学,2006.
[25] Rocha J L,Baker J F,Womack J E,et al.Statistical associations between restriction fragment length polymorphisms and quantitative traits in beef cattle.Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3360-3370.
[26] Yang Z L,Li Q F,Cao Y F,et al.Study on the combined effect of whole plant corn silage and cereal grass by in vitro gas production method.Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine,2017,44(3):698-707.杨志林,李秋凤,曹玉凤,等.体外产气法评定全株玉米青贮与谷草的组合效应研究.中国畜牧兽医,2017,44(3):698-707.
[27] Zhao X,Dong K H,Wang Y X,et al.Degradation dynamics of different fine-to-roughage mixed feeds in rumen of sheep.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2005,14(3):9-11.赵祥,董宽虎,王永新,等.不同精粗比全混合饲料在绵羊瘤胃内的降解动态.草业学报,2005,14(3):9-11.
[28] Xue H F,Meng Q X.Progress in research on neutral detergent fiber nutrition of dairy cows.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2007,19(1):454-458.薛红枫,孟庆翔.奶牛中性洗涤纤维营养研究进展.动物营养学报,2007,19(1):454-458.
[29] Li Y F,Hao J X,Ma Y Y,et al.Evaluation of nutritional value of different types of feed by rumen fermentation in vitro.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2013,25(10):2403-2413.李袁飞,郝建祥,马艳艳,等.体外瘤胃发酵法评定不同类型饲料的营养价值.动物营养学报,2013,25(10):2403-2413.
[30] Hoover W H.Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion.Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69:2755-2766.
[31] Hu M,Lu D X,Niu W Y,et al.Effects of different anions and cations on the rumen environmental parameters of sheep.Animal Husbandry and Feed Science,2002,23(5):7-8.胡明,卢德勋,牛文艺,等.不同阴阳离子水平日粮对绵羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响.畜牧与饲料科学,2002,23(5):7-8.
[32] Di B.In vitro gas production method to evaluate the combined effect of yak cold season supplement forage and natural grass in Yushu area.Xining:Qinghai University,2013.刁波.体外产气法评价牦牛冷季补饲草料与玉树地区天然牧草的组合效应.西宁:青海大学,2013.
[33] Chen W J,Sun P F,Zhang X D,et al.Effect of nitrogen-energy balance on the associative effects of feedstuffs in vitro.Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,2007,16(2):139-144.
[34] Feng Y L.Nutrition of ruminant animals.Beijing:Science Press,2004:136-138.冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学.北京:科学出版社,2004:136-138.
[35] Xiong B H,Pang Z H,Luo Q Y.China feed ingredients and nutritional value table (22 Edition).China Feed,2011,(21):37-43.熊本海,庞之洪,罗清尧.中国饲料成分及营养价值表(22版).中国饲料,2011,(21):37-43.
[36] Zhang J J.Modeling of roughage grading index parameters and combined effects of roughage scientific collocation.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2004.张吉鹃.粗饲料分级指数参数的模型化及粗饲料科学搭配的组合效应研究.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2004.
[37] Wang S,Shi L F,Zhang Z B,et al.Effects of the ratio of ramie and ramie on the rumen microbial fermentation parameters in vitro.Chinese Journal of Animal Ecology,2018,39(4):39-43.王珊,史良峰,张振斌,等.麻叶荨麻和羊草比例对体外培养瘤胃微生物发酵参数的影响.家畜生态学报,2018,39(4):39-43.
[38] Wang D L,Fang J,Xing F,et al.Alfalfa as a supplement of dried cornstalk diets:Associative effects on intake,digestibility,nitrogen metabolisation,rumen environment and hematological parameters in sheep.Livestock Science,2008,113(1):87-97.
[39] Spears J W,Schlegel P,Seal M C,et al.Bioavailability of zinc from zinc sulfate and different organic zinc sources and their effects on ruminal volatile fatty acid proportions.Livestock Production Science,2004,90(2):211-217.
[40] Hu W L.Study on the effect of saponin on rumen fermentation and methane production and animal performance.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.胡伟莲.皂甙对瘤胃发酵与甲烷产量及动物生产性能影响的研究.杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[41] Mo F.Nutritional needs of ruminants and evaluation and application of feed nutrient value.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2011.莫放.反刍动物营养需要及饲料营养价值评定与应用.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2011.
[42] Zhang S J,Chandhy A S,Osman A.Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value,fermentation and methane characteristics.Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,206:29-38.
[43] Li J G,An Y F.Standardized production technology of dairy cows.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2003:105.李建国,安永福.奶牛标准化生产技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:105.
[44] Shi H L,Wang L Q,Xi L Q,et al.Study on the rumen fermentation characteristics of the combination effect of alfalfa silage and corn silage by in vitro gas production.Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2013,50(7):1353-1359.史卉玲,王连群,席琳乔,等.利用体外产气法研究苜蓿青贮与玉米青贮组合效应的瘤胃发酵特征.新疆农业科学,2013,50(7):1353-1359.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |