公民纳入环境民事公益诉讼主体之合理性
|
摘要
以完善我国环境民事公益诉讼制度为目的,通过梳理我国环境民事公益诉讼主体的法律制度,并对美、日、德等国的相关制度展开比较,阐明我国环境民事公益诉讼主体制度的发展阶段。同时,以法律经济学、制度经济学为分析视角,批驳当下推动公民作为主体的主张。提出大约十年后,当制度发展到"充分的利益关系"阶段,将公民纳入法定主体范围具有合理性和可行性。
Aiming to improve the environmental civil public interest litigation system in China, by sorting out the legal system of the subject of environmental civil public interest litigation in China,and comparing the relevant systems in the United States, Japan, Germany and other countries, this article expounded the development stage of the subject system of environmental civil public interest litigation in China. At the same time, from the perspective of legal economics and institutional economics, the author refuted the proposition of promoting citizens as subjects. About ten years later, when the system develops to the stage of "sufficient interest relationship", it is reasonable and feasible to bring citizens into the scope of legal subjects.
Aiming to improve the environmental civil public interest litigation system in China, by sorting out the legal system of the subject of environmental civil public interest litigation in China,and comparing the relevant systems in the United States, Japan, Germany and other countries, this article expounded the development stage of the subject system of environmental civil public interest litigation in China. At the same time, from the perspective of legal economics and institutional economics, the author refuted the proposition of promoting citizens as subjects. About ten years later, when the system develops to the stage of "sufficient interest relationship", it is reasonable and feasible to bring citizens into the scope of legal subjects.
引文
[1]别涛.环境民事公益诉讼的主力军[N].中国环境报,2012-10-12(6).
[2]徐样民,胡中华,梅宏.环境民事公益诉讼制度研究———以制度建设为中心[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009:260.
[3]蔡守秋.论环境民事公益诉讼的几个问题[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,9(9):1-8.
[4]王灿发.中国环境民事公益诉讼的主体及其争议[J].国家检察官学院学报,2010,18(3):3-6.
[5]刘艺.美国私人检察诉讼演变及其对我国的启示[J].行政法学研究,2017(5):63-76.
[6]张辉.美国公民诉讼之“私人检察总长理论”解析[J].环球法律评论,2014,36(1):164-175.
[7]徐样民,胡中华,梅宏.环境民事公益诉讼制度研究———以制度建设为中心[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009:260.
[8]杨晓婉.环境民事公益诉讼中环境行政机关角色和作用探析[J].中国环境监察,2016(增刊1):91-95.
[9]张广源,韩陛贤.环境民事公益诉讼激励机制的法律构建[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2018,28(4):15-18.
[10]裴惠玲,张建省,何鑫.论环境公益诉讼[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2010,20(4):31-34.
[2]徐样民,胡中华,梅宏.环境民事公益诉讼制度研究———以制度建设为中心[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009:260.
[3]蔡守秋.论环境民事公益诉讼的几个问题[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,9(9):1-8.
[4]王灿发.中国环境民事公益诉讼的主体及其争议[J].国家检察官学院学报,2010,18(3):3-6.
[5]刘艺.美国私人检察诉讼演变及其对我国的启示[J].行政法学研究,2017(5):63-76.
[6]张辉.美国公民诉讼之“私人检察总长理论”解析[J].环球法律评论,2014,36(1):164-175.
[7]徐样民,胡中华,梅宏.环境民事公益诉讼制度研究———以制度建设为中心[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009:260.
[8]杨晓婉.环境民事公益诉讼中环境行政机关角色和作用探析[J].中国环境监察,2016(增刊1):91-95.
[9]张广源,韩陛贤.环境民事公益诉讼激励机制的法律构建[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2018,28(4):15-18.
[10]裴惠玲,张建省,何鑫.论环境公益诉讼[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2010,20(4):31-34.