土壤污染修复治理中地方政府联动协作机制研究
|
摘要
我国土壤污染修复治理主要采取以行政划界的碎片化管理,与日益凸显的环境整体性治理相矛盾。《土壤污染防治行动计划》提出探索跨行政区域的土壤污染防治联动协作机制。我国土壤污染修复治理中地方政府联动协作机制运行中存在着各区域间的合作体系层级低、法律配套欠完善、地方政府间竞争无序、资源配置不合理和地方政府协作机制权责不明等问题,需要构建"多元共治"体系,完善协作运行配套机制;发挥市场主体协调自主性,建立生态利益补偿激励机制;厘清权责关系,明确协作管理责任等优化路径。
The promulgation of the Action Plan on Soil Pollution Prevention and Control in 2016 has clearly defined the importance of exploring a collaboration mechanism for soil pollution prevention and control across administrative regions. At present, the treatment and remediation of soil pollution in China highlights the conflicts and contradictions between the overall governance needs of the environment and the fragmented management of traditional administrative demarcation. Improving the collaboration mechanism of local governments is a major problem in remediation of soil pollution. This article analyzes the status quo of the local government linkage coordination mechanism on the basis of overall governance theory, discusses the problems affecting the operation of the mechanism which includes the initial stage of regional cooperation mechanism, the imperfection of various systems and regulations, the unreasonable allocation of resources caused by disorderly competition among local governments, the unclear authority and liabilities of local government cooperation mechanism, and the lack of authority, and finds a suitable approach to improve the collaboration mechanism of local government linkages in soil pollution control and restoration: Firstly, to build a "multi-governance"system and improve the supporting mechanism of cooperation; secondly, to give full play to the coordination and autonomy of market participants and improve the incentive mechanism of compensation for ecological interests; thirdly, to clarify the power-liability relationship and explore the liability sharing and reward-punishment mechanism of cooperative management.
The promulgation of the Action Plan on Soil Pollution Prevention and Control in 2016 has clearly defined the importance of exploring a collaboration mechanism for soil pollution prevention and control across administrative regions. At present, the treatment and remediation of soil pollution in China highlights the conflicts and contradictions between the overall governance needs of the environment and the fragmented management of traditional administrative demarcation. Improving the collaboration mechanism of local governments is a major problem in remediation of soil pollution. This article analyzes the status quo of the local government linkage coordination mechanism on the basis of overall governance theory, discusses the problems affecting the operation of the mechanism which includes the initial stage of regional cooperation mechanism, the imperfection of various systems and regulations, the unreasonable allocation of resources caused by disorderly competition among local governments, the unclear authority and liabilities of local government cooperation mechanism, and the lack of authority, and finds a suitable approach to improve the collaboration mechanism of local government linkages in soil pollution control and restoration: Firstly, to build a "multi-governance"system and improve the supporting mechanism of cooperation; secondly, to give full play to the coordination and autonomy of market participants and improve the incentive mechanism of compensation for ecological interests; thirdly, to clarify the power-liability relationship and explore the liability sharing and reward-punishment mechanism of cooperative management.
引文
[1]汪建昌.理想与现实:构建网络型的府际关系[J].理论导刊,2010,(4):21-23.
[2]秦长江.协作性公共管理:国外公共行政理论的新发展[J].上海行政学院学报,2010,(1):103-109.
[3]Taillieu.Collaborative Strategies and Multi-organizationa Partnerships[M].Leuven:Garant Publication,2001.
[4]胡佳.区域环境治理中的地方政府协作研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[5]竺乾威.公共行政理论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2008.
[6]竺乾威.从新公共管理到整体性治理[J].中国行政管理,2008,(10):52-58.
[7]Christopher Pollitt.Joined-Up government:a Survey[J]Political Studies Review,2003,(1):1-35.
[8]胡佳.区域环境治理中地方政府协作的碎片化困境与整体性策略[J].广西社会科学,2015,(5):134-138.
[9]李红利.环境困局与科学发展中国地方政府环境规制研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012.
[10]罗伯特,阿格拉诺夫,等.协作性公共管理:地方政府新战略[M].李玲玲,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[11]王华薇.环境维权升级下的地方政府治理困境与改善[J].理论探讨,2018,(6):174-179.
[12]胡佳.区域环境治理的地方政府协作策略[J].中国社会科学报,2018,(7):1-3.
[13]金太军.论长三角一体化进程中区域合作协调机制的构建[J].晋阳学刊,2009,(4):32-36.
[14]胡佳.区域环境治理中的地方协调机制及其效用比较[J].福建行政学院学报,2015,(3):9-14.
[2]秦长江.协作性公共管理:国外公共行政理论的新发展[J].上海行政学院学报,2010,(1):103-109.
[3]Taillieu.Collaborative Strategies and Multi-organizationa Partnerships[M].Leuven:Garant Publication,2001.
[4]胡佳.区域环境治理中的地方政府协作研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[5]竺乾威.公共行政理论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2008.
[6]竺乾威.从新公共管理到整体性治理[J].中国行政管理,2008,(10):52-58.
[7]Christopher Pollitt.Joined-Up government:a Survey[J]Political Studies Review,2003,(1):1-35.
[8]胡佳.区域环境治理中地方政府协作的碎片化困境与整体性策略[J].广西社会科学,2015,(5):134-138.
[9]李红利.环境困局与科学发展中国地方政府环境规制研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012.
[10]罗伯特,阿格拉诺夫,等.协作性公共管理:地方政府新战略[M].李玲玲,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[11]王华薇.环境维权升级下的地方政府治理困境与改善[J].理论探讨,2018,(6):174-179.
[12]胡佳.区域环境治理的地方政府协作策略[J].中国社会科学报,2018,(7):1-3.
[13]金太军.论长三角一体化进程中区域合作协调机制的构建[J].晋阳学刊,2009,(4):32-36.
[14]胡佳.区域环境治理中的地方协调机制及其效用比较[J].福建行政学院学报,2015,(3):9-14.