用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同林农复合模式对造林1年后毛白杨幼林根系的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of different agro-forestry models on seedling root system of Populus tomentosa after one year of afforestation
  • 作者:王长伟 ; 刘勇 ; 李国雷 ; 孙明慧 ; 赵蕊蕊 ; 王苗苗 ; 路兴良 ; 宋怀山
  • 英文作者:Wang Changwei;Liu Yong;Li Guolei;Sun Minghui;Zhao Ruirui;Wang Miaomiao;Lu Xingliang;Song Huaishan;College of Forestry,Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University;Guanxian State-owned Nursery National Poplar Forest Base;
  • 关键词:毛白杨 ; 复合模式 ; 细根根长密度 ; 细根根质量密度
  • 英文关键词:Populus tomentosa;;intercropping model;;fine root length density;;fine root biomass density
  • 中文刊名:北京林业大学学报
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Beijing Forestry University
  • 机构:北京林业大学林学院省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室;冠县国有苗圃国家杨树林基地;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 出版单位:北京林业大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:01
  • 基金:国家重点研发专项“白杨工业资源材高效培育技术研究”(2016YFD0600403)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:36-45
  • 页数:10
  • CN:11-1932/S
  • ISSN:1000-1522
  • 分类号:S792.117
摘要
【目的】林农复合经营是解决林农争地的有效途径,本文为探究新品种毛白杨幼林根系在造林1年后不同林农复合模式下的分布情况,研究了毛白杨幼林间作条件下细根根长密度(FRLD)和细根根质量密度(FRBD)在不同造林密度和间作模式下的空间分布,旨在筛选较佳的林农复合模式,为毛白杨幼林林下物种合理配置提供理论依据。【方法】本研究以1年生‘北林雄株1号’为试验材料,采用裂区试验设计,主区设置2个毛白杨常见造林密度:2 m×3 m和3 m×4 m,副区设置2个当地常见的林下间作模式:毛白杨+花生+菠菜(花生、菠菜轮作)、毛白杨+花生,以幼林常规抚育模式作为对照,共6个处理,每个处理设3次重复。造林1年后,每个处理及对照组选取3株标准木,沿树体行间水平方向每隔30 cm取根样,取到150 cm处;垂直方向从地表向下每20 cm取根样,取到80 cm处,共取根样1 080个。通过对毛白杨FRLD和FRBD的分析,研究不同林农复合模式对2年生毛白杨幼林根系的影响。【结果】造林1年后,不同造林密度对2年生毛白杨单株的FRLD和FRBD未表现出显著影响(P> 0. 05),后期还需继续观测;造林1年后的不同间作模式对2年生毛白杨FRLD和FRBD均有显著影响(P <0. 05),两者的交互作用对毛白杨的FRLD和FRBD无显著影响。不同林农复合模式在水平和垂直方向的细根集中分布区相同。水平方向上,毛白杨+花生+菠菜、毛白杨+花生、常规抚育3种不同模式下有超过56. 36%的FRLD和FRBD分布于0~30 cm土层范围内;垂直方向上,在0~20 cm和20~40 cm土层范围内FRLD和FRBD约占测量总体的78. 95%以上。对3种模式在水平和垂直方向上的FRLD和FRBD进行多重比较,发现毛白杨+花生+菠菜和毛白杨+花生2种模式在水平和垂直方向的FRLD和FRBD均高于毛白杨幼林常规抚育模式。【结论】不同林农复合模式下,2年生毛白杨幼林根系水平方向主要分布于0~30 cm,垂直方向主要分布于0~20 cm和20~40 cm,毛白杨幼林间作农作物在造林1年后可以促进林木根系的生长。
        [Objective] Agro-forestry is an effective way to solve the dispute between forest land andagricultural land. In order to explore the distribution of the new roots of Populus tomentosa in the forestagricultural compound model after one year of afforestation,the spatial distribution of fine root length density( FRLD) and fine root biomass density( FRBD) under different afforestation densities and intercropping patterns under intercropping conditions of P. tomentosa were studied. The purpose of this study was to screen a better intercropping pattern and provide a theoretical basis for the rational allocation of species under young P. tomentosa forests. [Method] 1-year-old ‘Beilin Xiongzhu No 1 ',a new variety of P. tomentosa was used as the experimental material. The split-plot experimental design was used,the main area was set with two common plantation space of 2 m × 3 m and 3 m × 4 m,two common intercropping modes were set in the sub-zone,P. tomentosa + peanut + spinach( peanut,spinach rotation),P. tomentosa + peanut,with one conventional tending of plantation as control,a total of 6 treatments,repeated 3 times. After 1 year of outplanting,three standard saplings were selected for each treatment,root samples were taken at intervals of 30 cm along the horizontal direction between rows of trees,both planting densities were taken at 150 cm,root samples were taken at intervals of 20 cm from the surface to 80 cm in the vertical direction,a total of 1 080 root samples were taken. By analyzing the FRLD and FRBD of P. tomentosa saplings,the effects of different agro-forestry patterns on the root system of P. tomentosa saplings were studied. [Result]The planting space had no significant effects on the total average fine root length density( FRLD) and fine root biomass density( FRBD) after one year of afforestation,need to continue observation later. However,different intercropping patterns had significant effects on the FRLD and FRBD of 2-year-old P. tomentosa saplings( P < 0. 05),the interaction between them had no significant effects on FRLD and FRBD. Different agro-forestry patterns were similar in the fine root distribution areas in horizontal and vertical directions. In the horizontal direction,more than56. 36% of the FRLD and FRBD of P. tomentosa + peanut + spinach,P. tomentosa + peanut and conventional tending accounted for 0-30 cm. FRLD and FRBD in vertical direction accounted for more than 78. 95% of 0-80 cm in 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm soil layer. After comparing the three models in horizontal and vertical directions,The FRLD and FRBD in both the horizontal and vertical directions of P. tomentosa + peanut + spinach and P. tomentosa + peanut were higher than the conventional tending of P. tomentosa saplings. [Conclusion] It is concluded that under the different intercropping patterns,the horizontal distribution of FRLD and FRBD was mainly in 0-30 cm,and the vertical distribution is mainly in 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm,the intercropping of agricultural crops after planting could promote the root growth of P. tomentosa trees after one year of afforestation.
引文
[1]袁玉欣,魏宏侠,马荣泽,等.杨粮间作系统农作物产量研究[J].河北林果研究,2001,16(1):7-13.Yuan Y X,Wei H X,Ma R Z,et al. The study on crop yield of poplar-crop intercropping system[J]. Hebei Forestry Research,2001,16(1):7-13.
    [2]李勇美,张金池,郭小平,等.不同林农复合经营模式对作物生长和产量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(2):61--68.Li Y M,Zhang J C,Guo X P,et al. Effects of different agro-forestry models on crop growth and yield[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition),2013,41(2):61--68.
    [3]康向阳,朱之悌.三倍体毛白杨在我国纸浆生产中的地位与作用[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(增刊1):51-56.Kang X Y,Zhu Z T. The position and function of triploid Populus tomentosa in pulp production in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2002,24(Suppl. 1):51--56.
    [4]张国君,盛海波,周梅,等.杨树林地郁闭前林农间作研究[J].湖南林业科技,2008,35(2):31-32,35.Zhang G J,Sheng H B,Zhou M,et al. Reserch on forest and crops inteplanting on the front closing forest land of poplar tree[J].Hunan Forestry Science and Technology,2008,35(2):31-32,35.
    [5]吴殿鸣.杨农间作系统对土壤不同形态氮素损失效应的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2012.Wu D M. Study on effects of poplar-crop intercropping system on the soil nitrogen loss[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University,2012.
    [6]史建伟,王孟本,于立忠,等.土壤有效氮及其相关因素对植物细根的影响[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(10):1634--1639.Shi J W,Wang M B,Yu L Z,et al. Effects of soilavailable nitrogen and related factors on plant fine root[J]. Journal of Ecology,2007,26(10):1634-1639.
    [7]黄晶晶,井家林,曹德昌,等.不同林龄胡杨克隆繁殖根系分布特征及其构型[J].生态学报,2013,33(14):4331-4342.Huang J J,Jing J J,Cao D C,et al. Cloning root system distribution and architecture of different forest age in Populus euphratica Ejina Oasis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(14):4331-4342.
    [8]司建华,冯起,李建林,等.荒漠河岸林胡杨吸水根系空间分布特征[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(1):1-4.Si J H,Feng Q,Li J L,et al. Spatial distribution pattern of Populus euphratica fane roots in desert riparian forests[J]. Journal of Ecology,2007,26(1):1-4.
    [9]吴雪琼,杨文斌,李卫,等.低覆盖度行带式间作模式下赤峰杨根系分布特征[J].林业科学研究,2015,28(2):255-260.Wu X Q,Yang W B,Li W,et al. Root distribution of Populus×xiao zhuanica cv.‘Chifengensis’planted under low coverage beltscheme[J]. Forest Research,2015,28(2):255--260.
    [10]马长明,翟明普,刘春鹏.单作与间作条件下核桃根系分布特征研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(6):181--186.Ma C M,Zhai M P,Liu C P. Root distribution characteristics of Juglans regia in monoculture and intercropping[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2009,31(6):181--186.
    [11]王宝驹.南疆地区枣麦农林复合系统根系互作研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2014.Wang B J. The study of the roots interaction in Jujube/wheat agroforestry systems at southern Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi:Shihezi University,2014.
    [12]席本野,王烨,贾黎明,等.宽窄行栽植模式下三倍体毛白杨根系分布特征及其与根系吸水的关系[J].生态学报,2011,31(1):47--57.Xi B Y,Wang Y,Jia L M,et al. Property of root distribution of triploid Populus tomentosa and its relation to root water uptake under the wide-and-narrow row spacing scheme[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(1):47--57.
    [13] Block R M A,Van Rees K C J,Knight J D. A review of fine root dynamics in Populus plantations[J]. Agroforestry System,2006,67(1):73--84.
    [14]龚学臣. SPSS18. 0在裂区试验结果方差分析中的应用[J].河北北方学院学报(自然科版),2014,30(5):52--54,58.Gong X C. Application of SPSS18. 0 in variance analysis of splitplot design[J]. Journal of Hebei North University(Natural Science Edition),2014,30(5):52-54,58.
    [15]张久权,黄一兰,张瀛,等.裂区试验资料均值的多重比较及错误辨析[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(6):105-111.Zhang J Q,Huang Y L,Zhang Y,et al. Multiple comparison of means and misuse of split plot design with quantitative data[J].Chinese Tobacco Science,2015,36(6):105--111.
    [16]闫小莉,戴腾飞,邢长山,等.水肥耦合对欧美108杨幼林表土层细根形态及分布的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(11):3692--3701.Yan X L,Dai T F,Xing C S,et al. Coupling effect of water and nitrogen on themorphology and distribution of fine root in surface soil layer of young Populus×euramericana plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(11):3692--3701.
    [17]薛建辉,王智,吕祥生.林木根系与土壤环境相互作用研究综述[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(3):79--84.Xue J H,Wang Z,LüX S. Progress on the interaction between tree roots and soil environment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),2002,26(3):79--84.
    [18]孙志虎,王庆成.采用地统计学方法对水曲柳人工纯林表层根量的估计[J].生态学报,2005,25(4):923--930.Sun Z H,Wang Q C. The estimate of root biomass in upper soil layer of Fraxinus mandshurica plantation by geostatistics method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(4):923--930.
    [19]程云环,韩有志,王庆成,等.落叶松人工林细根动态与土壤资源有效性关系研究[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(3):303--310.Cheng Y H,Han Y Z,Wang Q C,et al. Seasonal dynamics of fine root biomass,root length density,specific root length and soil resource availability in a Larix gmelini plantation[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology,2005,29(3):303-310.
    [20]杨秀云,韩有志,张芸香,等.采伐干扰对华北落叶松细根生物量空间异质性的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(1):64-73.Yang X Y,Han Y Z,Zhang Y X,et al. Effects of cutting disturbance on spatial heterogeneity of fine root biomass of Larix principis-rupprechtii[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(1):64-73.
    [21]田宇明.水曲柳人工幼龄林密度效应的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2009.Tian Y M. Density effect of Juvenile Fraxinus mandshurica plantation[D]. Haerbin:Northeast Forestry University,2009.
    [22]谷加存,肖立娟,马振东,等.造林密度对水曲柳人工林地上生长和细根生物量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3008--3016.Gu J C,Xiao L J,Ma Z D,et al. Effect of planting density on the aboveground growth and fine root biomass in Fraxinus mandschurica Rupr. plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2017,36(11):3008--3016.
    [23]朱宾良,李志辉,陈少雄.不同林分密度对尾巨桉生物产量及生产力的影响研究[J].湖南环境生物职业技术学院学报,2007,13(4):11-14.Zhu B L,Li Z H,Chen S X. Effect of different stand density on biomass and productivity of Eucalyptus urophglla×grandis[J].Journal of Hunan Environmental Biotechnology College,2007,13(4):11-14.
    [24]李盼盼.杨树人工林细根的空间分布特征及其季节动态[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2012.Li P P. Fine root distribution patterns and seasonal dynamics of poplar plantation[D]. Taian:Shandong Agricultural University,2012.
    [25]郭从俭,张新胜.楸树幼林根系调查研究[J].河南林业科技,1996(1):25-27.Guo C J,Zhang X S. Investigation on root system of young tree of Catalpa bungei[J]. Henan Forestry Science and Technology,1996(1):25--27.
    [26]李盼盼,王延平,王华田,等.黄河冲积平原杨树人工林细根空间分布特征[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(1):61-65.Li P P,Wang Y P,Wang H T,et al. Fine roots distribution patter of Populus deltoites plantations in Yellow River Fluvial Plain[J].Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition),2013,44(1):61--65.
    [27]姜岳忠,刘盛芳,马履一,等.毛白杨幼林间作效应研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(3):81-85.Jiang Y Z,Liu S F,Ma L Y,et al. Effects of intercropping on young Populus tomentosa[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2006,28(3):81-85.
    [28]王来,仲崇高,蔡靖,等.核桃-小麦复合系统中细根的分布及形态变异研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(7):64--70.Wang L,Zhong C G,Cai J,et al. Spatial distribution and morphological variations of the fine roots in walnut-wheat intercropping agroforestry ecosystem[J]. Journal of Northwest University of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition),2011,39(7):64-70.
    [29]何春霞,孟平,张劲松,等.华北低丘山区核桃-决明子复合模式的根系分布[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(6):715--721.He C X,Meng P,Zhang J S,et al. Root spatial distribution of walnut/cassia agroforestry systemin the rocky hilly area of north China[J]. Forestry Science Research,2013,26(6):715--721.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700