大数据时代边疆地区“互联网+政务服务”优化研究
|
摘要
"互联网+政务服务"从部分区域到全国覆盖是一个逐渐适应调整的过程,基于政务价值追求与地区差异考量,重点关注边疆"起步"地区如何发力。立足具有特殊地缘格局的广西壮族自治区、内蒙古自治区以及云南省,透过案例分析法、文献研究法和比较研究法,通过与领先地区案例的对比描述,构建"制约五要素"解释模型,深层发掘边疆地区"互联网+政务服务"制约因素表现在技术、管理、意识、人才、模式层面。研究表明:大数据时代"制约五要素"解释模型对具特殊地缘结构、复杂政治环境的边疆地区"互联网+政务服务"特色发展具有指导意义。遵循先进经验借鉴与本土化特点相融合的思路,提出优化大数据下的"互联网+政务服务"在边疆地区地方政府治理中的有效运用需树立政务资源意识,围绕技术基础、机制优化、主体引导、安全建设和价值追求开展开拓。
"Internet+Government-service" is a process of gradual adaptation and adjustment from some regions to the whole country.With a consideration of the value orientation of governance and regional differences,the focus is on how the frontier start-up regions can bring their potential into full play.With a comparative case analysis of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Yunnan Province with their special geographical patterns and complicated political environments as well as other leading cases plus a relevant literature research,this paper proposes a "five-restriction-factors" interpretive model to explore the restriction factors of "Internet+Government-service" in the border areas of China in terms of technology,management,consciousness,talents and models.The research shows that this interpretive model in the era of big data has some prognostic significance for the development of "Internet+Government-service" with typical characteristics in such border areas.In view of this,adhering to the principle of integrating advanced experience with local characteristics,this paper proposes that the optimization of the "Internet+Government-service" in the era of big data implemented by the local governments in border areas should rely on the enhancement of the awareness of government resources,the optimization of basic technologies and mechanisms,good leadership guidance,efficient safety services and correct social value orientation.
"Internet+Government-service" is a process of gradual adaptation and adjustment from some regions to the whole country.With a consideration of the value orientation of governance and regional differences,the focus is on how the frontier start-up regions can bring their potential into full play.With a comparative case analysis of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Yunnan Province with their special geographical patterns and complicated political environments as well as other leading cases plus a relevant literature research,this paper proposes a "five-restriction-factors" interpretive model to explore the restriction factors of "Internet+Government-service" in the border areas of China in terms of technology,management,consciousness,talents and models.The research shows that this interpretive model in the era of big data has some prognostic significance for the development of "Internet+Government-service" with typical characteristics in such border areas.In view of this,adhering to the principle of integrating advanced experience with local characteristics,this paper proposes that the optimization of the "Internet+Government-service" in the era of big data implemented by the local governments in border areas should rely on the enhancement of the awareness of government resources,the optimization of basic technologies and mechanisms,good leadership guidance,efficient safety services and correct social value orientation.
引文
(1)中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC).中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].http://cnnic.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/201801/t20180131_70188.htm.
(2)黄颖.一本书读懂大数据[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2014:2～3.
(3)程学旗,靳小龙,王元卓,等.大数据系统和分析技术综述[J].软件学报,2014,(9).
(4)徐继华,冯启娜,陈贞汝.智慧政府:大数据治国时代的来临[M].北京:中信出版社,2014:3.
(5)邓崧.大数据时代的地方政府治理研究——数据开放、流程再造、行政决策[M].云南:云南大学出版社,2017:90.
(6)赵大鹏.“互联网+政务”发展研究[J].合作经济与科技,2016,(19).
(7)段永利,侯蕴琦.宁家骏:“一号一窗一网”是信息惠民的升级版[J].中国信息界,2016,(3).
(8)王成程.从线下到线上:行政服务中心运行机制的演变——基于“互联网+政务服务”的视角[J].公共管理与政策评论,2017,(4).
(9)陈朝兵.发达国家应用互联网与大数据推进政府治理的主要做法与借鉴[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2017,(6).
(10)国务院办公厅关于全国互联网政务服务平台检查情况的通报[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-11/03/content_5236744.htm.
(11)国家行政学院电子政务研究中心课题组.“互联网+政务服务”发展现状[J].中国建设信息化,2017,(23).
(12)唐志远.大数据时代地方政府决策体制优化研究[J].湖南财政经济学院学报,2017,(4).
(13)杨润美,邓崧.大数据时代行政决策评估进展研究[J].电子政务,2015,(11).
(14)清华大学2016年中国“互联网+政务服务”调查评估和政府网站绩效评估报告[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016-12/27/c_1120192479.htm.
(15)邓崧,葛百潞.中外政府数据开放比较研究[J].情报杂志,2017,(12).
(16)黄娅琴,周婉滢.大数据时代被遗忘权的正当性基础与保护路径研究[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,(6).
(17)廖林燕,张飞.边疆治理转型过程中的地方政府治理现代化探论[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(2).
(18)鲁刚.当前云南边疆治理综合问题研究——以维护社会稳定为中心[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(1).
(2)黄颖.一本书读懂大数据[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2014:2～3.
(3)程学旗,靳小龙,王元卓,等.大数据系统和分析技术综述[J].软件学报,2014,(9).
(4)徐继华,冯启娜,陈贞汝.智慧政府:大数据治国时代的来临[M].北京:中信出版社,2014:3.
(5)邓崧.大数据时代的地方政府治理研究——数据开放、流程再造、行政决策[M].云南:云南大学出版社,2017:90.
(6)赵大鹏.“互联网+政务”发展研究[J].合作经济与科技,2016,(19).
(7)段永利,侯蕴琦.宁家骏:“一号一窗一网”是信息惠民的升级版[J].中国信息界,2016,(3).
(8)王成程.从线下到线上:行政服务中心运行机制的演变——基于“互联网+政务服务”的视角[J].公共管理与政策评论,2017,(4).
(9)陈朝兵.发达国家应用互联网与大数据推进政府治理的主要做法与借鉴[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2017,(6).
(10)国务院办公厅关于全国互联网政务服务平台检查情况的通报[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-11/03/content_5236744.htm.
(11)国家行政学院电子政务研究中心课题组.“互联网+政务服务”发展现状[J].中国建设信息化,2017,(23).
(12)唐志远.大数据时代地方政府决策体制优化研究[J].湖南财政经济学院学报,2017,(4).
(13)杨润美,邓崧.大数据时代行政决策评估进展研究[J].电子政务,2015,(11).
(14)清华大学2016年中国“互联网+政务服务”调查评估和政府网站绩效评估报告[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016-12/27/c_1120192479.htm.
(15)邓崧,葛百潞.中外政府数据开放比较研究[J].情报杂志,2017,(12).
(16)黄娅琴,周婉滢.大数据时代被遗忘权的正当性基础与保护路径研究[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,(6).
(17)廖林燕,张飞.边疆治理转型过程中的地方政府治理现代化探论[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(2).
(18)鲁刚.当前云南边疆治理综合问题研究——以维护社会稳定为中心[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(1).
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |