乡村振兴视阈下泉州市农村环境多元共治有效路径研究
|
摘要
[目的]农村环境治理是全面部署实施乡村振兴重大战略中核心问题之一。[方法]文章首先基于利益相关理论从政府、企业、城市、村民、环保组织、科研院校6个不同利益相关者层面分析出农村环境多元共治的17个影响因素;其次采用SNA-ISM方法定量辨识影响泉州市农村环境多元共治的关键因素及分析各影响因素的层次关系。[结果]农村环境多元共治各影响因素之间关联作用较强,城市污染企业为转嫁排污成本转入偏远农村和农村承载城市发展中一些污染转移为表层直接影响因素,在资源输出上很大程度上依赖其他因素;轻视产生较少经济效益的农村基本公共卫生设施资金投入、乡村企业粗放型发展模式、忽视农村环境保护技术有别、重视事前环保技术研发而忽视之后的应用和改进和缺乏政府、科研院校和农村三方合作的乡村环保科研产业链为中间层间接影响因素,中介传输作用较强;地方保护主义、城市发展汲取农村资源是深层根源影响因素,在资源输入上较大程度上受其他因素的控制。[结论]最后根据各因素之间的层次关系和相互影响程度分析结果,为解决泉州市农村环境多元治理失灵提供参考建议。
Rural environmental governance is a core question for rural revitalization strategy. This research obtained the 17 influencing factors of rural environmental cooperative governance from six stakeholders including government, enterprise, city, villager, environmental organizations and research institution, and adopted SNA-ISM method to identify the key factors of rural environmental cooperative governance, and then analyzed the structure and inherent links among the influencing factors in Quanzhou. The results showed that the correlation of those influencing factors of rural environmental cooperative governance was highly connected, urban pollution enterprises being shifted to remote rural areas for transferring emission costs and some urban pollution being transferred to rural areas in urban development were the surface direct influencing factors, which depended on other factors largely; despising the investment in rural basic public health facilities due to their low economic profit, the economy grown mode of rural enterprise, the neglect of distinction of rural environmental protection technology, the emphasis on environmental technology research and development in advance but neglecting the application and improvement of environmental later, and rural environmental protection research industry chain lacking of tripartite cooperation among government, research institutes and country, all these were the middle indirect influencing factors with strong transmission effect; regional protectionism and rural resources being drawn for urban development were the root and basic influencing factors which controlled by other factors. In summary, according to the analysis of the hierarchical structure and correlative influencing degree among those factors, this research provides suggestion for solving failure of cooperative governance for village environment in Quanzhou city.
Rural environmental governance is a core question for rural revitalization strategy. This research obtained the 17 influencing factors of rural environmental cooperative governance from six stakeholders including government, enterprise, city, villager, environmental organizations and research institution, and adopted SNA-ISM method to identify the key factors of rural environmental cooperative governance, and then analyzed the structure and inherent links among the influencing factors in Quanzhou. The results showed that the correlation of those influencing factors of rural environmental cooperative governance was highly connected, urban pollution enterprises being shifted to remote rural areas for transferring emission costs and some urban pollution being transferred to rural areas in urban development were the surface direct influencing factors, which depended on other factors largely; despising the investment in rural basic public health facilities due to their low economic profit, the economy grown mode of rural enterprise, the neglect of distinction of rural environmental protection technology, the emphasis on environmental technology research and development in advance but neglecting the application and improvement of environmental later, and rural environmental protection research industry chain lacking of tripartite cooperation among government, research institutes and country, all these were the middle indirect influencing factors with strong transmission effect; regional protectionism and rural resources being drawn for urban development were the root and basic influencing factors which controlled by other factors. In summary, according to the analysis of the hierarchical structure and correlative influencing degree among those factors, this research provides suggestion for solving failure of cooperative governance for village environment in Quanzhou city.
引文
[1] 沈费伟,刘祖云.农村环境善治的逻辑重塑——基于利益相关者理论的分析.中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(5):32-38.
[2] 许玲燕,杜建国,汪文丽.农村水环境治理行动的演化博弈分析.中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(5):17-26.
[3] 谭江涛,彭淑红.农村“公共池塘”资源治理中的集体行动困境与制度分析.公共管理学报,2013,10(1):79-90.
[4] 林萍.利益相关者理论概述.闽江学院学报,2009,30(1):54-58.
[5] 马辉,王素贞,黄梦娇.基于社会网络分析的建筑产业联盟协同创新影响因素分析.科技管理研究,2018,23(15):170-176.
[6] 彭本红,武柏宇,谷晓芬.电子废弃物回收产业链协同治理影响因素分析.中国环境科学,2016,36(7):2219-2229.
[7] 刘军.整体网络分析讲义:UCINET软件使用指南.上海:格致出版社,2009,155.
[8] 陈琦,韩立民.基于ISM模型的中国大洋性渔业发展影响因素分析.资源科学,2016,38(6):1088-1098.
[9] 狄乾斌,计利群.地域认同视角下沿海城市海洋性特征分析与评价.地理科学,2016,36(11):1688-1696.
[10] 宾慕容,覃一枝,周发明.湘江流域农户生猪养殖污染治理意愿分析.经济地理,2016,36(11):154-160.
[11] 任重,陈英华.农户生活废弃物处置行为及其影响因素研究.干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(10):82-87.
[2] 许玲燕,杜建国,汪文丽.农村水环境治理行动的演化博弈分析.中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(5):17-26.
[3] 谭江涛,彭淑红.农村“公共池塘”资源治理中的集体行动困境与制度分析.公共管理学报,2013,10(1):79-90.
[4] 林萍.利益相关者理论概述.闽江学院学报,2009,30(1):54-58.
[5] 马辉,王素贞,黄梦娇.基于社会网络分析的建筑产业联盟协同创新影响因素分析.科技管理研究,2018,23(15):170-176.
[6] 彭本红,武柏宇,谷晓芬.电子废弃物回收产业链协同治理影响因素分析.中国环境科学,2016,36(7):2219-2229.
[7] 刘军.整体网络分析讲义:UCINET软件使用指南.上海:格致出版社,2009,155.
[8] 陈琦,韩立民.基于ISM模型的中国大洋性渔业发展影响因素分析.资源科学,2016,38(6):1088-1098.
[9] 狄乾斌,计利群.地域认同视角下沿海城市海洋性特征分析与评价.地理科学,2016,36(11):1688-1696.
[10] 宾慕容,覃一枝,周发明.湘江流域农户生猪养殖污染治理意愿分析.经济地理,2016,36(11):154-160.
[11] 任重,陈英华.农户生活废弃物处置行为及其影响因素研究.干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(10):82-87.